SUNDAY, NOVEMBER 3, 2024
Voters Face Stark Choices in Josephine County
County Commissioner John West Faces Recall and Chris Barnett Faces More Allegations
By: John Oliver
Just days before the elections, tensions are high as County Commissioner John West faces a recall, while Chris Barnett, a candidate for County Commissioner, seeks to take office amid a growing controversy. With concerns surrounding their financial dealings, ethical questions, and handling of public criticism, residents are left to consider the direction of their local government and what it means for the community’s future.
John West, a wealthy commissioner with strong ties to the mining and timber industries, has come under intense scrutiny
for his actions and financial investments in his campaigns. He reportedly spent nearly $70,000 on a campaign for a position with an annual salary of around $90,000. The scale of his spending raises eyebrows among residents who wonder why West is willing to invest so much money in a role that offers a relatively modest salary in comparison.
The source of community concern lies in West’s potential conflicts of interest. Critics allege that West’s decisions in office have too often served his business interests rather than the public good. Despite mounting evidence and allegations of un-
ethical conduct, West has continued to defend his position. The response from some constituents has been to call for a recall, claiming his actions prioritize personal gain over the well-being of the county.
The petition to recall West has gained enough support to move forward, with a special election anticipated. Yet, West has not yielded to community concerns, instead investing more money further in defending his seat. While he dismisses allegations as politically motivated lies, residents argue that the extent of his financial investment only deepens doubts regarding his motives.
As the recall campaign against West gains momentum, residents are now also turning their attention to Chris Barnett, a
Fire District Coverage Overlap Sparks Concern
By: John Oliver
Josephine County is facing challenges as it plans to establish a new fire district. The proposed district overlaps with the existing Applegate Valley Fire District, raising concerns among county officials and residents over how to proceed effectively and fairly.
The overlap has led to significant worries about potential confusion and financial implications for residents. One of the primary issues is the possibility of double taxation, where residents may be required to pay for both the Applegate Valley Fire District and the new district’s services. This concern stems from state legislation that mandates the closest fire district to a property is responsible for coverage, regardless of whether a property owner subscribes to a private provider. As a result, residents may face additional costs even if they already receive fire protection from a private service. Under current state legislation, the Applegate Valley Fire District is allowed to extend its coverage area up to seven road miles from its fire stations. This provision automatically includes properties within that radius unless the property owners explicitly opt out. However, opting out is not a permanent solution. Certain events, like a change in property ownership or the construction of new structures, can trigger automatic re-annexation into the fire district.
Additionally, if a property within the fire district's coverage area receives emergency services, but the owner has not opted in or paid taxes, the district has the right to recover three times the cost of those services. This clause raises further concerns about fairness and the financial burdens that may be imposed on residents who are not part of the district but require assistance in emergencies.
The county is currently working on mapping the proposed fire district. This process includes examining properties that may be exempt, such as those under five acres without structures and government-owned land. Officials recognize the complexity of the situation and are focused on safeguarding residents' interests. They are negotiating with the Applegate Valley Fire District to explore coverage solutions and reduce the risk of redundancy and overcharges.
A town hall meeting is planned to keep residents informed, address their concerns, and collect feedback on the proposed district. One of the county’s main challenges is the ambiguity in state legislation concerning minimum service levels within the seven-mile coverage radius. Furthermore, the county lacks adequate personnel to manage the workload associated with property inspections,
a necessary step for confirming eligibility for annexation. This shortage complicates the county's efforts to effectively manage and expand fire services.
The overlapping coverage areas of the Applegate Valley Fire District and the new district present a mix of potential benefits and drawbacks for citizens.
Potential benefits include increased access to fire protection services for previously uncovered properties, and the standardization of fire protection services and regulations within the district. This could potentially enhance safety and ensure consistent service delivery for residents.
Potential drawbacks, however, include the increased costs associated with double taxation for those subscribing to private providers. The automatic annexation rules could also limit residents' choices in fire protection providers. The situation may lead to confusion and uncertainty about coverage areas and responsibilities, and could prompt disputes between fire districts and private providers over service provision and cost recovery.
Josephine County acknowledges the potential for conflicts and financial challenges due to this overlap with the Applegate Valley Fire District. County officials are working on a transparent process to ensure residents are aware of their options and any obligations related to the proposed fire district. The upcoming town hall meeting will serve as an essential forum for residents to gain clarity, express their concerns, and contribute to shaping the county’s approach to fire protection coverage.
In recent weeks, a string of misconceptions has painted the Grants Pass Tribune as a "liberal" newspaper, leading to misguided assumptions about our editorial stance and values. This labeling couldn't be further from the truth and ignores the essence of our paper’s mission, as well as the core beliefs of its staff and ownership. Let’s clear up these misconceptions, affirm our dedication to unbiased journalism, and encourage a more informed, connected community dialogue.
First and foremost, the Grants Pass Tribune isn’t affiliated with any political party. The Tribune’s founder and current owner, an independent voter, purposefully steers clear of aligning with any political ideology. Our paper doesn't lean left or right; it stands rooted in the middle, aiming to serve as a dependable platform for community news and fair reporting. The owner’s decision to register independently wasn’t accidental – it reflects a commitment to balance, logic, and common sense. Voting across party lines based on candidate merits, rather than labels, underscores this dedication.
We understand that in an era where most media are either labeled as “conservative” or “liberal,” neutrality can be a difficult position to comprehend. However, our goal is clear: we report on what matters to Grants Pass and Josephine County without bowing to political pressures or sensationalist trends.
Some may wonder why a politically neutral paper reports on political issues. This is a valid
COLENE MARTIN FOR
Josephine County Commissioner Position # 2
MY BACKGROUND
27 YEARS BUSINESS
OWNER OF PHOTO DEN CURRENTLY AT JOHN L SCOTT
12 YEARS OF WORKING WITH CHAMBERS OF COMMERCE AND BUSINESS
30+ YEARS OF VOLUNTEER ACTIVE BOARD LEADERSHIP
My priority is pragmatic problem-solving, and good governance.
I have proven leadership with decades of successes at the state and local levels.
I am asking for your vote in Novemeber.
Colene Martin
MY POSITIONS ON CURRENT ISSUES
BUDGET & FINANCE
1
2
Transparency and clarity to the citizens, budget committee and the staff is essential Fiscal responsibility, with efficiencies in current budgets I am dedicated to keeping our county sound and affordable for our residents
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
We need to be an innovative and a forward-thinking community, supporting our business community and employees I am looking forward to seeing the Fairgrounds becoming an economic driver to our community. Expanding and utilizing our airports, there is an opportunity and need for job training in the flight industry as well as for the hobbyist. Maintaining and improving our parks to serve the families and their activities Illinois Valley is growing, and the vibe out there is brilliant, they want to enrich their community & support their neighbors Supporting our organic and agriculture industry
INSURING OUR COMMUNITIES SAFETY
3
4
My unwavering commitment to the safety of our community drives my vision. I’ll work tirelessly to fortify law-enforcement staff and resources for our Sheriff and the jail
HOUSING/HOMELESS
I will collaborate with existing building programs, nonprofits and healthcare workers to see how we can expand these crucial services in our county. We need a comprehensivecommon sense approach while respecting the rights of property owners
For more info Electcolenemartin.com Paid for Friends of Colene Martin # 23406
NEWS DESK
Portland Prepares for Potential Election-Related Unrest as Police and National Guard Stand Ready
GPT News Desk
As Election Day approaches and political tensions run high across the country, Portland is bracing for potential unrest, with police and the National Guard prepared to respond to any disruptions. Governor Tina Kotek and local leaders are urging citizens to exercise their right to protest peacefully, while also affirming that any attempts at voter intimidation will not be tolerated.
In a recent statement, Governor Kotek emphasized her commitment to voter safety, calling any form of intimidation “un-American.” Her office, she said, is actively working with local, state, and federal agencies to ensure that voters in Oregon can safely cast their ballots. She also signaled that the National Guard is ready to assist if needed, echoing measures taken during the 2020 election by then-Governor Kate Brown.
Portland’s law enforcement is also on high alert. Mayor Ted Wheeler stated that city police have been strategizing for weeks on how to ensure both public safety and the right to free expression during and after the election. While there are no current indications of impending unrest, Wheeler acknowledged the community’s heightened uncertainty and anxiety. “We know there is a lot of uncertainty and tension in our community,” he said, stressing the city’s dedication to a safe election process.
Portland Police Bureau spokesperson Terri Wallo Strauss declined to give specific details on patrol numbers or exact deployment plans, but she confirmed it would be an “all-handson-deck” situation. Under a unified command structure, the bureau plans to have all officers available for duty on Election Day and the days that follow. The Oregon State Police, along with the Oregon Department of Emergency Management, is coordinating efforts with various law enforcement bodies, including tribal and federal authorities, to ensure a cohesive response across the state.
Should unrest arise, Portland police have affirmed their
commitment to investigate and respond to any illegal activity, including vandalism. Any incidents connected to the election will be prosecuted, with the Multnomah County District Attorney’s office set to handle cases as they arise. In a public statement, police reminded residents that while arrests may not always happen immediately during tense situations, charges may still be filed following investigations.
Portland has seen election-related tensions escalate into violence in the past. In 2016, after Donald Trump’s election, demonstrations erupted, and although most protests were peaceful, some participants caused property damage, breaking windows and vandalizing businesses. Dozens of arrests were made. Already, recent incidents involving ballot box tampering in Portland and nearby Vancouver, Washington, have raised concerns about potential disruptions. The upcoming election, with Trump again on the ballot and voicing claims of election fraud, has increased
the likelihood of similar unrest, especially if vote counts continue for days after Election Day.
In response to the possibility of disruptions, police are advising business owners to secure outdoor furniture, sandwich boards, and any other objects that could be used to damage property.
Oregon’s leaders, including U.S. Senators Ron Wyden and Jeff Merkley, along with Secretary of State LaVonne Griffin-Valade, are echoing calls for calm. They are urging Portland residents to prevent a repeat of the 2020 violence and reminding citizens that protests should remain peaceful.
As election night nears, Portland authorities will continue monitoring the situation, prepared to ensure safety, uphold lawful protest, and protect the right to vote in a secure environment.
Understanding the Recall of Commissioner John West
WE ARE A GROUP of concerned residents committed to the recall of Commissioner John West, driven by our deep concern for the well-being of our community.
Our mission is to address and correct the leadership and decision-making issues that have negatively impacted the health and safety of our county, led to financial mismanagement, and resulted in violations of state laws.
WHY WE’RE TAKING ACTION
Our efforts are based on several key concerns:
Pipe Fork Property Sale: We believe that West engaged in bad faith negotiations over the sale of the Pipe Fork property, which not only cost the county valuable revenue but also put a vital water source for the Williams community at risk.
Disregard for Voter Will: West has consistently ignored the will of the voters by cutting essential funding for community programs such as the Oregon State U niversity Extension Service, law enforcement, and public health initiatives. These cuts have strained the very services that our residents depend on.
Legal Violations: There are serious allegations against West, including violations of state laws, campaign finance regulations, and public meeting laws. He is also facing pending ethics and labor law violations, raising significant concerns about his adherence to legal and ethical standards.
Library District Withdrawal: West unilaterally approved the county’s withdrawal from a Library District, a decision that has led to costly litigation and strained county resources.
Threats to Community Safety: West’s decisions have jeopardized community safety by reducing or eliminating critical emergency preparedness programs, including scaling back the Firewise program, cutting the Emergency Management program, and removing fire safety standards for property development.
Questionable Hiring Practices: We are concerned that West has prioritized political loyalty over merit by appointing unqualified political allies to key county positions, compromising the effectiveness of our local government.
OUR VISION
We envision a county where leadership is accountable, transparent, and truly representative of the community’s best interests. Our recall effort is a step towards restoring integrity in local governance and ensuring that our county’s future is guided by ethical and responsible decision-making.
HOW YOU CAN GET INVOLVED
As we continue to gather support for this recall, we encourage all community members who share our concerns to join us in this important effort. Together, we can make a difference and ensure that our county is governed by leaders who prioritize the well-being of all residents.
MOVING FORWARD
The recall of Commissioner John West is about more than just addressing past actions; it’s about setting a new standard for leadership in our county. If we can join together and collect enough petition signatures from Josephine County voters, the recall ballot measure will appear on a special election ballot in December 2024. You will see by the facts behind our petition points that Commissioner John West has cost the citizens millions just in his first 19 months in office. If enough of our fellow voters agree, we are justified in bringing this special election before voters because Josephine County cannot afford two more years of the extremely costly decision-making of Commissioner John West.
Controversial County Commissioner Candidate Faces Multiple Lawsuits Ahead of Election
By: Clayton Moore
With only days left before the election, County Commissioner candidate Chris Barnett finds himself under intense scrutiny due to multiple open, old, and pending lawsuits, casting doubts on his suitability for public office. Court records indicate that Barnett is currently embroiled in several legal battles, some involving personal disputes, while others appear to be financial in nature.
A search of court records reveals cas-
es such as "Chris Lance Barnett vs. Chavala Fay Bates," "Chavala Bates vs. Chris Lance Barnett," and other civil cases involving individuals like Lisa M. Matchett, John C. Jones, and David G. Russell. Additionally, Midland Credit Management, Inc. has filed a case against Barnett, raising questions about potential unresolved financial matters. Notably, there is also a case listed as "Chris Barnett vs. John Oliver Riccio," further adding to the extensive list of legal entanglements.
This wave of legal troubles could hinder Barnett’s ability to focus on the duties of a County Commissioner. Public office demands attention, dedication, and availability, qualities that could be compromised if Barnett is occupied in court for the foreseeable future. For a community that depends on effective leadership, these ongoing legal issues raise concerns about whether he would be able to serve his constituents effectively.
As election day approaches, voters are
Stark Choices in Josephine County
candidate for County Commissioner who many fear may mirror the very behaviors that have led to West’s potential ouster. Barnett, also with significant financial resources, has been viewed by some as an extension of West’s influence, given their close ties and overlapping interests.
Recently, West contributed $4,000 to Barnett’s campaign, which has only fueled suspicions about the nature of their relationship. Community members have raised questions about Barnett’s campaign finances, questioning if some of his funding could be coming from undisclosed sources with vested interests. In particular, Barnett’s legal battles and campaign expenses raise concerns about his intentions, as some fear he could prioritize personal influence over transparency if elected.
Residents point out troubling similarities between West and Barnett, specifically in how they respond to public criticism. Barnett, for example, has faced accusations of blocking and deleting critical comments on his social media pages, actions that opponents claim are attempts to silence dissenting voices. While he claims to support free speech and transparency, many in the community argue that his actions reflect a different agenda.
Barnett’s handling of a lawsuit against a local newspaper, the Grants Pass Tribune, is another example that has raised doubts. He filed a libel suit against the Tribune over a month ago, but no official legal action has been taken, leading many to view the lawsuit as an intimidation tactic rather than a genuine legal dispute. The Tribune’s investigation into Barnett revealed a series of allegations related to his business practices, including coerced signatures on real estate contracts and accusations of workplace intimidation, which further damaged his image among constituents.
One disturbing aspect of Barnett’s background involves his time in the real estate business, where former employees have accused him of unethical practices. Nicole Alexander, a former employee, reported that Barnett pressured her to sign off on real estate deals without a license and failed to file workers’ compensation after she was injured on the job, only submitting it when there was no other choice. These actions, coupled with Barnett’s alleged threats to file non-disclosure agreements under coercion, paint a picture of a candidate whose priorities may lie outside the realm of public service.
The pattern of alleged misconduct extends further, with Barnett facing scrutiny for his claims of military service. While he initially suggested his nickname “Commander” came from his time in the U.S. Air Force, he later stated it was from a radio show. This inconsistency, along with what critics label as “stolen valor,” has led some to question his honesty and transparency.
Further investigations revealed potential conflicts of interest involving a 2010 real estate transaction on Oak Dale Drive in Grants Pass, where Barnett faced allegations of fraudulent practices. Barnett’s associations with West and their shared attorney have only fueled skepticism, leading voters to wonder whether Barnett’s potential leadership would follow in West’s footsteps, prioritizing financial interests over public accountability.
West’s own conflicts of interest remain a focal point of the recall effort. His recent role in reversing the sale of the Pipe Fork property, a move that favored timber extraction over conservation, has sparked outrage. The decision to pull the property from a sale to a conservation group and list it at a public auction has been seen by many as a betrayal of community trust and a favor to private interests over public benefit.
The reversal, alongside his ties to industries regulated by the county, raises questions about whether West can make unbiased decisions in office. Many view his relationship with Barnett as a troubling sign that Barnett’s potential election could bring more of the same, placing private gain above the community’s welfare.
The convergence of allegations against both West and Barnett highlights a deeper community concern: the desire for a transparent and accountable government. In Josephine County, where residents pride themselves on integrity, the thought of another potential commissioner who might leverage power for personal gain has pushed many to rally for change.
As the recall election draws closer, voters are left to weigh their options carefully. With West facing accusations of corruption and Barnett’s campaign steeped in controversy, the community must decide whether they want to see more of the same or a shift toward accountability in their leadership.
In the upcoming recall and regular election, Josephine County voters have a critical decision to make. Do they elect officials who seem to follow a pattern of prioritizing personal interests, or do they choose candidates who embody transparency and integrity? The recall of West could signify a turning point for the community, setting a precedent for how it values accountability and honesty in its leaders.
The community’s choice will be telling. As residents consider the allegations surrounding both West and Barnett, many hope that the coming elections will lead to a new era of open government. For now, though, the questions around financial influence, conflicts of interest, and accountability resonate deeply, urging voters to take a stand for a government that truly serves the public interest.
left to question if a candidate with multiple active lawsuits is truly the best choice for public office. Barnett’s supporters argue that he deserves his day in court, but others worry that his obligations as a commissioner could be overshadowed by his personal legal battles. Ultimately, the decision rests in the hands of the voters, who must weigh whether Barnett's current legal issues will impact his ability to serve the community effectively.
www.grantspassmag.com
POLITICS
County Residents Question Property Tax Hikes Amid New School Bond Proposal
By: Leaf Barret
As property tax bills hit mailboxes across Josephine County this year, many residents are feeling the pinch. Much of the increase in local taxes has been directed toward the Three Rivers School District, leaving some to wonder: why is the district now asking for an additional bond to replace school roofs and improve security?
The Three Rivers School District is proposing a $39 million bond measure on the ballot this election season, aimed primarily at funding roof replacements and security enhancements at several schools. This follows a similar bond proposal in May, which was rejected by 68% of voters. This time, district officials are hoping a longer 20-year repayment term will make the bond more palatable, reducing the tax rate impact to approximately 43 cents per $1,000 of assessed property value.
“We understand that residents are feeling the burden of rising taxes,” said David Valenzuela, superintendent of the Three Rivers School District. “But our schools have critical infrastructure needs that we can’t afford to ignore.”
The district has managed to complete roof repairs at only one facility, Illinois Valley High School, which received an updated roof last summer. Half of the cost for this project came from the district’s contingency fund, while the remaining amount will be paid off over the next decade. However, Valenzuela emphasized that this
piecemeal approach won’t suffice. “Our replacement needs don’t align with a oneroof-per-decade schedule,” he explained.
“With aging facilities, we need a sustainable plan to address these infrastructure issues.”
If voters approve the bond, approximately $5 million of the $39 million will be allocated to improving school security. The district also expects a $6 million grant from the state to bolster these security efforts. Plans include implementing fencing around school properties and upgrading building access systems to electronic key cards, which would help control campus access and enhance student safety.
While district officials emphasize the need for these improvements, some residents are skeptical. Many wonder why, after a noticeable tax increase largely benefiting the school district, there isn’t already adequate funding for essential repairs and security upgrades.
“It’s frustrating,” said one resident who preferred to remain anonymous. “We’re already paying higher taxes, and now they’re saying they need even more to cover these costs. It makes you question where the current funds are really going.”
Three Rivers School District argues that, despite the increase in property taxes, their existing budget cannot cover the extent of the needed repairs, especially with inflation affecting construction costs.
According to the district, without a bond
measure, repairs will continue at a much slower pace, potentially leading to even greater expenses down the road as structures age further.
Local taxpayers, however, are left balancing these needs against their own financial pressures. With rising costs across housing and essential goods, the additional tax burden may be difficult for some to support, even if it comes with promises of long-term improvements.
As Election Day nears, the district is making a concerted effort to inform the public about the proposed bond and the need for these repairs. Whether this new approach will sway voters remains uncertain, but with public skepticism still high, Three Rivers School District has its work cut out for it in making the case for this investment in the county’s schools.
GRANTS PASS WEATHER
5 DAY OUTLOOK
SOURCE: WEATHER.COM
Partly cloudy 56/38
Mostly sunny 64/35
GPT is Dedicated to Unbiased Journalism
question, and it has a straightforward answer: reporting on politics is often necessary because the stakes are high. The Tribune isn’t eager to dive into partisan mudslinging but, in cases where political decisions impact our community, we have a duty to shed light. The Tribune covers political events, issues, and candidates when it serves the community’s interests – not because we’re driven by a political agenda, but because we’re driven by a sense of responsibility.
Josephine County is not immune to corruption, divisive policies, or the power struggles that affect many local governments. At times, our coverage may highlight political corruption or poor decision-making because these issues directly affect the residents we serve. Remaining silent or “looking the other way” would betray our values. Reporting the facts, even when uncomfortable, isn’t about leaning left or right – it’s about holding power accountable.
It’s unfortunate that in today’s polarized climate, any organization that reports facts without bias risks being misunderstood or labeled by those who assume every voice in media must pick a side. Our job, however, is to confront these simplistic views and remain unwavering in our commitment to real journalism.
Some critics have taken to social media or email, claiming the Tribune has a liberal bias. In almost every instance, these detractors fail to mention any specific examples of biased reporting. Instead, many base their accusations on assumptions, rumors, or hearsay. This approach does nothing but add fuel to a fire that needs no stoking.
To those critics, we extend an invitation: rather than making baseless claims, we encourage you to engage with us directly. If
you believe a piece of our reporting is slanted or unjust, reach out to us. We’re open to conversation and welcome critiques grounded in reason and evidence. Let's foster dialogue rather than fuel misinformation.
In our community, much like the rest of the nation, political division is prevalent. People often see things through the lens of party affiliation, which can lead to stereotyping, misunderstandings, and ultimately, broken communication. But meaningful discourse doesn't happen behind a screen, nor does it come from calling names or spreading assumptions. We urge our readers, regardless of political orientation, to come together for the betterment of our community. Before jumping to conclusions or typing up accusatory comments, consider a conversation.
If you have questions about a candidate, an issue, or any coverage in our newspaper, don’t assume you know the whole story – reach out. Pick up the phone and ask. A simple inquiry can go a long way in fostering understanding and respect, two elements that are essential for a healthy community. Knee-jerk reactions or “keyboard wars” on social media only serve to polarize us further. And when we fail to listen, we lose our ability to address real issues, perpetuating ignorance instead of fostering knowledge.
The Grants Pass Tribune remains steadfast in its values. We are committed to providing honest, balanced, and thorough reporting. We are neither “liberal” nor “conservative” – we are simply dedicated to the truth and to the people of Grants Pass and Josephine County.
Our ethics and morals compel us to take a stand when our community faces challenges, especially those that come from within. Corruption, mismanagement, and poor leadership
cannot be ignored, and neither can we pretend these issues are exclusive to one side of the political spectrum. The Tribune pledges to approach each story with integrity, holding up our end of the bargain as a community news source, even if it means tackling tough topics that some might find inconvenient or uncomfortable.
For those who have labeled us a “liberal” newspaper, consider this: true ignorance is to assume without knowing, to judge without evidence. Grants Pass and Josephine County deserve better. We’re here to serve as a voice for every member of our community – Republicans, Democrats, independents, and those who feel they don’t fit any political mold.
We ask you to set aside your assumptions and give our articles a fair read. Instead of labeling and dismissing, explore the contents, question us, and engage thoughtfully. It’s our duty to report on the facts, but it’s everyone’s responsibility to approach those facts with an open mind.
To build a stronger, more informed community, we must break away from stereotypes and accusations and find common ground. There’s work to be done to bridge divides, but together we can make progress – one honest conversation, one informed citizen, and one fair newspaper article at a time.
The Grants Pass Tribune remains available to its readers. If you have questions, concerns, or suggestions, don’t hesitate to contact us. Our office doors, phone lines, and email inboxes are open. Our readers are our lifeblood, and we want to hear your perspectives, even if they differ from ours. Let’s commit to being better informed, more respectful, and more connected as a community.
TAKE A BREAK
