Justice Delayed Is Justice Denied Essay

Criminal Justice Vs Secular Justice

The criminal justice system incorporates some of the standards of biblical justice, while disregarding others. Biblical and secular justice both require the recognition of a criminal act and necessitate the application of an appropriate punishment. When God established His law the ultimate goal intended was to bring justice that promotes forgiveness and restoration of the sinner in honor of His covenant with mankind. Psalm 130:3–4 says, "If thou, Lord, shouldest mark iniquities, O Lord, who shall stand? But there is forgiveness with thee, that thou mayest be feared" (KJV). Criminal law's definition of justice suggests the idea of redemption while penalizing and punishing offenders in an effort to exact vengeance and maintain order and peace....show more content...

Often times it even succeeds in causing the offender to become even more predatory and depraved. This failure to rehabilitate is evidenced by the growing populations within the prison system and the number of repeat offenders. In the study of four publications, Parker (2012) observes, "All four authors find that the current criminal justice system fails to facilitate or encourage the transformation/restoration of individuals and communities (p.85). God's justice is a restorative or reconstructive justice before it is a retributive or injurious justice, teaching that what is paramount is reformation resulting in reconciliation. True justice, which can only come from God, produces a positive outcome for the victim, the offender, and

Justice Delayed is Justice DeniedWhen I hear of an individual who has taken another life, an unbalance occurs. This is an unbalance of justice that effects everyone. The taking of the murder 's life is what restores this balance and shows others in society that murder is an intolerable crime which will be punished in the exact same manner (deathpenaltycurriculum.org). Although I do believe in other occurrences such as a self defense act and an "accidental" murder (involuntary manslaughter), I still believe in the death penalty for the most cruel and heinous crimes. For these type of crimes the wrongdoer deserves the worst punishment possible (deathpenaltycurriculum.org). The United States Sentencing Commission web site states "because death obviously is an aggravating factor, it necessarily would be inappropriate to impose a sentence at a level below that" (ussc.gov). The death penalty acts as a deterrent to future criminals and it allows the state to exact appropriate retribution, criminals must face the consequences of their actions. Most importantly, the death penalty gives closer to the victims loved ones. The death penalty has proven to act as a deterrent to future murders. Each execution deters an average of 18 murders, according to a 2003 nationwide study by professors at Emory University.(cbsnews.com) There are many critics to every argument and especially this one. Those critics argue that the death penalty does not discourage crime. What gets little notice,

Martin Luther King once said, "Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere". People often say that as time goes by we learn from our past mistakes. However, do we really? I believe in equality. Now, the word "equality" may have different meanings to different individuals. In my case, equality to me is the belief that everyone should be created equal. Notice how I say "should" instead of "is"? Yes, I say that because even though we have come very far in this age and era, there is still inequality in this world. There are still places in this world where women's rights are denied. There are still places where LGBTQ rights are denied. There are still places where people are denied proper health care. There are still places where young

Get more content

Justice delayed is justice denied is rightly the present scenario of India. Justice though is difficult to define,bt can be said that it varies according to situations and persons. Since we live in a deomocratic country like india where people are governed by the laws of the country , it is very important to deliver justice on time to the victims to prevent the miscarriage of justice. It is rightly called the shield of innocence and the guardian of civil right. This is so because, like Martin Luther said, "Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere" A very recent survey in India shows that there are approximately 3.2 crore cases spending in high and lower courts which means there is no meaning for justice and if at it...show more content...

They never delayed in their judgments. They always judge the crime fact in a very short time. But In our society we always see the phenomenon. If anyone accused any kind of crime, he must be punished at once or else. If the justice delayed, the criminal somehow escape from his crime and prove himself as an innocent man. He will also try to make his punishment very small. Thus a criminal prove himself as an innocent because of delay of justice. If we wanted to punish the criminal for his crime we have to justify his crime in a short time or he will able to escape from his crime. If justice is delayed and justice is not really done people, then the life and property can not be safe. So we have to justice a crime without any delay, otherwise the fact will go behind the doubt.

In short terms it means that if the justice is delayed by any cause it is very harmful to the people of any society. So we have to justify any kind of crime

Get more content

By Martin Luther King

In 1868 and 1870, the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments were created, respectively. Both highlighted a momentous moment in the advancement of racial equality. Equality was established for the newly emancipated slaves. Over the last 150 years, America has been slowly advancing toward racial equality. With the election of Barack Obama in 2008, another historic change had come about. The first black male was elected president. Despite these advancements in racial equality, many Americans still remain staunch racists and maintain the mindset of superiority to blacks. Injustice is still apparent since blacks are targeted on a daily basis. Martin Luther King's "I Have a Dream Speech" revealed these everyday social discriminations, as he projected his dream of a society that truly exemplified the Founding Fathers' beliefs that all men are created equal and have the unalienable rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Without a doubt, racial equality has improved, but many Americans still believerace is a prominent issue in the United States because of the everyday injustices towards blacks, the criminal justice system, and their economic and educational disparities.

Martin Luther King's vision of a better society built upon equality is still far from fulfilled. A 2013 poll from the Pew Research Center highlighted the black's (horrible?) situation, as only 26% of black people believed America is better today than five years ago, in contrast to 2009, where 39% of Get more content

Procedural Justice

Definition and Description of Procedural Justice

Procedural justice is the act involved in decision making. It incorporates the process of involving transparency and fairness in making decisions. The incorporation of justice in this process is equally essential it entails that all parties allowed to give their views before decision are made concerning a given matter. Some theories state that restorative and distributivejustice might not be met but for as long as there is a fair and justice procedure, there is always the possibility of having outcomes that are equitable (Jason &Tyler, 2003). The police department in America is one unit that procedural justice needs to apply. Many cases land in court after passing through the police, unless...show more content... He is told to get out of his car because there is a police search. He is asked to produce his driving license and the keys to his car. The police explain that they have heard about a kidnap in the nearby state, and the suspects are prone to use the same route ponce is using, and it is for that reason that it is essential to inspect every car and individual for verification. His driving license is swiped in the machine, and it confirms that ponce is a United States citizen who lives in California and he is a businessman. The car is searched, his truck is opened to look for finer details and in the truck clothes are found. Ponce states that those are his clothes and after work he plans to go for a trip in Miami. The police thank him for his cooperation and he leaves. The police approach ponce politely, they explain why they have stopped him and why the search is important to them. They check his car and in few minutes they are done with the search and allow him to proceed with his journey. The approach the police use is about the law, they operating within their powers and ensure that ponce is aware of what is happening. Ponce does not defy the police and instead cooperates with them. Operating in such a manner is essential in ensuring that the citizens feel protected by the law. Respect is a two–way traffic and because the police respect Ponce result in respecting them (Jason &Tyler,

Get more content

Every year, common everyday people remorsefully record their confessions for the police hoping to barter for a reduced sentence. In certain cases, police and prosecutors use their power to pursue a forced confession regardless of revealing the true perpetrator. Even worse, citizens frequently have no knowledge of their rights, including a class of citizens who are mentally ill. Mentally ill citizens are inept to many social skills in life and can be manipulated effortlessly. While investigators aggressively pursue a confession, for an easily attainable conviction, of mentally ill citizens, they lack the training necessary and use legal, persuasive tactics that deceives the citizens and results in a false confessions. On the founding of the United States Constitution, Madison, a federalist advocate, said, "Justice is the end of government. It is the end of civil society. It ever has been and ever will be pursued until it be obtained, or until Liberty be lost in the pursuit" (Madison). The founding fathers constructed the constitution as a set of tools, for the government and later the people, to seek justice in the conviction of the government 's actions. In similarity to fire 's unpredictability, when someone seeks to control the power, they often get burnt. As a result, the founding fathers set restrictions on the government in order to preserve the rights of the people and guarantee liberty, which is voided only to an absolute jury 's conviction. If that is true, then the

Get more content

Justice

When the question is asked "Can we live in a just world?" In effect it is asking us a variety of things. "Can there be justice for all?" and "Can there be equality for all people?". The answer to this question is no. Unfortunately we live in a world where justice has never really transpired. The first justice that I would like to speak about is personal justice. Blessed are those reared in a household innocence of the deadly sin of envy. Their lives will be tormented by a grinding resentment that they are not beautiful, or famous, or favored with gifts of fortune. They will not demand as a natural right or an entitlement of personal equality with everybody under the sun; nor maintain that their...show more content...

I feel that would be unfair, andignorant. The stranger should have to earn my respect, just like my parents or friends. The teachings of Marx exemplified this very wrong that I am discussing. Marx believed (if I am not mistaken)that in order to bring about equality for all, first we must find the inequality between classes and get rid of it. When this deed is performed it would in essence place everybody on the same level. This would place all people in an equality of conditions, where all are in the same boat. The average person would be faced with the same problems as the next. This is the type of "just" society that I do not think should exist. It is absolutely unjust.

I have no doubt that when we recognize the differences between people, without being envious of their talents and gifts, we may find things that we may learn from. By doing this we not only make life more bearable by eliminating ignorance, but learning to love differences Many of the problems today are caused because people fail to see the glory in variance. This is the problem of mis–education, or lack of it. Education is also part of justice. I believe that all people (however unrealistic that this may be) whether rich or poor should be placed with an equivalence of education. The dilemma I face when making this statement is that it is contradictory to almost all that I have previously stated. If people

Introduction How long is too long? As the saying goes, "justice delayed is justice denied." All across the nation it is stated that the courts take too long. The court process from endless lawyer's talks, paper by the reams, and sky high legal bills, a court case can feel like FOREVER... According to Dr. Chadha, inefficiency within the judicial system causes frivolous litigation, harassment and delays, crowding out genuine litigants and forcing them to seek solutions in a quasi–legal framework (Chada, 2010).

Thesis

This paper will define the meaning of the phrase "justice delayed is justice denied", effect on defendants, the steps legislature has dealt with, problems of court delay, have the steps been effective, and recommendations for decrease in court delays in the future.

Discussion

According to Merriam–Webster, "Justice Delayed Is Justice Denied" is a legal maxim that if legal redress is available for a party that has suffered some injury, but is not forthcoming in a timely manner, it is effectively the same as having no redress at all. There are many people who are wrongfully accused resulting in a false conviction. When this happens the conviction should be overturned when the process after the appeals finally take place. As with the Wilmington Ten, they were wrongfully convicted. Nine men and one woman were convicted of arson and conspiracy. They served nearly a decade in jail. They appealed their convictions with the federal court of appeals on the Get more

2.3 Conclusion:

The aim of criminal law is to protect the rights of the individuals and to safeguard the weak against the strong, law abiding against lawless and peaceful against violent. The state has prescribed certain rules of conduct, sanctions for their violations and machinery to enforce sanctions and procedure to protect that machinery.

"If men were angels no government would be necessary." James Madison. Hence, it is the primary function of the government to protect the basic rights to life and property. There can be no liberty if no protection of the basic rights of the citizens by the government is...show more content...

Right to Life and Personal Liberty. People of India have become more receptive to quick, fair and affordable justice. The entire existence of the orderly society depends upon sound and efficient functioning of the Criminal Justice System. It is rightly said that "Justice delayed is Justice denied".

Whether a guilty person is exonerated or an innocent is punished or there is an enormous delay in deciding the case, quality of justice suffers in all these cases. Since the objections of the criminal justice system are not codified anywhere, hence they can be just inferred from different statutes. Every democratic country aims at providing maximum sense of security to the people at large by dealing with crimes and criminals effectively and legally. Our criminal justice system aims at reducing the level of criminality in the society by ensuring maximum detection of the reported crimes, convictions of accused persons without delay and to meet the ends of justice.

India inherited the adversarial system of common law from the British Colonial Rulers and the criminal justice system of India is followed on the same track. In adversarial system truth is supposed to emerge from the respective versions of the facts presented by prosecution and the defence before a neutral judge. The term ―neutral judge is emphasized here because in adversarial system there is no positive duty on the judge to

Martin Luther King Jr. was not someone who was only important in our history but he is an important historical figure. Martin Luther king believed in social justice fundamentalism. This is shown in Martin Luther Kind Speech at the Holt Street Baptist Church (1955). There he talks about Rosa Parks who was taken from a bus and carried to jail because she refused to give her seat up to a white person. Martin Luther King was happy that it happened to her because of her integrity and the kind of person she is. He believed that they were not there to advocate violence but instead overcome it. They would do that through the "weapon of protest". Martin Luther King believed that peaceful protests were the key to change he didn't believe that killing each other was effective at all....show more content...

"We are not wrong if we are wrong the Supreme Court, constitution and God Almighty is wrong". In Letter from the Birmingham Jail (1963) he talks about how some people have recently been calling his activities unwise and untimely. In the letter he talks about how waiting to him means that it will never happen "Justice too long delayed is justice denied". However, in the beginning he was fighting with racial issues occurring within the United

"Justice delayed is Justice Denied, but is Justice Hurried, Justice Buried?"

The Law which rightly speaks about the collective organization of the individual right to lawful defence. The law is justice. Nothing can be more clear and simple, more perfectly defined and bounced or more visible to every eye; for justice is a given quantity, immutable and unchangeable, and which admits of neither increase nor diminutions. Looking forward for justice people of India go to courts for a fair justice to their dues (problems). In Indian Jurisprudence, in the decision of Maneka Gandhi vs Union of India it was held that law must be fair, just, and reasonable. Well when a citizen comes for justice to the court it takes a lot oftime to give justice ; and till justice is given the purpose for which just was appealed would have perished. There comes the quote "justice delayed is justice denied." As Indian justice system goes hand in hand with facts, arguments, moral values, laws, documents, and investigations process, it consumes...show more content...

If we start fastening the present legal system to deliver justice at god speed then there would be a lot of burden on the judges; which will result in many unreasonable judgements, and at last the Justice system will be at fault. If the present legal justice system is fastened then the problem which it will face is the burden of solving cases, there lakhs of case pending still in different high courts of India. The most populated high court in India with pending cases is Allahabad High court. I agree that justice need to be delivered at a high rate, but not in the cost unreasonable fastened way of giving justice. And in the looking for fastened justice the important facts may be over ruled, important judgements may turn to disaster, one person happiness may transfer to someone else disaster of Get more content

Definition Essay: What Is Justice?

Justice When I first read this assignment, I wasn't sure how to start. What is justice seems like a straightforward question but I found trying to answer it wasn't. Justice might be better thought of as a general statement in this case "a theory about how best to allocate the benefits and burdens of society among its individuals" (Hinman, pg. 362). This definition has a lot of words but really doesn't put it in terms what we can identify with today. When someone thinks of justice, they look at how they are treated. Justice can also be thought of as "fairness that refers to the treatment of a person regardless of race, gender, age, or social or economic differences" (Nugent & Jones, pg. 17). Now that we have some real world context of what

After reading the fact of the case, I did not expect for the lower court to grand summary judgement to the defendants. Good thing that the plaintiff appealed to the Supreme Court. I like the Supremes Court's decision better. I think it is fair law to hold liable any person or organization that expose youths who are under 21 years old into danger. The Fraternity took a tremendous risk by providingalcohol at the party. We expect for the Fraternity to know that serving alcohol would put some students in danger and may cause harm to them or induce them to cause harm to a third party. Since the occurrence of students being drunk and causing accident from being drunk is something that is foreseeable, the fraternity is responsible for any damage

Get more content

Martin Luther King Jr. was an American Baptist minister, activist and leader in the civil rights movement. He was inspired by the nonviolent activism of Mahatma Gandhi. Though they were nonviolent and pacifist, Gandhi and King were justified in breaking the law. In the articles "Excerpt from Letter from Birmingham Jail" and "Text from Letter to Viceroy, Lord Irwin" Gandhi and king were known to feel that the laws are legal, but not just and that the threat of violence cannot be used to limit freedom of speech. King believed that sometimes a law which was carefully debated, turns out not to promote justice at all, but to make life more difficult for people. He states, "sometimes a law is just on its face and unjust in its application." It

Get more content

The Need For Justice Essay

The clash between good and evil perpetually permeates humanity. Balance of these forces through equality and tranquility is a goal sought after to amend injustice. Impartiality creates balance within a society. In addition, fairness through the application of law is a cornerstone of countless civilizations. The members of civilizations taught moralities through the tenets of religion heavily influence their integrity. The many manifestations and interpretations of righteousness confirm the eternal goal of civilization to do good unto others. Justice restores and perpetuates humanity's high moral standing. Justice means doing benevolent actions for the betterment of humanity. Justice is defined as the "maintenance of legal, social, or...show more content...

(Andrews 491) Civilization's need for justice derives from the need for democracy, which promotes equality. Reinhold Niebuhr, an American social thinker ("Niebuhr, Reinhold") said, "Man's capacity for justice makes democracy possible, but man's inclination to injustice makes democracy necessary". (The Oxford Dictionary 362) This is evident in the government of the United States. At first only white men could partake in government. This appalling inequality led to African–Americans and women demanding the right to vote and stopping the injustice brought against them. In the movie 12 Angry Men, the story of a trial with a jury of varying backgrounds and beliefs, justice is a theme at the forefront. Juror #8: It's always difficult to keep personal prejudice out of a thing like this. And wherever you run into it, prejudice always obscures the truth. I don't really know what the truth is. I don't suppose anybody will ever really know. Nine of us now seem to feel that the defendant is innocent, but we're just gambling on probabilities – we may be wrong. We may be trying to let a guilty man go free, I don't know. Prejudice is shown throughout history and in this movie; Juror #6 has a prejudice against Hispanics and wishes to rid the streets of them while Juror #12 was attacked by his teenage son and believes all teenagers are evil. As Niebuhr said, mans capacity for injustice is demonstrated through his prejudices against others. Democracy Get more content

JUSTICE DELAYED IS JUSTICE DENIED

This poem of Julia A F Cabney in "Little Things" was quoted by the Supreme Court judges Doraiswamy Raju and Arijit Pasayat while delivering their judgement on April 12 in the infamous Best Bakery riot case in Gujarat.

Before I start I would like to highlight something about the origin of the quoted line "Justice delayed is justice denied." This line was written by William Ewart Gladstone (1809– 1898). He was one of the greatest of English Politicians and also former British Prime Minister. The 15th August 1947 is a...show more content...

"The modern day Neros were looking elsewhere when innocent children and helpless women were burning and were probably deliberating how the perpetrators of the crime could be protected," the apex court said.

The judgment is an indictment not only against the Narendra Modi government, its bureaucracy, police, prosecution but also against the state judiciary. One can understand the inaction of the state governments, its subservient bureaucracy, police and prosecution but not the judiciary.

"The public prosecutor was not acting in a manner befitting the position held by him. He did not even request the trial court for holding the trial in–camera when a large number of witnesses were resiling from the statements made during investigation. The powers under Section 165 of the Indian Evidence Act (Judge's power to put questions or order production) was not resorted to at all'. One of the witnesses was declared being of

"Little drops of Water, little grains of sand Make the mighty ocean And the pleasant land, Little deeds of kindness, Little words of love Help to make earth happy Like the heaven above."

unsound mind but it was manipulated by the prosecution to drop him from being a witness, the apex court said.

Some of the witnesses were not examined at all without disclosing reasons. Courts are not expected to play to the gallery. They are not expected to be tape recorders to record whatever the witnesses are stating. Section 311 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and Section 165 of the Evidence Act confer vast and wide powers on presiding officers of court to elicit all

JUSTICE DELAYED IS JUSTICE DENIED ********************************

In the legendary interminable case of "Jarndyce Vs Jarndyce" in Dickens' "The Bleak House", characters have grown old, been born into, married into, and been divorced from various plaintiffs and defendants and awaited judgement with fond hope as if to The Last Day of Judgement. In this novel, Charles Dickens brings forth a long–running litigation which is an embodiment of the failures of the Chancery. His depiction of the judiciary as slow and arcane helped to spur an ongoing movement that later led to remarkable legal reforms in the Eighteenth century England. But even now,...show more content... After filing a complaint, she was so much harassed by the police that it led to her eventual suicide. But Rathore was convicted on Dec 21, 2009 –after two decades of the crime. It is because the accused was given this much time that he could gather false evidences resulting in lingering of the case for two decades. Another instance is the 1993 Mumbai Blast case. One of the accused and well–known bollywood actor, Sanjay Dutt, was convicted after a long period on 2013. The acquittal of congress leader Sajjan Kumar in 1984 riot case again proves the hold of nefarious politicians, whose sole raison d'ГЄtre is amassing power and money, over the court's judgement. These instances give corroborative evidences of the subjection of judiciary to political and financial clout. This legal maxim framed by British Prime Minister, William Ewart Gladstone, is to some extend vindicated. But it should not be forgotten that in between seeking justice and deliverance of justice there are a lot of pre–requisites, formalities and prescribed procedures governing the court proceedings that need to be followed. These are very time consuming but unavoidable also. For example, it is rather a precondition that every accused be given reasonable chance to defend himself.

Get more content

Essay on Justice

'Justice is such an elusive concept that it hardly seems worthwhile for a legal system to strive to achieve it'.

Justice is something that we all want from a Law and believe should be an integral part in any legal system. However, the meaning of Justice is very difficult to define. There are many aspects of justice that we may question about; i.e. is a particular law just? Is the legal system just? Much of the issue of justice is very controversial and raises questions such as whether the combination of Law and system produce a just result? Justice has a definition as follows: 'The quality of being just or fair, the act of determining rights and assigning rewards or...show more content... The logical extension of this view is that the Legal rules of a country can be broken if they do not conform to moral Laws, a view that was favoured by St. Thomas Aquinas. This theory of Natural Law can be contrasted with Positivism. Natural lawyers conflict with positivist thinkers who believe that if the Law is made according to correct procedure, then it should be followed however much it conflicts with morality. Positivists like Kelsen argue that Law and morality are entirely separate concepts, and believes that justice is abstract, therefore it is has no concept in Law. Kelsen also argued that the concept of justice is too vague to be defined and that even if law is immoral, it still should be followed. Austin's view stems from the positivist argument that Law is Law because of sovereignty and procedures. Professor Hart also considers law and morality to be separate. He believed that Law should be based on logical ideas that produce correct decisions from the rules. Durkheim, a sociologist, took the view that society is held together 'a cohesion' and that the Law is an integral part of making these structures work. Kelsen's theory can be contrasted to LL Fuller who favours the natural Law theory. Fuller took the example of the Nazi Law and condemned with their Legal system. He argued that Nazi Law was not Law at all as it was so fundamentally unjust.

Get more content