July 28, 2011
City again delays planning agreement vote By NATE ELLIS ThisWeek Community Newspapers For the second time in as many meetings, Pickerington City Council held off a decision on a proposed joint planning agreement with Violet Township. Two weeks after Violet Township trustees approved an agreement to share information about proposed development and land-use projects with the city of Pickerington, the city has yet to reciprocate.
City council on July 19 voted unanimously to table the JPA, which was proposed by Violet Township director of operations Bill Yaple and Pickerington city manager Bill Vance and billed as a way for the two governments to display a spirit of cooperation to potential developers and ensure incoming projects are mutually beneficial. As proposed, the JPA wouldn’t be legally binding, but it would commit the township and city to share information about development proposals within five
days of receiving formal project submissions. It also would establish a panel of at least two representatives from both governments; the panel would have no authority to change, approve or stop a proposed project, but could offer recommendations or issues of concerns for the respective governments and developers to consider. Council’s July 19 decision to table a resolution to approve the JPA followed similar action on June 7. Last month, council voted 4-3 to table
the matter. While Councilman Brian Wisniewski opposed the plan as being “unnecessary,” council members Jeff Fix, Cristie Hammond and Tricia Sanders said they wanted to hold off a decision while the city considered merging its economic development department with the township’s. Pickerington has since foregone the economic development merger for the time being, and on July 19, council tabled the JPA discussion so it could continue to explore the issue and consider a pro-
posal from Violet Township resident Rocco Sabatino to allow developers to “opt-out” of the JPA. Sabatino owns commercial properties in the township and city. He objected to the JPA on the grounds that sending proposed development plans to the joint panel would add another layer of bureaucracy that could scuttle projects. “The opt-out means you don’t forSee AGREEMENT, page A2
School levy to be decided Aug. 2
STORM TROUPERS
By NATE ELLIS ThisWeek Community Newspapers
the Patriots’ signs. Conversely, Russ said his group didn’t steal any Vote FOR Pick Kids’ signs. Vote FOR Pick Kids representatives estimated someone took more than 100 pro-levy signs from the public rights of way. “Vote FOR Pick Kids does not condone the removal of the opponent’s signs,” said Amanda Tonjes, Vote FOR Pick Kids campaign chair. “Many more of our signs have disappeared and we’ve said nothing and just attributed it to the fact that this is what people do.”
On Aug. 2, area voters will have their chance to weigh in on a 5.5-mill continuing levy for the Pickerington Local School District. Polls will be open from 6:30 a.m. to 7:30 p.m. The levy is the only item on Fairfield County’s special-election ballot. If passed, the levy would generate approximately $5.95 million per year, beginning in January 2012, according to the district. Annually, that would cost property owners $168.44 for every $100,000 in home valuation. The district unsuccessfully sought an 8mill replacement levy in November 2010 that would have generated $7.586-million. It failed by 130 votes. Since then, the district has cut approximately $13 million from its 2011-12 operating budget by laying off 125 employees, 82 of whom were teachers. The school board also approved reductions in district transportation, altered school hours for the 201112 school year and increased pay-to-participate fees for students involved in extracurricular activities. District officials have said they will need to cut at least another $7 million from the 2011-12 operating budget if the Aug. 2 levy fails. They maintain the levy is needed to balance the district’s budget in the face on continued cuts in state funding and a drop in local property tax collections due to Ohio’s prolonged economic slump. “Do we need a levy? The answer is absolutely yes,” PLSD treasurer Dan Griscom said at the school board’s July 11 meeting. “There’s only so much we can do … without digging into the programs and affecting the quality of services we provide.
See SIGN THEFTS, page A2
See SCHOOL LEVY, page A2
By Chris Parker/ThisWeek
Members of the Pickerington Post 283 baseball team wait out a rain delay during an American Legion state tournament game against Worthington Post 239 on July 25 at Lancaster High School. A wet, steamy summer has made such waits frequent. Post 283 won 9-2. See Sports, page B1..
Sign thefts rile pro-, anti-levy campaigns By NATE ELLIS ThisWeek Community Newspapers Both supporters and opponents of the Pickerington Local School District’s Aug. 2 levy issue said last week their campaigns had been marred by thefts of political signs. In the past few weeks, people on both sides of the issue have canvassed the local community to campaign for their causes, and have dotted the landscape with signs reflecting their respective positions. Representatives of Vote FOR Pick Kids, a prolevy group, and the Pickerington Patriots an anti-
levy group, have both complained that a number of campaign signs placed in the public rights of way have been stolen. “We put about 100 signs up,” said Andy Russ, an attorney for the Pickerington Patriots. “About 90 were stolen and the rest were sandwiched on both sides (by pro-levy signs) so you couldn’t see ours. “We just want to join the debate,” he said. “We want to make the community aware we are an opposing view, but I’m pretty sure the majority of (the signs) are gone.” A representative of Vote FOR Pick Kids said her group was “absolutely not” involved in removing
Financially disadvantaged students
Board approves sliding scale for pay-to-participate fees By NATE ELLIS ThisWeek Community Newspapers For the first time since a pay-to-participate program was instituted, Pickerington students who qualify for free and reduced-price lunches will be required to pay a portion of fees assessed for extracurricular activities. Since the 2003-04 school year, those students have been exempt from paying fees to participate in school-sponsored sports, marching band, chorale, theater and other clubs and activities. On Monday, the Pickerington Board of Education voted 4-1 to establish a sliding scale of fees for students whose families meet financial hardship qualifications. The move means these students will pay anywhere from $225 to $315 less than others to participate in athletics and other extracurriculars. Junior high students could qualify to pay anywhere from $120 to $165 less.
“In the past, students who qualified for free and reduced lunch automatically qualified for free extracurricular activities,” said board member Lori Sanders. “Basically, (the new policy) is a fee schedule for a financially-disadvantaged (student).” In January, the board passed new pay-to-participate fees, which would have required high school athletes to pay $500 per student, per sport, and junior high athletes to pay $325 per student per sport. Likewise, fees for band, chorale and theater participants were set at $275 per student. On July 11, however, the board approved reducing pay-to-participate fees to $375 per student, per sport for high school students and $195 per student, per sport. Fees for band were reduced to $200. The new scale for “financially disadvantaged” students is as follows:
Pasting pinatas
Neli Foster (center) demonstrates how to apply paper to make a papier-maché pinata to Makayla Craft (right) and her sister, McKenzie Craft, at the Pickering Public Library on July 25.
See SLIDING SCALE, page A6
You have a hole in your house.
By Chris Parker/ThisWeek
And don’t even know it. Learn how to plug it with an energy assessment or audit from AEP Ohio. Call 877-856-2454 to sign up today.