BusinessMirror
THREETIME ROTARY CLUB OF MANILA JOURNALISM AWARDEE 2006, 2010, 2012
U.N. MEDIA AWARD 2008
A broader look at today’s business Saturday 18,June 20141,Vol.2015 10 No.Vol. 40 10 No. 235 Monday,
www.businessmirror.com.ph
P. | | 7 DAYS A WEEK
n n
E.M.B. COOL ON CAMPI APPEAL FOR 2YEAR GRACE PERIOD ON IMPLEMENTATION OF NEW VEHICLE STANDARDS
DENR won’t delay Euro 4 enforcement
T
INSIDE
HE Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) is thumbing down the appeal of automakers to defer compliance with the environment-friendly Euro 4 fuel standards for new vehicles by two years, stressing that the cleaner-emission regulations have been delayed for far too long.
#NORMCORE NO MORE
Life
The newness of life
D
EAR Lord, when will our behavior become a living proof of the reality and universal effect of Your resurrection. Through our own and our neighbor’s love, we shall experience that the newness of life brought by You is not a myth or just a pious aspiration but a wonderful reality. We will also see that the Resurrection is not just an event of the past that concerns You alone, but an ever-present power, which recreates every human being from within, transforming each one from a weak sinner into a strong child of God who lives by the commandment of brotherly/sisterly love. Amen. EXPLORING GOD’S WORD, FR. SAL PUTZU, SDB AND LOUI OUIE M. LACSON Word&Life Publications • teacherlouie1965@yahoo.com
EDIE CAMPBELL in Vogue Paris
ALL ACCESS: THE SECOND COMING OF IAN VENERACION
»D3
BusinessMirror
Editor: Gerard S. Ramos • lifestylebusinessmirror@gmail.com
KAT A E MOSS by Corrine Day for The Face, circa 1990 AT
Monday, June 1, 2015 D1
THE Olsen twins schlepping about in socks and Birkenstocks
JOAN SMALLS
#normcore no more
W
ELL, apparently, being bland, boring and basic can make you a style icon. You just have to wear something conventional, nondescript and unpretentious. That aesthetic, that ethos is called “normcore,” a portmanteau of “normal” and “hardcore,” which refers to an attitude but not a particular look or code of unisex dressing that swept the fashion scene in 2014. The term normcore was coined by K-Hole, a New York-based trend forecasting group founded by Greg Fong, Sean Monahan, Emily Segal, Chris Sherron and Dena Yago. As brand consultants, the five wrote about the neologism in “Youth Mode: A Report on Freedom.” Normcore moves away from a coolness that relies on difference to a post-authenticity coolness that opts-in to sameness. But instead of appropriating an aestheticized version of the mainstream, it just cops to the situation at hand. To be truly normcore, you need to understand that there’s no such thing as normal. “Individuality was once the path to personal freedom—a way to lead life on your own terms. But the terms keep getting more and more specific, making us more and more isolated. Normcore seeks the freedom that comes with nonexclusivity. It finds liberation in being nothing special, and realizes that adaptability leads to belonging. Normcore is a path to a more peaceful life.” Though not as cringe-inducing as grunge or as exciting as the metrosexual, normcore as a way of dressing has nevertheless found its way into the style lexicon. Urbandictionary.com defines normcore as “a subculture based on conscious, artificial adoption of things that are in widespread use, proven to be acceptable, or otherwise inoffensive. Ultra-conformists.” Steve Jobs is often cited as the style reference, as are the tourists in
Times Square from Middle America. Include Jerry Seinfeld (Is the dadbod a spawn?), Tina Fey in 30 Rock, Kate Middleton (when she dresses without the royal trappings and only outside England) and an unknown Kate Moss photographed by Corinne Day for The Face in 1990. If I understand the concept correctly, I will include as a normcore example the 100th anniversary US Vogue cover when supermodels wore casual sportswear white shirts and jeans by The Gap. Dressing “normal” is a reaction to the “peacocking to street-style photographers” phenomenon that happens usually at Fashion Weeks. As an anti-trend, I would look no further as beacons the supermodels on their days off, especially Joan Smalls, as they must find wearing couture so cloying that they revert back to the basics. Or the glorious Jo Ann Bitagcol when she’s behind the camera. The New York Times has also weighed in: “Normcore [noun] 1. A fashion movement, c. 2014, in which scruffy young urbanites swear off the tired street-style clichés of the last decade—skinny jeans, wallet chains, flannel shirts—in favor of a less-ironic [but still pretty ironic] embrace of bland, suburban antifashion attire. [See Jeans, mom. Sneakers, white.]” For visualizing purposes, normcore would be, as per refinery29.com: a Nike adult sweatshirt and not an Alexander Wang pullover; a New Balance running shoe and not Nike wedge sneakers; a souvenir baseball cap and not a Stella McCartney cap; and Uniqlo chinos and not J. Crew printed stretch pants. Normcore crept into the mainstream consciousness when Fiona Duncan wrote about it in February 2014 in New York magazine, in a piece titled “Normcore: Fashion for Those Who Realize They’re One in 7 Billion”: “[Normcore] is embracing sameness deliberately as a new way of being cool, rather than striving for ‘difference’ or ‘authenticity.’ In
fashion, though, this manifests itself in ardently ordinary clothes. Mall clothes. Blank clothes.” Lorna Hall, head of market intelligence at trend forecaster WGSN, explained to Theguardian. com: “The normcore trend plays to the strengths of retailers that are good at the everyday basics people actually wear.” The clothes referred to are everyday wear like T-shirts, hoodies, short-sleeved shirts, (mom) jeans, chinos, khakis, baseball hats, sneakers and sandals. Does it mean, then, that Filipinos, beholden to trends and fast fashion, have been adapting the normcore attitude since malls began sprouting all over the islands? Even more so when Bench and Penshoppe dominated the retail landscape, and reaching its apex when The Gap, Superdry, H&M, Forever 21 and Uniqlo took over our shopping budget? I don’t think so. Even though we wear our “normcore” pedestrian clothes in our everyday lives, we do so because we are pragmatists living within our means, not out of an innate sense of style or even a working knowledge of the current style zeitgeist. I didn’t even notice my Twitter or Instagram feeds peppered with the hashtag #normcore alongside the vapid #OOTDs and #OOTNs. Didn’t our supposed Instagirls and selfie stickwielding boys get the memo? Or, maybe, normcore has not really caught on among our style arbiters because the whole thing can be very confusing after all? The more identity-validating Vogue. uk explained: “Beyond the jargon, this original notion of normcore is predicated on the desire to fit in rather than stand out. But the team behind the term believes that it’s been misunderstood and misappropriated by the fashion press. On the phone from their Manhattan office, 25-year-old K-Hole co-founder Segal explains the thinking behind this hypernormalized styling: ‘There’s an exhaustion with trying to seem different. People are genuinely tired by the fact that to achieve status, you need to be different from everyone else around you.’” “As envisioned by its creators, normcore [is] not a fashion trend, but a broader sociological attitude. The basic idea is that young alternative types [have] devoted so much energy to trying to define themselves as
LIFE
The director of the Environmental Management Bureau (EMB), Environment Undersecretary Jonas R. Leones, appears to be standing firm on the DENR’s ruling to implement Euro 4 compliance for all new vehicles to be used or introduced in the Philippines starting January 1, 2016. Another aspect of the implemen-
EMPLOYEE POWER BusinessMirror
Monday, June 1, 2015 E 1
SIX MYTHS ABOUT
DATTAA SCIENTISTS DAT DON’TT SCALE B S F
B
EMPOWERING EMPLOYEES
IG DATA is about to get a big reality check. Our obsession with data and analytics technology, and our reverence for the rare data scientist who reigns over this world, has disillusioned many of us. Executives are taking a hard look at their budgets—drained by disparate tools they’ve acquired and elusive “big insights” they’ve been promised - and wondering, “Where is the return on this enormous investment?” It’s not that we haven’t made strides in aggregating and organizing data, but that employees are still spending untold hours interpreting and manually reporting results. To solve this problem, organizations are contemplating even further investment, often in the form of data scientists who command big fees. But that’s not a scalable solution. A few innovative executives have sought automated solutions in artificial intelligence (AI) that interprets data and unlocks hidden insights. Why is this possible? Because AI is beginning to transform data and analysis into comprehensive, intuitive narratives. Any organization where employees spend time on manual, repetitive tasks is a prime candidate for automated solutions. Take, for example, the manual process of performance reporting for mutual funds. Typically, marketing teams toil every quarter to document portfolio performance and add commentary. Today some funds are using advanced natural language generation platforms, powered by AI, to automatically write these reports in mere seconds. In medical billing, AI can scour thousands of billing records across hundreds of hospitals and generate narrative reports that immediately provide the desired analysis. These reports can highlight changes to a hospital group’s insurance-provider portfolio that affect revenue and cash flow, while simultaneously identifying room for growth. Wealth management is starting to see this benefit, too. AI is being embedded into advisory platforms, delivering personalized portfolio reviews and recommendations to customers in language they can understand. All these new technologies share something that additional humans cannot provide: the power of scale. In the near-term, the adoption of AI within business intelligence platforms and customerfacing applications will accelerate. Eventually, AI will offer even more complex analysis and advice. We’re at the beginning of the next phase of big data focused on making data more useful, more understandable and more effective.
B D M
W
HEN Dr. Stephen R. Covey visited the nuclear-powered submarine I commanded, the USS Santa Fe Fe, he told me it was the “most empowering workplace he’d ever seen.” It was a bit ironic for me, because I’m sour on the word “empowerment.” To me, saying we need an empowerment program is like saying that the fundamental way we run our organization is dis-empowering—or is it de-empowering? Empowerment means changing how your organization is designed and managed so that people can exercise their natural power. Based on my experience, here are the six biggest myths about empowerment:
Myth 1: The route to empowerment is a program.
YOU can’t implement a bottom-up concept in a top-down way. The first step needs to be a commitment from the group that they want more authority and more decision-making. If the team wants empowerment, you’re on your way. If not, try again in six months.
Myth 2: You empower people
PEOPLE are already empowered. Leaders give them the voice and authority to exercise the empowerment they naturally have. What leaders do is push decision-making down the organization as far as possible so the decisions are made by those people closest to the information.
Myth 3: Empowerment is enough
LEADERS must ensure that their people have the requisite competence and clarity of purpose to make successful decisions. An empowering organization thus spends more time on training. Employees without sufficient technical competence and organizational clarity cause chaos.
Myth 4: Your picture of empowerment matches your team’s
THE word “empowerment” doesn’t contain the ability to measure and affect it—two necessary components for improving it. Instead, use specific words to identify the level of empowerment you want, such as “explore options,” “come up with a plan” or “do what you think is best.”
Myth 5: During a crisis, it’s appropriate to revert to top-down command and control
IN fact, the more important and time-urgent the event, the bigger the relative performance gain an empowered team will achieve. The best-performing teams in the military work in highly decentralized ways.
Myth 6: Blowing up your hierarchy will result in empowered people.
CLEAR AR role definitions allow the team to focus on getting the job done rather than worrying about the limits of their authority or responsibility. Use hierarchy to place greater obligation on those higher up to take care of their teams, and greater responsibility to ensure that those below them have the tools to make successful decisions. Remember, in highly effective organizations, there are leaders at every level, not just at the top. David Marquet is the author of Turn the Ship Around!
3 rules for experts who want more influence B D C
I
N these days of social media chestthumping, everybody is calling himself an expert. The first rule of expertise, I’ve learned, is never to call yourself an expert. That’s for others to determine. But becoming a recognized expert in a world of pretenders is increasingly valuable. The first step, of course, is truly knowing Your subject. Ramit Sethi— author of “ I Will Teach You to Be Rich ”— learned personal finance the hard way when he lost half his college scholarship in the stock market. That’s when he started mastering the techniques he now teaches. Nate Silver, the presidential election prognosticator, taught himself statistical skills by creating a tool to track baseball players’ performance that he later applied to the Electoral College. The second step is Sharing your knowledge, because if no one knows you’re an expert, it doesn’t really count. Sharing your ideas in book form can be a powerful tool to build an audience.
Writing books is rarely lucrative, but they can pay off in other ways such as through speaking fees. The final step is Cultivating a following. As you create content over time, more people are exposed to your ideas. Institutions can also begin to volunteer to spread your message further. Experts recognize that a direct link to their fan base is the real gold. “To me, the hottest and sexiest social network right now is your inbox,” blogger Chris Brogan said about email marketing. You have to build a following, and increasingly that’s your own responsibility. In a world where too many people claim to be experts, it becomes even more important to be one, and ensure that the right people know it. When you’ve cultivated genuine expertise, shared your knowledge generously and raised your profile by reaching more people, you’ve become worthy of the title.
3D printing will revive conglomerates
C
B R D’A
ONGLOMERATE RA S, at least RATE in the US, have a checkered history. Hailed in the 1960s as bastions of sophisticated management, they used cheap financing to acquire family-owned firms. The discipline they brought to these often loosely run businesses drove much of the post-war productivity boom. Then, conglomerates fell out of favor in the 1980s and 1990s as focus came into fashion. True synergies across the diverse operations were often hard to see. With 3D printing, however, industrial conglomerates are about to get a new lease on life. A single 3D printer can produce engine pumps one day and crankshafts the next. The technology’s flexibility introduces synergies where none existed before. For example, GE, a highly diversified manu-
manufacturer with this capability would take over many of the divisions. Eventually, 3-D printing will mature and become ubiquitous in manufacturing. Companies will send their digital files to an outside printer farm, which will work to keep the production lines running at capacity. When printer farms become a readily available commodity in the marketplace, conglomerates will lose their advantage in manufacturing synergies. To survive, conglomerates will have to adapt their capabilities to a new kind of value creation. Conglomerates, after all, are just a management tool. In some contexts, they add competitive advantage. In others, they weaken it.
facturer, makes everything from locomotives to ultrasound scanners. The company has invested heavily in 3D printing technologies flexible enough to produce a variety of products. In Alabama, GE’s first additive manufacturing facility is set to make nozzles for jet engines. But over time, there’s no reason it can’t make parts for other GE divisions. If jet sales are down, the Alabama plant could switch over to supplying parts for trains, medical devices or whatever division is selling strong. Running plants at full capacity is often a key to profitability in manufacturing. The big question is whether midsize conglomerates can develop a 3D printer farm on their own. They would need not only capital but also a good deal of technical expertise. Perhaps, the more likely scenario is that a large outside
MONDAY MORNING
Dorie Clark teaches at Duke University’s Fuqua School of Business. She is the author of Reinventing You and Stand Out.
Stuart Frankel is the CEO and a co-founder of Narrative Science, a company working on advanced natural language generation.
Richard D’Aveni is the Bakala professor of strategy at Dartmouth College’s Tuck School of Business.
E1
© 2013 Harvard Business School Publishing Corp. (Distributed by The New York Times Syndicate)
MICROSOFT YEARS Perspective BusinessMirror
E4 Monday, June 1, 2015
Microsoft employees– past and present–look back over the years
S
B M D | The Seattle Times
EATTLE—For August Hill, the job offer from Microsoft was a dream come true. The soft-spoken developer started his career deep in the guts of software programming for a telephone company in Saint Louis, working to make it easier for developers to build programs out of standardized chunks of data.
BILL GATES (left) and Paul Allen relocated Microsoft to Bellevue, Washington, in 1979. BARRY WONG/SEATTLE TIMES/TNS
“This was a chance to see software development at a huge level,” Hill said. “Microsoft, was, golly jeepers. Who was bigger? Who was doing as much?” Hill arrived in 1998, the year that Microsoft, by Wall Street’s gauge, hurdled above General Electric to become the world’s largest company. He was one of the 4,800 employees Microsoft added that year, many to do things the company hadn’t envisioned when it was born as a builder of programming languages in Albuquerque, New Mexico. Microsoft, based outside Seattle in Redmond, didn’t invent word-processing software, server tools, video-game consoles or even the original operating system that it used to power the first IBM PCs. But the company grew into a giant by evolving to tackle new markets with concerted catchup efforts piloted by generations of tech’s best and brightest (and a few well-timed acquisitions). As Microsoft quietly celebrated its 40th birthday last month, Satya Nadella, the company’s third chief executive, is piloting an effort to keep the company relevant in its fifth decade, even as consumers grow less willing to pay for programs, such as Windows, that make computers tick. Microsoft, in a fierce competition for eyeballs with rivals in Silicon Valley, is increasingly offering some of its core products free and banking that its customers will pay for other services. In the words of one analyst, the current shift to mobile and Web-based devices is the biggest challenge Microsoft has ever faced. The Seattle Times asked two-dozen current and former employees and observers about their lessons from Microsoft’s past efforts to tap new markets, offering a ground level view of the company’s ups and downs over four decades. “It was an adventure,” said Rob Short, who was among a group of defectors from a button-down East Coast computer builder
who joined Microsoft in 1988, when the company was growing at a startuplike pace at its new campus. “The budgeting process was you talk to Steve [Ballmer], and he’d say, ‘You can hire up to 200 people. If you want more than that, come talk to me,’” Short said. “We’d spend months poring over little details in budgets at our old place.” For all of Microsoft’s ubiquity in modern offices, the company then was a relative unknown to big business. Susan Hauser, now a vice president in charge of Microsoft’s corporate sales and partnerships group, joined the company’s New York City outpost in 1989. The team’s task was to try to persuade companies to adopt the company’s operating systems and office-productivity products. During her first years at Microsoft, the island of Manhattan—the heart of American big business—was divided in two. Hauser was responsible for courting potential customers south of 42nd Street. A colleague handled the northern half. Hauser found that Wall Street’s exacting standards meant Microsoft would have to increase its sales and customersupport organization. “We’re going to need better response time,” Hauser said of the feedback she received then. “We’re going to need people on site.” Microsoft evolved to meet the challenge. Hauser and her team, selling the sturdier operating system built by Short’s group, relentlessly courted chief information officers, making clients out of the likes of media conglomerate Time Warner and big Wall Street broker Merrill Lynch. A company that had grown in its early days by anticipating the needs of PC manufacturers, microchip makers and home programmers had added another important
constituency: people who buy technology to power the workplace. Microsoft along the way built a network of thousands of software resellers and partners. Hardware builders were brought along with early glimpses at the company’s software and other partnerships. Ballmer, the company’s sales chief before he was CEO, used to say “you have to convince the other guy he’s going to get rich working with you,” Short said. “You hear all these stories about Microsoft as a monster coming around and killing everybody in sight, but the actual partnership strategy was very, very clever.”
40 years of Microsoft 1975
1980 Jan. 1979 April 1975 Microsoft Bill Gates and Paul Allen relocates to found Microsoft in Bellevue, ending Albuquerque, N.M., to build software for MITS, the year with less than $2 million in an early personalrevenue and 30 computer maker. employees.
1995
Feb. 1983 Allen, recovering from Hodgkin's disease, resigns from the company.
1985
1990
March 1986 Microsoft goes public in an initial public offering that raises $61 million.
March 1987 Microsoft surpasses Lotus as the largest PC software maker, a title it hasn’t relinquished.
1990 Microsoft’s revenue crosses the $1 billion mark.
Aug. 1995 Microsoft launches Windows 95, the biggest-ever, software launch.
Nov. 2001 Microsoft and the Justice Department reach a settlement in the antitrust case.
May 1998 Justice Department files an antitrust suit against Microsoft.
2000
Jan. 2000 Gates steps down as chief executive but remains chairman. Steve Ballmer becomes Microsoft’s second CEO.
Computing portal
IN Redmond, Yusuf Mehdi was helping to guide Microsoft’s efforts to keep the attention of technology consumers. Mehdi grew up a few miles away from Microsoft’s first offices in the state. He was on the team that shepherded the launch of Windows 95, the operating system that helped the company close in on its long-held goal of putting a computer on every desktop. Mehdi later oversaw the marketing of Internet Explorer as Microsoft threw its weight behind a bid to catch up with the companies that were defining the growing Web. “I’m a little bit the Forrest Gump of Microsoft,” Mehdi jokes, comparing his winding path through the company to the way Tom Hanks’s character in that film seemed to stumble into important moments in American history. Microsoft, with the aid of Windows and a relentless pursuit of the Internet, in the 1990s grew to become the world’s primary portal to computing. “Microsoft has this ability to focus in,” said Ryan Hamlin, who helped build the MSN Web platform in the 1990s. “When we did that, Microsoft was very good at it.” Mehdi spurned job offers from Silicon Valley. “People here talk in these aspirational tones, but they mean it,” Mehdi said. “‘We’re on a mission. We’re going to do X.’” Along the way to X, Microsoft missed a few. After years spent working on database crunching software, August Hill, the Saint Louis import, was assigned to the developers chasing Apple’s first smash hit of the 21st century: the iPod. Microsoft’s Zune music player eventually boasted more powerful hardware than Apple’s product, but it wasn’t quick enough. Apple had moved again, striking gold with the iPhone. “We were just a little late,” Hill said. “If we’d been there a year prior, two years prior, it could have been a different thing.” How did Microsoft, which pours billions of dollars each year into wide-ranging technology research, fail to capitalize on some of the seismic consumer-technology shifts of the 2000s? “All successful companies get somewhat complacent,” said Michael Cusumano, a professor with MIT’s Sloan School of Business who has followed the company closely for decades. Cusumano said the company was hampered by its focus on the PC. It also was distracted as its executives battled US government antitrust charges in the late 1990s and early 2000s. “When you grow so big, the material changes,” Hamlin said. “Innovation gets squeezed because you have so many people working to solve the same thing. It creates an internal frustration: Who is going to lead? Why are you leading? Why can’t my team lead?” There were other cultural shifts. “Cautiousness took over,” said Patti Brooke, who did stints at Microsoft in the 1990s and 2000s in a range of strategy and product-development roles. “A lot of the strategy for the company became protecting the franchise.” While that approach may have contributed to Microsoft’s misses in consumer technology, it paid dividends for Microsoft’s relationship with big business. Backwaters that produced database software, business-collaboration tools and developer-focused server software grew into billion-dollar businesses. “People wonder when Facebook comes, and the iPhone hits, and Google grows up,
Aug. 1981 IBM introduces its entry into the PC market, which runs on Microsoft-Disc Operation System(MS-DOS). Nov. 1983 Microsoft announces Windows two months before Apple launches Macintosh. Windows is released two years later.
$1 billion
Nov. 2001 2005 Microsoft launches Xbox, which would become the company’s biggest consumer hit of the decade. Nov. 2006 Microsoft introduces Zune, an ultimately doomed challenge to Apple’s iPod. June 2008 Gates steps down from day-to-day role at Microsoft to focus on his charitable foundation.
May 2010 Apple hurdles Microsoft to become the most valuable technology company by market capitalization.
2010 June 2009 Microsoft launches Bing, competing with Google.
Dec. 2009 Microsoft settles nearly a decade of European antitrust struggles.
Nov. 2010 Microsoft launches Windows Phone 7, a dramatic departure from previous operating systems in interface design.
Feb. 2010 Microsoft debuts its Azure cloud-computing platform.
18,000 jobs
Aug. 2013 Ballmer says he plans to retire.
Oct. 2008 Microsoft launches Webbased version of Office.
Jan. 2015 Microsoft outlines its vision for Windows 10.
2015 Feb. 2014 Satya Nadella is named Microsoft’s third chief executive.
July 2014 Nadella announces Microsoft’s largest-ever layoff: 18,000 jobs. Plans are to reorient the company toward its fast-growing cloud computing units.
Revenue (in billions)
Employees 150,000
$100
120,000
80 60
90,000
40
60,000
20
30,000 0
0
’87
’89
’91
’93
’95
’97
’99
’01
’03
’05
’07
’09
’11
’13
’15
Note: 2015 revenue is an estimate compiled by Bloomberg. All years ending June 30. Employee count is as of March 31, 2015. Sources: Seattle Times archives, Microsoft, Bloomberg Graphic: Kelly Shea, Seattle Times/ TNS
‘Hey, are you still on the front foot of innovation?’” said Mehdi, now an executive at Xbox. “At the same time, we were hitting these other trends. We built a gameconsole business out of nothing. We built a server business out of nothing.” The company set up shop in Washington in 1979, ending that year with about $2 million in sales and 30 employees. In its most recent fiscal year, Microsoft pulled in $86 billion. The company employs 118,000 people.
a company known for insularity more open to the technology and ideas of others. “Every team across Microsoft must find ways to simplify and move faster, more efficiently,” Nadella said in a June memo last year outlining his strategy. A month later, Nadella announced the biggest restructuring in Microsoft history, an effort to streamline the company’s new mobile-phone hardware business and build a more efficient company. Microsoft would also lay off 18,000 people. Hill, who had worked on the development of Xbox since Microsoft pulled the plug on Zune, was told he was among those being let go. “My wife and I were looking at the book of our life, and we turned the page and said, ‘Hey, there’s a new chapter here,’” Hill said. “We didn’t expect that.” Hill, who has since started a franchise of small-business information technology company CMIT, is among those optimistic about Microsoft’s future under Nadella. “I like the ideals and I like the direction,” Hill said. “I’m happy to see where Microsoft ends up going.” Where will the company be in another 40 years? For some, that hinges on the ability of Nadella and company to make the place an appealing stop for technology’s most talented minds. “It isn’t the technology. It isn’t the products or services. They all come and go,” Mehdi said. “What won’t change is we’ll still get the best and brightest. If we keep that, this place is going to be around for a long, long time.” TNS
PERSPECTIVE Cultural shift
MICROSOFT is deep in the trenches of its latest reboot. Smartphones and tablets powered by rivals’ software have dethroned Windows as the dominant gateway between humans and computers. Microsoft is trying to navigate a transition to software sold and accessed on the Web without losing its giant customer base. “This is probably a bigger challenge than any they’ve encountered so far,” said Rick Sherlund, a Wall Street analyst who’s covered the company since it first sold stock to the public in 1986. Nadella, the 47-year-old who took the helm of Microsoft in February 2014, redoubled the company’s efforts to expand its presence on mobile devices—even if those devices aren’t made by Microsoft. He is also continuing the “all in” bet his predecessor Ballmer made on building the infrastructure to power modern Web-accessed programs and data storage. He’s tried to make Microsoft more nimble, and has overseen a move to make
SPECIAL REPORT
THE BASIC NEEDS: FOOD, CLOTHING AND...
D1
» D
www.businessmirror.com.ph
B C N. P
E4
tation of Euro 4 standards pertaining to the quality of fuel is slated to take effect in the country a month from now. It mandates the use of a cleaner-fuel standard that allows a maximum sulfur content of 50 parts per million (ppm). The prevailing Euro 2 used by vehicles in the country today has a cap of 500 ppm. C A
Business groups reject House-approved Timta
F
OR EIGN and local businessmen rejected salient features of the proposed Tax Incentives Management and Transparency Act (Timta), including the electronic-filing (e-filing) requirement of the Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR); the slapping of “steep” penalties for nonsubmission of incentive claims during the prescribed period; and an extension of the BIR’s assessment period. In a position paper released to the media on Sunday, 14 local and foreign business groups, representing 35,000 businesses in the country, identified the provisions they want to scrap in the House of Representatives’s version of the contentious Timta.
PESO EXCHANGE RATES n US 44.6500
Local and foreign businessmen opposed the e-filing of income-tax returns (ITRs), saying that such practice “may change from time to time, depending on the applicable or existing regulations of the BIR.” The Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) and the Department of Finance (DOF) agreed on a mandatory e-filing for all investment-promotion agencies (IPAs)-registered enterprises for up to six months, after the annual April 15 deadline. Board of Investments (BOI) Governor Lucita P. Reyes said e-filing could burden small and medium enterprises without much access to computers, as well as the instability of the BIR’s online system.
IN this October 3, 2014, file photo, residents bang pots and pans as they stage a “noise barrage” to protest possible eviction at the Fort Bonifacio Tenement Building in Taguig City. The building was the housing program of the late President Diosdado P. Macapagal in 1967 and was occupied by about a thousand family-beneficiaries from different urban-poor communities in 1967. The sign reads, “We Love Tenement, Nobody Leaves!” AP/BULLIT MARQUEZ
B J M N. C C N. P First of four parts
A
SK schoolchildren what are the basic needs, and you’ll readily get this answer—food, clothing and shelter. For Filipinos belonging to some 5.5 million households, however, that third component is probably missing. Shelter, or the lack thereof, remains as one of the top national concerns to this day, and is steadily worsening if you keep a head count of the growing number of Filipinos who do not own a house every year. But how do you totally solve a problem, the magnitude of which you are not even aware of? This is the daunting task staring the government and the private sector in the face, as they
attempt to provide solutions to the country’s housing-backlog riddle.
No official definition
THE chairman of the House Committee on Housing and Urban Development, Rep. Alfredo B. Benitez of the Third District of Negros Occidental, said the country’s housing backlog is estimated at 5.5 million units—a figure that would vary, depending on who or which agency you are talking to. Benitez admitted that there is no official estimate yet on the country’s housing backlog. The reason is elementary: “Currently, we don’t have an official definition of housing backlog,” Benitez admitted. Agreeing on the official definition of “housing backlog” is one of the main objectives of the Housing Summit that was launched by Congress and C A
S “T,” A
n JAPAN 0.3601 n UK 68.3636 n HK 5.7588 n CHINA 7.2002 n SINGAPORE 33.1133 n AUSTRALIA 34.0814 n EU 48.887 n SAUDI ARABIA 11.9067 Source: BSP (29 May 2015)