Democratic Party Responds to Christine Drazan’s Entry into Oregon Governor’s Race
By John Oliver
The Democratic Party has issued a formal response to former Republican state representative Christine Drazan’s announcement that she will again run for governor of Oregon in 2026. Drazan, who previously lost to Democrat Tina Kotek in the 2022 gubernatorial race, confirmed her new campaign earlier this week, sparking immediate reaction from state and national Democratic leaders.
According to the Democratic Governors Association (DGA), Drazan’s candidacy represents what they describe as a return to failed Republican strategies that have not resonated with Oregon voters in recent years. In a statement released by DGA spokesperson Johanna Warshaw, Democrats emphasized their belief that Drazan’s platform mirrors the national conservative agenda and stands in contrast to the values and priorities of most Oregonians.
The DGA outlined its concerns over Drazan’s legislative record during her time in the Oregon House, referencing her votes to restrict access to abortion services, reduce Medicaid funding, and oppose measures expanding
public assistance programs. The organization also linked her political approach to the broader national movement aligned with former President Donald Trump, suggesting that her campaign would promote policies at odds with Oregon’s progressive direction.
Democratic officials contrasted Drazan’s record with that of Governor Tina Kotek, who they said has remained focused on address-
ing the state’s most pressing issues. Under Kotek’s leadership, they noted, Oregon has increased funding for affordable housing, created new shelter beds for the unhoused, and expanded support for first responders and wildfire prevention. Democrats also highlighted the administration’s work to strengthen addiction recovery services, expand access to mental health care, and reduce the cost of prescription drugs.
The Democratic Party’s response further underscored Kotek’s efforts to protect Oregon from potential federal cutbacks to programs such as Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. Party leaders characterized her administration as one committed to protecting vulnerable communities and ensuring stability for working families across the state.
Democratic strategists view Drazan’s reentry into the race as a repeat of a campaign message that failed to connect with the broader electorate in 2022. They argue that while Drazan appeals to the Republican base, her alignment with national figures and divi-
sive political rhetoric will likely alienate moderate and independent voters. Party officials expressed confidence that Oregonians will continue to support policies that prioritize social services, healthcare access, and economic opportunity over partisan agendas.
As the race for governor begins to take shape, the Democratic Party appears prepared to defend Kotek’s record and draw a sharp distinction between her leadership and Drazan’s legislative history. With Oregon’s last Republican governor leaving office more than four decades ago, Democrats believe that voters will again reject a conservative platform they see as inconsistent with the state’s priorities.
The 2026 gubernatorial contest is expected to be one of Oregon’s most closely watched races, with national attention likely to follow. For Democrats, the message is clear: they intend to position Kotek and the party as defenders of steady progress and practical leadership, while framing Drazan’s campaign as a step backward from the policies they say have moved Oregon forward.
Oregon Leaders Condemn Suspected Arson at Councilor’s Home, Urge Unity and Calm
By John Oliver
Oregon lawmakers are voicing concern and solidarity following a weekend fire at the home of Portland City Councilor Candace Avalos, which authorities are investigating as a possible act of arson. The early morning blaze on Sunday sent emergency crews rushing to the scene, alarming neighbors and raising fears that the incident may have been a deliberate attempt to intimidate a public official.
Senate Majority Leader Kayse Jama, who represents East Portland, Boring, and Damascus, expressed his deep concern for Avalos and her community, calling the suspected arson an attack on shared civic values. Jama urged calm and solidarity, emphasizing that such acts of intimidation have no place in Oregon’s public life. He offered support for Avalos and her neighbors, extending his hopes for their continued safety and emotional recovery following the traumatic event.
Avalos, who has served on the Portland City Council as a vocal advocate for equity, civic engagement, and housing reform, reportedly escaped unharmed from the fire, which broke out in the early hours of Sunday morning. Firefighters responded quickly to contain the flames and prevent the spread to surrounding homes. Though no injuries were reported, the incident left significant damage to portions of the property and caused temporary displacement for nearby residents as investigators secured the area.
Preliminary findings have not yet determined the precise cause of the fire, but investigators have indicated that early evidence suggests a potential
criminal element. Portland Fire & Rescue and the Portland Police Bureau are coordinating their efforts as part of an ongoing joint investigation. Officials have asked residents in the area to come forward with any security footage or information that could assist in identifying suspects or clarifying the timeline of events.
In his statement, Jama condemned acts of violence that target individuals in public service, calling them fundamentally un-American and contrary to the principles of democracy and community. He said Oregonians must resist fear and division by standing together in shared commitment to peace and mutual respect. His comments echo broader concerns among Oregon’s leaders about the rising hostility and threats directed at public officials across the state in recent years.
The fire at Avalos’s home has prompted messages of sympathy and outrage across Portland’s civic community. While law enforcement continues to examine evidence, many have noted that the incident reflects a troubling climate in which public discourse has grown increasingly hostile, particularly toward women and people of color in leadership roles. The event has reignited discussion about safety measures for elected officials and the need to address the underlying polarization that has contributed to such tensions.
Avalos has been an active voice for inclusion, youth empowerment, and public participation in city governance. Her leadership on community safety and neighborhood engagement has earned both praise and criticism amid Portland’s shifting political landscape. Though she has not released
a detailed public statement since the fire, colleagues and community members have expressed relief that she was not injured and are organizing local support to assist her and her neighbors in recovery.
Jama’s remarks, delivered from Salem, reflect a broader call for reflection and unity as the investigation unfolds. He emphasized that crimes intended to frighten or silence elected officials represent an assault not only on individuals but on the democratic process itself. The senator urged all residents to reject hate and fear, to reaffirm the shared values that define Oregon, and to work collectively toward understanding and peace.
As investigators continue their work, community members have placed flowers and notes of encouragement near the councilor’s property, transforming the scene of destruction into one of solidarity. The ongoing investigation will determine whether the fire was an act of arson or a tragic accident, but for now, Oregon’s leaders are united in their message that violence and intimidation will not deter those who serve the public.
House Oversight Committee Declares Biden Pardons Invalid Over Use of Autopen in Final Report
By John Oliver
The Republican-led House Oversight Committee has released its final report alleging that presidential pardons and other executive actions approved during Joe Biden’s administration were invalid because they were signed using an autopen rather than personally by the president. The findings, issued after months of investigation, claim that Biden’s aides used the mechanical signature device to authorize official acts without sufficient documentation proving that the president had personally approved each one.
The report asserts that several clemency orders and other executive documents bearing Biden’s signature were not physically signed by him, suggesting instead that they were executed through an automated signing process managed by White House staff. Committee members contend that such actions should be considered void because the U.S. Constitution requires presidential decisions, including pardons, to be made by the president himself. The committee also raised concerns about the record-keeping practices within the administration, stating that there was no consistent chain of custody or confirmation of authorization from Biden before certain documents were finalized.
According to the report, investigators reviewed internal communications and procedures governing executive documents and concluded that some of them lacked proper sign-off or verification from the president. The committee further argued that this lapse points to possible overreach by senior White House
Letter from the Editor:
aides and called for the Department of Justice to examine whether any staff members violated federal law by approving actions in the president’s name without his direct involvement.
The report also includes recommendations for further inquiry into whether any government officials or medical advisors knowingly concealed the president’s physical or cognitive condition to maintain public confidence during the period in question.
In response, the White House and Democratic lawmakers rejected the committee’s conclusions, describing the findings as politically motivated and inconsistent with constitutional precedent. Administration officials maintain that all presidential decisions were properly authorized and that the use of an autopen does not invalidate executive actions. The autopen, a device that reproduces a person’s signature with mechanical precision, has been used by multiple presidents for decades to sign letters, official proclamations, and even bills into law
when physical signing is impractical.
Legal scholars have pointed out that the committee’s assertion that such signatures render presidential actions void lacks grounding in constitutional law or judicial precedent. The Department of Justice issued formal guidance in 2005 affirming that a president may lawfully delegate the act of signing through an autopen when the president has given clear authorization for its use. Courts have consistently upheld the validity of executive documents bearing mechanical signatures, emphasizing that the legality of a presidential action rests on authorization rather than the method of signature.
Experts in constitutional and administrative law note that if the committee’s interpretation were accepted, it could call into question not only Biden’s pardons but also many official actions taken by past presidents, including those by George W. Bush and Barack Obama, who both made documented use of autopen devices. They argue that such a precedent could lead
The Dunce of Josephine County
Once upon a time, a man named John Duns Scotus was celebrated as a brilliant medieval scholar. His followers, known as Duns men, defended his ideas long after the world moved on. Over centuries, the word “dunce” shifted from a mark of intellectual devotion to one of stubborn ignorance; a label reserved for those who refuse to learn, evolve, or even listen. Today, the dunce cap, once a tool of humiliation in classrooms, might find its modern political equivalent in Josephine County’s Board of Commissioners chamber. If the tradition still existed, there would be no competition for who deserves to wear it: Commissioner Chris Barnett, congratulations, you’ve earned the Dunce Cap of the Year.
In a county where leadership demands humility, transparency, and service, Barnett has made a study of self-interest. His time in office has been marked by tantrums, public outbursts, and a breathtaking misunderstanding of what it means to represent all residents — not just the ones who clap when he speaks. The role of a county commissioner is not to wield authority like a cudgel or to reward friends with contracts, but to steward taxpayer dollars responsibly and govern with respect. Yet, in Josephine County, we find ourselves governed by someone who seems more concerned with personal image than public impact.
When citizens challenge his behavior or question his ethics, Barnett reacts not with reflection or accountability but with insults and deflection, as though
disagreement were an act of rebellion rather than democracy in motion. His disregard for constituents who did not vote for him betrays a misunderstanding so deep it borders on willful ignorance. Leadership, at its core, is not about loyalty; it’s about duty. The people of Josephine County, whether supporters, critics, or those simply trying to live their lives — all deserve fair representation, not selective service based on personal bias.
Taxpayer dollars are not his personal piggy bank. Government employment is not a family business. And elected office is not a stage for self-congratulation. These lessons should be basic civic kindergarten, if you will. Yet, like the stubborn pupils of old who refused to heed their teachers, Barnett continues to prove that the dunce cap fits him perfectly.
It might be tempting to suggest he can still change course, to pull the cap off and learn from his mistakes. But the sad truth is that Barnett has doubled down at every turn, preferring outrage over introspection. In politics, as in life, you can’t teach those who refuse to learn. Once a dunce, always a dunce.
So, as Josephine County looks ahead, perhaps it’s time to remember what the dunce cap truly symbolized — not just foolishness, but refusal. Refusal to listen, to learn, to grow. And in that regard, Commissioner Barnett has given us a masterclass. Congratulations again, Commissioner — your cap awaits, tall, pointed, and perfectly fitted for the Dunce of Josephine County.
to significant legal uncertainty over thousands of previously valid government documents and disrupt long-standing executive protocols.
The issue has also drawn political attention because of the broader debate over Biden’s physical fitness for office and his role in personally overseeing executive decision-making. Some committee members have used the report’s findings to question whether Biden remained fully engaged in day-to-day presidential duties, while others have suggested the investigation reflects ongoing partisan tensions over presidential authority.
As of now, there is no indication that the Department of Justice plans to pursue a criminal investigation based on the committee’s findings. No court has ruled that any pardons or executive orders issued through autopen use are invalid. The White House continues to maintain that all official acts were properly authorized, while legal experts emphasize that the method of affixing a signature does not alter the constitutional legitimacy of presidential actions.
The release of the report marks the end of one of the more unusual oversight inquiries in recent congressional history, raising constitutional, procedural, and political questions about the nature of executive authority in modern governance. While the committee’s conclusions are unlikely to have immediate legal effect, they underscore how partisan scrutiny over presidential methods and decision-making continues to shape the political landscape heading into the next election cycle.
Tired of doing everything "right" and still feeling exhausted, bloated, and stuck?
At Elysian Women's Wellness, we specialize in helping women 35–55 balance their hormones, heal their metabolism, and lose stubborn weight without crash diets or two-hour workouts.
We use our Metabolic Optimization Method to help you feel like you again.
• Functional & traditional lab work
• Sustainable weight loss
• Hormone-friendly exercise & nutrition
• Expert support & accountability
RIO
By Ellen Ward
Texas Sues Tylenol Makers Over Claims of Deceptive Marketing and Autism Risk Links
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton has filed a lawsuit against Johnson & Johnson and its consumer health spinoff Kenvue, alleging that the companies engaged in deceptive marketing practices by promoting Tylenol as safe for use during pregnancy while concealing potential risks tied to autism and attention-deficit disorders in children. The lawsuit, filed in Panola County, Texas, has brought renewed attention to a growing national debate over the safety of acetaminophen, the active ingredient in Tylenol, and its possible connection to neurodevelopmental conditions.
The state’s complaint asserts that Johnson & Johnson and Kenvue violated Texas consumer protection and fraud statutes by advertising Tylenol as the preferred and trusted pain reliever for pregnant women without providing adequate warnings about potential long-term effects on fetal brain development. According to the lawsuit, internal research and scientific literature allegedly available to the companies suggested a link between prenatal exposure to acetaminophen and a higher likelihood of autism spectrum disorder or attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in children. The filing contends that the companies continued marketing Tylenol to pregnant mothers as entirely safe, despite the unresolved scientific debate.
The Texas Attorney General’s Office argues that the companies prioritized profits and brand reputation over consumer safety. The lawsuit also accuses Johnson & Johnson of transferring liabilities associated with Tylenol to Kenvue during the corporate spin-off of its
consumer health division, a move that Texas contends was designed to insulate Johnson & Johnson from future litigation. Paxton’s office is seeking civil penalties, financial restitution, and injunctions prohibiting future marketing that presents the medication as completely risk-free for pregnant users.
The case represents one of the most significant state-led legal actions to date against the makers of over-the-counter acetaminophen. It follows a wave of private lawsuits filed across the United States in recent years, many of which were consolidated in multidistrict litigation before being dismissed earlier in 2025 after a federal judge ruled that the plaintiffs’ expert testimony failed to meet admissibility standards. Unlike those cases, the Texas lawsuit is brought under state consumer
laws rather than product liability theories, potentially giving prosecutors broader authority to challenge alleged corporate misconduct.
Kenvue, which became an independent company in 2023, issued a public response rejecting the allegations and affirming that Tylenol remains one of the most studied and trusted over-the-counter medications in the world. The company stated that acetaminophen is considered by the medical community and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to be the safest pain and fever reducer available to pregnant women when used as directed. Johnson & Johnson, which no longer manufactures or markets Tylenol, referred inquiries to Kenvue, emphasizing that all consumer health operations and liabilities now fall under the new entity’s control.
Scientific research into the potential link between acetaminophen and neurodevelopmental disorders remains ongoing. Several observational studies have reported possible associations between frequent use of acetaminophen during pregnancy and increased risks of autism or ADHD in children. However, medical experts have cautioned that these studies show correlation rather than causation, and confounding factors such as genetics, maternal health conditions, and environmental influences may contribute to the observed patterns. The FDA has acknowledged the need for continued research but has stopped short of requiring label warnings, noting that a clear causal relationship has not been established.
The Texas lawsuit arrives at a politically
charged moment, as national debates over public health, pharmaceutical accountability, and reproductive safety continue to intensify. The case has also drawn attention because of its alignment with statements made by political figures, including former President Donald Trump and vaccine skeptic Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who have both echoed claims linking Tylenol use during pregnancy to autism. Public health organizations, including the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, have reiterated that acetaminophen remains appropriate for use during pregnancy when necessary to treat pain or fever, stressing that untreated high fever can also endanger fetal development.
If successful, the lawsuit could have major implications for the pharmaceutical industry and consumer health marketing practices. It challenges the boundaries of corporate accountability in product safety communication and raises broader questions about how scientific uncertainty should be addressed in consumer advertising. The case also tests how far a state attorney general can go in framing disputed medical research as a deceptive trade practice under state law.
As the litigation moves forward in the Texas courts, Johnson & Johnson and Kenvue are expected to mount a vigorous defense, arguing that the claims are not supported by reliable scientific evidence. For now, the lawsuit underscores both the enduring influence of Tylenol in American medicine and the growing scrutiny of corporate transparency in the health products industry.
Truth Social to Pioneer Prediction Markets Through Partnership with Crypto.com
By Ellen Ward
Trump Media and Technology Group, the parent company of Truth Social, announced plans to launch the world’s first social media platform with built-in prediction markets through a new partnership with Crypto.com Derivatives North America, a federally regulated exchange and clearinghouse registered with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. The collaboration will allow users of Truth Social to participate in event-based trading tied to real-world outcomes such as elections, economic indicators, and sports results.
The feature, branded as Truth Predict, will enable users to buy and sell prediction contracts that reflect the probability of various events occurring. Prices will adjust in real time as developments unfold, allowing participants to respond immediately to news and market shifts. Examples of available markets will include political contests, central bank decisions on interest rates, inflation data releases, and commodity price changes in gold and oil. Sports outcomes across major leagues will also be available, expanding the product’s reach beyond financial and political subjects.
The integration will begin with a testing phase on the Truth Social platform in the United States before a full nationwide launch. Once regulatory
and operational requirements are satisfied, Trump Media intends to expand the offering globally. According to the company, the partnership is designed to merge social interaction with predictive analysis, allowing users to engage in discussions while monitoring their positions within the same platform.
Truth Media, which operates Truth Social, the streaming service Truth+, and the fintech brand Truth.Fi, has been gradually building an ecosystem that merges digital media and financial technology. Earlier this year, the company introduced a rewards system that allows users to earn points, known as Truth Gems, for engaging on its platforms. These digital rewards can now be converted
into Cronos, the cryptocurrency issued by Crypto. com, and used to purchase prediction contracts within Truth Predict. This integration connects audience participation directly to tokenized financial activity, creating a new model of user engagement. The collaboration also builds on a previous agreement between Trump Media and Crypto.com to develop a broader digital asset strategy, including a treasury vehicle focused on the accumulation of Cronos tokens. The move aligns the company with the growing number of social media and technology platforms exploring the use of blockchain and digital assets to enhance participation and create new sources of revenue.
Industry analysts note that prediction mar-
kets, once a niche product limited to academic or offshore platforms, are now emerging as a legitimate financial instrument. By combining regulated derivatives trading with a social networking environment, Trump Media aims to bring these markets to a mainstream audience. The company reported more than three billion dollars in assets and its first quarter of positive operating cash flow earlier this year, suggesting it has the financial capacity to support such a rollout.
The introduction of Truth Predict also raises questions about how users will adapt to trading event contracts within a social platform environment and how regulators may view the blending of social engagement with speculative financial products. While the partnership with a CFTC-registered exchange provides legal clarity in the United States, international expansion will likely require additional regulatory approvals.
If successful, Truth Predict could redefine how social media users interact with news and current events by transforming conversation into measurable forecasts. It positions Trump Media and Crypto.com at the intersection of communication, finance, and technology, potentially signaling a new era in the evolution of digital platforms that merge audience participation with financial innovation.
Former NFL Star Adrian Peterson Arrested in Texas on DWI and Weapon Charges
By Ellen Ward
Former NFL Most Valuable Player Adrian Peterson, known for his record-breaking career as one of the league’s most dominant running backs, was arrested in Texas over the weekend on two criminal charges. The incident took place early Saturday morning in Sugar Land, a suburb southwest of Houston, located just a few hours from Peterson’s hometown of Palestine, Texas.
According to local authorities, Peterson was taken into custody after being stopped on suspicion of driving while intoxicated. During the course of the arrest, officers reportedly discovered a firearm in his possession, leading to an additional charge for unlawful carrying of a weapon. Law enforcement sources confirmed that Peterson was transported to a nearby detention facility for booking before being released later in the day on bond.
Peterson’s arrest adds another chapter to the turbulent off-field history of one of
football’s most celebrated athletes. Over his 15-season professional career, he became a household name for his explosive rushing ability, powerful running style, and remarkable endurance. Drafted by the Minnesota Vikings in 2007, Peterson quickly emerged as one of the sport’s elite players, earning the NFL MVP award in 2012 after rushing for more than
2,000 yards. His performance that season remains one of the most impressive comebacks in league history, occurring just a year after a severe knee injury that many believed would end his career.
Despite his athletic achievements, Peterson’s time in the public eye has also been marked by several legal and personal controversies. He previously faced legal trouble in 2014 when he was indicted in Texas on a child abuse charge involving the physical discipline of his son. The case resulted in a plea deal that allowed Peterson to avoid jail time but led to a suspension from the NFL for the remainder of that season. Since then, he has worked to repair his reputation and return to professional play, spending time with several teams including the New Orleans Saints, Washington Commanders, and Tennessee Titans.
The recent arrest now raises questions about Peterson’s future both personally and professionally. Although he has not played in
an NFL game since 2021, Peterson has occasionally expressed interest in continuing his football career or transitioning into coaching and mentorship roles. The outcome of these new charges could affect his ability to pursue such opportunities, depending on how the legal proceedings unfold in the coming months.
Peterson remains one of the most prolific running backs in league history, ranking fifth on the NFL’s all-time rushing list with more than 14,900 yards. His legacy on the field is well established, but the latest developments once again place his name in the headlines for reasons beyond his athletic accomplishments.
As of now, no further details have been released regarding court dates or the potential penalties Peterson may face. Local officials in Sugar Land are continuing their investigation, and the case is expected to proceed through the Fort Bend County judicial system in the weeks ahead.
SUPPORT FREE SPEECH
Advertise with The Grants Pass Tribune!
Show
COMMUNITY GRANTS PASS WEATHER
Downtown Grants Pass Gears Up for Annual Monster March and Costume Contest
By Ellen Ward
Downtown Grants Pass will once again come alive with spooky sights and family fun this Halloween as Main Street Grants Pass hosts its annual Monster March and Costume Contest on Thursday, October 31, 2025. The events are designed to bring the community together for a safe, family-friendly celebration featuring trickor-treating, festive costumes, and prizes for all ages.
The Main Street Monster March will take place from 3:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m., inviting children and families to stroll through downtown for an afternoon of candy collecting and Halloween cheer. Participating merchants along 6th and 7th Streets will open their doors to hand out treats, transforming the downtown corridor into a bustling parade of superheroes, witches, and playful monsters. The event offers a secure and welcoming way for families to enjoy traditional trickor-treating without the worry of traffic or unsafe neighborhoods.
Dozens of local businesses have joined forces to make the event possible, donating candy and decorations to create an unforgettable holiday experience. Among the sponsors and contributors are GG Sugarplum’s Bakeshop, Gallop ’n Glitz, The White Owl, Rogue Florist & Gifts, Diamond Cannabis, and The Laughing Clam, alongside many others who continue to show strong community spirit. Their participation highlights the importance of supporting local merchants while provid-
ing an engaging experience for children and families throughout the area. Immediately following the Monster March, the annual Main Street Grants Pass Costume Contest will begin at 5:30 p.m. at the Children’s Museum located at 4th and G Streets. Registration opens at 5:00 p.m., with entry fees set at $5 for ages 0–12 and $10 for ages 13 and older. Contestants will compete for prizes in various categories, and awards will be presented to the most creative and eye-catching costumes. The contest serves as a fundraiser for Main Street Grants Pass, helping to support future downtown community
events and programs.
The back-to-back events are expected to draw hundreds of families and visitors to downtown Grants Pass, continuing a beloved local tradition that celebrates creativity, safety, and community spirit. From the early afternoon trick-or-treating to the evening costume competition, the festivities promise an exciting Halloween experience for all ages. Residents are encouraged to attend, dress up, and take part in one of Grants Pass’s most festive annual celebrations that showcases the heart of the community and the dedication of its small businesses.
Another Round of Sewer Smoke Testing Scheduled for October 29
City of Grants Pass
Residents in parts of Grants Pass will see another round of sewer smoke testing this week as city crews continue efforts to inspect and maintain the underground wastewater system. The testing is scheduled for Wednesday, October 29, 2025, between 7:30 a.m. and 3:00 p.m., covering the area between 9th and 10th Streets, beginning at Wharton Street and moving north to include a small portion of Northeast Josephine and up to Northeast Cedar.
Smoke testing is a common and cost-effective method used by public works departments to locate cracks, breaks, or other defects in sewer lines and private laterals. By identifying weak points early, the city can prevent groundwater infiltration, reduce system overload during heavy rains, and minimize the risk of sewage leaks or backups. The process involves blowing harmless smoke into the sewer system under controlled pressure to reveal any points where the system may be compromised.
During the test, residents may notice
small amounts of smoke rising from roof vent stacks, ground cracks, or maintenance holes. City officials emphasize that the smoke used in the process is completely safe, non-toxic, non-staining, and dissipates within minutes. It does not pose a fire hazard and is similar to the type of smoke used in theatrical effects.
Homeowners are advised to prepare before the test by pouring a small amount of water into floor drains, basement drains, and any unused sinks. Doing so ensures that drain traps are filled, preventing smoke from entering homes or buildings through dry plumbing lines.
If smoke does enter a home, it could indicate a plumbing defect or disconnected pipe that might also allow harmful sewer gases to escape. In such cases, residents should ventilate the area immediately by opening doors and windows and contact city inspectors to schedule a follow-up assessment.
City staff are distributing informational notices to all homes and businesses in the testing zone before the procedure begins. These
notices explain the testing process, provide contact details, and offer guidance for anyone who may have concerns. Residents with confined pets, elderly family members, or individuals with respiratory issues are encouraged to notify the city ahead of time to help minimize stress or confusion during the test period.
While smoke testing can briefly draw public attention when visible plumes appear from the ground or rooftops, the procedure is one of the most effective tools available for ensuring the long-term reliability of the city’s sewer infrastructure. By locating defects early, the city can prioritize repairs, improve system efficiency, and protect the community from costly future failures.
For more information or to report any issues related to the upcoming smoke test, residents may contact the Grants Pass Public Works Department at 541-450-6115. The department reminds residents that this is one of several smoke tests being conducted citywide as part of ongoing maintenance and modernization of the municipal sewer system.
5 DAY OUTLOOK
SOURCE: WEATHER.COM
TAKE A BREAK
Posting Date October 27, 2025
Posting October 27, 2025
THE BCC WEEKLY
The BCC Weekly - Taking the “Blind” out of the BCC
Commissioner Barnett Invites A Potential Age Discrimination Lawsuit
By: Jay Meredith, CPA Investigative Journalist
One of the points on the recall petition for Josephine County Commissioner Chris Barnett states, “Oregon Supreme court recently upheld a $3.2 million judgment for elder financial abuse and breach of contracts for Barnett's company’s purchase of an RV resort.” And last week Barnett made a statement about a County job applicant that has the potential to get the County sued for age discrimination in its hiring and promotion practices.
This case actually started with some promotions in the County’s Public Works department that were done without following typical hiring and promotion policies. Several weeks ago, the County promoted two employees to Public Works managerial positions that seem to replace some of the responsibilities previously held by the Public Works Director. And it seems like both of these positions were to report to the Commissioners as a Department Director would do, but it wasn’t originally clear because these promotions happened without the County doing a typical advertising and recruiting process required by County policies.
While this was just the latest in several hiring and firing actions by the County Commissioners in 2025 that didn’t follow policies, sources suggest the promotion of these two Public Works employees is what finally sparked the harsh memo from County Legal Counsel Wally Hicks on October 1, 2025, warning of the consequences of personnel actions that don’t follow law or follow the proper hiring policies.
And so, after these two Public Works promotions were done incorrectly, Commissioners went back to the drawing board and started over with what was supposed to be a proper hiring process that allowed any qualified employee to apply for the job promotion. And all qualified applicants were invited to interview with the Commissioners in a recorded public meeting of the BCC last Thursday afternoon.
Our phones started blowing up shortly after the Thursday interviews with allegations that Commissioner Chris Barnett refused to choose a highly qualified job applicant due to her age. And sure enough, when we watched the video of the meeting, Commissioner Barnett stated as plain as day that he was impressed with the candidate, but he was worried how quickly she might retire.
The highly qualified applicant in question had worked for the County for 38 years, about half that time working in Public Works actually performing many of the responsibilities of the job promotion she was applying for. Commis-
sioner Ron Smith tried to do the right thing and made a motion to appoint her to the job. There was no second to the motion.
Then Commissioner Barnett stated, “I concur with Commissioner Smith [regarding the experience and qualifications of the applicant]…My concern would be, when are you going to retire?” Then Barnett made a motion to hire a different applicant for the job, reportedly someone that is about 9 years younger than the highly qualified applicant who has worked for the County for 38 years. And then all three Commissioners voted yes for the younger applicant. Perhaps not coincidentally, both job promotions in Public Works were reportedly given to the same individuals that had been improperly appointed to those jobs in the first round of promotions before Commissioners had to restart the process.
One County insider that observed both processes said that the older well-qualified applicant that was passed up had a good case against the County even before the interview and appointment process went bad from Commissioner Barnett’s discriminatory comment. With Barnett’s illegal age comment during the interview and decision process, the process went from bad to what may be an open and shut case of age discrimination.
The Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) prohibits employment discrimination based on age against workers and job applicants who are 40 or older. The ADEA applies to state and local government employers, including counties, as well as private employers that have 20 or more employees. The ADEA prohibits age discrimination in all employment aspects including hiring, firing, promotions,
pay, job assignments, and other conditions of employment.
While I am no attorney, it appears that the older employee was the most qualified candidate for this particular job based on experience. Two of the three Commissioners seemed to think so. And so there appears to be a big risk of a lawsuit due to Barnett’s comments.
The first step for the employee may be to file an administrative complaint with the Oregon BOLI and/or with the EEOC (Equal Employment Opportunity Commission). The ADEA filing deadline is generally 300 days from the discriminatory act in states with their own age discrimination laws. The EEOC will investigate the charge and may attempt to reach a settlement. If it finds a violation, it can sue the county on behalf of the employees. But the employee also has the right to file a lawsuit directly in court a certain amount of time after the administrative filing(s).
When employees sue government agencies for age discrimination and win, there seems to have been a wide range of financial awards given to the employee. A quick search revealed amounts ranging from $125,000 to over $1 million.
And now both Commissioners Blech and Barnett have directly caused actions that in my opinion have a high likelihood of being very expensive employment-related lawsuits against Josephine County. Earlier this year Commissioner Blech was responsible for firing several department directors. At least two of them have retained legal counsel and are awaiting results from BOLI cases before moving forward with potential lawsuits. Those two will likely be expensive because a third-party internal inves-
tigation found at the end of 2024 that former Commissioners West and Baertschiger bullied and retaliated against these two directors.
There are many other examples of personnel actions approved by Commissioners this year that either don’t follow the County Charter requirements or County Administrative Policies. At the top of this controversial list are when Commissioner Blech tried two different times this year to promote IT/Emergency Management Director Michael Sellers to a highly paid job that didn’t even exist in the approved County salary schedules, one which would have paid Sellers a total compensation package of approximately $388,000 per year. And also, earlier this year Commissioner Blech in my opinion wrongly approved a large retroactive raise for Sellers going all the way back to his July 2023 start date which likely cost the County over $50,000 including benefits and payroll taxes.
Commissioner Blech can’t claim ignorance regarding these policy and legal requirements having sat on a previous County Charter Review Commission and also having served as Commissioner towards the end of 2024 when Commissioners reviewed and made changes to the County’s entire Administrative Policy Manual. As for the other two commissioners, in my opinion they seem to be making a great case that Josephine County would be in better hands with an experienced County Manager that would oversee all departments from an administrative and personnel perspective.
County Commissioners are elected due largely to their political popularity and typically don’t come with significant administrative management experience. 2025 has shown us exactly what can happen when a BCC goes “Rogue” and doesn’t listen to the advice of experienced department heads. This year will likely cost the County millions in personnel and other lawsuits alone.
We’re paying almost $140,000 per year for each Commissioner (including benefits and taxes) and not one of this year’s Commissioners is qualified or experienced in administratively running a local government agency. Perhaps Josephine County would be better served by a BCC that is elected but serves part-time rather than full-time and serves as the “political” head of the County and not the administrative head of the County.
With several pending or threatened employee lawsuits with large price tags from both 2024 and 2025, taxpayers would have certainly benefited from a professional, experienced, County Manager in the last few years.
Natural Ways to Ease Winter Aches and Stay Limber in Southern Oregon’s Cold Months
By Bryce Robinson
When winter sweeps across Southern Oregon, it brings more than just chilly mornings and fog-covered valleys. The drop in temperature often triggers familiar aches, stiffness, and soreness that make even simple movements feel like a chore. For many, these bone-chilling months can aggravate joint pain, muscle tension, and arthritic discomfort. Yet, staying ahead of the pain does not always require prescription medication— natural approaches and simple daily habits can go a long way toward keeping the body warm, loose, and pain-free.
As temperatures fall, the body tends to constrict blood vessels to preserve warmth, which can limit circulation to muscles and joints. This reduction in blood flow may cause stiffness and sensitivity, especially in areas already prone to inflammation. To counteract that, maintaining regular movement becomes essential. Gentle stretching in the morning, yoga sessions, or even light walks around the neighborhood can help maintain flexibility and circulation. Those who prefer more structured activity might consider hot yoga, which combines stretching and heat to ease tightness and promote relaxation throughout the body.
Hydration also plays an important role during colder months. While people often associate water intake with summer, winter
air is equally dehydrating. Dry air and indoor heating can sap moisture from muscles and joints, making them more vulnerable to pain. Drinking adequate water, herbal teas, and broths throughout the day can help maintain the body’s natural lubrication and reduce inflammation.
Natural supplements like glucosamine and chondroitin have long been used to support joint health. Glucosamine helps maintain the cartilage that cushions joints, while chondroitin aids in retaining moisture within that cartilage, promoting smoother movement. Many also find comfort using natural anti-inflammatory herbs such as turmeric,
ginger, and boswellia, which can help reduce stiffness without the side effects of stronger pharmaceuticals. While supplements vary in quality, those derived from natural sources and taken consistently can make a difference for people managing mild to moderate discomfort.
Topical relief options offer another line of defense. Warming creams, essential oil rubs, and herbal balms can soothe muscle tension almost immediately. For more localized soreness, medicated patches or natural compresses using Epsom salts or menthol-based creams can help relax the area and restore mobility. Applying these treat-
ments after a warm shower or bath enhances their effectiveness by opening the pores and increasing circulation.
Heat therapy remains one of the most effective natural remedies for winter pain. A long soak in a hot bath, time in a sauna, or a dip in a hot tub can ease muscle tension, relieve stress, and promote better sleep. Even a simple heating pad on the lower back or shoulders can work wonders after a long day spent in the cold. Pairing heat therapy with gentle stretching afterward can improve flexibility and reduce the likelihood of next-day soreness.
For those who still experience significant discomfort, over-the-counter ibuprofen can help reduce inflammation when natural methods are not enough. It’s important, however, to use such medication sparingly and only as a short-term supplement to a broader self-care plan built around movement, nutrition, and rest.
Ultimately, staying ahead of winter aches means preparing both body and mind for the season. Maintaining a routine that includes warmth, hydration, gentle exercise, and natural supplementation allows the body to adapt to the cold without suffering its worst effects. As the frost settles over Southern Oregon, taking these proactive steps can turn a bone-chilling season into one of comfort, strength, and renewed mobility.
