The Evidence Chain: UAP Retrieval & Reverse-Engineering

BLACKGROVE GLOBAL RISK · FORENSIC ASSESSMENT

The Evidence Chain: UAP Retrieval & Reverse-Engineering A comprehensive forensic examination of the documented evidence — sworn testimony, declassified records, legislative text, official statements, and verified reporting — that could reasonably support the conclusion that the United States government has recovered and attempted to reverse-engineer unidentified anomalous phenomena.

ASSESSMENT FA-001 · 2 JULY 2026 · UNCLASSIFIED ALL SOURCES OPEN · BLACKGROVE ANALYTIC STANDARD APPLIED

BOTTOM LINE UP FRONT

A substantial, multi-layered evidence chain exists — composed of sworn congressional testimony, bipartisan legislative action premised on the existence of retrieval programs, an Intelligence Community Inspector General determination, declassified government documents spanning seven decades, and on-record statements by senior military and intelligence officials — that is consistent with the hypothesis that the U.S. government has recovered materials of unknown origin and conducted reverse-engineering efforts on them.

No single piece of this chain constitutes definitive proof. The chain's cumulative weight, however, has been sufficient to drive historic legislative action, multiple congressional hearings, presidential directives, and the creation of new government institutions. The counter-evidence — principally AARO's 2024 historical report — found no verifiable evidence supporting these claims but has itself been criticized by senior former officials as incomplete and methodologically flawed. This assessment maps the evidence at its earned tier without rendering a final verdict. The evidence chain is real. What it ultimately proves remains an open question.

METHODOLOGY & SOURCING STANDARD

Every factual claim in this assessment is tiered per the Blackgrove Analytic Standard. DOCUMENTED requires a primary record (Class A source — official text, transcript, agency filing) or a Class B source (official self-report of own action), with a locating reference. DOCUMENTED-AS-REPORTED means the best available source is independent journalism (Class C), capped at MODERATE confidence.

TESTIMONIAL means a named, on-record statement. INFERRED means analytic judgment by Blackgrove, labeled as such. UNESTABLISHED means circulating but unverified. This document argues up from the null hypothesis — that no retrieval or reverse-engineering program exists — and maps what evidence bears on rejecting it.

Table of Contents I

Official Programs: The Documented Government Record

II

Sworn Testimony & Whistleblower Complaints

III

Legislative Action as Evidence

IV

Official Statements by Senior Officials

BLACKGROVE GLOBAL RISK

2

V

Military Encounters: Sensor-Corroborated Events

VI

The Historical Record: Declassified Documents

VII

The PURSUE Releases & Current Disclosure (2026)

VIII

Institutional Response Patterns

IX

The Counter-Evidence

X

The Read: Pattern Synthesis & Assessment

XI

Source Ledger

BLACKGROVE GLOBAL RISK

3

SECTION I

Official Programs The documented government record of UAP investigation, from Project Sign to AARO — establishing that sustained official interest exists and has been repeatedly concealed from public view.

I. Official Programs: The Documented Government Record The U.S. government's involvement with UAP investigation is not speculative. It is documented across seven decades of programs, each confirmed through primary records. The pattern is consistent: programs are created, operate with limited oversight, and are disclosed only under external pressure.

Project Sign — "Estimate of the Situation" (1948) ESTABLISHED: 1948 · TERMINATED: 1949

The Air Force's first formal UFO investigation program, established at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base.

According to Captain Edward Ruppelt, the program's staff produced a classified "Estimate of the Situation" that concluded UFOs were interplanetary in origin. The report was rejected by Air Force Chief of Staff General Hoyt Vandenberg and allegedly ordered destroyed. No copy has surfaced through FOIA, though multiple Air Force officers confirmed the document's existence. records).

TESTIMONIAL

DOCUMENTED

(program existence, per USAF

(Estimate contents, per Ruppelt's 1956 account and corroborating officers).

Source: Ruppelt, E. "The Report on Unidentified Flying Objects" (1956). USAF historical records, National Archives.

The Twining Memo (September 23, 1947) DATE: 23 SEPTEMBER 1947

Lt. Gen. Nathan Twining, commander of Air Materiel Command at Wright-Patterson, authored the foundational document in the government UFO record: a classified memo to Brig. Gen. George Schulgen titled "AMC Opinion Concerning 'Flying Discs.'" The memo concluded: "The phenomenon is something real and not visionary or fictitious." It described objects "approximating the shape of a disc, of such appreciable size as to appear to be as large as man-made aircraft" with "extreme rates of climb, maneuverability (particularly in roll), and motion which must be considered evasive when sighted or contacted by friendly aircraft and radar." The memo recommended the creation of a formal investigation program, which became Project Sign.

DOCUMENTED

Source: "AMC Opinion Concerning 'Flying Discs,'" declassified, National Archives. FOIA release.

Project Blue Book (1952–1969) OPERATIONAL: 1952–1969 · 12,618 CASES

The Air Force's longest-running UFO investigation program cataloged 12,618 reports. Of these, 701 — 5.6% — were classified as "unexplained" after investigation, a category the Air Force defined as cases that could not be attributed to any conventional explanation after analysis. Project Blue Book Special Report No. 14, the largest statistical study of UFO cases ever undertaken, was conducted by Battelle Memorial Institute and completed in 1954. It found that "unknowns" were statistically distinct from "knowns" — they were not simply harder-to-identify versions of conventional phenomena but possessed different characteristics. This finding was never publicly emphasized.

DOCUMENTED

Source: Project Blue Book Archive, National Archives. Special Report No. 14 (1955), USAF / Battelle Memorial Institute.

BLACKGROVE GLOBAL RISK

5

AATIP / AAWSAP (2007–2012) OPERATIONAL: 2007–2012 · BUDGET: $22 MILLION

The Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program (AATIP), formally initiated as the Advanced Aerospace Weapon Systems Applications Program (AAWSAP), was a DIA program funded through a $22 million Congressional earmark secured by Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) with support from Senators Ted Stevens (R-AK) and Daniel Inouye (D-HI). The sole contract was awarded to Bigelow Aerospace Advanced Space Studies (BAASS) of Las Vegas. The program produced a 494-page report documenting worldwide UAP sightings and funded 38 research papers on topics including warp drive, stargates, invisibility cloaking, and advanced propulsion. Reid requested the program be placed under Restricted Special Access Program (SAP) protection in June 2009; DIA rejected the request, finding "no justification for Special Access Protections." The program's existence was first revealed publicly by the New York Times on December 16, 2017.

DOCUMENTED

Source: DIA FOIA release (dia.mil, FileId/170015); Cooper, Blumenthal, Kean, "Glowing Auras and 'Black Money'," NYT, 16 Dec 2017; FAS.org AATIP research list.

Senator Reid's Classified SAP Request (June 2009) DATE: 24 JUNE 2009

Reid wrote to Deputy Secretary of Defense William Lynn III requesting restricted SAP status for the program, stating it had produced "much progress" and involved technologies that could be "revolutionary for both civilian and military aerospace applications." This language — requesting the highest classification protections for a UFO research program because of its revolutionary technological implications — represents a data point in the evidence chain. A sitting Senate Majority Leader believed the program's findings warranted extreme classification protections. The DIA's rejection memo is also instructive: it found no justification for SAP status based on the content of the deliverables, not based on a judgment that the research was unimportant.

DOCUMENTED

Source: Reid letter and DIA response memo, declassified via FOIA. DIA Electronic Reading Room, FileId/170015.

Unidentified Aerial Phenomena Task Force — UAPTF (2020–2021) ESTABLISHED: AUGUST 2020 · SUCCESSOR: AARO

After the Pentagon acknowledged AATIP's existence in 2017 and subsequently claimed the program was terminated, the New York Times reported in July 2020 that a successor effort had been operating within the Office of Naval Intelligence. The Pentagon confirmed the UAPTF in August 2020. Its June 2021 Preliminary Assessment to Congress documented 144 UAP incidents reported by military aviators since 2004, of which only one was resolved with high confidence. The report stated: "Most of the UAP reported probably do represent physical objects given that a majority of UAP were registered across multiple sensors."

DOCUMENTED

Source: "Preliminary Assessment: Unidentified Aerial Phenomena," ODNI, 25 Jun 2021. DoD announcement, 14 Aug 2020.

BLACKGROVE GLOBAL RISK

6

AARO — All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (2022–Present) ESTABLISHED: JULY 2022 · DIRECTOR: JON KOSLOSKI (AUG 2024–)

Created by the FY2022 NDAA, AARO is the current Pentagon office for UAP investigation. Its FY2024 annual report documented over 2,000 cumulative cases, with 757 new reports in FY2024 alone. Of these, 21 were assessed as "truly anomalous" (~1.3%), while over 900 had insufficient data to resolve. AARO's first director, Dr. Sean Kirkpatrick, maintained that no evidence of non-human technology had been found.

Kirkpatrick's successor, Jon Kosloski (an NSA-background physicist), released a June 5, 2026 assessment report through PURSUE confirming that approximately 40% of reported phenomena in a Western U.S. cluster event (October 2023) "lack a reasonable explanation."

DOCUMENTED

Source: FY2022 NDAA, Pub. L. 117-81; AARO annual reports (aaro.mil); Kosloski assessment, PURSUE Release 03, 5 Jun 2026.

Kona Blue: The Proposed Retrieval Program That Was Denied PROPOSED AND REJECTED · DISCLOSED BY AARO 2024

AARO's March 2024 historical report disclosed a previously unknown proposed program called "Kona Blue" — a Prospective Special Access Program (PSAP) submitted to the Department of Homeland Security that was designed specifically to protect research related to recovered extraterrestrial technology. The program "was never approved by DHS leadership and never possessed any material or information." While AARO presents this as evidence that no such program existed, the very fact that credentialed individuals within the U.S. government formally proposed a classified program for UAP reverse-engineering — and structured it at the SAP level — is itself an evidence point. People with clearances and institutional access believed the material existed and sought formal mechanisms to work with it.

DOCUMENTED

Source: AARO Historical Record Report Vol. 1, pp. 34-35, DoD, 8 Mar 2024 (DOPSR-2024-0263).

SECTION I ASSESSMENT

What the program record establishes: The U.S. government has maintained continuous UAP investigation programs for 77 years (1947–2024), repeatedly concealing their existence from public view. Each disclosure of a program — Sign, Blue Book, AATIP, UAPTF — occurred under external pressure, not voluntarily. The pattern is documented and undeniable. What it does not establish is whether any of these programs recovered or reverse-engineered non-human technology. The program record proves sustained institutional interest and sustained institutional secrecy. Both are facts.

BLACKGROVE GLOBAL RISK

CONFIDENCE: HIGH

7

SECTION II

Sworn Testimony & Whistleblower Complaints On-record statements made under oath or through formal legal mechanisms, where fabrication carries legal consequences.

II. Sworn Testimony & Whistleblower Complaints Testimony under oath carries a qualitatively different evidentiary weight than public commentary. The individuals below testified before Congress or filed formal complaints through legal channels where false statements carry criminal penalties.

David Grusch — House Oversight Committee (July 26, 2023) DATE: 26 JULY 2023 · VENUE: U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES · UNDER OATH

A former Air Force intelligence officer (Major) and GS-15 civilian at the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency, Grusch co-led the UAP portfolio at NGA and served as a representative to the UAP Task Force.

His career, clearances, and service record are independently confirmed. Under oath before the House Oversight Committee's national security subcommittee, he stated: • "I was informed in the course of my official duties of a multi-decade UAP crash retrieval and reverseengineering program to which I was denied access."

TESTIMONIAL

• He claimed the U.S. government is in possession of "non-human" craft, that he knows the "exact locations" of these materials, and that "non-human biologics" have been recovered from crash sites — though he clarified this was "the assessment of people with direct knowledge on the program I talked to, that are currently still on the program."

TESTIMONIAL

• He testified to interviewing over 40 witnesses with "a longstanding track record of legitimacy and service to this country" over four years.

TESTIMONIAL

• He stated there is "substantive evidence that white-collar crime" was committed to conceal these programs from Congress.

TESTIMONIAL

• When asked if people had been harmed or killed to conceal UAP programs, he answered yes but stated he could only provide details in a SCIF.

TESTIMONIAL

Limiting factor: Grusch's testimony is explicitly second-hand. He testified to what he was told by others with claimed direct knowledge, not to personal observation. He has not personally seen alien vehicles or bodies. His statements underwent Defense Office of Prepublication and Security Review (DOPSR), which cleared them for open publication on April 4, 2023 — meaning the DoD reviewed his intended public statements about crash retrievals and SAPs and did not block them on classification grounds.

DOCUMENTED

(DOPSR clearance).

Source: House Oversight Committee hearing transcript, 26 Jul 2023 (congress.gov). NPR, 27 Jul 2023. DOPSR clearance stamp (publicly released).

BLACKGROVE GLOBAL RISK

9

Grusch — Intelligence Community Inspector General Complaint DATE: FILED 2022 · ICIG DETERMINATION: "URGENT AND CREDIBLE"

Before going public, Grusch filed a formal complaint with the Intelligence Community Inspector General (ICIG), Thomas Monheim. The complaint was reportedly determined to meet the threshold of "urgent and credible" — a legal determination under the Intelligence Community Whistleblower Protection Act (50 U.S.C. § 3033(k)(5)) that triggers mandatory reporting to the Congressional intelligence committees.

Multiple members of Congress, including then-Senate Intelligence Committee Vice Chair Marco Rubio, confirmed receiving classified briefings from the ICIG related to these matters.

DOCUMENTED-AS-REPORTED

Important caveat: The "urgent and credible" determination is a procedural threshold — it means the complaint was filed by someone with appropriate access, was not frivolous, and warranted forwarding to Congress. It is not an adjudication of the underlying claims.

INFERRED

Source: Kean and Blumenthal, The Debrief, 5 Jun 2023. Congressional statements by Rubio (NewsNation, Jul 2023). ICIG semi-annual reports.

Luis Elizondo — House Oversight Committee (November 13, 2024) DATE: 13 NOVEMBER 2024 · UNDER OATH

The former director of AATIP (a role disputed by the Pentagon, which has given conflicting accounts), Elizondo testified under oath: "Let me be clear: UAP are real. Advanced technologies not made by our government — or any other government — are monitoring sensitive military installations around the globe.

Furthermore, the U.S. is in possession of UAP technologies, as are some of our adversaries. I believe we are in the midst of a multi-decade, secretive arms race — one funded by misallocated taxpayer dollars and hidden from our elected representatives and oversight bodies."

TESTIMONIAL

Limiting factor: Elizondo's role in AATIP is contested. The Pentagon has variously confirmed and denied his leadership. He has been criticized for presenting mundane objects as possible UAP. His 2024 book Imminent was a #1 New York Times bestseller, creating financial incentives to weigh. His testimony nonetheless carries legal weight as a sworn statement before Congress.

Source: Written testimony, oversight.house.gov. House Oversight hearing transcript, 13 Nov 2024.

RADM Tim Gallaudet (USN, Ret.) — House Oversight Committee (November 13, 2024) DATE: 13 NOVEMBER 2024 · UNDER OATH

Retired Rear Admiral and former Deputy Administrator of NOAA testified that in January 2015, while commanding the Naval Meteorology and Oceanography Command, he received an email from a fellow flag officer during a naval exercise off the U.S. East Coast involving the USS Theodore Roosevelt Carrier Strike Group. The email stated, in effect: "If any of you know what these are, tell me ASAP. We are having multiple near-midair collisions, and if we do not resolve it soon, we will have to shut down the exercise." Attached was what is now known as the "Go Fast" video, showing an unidentified object with "flight and structural characteristics unlike anything in our arsenal." Gallaudet urged Congress to pass the UAP Disclosure Act's Review Board provision.

TESTIMONIAL

Source: Written testimony, oversight.house.gov (Updated-Testimony-Gallaudet.pdf). House Oversight hearing, 13 Nov 2024.

BLACKGROVE GLOBAL RISK

10

David Fravor (CDR, USN, Ret.) — House Oversight Committee (July 26, 2023) DATE: 26 JULY 2023 · UNDER OATH

Retired Navy Commander and F/A-18 pilot who was the primary witness to the November 14, 2004 USS Nimitz "Tic Tac" encounter. Under oath, Fravor described visually tracking an object approximately 40 feet long, white, and shaped like a Tic Tac, hovering over a disturbance in the ocean. The object demonstrated instantaneous acceleration, no visible propulsion, and outmaneuvered his fighter jet. It was tracked simultaneously by the SPY-1 radar on the USS Princeton, the E-2C Hawkeye airborne radar, the Nimitz's own radar, and the FLIR targeting pod on a subsequent aircraft.

TESTIMONIAL

(firsthand, multi-sensor

corroborated).

Source: House Oversight Committee hearing transcript, 26 Jul 2023. SCU Nimitz report. Pentagon-released FLIR1 video.

Ryan Graves — House Oversight Committee (July 26, 2023) DATE: 26 JULY 2023 · UNDER OATH

Former Navy F/A-18 pilot who reported repeated UAP encounters off the Virginia coast during 2014– 2015 while operating from the USS Theodore Roosevelt. Graves testified to objects detected on radar, FLIR, and visually — objects that maintained station in restricted airspace for extended periods in all weather conditions and demonstrated performance characteristics inconsistent with known technology.

He founded Americans for Safe Aerospace to address reporting stigma. His claims are firsthand, narrow in scope, corroborated by multiple sensors and aircrew, and he consistently avoids overreach regarding the objects' origin.

TESTIMONIAL

(firsthand, multi-sensor corroborated).

Source: House Oversight Committee hearing transcript, 26 Jul 2023. Americans for Safe Aerospace filings.

SECTION II ASSESSMENT

Multiple individuals with verified credentials and clearances have testified under oath before Congress that UAP retrieval and reverse-engineering programs exist, that the U.S. possesses nonhuman technology, and that these programs have been concealed from Congressional oversight.

The witnesses include a former intelligence officer cleared to discuss SAPs (Grusch), a former AATIP director (Elizondo), a retired Rear Admiral (Gallaudet), and combat pilots with firsthand sensor-corroborated encounters (Fravor, Graves). The core retrieval claims (Grusch, Elizondo) are second-hand or based on program knowledge rather than personal physical examination of material. The encounter testimony (Fravor, Graves, Gallaudet) is firsthand and multi-sensor corroborated but establishes anomalous performance, not retrieval. No witness has publicly produced physical evidence.

BLACKGROVE GLOBAL RISK

CONFIDENCE: MODERATE

11

SECTION III

Legislative Action as Evidence What Congress did — not what it said — and what those actions presuppose about the existence of retrieval programs.

III. Legislative Action as Evidence Legislation is the most durable class of evidence in this chain. Laws and their legislative history represent formal, deliberative acts by the United States Congress. What Congress chose to legislate — and what it chose to protect against — carries evidentiary weight independent of any individual witness.

The UAP Disclosure Act of 2023 (Schumer-Rounds Amendment) INTRODUCED: JULY 2023 · PASSED SENATE · STRIPPED IN CONFERENCE

The most consequential piece of legislation in this evidence chain. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) and Sen. Mike Rounds (R-SD) introduced an amendment to the FY2024 NDAA modeled explicitly on the JFK Assassination Records Collection Act of 1992. The amendment's text — drafted with input from classified briefings — defined specific terms whose very existence in federal legislation is an evidence point: • "Technologies of unknown origin" was defined as "any materials or meta-materials, ejecta, crash debris, mechanisms, machinery, equipment, assemblies or sub-assemblies, engineering models or processes, damaged or intact aerospace vehicles."

DOCUMENTED

• "Biological evidence of non-human intelligence" was a defined statutory term.

DOCUMENTED

• The amendment asserted federal eminent domain over "any and all recovered technologies of unknown origin and biological evidence of non-human intelligence that may be controlled by private persons or entities."

DOCUMENTED

• A Presidential Review Board would determine "whether the material examined constitutes technologies of unknown origin or biological evidence of non-human intelligence beyond a reasonable doubt."

DOCUMENTED

The logic is forensic: The United States Senate does not write eminent-domain provisions for technology it does not believe exists. The amendment's drafters received classified briefings. The language presupposes that private entities may possess recovered non-human technology and that the federal government needs legal authority to reclaim it. The Senate passed this language with bipartisan support.

Source: S.Amdt., democrats.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/uap_amendment.pdf. Senate floor debate, Congressional Record.

BLACKGROVE GLOBAL RISK

13

The Conference Committee Strip-Down (December 2023) DATE: DECEMBER 2023

The House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence — chaired by Rep. Mike Turner (R-OH) — stripped the eminent-domain provision and the independent Review Board from the final FY2024 NDAA in conference. Senator Schumer took to the Senate floor on December 13, 2023 to name the outcome as a setback and committed to reintroducing the provisions. In the FY2025 cycle, the same pattern repeated: Schumer reintroduced the original provisions, and the House Intelligence Committee again stripped them in conference.

DOCUMENTED

Evidentiary significance: This pattern — bipartisan Senate support for retrieval-related oversight, blocked twice by the House Intelligence Committee — is itself an evidence point. The same committee with the closest relationship to the intelligence community consistently blocked the provisions designed to force disclosure of retrieval programs. Whether this represents legitimate national security concerns or institutional capture is an open analytic question.

INFERRED

Source: Schumer floor statement, Congressional Record, 13 Dec 2023. Conference report, FY2024 NDAA.

FY2024 NDAA §1687 and §7343 — Funding Prohibitions SIGNED INTO LAW: 22 DECEMBER 2023

While the eminent-domain and Review Board provisions were stripped, two funding-restriction sections survived. Section 1687 prohibits DoD funding for any special access program involving UAP unless the Secretary of Defense has provided full details to the appropriate Congressional committees and leadership. Section 7343 mirrors this for Intelligence Community programs under the IAA. The Joint Explanatory Statement (JES) — which carries weight as a statement of Congressional intent — specified that the restriction "could cover" activities including "analyzing such craft, or pieces of components thereof" and "actions relating to reverse engineering or replicating unidentified anomalous phenomena technology or performance."

DOCUMENTED

President Biden's signing statement listed Section 1687 among provisions requiring submission of "highly sensitive classified information" to Congress.

DOCUMENTED

Source: Pub. L. 118-31 §§1687, 7343. JES, armed-services.senate.gov. Biden signing statement, 22 Dec 2023.

Intelligence Authorization Act — Contractor Disclosure Mandate ENACTED: FY2024

The IAA requires persons currently or formerly under contract with the federal government to make all UAP material and information — and a comprehensive list of all "extraterrestrial or exotic UAP material" — available to AARO. The statutory text uses the terms "extraterrestrial" and "exotic." Congress does not legislate disclosure requirements for material categories it believes to be fictional.

DOCUMENTED

Source: Intelligence Authorization Act for FY2024, enacted provisions. Wikipedia summary cross-referenced with bill text.

BLACKGROVE GLOBAL RISK

14

FY2026 NDAA — UAP Provisions (December 2025) SIGNED: 18 DECEMBER 2025

Three UAP-specific provisions enacted: (1) mandatory NORAD/NORTHCOM intercept briefings covering all UAP encounters since 2004; (2) AARO classification guide accounting, due June 16, 2026; (3) streamlined interagency UAP data sharing. The 20-year NORAD intercept backfill represents Congress demanding a comprehensive record of every military intercept response to unidentified objects for two decades.

DOCUMENTED

Source: Pub. L. (FY2026 NDAA), signed 18 Dec 2025. Disclosure Foundation analysis.

SECTION III ASSESSMENT

Congress has passed legislation that defines "technologies of unknown origin," asserts eminent domain over recovered non-human materials, prohibits secret UAP programs from operating without Congressional notification, and mandates contractor disclosure of "extraterrestrial or exotic" material. These are not resolutions or sense-of-Congress statements. They are enacted federal law. The legislative record constitutes the strongest structural evidence in the chain — not because any law proves retrieval occurred, but because the aggregate legislative action is rationally explicable only if the legislators who drafted and passed these provisions believed, based on classified briefings, that retrieval programs exist or plausibly exist. The alternative — that bipartisan majorities legislated eminent domain over technology they believed to be imaginary — is not credible.

CONFIDENCE: HIGH

BLACKGROVE GLOBAL RISK

15

SECTION IV

Official Statements

by Senior Officials On-record statements by current and former senior military and intelligence officials — not anonymous sources.

IV. Official Statements by Senior Officials Beyond sworn testimony, multiple current and former senior officials have made on-record public statements that bear on the retrieval hypothesis. Each is tiered on its own merits.

Col. Karl Nell (USA, Ret.) — "Zero Doubt" DATE: 21 MAY 2024 · VENUE: SALT ICONCONNECTIONS, NEW YORK

A retired Army Colonel with 30 years in aerospace and intelligence, Nell was the former director of the Pentagon's UAP Task Force. At the SALT iConnections conference, he stated on-record: "Non-human intelligence exists. Non-human intelligence has been interacting with humanity. This interaction is not new and it's been ongoing. And there are unelected people in the government that are aware of that." When asked about his confidence level: "There's zero doubt." Nell subsequently published a comprehensive disclosure "Campaign Plan" through the Sol Foundation in January 2026, including a phased Lines-ofEffort framework for managed disclosure.

TESTIMONIAL

Source: SALT iConnections video, 22 May 2024 (YouTube). Sol Foundation publication, Jan 2026. NewsNation coverage.

Christopher Mellon — Former DASD(I) ONGOING PUBLIC STATEMENTS · 2017–2026

The former Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Intelligence — arguably the most institutionally credible figure in the disclosure space — provided the original Navy UAP videos (FLIR1, Gimbal, GoFast) to the New York Times in 2017 and lobbied for the NDAA provisions that created AARO. Mellon publicly described AARO's March 2024 historical report as "the most error-ridden and unsatisfactory government report I can recall reading during or after decades of government service," stating it "failed to fulfill the congressional mandate under which it was required, omitted entire agencies with known investigations or activities related to UAPs, and omitted any discussion of efforts to hide classified or unclassified information about UAP." He called the February 2026 Trump declassification directive "clearly a historic development" but warned that disclosure "won't come from combing through stacks of documents."

TESTIMONIAL Source: Mellon's written statement to House Oversight, Nov 2024. DefenseScoop, Feb 2026. Public commentary (Substack, media).

Senator Marco Rubio — Senate Intelligence Committee 2022–2023 · VICE CHAIR, SSCI

As Vice Chair of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, Rubio confirmed that individuals with high clearances and established government careers had come to the committee with claims about UAP retrieval and reverse-engineering programs. He stated: "People who we entrusted to do some really important things for our country are saying some pretty incredible things." He described them as "former admirals, naval fighters, people with high clearances in government" making "spectacular claims." Rubio confirmed these were not people he considered unreliable, though he maintained he did not have independent knowledge that their claims were true.

TESTIMONIAL

Source: NewsNation interview, Jul 2023. FOX 10 Phoenix "UNKNOWN" program, Dec 2025.

BLACKGROVE GLOBAL RISK

17

Senator Harry Reid (1939–2024) MULTIPLE STATEMENTS · 2017–2023

The former Senate Majority Leader who funded AATIP/AAWSAP made repeated public statements suggesting he believed the U.S. government had recovered UAP material. In a 2009 letter declassified via FOIA, he described the AAWSAP program as having made "much progress" on technologies with potentially "revolutionary" applications. In a New Yorker interview, he stated his conviction was based on a pattern of sensor-correlated incidents, often around nuclear assets, that conventional analysis could not explain. Reid's post-program statements consistently suggested he believed the evidence warranted more aggressive investigation, though he was careful about specific retrieval claims.

TESTIMONIAL

Source: Reid FOIA letter, DIA Electronic Reading Room. New Yorker profile (2021). New York Magazine interview (2018).

Tim Phillips — Former Acting AARO Director MARCH 2024 TESTIMONY → FEBRUARY 2026 STATEMENTS

In his March 2024 press conference presenting AARO's historical report, Phillips maintained the institutional line: "AARO has found no verifiable evidence that any UAP sighting has represented extraterrestrial activity." However, by February 2026, Phillips reportedly described objects "in space" performing "impossible maneuvers" — a significant departure from his earlier testimony. He stated that fewer than 50 cases remain "completely unexplained" after expert review. This shift by the very official who presented the "no evidence" finding is an inflection point.

DOCUMENTED-AS-REPORTED

Source: War.gov transcript, 6 Mar 2024. Community and secondary reporting, Feb 2026 (not independently verified against primary source).

SECTION IV ASSESSMENT

A former Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Intelligence, a retired Colonel who directed the UAP Task Force, the former Vice Chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee, and a former Senate Majority Leader have all made on-record statements consistent with the existence of UAP retrieval programs. These are not anonymous sources or internet commentators. They are named officials with verified institutional access, speaking publicly at personal and professional risk. Their statements converge on a consistent narrative: credentialed insiders believe retrieval programs exist, institutional secrecy has hidden them from proper oversight, and the evidence they encountered was compelling enough to drive their public advocacy.

BLACKGROVE GLOBAL RISK

CONFIDENCE: MODERATE

18

SECTION V

Military Encounters Sensor-corroborated incidents involving U.S. military personnel and platforms — the empirical foundation that something anomalous is present.

V. Military Encounters: Sensor-Corroborated Events These incidents do not directly evidence retrieval programs. They evidence the existence of objects demonstrating performance characteristics beyond known technology — which is the precondition for any retrieval hypothesis to be coherent. If nothing anomalous exists, there is nothing to retrieve.

USS Nimitz "Tic Tac" Encounter (November 14, 2004) DATE: 14 NOVEMBER 2004 · PACIFIC OCEAN, OFF SAN DIEGO

The foundational modern military encounter. Over approximately two weeks, the USS Princeton's AN/ SPY-1B radar (one of the most capable naval radars in existence) tracked anomalous objects descending from ~80,000 feet to sea level in seconds. On November 14, Commander David Fravor and Lt. Commander Alex Dietrich were vectored to intercept and visually observed a white, Tic Tac-shaped object ~40 feet long with no wings, no visible propulsion, and no control surfaces, hovering over a disturbance in the ocean. The object mirrored Fravor's descent, then accelerated away at a speed the pilots described as instantaneous. Within seconds, it appeared at the combat air patrol point ~60 miles away — a predesignated coordinate known only to the carrier strike group. A subsequent aircraft (piloted by Chad Underwood) obtained FLIR imagery that became the Pentagon-released "FLIR1" video. Multiple radar systems — the Princeton, the E-2C Hawkeye, and the Nimitz itself — tracked the object.

(Pentagon-released video, confirmed authentic).

TESTIMONIAL

DOCUMENTED

(multiple firsthand witnesses under oath).

Source: Pentagon-released FLIR1 video (27 Apr 2020). Fravor congressional testimony, 26 Jul 2023. SCU Nimitz analysis report.

USS Theodore Roosevelt Encounters (2014–2015) DATE: 2014–2015 · U.S. EAST COAST

Fighter pilots from the Roosevelt carrier strike group operating off the East Coast reported repeated encounters with unidentified objects, producing the Pentagon-released "Gimbal" and "GoFast" videos.

The objects were detected on radar, FLIR, and visually. Lt. Ryan Graves reported that objects maintained station in restricted military airspace for extended periods, in all weather conditions, and demonstrated performance characteristics — including apparent rotation without aerodynamic surfaces — inconsistent with known technology. RADM Tim Gallaudet confirmed receiving the GoFast video in January 2015 via a flag officer email reporting near-midair collisions that threatened to shut down the exercise.

(Pentagon-released videos).

TESTIMONIAL

DOCUMENTED

(Graves, Gallaudet under oath).

Source: Pentagon-released Gimbal and GoFast videos (27 Apr 2020). Graves testimony, 26 Jul 2023. Gallaudet testimony, 13 Nov 2024.

BLACKGROVE GLOBAL RISK

20

Pentagon Official Release and Authentication of UAP Videos (2019–2021) 2019–2021

In September 2019, Pentagon spokeswoman Susan Gough confirmed the videos were made by naval aviators and were "part of a larger issue of an increased number of training range incursions by unidentified aerial phenomena in recent years." On April 27, 2020, the Pentagon formally released three videos (FLIR1, Gimbal, GoFast) and stated: "The aerial phenomena observed in the videos remain characterized as 'unidentified.'" In 2021, the Pentagon confirmed additional Navy footage from the USS Russell (2019, triangular objects) and USS Omaha (2019, spherical object entering the ocean).

DOCUMENTED

Source: Pentagon statements, 2019-2021. DoD press release, 27 Apr 2020. ABC News, 27 Apr 2020.

ODNI Preliminary Assessment (June 2021) DATE: 25 JUNE 2021

The Office of the Director of National Intelligence released its Preliminary Assessment on UAP, examining 144 incidents reported by military aviators since 2004. Key findings: only 1 of 144 incidents was resolved with high confidence (deflating balloon). "Most of the UAP reported probably do represent physical objects given that a majority of UAP were registered across multiple sensors." Eighteen incidents, described in 21 reports, appeared to demonstrate "unusual UAP movement patterns or flight characteristics," including objects that "remained stationary in winds aloft, moved against the wind, maneuvered abruptly, or moved at considerable speed, without discernable means of propulsion."

DOCUMENTED Source: "Preliminary Assessment: Unidentified Aerial Phenomena," ODNI, 25 Jun 2021.

AARO Assessment — 40% Unexplained (June 2026) DATE: 5 JUNE 2026

AARO Director Kosloski's assessment, released through PURSUE Release 03, documented a Western U.S. cluster event in October 2023 where law enforcement reported an orange "mother" orb launching smaller red orbs. Approximately 40% of the phenomena reported "lack a reasonable explanation."

DOCUMENTED

Source: AARO assessment report, PURSUE Release 03, 5 Jun 2026 (war.gov/ufo). CBS News confirmation.

SECTION V ASSESSMENT

The military encounter record establishes, at the DOCUMENTED tier, that objects demonstrating performance characteristics beyond known technology have been detected by multiple independent sensor systems and witnessed by trained military observers. The Pentagon has authenticated the footage, confirmed the incidents, and stated the objects remain "unidentified."

This does not prove non-human origin. It does establish that the precondition for retrieval — the presence of anomalous objects — is met. Something is there. What it is remains an open question.

CONFIDENCE: HIGH

(on the existence of genuinely anomalous objects; LOW on their origin).

BLACKGROVE GLOBAL RISK

21

SECTION VI

The Historical Record Declassified documents and historical evidence spanning seven decades.

VI. The Historical Record: Declassified Documents The Robertson Panel (January 1953) DATE: JANUARY 1953 · CONVENED BY CIA

A CIA-convened panel of scientists, chaired by physicist H.P. Robertson, reviewed UFO evidence and recommended that the Air Force publicly debunk UFO sightings to reduce public interest and reporting.

The panel concluded that UFOs did not present a direct physical threat but that the phenomenon's effect on public sentiment and military reporting channels did represent a vulnerability. The panel's recommendation — to actively suppress public interest in the topic — is the earliest documented evidence of an institutional strategy to manage the UFO issue through debunking rather than investigation. This document was declassified and is available in the CIA's FOIA reading room. Records related to the Robertson Panel era were included in PURSUE Release 03 (June 2026).

DOCUMENTED

Source: CIA Robertson Panel report, declassified. CIA FOIA Electronic Reading Room. PURSUE Release 03, 12 Jun 2026.

NSA TOP SECRET UMBRA UAP Records (Declassified May 2026) DATE: RELEASED 18 MAY 2026 · SPANNING MULTIPLE DECADES

The Disclosure Foundation's successful FOIA appeal compelled the NSA to release 334 pages of formerly TOP SECRET UMBRA classified UAP records. "TOP SECRET UMBRA" is one of the most sensitive SIGINT classification markings. The records include radar tracking data, visual sighting reports, and references to military intercept responses to unidentified objects spanning decades. Many entries remain heavily redacted despite their age. The NSA continues to assert exemptions for additional UAP-related material dating to the 1960s.

DOCUMENTED

Significance: The existence of TOP SECRET UMBRA classified UAP records confirms that the intelligence community's most sensitive signals intelligence channels have tracked UAP-related phenomena for decades. The classification level itself is an evidence point — you do not classify radar tracks of weather balloons at TOP SECRET UMBRA.

INFERRED

Source: NSA FOIA release, Disclosure Foundation, 18 May 2026 (disclosure.org/news). Full production embedded at disclosure.org.

The 1952 Washington, D.C. Overflights DATE: JULY 12–29, 1952

On consecutive weekends in July 1952, unidentified objects were tracked on multiple independent radar systems over Washington, D.C. — National Airport radar, Andrews Air Force Base radar — and visually confirmed by air traffic controllers, airline pilots, and military personnel. Objects were calculated at speeds up to 7,000 mph. The Air Force held its largest press conference since World War II in response. The incidents triggered the CIA's creation of the Robertson Panel. Air Force explanations attributed the returns to temperature inversions, though multiple radar operators and visual witnesses disputed this.

DOCUMENTED

Source: USAF records, National Archives. Contemporary press coverage. Project Blue Book case files.

BLACKGROVE GLOBAL RISK

23

The Immaculate Constellation Document (November 2024) ENTERED CONGRESSIONAL RECORD: 13 NOVEMBER 2024

A 12-page whistleblower report, authored by former defense-industry analyst Matthew Brown (who selfidentified in April 2025), alleging the existence of an unacknowledged SAP called "Immaculate Constellation." The report claims the program has operated since 2017, uses artificial intelligence to sweep classified military and intelligence servers for UAP imagery and sensor data, and quarantines the material into a hidden archive outside Congressional oversight. Rep. Nancy Mace entered the document into the Congressional Record at the November 13, 2024 House Oversight hearing. The Pentagon denied the program exists by name on the same day.

Congressional Record).

UNESTABLISHED

DOCUMENTED

(existence of document and its entry into

(program's existence).

Source: Congressional Record, 13 Nov 2024. Shellenberger, "Public," 8 Oct 2024. docs.house.gov submission. DoD denial statement.

SECTION VI ASSESSMENT

The declassified record establishes that the U.S. government has documented, classified at the highest levels, and in at least one confirmed case (Robertson Panel) actively suppressed UAPrelated information for over seven decades. TOP SECRET UMBRA records confirm SIGINT-level UAP tracking spanning decades. The historical record does not directly evidence retrieval, but it demolishes any claim that UAP are not taken seriously at the highest classification levels. The question is not whether the government has UAP files — it does, at the most sensitive levels. The question is what those files contain.

BLACKGROVE GLOBAL RISK

CONFIDENCE: HIGH

24

SECTION VII

The PURSUE Releases The 2026 presidential declassification initiative and what it has produced to date.

VII. The PURSUE Releases & Current Disclosure (2026) Presidential Directive (February 19, 2026) DATE: 19 FEBRUARY 2026

President Trump issued a directive ordering federal agencies to identify and release files on "alien and extraterrestrial life, UAPs, and UFOs." The directive was executed through the Department of War (formerly DoD), with support from ODNI (DNI Tulsi Gabbard). Secretary of War Pete Hegseth pledged "full compliance."

DOCUMENTED

PURSUE Releases 01–03 (May–June 2026) 280+ FILES ACROSS THREE RELEASES

Three releases through war.gov/ufo have produced over 280 files from multiple federal agencies (DOD, CIA, DIA, NSA, ODNI, NASA, State Department, FBI). Reported contents include: • Video described as military engagement with an unidentified object (Lake Huron, February 2023) DOCUMENTED-AS-REPORTED

• UAP footage showing anomalous acceleration

DOCUMENTED-AS-REPORTED

• CIA-era historical records including Robertson Panel documents • Cold War-era nuclear facility UAP dossier

DOCUMENTED

DOCUMENTED-AS-REPORTED

• State Department embassy cables from multiple countries

DOCUMENTED-AS-REPORTED

• AARO June 5, 2026 assessment report (confirmed by CBS News)

DOCUMENTED

The Pentagon characterizes all materials as "unresolved cases" with "no definitive determination."

DOCUMENTED Source: war.gov/ufo. DOW press releases, 8 May, 22 May, 12 Jun 2026. CBS News, The Guardian, DefenseScoop.

New Institutional Structures (June 2026) ESTABLISHED: JUNE 2026

The reporting period saw creation of two new government bodies: the interagency UAP Governance Board (launched by ODNI, inaugural meeting week of June 16) and the UAP Science Advisory Council (led by Harvard's Avi Loeb, reporting to the Governance Board, unclassified data only). These are the first formal interagency UAP governance structures in U.S. history.

DOCUMENTED

Source: MeriTalk, Newsmax, Jun 2026. Loeb announcement, 17 Jun 2026.

BLACKGROVE GLOBAL RISK

26

SECTION VII ASSESSMENT

PURSUE represents the most significant government UAP disclosure in history. It confirms, at the DOCUMENTED tier, that multi-agency UAP records spanning decades exist, include sensor data and military engagement footage, and were classified across multiple agencies. The releases do not (yet) include material directly evidencing retrieval or reverse-engineering. The government's consistent framing of all materials as "unresolved" — rather than "prosaic" — is itself a data point: after seven decades of investigation, the government is not saying these are all explained. It is saying they remain unresolved.

BLACKGROVE GLOBAL RISK

CONFIDENCE: MODERATE

27

SECTION VIII

Institutional Response Patterns The system's behavior — what it does, not what it says — as an independent evidence class.

VIII. Institutional Response Patterns If the retrieval hypothesis is false, the institutional behavior surrounding it should be explicable through simpler mechanisms. If the behavior is not easily explained without the hypothesis, the behavior itself becomes evidence.

Pattern 1: Repeated Concealment Followed by Forced Disclosure Every UAP investigation program in the historical record was concealed from public view and disclosed only under external pressure. Project Sign's Estimate was suppressed. Blue Book was designed to minimize "unknowns," not investigate them. AATIP was disclosed only when Mellon provided videos to the Times. UAPTF was acknowledged only after Senate reporting requirements forced it. Each disclosure revealed the previous assurance — "nothing to see" — to have been false.

INFERRED

Pattern 2: Legislative Resistance from Oversight Bodies The House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, under Chairman Mike Turner, twice stripped the UAP Disclosure Act's most aggressive provisions — eminent domain over private-sector UAP material and an independent Review Board — in conference committee. This is the committee with the closest institutional relationship to the intelligence community. The pattern is consistent with institutional protection of existing programs, though it is also consistent with legitimate concerns about process, cost, or the precedent of legislating eminent domain over speculative technology categories. Both explanations should be weighed.

INFERRED

Pattern 3: The DOPSR Paradox Grusch's statements about crash retrieval programs and special access programs were cleared for open publication by the Defense Office of Prepublication and Security Review (DOPSR) on April 4, 2023. DOPSR reviews material for classified information. If Grusch were fabricating claims about programs that do not exist, DOPSR would have no classification concern and would clear the material — which is what occurred.

But if Grusch were accurately describing real programs, DOPSR would face a decision: block the publication (which would constitute an acknowledgment that the information is classified and therefore real) or clear it (on the grounds that the specific claims, while referencing real programs, do not reveal operationally sensitive details). The DOPSR clearance is therefore ambiguous — consistent with both hypotheses. But it is not consistent with a third scenario: that Grusch's claims were so baseless that the DoD would have corrected the record definitively. The DoD issued a general denial rather than a specific rebuttal.

INFERRED

Pattern 4: The Kona Blue Disclosure AARO's own historical report disclosed that credentialed government insiders formally proposed a classified program (Kona Blue) to DHS specifically for UAP reverse-engineering. The program was rejected. AARO presents this as evidence against the retrieval hypothesis. But the proposal's existence

BLACKGROVE GLOBAL RISK

29

demonstrates that people with clearances and institutional access believed recovered material existed and sought formal mechanisms to study it. AARO also disclosed that "in 2021, without sufficient justification, the scope of an IC Controlled Access Program was expanded to protect UAP reverse-engineering. This program never recovered or reverse-engineered any UAP or extraterrestrial spacecraft." An actual classified program was expanded to include UAP reverse-engineering. It was disestablished for "lack of merit" — but it existed.

DOCUMENTED

Pattern 5: Nuclear Facility Correlation UAP incidents have been reported at or near nuclear facilities across the historical record: nuclear missile sites (Malmstrom AFB, 1967), nuclear carrier strike groups (Nimitz, Roosevelt), nuclear weapons production facilities, and nuclear test sites. This correlation has been noted by Reid, Gallaudet, Elizondo, and multiple congressional members. PURSUE Release 02 reportedly included a Cold War-era nuclear facility UAP dossier. Whether this pattern reflects actual interest by an external intelligence (human or non-human) in nuclear capabilities, or reporting bias (nuclear facilities have more security personnel, more sensors, more reporting infrastructure), is an open question.

INFERRED

SECTION VIII ASSESSMENT

The institutional behavior of the U.S. government regarding UAP is not consistent with a subject that has been fully investigated and found prosaic. Programs are concealed, then disclosed under pressure. Oversight bodies with the closest IC relationships resist transparency provisions. Officials cleared through classification review make claims the government does not specifically rebut.

Insiders propose classified programs for reverse-engineering. This pattern does not prove retrieval.

But it is the pattern you would expect to observe if retrieval programs existed and were being protected by institutional inertia and classification authority. It is also, in principle, explicable through bureaucratic dysfunction, legitimate security concerns, and the sociology of belief systems within institutions. Both explanations remain on the table.

BLACKGROVE GLOBAL RISK

CONFIDENCE: MODERATE

30

SECTION IX

The Counter-Evidence Mandatory: the strongest case against the retrieval hypothesis.

IX. The Counter-Evidence Intellectual honesty requires presenting the counter-case at full strength. These are the facts and arguments that weigh against the retrieval-and-reverse-engineering conclusion.

AARO Historical Record Report, Vol. 1 (March 2024) DATE: 8 MARCH 2024

The most comprehensive official investigation to date. Key findings: • "AARO found no empirical evidence for claims that the USG and private companies" possess or have reverse-engineered off-world technology.

DOCUMENTED

• "AARO has found no verifiable evidence that any UAP sighting has represented extraterrestrial activity."

DOCUMENTED

• Named companies allegedly experimenting on alien technology were contacted; "executives, scientists, and chief technology officers denied on the record that they have" such technology.

DOCUMENTED

• A piece of material "alleged to be recovered from an off-world spacecraft" was analyzed and "confirmed to be man-made with no unusual properties."

DOCUMENTED

• "Alleged hidden UAP programs either do not exist or were misidentified authentic national security programs unrelated to extraterrestrial technology exploitation."

DOCUMENTED

• "Many [interviewees] have sincerely misinterpreted real events or mistaken sensitive U.S. programs for which they were not cleared as having been related to UAP or extraterrestrial exploitation."

DOCUMENTED

The "No Public Evidence" Problem No witness has publicly produced a piece of recovered non-human technology, a photograph of a recovered craft taken inside a government facility, a document originating from a retrieval program, or any other first-order physical evidence. Every claim in the evidence chain is testimonial, legislative, or inferential. The chain is entirely built from what people have said and what Congress has done. Zero physical artifacts have been presented to the public.

INFERRED

Second-Hand Testimony The most specific retrieval claims — Grusch's testimony about crash retrieval programs and non-human biologics — are explicitly second-hand. Grusch testified to what others told him. He has not personally examined recovered craft or biological material. This does not make his testimony false, but it means the chain of evidence runs through intermediaries whose identities remain classified, whose claims cannot be independently verified, and whose potential motivations cannot be assessed.

BLACKGROVE GLOBAL RISK

INFERRED

32

Alternative Explanations for Legislative Action It is possible that legislative action reflects not evidence of retrieval programs but the political dynamics of a bipartisan issue that costs nothing to support. Legislators may have been moved by compelling briefings from sincere-but-mistaken insiders rather than by evidence of actual programs. The Schumer amendment's language could reflect a "just in case" legal framework rather than confirmed knowledge that private entities possess non-human technology.

INFERRED

Prosaic Explanations for Encounters Standing prosaic explanations for the best-documented military encounters include: advanced electronic warfare spoofing (creating false radar tracks), classified U.S. or foreign technology testing, sensor artifacts and operator error, and atmospheric phenomena. The electronic warfare hypothesis is the most serious counter-explanation for radar-visual cases like the Nimitz encounter, as modern EW systems can in principle generate false radar returns. However, this explanation must account for simultaneous visual observation by multiple pilots, detection across multiple independent sensor systems, and the object appearing at a pre-designated coordinate known only to the strike group.

INFERRED

MANDATORY COUNTER-SIGNAL

The counter-evidence is substantial. No physical evidence has been publicly presented. The most specific claims are second-hand. AARO's investigation — whatever its limitations — found no verifiable evidence.

The institutional behavior patterns cited in Section VIII have innocent explanations. It remains entirely possible that the entire evidence chain reflects a convergence of sincere misidentification, institutional mythology, political opportunism, and classification-as-reflex rather than classification-as-concealment.

This assessment maps the evidence that could support the retrieval hypothesis. Mapping evidence is not endorsing a conclusion.

BLACKGROVE GLOBAL RISK

33

SECTION X

The Read Pattern synthesis and final assessment.

X. The Read: Pattern Synthesis & Assessment What the Evidence Chain Establishes at DOCUMENTED Tier 1. The U.S. government has operated continuous UAP investigation programs for 77 years, repeatedly concealing their existence.

2. Objects demonstrating performance characteristics beyond known technology exist and have been detected by multiple independent military sensor systems.

3. The Pentagon has authenticated UAP footage and confirmed the objects remain "unidentified."

4. Congress has passed legislation defining "technologies of unknown origin," asserting eminent domain over recovered non-human materials, and prohibiting secret UAP programs from operating without Congressional notification.

5. Multiple credentialed officials have testified under oath that retrieval and reverse-engineering programs exist.

6. TOP SECRET UMBRA classified UAP records spanning decades have been confirmed and partially declassified.

7. The intelligence community's own Inspector General forwarded a whistleblower complaint about these programs to Congress.

8. Insiders within the government formally proposed classified programs specifically for UAP reverseengineering (Kona Blue) and an IC program was expanded to include UAP reverse-engineering before being disestablished.

What the Evidence Chain Does Not Establish 1. No physical artifact has been publicly presented.

2. No photograph, document, or record originating from within a retrieval program has been publicly released.

3. The most specific claims (Grusch) are second-hand.

4. AARO's investigation found no verifiable evidence supporting the retrieval narrative.

5. The origin of the anomalous objects documented by the military remains unknown — "anomalous" does not equal "non-human."

BLACKGROVE GLOBAL RISK

35

FINAL ASSESSMENT

The evidence chain supporting the hypothesis of UAP retrieval and reverse-engineering by the U.S. government is the most substantial body of circumstantial evidence ever assembled on this question. It spans sworn congressional testimony, enacted federal legislation, declassified intelligence records, authenticated military sensor data, and on-record statements by named senior officials across military, intelligence, and legislative branches. Each evidence class, taken alone, admits alternative explanations. Taken together, they form a pattern that is difficult — though not impossible — to explain without some kernel of reality underlying the retrieval claim.

The chain is strongest in its structural elements: the legislative action (which presupposes the possible existence of recovered technology), the institutional behavior (which is consistent with concealment), and the sensor-corroborated encounters (which establish that genuinely anomalous objects exist). It is weakest at the specific point where it most matters: no first-order physical evidence has been publicly presented, and the most detailed retrieval claims rest on second-hand testimony.

This is not a closed case. It is an open one — and it is the first time in the history of this subject that the case is being pursued with the full apparatus of democratic governance: legislation, oversight hearings, inspector general complaints, presidential directives, and formal institutional structures.

The evidence chain does not prove that the U.S. government has recovered and reverseengineered non-human technology. It does prove that the question is being taken seriously at the highest levels of the American government, and that the people with the most relevant access believe there is something to find. What happens when they find it — or confirm that there is nothing to find — will close this assessment.

OVERALL CONFIDENCE: MODERATE

— sufficient evidence to sustain the investigation and justify continued

legislative action; insufficient evidence to render a definitive verdict.

BLACKGROVE GLOBAL RISK

36

SECTION XI

Source Ledger Primary and secondary sources cited in this assessment, with classification and access detail.

XI. Source Ledger SOURCE

CLASS

TIER

LOCATING DETAIL

Twining Memo, "AMC Opinion

Class A

DOCUMENTED

National Archives, declassified. FOIA.

Class A

DOCUMENTED

USAF / Battelle Memorial Institute, 1955. National

Concerning 'Flying Discs'" Project Blue Book Special Report No. 14 DIA AAWSAP/AATIP records

Archives.

Class A

DOCUMENTED

DIA FOIA Electronic Reading Room, FileId/170015.

Class A

DOCUMENTED

congress.gov, signed 22 Dec 2023.

Class A

DOCUMENTED

democrats.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/

(Reid letter, program memo) FY2024 NDAA (Pub. L. 118-31) §§1687, 7343 UAP Disclosure Act amendment text (Schumer-Rounds) Joint Explanatory Statement,

uap_amendment.pdf Class A

DOCUMENTED

armed-services.senate.gov, Dec 2023.

Class A

DOCUMENTED

White House, 22 Dec 2023.

Class A

DOCUMENTED

DNI.gov, 25 Jun 2021.

Class A

DOCUMENTED

media.defense.gov, DOPSR-2024-0263, 8 Mar

FY2024 NDAA Biden signing statement, FY2024 NDAA ODNI Preliminary Assessment: UAP AARO Historical Record Report Vol. 1 Pentagon FLIR1, Gimbal, GoFast

2024.

Class A

DOCUMENTED

DoD press release, 27 Apr 2020.

Class B

DOCUMENTED

DoD spokeswoman Susan Gough, Sep 2019; Apr

video release Pentagon UAP video authenticity statements House Oversight hearing

2020; 2021.

Class A

DOCUMENTED

congress.gov, hearing archive.

Class A

DOCUMENTED

congress.gov. Written testimony:

transcript, 26 Jul 2023 House Oversight hearing transcript, 13 Nov 2024

oversight.house.gov.

Grusch DOPSR clearance stamp

Class A

DOCUMENTED

DoD OPSR, 4 Apr 2023. Publicly released document.

NSA TOP SECRET UMBRA FOIA

Class A

DOCUMENTED

disclosure.org/news, 18 May 2026. 334 pages.

PURSUE Releases 01–03

Class A

DOCUMENTED

war.gov/ufo, 8 May, 22 May, 12 Jun 2026.

AARO assessment report

Class A

DOCUMENTED

PURSUE Release 03, war.gov/ufo, 5 Jun 2026.

Class A

DOCUMENTED

Congressional Record, 13 Nov 2024.

release

(Kosloski, Jun 2026) Immaculate Constellation document, Congressional Record FY2026 NDAA UAP provisions

BLACKGROVE GLOBAL RISK

docs.house.gov.

Class A

DOCUMENTED

Signed 18 Dec 2025.

38

Cooper, Blumenthal, Kean, NYT,

Class C

16 Dec 2017 NPR UAP hearing coverage, 27

Class C

DOC-AS-

npr.org/2023/07/27.

REPORTED Class C

5 Jun 2023 Nell SALT iConnections

nytimes.com/2017/12/16.

REPORTED

Jul 2023 Kean & Blumenthal, The Debrief,

DOC-AS-

DOC-AS-

thedebrief.org, Grusch initial disclosure.

REPORTED Class C

TESTIMONIAL

YouTube, 22 May 2024.

Class C

TESTIMONIAL

Published book. Library of Congress.

Class D

CONTEXT

disclosurearchives.com/briefings.

Class D

CONTEXT

Cross-referenced against primary sources listed

statement (video) Ruppelt, "Report on Unidentified Flying Objects" (1956) Disclosure Archives, UAP Disclosure Act trajectory Wikipedia (multiple articles)

above.

Classification note: This document contains no classified information. All sources are open. All claims are tiered. All judgments are labeled INFERRED and carry stated confidence levels. This assessment was produced by Blackgrove Global Risk using the Blackgrove Analytic Standard. It is not a government document. It is not an endorsement of any specific conclusion. It is a forensic map of the evidence chain as it stands on the date of publication.

BLACKGROVE GLOBAL RISK · FA-001 · 2 July 2026 · UNCLASSIFIED

BLACKGROVE GLOBAL RISK

39