WAR stands with Lidia Thorpe and opposes Constitutionally entrenched ‘Voice’

Page 1

WAR stands with Lidia Thorpe and opposes Constitutionally entrenched ‘Voice’ MEDIA STATEMENT ​— ​JULY 9, 2020 Warriors of the Aboriginal Resistance (WAR) stands with incoming Greens Senator, Lidia Thorpe in her stance against Constitutional recognition. WAR opposes the push for a Constitutionally entrenched ‘Voice’ to Parliament, one of the three proposals of the Uluru Statement. This body, as Referendum Council Co-Chair Mark Leibler has admitted, would only have ​“advisory powers”​. Yet another advisory body will fail to enable Aboriginal self-determination in any real or meaningful way. Pakana lawyer Michael Mansell argues that it will in fact entrench Aboriginal people’s position as merely advisors to the Australian parliament about our own affairs. ​“The advisory body would not have any say over its own composition, its role, functions and powers,” Mansell has said. “These would be matters entirely for the parliament.” ‘The Voice’ is being falsely marketed as a model for reform which came out of a grassroots movement, when in reality it is the brainchild of Noel Pearson and conservative Constitutional lawyers; ​Pearson proposed the Voice model in 2014​. The government-sponsored process by which Aboriginal people supposedly chose the Voice as our preferred reform model has also been represented in very misleading ways. WAR members were first-hand witnesses to this process, from the preliminary meeting held by the Referendum Council in July 2016 in Melbourne, to the Regional Dialogues, and then the National Convention in May 2017. It is our view that the entire process was highly curated and controlled, and that support for the Voice was a predetermined outcome from the get-go. Meetings were by invitation only, and it has even been ​alleged that the Referendum Council misrepresented the views and decisions of Regional Dialogues, including the Hobart and Dubbo meetings. There was a walkout by a number of delegates at the National Convention, and others have said they felt attendees were rushedly cajoled into supporting the Voice. We believe that the process was deeply flawed, and that the supposed people’s mandate for the Voice was manufactured. It is true that ​some Aboriginal people support the Voice model, but there are also many who do not. The Voice campaign is feeding our people false hope of the power and potential of a glorified advisory body. For instance, one of the arguments put forward in favour of the Voice is that by entrenching the body in the Constitution, Federal parliament could not abolish the body at its whim like they did with the Aboriginal and Torres


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.
WAR stands with Lidia Thorpe and opposes Constitutionally entrenched ‘Voice’ by The Black Rising Magazine - Issuu