daily herald the Brown
vol. cxxii, no. 91
INSIDE
Page 3
wednesday, october 24, 2012
Presidency balances peer influence with unique vision
Check the box
By Kate Desimone and joseph rosales
Candidates spar in final debates as vote approaches
Senior Staff Writer and Arts & Culture Editor
Page 5
Art and money RISD ranks seventh for highest Parent PLUS loans Page 12
Review session Third World Center conducts yearlong evaluation
today
tomorrow
Herald file photo
59 / 43
62 / 47
since 1891
Like President Christina Paxson, many past University presidents and leaders of peer institutions served first as administrators at other schools.
President Christina Paxson stepped into the top administrative role at Brown earlier this year with a background shaped by the three institutions of her past — Swarthmore College, where she studied as an undergraduate, Columbia, where she earned her doctoral degree, and most recently, Princeton, where she filled teaching, research and Shaping the Presidency administrative Part two of three roles. These experiences, presenting her with perspectives on university governance, will likely inform her tenure at Brown. In the University’s recent history, many presidents have assumed the position after filling leadership roles at other institutions of higher education. Former presidents Henry Wriston,
Howard Swearer and Ruth Simmons led Lawrence University, Carleton College and Smith College, respectively, before coming to Brown. Others, like Paxson, arrived as first-time presidents, having served as deans or provosts at other institutions. This pattern is also characteristic of leadership at Brown’s peer institutions. Penn President Amy Gutmann was provost of Princeton before taking up her current position in 2004, while Columbia President Lee Bollinger left his post as president of the University of Michigan to move to the Ivy League. Cornell President David Skorton led the University of Iowa for three years before moving to Ithaca. Presidents who have been leaders at other universities “generally do better as a result,” said George Borts, professor of economics, who has been with the University since 1950 and seen nine administrations. Such experience can give presidents insight into how to lead an institution of higher education, but presidents must de/ /Presidencies page 6
U. student loan default rate below nat’l average Panelists discuss role of religion in elections By ALexa Pugh
Senior Staff Writer
Only 1.5 percent of Brown students default on their loans within three years of entering repayment, compared to 13.4 percent nationwide, according to reports recently released by the Department of Education. This is the first time the Department of Education has released an official report of the three-year cohort default rates, which measures the number of borrowers who entered repayment between October 2008 and September 2009 and defaulted by the end of September 2011. The national default rates include both Federal Family Education Loan Program loans and William Ford Federal Direct Loan Program loans. Of the loans calculated in this rate, Brown only uses direct loans, said
Wynette Richardson, director of financial services at Brown. Within two years of starting repayment, 9.1 percent of students nationwide defaulted, according to this year’s report. This is up from last year’s 8.8 percent two-year cohort default rate, which measured the number of students who defaulted on their loans by the end of the fiscal year 2009. By comparison, 1.2 percent of borrowers at Brown, including master’s and doctoral students, defaulted within two years, up from last year’s 0.5 percent. Though this year’s rate is more than double that of last year’s, the jump does not represent a significant change in the number of borrowers who default, Richardson said. Brown’s current two-year rate represents 10 defaulting students out of 772 borrowers. Five students out of 839 bor-
rowers were in default in 2010, according to last year’s released figures. While the national two-year cohort default rates have climbed steadily since 2005, Brown’s rates have remained at around 1 percent over the past few years. “I would say that a lot of it is to do with some of the education that we do with students, ensuring that borrowing is kept at a minimum,” Richardson said. Educating students early about their options is key, Richardson said. The loan office has introduced a new program this year called Get Your Bearings, which promotes financial literacy among students. A series of workshops over the course of the semester will instruct on matters such as budgeting and saving, how to manage credit and loan repayment options. Sessions will be offered to
students ranging from sophomores to seniors in hopes that students will better understand their financial responsibilities by the time they graduate, Richardson said. The loan office does not encourage students to change their intended career path based on the level of expected debt, but students should take into account their earning potential when making decisions about their future, Richardson said. “I think when students are graduating with $20,000 in loan debt, that’s not a thing to ask and still expect all of their future prospects to be intact,” said Alex Mechanick ’15, president of Brown for Financial Aid. Education is an investment, and having no loans is not necessarily the goal, he said. But Brown for Financial Aid does want to see certain policy / / Default page 5 changes at the
Rebirth centered on Westminster Street By Claire schlessinger Staff writer
Where Manhattan meets Providence, teenaged boys wearing beanies steer their skateboards between suit-clad businessmen talking on cellphones and hipster couples chain-smoking cigarettes. Just a block away from Kennedy Plaza, Westminster Street is home to an eclectic spread of small businesses specializing in clothes and accessories. This recent revitalization has earned it the description as “the hippest street in the hippest ’hood in the hippest city,” by a user of the customer-based review website Yelp.
Wonderland of colors and crafts Walking into Craftland is a little like walking into a kaleidoscopic candy store — if the candies were handcrafted goods made by individual artisans. A rainbow of bright colors in the windows beckons customers to check out postcards featuring artistic maps of Rhode Island, zipper necklaces with stunning glass pendants and dozens of other goodies. / / Westminster page 9
merson tadesse / Herald
Westminster Street is home to a number of boutiques, such as Craftland and Modern Core, with a focus on local and artisan goods.
By Mathias Heller Senior Staff Writer
A panel of academics highlighted the past and present impact of religion on U.S. politics during a discussion last night about the potential effects of Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney’s Mormon faith on the 2012 presidential election. The forum was held in Rhode Island Hall and was moderated by Nathaniel Berman, professor of international affairs, law and modern culture. “Probably since 1960, there’s been no election in which the religious background of both candidates has generated so much controversy as this one,” said Berman, citing Romney’s Mormon faith and false rumors that President Obama is a Muslim as examples. In 1960, President John F. Kennedy’s Catholic faith was considered a possible barrier to gaining the presidency. But Berman said national media has recently seemed unconcerned about the impact of the candidates’ religious views on politics. “Today, just two weeks before the election, there’s almost no talk about it,” he said. Mark Cladis, professor of religious studies and one of the three panelists, said the question of religion and politics has a deep and complicated history in the United States, especially during presidential election years. “I think there should be a generous role and place for religions in democratic politics,” said Cladis, / / Faith page 2 adding that