Skip to main content

Duarte Dispatch_2/26/2026

Page 1


Ex-fire chief sues city, alleging retaliation by Bass over Palisades response Pg 15

Thursday, February 26-March 04, 2026

Report: LAFD sought to protect Bass in wake of Palisades Fire review

Atop aide to Mayor Karen Bass is criticizing a report that said the Los Angeles Fire Department attempted to shield Bass and other top brass from "reputational harm" caused by the city's handling of the Palisades Fire.

AccordingtotheLos AngelesTimes,which obtained a 13-page city document through a California Public Records Act request, the LAFD tried to shape news coverage with a plan formulated ahead of the release of the high-profile After Action Fire Report on the Palisades Fire, including efforts to "minimize tough Q&A" by asking to hold closed-door briefings with the Fire Commission and City Council.

While undated, the document was last updated Oct. 7, 2025, a day before the after-action report was made public, the newspaper reported.

Though the report was

unsigned and labeled "for internal use only," the document was produced on LAFD letterhead and included email addresses for fire officials, representatives of Bass' office, as well as public relations consultants, who were hired to help the department with messaging

regarding the fire, according to the report.

Yusef Robb, a senior adviser to Bass, called the published story "false."

"It's important to note that the Fire Department hired this consultant, not the Mayor's Office, and consultants write all sorts

of memos promising to save the world. LAFD incorporated this consultant into its team, so of course and appropriately the Mayor's Office engaged with that team," Robb said in a statement.

"Mayor Bass removed the previous fire chief over

the chief's refusal to do an after action report and for failure to pre-deploy. The notion that the mayor then took a U-turn and 'watered down' a report that justified her removal of the chief and her public criticisms of pre-

deployment failures is just bonkers," Robb continued.

An LAFD spokesperson said the department had no comment as "we have not yet identified the specific document referenced in the LA Times report."

Bass'officepreviously denied a published story that she directed the wateringdown of the after-action report that discussed alleged failings of the fire department during the fire. She allegedly received an early draft for the report, and told then-interim Fire Chief Ronnie Villanueva that the report could result in legal liabilities for those failures.

The Times reported that Bass held onto the original draft until after changes were made. It was unclear whether Villanueva or other LAFD officials, or anyone in the mayor's office, made "line-by-line edits" at Bass' specific instructions or if

LA, LB port officials warn of new uncertainties after Supreme Court rejects tariffs

Port authorities in the Los Angeles area on Friday welcomed the U.S. Supreme Court's decision to strike down President Donald Trump's widespread emergency tariffs — but also cautioned of uncertainties resulting from a new 10% global tariff Trump announced immediately after the ruling.

In a 6-3 decision Friday, the Supreme Court found it was unconstitutional for the president to create and change tariffs because that power belongs only to Congress. Justices Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas and Brett Kavanaugh dissented. Long Beach and LA port officials have noted the

importance of clear, predictable trade policy for effective financial planning and moving cargo efficiently to keep products flowing to businesses and consumers.

Port of Los Angeles Executive Director Gene Seroka said the Supreme Court decision affects about two-thirds of the tariffs

that have been collected since the administration implemented them last year, leading to new types of uncertainty.

"First, there is not yet clarity on whether there will be refunds from the U.S. Treasury Department on tariffs already paid," Seroka said in a statement.

"Second, the administration has already announced a new 10% global tariff in the wake of the ruling with no indication as to when that will take effect."

He added that the court's decision is in the midst of work stoppages for the Lunar New Year holiday. Most factories in China and

throughout Asia are closed, with reopening not expected until at least next week.

"The Port of Los Angeles and its network of supply chain partners stand ready to manage any fluctuation in cargo and get it through the system swiftly without

Pasadena Buddhist Temple’s mural offers ‘Healing and Hope’ Pg 17
LA Mayor Karen Bass briefs the media a month after the start of the wildfire that devastated Pacific Palisades and nearby areas. | Photo courtesy of the mayor's o ce

SCOTUS declines to step into legal battle over housing between Huntington Beach, state

The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday rejected a request by Huntington Beach to get involved in the city's legal battle against the state over compliance with affordable housing policies.

The City Council challenged the constitutionality of California housing laws in federal court. After rulings against the city in the lower court and the federal appeals court, the U.S. Supreme Court declined to consider Huntington Beach's appeal.

"City officials can't use the First Amendment as an excuse to violate state housing law," Gov. Gavin Newsom said in a statement Monday. "The Huntington Beach officials who wasted taxpayer dollars on this embarrassing approach rather than doing their jobs ought to be ashamed of themselves. Huntington Beach deserves better. What a waste of taxpayers' dollars that could have gone to much-needed housing for their community."

California Attorney General Rob Bonta also hailed the high court's rejection of the case.

"Huntington Beach took its fight to the highest court in the country — and lost," Bonta said in a statement. "The U.S. Supreme Court officially declined to step in, leaving no doubt that the city must comply with our state

housing laws. After years of meritless resistance that has wasted taxpayer dollars, Huntington Beach can no longer claim that the U.S. Constitution is on its side. It is not. We look forward to holding the city fully accountable in state court, where we recently secured a decision that requires it to remedy its violations and significantly restricts the city's local control until it does so."

HB Mayor Casey McKeon also issued a statement Monday.

“While it’s disappointing that the United States Supreme Court decided not to take up our Housing Lawsuit, it’s certainly not surprising, as the Supreme Court only takes up about 1% of the cases brought before it," McKeon said.

"We felt our legal argument that the 9th District Court of Appeals’ claims of 'lack of standing' for Cities to sue their respective States in Federal Court needed to be adjudicated, as a lion's share of the Circuits allow their Cities to sue their respective States in federal court on certain issues," the mayor said. "There should be consistent, legal standing across the entire country.

"The voters of Huntington Beach elected us to defend our local control over

municipal affairs, especially housing, and that’s what we will continue to do relentlessly," McKeon's statement concluded. "Even though this path has ended, other paths will always exist for us to continue to rigorously fight to defend the Huntington Beach residents’ local control.”

In December, the California Supreme Court refused to review an appellate court ruling favorable to the state requiring the city to comply with the affordable housing rules.

HB officials had argued that charter-city designation allows for more local government authority for self-governance, and as a result the city did not have to comply with the state's requirements for approving proposed projects and eventually constructing affordable housing units.

The state sued Huntington Beach in March 2023, and a year later a San Diego Superior Court judge ruled the city violated the state's Housing Element Law. That ruling, however, did not include remedies the state wanted. An appeals court panel overturned the Superior Court judge's ruling, requiring the judge to reconsider the issue.

The city issued this statement after the state

Supreme Court declined to review the case in December: "The Supreme Court rarely grants review while a case is still developing in the trial court, and major legal questions remain unresolved, including the conflict between the Housing Element Law and CEQA and the Housing Department's uneven enforcement. The City sought review after the Court of Appeal’s interim decision declined to address the CEQA conflict, leaving the City in a no-win situation: facing penalties unless it adopts a housing element, even though CEQA prohibits adoption until environmental review is completed and lawful findings can be made."

Officials added that "because the litigation continues, (the Dec. 10) denial simply means the Supreme Court is not considering review at this time. The City will continue to vigorously defend its environmental stewardship, its charter-city authority, and its right to fair and evenhanded enforcement of State housing laws in the Superior Court."

The California Department of Housing and Community Development provides information online about the Housing Element Law, hcd.ca.gov/housingelement.

Huntington Beach. | Photo courtesy of Mike Fox/Unsplash

HEYSOCAL EVENTS CALENDAR

‘UNCONDITIONAL: A Musical Memoir’

Los Angeles LGBT Center – Renberg Theatre | 1125 N. McCadden Place, Los Angeles, CA 90038 | Feb. 28 | lalgbtcenter.org

Findawayhome Ink and the Los Angeles LGBT Center present a one-night-only encore of UNCONDITIONAL: A Musical Memoir, written and performed by Margot Rose and directed by Anne Kenny. This live-band musical tells the true story of two women who fight to build a family— and the resilience required to endure unimaginable loss. An intimate and powerful evening of music and storytelling. Tickets $24.98–$71.98.

UNCONDITIONAL: A Musical Memoir, presented by Findawayhome Ink and the Los Angeles LGBT Center, showing at the Renberg Theatre in Los Angeles on Feb. 28

‘Octopus’s Garden’

Boston Court Pasadena – Main Stage | 70 Mentor Ave., Pasadena, CA | Feb. 26 – March 29 | bostoncourtpasadena.org

Boston Court Pasadena, in collaboration with Circle X Theatre Co. and Outside In Theatre, presents the world premiere of Octopus’s Garden, a surreal new play by Weston Gaylord, directed by Jessica Kubzansky. When an octopus in a marine biology lab creates a piece of astonishing music, two scientists and a struggling composer are pulled into a transformative journey exploring art, obsession, and the mysteries of the unknown. Opening Night: March 7.

‘Pop Up! with Brightwork newmusic’

Sierra Madre Playhouse | 87 W. Sierra Madre Blvd., Sierra Madre, CA | Feb. 28 | sierramadreplayhouse.org

Brightwork newmusic delivers a bold concert blending pop, classical, and avant-garde influences in an energetic live performance. The program features works by Anthony Davis alongside contemporary composers, including Luciano Berio, creating a dynamic and adventurous evening of sound. Tickets $12–$35.

‘The Price’

Pacific Resident Theatre | 703 Venice Blvd., Venice, CA 90291 | Feb. 28 – April 12 | pacificresidenttheatre.org

In Arthur Miller’s powerful 1968 drama, two estranged brothers reunite in their late father’s attic to settle the estate—only to confront long-buried resentments, sacrifices, and the true cost of their life choices. Directed by Elina de Santos, this poignant and darkly humorous production explores responsibility, integrity, and the moral weight of compromise. Performances run Thursdays–Sundays (additional matinee March 14; no performances March 27 or April 3). Tickets start at $25.

‘Disney & Pixar’s Hoppers’

El Capitan Theatre | 6838 Hollywood Blvd., Hollywood, CA | Feb. 28 – March 22 | elcapitantheatre.com

Experience Pixar Animation Studios’ all-new animated

adventure Hoppers at the historic El Capitan Theatre, featuring a special live animal showcase before select screenings. The film follows Mabel, an animal lover who discovers technology that allows humans to communicate with animals by “hopping” into robotic bodies, leading to a heartwarming and high-tech adventure. Special early access and fan event screenings available; regular daily showtimes throughout the run. Tickets $18–$22 (special event pricing varies).

‘Thresholds of Invention: Passage’

Odyssey Theatre Ensemble | 2055 S. Sepulveda Blvd., Los Angeles, CA | March 1 | odysseytheatre.com

The Odyssey Theatre Ensemble presents a staged reading of Passage, a new play by Tina Preston and directed by Roxanne Rogers. Part of the Thresholds of Invention series, the work follows five women aboard a ship as they navigate passion, anger, freedom, and despair in an intimate first-look presentation. Tickets $25.

‘Camerata Pacifica: World Premiere by David Bruce’

Camerata Pacifica | March 1 – 6 | cameratapacifica.org

Camerata Pacifica presents a chamber music program highlighted by the world premiere of Natural Light by acclaimed composer David Bruce. The program also features works by Madeline Dring, Cécile Chaminade, and Antonín Dvořák, blending contemporary innovation with beloved classics across performances in Thousand Oaks, San Marino, Los Angeles, and Santa Barbara. Tickets $75+ (venue pricing varies).

‘Desert Smash Celebrity Pickleball Challenge’

March 2 | tickets.oneboxtds.com

The 2026 Desert Smash Celebrity Pickleball Challenge brings together celebrity talent and top professional pickleball players for an action-packed afternoon at one of the sport’s premier destinations. Guests enjoy courtside seating, product samplings, giveaways, and VIP experiences—all while supporting a charitable cause. Set against the stunning backdrop of La Quinta Resort & Club, this high-energy event blends world-class competition with star power and exclusive networking opportunities.

‘Studio Ghibli’s Ponyo’

Academy Museum of Motion Pictures | 6067 Wilshire Blvd., Los Angeles, CA | Through Jan. 10, 2027 | academymuseum.org

The Academy Museum presents Studio Ghibli’s Ponyo, celebrating the artistry of Studio Ghibli and the handdrawn animation behind the 2008 film. The exhibition features over 100 original materials from Studio Ghibli, including art boards, posters, an animation desk, and hand drawings by Hayao Miyazaki, many on display in North America for the first time. Curated by Jessica Niebel with assistant curator Emily Rauber Rodriguez. The museum is open six days a week, closed on Tuesdays. Tickets $15–$25; film screenings $5–$10.

Exhibition photography for "Studio Ghibli’s PONYO" at The Academy Museum of Motion Pictures in Los Angeles. | Photo courtesy of Emily Shur/Academy Museum Foundation

OPINION

The future of the US-Taiwan trade agreement is fraught with uncertainty

Therecentlysigned ReciprocalTrade Agreement(ART) between the United States and Taiwan, which will bring $44 billion in new orders to the US, is expected to bring hightech production capacity, represented by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC), back to the US.

A sure-fire deal for the U.S.

According to the agreement, Taiwan will purchase more than $44 billion worth of liquefied natural gas and crude oil from the U.S., further opening its market to U.S. products, including beef, dairy products, pork, wheat, medical products, and automobiles. Taipei also pledged to purchase approximately $15 billion worth of U.S. civilian aircraft and components by 2029 and invest approximately $25 billion in power generation equipment.

The true "greatness" of this agreement lies in its potential to drive the semiconduc-

tor industry back to the U.S. TSMC, the world's leading high-end chip foundry, is adding to its existing $165 billion investment in the U.S. The Trump administration stated it would further promote the transfer of 40% of TSMC's production capacity to the U.S.

The agreement has sparked controversy within Taiwan.

The over-concentration of open projects could negatively impact domestic demand and traditional industries (automobiles, agriculture, livestock, and healthcare distribution).

Coupled with the pressure of large-scale procurement commitments and institutional reconciliation, this could create long-term structural fiscal crowdingout effects. Furthermore, Taiwan's over-reliance on the U.S. could lead to a loss of autonomy for Taiwanese businesses, all of which are undermining the island's sense of security and confidence.

Taiwan's opposition parties have questioned the ruling party's "black box" approach to negotiating the agreement, citing information asymmetry and describing it as a "blind box of shocks." They claim that Taiwanese businesses are not facing a transparent and predictable trade system, but rather a policy process where the effects are revealed gradually and immediately.

Taiwan'sbusiness magazine “Business Weekly” reported last month: when Taiwan expanded westward into mainland China, it shed the "fat" of low-end assembly, making its industries more agile. Now, by expanding eastward into the U.S., Taiwan is losing its "heart," potentially causing its "body to lose its power."

Uncertainties remain.

The recent setbacks in the prestige of Taiwan's president and ruling party, coupled with escalating cross-party confrontation and growing public discontent, cast a

shadow over the agreement's effective implementation. The opposition has stated it will rigorously review the agreement in the Legislative Yuan, potentially initiating a special oversight mechanism and requiring multiple public hearings or committee reviews, which could prolong the process. If it fails to pass or undergoes significant revisions, the agreement will need to be returned to the Executive Yuan for renegotiation with the U.S.

The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), a U.S. think

Ptank, cautions that many key details of the agreement are still incomplete, and its implementation and actual effectiveness remain to be seen. The CFR states that the U.S.'s goal of transferring approximately 40% of Taiwan's semiconductor supply chain to the U.S. is unlikely to be accepted by Taiwan. If the importance of Taiwan's semiconductor supply chain is weakened, it could affect the U.S.'s incentive to "protect Taiwan" strategically. Furthermore, from an industry perspective, the conditions in the U.S. are also

pension?

a major constraint. Taiwan has established a complete semiconductor ecosystem with mature industrial clusters and a large pool of professionals; in contrast, the U.S. lags significantly behind in terms of related human resources, supply chain integration, and cost structure. In fact, TSMC is already facing challenges in its U.S. factories, including talent recruitment, equipment maintenance, and operational efficiency. If it further expands its investment, these challenges will likely become even more severe.

erhaps tension is the wrong word. I’m sure being the community services director was challenging, demanding, rewarding, and fun. And no one made it look easier than Tina Cherry. Honestly, I only chose the work tension for the rhyme. It was such a pleasure to attend Tina’s retirement party and revel in all of the wonderful things Tina’s peers and friends had to say about her accomplishments, her work ethic, the way she made them feel, and the way she was able to connect all of us together into such a tightknit community. Tina was humble and graceful, and as her eyes filled up during her speech, I think all of ours did too. Tina was an incredibly special fit for that role. All the events we have had — tree lightings, parades, carnivals, festivals, concerts, movies … the list could go on and on — went off without a hitch and Tina made it look effortless. I am really surprised the nickname Queena did not stick, as she was the queen of the community. I really should have thrown it out there sooner.

With every queen comes a court. Tina had an exceptional staff. The reason all of the events looked seamless and effortless to us was because of the talent Tina surrounded herself with. A lot of people spoke at Tina’s retirement party about how much they are going to miss her. Honestly, I am excited that she is retired. I hope she finally has more time for lunch, brunch, happy hour or whatever else she wants to do. I hope to see Tina and her husband on the ferris wheel

this coming Monrovia Days weekend.

Tina has not abandoned us. She has left us in very capable hands. I am so happy to announce that Rebecca

Sandoval will be taking over as our next community services director. Rebecca has served the community for nearly 18 years and is such a blessing to our Community

Services Department. This promotion was a no-brainer. I am very excited to see the direction Rebecca takes as she leads the department and our community. She and her staff are going to do amazing things in Monrovia — have no doubt! Tina will be there, cheering them all on.

Out of all the speeches given at Tina’s retirement party, Dr. Tamala Kelly gave my favorite. I wish I could share it here, but the space allotted me says no. Her speech was so beautifully given, it made my heart full.

Dr. Kelly has just stepped down as Mayor Pro Tem, where she has served us well since April of last year. She is a true woman of the people. She is driven by a love of God, her family and her community. She is beauty, grace, intelligence and eloquence,

and when she speaks it is with thoughtfulness and intention. I am so happy she is a member of our City Council. I am so thankful for her leadership and contributions, and I am excited to see her grow in her role. Thank you, Dr. Kelly! I will end by welcoming City Councilmember Sergio Jimenez, as he steps into the role of Mayor Pro Tem. His leadership and love of the community show in all that he does. I’m looking forward to his contributions. I’m not sure why I am so hearts-andflowers today. It is a gorgeous day in Monrovia, and I guess I am feeling very blessed to be part of a community where our leaders love the town as much as we do. Not all cities are like this. Other cities do not hold a candle to this beautiful Gem of the Foothills.

Photo by Louis Reed / Unsplash
Monrovia Old Town report: Goodbye tension, hello
Tina Cherry, at left, and Rebecca Sandoval. | Photo by Shawn Spencer

ANNOUNCEMENTS

Eliminate gutter cleaning forever! LeafFilter, the most advanced debris-blocking gutter protection. Schedule a FREE LeafFilter estimate today. 20% off Entire Purchase. 10% Senior & Military Discounts. Call 1-855-424-7581 (Cal-SCAN)

HOME IMPROVEMENT

Safe Step. North America's #1 Walk-In Tub. Comprehensive lifetime warranty. Top-ofthe-line installation and service. Now featuring our FREE shower package and $1600 Off for a limited time! Call today! Financing available. Call Safe Step 1-888-989-5749 (CalSCAN)

INSURANCE/HEALTH

DENTAL INSURANCE from Physicians Mutual Insurance Company. Coverage for 400 plus procedures. Real dental insurance - NOT just a discount plan. Do not wait! Call now! Get your FREE Dental Information Kit with all the details! 1-844-2032677 www.dental50plus.com/ calnews #6258 (Cal-SCAN)

MISCELLANEOUS

The difference in winning and losing market share is how businesses use their advertising dollars. CNPA’s Advertising Services’ power to c onnect to nearly 13 million of the state’s readers who are an engaged audience, makes our services an indispensable marketing solution. F or more info call Cecelia @ (916)288-60 11 or cecelia@

cnpa.com

DID YOU KNOW Newspapergenerated content is so valuable it’s taken and repeated, condensed, broadcast, tweeted, discussed, posted, copied, edited, and emailed countless times throughout the day by others? Discover the Power of Newspaper Advertising. For a free brochure call 916-2886011 or email cecelia@cnpa. com (Cal-SCAN)

REAL ESTATE LOANS

RETIRED COUPLE $$$$ for business purpose Real Estate loans. Credit unimportant. V.I.P. Trust Deed Company www.viploan.com Call 1-818248-0000. Broker-principal DRE 01041073. No consumer loans. (Cal-SCAN)

Credit One Bank agrees to pay just over $10M to settle lawsuit

Credit One Bank has agreed to pay just over $10 million to settle a civil consumer protection lawsuit alleging the company or its vendors made repeated, intrusive and harassing debt collection calls, the Los Angeles County District Attorney's Office announced Friday.

TheNevada-based company — which did not admit wrongdoing — was ordered to pay $9 million in civil penalties and $1.2 million in investigative costs in connection with the judgment entered Feb. 19 in Riverside County Superior Court in a lawsuit filed by the district attorney's offices of Los Angeles, Riverside, San Diego and Santa Clara counties.

The settlement also requires the company to comply with state and federal law involving consumer debt collection, according to the District Attorney's Office.

The lawsuit alleged that Credit One had a policy that allowed its vendors to make eight calls per day along with an additional two calls per day under certain circumstances on overdue

credit card accounts and that the calls could be placed on consecutive days.

"Credit card companies do not have the right to badger consumers and invade their privacy with non-stop phone calls to collect debt," Los Angeles County District Attorney Nathan J. Hochman said in a statement announcing the settlement. "We are sending a strong message today that companies will not get away with harassing consumers in our state."

The District Attorney's

Chica A496941

Chica first came to Pasadena Humane in 2021, and now this five-yearold blue pittie is back in our care, ready for a fresh start. All heart and full of love, Chica is easygoing, playful, and incredibly affectionate. She enjoys lounging near her people, heading out for sniff-filled walks with her excellent leash manners, and soaking up all the praise and physical touch she can get. In her foster home, Chica is a gem. She’s potty trained, not a chewer, and happily snoozes while you’re away. She bonds deeply and may give a brief, hopeful thump at the door when you leave, but she settles in quickly. She can be reactive to dogs and enjoys some strong, happy playtime when excited, so she’d do best in an adult home that appreciates her solid, silly enthusiasm. Chica has so much love to give and is hoping her second adoption is the one that leads to forever. With a 10-day adoption trial available, you can take this big-hearted girl home and see just how sweet life with Chica can be!

Boda A526802

Office said Credit One had previously been found liable by a federal jury in 2019 for violating the Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, which allows debt collectors to make calls with frequency that is reasonable under the circumstances.

The case stemmed from an investigation by the California Debt Collection Task Force, a statewide law enforcement team composed of the district attorney's offices of Los Angeles, San Diego, Riverside and Santa Clara counties.

Six-year-old Boda is a big lovebug just waiting to make a big impression on someone’s heart. This handsome guy greets the world with a softness that quickly transforms into the happiest full-body wiggles. He’s easy to leash, confident, and while he’s definitely strong (one of the strongest pups around!), he’s also surprisingly polite. In the yard, Boda’s playful side really shines. He loves to chase toys and then bring them right back and place them gently at your feet like a perfect gentleman. He knows “sit” like a pro, offers an enthusiastic “shake,” and even takes breaks by flopping down at your feet with his toy for a quick breather. He loves people and settles easily when it’s time for a nice break. Boda may be a big ol’ guy (with a little drool to prove it!), but he’s also an easygoing, confident sweetheart who’s ready for his forever home. If you’re looking for a playful, affectionate best friend with great manners and an even bigger heart, come meet Boda and see why he’s such a good boy.

The adoption fee for dogs is $150. All dog adoptions include spay or neuter, microchip, and age-appropriate vaccines. Walk-in adoptions are available every day from 9:30 a.m.-5:30 p.m. View photos of adoptable pets at pasadenahumane.org. New adopters will receive a complimentary health-and-wellness exam from VCA Animal Hospitals, as well as a goody bag filled with information about how to care for your pet. Pets may not be available for adoption and cannot be held for potential adopters by phone calls or email.

| Photo by Neirfy007/Envato

Los Angeles

Monrovia

Monrovia’s 3rd Annual House Party @ the Park set for March 15

The 3rd Annual House Party at the Park is set for Sunday, March 15, from 1 to 5 p.m. Hosted by CommUNITYreIMAGINED and Chris Loos, this family-friendly celebration honors the people making a positive impact in Monrovia. The party will feature food, music, youth activities, games, a car show, and community resources. Know someone who deserves an M-Town Award? Nominate them at https:// docs.google.com/forms/d/e/ 1FAIpQLScU6TZH3dDi9M7k 8hjYfQZZxeWAl-MaKunnfKmpWeVHGY33OQ/viewform.

San Gabriel

San Gabriel Farmers Market is back

The City of San Gabriel's relaunched San Gabriel Farmers Market begins Saturday, April 11, 2026. This market will take place every Saturday from 9 a.m. to 1 p.m., rain or shine, along Mission Drive in front of the historic San Gabriel Mission Playhouse. Each week, the Farmers Market is expected to feature 20 or more vendors offering a diverse selection of goods, including fresh local produce, artisan and packaged foods, jarred honey, baked goods, snacks, flowers, and more. Residents and visitors are encouraged to shop local, support small businesses, and enjoy the lively atmosphere of this weekly community event. To accommodate the market, Mission Drive between

Broadway and Santa Anita Street will be closed on Saturdays during market hours. Learn more at SanGabrielED com/FarmersMarket.

Long

Beach

Long Beach to offer Spring Fun Days April 6-10

The City of Long Beach Department of Parks, Recreation and Marine (PRM) will offer its free youth recreation program, Spring Fun Days, at various parks throughout Long Beach during the upcoming school spring break. Spring Fun Days engage children ages 5 to 12 in activities such as sports, games, arts and crafts and special events. This is a free drop-in program where registered participants may come and go as they please. The program will run Monday through Friday, April 6-10, from noon to 5 p.m. each day at parks throughout Long Beach.Pre-registration is required. Registration forms will be available at participating Spring Fun Day park locations beginning Monday, March 23. Residents can call or visit their preferred neighborhood park for schedules and to register for activities. More information, including the complete list of all participating locations, is available at https:// www.longbeach.gov/park/ recreation-programs/youthprograms/spring-fun-days/. .

Orange County

Extended spring-summer OC Park hours begin March 8

The clocks spring forward early March 8, marking the

beginning of daylight saving time and OC Parks’ springsummer operating schedule. Most regional parks close at 9 p.m. for the spring and summer. Wilderness parks close at sunset year-round. Irvine Lake will continue to operate Friday through Sunday 7 a.m. to 4 p.m. Hours for OC Parks’ beaches vary but are generally between 6 a.m. and 10 p.m. Salt Creek Beach opens at 5 a.m. and closes at midnight. OC Parks facilities will remain on these operating hours until daylight saving time ends Nov. 1, 2026.

John Wayne Airport celebrates new dining and retail concessions

John Wayne Airport (JWA) has announced the recent openings of several new dining and retail concessions, expanding amenities for travelers. The new openings include Dunkin’, operated by HMSHost; Harbor Exchange, operated by Paradies Lagardère; and Brookstone, operated by Hudson. Dunkin’, the largest coffee and donut brand in the United States, is located in pre-security, Terminal B, baggage claim. Harbor Exchange showcases curated retail offerings inspired by Southern California, featuring travel essentials, gifts, and locally influenced merchandise that reflect the region’s character and culture (postsecurity, Terminal A, across from Gate 8). Brookstone, operated by Hudson (postsecurity, Terminal A, across from Gate 8), brings an electronics and lifestyle retail experience to the airport, offering technology products and accessories

Riverside County

Riverside County Department of Animal Services launches Ironwood dog foster program

The Riverside County Department of Animal Services has partnered with Ironwood State Prison to bring people and animals together to help save and change lives through a novel foster program. Thirty-one RivCo dogs started the foster program with incarcerated men at the state prison located in Blythe, where the dogs can socialize, exercise and learn new manners outside of the stressful shelter environment. The human foster participants were screened and selected by prison staff and share daily caretaking responsibilities for the dogs. The RivCo dogs at Ironwood become available for adoption after 14 days in the program, if they are not first adopted by Ironwood staff or families of the foster guardians. Since starting the foster program in December, eight RivCo dogs have been adopted without having to return to a shelter. For more information on the Ironwood Dog Foster Program and how to adopt a dog in the program, visit www.rcdas. org/Ironwood

City of Riverside

Riverside sustainability manager named to California Climate Leaders Fellowship

Fortino Morales III, who serves as sustainability manager for the City of Riverside, has been named as a member of the Center for Community Investment’s 2026–2027 cohort of the California Climate Leaders Fellowship. The program is designed to support individuals across California who are advancing communitycentered climate resilience through equity, commu-

nity power, and community investment. “Riverside is a leader in sustainability in our region, which is reflected in my selection to this prestigious fellowship,” Morales said. “I am eager to take what I learn through the fellowship to make our city even more impactful when it comes to these critical issues.” During the next year, fellows will engage in peer learning, leadership development, and systems-based strategies, including CCI’s Capital Absorption Framework, to strengthen pipelines of high-impact, investable climate solutions rooted in community priorities. The Framework’s three functions include articulating a shared priority, creating and executing an investable pipeline of projects, and improving the enabling environment.

San Bernardino County

Code Enforcement to host community cleanup events in Newberry Springs, Daggett

San Bernardino County Code Enforcement and the Solid Waste Management Division will be hosting free bulky item disposal events for residents of the county’s unincorporated areas. These events will provide containers within these specific communities for trash, e-waste, tires and on-site confidential document shredding. No business or commercial materials will be accepted. Residents are asked to secure and properly cover their loads before traveling to the site. Those bringing tires are limited to nine per load, in accordance with state law. Tires on rims will be accepted. Participants must unload their own materials. Oversized or hard-to-handle loads may be turned away. Accepted items include household trash, bulky items, green waste, and vehicle tires. Concrete will not be accepted.

The Urban Conservation Corps will collect electronics such as TVs, computer monitors, VCRs, stereos and cell phones.Hazardous waste will not be accepted. Prohibited items include household and auto batteries, motor oil, antifreeze, gasoline, pesticides, fertilizers, fluorescent lights, pool chemicals, paint products and medications. The Newberry Springs event will be held at Springs Senior/Family Center, 33383 Newberry Springs Road, from 8 a.m. to noon. The Daggett event will be held at the Daggett Community Services District, 33703 Second St., from 8 a.m. to noon.

City of San Bernardino

Feldheym Library to hold its spring book sale Feb. 28, March 7

The Friends of the San Bernardino Public Library (SBPL) will be holding its Spring Book Sale on Saturday, Feb. 28 and Saturday, March 7 from 10 a.m. until 4 p.m. at the Norman F. Feldheym Library. Proceeds from the sale will help support programs at all four City Libraries, including the popular Summer Reading Program. Books, magazines and other reading materials, as well as DVDs, music and more will be available for purchase at discounted prices. Most hardback books sell for one dollar each; paperbacks and children’s books start at $.25 or five for one dollar; and most DVD’s are only one dollar. On Saturday, March 7, the sale will feature the library’s special “fill the bag” promotion, where patrons will be able to fill a bag with books for only $3. The Feldheym Central Library is located 555 West Sixth Street in San Bernardino. The Book Sale room is on the south side of the library, with a separate entrance from the main library. All sales are cash only and denominations of $20 or less will be accepted.

Monrovia

Feb. 12

At 8:07 a.m., several callers in the 600 block of West Duarte reported an armed male subject in the area shooting at moving vehicles. Officers arrived and located the subject in a nearby apartment complex. An investigation revealed he was using a toy gun to shoot at passing vehicles. He was also found to be in possession of a knife and had harmed himself with it. He had to be transported to a hospital for treatment.

At 12:35 p.m., a family disturbance was reported in the 1000 block of Royal Oaks. Officers arrived and made contact with the parties involved. An investigation revealed a female subject battered her spouse. She was arrested and taken into custody.

At 5:34 p.m., a caller in the area of Myrtle and Foothill reported a subject slumped over the steering wheel of his parked vehicle. Officers arrived and made contact with him. He was found to be in possession of drug paraphernalia. He was arrested and taken into custody.

Feb. 13

At 12:53 a.m., an officer patrolling the 1600 block of South Myrtle saw a subject in a park after hours. The officer made contact with the subject. He was found to be in possession of a controlled substance and drug paraphernalia. He was

arrested and taken into custody.

At 2:13 a.m., security at a hotel in the 900 block of West Huntington reported a male subject on the property threatening to kill an employee. The subject fled prior to officers’ arrival. This investigation is continuing.

At 9:23 a.m., while patrolling the 100 block of East Central, an officer saw graffiti on a wall. The graffiti was documented for removal. This investigation is continuing.

At 12:08 p.m., an employee from a business in the 700 block of East Huntington reported a theft in progress. Officers arrived while the female subject was outside the business. She was arrested and taken into custody.

At 6:05 p.m., a caller at a business in the 1200 block of South Shamrock reported suspicious juveniles who may have written graffiti on the property. The reporting party believed one juvenile may have written graffiti near a light box on the north side of the property. This investigation is continuing.

At 8:28 p.m., a caller in the 100 block of West Colorado reported graffiti in a parking structure. This investigation is continuing.

At 9:14 p.m., officers responded to the area of Mayflower and Evergreen regarding reports of three

juveniles tagging. Officers arrived and located the three juveniles nearby. The subject responsible for the tagging was arrested and transported to the MPD jail. He was later released to his parents with a citation.

Feb. 14

At 3:39 a.m., multiple locations throughout the city were reported to be tagged with graffiti. This investigation is continuing.

At 9:20 a.m., a caller in the 300 block of West Duarte reported a male subject drinking in a parking lot. Officers arrived and made contact with the subject. Officers determined he was too intoxicated to care for himself. He was arrested and transported to the MPD jail to be held for a sobering period.

At 12:55 p.m., a family disturbance was reported in the 1000 block of East Huntington. Officers arrived and made contact with the parties involved. An investigation revealed a male subject battered his ex-girlfriend. He was arrested and taken into custody.

At 2:23 p.m., an employee from a business in the 500 block of West Huntington reported a shoplifting in progress. Officers arrived and located the female subject fleeing in her vehicle, she abandoned her vehicle and fled on foot. She was eventually detained and taken into

custody.

At 4:01 p.m., a caller in the area of Duarte and Shamrock reported three subjects drinking in public. Officers arrived and made contact with the subjects. One of the subjects was determined to be too intoxicated. He was arrested and transported to the MPD jail to be held for a sobering period.

Feb. 15

At 2:47 a.m., an officer on patrol found graffiti in the 1800 block of South Mountain. This investigation is continuing.

At 5:08 a.m., a suspicious person was seen jumping fences in an apartment complex in the 1600 block of South Magnolia. Officers arrived and located the subject who was determined to be trespassing and in possession of drug paraphernalia. He was arrested and taken into custody.

At 4:07 p.m., a residential burglary was reported in the 200 block of Valle Vista. Property was taken. This investigation is continuing.

At 6:13 p.m., a domestic dispute was reported in the 700 block of South Alta Vista. Officers arrived and made contact with the parties involved. An investigation revealed a father and adult daughter were involved in an argument and the father who was determined to be intoxicated became physically

aggressive. He was arrested and taken into custody.

At 7:09 p.m., a shoplifting incident was reported at a business in the 500 block of West Huntington. The subject was gone prior to officers’ arrival. This investigation is continuing.

At 9:33 p.m., a caller in the 500 block of South Primrose reported subjects loitering in an alley, blocking access to a garage door. Officers arrived and made contact with one of the subjects. An investigation revealed the subject had a warrant for his arrest and was in possession of a controlled substance and drug paraphernalia. The subject was arrested and taken into custody.

At 10:41 p.m., officers patrolling the area of Myrtle and Cypress located six instances of graffiti on multiple walls throughout the city. This investigation is continuing.

Feb. 16

At 11:20 a.m., a victim in the 800 block of South Alta Vista reported graffiti on his van. This investigation is continuing.

At 2:12 p.m., a resident in the 400 block of East Cypress reported seeing fire coming from a home. MFD responded and extinguished the fire. This investigation is continuing.

Feb. 17

At 1 p.m., a victim in the

500 block of East Walnut reported her vehicle stolen. This investigation is continuing.

At 4:22 p.m., a mother in the 800 block of West Duarte reported her juvenile daughter as a runaway. Officers were unable to locate her. She was entered into the system as a critical missing runaway. She returned home later that evening.

At 7:03 p.m., multiple vandalism incidents related to graffiti were reported throughout the city. This investigation is continuing.

At 8:03 p.m., a vandalism in progress at a park in the 300 block of South Myrtle was reported. Officers arrived and saw two juveniles attempting to start a fire, leaving scorch marks behind. Both juveniles were arrested, transported to the MPD, cited and released to their parents.

Feb. 18

At 1:07 p.m., an officer patrolling the 300 block of South Myrtle reported graffiti on a wall. This investigation is continuing.

At 11:23 p.m., an officer patrolling the 100 block of West Pomona saw a bicyclist commit a traffic violation. A traffic stop was conducted. An investigation revealed he was in possession of a controlled substance. He was arrested, cited, and released at the scene.

Thousands of Kaiser Permanente nurses return to work after monthlong strike

Thousands of unionized nurses and health care professionals at Kaiser Permanente facilities in California and Hawaii will returned to work Tuesday, ending a roughly four-week strike carried out amid prolonged contract talks, union officials said Monday.

Officials with the United Nurses Associations of California/Union of Health Care Professionals said in a statement there has been "significant movement at the bargaining table" over the past 48 hours, prompting them to call for an end to the strike as of 7 a.m. Tuesday.

The union also called off all picketing activity on Monday as the union and Kaiser "finalize return-towork agreements."

The nurses' strike began on Jan. 26. Union officials called it the "largest open-ended strike of registered nurses and health care professionals in

United States history."

There were no immediate details available about the how close the two sides were to reaching a contract agreement, or what issues may have been resolved.

The roughly 31,000 members of the UNAC/UHCP had vowed to stay on strike until a fair contract agreement was reached. UNAC/UHCP members include registered nurses, pharmacists, nurse anesthetists, nurse practitioners, midwives, physician assistants, rehab therapists, speech language pathologists, dietitians and other specialty health care professionals.

"We're striking because Kaiser has committed serious unfair labor practices and because Kaiser refuses to bargain in good faith over staffing that protects patients, workload standards that stop moral injury and the respect and dignity that Kaiser caregivers have been

denied for far too long," registered nurse Charmaine Morales, president of UNAC/ UHCP, said previously.

Kaiser Permanente countered that it had "proposed 21.5% wage increases — our strongest national bargaining offer ever — and we are prepared to close agreements at local tables now.

Employees deserve their raises and patients deserve our full attention, not prolonged disputes."

Camille Applin-Jones, senior vice president at Kaiser Permanente Southern California, previously described Kaiser's latest contract offer as "one of the strongest nursing contract offers in California this year" once step increases and local adjustments are factored in.

"Despite the union's claims, this strike is about wages. This open- ended strike by UNAC/UHCP is unnecessary when such a

generous offer is on the table. The strike is designed to disrupt the lives of our patients — the very people we are all here to serve," Applin-Jones said.

REAL ESTATE

EThe union filed an unfair labor practice charge against Kaiser with the National Labor Relations Board alleging the company walked away from the bargain-

ing table in December and has attempted to bypass the agreed-upon national bargaining process. The union has been bargaining with Kaiser since last May.

Early 2026 housing trends: Rates improve, incentives expand, confidence lags

ach month, NewHomeSource parent company

Zonda surveys homebuilders to gauge sentiment about the housing market. The builder-focused insights reveal how the companies building homes feel about market sentiment and trends. For homeowners and prospective buyers, these insights can be a valuable tool to understand what is happening, what is coming in the housing market, and how to move forward.

The main takeaways from the January report center on demand-side topics such as mortgage rates, financing incentives, and buyer confidence.

Rates Retreat, Demand Returns

Just over half of the builders surveyed by Zonda reported that demand was on track with their expectations in January, double the

share reporting such levels of demand in December and the highest share of “on track” responses since April 2024.

While this may be an indication that demand is returning in the new year, this may also reflect adjusted expectations. Since the “on track” metric has no quantitative association, it’s possible that builders are reporting demand is in line with lower expectations given current conditions.

One quarter of builders surveyed attributed the improvement to lower rates, up from 14% of builders a month ago. However, the pickup in traffic has been uneven: 16% of builders reported no change in traffic tied to rates while a quarter of respondents said buyers remain spooked by overall market conditions.

Incentives Still Reign Supreme

Four in five builders surveyed reported the use of mortgage rate buydowns in January, with 55% of builders offering buydowns in the 4% range. Another 20% of builders reported offering buydowns in the low- to mid-5% range.

The survey results show incentives are still an essential tool for builders in the current market. For buyers, this means there are plenty of deals out there that may help ease their economic uncertainty. For some, the difference between the average mortgage rate and the rate with a builder buydown may be enough to move them from the fence and fully into the housing market.

Buyer Confidence

Remains a Challenge Consumer confidence weighed on the housing market for much of 2025 and early indications show it remains a limiting factor early in 2026. It was cited as the primary holdup for buyers for the fourth consecutive month by builders surveyed by Zonda. Beyond confidence, the labor market, affordability, and overall economic uncertainty are factors keeping buyers on the sidelines. While lower rates and buydowns can move some buyers off the sidelines, the survey reveals some confidence issues stem from issues separate from mortgage rates.

and

Kaiser Permanente nurses and other hospital workers demonstrate Feb. 8 during their extended work stoppage. | Photo courtesy of UNAC/UHCP/Facebook
| Photo courtesy of Artful Homes/Unsplash

Rob Reiner's youngest son pleads not guilty in parents' deaths

Actor-directorRob Reiner's youngest son pleaded not guilty Monday to murder charges stemming from the deaths of the famed filmmaker and his photographer wife, Michele, in their Brentwood home.

Nick Reiner, 32, who remains jailed without bail, is set to return to court April 29, when a date is scheduled to be set for a hearing to determine if there is enough evidence for him to stand trial.

Nick Reiner was charged Dec. 16 with two counts of murder in connection with the slayings of his 78-yearold father and 70-year-old mother, who were found dead about 3:30 p.m. Dec. 14 in the couple's Brentwood home in the 200 block of Chadbourne Avenue between Sunset and San Vicente boulevards.

The murder charges include the special circumstance allegation of multiple murders, opening him to a possible death sentence if prosecutors choose to pursue capital punishment. He is also facing an allegation that he personally used a deadly weapon — a knife.

Los Angeles County District Attorney Nathan Hochman told reporters outside court following Monday's brief hearing that his office will be "looking at all aggravating and mitigating circumstances" and that Nick Reiner's attorney has been invited to present written and oral arguments before a decision is made on whether to seek the death penalty.

"It will be subject to not only a rigorous analysis, but many of the most experienced individuals in the DA's Office with death penalty experience will be helping me evaluate that information," Hochman said.

Of the court proceedings, he noted that the defense could likely request more time to prepare before a preliminary hearing date is

set "because of the volume of discovery that will have to be gone through by defense counsel, by the fact that we're still waiting for the coroner's report and by the fact that if defense counsel wants to seek any additional expert testimony it will certainly take additional time."

Nick Reiner's first scheduled arraignment was postponed Dec. 17 at the defense's request, with his then-attorney Alan Jackson telling reporters that there were some "very, very complex issues that are associated with the case."

The defendant appeared in court again Jan. 7, with Jackson announcing then that he was withdrawing from the case. The defense lawyer told Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Theresa R. McGonigle then, "We feel we have no choice at this juncture."

His new attorney, Deputy Public Defender Kimberly Greene, asked then for the arraignment to be delayed "one last time" after replacing Jackson at that court appearance.

Outside court after that hearing, Jackson told reporters, "Circumstances beyond our control but more importantly circumstances beyond

Nick's control have dictated that sadly it's made it impossible for us to continue our representation of Nick. I'm legally and I'm ethically prohibited from explaining all of the reasons why. ...

"What we've learned and you can take this to the bank is that pursuant to the laws of this state, pursuant to the law in California, Nick is not guilty of murder," Jackson said outside court last month.

Minutes later, the district attorney told reporters last month, "We are fully confident that a jury will convict Nick Reiner beyond a reasonable doubt of the brutal murders of his parents, Rob Reiner and Michele Singer Reiner, and do so unanimously."

The LA County Office of Medical Examiner classified the couple's deaths as homicides, with both dying from "multiple sharp force injuries."

The death certificates note they were killed "with knife, by another."

Nick Reiner was arrested by Los Angeles police in the Exposition Park area near USC less than six hours after his parents' bodies were discovered. He remains behind bars without bail.

Los Angeles Police

Department Chief Jim McDonnell declined soon afterward to provide any details on what led to Nick Reiner being identified as the suspect.

In a statement released the day of their brother's initial court appearance, Nick Reiner's older brother, Jake, and younger sister, Romy, said, "Words cannot even begin to describe the unimaginable pain we are experiencing every moment of the day. The horrific and devastating loss of our parents, Rob and Michele Reiner, is something that no one should ever experience. They weren't just our parents; they were our best friends.

"We are grateful for the outpouring of condolences, kindness, and support we have received not only from family and friends but people from all walks of life," the two said. "We now ask for respect and privacy, for speculation to be tempered with compassion and humanity, and for our parents to be remembered for the incredible lives they lived and the love they gave."

Rob Reiner was best known for his iconic role as Archie Bunker's liberal sonin-law Michael "Meathead" Stivic on the classic sitcom

"All in the Family" — a role for which he won two Primetime Emmy Awards, along with being the director of films including "Stand By Me," "The Princess Bride," "A Few Good Men," "Misery," "This Is Spinal Tap" and "When Harry Met Sally."

According to multiple reports, the couple's 28-yearold daughter discovered her father's body. One report suggested that a massage therapist had shown up at the couple's home for a prescheduled appointment but got no answer at the door and contacted their daughter, who went inside the home and found Rob Reiner slain. She contacted authorities, who subsequently found Michele Reiner's body in the house.

Rob and Michele Reiner, along with Nick, attended talk-show host Conan O'Brien's Christmas party the night before, and sources said Rob Reiner and his son got into a heated argument over his son's odd behavior at the event. Rob and Michele Reiner wound up leaving the event, but it was unclear when Nick Reiner left. TMZ reported that Nick Reiner checked into a Santa Monica hotel around 4 a.m. the next day, and that blood was later found in the room.

It was reported in December that Nick Reiner had been diagnosed with schizophrenia and was taking medications that made him "erratic and dangerous."

Citing two sources with knowledge of the situation, TMZ reported that he had been under the care of a psychiatrist for mental illness, but that his behavior had grown more alarming in recent weeks.

Nick Reiner has been open about his struggles with drug abuse over the years, even working with his father to produce a 2015 semi-autobiographical movie titled "Being Charlie," based on Nick's drug-addiction issues and the family's struggles to cope.

In media interviews and podcast appearances, he previously described being in and out of rehab programs throughout his teen years, and spending time homeless in various states, including Texas, New Jersey and Maine. He also described an instance when he was high on cocaine for multiple days and trashed his parents' guest house.

Rob Reiner — who was married for 10 years to actress/director Penny Marshall before they divorced in 1981 — married Michele Singer in 1989 after meeting her while he was directing "When Harry Met Sally." Reiner often told the story about how his romance with Singer led him to change the ending to the movie — with the characters played by Billy Crystal and Meg Ryan reuniting rather than going their separate ways.

Rob Reiner was a vocal Democratic Party activist, helping to spearhead efforts to legalize same-sex marriage in California and to pass a 1998 initiative that created the First 5 California childhood-development services program, funded by a tobacco tax.

Nick Reiner, at left, and his father Rob Reiner in 2016. | Photo courtesy of Tony Turner/Montclair Film Festival/Flickr (CC BY 2.0)

New online tool maps factory farms across California

Anewonlinetool

maps out the locations of California’s 1,300 largest factory farms and lets people know where and how animals from their favorite brands are raised.

The database at FactoryFarmWatch.org compiles publicly available information and makes it searchable.

Lewis Bernier, researcher for Factory Farm Watch and investigator for the advocacy group Direct

Action Everywhere, said it is the most comprehensive database of its kind in the country.

"We have the emissions data, violations of water quality laws, OSHA violations," Bernier outlined. "We have the corporations that own the farms. We have the brands that they sell. And it's the first time that regular people have ever been able to connect all of those things in one place."

The map lets you zoom

into your area to see the farms closest to you. You can also search your favorite brand to learn about conditions at the dairies and feedlots supplying your eggs, milk, and meat.

Packaging on the products often shows rolling green hills with animals kept outside but Bernier pointed out marketing is often deceptive, masking true conditions.

"The vast majority of animals that are produced

for food live in absolutely horrible conditions, because that's what the market incentives push toward, and that's what we allow with our laws," Bernier emphasized. "If we allow them to have 4.2 million chickens in a single egg-laying farm, they're going to do that."

Food producers said they maintain high standards and humane conditions, and comply with all state regulations. Advocates at Factory Farm Watch said they hope

will spur

Ducks defenseman wins Olympic gold medal in ice hockey

AnaheimDucks defenseman Jackson LaCombe won an Olympic gold medal Sunday without playing in the tournament as the United States defeated Canada, 2-1, in overtime in Milan, Italy, the Americans' first men's hockey gold medal since 1980.

Under Olympic rules, all players on the rosters of medal-winning teams receive medals.

The Canadian team included Kings defenseman Drew Doughty and goaltender Darcy Kuemper. Doughty played in all six of Canada's games as he sought his third Olympic goal medal. He also played for the Canadians in the 2010 and 2014 Olympics.

Kuemper was in uniform for three of Canada's six games but did not play. He was not in uniform Sunday.

NHL players did not play in the 2018 Olympics because NHL owners opposed shutting down the regular season for several weeks and the International Olympic Committee

and the league could not reach an agreement on covering travel and insurance costs.

The NHL did not allow its players to play in the 2022 Olympics after the regularseason schedule was disrupted due to increasing COVID-19 cases and a rising number of postponed games.

LaCombe did not dress for any of the six U.S. games in the Olympics, all victories. He was added to the team Jan. 21, 22 days before its opener, replacing Florida Panthers defenseman Seth Jones, who suffered an upper-body injury when he was hit with a puck in the first period of the Winter Classic on Jan. 2.

LaCombe, who turned 25 on Jan. 9, is the third-youngest defenseman on the U.S. team and its fifth-youngest player.

LaCombe was selected by the Ducks in the second round of the 2019 NHL draft, the 39th overall selection, following his senior season at Shattuck-St. Mary's School, an Episcopal boarding and day school in Faribault, Minnesota, known

for its renowned boys' and girls' hockey programs.

He played the next four seasons for the University of Minnesota, leading Golden Gophers defensemen in points and goals each of his final three seasons and helping the team to three Frozen Four appearances.

LaCombe made his NHL debut on April 11, 2023, the Ducks' next-to-last game of the season. He has played 204 NHL games, with 22 goals and 75 assists. He signed an eightyear contract extension before the start of this season, which goes into effect next season. It is worth $72 million, the most lucrative agreement in franchise history, according to The Orange County Register.

The U.S. won the gold medal on a goal by New Jersey Devils center Jack Hughes 1:41 into overtime, off assists by Columbus Blue Jackets defenseman Zach Werenski and Winnipeg Jets goaltender Connor Hellebuyck.

Overtime in Olympic hockey is played with three

skaters per team, two fewer than in regulation. The NHL has the same rule for overtime.

The victory came on the 46th anniversary of the U.S. victory over the Soviet Union in a final-round game in the 1980 Olympics. The Americans won the gold medal two days later with a 4-2 victory over Finland. If the U.S. had lost to the Finns that year, the Soviets would have won the gold medal.

The Americans opened

the scoring 6 minutes into the game on a goal by Minnesota Wild left wing Matt Boldy off assists by Toronto Maple Leafs center Auston Matthews and Wild defenseman Quinn Hughes.

Canada tied the score on a goal by Cale Makar 18:16 into the second period, off an assist by fellow Colorado Avalanche defenseman Devon Toews.

The United States had lost four of its five games against Canada in the five previous

Olympics that have included NHL players, including the gold medal games in 2002 and 2010.

The U.S. had never won a men's hockey Olympic gold medal outside the United States. In addition to their 1980 victory in Lake Placid, New York, the Americans won the gold medal in 1960 when the Olympics were held in the California resort town now called Palisades Tahoe.

USA players celebrate during their team photo Sunday after winning gold medals in men's ice hockey for the first time since 1980. | Photo courtesy of USA Hockey/Facebook
the database
reforms and sway
consumers to consider a plant-based diet.
The new Factory Farm Watch online tool identifies Brandt Cattle Company in the Imperial Valley as the largest cattle feedlot in California. | Photo courtesy of Direct Action Everywhere / PNS

DOJ sues UC over alleged antisemitism, hostile work environment at UCLA

The U.S. Department of Justice is suing the University of California, alleging it fostered a hostile work environment against Jewish and Israeli faculty and staff at UCLA in violation of federal law.

According to the complaint, filed Tuesday in Los Angeles federal court, acts of antisemitism permeated UCLA following the Hamas-led massacre in Israel on Oct. 7, 2023.

The suit alleges the university engaged in a "pattern or practice of discrimination" in violation of civil rights law against Jewish and Israeli employees by failing to prevent and correct discriminatory and harassing conduct. The lawsuit further alleges UCLA negligently permitted a hostile work environment against the employees.

The DOJ contends that in 2024, the university allowed antisemitic harassment to continue unabated for days at a pro-Palestinian encampment in front of Royce Hall, including such acts as refusing to allow Jews on portions of the main quad. The department also alleges

that Jewish professors were assaulted, and swastikas were scrawled on UCLA buildings.

Mary Osako, UCLA's vice chancellor for strategic communications, said the university's leadership has made clear that antisemitism "is abhorrent and has no place at UCLA or anywhere" and has taken "concrete and significant steps to strengthen campus safety, enforce policies, and combat antisemitism in a systemic and sustained manner" since the events of two years ago.

Among other things, the university has recruited an associate vice chancellor for campus and community safety, established an initiative to combat antisemitism, and reorganized its civil rights office to ensure oversight and accountability, Osako said. "These ongoing and long-standing institutional efforts, including clear expectations and a commitment to enforcement, are working," she said. "We stand firmly by the decisive actions we have taken to combat antisemitism in all its forms,

and we will vigorously defend our efforts and our unwavering commitment to providing a safe, inclusive environment for all members of our community."

The lawsuit alleges the university not only turned a blind eye to antisemitism on campus but at times "facilitated" actions directed against Jewish and Israeli employees, including physical threats, classroom disruption, and workplaces papered with anti-Jewish imagery.

"Based on our investigation, UCLA administrators allegedly allowed virulent anti-Semitism to flourish on campus, harming students and staff alike," Attorney General Pamela Bondi said in a statement. "Today's lawsuit underscores that this Department of Justice stands strong against hate and anti- Semitism in all its vile forms."

The 81-page suit stems from a probe by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission in June 2024 which focused on alleged incidents of harassment at UCLA and the university's poor complaint system. Until

the DOJ issued a notice of its investigation to UCLA in March 2025, "not a single one of the dozens of civil rights complaints filed by Jewish and Israeli employees since October 7 was properly investigated," the lawsuit contends.

"The EEOC is committed

to eradicating antisemitism at work," EEOC Chair Andrea Lucas said. "If a university will not investigate and remedy repeated allegations of antisemitism against its employees, then EEOC will."

First Assistant U.S. Attorney Bill Essayli alleged that UCLA "failed to live up

Paramount Skydance boosts offer for Warner Bros. Discovery

Warner Bros. Discovery is reviewing a new bid by Paramount Skydance to buy the media giant in a bidding war with Netflix, the company said Tuesday.

Last week, the WBD Board of Directors gave PSKY until Feb. 23 to submit its "best and final proposal," while making clear that the board continued to favor the Netflix $82.7-billion, all-cash proposal.

The amount of the latest offer was not revealed, but it is believed to be higher than Paramount's previous bid of $30 per share in cash.

"Following engagement with PSKY during the seven-

day limited waiver period, we received a revised PSKY proposal to acquire WBD, which we are reviewing in consultation with our financial and legal advisors," WBD said in a statement Tuesday. "We will update our shareholders following the Board's review. The Netflix merger agreement remains in effect, and the Board continues to recommend in favor of the Netflix transaction. WBD shareholders are advised not to take any action at this time with respect to the amended PSKY tender offer."

Netflix and Paramount have been jockeying for months over the sale of

Warner Bros. Discovery's studios and HBO Max streaming business in a deal closely watched throughout the entertainment industry.

Netflix's offer is to purchase WBD but not all of its cable channels, while PSKY wants to buy the whole company. Warner is planning to spin off its cable channels into a separate company.

While the WBD Board of Directors considers Paramount's revised proposal, Paramount will continue to maintain its previously announced tender offer and its solicitation in opposition to the Netflix merger.

Paramount previously added a $2.8 billion fee that Warner would have to pay Netflix if the company pulled the plug on that deal. Paramount also added an offer to pay Warner investors 25 cents a share for every quarter after Jan. 1 that the deal does not close.

If the WBD board decides that the final Paramount offer is superior, Netflix will have four days to answer with an improved bid of its own.

WBD has called a March 20 meeting of its shareholders to decide the matter.

to its systemwide commitment to diversity and equal opportunity when it stood by as Jewish employees were subjected to harassment. The federal government has an obligation to step in and ensure a discriminationfree environment at our universities."

| Photo courtesy of Clément Proust/Pexels

Temple City Notices

CITY

OF TEMPLE CITY NOTICE

OF VOTE IN PERSON LOCATIONS

CITY OF TEMPLE CITY NOTICE OF VOTE IN PERSON LOCATIONS

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that at the General Municipal Election to be held in the City of Temple City on Tuesday, March 3, 2026, 1. there shall be 2 voting in person locations

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that at the General Municipal Election to be held in the City of Temple City on Tuesday, March 3, 2026,

1. there shall be 2 voting in person locations.

2. that the vote in person locations for the respective precincts shall be the places designated below and the language(s) other than English in which assistance will be provided.

2. that the vote in person locations for the respective precincts shall be the places designated below and the language(s) other than English in which assistance will be provided.

A Voting Precinct 7050001A, 7050006A, 7050007A, 7050011A, 7050064A, 7050068A, 7050076A, 7050078A

Vote in Person Location: City Hall Community Room 9701 Las Tunas Drive

Accessible to Handicapped: Yes : Assistance will be provided in: English, Chinese

The polls will be open between the hours of:

The polls will be open between the hours of:

2/28 8:00 a.m. to 5 p.m.

3/1 8:00 a.m. to 5 p.m.

2/28 8:00 a.m. to 5 p.m.

3/2 8:00 a.m. to 5 p.m.

3/1 8:00 a.m. to 5 p.m.

3/3 7:00 a.m. to 8 p.m.

3/2 8:00 a.m. to 5 p.m.

3/3 7:00 a.m. to 8 p.m.

Peggy Kuo Elections Official

Peggy Kuo Elections Official

Dated: 2/26/2026

Dated: 2/26/2026

Publish February 26, 2026

TEMPLE CITY TRIBUNE

B Voting Precinct 7050001A, 7050006A, 7050007A, 7050011A, 7050064A, 7050068A, 7050076A, 7050078A

Vote in Person Location: Live Oak Park, Live Oak Rm 3 10144 Bogue Street

Accessible to Handicapped: Yes

Assistance will be provided in: English, Chinese

Starting a new business?

El Monte City Notices

CITY OF EL MONTE ZONING REVIEW COMMITTEE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING

Hablamos Español favor de hablar con Jeni Colon (626) 258-8626

TO: All Interested Parties

FROM: City of El Monte Planning Division

PROJECT LOCATION: 12019 Conference Street /APN: 8541-016-024

APPLICATION: Minor Use Permit (MUP) No. 16-2025

REQUEST: The Applicant is requesting approval to construct a residential addition of 710 sq. ft. to an existing 812 sq. ft. dwelling on an existing parcel that is 14,000 sq. ft. in size. The subject property is developed with two (2) dwellings and is located in the R-1C zone within the Rurban Homestead Overlay District (RHOD). The subject property is considered nonconforming because it exceeds the maximum residential density. The MUP request is made pursuant to Chapter 17.123 (Conditional and Minor Use Permits) and Chapter 17.16 (Nonconforming Provisions) of the El Monte Municipal Code (EMMC).

PROPERTY OWNER: Leobardo Mares

APPLICANT: Leobardo Mares

ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION: Article 19. Categorical Exemptions – Class 1, Section 15301 (Existing Facilities) in accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) of 1970 and the CEQA Guidelines, as amended.

PLACE OF HEARING: Pursuant to State Law, the Zoning Review Committee will hold a public hearing to receive testimony, orally and in writing, on the proposed project. The public hearing is scheduled for:

Date: Tuesday, March 10, 2026

Time: 6:00 p.m.

Place: El Monte City Hall City Hall East – Council Chambers 11333 Valley Boulevard El Monte, CA 91731

Members of the public wishing to observe the meeting may do so by attending the meeting in person at the City’s Council Chambers

Members of the public wishing to make public comment may do so in one of the following ways:

(1) In person by attending the public hearing at the date, time, and place specified above; or (2) E-mail – All interested parties can submit questions/comments in advance to the Planning Division’s general e-mail address: planning@elmonteca.gov. All questions/comments must be received by the Planning Division no later than 3:00 pm on March 10, 2026.

The staff report on this matter will be available on or about March 5, 2026, on the City of El Monte website, which may be accessed at https://www.ci.el-monte.ca.us/276/Zoning-Review-Committee or by e-mailing wweisberg@elmonteca.gov.

Americans With Disabilities Act: In compliance with Section 202 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. Sec. 12132) and the federal rules and regulations adopted in implementation thereof, the Agenda will be made available in appropriate alternative formats to persons with a disability. Should you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk’s Office by calling (626) 580-2016. Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting.

Persons wishing to comment on the environmental documentation or proposed application may do so in in writing prior to the meeting date and must be received by 3:00 p.m., the day of the meeting. Public Comments of no more than 3-minutes shall be read into the record. Written comments shall be sent to Whitney Weisberg; El Monte City Hall West; 11333 Valley Boulevard; El Monte, CA 91731 or at wweisberg@elmonteca.gov. If you challenge the decision of the City Zoning Review Committee, in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Zoning Review Committee at, or prior to, the public hearing.

For further information regarding this application please contact Whitney Weisberg at (626) 258-8808. Monday through Thursday, except legal holidays, between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 5:30 p.m.

PUBLISHED DATE: Thursday, February 26, 2026, by Sandra Elias, Zoning Review Committee Secretary

PUBLISH FEBRUARY 26, 2026

EL MONTE EXAMINER

CITY OF EL MONTE

NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of El Monte will conduct a Public Hearing at 7:00 p.m., or soon thereafter, on March 11, 2026, in the El Monte City Council Chambers at 11333 Valley Blvd, El Monte, CA 91731 to consider the following item.

Members of the public wishing to observe the meeting may do so in one of the following ways:

(1) Turn your TV to Channel 3; (2) Visit the City’s website at http://www.elmonteca.gov/378/Council-Meeting-Videos; or (3) In Person.

Members of the public wishing to make public comment may do so via the following ways:

(1) Email – All interested parties can submit questions/comments in advance to the City Clerk’s general email address: city¬clerk@elmonteca.gov; or (2) In person.

SUBJECT:

CLOSEOUT OF THE CDBG-CV PROJECT FUNDED BY THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FOR THE FOLLOWING:

• Project Name: Hilda Solis Iris House (Budget Inn)

• Grant Number: 21-CDBG-HK-00006

• Total CDBG-CV Funds Expended: $2,487,500.00

• Accomplishments: The City completed the rehabilitation of the Hilda Solis Iris House project in November 2023 and filed the Notice of Completion. The Iris House provides 40 units of interim housing for vulnerable unhoused individuals. The project has been at full capacity since its doors opened. Union Station Homeless Services is the onsite service provider that delivers full wrap around services to the residents.

The City was awarded Homekey funding to acquire, rehabilitate, and operate the Budget Inn located at 10038 Valley Boulevard and M Motel located at 10024 Valley Boulevard to convert them into interim and/or permanent housing for a minimum of 133 persons experiencing homelessness. A Relocation Plan was approved by the City on April 20, 2021 for the 10 households that will be displaced as a result of the project.

The City of El Monte anticipates submitting two applications under this NOFA for approximately $6.65 million in total of CDBG-CV funds to cover costs associated with relocation and rehabilitation for the M Motel and Budget Inn to meet a national objective. The City does expect to expend an undetermined amount of Program Income dollars in the next program year/contract term.

The City promotes fair housing and makes all its programs available to low-and moderate-income families regardless of age, race, color, religion, sex, national origin, sexual preference, marital status or handicap.

Where You Come In: The purpose of this public hearing/meeting is to give community members an opportunity to make their comments known regarding what types of eligible activities the City/County should be applying for under the State CDBG program.

Any member of the public may appear at or virtually participate in the meeting and be heard on the item described in this notice, or members of the public may submit written comments to the City Clerk prior to the meeting by email to: cityclerk@elmonteca.gov.

If you require special accommodations to participate in the public hearing, please contact the Clerk’s office at least 72 hours in advance of the meeting by calling (626) 580-2016. If you are unable to attend the public hearing, you may direct written comments to the City Clerk’s Office: cityclerk@elmonteca.gov. Your comments will be read at the meeting.

For More Information: If you have any questions or would like more information regarding the item described in this notice, please contact Steven Fowler, Director of Community and Economic Development at (626) 258-8626 or visit our website to access information at https://www.ci.el-monte.ca.us/AgendaCenter. The State Action Plan Substantial Amendment for the CARES Act funding may be accessed at: https://www.hcd.ca.gov/policy-research/plans-reports/ index.shtml#aap. State CDBG NOFA’s can be accessed at: https:// www.hcd.ca.gov/grants-funding/active¬funding/cdbg.shtml.

CIUDAD DE EL MONTE AVISO DE AUDIENCIA PÚBLICA

POR LA PRESENTE SE NOTIFICA que el Consejo Municipal de la Ciudad de El Monte llevará a cabo una Audiencia Pública a las 7:00 p.m., o poco después, el 11 de marzo, 2026 en Salas del Ayuntamiento de El Monte en el 11333 Valley Boulevard, El Monte, CA 91731 para plantear el siguiente punto. Los miembros del público que desean observar la reunión pueden hacerlo de una de las siguientes maneras: (1) Cambie su televisor al canal 3; (2) Visita el página web de la ciudad en http://www.elmonteca. gov/378/Council-Meeting-Videos; o (3) En persona.

Los miembros del público que desean hacer comentarios públicos pueden hacerlo de las siguientes maneras: (1) Correo electrónico: todas las partes interesadas pueden envíar preguntas / comentarios por adelantado a la dirección general de correo electrónico del Secretario Municipal: cityclerk@elmonteca. gov; o (2) En persona.

ASUNTO:

EL PROPÓSITO DE LA AUDIENCIA PÚBLICA ES REVISAR EL CIERRE DEL PROYECTO CDBG-CV FINANCIADO POR EL DEPARTAMENTO DE VIVIENDA Y DESARROLLO COMUNITARIO DE CALIFORNIA PARA LO SIGUIENTE:

• Nombre del Proyecto: Hilda Solis Iris House (Budget Inn)

• Número de Subvención: 21-CDBG-HK-00006

• Fondos totales de CDBG-CV gastados: $2,487,500.00

• Logros: La ciudad completó la rehabilitación del proyecto de la Casa de Iris Hilda Solis en noviembre de 2023 y presentó el Aviso de Finalización. La Casa Iris ofrece 40 viviendas provisionales para personas vulnerables sin hogar. El proyecto ha estado a plena capacidad desde que abrió sus puertas. Union Station Homeless Services

es el proveedor de servicios en el lugar que ofrece servicios integrales a los residentes.

La Ciudad recibió fondos de Homekey para adquirir, rehabilitar y operar el Budget Inn y M Motel para convertirlos en viviendas provisionales y / o permanentes para un mínimo de 133 personas sin hogar. La Ciudad aprobó un Plan de Reubicación en 20 de abril de 2021 para los 10 hogares que serán desplazados como resultado del proyecto.

La Ciudad de El Monte anticipa presentar dos solicitudes bajo este NOFA por aproximadamente $6.65 millones en total de fondos CDBG-CV para cubrir los costos asociados con la reubicación y rehabilitación del M Motel y Budget Inn para cumplir con un objetivo nacional. La Ciudad espera gastar una cantidad indeterminada de dólares de Ingresos del Programa en el próximo año del programa / plazo del contrato.

La Ciudad promueve la vivienda justa y pone todos sus programas a disposición de familias de ingresos bajos y moderados, independientemente de su edad, raza, color, religión, sexo, nacionalidad, preferencia sexual, estado civil o discapacidad.

Dónde Asistir: El propósito de esta audiencia/reunión pública es darles a los miembros de la comunidad la oportunidad de expresar sus comentarios con respecto a los tipos de actividades elegibles para los que la Ciudad/Condado debe hacer la solicitud del programa estatal CDBG.

Cualquier miembro del público puede presentarse o participar virtualmente en la reunión y ser escuchado sobre el tema descrito en este aviso, o los miembros del público pueden presentar comentarios por escrito al Secretario Municipal antes de la reunión por entrega personal o por correo electrónico a: Oficina del Secretario Municipal, cityclerk@elmonteca.gov.

Si necesita adaptaciones especiales para participar en la audiencia pública, comuníquese con la oficina del Secretario, al menos 72 horas antes de la reunión llamando al (626) 580-2016. Si no puede asistir a la audiencia pública, puede dirigir comentarios por escrito a la Oficina del Secretario de la Ciudad: cityclerk@elmonteca.gov. Sus comentarios serán leídos en la reunión.

Para más información: Si tiene alguna pregunta o desea obtener más información sobre el tema descrito en este aviso, llame a Steven Fowler, Director de Desarrollo Comunitario y Económico, en el (626) 258-8626 o visite nuestro sitio web para acceder a la información en https://www.ci.el-monte.ca.us/AgendaCenter. Se puede acceder a la Enmienda Sustancial del Plan de Acción del Estado para el financiamiento de la Ley CARES en: https://www.hcd. ca.gov/policy-research/plansreports/index.shtml#aap. Se puede acceder a los NOFA estatales del CDBG en: https://www.hcd.ca.gov/ grants-funding/active-funding/cdbg.shtml.

Publish February 26, 2026

EL MONTE EXAMINER

San Gabriel City Notices

Public Notice: City Of San Gabriel Notice of Public Hearing Before the Planning Commission

You are invited to participate in a public hearing before the City’s Planning Commission. Members of the public may submit public comments by U.S. Mail addressed to Community Development Department, Attn: Public Hearing Comment, 425 S. Mission Drive, San Gabriel, CA 91776, which must be received by the hearing date, or electronically using the online public comment form at http://sangabrielcity.com/PlanningComment, by 5:00 p.m. of the hearing date to be considered by the Planning Commission. The meeting will be broadcast on the City of San Gabriel’s YouTube channel at the link shown below:

Hearing Date: Monday, March 9, 2026 Time: 6:30 p.m.

Location Of Hearing: Council Chambers located on the second floor of San Gabriel City Hall (425 South Mission Drive, San Gabriel, CA 91776) The meeting can be viewed live at: https://www.youtube.com/CityofSanGabriel

Project Address: 227 West Valley Boulevard, #328, San Gabriel, CA 91776

Project Description: The application, Project No. CUP26-001 is for a request for a Conditional Use Permit to allow a proposed Mahjong board game business. The project site is zoned CC/T (Commercial Center) within the Valley Boulevard Specific Plan area. The project site has a General Plan Land Use Designation of Commercial Specific Plan.

Questions: For additional information or to review the application, please contact Christine Song, Senior Planner at (626) 308-2806 ext. 4625 or csong@sangabriel.gov

Environmental Review: The project was reviewed for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). This project is exempt from the requirements of CEQA, per Guidelines Section 15301, Class 1 (Existing Facilities).

Project Address: 227 West Valley Boulevard, #198A & 198B, San Gabriel, CA 91776

Project Description: The application, Project No. CUP25-014 is for a request for a Conditional Use Permit to allow a proposed indoor

recreational arcade business. The project site is zoned CC/T (Commercial Center) within the Valley Boulevard Specific Plan area. The project site has a General Plan Land Use Designation of Commercial Specific Plan.

Questions: For additional information or to review the application, please contact Christine Song, Senior Planner at (626) 308-2806 ext. 4625 or csong@sangabriel.gov

Environmental Review: The project was reviewed for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). This project is exempt from the requirements of CEQA, per Guidelines Section 15301, Class 1 (Existing Facilities).

Project Address: 845 East Valley Boulevard, San Gabriel, CA 91776

Project Description: The application, Project No. CUP25-013 is a request for a Conditional Use Permit to allow for motor vehicle parts and accessories sales with incidental installation in an existing commercial building. The project site is zoned MU/C (Mixed-Use Corridor) within the VBSP (Valley Boulevard Specific Plan).

Questions: For additional information or to review the application, please contact Marlon Cervantes, Associate Planner at (626) 3082806 ext. 4631 or mcervantes@sangabriel.gov

Environmental Review: The project was reviewed for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). This project is exempt from the requirements of CEQA, per Guidelines Section 15301, Class 1 (Existing Facilities).

Per Government Code Section 65009, if you challenge the nature of the proposed actions in court, you may be limited to only raising those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning Division at or prior to the public hearing.

SAN GABRIEL PLANNING COMMISSION

Publish February 26, 2026

SAN GABRIEL SUN

Rosemead City Notices

NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD ON MARCH 10,

2026

subsequently challenged in court, the challenge may be limited to only those issues raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Rosemead at, or prior to, the public hearing.

For further details, please contact Lily Valenzuela, Director of Community Development at (626) 569-2142 or lvalenzuela@rosemeadca.gov. In addition, the City Council Agenda and Staff Report will be available on the City’s website under “Meetings and Agendas” (www.rosemeadca.gov) at least 72 hours in advance of the public hearing.

Notice and Publication Date: February 26, 2026 ROSEMEAD READER

Monrovia City Notices

NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING

MONROVIA PLANNING COMMISSION

This Notice is to inform you of a public hearing to determine whether or not the following project should be granted under Title 16 and/or 17 of the Monrovia Municipal Code:

APPLICATION: Conditional Use Permit (CUP20260003)

REQUEST: A Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to operate a 7 Leaves Café with drive-thru service in an existing vacant 1,900-square-foot former retail building. The site is located within 100 feet of residential property. The project also includes Design Review approval for exterior façade modifications. The property is located in the PD-7 (Planned Development – Area 7) zone.

NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING

MONROVIA PLANNING COMMISSION

This Notice is to inform you of a public hearing to determine whether or not the following project should granted under Title 16 and/or 17 of the Monrovia Municipal Code:

APPLICATION: Conditional Use Permit (CUP2026-0003)

Additional information regarding this request may be found on the City’s website at https://www.monroviaca. gov/projectsunderreview

REQUEST: A Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to operate a 7 Leaves Café drive thru service in an existing vacant 1,900 square foot former building The site is located within 100 feet of residential property project also includes Design Review approval for exterior modifications The property is located in the PD-7 (Planned Development – Area 7) zone.

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Rosemead City Council will conduct a public hearing to consider the Draft Amendment to the Five-Year Plan of the Permanent Local Housing Allocation (PLHA) Program on Tuesday, March 10, 2026, at 7:00 PM, at Rosemead City Hall, located at 8838 East Valley Boulevard, Rosemead. Comments may be submitted in person, virtually, or via email at publiccomment@rosemeadca.gov. Emailed comments must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on March 10, 2026. All comments are public record and will be recorded in the official record of the City. If you have a request for accommodation under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), please contact Ericka Hernandez, City Clerk, at (626) 569-2100.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: This project is Categorically Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) §15301, under Class 1, which consists of the operation, repair, maintenance, permitting, leasing, licensing, or minor alteration of existing public or private structures, facilities, mechanical equipment, or topographical features, involving negligible or no expansion of existing or former use.

Additional information regarding this request may be found on the website at https://www.monroviaca.gov/projectsunderreview

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: This project is Categorically Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) §15301, under Class 1, which consists operation, repair, maintenance, permitting, leasing, licensing, or alteration of existing public or private structures, facilities, mechanical equipment, or topographical features, involving negligible or no expansion of existing or former use.

TO ALL INTERESTED AGENCIES, GROUPS, AND PERSONS:

APPLICANT: Timothy Nguyen for 7 Leaves Café

APPLICANT: Timothy Nguyen for 7 Leaves Café PROJECT ADDRESS: 903 East Huntington Drive

The City of Rosemead is proposing an amendment to its Five-Year PLHA Plan for funds received from 2019 through 2023. The PLHA Program, administered by the California Department of Housing and Community Development, provides state funding to local governments for housing-related programs that address unmet local housing needs.

Under the current Five-Year PLHA Plan, funds were primarily used for the predevelopment and acquisition of ownership housing, along with limited administrative costs. The proposed amendment revises how the City’s existing funds are allocated to better address current homeownership needs.

Specifically, the amendment updates the use of funds under Activity 2 by shifting from predevelopment and acquisition to the predevelopment and development of ownership housing for working households earning up to 150 percent of the Area Median Income (AMI), which is permitted in high-cost areas such as Rosemead. The amendment also reallocates funds to Activity 9 to support homeownership opportunities, including down payment assistance for eligible households. Administrative costs will remain limited to five percent per year.

COMMENTS

PROJECT ADDRESS: 903 East Huntington Drive

Project Location Map

HEARING DATE AND TIME: Wednesday, March 11, 2026, at 7:30 PM

HEARING DATE AND TIME: Wednesday, March 11, 2026, at 7:30 PM

HEARING LOCATION: Monrovia City Hall (Council Chambers), 415 South Ivy Avenue, Monrovia, California 91016

HEARING LOCATION: Monrovia City Hall (Council Chambers), 415 South Ivy Avenue, Monrovia, California 91016

PUBLIC COMMENTS: Public comments regarding this item may be stated in person hearing, or submitted in writing. To ensure that Planning Commissioners have time to review, written comments must be submitted by 5:00 March 11, 2026

The purpose of this notice is to provide the public with a minimum of 10-day review period to express their concerns and comments. The public comment period begins February 26, 2026 and ends March 9, 2026. Any person interested in the above proceedings may appear at the time and place indicated above to testify in support of, or in opposition to, the item(s) indicated in this notice. Copies of the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative A copy of the Draft Amendment to the Five-Year Plan of the Permanent Local Housing Allocation (PLHA) Program is available on the City’s website at www.rosemeadca.gov for public review.

Pursuant to Government Code Section 65009(b), if this matter is

PUBLIC COMMENTS: Public comments regarding this item may be stated in person at the hearing, or submitted in writing. To ensure that Planning Commissioners have time to review, written comments must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on March 11, 2026.

If you challenge this application in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning Division at, or prior to, the public hearing. This ap-

plication will not alter the zoning status of your property. For further information regarding this application, please contact the Planning Division at (626) 932-5565, or by email at planning@monroviaca. gov.

The Staff Report for this project will be available online after 4:00 p.m. on Thursday, March 5, 2026, at the following hyperlink: https:// www.monroviaca.gov/your-government/boards-and-commissions/ planning-commission/agendas-minutes

Este aviso es para informarle sobre una junta pública acerca de la propiedad indicada más arriba. Si necesita información adicional en español, favor de ponerse en contacto con el Departamento de Planificación al número (626) 932-5565.

Austin Arnold, Assistant Planner

Publish February 26, 2026 MONROVIA WEKLY

NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING MONROVIA PLANNING COMMISSION

This Notice is to inform you of a public hearing to determine whether or not the following project should be granted under Title 16 and/or 17 of the Monrovia Municipal Code:

APPLICATION: Conditional Use Permit (CUP20260002)

REQUEST: A Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to allow a California Department of Alcohol Beverage Control (ABC) Type 41 license for the incidental sale and on-site consumption of beer and wine in conjunction with a new restaurant, Dao Zao Sushi & Saki. The property is located in the NC (Neighborhood Commercial) zone.

NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING

MONROVIA PLANNING COMMISSION

Additional information regarding this request may be found on the City’s website at https://www.monroviaca. gov/projectsunderreview

information regarding this application, please contact the Planning Division at (626) 932-5565, or by email at planning@monroviaca. gov.

The Staff Report for this project will be available online after 4:00 p.m. on Thursday, March 5, 2026, at the following hyperlink: https:// www.monroviaca.gov/your-government/boards-and-commissions/ planning-commission/agendas-minutes

Este aviso es para informarle sobre una junta pública acerca de la propiedad indicada más arriba. Si necesita información adicional en español, favor de ponerse en contacto con el Departamento de Planificación al número (626) 932-5565.

Austin Arnold, Assistant Planner

Puiblish February 26, 2026 MONROVIA WEEKLY

Probates Notices

NOTICE OF PETITION TO ADMINISTER ESTATE OF:

DENNIS BRIAN DULING AKA

DENNIS B. DULING CASE NO. 26STPB01501

To all heirs, beneficiaries, creditors, contingent creditors, and persons who may otherwise be interested in the lost WILL or estate, or both of DENNIS BRIAN DULING AKA DENNIS B. DULING.

A PETITION FOR PROBATE has been filed by NANCY D. DULING in the Superior Court of California, County of LOS ANGELES.

THE PETITION FOR PROBATE requests that NANCY D. DULING be appointed as personal representative to administer the estate of the decedent.

THE PETITION requests the decedent's lost WILL and codicils, if any, be admitted to probate. The lost WILL and any codicils are available for examination in the file kept by the court.

This Notice is to inform you of a public hearing to determine whether or not the following project should be granted under Title 16 and/or 17 of the Monrovia Municipal Code:

APPLICATION: Conditional Use Permit (CUP2026-0002)

NOTICE OF PETITION TO ADMINISTER ESTATE OF: ESTEBAN RIOS CRUZ CASE NO. 25STPB13145

To all heirs, beneficiaries, creditors, contingent creditors, and persons who may otherwise be interested in the WILL or estate, or both of ESTEBAN RIOS CRUZ.

A PETITION FOR PROBATE has been filed by MARIA FELIX RIVERA RIOS in the Superior Court of California, County of LOS ANGELES. THE PETITION FOR PROBATE requests that MARIA FELIX RIVERA RIOS be appointed as personal representative to administer the estate of the decedent.

MICALIZZI & JOSEPHINE ANN LUCERO in the Superior Court of California, County of LOS ANGELES. THE PETITION FOR PROBATE requests that FRANCES MARGARET

MICALIZZI & JOSEPHINE ANN LUCERO be appointed as personal representative to administer the estate of the decedent.

THE PETITION requests the decedent's WILL and codicils, if any, be admitted to probate. The WILL and any codicils are available for examination in the file kept by the court.

THE PETITION requests authority to administer the estate under the Independent Administration of Estates Act. (This authority will allow the personal representative to take many actions without obtaining court approval. Before taking certain very important actions, however, the personal representative will be required to give notice to interested persons unless they have waived notice or consented to the proposed action.) The independent administration authority will be granted unless an interested person files an objection to the petition and shows good cause why the court should not grant the authority.

A HEARING on the petition will be held in this court as follows: 03/13/26 at 8:30AM in Dept. 2D located at 111 N. HILL ST., LOS ANGELES, CA 90012

IF YOU OBJECT to the granting of the petition, you should appear at the hearing and state your objections or file written objections with the court before the hearing. Your appearance may be in person or by your attorney.

IF YOU OBJECT to the granting of the petition, you should appear at the hearing and state your objections or file written objections with the court before the hearing. Your appearance may be in person or by your attorney.

IF YOU ARE A CREDITOR or a contingent creditor of the decedent, you must file your claim with the court and mail a copy to the personal representative appointed by the court within the later of either (1) four months from the date of first issuance of letters to a general personal representative, as defined in section 58(b) of the California Probate Code, or (2) 60 days from the date of mailing or personal delivery to you of a notice under section 9052 of the California Probate Code. Other California statutes and legal authority may affect your rights as a creditor. You may want to consult with an attorney knowledgeable in California law.

YOU MAY EXAMINE the file kept by the court. If you are a person interested in the estate, you may file with the court a Request for Special Notice (DE-154) of the filing of an inventory and appraisal of estate assets or of any petition or account as provided in Probate Code section 1250. A Request for Special Notice form is available from the court clerk.

Petitioner In Pro Per:

Stephen D. Fantazia 3349 N. San Joaquin Road Covina, CA 91724

Telephone: (626)727-1209 2/23, 2/26, 3/2/26 CNS-4014875# AZUSA BEACON

REQUEST: A Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to allow a California Department of Alcohol Beverage Control (ABC) Type 41 license for the incidental sale and on-site consumption of beer and wine in conjunction with a new restaurant, Dao Zao Sushi & Saki. The property is located in the NC (Neighborhood Commercial) zone.

ENVIRONMENTAL

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: This project is Categorically Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) §15301, under Class 1, which consists of the operation, repair, maintenance, permitting, leasing, licensing, or minor alteration of existing public or private structures, facilities, mechanical equipment, or topographical features, involving negligible or no expansion of existing or former use.

Additional information regarding this request may be found on the City’s website at https://www.monroviaca.gov/projectsunderreview

THE PETITION requests authority to administer the estate under the Independent Administration of Estates Act. (This authority will allow the personal representative to take many actions without obtaining court approval. Before taking certain very important actions, however, the personal representative will be required to give notice to interested persons unless they have waived notice or consented to the proposed action.) The independent administration authority will be granted unless an interested person files an objection to the petition and shows good cause why the court should not grant the authority.

DETERMINATION: This project is Categorically Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) §15301, under Class 1, which consists of the operation, repair, maintenance, permitting, leasing, licensing, or minor alteration of existing public or private structures, facilities, mechanical equipment, or topographical features, involving negligible or no expansion of existing or former use.

APPLICANT: Yu Qing Du and Xuan Mei Piao for Dao Zao Sushi & Saki

APPLICANT: Yu Qing Du and Xuan Mei Piao for Dao Zao Sushi & Saki

PROJECT ADDRESS: 917 West Duarte Road

PROJECT ADDRESS: 917 West Duarte Road

HEARING DATE AND TIME: Wednesday, March 11, 2026, at 7:30 PM

HEARING DATE AND TIME: Wednesday, March 11, 2026, at 7:30 PM

A HEARING on the petition will be held in this court as follows: 03/13/26 at 8:30AM in Dept. 79 located at 111 N. HILL ST., LOS ANGELES, CA 90012

IF YOU OBJECT to the granting of the petition, you should appear at the hearing and state your objections or file written objections with the court before the hearing. Your appearance may be in person or by your attorney.

IF YOU ARE A CREDITOR or a contingent creditor of the decedent, you must file your claim with the court and mail a copy to the personal representative appointed by the court within the later of either (1) four months from the date of first issuance of letters to a general personal representative, as defined in section 58(b) of the California Probate Code, or (2) 60 days from the date of mailing or personal delivery to you of a notice under section 9052 of the California Probate Code. Other California statutes and legal authority may affect your rights as a creditor. You may want to consult with an attorney knowledgeable in California law.

THE PETITION requests authority to administer the estate under the Independent Administration of Estates Act with limited authority. (This authority will allow the personal representative to take many actions without obtaining court approval. Before taking certain very important actions, however, the personal representative will be required to give notice to interested persons unless they have waived notice or consented to the proposed action.) The independent administration authority will be granted unless an interested person files an objection to the petition and shows good cause why the court should not grant the authority.

A HEARING on the petition will be held in this court as follows: 03/13/26 at 8:30AM in Dept. 2D located at 111 N. HILL ST., LOS ANGELES, CA 90012

IF YOU OBJECT to the granting of the petition, you should appear at the hearing and state your objections or file written objections with the court before the hearing. Your appearance may be in person or by your attorney.

IF YOU ARE A CREDITOR or a contingent creditor of the decedent, you must file your claim with the court and mail a copy to the personal representative appointed by the court within the later of either (1) four months from the date of first issuance of letters to a general personal representative, as defined in section 58(b) of the California Probate Code, or (2) 60 days from the date of mailing or personal delivery to you of a notice under section 9052 of the California Probate Code. Other California statutes and legal authority may affect your rights as a creditor. You may want to consult with an attorney knowledgeable in California law.

YOU MAY EXAMINE the file kept by the court. If you are a person interested in the estate, you may file with the court a Request for Special Notice (form DE-154) of the filing of an inventory and appraisal of estate assets or of any petition or account as provided in Probate Code section 1250. A Request for Special Notice form is available from the court clerk.

IF YOU ARE A CREDITOR or a contingent creditor of the decedent, you must file your claim with the court and mail a copy to the personal representative appointed by the court within the later of either (1) four months from the date of first issuance of letters to a general personal representative, as defined in section 58(b) of the California Probate Code, or (2) 60 days from the date of mailing or personal delivery to you of a notice under section 9052 of the California Probate Code. Other California statutes and legal authority may affect your rights as a creditor. You may want to consult with an attorney knowledgeable in California law.

YOU MAY EXAMINE the file kept by the court. If you are a person interested in the estate, you may file with the court a Request for Special Notice (form DE-154) of the filing of an inventory and appraisal of estate assets or of any petition or account as provided in Probate Code section 1250. A Request for Special Notice form is available from the court clerk.

Attorney for Petitioner

KYLE R. GRAVES - SBN 332702

GOLDEN OAKS LAW GORUP, LLP 1317 W. FOOTHILL BLVD., SE. 245 UPLAND CA 91786

Telephone (909) 981-6177

BSC 228065 2/19, 2/23, 2/26/26 CNS-4013593# ROSEMEAD READER

NOTICE OF PETITION TO ADMINISTER ESTATE OF Ruben James Flores (aka Ruben J. Flores) CASE NO. 26STPB01411

To all heirs, beneficiaries, creditors, contingent creditors, and persons who may otherwise be interested in the will or estate, or both, of: Ruben James Flores (aka Ruben J. Flores)

NOTICE OF PETITION TO ADMINISTER ESTATE OF: MANUEL A. JASO CASE NO. 25STPB05874

To all heirs, beneficiaries, creditors, contingent creditors, and persons who may otherwise be interested in the WILL or estate, or both of MANUEL A. JASO.

A PETITION FOR PROBATE has been filed by ERIC J. URIAS in the Superior Court of California, County of LOS ANGELES. THE PETITION FOR PROBATE requests that ERIC J. URIAS be appointed as personal representative to administer the estate of the decedent. THE PETITION requests authority to administer the estate under the Independent Administration of Estates Act with limited authority. (This authority will allow the personal representative to take many actions without obtaining court approval. Before taking certain very important actions, however, the personal representative will be required to give notice to interested persons unless they have waived notice or consented to the proposed action.) The independent administration authority will be granted unless an interested person files an objection to the petition and shows good cause why the court should not grant the authority.

A HEARING on the petition will be held in this court as follows: 03/19/26 at 8:30AM in Dept. 62 located at 111 N. HILL ST., LOS ANGELES, CA 90012

HEARING LOCATION: Monrovia City Hall (Council Chambers), 415 South Ivy Avenue, Monrovia, California 91016

HEARING LOCATION: Monrovia City Hall (Council Chambers), 415 South Ivy Avenue, Monrovia, California 91016

PUBLIC COMMENTS: Public comments regarding this item may be stated in person at the hearing, or submitted in writing. To ensure that Planning Commissioners have time to review, written comments must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on March 11 2026

PUBLIC COMMENTS: Public comments regarding this item may be stated in person at the hearing, or submitted in writing. To ensure that Planning Commissioners have time to review, written comments must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on March 11, 2026.

YOU MAY EXAMINE the file kept by the court. If you are a person interested in the estate, you may file with the court a Request for Special Notice (form DE-154) of the filing of an inventory and appraisal of estate assets or of any petition or account as provided in Probate Code section 1250. A Request for Special Notice form is available from the court clerk.

If you challenge this application in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the

Attorney for Petitioner AARON B. BROBERG - SBN 353282 CALLISTER, BROBERG & BECKER, A LAW CORPORATION

700 N BRAND BLVD. SUITE 560 GLENDALE CA 91203

If you challenge this application in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning Division at, or prior to, the public hearing. This application will not alter the zoning status of your property. For further

Telephone (818) 500-1890 2/19, 2/23, 2/26/26

CNS-4013293# SAN GABRIEL SUN

Attorney for Petitioner RICHARD W. SHARPE - SBN 51548

COMSTOCK & SHARPE, INC. 11100 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD CULVER CITY CA 90232

Telephone (310) 559-8820 2/19, 2/23, 2/26/26 CNS-4013323# AZUSA BEACON

NOTICE OF PETITION TO ADMINISTER ESTATE OF: JOHN S. LUCERO CASE NO. 26STPB01263

To all heirs, beneficiaries, creditors, contingent creditors, and persons who may otherwise be interested in the WILL or estate, or both of JOHN S. LUCERO.

A PETITION FOR PROBATE has been filed by FRANCES MARGARET

A PETITION FOR PROBATE has been filed by Stephen D. Fantazia in the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles. THE PETITION FOR PROBATE requests that Stephen D. Fantazia be appointed as personal representative to administer the estate of the decedent. THE PETITION requests authority to administer the estate under the Independent Administration of Estates Act with full authority . (This authority will allow the personal representative to take many actions without obtaining court approval. Before taking certain very important actions, however, the personal representative will be required to give notice to interested persons unless they have waived notice or consented to the proposed action.) The independent administration authority will be granted unless an interested person files an objection to the petition and shows good cause why the court should not grant the authority.

A HEARING on the petition will be held on 03/19/2026 at 8:30 AM in Dept. 11 located at 111 N. HILL ST. LOS ANGELES CA 90012 STANLEY MOSK COURTHOUSE.

IF YOU OBJECT to the granting of the petition, you should appear at the hearing and state your objections or file written objections with the court before the hearing. Your appearance may be in person or by your attorney. IF YOU ARE A CREDITOR or a contingent creditor of the decedent, you must file your claim with the court and mail a copy to the personal representative appointed by the court within the later of either (1) four months from the date of first issuance of letters to a general personal representative, as defined in section 58(b) of the California Probate Code, or (2) 60 days from the date of mailing or personal delivery to you of a notice under section 9052 of the California Probate Code. Other California statutes and legal authority may affect your rights as a creditor. You may want to consult with an attorney knowledgeable in California law.

YOU MAY EXAMINE the file kept by the court. If you are a person interested in the estate, you may file with the court a Request for Special Notice (form DE-154) of the filing of an inventory and appraisal of estate assets or of any petition or account as provided in Probate Code section 1250. A Request for Special Notice form is available from the court

Project Mao Location
Project Location Map

Ex-fire chief sues city, alleging retaliation by Bass over Palisades response

FormerLosAngeles

Fire Department Chief

Kristin Crowley, who was fired by Mayor Karen Bass in the aftermath of the deadly Palisades Fire, has sued the city over her termination, accusing the mayor of "orchestrating a campaign of retaliation" against her.

In her Los Angeles Superior Court lawsuit filed Friday, Crowley alleges retaliation in violation of the Labor Code and retaliation in violation of the state Constitution. The suit seeks unspecified damages.

Crowley was removed as LAFD chief by Bass on Feb. 21, 2025, although Crowley is still with the LAFD as an assistant chief in the Valley Bureau.

Bass accused Crowley of leadership failures during the January 2025 windstorm that led to the deadly Palisades Fire, and also accused of refusing to prepare an after-action report on the firefight. The mayor also accused Crowley of failing to deploy 1,000 firefighters who "could have been on duty" the morning the fire erupted. Bass also contended in interviews that Crowley failed to inform her of the fire danger presented by

forecasted Santa Ana winds — despite those warnings being widely publicized by the National Weather Service and in media reports for days in advance.

Crowley's lawsuit, however, lays blame for the fire at the feet of the mayor and city leaders, saying the city historically failed to properly fund the LAFD, leaving the agency undermanned and backlogged in the maintenance of vehicles and other equipment.

"Crowley brings this case based on the actions of Mayor Karen Bass, who orchestrated a campaign of retaliation to conceal the extent to which Bass undermined public safety and transparency," according to Crowley's lawsuit.

The suit contends Crowley submitted"numerous detailed reports" annually to city leaders, including Bass complaining of aging infrastructure, shrinking staff and rising emergency calls that demanded attention.

"Despite these warnings, and despite Crowley's request for an increased budget to address these issues, Mayor Bass and her administration cut the LAFD's operating budget for fiscal year 2024-2025 by

$17.6 million and eliminated positions critical to maintaining fire engines, trucks, and ambulances," according to the suit.

The lawsuit also slams Bass' decision to leave the country in the days prior to the severe Santa Ana wind event for a diplomatic trip to Ghana — a trip she took without notifying Crowley.

"When the Palisades Fire erupted, Bass — then out of the country — initially praised the department's preparedness, even issuing a press release highlighting its deployment strategy," the suit states. "But as criticism mounted over her absence and over her decision to cut the operating budget for LAFD despite evidence that LAFD needed more and not fewer resources, Bass reversed course. She sought to avoid accountability by shifting blame and lying — including falsely claiming that she was not aware of the nationally anticipated weather event, falsely claiming that that the LAFD's budget was not cut, and falsely claiming that LAFD's resources would have supported an additional 1,000 firefighters to fight the blaze — claims

contradicted by public records and Bass' own prior statements.

"These false statements were not mistakes but part of a deliberate strategy to divert scrutiny from Bass' decisions and to avoid accountability."

In response to the suit, Bass' senior adviser Yusef

Robb issued a statement saying, "There is nothing new here. Ms. Crowley was removed from her post for her failure to predeploy and her decision to send 1,000 firefighters home instead of keeping them on duty on the morning the fires broke out. This lawsuit has no merit."

Crowley last year appealed her termination to the City Council, but the council stood behind Bass, rejecting the appeal in a 13-2 vote.

The Palisades Fire burned more than 23,000 acres, killed 12 people and destroyed thousands of structures.

they imposed changes after receiving a general direction from the mayor.

Bass has vehemently denied the allegations.

"Absolutely false, 100%," Bass said, referring to the Times story. "Just think about it for a minute. I'm the one who ordered the after-action report when the fire chief would not do it. I fired her. Why would I water down a report that essentially presented the information for why I fired her? That makes sense."

Bass removed then-LAFD Chief Kristin Crowley from her position, citing her failure to pre-deploy firefighters and fire trucks ahead of the

Palisades Fire, among other issues. Crowley in turn sued the city and Bass, alleging that she had been defamed and retaliated against.

Crowley also alleged negligence on the part of the city and Bass.

According to the Times, citing two sources close to the mayor's office it did not identify, the report had been altered to reduce criticism of the fire department's failure to pre-deploy engines and other resources to Pacific Palisades, as well as detailed other areas which lacked preparedness for the emergency.

In January, LAFD Chief Jaime Moore, who replaced Villanueva in November,

acknowledged the after-action report was edited to reduce criticism of LAFD's leadership.

Moore previously said he ordered a separate independent investigation into the Lachman Fire — a holdover fire from New Year's Eve that later erupted into the Palisades Fire — to closely examine the department's decisions and procedures and determine where improvements are needed.

He formally asked the Fire Safety Research Institute to include the Lachman Fire as part of its broader analysis of last January's fires. The institute conducted an independent analysis of the fires, as ordered by state leaders.

LAFD memo
Former LAFD Chief Kristin Crowley. | Photo courtesy of the city of Los Angeles Fire Department/ Wikimedia Commons (CC0)
CLA Superior Court: 464,000 criminal case results weren't reported to state

iting technical shortcomings in a decadesold case-management system, Los Angeles Superior Court officials said Tuesday the results of roughly 464,000 criminal cases dating back to the 1980s were never reported to the state Department of Justice, affecting the official criminal records of more than 400,000 people.

According to the court, the backlog was discovered last year during a technologymodernization project that began roughly a decade ago to replace the court's Trial Court Information System, which was originally installed in the 1980s. Court officials said "a lack of technical programming" in the TCIS system left court staff unaware of thousands of "arrest disposition reports" that were never reported to the state Department of Justice.

Arrest disposition reports detail the outcomes of arrests -- either convictions or dismissals -- and are filed with the DOJ so defendants' criminal records are kept up to date. Court officials said their investigation identified about 464,000 disposition reports that were never filed with the state -- 380,000 cases that involved convictions and about 84,000 dismissals.

Of the 380,000 convictions that were never reported, about 147,000 involved felonies and 233,000 were misdemeanors, according to the court. Of the dismissed cases that were never reported, about 61,000

DOJ

involved felony cases and 23,000 were misdemeanors.

According to the court, the 464,000 affected disposition reports involved roughly 408,000 individual defendants, with the cases occurring from the early 1980s to 2023.

"This means that individuals whose arrests resulted in filed criminal cases that were disposed by conviction or dismissal may not be currently reflected on their criminal histories, although roughly half of the individuals represented in the backlog have unrelated prior or subsequent convictions or dismissals that were reported to the DOJ," according to a statement by the court.

Court officials said all of the affected cases are now being sent to the DOJ, which is working to process them into the records system. The court also insists that its new case management system, along with other "failsafe mechanisms," are flagging

cases that have not been reported to DOJ, so there have been no additional cases of failed DOJ transmissions since 2023.

"The court is committed to building public trust and confidence in the judicial system, and that demands transparency when the court falls short of its standards," Executive Officer and Clerk of Court David W. Slayton said in a statement. "At the end of the day, it is most important that the criminal history records be complete and accurate, and the court has taken steps to ensure this is the case.

"The court is collaborating with the California Department of Justice to mitigate the backlog as expeditiously as possible. The court's leadership team has devoted significant resources to modernizing the court's infrastructure through innovation and forward-thinking investments to ensure an incident of this magnitude does not occur again."

| Photo courtesy of Jeremy Thompson/Flickr (CC BY 2.0)

Pasadena Buddhist Temple’s mural offers ‘Healing and Hope’

May S. Ruiz

MayRChu56@gmail.com

The Eaton Fire killed 19 people, destroyed over 9,000 structures, and brought untold grief to the community. More than a year later, displaced Altadena and Pasadena residents are still reeling from the trauma. There are constant reminders of what they lost and memories of that fateful day are still fresh in their mind.

As much anguish as the Eaton fire wrought, there have also been many instances of a community coming together in their shared experience. The most recent of such moments is a group painting initiated by Miki Yokoyama who created a mural at the Pasadena Buddhist Temple. The brainchild of Kyoko Gibbs, wife of the temple’s spiritual leader Reverend Gregory Gibbs, the mural symbolizes what she thinks everyone needs — healing and hope.

“As the first anniversary of the fire approached, I was thinking about what we — as the whole affected community — could do to help heal and inspire hope,” explains Gibbs. Then, SOGs (Sons of Gardeners), who volunteer twice a week to maintain the temple grounds, were discussing painting a concrete section of the ramp outside. And it hit me with the idea of creating a mural instead of just painting. I brought up this concept with them and shared it with the temple board, and they all rallied behind it right away!”

“Fortunately, Keiro, which has been a financial supporter of activities and events for fire survivors, also agreed to continue its support,” Gibbs says further. “I knew who I needed to ask to lead the mural designs — Miki. She isn’t a member of the temple but I met her through the meal program for fire survivors.”

In mid-November, Gibbs reached out to Miki Yokoyama and proposed crafting a mural and inviting the participation of those who had lost their homes

in the fire as a way to help restore the town. They discussed what kind of wall painting they wanted to create and developed the concept together. To signify what it represents, they called it “Healing and Hope Mural.”

The Eaton Fire decimated Yokoyama’s home and all her artwork, and wreaked havoc on her mental health. She discloses, “The emotional shock was immense; I struggled with symptoms of PTSD for a long time. During the first year after the disaster, I believe that painting truly saved me. Now, through this project, I find healing in creating together with the temple community and others who were also affected by the disaster. Realizing that I am not alone and receiving strength from everyone involved fills me with deep gratitude.”

Yokoyama describes how she transferred the painting — measuring approximately 70 feet long by 56 inches tall — on the wall. “I first created a rough sketch on paper and then projected it onto the wall. However, many of the finer details will be added freehand while looking at the actual wall. From here, I plan to add more delicate lines and dots to develop the piece further.”

“This project is open to everyone, regardless of artistic experience,” explains Yokoyama. “Before we began painting together, I prepared the mural by drawing the outlines in black ink. Although I predetermined the colors, my hope is simply that everyone enjoys the process. I tell participants that it is perfectly fine if they paint outside the lines or even cover the black outlines. I will make any necessary corrections afterward, so everyone is free to add color as they wish.”

“At present, the mural is about halfway complete,” Yokoyama adds. “Much of the white space has been filled, and the next steps are to apply a second layer

to the lighter areas of ink, retrace the black outlines, and then add finer lines and dots. By layering these delicate details, I hope to bring greater depth and subtlety to the work. Even if it takes time, I am committed to leaving behind the best possible piece.”

“As we continue working together with the community — shaping it according to our shared intentions — I am also excited to see how the mural will ultimately come together,” Yokoyama says further. “I am very much looking forward to its completion.”

When the mural is completed, people will recognize the animals and flowers they see in their town. And since Altadena is renowned for Christmas Tree Lane, Yokoyama incorporated Deodar Cedar trees in the artwork. The two churches along Lincoln Avenue — First Presbyterian Church of Altadena and Sacred Heart Catholic Church — as well as Altadena Community Church on Lake Avenue, are also depicted. Millard Falls Trailhead is portrayed in the center of the painting.

One of the Eaton Fire survivors who went to the temple to paint heard about it through her mom who is a member of the temple. She asks that her name not be mentioned but graciously agrees to talk about her participation.

“Miki was there and she showed me where to paint, provided paint and brush, and instructions,” she begins. “I painted the windows on the house light blue as she instructed. She explained that it was okay to paint over lines as these will be repainted after the color is applied; the community painters are adding color and the artists are adding detail. While I was there one of the artists was refining with details. She used a Q-tip to add white spots to a red butterfly. The mural is a representation of the local

community and the hope that exists in the Eaton Fire area to rebuild the physical and emotional aspects of the community.”

Painting the mural offered a brief respite from her daily stresses in the aftermath of the fire. She says, “The consequences of the fire a year later are

still part of a continuing domino effect in various ways that will remain for many years. Growth and hope are also results of this effect. Projects and institutions such as the Pasadena Buddhist Temple bring the community together for positive focus and forward momentum.”

It is exactly what compelled Gibbs to come up with a community endeavor. She declares, “Through this experience — coloring in the mural while chatting with others or working quietly — I would like all to feel connected and empowered. You are not alone. We are stronger together.”

The "Healing and Hope Mural" at Pasadena Buddhist Temple. | Photo courtesy of Miki Yokoyama/ Pasadena Buddhist Temple

Glendale City Notices

NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING APPEAL OF PLANNING HEARING OFFICER’S DECISION VARIANCE CASE NO. PVAR-004061-2024

LOCATION: 3411 EAST CHEVY CHASE DRIVE

APPELLANT: Emmy Mnatsakanian

OWNER: Ara and Emmy Mnatsakanian

ZONE: “R1R-III” - (Restricted Residential, Floor Area Ratio III) LEGAL DESCRIPTION/APN: Lot 4, Tract No. 22757 / APN: 5659-024-004 PROJECT DESCRIPTION

This

as

Class

16,480

DETERMINATION: The project is exempt from environmental

“Existing

pursuant to Section 15301 of the

CEQA Guidelines because the proposed project involves the maintenance of an existing retaining wall with a fence on top of the wall and a new driveway gate and the project is in an area where all public services and facilities are available and is not located in an environmentally sensitive area. Existing protected oak and sycamore trees on the property will be preserved.

PUBLIC HEARING

The Planning Commission will conduct a public hearing regarding the above project in Room 105 of the Municipal Services Building, 633 E. Broadway, Glendale, CA 91206, on MARCH 18, 2026, at 5:00 pm or as soon thereafter as possible.

The hearing will be open to the public. For public comments and questions during the meeting, the public may call 818-937-8100. City staff will be submitting these questions and comments in real time to the appropriate person during the meeting. You may also testify in person at the hearing if you wish to do so. Written comments may be submitted to the planner above prior to the hearing.

The meeting can be viewed on Charter Cable Channel 6 or by streaming online at: https:// www.glendaleca.gov/government/departments/management-services/gtv6/live-video-stream

If you would like more information on the proposal, please contact the case planner, Milca Toledo, in the Planning Division at mitoledo@glendaleca.gov or (818) 937- 8181. The staff report and case materials will be available before the hearing date at www. glendaleca.gov/agendas

Any person having an interest in the project described above may participate in the hearing, by phone as outlined above, or appear in person and may be heard in support of their opinion. Any person protesting may file a duly signed and acknowledged written protest with the Director of Community Development not later than the hour set for public hearing before the Hearing Officer. “Acknowledged” shall mean a declaration of property ownership (or occupant if not owner) under penalty of perjury. If you challenge the decision of this project in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Glendale, at or prior to the public hearing. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990, please notify the Community Development Department at least 48 hours (or two business days) for requests regarding sign language translation and Braille transcription services.

Dr. Suzie Abajian, The City Clerk of the City of Glendale

Publish February 26, 2026

GLENDALE INDEPENDENT

NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP GLN NO. 1658

LOCATION: 4033 LIBERTY AVENUE

APPLICANT: Feng Xiao

OWNER(S): Benjamin Cheng & Winifer Cheng, husband and wife as Joing Tenants as to an undivided 50% Interest and Ronald D. Young and Nerisa M.L. Young, as Trustees of the Young Family Trust udt

Dated 12/16/94 as to an undivided 50% interest, all as Tenants in Common

ZONE: “R-1” - (Low Density Single Family), FAR District II

LEGAL DESCRIPTION/APN: Portion of Lot 11, Block F of Crescenta Canada, as recorded in Book 5, Pages 574-575 of Miscellaneous Records, Los Angeles County, shown as Parcel 13 on Licensed Surveyor’s Map Book 13, Page 18/APN: 5636-010-088

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

The applicant is requesting approval of a tentative parcel map to subdivide an existing 15,325 square-foot (SF) lot into two parcels. The project includes demolition of the existing single-family residence and detached garage to accommodate new development. Parcel A will be a 6,088 SF rectangular lot fronting Liberty Avenue and is proposed to include a two-story, approximately 2,366 SF single-family residence with an attached two-car garage. Parcel B will be a 9,237 SF flag lot at the rear of the site, accessed via a 20-foot-wide driveway stem from Liberty Avenue, and is proposed to include a two-story, approximately 2,963 SF single-family residence with an attached two-car garage.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION

The project is categorically exempt from California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) review under Section 15303 “New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures,” because the project is consistent with applicable zoning and general plan designations, policies and standards; the site is located in an urban area developed with urban uses and is not more than six units; the approval would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air or water quality, and the site is adequately served by all required utilities and public services.

PUBLIC HEARING

The Planning Commission will conduct a public hearing regarding the above project in Room 105 of the Municipal Services Building, 633 E. Broadway, Glendale, CA 91206, on MARCH 18, 2026, at 5:00 pm or as soon thereafter as possible.

The hearing will be open to the public. For public comments and questions during the meeting, the public may call 818-937-8100. City staff will be submitting these questions and comments in real time to the appropriate person during the meeting. You may also testify in person at the hearing if you wish to do so. Written comments may be submitted to the planner above prior to the hearing.

The meeting can be viewed on Charter Cable Channel 6 or by streaming online at: https:// www.glendaleca.gov/government/departments/management-services/gtv6/live-video-stream

If you would like more information on the proposal, please contact the case planner, Eric Ji, in the Planning Division at eji@glendaleca.gov or (818) 937- 8178.

The staff report and case materials will be available before the hearing date at www.

glendaleca.gov/agendas.

Any person having an interest in the project described above may participate in the hearing, by phone as outlined above, or appear in person and may be heard in support of their opinion. Any person protesting may file a duly signed and acknowledged written protest with the Director of Community Development not later than the hour set for public hearing before the Hearing Officer. "Acknowledged" shall mean a declaration of property ownership (or occupant if not owner) under penalty of perjury. If you challenge the decision of this project in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Glendale, at or prior to the public hearing. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990, please notify the Community Development Department at least 48 hours (or two business days) for requests regarding sign language translation and Braille transcription services.

Publish February 26, 2026

GLENDALE INDEPENDENT

Dr. Suzie Abajian, The City Clerk of the City of Glendale

NOTICE OF PETITION TO ADMINISTER ESTATE OF LAURA LOWE BARKER

Case No. 26STPB00057

To all heirs, beneficiaries, cred-itors, contingent creditors, and persons who may otherwise be interested in the will or estate, or both, of LAURA LOWE BARKER

A PETITION FOR PROBATE has been filed by Shawna Cokkinos in the Superior Court of California, County of LOS ANGELES.

THE PETITION FOR PROBATE requests that Shawna Cokkinos be appointed as personal representative to administer the estate of the decedent.

THE PETITION requests the decedent's will and codicils, if any, be admitted to probate. The will and any codicils are available for examination in the file kept by the court.

THE PETITION requests authority to administer the estate under the Independent Administration of Estates Act. (This authority will allow the personal representative to take many actions without obtaining court approval. Before taking certain very important actions, however, the personal representative will be required to give notice to interested persons unless they have waived notice or consented to the proposed action.) The independent administration authority will be granted unless an interested person files an objection to the petition and shows good cause why the court should not grant the authority.

A HEARING on the petition will be held on March 6, 2026 at 8:30 AM in Dept. No. 99 located at 111 N. Hill St., Los Angeles, CA 90012.

IF YOU OBJECT to the granting of the petition, you should appear at the hearing and state your objections or file written objections with the court before the hearing. Your appearance may be in person or by your attorney.

IF YOU ARE A CREDITOR or a contingent creditor of the decedent, you must file your claim with the court and mail a copy to the personal representative appointed by the court within the later of either (1) four months from the date of first issuance of letters to a general personal representative, as defined in section 58(b) of the California Probate Code, or (2) 60 days from the date of mailing or personal delivery to you of a notice under section 9052 of the California Probate Code.

Other California statutes and legal authority may affect your rights as a creditor. You may want to consult with an attorney knowledgeable in California law.

YOU MAY EXAMINE the file kept by the court. If you are a person interested in the estate, you may file with the court a Request for Special Notice (form DE-154) of the filing of an inventory and appraisal of estate assets or of any petition or account as provided in Probate Code section 1250. A Request for Special Notice form is available from the court clerk.

Attorney for petitioner: CARMEN CHENG ESQ SBN 276242

PINNACLE LEGAL AND CONSULTING APC

1613 CHELSEA ROAD STE 334 SAN MARINO CA 91108

CN124576 BARKER Feb 19,23,26, 2026

WEST COVINA PRESS

NOTICE OF PETITION TO ADMINISTER ESTATE OF BRENDA L. BALLESTEROS aka BRENDA LEE BALLESTEROS

representative to administer the estate of the decedent.

THE PETITION requests authority to administer the estate under the Independent Administration of Estates Act. (This authority will allow the personal representative to take many actions without obtaining court approval. Before taking certain very important actions, however, the personal representative will be required to give notice to interested persons unless they have waived notice or consented to the proposed action.) The independent administration authority will be granted unless an interested person files an objection to the petition and shows good cause why the court should not grant the authority.

Case No. 26STPB01421

To all heirs, beneficiaries, creditors, contingent creditors, and persons who may otherwise be interested in the will or estate, or both, of BRENDA L. BALLESTEROS aka BRENDA LEE BALLESTEROS

A PETITION FOR PROBATE has been filed by Carolyn Currie in the Superior Court of California, County of LOS ANGELES.

THE PETITION FOR PROBATE requests that Carolyn Currie be appointed as personal representative to administer the estate of the decedent.

THE PETITION requests authority to administer the estate under the Independent Administration of Estates Act. (This authority will allow the personal representative to take many actions without obtaining court approval. Before taking certain very important actions, however, the personal representative will be required to give notice to interested persons unless they have waived notice or consented to the proposed action.) The independent administration authority will be granted unless an interested person files an objection to the petition and shows good cause why the court should not grant the authority.

A HEARING on the petition will be held on March 12, 2026 at 8:30 AM in Dept. No. 67 located at 111 N. Hill St., Los Angeles, CA 90012.

IF YOU OBJECT to the granting of the petition, you should appear at the hearing and state your objections or file written objections with the court before the hearing. Your appearance may be in person or by your attorney.

IF YOU ARE A CREDITOR or a contingent creditor of the decedent, you must file your claim with the court and mail a copy to the personal representative appointed by the court within the later of either (1) four months from the date of first issuance of letters to a general personal representative, as defined in section 58(b) of the California Probate Code, or (2) 60 days from the date of mailing or personal delivery to you of a notice under section 9052 of the California Probate Code. Other California statutes and legal authority may affect your rights as a creditor. You may want to consult with an attorney knowledgeable in California law.

YOU MAY EXAMINE the file kept by the court. If you are a person interested in the estate, you may file with the court a Request for Special Notice (form DE-154) of the filing of an inventory and appraisal of estate assets or of any petition or account as provided in Probate Code section 1250. A Request for Special Notice form is available from the court clerk. Attorney for petitioner: DARRELL G BROOKE ESQ SBN 118071 THE BROOKE LAW GROUP PC 525 S MYRTLE AVE STE 204 MONROVIA CA 91016

CN124585 BALLESTEROS Feb 19,23,26, 2026

BALDWIN PARK PRESS

NOTICE OF PETITION TO ADMINISTER ESTATE OF:

PATRICIA ANN TERRELL CASE NO. 26STPB01511

To all heirs, beneficiaries, creditors, contingent creditors, and persons who may otherwise be interested in the WILL or estate, or both of PATRICIA ANN TERRELL.

A PETITION FOR PROBATE has been filed by KELLEE NICOLE TERRELL in the Superior Court of California, County of LOS ANGELES.

THE PETITION FOR PROBATE requests that KELLEE NICOLE TERRELL be appointed as personal

A HEARING on the petition will be held in this court as follows: 03/13/26 at 8:30AM in Dept. 44 located at 111 N. HILL ST., LOS ANGELES, CA 90012

IF YOU OBJECT to the granting of the petition, you should appear at the hearing and state your objections or file written objections with the court before the hearing. Your appearance may be in person or by your attorney.

IF YOU ARE A CREDITOR or a contingent creditor of the decedent, you must file your claim with the court and mail a copy to the personal representative appointed by the court within the later of either (1) four months from the date of first issuance of letters to a general personal representative, as defined in section 58(b) of the California Probate Code, or (2) 60 days from the date of mailing or personal delivery to you of a notice under section 9052 of the California Probate Code.

Other California statutes and legal authority may affect your rights as a creditor. You may want to consult with an attorney knowledgeable in California law.

YOU MAY EXAMINE the file kept by the court. If you are a person interested in the estate, you may file with the court a Request for Special Notice (form DE-154) of the filing of an inventory and appraisal of estate assets or of any petition or account as provided in Probate Code section 1250. A Request for Special Notice form is available from the court clerk.

Attorney for Petitioner

DELA P. ROMEN, ESQ. - SBN 307926

RONEN PRIVATE WEALTH, PC 9350 WILSHIRE BLVD., STE. 200 BEVERLY HILLS CA 90212

Telephone (323) 379-5079

BSC 228070

2/19, 2/23, 2/26/26

CNS-4013712# PASADENA PRESS

NOTICE OF PETITION TO ADMINISTER ESTATE OF JERRY CLINTON GETMAN Case No. 26STPB01200

To all heirs, beneficiaries, cred-itors, contingent creditors, and persons who may otherwise be interested in the will or estate, or both, of JERRY CLINTON GETMAN

A PETITION FOR PROBATE has been filed by Alejandra Daniela Spitalier Pena (also known as Alejandra Daniela Spitalier Pena de Moreno) in the Superior Court of California, County of LOS ANGELES.

THE PETITION FOR PROBATE requests that Alejandra Daniela Spitalier Pena be appointed as personal representative to administer the estate of the decedent.

THE PETITION requests the decedent's will and codicils, if any, be admitted to probate. The will and any codicils are available for examination in the file kept by the court.

THE PETITION requests authority to administer the estate under the Independent Administration of Estates Act. (This authority will allow the personal representative to take many actions without obtaining court approval. Before taking certain very important actions, however, the personal representative will be required to give notice to interested persons unless they have waived notice or consented to the proposed action.) The independent administration authority will be granted unless an interested person files an objection to the petition and shows good cause why the court should not grant the authority.

A HEARING on the petition will be held on March 17, 2026 at 8:30 AM in Dept. No. 11 located at 111 N. Hill St., Los Angeles, CA 90012.

IF YOU OBJECT to the granting of the petition, you should appear at the hearing and state your objections or file written objections with the court before the hearing. Your appearance may be in person or by your attorney. IF YOU ARE A CREDITOR or a contingent creditor of the decedent, you must file your claim with the court and mail a copy to the personal representative appointed by the court within the later of either (1) four months from the date of first issuance of letters to a general personal representative, as defined in section 58(b) of the California Probate Code, or (2) 60 days from the date of mailing or personal delivery to you of a notice under section 9052 of the California Probate Code. Other California statutes and legal authority may affect your rights as a creditor. You may want to consult with an attorney knowledgeable in California law. YOU MAY EXAMINE the file kept by the court. If you are a person interested in the estate, you may file with the court a Request for Special Notice (form DE-154) of the filing of an inventory and appraisal of estate assets or of any petition or account as provided in Probate Code section 1250. A Request for Special Notice form is available from the court clerk. Attorney for petitioner:

JERRY J RUIZ ESQ SBN 96054

NOTICE OF PETITION TO ADMINISTER ESTATE OF LAURA LOWE BARKER aka LAURA L. BARKER aka LAURA BARKER Case No. 26STPB00057

To all heirs, beneficiaries, creditors, contingent creditors, and persons who may otherwise be interested in the will or estate, or both, of LAURA LOWE BARKER aka LAURA L. BARKER aka LAURA BARKER

A PETITION FOR PROBATE has been filed by Rhett Barker in the Superior Court of California, County of LOS ANGELES.

THE PETITION FOR PROBATE requests that Rhett Barker be appointed as personal representative to administer the estate of the decedent.

THE PETITION requests the decedent's will and codicils, if any, be admitted to probate. The will and any codicils are available for examination in the file kept by the court.

THE PETITION requests authority to administer the estate under the Independent Administration of Estates Act. (This authority will allow the personal representative to take many actions without obtaining court approval. Before taking certain very important actions, however, the personal representative will be required to give notice to interested persons unless they have waived notice or consented to the proposed action.) The independent administration authority will be granted unless an interested person files an objection to the petition and shows good cause why the court should not grant the authority.

A HEARING on the petition will be held on March 16, 2026 at 8:30 AM in Dept. No. 99 located at 111 N. Hill St., Los Angeles, CA 90012.

IF YOU OBJECT to the granting of the petition, you should appear at the hearing and state your objections or file written objections with the court before the hearing. Your appearance may be in person or by your attorney.

IF YOU ARE A CREDITOR or a contingent creditor of the decedent, you must file your claim with the court and mail a copy to the personal representative appointed by the court within the later of either (1) four months from the date of first issuance of letters to a general personal representative, as defined in section 58(b) of the California Probate Code, or (2) 60 days from the date of mailing or personal delivery to you of a notice under section 9052 of the California Probate Code.

Other California statutes and

Probate Notices

legal authority may affect your rights as a creditor. You may want to consult with an attorney knowledgeable in California law. YOU MAY EXAMINE the file kept by the court. If you are a person interested in the estate, you may file with the court a Request for Special Notice (form DE-154) of the filing of an inventory and appraisal of estate assets or of any petition or account as provided in Probate Code section 1250. A Request for Special Notice form is available from the court clerk. Attorney for petitioner: ELLEN EDWARDS FAREWELL ESQ

SBN 128113

THE LAW OFFICE OF FAREWELL & FAREWELL LLP 1601 GRANDVIEW AVE

GLENDALE CA 91201

CN124630 BARKER

Feb 26, Mar 2,5, 2026 WEST COVINA PRESS

Public Notices

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR CHANGE OF NAME CASE # CIVSB 2601056 TO ALL INTERESTED PER-

SONS: Petitioner: Edmundo Morgan Perez, filed a petition with this court for a decree changing names as follows: Present Name(s): Edmundo Morgan Perez to Proposed name: Edmundo Perez Jr 2, THE COURT ORDERS that all persons interested in this matter appear before this court at the hearing indicated below to show cause, if any, why the petition for change of name should not be granted. Any person objecting to the name changes described above must file a written objection that includes the reasons for the objection at least two court days before the matter is scheduled to be heard and must appear at the hearing to show cause why the petition should be granted. If no written objection is timely filed, the court may grant the petition without a hearing. NOTICE OF HEARING Date: 3/16/2026 Time: 9:00

am Dept.:S29 The address of the court is: Superior Court of California, County of San Bernardino, San Bernardino District Civil Division 247 West Third Street, San Bernardino, CA 924150210 A copy of this Order to Show Cause shall be published at least once a week for four successive weeks prior to the date set for hearing on the petition in the following newspaper of general circulation printed in this county: Ontario Press Newspaper. Date: January 30, 2026 STAMPED/s/: Gilbert G Ochoa, Judge of the Superior Court Publish Dates: February 5, 12, 19, 26, 2026 ONTARIO NEWS PRESS

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR CHANGE OF NAME PETITION OF Men Nuick How Tung Sang FOR CHANGE OF NAME CASE NUMBER: 25NNCP00945 Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles 600 E. Broadway, Glendale, Ca 91206, North Central Judicial District TO ALL INTERESTED PERSONS: 1. Petitioner Men Nuick How Tung Sang filed a petition with this court for a decree changing names as follows: Present name a. OF Men Nuick How Tung Sang to Proposed name Lily How 2. THE COURT ORDERS that all persons interested in this matter shall appear before this court at the hearing indicated below to show cause, if any, why the petition for change of name should not be granted. Any person objecting to the name changes described above must file a written objection that includes the reason for the objection at least two court days before the matter is scheduled to be heard and must appear at the hearing to show cause why the petition should not be granted. If no written objection is timely filed, the court may grant the petition without a hearing NOTICE OF HEARING a. Date: 03/12/2026

Time: 8:30AM Dept: E. The address of the court is same as noted above. 3. a. A copy of this Order to Show Cause shall be published at least once each week for four successive weeks prior to the day set for hearing on the petition in the following newspaper of general circulation, printed in this county: Alhambra Press

DATED: December 30, 2025 Roberto Longoria JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT Pub. February 5, 12, 19, 26, 2026 ALHAMBRA PRESS

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR CHANGE OF NAME PETITION OF Jack Wan FOR CHANGE OF NAME CASE NUMBER: 26NNCP00070 Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles 300 East Walnut St, Pasadena, Ca 91101, Northeast Judicial District TO ALL INTERESTED PERSONS: 1.

Petitioner Jack Wan filed a petition with this court for a decree changing names as follows: Present name a. OF Jack Wan to Proposed name Zhiwei Wan 2. THE COURT ORDERS that all persons interested in this matter shall appear before this court at the hearing indicated below to show cause, if any, why the petition for change of name should not be granted. Any person objecting to the

name changes described above must file a written objection that includes the reason for the objection at least two court days before the matter is scheduled to be heard and must appear at the hearing to show cause why the petition should not be granted. If no written objection is timely filed, the court may grant the petition without a hearing NOTICE OF HEARING a. Date: 04/17/2026 Time: 8:30AM Dept: P. The address of the court is same as noted above. 3. a. A copy of this Order to Show Cause shall be published at least once each week for four successive weeks prior to the day set for hearing on the petition in the following newspaper of general circulation, printed in this county: Alhambra Press DATED: February 2, 2026 Roberto Longoria JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT Pub. February 5, 12, 19, 26, 2026 ALHAMBRA PRESS

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR CHANGE OF NAME PETITION OF Sabina Blaire Quijano Lopez, a minor by and through his/her parent(s), Merwin Basilio Lopez, and Leslie Grace Quijano Lopez FOR CHANGE OF NAME CASE NUMBER: 26NNCP00088 Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles 600 East Broadway. Glendale, Ca 91206, North Central Judicial District TO ALL INTERESTED PERSONS: 1. Petitioner Sabina Blaire Quijano Lopez, a minor by and through his/her parent(s), Merwin Basilio Lopez, and Leslie Grace Quijano Lopez filed a petition with this court for a decree changing names as follows: Present name a. OF Sabina Blaire Quijano Lopez to Proposed name Sabrina Blaire Quijano Lopez 2. THE COURT ORDERS that all persons interested in this matter shall appear before this court at the hearing indicated below to show cause, if any, why the petition for change of name should not be granted. Any person objecting to the name changes described above must file a written objection that includes the reason for the objection at least two court days before the matter is scheduled to be heard and must appear at the hearing to show cause why the petition should not be granted. If no written objection is timely filed, the court may grant the petition without a hearing NOTICE OF HEARING a. Date: 04/23/2026 Time: 8:30AM Dept: E. The address of the court is same as noted above. 3. a. A copy of this Order to Show Cause shall be published at least once each week for four successive weeks prior to the day set for hearing on the petition in the following newspaper of general circulation, printed in this county: Glendale Independent DATED: February 6, 2026 Roberto Longoria JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT Pub. February 12, 19, 26, March 5, 2026 GLENDALE INDEPENDENT

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR CHANGE OF NAME PETITION OF Thomas Buckles McManusFigus FOR CHANGE OF NAME CASE NUMBER: 26NNCP00083 Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles 600 East Broadway, Room 279, Glendale, Ca 91206, North Central Judicial District TO ALL INTERESTED PERSONS: 1. Petitioner Thomas Buckles McManusFigus filed a petition with this court for a decree changing names as follows: Present name a. OF Thomas Buckles McManusFigus to Proposed name Thomas McManus Figus 2. THE COURT ORDERS that all persons interested in this matter shall appear before this court at the hearing indicated below to show cause, if any, why the petition for change of name should not be granted. Any person objecting to the name changes described above must file a written objection that includes the reason for the objection at least two court days before the matter is scheduled to be heard and must appear at the hearing to show cause why the petition should not be granted. If no written objection is timely filed, the court may grant the petition without a hearing NOTICE OF HEARING a. Date: 04/09/2026 Time: 8:30AM Dept: E. The address of the court is same as noted above. 3. a. A copy of this Order to Show Cause shall be published at least once each week for four successive weeks prior to the day set for hearing on the petition in the following newspaper of general circulation, printed in this county: Alhambra Press DATED: February 5, 2026 Roberto Longoria JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT Pub . February 12, 19, 26, March 5, 2026 ALHAMBRA PRESS

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR CHANGE OF NAME PETITION OF Weston Windstar Elliot Hayes FOR CHANGE OF NAME CASE NUMBER: 26NNCP00092 Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles 600 East Broadway, Glendale, Ca 91206, North Central Judicial District TO ALL INTERESTED PERSONS: 1. Petitioner Weston Windstar Elliot Hayes filed a petition with this court for a decree changing names as follows: Present name a. OF Weston Windstar Elliot Hayes to Proposed name Weston Windstar Elliot Gerken 2. THE COURT ORDERS that all persons interested in this matter shall appear

LEGALS

before this court at the hearing indicated below to show cause, if any, why the petition for change of name should not be granted. Any person objecting to the name changes described above must file a written objection that includes the reason for the objection at least two court days before the matter is scheduled to be heard and must appear at the hearing to show cause why the petition should not be granted. If no written objection is timely filed, the court may grant the petition without a hearing NOTICE OF HEARING a. Date: 04/23/2026 Time: 8:30AM Dept: E. The address of the court is same as noted above. 3. a. A copy of this Order to Show Cause shall be published at least once each week for four successive weeks prior to the day set for hearing on the petition in the following newspaper of general circulation, printed in this county: Burbank Independent DATED: February 6, 2026

Roberto Longoria JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT Pub. February 12, 19, 26, March 5, 2026 BURBANK INDEPENDENT

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR CHANGE OF NAME PETITION OF Ellie Julianne Ea by and through her guardian an litem Kha H. Sok & Sethika K. Em FOR CHANGE OF NAME CASE NUMBER: 26PSCP00046 Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles 1427 West Covina Parkway, West Covina, Ca 91790, East Judicial District TO ALL INTERESTED PERSONS: 1. Petitioner Ellie Julianne Ea by and through her guardian an litem Kha H. Sok & Sethika K. Em filed a petition with this court for a decree changing names as follows: Present name a. OF Ellie Julianne Ea to Proposed name Ellie Julianne Em 2. THE COURT ORDERS that all persons interested in this matter shall appear before this court at the hearing indicated below to show cause, if any, why the petition for change of name should not be granted. Any person objecting to the name changes described above must file a written objection that includes the reason for the objection at least two court days before the matter is scheduled to be heard and must appear at the hearing to show cause why the petition should not be granted. If no written objection is timely filed, the court may grant the petition without a hearing NOTICE OF HEARING a. Date: 04/17/2026 Time: 8:30AM Dept: 1. Room: 117 The address of the court is same as noted above. 3. a. A copy of this Order to Show Cause shall be published at least once each week for four successive weeks prior to the day set for hearing on the petition in the following newspaper of general circulation, printed in this county: Pasadena Press DATED: February 5, 2026 Benjamin P. HernandezStern JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT Pub. February 12, 19, 26, March 5, 2026 PASADENA PRESS

Notice of Lien Sale

Notice is given that pursuant to sections 2170021713 of the Business and Professions Code, Section 2328 of the Commercial Code, Section 535 of the Penal Code, that Crenshaw Self Storage LLC at 6725 Crenshaw Blvd., Los Angeles, CA. 90043 will sell by competitive bidding, will conduct an auction to sell the goods stored by the following tenants at the storage facility. The sale will occur as an online auction via https://www.storagetreasures.com on March 10, 2026 at 12:00pm. Unless stated otherwise the description of the contents may contain household goods, furniture, personal items, clothing, electronics, tools, auto parts, and miscellaneous unknown boxes belonging to the following: Thomas, Diego Escobar Peraza, Daniel A. Warren, Rogers Robertson, Joyce M. Stallworth, Mary Caldwell, Lance Horton, Danny W. RUFFIN, CAROLYN C. Torres, Sergio G. Christian, Kyron S. Griffin, Paul A. Lewis, Kyra L. GutierrezEscobar, Angel Richard, Rudy D. Mckinney, Gerald Gordon, Briana L. Knight, Tanija Garlington, Antoine Gordon, Angela Lashawn Valentine, Terry L. CAMPBELL, ANTHONY Hawkins, Ebany M. Coker Hercules, Gabriel Aman J. Harmon, Larry Williams, Amili Brown, Kesean SHAKUR, MALIK Heard, Leroy Miranda, Miriam R. Jones, Darryl Irving, Michael W. Anthony, Christine A.

All property is being stored at the above selfstorage facility. This sale may be withdrawn at any time without notice. Certain terms and conditions apply. See manager for details.

Publish February 19, 2026 & February 26, 2026 in THE WEST COVINA PRESS

NOTICE OF LIEN SALE

Notice is given that pursuant to sections 2170021713 of the Business and Professions Code, Section 2328 of the Commercial Code, Section 535 of the Penal Code, that Western States Self Storage, LLC at 23190 Hemlock Ave., Moreno Valley, CA 92557 will sell by competitive bidding, on or after March 12, 2026 at 11:30am, property belonging to those listed below. Auction will be held at the above address. Property to be sold as follows: household goods, furniture, personal items, clothing, electronics, tools, auto parts, and miscellaneous unknown boxes belonging to the following: Ramirez, Felicia Anzoategui, Luis Lee, Sheryl Small, William Sanchez, Cesar Morales, Juan Taylor, Jessica Perez, Jaime Harrison, Yvonne Garcia, Guillermina Walker, Deirdre Quiroz, Melissa YOUNG, AMANDA Davis, Roslyn Martinez, Kristy NORTON, JANEA GRANIEL, TRISTIN Richards, Carin Cabrera, Raven West, Kim Marshall, Rejenna Carrera, Jose Oliver, Mirisha M. Walker, Adrienne Oliver, Mirisha Bechard, Anthony Scott, Loretta Bolden, Veronica Garcia, JoseLuis Wines, Beverly Yazloff, Mike Gonzalez, Jessica Zubiate, Antonia Castillo, Yesenia Harris, Anthony Cheatham, Louis Matthis, Ashae Mercado, Norma Martinez, Ismeal Caldwell, Reginald

Publish February 19, 2026 & February 26, 2026 in THE RIVERSIDE INDEPENDENT

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR CHANGE OF NAME PETITION OF Harry Sharma and Shalu Sharma on behalf of Daiwik Sharma FOR CHANGE OF NAME CASE NUMBER: 26NNCP00033 Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles 150 West Commonwealth Avenue, Alhambra, Ca 91801, Northeast Judicial District TO ALL INTERESTED PERSONS: 1. Petitioner Harry Sharma and Shalu Sharma on behalf of Daiwik Sharma filed a petition with this court for a decree changing names as follows: Present name a. OF Daiwik Sharma to Proposed name Devik Sharma 2. THE COURT ORDERS that all persons interested in this matter shall appear before this court at the hearing indicated below to show cause, if any, why the petition for change of name should not be granted. Any person objecting to the name changes described above must file a written objection that includes the reason for the objection at least two court days before the matter is scheduled to be heard and must appear at the hearing to show cause why the petition should not be granted. If no written objection is timely filed, the court may grant the petition without a hearing NOTICE OF HEARING a. Date: 03/25/2026 Time: 8:30AM Dept: 3. The address of the court is same as noted above. 3. a. A copy of this Order to Show Cause shall be published at least once each week for four successive weeks prior to the day set for hearing on the petition in the following newspaper of general circulation, printed in this county: Burbank Independent DATED: January 15, 2026 Roberto Longoria JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT Pub. February 19, 26. March 5, 12, 2026 BURBANK INDEPENDENT

Notice of Self Storage Sale

Please take notice A Storage PlaceRiverside located at 3399 Central Avenue, Riverside, CA 92506 intends to hold an auction to sell the goods stored by the following tenants at the storage facility. The sale will occur as an online auction via www.storagetreasures.com on March 12, 2026, at 9:00AM. Michael L Duncan; Arlee D Atkins; Sarah Chavez; Deonte Dixon; Joseph E Emmanuel; Ronald L Walton Jr.; Iris Ramirez; John Holland; Sean J Watts . All property is being stored at the above selfstorage facility. This sale may be withdrawn at any time without notice. Certain terms and conditions apply. See the manager for details. Publish February 26, 2026 in the Riverside Independent.

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR CHANGE OF NAME PETITION OF Eduardo Cuevas FOR CHANGE OF NAME CASE NUMBER: 26PSCP00032

Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles 400 Civic Center Plaza, Pomona, Ca 91766, East Judicial District TO ALL INTERESTED PERSONS: 1.

Petitioner Eduardo Cuevas filed a petition with this court for a decree changing names as follows: Present name a. OF Eduardo Cuevas to Proposed name Eduardo Mosquera 2. THE COURT ORDERS that all persons interested in this matter shall appear before this court at the hearing indicated below to show cause, if any, why the petition for change of name should not be granted. Any person objecting to the name changes described above must file a written objection that includes the reason for the objection at least two court days before the matter is scheduled to be heard and must appear at the hearing to show cause why the petition should not be granted. If no written objection is timely filed, the court may grant the petition without a hearing NOTICE OF HEARING a. Date: 04/03/2026 Time: 8:30AM Dept: H. 3rd Floor The address of the court is same as noted above. 3. a. A copy of this Order to Show Cause shall be published at least once each week for four successive weeks prior to the day set for hearing on the petition in the following newspaper of general circulation, printed in this county: Alhambra Press DATED: January 23, 2026 Allison L. Westfahl Kong JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT Pub. February 12, 19, 26, March 5, 2026 ALHAMBRA PRESS

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR CHANGE OF NAME PETITION OF Efrain E. Guzman FOR CHANGE OF NAME CASE NUMBER: 26NNCO00120

Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles 150 West Commonwealth Avenue, Alhambra, Ca 91801, Northeast Judicial District TO ALL INTERESTED

PERSONS: 1. Petitioner Efrain E. Guzman filed a petition with this court for a decree changing names as follows: Present name a. OF Efrain E. Guzman to Proposed name Efrain E. Garcia I 2. THE COURT ORDERS that all persons interested in this matter shall appear before this court at the hearing indicated below to show cause, if any, why the petition for change of name should not be granted. Any person objecting to the name changes described above must file a written objection that includes the reason for the objection at least two court days before the matter is scheduled to be heard and must appear at the hearing to show cause why the petition should not be granted. If no written objection is timely filed, the court may grant the petition without a hearing NOTICE OF HEARING a. Date: 05/01/2026 Time: 8:30AM Dept: X. The address of the court is same as noted above. 3. a. A copy of this Order to Show Cause shall be published at least once each week for four successive weeks prior to the day set for hearing on the petition in the following newspaper of general circulation, printed in this county: Monterey Park Press DATED: February 18, 2026 Roberto Longoria JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT Pub. February 26, March 5, 12, 19, 2026 MONTEREY PARK PRESS

CASE NUMBER: (Numero del Caso): 25NNCV07043 SUMMONS (CITACION JUDICIAL)

NOTICE TO DEFENDANT: (AVISO AL DEMANDADO): MICHAEL HANH, an individual, UNITED RENTALS (NORTH AMERICA), inc., a corporation, DREW BOUVET, an individual, HOLMAN AUTOMOTIVE GROUP, INC., a corporation, and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive

Plaintiff’s Title Thereto. YOU ARE BEING SUED BY PLAINTIFF: (LO ESTA DEMANDANDO EL DEMANDANTE): SAGE HAYASHI, an individual

NOTICE! You have been sued. The court may decide against you without your being heard unless you respond within 30 days. Read the information below. You have 30 CALENDAR DAYS after this summons and legal papers are served on you to file a written response at this court and have a copy served on the plaintiff. A letter or phone call will not protect you. Your written response must be in proper legal form if you want the court to hear your case. There may be a court form that you can use for your response. You can find these court forms and more information at the California Courts Online SelfHelp Center (www. courtinfo.ca.gov/selfhelp), your county law library, or the courthouse nearest you. If you cannot pay the filing fee, ask the court clerk for a fee waiver form. If you do not file your response on time, you may lose the case by default, and your wages, money, and property may be taken without further warning from the court. There are other legal requirements. You may want to call an attorney right away. If you do not know an attorney, you may want to call an attorney referral

service. If you cannot afford an attorney, you may be eligible for free legal services from a nonprofit legal services program. You can locate these nonprofit groups at the California Legal Services Web site (www.lawhelpcalifornia.org), the California Courts Online SelfHelp Center (www.courtinfo.ca.gov/selfhelp), or by contacting your local court or county bar association. NOTE: The court has a statutory lien for waived fees and costs on any settlement or arbitration award of $10,000 or more in a civil case. The court's lien must be paid before the court will dismiss the case. ¡AVISO! Lo han demandado. Si no responde dentro de 30 días, la corte puede decidir en su contra sin escuchar su versión. Lea la información a continuación. Tiene 30 DÍAS DE CALENDARIO después de que le entreguen esta citación y papeles legales para presentar una respuesta por escrito en esta corte y hacer que se entregue una copia al demandante. Una carta o una llamada telefónica no lo protegen. Su respuesta por escrito tiene que estar en formato legal correcto si desea que procesen su caso en la corte. Es posible que haya un formulario que usted pueda usar para su respuesta. Puede encontrar estos formularios de la corte y más información en el Centro de Ayuda de las Cortes de California (www.sucorte.ca.gov), en la biblioteca de leyes de su condado o en la corte que le quede más cerca. Si no puede pagar la cuota de presentación, pida al secretario de la corte que le dé un formulario de exención de pago de cuotas. Si no presenta su respuesta a tiempo, puede perder el caso por incumplimiento y la corte le podrá quitar su sueldo, dinero y bienes sin más advertencia. Hay otros requisitos legales. Es recomendable que llame a un abogado inmediatamente. Si no conoce a un abogado, puede llamar a un servicio de remisión a abogados. Si no puede pagar a un abogado, es posible que cumpla con los requisitos para obtener servicios legales gratuitos de un programa de servicios legales sin fines de lucro. Puede encontrar estos grupos sin fines de lucro en el sitio web de California Legal Services, (www.lawhelpcalifornia. org), en el Centro de Ayuda de las Cortes de California, (www.sucorte.ca.gov) o poniéndose en contacto con la corte o el colegio de abogados locales. AVISO: Por ley, la corte tiene derecho a reclamar las cuotas y los costos exentos por imponer un gravamen sobre cualquier recuperación de $10,000 ó más de valor recibida mediante un acuerdo o una concesión de arbitraje en un caso de derecho civil. Tiene que pagar el gravamen de la corte antes de que la corte pueda desechar el caso. The name and address of the court is: (El nombre y direccion de la corte es): Superior Court Los Angeles County, Alhambra Courthouse, 150 West Commonwealth Avenue, Alhambra, Ca 91801

The name, address and telephone number of plaintiff's attorney, or plaintiff without an attorney is: (El nombre, la direccion y el numero de telefono del abogado del demandante, o del demandante que no tiene abogado, es): Andrew T. Ryan, The Ryan Law Group, 317 Rosecrans Avenue, Manhattan Beach, Ca 90266 Date: (Fecha) October 7, 2025 David W. Slayton, Clerk (Secretario) By: E. Madrid, Deputy (Adjunto)

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES – NORTH CENTRAL DISTRICT Case No.: 25NNOV07043

SAGE HAYASHI, an individual, Plaintiff,

MICHAEL HAHN, an individual, UNITED RENTALS (NORTH AMERICA), INC., a corporation, DREW BOUVET, an individual, HOLMAN AUTOMOTIVE GROUP, INC., a corporation, and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, Defendants

COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES

1. NEGLIGENCE

2. NEGLIGENCE PER SE 3. NEGLIGENT HIRING, TRAINING, SUPERVISION, RETENTION AND ENTRUSTMENT

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

STATEMENT OF FACTS

1. On or about October 10, 2023, Plaintiff Sage Hayashi ("Plaintiff") was lawfully operating her vehicle, driving westbound on State Route 118 in Los Angeles County, California. At all relevant times, Plaintiff was a restrained driver and following the rules of the road. 2. At the same time, Defendant Michael Hahn

3. The Commercial Vehicle had a GVWR exceeding 26,000 pounds. Defendants Hahn, United, Holman, and Bouvet were required to comply with the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Provisions ("FMCSR") provisions applicable to heavy commercial motor vehicles. These regulations specifically recognize that vehicles of such weight and mass create substantially greater risks of catastrophic injury and therefore impose mandatory safety obligations on both drivers and carriers.

4. Suddenly and without warning, Hahn changed lanes and struck the vehicle, a big rig, directly in front of him, which had slowed for heavy traffic. At the time of this collision, Hahn was traveling at approximately 78 mph in a 55 mph zone for big rigs, in violation of CVC § 22350 and 22406.

5. The impact of this collision caused a multiplevehicle collision, and the middle vehicle was pushed into the rear of Plaintiff's vehicle.

6. As a direct and proximate result of the collision, Plaintiff suffered serious injuries, including but not limited to traumatic brain injury, postconcussive syndrome, posttraumatic headaches, cognitive impairment, lumbar spine injuries that include but are not limited to an annular tear at L5S1, and persistent physical and emotional pain and suffering, loss of enjoyment of life, disfigurement, physical impairment, inconvenience, grief, anxiety, humiliation, and emotional distress.

7. As a direct and proximate result of the collision, Plaintiff has sustained and continues to sustain economic damages including but not limited past and future medical expenses, past and future loss of earnings, and loss of earning capacity.

8. The impact of the collision caused Ms. Hayashi to suffer significant injuries that exceed the jurisdictional minimum of this Court.

PARTIES, JURISDICTION, AND VENUE

9. Plaintiff Sage Hayashi is a resident of Los Angeles County, California.

10. Defendant Hahn is a resident of Lancaster, CA.

11. Defendant United Rentals (North America), Inc. is a commercial motor carrier registered with the U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT No. 899748; MC No. 415505), and at all relevant times was subject to and required to comply with the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations. United is a corporation formed in Delaware, that at all times relevant herein transacted business in the state of California.

12. Defendant Holman Automotive Group, Inc. ("Holman”) is, and at all relevant times was, a business entity engaged in the ownership, leasing, and provision of commercial motor vehicles.. On information and belief, Holman owned the subject tractor operated by Hahn at the time of the collision and entrusted said vehicle to United and Hahn. Despite knowing or having reason to know of unsafe practices, inadequate qualifications, and failure to comply with FMCSR requirements, Holman permitted its vehicle to be operated on public highways. Holman did not hold interstate forhire operating authority (MC authority), but nevertheless owed and breached duties of inspection, maintenance, and safe entrustment under the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations.

13. Defendant Drew Bouvet ("Bouvet") was the Branch Manager of United's Sun Valley and Burbank branches at the time of the incident, and now serves as Area General Manager for the San Fernando Valley region, overseeing multiple branches. Bouvet directly supervised or ratified the hiring, training, and safety practices of the logistics and driver workforce, including Hahn, and exercised managerial authority over the policies and practices that gave rise to the violations herein alleged.

14. Plaintiff is unaware of the true names and capacities of Defendants sued herein as DOES 1 through 50 inclusive and therefore sue these Defendants by such fictitious names. Plaintiff is informed and believes, and thereon alleges, that each of the fictitiously named Defendants proximately caused damages to Plaintiff as alleged herein and/or is responsible for the acts complained of herein. Plaintiff will amend this Complaint to allege their true names and capacities when ascertained.

15. This Court has jurisdiction over this matter, as the events giving rise to this action occurred in Los Angeles County, California, and the Defendants have sufficient minimum contacts with California for this Court to exercise personal jurisdiction. The amount in controversy exceeds the jurisdictional minimum of this Court.

16. Venue is proper in this Court because the event giving rise to this action occurred in Chatsworth, California.

PUNITIVE DAMAGES ALLEGATIONS

17. Plaintiff realleges and incorporates as if fully stated herein each and every allegation contained above and incorporate the same herein by this reference

as though set forth in full.

18. Prior to Michael Hahn's hiring by United Rentals in approximately July 2022, Hahn had been involved in at least two prior vehicle accidents. Despite United Rentals' awareness of these accidents, they nonetheless hired Michael Hahn to drive commercial Class A vehicles. Further, Hahn, while driving for United, had 21 hard braking events in the year 2023, the most of any driver in the United San Fernando Valley Hub, and was ranked last in the metropolitan region (#314.) These incidents placed United and Holman on actual and/or constructive notice that Hahn was an unsafe driver who posed an unreasonable risk of harm to the motoring public.

19. Despite this history, Defendants United, Holman, and Bouvet failed to properly investigate, monitor, or take corrective action concerning Hahn's driving record. They nevertheless hired, retained, and entrusted Hahn with the operation of a tractortrailer weighing in excess of 26,000 pounds on public highways, in violation of their duties under state law and the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations, including 49 CFR §§, 391.25, and 391.51.

20. Defendants failed to adequately investigate Hahn's prior accident history, which included at least two prior accidents (2019Mecklenburg, SC, 2021Gaston, SC). They failed to conduct effective annual reviews and monitoring of his driving record despite repeated unsafe events, including 21 hard braking events in 2023, in violation of 49 CFR §391.25.. They failed to monitor driver logs and compliance under 49 CFR $395.8, despite Hahn sleeping in his rig and exhibiting fatiguerelated conduct.

21. Therefore, it was completely foreseeable to Defendants United, Fleet Lease and Bouvet, that Hahn would be involved in reckless driving which lead to the crash on October 10, 2023 when he struck Plaintiff. At the time of the crash, Hahn was operating the subject commercial motor vehicle in violation of California Vehicle Code §§ 22406, which restricts heavy trucks to a maximum lawful speed of 55 miles per hour on California freeways, and 22350, which probits driving any vehicle upon a highway at a speed greater than is reasonable for the current conditions. Hahn's operation of a tractortrailer weighing in excess of 26,000 pounds at a speed greater than 55 miles per hour, under conditions of heavy traffic, constituted an unreasonable, unsafe, and unlawful act. Such conduct demonstrated a willful and wanton disregard for the safety of persons and property within the meaning of California Vehicle Code § 23103, amounting to reckless driving.

22. Bouvet, as Branch Manager and later Area General Manager, had managerial authority with discretion to make decisions that could affect company policy and ratified unsafe practices, including lack of FMCSR oversight, inadequate driver qualification systems, and failure to monitor driver hours and safety compliance. Bouvet does not even know the definition of the FMCSR.

23. This conscious disregard of known safety risks, coupled with Defendants' knowledge of Hahn's repeated unsafe driving history and their systemic failure to enforce FMCSR compliance, constitutes despicable conduct carried out with willful and wanton disregard for the rights and safety of others. Such conduct justifies the imposition of punitive damages against Hahn, United, Holman, and Bouvet. In addition, Hahn's operation of the tractortrailer at 78 mph directly violated United Rentals' company policies and procedures. United and Bouvet ratified Hahn's unsafe conduct by continuing to retain him despite repeated policy violations and FMCSR breaches. Holman, as the registered owner of the tractor, had no meaningful understanding of FMCSR requirements and failed to implement any compliance system despite operating as a USDOTregistered motor carrier. This ignorance of federal safety rules, while entrusting its tractor to an unqualified driver, constitutes despicable conduct in conscious disregard of public safety and further 4 supports punitive damages.

24. Defendants' failures also violated specific provisions of the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations, including but not limited to 49 CFR §391.25 (annual review of driver's driving record), §391.31 (adequate road testing), §391.51 (maintenance of driver qualification files), and §395.13 (carrier duty to ensure compliance with hoursof service and log requirements). These mandatory safety rules are designed to prevent the operation of unsafe drivers, and Defendants' conscious disregard of them further evidences malice and oppression within the meaning of Civil Code §3294.

FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION Negligence (Against all Defendants)

25. Plaintiff realleges and incorporates as if fully stated herein each and every allegation contained above and incorporate the same herein by this reference as though set forth in full.

26. Defendant Hahn owed a duty to

LEGALS

operate the commercial vehicle safely and compliance with applicable federal and state safety laws and a general duty of care to prevent crashes to the driving public. Hahn breached that duty, which was a substantial factor in causing Plaintiff's injuries

27. Defendant United is vicariously liable under respondeat superior. Defendant Holman, as the owner and lessor of the tractor, owed independent duties to ensure that the commercial vehicle it provided was operated and maintained in compliance with safety standards. United breached this duty by negligently entrusting, maintaining, and allowing the subject vehicle to be operated on public highways, which was a substantial factor in causing Plaintiff's injuries.

28. Defendant Drew Bouvet, as Branch Manager had managerial authority and a duty to ensure adequate hiring, training, and safety, personally and breached that duty by failing to implement, supervise, or enforce lawful safety practices, and ratified unsafe conduct, which was a substantial factor in causing Plaintiff's injuries.

29. Holman negligently failed to implement adequate policies or procedures for the inspection, maintenance, and safe operation of the subject tractor, and negligently entrusted the tractor to United Rentals and Hahn despite knowledge or reason to know of Hahn's unsafe driving history and United's lack of FMCSR compliance. These acts and omissions were a substantial factor in causing Plaintiff's injuries.

30. As a direct and proximate result of the collision, Plaintiff has sustained and continues to sustain economic damages including but not limited past and future medical expenses, past and future loss of earnings, and loss of earning capacity.

SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION

Negligence Per Se (Against all Defendants)

31. Plaintiff realleges and incorporates as if fully stated herein each and every allegation contained above and incorporate the same.

32. At all relevant times, Defendants were subject to the FMCSR, which establish the minimum safety standards governing the operation of commercial motor vehicles.

33. Defendants violated multiple FMCSR provisions, including but not limited to:

■ CFR §390.3(e), §390.11 Carrier responsibility for compliance.

■ CFR §391.11, §391.25, §391.51 investigation requirements.

■ CFR §392.2, §392.3 Safe vehicle operation and prohibition on fatigued driving.

34. CFR §395.3, §395.8, §395.13 Hours of service and duty log requirements. Defendants failed to adequately investigate Hahn's prior employment and accident history, which included at least two prior accidents, in violation of 49 CFR §391.23. They failed to conduct effective annual reviews and monitoring of his driving record despite repeated unsafe events, including hard braking events in 2023, in violation of 49 CFR §391.25. They failed to properly monitor driver logs and compliance under 49 CFR §395.8, despite Hahn sleeping in his rig and exhibiting fatiguerelated conduct.

35. Defendants also violated FMCSR provisions related to fatigue and fueling safety. On or about June 17, 2023, Hahn was discovered sleeping in his commercial motor vehicle while it was left running in the United Rentals yard, in violation of 49 CFR §392.3 (prohibition on operating while fatigued) and 49 CFR §395.3 (hours of service). Further, on June 21, 2023, Hahn caused a diesel spill while fueling a rollback truck and left the spill unattended, in violation of 49 CFR §392.2 (duty to comply with applicable safety laws) and 49 CFR §396.3 (systematic maintenance and safe condition of vehicles). These violations, combined with Hahn's chronic lateness and absenteeism, created unsafe conditions that foreseeably led to the subject collision.

36. Holman violated 49 CFR §396.3 (systematic inspection, repair, and maintenance obligations), 49 CFR §390.3(e) (carrier responsibility for compliance), and CFR §392.2 (operation of commercial motor vehicles in accordance with law) by failing to ensure the subject tractor was lawfully operated and maintained.

37. Further, Hahn was traveling at 78 mph at the time of the crash in violation of California Vehicle Code §§22406 and 22350.

38. The above statutes and regulations were designed to prevent precisely the type of harm suffered by Plaintiff.

39. Defendants' conduct as alleged herein was a breach of the statutory duties imposed by the statutes alleged herein.

40. Said breach was a substantial factor in causing Plaintiff to sustain damages and injuries as alleged herein.

THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION

Negligent, Hiring, Training, Supervision, Retention and Entrustment

(Against Defendants United, Bouvet, and Fleet)

41. Plaintiff realleges and incorporates as if fully stated herein each and every allegation contained above and incorporate the same.

42. United, through Bouvet and its managers, had a duty to properly hire, investigate, train, and supervise its commercial drivers in compliance with FMCSR.

43. United and Bouvet negligently hired, trained, and supervised Hahn, and breached their duties by failing to ensure Hahn's compliance with driver qualification standards, safety training, and hoursofservice monitoring. Bouvet, while in the scope and course of his employment for United, did not know what the FMCSR were, did not know who reviewed driver applications for compliance, and had no background in driving or safety. Despite his managerial role, Bouvet failed to implement or enforce lawful and required safety practices, further breaching the duty of care. Defendants' breaches of the duty of care were a substantial factor in causing Plaintiff's injuries

44. Holman, as the vehicle owner, had a duty to ensure that its big rigs were only operated by persons who were fit to drive in a safe manner. Holman knew or should have known that Hahn had prior collisions, repeated unsafe driving events, and disciplinary actions for reckless conduct, yet permitted its tractor to be entrusted for operation to Hahn on public highways. This negligent entrustment was a breach of the duty of care and a substantial factor in causing Plaintiff's injuries.

45. United, Holman, and Bouvet were also aware, or should have been aware, of Hahn's repeated attendance failures, including documented records showing he was late to work 4058% of the time in 2023 and on time only 27% of the time during one month. These chronic attendance issues caused late deliveries, unsafe dispatching, and undermined operational safety, yet management took no corrective action. By ignoring this pattern, Defendants failed in their duty under 49 CFR §390.11 to require driver compliance with safety rules. Their failure to act in the face of repeated safety red flags amounted to negligent supervision and retention.

RELIEF

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays for judgment against Defendant(s) as follows:

1. For general damages;

2.For special damages according to proof;

3. For punitive damages;

3. For interest as allowed by law;

4. For costs of suit incurred herein; and

5. For such other and further relief as the court may deem proper.

DATED: October 2, 2025

THE RYAN LAW GROUP

BY:_________________

Andrew T. Ryan

Jason A. Kayne

Attorneys for Plaintiff

JURY TRIAL DEMAND

Plaintiff Sage Hayashi hereby demands a trial by jury.

DATED: October 3, 2025

THE RYAN LAW GROUP

BY:_________________

Andrew T. Ryan

Jason A. Kayne

Attorneys for Plaintiff

CIVIL CASE COVER SHEET

Unlimited (Amount demanded exceeds $35,000)

CASE NAME:

Sage Hayashi, an individual v. Michael Hahn et al.

1. Check one box below for the case type that best describes this case: Auto: Auto (22)

2. This case is not complex under rule

3.400 of the California Rules of Court. If the case is complex, mark the factors requiring exceptional judicial management:

3. Remedies sought (check all that apply): a. monetary

4. Number of causes of action (specify):

3 5. This case is not a class action suit.

6. If there are any known related cases, file and serve a notice of related case. (you may use form CM015)

Date: 10/03/2025

Andrew T. Ryan

CIVIL CASE COVER SHEET ADDENDUM AND STATEMENT OF LOCATION

(CERTIFICATE OF GROUNDS FOR ASSIGNMENT TO COURTHOUSE LOCATION)

This form is required pursuant to Local Rule 2.3 in all new civil case filings in the Los Angeles Superior Court

Step 1: after completing the Civil Case Cover Sheet (Judicial Council form CM101), find the exact case type in Col-

umn A that corresponds to the case type indicated in the Civil Case Cover Sheet.

Step 2: In Column B, check the box for the type of action that best describes the nature of the case.

Step 3. In Column C, circle the number which explains the reason for the court filing location you have chosen.

Applicable Reasons for Choosing Courthouse Location (Column C)

1. Class Actions must be filed in the Stanely Mosk Courthouse, central District.

2Permissive filing in Central District

3. Location where cause pf action arose

4. Location where bodily injury, death or damage occurred

5. Location where performance required, or defendant resides

6. Location of Property or permanently garaged vehicle

7. Location where petitioner resides

8. Location wherein defendant/respondent functions wholly

9. Location where one or more of the parties reside.

10. Location of Labor Commissioner Office.

11. Mandatory filing location (Hub Cases – Unlawful detainer, limited noncollection, limited collection).

A Civil Case Cover Sheet Case Type

B Type of Action (Check only one)

C Applicable Reasons (see step 3 above)

A: Auto Tort: auto (22):

B: 2201 Motor Vehicle – Personal injury/ property Damage/Wrongful Death.

C: 1, 4.

Step 4: Statement of Reason and Address: Check the appropriate boxes for the numbers shown under Column C for the type of action that you have selected. Enter the address, which is the basis for the filing location including zip code. (No address required for class action cases.)

REASON: 4.

ADDRESS:

231 W. Orange Grove Ave CITY: Burbank SATET: CA ZIP CODE: 91502

Step 5: Certification of Assignment: I certify that this case is properly filed in the Noth central District of the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles [Code of Civ. Proc., 392 et seq., and LASC local Rule 2.3(a)(1)(E)]

Dated: 10/03/2025

PLEASE HAVE THE FOLLOWING ITEMS COMPLETE AND READY TO BE FILED IN ORDER TO PROPERLY COMMENCE YOUR NEW COURT CASE:

1. Original Complaint or Petition

2. If filing a Complaint, a completed Summons form for issuance by the Clerk

3. Civil Case Cover Sheet Judicial Council form CM010

4. Civil Case Cover Sheet Addendum and Statement of Location form LASC CIV 109 (01/23).

5. Payment in full of the filing fee, unless there is a court order for waiver, partial or schedule payments.

6. A signed order appointing a Guardian ad litem, Judicial Council form CIV010, if the plaintiff or petitioner is a minor under 18 years of age will be required by Court to issue a Summons.

7. Additional copies of documents to be confirmed by the Clerk. Copies of the cover sheet and this addendum must be served along with the Summons and Complaint, or other initiating pleading in the case.

STATEMENT OF DAMAGES

(Personal Injury or Wrongful Death)

To (name of one defendant only): Michael Hahn

Plaintiff (name of one plaintiff only): Sage Hayashi seeks damages in the aboveentitled action, as follows:

1.Generaldamages AMOUNT

a. Pain, suffering, and inconvenience

$5,000,000.00

b. Emotional distress

$2,500,000.00

2. Special damages

a. Medical expenses (to date)

$50,000.00

b. Future medical expense (present value)

$2,000,000.00

c. Los of earning (to date)

$50,000.00

d. Loss of future earning capacity (present value)

$1,500,000.00

3. Punitive damages: Plaintiff reserves the right to seek punitive damages in the amount of (specify) $15,000,000.00 When pursuing a judgment in the suit filed against you.

Date: October9, 2025 Andrew T. Ryan

T. Ryan (SBN 227700) Jason A. Kayne (SBN 321006) 317 Rosecrans Avenue

Manhattan Beach, CA 90266

Tel: (310) 3214800 Fax: (310) 4961435

Andrew.ryan@theryanlawgroup.com

Jason@theryanlawgroup.com

Publish February 26, March 5, 12, 19, 2026

BURBANK INDEPENDENT

CASE NUMBER: (Numero del Caso): 25NNCV02785 SUMMONS (CITACION JUDICIAL) NOTICE TO DEFENDANT: (AVISO AL DEMANDADO): JORGE GONZALEZ JR.; and DOES 1 through 25, inclusive

Plaintiff’s Title Thereto. YOU ARE BEING SUED BY PLAINTIFF: (LO ESTA DEMANDANDO EL DEMANDANTE): FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY

NOTICE! You have been sued. The court may decide against you without your being heard unless you respond within 30 days. Read the information below. You have 30 CALENDAR DAYS after this summons and legal papers are served on you to file a written response at this court and have a copy served on the plaintiff. A letter or phone call will not protect you. Your written response must be in proper legal form if you want the court to hear your case. There may be a court form that you can use for your response. You can find these court forms and more information at the California Courts Online SelfHelp Center (www. courtinfo.ca.gov/selfhelp), your county law library, or the courthouse nearest you. If you cannot pay the filing fee, ask the court clerk for a fee waiver form. If you do not file your response on time, you may lose the case by default, and your wages, money, and property may be taken without further warning from the court. There are other legal requirements. You may want to call an attorney right away. If you do not know an attorney, you may want to call an attorney referral service. If you cannot afford an attorney, you may be eligible for free legal services from a nonprofit legal services program. You can locate these nonprofit groups at the California Legal Services Web site (www.lawhelpcalifornia.org), the California Courts Online SelfHelp Center (www.courtinfo.ca.gov/selfhelp), or by contacting your local court or county bar association. NOTE: The court has a statutory lien for waived fees and costs on any settlement or arbitration award of $10,000 or more in a civil case. The court's lien must be paid before the court will dismiss the case.

¡AVISO! Lo han demandado. Si no responde dentro de 30 días, la corte puede decidir en su contra sin escuchar su versión. Lea la información a continuación. Tiene 30 DÍAS DE CALENDARIO después de que le entreguen esta citación y papeles legales para presentar una respuesta por escrito en esta corte y hacer que se entregue una copia al demandante. Una carta o una llamada telefónica no lo protegen. Su respuesta por escrito tiene que estar en formato legal correcto si desea que procesen su caso en la corte. Es posible que haya un formulario que usted pueda usar para su respuesta. Puede encontrar estos formularios de la corte y más información en el Centro de Ayuda de las Cortes de California (www.sucorte.ca.gov), en la biblioteca de leyes de su condado o en la corte que le quede más cerca. Si no puede pagar la cuota de presentación, pida al secretario de la corte que le dé un formulario de exención de pago de cuotas. Si no presenta su respuesta a tiempo, puede perder el caso por incumplimiento y la corte le podrá quitar su sueldo, dinero y bienes sin más advertencia. Hay otros requisitos legales. Es recomendable que llame a un abogado inmediatamente. Si no conoce a un abogado, puede llamar a un servicio de remisión a abogados. Si no puede pagar a un abogado, es posible que cumpla con los requisitos para obtener servicios legales gratuitos de un programa de servicios legales sin fines de lucro. Puede encontrar estos grupos sin fines de lucro en el sitio web de California Legal Services, (www.lawhelpcalifornia. org), en el Centro de Ayuda de las Cortes de California, (www.sucorte.ca.gov) o poniéndose en contacto con la corte o el colegio de abogados locales. AVISO: Por ley, la corte tiene derecho a reclamar las cuotas y los costos exentos por imponer un gravamen sobre cualquier recuperación de $10,000 ó más de valor recibida mediante un acuerdo o una concesión de arbitraje en un caso de derecho civil. Tiene que pagar el gravamen de la corte antes de que la corte pueda desechar el caso. The name and address of the court is: (El nombre y direccion de la corte es): Alhambra Courthouse, 150 West Commonwealth, Alhambra, Ca 91801 The name, address and telephone number of plaintiff's attorney, or plaintiff without an attorney is: (El nombre, la

Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739. Mailing Address, 13956 Crescenta Way, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739. # of Employees 1. Giannina A Espinoza, County of Principal Place of Business: San Bernardino This business is conducted by: a individual. Registrant commenced to transact business under the fictitious business name or names listed herein on January 30, 2026. By signing below, I declare that I have read and understand the reverse side of this form and that all information in this statement is true and correct. A registrant who declares as true any material matter pursuant to Section 17913 of the Business and Professions Code that the registrant knows to be false is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not to exceed one thousand dollars ($1,000). I am also aware that all information on this statement becomes Public Record upon filing pursuant to the California Public Records Act (Government Code Sections 6250- 6277). /s/ Giannina A Espinoza, Owner. This statement was filed with the County Clerk of San Bernardino on January 30, 2026 Notice- In accordance with subdivision (a) of Section 17920. A Fictitious Name Statement generally expires at the end of five years from the date on which it was filed in the office of the County Clerk, except, as provided in subdivision (b) of Section 17920, where it expires 40 days after any change in the facts set forth in the statement pursuant to Section 17913 other than a change in the residence address of a registered owner. A new Fictitious Business Name Statement must be filed before the expiration. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use in this state of a fictitious business name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see Section 14411 et seq., Business and Professions Code) File#: FBN20260000751 Pub: 02/05/2026, 02/12/2026, 02/19/2026, 02/26/2026 San Bernardino Press

FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT

File No. FBN20250012034

The following persons are doing business as: moderno perfumes, 9999 Foothill Blvd space 112, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730. Mailing Address, 9999 Foothill Blvd space 112, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730. (1). SANDRA ANAYA (2). JOSE ANAYA. County of Principal Place of Business: San Bernardino This business is conducted by: a general partnership. Registrant commenced to transact business under the fictitious business name or names listed herein on November 5, 2025. By signing below, I declare that I have read and understand the reverse side of this form and that all information in this statement is true and correct. A registrant who declares as true any material matter pursuant to Section 17913 of the Business and Professions Code that the registrant knows to be false is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not to exceed one thousand dollars ($1,000). I am also aware that all information on this statement becomes Public Record upon filing pursuant to the California Public Records Act (Government Code Sections 62506277). /s/ SANDRA ANAYA, General Partner. This statement was filed with the County Clerk of San Bernardino on December 29, 2025 Notice- In accordance with subdivision (a) of Section 17920. A Fictitious Name Statement generally expires at the end of five years from the date on which it was filed in the office of the County Clerk, except, as provided in subdivision (b) of Section 17920, where it expires 40 days after any change in the facts set forth in the statement pursuant to Section 17913 other than a change in the residence address of a registered owner. A new Fictitious Business Name Statement must be filed before the expiration. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use in this state of a fictitious business name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see Section 14411 et seq., Business and Professions Code) File#: FBN20250012034 Pub: 02/05/2026, 02/12/2026, 02/19/2026, 02/26/2026 San Bernardino Press

FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT 20266734579. The fol-

lowing person(s) is (are) doing business as: TRUE RATE LENDING, 4425 Jamboree Rd suite 270,, Newport Beach, CA 92660. Full Name of Registrant(s) LAMIN CAPITAL GROUP (CA, 4425 Jamboree Rd suite 270,, Newport Beach, CA 92660. This business is conducted by a corporation. Registrant commenced to transact business under the fictitious business name or names listed herein on January 30, 2026. TRUE RATE LENDING. /S/ XIAOXIA REN, VICE PRESIDENT. This statement was filed with the County Clerk of Orange County on January 30, 2026. Publish: Anaheim Press 02/05/2026, 02/12/2026, 02/19/2026, 02/26/2026

FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT 20266734335. The fol-

lowing person(s) is (are) doing business as: Elm Street Associates, 384 N Elm St, Orange, CA 92868. Full Name of Registrant(s) Zachary Michael Relock, 384 N Elm St, Orange, CA 92868. This business is conducted by a individual. Registrant has not yet begun to transact business under the fictitious business name or names listed herein. /S/ Zachary Michael Relock. This statement was filed with the County Clerk of Orange County on January 28, 2026. Publish: Anaheim Press 02/05/2026, 02/12/2026, 02/19/2026, 02/26/2026

FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT File No. FBN20260000996

The following persons are doing business as: Grace & Gathering, 7143 Abigail Place, Fontana, CA 92336. Mailing Address, 7143 Abigail Place, Fontana, CA 92336. Dana Ables. County of Principal Place of Business: San Bernardino This business is conducted by: a individual. Registrant has not yet begun to transact business under the fictitious business name or names listed herein. By signing below, I declare that I have read and understand the reverse side of this form and that all information in this statement is true and correct. A registrant who declares as true any material matter pursuant to Section 17913 of the Business and Professions Code that the registrant knows to be false is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not to exceed one thousand dollars ($1,000). I am also aware that all information on this statement becomes Public Record upon filing pursuant to the California Public Records Act (Government Code Sections 6250- 6277). /s/ Dana Ables, Owner. This statement was filed with the County Clerk of San Bernardino on February 9, 2026 Notice- In accordance with subdivision (a) of Section 17920. A Fictitious Name Statement generally expires at the end of five years from the date on which it was filed in the office of the County Clerk, except, as provided in subdivision (b) of Section 17920, where it expires 40 days after any change in the facts set forth in the statement pursuant to Section 17913 other than a change in the residence address of a registered owner. A new Fictitious Business Name Statement must be filed before the expiration. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use in this state of a fictitious business name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see Section 14411 et seq., Business and Professions Code) File#: FBN20260000996 Pub: 02/12/2026, 02/19/2026, 02/26/2026, 03/05/2026 San Bernardino Press

FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT File No. FBN20260000371

The following persons are doing business as: A&R Premium Facilities, 980 W Belleview St, San Bernardino, CA 92410. Mailing Address, 980 W Belleview St, San Bernardino, CA 92410. # of Employees 1. Angely W Torres Rodiles. County of Principal Place of Business: San Bernardino This business is conducted by: a individual. Registrant commenced to transact business under the fictitious business name or names listed herein on January 16, 2026. By signing below, I declare that I have read and understand the reverse side of this form and that all information in this statement is true and correct. A registrant who declares as true any material matter pursuant to Section 17913 of the Business and Professions Code that the registrant knows to be false is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not to exceed one thousand dollars ($1,000). I am also aware that all information on this statement becomes Public Record upon filing pursuant to the California Public Records Act (Government Code Sections 62506277). /s/ Angely W Torres Rodiles, Owner. This statement was filed with the County Clerk of San Bernardino on January 16, 2026 Notice- In accordance with subdivision (a) of Section 17920. A Fictitious Name Statement generally expires at the end of five years from the date on which it was filed in the office of the County Clerk, except, as provided in subdivision (b) of Section 17920, where it expires 40 days after any change in the facts set forth in the statement pursuant to Section 17913 other than a change in the residence address of a registered owner. A new Fictitious Business Name Statement must be filed before the expiration. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use in this state of a fictitious business name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see Section 14411 et seq., Business and Professions Code) File#: FBN20260000371 Pub: 02/12/2026, 02/19/2026, 02/26/2026, 03/05/2026 San Bernardino Press

The following person(s) is (are) doing business as

LEGALS

Songbird Health and Wellness 39976 Pasadena Dr. Temecula, CA 92591

Riverside County Jamie Michelle Seif, 39976 Pasadena Dr., Temecula, CA 92591

Riverside County

This business is conducted by: a individual. Registrant has not yet begun to transact business under the fictitious business name or names listed herein. I declare that all the information in this statement is true and correct. (A registrant who declares as true any material matter pursuant to Section 17913 of the Business and Professions Code, that the registrant knows to be false, is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not to exceed one thousands dollars ($1000).)

s. Jamie Seif

Statement filed with the County of Riverside on February 5, 2026

NOTICE: In accordance with subdivision (a) of section 17920, a fictitious name statement generally expires at the end of the five years from the date on which it was filed in the office of the county clerk, except, as provided in subdivision (b) of section 17920, where it expires 40 days after any changes in the facts set forth in the statement pursuant to section 17913 other than a change in the residence address of a registered owner. A new Fictitious Business Name Statement must be filed before the expiration. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use this state of a fictitious business name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see Section 14411 Et Seq., business and professions code). I hereby certify that this copy is a correct copy of the original statement on file in my office.

Peter Aldana, County, Clerk File# R-202601751 Pub. 02/12/2026, 02/19/2026, 02/26/2026, 03/05/2026 Riverside Independent

FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT File No. FBN20260000907

The following persons are doing business as: ALL STAR LAND POWER REPAIR, 4726 Brooks St, Montclair, CA 91763. Mailing Address, 516 N Camellia Ave, Ontario, CA 91762. RENE FLORES. County of Principal Place of Business: San Bernardino This business is conducted by: a individual. Registrant commenced to transact business under the fictitious business name or names listed herein on January 2, 2026. By signing below, I declare that I have read and understand the reverse side of this form and that all information in this statement is true and correct. A registrant who declares as true any material matter pursuant to Section 17913 of the Business and Professions Code that the registrant knows to be false is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not to exceed one thousand dollars ($1,000). I am also aware that all information on this statement becomes Public Record upon filing pursuant to the California Public Records Act (Government Code Sections 6250- 6277). /s/ RENE FLORES, Owner. This statement was filed with the County Clerk of San Bernardino on February 4, 2026 Notice- In accordance with subdivision (a) of Section 17920. A Fictitious Name Statement generally expires at the end of five years from the date on which it was filed in the office of the County Clerk, except, as provided in subdivision (b) of Section 17920, where it expires 40 days after any change in the facts set forth in the statement pursuant to Section 17913 other than a change in the residence address of a registered owner. A new Fictitious Business Name Statement must be filed before the expiration. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use in this state of a fictitious business name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see Section 14411 et seq., Business and Professions Code) File#: FBN20260000907 Pub: 02/19/2026, 02/26/2026, 03/05/2026, 03/12/2026 San Bernardino Press

FICTITIOUS BUSINESS

NAME STATEMENT

File No. FBN20260001097

The following persons are doing business as: River Maintenance & Consulting “RMC”, 50918 Parker Dam Rd, Earp, CA 92242. Mailing Address, 1315 N Van Gogh Cir, Orange, CA 92867. # of Employees 1. Brian P Richardson, 1315 N Van Gogh Cir, Orange, CA 92867. County of Principal Place of Business: San Bernardino This business is conducted by: a individual. Registrant has not yet begun to transact business under the fictitious business name or names listed herein. By signing below, I declare that I have read and understand the reverse side of this form and that all information in this statement is true and correct. A registrant who declares as true any material matter pursuant to Section 17913 of the Business and Professions Code that the registrant knows to be false is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable

by a fine not to exceed one thousand dollars ($1,000). I am also aware that all information on this statement becomes Public Record upon filing pursuant to the California Public Records Act (Government Code Sections 6250- 6277). /s/ Brian P Richardson, Owner. This statement was filed with the County Clerk of San Bernardino on February 12, 2026 Notice- In accordance with subdivision (a) of Section 17920. A Fictitious Name Statement generally expires at the end of five years from the date on which it was filed in the office of the County Clerk, except, as provided in subdivision (b) of Section 17920, where it expires 40 days after any change in the facts set forth in the statement pursuant to Section 17913 other than a change in the residence address of a registered owner. A new Fictitious Business Name Statement must be filed before the expiration. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use in this state of a fictitious business name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see Section 14411 et seq., Business and Professions Code) File#: FBN20260001097 Pub: 02/19/2026, 02/26/2026, 03/05/2026, 03/12/2026 San Bernardino Press

FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT 20266735329. The following person(s) is (are) doing business as: Modern Notary Pros, 1421 N WANDA RD #120, Orange, CA 92867. Full Name of Registrant(s) AARON JAMES DAVILA, 1421 N WANDA RD #120, ORANGE, CA 92867. This business is conducted by a individual. Registrant commenced to transact business under the fictitious business name or names listed herein on February 10, 2026. /S/ AARON DAVILA. This statement was filed with the County Clerk of Orange County on February 9, 2026. Publish: Anaheim Press 02/19/2026, 02/26/2026, 03/05/2026, 03/12/2026

FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT File No. FBN20260001300

The following persons are doing business as: Color Me Face Painting, 6611 Coyote St, Chino Hills, CA 91709. Mailing Address, 6611 Coyote St, Chino Hills, CA 91709. Vanessa D Mendoza. County of Principal Place of Business: San Bernardino This business is conducted by: a individual. Registrant commenced to transact business under the fictitious business name or names listed herein on July 7, 2020. By signing below, I declare that I have read and understand the reverse side of this form and that all information in this statement is true and correct. A registrant who declares as true any material matter pursuant to Section 17913 of the Business and Professions Code that the registrant knows to be false is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not to exceed one thousand dollars ($1,000). I am also aware that all information on this statement becomes Public Record upon filing pursuant to the California Public Records Act (Government Code Sections 6250- 6277). /s/ Vanessa D Mendoza, Owner. This statement was filed with the County Clerk of San Bernardino on February 20, 2026 Notice- In accordance with subdivision (a) of Section 17920. A Fictitious Name Statement generally expires at the end of five years from the date on which it was filed in the office of the County Clerk, except, as provided in subdivision (b) of Section 17920, where it expires 40 days after

any change in the facts set forth in the statement pursuant to Section 17913 other than a change in the residence address of a registered owner. A new Fictitious Business Name Statement must be filed before the expiration. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use in this state of a fictitious business name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see Section 14411 et seq., Business and Professions Code) File#: FBN20260001300 Pub: 02/26/2026, 03/05/2026, 03/12/2026, 03/19/2026 San Bernardino Press

FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT File No. FBN20260000979

The following persons are doing business as: LONGSHOTS SPORTS MEDIA, 1049 W. Hollowell St, Ontario, CA 91762. Mailing Address, 1049 W. Hollowell St, Ontario, CA 91762. # of Employees 5. Davis Garcia. County of Principal Place of Business: San Bernardino This business is conducted by: a individual. Registrant commenced to transact business under the fictitious business name or names listed herein on February 5, 2026. By signing below, I declare that I have read and understand the reverse side of this form and that all information in this statement is true and correct. A registrant who declares as true any material matter pursuant to Section 17913 of the Business and Professions Code that the registrant knows to be false is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not to exceed one thousand dollars ($1,000). I am also aware that all information on this statement becomes Public Record upon filing pursuant to the California Public Records Act (Government Code Sections 62506277). /s/ Davis Garcia, Owner. This statement was filed with the County Clerk of San Bernardino on February 6, 2026 Notice- In accordance with subdivision (a) of Section 17920. A Fictitious Name Statement generally expires at the end of five years from the date on which it was filed in the office of the County Clerk, except, as provided in subdivision (b) of Section 17920, where it expires 40 days after any change in the facts set forth in the statement pursuant to Section 17913 other than a change in the residence address of a registered owner. A new Fictitious Business Name Statement must be filed before the expiration. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use in this state of a fictitious business name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see Section 14411 et seq., Business and Professions Code) File#: FBN20260000979 Pub: 02/26/2026, 03/05/2026, 03/12/2026, 03/19/2026 San Bernardino Press

The following person(s) is (are) doing business as Nick the Greek 30076 HUAN RD STE 220 MENIFEE, CA 92584 Riverside County Greek Grill Menifee LLC (CA, 309 S Black Rd, Anahiem, CA 92807 Riverside County

This business is conducted by: a limited liability company (llc). Registrant has not yet begun to transact business under the fictitious business name or names listed herein. I declare that all the information in this statement is true and correct. (A registrant who declares as true any material matter pursuant to Section 17913 of the Business and

Professions Code, that the registrant knows to be false, is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not to exceed one thousands dollars ($1000).) s. Simarjot Khangura, Member Statement filed with the County of Riverside on February 13, 2026 NOTICE: In accordance with subdivision (a) of section 17920, a fictitious name statement generally expires at the end of the five years from the date on which it was filed in the office of the county clerk, except, as provided in subdivision (b) of section 17920, where it expires 40 days after any changes in the facts set forth in the statement pursuant to section 17913 other than a change in the residence address of a registered owner. A new Fictitious Business Name Statement must be filed before the expiration. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use this state of a fictitious business name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see Section 14411 Et Seq., business and professions code). I hereby certify that this copy is a correct copy of the original statement on file in my office. Peter Aldana, County, Clerk File# r-202602086 Pub. 02/26/2026, 03/05/2026, 03/12/2026, 03/19/2026 Riverside Independent

The following person(s) is (are) doing business as Sunshine Dental 1820 Fullerton Ave Suite 227 Corona, CA 92881 Riverside

LA County board extending parking restrictions for large vehicles

The county Board of Supervisorsgave preliminary approval Tuesday to an ordinance expanding the list of unincorporated areas where so-called "nonconforming vehicles" -- such as RVs -- would be barred from parking on county streets.

The ordinance defines a nonconforming vehicle as those that exceed 8 feet in width, 7 1/2 feet in height or 20 feet in length.

Current county law bars such vehicles from being parked on streets in unincorporated areas in or near Ladera Heights, View Park/

Windsor Hills, Altadena, Long Beach, South Whittier/ East Whittier/East La Mirada, West Whittier/Los Nietos, and Whittier. Such parking is also barred during overnight hours in Marina del Rey without a permit.

Under the extension given tentative approval by the board Tuesday, the restriction would be extended to unincorporated areas around Azusa/Charter Oak/Covina, Del Aire/Lennox, East Los Angeles, East Rancho Dominguez, El Camino Village, Florence-Firestone/ Walnut Park, Hawthorne, Rancho Dominguez, West

delay," Seroka said.

Port of Long Beach CEO Noel Hacegaba said a predictable approach to tariffs helps businesses plan investments, which in turn enables ports to maximize their contributions to the national economy. He noted that the port is one of the nation's largest gateways and will continue to work with partners to enhance operations that support the global supply chain, support the 2.7 million jobs tied to the port and enhance U.S. economic competitiveness.

The Supreme Court's ruling "rescinds most of the tariffs imposed over the last year," Hacegaba said in a statement. "While this decision rules on the legality of the tariffs, it does not remove the uncertainty."

Like his LA counterpart Seroka, the Long Beach Port chief also called for "clarity ... on whether tariffs already paid will be refunded and when the newly announced 10% global tariff will go into effect.

"For now, the only certainty is more uncertainty. ... Freight can’t wait — and certainty helps keep it moving," Hacegaba said.

The Supreme Court did not rule out allowing importers to request refunds for tariffs imposed by the Trump administration under the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act.

The IEEPA was Trump's

Athens/Westmont, West Carson, West Los Angeles, West Puente Valley/Valinda/ South San Jose Hills, and West Rancho Dominguez/ Willowbrook.

"The residents in these additional areas have expressed concerns that nonconforming vehicles are parked on county roadways for extended periods of time

Tariffs

legal basis for the sweeping tariffs on countries with which the U.S. has unfair trade relationships, according to his administration.

The tariffs were a large part of the president's economic agenda that aims to bolster manufacturing and raise revenue to pay down the $38.65 trillion national debt.

In response to the Supreme Court ruling, Trump announced he would impose a worldwide 10% tariff while administration officials seek out other options for trade policy. The new tariff is limited to 150 days.

Trump lashed out at justices who supported the Court's decision that he called called "deeply disappointing." He posted a response on his Truth Social platform.

"This was an important case to me, more as a symbol of Economic and National Security, than anything else," Trump wrote. "The Good News is that there are methods, practices, Statutes, and other Authorities, as recognized by the entire Court and Congress, that are even stronger than the IEEPA TARIFFS, available to me as President of the United States of America and, in actuality, I was very modest in my 'ask' of other Countries and Businesses because I wanted to do nothing that could sway the decision that has been rendered by the Court."

According to government estimates, the reciprocal tariffs would have generated about $3 trillion toward lowering the federal debt.

In April, Trump imposed hefty reciprocal tariffs on countries that have the highest trade deficits with the U.S. — China, 34%; Vietnam, 46%; India, 25%-30%; Japan, 24%; European Union, 20%; Cambodia, 49%; Thailand, 36%; Laos, 40%; and Myanmar, 40%.

Recent estimates from U.S. Customs and Border Protection and independent research organizations shows that between $133 and $200 billion have been collected under IEEPA tariffs.

Gov. Gavin Newsom and California Attorney General Rob Bonta issued statements following the Supreme Court's rejection of the tariffs.

“Time to pay the piper, Donald. These tariffs were nothing more than an illegal cash grab that drove up prices and hurt working families, so you could wreck longstanding alliances and extort them," Newsom said. "Every dollar unlawfully taken must be refunded immediately — with interest. Cough up!"

Bonta referred to states' opposition to Trump's trade policy.

“The Trump Administration’s illegal and chaotic tariff regime has come to an end. ... The highest court in

and that the continuous presence of these nonconforming vehicles impact visibility at driveways and intersections, reduce availability of on-street parking for residents, and cause visual blight," county Public Works Director Mark Pestrella wrote in a letter to the board in support of the ordinance.

The ordinance would provide exemptions for vehicles being used for construction, maintenance or "other services to residents," Pestrella wrote.

Owners of nonconforming vehicles will also be

able to obtain as many as 30 one-day parking permits during a calendar year.

The board approved the ordinance on a 4-0 vote, with Supervisor Kathryn Barger absent. The ordinance is expected to return to the board for a final vote next week.

Several residents spoke in favor of the ordinance during Tuesday's meeting, complaining that such vehicles are not only a visual blight but also the source of crime and other activity, while discouraging people from visiting nearby businesses.

the country has agreed with arguments put forth by California, our sister states, and the dedicated businesses that decided to fight for their livelihoods and for what was right,” Bonta said. “While this is great news, we must not forget the chaos that sent businesses, consumers, and global economies reeling. At a time when more and more families are struggling with affordability and having trouble paying for the basics — their utilities, groceries, gas — this Administration seems intent on making it more expensive for Californians and Americans to live."

White House spokesman Kush Desai responded in a statement to HeySoCal.com, “Does Gavin Newsom not have a day job to constantly be screeching about Presi-

dent Trump? Millions of Americans have fled California in recent years because of high taxes, cost of living, regulations, and crime — Newsom’s time would be better spent dealing with those issues than ginning up another popcorn headline.”

Alan Morrison, lead counsel for Consumer Watchdog's amicus brief in the lawsuit opposing the tariffs, said the ruling was a "resounding victory for the principles of separation of powers."

Morrison, an adjunct professor at George Washington University Law School, said in a statement the decision "returns to Congress the question of whether tariffs are good for America and, if so, how much and on what imports, where it belongs."

He emphasized that the Supreme Court rejected Trump's claim that IEEPA "allowed him to impose massive taxes on American businesses and consumers, in whatever amount he decided, for whatever products he selected, and for however long he preferred."

William Pletcher, litigation director for Consumer Watchdog, added the ruling was a noteworthy win for customers.

"The court made clear that no president can use emergency powers as an end-run around Congress's exclusive taxing power. Americans cannot be taxed by executive fiat," Pletcher said in a statement.

The ruling in Learning Resources Inc. v. Trump is on the Supreme Court's website.

The Port of Los Angeles. | Photo courtesy of Linnaea Mallette/PublicDomainPictures.net (CC0)
| Photo courtesy of Artful Homes/Unsplash

MONDAY MENTAL HEALTH

Join Us at Mental Health Monday , a Monthly Workshop Series to Help Families Heal.

MONDAYS

6:00 - 7:00 PM

FEBRUARY 9 TH

From Survival to Re ection: Reclaiming Calm

Learn how to slow your nervous system, process what you’ve been through, and find moments of steadiness after prolonged stress and uncertainty.

2 ND

Healing Beyond Words: Expressing Recovery Through Art

Using creative expression to explore emotions, release what’s hard to name, and reconnect with yourself through nonverbal healing practices.

9 TH

Money Stress & Mental Wellness: Healing While Navigating Post-Fire Financial Recovery

Understanding how financial strain impacts mental health, and learning tools to manage anxiety, overwhelm, and decision fatigue during recovery.

The Gift of Stillness: Finding Peace In Uncertain Times

Exploring grounding techniques that help create a sense of safety, presence, and emotional rest when the future feels unclear.

Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook