

Students at UC Riverside established an encampment in the middle of campus to protest Israel’s actions in Gaza, joining nearly a dozen universities across California and numerous nationwide to demand the school end “all investments and endowments” benefiting the Jewish state.
“We are joining the student movement, the student Intifada,” according to an unnamed spokeswoman for Students for Justice in Palestine, UCR chapter. “We are not leaving this encampment day and night until the university complies and meets with us to discuss our demands.”
The encampment was set up April 29, with several dozen tents placed on the green adjacent to the campus Bell Tower, recognized as the center of UCR.
Campus administrators did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
The specific number of students participating in the peaceful campus demonstration could not be confirmed. On Wednesday, a group of students staged a midday walkout from classes and held a rally at the tower, chanting “Israel is a racist state!” and “Free, free, free Palestine!”
There was no obvious law enforcement presence, and no campus buildings appeared to be obstructed.
The “demands” issued by the SJP UCR chapter included “a full transparent disclosure of all investments and endowments in weapons manufactures and the Israeli genocidal machine,” as well as a “full divestment from weapons manufacturers and any corporations that either fund or profit off the genocidal machine.”
The SJP-UCR representative noted there is no “standing university in Gaza” due to the unabated bombing
campaign since early October conducted by the Israeli Defense Forces using U.S.supplied drones and fighterbombers.
The chapter spokeswoman alleged American “universities are complicit in the genocide,” and the protests at UCR and other campuses are intended to “condemn war crimes and crimes against humanity.”
Messages taped to the large UCR sign underneath the Bell Tower included “Stop the U.S.-funded Genocide” “End the Occupation Now” and “Ceasefire Now!”
Estimates on the number of campuses where anti-war movements have surfaced
over the last month vary, but according to the nonprofit National Students for Justice in Palestine, “solidarity encampments” numbered just over 70 as of May 1.
According to the Palestinian Ministry of Health and the International Committee of Red Cross-affiliated Palestine Red Crescent Society, nearly 35,000 people have been killed in Gaza — over 14,500 of them children — since the deadly Oct. 7 Hamas incursion into Israel, culminating in the IDF’s invasion of the Gaza Strip.
The number of injuries is
in excess of 77,000, according to published reports.
Israel’s official casualty rate for the duration of hostilities is 8,730, of which just over 1,000 have been fatalities.
Along with universities, hospitals, refugee camps and residential complexes in Gaza have been targeted, displacing hundreds of thousands of people, according to reports from the region.
Human Rights Watch has alleged Israel “is using starvation of civilians as a method of warfare in the Gaza Strip,” and according to
Concerns mount about welfare of man missing from Riverside
Astate-level committee awarded the city of Coachella a $10 million grant with the intent of making the area “a more climate-resilient community,” a municipal spokesperson announced Thursday.
Approved by the California Strategic Growth Council, the Community Resilience Center (CRC) Implementation Grant Award will be used to modify the current Hidden Harvest facility on Peter Rabbit Lane into the Coachella Community Resilience Center, according to a press release. The CRC will function as an emergency shelter, garden space, food hub, resource center and workforce training location, among other purposes.
The Board of Supervisors Tuesday approved a $580 million project to establish an all-in-one medical campus providing a “range of services” for Riverside County residents of all ages.
In a 5-0 vote, the board formally signed off on the Riverside University Health System’s Wellness Village, a 19-acre facility slated for construction near the intersection of Harvill and Placentia avenues in Mead Valley.
A ceremonial groundbreaking at the site is tentatively set for the afternoon of June 1. Construction is expected to be completed in 2026, RUHS officials said.
“The RUHS Wellness Village represents a major shift in how we provide healthcare and will serve as a model for the
The Board of Supervisors on Tuesday set a June 4 public hearing to consider a series of proposed increases to fees for permits issued by the Riverside County Department of Environmental Health, whose director pointed out the hikes being sought are not based solely on inflationary pressures.
“We’re not using only the consumer price index model,” agency Director Jeff Johnson told the board. “We’re looking at the costs and assignments on our end ... (which are) variable across different aspects of what we regulate.”
Johnson emphasized the department did not seek any fee adjustments for the current fiscal year and is now seeking to offset
expenses that have grown beyond what the agency can absorb and stay within budget.
“We go back and analyze what we do. We ask if we can do some things better, create efficiencies,” he said.
“That’s why I didn’t come here last year and ask for a CPI adjustment. We’ve had to absorb costs internally, but we’re a lean machine.”
Supervisor Kevin Jeffries applauded the efficiency goal, saying he has never liked going along with other board members in applying a “rubber stamp and not ask what’s driving increases.”
“Anything that leads us to a process where we can see where the revenue challenges and the shortfalls are ... is a benefit,”
Jeffries said.
The permit and inspection fees the department is seeking to increase cover a broad regulatory scheme, from food facilities to farm
stands, and swimming pools to septic tanks.
Among the higher fees slated for an increase is the permit for a community temporary event. The greater the number of vendors, the bigger the cost for a Department of Environmental Health review. A permit for an event featuring 26 to 30 vendors would go from $3,644 to $3,863, while an event with 56 to 60 vendors would rise from $7,202 to $7,634.
A catering permit would go from $527 to $563, while a produce stand permit would only rise $9 to $398.
The cost of a permit to sell unpackaged edibles from a mobile food facility would increase from $589 to $624, and to host a certi-
fied farmers’ market, a $543 fee would be required for a permit, compared to $522 currently.
The cost of a permit for installation of an underground storage tank would jump from $1,328 to $1,380, and the fee for closing an underground system would go from $944 to $962.
Among the smallest increases was for food handler certification, which is a $27 fee. It would bump up to $28 under the proposed amendments.
A few fees would be left unchanged, including the $140 inspection fee for a mobile home park and the 10-cent per page cost of clerical records supplied by the department.
Lawmaker: ‘No statute’ requiring schools to hide students’ identity decisionsBy City News Service
AnInlandEmpire lawmaker Thursday urged school districts to nullify any policies regarding withholding information about students’ gender identity choices from parents in light of the state’s acknowledgement that its prosecutors would not take action against districts that don’t enforce such policies.
Assemblyman Bill Essayli, R-Norco, pointed to a hearing earlier this week in U.S. District Court in San Diego during which a California Department of Justice attorney admitted student privacy guidelines stemming from state legislation approved a decade ago were “non-enforceable.”
“This admission in court that California Department of Education guidance to keep secrets from parents is unenforceable is a victory for parents and school board members, who will not be intimidated by empty lawsuits and threats,” Essayli said in a statement. “From day one, when we started our parental rights movement last year, we knew the law was clear, and there was no statute requiring schools to keep secrets from parents.”
On Monday, during a hearing on a federal civil rights lawsuit prompted by the dismissal of two Escondido Union School District teachers, state attorney Emmanuelle Soichet told U.S. District Judge Roger
Benitez that arguments indicating California Attorney General Rob Bonta might threaten legal action against the district for failure to enforce student gender identity privacy guidelines were misplaced.
otherwise.
The acknowledgement was elicited from Benitez ahead of his decision to tentatively release the attorney general and governor as defendants in the Escondido case, which was brought by two teachers who sued over alleged religious viewpoint discrimination when the district dismissed them for refusing to abide by its policy of keeping details about students’ gender identity decisions concealed
“To answer your question about who has enforcement power over those guidelines — those are non-enforceable guidelines, so there’s no one in the state who’s actually going to enforce those guidelines,” Soichet told the court.
The prosecutor added that the privacy provision inferred from earlier legislation should not be interpreted as a “mandate of state law,” and it was an “incorrect assumption” to believe
implemented as a result of the unenforceable guidelines illegally issued by the Department of Education,” Essayli said.
law in 2014.
from parents.
Benitez ordered them reinstated pending further proceedings.
“I encourage every California school district to immediately repeal any secrecy policies that were
In legislation he proposed last year, Assembly Bill 1314, Essayli sought to clarify the necessity of parental rights in school districts’ policies statewide. AB 1314 was tabled by the Committee on Education in January.
The bill primarily targeted policies implemented by districts in the wake of AB 1266, signed into
It focused on “pupil rights,” expanding on Section 221.5 of the California Education Code regarding students’ participation in courses.
The thrust of AB 1266 was that a “pupil shall be permitted to participate in sex-segregated school programs and activities, including athletic competitions, and use facilities consistent with his or her gender identity, irrespective of the gender listed on the pupil’s records.”
There were no explicit provisions written into the bill prohibiting educators from talking with parents about their kids’ gender choices. However, legal guidelines attached in a companion measure cited the California Public Records Act, Article 1, Section 1 of the state constitution and the federal Family Educational & Privacy Rights Act — FERPA — in establishing limits on what educators are permitted to disclose.
There have been teacher dismissals in other districts based on refusals to enforce the policies. Among them was Jurupa Unified School District physical education instructor Jessica Tapia, who openly defied JUSD’s requirement that students’ identity choices be kept from parents, if students desired it.
She has since filed a federal civil rights lawsuit, similar to the one in Escondido.
Essayli said there were already provisions in the education code asserting a “parent’s right to know” everything in connection to the welfare of his or her child, and AB 1314 would have reaffirmed that.
“Governor Gavin Newsom, Attorney General Bonta and Sacramento Democrats know the law and public opinion are on our side, which is why they refused to even hear my bill,” he said.
Editorial editorial@beaconmedianews.com editor@hlrmedia.com
Graphics/Production production@beaconmedianews.com production@hlrmedia.com
Advertising advertising@beaconmedianews.com advertising@hlrmedia.com
Legal Advertising legals@beaconmedianews.com legals@hlrmedia.com
Business accounting@beaconmedianews.com accounting@hlrmedia.com
BEACON MEDIA ADDRESS: 820 S. Myrtle Ave. Monrovia, CA 91016
PHONE: (626) 301-1010 WEBSITE www.beaconmedianews.com
HLR MEDIA ADDRESS: 820 S. Myrtle Ave. Monrovia, CA 91016 PHONE: (626) 301-1010 www.HLRmedia.com
PRESS RELEASE SUBMISSIONS editor@beaconmedianews.com editor@hlrmedia.com
An E. coli outbreak may be linked to walnuts sold in California and 18 other states, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention warned Wednesday.
Gibson Farms organic walnut halves and pieces were sold in bulk bins at stores in cities that include Brentwood, Compton, Culver City, Riverside and Rancho Mirage and in San Diego County, according to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Some stores may repackage bulk walnut halves and pieces into plastic clamshells or bags.
The walnuts’ expiration dates are between May 21, 2025, and June 7, 2025, according to the CDC.
So far 12 illnesses and seven hospitalizations were possibly linked to Hollisterbased Gibson Farms Inc.’s walnuts, the CDC reported. Nearly all the people who became ill purchased the walnuts from bulk bins in food co-ops or natural food stores in California and Washington.
E. coli causes fever and diarrhea often with bloody stools, the FDA said.
“Although most healthy adults can recover completely within a week, some people can develop a form of kidney failure called Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome,” according to the FDA. “HUS is most likely to occur in young
children and the elderly. The condition can lead to serious kidney damage and even death.”
The ‘secret’ auto insurance you didn’t know existed
Auto insurance. It’s a topic we’re all familiar with, at least in terms of knowing it’s something we must have to operate a vehicle. Auto insurance protects you as well as others when driving. But in some cases, depending on your personal history, you may not qualify to be insured by a company.
Most people are unaware that there is an alternative solution, so Way.com looked into a lesser-known insurance option for higher-risk drivers. Every state offers a program called the “assigned risk pool” for drivers who cannot obtain insurance coverage through voluntary markets. Car insurance companies are required to take part in these assigned state pools and accept any drivers assigned to them. Drivers who are part of the assigned risk pool will get coverage no matter what’s on their driving history, even if they have multiple speeding tickets or DUI convictions.
The reason you’ve never heard of it? It’s a government program and is not heavily marketed like public carriers. Note that coverage options vary among state pools and could be more limited. Insurance premiums and rates may be higher than on the voluntary market as well.
While the assigned
By Jeannie Assimos, Stackerrisk pool is an option for ‘high-risk’ drivers, it also gives the consumer time to rehabilitate their criteria over time so that, eventually, they can return to the voluntary market at an affordable rate.
Typically, it takes around a year to qualify for regular insurance options (most carriers consider a three-year history of violations and accidents.) While state-sponsored insurance is cheaper than a regular policy, there is a reason for this: The most affordable rates in the plan are for the state’s minimum coverage amounts.
The most common
reasons for needing this assigned insurance include drivers who have had multiple accidents, DUIs, or moving violations.
Unlike many government-assisted programs, getting this type of insurance can take as little as 48 hours. But every state is different.
The assigned risk pool in your state is not meant to be a ‘cure-all’ for your insurance needs. It could be used as an opportunity to rehabilitate your qualifications and eligibility. An end goal is to return to the public offerings in the open market at an affordable rate. The assigned
risk plan is your vehicle for more insurance stability. Visit your state’s Department of Insurance website to learn more about the assigned risk plan. You may be able to obtain a quote directly from the state or find a list of local agents who can assess if it’s the best option for you and offer the plan in your area.
Writtenby
Jeannie Assimos.This story was produced by Way.com and reviewed and distributed by Stacker Media. The article was copy edited from its original version. Republished pursuant to a CC BY-NC 4.0 license.
Anew report showed turnover among California chief election officials reached 57% in 2022, a record high. It then declined this year to 40%.
Researchers at the University of California-Los Angeles partnered with the Bipartisan Policy Center to analyze the data from 18,000 jurisdictions nationwide.
Rachel Orey, senior associate director of the Elections Project for the Bipartisan Policy Center, said the jobs of election workers have become significantly harder in recent years.
“Today, election officials must manage everything from cybersecurity risks posed by foreign adversaries to people who are doubting the outcome of elections, to information technology, legal disputes, political pressures,” Orey outlined.
The turnover rate is defined as the percentage of jurisdictions in a state where the chief local election official changed within the prior four years. It has been an issue in California for decades. The turnover rate stood at 41% back in 2004. But things got much worse after 2020, when election officials became targets of threats and harassment, often spurred by former President Donald Trump’s evidence-free claims about a rigged election.
Orey noted she expects this year’s presidential election to go smoothly, because dozens of states, including California, have done a lot to “beef up” the elections workforce.
“Sixty-five percent of local election officials have experience running a presidential election,” Orey pointed out. “Where there are new officials, we find that they have an average of eight years of experience in
an election office. So all in all, we see that election officials are well-prepared to administer the 2024 presidential election.”
The report recommended better funding for elections offices, higher salaries and more training in order to attract and retain a highly skilled election workforce. Support for this reporting was provided by The Carnegie Corporation of New York.
Universal Studios Hollywood announced Friday a 2026 opening for its first-ever high-speed outdoor roller coaster, while also confirming it will be titled “Fast & Furious: Hollywood Drift.”
Based on the hit film series, the coaster will feature cars that can spin 360 degrees “as they rocket along an elaborate track meticulously constructed with sound reduction technology for a breathtaking, superior experience,” according to the theme park.
“As Universal Studios Hollywood continues to evolve, the arrival of `Fast & Furious: Hollywood Drift’ will be a powerful game changer that will infuse a new level of thrill into our already dynamic theme park, and we look forward to welcoming guests when it races onto the scene in 2026,” theme park general manager Scott Strobl said in a statement.
Park officials last year confirmed plans for an outdoor coaster based on the “Fast & Furious” films, but few details were released. Some online coaster-enthusiast groups at the time speculated on the name “Hollywood Drift,” and the use of spinning cars designed to simulate the feeling of a drifting racecar.
Those rumors were confirmed Friday, with park officials saying the ride “will create a seamless sensation of drifting cars as guests spin in motion at furiously fast speeds.”
The ride’s cars will be modeled after actual vehicles seen in the films, with the aerial track winding over parts of the theme park. Riders will board the attraction on the park’s upper level, passing through a large, red- brick garage-type structure, according to the park.
Southern California News Group, citing county permit applications, reported last year that the coaster will start on the upper lot, then descend to the lower lot and make its way back up the hill near the park’s “Starway” escalator.
Universal Studios’ famed backlot tram tour already features a “Fast & Furious -Supercharged” attraction that features actors of the film franchise, including star Vin Diesel.
College students are ready to make their voices heard in the upcoming 2024 presidential election.
In a new BestColleges survey of 1,000 currently enrolled undergraduate and graduate students, 35% of those who will be eligible to vote in November say they plan to vote for Donald Trump for president. Slightly fewer students (33%) say they plan to vote for Joe Biden, while 23% are unsure.
Choosing beyond Biden and Trump
Regardless of who they plan to vote for, 43% of eligible students still say they would consider voting for a third-party candidate this election cycle.
Among different demographic groups, men (47%) and heterosexual students (43%) are notably more likely than women (27%) and LGBTQ+ students (12%) to plan to vote for Trump this November.
Conversely, BIPOC (41%) and LGBTQ+ students (50%) are more likely than white students (30%) and heterosexual or straight students (29%) to plan to vote for Biden.
Trump voters more likely to be men — and heterosexual
Among different demographic groups, men (47%) and heterosexual students (43%) are notably more likely than women (27%) and LGBTQ+ students (12%) to plan to vote for Trump this November.
Conversely, BIPOC (41%) and LGBTQ+ students (50%) are more likely than white students (30%) and heterosexual or straight students (29%) to plan to vote for Biden.
Students who plan to vote for Biden are more likely than students who plan to vote for Trump to say
they would consider voting for a third-party candidate (42% vs. 32%).
Economy, reproductive rights, student debt rank as top issues for students
Of the many issues in the spotlight this election year, college students are most likely to say the economy, employment, and inflation (46%); abortion and reproductive rights (35%); and college affordability and student loan debt (29%) are the most important issues to them right now.
Surveyed students share concerns about economy and social policy
When it comes to the economy, most students currently rate it as bad or very bad (65%). Additionally, 42% blame President Biden for the state of the economy.
This isn’t the first time students have expressed concerns about inflation and the economy under Biden’s presidency.
In a 2023 BestColleges survey, 60% of students reported that inflation over the last three years had impacted their mental wellbeing. Even more students (66%) said that inflation had impacted their financial well-being over time.
Under Biden’s presidency, students also saw the overturning of Roe v. Wade and the demise of his plan to forgive up to $20,000 in federal student loan debt per borrower.
When asked who they blame most for the debt forgiveness plan failing, students are equally likely to blame President Biden (34%) and the U.S. Supreme Court (34%). Fewer students blame Republicans (26%) or Democrats (26%), while 18% of students are unsure who to blame.
President Biden has
forgiven more student loan debt than any other president and continues to roll out debt relief measures that will aid millions of borrowers if passed. Debt relief remains a priority and concern for many students, with 66% saying it is important or very important to them when it comes to the 2024 U.S. presidential election.
Televiseddebates impact students’ views and votes — more than other factors
Of the many factors that might influence one’s political views or voting behaviors, students are most likely to say televised debates are impactful or very impactful on them (42%).
Students additionally say news organizations (31%), their peers (31%), and social media posts from political candidates or political organizations (29%) are impactful or very impactful on their views and voting behaviors.
No shortage of influencers for surveyed students
Roughly 2 in 10 students
say voting guides (23%), social media posts from friends or family (23%), and specific statements made by their college instructors or administrators (22%) are impactful or very impactful.
Fewer students cite social media posts from celebrities or influencers (18%) and, perhaps surprisingly, Taylor Swift’s social media/Instagram (11%) as impactful or very impactful on their views and behaviors.
Students feel unrepresented, lack trust in U.S. political system
Few students report feeling represented in national elections (29%). Instead, more than 1 in 3 students (37%) say they do not.
An even larger percentage of students say they do not trust the U.S. political system (50%).
Half of surveyed students don’t trust the system
Men (35%) and millennials (42%) are more likely than women (24%) and Generation Z (26%) to say they feel represented in
national elections.
Millennials are additionally more likely than Gen Z students to say they trust the U.S. political system (34% vs. 21%).
Students also report a lack of trust in the democratic process. Only about 2 in 5 students (39%) believe that the 2024 presidential election will be a free and fair election. That said, this finding marks some increase from the 2020 voting season, when 31% of students believed the election would be free and fair.
Biden supporters have faith in free and fair elections
Students who plan to vote for Biden are much more likely to have faith in a free and fair election than those who plan to vote for Trump (57% vs. 36%).
In general, students don’t see their interests represented by either the Democratic or Republican parties.
Only 1 in 3 students (33%) agree that the Democratic party adequately represents the interests of college students. Just 22% say the Republican party does.
Instead, 46% of students say the Republican party does not adequately represent students’ interests, and just over one-quarter of students (27%) say the Democratic party does not.
Nearly equal percentages of students consider themselves either more liberal (34%) or more conservative (30%) than the rest of the population. However, the majority of students agree that, generally, college encourages more liberal/ progressive attitudes (54%).
Students still believe voting matters
Regardless of how they identify politically, most students believe that
election outcomes have a direct impact on their dayto-day lives (52%) and that voting matters (74%).
Students who plan to vote for Biden are much more likely than those who plan to vote for Trump to say election outcomes have a direct impact on their day-to-day lives (66% vs. 53%).
Around 9 in 10 college students (91%) say they are registered to vote or plan to register before the election. Among these students, 88% plan to vote in the presidential election this November.
This survey was conducted from March 20-28 and was fielded by Pure Spectrum. Surveyparticipants included 1,000 respondents nationwide who were currently enrolled in an on-campus (52%), online (16%), or hybrid (32%) undergraduate or graduate degree program. Respondents were 18-62 years of age, with the majority (77%) ages 18-24, and currently pursuing an associate, bachelor’s, master’s, doctoral or professional degree. The respondents for the survey were screened by various quality checks, including systems like Relevant ID, and responses were manually reviewed to ensure consistency and accuracy.
A note on gender: BestColleges also surveyed nonbinary/gender-nonconforming students but did not surface enough participants in this group to reliably report on their responses.
Written by Jessica Bryant. This story was produced by BestColleges and reviewed and distributed by Stacker Media. The article was copy edited and retitled from its original version. Republished pursuant to a CC BY-NC 4.0 license.
Former Dodgers pitcher Julio Urías pleaded no contest Wednesday to a misdemeanor domestic battery charge stemming from his arrest last September outside BMO Stadium in Exposition Park.
Urías, 27, was placed on 36 months of summary probation and ordered to complete 30 days of community labor, complete a 52-week domestic violence counseling course, pay a domestic violence fund fee, not possess any weapons, not use any force or violence, pay restitution to the victim and abide by a protective order, Ivor Pine of the Los Angeles City Attorney’s Office told City News Service.
A second count of domestic battery, and one count each of injuring a spouse/cohabitant/fiancee/ date/child’s parent, assault and false imprisonment, were dismissed as a result of the no contest plea, according to court records.
The charges were filed April 8, just under three months after the Los Angeles County District
Attorney’s Office declined to file a felony case against Urías and instead referred the matter to the Los Angeles City Attorney’s Office for consideration of whether a misdemeanor case was warranted.
Urías, who became a free agent at the end of the 2023 season and remains unsigned, was arrested Sept.
by Exposition Park police following a much-publicized soccer match between the Los Angeles Football Club and Inter Miami — featuring star Lionel Messi — at BMO Stadium. He was released the next morning on $50,000 bond.
According to a District Attorney’s Office charge evaluation worksheet in
the alleged victim in the case was Urías’ wife, who was not identified.
“They engaged in an argument whereby the defendant pushed the victim against a fence and pulled her by the hair or shoulders,” according to the document. “Neither the victim’s injuries nor the defendant’s criminal history
Jjustify a felony filing. The case is accordingly referred to the city attorney for misdemeanor filing consideration.”
Urías was placed on administrative leave by Major League Baseball days after his arrest, and the Dodgers issued a statement saying the team was cooperating fully with the investigation.
“The Dodgers take all allegations of the kind in this case very seriously, and we do not condone or excuse any acts of domestic violence,” the team said.
Urías was 11-8 during the 2023 season with a 4.60 earned-run average. He began his Major League Baseball career with the Dodgers in 2016, and has a lifetime record of 60-25 with a 3.11 ERA.
He was suspended for 20 games in 2019 by MLB Commissioner Rob Manfred for an incident in the parking lot of the Beverly Center on May 13 of that year.
TMZ reported that a witness called police saying that Urías was arguing with a woman and shoved her to the ground. Officers responded to the scene and spoke with the woman, who denied anything physical took place, insisting it was nothing more than a heated argument.
Urías was arrested on suspicion of misdemeanor domestic battery in that incident, but no charges were filed.
ust hours after police cleared a massive proPalestinian encampment at UCLA, President Joe Biden addressed the topic of such campus protests, saying he supports peaceful activism, “but not the right to create chaos.”
Biden did not directly address the protests at UCLA or USC, but spoke in general terms about encampments that cropped up in recent weeks at many universities nationwide.
“There should be no place on any campus, no place in America for antisemitism, threats of violence against Jewish students,” Biden said. “There is no place for hate speech, or violence of any kind, antisemitism, Islamophobia, discrimination against Arab-Americans or
“Violent protest is not protected. Peaceful protest is,” Biden told reporters at the White House. “It’s against the law when violence occurs. Destroying property is not peaceful protest. It’s against the law. Vandalism. Trespassing. Breaking windows, Shutting down campuses. Forcing the cancellation of classes and graduations. None of this is a peaceful protest.”
Palestinian-Americans. It’s simply wrong. There’s no place for racism in America. It’s all wrong. It’s un-American.”
He added, “There’s a right to protest, but not the right to create chaos.”
While leaving the briefing at the White House, reporters asked him if the demonstrations will persuade him to change his policy in the Middle East. He said, “No.”
He was also asked if he would send in the National Guard to address the protests on college campuses. He responded, “No.”
Despitestrides, economic disparities persist among Latinas statewide, according to a new report issued Thursday that found Hispanic women earn only 42 cents for every dollar paid to white men compared to 71 cents for white women.
The report by Los Angeles-based Hispanas Organized for Political Equality illustrates Latina progress and underscores the barriers hindering their path to a better quality of life and financial security. By examining national, state, and regional indicators, HOPE’s survey aims to offer insights into the economic, leadership, health, and educational landscape of Latinas in California, juxtaposed against their white counterparts.
California has the largest Latino population in the nation, with Latinas comprising 20% of the state’s total population and 40% of all women, according to the fourth installment of HOPE’s Economic Status of Latinas in California report.
While the Latino homeownership rate statewide increased by three percentage points between 2021 and 2022, only 41% of such households have retirement accounts compared to 68% of white households. But the report found education rates
were on an upswing. In 2022, over 18% of Latinas aged 25 and older throughout the state had obtained at least a bachelor’s degree, a significant increase from 14.9% in 2018.
In terms of business and financial literacy, the report determined that entrepreneurial spirit thrives among Latinas, with a 23% increase in Latina-owned employer businesses between 2018 and 2021, generating nearly 147,000 jobs with an annual payroll of $5.92 billion.
However, interviews suggest a crucial need for improved financial literacy to navigate the state’s high cost of living and ensure sustainable growth.
While education rates among Latinas are rising, challenges remain. Graduation rates and access to advanced placement courses still trail behind those of white students. In 2022, over 18% of Latinas aged 25 and older statewide had obtained at least a bachelor’s degree, showing a positive trend compared to 2018, but significantly lower than the nearly 48% rate for white women.
Health disparities were exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic, according to HOPE. Life expectancy at birth declined by 4.1 years
for Latinas and 3.1 years for Black women between 2019 and 2021, compared to 1.8 years for white, non-Hispanic women. Latinas and Black women faced disproportionate impacts, with higher mortality rates and disparities in maternal care.
The report also found that uninsured rate for Latinas in California was at a historic low of 8.8% in 2022, compared to the total rate of 6.5%, but both are expected to rise as pandemic-era policies expire.
Despite a doubling in Latina representation on California corporate boards between 2020 and 2021, Latinas held only 3.3% of board seats last year, HOPE said. In government board and commission appointments made by Gov. Gavin Newsom, Latinas made up 9% of all appointments in 2023.
Although there’s been a significant increase in Latina representation in statewide office since 2015 with Latinas representing 25% of the state legislature, the presence of Latinas in national office remains low, with only four Latina congressional members out of 52 U.S. House of Representatives seats filled by Californians.
“This report underscores the urgency of addressing
the persistent economic disparities faced by Latinas in California,” HOPE CEO Helen Torres said. “By acknowledging these challenges and working together to implement equitable solutions, we can create a more inclusive society where every Latina has the opportunity to thrive.”
The report will be the central topic of discussion at an informational hearing for the State Assembly’s Select Committee on Latina Inequities, chaired by Assemblywoman Wendy Carrillo, at the State Capitol on May 8.
“I am deeply grateful to HOPE for its tireless dedication to shining light on the challenges that Latinas face in California,” Carrillo said in a statement. “Latinas are the economic engine of our state and the largest majority, yet we face some of the deepest inequities when it comes to economic, educational and health outcomes and we are severely underrepresented in various sectors from c-suite (senior executives), public office, and executive leadership roles.”
To prepare the report, HOPE analyzed data from
various government sources, including the U.S. Census Bureau and Bureau of Labor Statistics, to compare demographic and economic metrics of Latinas with other groups nationally, statewide, and regionally. Additional data from reports and interviews with Latina women from diverse regions, work sectors, and age groups were conducted to contextualize the data and gain insights into supporting their economic advancement and career trajectories, according to the Latina advocacy organization.
The state’s population rose by 67,000 people to over 39.1 million, making 2024 the first annual increase since 2020, according to California Department of Finance data released Tuesday.
The governor’s office attributed the population growth to an more legal foreign immigration and natural population increasing.
“People from across the nation and the globe are coming to the Golden State to pursue the California Dream and experience the success of the world’s 5th largest economy,” Gov. Gavin Newsom said in a statement.
“From the Inland Empire to the Bay Area, regions throughout California are growing — strengthening local communities and boosting our state’s future.”
The federal government’s reduction of immigra-
tion processing backlogs, rebounding legal immigration levels that don’t asylum seekers at the border and mortality rates returning to long-term trends have created a stable foundation that has allowed for population growth to resume, officials said.
“Net domestic migration has receded to its lower rates of the 2010s, and DOF estimates California is likely to experience continued positive population growth,” according to the governor’s office.
The population increased in 31 counties — mostly in the Bay Area, Central Valley and Inland Empire, the new figures show. The populations of Los Angeles and Orange counties expanded by 0.05% and 0.31%, respectively.
LA County has just over 10 million residents, Orange County has nearly 3.2
million, Riverside County totals over 2.4 million, San Bernardino County has nearly 2.2 million, and San Diego County has nearly 3.3 million inhabitants, the data shows.
Nine of the 10 counties with populations more than 1 million saw increases in population comprising 72% of California’s total population, officials said. Riverside County led with an increase of 13,800 people.
Five counties had growth higher than 1% percent — Sutter, 1.9%; Imperial, 1.8%; Glenn, 1.4%; Yuba, 1.1%; and San Benito, 1.1% that officials attributed to housing gains. The next largest growth rates for California counties were in San Joaquin, 0.96%; Madera, 0.9%; Tulare, 0.9%; Monterey, 0.8%; and Merced, 0.7%.
The top five cities where housing production drove
population growth include: Paradise, 16.1%, in Butte County; Lathrop, 5.4%, in San
County; Emeryville 5.0%, in Alameda County; Orland, 4.9%, in Glenn County; and Shafter, 4.3%, in Kern County.
The report data is
comprised of preliminary year-over-year January 2024 and revised January 2021 through January 2023 population figures for California cities, counties and the state, according to the governor’s office. Estimates were based on information through Jan. 1, 2024. Officials also touted California’s No.-1-in-the-nation status for new business starts, access to venture capital funding, tourism spending, manufacturing, high-tech industries and agriculture.
TheEnvironmental ProtectionAgency
unveiled a proposal this week to ban a controversial pesticide that is widely used on celery, tomatoes and other fruits and vegetables.
The EPA released its plan on Tuesday, nearly a week after a ProPublica investigation revealed the agency had laid out a justification for increasing the amount of acephate allowed on food by removing limits meant to protect children’s developing brains.
In calling for an end to all uses of the pesticide on food, the agency cited evidence that acephate harms workers who apply the chemical as well as the general public and young children, who may be exposed to the pesticide through contaminated drinking water.
Acephate, which was banned by the European Union more than 20 years ago, belongs to a class of chemicals called organophosphates. U.S. farmers have used these pesticides for decades because they efficiently kill aphids, fire
ants and other pests. But what makes organophosphate pesticides good bug killers — their ability to interfere with signals sent between nerve cells — also makes them dangerous to people. Studies have linked acephate to reductions in IQ and verbal comprehension and autism with intellectual disability.
Environmental advocates, who have been pushing the agency to restrict and ban acephate for years, said they were not expecting the agency to make such a bold move.
“I’m surprised and very pleased,” said Patti Goldman, a senior attorney at Earthjustice, who has been part of a farmworker led group that expressed concerns to EPA officials over the past years about the ongoing use of acephate and other organophosphates.
As much as 12 million pounds of acephate were used on soybeans, Brussels sprouts and other crops in 2019, according to the most recent estimates from the U.S. Geological Survey. The
federal agency estimates that up to 30% of celery, 35% of lettuce and 20% of cauliflower and peppers were grown with acephate.
A draft risk assessment issued in August by the EPA’s Office of Pesticide Programs found “little to no evidence” that acephate and a chemical created when it breaks down in the body harm the developing brain. The document said there was no justification to
keep restrictions on the bug killer that are designed to protect children from developmental harm. Removing that layer of protection would allow 10 times more acephate on food than is acceptable under the current limits.
The draft risk assessment’s conclusion relied in large part on the results of a new battery of tests that are performed on disembodied cells rather than whole lab
animals.
The tests have been in development for years, but the EPA’s review of acephate’s effects on the developing brain marked one of the first times the agency had recommended changing a legal safety threshold largely based on their results.
Multiple science groups, including panels the EPA created to help guide its work, had discouraged using the nonanimal tests to conclude a chemical is safe.
A member of the Children’s Health Protection Advisory Committee, one of the panels providing guidance to EPA, described the earlier acephate proposal as “exactly what we recommended against.”
But even as it proposed a new outcome this week, the EPA did not change its stance on the use of the cellbased tests.
“Even in this good news proposal, the EPA continues to misuse the cell-based assays,” said Jennifer Sass, a senior scientist at the environmental advocacy organization Natural Resources Defense Council.
Sass said she believes that both pressure from advocates and questions
Days after the team was eliminated in the first round of the NBA Playoffs by the Denver Nuggets, the Los Angeles Lakers Friday fired coach Darvin Ham.
“We greatly appreciate Darvin’s efforts on behalf of the Lakers and recognize the many accomplishments achieved over the past two seasons, including last year’s remarkable run to the Western Conference Finals,” Lakers Vice President of
Basketball Operations and General Manager Rob Pelinka said in a statement.
“We all want to thank Darvin for his dedication and positivity.
“While this was a difficult decision to make, it is the best course of action following a full review of the season. This organization will remain unwavering in its commitment to deliver championship-caliber basketball to Lakers fans around the world.”
from journalists helped the EPA decide to change course on acephate. ProPublica began submitting a series of detailed inquiries to the agency about the pesticide starting in January.
An EPA spokesperson said late Tuesday that the agency had been working for months on its proposal to ban acephate from food and that neither advocates nor journalists played a role in the decision.
The EPA proposal would ban acephate on all plants with the exception of trees that do not produce fruit or nuts.
While lauding the proposed ban, Nathan Donley, a scientist at the Center for Biological Diversity, expressed concern about the possibility that, after pesticide companies and agricultural groups respond to the proposal, the agency might not finalize its proposed ban. (The agency is accepting public comments through its portal until July 1.)
“The pushback on this is going to be really intense,” Donley said. “I hope they stick to their guns.” Republished with Creative Commons License (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0).
By City News ServiceHam led to the Lakers for two seasons, compiling a 90-74 record.
Ham played college ball at Texas Tech and played for eight seasons in the NBA, including stints with the Detroit Pistons, Atlanta Hawks, Bucks, Washington Wizards, Indiana Pacers and Denver Nuggets. He was been an NBA assistant coach for more than a decade, including a 2011-13 stint with the Lakers.
He was an assistant for
the Atlanta Hawks before joining the Bucks coaching staff as an assistant in 2018, remaining there until he was hired as Lakers coach to replace the ousted Frank Vogel.
The Lakers lost to the Nuggets 108-106 on Wednesday to end their playoff hopes, losing the series 4-1. It was the second straight year the Nuggets eliminated the Lakers. The Nuggets went on to win the NBA title last year.
SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. 2024-06
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONROVIA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 2 (ADMINISTRATION AND PERSONNEL) AND TITLE 5 (BUSINESS TAXES, LICENSES AND REGULATIONS) OF THE MONROVIA MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING A NEW CHAPTER 5.84 TO ESTABLISH OPERATIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR NONCONFORMING AUTOMOTIVE REPAIR BUSINESSES, AMENDING RELATED PROVISIONS OF THE MONROVIA MUNICIPAL CODE, AND MAKING A DETERMINATION OF EXEMPTION UNDER CEQA
This is a summary of the above entitled Ordinance of the City of Monrovia, which was read by title only and introduced by the Monrovia City Council at its regular meeting on April 16, 2024 by a vote of 4 in favor (Belden, Kelly, Shevlin, and Spicer) and 1 opposed (Jimenez). The final vote on the Ordinance will take place at the regular City Council meeting on May 7, 2024 at 7:30 p.m. or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, in the City Council Chambers, 415 South Ivy Avenue, Monrovia, California. This summary has been prepared and published in accordance with the requirements of Government Code Section 36933.
Ordinance No. 2024-06 amends Title 5 of the Monrovia Municipal Code by adding a new Chapter that establishes operational requirements for nonconforming automobile repair facilities. These operational requirements for nonconforming automobile repair facilities prohibit working outside of enclosed buildings and parking on public streets overnight or in front of a residential use, and regulate the storage of vehicles and outdoor storage of equipment. The Ordinance also provides a permit process to allow certain deviations from the operating requirements for nonconforming automobile repair facilities. An automotive repair operations permit allows some or all of the following activities if specified conditions are met: outdoor operations, outside storage, parking vehicles in certain approved locations, and the use of temporary shade structures and outdoor storage containers. The Ordinance does not apply to automobile repair businesses that have a conditional use permit for their operations.
The proposed Ordinance also amends Section 2.56.030 of the Monrovia Municipal Code to provide the Development Review Committee with the authority to hear and approve, conditionally approve, amend, or deny, operations permits for nonconforming automobile repair facilities.
A certified copy of the entirety of the text of Ordinance No. 2024-06 is available in the office of the City Clerk in City Hall, and is available for public inspection during regular business hours at that location.
/s/ Alice D. Atkins, MMC, City Clerk
Publish Monday May 6, 2024 MONROVIA WEEKLY
NOTICE OF ROSEMEAD CITY COUNCIL AND PLANNING COMMISSION SPECIAL JOINT WORKSHOP FOR GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING CODE UPDATE
The Rosemead City Council and Planning Commission will hold a workshop on Wednesday, May 22, 2024, at 6:00 PM, at Rosemead City Hall, located at 8838 East Valley Boulevard, Rosemead. Remote public comments will be received by calling (626) 569-2100 or via email at publiccomment@cityofrosemead.org by 5:00 p.m. on May 22, 2024. A live phone call option may also be requested by calling the number provided above. All comments are public record and will be recorded in the official record of the City. If you have a request for an accommodation under the ADA, please contact Ericka Hernandez, City Clerk, at (626) 569-2100.
GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING CODE UPDATE: On August 1, 2022, the City’s Housing Element Update was certified by the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD). Following certification, the City must update the General Plan and Zoning Code to ensure that the right regulations are in place to support enough residential growth to meet the City’s Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) allocation of 4,612 housing units. In March 2023, the City of Rosemead launched a General Plan and Zoning Code update to revise the City’s existing Zoning standards to support continued growth and demand for housing and mixeduse projects.
The goals of the General Plan and Zoning Code update are to: 1) Create the right conditions to allow enough housing and mixed-use development to support housing demands, which are projected to be 4,612 additional housing units by the end of 2029, 2) Provide clarity and consistency to make the code easier to understand with definitions, standards, approval processes, and related regulations to help all community members, applicants, and City officials navi-
gate the code and minimize inconsistencies and the need for interpretations, 3) Comply with new California state laws, and 4) Provide compliance with environmental certification, as every project in California must demonstrate that it addresses and protects existing environmental resources to the appropriate degree possible. Under the guidance of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), any changes to the Zoning Code or General Plan will be analyzed and mitigated accordingly.
The workshop was originally scheduled for a Special Joint Workshop with the City Council and Planning Commission on April 18, 2024, but was canceled. The rescheduled workshop will provide the community with an opportunity to provide feedback on the efforts of the General Plan and Zoning Code Update.
If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to contact Associate Planner Annie Lao at (626) 569-2144 or alao@cityofrosemead.org. Rosemead City Hall is open from 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday through Thursday (closed Friday).
Publish May 6, 2024
ROSEMEAD READER
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD ON MAY 28, 2024
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Rosemead City Council will conduct a public hearing on Tuesday, May 28, 2024, at 7:00 PM, at Rosemead City Hall, located at 8838 East Valley Boulevard, Rosemead, California 91770. Remote public comments will be received via email at publiccomment@cityofrosemead.org by 5:00 p.m. on May 28, 2024. Interpreters will be available to assist members of the public that speak Chinese (Cantonese & Mandarin), Spanish, and Vietnamese. All comments are public record and will be recorded in the official record of the City. If you have a request for accommodation under the ADA, please contact Ericka Hernandez, City Clerk, at (626) 569-2100.
The Rosemead City Council is evaluating the potential of transitioning from a general law city to a charter law city. A general law city is bound by the state’s general law, regardless of whether the subject concerns a municipal affair. A charter city has supreme authority over “municipal affairs” and thus can govern on matters of the City. Under the proposed charter, the City would retain its council-manager form of government. Matters of municipal affairs that would be modified under the proposed charter include term limits, prosecuting authority, economic development matters, purchasing and contracts authority, and preference for Veterans in awarding contracts permitted by law.
Before submitting the proposed charter to the voters, the City Council must hold at least two public hearings on the charter as required by Government Code Section 34458. The first public hearing is scheduled for Tuesday, May 28 at 7:00 p.m. in the City Hall Council Chamber.
For further details on this proposal, please contact Ericka Hernandez, City Clerk, at (626) 569-2100 or ehernandez@cityofrosemead. org. In addition, the City Council Agenda and Staff Report will be available on the City’s website under Agendas and Meeting and the “City Calendar” (www.cityofrosemead.org) at least 72 hours in advance of the public hearing. Any person interested in the above proceedings may appear at the time and place indicated above to testify in support of, or in opposition to, the item(s) indicated in this notice.
Notice and Publication Date: May 6, 2024
ROSEMEAD READER
NOTICE OF PETITION TO ADMINISTER ESTATE OF:
IRMA M. ORNELAS CASE NO. 24STPB04619
To all heirs, beneficiaries, creditors, contingent creditors, and persons who may otherwise be interested in the WILL or estate, or both of IRMA M. ORNELAS. A PETITION FOR PROBATE has been filed by YVETTE CRUZ in the Superior Court of California, County of LOS ANGELES. THE PETITION FOR PROBATE requests that YVETTE CRUZ be appointed as personal representative to administer the estate of the decedent.
THE PETITION requests authority to administer the estate under the Independent Administration of Estates Act. (This authority will allow the personal representative to take many actions without obtaining court approval. Before taking certain very important actions, however, the personal representative will be required to give notice to interested persons unless they have waived notice or consented to the proposed action.) The independent adminis-
California law. YOU MAY EXAMINE the file kept by the court. If you are a person interested in the estate, you may file with the court a Request for Special Notice (form DE-154) of the filing of an inventory and appraisal of estate assets or of any petition or account as provided in Probate Code section 1250. A Request for Special Notice form is available from the court clerk.
Attorney for Petitioner
KATHLEEN CASTRO, ESQ. - SBN 169747, CASTRO LAW, PC 377 E. CHAPMAN AVENUE, SUITE 220 PLACENTIA CA 92870
Telephone (714) 880-8276
BSC 225047
5/2, 5/6, 5/9/24
CNS-3808268#
ROSEMEAD READER
NOTICE OF PETITION TO ADMINISTER ESTATE OF Maria de Lourdes Lopez
Castro Case No. 23STPB11340
To all heirs, beneficiaries, creditors, contingent creditors, and persons who may otherwise be interested in the will or estate, or both, of Maria de Lourdes Lopez Castro
A PETITION FOR PROBATE has been filed by Gabriela Quintero Lopez in the Superior Court of California, County of LOS ANGELES. THE PETITION FOR PROBATE requests that Raul Martinez Cueto, CLPF be appointed as personal representative to administer the estate of the decedent.
THE PETITION requests authority to administer the estate under the Independent Administration of Estates Act. (This authority will allow the personal representative to take many actions without obtaining court approval. Before taking certain very important actions, however, the personal representative will be required to give notice to interested persons unless they have waived notice or consented to the proposed action.) The independent administration authority will be granted unless an interested person files an objection to the petition and shows good cause why the court should not grant the authority.
A HEARING on the petition will be held on May 22, 2024 at 8:30 AM in Dept. 9. located at 111 N. Hill St., Los Angeles, CA 90012.
IF YOU OBJECT to the granting of the petition, you should appear at the hearing and state your objections or file written objections with the court before the hearing. Your appearance may be in person or by your attorney.
fornia, County of LOS ANGELES. THE PETITION FOR PROBATE requests that GAVIN HENDRICK YEE be appointed as personal representative to administer the estate of the decedent.
THE PETITION requests authority to administer the estate under the Independent Administration of Estates Act. (This authority will allow the personal representative to take many actions without obtaining court approval. Before taking certain very important actions, however, the personal representative will be required to give notice to interested persons unless they have waived notice or consented to the proposed action.) The independent administration authority will be granted unless an interested person files an objection to the petition and shows good cause why the court should not grant the authority.
A HEARING on the petition will be held in this court as follows: 06/06/24 at 8:30AM in Dept. 11 located at 111 N. HILL ST., LOS ANGELES, CA 90012
IF YOU OBJECT to the granting of the petition, you should appear at the hearing and state your objections or file written objections with the court before the hearing. Your appearance may be in person or by your attorney.
IF YOU ARE A CREDITOR or a contingent creditor of the decedent, you must file your claim with the court and mail a copy to the personal representative appointed by the court within the later of either (1) four months from the date of first issuance of letters to a general personal representative, as defined in section 58(b) of the California Probate Code, or (2) 60 days from the date of mailing or personal delivery to you of a notice under section 9052 of the California Probate Code. Other California statutes and legal authority may affect your rights as a creditor. You may want to consult with an attorney knowledgeable in California law.
YOU MAY EXAMINE the file kept by the court. If you are a person interested in the estate, you may file with the court a Request for Special Notice (form DE-154) of the filing of an inventory and appraisal of estate assets or of any petition or account as provided in Probate Code section 1250. A Request for Special Notice form is available from the court clerk.
Attorney for Petitioner
KEVIN CHIU - SBN 249479 HART, MIERAS & MORRIS, INC. 255 E. SANTA CLARA ST., #300 ARCADIA CA 91006
Telephone (626) 607-1411
5/2, 5/6, 5/9/24
CNS-3809101# AZUSA BEACON
tration authority will be granted unless an interested person files an objection to the petition and shows good cause why the court should not grant the authority.
A HEARING on the petition will be held in this court as follows: 05/29/24 at 8:30AM in Dept. 9 located at 111 N. HILL ST., LOS ANGELES, CA 90012
IF YOU OBJECT to the granting of the petition, you should appear at the hearing and state your objections or file written objections with the court before the hearing. Your appearance may be in person or by your attorney.
IF YOU ARE A CREDITOR or a contingent creditor of the decedent, you must file your claim with the court and mail a copy to the personal representative appointed by the court within the later of either (1) four months from the date of first issuance of letters to a general personal representative, as defined in section 58(b) of the California Probate Code, or (2) 60 days from the date of mailing or personal delivery to you of a notice under section 9052 of the California Probate Code. Other California statutes and legal authority may affect your rights as a creditor. You may want to consult with an attorney knowledgeable in
IF YOU ARE A CREDITOR or a contingent creditor of the decedent, you must file your claim with the court and mail a copy to the personal representative appointed by the court within the later of either (1) four months from the date of first issuance of letters to a general personal representative, as defined in section 58(b) of the California Probate Code, or (2) 60 days from the date of mailing or personal delivery to you of a notice under section 9052 of the California Probate Code. Other California statutes and legal authority may affect your rights as a creditor. You may want to consult with an attorney knowledgeable in California law.
YOU MAY EXAMINE the file kept by the court. If you are a person interested in the estate, you may file with the court a Request for Special Notice (form DE-154) of the filing of an inventory and appraisal of estate assets or of any petition or account as provided in Probate Code section 1250. A Request for Special Notice form is available from the court clerk.
Attorney for petitioner: PORTIA M. WOOD, ESQ SBN: 309495 WOOD LEGAL GROUP, LLP 1199 E WALNUT STREET PASADENA, CA 91106 MAY 2, 6, 9, 2024 ARCADIA WEEKLY
NOTICE OF PETITION TO ADMINISTER ESTATE OF: ALLISON LUI CASE NO. 24STPB04617
To all heirs, beneficiaries, creditors, contingent creditors, and persons who may otherwise be interested in the WILL or estate, or both of ALLISON LUI.
A PETITION FOR PROBATE has been filed by GAVIN HENDRICK YEE in the Superior Court of Cali-
NOTICE OF PETITION TO ADMINISTER ESTATE OF: DEBORAH Y. LOOMIS CASE NO. 24STPB04572
To all heirs, beneficiaries, creditors, contingent creditors, and persons who may otherwise be interested in the WILL or estate, or both of DEBORAH Y. LOOMIS.
A PETITION FOR PROBATE has been filed by ROBERT P. LOOMIS AND KIMBERLY E. GOODMAN in the Superior Court of California, County of LOS ANGELES. THE PETITION FOR PROBATE requests that ROBERT P. LOOMIS AND KIMBERLY E. GOODMAN be appointed as personal representative to administer the estate of the decedent.
THE PETITION requests the decedent’s WILL and codicils, if any, be admitted to probate. The WILL and any codicils are available for examination in the file kept by the court. THE PETITION requests authority to administer the estate under the Independent Administration of Estates Act. (This authority will allow the personal representative to take many actions without obtaining court approval. Before taking certain very important actions, however, the personal representative will be required to give notice to interested persons unless they have waived notice or consented to the proposed action.) The independent administration authority will be granted unless an interested person files an objection to the petition and shows good cause why the court should not grant the authority.
A HEARING on the petition will be held in this court as follows: 05/24/24 at 8:30AM in Dept. 62 located at 111 N. HILL ST., LOS ANGELES, CA 90012 IF YOU OBJECT to the granting of
NOTICE INVITING BIDS
NOTICE is hereby given that the City of Glendale (“City”) will receive sealed Bids, before the Bid Deadline established below for the following work of improvement:
Weed Control Services for the City of Glendale
Bid Deadline: Submit between 1:00 and 2:00 p.m. on Wednesday, May 29, 2024
“the Bid Deadline”)
Original plus one (1) copy of Bid to be submitted to:
Attn: Loren Klick
City Clerk City of Glendale 613 E. Broadway, Room 110 Glendale, CA 91206
Bid Opening: 2:00 p.m. on Wednesday, May 29, 2024 – Same date as above City Hall
613 E. Broadway, Lobby Glendale, CA 91206
NO LATE BIDS WILL BE ACCEPTED.
Bidding Documents Available: Only electronically at: http://glendaleca.gov/govern ment/departments/public-works/bids
Mandatory Pre-Bid Conference: Date:Monday, May 13, 2024 Time:10:00 AM Location: 541 W. Chevy Chase Drive, Glendale, CA 91204
City of Glendale Contact Person: Loren Klick, Project Manager Fax: 818-547-0637 E-mail: lklick@glendaleca.gov
NO LATE BIDS WILL BE ACCEPTED.
Mandatory Qualifications for Bidder and Designated Subcontractors:
A Bid may be rejected as non-responsive if the Bid fails to document that Bidder meets the essential requirements for qualification. As part of the Bidder’s Statement of Qualifications, each Bid must provide satisfactory evidence that:
Bidder satisfactorily completed as a prime contractor or subcontractor at least three (3) prevailing wage public contracts in California; each comparable in scope and scale to this Project, within five (5) years prior to the Bid Deadline and with a dollar value in excess of the Bid submitted for this Project.
General Scope of Work:
Contractor shall furnish labor, materials, equipment, services, and specialized skills to perform work involved in the Project. The services the City seeks to maintain its right-of-ways free of weeds and aesthetically pleasing, include:
1. Weed control in all City streets and sidewalks, in asphalt/concrete medians, in City alleys, within tree wells not maintained by the adjacent property owner, within 10 feet of the road in undeveloped hillside areas, and within open parkways within the public right-of-way. Weed control within City tree wells adjacent to private property are not part of this scope. City right-ofways should be maintained on no less than a quarterly basis.
2. Monitoring and control of weeds in the North San Fernando Road Corridor Landscape Maintenance District on no less than a bimonthly (twice per month) basis. Locations include all City streets and sidewalks, in asphalt/ concrete medians, in City alleys, within all tree wells, and within open parkways within the public right-of-way.
3. Specific retreatment of vegetation as needed, upon request.
4. Abatement and removal of treated plant material in the City of Glendale as soon as possible.
5. Bimonthly (twice per month) reporting to the Urban Forester regarding schedule, work locations, and work progress.
6. Monthly reporting to the Urban Forester with invoices that include schedule, work locations, and spray totals, and look-ahead schedules as described in Special Conditions. Invoices shall be processed promptly by the Contractor upon completion of work, and submitted directly to the City’s Accounts Payable office via their online portal at: https://www.glendaleca.gov/government/departments/finance/accounting/invoice-submittal. A copy of the submitted invoice should be sent to the Urban Forester or his/her designee for review.
Weed control shall include pre-emergent and post-emergent systemic and contact herbicidal spraying. Contractor shall describe the schedule and types of treatment proposed inclusive of the herbicides to be used, including the proposed primary systemic herbicide(s) to be used and their totals. Contractor shall provide Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS) for each chemical to be utilized. Glyphosate-based products shall not be used and should not be submitted as part of this bid. Contractor shall not utilize controls or methods of control that harm non-targeted City or private trees and/or vegetation.
Except within the North San Fernando Road Corridor Landscape Maintenance District, weed control within City right-of-ways adjacent to private property, including tree wells, is not part of the scope of work. The Glendale Municipal Code (GMC 8.32.030) states: All persons owning, occupying or having control of property shall keep the sidewalk, parkway, gutter and alley in front of or adjacent to the side or rear of such property free of litter, weeds and other vegetation growing thereon, except such as may be sown, or planted for the purposes of landscaping and maintenance pursuant to Section 12.04.020 of this code. (Ord. 5385 § 2, 2004: prior code § 24-11)
Areas to perform weed control total to approximately 830 acres per year, approximately 5 acres of which is located within the North San Fernando Road Corridor Landscape Maintenance District. Manual weed removal will be limited to weeds five inches (5”) or higher. In some locations where herbicidal treatments are not possible for feasible based on the above scope of services, manual weed removal shall be the only method of removal. At the discretion of the Urban Forester or his/her designee the use of organic chemicals, mechanical and/or manual weed removal may be ordered in lieu of other herbicidal treatments.
Refer to the General Conditions and Special Conditions for complete details and requirements.
Contract:
The City intends to award a Contract with a three-year term, with a potential for two (2) one year extensions, based on satisfactory performance during the prior year and mutual agreement of the parties for a total term of five (5) years, which may thereafter be extended on a month-to-month basis upon mutual agreement of the parties..
Incomplete Work, Complaints, and Liquidated Damages: See Appendix 11 and Section 8 of the Contract between City and Contractor for terms and conditions relating to incomplete work, complaints, and liquidated damages.
Other Bidding Information:
1. Bidding Documents: Bids must be made on the Bidder’s forms contained
herein. Bid documents (plans, specifications, bid forms, and Addendums) may be obtained electronically at the City’s website: http://glendaleca.gov/ government/departments/public-works/bids
2. Contract Contingent on Annual Funding Appropriations. As set forth in Section 3 of the Contract, while the initial term of the Contract is three years, the availability and appropriation of funding for the Work will be determined on an annual basis. The Contract is valid and enforceable in any calendar year only if sufficient funds are made available for the purpose of the Contract. If sufficient funds are not appropriated in any year, the Contract may be amended to reflect any reduction in funding for the Work.
3. Completion: This Work will be performed on an ongoing basis for an initial minimum term of three (3) years from the Date of Commencement as established by the City’s written Notice to Proceed.
4. Acceptance or Rejection of Bids. The City reserves the right to reject any and all Bids, to award all or any individual part/item of the Bid, and to waive any informalities, irregularities or technical defects in such Bids and determine the lowest responsible Bidder, whichever may be in the best interests of the City. No late Bids will be accepted, nor will any oral, facsimile or electronic Bids be accepted by the City.
5. Mandatory Pre-Bid Conference. A mandatory pre-bid conference at 10:00 AM on Monday, May 13th, 2024 will be hosted at 541 W Chevy Chase Drive, Glendale, CA 91204. Participants must register with the Project Manager in writing by email no later than 4 pm on Thursday, May 9, 2024. The Project Manager will then issue an invitation to the event. There is no limit on the number of prospective bidders able to attend, and no limit on the number of participants from a given prospective bidder.
6. Contractor License. At the time of the Bid Deadline and at all times during performance of the Work, including full completion of all corrective work during the Correction Period, the Contractor must possess a California contractor license or licenses, current and active, of the classification required for the Work, in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 9, Division 3, Section 7000 et seq. of the Business and Professions Code. In compliance with Public Contract Code Section 3300, the City has determined that the Bidder must possess the following license(s): Agricultural Pest Control Advisor (PCA) and Qualified Applicator License (QAL). The successful Bidder will not receive a Contract award if the successful Bidder is unlicensed, does not have all of the required licenses, or one or more of the licenses are not current and active. If the City discovers after the Contract’s award that the Contractor is unlicensed, does not have all of the required licenses, or one or more of the licenses are not current and active, the City may cancel the award, reject the Bid, declare the Bid Bond as forfeited, keep the Bid Bond’s proceeds, and exercise any one or more of the remedies in the Contract Documents.
7. Bid Forms and Bid Security: Each Bid must be made on the Bid Forms. Each Bid shall be accompanied by a cashier’s check or certified check drawn on a solvent bank, payable to “City of Glendale,” for an amount equal to ten percent (10%) of the total maximum amount of the Bid. Alternatively, a satisfactory corporate surety Bid Bond for an amount equal to ten percent (10%) of the total maximum amount of the Bid may accompany the Bid. Said security shall serve as a guarantee that the successful Bidder, within fourteen (14) calendar days after the City’s Notice of Award of the Contract, will enter into a valid contract with the City for said Work in accordance with the Contract Documents.
8. Bid Irrevocability. Bids shall remain open and valid for ninety (90) calendar days after the Bid Deadline.
9. Substitution of Securities. Pursuant to California Public Contract Code Section 22300, substitution of securities for withheld funds is permitted in accordance therewith.
10. Prevailing Wages. This Project is subject to the provisions of California Labor Code Section 1720. Contractor awarded this Contract and all Subcontractors of any tier shall not pay less than the minimum prevailing rate of per diem wages for each craft, classification, or type of worker needed to perform the Work. The Director of Industrial Relations of the State of California, pursuant to the California Labor Code, and the United States Secretary of Labor, pursuant to the Davis-Bacon Act, have determined the general prevailing rates of wages in the locality in which the Work is to be performed. The rates determined by the California Director of Industrial Relations are available online at www.dir.ca.gov/DLSR/PWD/. Davis-Bacon wage rates are included in this Specification and are available online at www.wdol.gov/. To the extent that there are any differences in the federal and state prevailing wage rates for similar classifications of labor, Contractor and its Subcontractors shall pay the highest wage rate.
11. California Department of Industrial Relations ― Public Works Contractor Registration. Beginning July 1, 2014, under the Public Works Contractor Registration Law (California Senate Bill No. 854 - See Labor Code Section 1725.5), contractors must register and meet requirements using the online application https://efiling.dir.ca.gov/PWCR/ActionServlet?action=displayP WCRegistrationForm before bidding on public works contracts in California. The application also provides agencies that administer public works programs with a searchable database of qualified contractors. Application and renewal are completed online with a non-refundable fee of $300. More information is available at the following links: http://www.dir.ca.gov/DLSE/PublicWorks/SB854FactSheet_6.30.14.pdf http://www.dir.ca.gov/Public-Works/PublicWorks.html
Beginning April 1, 2015, the City must award public works projects only to contractors and subcontractors who comply with the Public Works Contractor Registration Law.
Notice to Bidders and Subcontractors: No contractor or subcontractor may be listed on a Bid proposal for a public works unless registered with the Department of Industrial Relations pursuant to Labor Code Section 1725.5 [with limited exceptions from this requirement for bid purposes only under Labor Code Section 1771.1(a)].
No contractor or subcontractor may be awarded a contract for public work on a public works project unless registered with the Department of Industrial Relations pursuant to Labor Code Section 1725.5
• This Project is subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the Department of Industrial Relations.
• The prime Contractor must post job site notices prescribed by regulation. (See 8 Calif. Code Reg. Section 16451(d) for the notice that previously was required for projects monitored by the DIR Compliance Monitoring Unit.)
Furnishing of Electronic Certified Payroll
of the City of Glendale. Publish April 22 & May 6, 2024
GLENDALE INDEPENDENT
NOTICE OF PLANNING HEARING OFFICER PUBLIC HEARING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. PCUP-002928-2024
LOCATION: 1540 WEST GLENOAKS BOULEVARD, UNIT 106 Glendale, CA. 91201
APPLICANT: Armond Khodaverdin on behalf of “PerfectTouch Therapy”
ZONE: “C2” - (Community Commercial) Zone
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Portion of Lot 71 and all of Lot 72, Tract No. 3196 APN: 5623-027-041
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Conditional Use Permit application to allow the continued operation of a massage establishment in the C2 (Community Commercial) zone, subject to the standards listed in Glendale Municipal Code (GMC) 5.64.
CODE REQUIRES 1) A conditional use permit application is required for a massage establishment in the C2 zone (GMC 30.12.020.B, Table 30.12 – A).
APPLICANT’S REQUEST 1) To continue operation of a massage establishment (PerfecTouch Therapy) in the C2 Zone.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: The project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) as a Class 1 “Existing Facilities,” per Section 15301 of the CEQA Guidelines, because the project involves the continuance of a massage establishment without physical expansion of the building or intensification of an existing use.
HEARING INFORMATION
The Planning Hearing Officer will conduct a public hearing regarding the above project in Room 105 of the Municipal Services Building, located at 633 East Broadway, Glendale, CA 91206 on MAY 15, 2024, at 9:30 am or as soon thereafter as possible. The purpose of the hearing is to hear comments from the public with respect to zoning concerns for the project. The hearing will be held in accordance with Glendale Municipal Code, Title 30, Chapter 30.42.
The meeting can be viewed on Charter Cable Channel 6 or streamed online at GlendaleCA.gov/live. For public comments and questions during the meeting call 818-937-8100. City staff will be submitting these questions and comments in real time to the appropriate person during the Planning Hearing Officer Hearing. You may also testify in person at the hearing if you wish to do so. If the final decision is challenged in court, testimony may be limited to issues raised before or at the public hearing.
The staff report and case materials will be available prior to the hearing date at GlendaleCA.gov/agendas.
QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS
If you desire more information on the proposal, please contact the case planner, Eric Ji, at EJi@GlendaleCA.gov or (818) 937-8178
PROCEDURES
Any person having an interest in the subject project may participate in the hearing, by phone as outlined above and may be heard in support of his/her opinion. Any person protesting may file a duly signed and acknowledged written protest with the Director of Community Development not later than the hour set for public hearing before the Hearing Officer. “Acknowledged” shall mean a declaration of property ownership (or occupant if not owner) under penalty of perjury. If you challenge the decision of this project in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Glendale, at or prior to the public hearing. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990, please notify the Community Development Department at least 48 hours (or two business days) for requests regarding sign language translation and Braille transcription services. When a final decision is rendered, a decision letter will be posted online at GlendaleCA.gov/planning/decisions. An appeal may be filed within 15 days of the final decision date appearing on the decision letter. All appeals must be filed using the City’s online permit portal: GlendaleCA.gov/permits
Dr. Suzie Abajian, The City Clerk of the City of Glendale
Published May 6, 2024 GLENDALE INDEPENDENT
Rolling Gate and Rollup Door Operator Installation
Notice is hereby given that the City of Pasadena is calling for sealed bids for the Libraries & Information Services Department and will receive sealed bids prior to 3:00 pm, Thursday, May 2, 2024 and will electronically unseal and make them available online (https:// procurement.opengov.com/portal/pasadena/projects/88411) for this solicitation named "Rolling Gate and Rollup Door Operator Installation" Project ID: 2024-IFB-LM-0199.
2.1. Summary
The City of Pasadena Public Library is seeking the services of a qualified firm to furnish and install new steel slide gate with new slide gate operator and to replace the existing rollup door operator.
2.2. Delivery Instructions
Bids will be received via the City's eProcurement Portal (https://procurement.opengov.com/portal/pasadena). A bid received after the time set for the bid opening shall not be considered. Bidders are required to submit (upload) all items listed in the Submittals/Checklist. Bids will be received prior to 3:00 pm on Thursday, May 2, 2024 and will be opened online at that time.
Copies of the Specifications and all required forms may be obtained for this solicitation online: https://procurement.opengov.com/portal/
pasadena/projects/88411
Addenda shall be acknowledged via the City's eProcurement Portal. Refer to the Specifications for complete details and bidding requirements. The Specification and this Notice shall be considered a part of any contract made pursuant thereunder.
See the Timeline in the section named "Instructions to Bidders." If there is a Mandatory pre-bid meeting, bidders are required to attend at the time, date, and location included in the Timeline (#Instructions to Bidders) of this solicitation. If there is a Non-Mandatory pre-bid meeting, bidders not required to attend.
Each prospective bidder will have the opportunity to clarify and ask questions regarding these Specifications. The Pre-bid Meeting will be held at the time, date, and location in the Timeline of this solicitation.
2.4. NOTICE REQUIREMENTS
No contractor or subcontractor may be listed on a bid proposal for a public works project unless registered with the Department of Industrial Relations pursuant to Labor Code section 1725.5 [with limited exceptions from this requirement for bid purposes only under Labor Code section 1771.1(a)].
2.5. Required Licenses (Eligibility Requirement)
Bidders must possess and provide the following license(s) or certification(s) to be deemed qualified to perform the work specified: C-10 license and C-61 Limited Specialty with a D-28 (Doors, Gates and Activating Devices) License
2.6. Deadline for Questions
The deadline to submit questions related to this solicitation is Tuesday, April 23, 2024, prior to 3:00 pm.
Questions regarding this solicitation should be submitted directly through the City's eProcurement Portal Q&A function. Do not contact any other City employee or official regarding this solicitation. Any questions submitted after the date and time specified may not be considered.
2.7. Release Date
Release Dated: Thursday, May 6, 2024
MIGUEL MÁRQUEZ City Manager
Publoah May 6, 2024 PASADENA PRESS
NOTICE OF PETITION TO ADMINISTER ESTATE OF:
BETTY SOI MEE LEE
CASE NO. 24STPB04425
To all heirs, beneficiaries, creditors, contingent creditors, and persons who may otherwise be interested in the WILL or estate, or both of BETTY SOI MEE LEE.
A PETITION FOR PROBATE has been filed by SAMUEL LEE in the Superior Court of California, County of LOS ANGELES.
THE PETITION FOR PROBATE requests that SAMUEL LEE be appointed as personal representative to administer the estate of the decedent.
THE PETITION requests authority to administer the estate under the Independent Administration of Estates Act. (This authority will allow the personal representative to take many actions without obtaining court approval. Before taking certain very important actions, however, the personal representative will be required to give notice to interested persons unless they have waived notice or consented to the proposed action.) The independent administration authority will be granted unless an interested person files an objection to the petition and shows good cause why the court should not grant the authority.
A HEARING on the petition will be held in this court as follows: 05/20/24 at 8:30AM in Dept. 4 located at 111 N. HILL ST., LOS ANGELES, CA 90012
IF YOU OBJECT to the granting of the petition, you should appear at the hearing and state your objections or file written objections with
NOTICE OF PETITION TO ADMINISTER ESTATE OF:
MARCEL MESA AKA
MARCEL LUJAN MESA
CASE NO. 24STPB04449
To all heirs, beneficiaries, creditors, contingent creditors, and persons who may otherwise be interested in the WILL or estate, or both of MARCEL MESA AKA MARCEL LUJAN MESA.
A PETITION FOR PROBATE has been filed by FRANCES LUJAN MESA AND WALTER CHARDIE in the Superior Court of California, County of LOS ANGELES.
THE PETITION FOR PROBATE requests that FRANCES LUJAN MESA AND WALTER CHARDIE be appointed as personal representative to administer the estate of the decedent.
THE PETITION requests authority to administer the estate under the Independent Administration of Estates Act with limited authority. (This authority will allow the personal representative to take many actions without obtaining court approval. Before taking certain very important actions, however, the personal representative will be required to give notice to interested persons unless they have waived notice or consented to the proposed action.) The independent administration authority will be granted unless an interested person files an objection to the petition and shows good cause why the court should not grant the authority.
A HEARING on the petition will be held in this court as follows: 05/29/24 at 8:30AM in Dept. 29 located at 111 N. HILL ST., LOS ANGELES, CA 90012
IF YOU OBJECT to the granting of the petition, you should appear at the hearing and state your objections or file written objections with the court before the hearing. Your appearance may be in person or by your attorney.
of the decedent.
THE PETITION requests authority to administer the estate under the Independent Administration of Estates Act with limited authority. (This authority will allow the personal representative to take many actions without obtaining court approval. Before taking certain very important actions, however, the personal representative will be required to give notice to interested persons unless they have waived notice or consented to the proposed action.) The independent administration authority will be granted unless an interested person files an objection to the petition and shows good cause why the court should not grant the authority.
A HEARING on the petition will be held in this court as follows: 06/27/24 at 1:30PM in Dept. CM06 located at 3390 HARBOR BLVD., COSTA MESA, CA 92626
NOTICE IN PROBATE CASES
The court is providing the convenience to appear for hearing by video using the court’s designated video platform. This is a no cost service to the public. Go to the Court’s website at The Superior Court of California - County of Orange (occourts.org) to appear remotely for Probate hearings and for remote hearing instructions. If you have difficulty connecting or are unable to connect to your remote hearing, call 657-622-8278 for assistance. If you prefer to appear in-person, you can appear in the department on the day/time set for your hearing.
IF YOU OBJECT to the granting of the petition, you should appear at the hearing and state your objections or file written objections with the court before the hearing. Your appearance may be in person or by your attorney.
the Independent Administration of Estates Act. (This authority will allow the personal representative to take many actions without obtaining court approval. Before taking certain very important actions, however, the personal representative will be required to give notice to interested persons unless they have waived notice or consented to the proposed action.) The independent administration authority will be granted unless an interested person files an objection to the petition and shows good cause why the court should not grant the authority.
A HEARING on the petition will be held in this court as follows: 05/23/24 at 8:30AM in Dept. 11 located at 111 N. HILL ST., LOS ANGELES, CA 90012
IF YOU OBJECT to the granting of the petition, you should appear at the hearing and state your objections or file written objections with the court before the hearing. Your appearance may be in person or by your attorney.
IF YOU ARE A CREDITOR or a contingent creditor of the decedent, you must file your claim with the court and mail a copy to the personal representative appointed by the court within the later of either (1)four months from the date of first issuance of letters to a general personal representative, as defined in section 58(b) of the California Probate Code, or (2) 60 days from the date of mailing or personal delivery to you of a notice under section 9052 of the California Probate Code.
Other California statutes and legal authority may affect your rights as a creditor. You may want to consult with an attorney knowledgeable in California law.
issu-ance of letters to a general personal representative, as defined in section 58(b) of the California Probate Code, or (2) 60 days from the date of mailing or personal delivery to you of a notice under section 9052 of the California Probate Code. Other California statutes and legal authority may affect your rights as a creditor. You may want to consult with an attorney knowledgeable in California law. YOU MAY EXAMINE the file kept by the court. If you are a person interested in the estate, you may file with the court a Request for Special Notice (form DE-154) of the filing of an inventory and appraisal of estate assets or of any petition or account as provided in Probate Code section 1250. A Request for Special Notice form is available from the court clerk.
Attorney for petitioner:
ROBERT WJ HEAVEN ESQ SBN 336803 PRUDENTIAL ADVOCATE APC 1925 CENTURY PARK EAST STE 1700 LOS ANGELES CA 90067 CN106353 NOMASA May 2,6,9, 2024 MONTEREY PARK PRESS
NOTICE OF PETITION TO ADMINISTER ESTATE OF: TADASHI HOZAKI CASE NO. 24STPB04699 To all heirs, beneficiaries, creditors, contingent creditors, and persons who may otherwise be interested in the WILL or estate, or both of TADASHI HOZAKI.
the court before the hearing. Your appearance may be in person or by your attorney.
IF YOU ARE A CREDITOR or a contingent creditor of the decedent, you must file your claim with the court and mail a copy to the personal representative appointed by the court within the later of either (1)four months from the date of first issuance of letters to a general personal representative, as defined in section 58(b) of the California Probate Code, or (2) 60 days from the date of mailing or personal delivery to you of a notice under section 9052 of the California Probate Code.
Other California statutes and legal authority may affect your rights as a creditor. You may want to consult with an attorney knowledgeable in California law.
YOU MAY EXAMINE the file kept by the court. If you are a person interested in the estate, you may file with the court a Request for Special Notice (form DE-154) of the filing of an inventory and appraisal of estate assets or of any petition or account as provided in Probate Code section 1250. A Request for Special Notice form is available from the court clerk.
Attorney for Petitioner
RUSSELL M OZAWA - SBN 272268
LAW OFFICES OF RUSSELL M. OZAWA
3655 TORRANCE BLVD., STE. 300 TORRANCE CA 90503
Telephone (626) 499-4500
4/29, 5/2, 5/6/24
CNS-3807260# GLENDALE INDEPENDENT
IF YOU ARE A CREDITOR or a contingent creditor of the decedent, you must file your claim with the court and mail a copy to the personal representative appointed by the court within the later of either (1) four months from the date of first issuance of letters to a general personal representative, as defined in section 58(b) of the California Probate Code, or (2) 60 days from the date of mailing or personal delivery to you of a notice under section 9052 of the California Probate Code. Other California statutes and legal authority may affect your rights as a creditor. You may want to consult with an attorney knowledgeable in California law.
YOU MAY EXAMINE the file kept by the court. If you are a person interested in the estate, you may file with the court a Request for Special Notice (form DE-154) of the filing of an inventory and appraisal of estate assets or of any petition or account as provided in Probate Code section 1250. A Request for Special Notice form is available from the court clerk.
Attorney for Petitioner ILIANA MADRIGAL, ESQ. - SBN 278590, CHAVEZ LAW GROUP 13225 PHILADELPHIA ST., STE. A WHITTIER CA 90601, Telephone (323) 506-3142 4/29, 5/2, 5/6/24 CNS-3807420# BALDWIN PARK PRESS
NOTICE OF PETITION TO ADMINISTER ESTATE OF:
CAROLYN JANE MORGAN
AKA CAROLYN MORGAN CASE NO. 30-2024-01394810-PR-LACMC
To all heirs, beneficiaries, creditors, contingent creditors, and persons who may otherwise be interested in the WILL or estate, or both of CAROLYN JANE MORGAN AKA
CAROLYN MORGAN.
A PETITION FOR PROBATE has been filed by JOHN MICHAEL MORGAN in the Superior Court of California, County of ORANGE. THE PETITION FOR PROBATE requests that JOHN MICHAEL MORGAN be appointed as personal representative to administer the estate
IF YOU ARE A CREDITOR or a contingent creditor of the decedent, you must file your claim with the court and mail a copy to the personal representative appointed by the court within the later of either (1)four months from the date of first issuance of letters to a general personal representative, as defined in section 58(b) of the California Probate Code, or (2) 60 days from the date of mailing or personal delivery to you of a notice under section 9052 of the California Probate Code.
Other California statutes and legal authority may affect your rights as a creditor. You may want to consult with an attorney knowledgeable in California law.
YOU MAY EXAMINE the file kept by the court. If you are a person interested in the estate, you may file with the court a Request for Special Notice (form DE-154) of the filing of an inventory and appraisal of estate assets or of any petition or account as provided in Probate Code section 1250. A Request for Special Notice form is available from the court clerk.
Attorney for Petitioner CATHERINE KIM, ESQ. - SBN 243811, ERNEST J. KIM, ESQ.SBN 181280, LAW OFFICES OF ERNEST J. KIM 17541 17TH STREET, SUITE 100 TUSTIN CA 92780 Telephone (949) 975-1870 4/29, 5/2, 5/6/24 CNS-3808252# ANAHEIM PRESS
NOTICE OF PETITION TO ADMINISTER ESTATE OF: MICHAEL L. WOODARD
CASE NO. 20STPB10005
To all heirs, beneficiaries, creditors, contingent creditors, and persons who may otherwise be interested in the WILL or estate, or both of MICHAEL L. WOODARD.
A PETITION FOR PROBATE has been filed by TERESA NAVARRO in the Superior Court of California, County of LOS ANGELES.
THE PETITION FOR PROBATE requests that TERESA NAVARRO be appointed as personal representative to administer the estate of the decedent.
THE PETITION requests the decedent’s WILL and codicils, if any, be admitted to probate. The WILL and any codicils are available for examination in the file kept by the court.
THE PETITION requests authority to administer the estate under
YOU MAY EXAMINE the file kept by the court. If you are a person interested in the estate, you may file with the court a Request for Special Notice (form DE-154) of the filing of an inventory and appraisal of estate assets or of any petition or account as provided in Probate Code section 1250. A Request for Special Notice form is available from the court clerk.
Attorney for Petitioner
GREGORY P. SWAIN - SBN 324283, BARBARO, CHINEN, PITZER & DUKE LLP
301 E COLORADO BLVD. PASADENA CA 91101-1911
Telephone (626) 793-5196 4/29, 5/2, 5/6/24
CNS-3808124# BURBANK INDEPENDENT
NOTICE OF PETITION TO ADMINISTER ESTATE OF MACHIKO NOMASA Case No. 24STPB04433
To all heirs, beneficiaries, cred-itors, contingent creditors, and persons who may otherwise be interested in the will or estate, or both, of MACHIKO NOMASA
A PETITION FOR PROBATE has been filed by Carol Nomasa in the Superior Court of California, County of LOS ANGELES.
THE PETITION FOR PROBATE requests that Carol Nomasa be appointed as personal representative to administer the estate of the decedent.
THE PETITION requests authority to administer the estate under the Independent Administration of Estates Act. (This authority will allow the personal representative to take many actions without obtaining court approval. Before taking certain very important actions, however, the personal representative will be required to give notice to interested persons unless they have waived notice or consented to the proposed action.) The independent administra-tion authority will be granted unless an interested person files an objec-tion to the petition and shows good cause why the court should not grant the authority.
A HEARING on the petition will be held on May 22, 2024 at 8:30 AM in Dept. No. 2D located at 111 N. Hill St., Los Angeles, CA 90012.
IF YOU OBJECT to the granting of the petition, you should appear at the hearing and state your objections or file written objections with the court before the hearing. Your ap-pearance may be in person or by your attorney.
IF YOU ARE A CREDITOR or a contingent creditor of the decedent, you must file your claim with the court and mail a copy to the personal representative appointed by the court within the later of either (1) four months from the date of first
A PETITION FOR PROBATE has been filed by TAISHI KOTOW in the Superior Court of California, County of LOS ANGELES. THE PETITION FOR PROBATE requests that TAISHI KOTOW be appointed as personal representative to administer the estate of the decedent.
THE PETITION requests authority to administer the estate under the Independent Administration of Estates Act. (This authority will allow the personal representative to take many actions without obtaining court approval. Before taking certain very important actions, however, the personal representative will be required to give notice to interested persons unless they have waived notice or consented to the proposed action.) The independent administration authority will be granted unless an interested person files an objection to the petition and shows good cause why the court should not grant the authority.
A HEARING on the petition will be held in this court as follows: 05/31/24 at 8:30AM in Dept. 99 located at 111 N. HILL ST., LOS ANGELES, CA 90012
IF YOU OBJECT to the granting of the petition, you should appear at the hearing and state your objections or file written objections with the court before the hearing. Your appearance may be in person or by your attorney.
IF YOU ARE A CREDITOR or a contingent creditor of the decedent, you must file your claim with the court and mail a copy to the personal representative appointed by the court within the later of either (1)four months from the date of first issuance of letters to a general personal representative, as defined in section 58(b) of the California Probate Code, or (2) 60 days from the date of mailing or personal delivery to you of a notice under section 9052 of the California Probate Code. Other California statutes and legal authority may affect your rights as a creditor. You may want to consult with an attorney knowledgeable in California law. YOU MAY EXAMINE the file kept by the court. If you are a person interested in the estate, you may file with the court a Request for Special Notice (form DE-154) of the filing of an inventory and appraisal of estate assets or of any petition or account as provided in Probate Code section 1250. A Request for Special Notice form is available from the court clerk.
Attorney for Petitioner
JOHN W. CHANG - SBN
NOTICE OF AMENDED PETITION TO ADMINISTER
ESTATE OF:
HOWARD CHESTER HORN
HOWARD C. HORN
AKA
CASE NO. 23STPB10642
To all heirs, beneficiaries, creditors, contingent creditors, and persons who may otherwise be interested in the lost WILL or estate, or both of
HOWARD CHESTER HORN AKA
HOWARD C. HORN.
A AMENDED PETITION FOR PROBATE has been filed by TIMOTHY BRET HORN in the Superior Court of California, County of LOS ANGELES. THE AMENDED PETITION FOR PROBATE requests that TIMOTHY BRET HORN be appointed as personal representative to administer the estate of the decedent.
THE AMENDED PETITION requests the decedent’s lost WILL and codicils, if any, be admitted to probate. The lost WILL and any codicils are available for examination in the file kept by the court.
THE AMENDED PETITION requests authority to administer the estate under the Independent Administration of Estates Act. (This authority will allow the personal representative to take many actions without obtaining court approval. Before taking certain very important actions, however, the personal representative will be required to give notice to interested persons unless they have waived notice or consented to the proposed action.) The independent administration authority will be granted unless an interested person files an objection to the petition and shows good cause why the court should not grant the authority.
A HEARING on the petition will be held in this court as follows: 07/30/24 at 8:30AM in Dept. 62 located at 111 N. HILL ST., LOS ANGELES, CA 90012
IF YOU OBJECT to the granting of the petition, you should appear at the hearing and state your objections or file written objections with the court before the hearing. Your appearance may be in person or by your attorney.
IF YOU ARE A CREDITOR or a contingent creditor of the decedent, you must file your claim with the court and mail a copy to the personal representative appointed by the court within the later of either (1) four months from the date of first issuance of letters to a general personal representative, as defined in section 58(b) of the California Probate Code, or (2) 60 days from the date of mailing or personal delivery to you of a notice under section 9052 of the California Probate Code.
Other California statutes and legal authority may affect your rights as a creditor. You may want to consult with an attorney knowledgeable in California law.
YOU MAY EXAMINE the file kept by the court. If you are a person interested in the estate, you may file with the court a Request for Special Notice (form DE-154) of the filing of an inventory and appraisal of estate assets or of any petition or account as provided in Probate Code section 1250. A Request for Special Notice form is available from the court clerk. Attorney for Petitioner
PHILIP BARBARO, JR. - SBN 96317
BARBARO, CHINEN, PITZER & DUKE LLP
301 EAST COLORADO BOULEVARD, SUITE 700 PASADENA CA 91101-1911
Telephone (626) 793-5196
5/2, 5/6, 5/9/24
CNS-3808745# PASADENA PRESS
NOTICE OF PETITION TO ADMINISTER ESTATE OF:
ANN KATTON READ
CASE NO. 24STPB04778
To all heirs, beneficiaries, creditors, contingent creditors, and persons who may otherwise be interested in the WILL or estate, or both of ANN KATTON READ.
A PETITION FOR PROBATE has been filed by HELEN LORENZANA in the Superior Court of California, County of LOS ANGELES. THE PETITION FOR PROBATE requests that HELEN LORENZANA be appointed as personal representative to administer the estate of the decedent.
THE PETITION requests authority to administer the estate under the
Independent Administration of Estates Act with limited authority. (This authority will allow the personal representative to take many actions without obtaining court approval. Before taking certain very important actions, however, the personal representative will be required to give notice to interested persons unless they have waived notice or consented to the proposed action.) The independent administration authority will be granted unless an interested person files an objection to the petition and shows good cause why the court should not grant the authority.
A HEARING on the petition will be held in this court as follows: 05/31/24 at 8:30AM in Dept. 62 located at 111 N. HILL ST., LOS ANGELES, CA 90012
IF YOU OBJECT to the granting of the petition, you should appear at the hearing and state your objections or file written objections with the court before the hearing. Your appearance may be in person or by your attorney.
IF YOU ARE A CREDITOR or a contingent creditor of the decedent, you must file your claim with the court and mail a copy to the personal representative appointed by the court within the later of either (1) four months from the date of first issuance of letters to a general personal representative, as defined in section 58(b) of the California Probate Code, or (2) 60 days from the date of mailing or personal delivery to you of a notice under section 9052 of the California Probate Code.
Other California statutes and legal authority may affect your rights as a creditor. You may want to consult with an attorney knowledgeable in California law.
YOU MAY EXAMINE the file kept by the court. If you are a person interested in the estate, you may file with the court a Request for Special Notice (form DE-154) of the filing of an inventory and appraisal of estate assets or of any petition or account as provided in Probate Code section 1250. A Request for Special Notice form is available from the court clerk.
Attorney for Petitioner KEVIN REHAWALD, ESQ. - SBN 255334
CHALEFF REHWALD PETERSON 32107 LINDERO CANYON RD., STE. 121 WESTLAKE VILLAGE CA 91361, Telephone (818) 703-7500 5/2, 5/6, 5/9/24
CNS-3809524# WEST COVINA PRESS
NOTICE OF PETITION TO ADMINISTER ESTATE OF:
JAMES SHIA-HUI CHENG AKA JAMES S. CHENG, JAMES CHENG, SHIA HUI CHENG, JIMMY CHENG, JIMMY S. CHENG CASE NO. 24STPB04845
To all heirs, beneficiaries, creditors, contingent creditors, and persons who may otherwise be interested in the WILL or estate, or both of JAMES SHIA-HUI CHENG AKA JAMES S. CHENG, JAMES CHENG, SHIA HUI CHENG, JIMMY CHENG, JIMMY S. CHENG. A PETITION FOR PROBATE has been filed by HOOISIN DAVID LIM in the Superior Court of California, County of LOS ANGELES.
THE PETITION FOR PROBATE requests that HOOISIN DAVID LIM be appointed as personal representative to administer the estate of the decedent.
THE PETITION requests the decedent’s WILL and codicils, if any, be admitted to probate. The WILL and any codicils are available for examination in the file kept by the court.
THE PETITION requests authority to administer the estate under the Independent Administration of Estates Act. (This authority will allow the personal representative to take many actions without obtaining court approval. Before taking certain very important actions, however, the personal representative will be required to give notice to interested persons unless they have waived notice or consented to the proposed action.) The independent administration authority will be granted unless an interested person files an objection to the petition and shows good cause why the court should not grant the authority.
A HEARING on the petition will be held in this court as follows: 06/07/24 at 8:30AM in Dept. 29 located at 111 N. HILL ST., LOS ANGELES, CA 90012
IF YOU OBJECT to the granting of the petition, you should appear at the hearing and state your objections or file written objections with the court before the hearing. Your appearance may be in person or by your attorney.
IF YOU ARE A CREDITOR or a contingent creditor of the decedent, you must file your claim with the court and mail a copy to the personal representative appointed by the court within the later of either (1) four months from the date of first issuance of letters to a general personal representative, as defined in section 58(b) of the California Probate Code, or (2) 60 days from the date of mailing or personal delivery to you of a notice under section 9052 of the California Probate Code.
Other California statutes and legal authority may affect your rights as a creditor. You may want to consult with an attorney knowledgeable in California law.
YOU MAY EXAMINE the file kept by the court. If you are a person interested in the estate, you may file with the court a Request for Special Notice (form DE-154) of the filing of an inventory and appraisal of estate assets or of any petition or account as provided in Probate Code section 1250. A Request for Special Notice form is available from the court clerk.
Attorney for Petitioner IRENE N. BLOCKSOM SBN 349192, LAGERLOF, LLP 155 N. LAKE AVENUE, FLOOR 11 PASADENA CA 91101
Telephone (626) 683-7234 BSC 225071 5/6, 5/9, 5/13/24 CNS-3810063# PASADENA PRESS
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR
CHANGE OF NAME PETITION OF Clar-
ence Anthony Brown FOR CHANGE OF NAME CASE NUMBER: 24LBCP00111
Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles Governor George Deukmejian Courthouse, 275 Magnolia, Long Beach, CA 90802, South Judicial District TO ALL INTERESTED PERSONS: 1.
Petitioner Clarence Anthony Brown filed a petition with this court for a decree changing names as follows: Present name a. OF Clarence Anthony Brown to Proposed name Anthony X 2. THE COURT ORDERS that all persons interested in this matter shall appear before this court at the hearing indicated below to show cause, if any, why the petition for change of name should not be granted. Any person objecting to the name changes described above must file a written objection that includes the reason for the objection at least two court days before the matter is scheduled to be heard and must appear at the hearing to show cause why the petition should not be granted. If no written objection is timely filed, the court may grant the petition without a hearing NOTICE OF HEARING a. Date: 05/21/2024 Time: 8:30AM Dept: 26. The address of the court is same as noted above. 3. a. A copy of this Order to Show Cause shall be published at least once each week for four successive weeks prior to the day set for hearing on the petition in the following newspaper of general circulation, printed in this county: Belmont Beacon DATED: April 9, 2024 Michael P. Vicencia JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT Pub. April 22, 29, May 6, 13, 2024 BELMONT BEACON
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR CHANGE OF NAME PETITION OF Rouslan Akhmerov FOR CHANGE OF NAME CASE NUMBER: 24NNCP00146 Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles 150 W. Commonwealth Ave, Alhambra, Ca 91801, Northeast Judicial District TO ALL INTERESTED PERSONS: 1. Petitioner Rouslan Akhmerov filed a petition with this court for a decree changing names as follows: Present name a. OF Rouslan Akhmerov to Proposed name Russ Udin 2. THE COURT ORDERS that all persons interested in this matter shall appear before this court at the hearing indicated below to show cause, if any, why the petition for change of name should not be granted. Any person objecting to the name changes described above must file a written objection that includes the reason for the objection at least two court days before the matter is scheduled to be heard and must appear at the hearing to show cause why the petition should not be granted. If no written objection is timely filed, the court may grant the petition without a hearing NOTICE OF HEARING a. Date: 06/07/2024 Time: 8:30AM Dept: X. The address of the court is same as noted above. 3. a. A copy of this Order to Show Cause shall be published at least once each week for four successive
weeks prior to the day set for hearing on the petition in the following newspaper of general circulation, printed in this county:
Glendale Independent DATED: April 16, 2024 Robin Miller Sloan JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT Pub. April 29, May 6, 13, 20, 2024 GLENDALE INDEPENDENT
Notice of Public Lien Sale
Notice is hereby given that the undersigned intends to sell the personal property described below to enforce a lien imposed on said property under the California SelfStorage Facility Act, pursuant to Sections 21700-21716 of the Business & Professions Code, Section 2328 of the UCC, Section 535 of the Penal Code and provisions of the Civil Code. The undersigned will sell by competitive bidding on May 10, 2024, at 10:00 a.m. located at:
Citywide Self-Storage, LLC
1000 E. Alessandro Blvd. Riverside, CA. 92508
County of Riverside, State of California, the following:
Awan, T A162 Berry, A K021
Contents: Personal property including but not limited to household and misc. items. Purchases must be paid in full at the time of purchase in cash only. All purchased items sold-as is-where is--and must be removed at the time of sale. Sale subject to cancellation in the event of settlement between owner and obligated party. Dated this May 10, 2024, before 10:00 a.m.
American Auctioneers
Bond # 38594212400
1Office: (800)-838- 7653
Fax (951) 926-3599
Fax # (909)790-0438
Published April 29, 2024 & May 6, 2024 in the RIVERSIDE INDEPENDENT
NOTICE OF LIEN SALE
StorQuest – Rancho Cucamonga/ Hampshire
Notice is hereby given, StorQuest Self Storage – 9419 Hampshire Street, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 will sell at public sale by competitive bidding the personal property of Jerry Martinez, Carlos Maynez, Edward Kline, Prudence Annelise Laws, James Bradley Waterman, Qualena McClung, Norina Rivas, Daniel Cervantes, Jason Pierre Defachelle. Property to be sold: Misc. household goods, furniture, tools, clothes, boxes, & personal contents. Auctioneer Company: www.storagetreasures.com. The Sale will conclude at 3 PM on May 16th, 2024. Goods must be paid in CASH and removed at time of sale. Sale is subject to cancellation in the event of settlement between owner and obligated party.
Publish April 29, 2024 & May 6, 2024 in THE SAN BERNARDINO PRESS
Order To Show Cause For Change of Name Case No. 30-2024-01383668-CUPT-CJC To All Interested Persons: Steffanie Sousa Najera filed a petition with this court for a decree changing names as follows: PRESENT NAME Steffanie Sousa Najera PROPOSED NAME Steffanie Balsells Najera . The Court Orders that all persons interested in this matter shall appear before this court at the hearing indicated below to show cause, if any, why the petition for change of name should not be granted. Any person objecting to the name changes described above must file a written objection that includes the reasons for the objection at least two court days before the matter is scheduled to be heard and must appear at the hearing to show cause why the petition should not be granted. If no written objection is timely filed, the court may grant the petition without a hearing. Notice Of Hearing Date: 06/26/2024 Time: 8:30am Dept. D-100 REMOTE HEARING The address of the court is Central Justice Center, 700 Civic Center Drive West, Santa Ana, Ca 92701. A copy of this Order to Show Cause shall be published at least once each week for four successive weeks prior to the date set for hearing on the petition in the following newspaper of general circulation, printed in this county: Anaheim Press Date: April 24, 2024 Layne H. Melzer Judge of the Superior Court Pub Dates: April 29, May 6, 13, 20, 2024 ANAHEIM PRESS
CASE NUMBER: (Numero del Caso): 23GDCV01352 SUMMONS (CITACION JUDICIAL)
NOTICE TO DEFENDANT: (AVISO AL DEMANDADO): Madeline Byrd Thomason; and DOES 1 TO 20, inclusive
Plaintiff’s Title Thereto. YOU ARE BEING SUED BY PLAINTIFF: (LO ESTA DEMANDANDO EL DEMANDANTE): Brandon Nicholas Megrabyan
NOTICE! You have been sued. The court may decide against you without your being heard unless you respond within 30 days. Read the information below. You have 30 CALENDAR DAYS after this summons and legal papers are served on you to file a written response
at this court and have a copy served on the plaintiff. A letter or phone call will not protect you. Your written response must be in proper legal form if you want the court to hear your case. There may be a court form that you can use for your response. You can find these court forms and more information at the California Courts Online Self-Help Center (www.courtinfo.ca.gov/ selfhelp), your county law library, or the courthouse nearest you. If you cannot pay the filing fee, ask the court clerk for a fee waiver form. If you do not file your response on time, you may lose the case by default, and your wages, money, and property may be taken without further warning from the court. There are other legal requirements. You may want to call an attorney right away. If you do not know an attorney, you may want to call an attorney referral service. If you cannot afford an attorney, you may be eligible for free legal services from a nonprofit legal services program. You can locate these nonprofit groups at the California Legal Services Web site (www.lawhelpcalifornia.org), the California Courts Online Self-Help Center (www. courtinfo.ca.gov/selfhelp), or by contacting your local court or county bar association.
NOTE: The court has a statutory lien for waived fees and costs on any settlement or arbitration award of $10,000 or more in a civil case. The court’s lien must be paid before the court will dismiss the case.
¡AVISO! Lo han demandado. Si no responde dentro de 30 días, la corte puede decidir en su contra sin escuchar su versión. Lea la información a continuación. Tiene 30 DÍAS DE CALENDARIO después de que le entreguen esta citación y papeles legales para presentar una respuesta por escrito en esta corte y hacer que se entregue una copia al demandante. Una carta o una llamada telefónica no lo protegen. Su respuesta por escrito tiene que estar en formato legal correcto si desea que procesen su caso en la corte. Es posible que haya un formulario que usted pueda usar para su respuesta. Puede encontrar estos formularios de la corte y más información en el Centro de Ayuda de las Cortes de California (www.sucorte.ca.gov), en la biblioteca de leyes de su condado o en la corte que le quede más cerca. Si no puede pagar la cuota de presentación, pida al secretario de la corte que le dé un formulario de exención de pago de cuotas. Si no presenta su respuesta a tiempo, puede perder el caso por incumplimiento y la corte le podrá quitar su sueldo, dinero y bienes sin más advertencia. Hay otros requisitos legales. Es recomendable que llame a un abogado inmediatamente. Si no conoce a un abogado, puede llamar a un servicio de remisión a abogados. Si no puede pagar a un abogado, es posible que cumpla con los requisitos para obtener servicios legales gratuitos de un programa de servicios legales sin fines de lucro. Puede encontrar estos grupos sin fines de lucro en el sitio web de California Legal Services, (www.lawhelpcalifornia. org), en el Centro de Ayuda de las Cortes de California, (www.sucorte.ca.gov) o poniéndose en contacto con la corte o el colegio de abogados locales. AVISO: Por ley, la corte tiene derecho a reclamar las cuotas y los costos exentos por imponer un gravamen sobre cualquier recuperación de $10,000 ó más de valor recibida mediante un acuerdo o una concesión de arbitraje en un caso de derecho civil. Tiene que pagar el gravamen de la corte antes de que la corte pueda desechar el caso. The name and address of the court is: (El nombre y direccion de la corte es): Los Angeles Superior Court – Glendale Courthouse, 600 East Broadway, Glendale, Ca 91206. The name, address and telephone number of plaintiff’s attorney, or plaintiff without an attorney is: (El nombre, la direccion y el numero de telefono del abogado del demandante, o del demandante que no tiene abogado, es): Sofia TAMAZYAN, Esq, 801 N. Brand Blvd, Ste 1120, Glendale, Ca 91203
Date: (Fecha) June 28, 2023
David W. Slayton, Clerk (Secretario) By: E. Madrid, Deputy (Adjunto) You are served April 29, May 6, 13, 20, 2024 BURBANK INDEPENDENT
NOTICE OF LIEN SALE
STORQUEST SELF STORAGENotice is hereby given, StorQuest Self Storage-12530 Magnolia Ave, Riverside Ca 92503 will sell at public sale by competitive bidding the personal property of: Name: Aracely Silva, Darryl Ray Lewis Jr, Brenda Rodriguez, Ruben Leon, Angela Beeler, Juan Cervantes Property to be sold: Misc. household goods,appliances, furniture, clothes, toys, tools,boxes & contents. Auction Company: www.storagetreasures.com . The Sale ends at 3:00 PM on May 16th, 2024. Goods must be paid in CASH and removed at the time of the sale. Sale is subject to cancellation in the event of settlement between owner and obligated party.
STORQUEST SELF STORAGE-RIVERSIDE 12530 Magnolia Avenue Riverside, CA 92503 951-737-7440
Publish April 29, 2024 & May 6, 2024 in THE RIVERSIDE INDEPENDENT
NOTICE OF LIEN SALE
STORQUEST SELF STORAGENotice is hereby given, StorQuest Self Storage-12530 Magnolia Ave, Riverside Ca 92503 will sell at
by competitive bidding the personal
of: Name: Fancisco Guzman, Justin Meador, Adrian Martinez Property to be
Misc.
goods,appliances, furniture,
tools,boxes & contents. Auction Company: www.storagetreasures.com . The Sale ends at 3:00 PM on May 17th, 2024. Goods must be paid in CASH and removed at the time of the sale. Sale is subject to cancellation in the event of settlement between owner and obligated party.
STORQUEST
Avagyan, 2209; Diana Montano, 1118; Sophia Ritter, 3474; Jonadab Torres, 2322; Victor El Khal, 2622. Purchases must be paid for at the time of purchase in cash only. All purchased items sold as is, where is and must be removed at the time of sale. Sale subject to cancellation in the event of settlement between owner and obligated party. Andasol Management, Inc. Bond #: 791831C, (888) 285-0189 CN106276 05-21-2024 May 6,13, 2024 GLENDALE INDEPENDENT
Notice of Public Lien Sale Business and Profession Code 21700 Notice is hereby given by the undersigned that a public lien sale of the following described personal property will be held at the hour of 12:00 o’clock pm on the day of May 13th, 2024, auction will be held online at storageauctions.net. The property is stored by A Storage Place – Yucaipa, located at 35056 County Line Rd., Yucaipa, CA 92399.
Name: Robert De Hart Ashlee Summons
This Notice is given in accordance with the provisions of Section 21700 Et Saq of the Business & Profession Code of The State of California.
Dated: 04/29/2024 By: Angela Finley
Publish on May 6, 2024 in the San Bernardino Press
Order To Show Cause For Change of Name Case No. 30-2024-01380345 To All Interested Persons: Hugo Noel Vargas III filed a petition with this court for a decree changing names as follows: PRESENT NAME Hugo Noel Vargas III PROPOSED NAME Hugo Noel Mejia Vargas . The Court Orders that all persons interested in this matter shall appear before this court at the hearing indicated below to show cause, if any, why the petition for change of name should not be granted. Any person objecting to the name changes described above must file a written objection that includes the reasons for the objection at least two court days before the matter is scheduled to be heard and must appear at the hearing to show cause why the petition should not be granted. If no written objection is timely
TIAL
free and clear ownership of the property. You should also be aware that the lien being auctioned off may be a junior lien. If you are the highest bidder at the auction, you are or may be responsible for paying off all liens senior to the lien being auctioned off, before you can receive clear title to the property. You are encouraged to investigate the existence, priority, and size of outstanding liens that may exist on this property by contacting the county recorder’s office or a title insurance company, either of which may charge you a fee for this information. If you consult either of these resources, you should be aware that the same lender may hold more than one mortgage or deed of trust on the property. NOTICE TO PROPERTY OWNER: The sale date shown on this notice of sale may be postponed one or more times by the mortgagee, beneficiary, trustee, or a court, pursuant to Section 2924g of the California Civil Code. The law requires that information about trustee sale postponements be made available to you and to the public, as a courtesy to those not present at the sale. If you wish to learn whether your sale date has been postponed, and, if applicable, the rescheduled time and date for the sale of this property, you may call 800-758-8052 or visit this Internet Web site https://www. xome.com using the file number assigned to this case
22002622-1 CA. Information about postponements that are very short in duration or that occur close in time to the scheduled sale may not immediately be reflected in the telephone information or on the Internet Web site. The best way to verify postponement information is to attend the scheduled sale. NOTICE TO TENANT: You may have a right to purchase this property after the trustee auction pursuant to Section 2924m of the California Civil Code. If you are an “eligible tenant buyer,” you can purchase the property if you match the last and highest bid placed at the trustee auction. If you are an “eligible bidder,” you may be able to purchase the property if you exceed the last and highest bid placed at the trustee auction. There are three steps to exercising this right of purchase. First, 48 hours after the date of the trustee sale, you can call 800-758-8052 or visit this Internet Web site https://www.xome. com using the file number assigned to this case 22002622-1 CA to find the date on which the trustee’s sale was held, the amount of the last and highest bid, and the address of the trustee. Second, you must send a written notice of intent to place a bid so that the trustee receives it no more than 15 days after the trustee’s sale. Third, you must submit a bid so that the trustee receives it no more than 45 days after the trustee’s sale. If you think you may qualify as an “eligible tenant buyer” or “eligible bidder,” you should consider contacting an attorney or appropriate real estate professional immediately for advice regarding this potential right to purchase. Dated: 04/30/2024 ZBS Law, LLP, as Trustee 30 Corporate Park, Suite 450 , Irvine, CA 92606For NonAutomated Sale Information, call: (714) 848-7920For Sale Information: 800-7588052 or https://www.xome.com Michael Busby, Trustee Sale Officer This office is enforcing a security interest of your creditor. To the extent that your obligation has been discharged by a bankruptcy court or is subject to an automatic stay of a bankruptcy, this notice is for informational purposes only and does not constitute a demand for payment or any attempt to collect such obligation. EPP 40074 Pub Dates 05/06, 05/13, 05/20/2024 ONTRIO NEWS PRESS
FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT
File No. FBN20240002976
The following persons are doing business as: Fernandez Hauling, 851 W Flora St, Ontario, CA 91762. Mailing Address, 851 W Flora St, Ontario, CA 91762. Jesse Fernandez, 851 W Flora St, Ontario, CA 91762. County of Principal Place of Business: San Bernardino This business is conducted by: a individual. Registrant has not yet begun to transact business under the fictitious business name or names listed herein. By signing below, I declare that I have read and understand the reverse side of this form and that all information in this statement is true and correct.
A registrant who declares as true any material matter pursuant to Section 17913 of the Business and Professions Code that the registrant knows to be false is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not to exceed one thousand dollars ($1,000). I am also aware that all information on this statement becomes Public Record upon filing pursuant to the California Public Records Act (Government Code Sections 6250- 6277). /s/ Jesse Fernandez. This statement was filed with the County Clerk of San Bernardino on March 25, 2024 Notice- In accordance with subdivision (a) of Section 17920. A Fictitious Name Statement generally expires at the end of five years from the date on which it was filed in the office of the County Clerk, except, as provided in subdivision (b) of Section 17920, where it expires 40 days after any change in the facts set forth in the statement pursuant to Section 17913 other than a change in the residence address of a registered owner. A new Fictitious Business Name Statement must be filed before the expiration. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use in this state of a fictitious business name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see Section 14411 et seq., Business and Professions Code) File#: FBN20240002976 Pub: 04/15/2024, 04/22/2024, 04/29/2024, 05/06/2024 San Bernardino Press
FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT File No. FBN20240003190
The following persons are doing business as: METRO-LOK, 1339 Brooks St, Ontario, CA 91762. Mailing Address, 1339 Brooks St, ontario, CA 91762. ANOLDA ENTERPRISES, LLC (CA, 27365 Bottlebrush Way, murrieta, CA 92562; WILLIAM FUENTES, PRESIDENT. County of Principal Place of Business: San Bernardino This business is conducted by: a limited liability company (llc). Registrant commenced to transact business under the fictitious business name or names listed herein on January 1, 2024. By signing below, I declare that I have read and understand the reverse side of this form and that all information in this statement is true and correct. A registrant who declares as true any material matter pursuant to Section 17913 of the Business and Professions Code that the registrant knows to be false is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not to exceed one thou-
sand dollars ($1,000). I am also aware that all information on this statement becomes Public Record upon filing pursuant to the California Public Records Act (Government Code Sections 6250- 6277). /s/ WILLIAM FUENTES, PRESIDENT. This statement was filed with the County Clerk of San Bernardino on March 29, 2024 Notice- In accordance with subdivision (a) of Section 17920. A Fictitious Name Statement generally expires at the end of five years from the date on which it was filed in the office of the County Clerk, except, as provided in subdivision (b) of Section 17920, where it expires 40 days after any change in the facts set forth in the statement pursuant to Section 17913 other than a change in the residence address of a registered owner. A new Fictitious Business Name Statement must be filed before the expiration. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use in this state of a fictitious business name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see Section 14411 et seq., Business and Professions Code) File#: FBN20240003190 Pub: 04/22/2024, 04/29/2024, 05/06/2024, 05/13/2024 San Bernardino Press
The following person(s) is (are) doing business as N & L TRANSPORT 26366 Baldy Peak Rd Menifee, CA 92586
Riverside County ENRIQUE SAVEDRA, 26366 Baldy Peak Dr, Menifee, CA 92586
Riverside County
This business is conducted by: a individual. Registrant has not yet begun to transact business under the fictitious business name or names listed herein. I declare that all the information in this statement is true and correct. (A registrant who declares as true any material matter pursuant to Section 17913 of the Business and Professions Code, that the registrant knows to be false, is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not to exceed one thousands dollars ($1000).)
s. ENRIQUE SAVEDRA
Statement filed with the County of Riverside on April 17, 2024
NOTICE: In accordance with subdivision (a) of section 17920, a fictitious name statement generally expires at the end of the five years from the date on which it was filed in the office of the county clerk, except, as provided in subdivision (b) of section 17920, where it expires 40 days after any changes in the facts set forth in the statement pursuant to section 17913 other than a change in the residence address of a registered owner. A new Fictitious Business Name Statement must be filed before the expiration. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use this state of a fictitious business name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see Section 14411 Et Seq., business and professions code). I hereby certify that this copy is a correct copy of the original statement on file in my office. Peter Aldana, County, Clerk File# R-202405097
Pub. 04/22/2024, 04/29/2024, 05/06/2024, 05/13/2024
Riverside Independent
The following person(s) is (are) doing business as Goldleaf Scientific 3300 Harrison St suite 2 Riverside, CA 92503
Riverside County Lab Locus LLC (CA, 30042 Mission Blvd Ste 121-244, Hayward, CA 94544
Riverside County
This business is conducted by: a limited liability company (llc). Registrant has not yet begun to transact business under the fictitious business name or names listed herein. I declare that all the information in this statement is true and correct. (A registrant who declares as true any material matter pursuant to Section 17913 of the Business and Professions Code, that the registrant knows to be false, is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not to exceed one thousands dollars ($1000).)
s. Ryan Henry, Manager
Statement filed with the County of Riverside on April 17, 2024
NOTICE: In accordance with subdivision (a) of section 17920, a fictitious name statement generally expires at the end of the five years from the date on which it was filed in the office of the county clerk, except, as provided in subdivision (b) of section 17920, where it expires 40 days after any changes in the facts set forth in the statement pursuant to section 17913 other than a change in the residence address of a registered owner. A new Fictitious Business Name Statement must be filed before the expiration. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use this state of a fictitious business name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see Section 14411 Et Seq., business and professions code). I hereby certify that this copy is a correct copy of the original statement on file in my office.
Peter Aldana, County, Clerk File# R-202405113 Pub. 04/22/2024, 04/29/2024, 05/06/2024, 05/13/2024 Riverside Independent FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT File No. 20240003581
The following persons are doing business as: APEX INTERNATIONAL CULTURE AND ART EXPO, 5388 Arrow Hwy, Montclair, CA 91763. Mailing Address, 5388 Arrow Hwy, Montclair, CA 91763. Carissa and Harry Foundation (CA, 5388 Arrow Hwy, Montclair, CA 91763; Sam Ip, President. County of Principal Place of Business: San Bernardino This business is conducted by: a corporation. Registrant has not yet begun to transact business under the fictitious business name or names listed herein. By signing below, I declare that I have read and understand the reverse side of this form and that all information in this statement is true and correct. A registrant who declares as true any material matter pursuant to Section 17913 of the Business and Professions Code that
the registrant knows to be false is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not to exceed one thousand dollars ($1,000). I am also aware that all information on this statement becomes Public Record upon filing pursuant to the California Public Records Act (Government Code Sections 6250- 6277). /s/ Sam Ip, President. This statement was filed with the County Clerk of San Bernardino on April 12, 2024 Notice- In accordance with subdivision (a) of Section 17920. A Fictitious Name Statement generally expires at the end of five years from the date on which it was filed in the office of the County Clerk, except, as provided in subdivision (b) of Section 17920, where it expires 40 days after any change in the facts set forth in the statement pursuant to Section 17913 other than a change in the residence address of a registered owner. A new Fictitious Business Name Statement must be filed before the expiration. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use in this state of a fictitious business name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see Section 14411 et seq., Business and Professions Code) File#: 20240003581 Pub: 04/22/2024, 04/29/2024, 05/06/2024, 05/13/2024 San Bernardino Press
The following person(s) is (are) doing business as Big Voice Pictures 560 Desert Way Palm Springs, CA 92264 Mailing Address, PO Box 931, Palm Springs, CA 92263. Riverside County Kathleen Barbini, 560 Desert Way, Palm Springs, CA 92264 Riverside County This business is conducted by: a individual. Registrant has not yet begun to transact business under the fictitious business name or names listed herein. I declare that all the information in this statement is true and correct. (A registrant who declares as true any material matter pursuant to Section 17913 of the Business and Professions Code, that the registrant knows to be false, is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not to exceed one thousands dollars ($1000).) s. Kathleen Barbini Statement filed with the County of Riverside on April 11, 2024 NOTICE: In accordance with subdivision (a) of section 17920, a fictitious name statement generally expires at the end of the five years from the date on which it was filed in the office of the county clerk, except, as provided in subdivision (b) of section 17920, where it expires 40 days after any changes in the facts set forth in the statement pursuant to section 17913 other than a change in the residence address of a registered owner. A new Fictitious Business Name Statement must be filed before the expiration. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use this state of a fictitious business name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see Section 14411 Et Seq., business and
professions code). I hereby certify that this copy is a correct copy of the original statement on file in my office. Peter Aldana, County, Clerk File# R-202404844 Pub. 04/22/2024, 04/29/2024, 05/06/2024, 05/13/2024 Riverside Independent
FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT 20246685489.
a change in the residence address of a registered owner. A
Fictitious Business Name Statement must be filed before the expiration. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the
in vio
of a
lation of the
of
or common law (see Section 14411 Et Seq., business and professions code). I hereby certify that this copy is a correct copy of the original statement on file in my office. Peter Aldana, County, Clerk File# R-202405564 Pub. 05/06/2024, 05/13/2024,
Opening statements are slated for Monday in the trial of an Indio man and his girlfriend accused in the slaying of an 18-year-old woman who was a witness to his alleged attack on her boyfriend.
Alexis Daniel Rosas, 28, and Maury Duarte, 32, are charged with first- degree murder and special circumstance allegations of killing a witness to a crime and lying in wait for the 2019 death of Makayla Jean Massey, also known as Anita Garcia, of Victorville.
Rosas is additionally charged with attempted murder and sentenceenhancing gun and great bodily injury allegations, while Duarte alone is charged with being an accessory after the fact.
The defendants have separate juries, which were impaneled following a selec-
tion process that spanned weeks, with screening for Duarte’s jury finally wrapping up Tuesday.
She’s being held in lieu of $1 million bail at the Smith Correctional Facility in Banning, and Rosas is being held without bail at the Byrd Detention Center in Murrieta.
Riverside County Superior Court Judge Jennifer Gerard scheduled opening arguments for Monday morning at the Larson Justice Center in Indio.
According to a trial brief filed by the District Attorney’s Office, Massey’s boyfriend, identified only as “Abram,” had been at odds with Rosas, a documented member of Indio’s Jackson Terrace street gang, bearing the moniker “Trigger,” for some time, and the conflict had resulted in the defendant allegedly harassing and attacking the victim on multiple occasions,
including beating him to the ground in a park.
On June 24, 2019, the feud led to Rosas allegedly going to the abandoned house in the 45-400 block of Oasis Street where Abram and Massey were residing and shooting him in the chest -- an act which the victim witnessed and related to Indio police immediately afterward, the
Abram was hospitalized but ultimately recovered from the non-life- threatening wound.
After the shooting, Massey checked into a Motel 6 in Indio, possibly in an attempt to hide, but Rosas learned of her whereabouts and that she had made contact with police, allegedly prompting him to
plan her murder, according to prosecutors.
He enlisted Duarte’s assistance, and they relied on her 2005 Toyota Camry for transportation. In the predawn hours of June 25, 2019, Rosas went to her motel room and persuaded her to come out, then physically restrained her inside the Toyota, which Duarte drove in the direction of a recently vacated ranch property in the 82-600 block of Avenue 53 in Thermal, court papers alleged.
Once at the location, Rosas shoved the petrified victim out of the car and ordered to start walking toward a gate.
An earthquake centered roughly five miles southwest of Corona on Wednesday rattled the Inland Empire, but there were no reports of damage.
According to the U.S. Geological Survey, the 4.1-magnitude temblor occurred at 1:49 p.m. at a subterranean depth of nearly a mile. The quake was originally reported as a 4.5 magnitude, then reduced to a 4.3 and ultimately to a 4.1.
The quake was felt in Riverside and began with a jolt, followed by moderate shaking that lasted about five seconds. It was felt as far away as West Los Angeles and the Long Beach area, too.
“The city of Corona immediately responded to the seismic event by surveying the affected area to ensure the safety and well-being of our residents and infrastructure,” Corona Fire Department
spokesman Daniel Yonan said.
“We are pleased to report that there has been no reported damage within the city at this time. However, our teams will continue to diligently evaluate and assess the situation to ensure ongoing safety.”
Yonan said the event is a “reminder to our community that earthquakes can occur unexpectedly and anywhere,” and he encour-
aged residents to be prepared by having “emergency kits” on hand in case of utility outages, as well as going through “drop, cover and hold on” drills to be ready for a major seismic occurrence.
Several smaller quakes happened in the same area on Tuesday, including a pair of 2.8-magnitude quakes between roughly 7:30 and 7:40 p.m., and a magnitude 2.5 shaker that struck at about 2 p.m.
“Having all of these essential services housed under one roof at our new Resilience Center is a huge step in the right direction,” Coachella Mayor Steven Hernandez said in a statement.
Several partners have already pledged to assist the city with the new multipurpose center, including GRID Alternatives Inland Empire, Hidden Harvest, The LEAP Institute, University of California, Berkeley, and the County of Riverside Emergency Management Department, the spokesperson said.
The new facility will also implement some environmentally friendly components in its design and operations, from solar panels and solar generators to zero-emission rideshare transportation and other nature-based solutions, according to the press release.
In addition to accelerating progress toward municipal climate-related goals, these features are intended to “expand economic opportunities, and reduce health, environmental, and social inequities,” per the spokesperson. In doing so, current design plans emphasize “flexibility, sustainability and accessibility ... to accommodate all individuals’ needs, including the community’s priority populations.”
City officials promised to provide additional details and time frames with next week’s press conference at the future CRC site and continued social media updates.
“The $30 million we secured over the past few months, coupled with an additional $20 million we are pursuing are all earmarked for the continued expansion of accessible resources for our residents that will continue helping enhance their quality of life,” Hernandez said.
the International Committee of the Red Cross, the humanitarian crisis caused by the bombardments on the Strip’s infrastructure has resulted in almost 500,000 “displaced persons” requiring shelter and other assistance.
The Committee to Protect Journalists said Wednesday that of the 97 reporters killed in hostilities since early October, 92 have been Palestinian. Others have been assaulted, injured and arrested. The CPJ said the current “war ... has led to the deadliest period for journalists since we began gathering data in 1992.”
Aid workers have also been killed. The United
He left the victim where she was slain and got back into the Toyota with Duarte, and the pair headed back toward Indio, dumping the .380-caliber semiautomatic pistol that he’d allegedly killed the victim with on a roadside along the way, according to the prosecution.
Massey’s remains were discovered within a couple of days, leading to a sheriff’s investigation that pointed to Rosas as the alleged murderer, according to court documents.
Both defendants were arrested without incident on Avenue 42 in Indio on June 30, 2019.
Court papers allege that both Rosas and Duarte conspired in retail fraud, but neither has documented prior felony convictions in Riverside County.
“The defendant kicked her in the stomach, causing her to fall to the ground,” the brief said. “Rosas then shot Makayla five times. One shot was to her head. He knew he had killed her after the second shot, but he continued to shoot bullets into her body.”
Aweekslong anti-crime crackdown along a west Riverside corridor netted more than 100 arrests, authorities said Thursday.
Operation“Street Sweeper” focused on suspected drug offenders known to walk a four-mile stretch of Magnolia Avenue, between Van Buren Boulevard to the east and Pierce Street to the west, according to the Riverside Police Department.
The crackdown began in early April and concluded late in the month, during which undercover officers engaged in purchases of “methamphetamine, fentanyl, cocaine, PCP and Psilocybin mushrooms,” police spokesman Officer Ryan Railsback said.
“At the conclusion of this undercover program, the Narcotics Unit coordinated a three-day arrest operation to locate the 44 suspects who were caught selling illegal drugs,” Railsback said. “Of the 44 drug dealers identified, 33
were arrested and booked into the Robert Presley Detention Center for narcotics sales violations.”
He said assistance from the department’s Post-Release Accountability & Compliance Team, the Riverside County Probation Department, the police Metro Unit and others resulted in “71 other suspects (who) were also arrested and booked into jail.”
Their offenses included probation and parole violations, misdemeanor warrants tied to thefts and being under the influence of controlled substances, as well as other alleged crimes, according to Railsback.
“During one of the probation searches conducted at a motel room, a woman was found to be wanted on a 2022 felony drunk driving case, where she struck a vehicle containing two adult women and a 4-year-old boy, all of whom sustained serious injuries from the crash,” he
said. “Also inside her room was a man with an outstanding felony warrant for burglary, and officers discovered several thousand dollars’ worth of stolen merchandise in his possession during their search.”
Their identities were not disclosed.
Railsback said nearly all of the arrestees “claimed to be homeless and living on the streets, or in motels along Magnolia Avenue.”
“Medical aid and police calls for service along the Magnolia corridor immediately and significantly decreased as a result (of the operation),” the police spokesman said.
“The Riverside Police Department will continue its directed enforcement and efforts to investigate those engaged in the trafficking and sale of illicit drugs within our neighborhoods, amongst other crimes affecting the safety of community members,” he said.
state,” said Supervisor Kevin Jeffries, whose First District encompasses the future campus. “By centralizing and enhancing access to health care, such as pediatric behavioral health services, we’re ensuring that families no longer need to travel out of county for essential care.”
Services set to be provided at the campus include general medical care, dental care, substance abuse therapy, pharmaceuticals, and possibly job training and educational programs later on, according to officials.
“This project is unlike anything else that’s been done,” RUHS Behavioral Health Director Dr. Matthew Chang said. “It will be a place where individuals of all ages can access a range of services in an environment designed to foster healing, community interaction and overall well-being. In terms of behavioral health treatment approaches, we are breaking new ground.”
San Bernardino County will receive funding to start work on an extension of the Santa Ana River Trail in Redlands, county supervisors and the Regional Parks department announced Thursday.
Phase IV-A of the trail lengthening effort will add 3.9 miles of paved roadway between California Street and Orange Street.
Officials hope this section of the trail will give a safer commute for pedestrians and cyclists from Redlands through Riverside County and on to the trail’s end in Huntington Beach.
When Phase IV’s sections A, B and C are finished, the trail will total 110 miles.
The county Board of Supervisors secured funding for Phase IV-A when they approved a $6.8 million grant agreement April 23 with the California State Coastal Conservancy to cover the cost of the project’s planning, design and construction.
“This is great news for the people of Redlands and everyone looking forward to a mountains-to-thesea walking and cycling trail,” Board of Supervisors Chairman and 3rd District Supervisor Dawn Rowe said in a statement. “Signing this grant agreement supports the development of a balanced
and sustainable county for our communities, and signals progress in providing a safe means of travel and recreation that promotes health and well-being.”
Regional Parks Director Beahta Davis said, “This aligns with the commitment the Board of Supervisors made when they adopted the Countywide Vision, promoting a healthy and active community.”
Two sections of the Santa Ana River Trail have been completed and are currently open to the public.
Phase I opened in April 2007. It extended the trail from La Cadena Avenue in Colton to the Riverside-
San Bernardino County line, where it connects with Riverside County’s existing trail section, according to the county. Phase II was completed in April 2005, extending the trail from La Cadena Avenue in Colton to Waterman Avenue in San Bernardino. Phase III is in Redlands between Waterman Avenue in San Bernardino and California Street. Construction started in September 2023 and officials estimate completion by the end of this year.
More information about the Santa Ana River Trial is available at https://parks. sbcounty.gov/park/santa-anariver-trail-pkwy/.
The whereabouts of a 71-year-old man in compromised health who went missing from his west Riverside boardand-care facility remained unknown Wednesday.
Sammy Flores was last seen at about 6:30 p.m. April 29 in the 5000 block of La Sierra Avenue, near Pierce Street, according to the Riverside Police Department.
“He still hasn’t returned to his care facility,” Riverside police spokesman Officer Ryan Railsback told City News Service on Wednesday.
Police said Flores wandered away from his care home without telling anyone where he was going or why.
“He suffers from conditions that require frequent medications and is prone to fainting or losing consciousness,” according to an agency statement. “He is known to hang around the area near La
Sierra and Pierce, near businesses, but has also taken the (Riverside Transit Agency) bus to the Galleria at Tyler Mall.”
Patrol officers have searched the area without success.
Flores stands 5 feet, 11 inches and weighs 150 pounds. He has brown eyes
and black-and-gray hair and was last seen wearing a blue long-sleeved Polo shirt, blue jeans and black shoes. Anyone with information was asked to contact the police department at 951-354-2007. Additional photos of Fore3s are online at https:// tinyurl.com/3zeda5b2.