SINCE 1891
THE BROWN DAILY HERALD WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 7, 2016
VOLUME CLI, ISSUE 119
WWW.BROWNDAILYHERALD.COM
U. reshapes communications strategy Class disparities affect
student life in various spaces
Cross-departmental communication, centralized style marks new strategy
Experiences with academics, finances, activism differ with socioeconomic status
By SHIRA BUCHSBAUM
CLASS ON CAMPUS
SENIOR STAFF WRITER
Nov. 1 marked 18 months since Vice President for Communications Cass Cliatt arrived at Brown and helped form the Office of University Communications. With this passage of time has come a marked strategic shift in the University’s communication operations toward prioritizing the active promotion of the University’s mission on and off campus. Cliatt’s vision reflects President Christina Paxson’s P’19 commitment to communications. In her first year and a half at Brown, Cliatt has coralled a staff of over 50 people, established a branch of marketing, hired a new director of news and editorial development, assumed leadership over Brown’s graphic services team and integrated her strategic plan in communications functions across campus. “Brown is a very decentralized place,” Cliatt said. But the OUC has centralized a number of functions,
By ALEX SKIDMORE SENIOR STAFF WRITER
LAUREN ARATANI / HERALD
including the University’s Visual Identity Policy and Strategy. Published in July, it creates a centralized standard for the presentation of materials — pamphlets, booklets and websites, to name a few — from departments and centers across campus. Whether creating a t-shirt or a magazine, this guideline “helps unify the way we communicate” in streamlining the logo, color, font and basic message of the materials, said Jim Kempster, assistant vice president for marketing communications. “Just as much as Brown gives strength and reputation to its constituencies, the quality of its parts contribute to the (University’s) strength
Graduate school application process largely self-driven Advising for graduate school decentralized, disadvantaged students face social barriers By SUVY QIN SENIOR STAFF WRITER
The process of applying to master’s and PhD programs is largely self-directed, which can be a benefit for some students, but it can also create barriers for others. While around 11 percent of the class of 2015 reported pursuing a master’s or doctoral degree, only 3 percent pursued a fellowship or scholarship, according to the CareerLAB website. But students and alums noted the disparate levels of support they experienced when applying to graduate programs compared to fellowships and scholarships. Navigating the application processes The process of applying to master’s and PhD programs is often studentdriven and individualized, according to multiple students and alums who have applied or are currently applying to graduate programs. Applicants often receive advice from multiple
INSIDE
sources, including co-workers, professors, outside mentors and family members. Evan Lunt ’16, who will be a doctoral candidate in inorganic chemistry at Penn next year and hopes to go into academia, said he was overwhelmed by the number of programs he was interested in. A co-worker at a lab he worked at over the summer gave him the advice to choose schools that had at least several professors whose work interested him, Lunt said. He also used rating systems that compared chemistry graduate programs to help him narrow down the list to around 10 schools, Lunt said. The application process for master’s programs can also be daunting, said Caroline Vexler ’17, who is applying to master’s programs in economics. “I ended up cold-calling schools at one point,” said Alexandra Sepolen ’16, who is currently in a master’s of public health program at Columbia. “It feels like a very isolating process” because not many peers are also applying, and applicants have to do a lot of work, said Celia Ford ’17, who is applying to PhD programs in cognitive neuroscience. “It feels like you’re taking a fifth class no one knows about,” she added. » See ADVISING, page 4
and reputation,” he said. Kathryn Dunkelman, the Watson Institute for Public and International Affairs’ director of communications and outreach, noted that this marketing strategy “ensures that people see the connection” between Brown and all of its moving parts. “Why would you not associate yourself with a wellestablished institution?” she added. With the hiring of a new dean of admission and a new assistant vice president of advancement communications, the formation of the OUC has allowed for more cross-departmental communication and collaboration. The Office of Advancement has been » See COMMUNICATIONS, page 2
This story is the second in a three-part series about socioeconomic status at Brown. The series, through interviews with five students, examines the way socioeconomic status shapes students’ relationships to Brown in three stages: the application process, adjusting to life on campus and going back home after living and studying here. This story chronicles the adjustments of five students from high school to Brown’s campus. While some students reported consistencies between the environments of their high schools and the University’s, others were taken aback by the range of class privileges students bring to campus. Among the noteworthy class conditions on campus for the students interviewed were the sheer wealth some command as well as the way class background informs social habits,
comfort in class and political attitudes. Wealth shock For some, coming to campus led to some of their first sustained interactions with people who can pay Brown’s full price tag of $62,046 per year. “The first thing that shocked me was there are these people who are immensely rich at Brown — like billions of dollars,” said Chinenye Uduji ’19, adding that he had “never experienced that.” Uduji attended Central High School in Philadelphia, a public school with “a lot of low-income students.” “The privilege here is very evident,” said Kimberly Davila ’20, who went to a public high school near Los Angeles. Describing the student body of her high school, she said, “It’s predominantly Latino, low-income, and a lot of people are the first in their families to go to college.” Others were less struck by the wealth of some of Brown’s student body. “I went from being one of the lesser privileged kids in a very privileged community to being one of the more privileged kids in a less privileged community,” said Charlotte May ’17.5, who went to the Hackley School, of her transition » See CLASS, page 8
COURTESY OF MAGGIE HALL
The domestic dramedy ‘Straight White Men’ tells the story of three brothers and their father who share traditions like eating Chinese food on the sofa, but differ in their experiences with white privilege and social justice.
‘Straight White Men’ probes race, gender
Play developed by TAPS explores privilege through family interactions without oversimplifying By ZACHARY BARNES STAFF WRITER
“Straight White Men,” playing in repertory at the Wilbury Theatre Group, delivers bold and lacerating insight into privilege and what it means to be “woke” in the world today through the lens of domestic dramedy. Developed in Brown’s Department
ARTS & CULTURE
of Theatre Arts and Performance Studies in 2013, the play comes from a political era in which the eponymous demographic seemed to be slowly losing some of its dominance in American society. But the Wilbury production arrives at a critically different time. Not only has the demographic reasserted its dominance nationally via the election of a man who carries whiteness and maleness to terrifying extremes, but it has done so under the perversely twisted guise of a forgotten class proudly reclaiming its place. From long magazine features to cable news conventional wisdom, the narrative of the tragically misunderstood Trump voter has become ubiquitous.
Yet “Straight White Men,” despite having only white, male and presumably straight characters, escapes this wrongheaded genre of social commentary. “More than anything, I admire the way (the playwright) Young Jean Lee is so committed to challenging audiences and creates characters that we can all relate to … even when they may not be the nicest people,” wrote Josh Short, the artistic director of the Wilbury, in an email to The Herald. Indeed, the four characters do not provoke easy reactions; socially aware but still problematic, loving but sometimes insensitive, the characters whir with complexity. The show opens as one character, » See WHITE MEN, page 3
WEATHER
WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 7, 2016
NEWS Center for Entrepreneurship launches to increase student accessibility to entrepreneurship
NEWS Students frustrated by problems in receiving absentee ballots from Mail Services
COMMENTARY Rowland ’17: Activities of Undergraduate Finance Board should be more transparent
COMMENTARY Silvert ’20: Students should build on political correctness to initiate meaningful interactions
PAGE 3
PAGE 4
PAGE 7
PAGE 7
TODAY
TOMORROW
46 / 34
46 / 30