Coast Mountain News Thursday, October 25, 2012
$1.00 + HST Vol. 28 | No. 22 Thursday, October 25, 2012
Serving the Bella Coola Valley eyy and the Chilcotin
A1
Acswaltca Students complete another Terry Fox run
Page 6
Debate continues to rage around illegal shooting of black bear CAITLIN THOMPSON
Michael Wigle photo
The illegal shooting of a black bear last August in Hagensborg has become the tipping point for some residents when it comes to how human-wildlife conflicts are addressed in the Bella Coola Valley
The illegal shooting of a black bear last August in Hagensborg has become the tipping point for some residents when it comes to how humanwildlife conflicts are addressed in the Bella Coola Valley. As the original story ran, charges were laid in the illegal shooting of a black bear on Olsen Road that had been eating cherries on a residential property. The resident who shot the bear was fined $115 for failing to report it. Given that there was some initial confusion about who shot the bear, the Conservation Officer Service (COS) confirmed that they conducted their investigation with this knowledge in mind. “We were aware of the discrepancies in this case and we investigated them to the best of our abilities,” said CO Len Butler. “But, at the end of the day, we have a sworn statement from the individual who claimed responsibility and interviews to support that statement, so we concluded our investigation.” The property owner, who does not reside at the residence, was served with a ‘dangerous wildlife protection order,’ as her property harboured the
cherries that attracted the bear. Failing to comply with the order can result in a fine of $575. After a discussion with the COS, the cherry tree was removed. This shooting and the subsequent letters published in the Coast Mountain News highlight the challenges people face living in close proximity with bears. Recent discoveries of dead bears being dumped on logging roads, apples left to rot in recreational areas, a poor salmon run, the lack of a Conservation Officer in the Valley, attractant issues, and the desire of local individuals to both protect and deter bears, have left emotions running high. Simply put, the Valley has not received great accolades when it comes to how residents respond to bear conflicts. Although the majority of homeowners do not shoot bears, a bear killer is always going to hog the spotlight in the eyes of the press, especially those on the outside. No one is going to dispute the right of an individual to protect life and property from an aggressive animal, but each case is specific and largely depends on the personal comfort level of the SEE BEAR ON PAGE 3