SUNDAY, JULY 7, 2024
Breach of Trust
Chris Barnett's $3.2 Million elder abuse judgment raises
alarming questions about his leadership
Source: Concerned Resident of Josephine County In the realm of public service, trust and integrity are paramount. Chris Barnett, a candidate for county commissioner, has been endorsed by current commissioner John West, who is also under scrutiny for numerous ethics violations and complaints. Barnett is now facing significant scrutiny following a legal battle that raises serious questions about his ethical standards and suitability for public office. The case of Adelsperger v. Barnett Resorts LLC RV (2022) highlights substantial concerns about Barnett's ability to manage public funds responsibly.
In 2017, Barnett Resorts, LLC, led by Chris and Stefani Barnett, acquired the Osprey Point RV Resort in Lakeside, Oregon. The previous owner, Elkside Development, LLC, had established longterm membership contracts with numerous individuals, promising extensive use of the resort in exchange for initial fees and annual dues. Upon purchasing the property, Barnett Resorts decided not to honor these existing contracts, leading to a lawsuit by 71 affected members.
The plaintiffs, many of whom are senior citizens, argued that Barnett Resorts' refusal to honor the contracts constituted a breach of contract and elder financial abuse. The jury ruled in favor of the plaintiffs, awarding $500,000 in damages for breach of contract and an additional $2.7 million for elder financial abuse under Oregon law.
The court's decision underscores a significant ethical lapse. Barnett Resorts was fully aware of the membership contracts prior to the purchase. Despite initial indications that they might honor these agreements, Barnett Resorts quickly reversed its stance, leading to financial harm for the members, many of whom are elderly.
This case brings to light critical questions about Chris Barnett's character and his capacity to lead. If Barnett is willing to disregard legally binding agreements and engage in actions that a court deemed financially abusive towards vulnerable seniors, it raises serious concerns about his ability to manage a county budget and prioritize the welfare of the community over personal or business interests.
For a public official, maintaining trust is essential. The legal troubles faced by Chris Barnett suggest a pattern of behavior that is not aligned with the values of transparency, accountability, and ethical governance. Voters and community members must consider whether they can trust Barnett with the responsibilities of public office, given his demonstrated inability to honor commitments and protect the financial interests of those he serves.
As the community evaluates his candidacy, it is crucial to remember the lessons from this lawsuit. Leadership in public service demands a higher standard of ethics and a commitment to the public good. The actions of Chris Barnett in this case suggest a concerning gap between these ideals and his practices, calling into question his suitability for a role that requires unwavering integrity and trustworthiness.
Let this Adelsperger v. Barnett Resorts LLC RV case serve as a poignant reminder that ethical leadership is non-negotiable. The community deserves leaders who are committed to upholding their promises and acting in the best interests of all, especially the most vulnerable.
Josephine County's baffling stance on Pipe Fork Wilderness sale raises questions
BY: LEAF BARRET
Something stinks in Josephine County, and it’s not just the smoky aftermath of Fourth of July fireworks. The ongoing saga surrounding the lucrative $2,320,000 offer for the Pipe Fork Wilderness Area has many residents scratching their heads and questioning the motives of their county commissioners, particularly John West.
The county’s budget is in desperate need of funds, yet the commissioners continue to deploy stall tactics that interfere with the profitable sale of a county tract of forest land. Instead of seizing the opportunity to bolster public health and safety, the commissioners are inexplicably advocating for the defunding of Josephine Public Health. This puzzling decision flies in the face of common sense, especially when preserving the environment and enhancing public services should be top priorities.
Negotiations for the Pipe Fork Wilderness Area have been dragging on since 2020 with two conservation groups – the Williams Community Forest Project and the Conservation Fund. Despite countless obstacles set by the Board of County Commissioners (BCC), these groups have repeatedly met all stipulations. Finally, they reached an agreement on the purchase price, only to face further obstructions from the commissioners.
Pipe Fork’s watershed provides essential drinking water, the land is a cherished outdoor recreation site, and it is home to endangered Port Orford cedar. The property’s adjacency to an existing Bureau of Land Management (BLM) research natural area underscores its environmental significance. The Conservation Fund has assured that the BLM intends to add the property to its research area, with conditions that include maintaining public access.
Everything seemed set until Commissioner John West, who owns the adjacent property, intervened. West claimed the sale price was too low, backed by an unpublished appraisal, and demanded an additional $750,000. The determined Williams group raised another $300,000, yet West and fellow Commissioner Herman Baertschiger continued to erect barriers, demanding proof of permanent public access and logging restrictions. Just last week, Commissioner Baertschiger made a surprising last-minute demand for a $200,000 nonrefundable escrow deposit (the previously agreed deposit was $10,000) and walked out of the meeting after the buyer representatives said they can't do that by policy. Buyer representatives have said
Commissioner Dan DeYoung apologizes for misunderstood comment at BCC meeting
By: Ellen Ward
Last week at a public Board of County Commissioners (BCC) meeting, Commissioner Dan DeYoung made an offhand remark that has since stirred some controversy. During a moment of humor aimed at addressing the lack of seating, DeYoung jokingly suggested, "Sit in my lap." While his intention was light-hearted, the comment was perceived as inappropriate by some attendees and viewers of the video recording.
Immediately after making the comment, DeYoung recognized that it might have been taken the wrong way. Understanding the sensitivities of the current social climate, he promptly apologized for any offense caused. Despite his quick response, a formal complaint was already filed against him.
DeYoung's remark, while intended as a joke, highlights the fine line public figures must walk in today’s society. Humor that once might have been overlooked can now be seen as offensive or out of place. This incident serves as a reminder of the evolving standards of public discourse and the importance of being mindful of one's words.
The community's reaction to the incident has been mixed. Some residents believe that DeYoung's swift apology demonstrates his awareness and willingness to correct his mistakes. Others feel that the comment, regardless of intent, was inappropriate for a public meeting and warranted the formal complaint.
Commissioner DeYoung has emphasized that his remark was meant in jest and had no ill intent. He hopes that his immediate apology and acknowledgment of the misstep will help to address any concerns and foster a more respectful and understanding dialogue moving forward.
POLITICS
Biden's post-debate performance and current decline sparks concern in Democratic party
By: Jerry Walters
In the aftermath of the recent debate, President Joe Biden's performance has sparked a wave of concern within the Democratic Party. Observers noted that Biden appeared befuddled and struggled with coherence at times, raising questions about his cognitive health. This has led to what some are describing as a state of panic among Democratic leaders, who are now scrambling to address the potential political fallout and consider contingency plans.
During the debate, President Biden appeared to struggle with articulating his thoughts clearly, leading to a series of moments that have since gone viral on social media. These instances have fueled speculation about his mental fitness, a topic that has been a point of contention throughout his presidency. Critics argue that his performance was indicative of a deeper issue, and even some of his supporters expressed concern over his apparent difficulties.
In response to the debate performance, the Democratic Party has launched a robust damage control effort. Senior party officials and advisors have been working behind the scenes to reassure the public and mitigate the political damage. This has included a series of public statements emphasizing Biden's accomplishments and his capability to lead the nation.
Despite these efforts, there is a growing unease within the party about Biden's ability to continue as a viable candidate for the 2024 election. According to sources close to the party's leadership, there have been preliminary discus-
sions about potential replacements should Biden decide to step down. However, the president has shown no indication of stepping aside, further complicating the situation for the Democrats.
President Biden has consistently maintained that he is fit to serve and intends to run for re-election. In his public appearances following the debate, he has sought to project confidence and determination. His supporters argue that while he may have moments of verbal missteps, his overall record and policy achievements speak to his effectiveness as a leader.
Adding to the controversy is the comparison being drawn between Biden's situation and that of Robert Hur, who was deemed mentally unfit to stand trial. Critics have pointed to this case as a parallel, suggesting that Biden, too, may be unfit for his role. However, this comparison is seen by many as politically motivated, aiming to undermine the president's credibility.
T he Democratic Party faces a significant dilemma. On one hand, they must continue to support their sitting president and ensure the stability of his administration. On the other hand, they need to prepare for the possibility of fielding a new candidate should Biden's condition deteriorate further. This balancing act is complicated by the president's firm stance on continuing his term.
As the situation unfolds, the Democratic Party's actions in the coming weeks and months will be crucial. They must navigate the fine line between supporting their current leader
and preparing for any eventuality. The party's strategy will likely involve a mix of public support for Biden, while discreetly exploring potential alternatives.
President Biden's recent debate performance has undoubtedly put the Democratic Party in a challenging position. With concerns about his mental fitness coming to the forefront, the party must act swiftly and decisively to manage the situation and ensure they are prepared for whatever the future holds.
Questions raised while commissioners ignore substantial financial opportunity
FROM PAGE 1
they will lose their current funding if a deal is not inked with the County by July 15th.
These demands contradict the very nature of BLM land, which is public by definition. Moreover, the commissioners’ initial plans to log the area would have temporarily destroyed some of its environmental value and public utility, making their current stance even more perplexing. Commissioner West even said last week there was no County plan to log this property, and yet the County's plan to log the property was why this whole negotiation started in the first place almost five years ago. As West is the Commissioner liaison to County Forestry, he should have known better.
For the conservationists, the inconsistencies and contradictions are overwhelming. Commissioner Dan DeYoung, who has been part of the negotiations from the beginning, now fully supports the sale. Even Commissioner DeYoung appears
baffled as to why West and Baertschiger persist in their obstruction.
The delay and defunding tactics raise serious questions about Commissioner West’s motives. His history of allegations of unethical behavior for personal gain adds a layer of suspicion to his current actions. Why does he continue to defund and delay a deal that would bring significant financial relief to the county and make the county's timber portfolio even more financially productive for the benefit of Josephine County Juvenile Justice?
The most baffling aspect of this saga is the commissioners’ refusal to accept more than two million dollars during a time of extreme budget shortfalls. Residents are left wondering why their leaders are ignoring such a substantial financial opportunity while pushing unnecessary cuts to public health funding.
COMMUNITY GRANTS PASS WEATHER
Grants Pass fire rescue and police respond to numerous fireworks-related incidents
City of Grants Pass
The Fourth of July celebrations brought an influx of fireworks-related calls for both Grants Pass Fire Rescue and the Grants Pass Police Department, keeping emergency services busy throughout yesterday and into the early hours of this morning.
Grants Pass Fire Rescue responded to a total of 10 calls for grass or trash fires that had started in various locations. Eight of these fires were likely caused by fireworks, illustrating the significant risk posed by these celebratory explosives. Additionally, two fires were reported this morning in or near trash receptacles, believed to be the result of improper disposal of fireworks.
In response to the fire activity, Grants Pass Fire Rescue dispatched a Type 6 Engine to assist with the Dead Indian Memorial Road Fire in Jackson County last night as part of the Rogue Valley 1 Strike Team. This deployment underscores the regional cooperation among fire departments to manage and contain larger fire incidents effectively.
Meanwhile, the Grants Pass Police Department was also actively addressing fireworks-related issues. Between midnight and 1 a.m. this morning, officers responded to five calls concerning individuals setting off fireworks. This was in addition to the 43 calls received throughout the day yesterday, reflecting the widespread use of fireworks despite local regulations.
In Grants Pass, only certain types of fireworks are legal. The permitted fireworks are those that travel no higher than 12 inches from the ground or extend no more than six horizontal feet. These regulations are in place to minimize fire risks and ensure public safety. Moreover, the legal timeframe for setting off fireworks is strictly limited to the hours between 6 p.m. and 11 p.m. on July 4th.
The authorities have urged residents who still have leftover fireworks to store them safely and refrain from using them until the next permitted period on July 4, 2025. This request aims to prevent further incidents and ensure community safety in the days following Independence Day.
Both Grants Pass Fire Rescue and the Grants Pass Police De-
partment have emphasized the importance of adhering to local fireworks regulations and practicing safe disposal methods. They remind the community that fireworks, while enjoyable, can pose serious dangers if not handled responsibly.
The series of calls and incidents over the holiday highlight the ongoing challenges that fireworks pose for fire and law enforcement agencies. Despite the excitement and tradition associated with fireworks, the need for safety and compliance with local laws cannot be overstated.
Residents are encouraged to remain vigilant and report any illegal fireworks activity to the authorities. By working together, the community can enjoy future celebrations safely and without incident.
For more information on fireworks regulations and safety tips, residents can contact the Grants Pass Fire Rescue or the Grants Pass Police Department. Both agencies are committed to ensuring the well-being and safety of the community, particularly during times of increased risk like the Fourth of July celebrations.
5 DAY OUTLOOK
very hot 110/69
very hot 107/67
SOURCE: WEATHER.COM SUNDAY MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY Sunny, very hot 110/65
YOUR RETIREMENT GUIDE TO YOUTHFUL LIVING Southern Oregon’s
SPECIAL ADVERTISING SECTION
Discover Quality, Affordable Care with Team Senior –100% Free Assistance for You!
ASSISTED LIVING AND CAREGIVING HAVE EVOLVED, but not always for the better. Many companies are profiting significantly while the quality of care often stagnates or declines. This is a growing concern as the demand for long-term care among older adults strains our economy, with working adults sacrificing time and money to care for loved ones.
In 2021, the average hourly rate for a caregiver was $25. Today, it has soared to over $45, with agencies struggling to retain employees. Caregivers, the heart of these services, often receive a small fraction of what clients pay, exacerbating the problem.
This situation also impacts the mental health of middle-aged adults who juggle the needs of their children, aging parents, and careers. It’s a challenging balance, but there is help available.
At Team Senior, we know how to find affordable, reliable care. Often, we can secure services at half the cost you might be paying, with significantly better quality. Let us share our expertise with you.
Statistics show that at least 70% of people aged 65 today will require some form of care. Many will struggle to afford it. This is where Team Senior excels. We bring the most value by offering free consultations in a place where you feel comfortable and secure, often in your own home. We can discuss financial aids and options, including little-known loopholes in the Department of Human Services and VA programs. If you are in the hospital or rehab, we will meet you and your family there. We know how to assist in obtaining quality, affordable care and
can identify who is genuinely providing good care – not just sending out inexperienced caregivers.
While encouraging youth to become caregivers is important, we ensure they are matched appropriately to patients. Our goal is to provide the right caregiver for each individual, not just the available one.
Team Senior knows nearly every care-related company in Southern Oregon, from caregiving agencies to memory care facilities. Our value lies in sharing our extensive knowledge of who is doing it right. Our services are 100% FREE to you.
Even if you are not ready to make a move or hire a caregiver, we can help you explore your options. Don’t make decisions without proper guidance. Call us first. Let us share what’s really happening inside that beautiful assisted living facility that impressed you with a great meal. Sometimes, the reality behind the scenes is very different.
Quality caregivers and staff, supported by competent management and owners, are crucial. We know which companies can deliver on their promises and are happy to share that information with you.
Team Senior played a pivotal role in writing the original legislation in Oregon regulating the long-term care referral industry. We did this to protect you!
Lean on us as your biggest advocate. Our services are completely free! Visit us at www.teamsenior.org or call (541) 295-8230.
