THE BURLINGAME B theburlingameb.org
November 20, 2017
Issue 3 Vol. 111
The Fourth Amendment is permeable in schools BY DARRION CHEN
Senior Reporter
Despite belief that students’ privacy at school is protected by the Fourth Amendment, students at school have few to no rights guaranteed by the Fourth Amendment according to state, district and school policy. “There is confusion among the students about their rights,” senior Caitlyn Rusley said. “They think that their backpacks can’t be searched because it is a personal belonging, but their locker can be checked because it is school property.” Even among the students, “some people say that they can, and some people say that they can’t,” senior Katie Caulfield said. The San Mateo Union High School District policy states that “school officials may search any individual student, his/her property, or district property under his/her control when there is a reasonable suspicion that the search will uncover evidence that he/she is violating the law, …[or] other rules.” The United States Bill of
Rights declares the “right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures.” However in the 1985 New Jersey v. T.L.O. case, the United States Supreme Court decided that schools are subject to a lower standard of the Fourth Amendment that would only require “reasonable suspicion” and not a written warrant to start a search or seizure. In the Supreme Court case, a student was seen smoking in the bathroom, and was consequently brought to the administrative office, where her purse and bags were searched by administrators. The Supreme Court ruled the search constitutional because there was “probable cause” and “reasonable suspicion,” albeit there was no specific written warrant. In other words, anything on district property can be searched by district employees. A car parked on Carolan Avenue, however, cannot be searched by the district, but it can be searched by Burlingame police given reason-
able suspicion. Although there is no exact constitutional definition of “reasonable suspicion,” Dean of Students Fred Wolfgramm lays out some clear boundaries. “Any student who leaves campus should expect to be searched when they come back,” said Wolfgramm, referencing the Student Code of Conduct. “It’s protocol. Also, any student engaging in suspicions activity, for example grouping in a bathroom stall, should expect to be searched.” Contrary to popular belief, “reasonable suspicion” is enough to override a student who does not consent to a search. A student who is to be searched would be brought to the administrative offices, put through due process, and searched by two or more district employees. When there is probable cause, the school acts in the name of parents, but the school will call the parent as soon as possible. “After all, it all revolves around safety and security,” Wolfgramm said.
To read more about district policy, visit www.gamutonline.net/district/sanmateounionhsd/
What’s Inside? PAGE 2 - Staff reporter Annie Sun writes about the revisions being made to the Academic Honesty Policy PAGE 3 - Staff reporter Payton Toomey recaps the Nov. 10 Model UN conference at Stanford PAGE 4 - Editor-in-Chief Maggie Murdoff and Design Editor Stella Lorence offer a helpful graphic for totaling cost of applying to college
PAGE 8 - Is the College Board ripping people off ? Business Manager Priscilla Jin gives her answer PAGE 10 - Senior Editor Lily Page profiles the Burlingame University facility dogs
The right of the people to
be secure in their persons, The district can search anything on district property (CA state law)
houses, papers, and effects,
Admin decides upon reasonable suspicion (CA state law)
shall issue, but upon probable
Not needed if you have gone off campus (Code of Conduct)
against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants
cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or
Admin decides on “probable cause” (CA state law)
Anything on school property (SMUHSD policy)
things to be seized.
kNOw Limits is not being put on due to lack of participation BY LOGAN TURNER
Staff Reporter
“I really wanted to put on an event like this because I had seen many pictures and heard stories about what a great event it was,” senior and former Student Impact Team member Vivian Yuen said. However, in more recent years the participation in this wellknown event decreased dramatically. Last year, the team struggled to gather participants, guest speakers and donations. The decision to terminate this event was made by the club advisor David Kimura. Many students including former members of the Student Impact Team are unsure of why the event is no longer being put on. “We didn’t really have a say since we were graduating, but I think it was related to lack of attendance,” former co-chair Char-
lie Jones said. Every year, the Student Impact Team worked hard to publicize kNOw Limits and encourage their friends to attend while working toward the goal of 100 participants. For the past few years, the team has struggled to reach this goal. In 2017, the event did not attract even half of this number. The lack of demand for kNOw Limits led the teacher advisor and administration to make the choice to stop holding the event. Although the participation decreased, students would have liked to try to continue to promote the kNOw limits event and put it on again. “I was really hoping to continue the event and was pretty sad to hear that the club wasn’t coming back,” Yuen said.
Even before 2008, the popular and long-held tradition of the kNOw Limits event put on by the Student Impact Team will not take place this year. In addition, the Student Impact Team is no longer an active club at school. kNOw Limits was recognized by many students as a way to meet new people and get to know peers on a deeper and more personal level. Two years ago, Nidhi Bandrapall, the club’s president, said in the club’s 2016 promotional video that the event “is an 8-hour bonding event to help break down social barriers and to kind of unite the whole school.” Various team-building activities during this day-long event allowed students to understand the struggles of their peers that are different from and similar to their own. The event that promoted kindness and diversity inspired those who attended it. Former co-president Reivo Trio said in the video that “it allows people that don’t talk to each other every day at school to go deeper than the shallow conversations.” Both Bandrapall and Trio graduated two years ago. “After participating in kNOw Limits, I really felt more connected to my peers,” senior Halle Friedeberg said. “I gained perspective on the entire school community and saw how everyone’s lives can be so alike and different.” Many students were eager to attend the event or even be a part of BHS alumni Nicole Chin, Audrey Oliver, and Jamie Carey bond the Student Impact Team. during kNOw Limits 2017.
PHOTO COURTESY OF NICOLE CHIN
SPREAD - See the winners of the B’s November photo contest!
The Fourth Amendment