Barry McAuley, PhD Post-Doctoral Researcher 086 014 4853 bmcauley@cita.ie www.bicp.ie
BICP Case Study: Trinity College Dublin Business School (TBS) Background The Trinity College Dublin (TCD) business school project is part of a €295 million capital investment plan, outlined in the college’s 2014-19 Strategic Plan. The site is principally bounded by Pearse Street to the north; the existing railway line to the east; existing structures on Pearse Street, the Simon Perry building to the south west and the Botany building to the south. The proposed development will consist of a business school, innovation and entrepreneurship hub, auditorium, cafe and student accommodation with ancillary administration, staff and student uses. The building will comprise of six floors of lecture/office accommodation over two basement levels (13000 m2 gross floor area) linked to Nos. 183188 Pearse Street. The new building will house a 600seat auditorium, a smaller auditorium, a 140-seat lecture theatre and several smaller lecture halls. The innovation and entrepreneurship hub will provide incubator space and offices for businesses, to encourage links between students, faculty members and the business community. A roof garden will be located on the top floor. The development will also include the regeneration of Pearse Street. Figure 1 provides a CGI of the proposed building.
requirement. Scott Tallon Walker (STW) were appointed as lead Architects; Turner and Townsend as Quantity Surveyors (QS) and JJ Rhatigans as the main contractors. STW created a 3D model and used this to produce 2D drawings as the basis of the tender design. STW also prepared an Employer Information Requirements (EIR) document in consultation with TCD. JJ Rhatigans produced a model utilising a point cloud survey of the existing protected structures on Pearse Street. This enabled an accurate survey of the protected structures current condition. When the model was first produced a number of meetings and training programmes were undertaken to ensure that the whole project team where comfortable using the specified digital technologies. The QS worked closely with the project team to ensure an effective analysis in CostX and approximate calculation of quantity take-offs. As BIM presented a new way of working for members of the project team, the QS found that in instances the workflow was disrupted due to missing information within the model. The BIM Execution Plan (BEP) was structured in accordance with PAS 1192-2:2014. The BEP outlined the role of each design team member in respect to modeling requirements, collaboration and coordination procedures. Data was held in the Common Data Environment (CDE) which was structured in compliance with PAS 1192:2 detailing work in progress, shared, published documentation and an archive folder. The Level of Detail (LOD) was also outlined in the BEP.
Figure 1 – CGI of proposed TBS from Pearse Street
Project Team and Initial Design TCD specified that BIM should form part of the tender for the TBS. This would represent the first project tendered by TCD that had a BIM delivery
The Client’s Facilities Management (FM) enterprise system was aligned with the CDE. TCD designed a training platform to assist in upskilling the FM team.
1|Page