Essays Montaigne Sparknotes

History is primarily a study of people. How they lived, why they lived that way, and what impact their lives had. Montaigne is one of those characters in history that has a reach far beyond his life and the study of it by historians. Montaigne's Essays, a completely new literary form, are an insight not only to the man but also to the world of the French Renaissance. In discussing a variety of topics from education and women to cannibalism and the human nature, Montaigne marks himself as both modern and pre–modern, influenced heavily by the Age of Reconnaissance and the Wars of Religion. Montaigne was a man ahead of his time and a read can gain much from his Essays, lessons vital to today despite that he wrote 400 years ago....show more content...

Not only should a student not simply memorize, but he should also question what his tutor teaches him. As Montaigne suggests, "The tutor should make his pupil sift everything, and take nothing into his head on simple authority or trust" (Montaigne, p. 56). This idea was not new to Montaigne, as Socrates first said question everything. What Montaigne is describing is critical thinking, which is an important aspect of modern educational skills that students are supposed to learn. Only once the student learned how to learn should he receive education in the fields of logic, physics, geometry, and rhetoric; Montaigne saw these as fundamental for futurelearning of any other subjects (Montaigne, p. 66). The Greeks taught these subjects long before Montaigne, but his use of them shows him as well read. Not only does Montaigne give instructions on how to educate children, he also says what should not be a part of their education. The most abhorrent practice in contemporary education, for Montaigne, was the physical punishment of students. Montaigne laments, "Instead of being invited to study, children are now confronted with terror and cruelty. Away with violence and compulsion! There is nothing, in my opinion, that is so debasing and stupefying to a noble nature." (Montaigne, p. 72). Being against physical punishment puts him ahead of his time and shows Montaigne's character as a gentle soul, compassionate for his fellow human being. As Get more content

Michel de Montaigne, Excerpts from Book III, Chapter IX from Essays Michel de Montaigne, French author and philosopher, was born February 28, 1533 near Bordeaux, France. He was born into a family of administrative nobility and fortune that went back several generations. Montaigne 's father was a mayor of Bordeaux and had unique ideas concerning his son 's education. Montaigne was home–schooled exclusively in Latin and did not learn French until the age of six. When he attended college, Montaigne was not highly interested in the offered disciplines. Following, he attended a university to study law in order to continue the family 's tradition of public service. It was during his time in the French parliament that he befriended a distinguished scholar, who years later was an inspiration for his first essay on friendship. Montaigne was married at about thirty two, not out of love, but out of a sense of social duty. During the marriage, the couple had six daughters with only one surviving past infancy. He published his first writing in 1569, however, it was only in 1570 that he made a decision to leave public office and emerge himself in reading, meditation, and writing. Montaigne spends a great deal of his time in the library located in his castle 's tower. It is there, surrounded by a thousand books, that he spent ten years working on his first two essays, publishing them in 1580. Following the publication, Montaigne, being tired of the political climate of France and looking Get more content

On

Cannibals,

By Michel De Montaigne

The 17th century French aristocrat Michel de Montaigne lived in a tumultuous world. With the spark of Luther's Ninety–Five Theses, the fire spread rapidly to France. The nation divided against itself. The rebellious protestant Huguenots and the traditional staunch Catholics both viewed the other group as idolatrous heretics in time when that crime could justify execution. Consequently, Catholic monarchs throughout Europe felt the impending threat to their reigns, too, because if they supposedly ruled through divine right, what would change concerning the support of their subjects? After the peace–making Edict of Nantes, rehashing the religious conflicts of the century was forbidden, but seeing his country–and even his own family–torn apart, how could one refrain from comment? So in his writings, Montaigne has to write around his actual subjects. This isn't to say, however, that he conveyed none of his ideas directly. Montaigne criticizes the cultural belief in a correct way of life, opposing the idea with a more relativistic viewpoint, though the way in which he presents it, as mere musings in personal correspondence, fails to effectively convince his readers. Throughout his essays, Montaigne expresses strong opinions against ethnocentrism, such as in On Cannibals, where he writes that, "there is nothing savage of barbarous about those peoples, but that every man calls barbarous anything he is not accustomed to," (82) and, "We should be similarly wary of accepting common Get

Acceptance and understanding into a persons society is one of the major goals that people strive to achieve. There is a natural tendency for the individual to be compelled to join the majority. Many times, however, a person will change themselves to fit into the group instead of having the group change itself for the person. This forces a person to take action, form opinions or adopt customs that do not reflect their own beliefs. Montaigne addresses the differences between two distinctly different forms of society in his essay Of Cannibals. Montaigne's comparison between the recently discovered aborigines of the new world and his European society compels a person to reconsider what an ideal society should be. Should a natural state be the...show more content...

The absence of vices also means an absence of a more comfortable living standard. A more comfortable living standard creates more vices. I believe the inhabitants of the new world could live out their lifestyle because they were ignorant to their own possibilities. However, these possibilities were discovered and utilized by the Europeans. With more knowledge and understanding the basic society that Europe once belonged to grew into the society that discovered the new world. The possibility of discovering what an ideal society would be portrayed as is an impossible feat. This is impossible because the ideal society is all subjective. I agree with Montaigne that the basic society, that is ignorant of their potential creativity and imagination, can create an ideal society. I do not agree however, that a complex society is only the things he says it is, brutal and greedy. I believe that he has overlooked all the good qualities that a basic society can

Get more content

Montaigne On Fear

A line from Montaigne's essay on fear. "But even amongst soldiers, a sort of men over whom, of all others, it ought to have the least power, how often it converted flocks of sheep into armed squadrons, reeds and bull rushes into pikes and lances, friends into enemies, and the French white cross into the red cross of Spain" Montaigne's thoughts about fear was that it controlled us, and that the most fearful thing was fear itself. However, after many centuries this idea slowly changed. In today's society, many young teens and adult enjoy the feeling of fear. Now instead of being controlled by fear, we can appreciate the adrenaline and thrill it brings. While in the past, being fearful of something was a terrible feeling, but now fear can be

Get more content

Montaigne shifts himself in his seat, uncomfortable with the atmosphere and the temperature of the room. "Is something wrong?" asks More. "No, no. I'm fine." Montaigne says to More shifting again in the dusty chair. More looks at Montaigne "Maybe it would be best if we move the conversation outside?" Montaigne smiles and stands from his chair, stretching his arms and legs. More smiles once more at his friend and gestures towards the door. They both step out into the sunlit garden; Montaigne takes a seat on a bench opposite of More. More asks one of his servants to bring them some food and wine. He then turns to his new friend and says "Montaigne, sir, tell me more about these cannibals." "They were quiet interesting you see when I first met

Get more content

Michel de Montaigne The world is a place of chaos nowadays. At every turn of a corner, there is desolation triggered from humanity's sidetracked views of what the world is about. With all this deception and superficiality, pureness in the human soul seems almost non–existent. Michel de Montaigne recognizes the essential need of this purity for the improvement of society in his Essays. Although the main topics he is focusing own are his own nature, own habits, and own opinions, he uses these personal vignettes to illustrate larger truths about man and his behaviors, his strengths and weaknesses. He subtly forces us to see the materialistic ideals that supposedly make us "happy" and dares us to see how it has tainted our minds and...show more content...

Artifice is the unnecessary "magnificence which drains away immediately from use or money" (334). In "On Coaches", we see Montaigne's frustration with society's tendency to attempt to gain respect with "deeds of the purse–string" rather than true "deeds of virtue" (338). He asserts that this type of generosity doesn't have any real influence because of the tainted intentions behind it. Montaigne urges us to see the limits of the mind that is shaped by shallowness and materialistic possessions. He speaks with a harsh tone, "and against the ides of a universe which flows on while we are in it, how puny and stunted in the knowledge of the most inquisitive men" (341), trying to wake society out of he oblivion of artifice it has settled itself on to. In "To philosophize is to learn how to die" he compares the span of human lives to the span of mountains and rivers, as well as to insects whose lives lasts a single day. Carnal aspects influence even the general fear of death humans' feel. "I truly believe that what frightens us more than death it self are those terrifying grimaces and preparation with which we surround it" (35). At times it seems as if he was writing in a state of frenzy because of human's ignorance of the insignificance issues they deem to be significant when compared to the powers of nature. His frustrations make him scold us in the place of Mother Nature. "Why do you complain of me or of Destiny?? Do we do you wrong? Should you

The Unity of the Mind and Body

Both Michel De Montaigne and John Donne argue that the cultivation of the mind is linked to the well being of the body. Both argue that a mind void of proper enrichment and education will lead to an unhealthy body. However, Montaigne argues that the appropriate means of 'education and enrichment'; are studying and following the works of other great thinkers of history. Additionally, Montaigne declaresimagination to be the impetus for the downfall of the body. Conversely, Donne argues that amind groomed in imagination is the proper mode of finding bodily health.

In their writings, both Montaigne and Donne are seeking a unity between the mind and the body. By comparing Montaigne's Essays and the poetry ...show more content...

Finally, Montaigne's essay 'On the Education of Children'; reveals Montaigne's argument against the learning of 'profitless'; knowledge, or in other words. He says that '…most of the branches of knowledge in current usage are valueless to us…';(pg.65) and that '…we must limit the extent of our studies in those branches…';(pg.65). Montaigne's apparent argument is that only a certain type of education, one based strongly in the thought of the 'great thinkers,'; is the type of education that will provide for not only a healthy body, but also a healthy mind.

In Montaigne's essay 'On the Power of the Imagination,'; Montaigne next argues against the perils of the imagination. He declares that the imagination, unlike freethinking based in acceptable knowledge, leads directly to an unhealthy body. Montaigne first attacks the sheer power of the imagination. Montaigne states regarding the imagination that 'Everyone feels its impact, but some are knocked over by it';(pg.36). He contends that the imagination is something that slowly begins to take over the mind of a person and drive them further from the appropriate lines of learning. He argues that the imagination leads to the harm of the body. His first claim on this is that bad thoughts, such as having bodily failures (Montaigne uses the example of impotence), are spawned from the imagination. He declares

Michel De Montaigne had unique ideas on living a good life, he focussed on feelings of inadequacy and how to solve or avoid these feelings. Montaigne separated his feelings of inadequacy into main categories; sexual inadequacy, bodily inadequacy, intellectual inadequacy and cultural inadequacy. He was very open about himself and his feelings and the things he did in his daily life, he believed that talking about about the normal things he did and in particular the normal things that were seen as taboo in his society would normalise and desensitise. Montaigne thought that if our natural bodily functions were accepted and embraced then everyone would be living more comfortably within themselves. He had other ideas and suggestions on how to overcome

Get more content

Montaigne is considered the first modern essayist but he refuses to define exactly what an essay is. For Montaigne essays seem to be a form of story–telling and a stream of consciousness. Considering he worked on the essay, "Of Coaches," for 12 years it is logical to conclude that his essays would digress and drift off to other topics. His thoughts paralleled his life and not everything stays consistent throughout our lives which is why his essay continues to change topics. Comparatively, this is a very different style ofwriting than we are accustomed to academically.Essays have been established in setting in which at times it feels like creativity has been suppressed. Thoughts are not allowed to run rampant and everything has to be extremely professional in order to achieve the grade.

Essays such as Montaigne's give me hope as to the creative potential in essays. He has this timeless aspect to his essays; what was once applicable in his time is still very much relevant in today's world. At first Montaigne's essay seems to be a jumble of different stories put together. It starts off with Montaigne first describing why we sneeze. He then continues to describe how he prefers horseback, then with the spending of public money, and finally with the abuse of the native people by the Spaniards. Montaigne was still able to connect the beginning of the essay and the end. The beginning described a type of coach, a chariot, that was used in battles. The end described the last king

Montaigne's view is really a third, an amalgamation of the two perspectives specified previously. We may call Montaigne's perspective of human instinct a basic realist see. In this viewpoint, all people, Europeans and others, have both savage and respectable qualities. Montaigne impacted the improvement of the respectable savage theory,which was later received by different authors including Jean Jacques Rousseau. While Montaigne takes note of the numerous ways that tribal societies were better than the way of life of Western Europe at the season of his written work, his romanticizing is a bit berated. Montaigneneither sanctions human flesh consumption, nor the murdering of detainees of war. However, he notes thatEuropeans were likewise liable

Get more content

Michel de Montaigne was one of the most significant philosophers of the French Renaissance. Although he is best known for his essays and his study of literature, he was also an admired and respected as a statesman. His essays led a major role by influencing writers from all over the globe, including well known Renaissance men like William Shakespeare. His works of literature are well known and studied by many people from all over the world. Montaigne was born into a very wealthy family on February 28th 1533 in the town of Saint Michel de Montaigne. Soon after birth, his father sent him to a small cottage to live the first 3 years of his life with a peasant family in order to "draw the boy close to the people". After these years, Montaigne

Get more content

Throughout the history of civilization, there have been many great thinkers and philosophers who lay claim and offer their theory of the world around them. Michel de Montaigne, a prominent philosopher of the French Renaissance, argued in his essays of the habitual inconsistency of man and how it is nearly impossible for man to correct these everyday irregularities and contradictions. To say that man is flawed and utterly irregular are statements not particularly surprising or revelatory for philosophers to make, even in Montaigne's time. However, what can be considered unique about Montaigne, aside from his sharp perceptions of the everyday man, are his sharp–and honest–perceptions of himself, never bragging about his intellectual prowess or...show more content...

With each philosopher comes a different theory and approach to life, but a common thread amongst a great many of them is this tone, this speaking with certainness and authority. For instance, in the famous quote by Rene Descartes, "I think, therefore I am," comes with it a type of assertiveness. Montaigne's approach, however, comes in contrary to Descartes. Rather than coming across as definite and without doubt, Montaigne speaks very modestly and even query. In his "Of the Inconstancy of Our Actions," Montaigne states, "I have nothing to say of myself entirely, simply, and solidly without mixture and confusion" (4–5). So, rather than saying, "I think, therefore I am," Montaigne seems to first ask, "What is it that I think, why do I think that, and how does this get back to me?" all while trying to put the "pieces" of his character together. Also, the simple fact remains that one cannot heighten their image or affirm their stature without first fully knowing what their image or stature is. And Montaigne seems rather uneasy to make such announcements. Rather than having explanation marks, Montaigne would hang questions for nearly every statement he would make; he did not feel he was capable of developing a grand plan or theory behind things, and this modesty can be found in the initial purpose of his

Get more content

Montaigne On Solitude

Michel de Montaigne is the author the book On Solitude. In this book Montaigne brings up many topics and discusses his views on them and what these nouns do to men in the world. Some of these topics are solitude, as stated in the title, sadness, fear, books, as well as a few others. In these topics Montaigne elaborates on how these objects and states of being can affect a person's life in both positive and negative ways, but most of the affects that will be talked about are negative. In any case, Montaigne's point of view on such objects connect even to today's times. To begin, let's talk about solitude. In Montaigne's essay or chapter labeled "On Solitude", he brings up a quote in Latin that when translated means, "Does knowing mean nothing...show more content...

Throughout the book On Solitude, Montaigne brings up several great points that he argues. If you look at things such as fear, solitude, and sadness you will see some of the same trends talked about by Montaigne happening in this very moment in time. Even though most might be a negative reaction to these subjects, the correlation is

The article "Of the Cannibals" from Michel Eyquem de Montaigne speaks about two major problems. The first one is the problem of men telling stories subjectively instead of objectively. This problem is dealt with only in very short and there is no real solution presented in the essay. The other problem is men calling others barbarous just because they are different. The essay also deals with the word "barbarism" and what can be meant by that.

Eyquem de Montaignes' thesis is that his own countrymen are not less or more barbarous than cannibals, which are still very close to nature and to the origin of life.

The following excerpt of the essay will elaborate on these problems.

Michel Eyquem de Montaigne was born in 1533. After a...show more content...

Michel Eyquem de Montaigne also brings other examples where things change rapidly. So, for example, a river that shifted its borders from one side to the other, or a city that his brother discovered that got buried under sand within a very short time. This excurse seems to be there to make clear that things change very fast. Then he returns to the new nation that some people call barbarous whereas he himself does not think so. Michel says that all the invention and changes to nature that humankind caused, did not make it any better, but the purity that was in it before is worth much more than human intelligence. And that is the reason why he doe not call the newly discovered nation barbarous because they are still very close to the origin of nature. In the following passage he describes the tribe a bit closer: It is a nation without traffic, letters and politics but they are free of envy and falsehood. There are no sick people amongst them and they have abundance of all sources of nature. They sleep in long buildings and make drinks of roots. The tribe spends a lot of time dancing and they have two important rules to follow: The first one is "undismaied resolution to warre" and the second one is "inviolable affection to their wives." They also have a religion which can be seen when the priests and prophets come to the town and speak to them. They prophets often

The Education Of Children

By Michel De Montaigne

Today's education is largely based on memorization and conforming students to not have their own thoughts. However in Michel de Montaigne's ideas On the Education of Children, he critiques the way the education system is today. Montaigne argues that children should apply their education to their own life, rather than memorization and reciting the information. Montaigne's ideal of education of children guides today's education at all two levels by using his idea of application rather than memorization and educate without anger or force.

Post secondary school has become to focus more on application than just pure memorization and recitation. When students were forced to just memorize and regurgitate information, many were harshly disciplined and had a flawed view of intelligence. Montaigne's idea of the education should put a student "through its paces, making it taste things, choose them, and discern them by itself" (Montaigne 2006). Students should be allowed to recognize important information for themselves. But since the implementation of application in mainstream studies, many students faced fewer punishments and also at the same time, were able to learn more. Even if students don't memorize every content they won't be punished for.

Universities often encourage students to apply their knowledge and judgment with real world situations and experiences. However, Montaigne mentions in his essay that school during his time were more focused on knowing the information

Get more content

Montaigne's "Of Cannibals": Questioning European Superiority Through the Idealization of Native Americans In his essay "Of Cannibals", Michel de Montaigne presents Native Americans as a mirror image of European racial and cultural superiority, placing their barbarous cannibalism in context in order to critique the widely–held belief of their inferiority. Montaigne's comment on the European perception of Native Americans as uncivilized is ultimately undermined by the extreme nature of the arguments used in his critique. Michel de Montaigne wrote "Of Cannibals" having never been to the New World, and at a time when Native Americans were almost universally considered to have a backwards, lesser society compared to those of Europe. As a member of the French elite, his perspective is unique because he takes a stance that is incongruous with general European sentiment. Additionally, Montaigne is upfront about the fact that he is not an expert on Native Americans, admittedly never having been to the New World, gaining much of his knowledge of Native Americans from a man who "had lived ten or twelve years in the new world." (1) He refutes any assumptions that the man might have lied to him, saying he "...was a plain and ignorant fellow, and therefore more likely to tell the truth," (3) but nevertheless, his writings must be read with this possibility in mind. Montaigne's argument is centered around the European perception of Native Americans as barbarous people, which he refutes by listing the virtues of the native people, presenting them as the ideal 'natural man'. When he says, "I am afraid our eyes are bigger than our bellies, and that we have more curiosity than capacity," (1) he cautions Europeans in their tendency to minimize the value of the people they encounter and try to colonize. He states about the New World: "I find that there is nothing barbarous and savage in this nation, by anything I can gather," (3) and goes on to comment on their impressive health, writing: "as my witness informs me, 'tis rare to hear of a sick person, and... they never saw any of the natives, either paralytic, blear–eyed, toothless or crooked with age." (5) Montaigne explores the fact that Native Americans are happy despite

Montaigne's essay "On the Education of Children" brings to light a new way at looking at the way one would educate a child. Yet, the question still stands; has today's modern style of educating children changed for the better since Montaigne was alive? During Montaigne's day education focused heavily on rhetoric, on learning to speak a certain or remember a fact only to be able to show off that you remembered it. For example Montaigne says "not in the fashion of our French nobles, simply to report on the length of the Pantheon, or the sumptuousness of Signora Livia's drawers" (Frampton pg. 138). He talks about how in his day teachers just talk students to remember facts and numbers to remember and not the morals behind them. Montaigne's idea of education though was that everything the student learns should be used to help the child form a judgement. Those lessons should focus on a moral understanding, then just the facts. As a student myself, I have to agree with parts of Montaigne's idea. I've always felt that the purpose of education was to inspire a child to want to learn. To take what they learn and use it to help people. I have seen this myself with every child that comes out on a Safari tour at Busch Gardens. There is this reaction that look of awe when they feed a Giraffe or see a Rhino for that first time. I believe that Montaigne would agree with this too, that education is supposed to inspire children to learn. Then take what they have learned and be able to

Monsieur de Nemours is not bothered by Madame de Cleves refusal to see him, because her bitterness is validation of her feelings for him. When she pretends to be ill he does not see this as unfavorable at all, rather he takes pleasure in knowing that she is jealous (160). We know that her anger stems from the letter that is believed to belong to Monsieur de Nemours; she is hurt because she thought that he admired her, and she assumes that his affections actually lie elsewhere because of the content of the letter. When he asks her about the letter and she snaps at him, "It is much better that you should to go the crown princess and tell her frankly your interest in this letter, since it has been said that it belongs to you" (160), he takes even more satisfaction in her frustration and jealousy....show more content...

With the knowledge that the letter does not actually belong to Monsieur de Nemours, Madame de Cleves agrees to help him; this is what brings the two closer together. This closeness is portrayed in her willingness to hand over the letter to him, and the agreement to keep the secrets he tells her (161). Additionally, their closeness is portrayed when they work together to write a copy of the letter; "They locked themselves up to work, left word at the door that no one was to be let in, and sent off Monsieur de Nemours' servants. This appearance of mystery and of confidence was far from unpleasant to this prince, and even to Madame de Cleves" (163). This closeness is further proven when it is said that Monsieur de Nemours' love for Madame de Cleves is deepened (163). Madame de Cleves' willingness to hear Monsieur de Nemours out and help him when she learn the truth proves that she is different than other women, and even people in

Get more content

"On the Inconsistency of our Actions"

They show that humankind is dishonest and inconsistent. Humans are constantly being contradictory against themselves by going against what they have previously said or promised.

These examples illustrate Montaigne's belief that while there is some justification to base a judgment based on daily activities, it is nearly impossible to create a proper judgment of humankind, and when a historian cannot, they become hypocrites. Montaigne believes that it is necessary to trace our actions to the circumstances, situation, and context with which it happened, without creating a judgement. It is not possible to create a proper judgement without all of the information, just like one cannot find the solution without...show more content...

The three cannibals complain that the European society shouldn't be run by a child, but rather an older gentlemen to commande. They continue to criticize the society by saying that there is disparity in wealth, and that it is not a proper place where only half can dine and live in wealth while the other half is hungry.

"On Experience"

Montaigne says that it is a "personal weakness" that makes one content with their own or the knowledge of others. Rather, a better human would always keep learning, never be happy with what they know, because the more you know, the more you know that you don't know. In order to gain knowledge, one must study him or herself. By learning about oneself, one ultimately learns about others and the world around him or her.

In studying himself....

Montaigne realized that he should not trust his own judgment but rather try to regulate it.

Montaigne learned how to foresee when his passions, such as anger, would come and watch its course