Built Heritage

CRL Contract 3 Aotea Utility Relocation Works – Stages 4 & 5 Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (Built Heritage)

CRL-AOT-RME-LKA-PLN-800024

Revision: 1.0 Date: 08 November 2019

Page 1

| Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (Built Heritage)

Historic Character (Built Heritage) Delivery Work Plan

Document title CRL-AOT-RME-LKA-PLN-800024

This document is uncontrolled when printed. This document should be printed in colour

Revision Status Revision

Date

Version details

1.0

8 Nov 19

For issue

Prepared By

Approved By

Approval Status Name/Title

Signature

Date

Prepared by:

Jane Matthews Heritage Architect

08/11/2019

Reviewed by:

Alisdair Simpson Planner

08/11/2019

Approved by:

Peter Roan Link Alliance – Consents Manager

08/11/2019

Page 2

| Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (Built Heritage)

Historic Character (Built Heritage) Delivery Work Plan

Table of contents 1. Introduction .............................................................................................. 5 1.1

Overview ......................................................................................................................... 5

1.2

Purpose of the HC DWP (Built Heritage Section) ............................................................. 5

1.3

Relevant Conditions ........................................................................................................ 6

1.4

Sustainability................................................................................................................... 9

1.5

DWP Review and updates ............................................................................................... 9

2. Project Description.................................................................................. 10 2.1

Overview ....................................................................................................................... 10

2.2

Construction Methodology............................................................................................ 11

3. Built Heritage .......................................................................................... 12 3.1

Built Heritage in proximity to the Stage 4 and 5 Works................................................. 12

3.2

Historic Streetscape Elements ....................................................................................... 13

4. Overview of potential risks to Built Heritage during Stage 4 and 5 Works 15 4.1

Vibration ....................................................................................................................... 15

4.2

Ground Movement........................................................................................................ 15

4.3

Stormwater Drainage .................................................................................................... 16

4.4

Impact Damage ............................................................................................................. 16

4.5

Canopy Removals .......................................................................................................... 16

4.6

Built heritage Potentially Impacted by the Stage 4 and 5 Works ................................... 17

5. Management and Mitigation Measures ................................................. 21 5.1

5.1.1.

Pre-Construction Surveys ....................................................................................... 21

5.1.2.

Surveys during Construction ................................................................................... 22

5.1.3.

Post Construction Surveys ...................................................................................... 22

5.1.4.

Building Record Strategy......................................................................................... 22

5.1.5.

Building record ....................................................................................................... 23

5.1.6.

Measured Drawings................................................................................................ 23

5.1.7.

Photographic Technical Requirements.................................................................... 23

5.2

Page 3

Pre and Post Construction Condition Surveys of Built Heritage ..................................... 21

Monitoring and Management Measures....................................................................... 24

5.2.1.

Groundwater and Settlement Monitoring Methodology......................................... 24

5.2.2.

Vibration monitoring and management.................................................................. 24

| Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (Built Heritage)

Historic Character (Built Heritage) Delivery Work Plan 5.3

Protection Methodology during construction activities ................................................ 25

5.4

Rectification Methodology ............................................................................................ 25

6. Canopy Removals-Recording and Reinstatement Strategy .................... 26 7. General Matters ...................................................................................... 26 7.1

Communication and Consultation ................................................................................. 26

7.2

Contact details............................................................................................................... 26

7.3

Built Heritage role and responsibilities.......................................................................... 27

Appendix A: ISCA Requirements ................................................................... 28 Appendix B: Historic Heritage and Character Buildings in Proximity to the Stage 4 and 5 Works...................................................................................... 29 Appendix C: CLG and review comments ....................................................... 39

Page 4

| Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (Built Heritage)

Historic Character (Built Heritage) Delivery Work Plan

1. Introduction 1.1

Overview

The City Rail Link (CRL) project comprises the construction, operation and maintenance of a 3.4km twin-tunnel underground passenger railway, running between Britomart Station and the North Auckland Line (NAL) in the vicinity of Mt Eden Station. The CRL involves the construction of two new underground stations at Aotea and Karangahape, and a redeveloped station at Mt Eden. The design and construction of the CRL infrastructure between the Aotea and Mt Eden Stations is being delivered by the Link Alliance.

In 2017, City Rail Link Limited (CRLL) submitted an outline plan for canopy removal and utility relocation works within the Aotea Station area, along the western side of Albert Street between Victoria Street West and Wellesley Street West (Auckland Council ref. OPW60310921). This outline plan was accepted by Auckland Council without changes. Canopy removal works have now been completed.

Additional utility relocation and canopy removal works are required beyond the footprint of the approved works. As such, the Link Alliance is seeking authorisation for works that are beyond the scope of OPW60310921.

This Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (Built Heritage Section) (herein referred to as the ‘HC DWP (Built Heritage Section))’ has been prepared in relation to the Stage 4 and 5 utility relocation works, canopy removal works and Construction Support Area establishment (herein referred to as the ‘Stage 4 and 5 works’) and is submitted to Auckland Council to support the authorisation of the additional works.

This first revision of the HC DWP (Built Heritage Section) addresses the Stage 4 and 5 works. This Plan will be revised in the future to include the main construction activities and public realm reinstatement.

1.2

Purpose of the HC DWP (Built Heritage Section)

This HC DWP (Built Heritage) has been prepared to identify measures that will be implemented to mitigate and manage the potential adverse effects on built heritage during the Stage 4 and 5 works. In accordance with CRL designation Conditions 41.1 and 41.2, the objective of the DWP is: ·

to manage the adverse effects on built heritage that may result from associated works prior to, during, and after the construction of the City Rail Link or any part of it. The objective of the Built Heritage section is to avoid, remedy or mitigate adverse effects on built heritage as far as reasonably practicable.

The HC DWP (Built Heritage) otherwise addresses the requirements of CRL designation Conditions 41 and 46 and will be implemented throughout the construction of the Stage 4 and 5 works.

This DWP has considered buildings located in proximity to the Stage 4 and 5 works which are recognised as having heritage value as a result of scheduling or identification as special character

Page 5

| Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (Built Heritage)

Historic Character (Built Heritage) Delivery Work Plan buildings1 in the Auckland Unitary Plan and listing under the Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga Act 2014 (HNZPTA).

The HC DWP (Built Heritage) has been prepared by Matthews & Matthews Architects Ltd and forms part of the Construction Environmental Management Plan (CEMP) for the Stage 4 and 5 works.

1.3

Relevant Conditions

Table 1 identifies the CRL designation conditions relevant to this HC DWP (Built Heritage) and where they are addressed in the document.

Table 1: CRL Designation Conditions for Built Heritage and relevant sections of this HC DWP Condition No.

Condition

Relevant section of DWP

41.11.141.1

The Historic Character DWP shall be prepared to manage the adverse effects on built heritage and archaeology that may result from associated works prior to, during, and after the construction of the City Rail Link or any part of it.

This document ent1111

41.2

The objective of the Built Heritage section is to avoid, remedy or mitigate adverse effects on built heritage as far as reasonably practicable. To achieve the above objective, the following shall, as a minimum, be included in the built heritage section of the Historic Character DWP:

This document

(a) Preparation of a Building Record and Salvage Strategy that outlines a suitable set of procedures for the removal, storage and for later refitting and reuse of elements of heritage buildings and/or structures identified for demolition including the Griffiths Building, Beresford Toilets, Bluestone Toilets, and the rear annex to the building at 223-227 Symonds Street.

6.0

(b) The proposed methods for monitoring building damage that is to be undertaken by a suitably qualified person for the duration of construction works. This includes confirming which Built Heritage buildings and structures are to be subject to a pre and post building condition survey through:

5.0

(i) Using the updated predicted vibration contours undertaken in Condition 36;

1

(ii) Reviewing those buildings in Appendix 2 to these conditions in accordance with Condition 46.1;

3.1, Appendix B

(iii) Reviewing buildings within the designation footprint (including above sub-strata designation) or located in close proximity to identify buildings which have been recognised as having heritage value as a result of scheduling under the Historic Places Act 1993 [now the HNZPTA] or in the Auckland Unitary Plan.

3.1, Appendix B

Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in Part) Schedule 14.1 and Special Character Buildings in the City Centre Zone shown on Map H8.11.1 Page 6 | Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (Built Heritage)

Historic Character (Built Heritage) Delivery Work Plan (c) Identification and methodology for recording of Built Heritage directly affected by the construction or associated pre- and post-construction works (i.e. within the surface designation footprint), which cannot be retained and / or adaptively re-used / partially retained. For the avoidance of doubt, the following buildings and structures may be demolished:

N/A

(i) Bluestone Toilets (SCDP Category B); (ii) Beresford Toilets; (iii) Rear annex to building at 229-231 Symonds Street; and (iv) Griffiths Building. (d) Identification and methodology for recording Built Heritage directly affected by the construction, or associated pre- and post-construction, which are to be: (i) Adaptively reused;

N/A A

(ii) Partially retained in design and construction; or

N/A

(iii) Built heritage elements have been integrated into other elements of the City Rail.

N/A

(iv) In particular, the Requiring Authority shall explore the adaptive re-use of the buildings at 51-53 Victoria Street West (known as Martha’s Corner building) with complete demolition only considered as a last resort. As guidance, an appropriate level of adaptive re-use could include retention of the façade on all street frontages or the utilisation and incorporation of elements of the building into the design:

N/A

(e) How Built Heritage Buildings and Structures will be protected during construction through the use of screening or other protective measures to mitigate adverse construction effects;

55.3 6.

(f) How mitigation or rectification of damage to Built Heritage Buildings and Structures will be addressed; and

55.0, 6.0

(g) Cross references to the specific sections in the Communication and Consultation Plan which detail how the Auckland Council Heritage Department, the New Zealand Historic Places Trust [now HNZPT], and mana whenua (see condition 15) are consulted, and the communication with the general public on the management of the adverse effects relating to Built Heritage.

7.0, Appendix C

Building Condition Surveys 46.1

Page 7

Process for Building Condition Surveys Prior to construction, as a minimum those buildings listed in Appendix One and Appendix Two or identified pursuant to Condition 41.2(b) will be considered for a building condition survey. A building condition survey will be undertaken where it is assessed that there is potential for damage to buildings or structures arising from construction as determined by an independent suitably qualified person appointed by the Requiring Authority based on the criteria below unless the relevant industry criteria applied at the time or heightened building sensitivity or other inherent building vulnerability requires it. Building damage criteria will initially be assessed in accordance with Burland, J.B. (1997) “Assessment of Risk of Damage to Buildings due to Tunnelling and Excavation”. Additional factors which may be considered in determining whether a building condition survey will be undertaken include: (a) Age of the building; (b) Construction types; (c) Foundation types;

| Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (Built Heritage)

5.1 5.1

Historic Character (Built Heritage) Delivery Work Plan (d) General building condition; (e) Proximity to any excavation; (f) Whether the building is earthquake prone; and (g) Whether any basements are present in the building.

46.2

Where prior to construction it is determined that a Building Condition Survey is required in accordance with Condition 46.1, or if measurements exceed the criteria in Condition 33: (a) The Requiring Authority shall employ a suitably qualified person to undertake the building condition surveys and that person shall be identified in the CEMP; (b) The Requiring Authority shall provide the building condition survey report to the relevant property owner within 15 working days of the survey being undertaken, and additionally it shall notify and provide the Auckland Council Consent Monitoring officer a copy of the completed survey report; (c) The Requiring Authority shall contact owners of those buildings and structures where a Building Condition Survey is to be undertaken to confirm the timing and methodology for undertaking a pre-construction condition assessment; (d) The Requiring Authority shall record all contact, correspondence and communication with owners and this shall be available on request for the Auckland Council Consent Monitoring Officer; (e) Should agreement from owners to enter property and undertake a condition assessment not be obtained within 3 months from first contact, then the Requiring Authority shall not be required under these designation conditions to undertake these assessments; (f) The Requiring Authority shall undertake a visual inspection during "active construction" if requested by the building owner where a pre-construction condition assessment has been undertaken. (g) The Requiring Authority shall develop a system of monitoring the condition of existing buildings which is commensurate with the type of the existing building and the proximity of the CRL works. The purpose of monitoring is to assess whether or not active construction is compromising the structural integrity of the building. (h) The Requiring Authority shall, during the Building Condition Survey, determine whether the building is classified as Commercial / Industrial / School or a Historic or sensitive structure in terms of Condition 33.

46.3

During construction: (a) The Requiring Authority shall implement procedures that will appropriately respond to the information received from the monitoring system. Where necessary this may include the temporary cessation of works in close proximity to the relevant building until such time as measures are implemented to avoid further damage or compromise of the structural integrity of the building. (b) Any damage to buildings or structures shall be recorded and repaired by the Requiring Authority and costs associated with the repair will met by the Requiring Authority.

46.4

Following construction: (a) The Requiring Authority shall, within 12 months of the commencement of operation of the City Rail Link, contact owners of those buildings and structures where a Building Condition Survey was undertaken to confirm the need for undertaking a post-construction condition assessment; (b) Where a post-construction building condition survey confirms that the building has deteriorated as the result of construction or operation works relating to the City Rail Link, the Requiring Authority shall, at its own cost, rectify the damage; and

Page 8

| Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (Built Heritage)

Historic Character (Built Heritage) Delivery Work Plan

46.5

1.4

Where the Requiring Authority is required to undertake building repairs in accordance with Conditions 46.3(b) or 46.4(b), such repairs shall be undertaken as soon as reasonably practicable and in consultation with the owner of the building.

55.4

Sustainability

The Link Alliance is seeking an Infrastructure Sustainability Council of Australia (ISCA) Infrastructure Sustainability (IS) Rating. Further details can be found in the CEMP and Sustainability Rating Management Plan. Project sustainability requirements that relate directly to this HC DWP (Built Heritage Section) are included in Appendix A. These requirements are imbedded within this HC DWP to ensure that sustainability is a key focus and ‘the way we do things’.

In some cases, the IS requirements and sustainability goals enhance the designation and consent requirements.

1.5

DWP Review and updates

This HC DWP (Built Heritage) is a live document that will be reviewed at least annually, or as a result of a material change to the project, or to address unforeseen adverse built heritage effects arising from construction, or unresolved complaints. Any material changes to the HC DWP must be approved

by Auckland Council prior to any on-site activity reliant upon the change commencing. Refer to the CEMP for further detail on the review and updating process.

Page 9

| Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (Built Heritage)

Historic Character (Built Heritage) Delivery Work Plan

2. Project Description 2.1

Overview

The project site applicable to this HC DWP (Built Heritage) is located within Albert Street and the adjoining streets, between Wyndham Street and Mayoral Drive. The Stage 4 and 5 utility relocation works, canopy removal works and Construction Support Area establishment (herein referred to as the ‘Stage 4 and 5 works’) involves the following main activities: · · · · · · · ·

Canopy removal; Utility relocation activities via trenching; Utility relocation activities via micro-tunnelling within Victoria Street West; Closure of the Albert Street / Wellesley Street intersection to undertake east-west and north-south trenching works for utility relocation; Closure of the southern slip lane from Durham Street to Albert Street for approximately 4 to 6 weeks to allow for utility relocation; Closure of Kingston Street for approximately 4 to 6 weeks to allow for utility relocation; Directional drilling along Wellesley Street between Albert Street and Federal Street, and; Establishment of a construction compound to support the subsequent main station construction works.

The Stage 4 and 5 works will be undertaken along parts of Albert Street, Kingston Street, Victoria Street West, Wellesley Street and Mayoral Drive. In addition, a construction compound (herein referred to as the ‘Construction Support Area’ (CSA)) required to support the main works is to be established within the outdoor car park area to the west of Bledisloe House. The site adjoins the project area of the canopy and utility works authorised by OPW60310921.

Figure 1 Site Location

The area surrounding the project site is a dense urban environment with a built form comprised of medium to high rise buildings. Common land uses in the project area include commercial offices and services, residential apartments, retail, civic, hospitality, hotel accommodation and car parking.

Along Albert Street multiple active construction sites are present including for the CRL and private development. Buildings adjoin much of the project site boundary (road corridor) forming active frontages that provide access to private property and businesses.

Page 10

| Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (Built Heritage)

Historic Character (Built Heritage) Delivery Work Plan The area of works is highly utilised by pedestrians and vehicles, both for private and business purposes. Albert Street, Victoria Street West, Wellesley Street West and Mayoral Drive are classified as primary arterial roads. Kingston Street and Durham Street West are classified as local roads.

2.2

Construction Methodology

The methodology for utility relocation and canopy removal proposed during the Stage 4 and 5 works is essentially the same as set out in the Approved Construction Environmental Management Plan (CEMP).

A full description of the methodology associated with the Stage 4 and 5 works is provided in Section 2.3 of the CEMP addendum. This includes a description of the Stage 4 and 5 works which are beyond the scope of works described in the Approved CEMP. Staging plans and site layouts for each stage of the works are provided in Appendix C of the CEMP addendum.

Page 11

| Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (Built Heritage)

Historic Character (Built Heritage) Delivery Work Plan

3. Built Heritage 3.1

Built Heritage in proximity to the Stage 4 and 5 Works

Built heritage potentially affected by the Stage 4 and 5 works is listed below, including buildings and structures that are scheduled historic heritage buildings or identified as special character buildings2 in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in Part), and where applicable listed under the HNZPTA. Appendix B of this HC DWP (Built Heritage) provides further information for these heritage buildings and structures including their heritage status, and key heritage values, where identified.

Property addresses for these buildings are shown on Figure 2 below.

Figure 2: Site Plan showing property addresses

Table 2: Location of identified Built Heritage.

Ref no. CRL designation Conditions (Appendix 2)

15 16

17

2

Address

61 Albert Street Shakespeare Hotel and Brewery 76-78 Albert Street Bluestone Wall and Toilets under wall 83 to 85 Albert Street

Building Classification

Scheduled AUP

HNZPT listing

Category B, ID 1925

Category 2, List Number 654

Category B, ID 1906

Category B, ID 2741

Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in Part) Schedule 14.1 and Special Character Buildings in the City Centre Zone shown on Map H8.11.1 Page 12 | Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (Built Heritage)

Historic Character (Built Heritage) Delivery Work Plan 85 Albert Street; Former Waitemata Electric Power Board Building 83 Albert Street 4 Kingston Street 6-12 Kingston Street 18

19 20

102 Albert Street Gypren Hannah Building (former Armishaw’s Building 26,34-36 Wyndham Street Former Gas Co Building 9-11 Durham Street Bluestone Store

21

37-43 Victoria Street

22

51-63 Victoria Street West Martha’s Corner 61-65 Victoria Street (Note street address in Auckland Council Geomaps is 67, 69 and 71 Victoria Street West) 66 Victoria Street West London Dairy 68 Victoria Street West J H Hannan 24 Wellesley Street Bledisloe House 15-31 Wellesley Street West Archibald and Sons Warehouse/ T& G Building

23

24 25 26 27

31

3.2

11 Mayoral Drive Former Public Trust

City Centre Special Character Building City Centre Special Character Building City Centre Special Character Building Category B, ID 2785

Category A, ID 1949

Category 1, List Number 2647

City Centre Special Character Buildings City Centre Special Character Building City Centre Special Character Buildings

City Centre Special Character Building City Centre Special Character Building Category B, ID 2730 Category B, ID 2088

Category 2, List Number 659

Category B, ID 1985

Category 1, List Number 664

Historic Streetscape Elements

Historic streetscape elements, including basalt kerbs and basalt blocks set into the footpaths in some locations are evident in the central Auckland streets in the vicinity of the Stage 4 and 5 works (refer to Figure 3).

Page 13

| Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (Built Heritage)

Historic Character (Built Heritage) Delivery Work Plan Figure 3 Historic streetscape elements include basalt kerb blocks, in Albert Street.

Page 14

| Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (Built Heritage)

Historic Character (Built Heritage) Delivery Work Plan

4. Overview of potential risks to Built Heritage during Stage 4 and 5 Works Unreinforced masonry buildings, including the historic heritage and special character buildings and structures in proximity to the Stage 4 and 5 works are likely to be at higher risk from the potential effects of vibration or ground movement associated with the works. These buildings may have soft mortar joints, simple foundations and connections of structural members or limited bracing. It is important to understand the specific building structure, including foundations, fabric and detailing, in order to inform the likely built heritage effects and the methods that need to be implemented during the works to avoid, remedy or mitigate these effects (outlined in Section 5 of this HC DWP (Built Heritage)).

4.1

Vibration

Ground movement and vibration can affect nearby buildings and their foundations, with consequential damage to building fabric and services. Potential damage from vibration can range from cosmetic to minor or major damage. Potential effects on historic structures as a result of ground movement due to vibration include cosmetic or aesthetic effects such as hairline cracks to surfaces or to mortar joints that might affect appearance, through to changes to building fabric that might affect weather tightness, alignment of windows and doors, or damage to services. Major damage could place buildings at risk in terms of structural stability. For built heritage places, even aesthetic damage may impact on heritage values, for example if original details or finishes are cracked or damaged.

A Construction Noise and Vibration Delivery Work Plan (CNV DWP) addendum has been prepared to address the vibration effects of the Stage 4 and 5 works. Some construction activities are predicted to generate high levels of vibration including sheet piling, excavation, compaction and breaking.

Vibration effects resulting from construction of the Stage 4 and 5 utility works will be carefully managed through this HC DWP (Built heritage) and the CNV DWP in accordance with the CRL designation conditions.

4.2

Ground Movement

Excavation and foundation work can also cause ground displacement and movement of an adjacent historic structure. Excavation deeper than the foundations of neighbouring historic buildings has the potential for risk. A historic structure, with a shallow masonry footing, may experience corresponding displacement that can result in major structural damage. Managing the risk and potential effects of ground movement or settlement is addressed in the Project GSMCP. With regards to the proposed works (involving trenching and directional drilling), the Link Alliance has advised that: ¡

¡

Prior to carrying out work, [trial trenches] or investigative potholing at discrete locations will be carried out to confirm foundation type and size. These works will not cause any damage to foundations of the building being inspected.

The outcome of the investigations will determine the mitigation measures to be implemented to control settlement to the building foundations.

Each individual building will be assessed according to its foundation type, construction and sensitivity to ground movement.

Page 15

| Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (Built Heritage)

Historic Character (Built Heritage) Delivery Work Plan Potential ground settlement effects associated with the deeper utility relocations will be addressed through the Groundwater and Settlement Monitoring and Contingency Plan (GSMCP) addendum for the Stage 4 and 5 works.

4.3

Stormwater Drainage

Maintaining a well-functioning stormwater drainage system is essential to the protection of any historic structure. This system can easily be rendered ineffective by construction or demolition work if debris originating at the construction site finds its way to the rainwater disposal system or drains of an adjacent building. The Industrial and Trade Activity Environmental Management Plan for the Project explains how potentially contaminated runoff will be managed. The Erosion and Sediment Control Plan also address the management of sediment runoff from construction activities (refer Appendix D of the CEMP addendum).

4.4

Impact Damage

Construction activities have potential to cause accidental damage to building fabric through direct impact from machinery. Appropriate protection and management are required to avoid this.

4.5

Canopy Removals

The removal of canopies is required as part of the Stage 4A works, with potential risk to historic character and heritage buildings during these removal works. The canopy removal will be different for each building, however the work will generally involve the following: · · · · ·

Terminate all power supplies to and relocate any and all plant, equipment and signage currently located on those parts of the canopy to be removed.

Erect scaffold, dismantle and remove building canopy or cut-back to agreed position.

Remove glazing/panel/roof sections Remove roof/secondary supports between main support beams Remove primary support beams

Addresses of identified historic heritage and character buildings requiring canopy removal in Stage 4A are listed in Table 3 below. All buildings that require canopy removals are indicated in Figure 4 below.

Table 3: Addresses of historic heritage and character buildings requiring canopy removal.

Address 98 - 102 Albert Gypren Hannah Building (former), Armishaw’s Building Scheduled Category B, ID 2785 43; 43A Victoria Special character building

Figure 4: Map showing the location of canopy removals

Page 16

| Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (Built Heritage)

Legal Description Lot-1-DP 4267

Part Allot 9 Sec 16 Auckland CITY

Historic Character (Built Heritage) Delivery Work Plan

4.6

Built heritage Potentially Impacted by the Stage 4 and 5 Works

Table 6 in Section 4.2 of the CNV DWP identifies the buildings located within the setback distances of the Stage 4 and 5 works, and therefore require a Site Specific Vibration Management Plan to be prepared. This list includes heritage buildings that may be at risk of receiving vibration which exceeds the building damage vibration limits.

Section 3.4 of the (GSMCP) identifies the buildings adjacent to the area of works which may be impacted by settlement as a result of the Stage 4 and 5 works. Pre-construction condition surveys are required for the heritage buildings and structures in Table 4, in accordance with Condition 46.

Table 4: Heritage Buildings for which pre-construction condition surveys are required.

Ref no. CRL designation Conditions (Appendix 2)

Address

16

76-78 Albert Street Bluestone Wall and Toilets under wall

17

83 to 85 Albert Street

Building Classification

Scheduled in AUP

83 Albert Street Scheduled in AUP

Page 17

| Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (Built Heritage)

Historic Character (Built Heritage) Delivery Work Plan 4 Kingston Street

Special Character building in AUP 6-12 Kingston Street

Special Character building in AUP 18

98-102 Albert Street

Scheduled in AUP 19

26,34-36 Wyndham Street Former Gas Co Building

20

9-11 Durham Street Bluestone Store

Scheduled in AUP

Scheduled in AUP, Listed by HNZPT

Page 18

| Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (Built Heritage)

Historic Character (Built Heritage) Delivery Work Plan 21

37-43 Victoria Street

22

51-53 Victoria Street West Martha’s Corner

23

61-65 Victoria Street (Street address in Auckland Council Geomaps is 67, 69 and 71 Victoria Street West)

24

66 Victoria Street West London Dairy

25

68 Victoria Street West J H Hannan

Special character building in AUP

Special character building in AUP

Special character building in AUP

Special character building in AUP

Page 19

| Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (Built Heritage)

Historic Character (Built Heritage) Delivery Work Plan Special character building in AUP 26

24 Wellesley Street Bledisloe House

27

15-31 Wellesley Street West Archibald and Sons Warehouse/ T& G Building

31

11 Mayoral Drive Former Public Trust

Scheduled in AUP

Scheduled in AUP, listed by HNZPT

Scheduled in AUP, listed by HNZPT

Page 20

| Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (Built Heritage)

Historic Character (Built Heritage) Delivery Work Plan

5.

Management and Mitigation Measures Methods to be implemented during construction to mitigate and manage potential impacts on built heritage include: · Building Condition Surveys prior to the commencement of works; · Investigations of building foundations prior to the commencement of works; · Monitoring as set out in the CNV DWP and GSMCP; · Built heritage protection; and · Canopy recording and reinstatement strategy (with respect to the removal of canopies on historic heritage or special character buildings) (refer to Section 6 of this HC DWP).

5.1

Pre and Post Construction Condition Surveys of Built Heritage 5.1.1. Pre-Construction Surveys

A pre-construction condition survey of identified built heritage (refer Table 3) (inclusive of those buildings listed in Appendix 2 of the CRL designation conditions) will be undertaken as part of Stage 4 and 5 works. The condition assessments will ascertain any pre-existing damage to a building, existing structural distress, and any potential weakness of the structure’s foundations or structural elements, as well as non-structural damage. The Condition Surveys will form the basis for recording buildings and recording baseline information prior to works commencing.

The building condition surveys will generally be undertaken as follows (in accordance with CRL designation Condition 46): · ·

The building surveys will be undertaken by an independent senior qualified person.

The survey shall include: · · · · ·

Any information about the type of foundations; Existing levels of damage (aesthetic, superficial, affecting levels of serviceability); Whether observed damage is associated with structural damage; Susceptibility of building or structure to further movement; and Photographic evidence.

The pre-construction building condition survey, will determine the building classification for the subject buildings i.e. Commercial / Industrial / School or a Historic or sensitive structure in terms of CRL designation Condition 33 (project construction vibration standards). The foundation type of the building will also be determined.

With respect to built heritage, the pre-construction condition surveys will include: · ·

· ·

Page 21

A survey of the exterior and interior of heritage buildings.

A record of the condition of buildings using photographs, annotated drawings and written records, noting any existing signs of structural distress and damage or deterioration of a non-structural nature.

Consideration of the stability of any elements, including applied decorative elements or features, and any fragile elements.

Any recommended remediation to secure or mitigate potential problems prior to the commencement of construction.

| Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (Built Heritage)

Historic Character (Built Heritage) Delivery Work Plan ·

The location of all cracks greater than 2 mm in aperture width, which shall be recorded with a positional accuracy of +/- 200mm. Installation of grid crack monitors may be required on selected readily accessible cracks with an aperture width greater than 2 mm and as determined in consultation with the Built Heritage Specialist.

The condition surveys shall generally include: ·

· · · · · · · ·

An introduction with overview of the premises, record of when the inspection was made, orientation notes for viewing photos and captions, summary of the scope of inspection, purpose of report and any limitations, any areas not accessed; A description of the property construction, based on a visual inspection and review of available architectural drawings and property information obtained from Council; A summary of existing damage and susceptibility to future damage; Site plan; Annotated plans, elevations and sections that relate to the photographic record; Floor plans if available; Burland building damage classification matrix; Pre-Construction Condition Schedule, with description, visible damage evident, damage category recorded and photograph reference; and Annotated photographs recording building condition. This should include general exterior and interior views as well as photographs of specific defects.

The pre-construction condition surveys will be reviewed by the Project Built Heritage Specialist, prior to works commencing.

5.1.2. Surveys during Construction As set out in the CNV DWP, building condition surveys may be undertaken during the construction works in the event that complaints in relation to building damage are received or if the vibration criteria set out in the CRL designation conditions are exceeded.

In addition, the Link Alliance shall carry out visual inspections of the surrounding ground and external building facades of buildings for which pre-constriction condition surveys are required for the Stage 4 and 5 works to monitor any deterioration or movement of any pre-existing cracks.

5.1.3. Post Construction Surveys Post- construction survey shall comprise a repeat of the required elements of the pre-construction survey so that a direct comparison can be made. In accordance with CRL designation Condition 46.4, building condition surveys of those buildings or structures that were subject to a preconstruction building condition survey may be undertaken post-construction of the works. Where a post-construction building condition survey confirms a building has deteriorated as a result of the works, the damage shall be rectified by the Link Alliance.

5.1.4. Building Record Strategy The Stage 4 and 5 works will be predominantly undertaken within the road reserve of Albert Street, Victoria Street West and Wellesley Street West and as such a Salvage Strategy is not applicable to this Project. However, where heritage buildings are directly affected, for example where canopies need to be removed, a comprehensive record should be made before, during and after construction works. This section describes the building record methodology that will be Page 22

| Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (Built Heritage)

Historic Character (Built Heritage) Delivery Work Plan implemented in any locations of built heritage directly affected. Refer Section 5.1 of this HCDWP for further detail regarding pre- and post-construction surveys of built heritage. Refer Section 6 regarding canopy removal and reinstatement.

5.1.5. Building record The following recording level will be undertaken for identified Built Heritage adjacent to the Project works in any locations directly affected: a) b) c) d)

Assembly of existing measured drawings of all elevations, cross- sections, floor plans, roof plans, reflected ceiling plans, mouldings and other details (if held in public records) Measured drawings relevant to elements directly affected by the works Outline written records, including recording of changes/alterations, composition and finish of materials Comprehensive photography including contextual views, elevations, details and features, incorporating the use of high or medium format photography

5.1.6. Measured Drawings Measured drawings should be prepared for all relevant elements and record materials, detail and finishes, to suitable scale as indicated in Table 5.

Table 5: Recommended Scale Overall site layout Floor plans Roof and ceiling plans Elevations (interior/ exterior)

1:500 or 1:200 (showing overall layout, boundaries and topographic features in relation to main buildings) 1:50 or 1:20 1:50 or 1:20 (showing disposition of roof/ ceiling timbers) 1:50 or 1:20

Sections Joinery details Other significant details Moulding profiles

1:50 or 1:20 (across and along structure) 1:20 or 1:10 1:20 or 1:10 1:2 or 1:1

5.1.7. Photographic Technical Requirements General Images - conventional (digital) photography will be used with appropriate professional lenses capable of producing high resolution 1- 2Mb JPEG images3.

Archival images - For archival images the camera should be set to record using a raw file format. This raw file should not be modified- it should be considered to be the ‘digital negative’. It is recommended that these images be converted to uncompressed baseline v.6 TIFF for archiving. All images should have accompanying metadata specifying: photo ID, capture device, converting software, colour space, bit depth, resolution, date of capture, photographer, caption and any alterations made to the image.

3

Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga; AGS1 Guidelines for investigation and recording of buildings and standing structures, November 2018.

Page 23

| Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (Built Heritage)

Historic Character (Built Heritage) Delivery Work Plan Video equipment shall be high-resolution (broadcast quality), with low light capabilities although additional lighting may also be required Photographic recording should include: Context: Views showing relationship to the surrounding setting, other buildings and streetscape Exterior: Elevations, roof where practicable, typical elements (chimneys, windows, doors, parapets, details, fixtures) Interior: General views of interior layout, individual rooms/spaces, interior elevations, typical elements (windows, doors, details, fixtures and fittings), features such as staircases, fireplaces, evidence of use, wear and changes made, chattels and artefacts)

5.2

Monitoring and Management Measures

The Project works have the potential to result in adverse effects to the built heritage values of adjacent heritage buildings which are identified in Table 3 of this HCDWP. This Section outlines the proposed methods for monitoring for potential risk of damage.

5.2.1. Groundwater and Settlement Monitoring Methodology Based on the results of the pre-construction building condition surveys, and in accordance with the GSMCP, geotechnical and structural monitoring instrumentation will be installed on surfaces of, and nearby to, existing structures. This will include ground and building survey monitoring marks installed along the areas likely to be affected by the Stage 4 and 5 works. The location and number of monitoring marks will take into account the building type/size, accessibility and risk of damage from ground settlement.

This will allow any actual building movement to be monitored and compared with the estimated potential effects.

The purpose of this instrumentation will be to measure/monitor any movement, settlement, tilt, strain and induced vibrations as a result of the works which may have the potential to adversely affect the structure. The instrumentation will be installed prior to starting the construction works.

The instrumentation will be installed prior to starting the construction works. This will allow a period where initial readings and baseline monitoring readings from the instrumentation may be obtained, in order to provide a reference data set.

The routine monitoring frequency and duration will depend upon the location of the Project works at any time. The proposed monitoring frequency and duration of the geotechnical and structural instrumentation installed on or near historic resources/structures is described in the Project Groundwater and Settlement Monitoring and Contingency Plan.

5.2.2. Vibration monitoring and management Vibration mitigation and management, based on a Best Practicable Option (BPO) approach will be implemented during the works as outlined in the CNV DWP, including undertaking building condition surveys (refer to Section 4.2) and monitoring prior to and during construction.

Regular monitoring and assessment of the vibration measurements will determine the process to be followed and any required action to mitigate and manage any potential effects, as set out in Section 7.2 of the Approved CNV DWP. If vibration monitoring demonstrates non-compliance with Page 24

| Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (Built Heritage)

Historic Character (Built Heritage) Delivery Work Plan the vibration building damage limits the construction activity responsible for the exceedance shall cease as soon as safe and practicable to do so, construction methodology, mitigation and management strategies will be reviewed, advice will be sought from a structural engineer and a detailed building condition survey shall be undertaken by a suitably qualified engineer.

5.3

Protection Methodology during construction activities

Table 6 outlines the methodology to be implemented to protect key features of historic (and other) buildings against construction activities undertaken adjacent to, or in close proximity to these buildings.

Table 6: Overview of Protection Methodology Built Heritage Feature Exterior fabric and surfaces of buildings and structures (including the Bluestone Wall)

Canopies and overhangs

Historic streetscape elements

Protection Methodology Where works will be undertaken immediately adjacent to exterior fabric and surfaces of buildings and structures (including the Bluestone Wall), appropriate protection such as plywood sheets or temporary fencing to a minimum of 2 metres high will be required.

Avoiding impact from machinery movement through use of appropriate equipment and observation while works undertaken under or adjacent to canopies.

Elements, such as basalt kerbs, or basalt blocks inset into the footpaths shall be carefully removed if required, prior to or during the works and stored for reinstatement at an appropriate time following the completion of works.

Protection measures shall be reviewed by the Project Built Heritage Specialist prior to works commencing and periodically during the works.

5.4

Rectification Methodology

The building condition surveys and assessments and monitoring/management methods outlined in Section 5 of this HC DWP (Built Heritage) will be the vehicle for any discussion around the need for rectification works. In addition, it is likely that rectification discussions will be undertaken on a case by case basis when the post-condition assessments are undertaken.

Page 25

| Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (Built Heritage)

Historic Character (Built Heritage) Delivery Work Plan

6.

Canopy Removals-Recording and Reinstatement Strategy

Prior to canopies being removed from historic heritage and special character buildings identified in section 4.5 above, the existing canopies should be recorded in sufficient detail to enable subsequent reinstatement to match the existing appearance. Auckland Council’s property file should be reviewed for any drawings related to the existing canopies. Recording should include photographs and measured drawings to record fascia details and materials, linings to top and underside, supports, and lighting.

Photographic recording should also be undertaken during the canopy removal, for example if any historic signage is revealed.

Canopies should be reinstated to historic character and heritage buildings to match the existing appearance, visible materials and detail as far as possible. If the existing canopies have decorative support stays, these should be reused if possible, or replaced with new to a achieve a similar appearance.

7. General Matters 7.1

Communication and Consultation

Communication with HNZPT and Auckland Council Heritage Unit (Built Heritage and Implementation) will be undertaken to ensure that any issues can, and will, be addressed in a timely and transparent manner. This will cover regular updates on progress, periodic site visits, and in the event of unexpected finds or changes to agreed methodologies. Details of the communication are provided in the Project Communication and Consultation Plan.

7.2

Contact details

The contact details of the Project Built Heritage Specialist, Auckland Council Heritage and Heritage NZ are provided in Table 7.

Table 7: Contact Details Role

Company Name

Phone

Email

Project Built Heritage Specialist

Matthews & Matthews Architects Ltd

Jane Matthews

(027)415 2102

jane@mmarchitects.co.nz

Built Heritage Specialist Auckland Council

Auckland Council

Dan Windwood

(09) 890 2130

dan.windwood@aucklandcouncil.govt.nz

Auckland Council Compliance and Monitoring Officer

Auckland Council

Timothy O’Grady

(021)834 584

Timothy.OGrady@aucklandcouncil.govt.nz

Built Heritage Adviser

HNZPT

Robin Byron

(09) 307 9928

rbyron@historic.org.nz

Page 26

| Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (Built Heritage)

Historic Character (Built Heritage) Delivery Work Plan

7.3

Built Heritage role and responsibilities

Contractor Briefing Prior to the start of the Stage 4 and 5 works, the Project Built Heritage Specialist will meet key construction contractors on site to brief them on built heritage requirements for the works.

Recording and monitoring The Project Built Heritage Specialist will be advised of the programme for works and any changes that may arise, to ensure that any recording work is completed, and to allow for periodic site visits.

Page 27

| Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (Built Heritage)

Historic Character (Built Heritage) Delivery Work Plan

Appendix A: ISCA Requirements Table B.1 identifies the ISCA Credit Requirements relevant to this HC DWP (Built Heritage Section) and where they are addressed in the document.

Credit

Requirement*

Relevant Section of HC DWP (Built Heritage Section)

Other relevant Information / Comments

Heritage Assessment and Management HER-1 Level 1

Measures to minimise the adverse impacts to heritage during construction have been identified and implemented

3, 4, 5, 6 and 7

HER-1 Level 1

Community heritage values have been identified through consultation and integrated into studies.

3, 4, 7, Appendix C

HER-2 Level 1

Monitoring of heritage is undertaken at appropriate intervals during construction and operation.

5, 6 and 7

Refer to the ISCA Rating Tool for full details of the requirements.

Page 28

| Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (Built Heritage)

Communication and Consultation Plan

Historic Character (Built Heritage) Delivery Work Plan

Appendix B: Historic Heritage and Character Buildings in Proximity to the Stage 4 and 5 Works Ref no. In Appendix 2 to Address/ Building Name CRL Conditions 16

Photo

76-78 Albert Street Bluestone Wall and Toilets under wall

Legal Description

Road reserve

Auckland Unitary Plan (AUP)

Scheduled Category B, ID 1906 Albert Street basalt wall including gate, fence, lamp and toilets Values: A historical, F physical attributes, G aesthetic, H context Includes Historic Heritage Extent of Place

Schedule 14.1

HNZPT

No

Summary The Bluestone Wall was completed 1880 following the widening of Durham Street, with archway to the men’s' toilets. It is thought to have been designed by Daniel Fallon (1840-1920). Features of note include an elaborate cast-iron screen in the toilets. The Interior has been considerably modified and is still in use. Note the cast-iron screen was cut into three sections during 1996 refurbishment and reused.

17

Page 29

83 to 85 Albert Street

Legal Description

83 Albert Street: PT ALLOT 16 SEC 21 Auckland city

(as given in Auckland Council Geomaps)

85 Albert Street: PT ALLOT 17 SEC 21 Auckland City

| Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (Built Heritage)

Historic Character (Built Heritage) Delivery Work Plan Auckland Unitary Plan (AUP) Schedule 83 Albert Street; Scheduled Category B, ID 2741 14.1 Former Waitemata Electric Power Board Building

HNZPT

Values: A historical, F physical attributes, G aesthetic, H context No

Summary Two buildings, both constructed in the 1920s, have character facades with period features such as sash windows and decorative plasterwork, typical of many of Albert Street’s older commercial buildings.

The scheduled building at 83 Albert Street, on the corner of Kingston Street, was designed by architect Herbert Clinton Savage for the Waitemata Electric Power Board Building in 1926, along with an additional storey in 1929. The Waitemata Electric Power Board was established in 1924, servicing the areas of West Auckland, the North Shore and former Rodney District Council.

4 Kingston Street

Legal Description

Lot 1 DP 507298

(as given in Auckland Council Geomaps) Auckland Unitary Plan (AUP)

City Centre Special Character Building – Refer map H8.11.1

HNZPT

No

Summary The building is indicative of the historic pattern of development in central Auckland in the early 20th century and demonstrates typical masonry construction with a rendered street façade.

6-12 Kingston Street

Legal Description Page 30

| Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (Built Heritage)

Pt ALLOT 16 SEC 21 City of Auckland

Historic Character (Built Heritage) Delivery Work Plan (as given in Auckland Council Geomaps) Auckland Unitary Plan (AUP)

City Centre Special Character Building – Refer map H8.11.1

HNZPT

No

Summary The building is indicative of the historic pattern of development in central Auckland in the early 20th century and demonstrates typical masonry construction with a rendered street façade.

18

102 Albert Street

Legal Description

Pt Lot 9 DP 4267; road reserve.

(as given in AUP Schedule 14.1) Auckland Unitary Plan (AUP) Schedule Scheduled Category B, ID 2785 14.1 Gypren Hannah Building (former Armishaw’s Building) Values: A historical, F physical attributes, G aesthetic, H context Historic Heritage Extent of Place extends over footpath/ includes canopy.

HNZPT Summary The Gypren Hannah Building (former) was completed in 1916 and is significant for its historic values commissioned by Gypren Hannah, an early Syrian merchant in New Zealand. It is significant for its physical attributes and aesthetic values for its design by architect WH Glover in Edwardian Free Classical Style. The building is located on a prominent corner site and demonstrates the pattern of development in central Auckland in the early 20th century.4

4

Historic Heritage Evaluation for 98-102 Albert Street, Auckland Council Heritage Unit 2017.

Page 31

| Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (Built Heritage)

Historic Character (Built Heritage) Delivery Work Plan 21

37-43 Victoria Street West

Legal Description

Pt ALLOT 9 SEC 16 Town Auckland

(as given in Auckland Council Geomaps) Auckland Unitary Plan (AUP)

City Centre Special Character Building – Refer map H8.11.1

HNZPT

No

Summary The building is indicative of the pattern of development in central Auckland in the late 19th and early 20 centuries.

19

26,34-36 Wyndham Street Former Gas Co Building

Legal Description

Part Allot 3 Sec 16 Auckland City, Part Allot 4 Sec 16 Auckland City

Auckland Unitary Plan (AUP) Schedule Scheduled Category B, ID 2091 14.1 Gas Company Buildings (Former) Values: A historical, F physical attributes, H context Historic Heritage Extent of Place extends over footpath/ includes canopy.

HNZPT

No

Summary The former Auckland Gas Company building in Wyndham Street is a c.1900 commercial building designed in Italianate style.

Page 32

| Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (Built Heritage)

Historic Character (Built Heritage) Delivery Work Plan 20

9-11 Durham Street Bluestone Store

Legal Description (as in AUP Schedule Lot 2 DP 201029 14.1) Auckland Unitary Plan (AUP) Schedule Scheduled in Category A, ID 1949 14.1 Scheduled extent of place over building and whole lot Values: A Historic, B Social, F Physical Attributes, H Context HNZPT

Historic Place Category 1, List Number 2647 Listing includes the building, its fixtures and finishes. It also includes the lean-tos attached to its western end.

HNZPT Heritage Order (1987)

Summary This is the oldest remaining commercial building in Auckland. Built in 1861 as a warehouse for storekeepers Bernhard Levy and Nathan Goldwater the exterior walls are of volcanic stone. It was used as a warehouse for various companies and for thirty years the Kiwi Boot Polish Company produced its famous shoe polish in this building.

21

37-41 Victoria Street

Legal Description (as in Auckland Council Geomaps)

Lot 1 DP 87475

Auckland Unitary Plan (AUP)

City Centre Special Character Building – Refer map H8.11.1

HNZPT

No

Summary The two-storey building is indicative of the historic pattern of development in central Auckland in the late 19th and early 20 centuries. A representative example of a c1900s Victorian Italianate Page 33

| Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (Built Heritage)

Historic Character (Built Heritage) Delivery Work Plan commercial building in downtown Auckland. The building demonstrates typical masonry construction with a rendered street façade.

22

51-63 Victoria Street West Martha’s Corner

Legal Description

Lot 1 DP 88284

(as in Auckland Council Geomaps) Auckland Unitary Plan (AUP)

City Centre Special Character Building – Refer map H8.11.1

HNZPT

No

Summary The two-storey terraced shops are thought to have been built around the late 1870s/ 1880 and demonstrate the historic pattern of commercial development in central Auckland in the late 19th century. The building demonstrates typical masonry construction with a rendered street façades and forms part of a recognisable grouping of buildings of similar scale, massing and character.

Modifications to the façade of the two western terraces have been made incorporating Art Deco motifs. While periodic changes have been made over time, some early shop front features remain including a curved recessed shop fronts and entries incorporating cast iron columns. 5 23

61-65 Victoria Street

Legal Description (as given in AUP Schedule 14.1) Auckland Unitary Plan (AUP)

City Centre Special Character Building – Refer map H8.11.1

HNZPT

No

Summary Together with the adjacent Martha’s Corner, the buildings demonstrate the commercial historic pattern of development in central Auckland in the late 19th century. The buildings demonstrate typical masonry construction with a rendered street façade and form part of a recognisable grouping of buildings of similar scale, massing and character.

5

Reverb, Martha’s Corner Heritage Assessment Report, June 2015 | Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (Built Heritage)

Page 34

Historic Character (Built Heritage) Delivery Work Plan 24

66 Victoria Street West London Dairy

Legal Description

Lot 2 DP 687

Auckland Unitary Plan (AUP)

City Centre Special Character Building – Refer map H8.11.1

HNZPT

No

Summary The two-storey building is indicative of the historic pattern of commercial development in central Auckland in the late 19th and early 20 centuries. A representative example of an c. 1900s Italianate commercial building in downtown Auckland. The building demonstrates typical masonry construction with a rendered street façade.

25

68 Victoria Street West J H Hannan

Legal Description

Lot 1 DP 687

Auckland Unitary Plan (AUP)

City Centre Special Character Building – Refer map H8.11.1

HNZPT

No

Summary The two-storey building is indicative of the historic pattern of commercial development in central Auckland in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. A representative example of a c.1900 Italianate commercial building, it demonstrates typical masonry construction with a rendered street façade.

Page 35

| Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (Built Heritage)

Historic Character (Built Heritage) Delivery Work Plan 26

24 Wellesley Street Bledisloe House

Legal Description

LOT 1 DP 200295, LOT 2 DP 200295, LOT 16 DP 21520 LOT 17 DP 21520

Auckland Unitary Plan (AUP) Schedule Category B 14.1 Values: A Historic, F Physical Attributes, H Context HNZPT

No

Summary The Bledisloe State Building completed in 1959. It is significant for its modernist design by Government Architect F Gordon Wilson. The government departmental building forms part of the post-war master-planned Auckland Civic Centre Scheme. As part of a comprehensive urban development that involved both local and central government, Bledisloe House was one of eight identical structures that were initially conceived to define the civic centre. However, it was the only one built. Significant features include the well-articulated roof terrace and Guy Ngan’s decorative mural on the lift tower.

182 Federal Street and 58 Wellesley Street West.

Hampton Court

Legal Description (as in AUP Schedule Lot 1 DP 22238 14.1) Auckland Unitary Plan (AUP) Schedule Scheduled in Category B, ID 1956 14.1 Values: A Historic, B Social, G, Aesthetic HNZPT

Historic Place Category 2, List Number 585

Summary- Built in 1930, Hampton Court was designed by architect Surrey S. Alleman and gained a New Zealand Institute of Architects gold medal.

Page 36

| Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (Built Heritage)

Historic Character (Built Heritage) Delivery Work Plan 27

15-31 Wellesley Street West Archibald and Sons Warehouse (former) / T&G Building

Legal Description

Lot 1 DP21425

(as in AUP Schedule 14.1) Auckland Unitary Plan (AUP) Schedule Scheduled in Category B, ID 02088 14.1 Values: A Historic, F, Physical Attributes, G, Aesthetic, H Context.

HNZPT

Historic Place Category 2, List Number 659

Summary The building was constructed in 1910 for Archibald Clark and Sons, a substantial early manufacturing and warehousing company in Auckland. The Temperance and General Mutual Life Assurance Society (T&G) remodelled the entire building in 1928 when the tower at the corner was built.

30

Aotea Square Aotea Centre (rear section) Legal Description

Auckland Unitary Plan (AUP) Schedule No 14.1 HNZPT

No

Summary The Aotea Centre, Auckland’s major performing arts and events centre, was constructed in the late 1980s and officially opened in 1990.

31

11 Mayoral Drive Former Public Trust

Legal Description (as given in AUP Schedule 14.1) Page 37

| Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (Built Heritage)

Lot 4 DP 4059

Historic Character (Built Heritage) Delivery Work Plan Auckland Unitary Plan (AUP) Schedule Scheduled in Category B, ID 01985 14.1 Values: A Historic, E Technology, F, Physical Attributes, G, Aesthetic HNZPT

Historic Place Category 1, List Number 664

Summary The Public Trust Building was designed by architects Hoggard & Prouse and built in 1912 as the Auckland office for the Public Trust, which had been established in 1872. The Public Trustee’s main function was to administer the estates of deceased people who had named the Trustee as executor of their wills, or for people who died without a will. The substantial building is significant for its Neo-Classical design using concrete construction.

Page 38

| Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (Built Heritage)

Historic Character (Built Heritage) Delivery Work Plan

Appendix C: CLG and review comments CLG Comments A Community and Business Liaison Group (CLG) meeting for the Stage 4 and 5 works was held on 30th September 2019. No comments were received on the HCDWP (Built Heritage).

Comment ID

Date

Time

Forum

30/09/2019

1600 – 1730hrs

CLG

Contributor

Comment

Resolution

No comments recorded.

No Change to DWP

Independent Peer Review Page no.

HCDWP (Built Heritage) section

Paragraph/ sentence

ALL

Comment

Resolution

No changes to document proposed.

No change to document.

Comment

Resolution

No changes to document proposed.

No change to document.

Auckland Council Page no.

HCDWP (Built Heritage) section

Paragraph/ sentence

ALL

Page 39

| Historic Character Delivery Work Plan (Built Heritage)