

By Staff
Abrush fire in Aguanga hasburnedover
1,096 acres east of State Route 371 and into the Cahuilla Reservation with 34% containment, fire officials said Friday.
The Dale Fire was one of two brushers that erupted less than a mile apart and increased to from about 300 to 1,072 acres by early Thursday morning, according to Cal Fire.
“Units are working in and around hot spots along the edges of the fire,” Cal Fire reported Friday morning. “The incoming weather system did not bring any precipitation to the footprint of the fire. Crews will be on the lookout for any new fires in the area.”
The fire has prompted evacuations, caused a highway closure and destroyed structures in a sparsely populated area.
The non-injury wildfires
were reported around 12:35 p.m. Wednesday — the Dale Fire in the area of Riverdale Drive and State Route 371, and the second blaze nearly a mile to the south at Bradford Road and Gelding Way, officials said.
Multiple engine and hand crews from Riverside County and nearby agencies were dispatched to the area and found fast-moving flames from the larger brush fire along Riverdale Drive.
At least two structures, possibly vacant outbuildings, were consumed by the flames, officials said. The second fire at Bradford was slower but also damaged two to three buildings, burning about 3 acres before firefighters stopped its forward progress shortly before 2 p.m. and achieving 100% containment less than an hour later.
Three water-dropping helicopters and numerous
firefighting air tankers from throughout the state continued flying fire suppression missions Friday, with 766 personnel involved in the firefight, 24 crews, 58 engines, seven dozers and 16 water tenders, Cal Fire reported.
On Thursday morning, personnel battling the Dale Fire totaled 358, with three helicopters, 42 engines, 12 crews, nine dozers and 11 water tenders, according to Cal Fire.
On Wednesday, seven Cal Fire air tankers and three helicopters initiated runs on the Dale Fire. The flames continued progressing toward Cahuilla Creek Motocross and the Cahuilla Casino Hotel, both south of State Route 371, east of the fire.
Evacuation orders were
implemented by sheriff’s deputies for the race track, remote properties southeast of the Lake Riverside Estates community and other areas south of SR 371. Properties in and around the Cahuilla Indian Reservation were under evacuation orders and warnings.
The orders and warnings were in effect for the area north of Tule Peak Road, west of Eagle Nest Court, South of State Route 371 and east of Bradford Hills Road.
“Crews will be working through the night hitting hot spots as they continue to bolster the containment lines,” the agency said just after midnight Thursday and in a subsequent update around 8:45 a.m.
A care and reception center for evacuees was
Inland Empire task force seizes over 28,000 pounds of fireworks
RBy
esidents of Cabazon will have opportunities this week to submit input on a proposed special tax district intended to pay for improvements to streets, signs, gutters, flood channels and other projects throughout the unincorporated community.
The Riverside County Transportation and Land Management Agency is proposing establishment of an Enhanced Infrastructure Financing District, encompassing all of Cabazon.
“Limited infrastructure in the Cabazon area has been an ongoing community concern,” according to an agency statement. “To support long-term infrastructure improvements and increase quality of life for residents, the county is proposing to create an EIFD, and community input into the process is essential.”
Public meetings are slated for Tuesday at the Venable Community Center, 50390 Carmen Ave. The first meeting
Assemblyman James C. Ramos presented a symbolic $10 million state-funded check Friday to California Indian Nations College as part of an effort to help the school become the state’s first federally accredited tribal college.
The presentation featuring a “blown-up” check was scheduled for 10 a.m. at the Agua Caliente Cultural Museum, 140 N. Indian Canyon Drive, and was livestreamed on multiple social media platforms.
Participants included Ramos, D-San Bernardino, California Indians Nations College Founder Theresa Mike; CINC President Erica Munoz; Rose Saubel, a 2023 CINC graduate; Dakota Galindo, associated students of CINC vice president; and members of California Legislative Native American caucus.
The two-year college, located at 75080 Frank Sinatra Drive in Palm Desert, received pre-accreditation in January from the Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges.
The college receives no ongoing federal or state support, aside from a one-time $5 million state allocation in 2022 to help reach accreditation and a $9 million donation from the Twenty-Nine Palms Band of Mission Indians.
With only 11.4% of American Indian students in California graduating high school and just 14.4% enrolling in college, officials say tribal colleges could help boost academic success.
“Native students who attend a tribal college are four times more likely to complete a bachelor’s degree,” accord-
By City News Service
CRamos’ 24-year experience in law enforcement, including his previous roles as Captain, the city’s first Community Policing Officer, the department’s first Administrative Sgt., and as an Emergency Services Coordinator, helped him land the position after a lengthy selection process.
Ramos holds an M.S. in law enforcement and public safety leadership and a bachelor’s degree in business administration from UC San Diego. He is a graduate of the Sherman Block Supervisory Leadership Institute and is enrolled in POST Command College. He also serves as an associate director on the California Police Chiefs Association Board of Directors.
“The city of Beaumont looks forward to the continued progress and leadership of Chief Ramos, a family-centered and dedicated Beaumont leader, as he serves the Beaumont Police Department and the community it protects,” Mayor Mike Lara said in a statement.
The agency serves more than 58,000 residents and consists of 11 police units, 60 sworn officers, 33 professional staff, 20 volunteers, two police K9 units and five patrol beats, according to the statement.
By Staff
The City of Ontario’s next citywide yard (garage) sale weekend is scheduled to take place on Friday, Aug. 1, through Sunday, Aug. 3. If rainy conditions exist on that Friday or Saturday, an alternate yard sale may be held on Aug. 8, 9, and 10. In 2010, the city adopted a yard sale ordinance giving residents the opportunity to hold more sales each year on fixed dates and eliminating the need for yard sale permits and fees. The rules for signs (one 6-square-foot sign on the owner’s property) and rules for merchandise to be sold (seller’s personal property only, no new or re-sold goods) remain unchanged. Contact the City of Ontario Community Improvement Department at (909) 395-2007 with questions about the yard sale.
By City News Service
The average price of a gallon of self-serve regular gasoline in Riverside County dropped Friday to its lowest amount since Jan. 15, decreasing 1.1 cents to $4.337.
The average price has dropped 10 of the past 11 days, decreasing 5.8 cents, including nine-tenths of a cent Thursday, according to figures from AAA and the Oil Price Information Service. It dropped six consecutive days, rose two-tenths of a cent Monday and resumed
decreasing Tuesday.
The average price is 3.8 cents less than one week ago, 12 cents lower than one month ago and 30 cents below what it was one year ago. It has dropped $2.036 since rising to a record $6.373 on Oct. 5, 2022.
“Oil Price Information Service reports that imported gasoline and high refinery utilization rates are keeping supply steady in Southern California,” Doug Shupe, the Automobile Club of Southern
California’s corporate communications manager, said in a statement released Thursday.
The national average price dropped a half-cent to $3.155, one day after remaining unchanged. It is 1.2 cents less than one week ago, 3.2 cents lower than one month ago and 35 cents below what it was one year ago.
The national average price has dropped $1.861 since rising to a record $5.016 on June 14, 2022.
is set for noon, while the second will begin about 5 p.m. Both are expected to last 90 minutes to two hours.
Officials will outline how an EIFD operates and what the financing mechanism can be used for, including road upgrades, flood controls, new signage, wildfire mitigation measures and other infrastructure improvements.
EIFDs were authorized under Senate Bill 628 in 2014 and permit bond sales to finance construction of
private and public projects.
Districts rely on “tax increment” to pay off the bonds issued in support of them.
Tax increment is generated by projects within specified locations that increase property values. No separate property taxes are actually created by EIFDs.
There are several already in operation in both the eastern and western halves of the county. Governing boards are set up to vote on proposed projects within a financing
district, the foundation of which must be approved by voters.
“This is an important opportunity for Cabazon,” county Supervisor Yxstian Gutierrez said. “It only works with community participation. We’re asking residents to be part of the conversation and help guide the improvements they want to see.”
More information about the proposed Cabazon EIFD can be found at rivco.org/ cabazon-eifd.
Editorial editorial@beaconmedianews.com
editor@hlrmedia.com
Graphics/Production production@beaconmedianews.com production@hlrmedia.com
Advertising advertising@beaconmedianews.com advertising@hlrmedia.com
Legal Advertising legals@beaconmedianews.com legals@hlrmedia.com
Business accounting@beaconmedianews.com accounting@hlrmedia.com
BEACON MEDIA ADDRESS: 820 S. Myrtle Ave. Monrovia, CA 91016
PHONE: (626) 301-1010
WEBSITE www.beaconmedianews.com
HLR MEDIA ADDRESS: 820 S. Myrtle Ave. Monrovia, CA 91016
PHONE: (626) 301-1010
www.HLRmedia.com
PRESS
editor@beaconmedianews.com editor@hlrmedia.com
By Suzanne Potter, Producer, Public News Service
undreds of millions of American young people are exposed to vaping and smoking in popular movies, TV shows and music videos each year, according to the 7th annual “While You Were Streaming” report from the nonprofit Truth Initiative.
Tobacco depictions are down in the most popular Hollywood shows but they are heavily featured in programs like The Bear, Euphoria, and Stranger Things.
Dr. Jessica Rath, a behavioral scientist and senior vice president of Truth Initiative, said youth and young adults are three times more likely to start vaping when exposed to tobacco imagery in shows.
“Animated shows remain a consistent offender,” Rath emphasized. “Five out of six of the top 15 animated shows contain tobacco depictions and those are more popular with Gen Z than any other demographic.”
The report found in 2023, 70% of bingewatched streaming shows contained tobacco imagery,
a 6% increase from the year before. Shows fueling the increase included “American Dad,” “Law & Order SVU,”
“Never Have I Ever,” and “South Park.”
Rath noted her organization is working with entertainment companies and state attorneys general to get information added before or after the shows, like you might see for suicide prevention.
“Companies can roll
advertisements with tested prevention messaging or quit line resources up in the top corner when the content that they’re showing contains tobacco,” Rath suggested.
The good news is youth vaping is actually at its lowest rate in a decade but smoking in entertainment threatens to reverse progress.
Truth Initiative developed a free resource to help
people quit: Text “EXPROGRAM” to 88709.
Disclosure: Truth Initiative contributes to Public News Service’s fund for reporting on Consumer Issues, Health Issues, Smoking Prevention, and Social Justice. If you would like to help support news in the public interest, visit https://www.publicnewsservice.org/dn1.php.
References: Tobacco survey CDC 10/17/2024
By City News Service
Peacock TV will pay $3.6 million to settle a lawsuit brought by the county of Los Angeles, which alleged the media streaming platform failed to provide consumers with conspicuous disclosures and simple ways to cancel automatic renewal subscriptions as required by California and federal laws.
Under an agreement pending final approval by a Los Angeles County Superior Court, Peacock TV will pay $1.5 million to the county’s Department of Consumer and Business Affairs for consumer protection investigation and enforcement activities, $2 million in civil penalties that must be used for enforcement of consumer protection laws by the county and $100,000 in investigative costs.
“This outcome is a significant win for the public and a reminder that no business, regardless of
size or influence, is above consumer protection laws,” said Rafael Carbajal, director of the county’s Department of Consumer and Business Affairs. “This settlement strengthens our ability to hold bad actors accountable, expand our investigative reach, and safeguard the communities we serve from future harm.”
As part of the settlement, Peacock TV must present automatic subscription renewal terms clearly and conspicuously, obtain the consumer’s affirmative consent to a subscription agreement, provide an acknowledgment that includes the automatic renewal terms and a description of the cancellation policy and provide an easy cancellation method allowing for immediate termination without further steps that obstruct or delay the end of service.
The lawsuit was filed by
By City News Service
CaliforniaAttorney GeneralRobBonta Thursdayjoineda multistate coalition in filing a challenge to a final rule by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services that critics say would create significant barriers to obtaining health care coverage under the Affordable Care Act.
“Far from delivering on their promises to drive down costs and `make America healthier,’ the Trump administration’s HHS and CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) are doing their best to make it harder and more expensive for Americans to obtain health insurance and access care,” Bonta said in a statement.
“These sweeping changes would impose onerous verification requirements, junk health insurance premiums for some consumers, shorten enrollment periods in federal and state health care exchanges like Covered California, deprive up to 1.8 million Americans of health insurance, drive up out-ofpocket health care costs and so much more,” he said. “It’s unlawful and it’s wrong
-- we’re meeting the Trump administration in court to defend Americans’ health care coverage.”
The coalition is co-led by Bonta with the attorneys general of Massachusetts and New Jersey.
The Trump administration’s final rule would make a range of amendments to the rules governing federal and state health insurance marketplaces, which the administration estimates will cause between 725,000 and 1.8 million people to lose their health insurance, while causing millions more to pay increased insurance premiums and out-of-pocket costs like co-pays and deductibles.
In the lawsuit, the attorneys general argue that the HHS and CMS rule is arbitrary and capricious, contrary to law, and violates the Administrative Procedure Act. The coalition is also seeking preliminary relief, and a stay, to prevent the challenged portions of the final rule from taking effect before the Aug. 25 effective date.
Congress enacted the
ACA in 2010 to increase the number of Americans with health insurance and decrease the cost of health care. The plaintiffs say that 15 years later, the act continues to meet its goals, with annual enrollment on the ACA marketplace doubling over the past five years, resulting in over 24 million people signing up for health insurance coverage in plan year 2025 on the ACA exchanges and receiving subsidies to make such coverage affordable.
California has nearly two million ACA plan enrollees, the third highest of any state, Bonta said.
According to the lawsuit, filed in federal court in Massachusetts, with less than four months until open enrollment for plan year 2026 begins, the Trump administration’s final rule would abruptly reverse the trend, erecting a series of new barriers to enrollment, including imposing an automatic monthly charge on all automatically re-enrolled consumers who qualify for $0 premiums, shortening the open enrollment period for signing up for health coverage,
Cargo volumes at the Port of Long Beach fell 16.4% in June compared to the same month last year, port officials said Wednesday, though a pause on new tariffs could fuel a rebound in the coming weeks.
Dockworkers and terminal operators processed 704,403 twenty-foot equivalent units (TEUs) in June, with imports down 16.9% to 348,681 TEUs, exports down 10.9% to 87,627 TEUs and empty containers falling 17.4% to 268,095 TEUs.
“We’re anticipating a cargo surge in July as retailers stock up on goods ordered during the 90-day pause placed on tariffs and retaliatory tariffs,” Port of Long Beach CEO Mario Cordero said in a statement.
“The Port of Long Beach is prepared to handle the influx by tracking trade moving through the harbor with the Supply Chain Information Highway, our digital solution to maximize visibility and efficiency in cargo movement,” he added.
The port has moved 4.7 million TEUs through the first half of 2025, up 10.6% from the same period in 2024.
“No matter the economic situation, our facilities, dockworkers and marine terminal operators continue to make this the premier gateway for trans- Pacific goods movement,” Long Beach Harbor Commission President Bonnie Lowenthal. “Over the long term, we’re investing in infrastructure projects to keep cargo moving efficiently and sustainability to preserve our status as the Port of Choice.”
July 7, President Donald Trump signed an executive order extending the date for new “reciprocal” tariffs -- excluding China -- to Aug. 1. The tariffs were initially set to take effect Wednesday. The extension allows for continued negotiations with 14 countries, including Japan, Korea, South Africa, Laos, Malaysia, Indonesia and Bangladesh.
More recently, Trump added Mexico and the
European Union to the list of countries that could face tariffs of up to 30%.
Japan and Korea could face a levy of 25%, while South Africa, Bosnia, Herzegovina, Indonesia, Bangladesh and Thailand may see a tax at or above 30%.
According to the White House, Trump sent letters to those countries explaining that, starting Aug. 1, they will be subject to new reciprocal tariff rates “designed to make the terms of our bilateral trade relationship more reciprocal over time and to address the national emergency caused by the massive U.S. goods trade deficit.”
In some cases, countries will face lower tariff rates than those initially announced on April 2, while others may see higher rates, officials said.
Trump has said the tariffs aim to promote domestic building and manufacturing, and he pledged to fasttrack approvals to bring back American jobs.
Legoland will launch a new space-themed land early next year that will include an “immersive, groundbreaking indoor roller coaster” that “promises to be the most technologically advanced attraction the resort has ever created,” park officials announced Tuesday.
The coaster is being created by Merlin Magic Making’s global team of designers and engineers, in collaboration with the Lego Group.
“This isn’t just about a new innovative coaster; it’s about creating an entire universe for our guests to
explore, where the boundless creativity of Lego meets the wonders of space,” said Flora Liu, senior project manager of Merlin Magic Making. “We’ve designed it so that families can explore space together in a way that only Lego can make happen.”
The new land will also feature two additional spacethemed rides, junior astronaut training dedicated to a toddler play area and a galactic grub and gear hub, with spacethemed food and beverages and a souvenir shop.
Entry to the new cosmic park will be included with general park admission and
all annual passes, according to resort officials.
The indoor roller coaster is also being added to Legoland’s Florida Resort, marking what officials call the biggest single in-park investment in the resorts’ histories at more than $90 million.
The land is currently under construction across from the Driving Schools attractions in Fun Town. More details about the expansion, including specific ride names and grand opening, will be released as the 2026 launch approaches. More information can be found at legoland.com/california/.
By William Turton, Christopher Bing and Avi Asher-Schapiro, ProPublica
The Internal Revenue Service is building a computer program that would give deportation officers unprecedented access to confidential tax data.
ProPublica has obtained a blueprint of the system, which would create an “on demand” process allowing Immigration and Customs Enforcement to obtain the home addresses of people it’s seeking to deport.
Last month, in a previously undisclosed dispute, the acting general counsel at the IRS, Andrew De Mello, refused to turn over the addresses of 7.3 million taxpayers sought by ICE. In an email obtained by ProPublica, De Mello said he had identified multiple legal “deficiencies” in the agency’s request.
Two days later, on June 27, De Mello was forced out of his job, people familiar with the dispute said. The addresses have not yet been released to ICE. De Mello did not respond to requests for comment, and the administration did not address questions sent by ProPublica about his departure.
The Department of Government Efficiency began pushing the IRS to provide taxpayer data to immigration agents soon after President Donald Trump took office. The tax agency’s acting general counsel refused and was replaced by De Mello, who Trump administration officials viewed as more willing to carry out the president’s agenda. Soon after, the Department of Homeland Security, ICE’s parent agency, and the IRS negotiated a “memorandum of understanding” that included specific legal guardrails to safeguard taxpayers’ private information.
In his email, De Mello said ICE’s request for millions of records did not
meet those requirements, which include having a written assurance that each taxpayer whose address is being sought was under active criminal investigation.
“There’s just no way ICE has 7 million real criminal investigations, that’s a fantasy,” said a former senior IRS official who had been advising the agency on this issue. The demands from the DHS were “unprecedented,” the official added, saying the agency was pressing the IRS to do what amounted to “a big data dump.”
In the past, when law enforcement sought IRS data to support its investigations, agencies would give the IRS the full legal name of the target, an address on file and an explanation of why the information was relevant to a criminal inquiry. Such requests rarely involved more than a dozen people at a time, former IRS officials said.
Danny Werfel, IRS commissioner during the Biden administration, said the privacy laws allowing federal investigators to obtain taxpayer data have never “been read to open the door to the sharing of thousands, tens of thousands, or hundreds of thousands of tax records for a broad-based enforcement initiative.”
A spokesperson for the White House said the planned use of IRS data was legal and a means of fulfilling Trump’s campaign pledge to carry out mass deportations of “illegal criminal aliens.”
Taxpayer data is among the most confidential in the federal government and is protected by strict privacy laws, which have historically limited its transfer to law enforcement and other government agencies. Unauthorized disclosure of
taxpayer return information is a felony that can carry a penalty of up to five years in prison.
The system that the IRS is now creating would give ICE automated access to home addresses en masse, limiting the ability of IRS officials to consider the legality of transfers. IRS insiders who reviewed a copy of the blueprint said it could result in immigration agents raiding wrong or outdated addresses.
“If this program is implemented in its current form, it’s extremely likely that incorrect addresses will be given to DHS and individuals will be wrongly targeted,” said an IRS engineer who examined the blueprints and who, like other officials, spoke on condition of anonymity for fear of retribution.
The dispute that ended in De Mello’s ouster was the culmination of months of pressure on the IRS to turn over massive amounts of data in ways that would redefine the relationship between the agency and law enforcement and reduce taxpayers’ privacy, records and interviews show.
In one meeting in late March between senior IRS and DHS officials, a top ICE official made a suggestion: Why doesn’t Homeland Security simply provide the name and state of its targets and have the IRS return the addresses of everyone who matches that criteria?
The IRS lawyers were stunned. They feared they could face criminal liability if they handed over the addresses of individuals who were not under a criminal investigation. The conversation and news of deeper collaboration with ICE so disturbed career staff that it led to a series of departures in late March and early April across the IRS’ legal, IT and privacy offices.
They were “pushing the boundaries of the law,” one official said. “Everyone at IRS felt the same way.”
The Blueprint
The technical blueprint obtained by ProPublica shows that engineers at the agency are preparing to give DHS what it wants: a system that enables massive automated data sharing. The goal is to launch the new system before the end of July, two people familiar with the matter said.
The DHS effort to obtain IRS data comes as top immigration enforcement leaders face escalating White House pressure to deport some 3,000 people per day, according to reports.
One federal agent tasked with assisting ICE on deportations said recent operations have been hamstrung by outdated addresses. Better information could dramatically speed up arrests. “Some of the leads that they were giving us were old,” said the agent, who spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to speak with the press. “They’re like from two administrations ago.”
In early March, immigrants rights groups sued the IRS hoping to block
the plan, arguing that the memorandum of understanding between DHS and the IRS is illegal. But a judge in early May ruled against them, saying the broader agreement complied with Section 6103, the existing law regulating IRS data sharing. That opened the door for engineers to begin building the system.
The judge did not address the technical blueprint, which didn’t exist at the time of the ruling. But the case is pending, which means the new system could still come under legal review.
Until now, little was known about the push and pull between the two agencies or the exact technical mechanics behind the arrangement.
The plan has been shrouded in secrecy even within the IRS, with details of its development withheld from regular communications. Several IRS engineers and lawyers have avoided working on the project out of concerns about personal legal risk.
Asked about the new system, a spokesperson
for IRS parent agency the Treasury Department said the memorandum of understanding, often called an MOU, “has been litigated and determined to be a lawful application of Section 6103, which provides for information sharing by the IRS in precise circumstances associated with law enforcement requests.”
At a time when Trump is making threats to deport not only undocumented immigrants but also U.S. citizens, the scope of informationsharing with the IRS could continue to grow, according to documents reviewed by ProPublica and sources familiar with the matter: DHS has been looking for ways to expand the agreement that could allow Homeland Security officials to seek IRS data on Americans being investigated for various crimes.
Last month, an ICE attorney proposed updating the MOU to authorize new data requests on people “associated with criminal activities which may include United States citizens or lawful permanent residents,” accord-
ing to a document seen by ProPublica. The status of this proposal is unclear. De Mello, at the time, rejected it and called for senior Treasury Department leadership to personally sign off on such a significant change.
The White House described DHS’ work with the IRS as a good-faith effort to identify and deport those who are living in the country illegally.
“ProPublica continues to degrade their already terrible reputation by suggesting we should turn a blind eye to criminal illegal aliens present in the United States for the sake of trying to collect tax payments from them,” White House spokesperson Abigail Jackson said in a statement after receiving questions about the blueprint from ProPublica.
She pointed to the April MOU as giving the government the authority to create the new system and added, “This isn’t a surveillance system. … It’s part of President Trump’s promise to carry out the mass deportation of criminal illegal aliens — the promise that the American people elected him on and he is committed to fulfilling.”
In a separate statement, a senior DHS official also cited the court’s approval of the MOU, saying that it “outlines a process to ensure that sensitive taxpayer information is protected while allowing law enforcement to effectively pursue criminal violations.”
How the System Works
The new system would represent a sea change, allowing law enforcement to request enormous swaths of confidential data in bulk through an automated, computerized process.
The system, according to the blueprint and interviews with IRS engineers, would work like this:
First, DHS would send the IRS a spreadsheet containing the names and previous addresses of the people it’s targeting. The request would include the date of a final removal order, a relevant criminal statute ICE is using to investigate the individual, and the tax period for which information is sought. If DHS fails to include any of this information, the system would reject the request.
The system then attempts to match the information provided by the DHS to a specific taxpayer identification number, which is the primary method by which the IRS identifies an individual in
its databases. If the system makes a match, it accesses the individual’s associated tax file and pulls the address listed during the most recent tax period. Then the system would produce a new spreadsheet enriched with taxpayer data that contains DHS’ targets’ last known addresses. The spreadsheet would include a record of names rejected for lack of required information and names for which it could not make a match.
Tax and privacy experts say they worry about how such a powerful yet crude platform could make dangerous mistakes. Because the search starts with a name instead of a taxpayer identification number, it risks returning the address of an innocent person with the same name as or a similar address to that of one of ICE’s targets. The proposed system assumes the data provided by DHS is accurate and that each targeted individual is the subject of a valid criminal investigation. In effect, the IRS has no way to independently check the bases of these requests, experts told ProPublica.
In addition, the blueprint does not limit the amount of data that can be transferred or how often DHS can request it. The system could easily be expanded to acquire all the information the IRS holds on taxpayers, said technical experts and IRS engineers who reviewed the documents. By shifting a single parameter, the program could return more information than just a target’s address, said an engineer familiar with the plan, including employer and familial relationships.
Engineers based at IRS offices in Lanham, Maryland, and Dallas are developing the blueprint.
“Gone Back on Its Word”
For decades, the American government has encouraged everyone who makes an income in the U.S. to pay taxes — regardless of immigration status — with an implicit promise that their information would be protected. Now that same data may be used to locate and deport noncitizens.
“For years, the IRS has told immigrants that it only cares that they pay their taxes,” said Nandan Joshi, an attorney with the Public Citizen Litigation Group, which is seeking to block the data-sharing agreement in federal court. “By
agreeing to share taxpayer data with ICE on a mass basis, the IRS has gone back on its word.”
The push to share IRS data with DHS emerged while Elon Musk’s DOGE reshaped the engineering staff of the IRS. Sam Corcos, a Silicon Valley startup founder with no government experience, pushed out more than 50 IRS engineers and restructured the agency’s engineering priorities while he was the senior DOGE official at the agency. He later became chief information officer at Treasury. He has also led a separate IRS effort to create a master database using products from Silicon Valley giant Palantir Technologies, enabling the government to link and search large swaths of data.
Corcos didn’t respond to a request for comment. The White House said DOGE is not part of the DHS-IRS pact.
Sen. Ron Wyden, the ranking Democrat on the Senate Committee on Finance, which oversees the IRS, told ProPublica the system being built was ripe for abuse. It “would allow an outside agency unprecedented access to IRS records for reasons that have nothing to do with tax administration, opening the door to endless fishing expeditions,” he said.
The Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration, the department’s internal watchdog, is already probing efforts by Trump and DOGE to obtain private taxpayer data and other sensitive information, ProPublica reported in April.
The Trump administration continues to add government agencies to its deportation drive.
DOGE and DHS are also working to build a national citizenship database, NPR reported last month. The database links information from the Social Security Administration and the DHS, ostensibly for the purpose of allowing state and local election officials to verify U.S. citizenship.
And in May, a senior Treasury Department official directed 250 IRS criminal investigative agents to help deportation operations, a significant shift for two agencies that historically have had separate missions.
McKenzie Funk contributed reporting, and Kirsten Berg and Alex Mierjeski contributed research.
Republished with Creative Commons License (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0).
TheTrumpadministration has asked a federal appeals court in Pasadena to overturn a lower court’s order preserving Temporary Protected Status for more than 350,000 Venezuelan immigrants, including a Culver City woman, who contend they are unable to safely return to Venezuela.
U.S. Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem attempted to end the protections just days after taking office in January. However, a federal district court put her decision on hold pending a final resolution in the case, finding that the secretary’s decision appeared to be motivated by racial bias toward Venezuelans and violated the law governing TPS.
A three-judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals heard arguments Wednesday in the administration’s appeal of U.S. District Judge Ed Chen’s ruling in March blocking the government’s attempt to strip Venezuelan migrants of their lawful immigration status.
In May, the U.S. Supreme Court stayed Chen’s ruling pending the appeal.
It was not known when the 9th Circuit panel would issue its ruling.
Ahilan Arulanantham of the Center for Immigration Law and Policy at UCLA School of Law previously said Chen’s ruling was a “detailed, well- reasoned order (that) allows the Venezuelan community to continue living and working
in this country while the case moves forward.”
The lawsuit in which the National TPS Alliance and seven Venezuelans accuse Noem of illegally revoking an 18-month extension of TPS for Venezuelans that was granted by the Biden administration was filed in February in San Francisco federal court.
After Chen blocked the government’s attempt to deport Venezuelan migrants, saying the administration’s move “smacks of racism,” DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin blasted the decision.
“This is yet another
example of an activist judge trying to obstruct President Trump’s agenda,” McLaughlin said in a statement sent to City News Service. “This unelected judge didn’t get the memo that on Nov. 5, the American people voted for re-instituting integrity in our immigration enforcement and mass deportations of illegal aliens.
“Secretary Noem will continue fighting to return integrity to the TPS system, which has been abused and exploited by illegal aliens for decades. We will return TPS to its original status: temporary,” the statement said.
By Paul Anderson, City News Service
James Canfield started his new job overseeing the Orange County Fair and Event Center at the beginning of the month, but said he already loves what he sees as the fairgrounds are being prepared for their biggest event of the year.
“It’s very exciting to be here, and a great time right before the fair, the most exciting time of the year for us at the fairgrounds and a great month for Orange County overall,” Canfield told City News Service.
Canfield, who was hired last month as the OC Fair and Event Center’s CEO and started work on July 1, has been busy overseeing the roll out of the county fair, which began Friday and continues its 23-day run through Aug. 17.
Canfield most recently served as senior director and general manager of the Birmingham Jefferson Convention Complex in Alabama, but his new gig is a return to Southern California where he grew up.
“I’ve really walked every square (of the fairgrounds) at this point,” Canfield said. “I don’t know that I’ve found a favorite thing yet, but I do know there are some incredible rides in the Midway, there’s some incredible food options.”
The carnival rides, clever food-on-a-stick goodies and concerts at the Pacific Amphitheatre get a lot of attention from fair visitors, but Canfield sang the praises of everything else the fair offers.
He recalled watching the judges scrutinize all of the contest entries for art, crafts, food, wine and other hobbies.
“It’s really fascinating to watch and try to understand how serious that judging is and how professional and educated they are,” Canfield
said.
Some new attractions this year include a collection of original movie posters on display in an exhibit that also mimics the experience of shopping for videotapes at stores like Blockbuster.
“With each of those movie posters the originals were hand painted — it wasn’t a photograph,” he said. “It was painted art and printed from there, so what they have is a collection of the original art from a lot of these movies like `Back to the Future’ and `Star Wars.’ “
Visitors will also see the movie posters for the various films about Superman as well, he added.
As for fair food, Canfield noted, “I have had a chance to taste some very incredible jams,” but one of the
big draws this year may be bacon cotton candy on a pork belly stick.
“I can’t think of anything better,” he said, adding there’s also a bacon-wrapped carnitas burrito.
“I’m in,” he said. His wife is “very excited to get the deep-fried Oreo,” he said.
Canfield said he was also looking forward to seeing rocker George Thorogood begin the live concerts with classic rockers Foghat on Friday.
“I remember seeing Foghat awhile back and I love George Thorogood,” Canfield said.
Other popular acts are sure to be the tributes to Abba and the Bee Gees, Canfield said.
The tribute band industry
is growing in popularity, Canfield said.
“It’s sometimes the only way to see that music performed live because those groups and that talent aren’t performing anymore,” he said.
“People relate to all of that music that those folks put out,” he said. “And the tribute bands make it accessible for everyone.”
Canfield recalled meeting some of the most iconic musicians over the years running convention sites such as Harry Wayne Casey of KC and the Sunshine Band fame. He’s looking forward to seeing Los Angeles indie pop band Fitz and the Tantrums, which he first saw at Coachella.
“I think they’re great,” he said.
As a classical music fan he’s also eagerly anticipating Beck performing with the Pacific Symphony.
“And Blues Travelers, the Gin Blossoms and the Spin Doctors — that’s right in my wheelhouse of music,” he said.
One of the best things about the fair, he added, is how visitors can also see and meet up and coming artists on the community stages. Visitors can also meet the drivers in the Action Sports arena, he said.
“If you go see monster trucks at Angel Stadium you don’t get those same opportunities,” he said. “You can go to the zoo and see the animals, but they’re away from you and behind the fence. Where do you get to stand right next to them and
pet them?”
The carnival will feature new rides such as the Aviator, Soundstorm, the Royal Wheel and Frog Hopper. The Royal Wheel is a “massive Ferris wheel” that visitors can see illuminated as they drive by, he said.
Canfield advised fairgoers that attendance will continue to be capped each day as has been the tradition since the coronavirus pandemic so tickets must be ordered online and are not available at the gate anymore. Fair officials found that visitors enjoyed the smaller crowds.
“What we’re trying to do is preserve the great guest experience for everyone, and we have an accessible event where everyone who wants to come can get in, but folks just have to plan,” Canfield said.
“Now you can pick your day and know that when you get there it will be a good experience and you won’t have such a large crowd.”
Gone are the days of attempting to break attendance records, he said.
“We think we want to measure our success through guest satisfaction and positive guest experience and make sure everyone who comes has a great time,” Canfield said. Canfield also noted how affordable the fair is with general admission $13 for Wednesdays and Thursdays and $15 for Fridays, Saturdays and Sundays. Tickets for seniors and youths 6 to 12 are $7 a day. Parking is $15 for cars and motorcycles and $30 for buses and limousines.
Tickets purchased for shows at the Pacific Amphitheatre, the Hangar and Action Sports Arena include same-day fair admission at no extra cost.
The City Council is holding a public hearing on the project described below. You are receiving this notice because your property is located near the project, the project may directly, or indirectly affect you, or because you have requested to be notified.
Project Location: Citywide, City of Temple City, County of Los Angeles
Project: Zoning Code Amendment. The proposed ordinance would amend the Temple City Municipal Code to comply with SB 1186 (Medicinal Cannabis Patients’ Right of Access Act)
Applicant: City of Temple City, 9701 Las Tunas Drive, Temple City, CA 91780
Environmental Review: This Ordinance is not subject to environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3) (also known as the “general rule” exemption) and 15305 (Class 5 – Minor Alterations in Land Use Limitations).
Previous Action: On June 10, 2025, the Planning Commission approved a resolution recommending that the City Council approve the proposed Ordinance.
For questions or concerns regarding this project, or if you wish to review the project file, please contact: Project Planner: Scott Reimers, Community Development Director (626) 656-7316 sreimers@templecity.us or visit the Community Development Department offices at City Hall, located at: 9701 Las Tunas Drive, Temple City, CA 91780 Monday – Thursday: 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Friday 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.,
If you have a request for reasonable modification or accommodation due to a disability covered by the Americans with Disabilities Act please contact staff (planning@templecity.us or (626) 656-7316) 48 hours in advance of the meeting.
The decision of the City Council is final. If you challenge any of the foregoing actions in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the hearing body at, or prior to, the public hearing.
Date: July 17, 2025 Signature: Scott Reimers Scott Reimers, Community Development Director
Published July 21,2025 TEMPLE
NOTICE OF PETITION TO ADMINISTER ESTATE OF:
MARIANNE LAM VELZEN CASE NO. 25STPB07785
To all heirs, beneficiaries, creditors, contingent creditors, and persons who may otherwise be interested in the WILL or estate, or both of MARIANNE LAM VELZEN.
A PETITION FOR PROBATE has been filed by RICHARD LAM VELZEN in the Superior Court of California, County of LOS ANGELES. THE PETITION FOR PROBATE requests that RICHARD LAM VELZEN be appointed as personal representative to administer the estate of the decedent.
THE PETITION requests authority to administer the estate under the Independent Administration of Estates Act. (This authority will allow the personal representative to take many actions without obtaining court approval. Before taking certain very important actions, however, the personal representative will be required to give notice to interested persons unless they have waived notice or consented to the proposed action.) The independent administration authority will be granted unless an interested person files an objection to the petition and shows good cause why the court should not grant the authority.
A HEARING on the petition will be held in this court as follows: 08/08/25 at 8:30AM in Dept. 67 located at 111 N. HILL ST., LOS ANGELES, CA 90012
IF YOU OBJECT to the granting of the petition, you should appear at the hearing and state your objections or file written objections with the court before the hearing. Your appearance may be in person or by your attorney.
IF YOU ARE A CREDITOR or a contingent creditor of the decedent, you
must file your claim with the court and mail a copy to the personal representative appointed by the court within the later of either (1) four months from the date of first issuance of letters to a general personal representative, as defined in section 58(b) of the California Probate Code, or (2) 60 days from the date of mailing or personal delivery to you of a notice under section 9052 of the California Probate Code. Other California statutes and legal authority may affect your rights as a creditor. You may want to consult with an attorney knowledgeable in California law.
YOU MAY EXAMINE the file kept by the court. If you are a person interested in the estate, you may file with the court a Request for Special Notice (form DE-154) of the filing of an inventory and appraisal of estate assets or of any petition or account as provided in Probate Code section 1250. A Request for Special Notice form is available from the court clerk. Attorney for Petitioner
SHAUNA R. ANDERSON, ESQ.SBN 265989
CHARLOTTE A. FLANIGAN, ESQ. - SBN 264104
LAW STEIN ANDERSON LLP 2601 MAIN STREET, SUITE 1200 IRVINE CA 92614
Telephone (949) 501-4800
BSC 227124
7/14, 7/17, 7/21/25
CNS-3946929# ROSEMEAD READER
NOTICE OF PETITION TO ADMINISTER ESTATE OF ANN M. RUSSELL CASE NO. 25STPB07715
To all heirs, beneficiaries, creditors, contingent creditors, and persons who may otherwise be interested in the will or estate, or both, of: ANN M. RUSSELL A Petition for Probate has been filed
within the later of either (1) four months from the date of first issuance of letters to a general personal representative, as defined in section 58(b) of the California Probate Code, or (2) 60 days from the date of mailing or personal delivery to you of a notice under section 9052 of the California Probate Code. Other California statutes and legal authority may affect your rights as a creditor. You may want to consult with an attorney knowledgeable in California law. You may examine the file kept by the court. If you are a person interested in the estate, you may file with the court a Request for Special Notice (form DE-154) of the filing of an inventory and appraisal of estate assets or of any petition or account as provided in Probate Code section 1250. A Request for Special Notice form is available from the court clerk. Attorney for Petitioner: SAMANTHA R. SALES, ESQ. WEINER LAW,12626 HIGH BLUFF DRIVE, STE. 440, SAN DIEGO CA, 92130, Telephone: 858.356.9070 7/17, 7/21, 7/24/25 CNS-3947518# EL MONTE EXAMINER
NOTICE OF PETITION TO ADMINISTER ESTATE OF:
JEANETTE MARY MILLERTREPP
CASE NO. 25STPB07896
To all heirs, beneficiaries, creditors, contingent creditors, and persons who may otherwise be interested in the WILL or estate, or both of JEANETTE MARY MILLER-TREPP.
A PETITION FOR PROBATE has been filed by ROXANNA JOYCE HUBBARD in the Superior Court of California, County of LOS ANGELES. THE PETITION FOR PROBATE requests that ROXANNA JOYCE HUBBARD be appointed as personal representative to administer the estate of the decedent.
THE PETITION requests authority to administer the estate under the Independent Administration of Estates Act with limited authority. (This authority will allow the personal representative to take many actions without obtaining court approval. Before taking certain very important actions, however, the personal representative will be required to give notice to interested persons unless they have waived notice or consented to the proposed action.) The independent administration authority will be granted unless an interested person files an objection to the petition and shows good cause why the court should not grant the authority.
by TRUDY K. ADAMS in the Superior Court of California, County of LOS ANGELES.
The Petition for Probate requests that TRUDY K. ADAMS be appointed as personal representative to administer the estate of the decedent. The Petition requests authority to administer the estate under the Independent Administration of Estates Act. (This authority will allow the personal representative to take many actions without obtaining court approval. Before taking certain very important actions, however, the personal representative will be required to give notice to interested persons unless they have waived notice or consented to the proposed action.)
The independent administration authority will be granted unless an interested person files an objection to the petition and shows good cause why the court should not grant the authority.
A hearing on the petition will be held in this court on AUGUST 7, 2025 at 8:30 AM in Dept. 62 Room located at 111 N HILL ST.,LOS ANGELES, CA 90012,STANEY MOSK COURTHOUSE. Per Probate Court - Dept.62 Policies and Procedures Court appearances may be made either in person or virtually, unless otherwise ordered by the Court. Remote appearances must be made using the Court’s LACourt Connect platform. On the day of the hearing, participants must check in through the LACourtConnect Same Day Check-In portal at: htpps://lacc. lacourt.org/
If you objectto the granting of the petition, you should appear at the hearing and state your objections or file written objections with the court before the hearing. Your appearance may be in person or by your attorney.
If you are a creditor or a contingent creditor of the decedent, you must file your claim with the court and mail a copy to the personal representative appointed by the court
NOTICE OF PETITION TO ADMINISTER ESTATE OF: JOSEF M. SHELP
CASE NO. 25STPB08029
To all heirs, beneficiaries, creditors, contingent creditors, and persons who may otherwise be interested in the WILL or estate, or both of JOSEF M. SHELP.
A PETITION FOR PROBATE has been filed by YOLANDA M. SHELP in the Superior Court of California, County of LOS ANGELES.
THE PETITION FOR PROBATE requests that YOLANDA M. SHELP be appointed as personal representative to administer the estate of the decedent.
THE PETITION requests authority to administer the estate under the Independent Administration of Estates Act. (This authority will allow the personal representative to take many actions without obtaining court approval. Before taking certain very important actions, however, the personal representative will be required to give notice to interested persons unless they have waived notice or consented to the proposed action.) The independent administration authority will be granted unless an interested person files an objection to the petition and shows good cause why the court should not grant the authority.
A HEARING on the petition will be held in this court as follows: 08/15/25 at 8:30AM in Dept. 9 located at 111 N. HILL ST., LOS ANGELES, CA 90012
IF YOU OBJECT to the granting of the petition, you should appear at the hearing and state your objections or file written objections with the court before the hearing. Your appearance may be in person or by your attorney.
IF YOU ARE A CREDITOR or a contingent creditor of the decedent, you must file your claim with the court and mail a copy to the personal representative appointed by the court within the later of either (1) four months from the date of first issuance of letters to a general personal representative, as defined in section 58(b) of the California Probate Code, or (2) 60 days from the date of mailing or personal delivery to you of a notice under section 9052 of the California Probate Code. Other California statutes and legal authority may affect your rights as a creditor. You may want to consult with an attorney knowledgeable in California law.
A HEARING on the petition will be held in this court as follows: 08/15/25 at 8:30AM in Dept. 44 located at 111 N. HILL ST., LOS ANGELES, CA 90012
IF YOU OBJECT to the granting of the petition, you should appear at the hearing and state your objections or file written objections with the court before the hearing. Your appearance may be in person or by your attorney.
IF YOU ARE A CREDITOR or a contingent creditor of the decedent, you must file your claim with the court and mail a copy to the personal representative appointed by the court within the later of either (1) four months from the date of first issuance of letters to a general personal representative, as defined in section 58(b) of the California Probate Code, or (2) 60 days from the date of mailing or personal delivery to you of a notice under section 9052 of the California Probate Code. Other California statutes and legal authority may affect your rights as a creditor. You may want to consult with an attorney knowledgeable in California law.
YOU MAY EXAMINE the file kept by the court. If you are a person interested in the estate, you may file with the court a Request for Special Notice (form DE-154) of the filing of an inventory and appraisal of estate assets or of any petition or account as provided in Probate Code section 1250. A Request for Special Notice form is available from the court clerk.
Attorney for Petitioner PAUL KELLY, ESQ. - SBN 282324
THE KELLY LAW FIRM
3777 LONG BEACH BLVD., SUITE 300
LONG BEACH CA 90807
Telephone (562) 548-7500
BSC 227143
7/17, 7/21, 7/24/25 CNS-3947927# ARCADIA WEEKLY
default, and your wages, money, and property may
YOU MAY EXAMINE the file kept by the court. If you are a person interested in the estate, you may file with the court a Request for Special Notice (form DE-154) of the filing of an inventory and appraisal of estate assets or of any petition or account as provided in Probate Code section 1250. A Request for Special Notice form is available from the court clerk.
Petitioner In Pro Per:
YOLANDA M. SHELP 8945 OAK PARK AVENUE NORTHRIDGE CA 91325 Telephone (818) 681-2764 7/21, 7/24, 7/28/25 CNS-3948571# ROSEMEAD READER
CASE NUMBER: (Numero del Caso): 25NNCV02485 SUMMONS (CITACION JUDICIAL) NOTICE TO DEFENDANT: (AVISO AL DEMANDADO): XINGBO ZHAO, an individual; STEVE GORDON, DIRECTOR OF THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES, a California state agency as a nominal defendant, and DOES 1 through 20, Inclusive. YOU ARE BEING SUED BY PLAINTIFF: (LO ESTA DEMANDANDO EL DEMANDANTE): BMW BANK OF NORTH AMERICA, a Utah industrial bank, by and through its servicer, BMW FINANCIAL SERVICES NA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company. NOTICE! You have been sued. The court may decide against you without your being heard unless you respond within 30 days. Read the information below. You have 30 CALENDAR DAYS after this summons and legal papers are served on you to file a written response at this court and have a copy served on the plaintiff. A letter or phone call will not protect you. Your written response must be in proper legal form if you want the court to hear your case. There may be a court form that you can use for your response. You can find these court forms and more information at the California Courts Online Self-Help Center (www.courtinfo.ca.gov/ selfhelp), your county law library, or the courthouse nearest you. If you cannot pay the filing fee, ask th e court clerk for a fee waiver form. If you do not file your response on time, you may lose the case by
por escrito tiene que estar en formato legal correcto si desea que procesen su caso en la corte. Es posible que haya un formulario que usted pueda usar para su respuesta. Puede encontrar estos formularios de la corte y mas informacion en el Centro de Ayuda de las Cortes de California (www.sucorte.ca.gov) en la biblioteca de leyes de su condado o en la corte que le quede mas cerca. Si no puede pagar la cuota de presentacion, pida al secretario de la corte que le de un formulario de exencion de pago de cuotas. Si no presenta su respuesta a tiempo, puede perder el caso por incumplimiento y la corte le podra quitar su sueldo, dinero y bienes sin mas advertencia. Hay otros requisitos legales. Es recomendable que llame a un abogado inmediatamente. Si no conoce a un abogado, puede llamar a un servicio de remision a abogados. Si no puede pagar a un abogado, es posible que cumpla con los requisitos para obtener servicios legales gratuitos de un programa de servicios legales sin fines de lucro. Puede encontrar estos grupos sin fines de lucro en el sitio web de California Legal Services, (www. lawhelpcalifornia.org), en el Centro de Ayuda de las Cortes de California, (www. sucorte.ca.gov) o poniendose en contacto con la corte o el colegio de abogados locales. AVISO: Por ley, la corte tiene derecho a reclamar las cuotas y los costos exentos por imponer un gravamen sobre cualquier recuperacion de $10,000 o mas de valor recibida mediante un acuerdo o una concesion de arbitraje en un caso de derecho civil. Tiene que pagar el gravamen de la corte antes de que la corte pueda desechar el caso. The name and address of the court is: (El nombre y direccion de la corte es): Alhambra Courthouse, 150 West Commonwealth Avenue, Alhambra, CA 91801. The name, address and telephone number of plaintiff’s attorney, or plaintiff without an attorney is: (El nombre, la direccion y el numero de telefono del abogado del demandante, o del demandante que no tiene abogado, es): REBECCA A. CALEY / CHRISTOPHER M. DOMIN, 131997 / 273951, CALEY & ASSOCIATES, 265 S. Randolph Avenue, Suite 270, Brea, CA 92821, File No. 2030-338, Phone: (714) 529-1400, Fax: (714) 529-1515 Date: (Fecha) 04/10/2025 DAVID W. SLAYTON, Executive Officer / Clerk of Court (Secretario) By: D. GALLEGOS, Deputy (Adjunto) CN117881 ZHAO Jul 7,14,21,28, 2025 SAN GABRIEL SUN
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR CHANGE OF NAME PETITION OF Dzung Tu Hang FOR CHANGE OF NAME CASE NUMBER: 25NNCP00498 Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles 150 West Commonwealth Avenue, Alhambra, Ca 9180 , Northeast Judicial District TO ALL INTERESTED PERSONS: 1. Petitioner Dzung Tu Hang filed a petition with this court for a decree changing names as follows: Present name a. OF Dzung Tu Hang to Proposed name Dzung Hang Phan 2. THE COURT ORDERS that all persons interested in this matter shall appear before this court at the
BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MONTEREY PARK – COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES –STATE OF CALIFORNIA
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE is hereby given that the City Council of the City of Monterey Park will hold a public hearing on August 6, 2025, at the hour of 6:30 p.m. located at 320 W. Newmark Avenue, Monterey Park, CA 91754, in the Council Chambers. The meeting information can be obtained by contacting the City Clerk’s office at (626) 307-1359 or online at www.montereypark.ca.gov/AgendaCenter.
SAID hearing is to consider the approval of the annual weed abatement charge list submitted by the County of Los Angeles Agricultural Commissioners and Weights and Measures Weed Abatement Division for abatement of noxious and dangerous weeds and rubbish for fiscal year 2024/2025.
REFERENCE is hereby made to the documents on file with the Code Compliance Division for further particulars. The Staff Report on this matter will be available in the City Clerk's Office on or about July 31, 2025, and copies may be obtained at cost or online at www. montereypark.ca.gov/agendacenter.
ANY interested individual may appear in person or by agent at such hearing and be heard on any matter relevant to such proceedings. If you challenge the proposed action in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Council at, or prior to, the public hearing. For additional information about this matter, please contact the Code Compliance Division at (626) 307-1415.
Maychelle
Yee, City Clerk
Published on July 21, 2025 MONTEREY PARK PRESS
ORDINANCE NO. 2266
AN URGENCY ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 3.100 OF THE MONTEREY PARK MUNICIPAL CODE ENTITLED (PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACTS) AND MPMC § 3.90.050 (SIGNATURE AUTHORITY) TO ADD SECTIONS GOVERNING CONTRACTING TO ABATE PUBLIC NUISANCES
The City Council of the City of Monterey Park does ordain as follows:
SECTION 1. Findings. The City Council finds, determines and declares as follows:
A. Ordinarily, the City must comply with the competitive bidding requirements set forth in the Monterey Park Municipal Code and California Public Contracts Code for public works projects;
B. The purpose of such bidding requirements is to guard against favoritism, improvidence, extravagance, fraud and corruption, to prevent waste of public funds, and to obtain the best economic result for the public;
C. For nuisance abatement projects, however, competitive bids would be unavailing or would not produce an advantage, and competitive bids would thus be undesirable and impractical for the following reasons:
1. Nuisance properties may pose imminent dangers to public health, safety, and welfare, particularly when they are structurally unsound, partially constructed, or blighted with hazardous conditions conducive to crime, trespassing, and fire;
2. Nuisance structures are often the site of fires, attributable to illegal occupancy, hazardous conditions, or intentional acts (e.g., arson);
3. Nuisance properties frequently sustain further damage over time, exacerbating the above-referenced safety risks and increasing nuisance abatement costs if not promptly remediated;
4. Although the City issues notices and orders for property owners to remediate nuisances on private properties, these are often ignored. Consequently, the City is compelled to urgently abate the nuisances to protect public health, safety, and welfare.
5. This Ordinance implements regulations that helps facilitate a prompt clean-up of nuisances. Contractors must still be registered with the Department of Industrial Relations (“DIR”); have required insurance and bonding; be properly licensed; and execute the City’s standard agreement for nuisance abatement projects.
D. In waiving the competitive bid requirements otherwise required by the Public Contract Code, the City Council takes note of the analysis and decisions set forth in Graydon v. Pasadena Redevelopment Agency (1980) Cal.App.3d 631; Hodgeman v. City of San Diego (1942) 53 Cal. App.2nd 610; Orange County Water
Dist. v. Bennett (1958) 156 Cal. App.2nd 745; and Los Angeles G&E Corp. v. City of Los Angeles (1922) 188 Cal. 307.
E. Because of the findings set forth above, the City Council finds that this Ordinance should be adopted on an urgency basis to preserve the public health, safety, and welfare in accordance with Government Code §§ 36934 and 36937(b).
SECTION 2: Public Works Contracting Amendments. Monterey Park Municipal Code (“MPMC”) Chapter 3.100, entitled “Public Works Contracts,” is amended to read as follows: “Chapter 3.100 PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACTS
3.100.030 Definitions.
“Prevailing wage law” means Labor Code § 1720, et seq. and California Code of Regulations, tit. 8, § 16000, et seq., as amended.
3.100.040 Soliciting Bids and Awarding Contracts.
A. The city manager may solicit bids, award contracts up to $100,000, and execute contracts, in a form approved by the city attorney, for public projects, including without limitation, urgency abatement projects, without approval from the city council. Contracts for public projects costing more than $100,000 may be solicited by the city manager but must be awarded by the city council.
B. Should the expenditure be less than or equal to $100,000, the work (including maintenance) may be performed by the employees of the city, by force account, by informal bids from qualified contractors, or by negotiated contract.
C. Regardless of the expenditure amount, the city manager is authorized to solicit bids for projects identified in the capital improvement plan approved by the city council and included in the current operating budget without additional city council authorization. The city manager is required to bring all recommendations for award exceeding $100,000 to the city council.
D. Beginning in January 2026, the sums set forth above will adjusted automatically in accordance with the Engineering Construction Cost Index – U.S. City Average as published by the Engineering News-Record. In the event this Cost Index is no longer available, the City Manager, or designee, must use a similar index that is standard in the industry to account for inflation in any adjustment.
3.100.110 Design Immunity.
A. Pursuant to Government Code § 830.6, the city engineer is authorized to approve standard design and construction plans for construction or maintenance projects before work commences.
B. The city engineer may also exercise discretionary approval for plans or designs for each project identified in the capital improvement plan approved by the city council in advance of the construction or improvement. Such approval must conform with the following:
1. The city engineer must determine that design and plans for the capital improvement projects are consistent with the city’s standards, guidelines, practices, or otherwise comply with applicable law and engineering standards, guidelines, or practices;
2. Approval must be in writing and be stamped by the city engineer while exercising his or her discretion in accordance with California law; and
3. The design approval must occur before a solicitation of bids is issued in accordance with this code and before actual construction work construction commences.
C. The city engineer is authorized to act on the city’s behalf in approving any alterations or modifications of approved design and plans.
D. The approval and authorization granted in this section is intended to avail the city of the immunities set forth in Government Code § 830.6.
3.100.120 Nuisance Abatement.
Where abatement of public nuisances constitutes rehabilitation, demolition or repair, or removal of real property including, without limitation, structures or landscaping, or other work as authorized by an abatement warrant, the city manager is authorized to directly negotiate with a qualified contractor to expeditiously abate the nuisance. Such projects are not public works projects and, accordingly, prevailing wage need not be paid. All abatement costs will be recovered in accordance with this code.”
SECTION 3: Amendments for Signature Authority. Subsection C is amended in MPMC § 3.90.050 to read as follows (the existing subsection C is renumbered as subsection D): “3.90.050 Signature Authority. *
C. The city attorney when directed to do so by the city council; to retain special counsel; retain expert witnesses in anticipation of litigation; or retain contractors for nuisance abatement in accordance with this code; *
SECTION 4: Invalidity. If any part of this Ordinance or its application is deemed invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, the City Council intends that such invalidity will not affect the effectiveness of the remaining provisions or applications and, to this end, the provisions of this Ordinance are severable.
SECTION 5: Environmental Assessment. This Ordinance is exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act (Cal. Pub. Res. Code §§ 21000, et seq.; “CEQA”) and CEQA Guidelines (14 Cal. Code Regs. §§ 15000, et seq.) because it authorizes the administrative approval of the repair, maintenance, permitting, licensing, or minor alteration of existing private structures, facilities, or mechanical equipment, including the rehabilitation or restoration of deteriorated or damaged structures to meet current standards of public health and safety. Nuisance abatement projects covered by
this Ordinance will involve such activities and will not result in expansion of existing uses. In addition, this Ordinance authorizes the replacement or reconstruction of existing structures and facilities on the same site and with substantially the same purpose and capacity. This Ordinance, therefore, is categorically exempt from further CEQA review under CEQA Guidelines §§ 15301 (Class 1, Existing Facilities) and 15302 (Class 2 Replacement or Reconstruction).
SECTION 6: Electronic Signatures. This Ordinance may be executed with electronic signatures in accordance with Government Code §16.5. Such electronic signatures will be treated in all respects as having the same effect as an original signature.
SECTION 7: Recordation. The Mayor, or presiding officer, is authorized to sign this Ordinance signifying its adoption by the City Council of the City of Monterey Park and the City Clerk, or her duly appointed deputy, may attest thereto.
SECTION 8: Effective Date. Based on the findings in Section 1, this Urgency Ordinance is adopted by a four-fifths vote for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, safety and welfare and becomes effective immediately pursuant to Government Code § 36937(b).
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 16th day of July, 2025.
Vinh Ngo, Mayor ATTEST:
Maychelle Yee, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
KARL H. BERGER, CITY ATTORNEY
Joaquin Vazquez, Deputy City Attorney
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES)§ CITY OF MONTEREY PARK)
I, Maychelle Yee, City Clerk of the City of Monterey Park, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Urgency Ordinance No. 2266 was duly passed, approved and adopted at its regular meeting held on 16th day of July, 2025 by the following vote:
Ayes: Council Members: Wong, Lo, Yiu, Ngo
Noes: Council Members: None
Absent: Council Members: Sanchez
Abstain: Council Members: None
Recusal: Council Members: None
Dated this 16th day of July, 2025.
Maychelle Yee, City Clerk
City of Monterey Park, California
Publish July 21, 2025
MONTEREY PARK PRESS
NOTICE OF PETITION TO ADMINISTER ESTATE OF Leopoldo O. Laboriante CASE NO. 25STPB07491
To all heirs, beneficiaries, creditors, contingent creditors, and persons who may otherwise be interested in the will or estate, or both, of: Leopoldo O. Laboriante
A PETITION FOR PROBATE has been filed by Encarnacion L. Dominguez in the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles.
THE PETITION FOR PROBATE requests that Encarnacion L. Dominguez be appointed as personal representative to administer the estate of the decedent.
THE PETITION requests authority to administer the estate under the Independent Administration of Estates Act with limited authority . (This authority will allow the personal representative to take many actions without obtaining court approval. Before taking certain very important actions, however, the personal representative will be required to give notice to interested persons unless they have waived notice or consented to the proposed action.) The independent administration authority will be granted unless an interested person files an objection to the petition and shows good cause why the court should not grant the authority.
A HEARING on the petition will be held on 8/1/2025 at 8:30 a.m. in Dept. 79 located at 111 N. HILL ST. LOS ANGELES CA 90012 STANLEY MOSK COURTHOUSE.
IF YOU OBJECT to the granting of the petition, you should appear at the hearing and state your objections or file written objections with the court before the hearing. Your appearance may be in person or by your attorney.
IF YOU ARE A CREDITOR or a contingent creditor of the decedent, you must file your claim with the court and mail a copy to the personal representative appointed by the court within the later of either (1) four months from the date of first issuance of letters to a general personal representative, as defined in section 58(b) of the California Probate Code, or (2) 60 days from the date of mailing or personal delivery to you of a notice under section 9052 of the California Probate Code. Other California statutes and legal authority may affect your rights as
a creditor. You may want to consult with an attorney knowledgeable in California law. YOU MAY EXAMINE the file kept by the court. If you are a person interested in the estate, you may file with the court a Request for Special Notice (DE-154) of the filing of an inventory and appraisal of estate assets or of any petition or account as provided in Probate Code section 1250. A Request for Special Notice form is available from the court clerk. Attorney for Petitioner: Steven M. Gluck, Esq. SBN # 80097 1313 Post Avenue Torrance CA 90501 Telephone: (818) 267-4718 7/14, 7/17, 7/21/25 CNS-3945939# BURBANK INDEPENDENT
NOTICE OF COMPETING PETITION TO ADMINISTER ESTATE OF: RAYMOND R. RENTERIA CASE NO. 22STPB00164 To all heirs, beneficiaries, creditors, contingent creditors, and persons who may otherwise be interested in the WILL or estate, or both of RAYMOND R. RENTERIA.
A COMPETING PETITION FOR PROBATE has been filed by YSABEL RENTERIA in the Superior Court of California, County of LOS ANGELES. THE COMPETING PETITION FOR PROBATE requests that YSABEL RENTERIA be appointed as personal representative to administer the estate of the decedent. THE COMPETING PETITION requests authority to administer the estate under the Independent Administration of Estates Act. (This authority will allow the personal representative to take many actions without obtaining court approval. Before taking certain very important actions, however, the personal representative will be required to give notice to interested persons unless they have waived notice or consented to the proposed action.) The independent administration authority will be granted unless an interested person files an objection to the petition and shows good cause why the court should not grant the authority.
A HEARING on the competing petition will be held in this court as fol-
ANGELES, CA 90012
IF YOU OBJECT to the granting of the petition, you should appear at the hearing and state your objections or file written objections with the court before the hearing. Your appearance may be in person or by your attorney.
IF YOU ARE A CREDITOR or a contingent creditor of the decedent, you must file your claim with the court and mail a copy to the personal representative appointed by the court within the later of either (1) four months from the date of first issuance of letters to a general personal representative, as defined in section 58(b) of the California Probate Code, or (2) 60 days from the date of mailing or personal delivery to you of a notice under section 9052 of the California Probate Code. Other California statutes and legal authority may affect your rights as a creditor. You may want to consult with an attorney knowledgeable in California law.
YOU MAY EXAMINE the file kept by the court. If you are a person interested in the estate, you may file with the court a Request for Special Notice (form DE-154) of the filing of an inventory and appraisal of estate assets or of any petition or account as provided in Probate Code section 1250. A Request for Special Notice form is available from the court clerk. Attorney for Petitioner
MICHAEL G. EBINER - SBN 183499
EBINER LAW OFFICE
100 N. CITRUS ST., #520 WEST COVINA CA 91791
Telephone (626) 918-9000 7/14, 7/17, 7/21/25 CNS-3946030# WEST COVINA PRESS
NOTICE OF PETITION TO ADMINISTER ESTATE OF:
RONALD DEAN KETTNER AKA RONALD D. KETTNER CASE NO.
30-2025-01495738-PR-LACMC
To all heirs, beneficiaries, creditors, contingent creditors, and persons who may otherwise be interested in the WILL or estate, or both of RONALD DEAN KETTNER AKA RONALD D. KETTNER.
A PETITION FOR PROBATE has been filed by ERICA PENNINGTON KELLY GAGNON in the Superior Court of California, County of ORANGE.
THE PETITION FOR PROBATE requests that ERICA PENNINGTON KELLY GAGNON be appointed as personal representative to administer the estate of the decedent.
THE PETITION requests authority to administer the estate under the Independent Administration of Estates Act. (This authority will allow the personal representative to take many actions without obtaining court approval. Before taking certain very important actions, however, the personal representative will be required to give notice to interested persons unless they have waived notice or consented to the proposed action.)
The independent administration authority will be granted unless an interested person files an objection to the petition and shows good cause why the court should not grant the authority.
A HEARING on the petition will be held in this court as follows: 09/03/25 at 1:30PM in Dept. CM08 located at 3390 HARBOR BLVD., COSTA MESA, CA 92626
NOTICE IN PROBATE CASES
The court is providing the convenience to appear for hearing by video using the court’s designated video platform. This is a no cost service to the public. Go to the Court’s website at The Superior Court of California - County of Orange (occourts. org) to appear remotely for Probate hearings and for remote hearing instructions. If you have difficulty connecting or are unable to connect to your remote hearing, call 657-6228278 for assistance. If you prefer to appear in-person, you can appear in the department on the day/time set for your hearing.
IF YOU OBJECT to the granting of the petition, you should appear at the hearing and state your objections or file written objections with the court before the hearing. Your appearance may be in person or by your attorney.
IF YOU ARE A CREDITOR or a contingent creditor of the decedent, you must file your claim with the court and mail a copy to the personal representative appointed by the court within the later of either (1) four months from the date of first issuance of letters to a general personal representative, as defined in sec-
tion 58(b) of the California Probate Code, or (2) 60 days from the date of mailing or personal delivery to you of a notice under section 9052 of the California Probate Code. Other California statutes and legal authority may affect your rights as a creditor. You may want to consult with an attorney knowledgeable in California law.
YOU MAY EXAMINE the file kept by the court. If you are a person interested in the estate, you may file with the court a Request for Special Notice (form DE-154) of the filing of an inventory and appraisal of estate assets or of any petition or account as provided in Probate Code section 1250. A Request for Special Notice form is available from the court clerk.
Attorney for Petitioner
ROBERT L. COHEN, ESQ. - SBN 150913
LAW OFFICES OF ROBERT L. COHEN, INC. 8081 ORANGETHORPE AVE. BUENA PARK CA 90621
Telephone (714) 522-8880 7/14, 7/17, 7/21/25 CNS-3946765# ANAHEIM PRESS
NOTICE OF PETITION TO ADMINISTER ESTATE OF DURIE BAILEY, JR.
Case No. 25STPB04373
To all heirs, beneficiaries, creditors, contingent creditors, and persons who may otherwise be interested in the will or estate, or both, of DURIE BAILEY, JR.
A PETITION FOR PROBATE has been filed by Sandra Benson Bailey in the Superior Court of California, County of LOS ANGELES.
THE PETITION FOR PROBATE requests that Sandra Benson Bailey be appointed as personal representative to administer the estate of the decedent.
THE PETITION requests authority to administer the estate under the Independent Administration of Estates Act. (This authority will allow the personal representative to take many actions without obtaining court approval. Before taking certain very important actions, however, the personal representative will be required to give notice to interested persons unless they have waived notice or consented to the proposed action.) The independent administration authority will be granted unless an interested person files an objection to the petition and shows good cause why the court should not grant the authority.
A HEARING on the petition will be held on August 4, 2025 at 8:30 AM in Dept. No. 67 located at 111 N. Hill St., Los Angeles, CA 90012.
IF YOU OBJECT to the granting of the petition, you should appear at the hearing and state your objections or file written objections with the court before the hearing. Your appearance may be in person or by your attorney.
IF YOU ARE A CREDITOR or a contingent creditor of the decedent, you must file your claim with the court and mail a copy to the personal representative appointed by the court within the later of either (1) four months from the date of first issuance of letters to a general personal representative, as defined in section 58(b) of the California Probate Code, or (2) 60 days from the date of mailing or personal delivery to you of a notice under section 9052 of the California Probate Code. Other California statutes and legal authority may affect your rights as a creditor. You may want to consult with an attorney knowledgeable in California law.
YOU MAY EXAMINE the file kept by the court. If you are a person interested in the estate, you may file with the court a Request for Special Notice (form DE-154) of the filing of an inventory and appraisal of estate assets or of any petition or account as provided in Probate Code section 1250. A Request for Special Notice form is available from the court clerk. Attorney for petitioner: CHRISTOPHER R MILTON ESQ SBN 220361 MILTON LAW 2626 FOOTHILL BLVD STE 200 LA CRESCENTA CA 91214 CN118537 BAILEY
Jul 17,21,24, 2025 WEST COVINA PRESS
NOTICE OF PETITION TO ADMINISTER ESTATE OF ALBERT L. CONNER, JR. aka ALBERT LAWRENCE
CONNER, II aka ALBERT L. CONNER
Case No. 25STPB07920
To all heirs, beneficiaries, creditors, contingent creditors, and persons who may otherwise be interested in the will or estate, or both, of ALBERT L. CONNER, JR. aka ALBERT LAWRENCE CONNER, II aka ALBERT L. CONNER
A PETITION FOR PROBATE has been filed by Albert L. Conner, III in the Superior Court of California, County of LOS ANGELES.
THE PETITION FOR PROBATE requests that Albert L. Conner, III be appointed as personal representative to administer the estate of the decedent.
THE PETITION requests authority to administer the estate under the Independent Administration of Estates Act. (This authority will allow the personal representative to take many actions without obtaining court approval. Before taking certain very important actions, however, the personal representative will be required to give notice to interested persons unless they have waived notice or consented to the proposed action.) The independent administration authority will be granted unless an interested person files an objection to the petition and shows good cause why the court should not grant the authority.
A HEARING on the petition will be held on August 14, 2025 at 8:30 AM in Dept. No. 79 located at 111 N. Hill St., Los Angeles, CA 90012.
IF YOU OBJECT to the granting of the petition, you should appear at the hearing and state your objections or file written objections with the court before the hearing. Your appearance may be in person or by your attorney.
IF YOU ARE A CREDITOR or a contingent creditor of the decedent, you must file your claim with the court and mail a copy to the personal representative appointed by the court within the later of either (1) four months from the date of first issuance of letters to a general personal representative, as defined in section 58(b) of the California Probate Code, or (2) 60 days from the date of mailing or personal delivery to you of a notice under section 9052 of the California Probate Code.
Other California statutes and legal authority may affect your rights as a creditor. You may want to consult with an attorney knowledgeable in California law.
YOU MAY EXAMINE the file kept by the court. If you are a person interested in the estate, you may file with the court a Request for Special Notice (form DE-154) of the filing of an inventory and appraisal of estate assets or of any petition or account as provided in Probate Code section 1250. A Request for Special Notice form is available from the court clerk. Attorney for petitioner: TERRENCE J O REILLY ESQ SBN 80491 800 W SIXTH ST STE 1200
LOS ANGELES CA 90017 CN118549 CONNER Jul 21,24,28, 2025 WEST COVINA PRESS
NOTICE OF PETITION INCLUDING 1ST AMENDMENT TO ADMINISTER ESTATE OF JOAN ELIASOPH CASE NO. 24STPB11270
To all heirs, beneficiaries, creditors, contingent creditors, and persons who may otherwise be interested in the will or estate, or both, of: JOAN ELIASOPH
A Petition for Probate has been filed by TIMOTHY S. FELTHAM, MICHAEL HECHT, & IAN B. MACCALLUM in the Superior Court of California, County of LOS ANGELES. The Petition for Probate requests that TIMOTHY S. FELTHAM, MICHAEL HECHT, & IAN B. MACCALLUM be appointed as personal representative to administer the estate of the decedent. The Petition requests the decedent’s will and codicils, if any, be admitted to probate. The will and any codicils are available for examination in the file kept by the court.
The Petition requests authority to administer the estate under the Independent Administration of Estates Act. (This authority will allow the personal representative to take many actions without obtaining court approval. Before taking certain very important actions, however, the personal representative will be required to give notice to interested persons
unless they have waived notice or consented to the proposed action.)
The independent administration authority will be granted unless an interested person files an objection to the petition and shows good cause why the court should not grant the authority.
A hearing on the petition will be held in this court on August 5, 2025 at 8:30 AM in Dept. 99 located at 111 N Hill Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012, Stanley Mosk Probate Court.
If you object to the granting of the petition, you should appear at the hearing and state your objections or file written objections with the court before the hearing. Your appear-ance may be in person or by your attorney. If you are a creditor or a contingent creditor of the decedent, you must file your claim with the court and mail a copy to the personal representative appointed by the court within the later of either (1) four months from the date of first issuance of letters to a general personal representative, as defined in section 58(b) of the California Probate Code, or (2) 60 days from the date of mailing or personal delivery to you of a notice under section 9052 of the California Probate Code.
Other California statutes and legal authority may affect your rights as a creditor. You may want to consult with an attorney knowledgeable in California law.
You may examine the file kept by the court. If you are a person interested in the estate, you may file with the court a Request for Special Notice (form DE-154) of the filing of an inventory and appraisal of estate assets or of any petition or account as provided in Probate Code section 1250. A Request for Special Notice form is available from the court clerk.
Attorney for Petitioner: TIMOTHY S. FELTHAM, ESQ., MCLAUGHLIN & STERN LLP, 260 MADISON AVENUE, NEW YORK, NY 10016, Telephone: (212) 4550422 7/17, 7/21, 7/24/25 CNS-3947197# PASADENA PRESS
NOTICE OF PETITION TO ADMINISTER ESTATE OF: WINIFRED LINDSEY CHILD CASE NO. 24STPB07864
To all heirs, beneficiaries, creditors, contingent creditors, and persons who may otherwise be interested in the WILL or estate, or both of WINIFRED LINDSEY CHILD.
A PETITION FOR PROBATE has been filed by WILLIAM J. ABELMANN in the Superior Court of California, County of LOS ANGELES.
THE PETITION FOR PROBATE requests that WILLIAM J. ABELMANN be appointed as personal representative to administer the estate of the decedent.
THE PETITION requests authority to administer the estate under the Independent Administration of Estates Act. (This authority will allow the personal representative to take many actions without obtaining court approval. Before taking certain very important actions, however, the personal representative will be required to give notice to interested persons unless they have waived notice or consented to the proposed action.)
The independent administration authority will be granted unless an interested person files an objection to the petition and shows good cause why the court should not grant the authority.
A HEARING on the petition will be held in this court as follows: 08/04/25 at 8:30AM in Dept. 4 located at 111 N. HILL ST., LOS ANGELES, CA 90012
IF YOU OBJECT to the granting of the petition, you should appear at the hearing and state your objections or file written objections with the court before the hearing. Your appearance may be in person or by your attorney.
IF YOU ARE A CREDITOR or a contingent creditor of the decedent, you must file your claim with the court and mail a copy to the personal representative appointed by the court within the later of either (1) four months from the date of first issuance of letters to a general personal representative, as defined in section 58(b) of the California Probate Code, or (2) 60 days from the date of mailing or personal delivery to you of a notice under section 9052 of the California Probate Code. Other California statutes and legal authority may affect your rights as a creditor. You may want to consult with an attorney knowledgeable in California law.
YOU MAY EXAMINE the file kept
by the court. If you are a person interested in the estate, you may file with the court a Request for Special Notice (form DE-154) of the filing of an inventory and appraisal of estate assets or of any petition or account as provided in Probate Code section 1250. A Request for Special Notice form is available from the court clerk. Attorney for Petitioner
JOSEPH A. SIFFERD SBN 226219
POINDEXTER & DOUTRE, INC. 400 SOUTH HOPE STREET, SUITE 1320 LOS ANGELES CA 90071
Telephone (213) 628-8297 7/17, 7/21, 7/24/25
CNS-3947243# PASADENA PRESS
NOTICE OF PETITION TO ADMINISTER ESTATE OF: ROGER ELLIOTT COHEN CASE NO. 25STPB07802
To all heirs, beneficiaries, creditors, contingent creditors, and persons who may otherwise be interested in the WILL or estate, or both of ROGER ELLIOTT COHEN.
A PETITION FOR PROBATE has been filed by LISA ANDERSON in the Superior Court of California, County of LOS ANGELES.
THE PETITION FOR PROBATE requests that LISA ANDERSON be appointed as Special Administrator to administer the estate of the decedent.
A HEARING on the petition will be held in this court as follows: 08/11/25 at 8:30AM in Dept. 62 located at 111 N. HILL ST., LOS ANGELES, CA 90012
IF YOU OBJECT to the granting of the petition, you should appear at the hearing and state your objections or file written objections with the court before the hearing. Your appearance may be in person or by your attorney. IF YOU ARE A CREDITOR or a contingent creditor of the decedent, you must file your claim with the court and mail a copy to the personal representative appointed by the court within the later of either (1) four months from the date of first issuance of letters to a general personal representative, as defined in section 58(b) of the California Probate Code, or (2) 60 days from the date of mailing or personal delivery to you of a notice under section 9052 of the California Probate Code.
Other California statutes and legal authority may affect your rights as a creditor. You may want to consult with an attorney knowledgeable in California law.
YOU MAY EXAMINE the file kept by the court. If you are a person interested in the estate, you may file with the court a Request for Special Notice (form DE-154) of the filing of an inventory and appraisal of estate assets or of any petition or account as provided in Probate Code section 1250. A Request for Special Notice form is available from the court clerk.
Attorney for Petitioner
JEFFREY L. CONDON - SBN 132774
CONDON & CONDON, APC 3435 OCEAN PARK BLVD., STE. 108 SANTA MONICA CA 90405
Telephone (310) 393-0701
7/17, 7/21, 7/24/25 CNS-3947461# BURBANK INDEPENDENT
NOTICE OF PETITION TO ADMINISTER ESTATE OF: ROBERT S. REMMEL AKA
ROBERT SHELDON REMMEL CASE NO. 25STPB07902
To all heirs, beneficiaries, creditors, contingent creditors, and persons who may otherwise be interested in the WILL or estate, or both of ROBERT S. REMMEL AKA ROBERT SHELDON REMMEL.
A PETITION FOR PROBATE has been filed by SUE CAMPION in the Superior Court of California, County of LOS ANGELES. THE PETITION FOR PROBATE requests that SUE CAMPION be appointed as personal representative to administer the estate of the decedent.
THE PETITION requests authority to administer the estate under the Independent Administration of Estates Act. (This authority will allow the personal representative to take many actions without obtaining court approval. Before taking certain very important actions, however, the personal representative will be required to give notice to interested persons unless they have waived notice or
consented to the proposed action.) The independent administration authority will be granted unless an interested person files an objection to the petition and shows good cause why the court should not grant the authority.
A HEARING on the petition will be held in this court as follows: 08/22/25 at 8:30AM in Dept. 29 located at 111 N. HILL ST., LOS ANGELES, CA 90012
IF YOU OBJECT to the granting of the petition, you should appear at the hearing and state your objections or file written objections with the court before the hearing. Your appearance may be in person or by your attorney. IF YOU ARE A CREDITOR or a contingent creditor of the decedent, you must file your claim with the court and mail a copy to the personal representative appointed by the court within the later of either (1) four months from the date of first issuance of letters to a general personal representative, as defined in section 58(b) of the California Probate Code, or (2) 60 days from the date of mailing or personal delivery to you of a notice under section 9052 of the California Probate Code. Other California statutes and legal authority may affect your rights as a creditor. You may want to consult with an attorney knowledgeable in California law.
YOU MAY EXAMINE the file kept by the court. If you are a person interested in the estate, you may file with the court a Request for Special Notice (form DE-154) of the filing of an inventory and appraisal of estate assets or of any petition or account as provided in Probate Code section 1250. A Request for Special Notice form is available from the court clerk. Attorney for Petitioner
KENNETH G. CAMPION - SBN 65380 2604-B EL CAMINO REAL #317 CARLSBAD CA 92008
Telephone (562) 947-1665 7/21, 7/24, 7/28/25 CNS-3948135# GLENDALE INDEPENDENT
NOTICE OF PETITION TO ADMINISTER ESTATE OF VALERIE HARRIET DENNETT aka VALERIE HARRIET MYERS
Case No. 25STPB08030
To all heirs, beneficiaries, creditors, contingent creditors, and persons who may otherwise be interested in the will or estate, or both, of VALERIE HARRIET DENNETT aka VALERIE HARRIET MYERS A PETITION FOR PROBATE has been filed by Shoushan Movsesian in the Superior Court of California, County of LOS ANGELES. THE PETITION FOR PROBATE requests that Shoushan Movsesian be appointed as personal representative to administer the estate of the decedent. THE PETITION requests authority to administer the estate under the Independent Administration of Estates Act. (This authority will allow the personal representative to take many actions without obtaining court approval. Before taking certain very important actions, however, the personal representative will be required to give notice to interested persons unless they have waived notice or consented to the proposed action.) The independent administration authority will be granted unless an interested person files an objection to the petition and shows good cause why the court should not grant the authority.
A HEARING on the petition will be held on August 15, 2025 at 8:30 AM in Dept. No. 11 located at 111 N. Hill St., Los Angeles, CA 90012.
IF YOU OBJECT to the granting of the petition, you should appear at the hearing and state your objections or file written objections with the court before the hearing. Your appearance may be in person or by your attorney.
IF YOU ARE A CREDITOR or a contingent creditor of the decedent, you must file your claim with the court and mail a copy to the personal representative appointed by the court within the later of either (1) four months from the date of first issuance of letters to a general personal representative, as defined in section 58(b) of the California Probate Code, or (2) 60 days from the date of mailing or personal delivery to you of a notice under section 9052 of the California Probate Code. Other California statutes and legal authority may affect your rights as a creditor. You may want to consult with an attorney knowledgeable
By Staff
Amulti-agency crackdown on illegal fireworks in Southern California’s Inland Empire resulted in more than 28,000 pounds seized and 115 citations, San Bernardino County officials said Thursday.
Investigators from the San Bernardino County Fire Protection District partnered with the Chino Valley Fire District and fire departments from the cities of Colton, Rancho Cucamonga and Palm Springs.
Since May, the task force conducted “fireworks interdiction operations” that targeted entry points along major routes such as Interstate 15 from Nevada, according to the county. Investigators also patrolled the region on Independence Day.
The Fireworks Interdiction Taskforce issued 115 citations and confiscated 28,050 pounds of illegal fireworks, officials reported. Each citation carries a $1,250 fine, totaling $143,750 in penalties for violations.
In addition to the task force operations, officials
noted the county’s broader effort to reduce illegal fireworks to protect residents, public safety workers and property during wildfire season.
The county Office of the
The public submitted more than 760 complaints, enabling investigators to identify areas of high fireworks activity and deploy targeted patrols, officials said. Complaints in cities
Fire Marshal reactivated the Illegal Fireworks Reporter, an online form to gather and investigate complaints.
were forwarded to local law enforcement agencies.
“San Bernardino County Fire remains ready to protect
By City News Service
The Palm Springs Public Library’s planned July closure and move to a temporary location has been delayed three weeks due to an HVAC system issue at the new Rimrock Plaza site, officials announced Wednesday.
The library, originally set to close July 20-31 for its move, will now close Aug. 9-24, and the temporary site will open Aug. 25 at 4721 E. Palm Canyon Drive.
The last day the library will be open to the public before its closure will be Aug. 8. However, patrons may still attend the closing party from 2-4 p.m. July 19 at 300 S. Sunrise Way, on the corner of Sunrise Way and Baristo Road.
Friends of the Palm Springs Library will continue to sell books at the library — priced at four books for $1 — and will have a book sale area at the temporary site.
The renovations will begin Aug. 25 for 18-36 months and will conclude in February 2027, officials said. A reopening was set for summer 2027.
Rickrock Plaza will maintain normal hours of operation, and all essential services will continue at various locations, including Welwood Murray Memorial Library and Mizell Center, with more locations to be announced at a later date. For more information, visit palmspringslibrary.org or call 760-322-7323.
our communities from the harm caused by illegal fireworks,” Fire Marshal Monica Ronchetti said in a statement. “We thank the dedicated taskforce members for their work and the public for
helping us track and stop this dangerous activity. As wildfire conditions grow more severe each year, our focus on prevention remains stronger than ever.”
Ronchetti advised the
public, “If you see something, say something. Call the We-Tip Hotline at 800-47-ARSON (800-4727766) or visit WeTip.com.”
All confiscated fireworks are turned over to the State Fire Marshal’s Office for safe disposal, officials said.
According to state law, “fireworks that explode, shoot into the air, or travel along the ground are considered dangerous and are illegal without a proper permit,” county officials reported.
“This includes firecrackers, mortars, roman candles, skyrockets and any modified or altered ‘safe and sane’ fireworks.”
The National Fire Protection Association reported that fireworks are the leading cause of fires in the United States on the Fourth of July. In addition to property damage and wildfires, fireworks can cause death, life-altering injuries, distress to military veterans living with PTSD and harm to household pets.
To report illegal fireworks and for fireworks safety tips, visit sbcfire.org/ fireworks.
Aconvictedfelon accused of gunning down a 50-year- old man in a drive-by attack on the edge of the Morongo Indian Reservation northeast of Banning pleaded not guilty Wednesday to first-degree murder and other charges.
Robert Eugene Leonard, 43, of Beaumont was arrested last month following a Riverside County Sheriff’s Department investigation into the slaying of Orlando Lara of Banning.
Along with murder, Leonard is charged with being a felon in possession of a loaded firearm, being in possession of controlled substances while armed, a special circumstance allegation of perpetrating a murder in a drive-by and sentenceenhancing gun and great bodily injury allegations.
He was arraigned before Superior Court Judge Jay Kiel, who scheduled a felony settlement conference for Aug. 6 at the Banning Justice Center.
The defendant is being
held without bail at the Robert Presley Jail.
Lara’s remains were discovered by passers-by shortly before 11 p.m. on June 25 in the 47000 block of Morongo Road, near Cottonwood Road, along the upper boundary of the reservation, according to sheriff’s Sgt. Alberto Loureiro.
“Upon arrival, deputies found the male with a traumatic injury,” Loureiro said, confirming there were “obvious signs” the victim had been shot to death.
The likely circumstances and motive were not disclosed.
Within two days, Central Homicide Unit detectives gathered sufficient evidence pointing to Leonard as the alleged shooter. He was tracked to a residence on the reservation, where he was taken into custody without incident on June 27.
Court records did not list Leonard’s prior convictions, which occurred in another jurisdiction.
By City News Service
Confirmation that a man died after consuming the super toxic drug carfentanil prompted Riverside County health officials Thursday to remind residents to take precautions before consuming any kind of opioid.
“Every life lost from opioids is one too many,” Public Health Officer Jennifer Chevinsky said. “Together, we can continue to raise awareness about the risks associated with drug use and work as a community to support safety, reduce harm and care for one another.”
The victim, identified only as a resident in his 40s, died from the drug overdose in March, but extended delays conducting toxicology tests prevented completion of the autopsy until recently, when pathologists verified that carfentanil was the cause, according to the Riverside University Health System.
“Carfentanil was developed for use as a tranquilizer in large animals, such as elephants, and due to its potency, even a minuscule amount can cause a fatal overdose,” according to an agency statement.
In 2023, the District Attorney’s Office successfully prosecuted a Perris man for possession with intent to sell more than 20 kilograms of carfentanil.
“Carfentanil is 100 times more powerful than fentanyl
and 10,000 times more potent than morphine,” the D.A.’s office said at the time. “A lethal dose of carfentanil in humans would be at the nanogram level -- much smaller than the two milligrams of fentanyl that can kill. If mixed in with other drugs, the 21 kilos of carfentanil (possessed by the defendant) could have been enough to potentially kill more than 50 million people.”
Compared to fentanyl, carfentanil fatalities are rare throughout the United States. However, the numbers have been creeping up, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control & Prevention. In 2023, there were 29 deaths, compared to 238 in 2024, offi-
cials said.
“While overall, we are seeing a decrease in opioid overdose deaths in Riverside County, this is a reminder that there are things each of us can do to prevent these terrible outcomes,” Chevinsky said.
Naloxone and Narcan can be effective in combating overdoses.
The U.S. National Overdose Response service can be reached at 800-4843731, while anyone seeking help with substance abuse and addiction was encouraged to call 800-662-4357 for local options.
Additional information is available at www.ruhealth. org/ruhs-public-health.
California
ing to a statement made by Ramos’ office.
“More than 30 accredited tribal colleges with 75 campuses are located in 13 states across the Southwest, Northwest and the Great Plains — from Kansas and Oklahoma to Minnesota and the Dakotas,” according to the American Indian College Fund. Ramos represents the 45th Assembly district including the cities of Fontana, Highland, Mentone, Redlands, Rialto and San Bernardino. He is the first and only California Native American serving in the state legislature.
The event livestreamed at facebook.com/events/751279414146428/ and on youtube. com/live/XqcQByr5Law?feature=share.
By City News Service
The Palm Springs Plaza TheatreFoundation announcedThursday it has received a $250,000 contribution from a nonprofit Coachella Valley-based foundation as part of an effort to help complete its restoration, set to open in December.
The Auen Foundation is a private grant-making organization that will receive recognition as a founding donor, with the plaza’s mezzanine set to be renamed to Auen Mezzanine.
“The Auen Foundation is proud to support the Plaza Theatre Foundation as a founding donor in the restoration of this cultural treasure in the heart of Palm Springs,” Sherrie Auen, trustee of the foundation, said in a statement.
With a deadline set to reopen in December and a slate of shows including the Palm Springs Symphony, the theatre are still need of raising $6 million for its ongoing restorations.
“We are honored to work with this respected foundation, which helps increase quality of life for so many,” J.R. Roberts, president of the Plaza
Theatre Foundation, said in statement. “There are several significant naming opportunities remaining, so other organizations and individuals may join the Auen Foundation to help us restore this icon, where the culture of Palm Springs takes center stage.”
The theatre at 128 S. Palm Canyon Drive first opened in 1936 with a world-premiere of the Academy Award-winning film, “Camille,” starring Greta Garbo. It was also a venue for
numerous broadcast radio programs with actors including Bob Hope, Bing Crosby and Jack Benny, according to its website.
The restoration includes replacing seats, sound, lighting and other modern equipment to make it accessible for everyone, officials said.
More information on the restoration project can be found at savetheplazatheatreps.com.