ROTARY CLUB OF MANILA JOURNALISM AWARDS
EJAP JOURNALISM AWARDS
2006 National Newspaper of the Year 2011 National Newspaper of the Year 2013 Business Newspaper of the Year 2017 Business Newspaper of the Year 2019 Business Newspaper of the Year
BUSINESS NEWS SOURCE OF THE YEAR (2017, 2018, 2019)
DEPARTMENT OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
2018 BANTOG MEDIA AWARDS
PHILIPPINE STATISTICS AUTHORITY
DATA CHAMPION
www.businessmirror.com.ph
A broader look at today’s business n
Sunday, September 19, 2021 Vol. 16 No. 340
P25.00 nationwide | 12 pages | 7 DAYS A WEEK
REMEMBERING
ROBODREAD | DREAMSTIME.COM
NO TO NUKE T
By Joel C. Paredes
HIRTY-FIVE years after being mothballed, the Bataan Nuclear Power Plant (BNPP) continues to hound a discredited regime for its “single largest fraudulent” transaction.
Yet post-Edsa administrators—from President Fidel Ramos to Rodrigo Duterte, actually tried, but failed, to revive a “white elephant” or reintroduce nuclear power program in the country, despite the plant’s being deemed “unsafe” and dangerous. Either they have forgotten—or just simply took for granted—how “people power” battled the threat that could trigger a possible nuclear disaster in the country. No less than the Department of Energy and the Department of Science and Technology still think that the BNPP failed only because there was “communications problem” or that it lacked a “public relations campaign,” according to social scientist Dr. Roland Simbulan, who chairs the Nuclear Free Philippines Coalition (NFPC). Perhaps, if only to set the record straight, the NFPC is coming out in October with a documentation of the anti-BNPP campaign in the book Nuclear-Free Nation: the Power of the People Vs. Nuclear Power in the Philippines. “Fortunately, at every attempt at its revival, the environmentalist and anti-nuclear power advocates have consistently fought tooth and nail against the BNPP revival and nuclear power. Yet we cannot just
SIMBULAN: The globalization of resistance to nuclear power “is our answer to the assault of international nuclear corporate Mafia.” PHISO.ORG
ignore the fact that nuclear power in the country also entails too much risk,” Simbulan wrote in the book, which he also edited based on the accounts of the people who were at the forefront of the “successful struggle and resistance” to the BNPP. As Simbulan puts it, “one of the critical issues that we have posed to ourselves or what some people have asked us is, was the anti-BNPP struggle merely a political opposition to the Marcos dictatorship and all its projects? Or is it a deepened and enlightened opposition against nuclear power?” According to Simbulan, they
PESO EXCHANGE RATES n US 49.8520
THE Bataan Nuclear Power Plant on the Bataan Peninsula, 100 km west of Manila. GOOGLE EARTH
Before the People Power revolt, there was the equally successful mass protest that stopped a dictator’s pet project: the Bataan nuclear plant. consider their struggle as part of a “social movement superpower” which led to the 1986 People Power Revolution and later inspired other similar people’s upheavals in many parts of the world, especially those in Eastern Europe. The 246-page resource book
also traced the history of the NFPC, the broad coalition that led such a comprehensive grassroots people’s campaign. The best lesson that can be derived from the NFPC experience, Simbulan pointed out, was the importance of continuing education of the public, the coun-
try’s decision-makers and members, as well as in espousing issues and concerns of its organization. The fundamental lesson of the Filipino people’s struggle against the BNPP, he said, was that despite formidable odds, they needed to trust the “people’s resolve and their capacity, in due time, to redress wrongs and injustices influenced upon them by those in power.”
How it all started
IN one chapter, Dr. Jorge Emmanuel, then a US-based chemist and research engineer with the General Electric’s Corporate Research Center, wrote that in 1971, the US
State Department instructed its Embassy in Manila to pressure the Philippine government to pursue plans for two nuclear reactors. GE was itself a major nuclear exporter and had competed with Westinghouse for the BNPP contract. But as early as 1957 when the Philippine Atomic Energy Agency was formed, the Philippines had already trusted the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) with reviewing the prospect of nuclear power in the country, he said. The IAEA then recommended three nuclear power plants for Luzon, only to be shelved due to the high cost. Continued on A2
n JAPAN 0.4544 n UK 68.7758 n HK 6.4051 n CHINA 7.7220 n SINGAPORE 37.0785 n AUSTRALIA 36.3620 n EU 58.6808 n SAUDI ARABIA 13.2956
Source: BSP (September 17, 2021)