Baldwin Park Press_7/7/2025 by Beacon Media News

Baldwin Park

RAND study: Homelessness drops in 3 parts of LA, but ‘rough sleeping’ persists

By Joe Taglieri joet@beaconmedianews.com

Ayearlongcountof unshelteredAngelenos by the RAND Corp. found a significant decrease in the number of unhoused residents from the previous year, but those who remain may be increasingly difficult to move into housing, the nonprofit research organization announced Tuesday.

The study of unsheltered residents of Skid Row in downtown Los Angeles and of people experiencing homelessness in Hollywood and Venice during 2024 found a 15% drop from the previous year, which researchers said was likely driven by more individuals gaining access to interim and permanent housing through government programs.

RAND also reported that “rough sleeping” — living completely unsheltered without a tent, makeshift shelter or vehicle — showed little change. Rough sleeping is now the most common type in the three study areas, representing about 40% of the total population of people experiencing unsheltered homelessness.

While researchers counted a nearly 700-person decrease in the combined unsheltered populations of Hollywood and Venice, that was offset partially by a 170-person, 9% increase in Skid Row. Hollywood showed a 49% decline, and Venice posted a 22% drop, according to the study titled “Los Angeles Longitudinal Enumeration and Demographic Survey Project,” or LA LEADS.

“Our latest count found meaningful progress in reducing the number of the unhoused, as compared to the two previous years,” Louis Abramson, the study’s lead author and a RAND adjunct researcher, said in a statement.

“But our results suggest

that the remaining unhoused residents may be harder to engage and bring indoors,” Abramson said. “New policies may be needed to extend 2024’s successes into a future that looks meaningfully different from the one that current strategies were designed to address.”

The RAND study is the largest count of people living unhoused in LA outside the annual point-in-time count organized by the joint city-county Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority. That countywide survey is conducted mainly by teams of trained volunteers and occurs during several consecutive evenings every January.

Last year RAND’s survey staff counted unhoused people every two months in the study neighborhoods and surveyed 463 unsheltered people across the neighborhoods from July to October. According to the study, survey participants reported staying in the same location for shorter time periods compared with past years.

This finding is consistent with the removal of “shelter in place” orders and increases in sanitation and other encampment-resolution effort. Most common in Hollywood, such cleanup efforts move unsheltered people indoors but also displace them.

The overall drop in unsheltered homelessness has mainly resulted from a reduction in tents and makeshift structures, leaving “a more transient, mobile and dynamic population,” according to the study. The fraction of unhoused people surveyed in Hollywood and Venice who said they were living with literally no shelter reached record levels — rough sleepers now dominate the LA LEADS unsheltered population, comprising 42% of all people who researchers inferred to be living on the street last December.

“Because fewer unhoused people are dwelling in dense tent communities, it suggests that outreach teams will have to traverse larger areas to engage the same number of

people, likely reducing their average efficiency,” Sarah B. Hunter, co-author of the study and director of the RAND Center on Housing and Homelessness, said in a statement. “As more people live totally exposed to the elements, their needs will rise.”

Although interest in acquiring housing and transitioning out of homelessness remained high at 91% of respondents from the three neighborhoods, the number of people who said they were on a waitlist was still relatively low at 38%.

Researchers also highlighted the finding that the demographics of Hollywood’s homeless population changed dramatically in 2024. The number of Black survey respondents decreased from 50% to 26%, and the share of white and Hispanic populations increased.

As in previous years, twothirds of the Skid Row survey sample is Black, while the

CBy City News Service

ity and county officials in Los Angeles are taking action to combat the tactics of U.S. immigration agents amid ongoing enforcement operations in the Southland.

The Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors on Tuesday directed its attorneys to explore legal remedies to prevent so-called “unconstitutional” federal immigration enforcement.

According to a motion introduced by Supervisors Hilda Solis and Lindsey Horvath, since June 6, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and Immigration and Customs Enforcement personnel have intensified immigration raids in the county, detaining people on streets, at shopping sites, parking lots and churches and have even attempted to enter schools.

“Over the last few weeks, federal agents, often in unmarked vehicles, without visible badges, in regular street clothes and masked faces, have detained people indiscriminately, at times even taking U.S. citizens,” the motion stated. “This includes numerous reported instances of individuals questioned and detained without a judicial warrant and without reasonable suspicion.”

At Tuesday’s meeting, Solis stressed that the Fourth Amendment protects individuals from unreasonable search and seizures.

“When law enforcement officers stop, question, or detain someone without reasonable suspicion, or when they make an arrest without probable cause, they are indeed violating that person’s constitutional and civil rights,” Solis said.

She cited data gathered by UC Berkeley Law that between June 1 and 10, ICE data showed 722 arrests in

Los Angeles, while a Los Angeles Times analysis found that 69% of those individuals had no criminal conviction, and 58% were never charged with a crime. The analysis also found the arrests were mostly men, with a majority from Latin America.

Solis also cited data from the DHS that between June 6 and 22, more than 1,600 individuals were detained or deported in Southern California.

Horvath said everyone is entitled to due process and deserves to have their civil rights upheld.

“Democracy is not a given — we must fight to continue the best of our constitutional traditions,” Horvath said. “We cannot sit on the sideline as the rights of our communities are violated. We must do everything in our power to protect our residents and fight back.”

Board Chair Supervisor Kathryn Barger said federal efforts were also undermining local law enforcement, adding to public fear.

The board directed county attorneys to explore legal remedies to prevent “unconstitutional or unlawful” immigration enforcement activities, including “unlawfully stopping, questioning or detaining individuals without reasonable suspicion, or arresting individuals without probable cause or a valid warrant.”

Approving a related motion by Supervisors Solis and Janice Hahn, the board on Tuesday also directed the Department of Youth Development, Public Defender, and Alternate Public Defender to develop a “Know Your Rights” campaign to educate youth participating in civil unrest. As a part of the campaign, the board called for the

Family of Rosemead woman killed by LASD deputies sues for wrongful death

Unsheltered homelessness often involves “rough sleeping” without a tent, makeshift shelter or vehicle. | Photo by Johnstocker/Envato

DHS sued by workers, others targeted in LA immigration raids

By City News Service

Southlandresidents, workers and advocacy groupsWednesday sued the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, alleging in federal court that the agency is operating a program of “abducting and disappearing” community members using unlawful arrest tactics, then confining detainees in illegal conditions while denying access to attorneys.

The proposed class-action suit brought in Los Angeles federal court by five workers as well as three membership organizations and a legal services provider, alleges that DHS has unconstitutionally arrested and detained people in order to meet arbitrary arrest quotas set by the administration of President Donald Trump.

“Since June 6th, marauding, masked goons have descended upon Los Angeles, terrorizing our brown communities and tearing up the Constitution in the process,” Mohammad Tajsar, senior staff attorney with plaintiffs’ representative the ACLU Foundation of Southern California, said in a statement. “No matter their status or the color of their skin, everyone is guaranteed Constitutional rights

to protect them from illegal stops. We will hold DHS accountable.”

Plaintiffs -- including the Los Angeles Worker Center Network, United Farm Workers, the Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights, and Immigrant Defenders Law Center -- seek to represent two classes of individuals, those who have been or will be subjected to unlawful practices of suspicionless stops and warrantless arrests without evaluations of flight risk, according to the complaint.

In response, DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin issued a statement saying claims that people are being targeted because of their skin color are “disgusting and categorically false.” She also insisted all immigration enforcement operations are “highly targeted,” not random.

“Any claim that there are subprime conditions at ICE detention centers are false,” McLaughlin said. “In fact, ICE has higher detention standards than most U.S. prisons that hold actual U.S. citizens. All detainees are provided with proper meals, medical treatment and have

opportunities to communicate with lawyers and their family members.”

Attorneys for the plaintiffs are seeking preliminary and permanent injunctions stopping further alleged violations of Fourth and Fifth Amendment rights.

“These raids have targeted the most vulnerable members of our workforce, essential workers who are the backbone of our local economy,” said Armando Gudino, executive director of the LA Center Network. “We cannot allow racial profiling, warrantless arrests, and denial of due process to become the standard operating procedure in our communities.”

Between June 1 and 10, DHS and Immigration and Customs Enforcement data showed 722 arrests in Los Angeles, while a Los Angeles Times analysis found that 69% of those individuals had no criminal conviction, and 58% were never charged with a crime. The analysis also found the arrests were mostly men, with a majority from Latin America.

Los Angeles County Supervisor Hilda Solis on Tuesday also cited data from the DHS that between June

6 and 22, more than 1,600 individuals were detained or deported in Southern California. Solis went on to claim the raids appeared to have targeted established immigrant communities, with agents “racially profiling” residents “based on their appearance and/or the color of their skin.”

According to the ACLU of SoCal, since June 6, the federal government has sent immigration agents to the streets, work sites and neighborhoods of Los Angeles and surrounding counties, creating a siege

and immigration dragnet over the region.

The suit alleges that “one of the clearest patterns that have emerged in the raids in Southern California has been stops and interrogations ... on the basis of apparent race and ethnicity.”

Mark Rosenbaum, senior special counsel for strategic litigation at Public Counsel, which is also representing the plaintiffs, alleges that members of the Southern California community have been “whisked away and disappeared into a grossly

overcrowded dungeonlike facility lacking food, medical care, basic hygiene, and beds.”

Rosenbaum contends that DHS is operating a “draconian crackdown” to “eviscerate basic rights to due process and to shield from public view the horrifying ways ICE and Border Patrol agents treat citizens and residents who have been stigmatized by our government as violent criminals based on skin color alone.” He added, “This lawsuit is in part about putting an end to that big lie.”

Gov. Newsom touts $750M film credit expansion, 16 new TV shows added

By City News Service

Gov. Gavin Newsom was in Burbank Wednesday with state and local officials to take a victory lap over the passage of legislation that will more than double California’s Film and Television Tax Credit Program from $330 million to $750 million and add 16 new television projects expected to generate $1.1 billion in economic activity.

Newsom was also joined by labor representatives and entertainment leaders at The Ranch Lot Studios at Warner Bros. on Wednesday to mark the expansion, which they say solidifies California’s status as the “global epicenter of film and television production.” The expanded program will also support below-the-line jobs and increase industry investment.

The governor is also awarding 16 new television shows through the program which, taken together, are collectively anticipated to bring in $1.1 billion in total spending and nearly 6,700

cast and crew jobs across the state.

“California is where filmed entertainment was born, and with this expansion, we’re making sure it stays here,” Newsom said. “We’re not just investing in productions and soundstages -- we’re investing in middle-class careers, small businesses, and the communities that power this iconic industry.”

The new TV projects, which have been approved across the program’s last three television application windows, include nine renewals, two pilots, four new shows and one relocating show, the governor said.

Altogether, the projects are expected to hire 6,664 cast and crew members, as well as 59,000 background performers -- measured in days worked, across 1,308 total California filming days.

Highlights from the projects include nine returning TV series, including HBO Max’s “The Pitt,” Hulu’s hit “Paradise” and CBS’ “NCIS: Origins,” Newsom said.

There are also two shows that will film outside of the Los Angeles area for a total of 23 filming days, and one relocating series -- Prime Video’s “Mr. & Mrs. Smith.”

Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass praised the move, noting that the entertainment industry touches the city in many ways.

“We have tens of thousands of Angelenos working in the industry -- actors, directors, writers, stage hands and more -- but it’s also about all the businesses that rely on this industry -- the flower

stores, the carpentry shops, the restaurants,” Bass said in a statement. “Hollywood is the cornerstone of this city and our economy.”

Dee Dee Myers, senior advisor to the governor and director of GO-Biz, called the decision part of “California’s long game.”

“By doubling down on this commitment, we’re ensuring California remains the premier place to work, create, and tell stories that reach across the world,” Myers said in a statement.

Since 2009, the tax credit

program has generated more than $27 billion in economic activity and supported over 209,000 jobs across nearly 850 projects.

Newsom’s office said each tax credit dollar returns about $24.40 in economic output, $16.14 in gross domestic product and $8.60 in wages.

The expanded program prioritizes workforce development, adds funding for the Career Pathways Training Program and launches what officials called the nation’s first “Safety on Production Pilot Program.”

Film and television workers, industry leaders and others have advocated for the program’s expansion, citing a need to stop runaway productions, as well as to assist an industry that has faced challenges as a result of the coronavirus pandemic, dual writers and actors strike, and current federal immigration policies.

The program has been “oversubscribed year after year,” the governor’s office

added. Film and television projects were driven out-ofstate, coaxed by investments elsewhere.

“This program isn’t just about keeping cameras rolling -- it’s about sustaining careers, building opportunity and ensuring that the economic and cultural benefits of filmmaking stay right here in the Golden State,” Colleen Bell, director of the California Film Commission, said in a statement.

Last month, Newsom signed the state’s budget bill, which included the $750 million program expansion. He is expected to sign new legislation that is intended to modernize and further improve the program.

The California Film Commission will integrate the funding into upcoming application cycles scheduled for July 7-9 (television) and Aug. 25-27 (film). More information will be provided by the Film Commission in the coming days.

Los Angeles Worker Center Network, United Farm Workers, the Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights, and Immigrant Defenders Law Center and ACLU Foundation of Southern California hold a press conference Wednesday. | Photo courtesy of Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights/Facebook

Photo by Osarugue Igbinoba on Unsplash

Editorial editorial@beaconmedianews.com

editor@hlrmedia.com

Graphics/Production production@beaconmedianews.com production@hlrmedia.com

Advertising advertising@beaconmedianews.com advertising@hlrmedia.com

Legal Advertising legals@beaconmedianews.com legals@hlrmedia.com

Business accounting@beaconmedianews.com accounting@hlrmedia.com

BEACON MEDIA ADDRESS: 820 S. Myrtle Ave. Monrovia, CA 91016

PHONE: (626) 301-1010

WEBSITE www.beaconmedianews.com

HLR MEDIA ADDRESS: 820 S. Myrtle Ave. Monrovia, CA 91016

PHONE: (626) 301-1010 www.HLRmedia.com

PRESS

editor@beaconmedianews.com editor@hlrmedia.com

CClayton Kershaw becomes 20th MLB pitcher with 3,000 strikeouts

laytonKershaw

Wednesdayevening became the 20th pitcher in Major League Baseball history with 3,000 strikeouts with three against the Chicago White Sox at Dodger Stadium.

Kershaw struck out former teammate Miguel Vargas in the third, Lenyn Sosa in the fifth and Vinny Capra in the sixth to reach the milestone.

Kershaw was relieved by Lou Trivino before the start of the seventh inning and the Dodgers trailing 4-2. They scored three runs in the ninth for a 5-4 victory.

Kershaw is the fourth lefthander with 3,000 strikeouts, joining Steve Carlton, Randy Johnson and CC Sabathia.

All but two of the eligible pitchers with 3,000 strikeouts are in the Hall of Fame. The exceptions are Roger Clemens and Curt Schilling.

The37-year-old Kershaw began the season on the 60-day injured list as he continued to recover from left toe and left knee surgeries performed in November. His first official pitchingappearance came on April 16 with the Dodgers’ Triple-A Oklahoma City affiliate, pitching three shutout innings and striking

By City News Service

out two in a 3-1 victory over the Tacoma Rainiers.

Kershaw had a 1-0 record and 2.57 ERA in five games with three minor league affiliates before making his 2025 Major League debut May 17 against the Angels, allowing five runs and five hits in four innings but not figuring in the decision in an 11-9 loss at Dodger Stadium.

Kershaw entered Wednesday’s play with a 4-0 record and 3.03 ERA.

Kershaw’s 2024 season was ended on Aug. 30 because of a bone spur in his left big toe. After his toe problems were discovered, Kershaw said he decided to have his left knee examined because it had been bothering him for some time. Imaging later showed he needed surgery to repair his left meniscus.

The Dodgers selected Kershaw with the seventh pick in the 2006 draft out of Highland Park High School in the Dallas suburb of University Park where he was also the center on the football team, quarterbacked by Matthew Stafford, now the Rams’ quarterback.

Kershaw made his major league debut on May

25, 2008, against the St. Louis Cardinals at Dodger Stadium, striking out the first batter he faced, Skip Schumaker.

Kershaw’s top strikeout victim is Brandon Belt, who he struck out 30 times in 67 plate appearances between 2011 and 2020, all when Belt was with the San Francisco Giants.

Tenant screening inaccuracies and the people they hurt

By Ryan

newspaper of general circulation in court case number KS017174 City of Baldwin Park, County of Los Angeles, State of California.

Burbank Independent has been adjudicated as a newspaper of general circulation in court case number ES016728 City of Burbank, County of Los Angeles, State of California. The

Landlords and tenants often accept the tenant screening process as a formality. But there’s a hidden set of processes that work behind the scenes to create the neatly formatted PDFs landlords rely on to evaluate applicants. And sometimes those tenant background checks are flat out inaccurate.

A recent study conducted by Rent Butter, a tenant screening service provider, revealed that 1 in 7 traditional tenant background checks contains inaccurate or missing data. In the 30-day study, legacy screening methods failed to identify six registered sex offenders, 85 felony convictions, and 34 misdemeanors in already accepted applications out of 1,000 screenings. These inaccuracies have the potential to create a catastrophe for landlords.

And tenants can feel the pain if an inaccurate report works against them and causes an unfair denial.

Considering this reality, TurboTenant examines the information screening reports contain, how inaccuracies hurt both tenants and landlords, why data gets mixed up, and how nextgeneration providers are addressing these challenges. How screening inaccuracies hurt tenants

You don’t have to look far to find examples of inaccurate screening reports impacting innocent people.

In 2020, The New York Times reported three examples of mistaken identity. Each case resulted in a housing denial, leaving one applicant homeless: “Glenn Patrick Thomas Sr and Glenn Patrick Thompson Jr., who said they had been left homeless near Seattle after a tenant screening company

called On-Site, which is now a part of RealPage, told two different landlords that the father and son had been previously evicted. In fact, the eviction was for a Patricia Thompson, who was not related to them.”

To add insult to injury, tenants typically pay between $30 and $75 for these reports. So, not only are they denied housing, but often they also have to pay a fee for each application they submit. By the time the applicant can dispute the report, the landlord has likely moved forward with another applicant.

To find housing quickly, renters must apply for another property and pay another fee, unless their state or city allows the use of portable tenant screening reports.

If the city or state allows PTSRs, tenants can pay for the report themselves, collect any information disputing it, and speak directly with the landlord to explain any inconsistencies. It’s not the most efficient process, but it’s better than nothing.

How screening inaccuracies hurt landlords On the other side of the equation are landlords. And while most of the headlines you’ll come across on the internet focus on tenants who are harmed by inaccurate screening reports, the reality is that landlords have no say in what the screening service delivers to their inboxes.

There are financial considerations, which will be addressed next, but landlords can easily invite

Squires for TurboTenant, via Stacker

Clayton Kershaw displays the baseball he threw for the megamilestone 3,000th strikeout of his career. | Photo courtesy of the Los Angeles Dodgers/X

unwanted legal attention when they accept the results of screening reports at face value.

Legal challenges

In two lawsuits filed late last year, “two large private-equity-backed landlords discriminated against prospective tenants by relying on screening systems reporting inaccurate information about applicants’ previous evictions and criminal histories,” according to NBC News.

In another lawsuit involving the Washington, D.C., housing authority, the tenant screening company contracted to run reports for the housing authority is facing a lawsuit claiming, “The plaintiffs mentioned how the company confused individuals with similar names and used court proceedings for unrelated individuals. Furthermore, these reports contained information seven years or older, violating the Fair Credit Reporting Act’s (FCRA) provisions.”

In this case, landlords relied on the housing authority to vet tenants. However, the outcome was essentially the same; landlords (and the housing authority) found themselves in hot water by accepting the

results of a tenant screening report.

For landlords, verifying the information within the report can save considerable time, stress, and money. And a close eye on screening reports might be the ticket to landing a quality tenant whom a landlord might have otherwise denied.

Financial considerations and reputational harm

Any judgment against a landlord has the potential to harm their financial standing. Additionally, if a report fails to attribute negative financial, criminal, or eviction history to an applicant, landlords may find themselves with a tenant who fails to pay rent on time, causes property damage, or requires eviction.

Alternatively, when a landlord denies a tenant due to false information, they not only dismiss what could have been a great tenant, but for each day their rental remains vacant, they also lose $65 a day on average in the U.S. For a single day, that may not seem like much, but when vacancies extend to two weeks, losses pile up to over $900.

Note: This calculation is based on a $2,000 monthly rent and a 31-day month,

Tenant screening

which may be a low estimate in some states such as New York and California.

Finally, as referenced in the introduction, Rent Butter identified several instances of serious issues within accepted rental applications. The potential harm that an inaccurate background report could have on the community should not be understated.

Imagine if an inaccurate screening report opens the door for a violent criminal to rent a home in a familycentered neighborhood, or if a person on the National Sex Offender Registry moves into a school zone. It’s critical that landlord scrutinize screening reports to safeguard their communities, properties, and reputations.

Information contained in screening reports

With so much at stake for both landlords and tenants, it’s essential to understand the information a tenant background check will return.

Probably the most wellunderstood aspect of any tenant background report is the credit check, which landlords use to gauge a tenant’s financial responsibility and their likelihood of paying rent on time. Credit

bureaus compile credit reports using:

- The credit score

-Total debt and credit utilization

-Delinquencies, collections, and charge-offs

-Number and type of credit accounts (loans, credit cards, etc.)

- Bankruptcy filings

-Credit inquiries (soft and hard pulls)

Keep in mind that these reports can be skewed by

data that doesn’t accurately reflect the trustworthiness of an applicant at the current moment. For example, financial activity from years ago can impact an applicant’s current score.

Criminal history

Of the three major components of a tenant screening report, criminal histories help landlords

screen for safety concerns. Reports often include:

- Offense types (felony or misdemeanor)

-Charge details and court location

-Disposition (guilty, dismissed, pending)

-Conviction date and sentencing information

- Sex offender registry

The problem is that

See Tenant screening Page 08

| Photo courtesy of fizkes/Shutterstock/Stacker

CA members of Congress face pressure to reject cuts to Medi-Cal

By Suzanne Potter, Producer, Public News Service

As the U.S. Senate has approved President Donald Trump’s tax cut and spending bill, health care advocates are hoping to get California’s Republican members of Congress on board to reject huge potential cuts to Medicaid, known as Medi-Cal in the Golden State.

The House approved the massive budget bill once before but now must reconsider the changes made in the Senate.

Matthew Herdman, California state director for the nonprofit Protect Our Care, hopes three California House members in particular will “flip” their votes.

“We believe that it’s possible to stop this,” Herdman explained. “When it initially came through the House, it only passed by one single vote, which means any one -- of David Valadao,

Young Kim or Ken Calvert -- could vote against this in order to stop it.”

The Congressional Budget Office estimated the Senate version of the bill would slash about $1 trillion from Medicaid and other health programs and it is forecast to cause almost 12 million people to lose health coverage by increasing work requirements and requiring people to verify their eligibility more often. Backers said the savings are necessary to partially cover the cost of extending Trump’s 2017 tax cuts.

Rep. David Min, D-Calif., who represents parts of Orange County, said the bill would still increase the national debt by trillions of dollars.

“It’s all because of this completely evil and immoral agenda to give more money to people in the world who

don’t need it,” Min asserted. “This is so wrong, and we need to fight back.”

Naida Tushnet, a member of the Long Beach Gray Panthers, said she is worried about low-income older people who rely on both Medicaid and Medicare, particularly for long-term care.

“If they have to keep filing, even if they’re capable of doing it all, they’re going to fall into the cracks, because the system -- that’s all online -- has been stripped of humans, because they fired all those other people who could take it on the phone and talk them through it,” Tushnet outlined.

President Trump has set a deadline of July 4 for final passage of the bill, so the Republican leadership in the House is furiously negotiating and will try to hold a vote in the next few days.

SoCal grocery workers reach tentative labor deal

The union representing more than 45,000 workers for Ralphs, Albertsons, Pavilions and Vons across Southern California announced Wednesday it has reached a tentative contract agreement with the grocery companies.

The union workers had previously authorized a strike if a deal could not be reached. No specific details of the proposed agreement were released, although union officials said it includes higher wages, additional pension contributions and improvements in health, welfare and staffing.

“This victory wouldn’t have been possible without the power of our collective action,” according to a statement from the United Food and Commercial Workers’ union negotiating committee. “We stood strong against the companies’ disrespect and made it clear that we were ready to fight for the contract we deserve. Today proves that when workers stand together, we win.

“We look forward to sharing and discussing the details of this agreement

By City News Service

with our co-workers before we make our voices heard during the voting process.”

There was no immediate response to a request for comment from Kroger -- the parent company of Ralphs -- or Albertsons, which also owns Pavilions and Vons.

It was unclear when union members would hold a ratification vote. Union officials said details of the tentative agreement

would be shared with union members during upcoming meetings.

The union’s previous contract expired March 2. The union announced June 11 that its members had voted overwhelmingly to authorize a strike. Although a walkout had not been called by the union, workers held a series of “practice strike” demonstrations over the past few weeks.

| Photo courtesy of UFCW770 / Facebook

Photo courtesy of Stockcake

Healthiest and unhealthiest barbecue recipes

By Dr. Craig Primack for Hers, via Stacker

Cookoutseasonhas arrived, whether you’re grilling with friends on the Fourth of July or searching for recipes to make at home for a family backyard barbecue. It’s the perfect time of year to enjoy fresh summer produce and plenty of protein, all while staying on track with your health and fitness goals.

Ready to navigate the cookout scene while still keeping an eye on nutritional content? Hers ranked 29 popular summer recipes on Allrecipes from healthiest to unhealthiest based on the following categories.

- Protein: A summer cookout is the perfect place to meet your protein goals, which helps repair damaged cells and boost metabolism.

- Fiber: Adding more fiber to your diet improves metabolic health and reduces the risk of cardiovascular disease.

- Calories: Finding the right balance of daily caloric intake is essential in any wellness journey. Both overand under-eating can lead to health issues.

- Saturated fat: Eating too much saturated fat is thought to lead to higher cholesterol levels and cardiovascular disease.

- Net carbs: Net carbs refer to the total amount of carbohydrates in a serving after subtracting grams of fiber. Fiber benefits gut health, while overconsuming carbs (especially refined grains) may increase the risk of metabolic disease.

- Sugar: Regularly eating large amounts of sugar may impact health outcomes, including a greater risk of metabolic, cardiovascular and nervous disorders.

Key Findings

- Burgers and deviled eggs are healthy choices because they contain high protein and lower levels of sugar and net carbs.

- Unsurprisingly, the unhealthiest cookout dishes

are desserts with more sugar and saturated fat.

- Vegetable recipes vary on the nutrition spectrum depending on other ingredients, indicating a dish may not be healthy just because of its veggie content.

Check out 29 summer cookout recipes ranked from healthiest to unhealthiest to help you navigate your next potluck with confidence.

Summer cookout recipes ranked from healthiest to unhealthiest

Find the recipes online via tinyurl.com/4wnwydrs.

1. Slider-Style Mini Burgers

2. Bacon Cheddar Deviled Eggs and Juiciest Hamburgers Ever (tied)

4. Boston Baked Beans

5. Awesome Pasta Salad and Three-Bean Salad (tied)

7. Summer Corn Salad

8. The Best Fresh Tomato Salsa and Triple Dipped Fried Chicken (tied)

10. Unbelievable Chicken

11. Coconut Shrimp

12. BBQ Pork

13. Blackberry Pie

14. Beer Brats and Red Skinned Potato Salad (tied)

16. Perfect Summer Fruit Salad

17. Grilled Corn on the Cob

18. Classic Macaroni Salad

19. Alyson’s Broccoli Salad and Sweet Restaurant Slaw (tied)

21. Corn Dogs

22. Strawberry Pie

23. Oven-Baked Baby Back Ribs

24. Baked Fresh Cherry Pie

25. Awesome and Easy Corn Casserole

26. Chef John’s Strawberry Ice Cream and Scrumptious Strawberry Shortcake (tied)

28. Grandma’s Chocolate Texas Sheet Cake

29. All American Apple Pie

Summer cookout nutrition: Trends and insights

Use this breakdown of

the best and worst dishes in each specific nutrition category to build a plate with foods that help you meet your health goals.

Dishes with the most protein

1. Triple Dipped Fried Chicken

2. BBQ Pork

3. Unbelievable Chicken

Dishes with the least protein

1. The Best Fresh Tomato Salsa

2. Sweet Restaurant Slaw

3. Chef John’s Strawberry Ice Cream, Grandma’s Chocolate Texas Sheet Cake, Strawberry Pie and ThreeBean Salad

Which summer cookout dishes have the most fiber?

Dishes with the most fiber

1. Boston Baked Beans

2. Perfect Summer Fruit Salad

3. Blackberry Pie and Summer Corn Salad

Dishes with no fiber

Bacon Cheddar Deviled Eggs, BBQ Pork and The Best Fresh Tomato Salsa

Dishes with the most calories

1. Triple Dipped Fried Chicken

2. Alyson’s Broccoli Salad

3. All American Apple Pie

Dishes with the fewest calories

1. The Best Fresh Tomato Salad

2. Three-Bean Salad

3. Grilled Corn on the Cob

Dishes with the most saturated fat

1. Scrumptious Strawberry Shortcake

2. Awesome and Easy Corn Casserole

3. All American Apple Pie, Beer Brats and Chef John’s Strawberry Ice Cream

Dishes with the least saturated fat

1. Perfect Summer Fruit Salad and The Best Fresh Tomato Salsa

2. Three-Bean Salad

3. Blackberry Pie, Boston Baked Beans, Summer Corn Salad and Sweet Restaurant Slaw

Which Summer Cookout Dishes Have the Most Net Carbs?

Dishes with the most net carbs

1. Triple Dipped Fried Chicken

2. All American Apple Pie

3. Perfect Summer Fruit Salad

Dishes with the least net carbs

1. Bacon Cheddar Deviled Eggs and The Best Fresh Tomato Salad

2. Juiciest Hamburgers Ever

3. Beer Brats

Which Summer Cookout Dishes Have the Most Sugar?

Dishes with the most sugar

1. Perfect Summer Fruit Salad

2. All American Apple Pie

3. Oven-Baked Baby Back Ribs

Dishes with the least sugar

1. Triple Dipped Fried Chicken

2. Bacon Cheddar Deviled Eggs, Beer Brats and The Best Fresh Tomato Salsa

3. Juiciest Hamburgers Ever, Red Skinned Potato Salad and Slider-Style Mini Burgers

Methodology: How scores were calculated

This roundup of summer cookout recipes came from Allrecipes.com and included entrees, side dishes and desserts — drink recipes were eliminated — for a total of 29 dishes. The list was ranked for health based on higher levels of protein and fiber and lower levels of calories, saturated fat, net carbs and sugar. A 2x multiplier was used for protein and saturated fat.

Three tips for a healthy plate at your next summer cookout

Before you head out to celebrate the Fourth of July or summer in general, check out these ideas to help you stay healthy while still enjoying every bite.

- Fill up on protein and fiber beforehand: Instead of going to a backyard cookout with your stomach growling, eat a snack with

protein and fiber before you go. You’re more likely to feel satiated and avoid overeating on less healthy options once you’re at the party.

- Watch for sauces and mix-ins: Sugar-heavy barbecue sauces can quickly add up, especially if you’re tracking calories in, calories out. If available, opt for plain grilled meat or hardboiled eggs to avoid those heavy sauces. Also, watch for vegetable salads that may appear healthy, but have a lot of mayonnaise, adding saturated fat. A healthier alternative? Head for the crudité platter with hummus or Greek yogurt dip.

- Drink with intention: Whether you prefer alcoholic beverages or sweet sodas, set a limit in advance so you don’t accidentally overconsume. Switch to water or zero-calorie seltzer drinks to feel your best all day long. This story was produced by Hers and reviewed and distributed by Stacker. The article was copy edited and retitled from its original version. Republished with CC BY-NC 4.0 license.

| Photo courtesy of Mr.Somkeat/Shutterstock/Stacker

‘We the People’ includes all Americans — but July 4 is a reminder that democracy remains a work in progress

By Joseph Jones for the Conversation, via Stacker

TheUnitedStates’ founders firmly rejected King George III and the entire idea of monarchy 249 years ago, on July 4, 1776.

Political power does not come from some absolute authority of a king over people, the founders argued. Rather, political power comes from the people themselves. And these people must agree to any authority governing their society.

This is why the U.S. Constitution starts with the words “We the People,” and not “I, the ruler,” writes Joseph Jones, a history professor at West Virginia University, for The Conversation.

America’s founders did not trust everyone’s ability to equally participate in the new democracy, as laws at the time showed.

But, because of policy changes on issues like voting, the idea of who actually is represented in the phrase “We the People” has changed over time.

First steps

In 1776, only white men who owned property had the right to vote.

“Few men, who have no property, have any judgment of their own,” as former President John Adams wrote in 1776.

As activists — including some women and Black Americans — proclaimed their equality, public education spread, and social thinking shifted.

By about 1860, all state legislatures had lifted property requirements for voting. Allowing only wealthy property owners to vote did not align with the democratic notion that “all men are created equal.”

While some states, like Vermont, eliminated the property voting requirement in the 18th century, this shift became more popular in the 1820s and the 1830s.

Congress passed the 15th Amendment in 1870, giving Black men and others

the right to vote, regardless of race.

But that amendment still excluded some people, chiefly Native Americans and women.

An unfinished history

Despite the 15th Amendment, violence and intimidation in some states still prevented Black men from voting.

State lawmakers also used bureaucratic measures, such as a poll tax, renewed attempts at a property requirement and literacy tests, to prevent African Americans from voting.

The fight over African American suffrage continued for decades, and many courageous Americans protested and were arrested or killed in the struggle to exercise their voting rights.

Thanks to the work of civil rights activists — including John Lewis, Fannie Lou Hamer and Martin Luther King Jr. — public opinion shifted.

In the 1960s, Congress passed additional legal measures to protect the voting rights of Black Americans. This included the 24th Amendment, which outlawed the use of poll taxes, and the 1965 Voting Rights Act, which prohibited any racial discrimination in voting.

Women’s turn

In 1920, women gained the right to vote with the addition of the 19th Amendment, following another decades-long struggle.

Women’s rights activists made the first organized call for female suffrage at the Seneca Falls Convention in 1848.

In the following years, suffragists pushed for constitutional amendments, state laws and a change in public thinking to include women in “We the People.”

Native American rights

Having self-governed for centuries, Native Americans

were not legally recognized with voting rights until Congress approved the Indian Citizenship Act in 1924.

While that supposedly gave Native Americans the same rights as other Americans, Native Americans faced the same tactics, like violence, that white racists used to prevent Black Americans from voting.

Like other people excluded from “We the People,” Native Americans have continued to push for voting rights and other ways to ensure they are included in American self-government.

Making democracy more democratic

In 1971 “We the People” again expanded, to include younger people, with the lowering of the voting age from 21 to 18. The ongoing Vietnam War shifted public opinion, and there was popular support for the idea that someone old enough to

die fighting for their country should also be able to vote.

A government once described by Abraham Lincoln as “of the people, by the people, and for the people” was now going to technically include all of the people.

But equality for women, young people and racially marginalized groups did not change overnight.

Social equality remains far off for many people, including undocumented immigrants, for example, and LGBTQ+ individuals.

Current limitations to ‘We the People’

The government has recognized that citizens over 18 have a right to participate in self-government. But there are still political and legal attempts to restrict people’s ability to vote.

While some states have passed new laws that make it harder to vote in recent years, other states have made it easier.

North Carolina passed new ID requirements in April 2023 that make it difficult for those without current state identification to vote.

Texas, Georgia, Oklahoma and Idaho are also among the states that are deleting some voters from their rolls — if people do not regularly vote, for example.

Twenty-five states, meanwhile, including Hawaii and Delaware, have passed laws over the past few years that make it easier to vote. One of these measures automatically registers people to vote when they turn 18.

There are more examples. The bottom line is, voters have fewer protections when it becomes harder to vote, and American democracy is not as democratic as it could be.

The big picture

Voting is not the only form of recognition and participation in a democracy. People can be respected at work, paid what they are worth and treated with dignity. Community members can be treated fairly by police, school officials and other authorities, given an equal opportunity for justice and education to improve their lives.

People can also contribute to the social and economic well-being of a democracy in ways other than voting, doing everything from planting a tree in a public park to attending a political rally.

But the overall expansion of voting rights and a historical understanding of “We the People” shows that everyone belongs in a democratic society, regardless of wealth, achievement or other differences.

This story was produced by The Conversation and reviewed and distributed by Stacker. The article was copy edited and retitled from its original version. Republished with CC BY-NC 4.0 license.

| Photo courtesy of Mario Tama/Getty Images/Stacker

Feds look to deport Boxer Julio Cesar Chavez Jr. over alleged cartel ties

By City News Service

Professional boxer Julio Cesar Chavez Jr., who just days ago lost to Jake Paul in a pay-per-view bout in Anaheim, has been arrested in Studio City and will be deported to his native Mexico, where the alleged Sinaloa Cartel associate has an outstanding arrest warrant, federal immigration officials said Thursday.

Federal authorities allege that Chavez tried to get permanent status based on his marriage to a woman associated with the now-dead son of imprisoned Sinaloa Cartel boss Joaquin `El Chapo’ Guzman.

U.S. Immigration and CustomsEnforcement personnel detained Chavez on Wednesday, according to the Department of Homeland

Security, which blamed the boxer’s presence in the country on the Biden Administration.

In a news release, DHS referred to Chavez as a “prominent Mexican boxer and criminal illegal alien,” and said the son of a similarly named boxing legend is being processed “for expedited removal from the United States.”

“Chavez is a Mexican citizen who has an active arrest warrant in Mexico for his involvement in organized crime and trafficking firearms, ammunition and explosives,” according to a DHS statement.

According to the government, Chavez entered the U.S. legally in August of 2023, having obtained a B2

tourist visa that expired in February 2024.

“Chavez is also believed to be an affiliate of the Sinaloa Cartel, a designated Foreign Terrorist Organization,” according to the government statement, which said Chavez applied for Lawful Permanent Residence status on April 12, 2024, based on his marriage to a U.S. citizen “who is connected to the Sinaloa Cartel through a prior relationship with the now-deceased son of the infamous cartel leader Joaquin ‘El Chapo’ Guzman.

In December of last year, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services labeled Chavez “an egregious public safety threat” and referred the case to ICE.

“However, an entry in

a DHS law enforcement system under the Biden administration indicated Chavez was not an immigration enforcement priority,” according to the DHS statement. “On January 4, 2025, the Biden administration allowed Chavez to reenter the country and paroled him into the country at the San Ysidro port of entry.”

The government alleges that Chavez made “multiple fraudulent statements on his application to become a Lawful Permanent Resident.”

“He was determined to be in the country illegally and removable on June 27, 2025,” according to DHS statement.

Chavez fought Jake Paul on June 28, losing a unanimous decision, at Honda Center in Anaheim.

Tenant screening

sometimes these reports include information that state- or city-specific laws prohibit landlords from using when selecting a renter.

Eviction history

For landlords, no part of the report could be as concerning as an applicant with a history of eviction. When running the report, an eviction history will show:

- Eviction filing date and court jurisdiction

- Case type (unlawful detainer, non-payment, lease violation)

- Case outcome (dismissed, judgment, default)

- Amount of judgment (if any)

With legislation changing at a rapid pace, it can be challenging to keep up with the laws, which may result in sealed records and other

nondisqualifying factors unfairly appearing in screening reports.

How screening reports end up inaccurate

As mentioned in the previous sections, sometimes information that shouldn’t appear ends up trickling through to the final report that landlords receive. However, due to the algorithmic nature of tenant screening reports and slowto-update data, mistakes frequently occur.

Mixed files

A common situation is the phenomenon of mixed records, which occurs when a report combines an applicant’s data with that of another person, as mentioned in The New York Times example above.

The result is a situation where somebody with a clean record may end up

with a report displaying inaccurate results. Part of the reason this occurs is due to wildcard matching, where a service attempts to gather data based on similar names to find a match.

In Terrence Enright’s federal lawsuit against National Tenant Network, as described by The New York Times, “the company searched for “Enright, Ter*” and “Terrence, Enr*.” But the company also searched for misspelled versions, including “Enwright, Ter*” and found a match: an eviction for a Teri Enwright in California, one of what Mr. Enright said were three evictions mistakenly attributed to him, which resulted in his being denied the apartment.”

Complicating the issue of background checks is the fact that some states and

cities restrict the information that landlords can use to inform their housing decisions. In California, for example, a landlord cannot deny housing based on information related to sealed or expunged records, nonviolent offenses, or arrests that didn’t lead to a conviction in cases older than seven years.

In Chicago, the city requires landlords to use a two-step process to accept or deny an applicant. Tenants must first pass a prequalification stage that scrutinizes their employment history, income, credit history, and other relevant factors before a landlord can conduct a criminal background check.

In that stage, the landlord can only consider criminal history from the past three years.

Regarding evictions, some states and cities

restrict the use of eviction histories when making decisions about applicants.

Idaho and Washington, D.C., for example, seal eviction records after three years if they result in a judgment that favors the landlord.

Finally, in some financial records, a tenant screening report may include inaccurate information regarding:

- Bankruptcies

- Closed accounts that are reported as open

- Incorrect account balances

In all of these circumstances, outdated information can restrict the renter’s ability to secure housing while exposing the landlord to legal liability.

What to look for in a screening tool

To address these issues, look for screening tools that offer direct-source tenant

income verification, eviction history, criminal history reporting from multiple data sources, and national court records searches.

Landlords interested in leveraging tenant screening services to fill their vacancies can benefit by utilizing a holistic approach to the screening process. With the right solution, landlords gain a more comprehensive view of any applicant who applies for their rental property. This approach is a great way to identify the best tenant while ensuring that the records they review are of the highest quality. This story was produced by TurboTenant and reviewed and distributed by Stacker. The article was copy edited and retitled from its original version. Republished with CC BY-NC 4.0 license.

Julio Cesar Chavez Jr. | Photo courtesy of Box Azteca/Wikimedia Commons (CC BY 3.0)

Starting a new business? Go to filedba.com

Probate Notices

NOTICE OF AMENDED PETITION TO ADMINISTER

ESTATE OF:

KEYRAN ALBERT HETHERINGTON

CASE NO. 25STPB04925

To all heirs, beneficiaries, creditors, contingent creditors, and persons who may otherwise be interested in the WILL or estate, or both of KEYRAN ALBERT HETHERINGTON.

AN AMENDED PETITION FOR PROBATE has been filed by JESSICA KELLY in the Superior Court of California, County of LOS ANGELES. THE AMENDED PETITION FOR PROBATE requests that JESSICA KELLY be appointed as personal representative to administer the estate of the decedent.

THE AMENDED PETITION requests the decedent's WILL and codicils, if any, be admitted to probate. The WILL and any codicils are available for examination in the file kept by the court.

THE AMENDED PETITION requests authority to administer the estate under the Independent Administration of Estates Act. (This authority will allow the personal representative to take many actions without obtaining court approval. Before taking certain very important actions, however, the personal representative will be required to give notice to interested persons unless they have waived notice or consented to the proposed action.) The independent administration authority will be granted unless an interested person files an objection to the petition and shows good cause why the court should not grant the authority.

A HEARING on the petition will be held in this court as follows: 07/25/25 at 8:30AM in Dept. 11 located at 111 N. HILL ST., LOS ANGELES, CA 90012

IF YOU OBJECT to the granting of the petition, you should appear at the hearing and state your objections or file written objections with the court before the hearing. Your appearance may be in person or by your attorney.

YOU MAY EXAMINE the file kept by the court. If you are a person interested in the estate, you may file with the court a Request for Special Notice (form DE-154) of the filing of an inventory and appraisal of estate assets or of any petition or account as provided in Probate Code section 1250. A Request for Special Notice form is available from the court clerk. Attorney for Petitioner

DANIEL B. BURBOTT - SBN 279759

GAUDY LAW INC.

267 D STREET

UPLAND CA 91786

Telephone (909) 982-3199

7/3, 7/7, 7/10/25 CNS-3942975# DUARTE DISPATCH

NOTICE OF PETITION TO ADMINISTER ESTATE OF:

DOLORES JULIET TINOCO CASE NO. 25STPB07245

To all heirs, beneficiaries, creditors, contingent creditors, and persons who may otherwise be interested in the WILL or estate, or both of DOLORES JULIET TINOCO.

A PETITION FOR PROBATE has been filed by EDWARD M. TINOCO in the Superior Court of California, County of LOS ANGELES.

THE PETITION FOR PROBATE requests that EDWARD M. TINOCO be appointed as personal representative to administer the estate of the decedent.

THE PETITION requests authority to administer the estate under the Independent Administration of Estates Act. (This authority will allow the personal representative to take many actions without obtaining court approval. Before taking certain very important actions, however, the personal representative will be required to give notice to interested persons unless they have waived notice or consented to the proposed action.) The independent administration authority will be granted unless an interested person files an objection to the petition and shows good cause why the court should not grant the authority.

A HEARING on the petition will be held in this court as follows: 07/31/25 at 8:30AM in Dept. 79 located at 111 N. HILL ST., LOS ANGELES, CA 90012

Attorney for Petitioner SUE C. SWISHER - SBN 243310 LAW OFFICES OF SUE C. SWISHER 20955 PATHFINDER ROAD, SUITE 100 DIAMOND BAR CA 91765 Telephone (909) 843-6490 7/3, 7/7, 7/10/25 CNS-3943345# DUARTE DISPATCH

NOTICE OF PETITION TO ADMINISTER ESTATE OF: KRISTIN MARIE PETTERSON AKA KRISTIN PETTERSON CASE NO. 25STPB07362 To all heirs, beneficiaries, creditors, contingent creditors, and persons who may otherwise be interested in the WILL or estate, or both of KRISTIN MARIE PETTERSON AKA KRISTIN PETTERSON.

A PETITION FOR PROBATE has been filed by SCOTT PETTERSON in the Superior Court of California, County of LOS ANGELES. THE PETITION FOR PROBATE requests that SCOTT PETTERSON be appointed as personal representative to administer the estate of the decedent.

THE PETITION requests authority to administer the estate under the Independent Administration of Estates Act with limited authority. (This authority will allow the personal representative to take many actions without obtaining court approval. Before taking certain very important actions, however, the personal representative will be required to give notice to interested persons unless they have waived notice or consented to the proposed action.) The independent administration authority will be granted unless an interested person files an objection to the petition and shows good cause why the court should not grant the authority.

A HEARING on the petition will

be held in this court as follows: 07/31/25 at 8:30AM in Dept. 99 located at 111 N. HILL ST., LOS ANGELES, CA 90012

Attorney for Petitioner

MAURICE ABADIA - SBN 159766 LAW OFFICE OF MAURICE ABADIA

35 N. LAKE AVE., SUITE 710

PASADENA CA 91101

Telephone (626) 744-0992

7/7, 7/10, 7/14/25

CNS-3943981# ARCADIA WEEKLY

NOTICE OF PETITION TO ADMINISTER ESTATE OF:

NUBIA HILDA SANCHEZ CASE NO. 25STPB07071

To all heirs, beneficiaries, creditors, contingent creditors, and persons who may otherwise be interested in the WILL or estate, or both of NUBIA HILDA SANCHEZ.

A PETITION FOR PROBATE has been filed by ELVIN ZULETA in the Superior Court of California, County of LOS ANGELES.

THE PETITION FOR PROBATE requests that ELVIN ZULETA be appointed as personal representative to administer the estate of the decedent.

A HEARING on the petition will be held in this court as follows: 07/23/25 at 8:30AM in Dept. 29 located at 111 N. HILL ST., LOS ANGELES, CA 90012

assets or of any petition or account as provided in Probate Code section 1250. A Request for Special Notice form is available from the court clerk.

In Pro Per Petitioner

ELVIN ZULETA 11 LA TORRE DR POMONA CA 91766

7/3, 7/7, 7/10/25

CNS-3943857# ROSEMEAD READER

NOTICE OF PETITION TO ADMINISTER ESTATE OF: RANJANI VARMA CASE NO. 25STPB07419

To all heirs, beneficiaries, creditors, contingent creditors, and persons who may otherwise be interested in the WILL or estate, or both of RANJANI VARMA.

A PETITION FOR PROBATE has been filed by NAVAL K. VARMA in the Superior Court of California, County of LOS ANGELES.

THE PETITION FOR PROBATE requests that NAVAL K. VARMA be appointed as personal representative to administer the estate of the decedent.

A HEARING on the petition will be held in this court as follows: 08/01/25 at 8:30AM in Dept. 79 located at 111 N. HILL ST., LOS ANGELES, CA 90012

Attorney for Petitioner

JOHN L. SHAW - SBN 58283

LAW OFFICE OF JOHN L. SHAW 5816 TEMPLE CITY BLVD. TEMPLE CITY CA 91780

Telephone (626) 286-3710 7/7, 7/10, 7/14/25 CNS-3944273# SAN GABRIEL SUN

RANT INC., 3047 PROSPECT AVENUE, ROSMEAD, CA 91770

The assets being sold are generally described as: FIXTURES, FURNITURE AND EQUIPMENT and is/are located at 1220 S. GOLDEN WEST AVE, ARCADIA, CA 91007

The type of license to be transferred is/are 41 ON-SALE BEER AND WINE-EATING PLACE now issues for the premises located at:(if "same" address, so state) SAME. The Bulk Sale and transfer of the Alcoholic Beverage License is intended to be consum-mated at the office of: PRECISE ESCROW. 960 EAST LAS TUNAS DRIVE, SUITE B, SAN GABRIEL, CA 91776 and the anticipated sale date is 7/23/25.

The purchase price of consideration in connection with the sale of the business and transfer of the license, is the sum of $50,000.00, including inventory estimated at $ which consists of the following: Cash $ Checks $50,000.00

The parties agree that the consideration for the transfer of the business and the li-cense(s) is to be paid only after the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control has approved the proposed transfer. The parties also agree and herein direct the above-named escrow holder to make payment or distribution within a reasonable time after the completion of the transfer of the license as provided in Section 24074 of California Business and Professional Code.

Dated: 06/30/25

(SIGNATURE OF BUYER(S)/ APPLICANT(S) S/JIEPING ZHANG, PRESIDENT OF FULL HOUSE SEAFOOD RESTAURANT INC.

(SIGNATURE OF SELLER(S)/ LICENSEE(S)) S/ WEIJING ZHAO, SECRETARY OF GOLD OCEAN INTERNATIONAL, INC. 7/7/25

CNS-3944624# ARCADIA WEEKLY

CASE NUMBER: (Numero del Caso): 25NNCV02485 SUMMONS (CITACION JUDICIAL) NOTICE TO DEFENDANT: (AVISO AL DEMANDADO): XINGBO ZHAO, an individual; STEVE GORDON, DIRECTOR OF THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES, a California state agency as a nominal de-fendant, and DOES 1 through 20, Inclusive. YOU ARE BEING SUED BY PLAINTIFF: (LO ESTA DE-MANDANDO EL DEMANDANTE): BMW BANK OF NORTH AMERICA, a Utah industrial bank, by and through its servicer, BMW FI-NANCIAL SERVICES NA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability compa-ny. NOTICE! You have been sued. The court may decide against you without your being heard unless you respond within 30 days. Read the information below. You have 30 CALENDAR DAYS after this summons and legal papers are served on you to file a written response at this court and have a copy served on the plaintiff. A letter or phone call will not protect you. Your written response must be in proper legal form if you want the court to hear your case. There may be a court form that you can use for your response. You can find these court forms and more information at the California Courts Online Self-Help Center (www.courtinfo.ca.gov/ selfhelp), your county law library, or the courthouse nearest you. If you cannot pay the filing fee, ask the court clerk for a fee waiver form. If you do not file your response on time, you may lose the case by default, and your wages, money, and property may be taken without further warning from the court. There are other legal require-ments. You may want to call an attorney right away. If you do not know an attorney, you may want to call an attorney referral service. If you cannot afford an attorney, you may be eligible for free legal services from a nonprofit legal services program. You can locate these nonprofit groups at the California Legal Services Web site (www.lawhelpcalifornia.org), the California Courts Online Self-Help Center (www. courtinfo.ca.gov/selfhelp), or by contacting your local court or county bar association.

NOTE: The court has a statutory lien for waived fees and costs on any settlement or arbitration award of $10,000 or more in a civil case. The court’s lien must be paid before the court will dismiss the case. AVISO! Lo han demandado. Si no responde dentro de 30 dias, la corte puede decidir en su contra sin escuchar su version. Lea la infor-macion a continuacion. Tiene 30 DIAS DE CALEN-DARIO despues de que le entreguen esta citacion y papeles legales para presentar una respuesta por escrito en esta corte y hacer que se entregue una copia al demandante. Una carta o una llamada telefonica no lo protegen. Su respuesta por escrito tiene que estar en formato legal correcto si desea que procesen su caso en la corte. Es posible que haya un formulario que usted pueda usar para su respuesta. Puede encontrar estos formularios de la corte y mas informacion en el Centro de Ayuda de las Cortes de California (www.sucorte.ca.gov) en la bibli-oteca de leyes de su condado o en la corte que le quede mas cerca. Si no puede pagar la cuota de presentacion, pida al secretario de la corte que le de un formulario de exencion de pago de cuotas. Si no presenta su respuesta a tiempo, puede perder el caso por incumplimiento y la corte le podra quitar su sueldo, dinero y bienes sin mas advertencia. Hay otros requisitos legales. Es recomendable que llame a un abo-gado inmediatamente. Si no conoce a un abogado, puede llamar a un servicio de remision a abogados. Si no puede pagar a un abogado, es posible que cumpla con los requisitos para obtener servicios legales gratu-itos de un programa de servicios legales sin fines de lucro. Puede encontrar

estos grupos sin fines de lucro en el sitio web de California Legal Services, (www. lawhelpcalifornia.org), en el Centro de Ayuda de las Cortes de California, (www. sucorte.ca.gov) o poniendose en contacto con la corte o el colegio de abogados locales. AVISO: Por ley, la corte tiene derecho a reclamar las cuotas

LEASEHOLD INTEREST AND IMPROVEMENTS, COVENANT NOT TO COMPETE, INVENTORY of that certain business located at: 8 E FOOTHILL BLVD., 1ST FLOOR, ARCADIA, CA 91006 (6) The business name used by the seller(s) at said location is: CODE NINJAS ARCADIA (7) The anticipated date of the bulk sale is JULY 23, 2025 at the office of: STANDARD ESCROW, INC., 47 DISCOVERY, SUITE 110, IRVINE, CA 92618, Escrow No. SE024284-CK, Escrow Officer: CINDIE KIM (8) Claims may be filed with Same as “7” above (9) The last date for filing claims is: JULY 22, 2025. (10) This Bulk Sale is subject to Section 6106.2 of the Uniform Commercial Code. (11) As listed by the Seller, all other business names and addresses used by the Seller within three years before the date such list was sent or delivered to the Buyer are: NONE. DATED: JUNE 25, 2025 TRANSFEREES: IVY & SEQUOIA, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION 3928795-PP ARCADIA WEEKLY 7/7/25

NOTICE TO CREDITORS OF BULK SALE (Division 6 of the Commercial Code) Escrow No. SE-024281-CK (1) Notice is hereby given to creditors of the within named Seller(s) that a bulk sale is about to be made on personal property hereinafter described (2) The name and business addresses of the seller are: KIDS CODE 1, INC, 8204 HUNTINGTON DR., UNIT A, SAN GABRIEL, CA 91775 (3) The location in California of the chief executive office of the Seller is: SAME (4) The names and business address of the Buyer(s) are: IVY & SEQUOIA, 4200 CHINO HILLS PKWY, #910, CHINO HILLS, CA 91709 (5) The location and general description of the assets to be sold are: FURNITURE, FIXTURES, EQUIPMENT,

Public Notices

Glendale City Notices

NOTICE OF INTENTION TO SELL

$167,000,000*

CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA

Electric Revenue Bonds, 2025 Series

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City of Glendale, California (the “City”) intends to offer for public sale, only through electronic bidding, respectively at

Tuesday, July 15, 2025

8:00 a.m., California Time

(or such other date and at such other time as is announced via Ipreo) through the use of the Parity® electronic bid submission system of Ipreo, at www.newissuehome.i-deal.com the City of Glendale, California Electric Revenue Bonds, 2025 Series (the “Bonds”). No other means of delivery of bids will be accepted. The City reserves the right to postpone from time to time, or cancel, the sales, provided that notice of such change is given through Ipreo prior to such change, as described under “Postponement,” “Right of Cancellation by City,” and “Right to Modify or Amend” in the Notice Inviting Bids.

The Bonds are being issued by the City to provide moneys for (i) paying the costs (a) to further develop and to construct the Grayson Repowering Project, consisting of natural gas-powered electric generating facilities that will replace certain portions of the City’s existing Grayson Power Plant, with a total capacity of approximately 56 megawatts (three reciprocating internal combustion engines rated at 18.6 megawatts each) and a 75 megawatt/300 megawatt-hour battery energy storage system, (b) of acquisition and construction of the Scholl Canyon Landfill Biogas Renewable Generation Project, consisting of the installation of four gas engine generators, along with a landfill gas cleanup system, and (c) of acquisition and construction of certain improvements to the City’s electric public utility, such as 4 to 12kv feeder upgrades, solar generation facilities installed on city properties, substation improvements, meter upgrades, vault replacement and transmission and distribution improvements and pole replacements, in each case including necessary and appurtenant facilities and equipment relating thereto, all to be owned by the City, (ii) making a deposit to the Parity Reserve Fund, and (iii) paying the costs of issuance of the Bonds.

The public sale and the right to submit a bid are subject to the terms and conditions of the Notice Inviting Bids. Electronic copies of the Notice Inviting Bids and the Preliminary Official Statement relating to the Bonds may be obtained by request to the City’s Municipal Advisor, PFM Financial Advisors LLC; Telephone (213) 415-1624; Attention: Mike Berwanger.

Dated: July 7, 2025

* Preliminary, subject to change.

Publish July 7, 2025 GLENDALE INDEPEDENT

Probate Notices

NOTICE OF PETITION TO ADMINISTER ESTATE OF SEAN MICHAEL MURPHY Case No. 25STPB07042

To all heirs, beneficiaries, creditors, contingent creditors, and persons who may otherwise be interested in the will or estate, or both, of SEAN MICHAEL MURPHY

A PETITION FOR PROBATE has been filed by Robert Murphy in the Superior Court of California, County of LOS ANGELES.

THE PETITION FOR PROBATE requests that Robert Murphy be appointed as personal representative to administer the estate of the decedent.

A HEARING on the petition

will be held on July 28, 2025 at 8:30 AM in Dept. No. 2D located at 111 N. Hill St., Los Angeles, CA 90012.

Other California statutes and legal authority may affect your rights as a creditor. You may want to consult with an attorney knowledgeable in California law.

YOU MAY EXAMINE the file kept by the court. If you are a person interested in the estate, you

LEGALS

ing of the petition, you should appear at the hearing and state your objections or file written objections with the court before the hearing. Your appearance may be in person or by your attorney.

Other California statutes and legal authority may affect your rights as a creditor. You may want to consult with an attorney knowledgeable in California law.

Attorney for petitioner:

JOHN C CARPENTER ESQ SBN 155610

CARPENTER & ZUCKERMAN

8827 W. OLYMPIC BLVD.

BEVERLY HILLS CA 90211-3613

CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA

may file with the court a Request for Special Notice (form DE-154) of the filing of an inventory and appraisal of estate assets or of any petition or account as provided in Probate Code section 1250. A Request for Special Notice form is available from the court clerk.

Attorney for petitioner: JASMIN ARYA ESQ SBN 347469

THE BURBANK FIRM L C 2312 WEST VICTORY BLVD STE 100 BURBANK CA 91506

CN118109 MURPHY Jun 30, Jul 3,7, 2025

BURBANK INDEPENDENT

NOTICE OF PETITION TO ADMINISTER ESTATE OF MICHAEL JOHN DELBARIAN aka MICHAEL J. DELBARIAN

Case No. 25STPB07072

To all heirs, beneficiaries, creditors, contingent creditors, and persons who may otherwise be interested in the will or estate, or both, of MICHAEL JOHN DELBARIAN aka MICHAEL J. DELBARIAN

A PETITION FOR PROBATE has been filed by Joy E. Delbarian in the Superior Court of California, County of LOS ANGELES.

THE PETITION FOR PROBATE requests that Joy E. Delbarian be appointed as personal representative to administer the estate of the decedent.

THE PETITION requests the decedent’s will and codicils, if any, be admitted to probate. The will and any codicils are available for examination in the file kept by the court.

A HEARING on the petition will be held on August 6, 2025 at 8:30 AM in Dept. No. 5 located at 111 N. Hill St., Los Angeles, CA 90012.

IF YOU OBJECT to the grant-

filing of an inventory and appraisal of estate assets or of any petition or account as provided in Probate Code section 1250. A Request for Special Notice form is available from the court clerk. Attorney for Petitioner RUSSELL M. OZAWA - SBN 272268

LAW OFFICES OF RUSSELL M. OZAWA

3655 TORRANCE BLVD. SUITE 300 TORRANCE CA 90503

Telephone (626) 499-4500 6/30, 7/3, 7/7/25 CNS-3942581# PASADENA PRESS

NOTICE OF PETITION TO ADMINISTER ESTATE OF: NANCY PERKINS

CASE NO. 25STPB06593

To all heirs, beneficiaries, creditors, contingent creditors, and persons who may otherwise be interested in the WILL or estate, or both of NANCY PERKINS.

A PETITION FOR PROBATE has been filed by SAMUEL ALBRECHT, LPF in the Superior Court of California, County of LOS ANGELES.

THE PETITION FOR PROBATE requests that SAMUEL ALBRECHT, LPF be appointed as personal representative to administer the estate of the decedent.

CN118120 DELBARIAN Jun 30, Jul 3,7, 2025

BURBANK INDEPENDENT

NOTICE OF PETITION TO ADMINISTER ESTATE OF:

TERRI DANIELS

CASE NO. 25STPB07209

To all heirs, beneficiaries, creditors, contingent creditors, and persons who may otherwise be interested in the WILL or estate, or both of TERRI DANIELS.

A PETITION FOR PROBATE has been filed by PAUL CONNORS in the Superior Court of California, County of LOS ANGELES.

THE PETITION FOR PROBATE requests that PAUL CONNORS be appointed as personal representative to administer the estate of the decedent.

THE PETITION requests the decedent’s WILL and codicils, if any, be admitted to probate. The WILL and any codicils are available for examination in the file kept by the court.

A HEARING on the petition will be held in this court as follows: 07/25/25 at 8:30AM in Dept. 11 located at 111 N. HILL ST., LOS ANGELES, CA 90012

Other California statutes and legal authority may affect your rights as a creditor. You may want to consult with an attorney knowledgeable in California law.

YOU MAY EXAMINE the file kept by the court. If you are a person interested in the estate, you may file with the court a Request for Special Notice (form DE-154) of the

THE PETITION FOR PROBATE requests that ANASTASIA PETROS be appointed as personal representative to administer the estate of the decedent.

THE PETITION requests authority to administer the estate under the Independent Administration of Estates Act with full authority (This authority will allow the personal representative to take many actions without obtaining court approval. Before taking certain very important actions, however, the personal representative will be required to give notice to interested persons unless they have waived notice or consented to the proposed action.)

The independent administration authority will be granted unless an interested person files an objection to the petition and shows good cause why the court should not grant the authority.

A HEARING on the petition will be held on 08/07/2025 at 8:30AM in Dept. 5 located at 111 N. HILL ST. LOS ANGELES CA 90012 STANLEY MOSK COURTHOUSE.

A HEARING on the petition will be held in this court as follows: 07/17/25 at 8:30AM in Dept. 5 located at 111 N. HILL ST., LOS ANGELES, CA 90012

Attorney for Petitioner

CHRISTINA MCGONIGLE, ESQ.SBN 239264

MCGONIGLE & HUNSAKER, LLP

701 S. PARKER ST., STE. 2600 ORANGE CA 92868

Telephone (714) 955-5380

BSC 227056 6/30, 7/3, 7/7/25

CNS-3943092# BELMONT BEACON

NOTICE OF PETITION TO ADMINISTER ESTATE OF MARGO D. PETROS CASE NO. 25STPB07225

To all heirs, beneficiaries, creditors, contingent creditors, and persons who may otherwise be interested in the will or estate, or both, of: MARGO D. PETROS

A PETITION FOR PROBATE has been filed by ANASTASIA PETROS in the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles.

the court before the hearing. Your appearance may be in person or by your attorney.

IF YOU ARE A CREDITOR or a contingent creditor of the decedent, you must file your claim with the court and mail a copy to the personal representative appointed by the court within the later of either (1) four months from the date of first issuance of letters to a general personal representative, as defined in section 58(b) of the California Probate Code, or (2) 60 days from the date of mailing or personal delivery to you of a notice under section 9052 of the California Probate Code. Other California statutes and legal authority may affect your rights as a creditor. You may want to consult with an attorney knowledgeable in California law. YOU MAY EXAMINE the file kept by the court. If you are a person interested in the estate, you may file with the court a Request for Special Notice (form DE-154) of the filing of an inventory and appraisal of estate assets or of any petition or account as provided in Probate Code section 1250. A Request for Special Notice form is available from the court clerk.

Attorney for Petitioner

ARASH SADAR - SBN 279282 MILLS SADAT DOWLAT LLP

Other California statutes and legal authority may affect your rights as a creditor. You may want to consult with an attorney knowledgeable in California law.

YOU MAY EXAMINE the file kept by the court. If you are a person interested in the estate, you may file with the court a Request for Special Notice (DE-154) of the filing of an inventory and appraisal of estate assets or of any petition or account as provided in Probate Code section 1250. A Request for Special Notice form is available from the court clerk.

Attorney for Petitioner: BRITTANY BRITTON (SBN:303084) 2312 W. OLIVE AVENUE, SUITE D BURBANK, CA 91506

Telephone: (626) 390-5953 7/7, 7/10, 7/14/25 CNS-3943873# BURBANK INDEPENDENT

NOTICE OF PETITION TO ADMINISTER ESTATE OF: ALEXANDER WILLIAM DECARLI CASE NO. 25STPB07347

To all heirs, beneficiaries, creditors, contingent creditors, and persons who may otherwise be interested in the WILL or estate, or both of ALEXANDER WILLIAM DECARLI.

A PETITION FOR PROBATE has been filed by JULEE RENEE

GIANOULIS in the Superior Court of California, County of LOS ANGELES.

THE PETITION FOR PROBATE requests that JULEE RENEE

GIANOULIS be appointed as personal representative to administer the estate of the decedent.

A HEARING on the petition will be held in this court as follows: 07/30/25 at 8:30AM in Dept. 2D located at 111 N. HILL ST., LOS ANGELES, CA 90012

IF YOU OBJECT to the granting of the petition, you should appear at the hearing and state your objections or file written objections with

333 S. HOPE STREET, 40TH FLOOR LOS ANGELES CA 90071

Telephone (213) 628-3856 7/7, 7/10, 7/14/25 CNS-3943940# GLENDALE INDEPENDENT

NOTICE OF PETITION TO ADMINISTER ESTATE OF: FREIDA JOYCE CHASE CASE NO. PROVA2500512 To all heirs, beneficiaries, creditors, contingent creditors, and persons who may otherwise be interested in the WILL or estate, or both of FREIDA JOYCE CHASE. A PETITION FOR PROBATE has been filed by ODELL CHASE, II in the Superior Court of California, County of SAN BERNARDINO. THE PETITION FOR PROBATE requests that ODELL CHASE, II be appointed as personal representative to administer the estate of the decedent.

A HEARING on the petition will be held in this court as follows: 08/06/25 at 9:00AM in Dept. F2 located at 17780 ARROW BOULEVARD, FONTANA, CA 92335 IF YOU OBJECT to the granting of the petition, you should appear at the hearing and state your objections or file written objections with the court before the hearing. Your appearance may be in person or by your attorney.

ownership of the property. You should also be aware that the lien being auctioned off may be a junior lien. If you are the highest bidder at the auction, you are or may be responsible for paying off all liens senior to the lien being auctioned off, before you can receive clear title to the property. You are encouraged to investigate the existence, priority, and size of outstanding liens that may exist on this property by contacting the county recorder’s office or a title insurance company, either of which may charge you a fee for this information. If you consult either of these resources, you should be aware that the same lender may hold more than one mortgage or deed of trust on the property. Notice To Property Owner: The sale date shown on this notice of sale may be postponed

one or more times by the mortgagee, beneficiary, trustee, or a court, pursuant to Section 2924g of the California Civil Code. The law requires that information about trustee sale postponements be made available to you and to the public, as a courtesy to those not present at the sale. If you wish to learn whether your sale date has been postponed, and, if applicable, the rescheduled time and date for the sale of this property, you may call (877) 440-4460 or visit this Internet website www.mkconsultantsinc.com, using the file number assigned to this case 250311206. Information about postponements that are very short in duration or that occur close in time to the scheduled sale may not immediately be reflected in the telephone information or on the Internet Web site. The best way to verify postponement information is to attend the scheduled sale. Notice To Tenant: You may have a right to purchase this property after the trustee auction pursuant to Section 2924m of the California Civil Code. If you are an “eligible tenant buyer,” you can purchase the property if you match the last and highest bid placed at the trustee auction. If you are an “eligible bidder,” you may be able to purchase the property if you exceed the last and highest bid placed at the trustee auction. There are three steps to exercising this right of purchase. First, 48 hours after the date of the trustee sale, you can call (877) 440-4460, or visit this internet website www.mkconsultantsinc.com, using the file number assigned to this case 250311206 to find the date on which the trustee’s sale was held, the amount of the last and highest bid, and the address of the trustee. Second, you must send a written notice of intent to place a bid so that the trustee receives it no more than 15 days after the trustee’s sale. Third, you must submit a bid so that the trustee receives it no more than 45 days after the trustee’s sale. When submitting funds for a bid subject to Section 2924m, please make the funds payable to “Total Lender Solutions, Inc. Holding Account”. If you think you may qualify as an “eligible tenant buyer” or “eligible bidder,” you should consider contacting an attorney or appropriate real estate professional immediately for advice regarding this potential right to purchase. Date: 6/20/2025 Total Lender Solutions, Inc. 10505 Sorrento Valley Road, Suite 125 San Diego, CA 92121 Phone: 866-535-3736 Sale Line: (877) 440-4460 By: Rachel Seropain, Trustee Sale Officer Exhibit “A” Legal Description Lot 16 Of Tract No. 11697, In The City Of Burbank, County Of Los Angeles, State Of California, As Per Map Recorded In Book 213 Pages 16 And 17 Of Maps, In The Office Of The County Recorder Of Said County. total250311206 6/30/2025, 7/7/2025, 7/14/2025 . BURBANK INDEPENDENT

3955 Ibbetson St Corona, CA 92882

Riverside County Mina Louise Vazirian, 3955 Ibbetson St, Corona, CA 92882

Riverside County

This business is conducted by: a individual. Registrant commenced to transact business under the fictitious business name or names listed herein on May 23, 2025. I declare that all the information in this statement is true and correct. (A registrant who declares as true any material matter pursuant to Section 17913 of the Business and Professions Code, that the registrant knows to be false, is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not to exceed one thousands dollars ($1000).)

s. Mina Louise Vazirian

Statement filed with the County of Riverside on June 5, 2025

NOTICE: In accordance with subdivision (a) of section 17920, a fictitious name statement generally expires at the end of the five years from the date on which it was filed in the office of the county clerk, except, as provided in subdivision (b) of section 17920, where it expires 40 days after any changes in the facts set forth in the statement pursuant to section 17913 other than a change in the residence address of a registered owner. A new Fictitious Business Name Statement must be filed before the expiration. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use this state of a fictitious business name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see Section 14411 Et Seq., business and professions code). I hereby certify that this copy is a correct copy of the original statement on file in my office.

Peter Aldana, County, Clerk File# R-202507147

Pub. 06/16/2025, 06/23/2025, 06/30/2025, 07/07/2025 Riverside Independent

The following person(s) is (are) doing business as CNC WELLNESS 812 Poppy lane Corona, CA 92881 Riverside County California Nursing consultants

(CA, 812 Poppyseed Lane, Corona, CA 92881

Riverside County

This business is conducted by: a corporation. Registrant has not yet begun to transact business under the fictitious business name or names listed herein. I declare that all the information in this statement is true and correct. (A registrant who declares as true any material matter pursuant to Section 17913 of the Business and Professions Code, that the registrant knows to be false, is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not to exceed one thousands dollars ($1000).)

s. Holy Dove Quiboloy Paule, CEO Statement filed with the County of Riverside on June 11, 2025 NOTICE: In accordance with subdivision (a) of section 17920, a fictitious name statement generally expires at the end of the five years from the date on which it was filed in the office of the county clerk, except, as provided in subdivision (b) of section 17920, where it expires 40 days after any changes in the facts set forth in the statement pursuant to section 17913 other than a change in the residence address of a registered owner.

A new Fictitious Business Name Statement must be filed before the expiration. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use this state of a fictitious business name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see Section 14411 Et Seq., business and professions code). I hereby certify that this copy is a correct copy of the original statement on file in my office.

Peter Aldana, County, Clerk File# R-202507493

Pub. 06/16/2025, 06/23/2025, 06/30/2025, 07/07/2025 Riverside Independent

FICTITIOUS BUSINESS

NAME STATEMENT

File No. FBN20250005813

The following persons are doing business as: CMM Advantage, 14427 Huntridge Drive, Victorville, CA 92394.

Mailing Address, 14427 Huntridge Drive, Victorville, CA 92394. Monique R. Jennings. County of Principal Place of Business: San Bernardino This business is conducted by: a individual. Registrant has not yet begun to transact business under the fictitious business name or names listed herein. By signing below, I declare that I have read and understand the reverse side of this form and that all information in this statement is true and correct. A registrant who declares as true any material matter pursuant to Section 17913 of the Business and Professions Code that the registrant knows to be false is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not to exceed one thousand dollars ($1,000). I am also aware that all information on this statement becomes Public Record upon filing pursuant to the California Public Records Act (Government Code Sections 6250- 6277). /s/ Monique R. Jennings, Owners. This statement was filed with the County Clerk of San Bernardino on June 18, 2025 Notice- In accordance with subdivision (a) of Section 17920. A Fictitious Name Statement generally expires at the end of five years from the date on which it was filed in the office of the County Clerk, except, as provided in subdivision (b) of Section 17920, where it expires 40 days after any change in the facts set forth in the statement pursuant to Section 17913 other than a change in the residence address of a registered owner. A new Fictitious Business Name Statement must be filed before the expiration. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use in this state of a fictitious business name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see Section 14411 et seq., Business and Professions Code) File#: FBN20250005813 Pub: 06/23/2025, 06/30/2025, 07/07/2025, 07/14/2025 San Bernardino Press

FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT File No. FBN20250005557

The following persons are doing business as: LORE’S TRUCK & REGISTRATION SERVICES, 1511 W HOLT BLVD STE I, ONTARIO, CA 91762. LORE’S INSURANCE AGENCY INC (CA, 1511 W HOLT BLVD STE I, ONTARIO, CA 91762; LORENA SALAZAR, PRESIDENT. County of Principal Place of Business: San Bernardino This business is conducted by: a corporation. Registrant has not yet begun to transact business under the fictitious business name or names listed herein. By signing below, I declare that I have read and understand the reverse side of this form and that all information in this statement is true and correct. A registrant who declares as true any material matter pursuant to Section 17913 of the Business and Professions Code that the registrant knows to be false is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not to exceed one thousand dollars ($1,000). I am also aware that all information on this statement becomes Public Record upon filing pursuant to the California Public Records Act (Government Code Sections 6250- 6277). /s/ LORENA SALAZAR, PRESIDENT. This statement was filed with the County Clerk of San Bernardino on June 11, 2025 Notice- In accordance with subdivision (a) of Section 17920. A Fictitious Name Statement generally expires at the end of five years from the date on which it was filed in the office of the County Clerk, except, as provided in subdivision (b) of Section 17920, where it expires 40 days after any change in the facts set forth in the statement pursuant to Section 17913 other than a change in the residence address of a registered owner. A new Fictitious Business Name Statement must be filed before the expiration. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use in this state of a fictitious business name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see Section 14411 et seq., Business and Professions Code) File#: FBN20250005557 Pub: 06/30/2025, 07/07/2025, 07/14/2025, 07/21/2025 San Bernardino Press

Fictitious Business Name Filings

The following person(s) is (are) doing business as Vazirian Events

Metro advances agreement to create inhouse Transit Ambassador department

By City News Service

Metro’s Transit Ambassador program will be brought in-house and expanded to cover more bus and rail stations across the Los Angeles area, it was announced Wednesday.

On June 26, Metro’s Board of Directors unanimously approved a bargaining agreement with the International Brotherhood of Teamsters Union, which represents freight drivers, warehouse workers, bus drivers and other workers in the private and public sector.

Effective Tuesday, Teamsters represent the transit agency’s Transit Ambassadors.

The board’s actions move forward a goal set in October 2023 to build a Metro Ambassador department. The agency is expected to hire ambassadors who are already on the system and part of the program, but were hired by two contractors.

“Metro Ambassadors have been an incredible addition to our system, helping us make it friendlier and safer, while keeping a watchful eye out for issues that need to be addressed,” Metro CEO Stephanie Wiggins said in a statement. “They’re a key part of our customer experience and safety strategies, as we work to deliver the type of world-class transit service necessary for us

to become the first choice for transportation among L.A. County residents and visitors.”

The agency’s $9.4 billion spending plan for 2026 included $11.8 million for the labor agreement with new wages and benefits for 388 contract positions -- including 309 transit ambassadors currently in the field and 70 new ambassadors. Metro will also add 49 supervisor positions who will oversee staff in the field, as well as two noncontract positions tasked with oversight of day-to-day operations, staff training, and customer experience improvements.

Ambassadors are expected to be deployed across the agency’s system, as well as at the new Metro/ LAX Transit Center, A Line extension to Pomona and D Line extension to West L.A.

In 2021, LA Metro launched its Transit Ambassador program as a pilot as part of the agency’s effort to reimagine public safety. By March 2023, the agency had announced it successfully trained nearly 300 new ambassadors.

The ambassadors are tasked with keeping the peace along the bus and rail systems, alongside transit security, law enforcement agencies, homeless outreach

and crisis intervention teams.

Ambassadors are tasked with helping riders navigate the transit system, connecting individuals with resources and reporting any issues that need to be addressed. They are also trained to call for emergency help for customers in distress, provide life-saving support and are trained to use Narcan, an opioid reversing medication.

According to a 2023 survey of Metro customers, the agency found that the visible presence of ambassadors contributed to the perceptions of safety. About 63% of survey respondents reported that having seen ambassadors made them feel safer.

That figure increased to 66% among women and among people earning less than $25K a year, 86% among Hispanic/Latinos and people under the age of 18, as well as 70% among Asian/Pacific Islanders.

“I’ve been impressed by the support the Metro Ambassadors provide to transit riders,” Whittier City Councilman and Metro Board Chair said in a statement. “They connect riders to resources they need and provide a welcoming and visible presence that customers rely on, and help Metro respond to issues more quickly.”

Family of Rosemead woman killed by LASD deputies sues for wrongful death

By Fred Shuster, City News Service

The family of a Rosemead woman fatally shot by Los Angeles County sheriff’s deputies in February while experiencing a mental health episode filed a wrongful death lawsuit Wednesday against the county, its sheriff and various deputies, alleging in federal court that the shooting was “senseless and unjustified.”

Susan Lu, 56, was shot and killed by deputies from the LASD’s Temple station on Feb. 27, after officers responded to a neighbor dispute call, which was subsequently updated to a woman attempting to light the neighbor’s house on fire, according to a sheriff’s department statement issued following the shooting.

“LASD deputies came to Ms. Lu’s home when she was having a mental health crisis,” Paul Hoffman, the family’s attorney, said in a press release. “After several hours of surrounding the home with numerous deputies, the LASD obtained a warrant to enter Ms. Lu’s home forcibly. They did so and almost immediately fatally shot her.”

According to LASD, deputies arrived at the scene and attempted to contact Lu, but she ran into her home. A mental evaluation team responded and attempted negotiations for hours without success. After

Homelessness

populations in the other neighborhoods are more diverse, the study found. About half of the populations in Hollywood and Venice are white.

Respondents also were more likely to report receiving benefits or income.

Health status reports also worsened compared

to previous years in Hollywood. Respondents were more likely to report having served time in jail and less likely to report having received safe sex, harm reduction, documentation and housing assistance than in 2023. In Venice, the homeless population continued to report slightly higher

education levels, more receipt of Social Security and disability benefits and higher income. Unhoused people who are employed were more likely in Venice than in the other neighborhoods.

Respondents from Venice were simultaneously least likely to report ever being offered housing

or shelter — 51% — but most likely to accept most forms of it when an offer was made. Across all three neighborhoods, the reported rate of receiving offers for supportive housing was a low 13%. Group shelter offers were higher at 39%, with less than half of the offers accepted.

detectives obtained a search and arrest warrant for Lu on a charge of assault with a deadly weapon, they encountered the woman inside her home, armed with a meat cleaver, the sheriff’s department stated.

“A deputy gave Lu several verbal commands to drop the meat cleaver, but she refused,” the LASD statement said, adding that so-called less-lethal rounds were fired in an unsuccessful attempt to subdue the woman.

“Lu raised the meat cleaver toward deputies and a deputy-involved shooting occurred,” the department stated.

Lu was struck by gunfire and retreated into a closet, LASD said.

“Deputies immediately approached Lu and rendered first aid until the arrival of Los Angeles County Fire Department personnel,” according to the department. “Lu was subsequently transported to a local hospital where she was later pronounced deceased.”

According to the lawsuit, Lu’s siblings were at the scene for hours begging deputies not to kill their sister and explaining she had mental health issues.

The deputies’ conduct “demonstrated the inadequacy of their training and policies relating to dealing with mentally disabled or disturbed suspects,” according to the suit, which seeks changes in LASD procedures involving suspects suffering from mental health issues.

“We are deeply saddened, heartbroken, and outraged that our sister, Susan Lu, was senselessly shot multiple times and killed in her own home because she was experiencing mental health challenges,” Lu’s family said in a statement. “We demand justice for her, and we hope this tragic loss will serve as a wake-up call to prevent similar tragedies from happening to others in mental health crisis.”

Lu was the owner of a clothing store in downtown Los Angeles, and worked to support her 18-year-old college-student son, the family said.

A message sent to an LASD representative seeking comment was not immediately answered.

The family’s lawyer contends that although the LASD had mental health professionals at the scene, they used an “exaggerated version of the incident” between Lu and her neighbor to convince a judge to allow the forced entry into the house that led to the shooting, “even though Ms. Lu presented no danger to herself or others,” Hoffman said.

In Skid Row, a decrease in the average age of unsheltered residents, a decline in reported time on the streets and more reports of eviction as a cause of homelessness “suggests that there has been significant turnover in the unsheltered population there,” according to RAND. Compared with Holly-

wood and Venice, the homeless population in Skid Row continues to trend older, female and Black. Residents are also less likely to be working and more likely to report having mental health, physical health and substance use disorders. The study is available at rand.org.

Metro Ambassadors. | Photo courtesy of Metro Los Angeles / Facebook

Bystander recording of the incident. | Screenshot courtesy of Police Incidents / YouTube

Stephen Miller-backed group sues Dodgers over DEI policies

Aconservativelegal group founded by White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller filed a federal civil rights complaint with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission accusing the Los Angeles Dodgers of engaging in unlawful discrimination under the guise of “diversity, equity, and inclusion.”

America First Legal filed the complaint last week against the Dodgers and the investment firm Guggenheim Partners, which is also led by Mark Walter, the majority owner of the Dodgers. It claims the organization is in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 by allowing race, color, and sex to motivate employment decisions.

According to AFL, the Dodgers admit to “unlaw-

fully considering immutable characteristics” on their website by committing to sponsoring programs geared to women and people of color, and embedding diversity, equity and inclusion strategies into every aspect of the organization.

“Furthermore, the Dodgers admit to incorporating DEI into the organization in quantifiable ways with identifiable goals to achieve `success,’ that DEI is a core component of the team’s mission,” the group said.

AFL said the Dodgers also allow employees to join Business Resource Groups within the organization, providing employees “a forum to gather with other employees who hold common interests, identities and/or social issues.”

The group said some groups

development of educational materials and workshops tailored for youth who are participating in protests, walkouts, demonstrations, and other forms of civic engagement.

Also Tuesday, two members of the Los Angeles City Council called on the Los Angeles Police Department to enact new policies requiring officers to verify the identities of anyone claiming to be law enforcement and to increase penalties for impersonating public safety personnel.

City Council members Eunisses Hernandez and Bob Blumenfield introduced two motions Tuesday to bring transparency to federal immigration enforcement in Los Angeles. The motions were referred to the Civil Rights, Equity, Immigration, Aging and Disability Committee for consideration.

“Angelenos are overwhelmed with fear and confusion right now, especially immigrant and mixedstatus families,” Hernandez said in a statement.

“There are plainclothes individuals in unmarked vehicles taking community members off the street without presenting warrants and while refusing to identify themselves — even to other law enforcement officers like the LAPD. There must be accountability and transparency to keep our communities safe.”

The two council members

By City News Service

appear to provide benefits to employees based on their racial and ethnic identity and sex. For example:

-- The Asian Professionals employee group aims “to empower our Asian employees”;

-- The Black Action Network group “foster(s) the growth, development, and well-being of the Dodger Black community that will ultimately result in opportunities for Black people on the field, in the stands, and in the front office, building upon our proud history of diversity”;

-- The SOMOS LA group appears to provide Latino employees with employment benefits. Its mission “is to ensure organizational representation and promote resources for professional development, business support, and community

outreach that advances and empowers the Latinx community.”

The Dodgers did not immediately reply to a request for comment on the

Immigration

seek to codify and enhance LAPD’s Policy Notice 11.2, which outlines procedures for responding to federal immigration enforcement and proposes turning these protocols into law via a city ordinance, which would require LAPD officers to verify the identification of individuals claiming to be a law enforcement officer — including those from federal agencies such as U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and U.S. Customs and Border Protection.

The motion also directs the City Attorney’s Office, with support from the volunteer Board of Police Commissioners that oversees LAPD, to assist with the effort.

The second motion would direct the city attorney to increase penalties for impersonating public safety officers and reaffirm residents’ rights to request and receive proof of identity and legal authority during any enforcement or detention.

Hernandez told City News Service her team was inspired by Huntington Park, where Mayor Arturo Flores on June 21 condemned what he called “masked abductions” amid immigration raids across Los Angeles County and directed police to intervene in unlawful or unauthorized operations.

The council and Board of Supervisors are almost exclusively made up of Democrats, with John Lee,

an independent, the only non-Democrat on the 15-member City Council, while Republican Kathryn Barger is the only nonDemocrat among the five supervisors.

On Wednesday morning, the American Civil Liberties Union and other organizations were expected to weigh in, holding a news conference along with relatives of people recently detained in federal immigration enforcement operations.

The Trump administration’s enforcement of immigration laws in Los Angeles has drawn the ire of local Democrats, led by Mayor Karen Bass. One day after the administration sued the city of Los Angeles, challenging the constitutionality of its “sanctuary city” policies, Bass on Tuesday called the legal action part of an “all-out assault against Los Angeles” by the federal government.

“I will always protect Angelenos against the unwarranted and cruel actions of this administration,” Bass said during a downtown news conference.

Bass said the lawsuit filed June 30 is an “attempt to overturn the will of the city, calling for a halt to longstanding policy to protect immigrant Angelenos.”

“We will defend our ordinance and continue to defend policies that reflect the long-standing values of our city,” Bass said.

In its federal lawsuit, the

complaint sent Wednesday morning.

On June 20, the Dodgers pledged $1 million in partnership with Los Angeles to support immigrant families

facing economic hardship. The team had drawn criticism on social media for staying quiet amid ongoing federal immigration enforcement in the region.

U.S. Department of Justice alleged that Los Angeles’ sanctuary-city policies violate the Constitution by “thwarting” immigration enforcement.

The lawsuit contends that the sanctuary laws — in which local law enforcement officials refuse to assist immigration enforcement efforts — are illegal, and expressly designed to “obstruct the federal government’s enforcement of federal immigration law and impede consultation and communication between federal, state, and local law enforcement officials that is necessary for federal officials to carry out federal immigration law and keep Americans safe.”

The Los Angeles City Attorney’s Office issued a

statement June 30 saying, “The city of Los Angeles ordinance limiting the use of city resources for federal immigration enforcement was carefully drafted and fully complies with federal law and constitutional principles.

“The Constitution and federal law both allow the federal government to regulate immigration, but the reserved power of the state and the people including under the Tenth Amendment ensures our ability to defend the constitutionality of our ordinances and policies.”

The federal government’s lawsuit in U.S. District Court in downtown Los Angeles seeks to have Los Angeles’ policies declared invalid based on the Constitution’s

Supremacy Clause, which “prohibits the city and its officials from obstructing the federal government’s ability to enforce laws that Congress has enacted or to take actions entrusted to it by the Constitution,” the suit states.

The city’s sanctuary policies generally prohibit local resources — most notably police officers — from taking part in federal immigration enforcement efforts. The policies generally mirror state law that bar local cooperation with federal authorities except in cases involving serious or violent crimes.

Numerous other cities have also adopted sanctuary policies, including Long Beach, Pasadena, Santa Ana and West Hollywood.

Immigration enforcement agents detain three alleged undocumented immigrants in Los Angeles, including Roberto Jacinto Mateo, wearing orange, who has a 2017 conviction for lewd/lascivious acts with a child, authorities said. | Photo courtesy of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement/X

| Photo by woo CC BY 2.0