– page 02
deal with the climate change crisis?
– page 03
Find out more about an
Meet Louis de Minvielle, one of the four DSGs
– page 04
AIDA
conference IT & Database Wizard
How did our delegates
DSG INTERVIEW
Get to know Kelly Hunter, the
PAMUN IN CRISIS
IT WIZARD
February 15, 2016
organization that one of our very own press team members founded
– page 05
MUNIFICENCE PAMUN 2015
February 15, 2016
Volume 15, Issue 4
Staying Zen in MUN
ROCK SCULPTURE on sand by Andy Goldsworthy. Rocks were rubbed together to create the chalky white design. All natural materials were used in this creation.
Karya Sexener Staff Writer
B
reathing in and breathing out, life and death, arriving and departing, problems and solutions… These are all examples of the universal dualities of life. MUN quite overtly focuses on the last of these. The procedure is very much centered on identifying major problems and creatively engaging in finding resolutions. While doing so, the paramount tool of guidance is logic and argumentative reasoning. The delegates refine the issues through lenses of both national and global interests and judge what could be the most plausible solution to the problem. This is an effective method that has aided human beings on their journey in civilization for ages. Yet, is it possible to have an alternative approach? The philosophy of Zen has taught people many lessons on their journey towards “enlightenment”, so to speak. However, that very statement is in a way, an oxymoron. Zen does not believe in an individual who can arrive at enlightenment, for it does not believe in the existence of the individual. Zen philosophy centers on the idea that there is no ego or a self separate from the overall sea of being. The idea of a separate individual is an illusion and all beings are actually defined as being united in the name of “Brahman” or “the
VOTING PROCEDURE February 14th, delegates in the Political Committee raising their placards to vote. photo by Luigi Maruani
TWIG SCULPTURE by Andy Goldsworthy. Balance is achieved by carefully weaving the branches together.
Self”. It asserts that this intrinsic state of being can be achieved by practice such as meditation and once attained, brings with it a fundamental understanding of compassion and awe. This awareness evidently serves to be a shield against all conflict and misunderstandings due to its gentle and tolerant nature. When one contemplates that he or she does not exist as an isolated being entrapped by the fabric of skin and is actually a drop in the sea of the entirety of consciousness, it is not possible to feel greed, anger, resentment, jealousy or any other self-centric emotion. All that is left is the feeling of presence amidst the collective dance of existence and an innate love towards all there is. With the principle behind delegates’ refrain from using “I” and the idea that everyone is a representative of a larger-than-the-individual-society, MUN has areas which resemble the principles behind Zen. Furthermore, the role-play nature of MUN is very parallel with the Zen idea that all of the world is a grand play of “Brahman”. Still, it is important to remember that Zen is an "anti-philosophy". It is able to articulate the concept of such a totality (which is also described as a “non-duality”). Yet, it states that, by its nature, this understanding can only be attained by experience. It is not easy for such an experience-centric teaching to prevail in today’s global society of constant informa-
tion intake and stimuli of reasoning. We ultimately choose to negotiate, argue and exchange ideas with one another. This is how MUN fundamentally differentiates from Zen in the process of problem solving: MUN involves excessive amounts of judging and intellectual reasoning. Being a platform that is ultimately connected by language, (and not “Brahman”), it is inevitable that vessels of logic are to be used. Silence. Amidst all problem solving, there is always a standing existence of silence. MUN’s sophisticated logical approaches are effective at creating solutions. Yet, Zen’s foundation of compassion and “non-duality” is equally important in order to make those logical approaches sound, reliable and free from individual bias. It seems that in the duality of problem solving lies another duality: the duality between duality and “non-duality”. In order to achieve truly sustainable solutions, it would be remarkably helpful to integrate the two seemingly variant approaches: We cannot articulate what we want to say without reasoning. But we also can’t thoroughly understand one another without the fundamental basis of compassion and our oneness. Philosopher Karl Popper says, “All life is problem solving”. In this sea of life that constantly reaches then leaves the sands of duality, let’s hope we can strive in this central action.