25,
Kamala Harris: Evaluating the Role of Diversity and Qualifications in American Politics
By: Ellen Ward
As the 2024 election approaches, discussions about Vice President Kamala Harris's qualifications and her role in the current administration continue to dominate the political landscape. One of the most debated topics is whether Harris's selection as Joe Biden's running mate was driven by her qualifications or by the principles of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI). While the DEI movement aims to create opportunities for underrepresented groups, some argue that this focus may have overshadowed the need for candidates with proven track records and policy successes.
When Kamala Harris was chosen as the Democratic vice-presidential candidate in 2020, it was a historic moment. She became the first woman of color and the first Asian-American to hold the office, symbolizing a significant shift in American politics. For many, her selection was seen as a triumph of diversity, reflecting the nation's growing commitment to inclusivity. However, others viewed her nomination through a more critical lens, questioning whether DEI should be a deciding factor in selecting leaders at the highest levels of government.
Critics argue that Harris's tenure as Vice President has been marked by a lack of significant policy achievements. They point to various issues, from the ongoing border crisis to inflation, where they believe Harris has failed to make a
substantial impact. Moreover, they contend that her selection was more about fulfilling a diversity quota than ensuring the country had a capable and experienced leader ready to step into the presidency if necessary.
Supporters of Harris, on the other hand, argue that her position as Vice President is inherently challenging, as the
role often involves supporting the president rather than leading policy initiatives. They also highlight her advocacy on issues like voting rights and her representation of marginalized communities as essential contributions to the administration.
However, as the debate continues, one thing remains clear: DEI should not be the sole criterion for selecting leaders. While diversity is undeniably important, voters must also consider a candidate's qualifications, experience, and ability to address the country's most pressing issues. As the country prepares to cast its votes in 2024, it is crucial for the electorate to evaluate not only Kamala Harris's contributions but also the broader track record of the Biden administration.
Ultimately, the question voters must ask themselves is whether Kamala Harris and the current administration have delivered the results they promised. Have their policies improved the lives of everyday Americans, or have they fallen short of expectations? In an era where political decisions have far-reaching consequences, it is essential for voters to gather all the facts, weigh the evidence, and make informed choices based on merit rather than identity alone.
In the end, the American people will decide if DEI has succeeded or failed in shaping the nation's leadership. As voters, it is our responsibility to ensure that our choices reflect not only our values but also our desire for competent and effective governance.
County Commissioners Combine Departments, Raise Concerns Over Public Health and Governance
By: John Oliver
In a decision that has both baffled and angered residents of Josephine County, Commissioners John West and Herman Baertschiger have once again moved forward with their controversial strategy of consolidating county departments. This time, Public Health Emergency Preparedness has been merged with IT – Emergency Management, while Human Resources has been absorbed into the Finance Department. These seemingly illogical moves have sparked serious concerns about the future of essential county services and whether the commissioners are truly listening to the will of the people.
The timing of the Public Health consolidation is particularly troubling. Public Health Director Michael Webber is currently on protective leave, unable to defend himself or advocate for his department. Instead of waiting for his return, the commissioners decided to proceed with the changes, effectively silencing a key voice in the decision-making process. This has led many to question the transparency and fairness of the consolidation, as well as the commissioners' commitment to the well-being of the community.
The logic behind placing Public Health under IT and Emergency Management is baffling to many observers. Public Health is a critical service that requires specialized knowledge and expertise, yet it is
now being managed under departments that have little to no connection to healthcare. Similarly, the decision to place Human Resources under Finance raises questions about how employee relations and personnel matters will be handled in the future. The lack of clear rationale for these moves has left many residents feeling uneasy about the direction in which the county is headed.
Beyond the structural changes, there are deeper concerns about the people now overseeing these departments. Michael Sellers, who was already drawing three salaries from the state and county budget, now holds even more power under this new arrangement. Meanwhile, Sandy Novak appears to have secured favor from John West, a move that some
believe is connected to her role in the controversial removal of former Commissioner Dan DeYoung. These developments have only fueled suspicions of cronyism and favoritism within the county government.
The addition of Andreas Blech to the mix has only intensified concerns about corruption and mismanagement. With West and Baertschiger at the helm, many residents fear that the county is heading down a dangerous path. The consolidation of departments and the concentration of power in the hands of a few individuals have created an atmosphere of distrust and frustration among the public.
Perhaps most concerning is the potential impact on the county's emer-
COVID-19 Cases on the Rise CDC Recommends New Booster
By: Trevor Johnson
As COVID-19 cases rise again, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has recommended a new booster shot to combat emerging variants. This move comes at a time when public trust in health authorities and government institutions is waning, and skepticism about the effectiveness of vaccines is widespread.
According to the CDC, there has been an uptick in COVID-19 cases across the country, with new variants contributing to the increase. Hospitals in some regions have reported a rise in admissions, though current data suggests that the severity of the cases remains lower than during previous waves. The CDC emphasizes that this resurgence serves as a reminder that the virus continues to evolve, and preventive measures remain important.
In response to the rise in cases, the CDC, along with other health agencies, has fast-
• see NEW, page 3
Lawrence Jackson, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons
NEWS DESK
Ignorance Is Not Bliss: The Importance of Informed Dialogue in an Age of Misinformation
By: Susan Hauck
In today's fast-paced world, information flows at an unprecedented rate. News cycles are shorter, social media platforms amplify voices, and opinions often blur the lines between fact and fiction. Amid this whirlwind, it’s easy to see how the age-old adage “ignorance is bliss” might tempt some to stay uninformed or accept the first version of events that reaches them. However, this approach can be perilous. When people spread information without a firm grasp of the facts, they risk not only their credibility but also the very fabric of informed public discourse.
One of the most significant dangers of being uninformed or misinformed is the tendency to propagate rumors as truths. In an era where social media platforms allow anyone to share their thoughts with a global audience, the potential for spreading misinformation has never been higher. It’s not uncommon to see posts go viral, filled with inaccuracies that, once set in motion, are nearly impossible to fully retract. This leads to confusion, mistrust, and a culture where rumors often hold more weight than facts. The real issue arises when individuals, believing they are informed, start to share or defend these inaccuracies. Without realizing it, they contribute to the problem, be-
coming part of the misinformation machine. These individuals often come across as ill-informed, damaging their credibility and, in some cases, tarnishing their reputation. It’s easy to look foolish when regurgitating falsehoods that could have been avoided with a little research and fact-checking.
One of the core principles of responsible communication is the understanding that every story has multiple sides. Getting the full picture requires effort, patience, and a willingness to seek out differing perspectives.
Whether it's a political debate, a news story, or a workplace issue, understanding both sides of the story is essential before forming and sharing opinions. This doesn't mean abandoning your beliefs or being indecisive; it simply means being informed. In a world where partial truths and outright lies can spread like wildfire, striving for a balanced and well-researched viewpoint is more important than ever.
Moreover, it’s crucial to acknowledge that misinformation isn’t always spread with malicious intent. Often, people share incorrect information because they believe it to be true. This highlights the importance of critical thinking and fact-checking. Before hitting that "share" button or repeating what you've heard, take a moment to verify the information. Does it come from a
credible source? Have you considered other perspectives? Are you sure the information is up-to-date and accurate?
In addition, we must all recognize our responsibility as part of the broader information ecosystem. By ensuring that what we share is truthful and well-researched, we can help combat the spread of misinformation. Rather than being part of the problem, we can be part of the solution—promoting a more informed, educated, and thoughtful public discourse.
New Booster Recommended By CDC Amidst Growing Public Skepticism
From page 1
tracked the release of a new COVID-19 booster shot designed to target the latest variants. The timing of this release, however, has raised eyebrows. Critics point out that the announcement of the booster coincides with the increase in cases, leading some to question whether the move is driven more by profit motives or government agendas than by genuine public health concerns.
The new booster is being promoted as a necessary step to bolster immunity, especially for vulnerable populations such as the elderly and immunocompromised. Yet, many are left wondering whether this is a repeat of the past, with vaccines being pushed despite concerns about their efficacy and potential side effects.
Over the past four years, public health messaging around COVID-19 has evolved, sometimes in contradictory ways. Initially, vaccines were promoted as the key to ending the pandemic, with the promise of preventing infection and transmission. However, as breakthrough cases emerged and studies showed that vaccinated individuals could still spread the virus, the narrative shifted to emphasize that vaccines primarily reduce the severity of the disease rather than prevent infection altogether.
This shift in messaging has fueled skepticism, particularly among those who feel that they were misled or that the science behind the vaccines was not as solid as initially presented. The rollout of multiple boosters over time has further complicated the narrative, with each new shot being met with diminishing enthusiasm from the public.
The media's role in shaping public perception of the pandemic has also been a source of contention. Some argue that mainstream media outlets have uncritically echoed government and pharmaceutical industry messaging, leading to a lack of nuanced discussion about the risks and benefits of vaccines. Others feel that the media has at times stoked fear, contributing to a climate of anxiety
and compliance rather than informed decision-making.
This skepticism is not limited to fringe groups or conspiracy theorists. A significant portion of the population, including some healthcare professionals, has expressed doubts about the constant push for more boosters and the seeming inability of authorities to offer a clear, consistent plan for managing the pandemic.
As the nation faces yet another chapter in the ongoing COVID-19 saga, it is clear that trust in public institutions is at a low point. Many Americans are calling for greater transparency from health authorities and the government, demanding evidence-based explanations for why new measures, such as the latest booster, are necessary. At the same time, it is crucial for the public to critically evaluate information from all sources, including the government, media, and social platforms. Blindly following or rejecting guidance without thoughtful consideration can lead to harmful consequences on either side of the debate.
Ultimately, navigating the pandemic and its challenges requires a balanced approach — one that values science, transparency, and open dialogue. As new developments unfold, the public will need to stay informed and make decisions based on both the latest data and their own individual circumstances.
The rise in COVID-19 cases and the introduction of yet another booster shot has reignited debates about the pandemic response. While health authorities stress the importance of vaccination in managing the virus, growing public skepticism highlights the need for clearer communication and trust-building. As the nation moves forward, it will be essential to strike a balance between caution and critical thinking, ensuring that public health decisions are made with the best available information and genuine concern for the well-being of all.
Ignorance may indeed feel like bliss in the short term, but in the long run, it can lead to embarrassment, misinformation, and a breakdown of trust within our communities. Knowledge is power, and in today's world, it's more accessible than ever. Before sharing or acting on information, let's ensure we've done our homework, sought out multiple perspectives, and can confidently stand by what we say. By doing so, we not only protect our credibility but also contribute to a more informed and truthful society.
Chris Barnett: The County Commissioner Hopeful Who Embraces Censorship and Silences Dissenting Voices
By: John Oliver
Chris Barnett, a candidate running for County Commissioner, has proven time and again that he is willing to silence those who challenge his views. His approach to handling public discourse on his social media platforms is nothing short of censorship, and it raises serious concerns about his suitability for public office. When faced with comments or questions that don’t align with his narrative, Barnett’s immediate response is to delete them or block the individuals who posted them. Is this really the kind of person the community wants to trust with the responsibility of representing their interests?
Censorship is a hallmark of authoritarianism, often associated with Marxist regimes that stifle dissent and control the flow of information. In a democratic society, the ability to question and engage in open dialogue with those in power is essential. Barnett’s consistent pattern of silencing critics is a direct threat to these principles. If he can’t handle the heat of a few tough questions on social media, how will he handle the pressure of public office?
Barnett’s actions demonstrate a deep disregard for transparency and accountability, two qualities that are vital for any elected official. Rather than addressing concerns or engaging in meaningful discussions, he prefers to create an echo chamber, where only those who agree with him are allowed to speak. This behavior not only alienates potential supporters but also undermines the very foundation of public service. Public office is not about catering to personal egos; it’s about serving the community and being open to different perspectives, even those that challenge one’s own beliefs.
Controversial consolidation of county departments
From page 1
gency readiness and public health services. By placing these critical functions under the control of individuals with little relevant experience, the commissioners have put the community at risk. The effectiveness of emergency management could be compromised, leaving the county vulnerable in times of crisis. Similarly, the future of the Public Health Department hangs in the balance, with many fearing that its ability to serve the community could be severely diminished.
As the commissioners continue to make decisions that seem to prioritize personal connections over the needs of the county, residents are left wondering how much more the community can endure. The consolidation of departments, the questionable appointments, and the lack of transparency have all contributed to a growing sense of unease in Josephine County. It remains to be seen how these changes will play out in the long term, but for now, the future of the county seems uncertain at best.
Moreover, Barnett’s tendency to delete comments and censor conversations reveals a lack of confidence in his own positions. If he truly believed in his policies and ideas, he would welcome the opportunity to defend them against criticism. Instead, he hides behind the delete button, hoping that by erasing dissenting voices, he can avoid scrutiny. This is not the mark of a strong leader; it’s the sign of someone who is unfit for the responsibilities of public office.
The community deserves better than a candidate who resorts to censorship whenever he feels threatened. Public officials must be willing to listen to all constituents, not just those who sing their praises. Barnett’s behavior on social media is a clear indication that he is not ready to take on the role of County Commissioner. The people of this county need a representative who values free speech and encourages open dialogue, not someone who shuts down any conversation that doesn’t go his way.
In a time when transparency and accountability in government are more important than ever, Chris Barnett’s track record of censorship should be a red flag for voters. Public office is about serving the people, all of the people, not just those who agree with you. If Barnett cannot handle criticism and differing opinions, then he has no business running for public office. The community needs leaders who are willing to listen, engage, and represent all voices—not just the ones that flatter their egos.
Chris Barnett may present himself as a champion of the people, but his actions speak louder than words. Censorship has no place in public office, and those who embrace it, like Barnett, are not fit to serve.
Barnett’s actions demonstrate a deep disregard for transparency and accountability, two qualities that are vital for any elected official.
COMMUNITY GRANTS PASS WEATHER
5 DAY OUTLOOK
SOURCE: WEATHER.COM
SUNDAY
The Importance of Volunteering in Your Local Community
By: Sam Letizia
In today’s fast-paced world, where time seems to slip away with every passing minute, the idea of volunteering often falls to the wayside. Yet, volunteering is not just a selfless act; it's a cornerstone of building stronger, more connected communities. Whether it's helping at your local VA center, working at a food bank, or even something as simple as picking up garbage, every effort counts. The benefits of volunteering go beyond the immediate impact; it enriches the lives of those who participate and creates a ripple effect that can improve entire communities.
Volunteering offers numerous benefits both for the individual and the community. It fosters a sense of purpose and belonging, which is especially important in today's digital age where isolation can often creep in. Studies have shown that people who volunteer regularly experience increased happiness and reduced stress levels. Beyond the personal benefits, volunteers fill essential gaps in community services that may be underfunded or understaffed. In many cases, nonprofits and public service organizations depend on the generosity of volunteers to maintain their operations and outreach programs.
For example, local VA centers provide essential services to veterans, from healthcare to job placement. However, these centers often struggle to meet the demand for their services due to limited resources. Volunteering at a VA center can make a significant difference in the lives of veterans, many of whom face unique challenges when transitioning back to civilian life. Whether you’re providing administrative support, leading a recreational activity, or simply lending a listening ear, your time and efforts can have a lasting impact. The opportunities to volunteer in your local community are vast, and there’s something for everyone, no matter your interests or availability. Here are some ways you can make a difference:
VA Centers: Many veterans face loneliness, health challenges, and economic hardships. Volunteering at a VA center can involve anything from assisting with administrative tasks to providing companionship for veterans. These centers often need help organizing events, running support groups, or even helping with transportation services.
Food Banks: Hunger remains a pressing issue in many communities, and food banks are on the front lines of addressing this challenge. Volunteers can help sort donations, pack food boxes, or distribute food to those in need. Your efforts can ensure that fami-
MONDAY
Mostlt sunny 90/54
TUESDAY
lies who are struggling have access to nutritious meals.
Community Clean-Up: Sometimes, the most straightforward acts of kindness have the most visible results. Participating in a local clean-up effort or simply picking up garbage in your neighborhood can dramatically improve the appearance and safety of your community. Cleaner streets and parks not only boost community pride but also deter crime and improve the overall quality of life for residents.
Mentorship Programs: Many children and young adults lack positive role models in their lives. Volunteering as a mentor through local schools, community centers, or nonprofit organizations can provide guidance, support, and encouragement to youth who may be struggling. A few hours of your time each week can help shape the future of a young person and give them the tools they need to succeed.
Animal Shelters: If you’re an animal lover, consider volunteering at your local animal shelter. Shelters are often overwhelmed with animals in need of care and attention. Volunteers can assist with feeding, grooming, and even fostering animals until they find their forever homes. Your kindness can make a huge difference in the lives of these animals.
Volunteering doesn't require a significant time commitment. Even dedicating just a few hours a month can make a tangible difference. The key is finding a cause that resonates with you and aligns with your skills and interests. The beauty of volunteering is that it allows you to give back in a way that feels fulfilling and impactful.
For those who feel they don’t have time to volunteer regularly, consider participating in one-time events such as charity walks, fundraisers, or seasonal drives. These events provide opportunities to contribute without the need for a long-term commitment. Every action, no matter how small, contributes to the greater good of your community.
Volunteering is about more than just helping others; it’s about fostering a sense of connection and purpose. By dedicating your time and talents to your community, you’re not only making the world a better place—you’re also enriching your own life. Whether you choose to help at a local VA center, work at a food bank, or simply pick up garbage in your neighborhood, your contributions matter. Together, through volunteerism, we can build stronger, more vibrant communities that benefit everyone.
Sunny 82/49 Mostly sunny 86/54
WEDNESDAY
THURSDAY
HEALTH & WELLNESS Understanding Soluble and Insoluble Fiber Supplements, and What They are Good For
By: Walt Agnew
Fiber plays a crucial role in our overall health, and it’s wellknown for its benefits in promoting digestive regularity. However, not all fiber is the same. The two main types of dietary fiber—soluble and insoluble—serve different purposes in our bodies. For those looking to supplement their diets, understanding the differences between soluble and insoluble fiber supplements can help in choosing the right one to meet specific health needs.
Soluble fiber dissolves in water to form a gel-like substance in the digestive tract. This characteristic allows it to bind with fatty acids and help lower cholesterol levels, which is beneficial for heart health. Additionally, soluble fiber slows digestion and the absorption of sugar, leading to better blood sugar control—making it particularly beneficial for people with diabetes.
Common sources of soluble fiber include oats, barley, nuts, seeds, beans, lentils, peas, and some fruits and vegetables, like apples, carrots, and citrus fruits. When it comes to supplements, popular soluble fiber options include psyllium husk, inulin, and methylcellulose.
Cholesterol Management: Soluble fiber can reduce low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, the “bad” cholesterol. By binding with cholesterol in the digestive system and preventing its absorption, soluble fiber lowers blood cholesterol levels, supporting heart health.
Blood Sugar Control: Since soluble fiber slows down the absorption of sugar, it can help stabilize blood sugar levels. This can be particularly beneficial for people with type 2 diabetes or those at risk of developing the condition.
Improved Gut Health: Soluble fiber ferments in the gut, acting as a prebiotic. This fermentation process feeds the beneficial bacteria in the intestines, promoting a healthy
gut microbiome, which is linked to improved digestion and immunity.
Weight Management: Because it expands in the stomach, soluble fiber can create a feeling of fullness, which may help with appetite control and weight management.
In contrast, insoluble fiber does not dissolve in water. Instead, it adds bulk to the stool and helps food pass more quickly through the stomach and intestines. This type of fiber is known for its ability to prevent constipation and promote regular bowel movements.
Insoluble fiber can be found in whole grains, wheat bran, vegetables, and legumes. When looking for supplements, common options include wheat dextrin and cellulose.
Digestive Health: Insoluble fiber’s ability to add bulk to stool and speed up the movement of food through the digestive tract makes it essential for preventing constipation and maintaining regular bowel movements.
Prevention of Diverticulitis: Regular intake of insoluble fiber may reduce the risk of developing diverticular disease, a condition where small pouches form in the walls of the colon.
Healthy Weight: Like soluble fiber, insoluble fiber can help with weight management. Because it adds bulk to meals without adding calories, it can contribute to feelings of fullness and reduce overall calorie intake.
Lower Risk of Hemorrhoids: By promoting regularity, insoluble fiber can help reduce the strain during bowel movements, which may prevent the development of hemorrhoids.
When choosing between soluble and insoluble fiber supplements, it's important to consider your health goals. If you’re looking to manage cholesterol levels, control blood sugar, or improve gut health, a soluble fiber supplement
may be the better choice. On the other hand, if your primary concern is preventing constipation or promoting regular bowel movements, an insoluble fiber supplement could be more beneficial.
Many fiber supplements, such as psyllium husk, actually contain both soluble and insoluble fiber, providing a balanced approach to improving overall fiber intake. However, it’s important to consult with a healthcare provider before adding any supplement to your routine, especially if you have any underlying health conditions or are taking medications, as fiber can affect the absorption of certain medications.
While fiber supplements offer numerous health benefits, they can also cause side effects if not used properly. Introducing fiber too quickly can lead to bloating, gas, and cramping. To minimize discomfort, it’s best to start with a small dose and gradually increase it while ensuring you’re drinking plenty of water, as fiber absorbs water in the digestive system.
It’s also important to note that fiber supplements should complement, not replace, a balanced diet rich in whole foods. Whole grains, fruits, vegetables, and legumes naturally provide both types of fiber along with essential vitamins, minerals, and antioxidants that supplements alone cannot offer.
Understanding the differences between soluble and insoluble fiber supplements can help tailor your fiber intake to your specific health needs. Whether you’re aiming to improve digestive health, manage cholesterol, control blood sugar, or maintain a healthy weight, the right fiber supplement can be a valuable tool. However, a balanced diet rich in whole foods should always be the foundation of good health, with supplements serving as an additional support when needed.
Understanding the Recall of Commissioner John West
WE ARE A GROUP of concerned residents committed to the recall of Commissioner John West, driven by our deep concern for the well-being of our community. Our mission is to address and correct the leadership and decision-making issues that have negatively impacted the health and safety of our county, led to financial mismanagement, and resulted in violations of state laws.
WHY WE’RE TAKING ACTION
Our efforts are based on several key concerns:
Pipe Fork Property Sale: We believe that West engaged in bad faith negotiations over the sale of the Pipe Fork property, which not only cost the county valuable revenue but also put a vital water source for the Williams community at risk.
Disregard for Voter Will: West has consistently ignored the will of the voters by cutting essential funding for community programs such as the Oregon State U niversity Extension Service, law enforcement, and public health initiatives. These cuts have strained the very services that our residents depend on.
Legal Violations: There are serious allegations against West, including violations of state laws, campaign finance regulations, and public meeting laws. He is also facing pending ethics and labor law violations, raising significant concerns about his adherence to legal and ethical standards.
Library District Withdrawal: West unilaterally approved the county’s withdrawal from a Library District, a decision that has led to costly litigation and strained county resources.
Threats to Community Safety: West’s decisions have jeopardized community safety by reducing or eliminating critical emergency preparedness programs, including scaling back the Firewise program, cutting the Emergency Management program, and removing fire safety standards for property development.
Questionable Hiring Practices: We are concerned that West has prioritized political loyalty over merit by appointing unqualified political allies to key county positions, compromising the effectiveness of our local government.
OUR VISION
We envision a county where leadership is accountable, transparent, and truly representative of the community’s best interests. Our recall effort is a step towards restoring integrity in local governance and ensuring that our county’s future is guided by ethical and responsible decision-making.
HOW YOU CAN GET INVOLVED
As we continue to gather support for this recall, we encourage all community members who share our concerns to join us in this important effort. Together, we can make a difference and ensure that our county is governed by leaders who prioritize the well-being of all residents.
MOVING FORWARD
The recall of Commissioner John West is about more than just addressing past actions; it’s about setting a new standard for leadership in our county. As this movement gains momentum, we remain dedicated to keeping the community informed and involved. Your voice matters, and together, we can shape a better future for our county. Visit www. recalljohnwest.com for more information.