Construction Environmental Management Plan

City Rail Link In association with:

DEMOLITION WORKS – CONTRACT 3 CONSTRUCTION ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN Mt Eden Demolition Works

Document Ref: CRL-MTE-RME-000-RPT-0119 Revision: 02 8 March 2019

INTERNAL WORKING DOCUMENT COMMERCIAL IN CONFIDENCE

Document control record Document prepared by: Aurecon New Zealand Limited Level 4, 139 Carlton Gore Road Newmarket Auckland 1023 PO Box 9762 Newmarket Auckland 1149 New Zealand

T F E W

+64 9 520 6019 +64 9 524 7815 auckland@aurecongroup.com aurecongroup.com

A person using Aurecon documents or data accepts the risk of: a)

Using the documents or data in electronic form without requesting and checking them for accuracy against the original hard copy version.

b)

Using the documents or data for any purpose not agreed to in writing by Aurecon.

Document control Report title

CONSTRUCTION ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN Mt Eden Demolition Works

Document ID

CRL-MTE-RME-000-RPT-0119

Client

City Rail Link Limited

Client contact

Project number

251926

Aidan Kirkby-McLeod

Rev

Date

Revision details/status

Prepared by

Author

Reviewer

0

12.12.2018

Draft for internal review

P. Wilkinson

P. Wilkinson

H. Mclean

1

15.01.2019

Draft for Auckland Council & IP Review

P. Wilkinson

P. Wilkinson

H. Mclean

2

22.02.2019

Final for lodgement

P. Wilkinson

P. Wilkinson

H. Mclean

Current revision

Verifier

Approver

L Strogen

H McLean

1

Approval Author signature

Approver signature

Name

Paige Wilkinson

Name

Helen McLean

Title

Consultant, Environment and Planning

Title

Associate, Environment and Planning

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | ARUP

Contents 1

2

3

4

5

Introduction

1

1.1

Purpose of the CEMP

1

1.2

CEMP Requirements

2

1.3

Environmental Sub-Plans

2

1.4

Development of CEMP, DWPs and management plans

5

1.5

Mana Whenua

5

1.6

Designation Conditions

6

1.7

Resource Consent Conditions

14

1.8

Sustainability

24

Project Description

26

2.1

CRL Overview

26

2.2

Demolition Works

26

2.3

Pre-construction Activities

27

2.4

Construction Methodology

28

2.5

Programme

31

2.6

Hours of Operation

31

2.7

Site Layout and Management

32

2.8

Security and Safety

32

2.9

Graffiti and Litter

32

2.10 Returning the Site to Public Use

32

Social and Environmental Management

33

3.1

Construction Activities and Associated Environmental Receivers

33

3.2

Environmental Risk Register

33

3.3

Cumulative Effects

33

3.4

Legislative and Other Requirements

34

Implementation and Operation

36

4.1

Roles and Responsibilities

36

4.2

Training and Induction

42

4.3

Operating Procedures

43

4.4

Emergency and Incident Response

50

4.5

Stakeholder Communications

52

Monitor and Review

54

5.1

Environmental Monitoring

54

5.2

Environmental Inspections

55

5.3

Environmental Auditing

55

5.4

Corrective and Preventative Action

55

i

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | ARUP

CRL-MTE-RME-000-RPT-0119 Project 251926 | 08 March 2019 | Revision 1

5.5

Reporting

55

5.6

Document Control

56

5.7

CEMP Review

56

Appendices Appendix A CRL Designation 2500 Conditions Appendix B Aotea to North Auckland Line Regional Consents Package Conditions Appendix C Erosion and Sediment Control Plan Appendix D Traffic Access and Parking Delivery Work Plan Appendix E Construction Noise and Vibration Delivery Work Plan Appendix F Historic Character Delivery Work Plan Appendix G Contamination Delivery Work Plan Appendix H Air Quality Delivery Work Plan Appendix I Trees and Vegetation Delivery Work Plan Appendix J Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Work Plan Appendix K Communication and Consultation Delivery Work Plan Appendix L Record of IPRP feedback Appendix M ISCA Requirements

Figures Figure 1 Approximate extent of the Project Figure 2 Proposed staging areas of demolition works

26 31

ii

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | ARUP

CRL-MTE-RME-000-RPT-0119 Project 251926 | 08 March 2019 | Revision 1

Tables Table 1 Plans attached to the CEMP 3 Table 2 Designation conditions from the CRL designation relating to the CEMP 7 Table 3 Resource consent conditions from the Aotea to NAL resource consent relating to the CEMP 15 Table 4 ISCA credits and DWP linkages 24 Table 5 ISCA credits and achievement levels 25 Table 6 Indicative demolition methodology 30 Table 7 Key national legislation, regulations and standards 34 Table 8 Standards, guidelines and specific statutory requirements 34 Table 9 Specific roles and responsibilities 37 Table 10 Environmental incident notification 52 Table 11 Collaborative working contacts 54

Glossary of abbreviations Acronym

Definition

A2N

Aotea Station to North Auckland Line

ACZ

Active Construction Zone

AT

Auckland Transport Agency

AQ DWP

Air Quality Delivery Work Plan

AUP

Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in Part)

CBLG

Community Business Liaison Group

CCP

Communication and Consultation Plan

CDWP

Contamination Delivery Work Plan

CEMP

Construction Environmental Management Plan

CNV DWP

Construction Noise and Vibration Delivery Work Plan

CPTED

Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design

CRL

City Rail Link

CRLL

City Rail Link Limited

CSA

Construction Support Area

CSMP

Contaminated Soils Management Plan

DWP

Delivery Work Plan

ESCP

Erosion Sediment Control Plan

ESM

Environment and Sustainability Manager

HC DWP

Historic Character Delivery Work Plan

IPRP

Independent Peer Review Panel

NAL

North Auckland Line

NoR

Notice of Requirement

NUO

Network Utility Operator

OP

Outline Plan of Works

RMA

Resource Management Act 1991

iii

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | ARUP

CRL-MTE-RME-000-RPT-0119 Project 251926 | 08 March 2019 | Revision 1

Acronym

Definition

SIBD DWP

Social impact and business disruption Delivery Work Plan

SSCNVMP

Site Specific Construction Noise and Vibration Management Plan

TAP DWP

Transport Access and Parking Delivery Work Plan

TV DWP

Trees and Vegetation Delivery Work Plan

iv

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | ARUP

CRL-MTE-RME-000-RPT-0119 Project 251926 | 08 March 2019 | Revision 1

1

Introduction

This Construction Environmental Management Plan (CEMP) is submitted in support of the Outline Plan from City Rail Link Limited (CRLL) to Auckland Council for the demolition of buildings in the Mt Eden active construction zone (ACZ) and construction support area (CSA) (“the Project”). The works are required as part of the construction of the City Rail Link (CRL) under Designation 2500-6. The requirement for this CEMP and accompanying Delivery Works Plans (DWP) and Management Plans (MP) is required by the designation conditions 19 to 24. A CEMP is also required by conditions 35 to 40 of the CRL Aotea to North Auckland Line (A2N) resource consents.

The proposed works covered by this CEMP can be summarised as follows:

▪

Staged demolition of all buildings within the Mt Eden ACZ and CSA.

More details of the proposed works will be provided throughout this CEMP. This CEMP has been prepared by Aurecon and will be implemented by the Contract 3, C3 Alliance Construction Contractor (C3 Alliance) through the course of the works. The CEMP provides the overarching framework for the management of construction effects associated with the proposed works. Further DWPs are included as appendices to the CEMP. These DWPs detail the specific environmental management controls for particular aspects of the Project.

1.1

Purpose of the CEMP

The purpose of the CEMP is to confirm the Project construction details to set out how construction activities will be carried out and managed as far as is reasonably practical to avoid, remedy or mitigate adverse effects on the environment.

This CEMP demonstrates that the works remain within the limits of the CRL designation and associated A2N resource consents. The CEMP will ensure that appropriate environmental management practices are followed during the Project works. The CEMP will be implemented throughout the entire period (approximately six months) of the Project and updated as necessary.

CRLL will endeavour to ensure that the surrounding community and wider general public are proactively engaged with to ensure successful delivery.

Overall, implementation of this CEMP will ensure:

▪ ▪

Appropriate management of adverse environmental effects associated with the Project;

▪ ▪

Compliance with environmental legislation; and

Compliance with the relevant designation conditions of the CRL designation and A2N resource consents;

Achievement of the Project’s environmental and sustainability objectives.

The CEMP and DWPs will be reviewed as a result of a scheduled review, a material change to the Project, or to address unforeseen adverse effects arising from construction or unresolved complaints.

As the anticipated timeframe for these works is less than 12 months no annual review will be required.

The CEMP and DWPs are required to be prepared in consultation with the Community Liaison Group (CLG) for the Project. Additionally, the CEMP and DWPs have undergone independent peer review prior to submission to Auckland Council. Comments received from the CLG and from the independent peer review process have been (where applicable and appropriate) incorporated in the CEMP and DWPs, with an explanation being provided where any comments have not been incorporated. A record of consultation outcomes (CLG and independent peer review) for this CEMP is provided in Appendix L; a record of specific consultation outcomes is included in each relevant DWP.

1

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | ARUP

CRL-MTE-RME-000-RPT-0119 Project 251926 | 08 March 2019 | Revision 1

1.2

CEMP Requirements

The CRL designation requires that a CEMP be submitted to Auckland Council with the Outline Plan (OP), along with the Communication and Consultation Plan (CCP), DWPs and Site Specific Construction Noise and Vibration Management Plans (SSCNVMP).

The CEMP includes measures to give effect to the following specific requirements and objectives are, that not addressed by the DWPs:

▪

Training requirements on construction procedures, environment management, monitoring and emergency and incident responses;

▪

An outline of the construction programme of the work, including linkages to the DWPs which address the management of adverse effects during construction;

▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪

Specific details on demolition to be undertaken during the construction period; Means of ensuring the safety of the general public; Methods to assess and monitor potential cumulative adverse effects; Site layout and management (including graffiti, litter, lighting and hazardous substances); and Management of vacant areas once the demolition is complete.

The A2N resource consents require a CEMP be provided to Auckland Council for certification prior to works commencing. Condition 36 details what must be included in the CEMP.

1.3

Environmental Sub-Plans

The management of specific environmental effects during construction is addressed through the development and implementation of a suite of DWPs and management plans required by the CRL designation and A2N regional resource consents.

The DWPs and management plans are identified in Table 1 below and form appendices to this CEMP for the Project works.

2

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | ARUP

CRL-MTE-RME-000-RPT-0119 Project 251926 | 08 March 2019 | Revision 1

Table 1 Plans attached to the CEMP

Plan

Acronym

CRL Des. Condition #

Purpose

Section of CEMP

Transport Access and Parking DWP

TAPDWP

10, 25 and 30

To manage the adverse effects of construction on the transport network (including parking and access).

Section 4.3.2 and Appendix D

Construction Noise and Vibration DWP

CNVDWP

10 and 36

To provide for the development and implementation of identified best practicable options to avoid, remedy or mitigate adverse effects on receivers of noise and vibration resulting from construction effects.

Section 4.3.4 and Appendix E

Site Specific Construction Noise and Vibration MP

SSCNVMP

10, 37 and 38

Historic Character DWP

HCDWP

10 and 42

To manage the adverse archaeological effects that may result during construction.

Section 4.3.6 and Appendix F

Contamination DWP (also a Contaminated Soils MP)

CDWP

10 and 57

To manage the adverse effects relating to contaminated land during construction.

Section 4.3.8 and Appendix G

Air Quality DWP (also an Air Quality MP)

AQDWP

10 and 59

To avoid, remedy or mitigate the adverse effects on air quality during construction.

Section 4.3.9 and Appendix H

Trees and Vegetation DWP

TVDWP

10 and 55

To manage the adverse effects from the removal of trees and vegetation during construction.

Section 4.3.10 and Appendix I

Social Impact and Business Disruption DWP

SIBDDWP

10 and 61

To avoid, remedy or mitigate the adverse effects arising from disruption to businesses, residents and community services/facilities during construction.

Section 4.3.11 and Appendix J

Communication and Consultation Plan

CCP

10 and 15

To set out set out the framework to ensure appropriate communication and consultation is undertaken with the community, stakeholders, affected parties and affected in proximity parties during construction.

Section 4.3.12, 4.5 and Appendix K

Plan

Acronym

Aotea to NAL Condition #

Purpose

Section of CEMP

Erosion and Sediment Control Plan

ESCP

53-58

Management of the effects associated with soil mobilisation.

Section 4.3.2 and Appendix C

Section 4.3.4 and Appendix E

3

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | ARUP

CRL-MTE-RME-000-RPT-0119 Project 251926 | 08 March 2019 | Revision 1

Contaminated Soils MP (also a CDWP)

CSMP

131 – 134

To manage the adverse effects relating to contaminated land during construction.

Section 4.3.8 and Appendix G

Air Quality MP

AQDWP

223 – 224

To avoid, remedy or mitigate the adverse effects on air quality during construction.

Section 4.3.9 and Appendix H

Communication and Consultation Plan

CCP

25 – 33

To set out set out the framework to ensure appropriate communication and consultation is undertaken with the community, stakeholders, affected parties and affected in proximity parties during constriction.

Section 4.3.12, 4.5 and Appendix K

4

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | ARUP

CRL-MTE-RME-000-RPT-0119 Project 251926 | 08 March 2019 | Revision 1

1.4

Development of CEMP, DWPs and Management Plans

This CEMP and the DWPs and management plans have been developed by specialists and were subjected to range of reviews to ensure that they are commensurate to the scale of the effects associated with the Project.

The CEMP, DWPs and management plans have been presented to the relevant CLG for feedback in accordance with CRL designation condition 7.5. Where appropriate, this feedback has been incorporated into the CEMP, DWPs and management plans. Where feedback has not been incorporated, reasons why have been provided in each document.

The CEMP and DWPs and the feedback from the CLG on these plans has been reviewed by the CRL Independent Peer Review Panel (IPRP) in accordance with CRL designation condition 11. The IPRP have provided a number of recommendations to ensure the CEMP and DWPs meet the objectives and other requirements of the designation conditions. These inputs, along with the feedback from the CLG, are attached in Appendix L. The CEMP and sub-plans will be held on site and made available for viewing. They will also be available publicly on the official CRLL website (https://cityraillink.co.nz /crl-consents-environmentalmanagement/).

1.5

Mana Whenua

We are all descended from Ranginui, our Father Sky and Papatuanuku, our Mother Earth. Ngā mana whenua o Tāmaki Makaurau have a special relationship with Ranginui, Papatuanuku, and their resources. Acting as kaitiaki, they endeavour to protect their whānau, hapū and Iwi and encourage all people to act as protectors of the earth.

Kaitiakitanga includes:

▪ ▪ ▪ ▪

Protecting, restoring, enhancing the mauri (life supporting capacity) of resources; Fulfilling spiritual, emotional and inherited responsibilities to the environment; Maintaining mana over resources; and Ensuring the welfare of the people those resources support.

In Tamaki Makaurau it is Mana Whenua who are Kaitiaki.

The CRL sustainability framework is informed by tikanga tiaki and mātauranga. A CRL mana whenua forum has been established for the purposes of undertaking kaitiakitanga responsibilities associated with the project. The forum comprises those Mana Whenua groups who expressed an interest in being involved in the CRL project and its related activities. Eight Mana Whenua self-identified their interest in CRL and are currently part of the forum:

▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪

Ngāti Maru; Ngāti Paoa; Ngāi Tai Ki Tāmaki; Ngāti Te Ata Waiohua; Ngāti Whātua o Ōrākei; Te Akitai Waiohua; Te Kawerau a Maki; and Ngāti Tamaoho.

5

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | ARUP

CRL-MTE-RME-000-RPT-0119 Project 251926 | 08 March 2019 | Revision 1

CRLL continues to work collaboratively with the Mana Whenua forum on all aspects of the CRL project. With the commencement of the Project’s construction, the forum’s role includes cultural induction for contractors, assistance with discovery procedures, monitoring, and ongoing provision of mātauranga Māori input.

A Mana Whenua briefing for this Project was held on 18 October 2018. An overview of the Mt Eden demolition works as enabling works for C3 was given to Mana Whenua, which confirmed that the main tunnel boring works is part of C3 works. The various DWPs and management plans required to be prepared as part of the OP were discussed and the following matters were raised:

▪

The OP explains how the work will be undertaken under the existing designation and is supported by the DWPs and management plans that go to Council; and

▪

An ESCP is included in the suite of management plans as required in the consent conditions.

It was requested that the puna (spring) at Water Street is acknowledged in the management plans as part of these works. While the work area does not encompass the site where the Water Street spring is located, management of ground water has been included in the relevant management plans.

1.6

Designation Conditions

The Project works relate to the CRL Designation 2500-6 confirmed in November 2015. All works will be carried out in accordance with the CEMP and the plans required by the designation.

The designation conditions are included in Appendix A. Designation conditions 19 – 24 outline what is required for the CEMP. Table 2 identifies the relevant sections of the CEMP that address each condition.

6

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | ARUP

CRL-MTE-RME-000-RPT-0119 Project 251926 | 08 March 2019 | Revision 1

Table 2 Designation conditions from the CRL designation relating to the CEMP

Condition Number

Condition

Relevant Section of CEMP

Designation Conditions (Designation 2500–6) 13.1

The Requiring Authority, its contractor team, and the Auckland Council Consent Monitoring officer(s) shall establish and implement a collaborative working process for dealing with day to day construction processes, including monitoring compliance with the designation conditions and with the CEMP and DWPs (including SSCNVMPs, SSCNMPs and SSCVMPs) and any material changes to these plans associated with construction of the City Rail Link.

13.2

This collaborative working process shall:

13.3

Section 5

a.

Operate for the duration of the construction works and for 6 months following completion of construction works where monitoring of designation conditions is still required, unless a different timeframe is mutually agreed between the Requiring Authority and the Auckland Council;

Section 5.1

b.

Have a “key contact” person representing the Requiring Authority and a “key contact” person representing the contractor team to work with the Auckland Council Consent Monitoring officer(s);

Section 5.1

c.

The “key contacts” shall be identified in the CEMP and shall meet at least monthly unless a different timeframe is agreed with the Auckland Council Consent Monitoring officer(s). The purpose of the meeting is to report on compliance with the designation conditions and with the CEMP, DWPs and material changes to these plans and on any matters of non-compliance and how they have been addressed;

Section 5.1

d.

Once construction has commenced, the Requiring Authority and / or the contractor shall provide an update to the Community Liaison Groups (Condition 7 of this designation) at least once every 3 months, or if in accordance with Condition 7 these groups meet more regularly, at least once every two months.

Section 5.1 and 5.5

The purpose and function of the collaborative working process is to: a.

Assist as necessary the Auckland Council Consent Monitoring officer(s) to confirm that: i.

The works authorised under these designations are being carried out in compliance with the designation conditions, the CEMP, DWPs (including SSCNVMPs, SSCNMPs and SSCVMPs) and any material changes to these plans;

Section 5.1

ii.

The Requiring Authority and its contractor are undertaking all monitoring and the recording of monitoring results in compliance with the requirements of the CEMP and DWPs (including SSCNVMPs, SSCNMPs and SSCVMPs) and any material changes to these plans;

Section 5.1

b.

Subsequent to a confirmed Outline Plan, provide a mechanism through which any changes to the design, CEMP or DWPs, which are not material changes requiring approval under Condition 10 triggering the requirement for a new Outline Plan, can be required, reviewed and confirmed;

Section 5.7

c.

Advise where changes to construction works following a confirmed Outline Plan require a new CEMP or DWP (including SSCNVMPs, SSCNMPs and SSCVMPs);

Section 5.7

7

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | ARUP

CRL-MTE-RME-000-RPT-0119 Project 251926 | 08 March 2019 | Revision 1

Condition Number

Condition d.

17.1

17.2

Review and identify any concerns or complaints received from, or related to, the construction works monthly (unless a different timeframe is mutually agreed with the Auckland Council Consent Monitoringofficer) and adequacy of the measures adopted to respond to these.

Relevant Section of CEMP Section 5.7

Upon receiving a concern or complaint during construction, the Requiring Authority shall instigate a process to address concerns or complaints received about adverse effects. This shall: a.

Identify of the nature of the concern or complaint, and the location, date and time of the alleged event(s);

Section 5 & Appendix K

b.

Acknowledge receipt of the concern or complaint within 24 hours of receipt;

Section 5 & Appendix K

c.

Respond to the concern or complaint in accordance with the relevant management plan, which may include monitoring of the activity by a suitably qualified expert, implementation of mitigation measures, and, in the case of noise and / or vibration, preparation of a site specific noise and / or vibration management plan (in accordance with Conditions

Section 5 & Appendix K

A record of all concerns and / or complaints received shall be kept by the Requiring Authority. This record shall include: a.

The name and address of the person(s) who raised the concern or complaint (unless they elect not to provide this) and details of the concern or complaint;

Section 5 & Appendix K

b.

Where practicable, weather conditions at the time of the concern or complaint, including wind direction and cloud cover if the complaint relates to noise or air quality;

Section 5 & Appendix K

c.

Known City Rail Link construction activities at the time and in the vicinity of the concern or complaint;

Section 5 & Appendix K

d.

Any other activities in the area unrelated to the City Rail Link construction that may have contributed to the concern or complaint such as non-City Rail Link construction, fires, traffic accidents or unusually dusty conditions generally;

Section 5 & Appendix K

e.

Remedial actions undertaken (if any) and the outcome of these, including monitoring of the activity.

Section 5 & Appendix K

17.3

This record shall be maintained on site, be available for inspection upon request, and shall be provided every two months (or as otherwise agreed) to the Auckland Council Consent Monitoring officer, and to the “key contacts� (see Condition 13).

Section 5 & Appendix K

17.4

Where a complaint remains unresolved or a dispute arises, Auckland Council Compliance Monitoring Officer will be provided with all records of the complaint and how it has been dealt with and addressed and whether the Requiring Authority considers that any other steps to resolve the complaint are required. Upon receiving records of the complaint, the Auckland Council Compliance Monitoring Officer must determine whether a review of the CEMP and/or DWPs is required under Condition 22 to address this complaint. The Auckland Council Compliance Monitoring Officer shall advise the Requiring Authority of its recommendation within 10 working days of receiving the records of complaint.

Section 5 & Appendix K

19.1

The objective of the CEMP and DWPs is to so far as is reasonably practicable, avoid, remedy or mitigate any adverse effects (including cumulative effects) associated with the City Rail Link construction.

Section 1

8

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | ARUP

CRL-MTE-RME-000-RPT-0119 Project 251926 | 08 March 2019 | Revision 1

Condition Number

Condition

Relevant Section of CEMP

19.2

All works must be carried out in accordance with the CEMP, the DWPs required by these conditions and in accordance with any changes to plans made under Condition 23.

Noted

19.3

The CEMP and DWPs shall be prepared, complied with and monitoredby the Requiring Authority throughout the duration of construction of the City Rail Link.

Noted

19.4

The DWPs shall give effect to the specific requirements and objectives set out in these designation conditions.

Noted

19.5

The CEMP shall include measures to give effect to any specific requirements and objectives set out in these designation conditions that are not addressed by the DWPs.

Section 4

19.6

Where mitigation measures are required to be implemented by the Requiring Authority in relation to the construction of City Rail Link, it shall meet reasonable and direct costs of implementing such mitigation measures.

Noted

20.1

In order to give effect to the objective in Condition 19.1, the CEMP must provide for the following:

20.2

b.

Notice boards that clearly identify the Requiring Authority and the Project name, together with the name, telephone number and email address of the Site or Project Manager and the Communication andConsultation Manager;

Section 4.1

c.

Training requirements for employees, sub-contractors and visitors on construction procedures, environment management and monitoring;

Section 4.2

d.

A Travel Management Plan for each construction site outlining onsite car parking management and methods for encouraging travel to the site using forms of transport other than private vehicle to assist in mitigating localised traffic effects; and

Section 4.3.3 & Appendix D

e.

Where a complaint is received, the complaint must be recorded and responded to as provided for in Conditions 13, 15 and 17.

Section 4.5 & Appendix K

The CEMP shall include details of: a.

The site or Project Manager and the Communication and Consultation Manager (who will implement and monitor the Communication and Consultation Plan), including their contact details (phone, email and physical address);

Section 4.1

b.

The Document management system for administering the CEMP, includingreview and Requiring Authority / Constructor / Auckland Council requirements;

Section 4.1.2.4

c.

Environmental incident and emergency management procedures;

Section 4.4

d.

Environmental complaint's management procedures (see also Condition 17);

e.

An outline of the construction programme of the work, including construction hours of operation, indicating linkages to the DWPs which address the management of adverse effects during construction;

Section 4.5 & Appendix K Section 2

f.

Specific details on demolition to be undertaken during the construction period;

Sections 2 & 4

9

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | ARUP

CRL-MTE-RME-000-RPT-0119 Project 251926 | 08 March 2019 | Revision 1

Condition Number

21.1

Condition

Relevant Section of CEMP

g.

Means of ensuring the safety of the general public; and

Section 2.8

h.

Methods to assess and monitor potential cumulative adverse effects.

Section 4

In order to give effect to the objective in Condition 19.1, the CEMP shall include the following details and requirements in relation to all areas within the surface designation footprint where construction works are to occur, and / or where materials and construction machinery are to beused or stored: a.

Where access points are to be located and procedures for managing construction vehicle ingress and egress to construction support and storage areas;

Section 4.3.3 & Appendix D

b.

Methods for managing the control of silt and sediment within the construction area;

c.

Methods for earthworks management (including depth and extent of earthworks and temporary, permanent stabilisation measures and monitoring of ground movement) for earthworks adjacent to buildings and structures;

Section 4.3.2 & Appendix C, Section 4.3.2 & Appendix C

d.

Measures to adopt to keep the construction area in a tidy conditionin terms of disposal / storage of rubbish and storage unloading of construction materials (including equipment). All storage of materials and equipment associated with the construction works shall take place within the boundaries of the designation;

Section 2.8 & 2.9

e.

Measures to ensure all temporary boundary / security fences associated with the construction of the City Rail Link are maintained in good order with any graffiti removed as soon as possible;

Section 2.9

g.

The location and specification of any temporary acoustic fences and visual barriers, and where practicable, opportunities for mana whenua (see Condition 8) and community art or other decorative measures along with viewing screens to be incorporated into these withoutcompromising the purpose for which these are erected;

Section 4.3.4, 4.5.1 & Appendix E

h.

How the construction areas are to be fenced and kept secure from the public and, where practicable and without compromising theirpurpose how opportunities for public viewing, including provision of viewing screens and display of information about the project and opportunities for mana whenua and community art or other decorative measures can be incorporated to enhance public amenity and connection to the project;

Section 2.8 & 4.5.1

i.

The location of any temporary buildings (including workers officesand portaloos) and vehicle parking (which should be located within the construction area and not on adjacent streets);

Section 2.7 & 4.3.3

j.

Methods to control the intensity, location and direction of artificial construction lighting to avoid light spill and glare onto sites adjacent construction areas;

Section 4.3.5

k.

Methods to ensure the prevention and mitigation of adverse effects associated with the storage, use, disposal, or transportation of hazardous substances;

Section 4.3.14 & 4.4

m. That site offices and less noisy construction activities be located at the edge of the construction yards where practicable; and

Section 2.7

10

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | ARUP

CRL-MTE-RME-000-RPT-0119 Project 251926 | 08 March 2019 | Revision 1

Condition Number

Condition n.

22.1

Methods for management of vacant areas once construction is completed in accordance with the Urban Design DWP.

The CEMP and DWPs shall be reviewed at least annually or as a result of a material change to the City Rail Link project or to addressunforeseen adverse effects arising from construction or unresolved complaints. Such a review may be initiated by either Auckland Council or the Requiring Authority. The review shall take into consideration:

Relevant Section of CEMP Section 2.10 & 4.3.7 Noted

a.

Compliance with designation conditions, the CEMP, DWPs (including SSCNVMPs, SSCNMPs and SSCVMPs) and material changes to these plans;

Noted

b.

Any changes to construction methods;

Noted

c.

Key changes to roles and responsibilities within the City Rail Link project;

Noted

d.

Changes in industry best practice standards;

Noted

e.

Changes in legal or other requirements;

Noted

f.

Results of monitoring and reporting procedures associated with the management of adverse effects during construction;

Noted

g.

Any comments or recommendations received from Auckland Council regarding the CEMP and DWPs (including SSCNVMPs, SSCNMPs and SSCVMPs); and

Noted

h.

Any unresolved complaints and any response to the complaints and remedial action taken to address the complaint as required under Condition 17.

Noted

22.2

A summary of the review process shall be kept by the Requiring Authority, provided annually to the Auckland Council, and madeavailable to the Auckland Council upon request.

Noted

23.1

Following the CEMP and DWPs review process described in Condition 22, the CEMP may require updating.

Noted

23.2

Any material change to the CEMP and DWP must be consistent with the purpose and objective of the relevant condition.

Noted

23.3

Affected parties will be notified of the review and any material change proposed to the CEMP and DWPs (including SSCNVMPs, SSCNMPsand SSCVMPs).

Noted

23.4

The CEMP and DWPs must clearly document the comments and inputs received by the Requiring Authority from affected parties about the material change, along with a clear explanation of where any comments have not been incorporated, and the reasons why not.

Noted

23.5

Any material change proposed to the CEMP and DWPs shall be subject to an independent peer review as required by Condition 11.

Noted

11

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | ARUP

CRL-MTE-RME-000-RPT-0119 Project 251926 | 08 March 2019 | Revision 1

Condition Number

Condition

Relevant Section of CEMP

23.6

Following that review any material change proposed to the CEMP and DWPs relating to an adverse effect shall be submitted for approval to Auckland Council Compliance and Monitoring Officer, at least 10 working days prior to the proposed changes taking effect. If anychanges are not agreed, the relevant provisions of the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA) relating to approval of outline plans shall apply.

Noted

24.1

To manage the adverse effects on Network Utilities Operations during the construction of the City Rail Link, the following shall be included in the CEMP.

Noted

24.2

The purpose of this section of the CEMP shall be to ensure that the enabling works and construction of the City Rail Link adequately take account of, and include measures to address the safety, integrity, protection or, where necessary, relocation of existing network utilities that traverse, or are in close proximity to, the designation during the construction of the City Rail Link.

Noted

24.3

For the avoidance of doubt and for the purposes of this condition an “existing Network Utility� includes infrastructure operated by a Network Utility Operator which was: a. In place at the time the notice of requirement for the City Rail Link was served on Auckland Council (23 August 2012); or b. Undertaken in accordance with condition 6 of this designation or the section 176(1)(b) RMA process.

Noted

24.4

The CEMP shall be prepared in consultation with Network Utility Operators who have existing Network Utilities that traverse, or are in close proximity to, the designation and shall be adhered to and implemented during the construction of the City Rail Link. The CEMP shall include as a minimum:

Section 4.3.1 & Appendix K

a.

Cross references to the Communication and Consultation Plan for the methods that will be used to liaise with all Network Utility Operators who have existing network utilities that traverse, or are in close proximity to, the designation;

Section 4.5 & Appendix K

b.

Measures to be used to accurately identify the location of existing Network Utilities, and the measures for the protection, support, relocation and/or reinstatement of existing Network Utilities;

Section 4.3.1 & Appendix K

c.

Methods to be used to ensure that all construction personnel, including contractors, are aware of the presence and location of the various existing Network Utilities (and their priority designations) which traverse, or are in close proximity to, the designation, and therestrictions in place in relation to those existing Network Utilities. This shall include: i.

Measures to provide for the safe operation of plant and equipment, and the safety of workers, in proximity to existing Network Utilities; ii.

Plans identifying the locations of the existing Network Utilities (and their designations) and appropriate physical indicators on the ground showing specific surveyed locations;

Section 4.3.1 & Appendix K

d.

Measures to be used to ensure the continued operation of Network Utility Operations and the security of supply of the utilities by Network Utility Operators at all times;

Section 4.3.1 & Appendix K

12

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | ARUP

CRL-MTE-RME-000-RPT-0119 Project 251926 | 08 March 2019 | Revision 1

Condition Number

Condition e.

Measures to be used to enable Network Utility Operators to access existing Network Utilities for maintenance at all reasonable times on an ongoing basis during construction, and to access existing Network Utilities for emergency and urgent repair works at all times during theconstruction of the City Rail Link

Section 4.3.1 & Appendix K

h.

Earthworks management (including depth and extent of earthworks and temporary and permanent stabilisation measures), for earthworks in close proximity to existing Network Utilities;

Section 4.3.2 & Appendix C

i.

Vibration management and monitoring for works in close proximity to existing Network Utilities;

j.

Emergency management procedures in the event of any emergencyinvolving existing Network Utilities;

k.

The process for providing as-built drawings showing the relationship of the relocated Network Utilities to the City Rail Link to Network Utility Operators and the timing for providing these drawings;

Section 4.3.4 & Appendix E Section 4.3.1 & Appendix K N/A

m. A summary of the consultation (including any methods or measures in dispute and the Requiring Authorities response to them) undertaken between the Requiring Authority and any Network UtilityOperators during the preparation of the CEMP. 24.5

Relevant Section of CEMP

If the Requiring Authority and a Network Utility Operator cannot agree on the methods proposed under the CEMP to manage the construction effects on the Operator’s network utility operation, unless otherwise agreed, each party will appoint a suitably qualified and independent expert, who shall jointly appoint a third such expert to advise the parties and make a recommendation. That recommendation will beprovided by the Requiring Authority as part of the CEMP along with reasons if the recommendation is not accepted.

Appendix L

N/A

13

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | ARUP

CRL-MTE-RME-000-RPT-0119 Project 251926 | 08 March 2019 | Revision 1

1.7

Resource Consent Conditions

The Project falls within the scope of the A2N regional resource consents approved by Auckland Council on 17 November 20161. All works will be carried out in accordance with the CEMP and the plans required by those consents which have been prepared commensurate to the scale of the works proposed.

The resource consent conditions are included in Appendix B. Resource consent conditions 35 – 40 outline what is required for the CEMP under the A2N regional consents. Table 3 identifies the relevant sections of the CEMP that address each condition and where management plans identified by the regional consents are located.

1

R/LUC/2016/1890, R/REG/2016/1892, R/REG/2016/1895, R/REG/2016/1896, REG/2016/1897, R/REG/2016/1898, R/REG/2016/1899, R/REG/2016/1900 and R/REG/2016/2038. Conditions amended 8th November 2017.

14

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | ARUP

CRL-MTE-RME-000-RPT-0119 Project 251926 | 08 March 2019 | Revision 1

Table 3 Resource consent conditions from the Aotea to NAL resource consent relating to the CEMP

Condition Number

Condition

Relevant Section of CEMP

Aotea to NAL Resource Consent Conditions Communication and Consultation Plan This document

25

At least 3 months prior to the commencement of construction, the Consent Holder shall prepare a CCP the purpose of which is to set out a framework to ensure appropriate communication and consultation with the community, stakeholders, affected parties and affected in-proximity parties during the construction of the Project.

26

Blank

27

The CCP shall be based on and, where appropriate, incorporate the provisions of the PCCP, and shall set out how the Consent Holder will: a. Inform the community and business of construction progress and future construction activities and constraints that could affect them; b. Provide early information on key Project milestones; c. Obtain and specify a reasonable timeframe (being not less than 10 working days), for feedback and inputs from directly affected and affected in-proximity parties regarding the implementation and review of the CEMP or other Management Plans; d. Respond to queries and complaints including but not limited to: i.

Who is responsible for responding; ii.

How responses will be provided; and iii.

The timeframes within which responses will be provided.

Section 4.5 & Appendix K

28

The CCP shall (as a minimum) include: a. A communications framework that details the Consent Holder’s communication strategies, accountabilities, frequency of communications and consultation, the range of communication and consultation tools to be used (including relevant communication methods, newsletters or similar, advertising etc.), and any other relevant communication matters; b. The Communication and Consultation Manager for the Project including 24 hour contact details (phone, email and postal address); c. The 0800 CRL TALK phone number;

Section 4.5 & Appendix K

15

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | ARUP

CRL-MTE-RME-000-RPT-0119 Project 251926 | 08 March 2019 | Revision 1

Condition Number

Condition

Relevant Section of CEMP

28 cntn’d

d. The methods for identifying, communicating and consulting with persons affected by the project including but not limited to: i.

All property owners and occupiers of the sites that are identified at Appendix 4, and adjacent to the Project’s construction sites; ii.

Mana Whenua unless any of those named advise the Consent Holder of a different liaison process; iii.

Heritage NZ; iv.

NZ Transport Agency/ Auckland Motorway Alliance (AMA 2); v.

Kiwirail; vi.

Department of Corrections; vii.

Ministry of Justice; viii.

Network Utility Operators; and ix.

The Community and Business Liaison Group (refer Conditions 16-24) e. How stakeholders and persons affected by the Project will be notified of the commencement of construction, the expected duration of the activities and works, and who to contact for any queries, concerns and complaints; f. How stakeholders and persons affected by the Project will be consulted in the development and review of the CEMP and other Management Plans, including specifying reasonable timeframes for feedback; g. A list of stakeholders, directly affected and affected in-proximity parties to the construction works with whom the Consent Holder will communicate; h. A requirement that the Consent Holder shall make any information that is relevant to 22 Stable Lane available to the owner of that property (Christopher Patrick Browne) on request, and advise that owner in the event that any alert or alarm trigger levels are exceeded that are relevant to 22 Stable Lane. In addition, the CCP shall state the method by which Christopher Patrick Browne can make such a request and the anticipated timeframe within which it will be provided; i. A summary of communication and consultation undertaken between the Consent Holder and parties as required by the PCCP. The summary shall include any outstanding issues or disputes raised by parties; j. How communication and consultation relating to construction activities and monitoring requirements will be recorded; and k. How opportunities to interpret and display archaeological finds within the Project area will be identified and implemented, including how Heritage NZ will be involved in this process.

Advice Note: At the time this resource consent was granted, the Communication and Consultation Manager for the Project was Carol Greensmith, phone 0800 CRL TALK.

Section 4.5 & Appendix K

29

The CCP shall also include (as relevant) linkages and cross-references to the CEMP and other Management Plans.

Noted

Upon expiration of the existing AMA contract for maintenance of the Auckland highway network a new organisation “Auckland System Management” (ASM) will be in place.

2

16

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | ARUP

CRL-MTE-RME-000-RPT-0119 Project 251926 | 08 March 2019 | Revision 1

Condition Number

Condition

Relevant Section of CEMP

30

The CCP shall be reviewed six monthly for the duration of construction and updated if required. Any updates to the CCP shall be provided to the “key contacts” and the Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring) for review and agreement on any further action to be undertaken.

Noted

31

Any further action recommended as a result of the review under Condition 30 shall be undertaken by the Consent Holder’s Communication and Consultation Manager for the Project and confirmation of completion shall be provided to the Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring).

Noted

32

If, in the course of amendments undertaken as part of the review process under Condition 30, a material change to the CCP is made, the Consent Holder shall notify those parties affected by the change within 20 working days of the material change occurring.

Noted

33

The CCP shall be implemented and complied with for the duration of the construction of the Project.

Noted

Construction Management 35

Prior to the commencement of construction of the Project, the Consent Holder shall prepare a Construction Environmental Management Plan (CEMP) including all certified Management Plans which form part of these conditions to ensure compliance with the resource consents.

This document

36 cntn’d

The CEMP shall include details of: a. Final project details and staging of works to illustrate that the works remain within the limits and standards approved under these resource consents and that the construction activities avoid, remedy or mitigate adverse effects on the environment. b. The site or project manager and the Communication and Consultation Manager, including their contact details (phone, email and physical address); c. The “key contacts”; d. Communication and consultation procedures for ensuring that residents, road users and businesses in the immediate vicinity of construction areas are given prior notice of the commencement of construction and are informed about the expected duration and effects of the work. In particular, the procedures shall provide for the following in relation to residents, road users and businesses potentially affected by the construction works: i. consultation prior to the commencement of construction; ii. notice periods for changes to pedestrian and vehicle access; iii. regular updates on construction progress; iv. key dates for major milestones such as road closure and re-opening; and v. communication on any other matters potentially affecting residents or business operations in the vicinity of the works.

All sections

17

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | ARUP

CRL-MTE-RME-000-RPT-0119 Project 251926 | 08 March 2019 | Revision 1

Condition Number

Condition

Relevant Section of CEMP

36

e. Notice boards that clearly identify the Consent Holder and the Project name, together with the name, telephone number and email address of the Site or Project Manager and the Communication and Consultation Manager; f. General site layout and management; g. An outline of the Project’s construction programme, including construction hours of operation; h. Means of ensuring the safety of the general public; i. Certified Management Plans referred to in these conditions; j. Water Discharge Quality Monitoring Programme; and k. Identification of the suitably independent, qualified Chartered Professional Engineer, or member of the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors, who will be undertaking the condition surveys required by the conditions of consent.

All sections

37

The CEMP shall be provided to the Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring) for certification at least 20 working days prior to the commencement of construction

Noted

38

The Consent Holder shall request the Council’s (Team Leader Central Monitoring) determination, in writing, as to whether the CEMP can be certified as per the requirements of these consent conditions within 10 working days of receipt of the CEMP. Construction shall not commence until written certification is obtained from Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring).

Noted

39

The CEMP required by Condition 35 shall be implemented and maintained throughout the entire construction period for the Project, or relevant Project stage, to manage potential adverse effects arising from the construction and shall be updated as necessary (or as required by the review process in Condition 42).

Noted

40

Any change to the CEMP shall be submitted to the Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring) for certification and no activity reliant upon a change to the CEMP can be undertaken until the change has been certified.

The Consent Holder shall request the Council’s (Team Leader Central Monitoring) determination as to whether the proposed change can be certified, in writing, within 10 working days of submission of the change.

Noted

42

The Consent Holder shall review the CEMP and other Management Plans at least annually or a. as a result of a material change to the Project; b. to address unforeseen or materially greater adverse effects arising from construction or c. to address unresolved complaints.

Section 5.7

18

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | ARUP

CRL-MTE-RME-000-RPT-0119 Project 251926 | 08 March 2019 | Revision 1

Condition Number

Condition

Relevant Section of CEMP

43

A review pursuant to Condition 42 may be initiated by either the Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring) or the Consent Holder and shall take into consideration: a. Compliance with resource consent conditions, the CEMP, other Management Plans and any material changes to these Plans; b. Any changes to construction methods; c. Key changes to roles and responsibilities relating to the Project; d. Relevant changes in industry best practice standards; e. Relevant changes in legal or other requirements; f. Results of monitoring and reporting procedures associated with the management of adverse effects during construction; g. Any comments or recommendations received from Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring) or as a result of the CCP process regarding the CEMP and other Management Plans; and h. Any complaints and any response to complaints and remedial action taken to address the complaint as required under Conditions 45-49.

Noted

44

A summary of the review process shall be kept by the Consent Holder, provided annually to the Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring), and advised to and made available to the CLG.

Noted

Construction Traffic 41

The Consent Holder shall, so far as is it is reasonably practicable, avoid, remedy or mitigate the adverse effects of construction on transport, parking and property access.

This is to be achieved through the following objectives: a. managing the road transport network for the duration of the construction by adopting the best practicable option to manage congestion; b. maintaining pedestrian access to private property at all times; and c. providing on-going vehicle access to private property to the greatest extent possible.

Advice Note: Condition 41 refers to objectives to be achieved. The requirement to provide mechanisms to achieve these objectives is included in the relevant CRL designation conditions.

Section 4.3.3 & Appendix D

Erosion and Sediment Control Plan 53

At least 20 working days prior to the commencement of construction within a CSA or ACZ, the Consent Holder shall submit to the Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring) for certification an ESCP which provides for the management of all bulk earthworks to minimise any discharge of debris, soil, sediment or sediment-laden water beyond the site to either land and/ or stormwater drainage systems.

Section 4.3.2 & Appendix C

19

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | ARUP

CRL-MTE-RME-000-RPT-0119 Project 251926 | 08 March 2019 | Revision 1

Condition Number

Condition

Relevant Section of CEMP

54

The Consent Holder shall request the Council's (Team Leader Central Monitoring) determination as to whether the ESCP can be certified, in writing, within 10 working days of receipt of the ESCP. No construction activity shall commence until certification from Council is provided.

Noted

55

An ESCP shall include, but is not limited to, the following matters:

Section 4.3.2 & Appendix C

▪ ▪

identification of construction zones and construction support areas;

▪ ▪

catchment boundaries;

▪ ▪

details relating to the management of exposed areas;

▪

monitoring and maintenance requirements, including information on complaint investigation and response procedures, training, and roles and responsibilities.

specific erosion and sediment control works for each Active Construction Zone (location, dimensions, capacity supporting calculations and design drawings), which should be in line with Industry Best Practice that will meet or exceed the performance of measures detailed in TP90;

the timing and duration of construction and operation of control works (in relation to the staging and sequencing of earthworks);

reference to the Contaminated Soils Management Plan and confirmation of erosion and sediment control measures necessary to give effect to that plan; and

56

Any change to an ESCP shall be submitted to the Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring) for certification.

Noted

57

The Consent Holder shall request the Council’s (Team Leader Central Monitoring) written determination as to whether the proposed change can be certified, to be provided within 10 working days of submission of the change. No activity reliant upon a change to the ESCP can be undertaken until the change has been certified.

Noted

58

The Consent Holder shall comply with the ESCP for the duration of the earthworks associated with the Project.

Noted

Building Inspection

20

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | ARUP

CRL-MTE-RME-000-RPT-0119 Project 251926 | 08 March 2019 | Revision 1

Condition Number

Condition

Relevant Section of CEMP

109

Prior to the submission of the GSMCP, the Consent Holder shall employ an independent Senior Qualified Person to undertake, subject to the approval of the property owner, a detailed pre-construction condition survey of all buildings specified in Appendix 2 in order to confirm their existing condition.

The survey and assessment shall include, but not be limited to, the following: a. any information about the type of foundations; b. existing levels of damage considered to be of an aesthetic or superficial nature; c. existing levels of damage considered to affect the serviceability of the building where visually apparent and without recourse to intrusive or destructive investigation; d. a professional opinion as to whether observed damage may or may not be associated with actual structural damage; e. susceptibility of the building or structure to further movement; f. specific assessment of building damage with reference to the trigger levels identified in Appendix 2; g. review of proposed alarm and alert trigger levels to confirm they are appropriately set; and h. photographic evidence of (b) and (c).

N/A for this Project.

Contaminated Soils Management Plan 131

At least 20 days prior to the commencement of construction (earthworks), the Consent Holder shall provide a Contaminated Soils Management Plan (CSMP) to the Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring) for certification. The CSMP shall be prepared by a Contaminated Land Professional in accordance with the Contaminated Land Management Guidelines, No.1 Reporting on Contaminated Sites in New Zealand, Ministry for the Environment (revised 2011).

Appendix G

132

The Consent Holder shall request that Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring) provide a determination to the Consent Holder, in writing, within 10 working days of receipt of the CSMP, whether the CSMP can be certified as per the requirements of the Condition 134.

Noted

133

No earthworks shall commence until a. certification is provided from the Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring) that the CSMP satisfactorily meets the requirements of Schedule 13 (A4) of the ACRP:ALW, and b. all measures identified in that plan as being required to be established prior to the commencement of earthworks have been established.

Noted

21

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | ARUP

CRL-MTE-RME-000-RPT-0119 Project 251926 | 08 March 2019 | Revision 1

Condition Number

Condition

Relevant Section of CEMP

134

The CSMP shall address the following matters: a. The areas within the project site designated for the excavation works, including depths and extent of the proposed works, and an updated map/s showing the land disturbance activity areas b. Excavation, management, and disposal procedures for soil, sediment, dust, surface run-off water, perched groundwater, and groundwater, if encountered c. Temporary containment, treatment, and testing procedures for any water getting in contact with the contaminated material if the disposal option is to the stormwater system or the marine environment is considered d. Contingency measures for unexpected discovery of contamination e. Proposed sampling and analysis, if applicable; and f. Any proposed works summary reporting.

Advice Note: The Council acknowledges that the CSMP is intended to provide flexibility for the management of the works and contaminant discharge. Accordingly, the Plan may need to be further updated. Any updates must be limited to the scope of this consent and consistent with the conditions of this consent. If you would like to confirm that any proposed updates are within scope, or have any other queries, please contact the Council (Team Leader Earth and Stream Works, Trees, and Contaminated Land, Natural Resources and Specialist Input) on (09) 301 0101.

Section 4.3.8 & Appendix G

Air Quality Management Plan 223

The final AQMP/s shall be prepared by a Senior Qualified Person, provided to the Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring) for certification at least 20 working days prior to the commencement of construction and shall include: a. a clear identification of the type and location of the controls proposed; b. a detailed framework for the management, mitigation and monitoring of construction and earthworks activities associated with the Project; c. a focus principally on the sources of dust discharges, and d. an assessment of the risk of discharges from each ACZ and the associated CSA.

Section 4.3.9 & Appendix H

22

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | ARUP

CRL-MTE-RME-000-RPT-0119 Project 251926 | 08 March 2019 | Revision 1

Condition Number

Condition

Relevant Section of CEMP

224

The final AQMP/s shall also provide detailed methods including, but not limited to, the following matters: a. methods to ensure exposed surfaces remain dampened to minimise dust emissions (possible examples include a water spray system or other suitable system, water carts and other suppression methods); b. ensuring a 20 km/hr vehicle speed limit within the ACZs and CSAs; c. operation of wheel washes; d. regular sweeping of public roads around the exit points of ACZs and CSAs and sealed vehicle accessways within these areas; e. measures for supressing dust from any temporary stock piles (demonstrating how they are to be limited to no more than 24 mÂł of uncovered spoil at any one time in each ACZ); f. measures for the handling of cement associated with the forming of cement stabilised columns, including filter systems and high level alarms where a silo is used; g. covering of loads of material being delivered and removed from the site; h. instrument monitoring of dust concentrations (including identification of a monitoring methodology, monitoring network and appropriate alert thresholds) to ensure that any significant dust effects arising from the ACZs or CSAs are identified and remedied as soon as practicable throughout the Project; i. the locations of instrument dust monitoring sites, including at least three re-locatable and/or fixed monitors to be associated with each of ACZs A, K and M, and the duration of this monitoring; j. measures for responding to continuous instrument dust monitoring trigger alarms, including contingency measures to reduce measured concentrations below the trigger thresholds and provisions for responding after standard operating hours; k. measures for undertaking meteorological observations and visual inspections of dust or other air discharges from the Project, to be completed at least on a daily basis, with all relevant information logged; and l. information regarding complaint logging, investigation and response procedures, training and roles and responsibilities.

The Team Leader Central Monitoring shall be requested to respond to the AQMP/s with any suggested changes within 10 working days from receipt of the AQMP; otherwise the AQMP may be considered by the Consent Holder to be certified by the Council.

Section 2.7, 4.3.9 & Appendix H

23

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | ARUP

CRL-MTE-RME-000-RPT-0119 Project 251926 | 08 March 2019 | Revision 1

1.8

Sustainability

CRLL has a set of sustainability requirements to be achieved during the delivery of the project (Reference to CRLL minimum requirements - Appendices 10, 23 and 24 of the contract documents).

These can be different to, or additional to the Project’s conditioned consent requirements to be certified by Auckland Council. Some of the CRLL Sustainability requirements are directly related to the works included in this CEMP. This includes seeking an ISCA (infrastructure Sustainability Council of Australia) IS (infrastructure Sustainability) Rating for the whole project lifecycle where the requirements as per ISCA CRL IS Technical Manual – Mahi Rauora Aratohu – Version 1.2 are essential to achieve the Project’s sustainability goal.

ISCA credits that are directly linked to the DWPs under this CEMP are listed below in Table 4, with more details appended to each of those DWPs. The application of the ISCA credits remains subject to change as the project proceeds, and will be reviewed, amended (as and if needed) and confirmed prior to the commencement of works.

Table 4 ISCA credits and DWP linkages

ISCA Credit

Relevant DWP and section of the CEMP

Dis-1

Wai Ora (Receiving Water Quality)

Erosion and Sediment Control Plan (ESCP) and sections 4.3.2 and 4.3.8

Dis-2

Noise

Noise and Vibration (CNV DWP) and section 4.3.4

Dis-3

Vibration

Dis-4

Air Quality

Air Quality DWP and section 4.3.9

Lan-3

Contamination and remediation

Contamination DWP and sections 2.3.3 and 4.3.8

Was-1

Waste avoidance and resource recovery

Was-2

Diversion from Landfill

Was-3

Deconstruction / Disassembly / Adaptability

Currently not covered and therefore developing a WARRMP (waste avoidance and resource recovery management plan) to cover the CRLL Waste management requirements as Per Appendix 10 of the contract document including the requirements for ISCA Waste credits is needed

Eco-1

Ecological Value

Trees and Vegetation DWP and section 4.3.10

Her-1

Heritage assessment and management

Historic Character DWP and section 4.3.6

Her-2

Monitoring of heritage

Sta-1

Stakeholder engagement strategy

Communication and Consultation Plan, in conjunction with Social Impact and Business Disruption Management Plan, and section 3, 4.1, 4.3.11, 4.3.12 and 4.5

24

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | ARUP

CRL-MTE-RME-000-RPT-0119 Project 251926 | 08 March 2019 | Revision 1

Waste goals and targets CRLL is committed to achieving Auckland Council’s aspirational waste minimisation goal striving towards zero waste to landfill. CRLL waste goals / targets aiming to achieve are:

▪

Implementing the waste management hierarchy; waste avoidance, waste minimisation, materials reuse, recycling and disposal.

▪

Adopt and implement the five principles of designing out waste as detailed by the UK’s Waste Resource Action Programme (WRAP):  design for reuse and recovery  design for off-site construction;  design for materials optimisation;  design for waste efficient procurement; and  design for deconstruction and flexibility.

▪

Achieve the ISCA Waste related credits in Table 5 and have verified by ISCA:

Table 5 ISCA credits and achievement levels

ISCA Credit

Level to Achieve

Was-1

Waste avoidance and resource recovery

Level 2 as per CRLL Minimum requirements (Appendix 10 of the contract documents)

Was- 2

Diversion from Landfill

Level 3 as per CRLL Minimum requirements (Appendix 10 of the contract documents)

Was- 3

Deconstruction / Disassembly / Adaptability

To be defined and agreed on/verified prior to commencing work (Level 1 to 3 on a sliding scale)

(Refer – Appendix 10 of the C3 Alliance contract documents, Sustainability requirements)

IS Rating Tool Requirements CRLL requires, as a minimum, achievement and verification (by ISCA) of the following Waste Credits (“mandatory credits”) to at least the stated levels.

Tables outlining the core requirements that apply within the context of the ISCA IS rating tool framework relating to Was -1, Was -2, and Was-3 are attached as Appendix M (for more details refer to ISCA CRL IS Technical Manual – Mahi Rauora Aratohu - Version 1.2).

25

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | ARUP

CRL-MTE-RME-000-RPT-0119 Project 251926 | 08 March 2019 | Revision 1

2

Project Description

2.1

CRL Overview

The CRL project comprises the construction, operation and maintenance of a 3.4 km underground passenger railway, running between Britomart Station and the North Auckland Rail Line (NAL) in the vicinity of Mt Eden station. The first enabling works packages commenced in December 2015 and the procurement of the main works contracts is underway, with the Contract 3 contract award anticipated in Q1 of 2019.

The complex nature and substantial size of the project has meant that the project has been broken up into multiple different packages to ensure that risks are managed, most appropriately skilled resources are utilised and best value for money is achieved. The various packages of enabling works have also been separated into a number of smaller construction contracts. This CEMP specifically relates to Contract 3, for the pre-construction phase of the work only. The proposed works are described in more detail in sections 2.2 and 2.3 below.

2.2

Demolition Works

It is proposed to demolish buildings and structures within the Mt Eden CSA and ACZ as part of the early works for the CRL project, as these properties have been identified as being on the overall CRL project's critical path. The extent of the demolition area is illustrated in Figure 1 below.

Figure 1 Approximate extent of the Project

Demolition is generally deemed to include foundations and the removal and disposal of all demolished material and disturbed ground, which is covered by the ESCP, CDWP and HC DWP. It includes the provision of all precautionary safety measures, screens, scaffoldings, hoarding, covered walkways and the like for carrying out the demolition work.

In some instances where the future works contractor may benefit from certain structures being left in place (e.g. foundation slabs and/or basement walls or earth retaining structures) partial structures may be initially left to suit the contractor’s methodology. The main works for the CRL project will determine whether or not any remaining structures will be re-used or retained, as part of a future CEMP and associated suite of DWPs and management plans prepared by the C3 Alliance.

26

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | ARUP

CRL-MTE-RME-000-RPT-0119 Project 251926 | 08 March 2019 | Revision 1

The C3 Alliance will develop a demolition plan for each of the individual structures prior to commencing the work. Pre-construction activities will be undertaken in parallel with the development of the demolition plans, such as a study of the underground services in the areas planned for demolition.

2.3

Pre-construction Activities

There are a number of pre-construction activities that are required to take place before the demolition works. Multiple investigations and assessments have been carried out to inform the DWPs and management plans that have been developed to support the Project. The suite of DWPs and management plans are attached as appendices to this CEMP and have been prepared to meet the conditions in the designation and the A2N resource consents outlined in Section 2 of the OP. Additionally, each building requires a site-specific demolition plan to be developed prior to the works being carried out. The entire site will be fully vacated prior to works beginning.

Demolition Plan The specialist demolition contractor (C3 Alliance) engaged to carry out the works will develop a demolition plan or method statement for each of the individual structures in the Project area prior to commencing the work as outlined in the HSE Approved Code of Practice for Demolition, Section 4.8.

The demolition plans shall be developed in accordance with the requirements of the following current codes and regulations:

▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪

Construction Specification: Appendix 4 to the Conditions of Contract CRLL-006 February 2017; Health & Safety at Work Act 2015 – Approved Code of Practise for Demolition; Health & Safety at Work Act 2015 (Asbestos) Regulations 2016; Approved Code of Practice on the Management and removal of Asbestos; and The New Zealand Building Code.

Each site-specific demolition plan will cover the following high-risk components:

▪ ▪

Traffic management, including access and egress to each site and associated risk management;

▪

Management of various construction activities, such as vibration, sediment and dust.

Management and appropriate disposal of hazardous materials, such as contaminated soil and asbestos; and

The demolition plans will include an assessment of the site for asbestos containing materials in accordance with current codes and regulations as well as an assessment of any other potential hazardous materials. Where asbestos is identified, an asbestos management plan will be developed alongside the demolition plan.

The demolition plan will identify the sequence in which the building is to be demolished as well as highlighting any risks to adjoining properties. Further the demolition plan will highlight any structures that are to be demolished adjacent to the railway corridor where potential risks are presented to the operating railway or railway infrastructure.

The demolition plan will identify the plant and equipment to be used to undertake the demolition works.

This is likely to be more commonly available construction plant such as excavator with bucket and/or hydraulic breakers, hydraulic claws and shall be carried out generally in a sequence working from the upper levels towards the lower levels.

During demolition the site management will ensure that the site is not left in an unsafe manner overnight where a risk of falling/toppling objects or hazardous material remain overnight.

27

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | ARUP

CRL-MTE-RME-000-RPT-0119 Project 251926 | 08 March 2019 | Revision 1

Existing Services A study of the underground services in the areas planned for demolition will be undertaken in parallel with the development of the demolition plans for the various sites.

Where feasible, the timing of the demolitions of adjacent or adjoining structures will be optimised so that termination of services to multiple individual sites do not need to occur separately. Where services are required to remain in place for adjacent properties, these shall be identified and protected from any interruption to service during the demolition works.

In all cases the specialist demolition contractor C3 Alliance will coordinate with the respective network utility operators to undertake the termination work and confirm that services to the individual properties have been terminated prior to any demolition taking place.

Utilities coordination work entails the termination and abandonment of services (power and communications) as well as the protection or diversion of utilities serving upstream or downstream properties (transiting utilities). Engagement with the network utility operators (NUOs) is detailed in the SIDB DWP (Appendix J) and the CCP (Appendix K).

Asbestos Asbestos assessments of the buildings planned for demolition will be undertaken in parallel with the development of the site-specific demolition plans. There are three phases of asbestos assessment:

â–Ş â–Ş â–Ş

A preliminary survey; An invasive audit/testing; and Supervision of removal.

Invasive audit and testing for asbestos contamination will take six weeks for the entire site, however the premises must be vacant. The actual scope of invasive audit and testing is uncertain and can only be determined after the results of the preliminary surveys are available. Any potential asbestos risks will be communicated to the affected parties via the CCP (Appendix K). Where asbestos is identified, an asbestos management plan will be developed alongside the demolition plan.

Health and Safety Health and safety is an essential part of the overall construction methodology and individual demolition plans. C3 Alliance shall conform fully, both on- and off-site, with the provisions of the New Zealand Building Code in all matters related to construction safety, in particular with approved documents F1 (Hazardous Agents on Site), F2 (Hazardous Building Materials), F4 (Safety from Falling) and F5 (Construction and Demolition Hazards). C3 Alliance shall at all times comply with the Health and Safety at Work Act 2015, and particularly the Approval Code of Practice for Demolition, as well as the Health and Safety in Employment Regulations 1995 and all subsequent amendments.

C3 Alliance shall erect all necessary temporary supports to prevent any unexpected collapse of any part of the building during and after demolition. C3 Alliance to assume responsibility for all temporary works.

2.4

Construction Methodology Demolition

The demolition work is different for each building and a site-specific demolition plan is required to be developed for each site.

To ensure the Project works are undertaken as safely and efficiently as possible, demolition activities will be performed in stages as described in the following section. There are common methodologies

28

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | ARUP

CRL-MTE-RME-000-RPT-0119 Project 251926 | 08 March 2019 | Revision 1

that will apply to each stage, and similar tools and techniques will be used throughout, as detailed in the schedule below.

The equipment listed in Table 6 below will be supplemented by normal hand tools, ladders and handheld power tools.

29

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | ARUP

CRL-MTE-RME-000-RPT-0119 Project 251926 | 08 March 2019 | Revision 1

Table 6 Indicative demolition methodology

Activity

Approx. Duration

Site Fencing/Hoarding, including lockable gates and appropriate signage prohibiting unauthorised entry and identifying hazards. Signage will include the key contacts listed in Table 11 in section 5.1.1

Prior to the demolition works and shall remain fenced until CRL main works begin.

Protection of Adjacent Structures. Allow the structures to be vacated of occupants (including contractors during demolition), assessed and demolished at the same time. All public thoroughfares will be kept clear and free of debris.

Prior to the demolition works for 4 weeks.

Salvage of Materials, including the stripping of soft furnishings and hardwares before major demolition, recycling of concrete, and recycling of reinforcing steel. Salvage works may commence ahead of the demolition works on a building by building basis as and when they become vacant, and independent of the main demolition staging.

Prior to the demolition works for 4 weeks.

Loading and Unloading of Materials, undertaken in a manner that ensures that the streets, roads and paths are not obstructed and the traffic is not impeded.

Prior, during and post demolition works for 26 weeks.

Demolition, including foundations and the removal and disposal of all demolished material and disturbed ground. The demolition works will be undertaken in accordance with the site-specific Demolition Plan and within the respective stage’s time period.

Up to 6 weeks for each building.

Control of Debris, which shall only be allowed to fall freely and without deflection through chutes specially provided for the purpose. Precautions will be taken against flying or falling debris by sealing off all openings in walls adjacent to the area of fall.

Care will be taken to prevent excessive lateral pressure being built up due to stacking of debris against walls and adjoining properties.

During the demolition works for 26 weeks.

Removal of Support will only be undertaken once a risk assessment has taken place. Any mitigation measures identified through this assessment will form part of the demolition plan.

During and post demolition works for 26 weeks.

Levelling the Site where possible and temporary drainage measures implemented to ensure that the site is free draining, erosion and sediment controls measures installed and maintained. Any ground that is disturbed will not be re-compacted but removed from the site.

Post demolition works for 12 weeks.

Disposal of Materials. All salvaged materials and debris arising from demolitions will either be recycled for the main CRL project or disposed of site to an appropriate landfill site. Debris and rubbish will be removed in such a manner as to cause as little inconvenience as possible to the adjoining owners and the public. The site will be left clear of all demolition and related rubble and all disturbed ground, except where the crushed waste material may be of benefit to the contractor for future CRL work.

Prior, during and post demolition works for 26 weeks.

Total Demolition Duration: 26 weeks

30

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | ARUP

CRL-MTE-RME-000-RPT-0119 Project 251926 | 08 March 2019 | Revision 1

Construction Sequence It is proposed that the demolition works are conducted in stages, the order of which to be confirmed by the C3 Alliance.

Figure 2 below shows an indicative sequence of demolition, to be confirmed by the C3 Alliance. The staged approach will assist in confining the demolition to defined areas for improved manageability and reducing impacts of construction noise and vibration, dust and traffic movements on the surrounding community and environment.

Figure 2 Proposed staging areas of demolition works

2.5

Programme

The Project is anticipated to commence work in early to mid-2019 and take approximately six months to complete based on CRLL’s current understanding of underground services and building conditions.

Should additional complexity be encountered during the course of the Project, then the Project duration may extend beyond six months.

To ensure the Project works are undertaken as safely and efficiently as possible, demolition activities will be performed in three areas as outlined in Section 2.4 above. Additionally, the site preparation works prior to the demolition works may be performed in parallel to each other. The approximate duration of these main activities is shown in Table 6 above.

2.6

Hours of Operation

The designation conditions require that a number of noise and vibration limits are adhered to which restrict noise and vibration generating activity to between 0700 and 2200 (designation conditions 31 to 35). However, works will generally be undertaken between 0700 and 1900 Monday to Saturday.

31

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | ARUP

CRL-MTE-RME-000-RPT-0119 Project 251926 | 08 March 2019 | Revision 1

2.7

Site Layout and Management

Each site-specific demolition plan will detail the site layout and appropriate management measures to be implemented. The demolition plans will be informed by the DWPs attached to this CEMP. The location of temporary buildings and vehicle parking will be detailed in the site-specific demolition plan.

The project workforce will have access to a temporary support area on the vacant, levelled site at 18 Ruru Street for a site office and wash down areas (refer to Figure 2 above). This will also be available for contractor parking, as will areas of the site, in particular once demolition has taken place. Vehicle access points are to be confirmed, however it is generally assumed existing vehicle crossings to sites within the Project area will be used.

Specific works methodology for those sites adjacent to the rail corridor will be designed to avoid potential effects on KiwiRail land or risks to the rail corridor operation. These will be discussed with KiwiRail, and any required permits (or similar) will be sought. Where necessary, the works will be timed to align with blocks of line as needed.

2.8

Security and Safety

The site and temporary support area will be fenced or hoarded at the property boundaries to prevent unauthorised entry at all times and shall include lockable gates. Appropriate signage prohibiting unauthorised entry and identifying hazards will also be provided. The site shall remain fenced until such time as CRLL are ready to commence CRL works.

The C3 Alliance will conform fully, both on- and off-site, with the provisions of the New Zealand Building Code in all matters related to construction safety, in particular with approved documents F1 (Hazardous Agents on Site), F2 (Hazardous Building Materials), F4 (Safety from Falling) and F5 (Construction and Demolition Hazards). C3 Alliance shall at all times comply with the Health and Safety at Work Act 2015, and particularly the Approval Code of Practice for Demolition, as well as the Health and Safety in Employment Regulations 1995 and all subsequent amendments.

The C3 Alliance shall erect all necessary temporary supports to prevent any unexpected collapse of any part of the buildings during and after demolition. The C3 Alliance will assume responsibility for all temporary works.

2.9

Graffiti and Litter

Security fences and hoardings will be inspected for integrity and graffiti as part of a weekly environmental inspection. A small quantity of paint will be kept on site to paint over graffiti rapidly. The C3 Alliance will paint over graffiti once the problem has been identified and reported via the daily work site maintenance programme (although this may take longer if it requires working at height).

The site will be inspected for litter via the daily work site maintenance programme.

The C3 Alliance will discourage graffiti by putting murals and project information on hoardings (where practicable) to avoid providing a blank canvas for graffiti.

CRLL will continue to work with businesses in the area to assist in the regular removal of waste from the Project area through ensuring that there is access for normal collection.

2.10

Returning the Site to Public Use

This will be detailed in the Urban Design DWP which will be prepared as part of a subsequent outline plan process for the construction of the CRL in this area.

32

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | ARUP

CRL-MTE-RME-000-RPT-0119 Project 251926 | 08 March 2019 | Revision 1

3

Social and Environmental Management

This CEMP presents a framework of principles, environmental policy and performance standards as well as processes for implementing appropriate environmental management. The methods for achieving this are presented in detail in the sections below.

3.1

Construction Activities and Associated Environmental Receivers

Key construction activities associated with the Project include the demolition of buildings and structures. These activities have the potential to affect different aspects of the environment (e.g. traffic, noise). The DWPs and management plans attached to this CEMP detail mitigation measures specific to the environmental aspect and detail further the construction activity which causes the potential effect.

3.2

Environmental Risk Register

The Project Risk Register includes environmental risks for the demolition activities related to the Project. A risk register for the Project will be developed by the C3 Alliance and stored in their document management system.

The information contained in the risk register provides a guide for the implementation of environmental management activities, controls and monitoring, thus minimising environmental impacts.

Review of the Register The risk register is a ‘living document’ and will be constantly updated to address changing conditions, revised methodologies and each new work area.

The Environment and Sustainability Manager (ESM) is required to maintain and review environmental risks within the register. The risk register will be reviewed prior to the commencement of construction activities (taking into account finalised construction methodologies), at regular intervals and when there is a new or changed activity, equipment or location. Changes to legislative requirements may also drive risk register reviews. The register will be reviewed on a quarterly basis as a minimum.

The ESM, with the assistance of environmental and technical experts, will determine whether the CEMP and plans require revision to reflect the revised risk assessment. CRLL, as the consent holder, or the C3 Alliance as their appointed contractor, will be responsible for obtaining Auckland Council approvals, if any are required, prior to commencing any new or changed activities.

The ESM will inform the relevant staff, Project Director and management team of any changes to the environmental risks within the Project risk register.

3.3

Cumulative Effects

Methods to address cumulative effects are outlined for specific activities within the suite of DWPs and management plans attached to this CEMP. Monitoring for each area includes methods to ensure the effects from the Project are well understood and delineated from effects of any concurrent construction projects in proximity. The types of cumulative effects that are likely to occur from the demolition works and which are addressed in the DWPs and management plans are:

33

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | ARUP

CRL-MTE-RME-000-RPT-0119 Project 251926 | 08 March 2019 | Revision 1

▪ ▪ ▪

Dust emissions in the immediate area from demolition activities; Business disruptions from construction noise and vibrations during the weekday; and Traffic congestion from large vehicle movements on the local roads.

3.4

Legislative and Other Requirements

This section details the statutory framework and other requirements for environmental management on the Project and outlines the relevant legislation, policies, plans and consents.

National Legal Requirements and Policies The C3 Alliance will comply with all relevant legislation and will employ best practice environmental management procedures. Key environmental legislation for management of the Project is identified in Table 7 below.

Table 7 Key national legislation, regulations and standards

National legislation, regulations, strategies and policies Resource Management Act 1991 Hazardous Substances and New Organisms Act 1996 Protected Objects Act 1975 for the relevant archaeological and heritage standards/practices Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga Act 2014 National Environmental Standard – Air Quality 2004 (NEW:AQ) National Environmental Standard for Assessing and Managing Contaminants in Soil to Protect Human Health Regulations 2011

The C3 Alliance will identify, maintain and continually evaluate compliance with legal and other related requirements that are applicable to delivery of the Project.

Legislation, Standards and Guidelines relating to Environmental Aspects Table 8 identifies legislation, standards and guidelines which are relevant to specific environmental aspects of the Project and will be read in conjunction with the relevant DWPs and management plans of this CEMP. Table 8 Standards, guidelines and specific statutory requirements

Plan

Plan Statutory Requirements, Guidelines and Standards

CNVMP

▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪

NZS 6803:1999 Acoustics – Construction Noise

▪

Auckland Regional Council – GD05 – Guideline Document 2016/005, Erosion and Sediment Control Guide for Land Disturbing Activities in the Auckland Region

AQ DWP ESCP

DIN 4150-3:1999 Structural Vibration (German standard) NZS 6801:2008 Measurement of Sound NZS 6802:2008 Assessment of Environmental Sound Ministry for Environment, Good Practice Guide for Assessing and Managing the Environmental Effects of Dust Emissions 2001

34

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | ARUP

CRL-MTE-RME-000-RPT-0119 Project 251926 | 08 March 2019 | Revision 1

Plan

Plan Statutory Requirements, Guidelines and Standards

CDWP

▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪

TAP DWP

HC DWP

▪ ▪ ▪

Ministry for Environment A Guide to the Management of Cleanfills 2002 Health and Safety at Work (Asbestos) Regulations 2016 New Zealand Guidelines for Assessing and Managing Asbestos in Soils (BRANZ Limited (BRANZ) 2017) Approved Code of Practice Management and Removal of Asbestos (ACOP) (WorkSafe 2016) Ministry for Environment, Contaminated Land Management Guidelines No 1 to 5 National Environmental Standard for Assessing and Managing Contaminants in Soil to Protect Human Health Regulations 2011 Good Practice Guide for Assessing and Managing the Environmental Effects of Dust Emissions, Ministry for the Environment 2001 Australian and New Zealand Environment Conservation Council (ANZECC) Guidelines for Fresh and Marine Water Quality 2000 Auckland Transport’s Code of Practice NZ Transport Agency’s Code of Practice for Temporary Traffic Management Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga Act 2014

Note that specific works methodology for those sites adjacent to the rail corridor will be designed to avoid potential effects on KiwiRail land or risks to the rail corridor operation. These will be discussed with KiwiRail, and any required permits (or similar) will be sought.

35

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | ARUP

CRL-MTE-RME-000-RPT-0119 Project 251926 | 08 March 2019 | Revision 1

4

Implementation and Operation

This section addresses how the CEMP, DWPs and management plans will be implemented. Details around the following are provided:

▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪

Roles and responsibilities; Training and induction; Operating procedures; Emergency and incident responses; Communication and interfaces; and Complaints management.

4.1

Roles and Responsibilities Overview and Responsibility for this Plan

Each person involved in the Project has equal responsibility to avoid, remedy or mitigate adverse environmental effects. There are three key groups with responsibility for environmental management of the Project:

▪ ▪ ▪

CRLL as the Project owner; C3 Alliance, the construction contractor undertaking the works; and Auckland Council which audits the works and monitors compliance with resource consent conditions, the CEMP, DWPs and management plans.

The C3 Alliance will appoint an ESM as part of the construction team during the construction phase of the Project. The ESM will be involved throughout this period to give advice and to ensure that the CEMP and plans are implemented and maintained. Further details of responsibilities during the construction phase are included below.

Specific Roles and Responsibilities The key management roles for each organisation in relation to environmental management during the construction of the Project are outlined in Table 9.

36

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | ARUP

CRL-MTE-RME-000-RPT-0119 Project 251926 | 08 March 2019 | Revision 1

Table 9 Specific roles and responsibilities

Organisation

Role

City Rail Link Ltd

CRLL CEO

CRLL Construction Manager CRLL GM Corporate Relations & Communications

CRLL Consents Manager CRLL Construction Safety Manager

CRLL Project Manager

Responsibilities

▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪

Providing strategic direction to all workstreams to provide an integrated approach to the delivery of the CRL. Overseeing project planning, acquisition, design, constructability, procurement, stakeholder engagement, communications, programme and financial control.

Identifying and managing project risks and issues.

Regular reporting to the CRLL Board, CRL Steering Group and Project Control and Integration Group.

Liaising with Auckland Council and other key stakeholders.

Managing performance of the Contractor.

Responsible for the Contractor’s adherence to DWPs. Manager of CRL Communications for CRLL and responsible for communicating key aspects of Project to stakeholders, affected parties and general public.

Manages CRL Communications Strategy and is point of contact for CRLL. Manages CLGs for Project.

Manages CRLL’s online presence, specifically the CRLL website.

Main point of contact for implementation of, and compliance with CRL designation and resource consent conditions.

Health and Safety regime for the CRL enabling works.

Being informed of all incidents, according to severity and time scales as outlined in the Health and Safety Plan for the C3 Alliance.

Reporting to the AT Rail Systems and Safety Assurance Manager.

Performance oversight of the demolition.

Coordinate different CRLL (client) work streams to provide quality and timely client inputs and decisions.

Liaise fortnightly with the Project affected community regarding project progress and scheduled works in conjunction with the Stakeholder and Communications Manager.

37

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | ARUP

CRL-MTE-RME-000-RPT-0119 Project 251926 | 08 March 2019 | Revision 1

Organisation

Role CRLL Street Response Manager

C3 Alliance

Construction Manager

Stakeholder and Communications Manager

Responsibilities

▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪

Manages CRL street response measures including street cleaning, graffiti removal.

Co-ordinates Mt Eden Business Promotion events.

Co-ordinates CRL Business Support Programme (Business Pack).

Proactively identifying opportunities to mitigate impact on businesses.

Demolition delivery.

Adherence to the CEMP and delivery work plans (including the CCP) of site personnel.

Building trust in the team’s capabilities by personally leading the process and providing expertise in specialist areas. Alerting the Stakeholder and Communications Manager to stakeholder groups, individuals or issues that need attention.

Providing technical information and project progress/milestone information to CRLL for briefings and CLG meetings.

Leading the response to issues management and crisis management.

Ensuring that subcontractors adhere to the Project communication protocols and procedures.

The main and readily accessible point of contact for persons affected by the Project in addition to the 24-hour inquiries service.

Inform the community of project progress and likely commencement of demolition works and programme.

Liaise fortnightly with the Project affected community.

Manage stakeholder enquiries and complaints.

Immediately report high risk issues to the CRLL Project Manager and the CRLL GM Corporate Relations & Communications.

Report weekly to CRLL Project Manager and the CRLL GM Corporate Relations & Communications on all key community relations and stakeholder management issues.

Work with the CRLL GM Corporate Relations & Communications to manage and track stakeholder relations and risks.

Assist the CRLL Communications team with:  Stakeholders communications;  Delivering communications activity; and  Media enquiries

38

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | ARUP

CRL-MTE-RME-000-RPT-0119 Project 251926 | 08 March 2019 | Revision 1

Organisation

Role

Responsibilities

▪ ▪

Provide communications collateral and strategic advice to C3 Alliance Construction Manager on critical stakeholder engagement, communications and relationship building.

Assist the Construction Manager in the briefing of site personnel with respect to  The mandatory site inductions regarding the standards and requirements for community relations;  The protocols to follow if they are approached by a member of the public or the media; and  Behaviour protocols in and around the construction site boundaries.

Environmental and Sustainability Manager

▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪

Project and Site Engineers

▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪

Key contact for compliance monitoring.

Inspections, auditing and checking of environmental management practices and procedures.

On-site compliance with consent conditions, DWP’s, other requirements and tracking compliance information.

Attendance at compliance meetings with Auckland Council Compliance and Monitoring Officers.

Report to CRLL changes to construction techniques or natural environmental changes which require alterations to DWPs, existing consents or new resource consents.

Prepare (with assistance from Technical Specialists), review and update CEMP and relevant sub-plans.

Ensures the requirements of the ISCA rating related credits (in conjunction with other DWPs which includes but not limited to – AQ DWP, CNV DWP and the CCP) are met.

Facilitate and oversee environmental monitoring.

Update and maintain the environmental portion of the Project Risk Register.

Training of all staff including subcontractors.

Reporting on environmental and sustainability KPIs. Undertaking incident investigations.

Development, management and monitoring of Construction Execution Procedures (CEPs). Including incorporating environmental and sustainability requirements into the detailed CEPs developed on site.

Overseeing subcontractors.

39

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | ARUP

CRL-MTE-RME-000-RPT-0119 Project 251926 | 08 March 2019 | Revision 1

Organisation

Role Subcontractors

Responsibilities

▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪

Directing all public and media enquiries to the Stakeholder and Communications Manager.

Identifying themselves as a member of the project team and the company they work for.

Using approved haul routes so that access to and egress from the sites is undertaken with minimum disruption to the local community.

Parking only in designated project parking areas, if available Working within approved construction hours.

Working within the conditions specified in the Permits to Notify.

Showing consideration for stakeholders and community members at all times while working on the project and when travelling to and from the project site.

40

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | ARUP

CRL-MTE-RME-000-RPT-0119 Project 251926 | 08 March 2019 | Revision 1

Roles and responsibilities of personnel which implement specific environmental controls and monitoring programs (such as the contaminated land specialist and archaeologist) are detailed in the relevant plans. Key roles of personnel as they relate to environmental management during the construction of the Project are detailed below:

▪

All Staff  Attending project induction tool-box talks;  Responsible for reporting environmental incidents, complaints, defects and other problem areas to senior staff as they arise on site;  Ensuring that required processes and procedures for environmental management are followed;  Ensuring that environmental mitigation and protection measures are maintained and working correctly;  Within day to day work responsibilities, ensure the environment both on site and adjacent to the site is protected and respected;  Ensure the site is tidy and all litter is placed in bins; and  Ensure all graffiti is removed from the site boundary and security fences as soon as possible.

▪

Project Director  Takes ultimate responsibility for compliance with resource consent conditions;  Notifies CRLL of any environmental non-compliances (e.g. Auckland Council, Heritage New Zealand) or other environmental incidents;  Approves environmental plans prior to issue; and  Ensures adequate resources are provided to ensure environmental issues and obligations are appropriately managed.

▪

Stakeholder and Communications Manager  Responsible for notifying residents of Project works in accordance with the CCP and SIBDDWP;  Disseminates information to the public as approved by CRLL; and  Primary contact for Project related complaints and enquiries.

▪

Environmental and Sustainability Manager  Provides leadership to ensure staff are motivated to achieve environmental standards, and comply with all resource consent and designation conditions;  Develops, implements and reviews environmental management systems including the CEMP and plans for the Project;  Co-ordinates the interfaces and communications with external agencies and stakeholders in relation to environmental management on the Project in conjunction with Communication and Consultation Manager;  Co-ordinates with CRLL Sustainability Manager to review relevant ISCA credits requirements and sustainability minimum requirements to ensure the required levels and scores as per CRLL Minimum Requirements are achieved.  Manages and co-ordinates all consents required (current), and construction monitoring and maintains and submits relevant reporting and records to Auckland Council and CRLL, as required;

41

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | ARUP

CRL-MTE-RME-000-RPT-0119 Project 251926 | 08 March 2019 | Revision 1

 Undertakes regular site inspections and audits to ensure compliance with the CEMP and plans and consent conditions;  Input records of all environmental monitoring results to the C3 Alliance;  Coordinates environmental interfaces with consultants, subcontractors and suppliers;  Coordinates site archaeological monitoring and protection requirements and provides necessary training and advice to site staff;  Coordinates all site monitoring including but not limited to groundwater, settlement, water quality, dust, noise, and vibration monitoring and provides necessary related training and advice to staff in relation to this monitoring;  Trains staff in site specific environmental procedures;  Coordinates environmental emergency responses;  Notifies the Project Director of any significant environmental non-compliances;  Responsible for resolving issues of environmental non-compliances;  Manages maintenance and monitoring of the effectiveness of erosion and sediment controls, stormwater devices and other control devices; and  Ensures spill kits are available and stocked and provides training on equipment use.

▪

Project Technical Specialists  Prepares the DWPs and management plans for the CEMP;  Undertakes monitoring as required by the individual DWPs and management plans;  Liaise with the ESM to confirm compliance with the DWPs and management plans; and  Provide assistance to the ESM on technical matters.

▪

Project Engineer  Provides leadership to the site team to achieve Project environmental objectives and targets to ensure a high level of performance is achieved;  Responsible for ensuring environmental controls and erosion and sediment control works are installed, modified and maintained as appropriate for each stage of construction;  Assists in the development, implementation and review of Project environmental objectives; and  Ensures all staff on-site are aware of environmental requirements at all times and sees that routine maintenance to erosion sediment control facilities and management measures continue with ongoing effectiveness.

Contact Details The CEMP will be updated following the contract award of the C3 Alliance confirming the names and contact details of the following key personnel: Project Director, Environmental Manager, H&S Advisor, Stakeholder and Communications Manager.

4.2

Training and Induction

All personnel will receive training of a type and level of detail that is appropriate for the environmental aspects of their routine and emergency work assignments. As a minimum, all personnel are required to satisfactorily complete the Project Induction Training. Other mechanisms of communicating environmental controls are through the induction training, weekly tool box talks and prestart meetings, all of which are described below.

42

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | ARUP

CRL-MTE-RME-000-RPT-0119 Project 251926 | 08 March 2019 | Revision 1

Induction Training The Project Induction includes a presentation of the requirements of this CEMP and in particular the requirements of the issue specific plans, incident response, emergency procedures and spill management. The purpose of the induction is to ensure that, at a minimum, the employee or subcontractor is aware of the main environmental requirements for their scope of work, including:

▪

The importance of conforming with the environmental policy and procedures and the requirements of this CEMP; and

▪

The emergency response and incident procedures.

Tool Box Talks Weekly tool box talks are conducted for site personnel to deliver specific training in an aspect of work or controls. This may include spill kit training, graffiti covering or correct erection of a silt fence. This training provides site personnel with ongoing environmental training and information throughout the Project. Participants in tool box talks shall sign the attendance sheet.

Pre-Start Meetings Pre-start meetings are used by the supervisors and foremen to explain the work to be done in the upcoming shift. All operational aspects of the task are discussed including safety and environmental issues and controls, particularly if there are new hazards or if there has been a recent incident.

An environmental management representative will attend as applicable to explain new environmental controls or reiterate existing controls.

4.3

Operating Procedures

The following sections describe the environmental aspects associated with the construction phase of the Project along with references to the operational controls and mitigation measures, contained in the suite of DWPs and management plans attached to this CEMP.

Network Utilities Consultation and co-ordination with Network Utility Operators (NUO) will be ongoing throughout the duration of the Project and will continue to be undertaken in accordance with the ‘Principles and Objectives’ and ‘How we will communicate and consult’ sections of the CCP (Appendix K). The C3 Alliance will also utilise the strategies outlined in the Engagement Tools section of the CCP. The following NUO’s have been consulted with in order to ensure the continued operation of network utilities throughout the Project works to sites surrounding the Project area (unless otherwise agreed with the NUO) and to ensure that disconnection of utilities from sites within the Project area does not adversely affect surrounding sites:

▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪

Vector Electricity; Vector Gas; Vector Communications; Chorus; Vodafone; Auckland Council’s stormwater unit (Healthy Waters); Watercare Services; and City Link.

43

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | ARUP

CRL-MTE-RME-000-RPT-0119 Project 251926 | 08 March 2019 | Revision 1

Consultation has included regular workshops and ongoing liaison through emails, phone calls, and meetings. No methods or measures of construction were disputed during consultation.

Prior to excavation works for utility disconnections, all utilities in the Project area will be positively identified by trenching following initial location using scanning techniques (Ground Penetrating Radar or similar techniques) and marked out on the ground. The location of inspection pits and other access points will be identified prior to demolition beginning so that they can be marked to avoid stockpiles and other materials blocking access.

In order to ensure the continued operation of the utilities and to ensure the NUO have access to existing utilities for maintenance/emergency access and repair at all reasonable times, regular consultation and coordination with all NUOs will be undertaken throughout the Project. This will be through workshops, regularly scheduled meetings, phone calls and emails.

Erosion and Sediment Control An ESCP has been prepared to satisfy the relevant A2N resource consent conditions 53 – 58 and CRL designation condition 21, which is included in Appendix C. The ESCP provides for the management of all earthworks operations to minimise any discharge of debris, soil, sediment or sediment laden water beyond the site to either land and/or stormwater drainage systems.

The ESCP follows the principles of erosion and sediment control which are well understood by the contracting industry and are based on Auckland Council’s “Erosion and sediment control guide for land disturbing activities” in the Auckland Region (referred to as ‘GD05’).

Earthworks activities will involve removal of structures to ground level only. Sediment loading is anticipated to be low as demolition/construction works will be undertaken using the following controls to minimise erosion potential and reduce sediment loads to the receiving stormwater network prior to discharge from the Project area:

▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪

Hoardings established on asphalt bunds; Gradual stabilisation of exposed ground surfaces; Stabilised site ingress and egress; Stormwater inlet protection; New stormwater catchpits; Settlement tanks; and Dust control (supported by the AQ DWP in Appendix H).

The control methods used will cover stockpile management, ensure the stabilisation and cover of exposed areas as soon as practically possible, the installation of perimeter controls to protect the receiving environment from the demolition/earthworks, and the capture and treatment of sediment laden water generated by the site works. All erosion and sediment control measures will be fully established for each area within the project before any physical works can commence in the area.

Traffic, Access and Parking A TAP DWP has been developed to satisfy the relevant CRL designation conditions (10, 25 and 27), as well as with Auckland Transport’s Code of Practice (ATCoP) and the NZ Transport Agency’s Code of Practice for Temporary Traffic Management (CoPTTM). The TAP DWP is attached at Appendix D. The objective of the TAP DWP is to avoid, remedy or mitigate the adverse effects of construction on transport, parking and property access by managing the road transport network for the duration of construction, maintaining pedestrian access to private property as all times, and provide on-going vehicle access so far as is reasonably practicable. It should be noted that the Project works will occur

44

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | ARUP

CRL-MTE-RME-000-RPT-0119 Project 251926 | 08 March 2019 | Revision 1

outside the road corridor. Vehicle access points are to be confirmed, however it is generally assumed existing vehicle crossings to sites within the CSA will be used. Contractor parking will be available at 18 Ruru Street, where site offices will be located.

The modal priorities adopted by the TAP DWP are: 1. Active transport; 2. Public transport; 3. Freight, service vehicles, couriers and taxis; and 4. Private vehicles (including demolition traffic).

Within CoPTTM, roads are classified based on the daily traffic volume, function and other criteria. The roads within the immediate vicinity of the Project and their classification are listed below:

▪ ▪ ▪

Level 2 Roads – Mt Eden Road and New North Road; Level 1 Roads – Flower Street and Nikau Street; and Low Volume (LV) Roads – Ngahura Street, Ruru Street, Korari Street and Shaddock Street.

Based on the road classifications listed above, the traffic management measures proposed in the TAP DWP have been developed accordingly.

The TAP DWP outlines onsite access, car parking management and methods for encouraging travel to the site using forms of transport other than private vehicles to assist in mitigating localised traffic effects. Critical contractor parking will be provided for on site.

During the proposed demolition works, all existing streets will generally remain open to all road users, with two-way carriageways and the existing footpath provisions. As a result, access to all existing properties outside the CRL designation will remain available. Short term closures may be required during periods of the demolition, and this is most likely to affect Flower Street and Shaddock Street.

The closure of these streets will occur at different times. Where short term closures of lanes, or diversions of traffic or pedestrians are required, these will generally be very minor in effect, and comparable to those of a typical urban, off-street construction site.

It is estimated that there will be an average of 15 trucks per weekday to remove material (30 one-way trips) between 7:00 am and 6:00 pm Monday to Friday, and 7:00 am to 2:00 pm on Saturday over the six month demolition period. Truck movements will be subject to the following restrictions:

▪ ▪

Reverse manoeuvring of trucks shall not take place on Mt Eden Road; and Reverse manoeuvring of trucks may occur within local streets (Ngahura Street, Ruru Street, Korari Street, Flower Street, Nikau Street and Shaddock Street). This shall be carried out with the assistance of a spotter.

Truck movements to and from the sites will generally be via 11.5 m large rigid trucks, or smaller units.

It is acknowledged that these vehicles may be required to swing across opposing lanes when traversing local streets such as Ruru Street and Nikau Street; however, these manoeuvres are considered acceptable within these very low speed, low volume environments. Larger semi-trailer trucks may occasionally deliver plant to the sites. The manoeuvring of such vehicles may require traversing over other lanes, will be mitigated by take place outside of the commuter peak periods, and will be managed by appropriate mobile traffic management.

Construction Noise and Vibration Construction noise and vibration is addressed by the CNV DWP attached at Appendix E and has been developed to satisfy the relevant CRL designation conditions (10, 36, 37 and 38). The Noise and

45

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | ARUP

CRL-MTE-RME-000-RPT-0119 Project 251926 | 08 March 2019 | Revision 1

Vibration Monitoring Manager nominated in the CNV DWP will be responsible for its implementation.

The Monitoring Manager will receive suitable training from the Specialist Noise and Vibration Advisor.

Construction noise and vibration will be generated by construction equipment and activities at the site.

Throughout the demolition, noise and vibration effects will be carefully managed through the implementation of the CNV DWP and, where required, the preparation and implementation of a SSNVMP. The CNV DWP is a live document that will be reviewed and updated during the Project to reflect material changes. The SSNVMP will include the location and specification of temporary acoustic fences and visual barriers for each site.

Demolition has the potential to produce high levels of vibration, generally from one-off events, such as dropping of concrete or other heavy items. The buildings to be removed are generally low rise, with concrete block walls and/or timber or steel framing, and as such, high vibration events will largely be avoided. However residual vibration will be avoided by nibbling concrete and lowering the structure in parts rather than pulling it down in large panels.

The demolition works will remove all buildings and structures to ground level including their foundations. Therefore, concrete cutting and/or concrete breaking may be required to break up large concrete pieces into smaller pieces to enable them to be transported offsite for further processing.

Some sites will retain basement walls/foundations to support site stability, the road and footpaths, and to support future CRL main works. There will be no works in the road. A soft strip of salvageable materials will be carried out where possible. All demolition material will be removed from the Project area and either recycled for the main CRL project or disposed of at approved facilities, depending on what is more appropriate.

Lighting Spill and Glare During demolition, temporary lighting may be required where sufficient natural light is not available to undertake the works. Spill lighting may cause a nuisance to surrounding residents and businesses.

Glare from temporary light has the potential to cause a disabling effect to drivers of vehicles.

The principal objectives for the management of temporary lighting are to:

â–Ş â–Ş â–Ş

Minimise the nuisance level to adjacent residents/building occupiers of the works; and Minimise the impact of glare on the surrounding road environment; and Increase employee and subcontractor awareness of their obligations with regard to minimising effects of light spill on adjacent neighbours.

The C3 Alliance will minimise light spill by selecting / procuring light fittings that provide a defined directional beam. Lights will be mounted in elevated positions so that they may point down towards the works, rather than aiming across the work space and increasing the risk of light shining into adjacent buildings.

Historic Character: Archaeology A HCDWP, included in Appendix F, has been developed to satisfy the relevant CRL designation conditions (10 and 42) and addresses the management of any adverse archaeological effects that may result during the Project.

A built heritage section is not required as the buildings in proximity to the works area are late 20th century buildings with no built heritage values. The HCDWP therefore only covers archaeology and does not include built heritage as it is not applicable to the works. The HCDWP establishes procedures to be followed in the event of archaeological remains being discovered in accordance with CRL designation condition 42.3c, which includes ceasing activities in the immediate vicinity, recording

46

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | ARUP

CRL-MTE-RME-000-RPT-0119 Project 251926 | 08 March 2019 | Revision 1

and reporting in accordance with the CCP (Appendix K). An Archaeological Authority3 under Section 44(a) of the Heritage NZ Pouhere Taonga Act 2014 (HNZPTA) has been obtained for the CRL Project.

The management of any pre-1900 archaeological sites exposed within the Project area will be carried out in accordance with the designation conditions and the Archaeological Authority.

Urban Design As this CEMP is specific to enabling works for the CRL, and in particular the demolition of existing buildings only, it does not include provisions for urban design. Matters related to urban design of the CRL permanent works will be addressed in a subsequent outline plan and the provision of an Urban Design DWP.

Contaminated Soils A CDWP is included in Appendix G and has been developed to satisfy both the relevant A2N resource consents (conditions 131 – 134) and the CRL designation conditions (10 and 57). In this regard, this plan acts as both CDWP and CSMP. The CDWP provides the framework for managing contamination hazards and mitigation measures relevant to the expected conditions that will be encountered while earthworks are being undertaken.

The CDWP outlines proposed soil management and contingency measures, and also addresses health and safety issues associated with construction works on contaminated land.

The soils contain concentrations of metals above published background concentrations (ARC 2001) and detectable concentrations of PAHs, which indicates that it is contaminated fill that does not meet the clean fill criteria and is suitable for disposal at a licensed hazardous waste landfill facility. The underlying natural deposits are classified as cleanfill and can be disposed of to a cleanfill facility.

The potential effects include the exposure of construction workers and the general public to contaminants present in soil and groundwater, and for the discharge of contaminants to the environment. In addition to the CDWP, the ESCP (attached at Appendix C) will ensure the capture and treat any sediment laden water generated by the site works so it does not enter sensitive environments, such as the stormwater system along the local roads.

Management measures include the appointment of a Contaminated Land Specialist, the development of a Contractor Health and Safety Plan, appropriate disposal of contaminated soil and hazardous materials, and appropriate procedures for excavation works as well as identifying and managing unexpected discovery of contaminated soils or hazardous materials.

Air Quality During the construction phase there is potential for the discharge of contaminants to air, such as dust.

Combustion emissions from the operation of vehicles, and any residual emissions from emission control equipment associated with the works are expected to give rise to air quality effects that are negligible. The dust assessments were used to identify the degree of mitigation and monitoring required. A number of sensitive receivers are noted as being located in proximity to the area of works.

An AQDWP is included in Appendix H and has been developed to satisfy both the relevant A2N resource consents (conditions 223 – 224) and the CRL designation conditions (10 and 59). The purpose of this AQDWP is to avoid, remedy or mitigate the actual or potential adverse air quality effects during construction. The primary mitigation measure to suppress dust is through the use of water sprays. Mitigation will also be provided through asbestos surveys (and removal if found), low vehicle speeds, covering of unpaved areas, hoardings, minimising the size of stockpiles and monitoring.

3

Archaeological Authority number 2017/793 issued by HNZPT.

47

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | ARUP

CRL-MTE-RME-000-RPT-0119 Project 251926 | 08 March 2019 | Revision 1

Trees and Vegetation All trees and vegetation within the Project area will be removed and there are a small number of trees located in close proximity to the works. The removal of vegetation will result in an adverse effect on the local treescape and amenity if no mitigation measures are implemented. A TV DWP in included in Appendix I and has been developed to satisfy the relevant CRL designation conditions (10 and 55).

The TV DWP confirms that replacement planting will be undertaken post completion of the CRL construction. This replacement planting will be carried out a ratio of 1:1 and mitigate the adverse effects resulting from the tree removal. As the Project consists of enabling works for the CRL, there is no scope to conduct this replanting as a part of the Project. The exact nature and design of the landscaping and replacement planting will be specified in a future Urban Design DWP as part of a subsequent outline plan process. There are no scheduled trees within the footprint of, or proximate to, the Project. Street trees not removed as part of these works are to be recognised and protected through the preparation and implementation of a Temporary Traffic Management Plan by the C3 Alliance.

Social Impact and Business Disruption During the construction of the Project there is potential for disruption to businesses, residents and community services/facilities to occur. A SIBD DWP in included in Appendix J and has been developed to satisfy the relevant CRL designation conditions (10 and 61). Feedback obtained in the preparation of this DWP has reinforced the importance of regular communication between the Project team and affected parties during the period of construction.

An engagement programme with residential properties and businesses located immediately adjacent the demolition area was carried out between October and December 2018. The following are key issues were raised by parties during the engagement meetings:

▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪

Loss of on-street parking and road closure, affecting people’s way of life, connectivity and access; Noise and vibration, affecting people’s way and quality of life and ability to conduct business; Dust pollution affecting people’s quality of life and ability to conduct business; The potential for building damage; The potential for utility disruption; and Potential impacts on safety and amenity.

As required under CRL designation condition 61.6, the SIBD DWP will be implemented throughout the entire demolition period and for up to 12 months following the completion of the demolition Project if required. Social impact and business disruption effects will be mitigated through the suite of DWPs required under the CRL designation.

Mitigation measures include, but are not limited to, regular progress meetings and communications with all parties, advisory signage, restriction of vehicle movements, daily work site maintenance, lockable facilities and messaging to the effect that local businesses are operating as usual.

Monitoring of the social impact and business disruption issues will be undertaken through the suite of DWPs attached as appendices to this document. All complaints and subsequent mitigation measures/actions and responses will be documented to inform the annual report for Social Impact and Business Disruptions. Complaints shall be recorded in a complaints file, and an investigation shall be undertaken.

Notice boards that clearly identify the Requiring Authority and the Project name will be erected, together with the name, telephone number and email address of the Site or Project Manager and the Communication and Consultation Manager in accordance with designation condition 20.1(b).

48

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | ARUP

CRL-MTE-RME-000-RPT-0119 Project 251926 | 08 March 2019 | Revision 1

Communications and Consultation Plan A CCP has been prepared for the Project to satisfy both the relevant A2N resource consents (conditions 25 – 33) and the CRL designation conditions (10 and 15) and is included in Appendix K. The CCP sets out a framework for communication and consultation with the community, stakeholders, affected parties and in proximity parties during construction and should be read in conjunction with the SIBD DWP (Appendix J).

Once general information on the Project has been disseminated, the affected parties will be directly communicated with at a detailed level by the C3 Alliance. The priority for communication with affected parties is via face-to-face conversations. A secondary audience of the wider Auckland population will be serviced through a predominantly online and electronic communication strategy. The key messages for this audience will be advanced communication of changes to road function to enable informed choice and to ensure travel-related information is readily available.

The CCP details the communication channels and tools to be used, including the role and functioning of the Mt Eden Community and Business Liaison Group, and the frequency of communication. Overall the document aims to provide communities with confidence that they will be kept informed and know how this will happen, have effective ways to connect with the project and input into issues that affect them. Additionally, the CPP will ensure stakeholders and affected parties are consulted with, where there are direct effects on them, will have inquiries and complaints responded to in a timely manner and can get in touch easily on a 24/7 basis should the need arise.

Building Condition Surveys Building condition surveys will be undertaken prior to works commencing, in accordance with condition 46 of the designation conditions and condition 109 of the A2N resource consents, where it is assessed that there is potential for damage to buildings or structures arising from Project works.

The building condition surveys will generally be undertaken as follows:

▪ ▪

The building surveys will be undertaken by an independent senior qualified person; The survey shall include:  Any information about the type of foundations;  Existing levels of damage (aesthetic, superficial, affecting levels of serviceability);  Whether observed damage is associated with structural damage;  Susceptibility of building or structure to further movement;  Photographic evidence;  Specific assessment of damage with reference to trigger levels 4; and  Review of alarm and alert trigger levels.

▪

The C3 Alliance will provide the building condition survey report to the property owner and Auckland Council within 15 working days of the survey being undertaken;

▪

If requested by a building or structure owner where a pre-construction survey was undertaken, the C3 Alliance will undertake a visual inspection. This is in addition to monthly visual inspections until the completion of dewatering of the Project; and

▪

The C3 Alliance will carry out visual inspections of the surrounding ground and external building facades of the surrounding buildings adjacent to the Project to monitor any deterioration or movement of any pre-existing cracks.

4

Condition 109, R/LUC/2016/1890, R/REG/2016/1892, R/REG/2016/1895, R/REG/2016/1896, REG/2016/1897, R/REG/2016/1898, R/REG/2016/1899, R/REG/2016/1900 and R/REG/2016/2038

49

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | ARUP

CRL-MTE-RME-000-RPT-0119 Project 251926 | 08 March 2019 | Revision 1

Hazardous Substances Hazardous substances will be kept on site within specified hazardous substances storage areas, the monitoring and management of which will be the responsibility of the ESM. This section describes how the Project works will manage the storage, handling, transport and disposal of these substances including the following details:

▪

A list of all hazardous substances kept on site, include class information and Material Safety Data Sheets;

▪ ▪

Requirements for proper storage, handling, transport and disposal of hazardous substances; and Spill response procedures (refer Section 4.4.2).

Further detail relating to the storage and handling of hazardous substances is detailed in the following sections and provided in in the CDWP (attached at Appendix G). In addition to this, further management of hazardous substances is provided in the site-specific asbestos management plans and, subsequently, the demolition plans.

4.4

Emergency and Incident Response

An environmental emergency is an event which has a detrimental effect on the surrounding environment. A detrimental environmental effect is something that causes significant harm to the environment, which is not legally allowed and requires immediate response. An environmental emergency can also be a deviation from the environmental management system defined in the CEMP, DWPs and management plans. This means there has been a failure to follow the established process or procedures that help the contractor achieve best practice.

Examples of environmental emergencies include, but are not restricted to:

▪ ▪ ▪

Significant (large volume) chemical / oil spill; Excessive discharge of sediment to the stormwater system; and Hazardous substance release to air.

Emergency Response Plan An Emergency Response Plan (ERP) will be prepared for the Project by the C3 Alliance. This ERP will take into account the following factors:

▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪

The parts of the site or adjoining properties likely to be affected; The degree of predictability of the emergency; The likely speed of onset; The likely effect of the emergency; The contents of the ERP will include:  description of the potential emergency;  the person responsible for actioning the ERP;  the equipment required to deal with the emergency including rescue equipment;  emergency contact numbers;  direction to site workers and other affected persons on what they are required to do; and  the methods used to deal with the emergency (e.g. how to use specific equipment).

50

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | ARUP

CRL-MTE-RME-000-RPT-0119 Project 251926 | 08 March 2019 | Revision 1

As necessary, emergency services such as Police, Fire Brigade, and Ambulance are to be contacted and invited to visit the site in order to become aware of site access and other emergency considerations.

The ERP will incorporate the following components:

▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪

Emergency contact list (for the above); Emergency Reporting Instructions; Emergency Muster Point Location; Emergency Response Co-ordinator Action Plan; and Emergency Personnel and Equipment.

The ERP will be displayed in prominent locations around the site and employees will be trained in its requirements. All relevant Project personnel, subcontractors and relevant emergency agencies will be instructed and rehearsed, as appropriate, in the requirements of the ERP. The ERP is additional to the delivery work plans and management plans required by the resource consents and designation conditions for the Project but is not required to be certified by Auckland Council.

Incident Response An environmental incident is an occurrence which has (or potentially could have had) a negative or ‘adverse’ effect on the environment. An adverse effect is something that causes (or could have caused) environmental harm. This means there has been a failure to follow the established process or procedures that help the Project achieve best practice (e.g. failure to report a spill).

Environmental incidents include but are not restricted to:

▪ ▪ ▪

Spills; Unforeseen impacts on areas of high environmental value such as archaeology; and Consent non-compliances (e.g. noise, sediment).

A Spill Response Plan for the Project (appended to the ERP) will be developed by the C3 Alliance and will detail the actions to be followed in the event of a spill (including training).

During the construction phase, the ESM will be responsible for providing training and/or orientation to employees or subcontractors that addresses the proper action regarding spills.

The C3 Alliance will ensure that spill response materials are available, commensurate with the type, quantity and storage arrangements for Hazardous Substances on site.

The response to various environmental incidents is outlined in the relevant plans. For serious incidents, the immediate response may involve stopping works until a solution to manage the incident is developed.

Notification Procedure Environmental incidents shall be recorded. The cause of all incidents will be subject to an investigation, convened by the ESM to determine the root causes of the incident and to ensure that remedial / corrective action is able to be implemented to ensure a repeat of the incident is avoided.

The results of investigations and lessons learnt previously on the CRL Project will be shared at the tool box sessions.

In the event of an environmental incident, the C3 Alliance will provide CRLL and Auckland Council with notification as shown in Table 10.

51

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | ARUP

CRL-MTE-RME-000-RPT-0119 Project 251926 | 08 March 2019 | Revision 1

Table 10 Environmental incident notification

Severity Level

Incident Classification

Notification requirement to CRLL Construction Management

Incident Report Form to CRLL Construction Management

Investigation Team

Investigation report to be Supplied to CRLL

Insignificant

Event that occurs within established controls, e.g. a leak or small spill within a spill containment bund.

Via a monthly report

n/a

n/a

n/a

Minor

Event that breaches established controls but with no effect beyond the site boundary

Within 12 hours

Within 48 hours

Construction contractor

Within 10 working days

Serious

Consent breach Environmental harm beyond the site boundary

Immediately upon identification

AS soon as practicable but within 12 hours

CRLL and Construction Contractor Management to allocate resources as appropriate

Within 10 working days

A summary and review of incidents for the duration of the Project and for the relevant month will be included in the Project Monthly Report.

CRLL shall be notified of incidents that trigger notification as defined in the incident reporting and investigation procedure. These triggers include off site discharges, unauthorised disturbance or destruction of heritage sites, and breaches and non-conformances of licences and permits issued for the Project.

The C3 Alliance Project Director is responsible for notifying parent companies of reportable incidents.

CRLL is responsible for notifying relevant Regulators.

4.5

Stakeholder Communications

A CCP (Appendix K) has been developed which details the strategy, tools and process to manage communication and engagement between the C3 Alliance, its stakeholders and the community throughout the construction and monitoring periods for the Project.

The CCP sets out how the C3 Alliance will inform the community of Project progress and construction dates, foster good relationships with the community, obtain feedback from stakeholders, and outline how complaints and queries will be responded to.

The CCP has been prepared following consultation with stakeholders, directly affected parties and affected in proximity parties.

Public Safety The Project area will be contained within fencing, signage displayed and access into site limited and controlled through site sign-in procedures. Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) principles will be applied during site set up.

52

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | ARUP

CRL-MTE-RME-000-RPT-0119 Project 251926 | 08 March 2019 | Revision 1

Generally, site security will be maintained by establishing temporary fences at the perimeter of the works and or as described in Section 2 of this report. These may be anchored to or fixed into the ground where their location is critical (e.g. to eliminate fall risks). Gates will be provided at construction entry and exit points and these will be locked shut when the site is unattended. Noise barriers will be integrated with the fences where possible.

All security fences, boundary fences around the construction sites will be maintained in good order to ensure their ongoing functionality.

53

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | ARUP

CRL-MTE-RME-000-RPT-0119 Project 251926 | 08 March 2019 | Revision 1

5

Monitor and Review

5.1

Environmental Monitoring

Scheduled monitoring of environmental performance is required throughout the Project to ensure that no adverse impact on the environment occurs. This enables the overall effectiveness of the environmental controls to be determined and allows areas of non-compliance to be identified so corrective actions can be taken.

The specifics of monitoring for each environmental element are detailed in the individual plans, including any monitoring requirements, the frequency of the monitoring to be undertaken and the appropriate responsible person, as required within contract documentation or environmental approvals issued for the Project.

In general, monitoring will be conducted on a routine basis. However, additional monitoring may be required in the event of a complaint or incident, or after a rain event in the case of water quality monitoring. CRLL have initiated the required Water Quality Monitoring Programme required by the A2N resource consent conditions.

The ESM is responsible for the implementation of on-site measurements of environmental aspects, including water quality. External specialists may be used, where required, to conduct specialist monitoring, including noise, vibration, air quality, and non in-situ water monitoring. The initiation of such monitoring is on an as-needed basis and may be in response to contract requirements, complaints or internal requirements.

Environmental monitoring results will be reported will be reported in the monthly compliance report to Auckland Council and CRLL.

Collaborative Working The key contacts listed in Table 11 below will meet regularly to discuss:

▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪

Compliance with the designation conditions and the CEMP and DWPs; Material changes to the CEMP and DWPs; Any matters of non-compliance and how they have been addressed; The results of, need for, and frequency of site inspections; Environmental monitoring results; and Any other agenda items mutually agreed by the Key Contacts.

Table 11 Collaborative working contacts

Organisation

Title

Name

Auckland Council

[insert here]

[insert here]

Construction Contractor

[insert here]

[insert here]

CRLL

[insert here]

[insert here]

Collaborative Meeting At least five working days prior to construction commencing the key contacts listed above shall mutually agree an initial schedule for a collaboration meeting. The meeting shall be held at least monthly unless a different timeframe is agreed with Auckland Council.

54

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | ARUP

CRL-MTE-RME-000-RPT-0119 Project 251926 | 08 March 2019 | Revision 1

Collaboration meetings shall continue throughout construction and one month following completion of construction. Additional meetings between Auckland Council and the C3 Alliance specialists may be established on a one off or ongoing basis by mutual agreement of the Key Contacts listed above.

These ‘specialist meetings’ will allow for the discussion and resolution of technical issues and will provide feedback to the Key Contacts to facilitate decision making in the Collaboration Meeting.

5.2

Environmental Inspections

Weekly environmental compliance Inspections are conducted by the ESM (or a delegate). The findings of these inspections will be recorded, along with any required remedial actions, who is responsible for implementing these actions and in what timeframe. These shall be monitored to ensure that they are closed out in the required timeframe. An appropriate framework will be confirmed by the C3 Alliance prior to works commencing.

5.3

Environmental Auditing

Internal (by Project Staff) environmental auditing is required to determine whether the environmental management system conforms to planned arrangements and is properly implemented and maintained.

Internal audits will be completed on a three monthly basis (based on a six month timeframe) by the ESM (or delegate). Findings from the audits will be presented to the Construction Manager within two weeks of conducting the audit.

Internal environmental audits focus on environmental and sustainability matters within a single operational procedure or a group of related operational procedures (e.g. erosion and sediment control procedures, waste management reporting).

5.4

Corrective and Preventative Action

Corrective or preventative actions identified during environmental audits shall be commensurate to the magnitude of the problem and appropriate to the environmental harm encountered.

Ultimately the Project Director has responsibility for closing out any corrective or preventative actions resulting from the environmental inspections, audits and external regulatory compliance monitoring.

Additionally, assessment and follow-up reviews on the effectiveness of corrective and preventive actions will be undertaken and the outcomes documented, communicated and implemented.

Compliance shall be included as a regular agenda item at management meetings and project meetings. Minutes from each meeting shall record and assign actions to individuals where appropriate.

5.5

Reporting

Reporting requirements will evolve as the Project progresses. In the early phase emphasis is on the establishment of systems, controls and competence of all personnel, while later the emphasis will shift to monitoring performance. When nearing completion (as applicable) the focus will be on final reports to address approval requirements.

The ESM is responsible for managing the Environmental Reporting Program. The Project Director is responsible for submitting the reports required externally.

Reporting requirements include:

▪ ▪ ▪

Project internal reporting requirements; Reporting to CRLL and key stakeholders as specified within contract documents; and Specific reporting to Auckland Council where required – refer specific DWPs and management plans.

55

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | ARUP

CRL-MTE-RME-000-RPT-0119 Project 251926 | 08 March 2019 | Revision 1

5.6

Document Control

The ESM is responsible for ensuring all relevant documentation is submitted and maintained within the Project filing and document control system.

Applicable documentation will include but not be limited to:

▪ ▪ ▪

All environmental incidents reports and investigation outcomes; Formal and informal audit and environmental inspection reports; and Records of environmental training.

5.7

CEMP Review

This CEMP (including plans) will be updated, with the necessary certification by Auckland Council, throughout the course of the Project to reflect any changes to consent conditions, relevant legislation and material changes associated with changes to construction techniques or the natural environment.

Additionally, they may be updated in response to any unforeseen adverse effects arising from construction, unresolved complaints or environmental incidents. A review may also be initiated by Auckland Council in response to comments or recommendations received from Auckland Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring) or as a result of the CCP process.

Management Review A management review of the CEMP and plans will be undertaken at least annually or as a result of a material change or to address unforeseen adverse effects arising from the Project or unresolved complaints, by the Project Management team. The management review will be organised by the ESM. The review will take into consideration:

▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪

Site personnel comments; Audit findings and recommendations; Environmental monitoring records; Environmental complaints, incidents and emergencies; Details of corrective and preventative actions; Environmental non-compliances; Changes to organisational structure and roles and responsibilities; On-going compliance with objectives, conditions and targets; Changes to industry best practice standards, legislation and other statutory requirements; and Material changes to DWPs.

The review process will include looking at the environmental controls and procedures to make sure they are still applicable to the activities being carried out. Reasons for making changes to the CEMP will be documented. A copy of the original CEMP document and subsequent revisions will be kept for the Project records and marked as obsolete. Each new/updated revision of the CEMP documentation will be issued with a revision number and date to eliminate obsolete CEMP documentation being used.

Review Certification Any change to the CEMP or management plans required by the resource consents shall be submitted to Auckland Council (Team Leader Central Monitoring) for certification and no activity reliant upon a change to the CEMP can be undertaken until the change has been certified. CRLL will request

56

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | ARUP

CRL-MTE-RME-000-RPT-0119 Project 251926 | 08 March 2019 | Revision 1

Auckland Council’s (Team Leader Central Monitoring) determination as to whether the proposed change can be certified, in writing, within 10 working days of submission of the change.

Any material change proposed to the DWPs required by the designation conditions relating to an increase in adverse effect on a particular receiver shall be submitted for approval to Auckland Council, at least 10 working days prior to the proposed changes taking effect.

57

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | ARUP

CRL-MTE-RME-000-RPT-0119 Project 251926 | 08 March 2019 | Revision 1

Appendices

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

This page has been intentionally left blank.

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

Appendix A CRL Designation 2500 Conditions

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

This page has been intentionally left blank.

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

Appendix B Aotea to North Auckland Line Regional Consents Package Conditions

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

This page has been intentionally left blank.

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

Appendix C Erosion and Sediment Control Plan

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

This page has been intentionally left blank.

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

Appendix D Traffic Access and Parking Delivery Work Plan

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

This page has been intentionally left blank.

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

Appendix E Construction Noise and Vibration Delivery Work Plan

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

This page has been intentionally left blank.

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

Appendix F Historic Character Delivery Work Plan

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

This page has been intentionally left blank.

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

Appendix G Contamination Delivery Work Plan

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

This page has been intentionally left blank.

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

Appendix H Air Quality Delivery Work Plan

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

This page has been intentionally left blank.

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

Appendix I Trees and Vegetation Delivery Work Plan

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

This page has been intentionally left blank.

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

Appendix J Social Impact and Business Disruption Delivery Work Plan

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

This page has been intentionally left blank.

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

Appendix K Communication and Consultation Delivery Work Plan

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

This page has been intentionally left blank.

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

Appendix L Record of IPRP feedback

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

This page has been intentionally left blank.

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

Independent Peer Reviewer Comments The following comments were received from the Independent Peer Reviewer, Chris Millar, Opus International Consultants Ltd, regarding the CEMP: Comment ID

Date

Forum

Respondent

Comment

Resolution

1

14 February 2019

IPR

Chris Millar

If the project is intended to be completed within 6 months then an annual review is not necessary. Adjust to reflect timeframe of proposed works.

Section 1.1 updated to reflect a 6 month programme.

2

Project is looking to achieve the ISCA rating - instead of making a statement in only the introduction it would be useful to include what aspect of each section is applicable to which credit so that it is possible to ensure that the requirements are met. setting the expectations of the credit and understanding how operations need to be undertaken to meet them are important to achieve success with these credit systems.

Table 4 updated to include document sections.

3

Cross reference should be made to the vegetation DWP and the Traffic DWP in regards to the protection of street trees from large vehicles turning in the local roads.

Section 4.3.10 refences updated.

4

There are some inconsistencies in the text around the expected timeframes for the completion of project components. Some of these would extend the completion date beyond the stated 6 month expected completion date. The expected timeline should be consistent across the document and supporting documents. (protection of adjacent structures and Disposal of materials both state 30 weeks).

The 6 month (26 weeks) programme updated throughout the CEMP.

5

A gant chart or other visual timeline of planned works, relevant lead times and the ongoing monitoring/meetings/report deadlines would assist in planning these tasks.

This level of detail was not available at the time the CEMP was prepared.

The timing of the works and ongoing tasks will be provided by the contractor in parallel with each site specific demolition plan.

No change to the CEMP is required.

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

6

The environmental objectives and policies for the project should be included in the beginning of the document.

The objectives of the CEMP are listed in Table 1.

No change to the CEMP is required.

7

There is a risk around perception could be formed by neighbours that dust from site is or contains asbestos - especially if early demolition activities require asbestos mitigation on the first buildings to be demolished - the absence of which on later buildings could lead to misconceptions about any dust that does leave site during the demolition of later structures - it's recommended that all asbestos areas are dealt with last or in a continuous block of work and the CCL plan details how to communicate to stakeholders when the risk of asbestos spread has been removed.

Section 2.3.3 updated to reflect asbestos management practices, which will be determined by the contractor.

8

It is noted from aerial maps that there is

NA

9

Works undertaken along the southern boundary of the demolition areas in Areas 1 & 2 (as identified in the ESCP plans) appear to b in close proximity to the Northern rail line. As such reference should be made to those works that will be working in close proximity to live overhead lines.

The electrical and other rail systems, such as PA systems, could be affected by dust, dust suppression noise and vibrations from the planned works. this should be highlighted and addressed with specific controls or communication to be undertaken with kiwirail to ensure operations are not affected.

Specific works methodology for those sites adjacent to the rail corridor will be designed to avoid potential effects on KiwiRail land or risks to the rail corridor operation.

Engagement processes, including with KiwiRail, is described in the CCP (Appendix K) of the CEMP. No change to the CEMP is required.

10

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

If these areas are to be managed separately as three individual sections then these areas should be labelled as such in the CEMP and any separate/unique measures required in each section should be highlighted.

Whilst it is anticipated the demolition works will be carried out in stages the order of these stages was unknown at the time this CEMP was prepared and will be determined by the Contractor.

11

Annual review for a program of 6 months seems out of sorts. For a six month programme I wouldn't expect it would need a scheduled review. (not including those reviews of individual DWPs that require changes due to methodology or design changes).

Section 1.1 updated to reflect a 6 month programme and no annual review.

12

Which of the objectives and requirements referred to in this section have not been addressed by DWPs? It would be good for completeness and surety of the reader to list those here.

Section 1.2 amended to detail the objectives missing from the DWPs and addressed in the CEMP.

13

Reference is made to the Water St puna (though off site) being dealt with in the relevant DWP, there is no reference to the Water St Puna in the CDWP or social impact DWP. It is acknowledged that there is little risk as the management plan indicates that groundwater will not be affected by the above ground works, however it has been raised by one of the stakeholder and should be addressed accordingly, even if this is a statement that it is acknowledged, marked on a plan but not affected.

Section 1.5 notes the presence of the Water Street puna and confirms the puna is not located within the Project area. Erosion and sediment control measures have been designed to minimise the potential of sediment runoff from the Project works, largely containing it within site boundaries.

14

Condition 28 refers to consultation being required with Auckland Motorway Alliance (AMA). The NZTA contract for the maintenance of the Auckland highway network that this organisation works under will be coming to its conclusion and replaced with a new organisation - at this time it is to be known as the Auckland System Management (ASM). This reference should be updated.

Footnote added to recognise the future names change.

15

Condition 36 refers to Water Discharge Quality Monitoring Programme this was not sighted in this review.

Section 5.1 amended to confirm commencement of a water quality monitoring programme.

16

The main risks would appear to be dust, vibration and potentially asbestos - it is suggested that these sections - particularly the risks, monitoring limits and mitigation measures - are expanded on in the main body of the CEMP.

These risks are highlighted in sections 4.3.4, 4.3.9, 4.3.14, 5.1 and 5.2.

No change to the CEMP is required.

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

Much of the proposed mitigation for dust involves dampening down with water, concrete cutting, breaking, stockpiles etc. This is going to involve a large amount of water over the demolition period. It will be necessary to carefully control and monitoring the amount of water used and the discharge/control of the runoff from these activities, especially where concrete dust is being supressed.

Dust mitigation is addressed in the AQ DWP (Appendix H) and the ESCP (Appendix C).

18

How will the future demolition of those partial structures that may be left behind for the contractor be managed - will it involve the reactivation of this CEMP or will it be expected to be in a future contract and associated CEMP? It is recommended that this is clarified.

Section 2.2 updated to clarify any future works will be taken over by a new suite of DWPs and management plans prepared by the C3 Contractor.

19

It is recommended that this section lists the main or high risk components for the demolition plans to cover.

Section 2.3.1 amended to include the high risk components.

20

Is it expected that each block of the ACZ and CSAs will be fully vacated prior to works beginning? It is unclear between section 2.3.1 and 2.3.2 whether there will be tenants within the three works areas

Section 2.3 amended to clarify the entire site will be vacant prior to works commencing.

21

The first sentence is confusing and makes it unclear as to whether some structures will be demolished while plans are made to deal with asbestos in others.

Clarified in section 2.3.3. Asbestos Assessments conducted in parallel with the development of Demolition Plans.

22

For clarity it should be made clear whether the 6 weeks to audit and test is for all structures or each individual structure. Clarity in this matter would help the Environmental Manager manage the remainder of the activities on the site, particularly the setting up of Erosion and sediment controls and the settlement tanks required for the stormwater management. If there is a common geographic area) where there is a group of asbestos affected buildings the controls around this area could be installed and the areas treated as hot zones and cool zones to differentiate whether extra controls are needed.

Section 2.3.3 updated to refer to the entire site. The particular affected buildings are unknown at this point in time.

17

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

No change to the CEMP is required.

23

there are inconsistencies in the timeline between the expected 6 month period and the 30 weeks for support removal and salvage of materials.

The longest of the timeframes should be used, to align and assess the need for regular scheduled reviews and the frequency of other monitoring for exposure levels, meeting and reporting actions

Table 6 amended to 26 weeks, to match overall status of a 6 month period.

24

Site fencing/hoarding - should also include appropriate contact details for complaints and questions.

Table 6 has been updated to reference contact details.

25

Will all non-demolition related people be vacated from the worksite or is the protection of adjacent structures referring to other workers being cleared out of the buildings before demolition starts?

Table 6 has been updated to include contractors during demolition.

26

Disposal of materials - how are the credits for ISCA to be met if all materials are to be landfilled? - is there room here to consider reusing materials in other aspects of the construction?

Table 6 updated to clarify that waste will either be recycled for the main CRL project or disposed of, depending on what is appropriate.

The Contractor will determine if materials can be re-used in other areas of the Project, in accordance with the CRLL contract requirements.

27

The plan of the site should be labelled into the three main areas of construction to allow easy and consistent references to construction and mitigation measures.

Section 2.4.2 updated to illustrate the differences between the three site blocks.

28

Areas of the work site to be accessible to work crews for parking etc should be identified in the traffic management plan - o ensure success of the travel management plan restricting the growth of these areas should be considered to reduce the number of staff driving unnecessarily.

Traffic management is addressed in the TAP DWP (Appendix D).

How will wash bays at the crossing points be constructed and managed to ensure they are available and used?

Vehicle wash-down facilities are a requirement of the ESCP contained in Appendix C. Location and design of these will be determined by the Contractor.

29

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

No change to the CEMP is required.

30

Temporary supports area referenced, are these for internal buildings and will there be a separate demolition methodology for buildings on external boundaries to those internal to the site where the risk to the public is less and the control of effects are easier to retain within the site.

Sections 2.4.2, 2.7 and 2.8 temporary support area details are included.

31

The methods and goals to protect the rail network should be included this should include input from kiwirail and the rail operator providing requirements and confirming those proposed by the CRL contractors meet these.

Section 2.7 updated to include engagement with KiwiRail.

32

Graffiti inspections are planned for weekly inspection with a 48hour response time - this should be either amended to be more frequently (recommended to be done at same time as the daily work site management programme) done or amended so that graffiti is dealt with when reported.

Section 2.9 updated with recommendation.

33

The statement that CRLL will work with business to assist in regular removal of waste - is this through ensuring that there is access for normal collection or is this an active provision of additional bins or collection services?

Section 2.9 to reflect normal collection access will be maintained.

34

Depending on the timeline between the completion of demolition and beginning of further CRL works, there is an opportunity to use the cleared site for community use between times - such as pop up art space, markets, community gardens or information precinct for. this could be done without precluding the final reuse set out in the future Urban Design DWP.

The CRL construction programme does not currently anticipate the site being available for community uses after demolition has been completed and prior to CRL construction works commencing.

35

The risks from the overarching project register that are relevant to this set of works should be carried through into this CEMP.

The Project Risk Register is yet to be prepared by the contractor.

No change to the CEMP is required.

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

36

A risk register should be provided in this document with a process for identifying and mitigating the risks. It is acknowledged that the C3 alliance will need to populate this with specific mitigation techniques but the opportunity is here to draw out the risks and opportunities from the DWPs.

The Project Risk Register is yet to be prepared by the contractor. The DWPs will inform the risk register and manage all potential risks identified. The risk register is a ‘living document’ and will be constantly updated to address changing conditions, revised methodologies and each new work area.

No change to the CEMP is required.

37

Expected areas where cumulative effects are likely to occur should be listed here - for example the cumulative effects of concrete dust.

Section 3.3 amended to include cumulative effects summary list.

38

If works are within 4m of a railways power lines or other electrical either a Electrical Safety Permit or Permit to Work Near Railway Power Lines may be required. This may mean an adjustment to the installation and use of dust/odour or other suppression methods that rely on water or will come within the safety envelope of the rail corridor. This restriction should be either confirmed as not applicable or the need to be permitted highlighted when dealing with mitigation in the appropriate areas. the response received is attached - it should be noted that a key safety aspect for rail operations is visibility to signals - there may be room in the program/methodology to change rail operations to single track to avoid delays to the demolition program.

Sections 2.7 and 3.4.2 amended to highlight that specific works methodology for those sites adjacent to the rail corridor will be designed to avoid potential effects on KiwiRail land or risks to the rail corridor operation. These will be discussed with KiwiRail, and any required permits (or similar) will be sought. Where necessary, the works will be timed to align with blocks of line as needed.

39

I'd question whether the CRLL CEO should be tasked with identifying the project risks - it would be more appropriate in my opinion for the CEO to review and approve the risk register, the skill set for identifying should sit below this level

Table 9 updated to move the identifying and managing project risks and issues task to the Project Manager role. The review and approve the risk register task added to CEO role.

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

40

It is recommended that an org chart is included - this would aid the reader in determining who is responsible to whom and what the escalations pathways the team needs to follow in the event of disputes about costs and responsibilities for actions.

An org chart is currently unavailable and will be confirmed once the C3 Contractor is appointed.

41

there is a lot of work required in ensuring ISCA credits are met and the responsibility for ensuring construction methodologies are in line with the credits. In addition, it would be recommended to separate ISCA from the ESM managers role or at the least allow for support from someone who can manage/approve the time required to collect and submit necessary data.

CRLL consider the roles and responsibilities as identified in Table 9 are appropriate at the time of preparing this CEMP.

The final bullet point should have the word environmental in front of incidents that the person is responsible for.

The Environmental and Sustainability Managers responsibilities relate to all incidents.

42

No change to the CEMP is required.

No change to the CEMP is required.

43

The role descriptions for staff on pages 40-41 should retain the same format as the pages beforehand.

Section 4.1.2 formatting updated.

44

There is reference I the ESM role to a CRLL sustainability manager who is not referenced in the previous table.

Section 4.1.2 reference removed.

45

There is reference in the ESM role to a CRLL sustainability manager who is not referenced in the previous table.

As above.

46

With a short work programme and a simple set of activities. The reviewer questions whether a weekly tool box training will add value - the topics suggested should be covered in the induction or prequalification. It's suggested that monitoring and changes to DWPS would be a more useful use of time.

CRLL consider weekly toolbox training to be appropriate for all CRL contracts.

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

No change to the CEMP is required.

47

The last sentence of this section doesn't make sense. Is this intending to be a section that cross references parts of each DWP that is related to a common Aspect - e.g. concrete cutting involves dust and noise so needs to be refenced in the DWP for disposal of material, noise and air quality DWPs?

Section 4.3 introduction around references amended.

48

The location of inspection pits and other access points should be identified prior to demolition beginning so that they can be marked to avoid stockpiles and other materials blocking access.

Section 4.3.1 amended to clarify that such locations will be set out in advance of the works.

49

The statement about the stabilisation and exposed soils is more appropriate to earth working sites rather than the area of works in this project which appear to be to ground level with little exposure of soils, the focus should be on stockpile management and the prevention of materials from on top of hard surfaces.

Stockpile management noted in section 4.3.2, as some earthworks may occur in some instances and should not be left out of the description.

No change to the CEMP is required.

50

The removal of all demolition material may not fit with the sustainability ethos of recycling or reusing materials and consideration should be given to the reuse and recycling of demolition materials into appropriate aspects of the wider project.

Section 4.3.4 amended to include recycling.

51

It is assumed that the HC DWP also meets the requirements of the Archaeological authority? This should be stated as should the authorisation reference and a brief outline of the accidental discovery procedures and the likeliest risk items to be found.

Section 4.3.6 updated to reference the procedures should discovery of archaeological remains occur and confirm the Project has an Archaeological Authority from HNZ. Further detail is included in the HC DWP attached at Appendix F.

52

The term mitigation is used on this section with regard to the appointment of a contaminated land specialist - this and the following items are more aligned as Management techniques.

Section 4.3.8 wording amended.

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

53

There is mention earlier in the document that water will be treated prior to discharge, this should be referenced in this section or an additional section covering contaminated water included.

Section 4.3.8 updated to reference the ESCP (Appendix C).

54

The sensitive receiving environments should be noted in this section.

Section 4.3.8 updated to reflect that the local road stormwater system has been identified as a potential sensitive environment, however there are no other obvious ones in this utilitarian environment.

55

Why will the SIBD plan need to be implemented for 12 months after the project? The triggers for this plan remaining active for 12 months should be included here so that the reader knows what to look out for.

Section 4.3.11 updated to reference CRL designation condition 61.6.

56

What will be the main pathways and what will the consultation involve monitoring results, changes to work hours, progress results?

Section 4.3.12 updated to include further information on communication and consultation.

Further information is provided in the CCP (Appendix K) and SIBD DWP (Appendix J) referenced.

57

The visual inspections are said to occur every month until the completion of dewatering - does this take into account the lag time between these enabling works and the main construction works. Will these surveys continue till then or is there a gap - this should be clarified or there may be the expectation of continual monitoring being undertaken in between times.

No dewatering is anticipated by the Project works. This information will be provided by the Contractor.

58

Details of spill response procedures are referred to in section 4.3.20 which is not in this document.

Section 4.3.14 updated to reference section 4.4.2.

59

It would seem more appropriate to have a hazardous substances management plan for the site rather than for each individual building.

Section 4.3.14 updated to reference the CDWP (Appendix G), the asbestos management plans, demolition plans and section 4.4.

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

No change to the CEMP is required.

60

It would be beneficial for the incident log from previous CRL work packages to be shared with this project so that the lessons and recurring risks can be addressed here.

Section 4.4.3 amended.

61

Results of investigations and learnings should be included in the tool box sessions.

Section 4.4.3 updated to include lessons at the tool box session

62

Fences if solid should be treated - mural/historical pictures etc - to discourage graffiti.

Section 5.7.1 of the SIBD DWP (Appendix J) contains recommendations on the treatment of solid construction hoardings.

63

Quarterly auditing for 6 month this frequency should be reviewed to align with the works timetable.

Section 5.3 updated to a three monthly basis

64

There are some areas/DWPs that mention there will be potential changes to which ISCA credits are required. will this trigger the approval/amendment procedure with councils involvement? if so it is recommended that this is documented in the CEMP. This is particularly relevant to the Waste credits WAS1-3.

Changes to the CEMP only require approval by Council if the change is considered material.

65

The contaminated land DWP requires that surface water needs to be treated to 50* the ANZECC guidelines prior to discharge - the CEMP should set out how this is to occur, monitored and where the necessary records are to be kept.

Section 4.3.8 updated to reference the ESCP (Appendix C).

66

The responsibility for implementing the emergency response plan should be documented - this may be a statement around the role of who instigates the plan - this could be a supervisor at the immediate location of the 'emergency' or 'incident', this should cover things like when and how to escalate and notify the Environmental manager.

The ERP will detail the person responsible for actioning the ERP, which is a level of detail that is unavailable at this point in time.

No change to the CEMP is required.

No change to the CEMP is required.

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

67

It is understood that the works are limited to existing ground level if foundations below ground are to be removed appropriate measures around groundwater, Erosion control, archaeology and the like will need to be developed and implemented. It should be confirmed that this is appropriate to be done through the existing change process.

The DWPs and management plans will be updated if a material change to the Project works is required, in accordance with designation condition 22 and resource consent condition 42.

68

Section 5.9.2 of the CDWP should be brought into the main body of the text. the background levels of heavy metals should be included in the CEMP for reference when determining the fill management destination reference should be made to the time period required for fill testing and appropriate management of stockpiles can be undertaken to ensure material goes to the correct landfill location

Section 4.3.8 amended to include additional background information on soil.

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

Appendix M ISCA Requirements

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

This page has been intentionally left blank.

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

Was-1 Waste avoidance and resource recovery Aim To reward the practice of kaitiakitanga through sustainable waste management plans and practices.

Evidence

Benchmark

Criteria Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Predictions for waste quantities and types have been developed for construction and operation.

AND Measures to minimise waste during construction and operation have been identified and implemented.

AND Monitoring of all wastes is undertaken during construction and operation.

The requirements for Level 1 are achieved.

AND Waste monitoring and management has been managed, reviewed or audited by a suitably qualified professional.

AND Waste handling and disposal/recycling all the way to final destination has been audited at appropriate intervals.

Not applicable

Design reports Management plans.

Waste monitoring records and reports.

Evidence as for Level 1.

Review/audit reports.

Not applicable

CRLL stated level as minimum requirement: Level 2 Was-2 Diversion from landfill Aim To reward diversion of spoil, inert, non-hazardous and office waste from landfill.

Criteria

Benchmark

Level 1

Level 2 All of the following targets for landfill diversion have been achieved or bettered: 70 to <80% by volume of spoil AND 25 to <50% by volume of inert and non-hazardous waste AND 25 to <40% by volume of office waste.

Evidence

Waste monitoring records and reports.

All of the following targets for landfill diversion have been achieved or bettered: 80 to <100% by volume of spoil AND 50 to 90% by volume of inert and non-hazardous waste AND 40 to 60% by volume of office waste.

Evidence as for Level 1.

CRLL stated level as minimum requirement: Level 3

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

Level 3 All of the following targets for landfill diversion have been achieved or bettered: 100% by volume of spoil AND >90% by volume of inert and non-hazardous waste AND >60% by volume of office waste material.

Evidence as for Level 2.

Was-3 Deconstruction / Disassembly / Adaptability Aim To reward design and planning for deconstruction, disassembly and adaptability of infrastructure in the future.

Criteria

Evidence

Benchmark

Level 1

Level 1 to 3 on sliding scale

A deconstruction plan is developed based on good practice.

The requirements for Level 1 are achieved.

AND The deconstruction plan is reviewed and updated. Reviews should consider changes to technology and infrastructure planning.

AND 0 to 50% by value of components or pre-fabricated units used can be easily separated on disassembly/ deconstruction into material types suitable for recycling or reuse.

For every increment of deconstructability up to 50% for Level 3, fractions of Levels may be achieved on a sliding scale.

Deconstruction plan

Deconstruction plan showing reviews.

Design and/or construction reports.

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

Aurecon | Mott MacDonald | Jasmax | Grimshaw I ARUP

Auckland Office Level 4, Aurecon House 139 Carlton Gore Road Auckland 1023 New Zealand T +64 9 520 6019 F +64 524 7815