SUNDAY, AUGUST 18, 2024
Commissioner Candidates Barnett and Smith Duck Political Forum, Decline Unscripted Questions
By: John Oliver
In a move that has left many in Josephine County scratching their heads, County Commissioner candidates Chris Barnett and Ron Smith have both declined to participate in an upcoming political debate forum unless they are provided with pre-scripted questions and sufficient time to prepare their answers. This decision undermines the very purpose of such forums, which is to allow the public to see how candidates think on their feet and gauge their genuine understanding of the issues without relying on Google or Alexa.
The forum, organized by a nonpartisan group dedicated to promoting responsible government, was intended to be a platform for open and honest dialogue. The group initially came together with the goal of replacing the county charter, but after that measure failed, they refocused their efforts on this year’s elections. A debate between the commissioner candidates for each position was suggested as a way to give voters a clear view of who they are voting for.
To make the forum even more engaging, the group reached out to Diane Mackin at Grants Pass High School, offering front-row seats to her government class and the opportunity for students to ask the candidates a few questions. Mackin was enthusiastic about the idea, seeing it as a unique educational experience for her students.
The forum is scheduled for September 19th, with the
Grants Pass council chambers reserved for the event. Arrangements were made to have Rogue Valley Television (RVTV) livestream the debates to the group’s YouTube channel, ensuring that even those who couldn’t attend in person would have access. Lily Morgan, whose in-depth questioning had been praised at a previous North Valley candidates forum, was invited to moderate the debate.
Initially, all four commissioner candidates, including Barnett and Smith, agreed to participate. However, the situation quickly changed. Chris Barnett withdrew his commitment, insisting on receiving pre-scripted questions. Shortly thereafter, following the filing of a recall against John West by Lily Morgan, Smith also backed out of the forum, arguing that if Barnett demanded to
see the questions in advance, he should be entitled to the same.
In an effort to ensure a successful event, the organizers contacted Lois MacMillan, an Emmy-winning local high school history teacher, to step in as the moderator, believing she would provide a politically neutral presence. Despite these adjustments and accommodations, neither Barnett nor Smith would budge. Their refusal to engage in an unscripted debate, regardless of what was offered, effectively leaves Josephine County residents in the dark about where these candidates truly stand on important issues.
The decision by Barnett and Smith to sidestep a genuine public debate raises serious concerns. Political forums are designed to challenge candidates, to reveal how well they understand the issues, and to see how they perform under pressure. When candidates shy away from this opportunity, it not only robs the public of their right to a transparent election process but also calls into question the candidates’ readiness to lead.
For a county facing complex challenges, having commissioners who can navigate uncharted waters without a script is crucial. The community deserves leaders who are willing to engage directly with their constituents, answering tough questions on the spot. Unfortunately, with Barnett and Smith refusing to participate, voters are left to wonder just how prepared these candidates are to serve Josephine County.
Uncovering the Curious Ties Between Commissioner West and Simon Hare in Brimstone Gulch
By: John Oliver
Brimstone Natural Resources, co-owned by John West and Robert Stumbo, has frequently been in the media spotlight. However, the story behind how Commissioner John West came to own the Brimstone property raises questions about potential legal and ethical concerns. With Simon Hare, a close associate and then-county commissioner, playing a key role, there are suspicions that special favors were involved. Now, with West in office, those favors appear to be coming full circle. Let's delve into the history of this property to better understand the connections and implications.
On June 2, 2017, residents of Brimstone Gulch, along with experts and concerned citizens, gathered before the Josephine County Commissioners to address a contentious land-use appeal. The appeal centered on excavation and mining activities along a protected stream in a residential neighborhood. Despite the gravity of the situation and the community's meticulous preparation, the meeting ended abruptly within minutes. The commissioners dismissed the appeal, seemingly ignoring established land-use regulations and raising concerns about potential favoritism and conflicts of interest.
This meeting followed an earlier hearing on May 15, where the community had already voiced their concerns. The
had approved an application by Brimstone Natural Resources for a "Riparian Corridor Site Plan Review," subject to 21 conditions. These conditions were crucial to protecting Brimstone Gulch, a Class 1 fish-bearing stream. The plan proposed by Brimstone Natural Resources involved extensive tree removal and excavation along a 1,000-foot stretch of the creek, with the intent to process gold-bearing ore off-site before returning the waste to the mining
The appeal hearing on June 2 was called because Brimstone Natural Resources sought to have nine of the 21 conditions lifted by the county commissioners. These conditions were not arbitrary; they were based on expert input from the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW) and the Oregon Department of Forestry (ODF), both of which confirmed the county's regulatory authority over placer mining in the riparian area.
However, during the initial hearing on May 15, the Josephine County Planning Director clarified that the application was not explicitly for placer mining but rather for a "Riparian Corridor Site Plan Review Application." He cited both Josephine County Ordinance and Oregon Administrative Rules to support the county's authority over the riparian corridor, a stance that had been upheld in past rulings by the Land Use Board of Appeals.
Despite this clear guidance, the commissioners—led by Simon Hare—dismissed the appeal on June 2 without any formal motion, roll call, or vote, effectively silencing the voices of the concerned residents and their experts. In a written statement, the commissioners argued that concerns related to the riparian corridor were the state's responsibility rather than the county's, indicating a reluctance to enforce local land-use laws.
This decision has not only led to accusations that the commissioners are • see BRIMSTONE, page 3
NEWS DESK
Stolen Valor: A Critical Issue for Veterans and the Nation
By: Karl Schie
Stolen valor is not just a crime; it’s a profound betrayal that strikes at the heart of the honor and sacrifice embedded within the military community. Recently, the topic has resurfaced in the media spotlight with allegations against Kamala Harris's vice presidential pick, Tim Walz. But beyond the political implications, understanding why stolen valor is so deeply offensive from a veteran's standpoint is crucial for the public to grasp.
For those who have served, military decorations are not merely adornments. They are symbols of extraordinary courage, commitment, and sacrifice. They represent the physical and emotional toll that soldiers endure in the line of duty— sometimes paying the ultimate price. Medals like the Purple Heart, Bronze Star, or Medal of Honor are earned through acts of heroism that often involve life-and-death situations. For veterans, these honors are sacred and are a testament to the challenges they have overcome and the brotherhood and sisterhood they share with fellow service members.
When someone falsely claims to have served in the military or fabricates details of their service, they are not just lying; they are appropriating the experiences and sacrifices of those who have genuinely served. For veterans, this is a
deeply personal affront. It diminishes the true meaning of military service and erodes the respect that society holds for those who have worn the uniform. The hurt and outrage that veterans feel towards stolen valor come from a place of profound respect for the institution of the military and the sacrifices that come with it.
The impact of stolen valor extends beyond personal offense. It undermines the integrity of the military community and deceives the public. Individuals who falsely claim military honors often do so for personal gain, whether it be financial, social, or political. This not only tarnishes the reputation of genuine veterans but also exploits the trust that society places in military service members.
The recent controversy surrounding Tim Walz, who has been accused of embellishing his military record, has brought the issue of stolen valor back into the national conversation. While the details of Walz’s case are still unfolding, the allegations have sparked outrage among veterans and military families. The story serves as a reminder that the issue of stolen valor is not limited to isolated cases but can emerge in the highest levels of public office.
From a veteran's standpoint, the idea that someone could rise to a position of power while fabricating or exaggerating
Brimstone Gulch, Commissioner John West and Simon Hare Raise Questions
From page 1
prioritizing personal and political agendas over the public interest and their legal obligations, but it has also brought to light a long-standing relationship between Simon Hare and John West, the property owner behind Brimstone Natural Resources. According to sources, Simon Hare had been doing favors for John West’s Brimstone property even before West became a county commissioner. The recent actions of the commissioners suggest that these favors not only continue but are being reciprocated.
Further compounding the issue, the Josephine County Planning Department failed to address several critical aspects of the mining operation, including activities outside the riparian corridor, the specifics of ore processing, the chemicals to be used, the water required, the construction of access roads, and the overall impact on the local community.
The actions of the county commissioners in this case
have sparked significant concern among residents of Brimstone Gulch and beyond. By refusing to hold public hearings and making decisions behind closed doors, the commissioners have raised serious questions about their commitment to applying the law fairly and equally. As elected officials, their role is to represent the interests of all citizens, not just those with special connections or influence. The community's response to this incident reflects a growing demand for transparency, accountability, and adherence to the rule of law in local governance, as well as a need to scrutinize the relationships between public officials and private interests. The Brimstone Gulch controversy serves as a reminder of the importance of vigilance and public participation in ensuring that government actions are conducted in the best interest of all.
This is a developing story and we will continue to bring you more information as we uncover it.
their military service is particularly troubling. It speaks to a broader concern about the exploitation of military service for personal or political gain. For veterans, military service is a calling, not a stepping stone, and the idea of using it for self-aggrandizement is anathema to the values they hold dear.
The issue of stolen valor matters not only to veterans but to the nation as a whole. It is a question of integrity and respect for those who have served. It also raises important questions about the accountability of public figures and the standards to which we hold them. For the public, understanding the gravity of stolen valor is crucial in recognizing the true value of military service and the sacrifices it entails.
As the nation continues to be bombarded with the implications of stolen valor, it is essential to listen to the voices of those who have served. Veterans' perspectives provide valuable insight into why this issue is so deeply felt and why it must be addressed with the seriousness it deserves.
In the end, stolen valor is not just a crime; it is a moral failing that strikes at the core of what it means to serve one’s country. By recognizing and condemning stolen valor, we honor the true heroes—those who have served with honor and distinction and whose sacrifices should never be taken lightly.
OPINION
Why I Will No Longer Tip at Coffee Shops
By: Sam Staur
Tipping used to be a way to show appreciation for good service, a little extra for the barista who made your morning better. But today, tipping has become an expectation in a world where prices for simple drinks have skyrocketed to the point of absurdity. The tipping jar is now a guilt trip, not a gesture of gratitude.
I recently walked into a local coffee shop, craving something refreshing. A smoothie caught my eye—fruit, a splash of yogurt, maybe some honey. How much could that possibly cost? Well, when I was handed the bill, I was floored. Twelve dollars. Twelve dollars for a drink that contained about a dollar's worth of ingredients. No, I’m not
exaggerating; take a moment to consider it. A handful of fruit, some ice, and a splash of liquid, somehow justifying a price tag that would make anyone with a calculator scratch their head.
And then, there’s the coffee. Eight dollars for a cup of coffee, a simple brew that was once a humble comfort in the morning or a companion during a long workday. Now, it’s become a luxury item, priced as though it’s a golden elixir. What’s even more bewildering is the idea that these prices are somehow justified by the cost of labor or the expenses of running a coffee shop. Really? Has the cost of a cup of joe really risen so dramatically that it justifies these extortionate prices?
The final straw, however, comes when the payment screen flips around, with a cheerful barista smiling, perhaps knowingly, as I’m prompted to tip. Tipping on top of these already outrageous prices feels like a slap in the
face. At what point did tipping stop being a token of appreciation and start being an obligatory tax on an already overpriced experience?
The truth is, these prices are not about fair wages or high-quality ingredients—they’re about profit margins and the modern business model of exploiting customer generosity. The reality is, when I’m asked to pay $12 for a smoothie or $8 for a coffee, I’m no longer inclined to tip. It’s not about being stingy; it’s about drawing a line in the sand.
I refuse to participate in a system where the consumer is gouged for every penny, where the cost of a simple pleasure has been inflated beyond reason, and where I’m made to feel guilty for not adding even more to the bill. If coffee shops want to charge gourmet prices, they need to pay their staff fairly without leaning on the customer to make up the difference. Until then, my tipping days are over.
Guilt Trips and the Madness of Overpriced Beverages
COMMUNITY GRANTS PASS WEATHER
Local Resident Allegedly Disrupts Josephine County Growers Market
By: Leaf Barret
On Saturday, attendees of the Josephine County Growers Market experienced an unexpected disruption when a local resident, Michael Pelfrey, who is known by some as "Tan Santa," allegedly engaged in confrontational behavior with market-goers. The incident occurred amidst a gathering of citizens who were advocating for the recall of County Commissioner John West.
Pelfrey, a familiar figure in the community, has developed a reputation for outspoken commentary on local affairs. His actions on Saturday, however, have sparked controversy, with some market attendees accusing him of harassment. Witnesses report that Pelfrey confronted individuals who were supporting the recall effort, leading to tense exchanges.
Supporters of the recall campaign assert that they were merely exercising their rights as citizens to engage in peaceful political activism. “We were there to inform and engage with the community about the recall,” said one participant, who wished to remain anonymous. “We did not expect to be met with hostility.”
Pelfrey, who has often positioned himself as a vocal critic of certain local political movements, is viewed by some as an unofficial and self-appointed spokesperson for segments of the community. His detractors, however, argue that his confrontational style is more about seeking attention and creating drama than fostering meaningful dialogue.
Market organizers and attendees expressed concern about the impact of such incidents on the atmosphere of the event. “The Growers Market is meant to be a space for the community to come together, support local businesses, and enjoy a positive environment,” said a market vendor. “Incidents like this can really dampen the spirit of the event.”
No formal complaints were reported to authorities, but the
incident has sparked discussions about the balance between free speech and maintaining a respectful community environment. Some community members believe that Pelfrey’s behavior should be ignored to avoid escalating tension, while others feel that more should be done to address disruptive actions in public spaces.
As the recall effort continues to gain momentum, it remains to be seen how the community will navigate the diverse and often conflicting viewpoints that accompany such political movements.
Whether Pelfrey’s actions will have any lasting impact on the recall campaign or the community’s perception of political discourse in Josephine County is yet to be determined.
5 DAY OUTLOOK
SOURCE: WEATHER.COM
SUNDAY
MONDAY
Partly cloudy, chance of showers & T-storms 93/69
TUESDAY
Mostly sunny 94/67
WEDNESDAY
Mostly sunny 88/66
THURSDAY
Understanding the Recall of Commissioner John West
WE ARE A GROUP of concerned residents committed to the recall of Commissioner John West, driven by our deep concern for the well-being of our community. Our mission is to address and correct the leadership and decision-making issues that have negatively impacted the health and safety of our county, led to financial mismanagement, and resulted in violations of state laws.
WHY WE’RE TAKING ACTION
Our efforts are based on several key concerns:
Pipe Fork Property Sale: We believe that West engaged in bad faith negotiations over the sale of the Pipe Fork property, which not only cost the county valuable revenue but also put a vital water source for the Williams community at risk.
Disregard for Voter Will: West has consistently ignored the will of the voters by cutting essential funding for community programs such as the Oregon State University Extension Service, law enforcement, and public health initiatives. These cuts have strained the very services that our residents depend on.
Legal Violations: There are serious allegations against West, including violations of state laws, campaign finance regulations, and public meeting laws. He is also facing pending ethics and labor law violations, raising significant concerns about his adherence to legal and ethical standards.
Library District Withdrawal: West unilaterally approved the county’s withdrawal from a Library District, a decision that has led to costly litigation and strained county resources.
Threats to Community Safety: West’s decisions have jeopardized community safety by reducing or eliminating critical emergency preparedness programs, including scaling back the Firewise program, cutting the Emergency Management program, and removing fire safety standards for property development.
Questionable Hiring Practices: We are concerned that West has prioritized political loyalty over merit by appointing unqualified political allies to key county positions, compromising the effectiveness of our local government.
OUR VISION
We envision a county where leadership is accountable, transparent, and truly representative of the community’s best interests. Our recall effort is a step towards restoring integrity in local governance and ensuring that our county’s future is guided by ethical and responsible decision-making.
HOW YOU CAN GET INVOLVED
As we continue to gather support for this recall, we encourage all community members who share our concerns to join us in this important effort. Together, we can make a difference and ensure that our county is governed by leaders who prioritize the well-being of all residents.
MOVING FORWARD
The recall of Commissioner John West is about more than just addressing past actions; it’s about setting a new standard for leadership in our county. As this movement gains momentum, we remain dedicated to keeping the community informed and involved. Your voice matters, and together, we can shape a better future for our county. Visit www. recalljohnwest.com for more information.