The Observer, Volume L, Issue 04, 9/14/18

Page 1

the

Case Western Reserve University volume L, issue 4 friday, 9/14/2018

Observer

Tink restricts students distributing food

Policy change prevents organizations, individuals from serving food within University Center Yugan Sakthi Staff Reporter The Tinkham Veale University Center (TVUC) recently updated its food distribution policy, severely limiting student groups hoping to fundraise through means of tabling. The policy change, as TVUC management explained, was catalyzed by health concerns. According to TVUC Executive Director Randy Barnes, “[TVUC] does not permit distribution of food of any kind in the facility by any group, organization, individual that is not part of a booked and scheduled event utilizing approved catering or an operation of the University’s food service provider such as a food court server or restaurant.” The new changes go on to state, “All food preparation and distribution in [TVUC] must be provided by Bon Appetit catering, with the exception of the Student Organization Center, which must use a university-approved caterer.” It specifically mentions “tabling and tabling events.” Many student organizations around campus, including cultural organizations and Greek Life, rely on tabling, selling food and baked goods to raise money in TVUC because of the number of students who travel through the building every day. With the new rule, students complain that fundraising for

their organizations is much more difficult. One of those complaints concerns the diminished variety of food that students will be exposed to. Cultural organizations often rely on food to connect in new ways with the student body, often tabling with cuisines that many students have never experienced. Lauren Lew, a fourth-year student, said, “It’s hard for a large company like Bon Appetit to facilitate cultural foods well. Students don’t get properly represented with cultural foods; it’s almost counterintuitive.” Also affected by the new policy are external organizations that are connected to Case Western Reserve University through student groups—philanthropic ones, for example, that student organizations donate to, or local businesses and restaurants that can have their food catered on campus. Lew said, “That’s what makes community of [CWRU] so great is getting our name out there with small business.” Greek Life, which relies on tabling for promotion, recruitment and philanthropy, will have to find new avenues of fundraising as well. Third-year student Justin Marks said, “Many organizations like to give donuts, or coffee or candy when tabling and cannot. [The] general visibility of Greek Life is damaged overall.” The primary cause for the policy

Zoe Wang/Observer Students promoting their organization in the Tinkham Veale University Center (TVUC) in February. The TVUC no longer allows students to distribute food if it is not associated with an approved catering service. change concerns student health. According to Barnes, “The change was made as a response to a significant increase in CWRU students reporting food allergies over the last four years, incidents at other institutions and universities, and concern about the risks to our students from allergic reactions.” A lack of publicity and information about the revisions may have contributed to the policy’s controversial status around campus, as students have little idea about why the policy was changed and so strictly enforced.

“We recognize and regret that we were unable to engage the campus community regarding this policy in advance, and appreciate that students are unhappy about the policy and our communication of it,” Barnes said. “We now are engaging with the Undergraduate Student Government and other student organizations to hear members’ input and recommendations regarding the policy.” For now, students are encouraged to use the Thwing Center for food distribution and to bring up issues they have with TVUC management.

CWRU falls in recent undergraduate rankings Sophia Yakumithis News Editor

taged families can use academic resources to achieve at least a middle class standing, a highly contentious issue at universities across the nation. “I’m glad to see the drop in ratings, as it reflects that CWRU has consistently skirted their responsibility to educate disadvantaged students,” said fourth-year student Andrew Thompson. “As a student whose family comes from the lowest income bracket, I feel that [the University] has made it clear that they do not care about poor students.” Undergraduate Student Government (USG) Speaker of the General Assembly and fourth-year student Prince Ghosh noted that there “definitely still is a socioeconomic divide” in the CWRU community. He said, “I think the University has been willing to make more changes to bring

more diversity to campus, but there’s still so much more we can do to make [CWRU] more welcoming.” U.S. News also decreased the weight of the expert opinion category by two and a half percent, from 22.5 to 20, which is a formula component based on surveys of administrators in higher education and high school counselors. While the University said in a statement to The Observer that it “will not take specific steps in response to [U.S. News’] addition of two categories to the criteria included in its rankings methodology,” it emphasized two initiatives that launched between the 2016-17 admissions cycle and this past spring that will likely improve the University’s performance on the magazine’s new methodology over time.

In U.S. News & World Report’s recently published 2019 Best Colleges lists, Case Western Reserve University came in at No. 42 for National Universities, a considerable dip from last year’s position of No. 37. This is the first time in eight years that the University has ranked below No. 40 on the list. The reason for the drop is best explained by the publication’s new methodology which altered the weight of several categories related to undergraduate admissions. In an effort to emphasize two social mobility factors, some of the existing categories were weighted differently, while others were eliminated completely. One of U.S. News’ social mobility fac-

tors analyzes the graduation rates of Pell Grant recipients, and the second compares the graduation rates of Pell recipients to the rates of all students. These two factors combined constitute five percent of the ranking’s formula. The two social mobility factors, according to Inside Higher Ed, were determined using a formula based on the magazine’s outcomes measure, which includes student graduation rates and the performance of various student demographics based on their projected graduation rates. This year, the weight of the outcomes measure increased from 30 to 35 percent. At CWRU, 78 percent of Pell Grant recipients graduate in six years, which is five points less than the same rate in the context of all students. Social mobility in the context of higher education is the concept that disadvan-

News

A&E

Opinion

Sports

pg. 4 New Provost greets students

pg. 6 Improv slumber party

pg. 9 A failure to communicate

pg. 15 Volleyball sweeps at home

to RANKING I 5


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.