Coos County remains in extreme risk
Has been under extreme restrictions longer than any other county By ZACK DEMARS The World
Indoor dining and recreation in Coos County will remain closed for two more weeks as the community enters its tenth week in the extreme-risk category. With Douglas County moving out of the extreme-risk category this week, Coos County has now
been in the state’s highest tier of pandemic restrictions longer than any other county in the state. The state’s latest slate of restriction categories were announced by Gov. Kate Brown Tuesday, and show a marked difference between the South Coast and every other corner of the state. "This week we continue to see the majority of counties at Lower
and Moderate Risk, and I want to thank Oregonians once again for making smart choices throughout this pandemic," Brown wrote in a press release Tuesday. Most of the state’s higher-population counties are in less-restrictive categories due to their lower rates of virus spread in the community, like Eugene’s Lane County in the lower-risk category, and the Port-
land metro area’s Clackamas, Multnomah and Washington counties in the moderate-risk category. Joining Coos County in the extreme-risk category this week is Curry County, which will have to shutter indoor dining and some other businesses starting Friday after two months in less-restrictive categories. That county’s seen its case
Vaccines open up to additional groups
rates inch up over the past several weeks, and is now reporting the second-highest test positivity rate in the state. It’s second only to Coos County, which has maintained high case rates, but is now beginning to see some distant signs of a decline. “I’m cautiously optimistic that
Please see COVID, Page A2
Educator remembers one full year of COVID By JILLIAN WARD For The World
Photo by David Rupkalvis
Montgomery Allen, left, receives a Moderna vaccine during a clinic last Friday at the Mill Casino. All adults ages with an underlying health condition
Most adults with underlying health condition now eligible By ZACK DEMARS The World
Another slate of residents is now eligible for the COVID-19 vaccine, according to Coos Health & Wellness. County health officials chose to advance ahead of the state's timeline under a provision allowing counties to attest to having vaccinated a "critical mass" of currently eligible groups. The move means the following
groups, which were set to become eligible Monday, are now eligible for vaccines in Coos County: • All adults 45-64 with underlying health conditions, • Migrant and seasonal farm workers, • Seafood and agricultural workers, • Food processing workers, • People living in low-income senior housing, senior congregate and independent living, • Individuals experiencing home-
lessness, • People currently displaced by wildfires, • Wildland firefighters and • Pregnant people 16 and older. By Tuesday, a majority of Oregon's 36 counties had already chose to move ahead under the state timeline. While eligibility is expanding, doses still remain in short supply across the country. State health officials have warned that expansions of vaccine eligibility will likely
cause “traffic jams” in registrations for several weeks. The next eligible group, including frontline workers, multigenerational household members and those over 16 with underling conditions, will become eligible April 19. All adults will be eligible May 1. A complete list of eligibility guidelines will be available on the state’s website at covidvaccine. oregon.gov.
Please see Vaccine, Page A2
North Bend schools may put bond on ballot Bond Development Committee to present proposal to school board in May By JILLIAN WARD For The World
NORTH BEND ─ The North Bend School District may be asking voters to pass a facility bond this November. But first, the district’s Bond Development Committee will release a bond proposal draft April 6. District Superintendent Kevin Bogatin said from there the proposal will be shared with the community and
open forums will be held. “In May at the (school) board meeting, the (proposal) will go to the board and we will spend a little more time getting feedback,” Bogatin said. “The (school board) will have a final decision at the June meeting and a final adoption of the bond plan. “We expect to be on the ballot in November,” he said. Right now, the district has a facility bond about to expire at the
end of the year. It was a 20-year bond passed back in 2012 at about $22 million. Bogatin said the Bond Development Committee is considering a continuation of that bond, or one with “a little more money.” “It will likely land on an increase and there will be more details in the future,” Bogatin said. The committee is looking at three possible proposals to present to the school board. The first is the continuation of the $22 million bond.
Another is a bond asking for $35 million. The third possible proposal is a bond requesting almost $50 million. “Our committee created plans for all three of those scenarios that we did polling on,” Bogatin said. When asked what the bonds may cover, he said they may surround job readiness with a focus on Career Technical Education, safety Please see Bond, Page A2
COOS COUNTY ─ With school districts on spring break, the superintendent at South Coast Education Service District looked back on where educators were a year ago when COVID-19 made its first local impact. In 2020, spring break was being extended for a couple weeks. For educators, like South Coast ESD Superintendent Tenneal Wetherell, it was a mad dash to make significant changes. “For me and the administration team at ESD, a year ago we cancelled our holiday vacation plans and all worked onsite to adapt to distance learning,” Wetherell remembered. “…We needed to design a mechanism for our students and staff to work from home, to develop learning tools for the spring. Last spring break, ESD was very busy and it was very scary.” Wetherell recalled what she knew at the time, when COVID-19 was still a distant and unknown threat. “We didn’t know much about the virus,” she said. “Just that it was something dangerous and causing extreme changes, but there was no writing on the wall about the impact. As we designed distance learning for all, we all struggled through the worry about what the impacts would be (with) COVID.” Now a year later, Wetherell said what they know is the virus is dangerous and when gone unchecked can infect other people rapidly and “in some cases, end their life which is tragic.” During the turbulent year, Wetherell said the passing time both felt like “it’s been forever and a really short time with the changes, amounts of information and how we’ve adapted.” “(Information) has come so frequently and so fast that it’s like no time at all has passed, but the daily grind is so difficult that it’s obviously been a whole year,” she said. Even so, she has seen positives and negatives in the new ways educators approach their work. One of the negatives, she said, has been the “tremendous loss” of working in-person with staff, students and the community. On the other hand, new uses of technology have Please see Educator, Page A2