Commissioner West Backs Out of Recall Debate When Asked to Provide Facts
By: Jay Meredith, CPA
Elections have consequences, they say. Josephine County Commissioner John West is also about to find out that making false statements while campaigning during elections also has consequences.
As one of the original authors of the Recall Petition for Josephine County Commissioner John West, filed on August 2, 2024, I can honestly say I’ve been shocked about all the false statements made about the petition by Commissioner West and the Central Committee of the Josephine County Republican Party. And before reading on, let me say that I’m a lifelong conservative and also a registered Republican. And despite what West and other West allies have said lately, all the original “founding” members of what is now called the Committee to Recall John West were Republicans when the idea was in its formation stage. We just wanted to hold one of our own accountable. West’s bad and costly behavior is part of why we filed the Recall Petition, but the bold and brazen nature of the false statements since the filing of the petition has taken us by surprise. After all, the business of serving the public is well, public. Our Recall Petition points can be easily proven by some combination of simply watching public meeting videos or filing a simple public records request.
Commissioner West must be operating on the assumption that citizens won’t call him on the false statements or won’t take the time to research the truth. If so, that’s a bad assumption and yet another costly decision for West. It would also explain why West and political ally
editor of the Grants
West has a history of using lawsuits to attempt to intimidate and silence anyone that gets in the way of his agenda. As just a few of several recent examples, West filed a lawsuit for millions against the State of Oregon and certain employees of the State for not approving a mining permit. West recently filed a lawsuit against the Grants Pass Tribune and owner for $500,000 for false statements, and now last week filed another lawsuit against the Josephine County Clerk for the manner in which Recall Petition signatures were verified and approved. Commissioner Elect Chris Barnett, who West has done real estate business with for 15 years and donated thousands to his campaign, also used the same attorney and filed a similar lawsuit against the Grants
Pass Tribune after the Tribune started publishing less than flattering information about then candidate Chris Barnett.
I’ll mainly let the court of law speak for itself on these lawsuits, but my personal opinion is that all three recent lawsuits from West and Barnett are a mistake. After obtaining a copy of West’s lawsuit against the Grants Pass Tribune through a public records request, I especially think West’s lawsuit is a big mistake given that a part of West’s lawsuit is arguing the truth of the points listed in the Recall Petition. As a contributing journalist for the Grants Pass Tribune long before the Recall Petition was filed, I can also say that while the Tribune was being kept informed of our progress on the recall initiative, the Tribune did not initiate this recall as suggested in West’s lawsuit.
The Committee to Recall John West spent almost two months from the idea stage to the filing of the Recall Petition on August 2nd making sure every petition statement presented as a fact is true and that we had documentation to back up every fact-based statement in the Recall Petition. We knew from the start that West might threaten and intimidate using his attorney, and of course a recall as with any election measure is a very serious undertaking.
Recall ballots started arriving in mailboxes on Friday November 29th and votes are due by December 17th. When voters review the recall petition statement and then the statement of justification filed by Commissioner West which both appear on your ballot, you can’t help but
• see COMMISSIONER, page 5
Nationwide Recall: SunFed Produce
A significant food recall is underway as cucumbers distributed by SunFed Produce are being recalled due to potential salmonella contamination. The recall affects consumers in 26 U.S. states and five Canadian provinces.
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced the recall, specifying that the implicated product, marketed as “whole fresh American cucumbers,” was sold between October 12 and November 26. Consumers who have purchased these cucumbers are urged to dispose of them or return them to the place of purchase for a refund.
SunFed Produce’s President, Craig Slate, emphasized the company’s commitment to consumer safety in a press release issued by the FDA. “As soon as we learned of this issue, we immediately
Hunter Biden’s Legal Team Asserts Political Bias in Prosecution
By: Jason Foley
Hunter Biden's legal team has launched a vigorous public defense just weeks before federal judges in Delaware and California are set to sentence him on gun and tax-related charges. The move comes amid speculation about whether President Joe Biden might consider a pardon for his son, a possibility the president has previously ruled out.
In a 52-page document titled "The Political Prosecutions of Hunter Biden," released Saturday, Biden's attorneys argue that the investigations into their client have been politically motivated. The document claims that Hunter Biden has been subjected to scrutiny and charges that an average citizen would not face. His legal team further contends that the legal actions are part of a broader pattern of targeting due to his connection to a prominent political figure.
The legal defense also looks ahead, warning of additional challenges Hunter Biden could face under the administration of President-elect Donald Trump. Trump's Justice Department, they suggest, may intensify legal efforts against him, adding another layer of political pressure.
The document outlines a detailed timeline of events dating back to 2017, presenting them as evidence of what the legal team views as an unprecedented targeting of a private citizen for political purposes. It criticizes the foundation of the charges brought by special counsel David Weiss, who led the investigations. Weiss, appointed during the Trump administration, continued in his role under President Biden but has faced scrutiny for his handling of the case.
Creator: Jose Luis Magana | Credit: AP
Hunter Biden’s attorneys argue that the charges, which include allegations of tax evasion and falsifying a gun purchase form, are typically resolved without criminal prosecution. They highlight that their client has already addressed his tax liabilities and question the necessity of pursuing these matters in court.
Hunter Biden has recently been at his father’s side in Nantucket, where the Biden family traditionally gathers for Thanksgiving. This proximity has reignited public speculation about whether President Biden might consider using his pardon powers. The president has repeatedly stated that he would not pardon or commute his son’s sentence, emphasizing the independence of the legal process.
The legal team’s document seems to serve multiple purposes. While presenting its case for unfair treatment, it also indirectly appeals to President Biden, framing the prosecutions as politically driven and unjust. The timing of the re-
lease—so close to sentencing hearings—may be intended to shape public opinion and influence the judiciary.
Both the tax and gun charges were brought by Weiss’s office with support from Justice Department attorneys, highlighting the complex interplay of legal and political factors in this high-profile case. As Trump prepares to take office, Hunter Biden’s legal team suggests that the Department of Justice under new leadership may pursue additional actions against him, raising questions about the impartiality of the legal system in politically charged cases.
The document reiterates arguments Hunter Biden’s defense has previously made, some of which have been dismissed in court. While it offers a detailed narrative of alleged political targeting, critics argue that the evidence largely rehashes familiar claims rather than presenting new insights.
As Hunter Biden awaits sentencing, the case continues to draw national attention, reflecting broader debates about fairness and accountability in high-stakes legal battles involving public figures.
Commissioner elect Chris Barnett both filed what I personally believe are ridiculous lawsuits against John Oliver Riccio, founder and
Pass Tribune.
• see SUNFED, page 3
Why Haircuts Have Become So Expensive Post-COVID
By: John Oliver
In the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, the cost of haircuts and haircare products has risen significantly, leaving many consumers puzzled by the steep price increases. A service that was once relatively affordable has seen its prices triple in some cases. This dramatic change can be attributed to a combination of pandemic-related disruptions, labor shortages, and inflation, all of which have profoundly impacted the haircare industry. By examining the reasons behind these increases, consumers can better understand the current landscape and find ways to manage these rising costs.
The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted almost every industry, and hair salons were no exception. Forced closures during lockdowns meant many salons faced months without income, while the costs of reopening under stringent health guidelines created further financial strain. Salons had to invest in personal protective equipment (PPE), additional cleaning supplies, and more time between appointments for sanitation measures, all of which increased operational expenses. Many smaller salons, unable to bear these costs, closed their doors permanently. The surviving businesses have had to pass on these added expenses to their clients, contributing to the surge in haircut prices.
Labor shortages have also played a significant role. During the pandemic, many hairstylists left the industry due to financial instability or burnout from the added stress of working in close-contact environments. As a result, salons have struggled to find skilled professionals, prompting them to offer higher wages to attract and retain staff. These increased labor costs are reflected in the higher prices charged to customers.
Beyond the specific challenges faced by salons, the broader economic landscape has exacerbated the situation. Inflation has driven up the cost of essentials such as rent, utilities, and the professional-grade haircare products used in salons. Global supply chain disruptions have also led to shortages of key ingredients in shampoos, conditioners, and styling products, forcing manufacturers to raise their prices. These increases have cascaded down to consumers, further inflating the cost of maintaining their hair.
In addition, consumer behavior has shifted in the post-pandemic era. With self-care becoming a higher priority for many people, demand for premium haircare ser-
vices has grown. Salons have responded by offering luxury treatments and high-end products, which, while enhancing the customer experience, come with a higher price tag. This trend has reinforced the perception that haircuts and haircare have become more expensive.
For consumers grappling with these rising costs, there are ways to adapt. Stretching the time between haircuts can help reduce annual expenses; opting for low-maintenance styles that grow out well can make this strategy more practical. Learning basic haircare and styling techniques can also minimize reliance on professional services. Shopping locally or seeking out smaller, independently owned salons may offer more competitive pricing than luxury chains. Additionally, many salons provide loyalty programs, discounts for referrals, or reduced rates for services performed by trainees, all of which can help manage costs.
The pandemic has reshaped the haircare industry in profound ways, and the changes in pricing are unlikely to fully revert to pre-pandemic levels. However, by understanding the factors driving these increases and exploring alternative options, consumers can continue to prioritize their grooming needs without breaking the bank.
SunFed Produce Cucumbers Pulled for Potential Salmonella Contamination
From page 1
acted to protect consumers,” Slate said. “We are working closely with authorities and the implicated ranch to determine the possible cause.”
The company has pledged full cooperation with federal and local health authorities as investigations continue. Slate also highlighted that SunFed Produce enforces strict compliance with FDA food safety standards among all its growers.
Salmonella is a bacteria that can cause serious and sometimes fatal infections in young children, elderly individuals, and those with weakened immune systems. Symptoms of infection often include fever, diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain. In rare cases, the infection can lead to more severe conditions if it spreads to the bloodstream.
This recall is part of a series of food safety issues in recent months, underscoring the challenges faced by the agricultural and food production industries in ensuring the safety of fresh produce. The FDA has been working to implement more rigorous inspections and preventive controls under the Food Safety Modernization Act, yet incidents like these highlight the ongoing risks.
SunFed Produce has assured the public that it is investigating the source of the contamination. The company’s statement emphasized a commitment to preventing future occurrences and maintaining transparency throughout the process.
Consumers who purchased cucumbers during the specified timeframe should check the packaging or confirm with their retailer to determine if their product is
Consumers who suspect they may have been exposed to contaminated cucumbers and are experiencing symptoms are advised to contact their healthcare provider promptly.
part of the recall. The FDA advises against consuming any potentially contaminated cucumbers and recommends thorough cleaning of surfaces or utensils that may have come into contact with them.
For updates on the recall, consumers can visit the FDA’s website or contact SunFed Produce directly for more information.
While this recall raises concerns about the safety of fresh produce, it also demonstrates the importance of swift action and transparency in addressing potential risks. As investigations continue, both SunFed Produce and the FDA aim to reassure consumers that every measure is being taken to protect public health and prevent further incidents.
This incident serves as a reminder for consumers to stay informed about recalls and to take food safety precautions seriously, particularly when dealing with fresh produce.
POLITICS
John West Claims, "It’s All About the Law" Amid Recall Controversy
By: John Oliver
County Commissioner John West, who has been facing a heated recall effort, recently stated in an interview with NBC Channel 5, “It’s all about the law.” While this sentiment might seem commendable, critics argue that West’s actions throughout his tenure suggest a selective adherence to legal principles, raising questions about the integrity of his leadership.
West’s recent legal challenge to halt the recall process, targeting two individuals involved, underscores the mounting tension. His lawyer asserts that the recall manual doesn’t supersede statutory requirements, citing provisions for statistical sampling in election laws. However, critics point out a troubling pattern in West’s leadership style: following the law only when it suits his political survival.
The recall effort, rooted in allegations of misconduct and abuse of power, presents a stark contrast to West’s public defense. His official statement on the recall ballot, which consists of a single paragraph accusing opponents of lying, stands out for what it lacks—a direct rebuttal to the specific accusations raised by the recall committee. Rather than providing clarity or evidence to refute these claims, West has opted for an aggressive counter-cam-
paign, branding his detractors as dishonest while failing to substantiate his own defense.
Observers note that West had an opportunity to debate the recall committee, an ideal platform to present his side of the story and address the allegations directly. Instead, he declined, a decision critics interpret as an evasion of accountability. This approach has fueled skepticism among voters who are questioning whether West’s refusal to engage in transparent dialogue reflects deeper issues with his leadership.
Furthermore, West’s attacks on the county clerk — a position he oversees—have sparked additional controversy. By suggesting the clerk is mishandling the recall process, West appears to deflect responsibility while undermining the credibility of a critical public office. This strategy, detractors argue, is emblematic of a leadership style that prioritizes personal preservation over collaborative governance.
The recall committee, on the other hand, has emphasized a commitment to presenting verifiable facts. They have accused West of employing tactics such as lies, slander, and censorship to maintain his position, contrasting this with their evidence-based approach. To many,
the absence of a point-by-point rebuttal from West only strengthens the recall committee’s case, highlighting a failure to engage substantively with the concerns of his constituents.
In an era where public officials are increasingly scrutinized for their adherence to ethical standards, West’s handling of the recall has become a defining moment. His critics argue that his reliance on rhetoric over evidence and his refusal to participate in meaningful dialogue paint a troubling picture of a leader unwilling to confront his own record.
As voters in Josephine County prepare to make their voices heard, the stakes are clear. For West, this recall is not just a challenge to his leadership but a referendum on his approach to governance. And for the citizens, it is an opportunity to decide whether their commissioner’s actions align with the principles of accountability and transparency that should define public service.
The recall process will proceed according to the law, as West himself emphasized. The question now is whether voters believe their commissioner has upheld those same standards — or merely invoked them when convenient.
Commissioner West Can't Provide Facts
notice that West didn’t refute any of the specific recall petition points.
Making matters even worse for Commissioner West, last week West changed his mind and backed out of a proposed debate he previously agreed to do with certain leaders of the Committee to Recall John West after this Recall Committee requested that he bring facts and documentation to back up public statements he has made against the Recall Petition points.
The Recall Committee has been as transparent as possible since the filing of the Recall Petition and the beginning of gathering the nearly 6,500 verified County voter signatures required to bring this to a vote. Spokespersons for the Recall Committee have done interviews with all local media that requested it, including a new local podcast on YouTube called The Oregon Grape (TOG). While former Commissioner and State Rep Lily Morgan and I went into a lot of topics on the TOG not directly related to the Recall Petition, at the end of the podcast we mentioned that we would welcome a debate with West on the podcast as long as we gathered enough voter signatures to bring this recall to a vote of the people in Josephine County. This was before West sued The Grants Pass Tribune for
$500,000 and used some of the recall petition points as reasons for the lawsuit.
When TOG came back to us saying West agreed to debate, we said we would debate with West but only if the debate was limited to and included all points we listed in our Recall Petition, West had to agree not to bring a lawsuit against the Recall Committee or any volunteer/member of the Recall Committee for exercising our State Constitutional rights to file a recall petition and gather signatures for a recall, and West had to bring factual information or documentation concerning a few of the false statements West has made about the Recall Petition and be prepared to talk about those statements.
And that’s when West backed out of the debate. Now we have West’s official Statement of Justification elections filing form that you’ll see appear on your special election recall ballot that just arrived in the mail that doesn’t dispute any of the specific points in the recall petition. And we also now have West backing out of a debate he previously agreed to when asked to provide proof of some of the false statements he made against the Recall Petition points.
The number of false statements West and certain leaders of the local Josephine County Republican Party have
made and published since the filing of the Recall Petition are too great in number to list in this article and keep it readable, so I’ll have to mention a few more of them ever so briefly and come back next week with a more detailed list. West and political allies have been wrong about who is behind the formation of this Recall Petition, wrong about the motivations of individuals involved in the Recall Committee, and as West has done throughout the first two years of his 4-year term as Commissioner he threw out several rebuttals to the Recall Petition points quickly after the recall was filed without investigating the recall points and without thinking through the consequences of the false statements.
In my opinion, West (and the local Republican Party leadership) is just digging a deeper hole for himself the more time that this recall campaign goes on. And wow there sure are some significant false statements from the West campaign. Stay tuned this week as we dive into some of those West false statements in more detail.
If you’re the type of person that wants to dive into the details behind the Recall Petition points, see the fact sheet posted at www.RecallJohnWest.com and feel free to reach out to the Recall Committee with any questions.
Grants Pass Prepares for Annual Christmas Tree Lighting Ceremony December 6th
Source: City of Grants Pass
The City of Grants Pass is gearing up for one of its most cherished holiday traditions: the annual Christmas tree lighting ceremony. This year, the event promises to bring festive cheer and community spirit to the heart of the Historic District downtown.
The Christmas tree, a symbol of the season, is scheduled to arrive early next week and will be carefully placed at the prominent intersection of 5th and G streets. This location, known for its vibrant local businesses and historic charm, will once again serve as the centerpiece for holiday celebrations.
City officials and event organizers are working diligently to ensure that the tree’s installation goes smoothly. Local crews will manage the transportation and setup, transforming the area into a winter wonderland. Decorations, including twinkling lights and ornaments, will adorn the tree, enhancing the
festive atmosphere.
The highly anticipated lighting ceremony is set to take place on Friday, December 6, 2024. Residents and visitors alike are invited to gather downtown to witness the moment the tree is illuminated, officially kicking off the holiday season in Grants Pass. The ceremony will feature family-friendly entertainment, seasonal music, and refreshments to keep attendees warm and joyful.
Local businesses in the Historic District are also preparing for the influx of visitors by extending hours and offering special promotions during the event. The city encourages everyone to support these establishments while enjoying the festivities.
Mark your calendars and join the community for an evening of holiday magic. Whether you’re a longtime resident or a firsttime visitor, the Grants Pass Christmas tree lighting ceremony is an event you won’t want to miss.
GRANTS PASS WEATHER
5 DAY OUTLOOK
SOURCE: WEATHER.COM
SUNDAY
MONDAY
sunny 55/33
sunny 55/32
55/36
TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY
Grants Pass Christmas Parade Just One Week Away!
The holiday season is officially upon us, and in just one week, the much-anticipated 2024 Grants Pass Christmas Parade will bring the community together in a celebration of festive cheer. The parade will take place on Saturday, December 7, from 7:00 to 8:30 PM PST, lighting up the night with a spectacle of floats, music, and joy.
This annual tradition is one of the highlights of the season, drawing families, friends, and visitors to downtown Grants Pass. The parade route will stretch along 6th Street, starting at C Street and concluding
at L Street. Spectators are encouraged to arrive early to secure the best viewing spots and enjoy the pre-parade atmosphere.
This year’s lineup promises to be as dazzling as ever, with a variety of creative floats, local marching bands, and, of course, plenty of candy for children and the young at heart. Community groups, businesses, and schools will showcase their holiday spirit with themed displays, while musicians fill the air with the sounds of the season.
“The Grants Pass Christmas Parade is a cherished event that brings everyone together to celebrate the magic of the holidays,” said
a spokesperson for the parade organizers. “We’re excited to see all the hard work and creativity from our participants on display.”
The parade is free to attend and open to the public, making it an accessible way for everyone to share in the holiday spirit. Attendees are encouraged to dress warmly and bring blankets or chairs for comfort during the event.
Don’t miss this opportunity to kick off the holiday season with a night of community, laughter, and cheer. Mark your calendars and get ready to experience the magic of the Grants Pass Christmas Parade!
TAKE A BREAK
November 25, 2024
Posting Date
November 25, 2024
November 25, 2024
LETTERS
LETTER TO THE EDITOR
To the Editor,
This past political season has been one of the most ruthless I’ve ever witnessed — and I’ve seen many. Some have been good, some bad, but never truly mean-spirited like this. I’ve had to ask myself: what has changed? Why has my own political party undergone such an angry transformation?
I have a question for the current leadership of my local Central Republican Party: Where are you from? How long have you lived in Oregon, and where did you move here from?
I’m sure we have members who were born and raised here, along with others who relocated from different counties or states (that’s another topic entirely). But I’m particularly curious about those who throw signs, yell horrible things at their neighbors, lie about other Republicans, and demean citizens for reasons unknown.
This behavior feels like a scene from Mean Girls — without the striking looks. It would be interesting to see if there’s a common denominator among these angry newcomers. Perhaps it’s time for us to take back the reins until they can accept that they now live in Oregon.
We would love for them to get to know us as a community — not as “us” versus “them.” If that’s not possible, perhaps their old communities would welcome them back. Then again, maybe not.
Sincerely, Tina Gotchall
rity. Often, the loudest voices and most aggressive actions come from those who feel the weakest or most vulnerable inside. It’s a classic defense mechanism: those who lack inner confidence or conviction resort to bluster, intimidation, or divisive tactics to mask their own insecurities.
This behavior is not unique to politics, but it’s troubling to see it manifest so prominently in public discourse. The kind of bullying you’ve described — whether through shouting, sign-throwing, or character attacks — is not a demonstration of strength. Rather, it’s an attempt to deflect attention from deeper insecurities or unaddressed issues. Such tactics are often employed by individuals or groups who can’t substantiate their positions with reasoned arguments or evidence.
Your call for unity and community-focused dialogue is crucial. In an era when political divisions often feel insurmountable, the goal should be to foster understanding and cooperation. Instead of shouting over each other, we must work to find common ground and hold individuals accountable for their actions—whether they are longtime residents or newcomers to our communities.
One point you made particularly stood out: the importance of rejecting the “us versus them” mentality. When communities become fractured, it weakens everyone involved. Strength comes from building bridges, not from throwing stones. Those who hide behind bullying tactics are relying on others to give up and retreat. But, as you aptly said, this time no one is running.
RESPONSE FROM THE EDITOR
Dear Tina,
Thank you for sharing your perspective on what you describe as one of the most ruthless political seasons you’ve experienced. Your observations on the tone and actions within your political party resonate with many who are grappling with similar concerns.
While I can’t comment on Mean Girls, as I’ve never seen the movie, I can offer insight drawn from my experiences as a male who grew up witnessing—and reflecting on—the dynamics of power, fear, and insecu-
I encourage you—and others in your position — to continue speaking out. It’s through open dialogue and courageous voices like yours that change happens. We must call out divisive behavior while remaining committed to creating a community where respect and understanding prevail.
Thank you again for your heartfelt letter. Let’s hope this political season, as challenging as it has been, sparks conversations that lead to healing and progress.
Sincerely, John Oliver
Riccio
