Skip to main content

Current Issue

Page 1

Chelsea • Mordialloc • Mentone

GET YOUR

FREE TV GUIDE

Celebrating 20 years in 2026

INSIDE!

Fighting for the community since 2006

An independent voice for the community

Your weekly community newspaper covering news from Carrum to Mentone

FREE

Wednesday 24 June 2026

For all your advertising and editorial needs, call us on 03 5974 9000 or email: team@baysidenews.com.au www.baysidenews.com.au

SES members feel the Force THE Force was strong with Chelsea SES last week, as their members were treated to a visit from the 501st Legion Knightfall Garrison costumers. The group regularly dresses up as characters from the iconic Star Wars film franchise to cheer up those doing it tough. See story page 2. Pictures: Gary Sissons - picsales.au

Council arbitration matter thrown out Brodie Cowburn brodie@baysidenews.com.au ANOTHER arbitration matter between Kingston councillors has been thrown out, with the arbiter calling the latest application “vexatious”. Cr Hadi Saab applied for arbitration seeking a finding of misconduct against the mayor, Cr Georgina Oxley. The outcome was published last week, with the arbiter deciding to not uphold the misconduct allegation. The outcome of three arbitration mat-

ters between Kingston councillors have been published this year. Cr Jane Agirtan made an application against Cr Saab, Crs Oxley and Sarah O’Donnell made an application against Cr Saab, and most recently Cr Saab made an application against Cr Oxley. Each application was dismissed without a finding of misconduct. In the most recent application, Cr Saab alleged that Cr Oxley had published a “misleading” Facebook post in December last year about the continued presence of monitors at Kingston Council. The arbiter ruled against Cr Saab, claiming that

he had not followed the established process for conflict resolution. The arbiter wrote that Cr Oxley “alleged that the applicant [Cr Saab] failed to meaningfully initiate or participate in the staged internal dispute resolution process contained in Kingston Council’s Councillor Internal Resolution Procedure.” “What is missing from the applicant’s approach in this case is any meaningful attempt to specifically undertake the completion of any of the steps within the procedure. Discussion, conciliation and mediation provide the respondent with

Biggest EOFY Instore Sale Ever

UV RESISTANT

EASY TO INSTALL

FREE LOCAL DELIVERY

ORDER ONLINE OR CONTACT US FOR A FREE MEASURE AND QUOTE

1800 617 341 - designerplants.com.au - 5 Kevlar Close, Braeside

an important opportunity to understand the nature of the concerns being raised and to engage and respond before formal proceedings are commenced,” the arbiter wrote. “The fact that the applicant was engaged in the internal dispute resolution process on another application concurrently demonstrates that council dysfunction was not the blocker it was purported to be. “With the applicant making no genuine effort to engage in the process, it demonstrates he had no intention of resolving the dispute.” The arbiter wrote that the application

was “vexatious” because it was “based upon incomplete and misleading information, and represents a tokenistic approach to internal resolution and an abuse of the arbitration process; a process that is intended to be invoked as a last resort, only after reasonable attempts at internal resolution have been exhausted.” Kingston Council is currently being overseen by two state government-appointed monitors, whose terms are scheduled to conclude on 30 June. Their stay at council was extended by six months last December. Continued page 3


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Current Issue by Mornington Peninsula News Group - Issuu