RESTRAINT AND SECLUSION 2023


Navigating a Problematic CMS Standard



▪ Study found 27,000 patients restrained every ▪ About 5 per hospital and prevalence is 50 per 1,000 patient days
▪ 2007 Study in Journal of Nursing Scholarship, Vol 39, Issue 1, Page 30-37, Prevalence and Variation of Physical Restraint Use in Acute Care Settings in the US
▪ Restraints increase the risk for delirium by 4-fold
▪ JAMA March 20, 1996:;275(11):852-857, Precipitating Factors for Delirium in Hospitalized Elderly Patients
▪ Restraints increase the rates of pressure ulcers, respiratory complications and even death via strangulation and aspiration
▪ HHS study in 2006 found that 40% of hospitals fail to report deaths to CMS
▪ Hospital Reporting of Deaths Related to R&S, OIG and HHS, at http://oig.hhs.gov/oei/reports/oei
▪ If low number of registered nurses:
▪ Odds of using restraints were 11% and 18% higher
▪ Use of restraints to prevent a fall were 9 to 16% higher
▪ RNs are better trained to find alternatives to restraint and seclusion
▪ Physical restraints can include belts, mittens, vests (note most hospitals do not use), bedrails, geriatric chairs, and other devices
▪ It is not the number of staff present to reduce falls but rather having adequate number of RNs
▪ Study utilized three topic-based focus groups
▪ 19 participants from nursing, PT and medicine
– Participants noted lack of precise hospital guidelines
– Documentation often lacked the effect of restraint on patient’s behavior
– Restraints were described as a safety measure
– Implementation most often led by nurses
–
Attitudes and experiences were main detriments for restraint use
– Experienced nurses tended to use restraints less
– Prior experience with violence → more use
▪ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8859 077/pdf/NOP2-9-1311.pdf
▪ Changed “licensed independent practitioner” to “licensed practitioner”
▪ Allows Physician Assistant to order R&S in state that held the PA was a dependent practitioner
▪ Physician and other licensed practitioner training requirements must be specified in the hospital policy
▪ What:
▪ Handcuffs
▪ Who:
▪ Non-hospital
▪ Manacles
▪ Shackles
▪ Other chain-type restraint devices
▪ Not hospital staff:
▪ Not considered safe nor appropriate interventions
▪ Ensure P&P mention
▪ Employed
▪ Contracted law enforcement
▪ Purpose
▪ Custody
▪ Detention
▪ Public Safety
▪ Emergency restraint chair
▪ Manufacturer states used for safe transports to hospital or court
▪ Safely restrains a combative or selfdestructive person
▪ Skin integrity
▪ Circulation
▪ Respiration
▪ I&O
▪ Level of supervision appropriate to meet patient’s safety need
▪ Hygiene
▪ Any injuries
▪ Continued need for use
▪ Adequate justification for continued use