El Monte Examiner_12/05/2022

LA County COVID cases surging; indoor mask requirement looms again

BY CITY NEWS SERVICE

COVID-19 infections continue surging in Los Angeles County, with the rising rates of new cases and hospital admis sions again pushing the county into the “medium” COVID activity level, the public health director said Thursday, adding that another indoor masking mandate could be imposed soon.

County Public Health Director Barbara Ferrer said the county is now averag ing more than 2,700 new COVID infections per day, a 180% increase since Nov. 1. Daily virus-related hospital admissions are at 192 per day, a 200% jump since Nov. 1.

“There is this common line of thinking that the pandemic is over and COVID is no longer of concern, but these numbers clearly demonstrate that COVID is still with us,” Ferrer said.

“Given both the increases in hospitalizations and the lack of certainty in the winter trajectory for COVID-19, continuing some commonsense mitigation strategies that we know work to limit transmission and illness, including masking and being up to date on vaccines and boosters, remains a very sensible approach.”

Los Angeles County’s weekly rate of new cases rose to 185 per 100,000 resi dents, which was enough to push the county from the “low” virus activity level to the “medium” community level, as defined by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The move to “medium” did not prompt any immediate changes to public health mandates, such as indoor masking -- which remains “strongly recommended” by the county.

“However, it does signal

that case rates and hospi talizations are elevated, and we could be in the `high’ community level as soon as

back to the brink of another universal indoor maskwearing mandate, although it would not be immediate.

already exceeds that thresh old, at 11.9 new admissions per 100,000 residents. The percentage of inpatient beds

reported to the county, and due to the number of people who are likely sick but don’t get tested at all.

cumulative death toll to 34,199. Officials have said the majority of COVIDrelated fatalities occur in the elderly and those with preexisting health conditions.

As of Thursday, there were 1,164 COVID-positive patients in county hospitals, up from 1,132 on Wednesday. Of those patients, 121 were being treated in intensive care unites, down slightly from 122 on Wednesday.

Health officials have said previously that roughly 40% of virus patients were actually admitted to hospi tals for COVID-related issues, while the rest were admitted for other reasons but tested positive at the hospital.

The seven-day daily average rate of people testing positive for the virus was 13.4% as of Thursday, up from a revised 12% a week ago.

While indoor mask wearing is only “strongly recommended” in the county, masks are still required indoors at healthcare and congregate-care facilities, for anyone exposed to the virus in the past 10 days, and at locations where they are required by the operator.

next week,” she said.

The county would move into the “high” level if the weekly case rate reaches 200 per 100,000 residents. At the current rate of increases, the county will almost assur edly reach that level by next week, Ferrer noted.

Moving to the “high” level will push the county

Ferrer said the mandate would be issued if two hospital metrics reach CDC thresholds — a daily average admission rate of more than 10 per 100,000 residents and a greater than 10% rate of staffed inpatient beds being occupied by COVID patients.

As of Thursday, the hospital admission rate

occupied by COVID patients in the county was 5.6% as of Thursday — still well below the 10% threshold.

Ferrer again noted that the actual number of COVID infections in the community is likely much higher than the official numbers reflect — thanks to the prevalent use of at-home tests that aren’t

On Thursday, the county reported 4,493 new cases of COVID-19, raising the cumulative total from throughout the pandemic to 3,547,200.

The Department of Public Health also reported 14 additional deaths asso ciated with COVID-19 on Thursday, bringing the

Health officials have been warning about a possible surge not only of COVID-19 during the winter months, but also of flu and respiratory syncytial virus, or RSV. Authorities have repeatedly urged residents to ensure they are up to date on COVID-19 vaccines and boosters and to get a flu shot.

A fully vaccinated person can still contract and transmit COVID, but health officials say the vaccines offer protection against developing severe symptoms that can result in hospital ization and even death.

Judge: Arbitration of former NARAS exec’s discrimination suit

Walk of Fame star for actor Billy Porter unveiled

MONDAY, DECEMBER 05-DECEMBER 11, 2022

Young woman putting on face mask. | Photo courtesy of Nenad Stojkovic (CC BY 2.0)

VISIT

American exceptionalism at the World Cup: Why many soccer fans in the US will be cheering on another team (probably Mexico)

BY JOHN M. SLOOP FOR THE CONVERSATION, STACKER

Soccer fans have their eyes turned to Qatar as the World Cup gets underway. But in the U.S., the question of which team will be cheered on from afar isn’t entirely straightfor ward.

You see, one of the anomalies of being a “typical” soccer fan in the United States is that, you are not, in fact, a “typical” soccer fan.

For many teams’ support ers, the World Cup becomes an event to affirm one’s national identity. This is true, as cultural critic Laurent Dubois notes, even among fans who are not jingoistic or nationalistic in any other environment.

Indeed, the nationalist fervor that emerges among crowds can boil over into xenophobic inter-national violence. As renowned soccer historian David Goldblatt noted in reference to English soccer crowds in the late 20th century, their “essential xenophobia” revealed a “rabid insular nationalism that was just a few notches more extreme than the foreign policy of the most Europhobic government since the Second World War.”

For Americans, though, the experience can be very different. Factors ranging from the relatively low popu larity of soccer compared with other sports, familiarity with overseas clubs, and perhaps more importantly (especially to Americans of Mexican heritage) an attachment to countries deemed to be more traditional “soccer nations” mean that we Americans can find ourselves oddly divided over the nation we support in the global game.

Where is Uncle Sam in the global game?

Soccer has come a long way in the U.S. over the last few decades in terms of its domestic league and growing support base.

Yet, outside of our national teams—the U.S. Women’s National Soccer Team and its male counterparts, the USMNT—Americans are more likely to be familiar with teams in Europe than in their own domestic league, Major League Soccer.

Indeed, 2020 research into the most popular clubs for Americans found that FC Barcelona topped the list, followed by Real Madrid, both from the Spanish La Liga. The next four teams—Manchester United, Liverpool, Chelsea, and Arsenal—all play in the English Premier League.

You have to go down the list to 12th to find an MLS team, LA Galaxy. They and Atlanta United are the only two American clubs in a list of the top 20 most popular teams, as seen by Americans.

What this means is that soccer fans in the U.S. are, in the case of the men’s game, likely following players whose national identities are some where on the globe outside the U.S., given the relative lack of U.S. men’s representation on Europe’s biggest teams.

The growth of Mexico’s Liga MX

This whole “national identity thing” gets even messier when you dig deeper into what soccer games are actually the most watched in the U.S.

The MLS and European leagues have loyal followers in the U.S. Reviewing Thanksgiv ing sports-watching in 2020, reporter Connor Fleming noted that the 12 most popular EPL and MLS games during the period had televi sion audiences of 203,000744,000 viewers.

But those figures are dwarfed, Fleming noted, by the biggest overseas soccer match watched over the period: Chivas v. Club América.

Mexico’s El Súper Clásico, as the game is known, drew a total of 2.5 million viewers watching on Univision’s TUDN, the self-proclaimed “home of soccer in the U.S.”

And this wasn’t a fluke.

Data shows that Mexico’s top league, Liga MX, has a total U.S. viewership in the U.S. bigger than the MLS and the EPL combined. From 2016-2018, it grew by 46%, according to a December 2021 analysis.

What does it mean for American soccer identity at the World Cup that a majority of U.S. soccer fans prefer the Mexican league over the domestic league? And how does this translate into support, in particular, for the U.S. men’s national team?

The unparalleled success of the U.S. women’s team—

American exceptionalism of a different sort—has led to soaring television ratings for the National Women’s Soccer League and a greater focus on the women’s national team and “American” players.

Yet it is fair to say that hardcore support for both the U.S. men’s and women’s national teams among people living in America trails behind that of Mexico.

As sports writer Michael LoRé’s observed in an article earlier this year, with 60 million fans in the U.S., Mexico is “the most popular soccer team in the U.S.”

Jerseys of the Mexican national team outsell those of both the U.S. men’s and women’s teams in the United States. This was true even in 2019, when the U.S. women’s team won the World Cup and their jerseys outsold that of the men’s team for the first time.

Such is the popularity of the Mexican national team, especially in large West Coast cities, that it can play in front of a “home crowd” on foreign territory: perhaps the only national team that can claim to do so.

Games against the U.S. are now scheduled in the Midwest and South—in places includ ing Cincinnati and Columbus, Ohio, and Nashville, Tennes see—to account for the imbal ance in home support for the teams above and below the border.

Can you have an ‘other’ team?

Not all U.S.-based soccer fans are comfortable with the idea of Mexico being consid ered a “home nation.” In 2018, after the U.S. men’s team failed to qualify for the World Cup held in Russia, former U.S. national team star Landon Donovan took part in the “My Other Team is Mexico” campaign, aimed at marketing the sport in the U.S. despite the national team’s absence.

“USA fans,” Donovan wrote on Twitter, “our team may not be in Russia, but our neighbors to the south are.

So join me and their proud #sponsor @WellsFargo to cheer on our other team, Mexico.”

The response was mixed. “Nah man!!! Mexico is not ‘my team.’ Mexico is a rival …,” replied Donovan’s former teammate Cobi Jones. Others expressed similar sentiments in what dissolved into a messy online debat

Donovan’s support of the Mexican team in the 2018 World Cup was seen by some as a cynical marketing move to keep U.S. fans tuned into the World Cup. And it should be noted that the Mexican and U.S. soccer federations were at the time marketed by the same organization —Soccer

United Marketing—for all games played in the U.S.

Nonetheless, the debate that the “other team” campaign provoked opens up interesting questions concerning nationalism and patriotism.

A nation of two halves?

Multiple soccer scholars including Simon Kuper and Lauren Dubois have suggested that a country’s soccer team can represent the nation’s values. As such, it might be telling that a large segment of people living in the U.S. embrace another team.

Given the complexity of the U.S. soccer fan base – one with a large contingent loyal to either the Mexican team

or elite players at European teams – and with the compe tition for attention from other professional sports, it’s perhaps not surprising that supporter loyalty in U.S. is more divided than in other countries.

In a country that holds dear the notion that “Out of Many, We are One,” what does it say that, in soccer at least, “Out of Many, We are Two.”

This story originally appeared on The Conversation and has been independently reviewed to meet journalistic standards.

This article has been re-published pursuant to a CC BY-NC 4.0 License.

With

Rose

Bowl aboard, college football moves to 12-team playoff format

BY CITY NEWS SERVICE

With Rose Bowl officials now on board, the College Football Playoff Board of Managers Thursday formally announced a switch to a 12team playoff system that could change the timing of what has traditionally been a New Year’s Day game in Pasadena.

“We’re delighted to be moving forward,” Bill Hancock, executive director of the College Football Playoff, said in a statement Thursday. “When the board expanded the playoff beginning in 2026 and asked the CFP Manage ment Committee to examine the feasibility of starting the new format earlier, the Management Committee went right to work. More teams and more access mean more excitement for fans, alumni, students and studentathletes.

“We appreciate the leaders of the six bowl games and the two future national champi

onship game host cities for their cooperation. Everyone realized that this change is in the best interest of college football and pulled together to make it happen.”

The 12-team format will begin in 2024, with the first two national championship games under the system set for Jan. 20, 2025, in Atlanta and Jan. 19, 2026, in Miami.

Under the system, first-round games of the 12-team playoff will be held at the home field of the higher-seeded team — or at a stadium chosen by the higher-seeded team. In 2024, the quarterfinal games will be played at the Fiesta Bowl, Peach Bowl, Rose Bowl and Sugar Bowl, while the Cotton Bowl and Orange Bowl will host the semifinal games. In 2025, the quarterfinals will take place at the Cotton Bowl, Orange Bowl, Rose Bowl and Sugar Bowl, while the Fiesta Bowl and Peach Bowl will host the semifinal

games.

Specific dates for the games have not yet been determined.

According to ESPN, the Rose Bowl had been the last holdout in negotiations to move to the 12-team system. The network reported that Rose Bowl officials were trying to include a special clause in the venue’s contract that would ensure an exclusive television window for a New Year’s Day game in years when Pasadena was not set to play host to a playoff game.

CFP officials wouldn’t relent, and gave the Rose Bowl an ultimatum this week to either sign onto the system or be excluded from the new playoff television contract, ESPN reported. Rose Bowl officials eventually relented and agreed to the new system, according to the network.

There’s been no official comment from the Rose Bowl.

Entrance to Rose Bowl Stadium. | Photo courtesy of Terry Miller / Hey SoCal

Courtesy of Dorian Hurst

Editorial editorial@beaconmedianews.com editor@hlrmedia.com

Graphics/Production production@beaconmedianews.com production@hlrmedia.com

Advertising advertising@beaconmedianews.com advertising@hlrmedia.com

Legal Advertising legals@beaconmedianews.com legals@hlrmedia.com

Business accounting@beaconmedianews.com accounting@hlrmedia.com

BEACON MEDIA ADDRESS: 125 E. Chestnut Ave., Monrovia, CA 91016

PHONE: (626) 301-1010 WEBSITE www.beaconmedianews.com

HLR MEDIA ADDRESS: 121 E. Chestnut Ave. Monrovia, CA 91016 PHONE: (626) 386-3457 www.HLRmedia.com

PRESS RELEASE SUBMISSIONS

editor@beaconmedianews.com editor@hlrmedia.com

GabrielSan Sun

Riverside County Department of Waste Resources seeks volunteers to run recycling programs

BY CITY NEWS SERVICE

The Arcadia Weeklyhas been adjudicated as a newspaper of general circulation in court case number GS 004333 for the City of Arcadia, County of Los Angeles, State of California.

The Monrovia Weeklyhas been adjudicated as a newspaper of General Circulation in Court Case GS 004759 City of Monrovia, County of Los Angeles, State of California.

The Temple City Tribunehas been adjudicated as a newspaper of general circulation in court case number GS 012440 City of Temple City, County of Los Angeles, State of California.

The El Monte Examinerhas been adjudicated as a newspaper of general circulation in court case number KS 015872 City of El Monte, County of Los Angeles, State of California.

The Azusa Beaconhas been adjudicated as a newspaper of general circulation in court case number KS 015970 City of Azusa, County of Los Angeles, State of California.

The San Gabriel Sunhas been adjudicated as a newspaper of general circulation in court case number GS 013808 City of San Gabriel, County of Los Angeles, State of California.

The Duarte Dispatchhas been adjudicated as a newspaper of general circulation in court case number GS 013893 City of Duarte, County of Los Angeles, State of California.

The Rosemead Readerhas been adjudicated as a newspaper of general circulation in court case number GS 048894 City of Rosemead, County of Los Angeles, State of California.

The Alhambra Press has been adjudicated as a newspaper of general circulation in court case number ES016581 City of Alhambra, County of Los Angeles, State of California.

The Baldwin Park Press has been adjudicated as a newspaper of general circulation in court case number KS017174 City of Baldwin Park, County of Los Angeles, State of California.

The Burbank Independent has been adjudicated as a newspaper of general circulation in court case number ES016728 City of Burbank, County of Los Angeles, State of California.

The Glendale Independent has been adjudicated as a newspaper of general circulation in court case number ES016579 City of Glendale, County of Los Angeles, State of California.

The Monterey Park Press has been adjudicated as a newspaper of general circulation in court case number ES016580 City of Monterey Park, County of Los Angeles, State of California.

The West Covina Press has been adjudicated as a newspaper of general circulation in court case number KS017304 City of West Covina, County of Los Angeles, State of California.

The San Bernardino Press has been adjudicated as a newspaper of general circulation in court case number CIVDS 1506881 City of San Bernardino, County of San Bernardino, State of California.

The Riverside Independent has been adjudicated as a newspaper of general circulation in court case number RIC1505351 City of Riverside, County of Riverside, State of California.

The Pasadena Press has been adjudicated as a newspaper of general circulation in court case number ES018815 City of Pasadena, County of Los Angeles, State of California.

The Belmont Beacon has been adjudicated as a newspaper of general circulation in court case number NSO30275 City of Long Beach, County of Los Angeles, State of California.

The Anaheim Press has been adjudicated as a newspaper of general circulation in court case number 30-2017-00942735-CU-PT-CJC City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California.

The Ontario News Press has been adjudicated as a newspaper of general circulation in court case number CIVDS 1506881 City of Ontario, County of San Bernardino, State of California.

The Corona News Press has been adjudicated as a newspaper of general circulation in court case number RIC1723524 City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California.

A

zusa B eacon Rosemead Reader

D

ispatch

Riverside County resi dents who want to make a hands-on difference promoting and demonstrating the benefits of recycling can sign up now to volunteer for the Depart ment of Waste Resources’ composting and recycling programs in 2023.

“Outreach volun teers assist with classes or events by interacting

with the public, answer ing questions on outreach programs and distribut ing materials,” according to an agency statement. “The ideal volunteer enjoys meeting people, likes to learn new things and is passionate about the envi ronment.”

Volunteer opportunities include participation in classes countywide that can

ultimately lead to certifica tion and hosting seminars in schools and community gardens, officials said.

“Outreach volunteers can choose to attend extra training and volunteer more hours to become ... a master composter,” the DWR said. “Outreach volunteers are integral to the success of recycling and composting programs

and are recognized by the county annually for their dedication and hours worked.”

Volunteers can choose the dates and times that are best for them to help the agency with events.

For information on how to register, residents were asked to visit http://www. rcwaste.org/volunteer or call 951-486-3200.

Orange County board extends RSV, flu emergency at CHOC

BY CITY NEWS SERVICE

Pasadena Press

Belmont Beacon

The Orange County Board of Supervi sors Tuesday voted to extend its emergency decla ration to help the Children’s Hospital of Orange County cope with an ongoing wave of patients afflicted with upper respiratory viruses.

The emergency declara tion has been key in helping the hospital obtain Tamiflu, albuterol and other medica tions that have been in short supply nationally, Dr. Regina Chinsio-Kwong, the county’s

chief medical officer, told the board.

CHOC’s chief medical officer, Dr. Sandip Godambe, said the hospital is so jammed it is setting up beds wherever it has space such as a discharge lounge, an oncology playroom gym and surgical playrooms. The emergency room lobby has been extended into the hospital’s driveway, he added.

The hospital is seeing more than 150 children a day in the first-floor lobby. The average number of visits in

the emergency room during this wave is 410 with a high of 489, double the usual, Godambe said.

Without the emergency declaration, the hospital would not be able to get the medications it needs, but also important supplies such as syringes and gurneys.

The wave of RSV and flu patients is up 25% in an “already record-breaking year,” Godambe said.

January and February are usually the peak months for

the viruses, so it’s unclear if this wave will just continue or worsen through the winter, Godambe said.

Some of the older children are being sent to other area hospitals for adults, ChinsioKwong said.

Supervisor Andrew Do said, “We are treating this in a very limited way” to allow for a waiver on the usual regula tions for using free spaces for beds and to access more medi cations and supplies that are in short supply.

San Bernardino Press

David Wenwei Chou. | Photo courtesy of Orange County Sheriff’s Office

| Photo courtesy of United States Mission Geneva/Flickr (CC BY 2.0)

Richest soccer players in the world

BY PETE CAMARILLO, STACKER

Between a Netflix docu series and a metaverse game in the works, the celebration of the 2022 FIFA World Cup in Qatar is just the latest reminder that soccer is the most popular sport in the world with great players earning top-tier salaries. But who are the wealthiest?

All of the wealthiest soccer players are men. Soccer, like many other sports, has a huge gender pay gap. According to research from Bloom berg Law, women still earn 83 cents for every dollar earned by men. Last February, U.S. Soccer agreed to pay $24 million to the U.S. Women’s National Team players for gender pay disparities.

Wage gaps are just one of many discrimina tory practices women face in soccer. Just a few years ago, internationally renowned soccer team FC Barcelona made headlines when, during an interna tional tour that featured men’s and women’s teams together, men flew in business class while women flew economy.

Using data from Celeb rity Net Worth and other sources such as ESPN, Stacker compiled net worth data as well as life and career insights as of Oct. 28, 2022. Data points include net worth, salary,

age, nationality, and soccer teams where they have played. Some players have a significant net worth that doesn’t come directly from playing soccer. Others moved into managing after their days on the pitch.

#15. Samuel Eto’o

- Net worth: $95 million

- Salary: $26 million

- Nationality: Cameroon

- Date of birth: Mar 10, 1981 (41 years old)

- Teams: Real Madrid (Spain), Leganés (Spain), Espanyol (Spain), Mallorca (Spain), Barcelona (Spain), Inter Milan (Italy), Anzhi Makhachkala (Russia), Chelsea (United Kingdom), Everton (United Kingdom), Sampdoria (Italy), Anta lyaspor (Turkey), Konya spor (Turkey), Qatar SC (Qatar)

Samuel Eto’o retired in 2019 after a career of 22 years, four Championship League titles, and even an Olympic gold medal. While Eto’o has played in fields throughout the world, he has experienced his share of racism, fielding derogatory chanting and racist comments while he was on the pitch. The Cameroonian joined Real Madrid’s academy system when he was 16 and is now considered one of the best strikers of all time.

#14. Raúl González

Blanco (tie)

- Net worth: $100 million

- Salary: not available

- Nationality: Spain

- Date of birth: 1977 (45 years old)

- Teams: Real Madrid (Spain), Schalke 04 (Germany), Al Sadd (Qatar), New York Cosmos (United States)

Raúl González Blanco’s fame is so stratospheric that he’s simply known as Raúl. Football manager Pep Guardiola called him “the most important player in Spanish football history.” He first played profes sionally for Real Madrid in 1994 and now manages Real Madrid Castilla. He retired from soccer in 2015 after playing with the New York Cosmos after 448 goals throughout his career. Once Madrid’s topscorer, Blanco consistently scored 20 or more goals from 1995-96 to 2003-04. Blanco won six La Liga titles and three UEFA Champions League titles.

#14. Philipp Lahm (tie)

- Net worth: $100 million

- Salary: $14 million

- Nationality: Germany

- Date of birth: 1983 (39 years old)

- Teams: Bayern Munich (Germany), VfB Stuttgart (Germany)

Philipp Lahm was a fullback and defensive midfielder for the German national team until 2014 and Bayern Munich until the end of the 2017 season. Lahm was on the World Cup teams in 2006 and 2010 but famously finished his term after a German win in 2014 against Argen tina. USA Today Sports writer Adi Joseph called him “one of the greatest players in German history” who miraculously retired without ever having received a red card, despite being a defender.

#14. Pelé (tie)

- Net worth: $100 million

- Salary: not available

- Nationality: Brazil

- Date of birth: 1940 (82 years old)

- Teams: Santos (Brazil), New York Cosmos (United States)

Perhaps one of the most recognizable names in soccer, Pelé was a Brazil ian soccer player for two decades with three World Cup wins before joining the New York Cosmos. He developed his soccer skills while kicking a rolled-up sock stuffed with rags in the street of Brazil and eventually found tutelage under Waldemar de Brito, a former Brazilian national soccer player. He has scored 1,283 goals across

all tournaments (though the number varies depend ing on who you ask).

He stepped into the limelight in Sweden at the 1958 World Cup with two goals and is credited with inspiring many soccer superstars to play in America after he joined the New York Cosmos in 1975. Pelé received the International Peace Award in 1978 and was named Athlete of the Century by the International Olympic Committee in 1999. A Pelé Museum now exists in Santos, Brazil.

#14. Eden Hazard (tie)

- Net worth: $100 million

- Salary: $15 million

- Nationality: Belgium

- Date of birth: 1991 (31 years old)

- Teams: Lille B (France), Lille (France), Chelsea (United Kingdom), Real Madrid (Spain)

Eden Hazard is a Belgian soccer player who plays for Real Madrid and the Belgian national team. Rumor has it, however, that Hazard is looking to switch back to the Premier League, either with Newcastle or Aston Villa. Hazard has won the Premier League twice, the Champions League once, and many individual honors. The winger and midfielder captains the

Belgium team and stands to earn more as his career continues.

#13. Zinedine Zidane (tie)

- Net worth: $120 million

- Salary: $14 million

- Nationality: France

- Date of birth: 1972 (50 years old)

- Teams: Cannes (France), Bordeaux (France), Juventus (Italy), Real Madrid (France)

Zinedine Zidane, also called Zizou, was born to Algerian immigrants in France and learned to handle the ball on the streets of Marseille. While playing at youth clubs, he was discovered by a French Football Federation coach at 14 years old. He made his professional debut at Cannes three years later. In 2001, he signed with Real Madrid for more than $66 million in transfer fees. He eventually made his way over to the coaching side, managing Real Madrid, where he guided the team to victory in the Champi ons League three years in a row.

#13. Mesut Özil (tie)

- Net worth: $120 million

- Salary: $24 million

Courtesy of Fauzan Saari

- Nationality: Germany

- Date of birth: 1988 (34 years old)

- Teams: Schalke 04 (Germany), Werder Bremen (Germany), Real Madrid (Spain), Arsenal (United Kingdom), Fener bahçe (Turkey), Istanbul Başakşehir (Turkey)

Mesut Özil certainly knows the finer things in life. He reportedly owns about £800,000 worth of automobiles and an extravagant six-bedroom home in London. After the birth of their child, Özil and his wife funded 1,000 surgeries for underprivi leged children to mark the occasion in 2020. He was paid an estimated $24 million annually with Arsenal. The German outfielder, however, quit the national team in 2018 after experiencing racism. Apart from playing sports physically, he’s also gone into esports, founding M10 eSports in 2018, which competes in Fortnite and EA Sports’ FIFA.

#13. José Mourinho (tie)

- Net worth: $120 million

- Salary: $27 million

- Nationality: Portugal

- Date of birth: 1963 (59 years old)

- Teams: Rio Ave B (Portugal), Belenenses B (Portugal), Sesimbra (Portugal), Comércio e Indústria (Portugal)

José Mourinho is a veteran Portuguese football manager who has overseen Totten ham, Manchester United, Chelsea, Real Madrid, Inter Milan, and Porto before joining Roma in 2021 and winning 25 trophies along the way. The Portu guese Football Federation named him the coach of the century in 2015, and he holds several Guinness World Records, includ ing for “youngest football manager to reach 100 UEFA Champions League matches.”

#13. Andrés Iniesta (tie)

- Net worth: $120 million

- Salary: $33 million

- Nationality: Spain

- Date of birth: 1984 (38 years old)

- Teams: Barcelona B (Spain), Barcelona (Spain), Vissel Kobe (Japan)

After almost 22 years with Barcelona, Andrés Iniesta signed for $30 million annually to join Vissel Kobe through 2023. His high salary and active status give him an edge over the players tied in the 13th spot. He won the 2010

World Cup and has four Champions Leagues under his belt with Barcelona. After a serious injury in 2020, Iniesta continues to play with Japan and retains his love for the game. “The day I don’t feel the emotion of seeing a full stadium, or meeting the fans and my teammates, is perhaps the day I shouldn’t be playing any more and football is over,” he told BBC.

#12. Paul Pogba - Net worth: $125 million

- Salary: $33 million

- Nationality: France

- Date of birth: 1993 (29 years old)

- Teams: Manchester United (United Kingdom), Juventus (Italy)

Paul Pogma is a midfielder who plays for Juventus and the French national team. He earns about $28 million per year in base salary and up to $10 million per year in endorsements. Pogba has a sponsorship deal with Adidas and has enough star power to commandeer an Amazon Prime docu series “The Pogmentary” that explores his career trajectory and his eventual decision to leave Manches ter United. He also owns some luxury real estate in Miami and Cheshire.

#11. Thierry Henry

- Net worth: $130 million

- Salary: $5 million

- Nationality: France

- Date of birth: 1977 (45 years old)

- Teams: Monaco B (Monaco), Monaco (Monaco), Juventus (Italy), Arsenal (United Kingdom), Barcelona (Spain), New York Red Bulls (United States)

Thierry Henry is a retired French player known for his time with Arsenal in the early 2000s, where he won seven trophies. He set a record by winning the Golden Boot an astonishing four times. He helped the French national team win the 1998 World Cup and the 2000 European Championship. He became a manager for various teams, including Monaco and the Montreal Impact (now called CF Montreal). Henry stepped down as manager of the Impact in 2021. Henry had different deals with Nike, Reebok, and Puma over his career as a player. He has also endorsed Beats head phones and Gillette.

#10. Gareth Bale

- Net worth: $145 million

- Salary: $33 million

- Nationality: Wales

Richest soccer players

- Date of birth: 1989 (33 years old)

- Teams: Southampton (United Kingdom), Totten ham Hotspur (United Kingdom), Real Madrid (Spain), Los Angeles FC (United States)

Gareth Bale was a threetime Spanish champion and a five-time UEFA Champions League winner with Real Madrid. Born in Cardiff, Wales, Bale started as a defender but quickly made his name as a striker, scoring more goals for the Welsh national team than any other Welshman. He earns about $9 million in endorsements from brands like Adidas, EA Sports, and Lucozade, as well as $185,000 per sponsored Instagram post.

#9. Kylian Mbappé

- Net worth: $150 million

- Salary: $53 million

- Nationality: France - Date of birth: 1998 (23 years old)

- Teams: Monaco II (Monaco), Monaco (Monaco), Paris SaintGermain (France)

Kylian Mbappé is a French national player who is already one of the most paid on the planet. Apart from his $53 million salary, Mbappé also earns $10 million in endorse ments as of 2022. Mbappé helped his team win the FIFA World Cup in 2018, donating his entire $500,000 World Cup bonus to Premiers de Cordée association, a charity that benefits children living with disabilities who want to play sports. He re-signed with Paris Saint-Germain in 2022 for a contract worth $266.5 million over three years.

#8. Ronaldo - Net worth: $160 million

- Salary: not available

- Nationality: Brazil

- Date of birth: 1976 (46 years old)

- Teams: Cruzeiro (Brazil), PSV (The Nether lands), Barcelona (Spain), Inter Milan (Italy), Real Madrid (Spain), AC Milan (Italy), Corinthians (Brazil)

A soccer superstar, Ronaldo Luis Nazario de Lima was named FIFA Player of the Year three times and won the Ballon d’Or award twice. Starting at the Brazilian club Cruzeiro at 17 years old, he scored 12 goals in 14 appearances. He then joined a Dutch team, followed by a run with Barcelona for an incredible season where he made 47 goals in 49 games and was named FIFA Player of the

Year. Ronaldo purchased a team in La Liga called Real Valladolid in 2018. He retired in 2021 after 18 seasons due to knee injuries.

#7. Wayne Rooney - Net worth: $170 million

- Salary: $26 million

- Nationality: United Kingdom

- Date of birth: 1985 (37 years old)

- Teams: Everton (United Kingdom), Manchester United (United Kingdom), D.C. United (United States), Derby County (United Kingdom)

Wayne Rooney left D.C. United to become a player-coach for the English Football League Championship club Derby County in 2020. He became their full-time coach a year later. Rooney later returned to D.C. United as a manager in 2022, a move that earned the league a $25,000 fine for violat ing its diversity policy. Rooney’s records include the English national team all-time top-scorer and most Premier League goals scored for one club. Rooney has signed multimillionpound book deals, which didn’t fly off the shelves; he also has had endorse ments with Nike, Samsung, EA Sports, and more.

#6. Zlatan Ibrahimović

- Net worth: $190 million

- Salary: $35 million

- Nationality: Sweden

- Date of birth: 1981 (41 years old)

- Teams: Malmö FF (Sweden), Ajax (The Neth erlands), Juventus (Italy), Inter Milan (Italy), Barce lona (Spain), AC Milan (Italy), Paris Saint-Germain (France), Manchester United (United Kingdom), LA Galaxy (United States)

Zlatan Ibrahimović is a Swedish striker for AC Milan. He was named captain of the Swedish national team in 2012 and leads his country in goals scored with 62 goals in 116 games. An 8-foot-9-inchtall statue of him graces the stadium at Malmo, where his career began. His contract with Milan runs until June 30, 2023, but he is sidelined due to a knee injury. “I have a big passion for my game,” Ibrahimović, who does not plan to retire, told CNN in an October 2022 interview.

#5. Neymar - Net worth: $200 million

- Salary: $78 million - Nationality: Brazil - Date of birth: 1992 (30 years old)

- Teams: Santos (Brazil), Barcelona (Spain), Paris Saint-Germain (France)

Neymar is a Brazilian with one of the highest base salaries for soccer players in the world. His base salary is about $78 million, and he earns an additional $20 to 40 million from endorsements and bonuses. Neymar’s endorsement deals include Nike, Volkswagen, and more. He made his profes sional debut in 2009 at 17. He’s been a member of the Brazilian national team and Ligue 1 club Paris Saint-Germain.

#4. Dave Whelan

- Net worth: $210 million

- Salary: not available

- Nationality: England

- Date of birth: 1936 (85 years old)

- Teams: Blackburn Rovers (United Kingdom), Crewe Alexandra (United Kingdom)

Whelan played from 1956-66, but he found his true calling in commerce. He opened up a series of supermarkets called Whelan’s Discount Stores, which he eventually sold. He then acquired a sporting and fishing store in Wigan, which he expanded into the U.K.’s second-largest retail chain, JJB. He then set his sights back on soccer, purchasing Wigan Athletic in 1995 and took them to the Premier League in 2005. Wigan Atheltic also won the FA Cup in 2013. He stepped down as chairman of the club in 2015 amid a furor over racist comments.

#3. David Beckham

- Net worth: $450 million

- Salary: $50 million

- Nationality: England

- Date of birth: 1975 (47 years old)

- Teams: Manchester United (United Kingdom), Preston North End (United Kingdom), Real Madrid (Spain), LA Galaxy (United States), AC Milan (Italy), Paris Saint-Germain (France)

David Beckham was an English soccer player who married singer/ designer Victoria Beckham. He served as captain of the England national team from 2000 to 2006. He signed a reported $1-million-a-week, fiveyear contract with the LA Galaxy in 2007, which made him the highestpaid player in Major League Soccer at the time.

Beckham leads a group that owns Inter Miami. He bought more stake in the team, valued at $150 million in 2021.

#2. Cristiano Ronaldo

- Net worth: $500 million

- Salary: $70 million

- Nationality: Portugal

- Date of birth: 1985 (37 years old)

- Teams: Sporting CP (Portugal), Manchester United (United Kingdom), Real Madrid (Spain), Juventus (Italy)

Cristiano Ronaldo is on track to be one of the few professional athletes to surpass $1 billion in revenue in salary and endorsements. He already brings in over $100 million annually. Ronaldo is also a member of the Portugal national team.

Ronaldo’s profes sional career began with Manchester United in 2003, where he made a great showing. He then joined Real Madrid for about a $131 million transfer fee and left after nine years, in 2018, to play with Juventus. He rejoined Manchester United in 2022 but left the club in November of that year after a controversial inter view with Piers Morgan in which he criticized the team and its manager, just ahead of the 2022 World Cup. Ronaldo is a fivetime Ballon d’Or winner and signed a $1 billion lifetime deal with Nike in 2016—a lynchpin in his dizzying assortment of endorsements.

#1. Lionel Messi - Net worth: $600 million

- Salary: $75 million

- Nationality: Argen tina

- Date of birth: 1987 (35 years old)

- Teams: Barcelona (Spain), Paris SaintGermain (France)

Lionel Messi is the highest-paid soccer player and professional athlete overall. Messi makes over $168 million in average annual salary, plus $40 million in endorsements. He is a forward for Ligue 1 club Paris Saint-Germain and captains the Argen tina national team. Messi helped Argentina make the World Cup finals in 2014, but he has never won one. He scored 672 goals with Barcelona, which is more than any player with one team. Messi is also a philanthropist, founding his own charity to improve education and health care access for children in underserved communities.

Written by Pete Camarillo

This article has been re-published pursuant to a CC BY-NC 4.0 License.

Triple homicide in Riverside result of ‘inappropriate romance’ between child, predator

BY CITY NEWS SERVICE

The slaying of three family members in a Riverside home stemmed from an “inappro priate romance between a predator and child” that spun out of control without any warning signs of an imminent threat, the older sister of one of the victims said Wednes day.

“Nobody could imagine this crime happening to our family, especially one day after Thanksgiving,” Michelle Blandin told reporters while reading a statement at the Riverside Police Depart ment’s Magnolia Station. “We had all just celebrated the Thanksgiving blessing. We recounted many blessings. Little did I know it would be the last time my husband and I would see my sister and parents alive.”

Blandin’s parents, Mark Winek, 69, Sharie Winek, 65, and her sister, 38-year-old Brooke Winek, were slain Friday morning in their resi dence at 11261 Price Court.

The man believed to be responsible, 28-year-old Austin Lee Edwards of North Chesterfield, Virginia, a sheriff’s deputy and former Virginia State Police trooper, was killed in a gunfight that afternoon with San Bernardi no County sheriff’s deputies as he made a run for the California state line, west of Needles.

According to Riverside police Chief Larry Gonzalez, Edwards had engaged in an online relationship with Brooke Winek’s 15-year-old daughter, posing as a 17-yearold boy with an assumed identity as part of an “online enticement” known as “catfishing” with the probable intent of sexually exploiting her.

“This horrific event started with an inappropriate romance between a predator and child,” Blandin said. “This was an adult who traveled across the country to kidnap a 15-year-old girl, my niece... and devastate our family. He took an oath to protect, yet he failed to do so. Instead, he preyed on the most vulner able.”

“We hear the term ‘catfishing,’ and you think of a long-running dating show or series...sensationalizing online relationships,” she said. “However, catfishing led to the deaths of the three most important people in my life. Parents and guardians, when you’re talking to your children about the dangers of their online actions, please use us as a reference. Tell our story to help your parenting.”

The 15-year-old girl, whose name was not disclosed, is under the care of Riverside County Child Protective Services, and she is not currently believed to be a suspect in what transpired at the home.

Blandin characterized her parents as magnanimous people, her father a “humble man” who coached athletics at multiple Riverside high schools and “unselfishly gave to student-athletes,” includ ing her.

“My mom, Sharie, had the biggest, giving heart imaginable and did anything and everything for everyone without wanting anything in return,” Blandin said tearfully.

She credited her parents’ neighbor with enabling law enforcement to act quickly by spotting the unusual activity at her parents’ residence and notifying the police immedi ately.

“That call from the neighbor saved my niece’s life, and that neighbor is a hero in our lives,” Blandin said. “If something like this can happen here, it can happen anywhere.”

Gonzalez said an extensive digital and physical inves tigation into the homicides is ongoing. The victims’ manner of death has yet to be confirmed.

According to the chief, the events culminating in the murders almost serve as a template for how online preda tion of minors occurs.

“A child is groomed to meet someone for sexual purposes, or sell and trade the child’s sexual images,” he said. “It’s about developing a rapport. We’re still trying to determine how long this relationship was going online.”

Authorities in Virginia verified that Edwards served as a state trooper for about a year in the Richmond metro politan area but resigned in October. He was then hired as a deputy in Washington County, Virginia.

“It is shocking and sad to the entire law enforcement community that such an evil and wicked person could infil trate law enforcement while concealing his true identity as a computer predator and murderer,” Washington County Sheriff Blake Andis said in a statement. “Our thoughts and prayers are with ... all of those affected by this heinous crime.”

Riverside police spokes man Officer Ryan Railsback said a neighbor of the victims spotted Edwards and the teen getting into his Kia Soul shortly after 11 a.m. Friday and called 911 because the youth “appeared distressed.”

Officers were heading to the location when dispatch ers began receiving additional calls regarding a fire inside the Wineks’ house.

“The Riverside Fire Department arrived first and reported a working fire on the first floor of the residence,” Railsback said. “They initi ated a fire attack, made entry, then discovered the three adult victims laying on the ground in the front entryway. It was determined they were

Firefighters quickly knocked down the blaze, which was determined to be an act of arson. Railsback said detectives then set about unraveling what transpired and soon identified Edwards as the man leaving the property with the girl.

Sheriff’s deputies spotted his Kia on Highway 247, leading to a chase during which Edwards fired shots at his pursuers, according to officials. He lost control of the car and drove off the road. The girl escaped and was rescued by deputies, but Edwards got out and allegedly pointed a gun at a sheriff’s helicopter, prompting deputies to shoot and kill him.

Railsback said investiga tors are taking their time eliciting information from the teen, who was not injured.

“This is going to be the most traumatizing event in her life. We don’t want to overwhelm her,” he said. “We don’t know yet whether she was threatened or coerced. We don’t believe she was complicit. We need further investigation ... to figure out what (Edwards’) intentions were.”

A GoFundMe account established to assist the Winek family had raised nearly $60,000 as of Wednes day. The link is https://rb.gy/ yo8ecr.

San Bernardino County asking residents for feedback regarding community health

BY STAFF

The San Bernardino County Department of Public Health and the Community Vital Signs Initiative is asking county residents to provide feedback aimed at improv ing community health by taking part in the 2022 Community Health Survey.

The community health survey is anonymous for adults 18 years and older living in San Bernardino County. The survey is part of an ongoing community health assessment to prior itize health-related needs among county residents, set a community-led action plan to address those needs, and improve the commu nity’s overall health.

Beginning today through Dec. 12, county residents can complete the survey at https://bit. ly/CVSSurvey. The survey focuses on topics to understand what is most important to their health and community, how their quality of life is perceived, and their experience with the effects of health inequi ties.

“We want to hear from county residents to learn about the issues affect ing their health and their community,” said County Health Officer Dr. Michael Sequeira. “Completing the survey will provide data to accurately understand patterns in health ineq

uities and strategies to improve them. Our collec tive goal is to support all efforts that help residents live a long healthy life.”

Community organiza tions and stakeholders are highly encouraged to distribute the survey to their clients and others in the community. “We hope that we hear from a broad range of voices, especially residents who are often underserved, underrepre sented, have poorer health, and were disproportionally affected by the COVID-19 pandemic,” said Diana Fox, co-chair of the Commu nity Vital Signs Steering Committee.

Once the survey is closed and the data is analyzed, results will be shared with the commu nity to discuss which health issues should be prioritized and to identify what strategies will be most effective in address ing them. The process will inform the update of the San Bernardino County Community Health Assessment and Commu nity Transformation Plan.

For more information about this process or to obtain paper copies of the survey, contact Dori Baeza with the Department of Public Health and Commu nity Vital Signs Initiative at dbaeza@dph.sbcounty. gov or (909) 486-9537.

victims...of homicide.”

Austin Lee Edwards. | Photo courtesy of the Riverside Police

| Photo courtesy of Pixabay

LEGALS

Probate Notices

Arcadia City Notices

CITY OF ARCADIA REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

NOVEMBER 2022

Notice is hereby given that the City of Arcadia is requesting pro posals from qualified contractors to provide complete landscape maintenance services. The contract, which involves complete land scape of all landscape areas listed in contract documents including, but not limited to; irrigation, aeration, fertilization, mowing, edging, pruning; shaping and trimming trees, shrubs and ground cover plants; weed control, pest control of all plant diseases, and other maintenance required to maintain the City’s parkways, medians, and facility landscape, in a safe, attractive and usable condition; and maintenance of all plant material in good condition with horti cultural acceptable growth and color; debris removal and general clean-up of all areas under the contract, on an initial annual term with the option of three one-year renewals as indicated by the con tract specifications.

A copy of the Request for Proposal (RFP) can be obtained from the City of Arcadia Public Works Services Department located at 11800 Goldring Road in Arcadia, CA 91006, or by contacting the Depart ment at publicworks@arcadiaca.gov or (626) 254-2720. Proposals are due by 11:00 a.m. on Tuesday, December 20, 2022. Please submit three (3) copies of the proposal to:

City of Arcadia

Attention: Office of the City Clerk 240 W. Huntington Drive PO Box 60021

Arcadia, CA 91066-6021

Attention: Dave Thompson, Streets Superintendent

Firms mailing or shipping their proposals must allow sufficient deliv ery time to ensure timely receipt of their proposals by the specified time. Proposals received after the deadline will not be considered. Submissions by fax or other electronic media will not be accepted under any circumstances.

The City of Arcadia reserves the right to reject any or all Proposals, to waive any informality or irregularity in any Proposal received, and to be the sole judge of the merits of the respective Proposal received.

CITY OF ARCADIA

Publish November 28 & December 5, 2022

ARCADIA WEEKLY

CITY OF

ARCADIA

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS NOVEMBER

2022

Notice is hereby given that the City of Arcadia is requesting pro posals from qualified consultants to provide Material Testing for Miscellaneous Public Works Projects. A copy of the Request for Proposal (RFP) can be obtained from the City of Arcadia Public Works Services Department located at 11800 Goldring Road in Ar cadia, CA 91006, or by contacting the Department at publicworks@ arcadiaca.gov or (626) 254-2720. Proposals are due by 11:00 a.m. on Tuesday, December 20, 2022. Please submit three (3) copies of the proposal to:

City of Arcadia

Attention: Office of the City Clerk 240 W. Huntington Drive PO Box 60021

Arcadia, CA 91066-6021

Attention: Jan Balanay, Engineering Assistant

Firms mailing or shipping their proposals must allow sufficient deliv ery time to ensure timely receipt of their proposals by the specified time. Proposals received after the deadline will not be considered. Submissions by fax or other electronic media will not be accepted under any circumstances.

The City of Arcadia reserves the right to reject any or all Proposals, to waive any informality or irregularity in any Proposal received, and to be the sole judge of the merits of the respective Proposal received.

CITY OF ARCADIA

Publish Decembe 5, 12, 2022

To all heirs, beneficiaries, cred-itors, contingent creditors, and persons who may otherwise be in terested in the will or estate, or both, of MARCIA WILSON aka MARCIA PRUETT WILSON aka MARCIA P. WILSON

A PETITION FOR PROBATE has been filed by Patricia Graham in the Superior Court of California, County of LOS ANGELES.

THE PETITION FOR PROBATE requests that Patricia Graham be ap pointed as personal representative to administer the estate of the decedent.

THE PETITION requests the decedent’s will and codicils, if any, be admitted to probate. The will and any codicils are available for examination in the file kept by the court.

THE PETITION requests authority to administer the estate under the Independent Administration of Estates Act. (This authority will allow the personal representative to take many actions without obtaining court approval. Before taking certain very important actions, however, the per sonal representative will be required to give notice to interested persons unless they have waived notice or consented to the proposed action.) The independent administra-tion au thority will be granted unless an inter ested person files an objec-tion to the petition and shows good cause why the court should not grant the author ity.

A HEARING on the petition will be held on January 13, 2023 at 8:30 AM in Dept. No. 4 located at 111 N. Hill St., Los Angeles, CA 90012.

IF YOU OBJECT to the granting of the petition, you should appear at the hearing and state your objections or file written objections with the court before the hearing. Your ap-pearance may be in person or by your attorney.

IF YOU ARE A CREDITOR or a contingent creditor of the dece dent, you must file your claim with the court and mail a copy to the per sonal representative appointed by the court within the later of either (1) four months from the date of first issuance of letters to a general personal representative, as defined in section 58(b) of the California Probate Code, or (2) 60 days from the date of mailing or personal delivery to you of a notice under section 9052 of the California Probate Code.

Other California statutes and legal authority may affect your rights as a creditor. You may want to consult with an attorney knowl-edgeable in California law.

YOU MAY EXAMINE the file kept by the court. If you are a person interested in the estate, you may file with the court a Request for Special Notice (form DE-154) of the filing of an inventory and appraisal of estate assets or of any petition or account as provided in Probate Code section 1250. A Request for Special Notice form is available from the court clerk.

Attorney for petitioner: RICHARD A LUFTMAN ESQ SBN 222363

ALPERSTEIN SIMON FARKAS GILLIN AND SCOTT LLP 15760 VENTURA BLVD STE 1520 ENCINO CA 91436 CN992032 WILSON Nov 28, Dec 1,5, 2022 SAN GABRIEL SUN

important actions, however, the per sonal representative will be required to give notice to interested persons unless they have waived notice or consented to the proposed action.) The independent administration au thority will be granted unless an in terested person files an objection to the petition and shows good cause why the court should not grant the authority.

A HEARING on the petition will be held in this court as follows: 01/04/23 at 8:30AM in Dept. 9 located at 111 N. HILL ST., LOS ANGELES, CA 90012

IF YOU OBJECT to the granting of the petition, you should appear at the hearing and state your objections or file written objections with the court before the hearing. Your appearance may be in person or by your attorney.

IF YOU ARE A CREDITOR or a con tingent creditor of the decedent, you must file your claim with the court and mail a copy to the personal represen tative appointed by the court within the later of either (1) four months from the date of first issuance of letters to a general personal representative, as defined in section 58(b) of the Califor nia Probate Code, or (2) 60 days from the date of mailing or personal deliv ery to you of a notice under section 9052 of the California Probate Code. Other California statutes and legal authority may affect your rights as a creditor. You may want to consult with an attorney knowledgeable in Califor nia law.

YOU MAY EXAMINE the file kept by the court. If you are a person in terested in the estate, you may file with the court a Request for Special Notice (form DE-154) of the filing of an inventory and appraisal of estate assets or of any petition or account as provided in Probate Code section 1250. A Request for Special Notice form is available from the court clerk.

In Pro Per Petitioner

COELINA JOY TECSON SY

3674 SOLANA COURT EL MONTE CA 91731 BSC 222586 12/5, 12/8, 12/12/22 CNS-3648215#

EL MONTE EXAMINER

Public Notices

OF $10,000

the reason for the objection at least two court days before the matter is scheduled to be heard and must appear at the hear ing to show cause why the petition should not be granted. If no written objection is timely filed, the court may grant the petition without a hearing NOTICE OF HEARING a. Date: 01/23/2023 Time: 8:30AM Dept: P. The address of the court is same as noted above. 3. a. A copy of this Order to Show Cause shall be published at least once each week for four successive weeks prior to the day set for hearing on the peti tion in the following newspaper of general circulation, printed in this county: Monrovia Weekly DATED: November 9, 2022 Robin Miller Sloan JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT Pub. November 14, 21, 28, De cember 5, 2022 MONROVIA WEEKLY

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR CHANGE OF NAME PETITION OF Mai Ching L. Cuan FOR CHANGE OF NAME CASE NUMBER: 22AHCP00454 Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles 300 E. Walnut St, Pasadena, Ca 91101, Northeast Judicial District TO ALL INTER ESTED PERSONS: 1. Petitioner Mai Ch ing L. Cuan filed a petition with this court for a decree changing names as follows: Present name a. OF Mai Ching L. Cuan to Proposed name Mai Ching Cuan 2. THE COURT ORDERS that all persons inter ested in this matter shall appear before this court at the hearing indicated below to show cause, if any, why the petition for change of name should not be granted. Any person objecting to the name changes de scribed above must file a written objection that includes the reason for the objection at least two court days before the matter is scheduled to be heard and must appear at the hearing to show cause why the peti tion should not be granted. If no written objection is timely filed, the court may grant the petition without a hearing NOTICE OF HEARING a. Date: 01/06/2023 Time: 8:30AM Dept: P. The address of the court is same as noted above. 3. a. A copy of this Order to Show Cause shall be published at least once each week for four successive weeks prior to the day set for hearing on the petition in the following newspaper of general circulation, printed in this county: Temple City Tribune DATED: November 4, 2022 Robin Miller Sloan JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT Pub. November 21, 28, December 5, 12, 2022 TEMPLE CITY TRIBUNE

SUMMONS

(CITACION JUDICIAL) CASE NUMBER (Número del Caso): 19CHLC23104

NOTICE TO DEFENDANT (AVISO AL DEMANDADO): CHENGLONG LIU, an individual

YOU ARE BEING SUED BY PLAINTIFF (LO ESTÁ DEMANDANDO EL DEMAN DANTE): Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. NOTICE! You have been sued. The court may decide against you without your being heard unless you respond within 30 days. Read the information below.

Legal Services, (www.lawhelpcalifornia. org), en el Centro de Ayuda de las Cor tes de California, (www.sucorte.ca.gov) o poniéndose en contacto con la corte o el colegio de abogados locales. AVISO: Por ley, la corte tiene derecho a reclamar las cuotas y los costos exentos por imponer un gravamen sobre cualquier recuper ación de $10,000 ó más de valor recibida mediante un acuerdo o una concesión de arbitraje en un caso de derecho civil. Tiene que pagar el gravamen de la corte antes de que la corte pueda desechar el caso. The name and address of the court is (El nombre y dirección de la corte es): Superior Court of CA, Los Angeles, Chatsworth Courthouse, 9425 Penfield Ave., Chatsworth, CA 91311

The name, address, and telephone num ber of plaintiff’s attorney, or plaintiff without an attorney, is (El nombre, la dirección y el número de teléfono del abogado del de mandante, o del demandante que no tiene abogado, es): Jeffery Mukai (State Bar #: 273338), Collection At Law, Inc., A.P.C., 3835 E. Thousand Oaks Bl #R349, West lake Village, CA 91362, (818) 716-7630

DATE (Fecha): 06/19/2019 Sherri R. Carter Executive Officer / Clerk of Court, Clerk (Secretario), by Marissa Mo rales, Deputy (Adjunto) (SEAL)

NOTICE TO THE PERSON SERVED: You are served as an individual defendant. 11/28, 12/5, 12/12, 12/19/22 CNS-3646536#

SAN GABRIEL SUN

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR CHANGE OF NAME PETITION OF Mini Shaoran Xiong a minor by and through Guardian Ad Litem Sunny Xiong and Xiyan Zhong FOR CHANGE OF NAME

NOTICE OF PETITION TO ADMINISTER

ESTATE OF:

ROBERT LI SY

CASE NO. 22STPB06853

To all heirs, beneficiaries, creditors, contingent creditors, and persons who may otherwise be interested in the WILL or estate, or both of ROB ERT LI SY.

A PETITION FOR PROBATE has been filed by SUSAN TECSON SY, KYLE CEDRIC TECSON SY, AND COELINA JOY TECSON SY in the Superior Court of California, County of LOS ANGELES.

THE PETITION FOR PROBATE re quests that COELINA JOY TECSON SY be appointed as personal repre sentative to administer the estate of the decedent.

THE PETITION requests author ity to administer the estate under the Independent Administration of Estates Act. (This authority will allow the personal representative to take many actions without obtaining court approval. Before taking certain very

Notice is hereby given that the Board of Supervisors of the County of Los Angeles has extended the $10,000 reward in ex change for information leading to the ap prehension and conviction of the person or persons responsible for the murder of 46-year-old Terry Alford, who was fatally shot on the front porch of a residence located on the 100 block of Los Angeles Avenue in the City of Monrovia while vis iting family on January 29, 2021, at ap proximately 5:00 p.m. Si no entiende esta noticia o necesita mas infor-macion, favor de llamar al (213) 974-1579. Any person having any information related to this crime is requested to call Detective Cynthia San chez at the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department, Homicide Bureau at (323) 890-5617 or Crime Stoppers at (800) 2228477 and refer to Report No. 021-000143199-011. The terms of the reward provide that: The information given that leads to the determination of the identity, the apprehen sion and conviction of any person or per sons must be given no later than April 19, 2023. All reward claims must be in writing and shall be received no later than June 18, 2023. The total County payment of any and all rewards shall in no event exceed $10,000 and no claim shall be paid prior to conviction unless the Board of Super visors makes a finding of impossibility of conviction due to the death or incapacity of the person or persons responsible for the crime or crimes. The County reward may be apportioned between various per sons and/or paid for the conviction of vari ous persons as the circum-stances fairly dictate. Any claims for the reward funds should be filed no later than June 18, 2023, with the Executive Office of the Board of Supervisors, 500 West Temple Street, Room 383 Kenneth Hahn Hall of Admin istration, Los Angeles, Cali-fornia 90012, Attention: Terry Alford Reward Fund. For further information, please call (213)9741579. CELIA ZAVALA EXECUTIVE OFFI CER BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CN990890 03959 Nov 7,10,14,17,21,24,28, Dec 1,5,8, 2022

MONROVIA WEEKLY

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR CHANGE OF NAME PETITION OF Dani elle Elise Ordunio-De S. Palomares FOR CHANGE OF NAME CASE NUMBER: 22AHCP00465 Superior Court of Califor nia, County of Los Angeles 300 East Wal nut St, Pasadena, Ca 91101, Northeast District TO ALL INTERESTED PERSONS: 1. Petitioner Danielle Elise Ordunio-De S. Palomares filed a petition with this court for a decree changing names as follows: Pres ent name a. OF Danielle Elise Ordunio-De S. Palomares to Proposed name Danielle Elise Palomares2. THE COURT ORDERS that all persons interested in this mat ter shall appear before this court at the hearing indicated below to show cause, if any, why the petition for change of name should not be granted. Any person object ing to the name changes described above must file a written objection that includes

You have 30 CALENDAR DAYS after this summons and legal papers are served on you to file a written response at this court and have a copy served on the plaintiff. A letter or phone call will not protect you. Your written response must be in proper le gal form if you want the court to hear your case. There may be a court form that you can use for your response. You can find these court forms and more information at the California Courts Online Self-Help Cen ter (www.courtinfo.ca.gov/selfhelp), your county law library, or the courthouse near est you. If you cannot pay the filing fee, ask the court clerk for a fee waiver form. If you do not file your response on time, you may lose the case by default, and your wages, money, and property may be taken without further warning from the court. There are other legal requirements. You may want to call an attorney right away. If you do not know an attorney, you may want to call an attorney referral service. If you cannot afford an attorney, you may be eli gible for free legal services from a nonprofit legal services program. You can locate these nonprofit groups at the California Legal Services Web site (www.lawhelp california.org), the California Courts Online Self-Help Center (www.courtinfo.ca.gov/ selfhelp), or by contacting your local court or county bar association. NOTE: The court has a statutory lien for waived fees and costs on any settlement or arbitration award of $10,000 or more in a civil case. The court’s lien must be paid before the court will dismiss the case.

¡AVISO! Lo han demandado. Si no respon de dentro de 30 días, la corte puede deci dir en su contra sin escuchar su versión. Lea la información a continuación. Tiene 30 DÍAS DE CALENDARIO después de que le entreguen esta citación y pa peles legales para presentar una respu esta por escrito en esta corte y hacer que se entregue una copia al demandante. Una carta o una llamada telefónica no lo protegen. Su respuesta por escrito tiene que estar en formato legal correcto si de sea que procesen su caso en la corte. Es posible que haya un formulario que usted pueda usar para su respuesta. Puede en contrar estos formularios de la corte y más información en el Centro de Ayuda de las Cortes de California (www.sucorte.ca.gov), en la biblioteca de leyes de su condado o en la corte que le quede más cerca. Si no puede pagar la cuota de presentación, pida al secretario de la corte que le dé un formulario de exención de pago de cuotas. Si no presenta su respuesta a tiempo, pu ede perder el caso por incumplimiento y la corte le podrá quitar su sueldo, dinero y bienes sin más advertencia. Hay otros requisitos legales. Es recomend able que llame a un abogado inmediata mente. Si no conoce a un abogado, puede llamar a un servicio de remisión a aboga dos. Si no puede pagar a un abogado, es posible que cumpla con los requisitos para obtener servicios legales gratuitos de un programa de servicios legales sin fines de lucro. Puede encontrar estos grupos sin fines de lucro en el sitio web de California

CASE NUMBER: 22AHCP00472 Supe rior Court of California, County of Los Angeles 300 E. Walnut St, Pasadena, Ca 91101 Northeast Judicial District TO ALL INTERESTED PERSONS: 1. Pe titioner Mini Shaoran Xiong a minor by and through Guardian Ad Litem Sunny Xiong and Xiyan Zhong filed a petition with this court for a decree changing names as follows: Present name a. OF Mini Shaoran Xiong to Proposed name Carson Shaoran Xiong 2. THE COURT ORDERS that all persons interested in this matter shall appear before this court at the hearing indicated below to show cause, if any, why the peti tion for change of name should not be granted. Any person objecting to the name changes described above must file a written objection that includes the reason for the objection at least two court days before the matter is scheduled to be heard and must ap pear at the hearing to show cause why the petition should not be granted. If no written objection is timely filed, the court may grant the petition without a hearing NOTICE OF HEARING a. Date: 01/19/2023 Time: 8:30AM Dept: P. The address of the court is same as noted above. 3. a. A copy of this Order to Show Cause shall be published at least once each week for four succes sive weeks prior to the day set for hear ing on the petition in the following news paper of general circulation, printed in this county: San Gabriel Sun DATED: November 14, 2022 Robin Miller Sloan JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT Pub. November 28, December 5, 12, 19, 2022 SAN GABRIEL SUN

NOTICE TO CREDITORS OF BULK SALE

(Secs. 6104, 6105 U.C.C.) Escrow No. 27702-TV

Notice is hereby given to creditors of the within named Seller that a bulk sale is about to be made of the assets de scribed below.

The name(s) and business address(es) of the seller(s) are: Lorelay Faussier, 183 N. Hacienda Blvd., La Puente, CA 91744

The location in California of the chief executive office of the seller is: Same as address

As listed by the Seller, all other busi ness names and addresses used by the seller within three years before the date such list was sent or delivered to the buyer are: None

The name(s) and business address(es) of the buyer are:

Rene Marroquin and Reyna Marroquin, 840 City View Dr., Denver, CO, 80229

The assets to be sold are described in general as: Fixtures, Equipment, Recipes, And Goodwill, and which are located at: 183 N. Hacienda Blvd., La Puente, CA 91744

The business name used by the Seller at that location is: La Michoacana Rus tica Artesanal.

The anticipated date of the bulk sale is December 21, 2022 at the office of Covina Escrow Company, 167 East Collete Street, P.O. Box 266, Covina, CA 91723.

This bulk sale is subject to California Uniform Commercial Code Section 6106.2. If so subject, the name and ad dress of the person with whom claims may be filed is Covina Escrow Com pany, 167 East College Street P.O. Box 266, Covina, CA 91723, and the last date for filing claims shall be December 20, 2022, which is the business day be fore the sale date specified above.

Dated: November 29, 2022

S/ Rene Marroquin

S/ Reyna Marroquin 12/5/22

CNS-3649118#

NOTICE

REWARD OFFERED BY THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS

NOTICE OF PETITION TO ADMINISTER ESTATE OF MARCIA WILSON aka MARCIA PRUETT WILSON aka MARCIA P. WILSON Case No. 22STPB11371

CODE REQUIRES

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

environmental review as a Class 1 “Existing Facility” pursuant to Section 15301 of the State CEQA Guidelines because the proposal does not include any addition to the existing building.

HEARING INFORMATION:

The Planning Hearing Officer will conduct a public hearing regarding the above project at 613 E. Broadway, 2nd floor (Council Chambers), Glendale, CA 91206, on DECEMBER 14, 2022, AT 9:30 AM or as soon thereafter as possible. The purpose of the hearing is to hear comments from the public with respect to zoning concerns. The hearing will be held in ac cordance with Glendale Municipal Code, Title 30, Chapter 30.36.

The meeting can be viewed on Charter Cable Channel 6 or streamed online at: https://www.glendaleca.gov/government/departments/management-services/gtv6/livevideo-stream. For public comments and questions during the meeting call 818-937-8100. City staff will be submitting these questions and comments in real time to the appropriate person during the Planning Hearing Officer Hearing. You may also testify in person at the hearing if you wish to do so.

If the final decision is challenged in court, testimony may be limited to issues raised before or at the public hearing.

The staff report and case materials will be available a week before the hearing date at www.glendaleca.gov/agendas.

QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS: If you desire more information on the proposal, please contact the case planner Chloe Cuffel in the Planning Division at (818) 548-2140 or (818) 937- 8162 (email: ccuffel@glendaleca.gov).

Any person having an interest in the subject project may participate in the hearing, by phone as outlined above, and may be heard in support of his/her opinion. Any person protesting may file a duly signed and acknowledged written protest with the Director of Community Development not later than the hour set for public hearing before the Hearing Officer. “Acknowledged” shall mean a declaration of property ownership (or occupant if not owner) under penalty of perjury. If you challenge the decision of this project in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Glen dale, at or prior to the public hearing. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990, please notify the Community Development Department at least 48 hours (or two business days) for requests regarding sign language translation and Braille transcription services.

When a final decision is rendered, a decision letter will be posted online at www.glendale ca.gov/planning/decisions. An appeal may be filed within 15 days of the final decision date appearing on the decision letter. Appeal forms are available at https://www.glendaleca.gov/ home/showdocument?id=11926

December 5, 2022

Probate Notices

NOTICE OF PETITION TO ADMINISTER ESTATE OF JOSEPH COSENTINO

Case No. 22STPB11375

To all heirs, beneficiaries, creditors, contingent creditors, and per sons who may otherwise be inter ested in the will or estate, or both, of JOSEPH COSENTINO

A PETITION FOR PROBATE has been filed by Joseph Max Cosen tino in the Superior Court of California, County of LOS ANGELES.

THE PETITION FOR PROBATE requests that Joseph Max Cosentino be appointed as personal repre-sen tative to administer the estate of the decedent.

THE PETITION requests the decedent’s will and codicils, if any, be admitted to probate. The will and any codicils are available for examination in the file kept by the court.

THE PETITION requests authority to administer the estate under the Independent Administration of Estates Act. (This authority will allow the personal representative to take many actions without obtaining court approval. Before taking certain very important actions, however, the per sonal representative will be required to give notice to interested persons unless they have waived notice or consented to the proposed action.)

The independent administra-tion au thority will be granted unless an inter ested person files an objec-tion to the petition and shows good cause why the court should not grant the author ity.

A HEARING on the petition will be held on January 11, 2023 at 8:30 AM in Dept. No. 29 located at 111 N. Hill St., Los Angeles, CA 90012.

IF YOU OBJECT to the granting of the petition, you should appear at the hearing and state your objections or file written objections with the court before the hearing. Your ap-pearance may be in person or by your attorney.

IF YOU ARE A CREDITOR or a contingent creditor of the decedent, you must file your claim with the court

and mail a copy to the personal repre sentative appointed by the court with in the later of either (1) four months from the date of first issu-ance of let ters to a general personal represen tative, as defined in section 58(b) of the California Probate Code, or (2) 60 days from the date of mailing or per sonal delivery to you of a notice under section 9052 of the California Probate Code.

Other California statutes and legal authority may affect your rights as a creditor. You may want to consult with an attorney knowl-edgeable in California law.

YOU MAY EXAMINE the file kept by the court. If you are a person interested in the estate, you may file with the court a Request for Special Notice (form DE-154) of the filing of an inventory and appraisal of estate assets or of any petition or account as provided in Probate Code section 1250. A Request for Special Notice form is available from the court clerk.

Attorney for petitioner: DAVID M LA SALLE ESQ SBN 86310

LAW OFFICE OF MITSUMORI & LA SALLE 420 E THIRD ST STE 806

LOS ANGELES CA 90013-1638 CN992033 COSENTINO Nov 28, Dec 1,5, 2022 MONTEREY PARK PRESS

LEGALS

THE PETITION FOR PROBATE requests that Eileen V. Wallis be ap pointed as personal representative to administer the estate of the decedent.

THE PETITION requests authority to administer the estate under the Independent Administration of Estates Act. (This authority will allow the personal representative to take many actions without obtaining court approval. Before taking certain very important actions, however, the per sonal representative will be required to give notice to interested persons unless they have waived notice or consented to the proposed action.)

The independent administra-tion au thority will be granted unless an inter ested person files an objec-tion to the petition and shows good cause why the court should not grant the author ity.

A HEARING on the petition will be held on Dec. 19, 2022 at 8:30 AM in Dept. No. 2D located at 111 N. Hill St., Los Angeles, CA 90012.

IF YOU OBJECT to the granting of the petition, you should appear at the hearing and state your objections or file written objections with the court before the hearing. Your ap-pearance may be in person or by your attorney.

IF YOU ARE A CREDITOR or a contingent creditor of the decedent, you must file your claim with the court and mail a copy to the personal repre sentative appointed by the court with in the later of either (1) four months from the date of first issu-ance of let ters to a general personal represen tative, as defined in section 58(b) of the California Probate Code, or (2) 60 days from the date of mailing or per sonal delivery to you of a notice under section 9052 of the California Probate Code.

Other California statutes and legal authority may affect your rights as a creditor. You may want to consult with an attorney knowl-edgeable in California law.

YOU MAY EXAMINE the file kept by the court. If you are a person interested in the estate, you may file with the court a Request for Special Notice (form DE-154) of the filing of an inventory and appraisal of estate assets or of any petition or account as provided in Probate Code section 1250. A Request for Special Notice form is available from the court clerk.

Attorney for petitioner:

ANGELA HAWEKOTTE ESQ SBN 93133

ANGELA HAWEKOTTE APLC 790 E COLORADO BLVD STE 350 PASADENA CA 91101-2332 CN992043 WALLIS Nov 28, Dec 1,5, 2022 GLENDALE INDENDENT

NOTICE OF PETITION TO ADMINISTER ESTATE OF:

MAXINE HOLLOWAY CASE NO. 22STPB11533

To all heirs, beneficiaries, creditors, contingent creditors, and persons who may otherwise be interested in the WILL or estate, or both of MAX INE HOLLOWAY.

A PETITION FOR PROBATE has been filed by DEBORAH HOLLOWAY in the Superior Court of California, County of LOS ANGELES.

THE PETITION FOR PROBATE re quests that DEBORAH HOLLOWAY be appointed as personal represen tative to administer the estate of the decedent.

THE PETITION requests authority to administer the estate under the Inde pendent Administration of Estates Act. (This authority will allow the personal representative to take many actions without obtaining court approval. Before taking certain very important actions, however, the personal rep resentative will be required to give notice to interested persons unless they have waived notice or consented to the proposed action.) The indepen dent administration authority will be granted unless an interested person files an objection to the petition and shows good cause why the court should not grant the authority.

A HEARING on the petition will be held in this court as follows: 12/19/22 at 8:30AM in Dept. 11 located at 111 N. HILL ST., LOS ANGELES, CA 90012

IF YOU OBJECT to the granting of the petition, you should appear at the hearing and state your objections or file written objections with the court before the hearing. Your appearance may be in person or by your attorney.

defined in section 58(b) of the Califor nia Probate Code, or (2) 60 days from the date of mailing or personal deliv ery to you of a notice under section 9052 of the California Probate Code. Other California statutes and legal authority may affect your rights as a creditor. You may want to consult with an attorney knowledgeable in Califor nia law.

YOU MAY EXAMINE the file kept by the court. If you are a person inter ested in the estate, you may file with the court a Request for Special Notice (form DE-154) of the filing of an inven tory and appraisal of estate assets or of any petition or account as provided in Probate Code section 1250. A Re quest for Special Notice form is avail able from the court clerk.

Attorney for Petitioner SCOTT T. HOLMAN, ESQ. SBN 315487, HOLMAN & HOLMAN, LLP 316 W. FOOTHILL BLVD.

MONROVIA CA 91016 11/28, 12/1, 12/5/22 CNS-3646972# PASADENA PRESS

NOTICE OF PETITION TO ADMINISTER ESTATE OF: SOCORRO DE CARBAJAL

CASE NO. 22STPB11516

To all heirs, beneficiaries, creditors, contingent creditors, and persons who may otherwise be interested in the WILL or estate, or both of SO CORRO de CARBAJAL.

A PETITION FOR PROBATE has been filed by ALFONSO C. CONTRE RAS in the Superior Court of Califor nia, County of LOS ANGELES.

THE PETITION FOR PROBATE re quests that ALFONSO C. CONTRE RAS be appointed as personal repre sentative to administer the estate of the decedent.

THE PETITION requests authority to administer the estate under the Inde pendent Administration of Estates Act. (This authority will allow the personal representative to take many actions without obtaining court approval. Before taking certain very important actions, however, the personal rep resentative will be required to give notice to interested persons unless they have waived notice or consented to the proposed action.) The indepen dent administration authority will be granted unless an interested person files an objection to the petition and shows good cause why the court should not grant the authority.

A HEARING on the petition will be held in this court as follows: 01/05/23 at 8:30AM in Dept. 29 located at 111 N. HILL ST., LOS ANGELES, CA 90012

IF YOU OBJECT to the granting of the petition, you should appear at the hearing and state your objections or file written objections with the court before the hearing. Your appearance may be in person or by your attorney.

IF YOU ARE A CREDITOR or a con tingent creditor of the decedent, you must file your claim with the court and mail a copy to the personal represen tative appointed by the court within the later of either (1) four months from the date of first issuance of letters to a general personal representative, as defined in section 58(b) of the Califor nia Probate Code, or (2) 60 days from the date of mailing or personal deliv ery to you of a notice under section 9052 of the California Probate Code. Other California statutes and legal authority may affect your rights as a creditor. You may want to consult with an attorney knowledgeable in Califor nia law.

YOU MAY EXAMINE the file kept by the court. If you are a person inter ested in the estate, you may file with the court a Request for Special Notice (form DE-154) of the filing of an inven tory and appraisal of estate assets or of any petition or account as provided in Probate Code section 1250. A Re quest for Special Notice form is avail able from the court clerk.

Attorney for Petitioner

GENOVEVA

has been filed by Josue Cristobal Guerrero in the Superior Court of Cali fornia, County of LOS ANGELES.

THE PETITION FOR PROBATE requests that Josue Cristobal Guer rero be appointed as personal repre sentative to administer the estate of the decedent.

THE PETITION requests au thority to administer the estate under the Independent Administration of Estates Act. (This authority will allow the personal representative to take many actions without obtaining court approval. Before taking certain very important actions, however, the per sonal representative will be required to give notice to interested persons unless they have waived notice or consented to the proposed action.)

The independent administration au thority will be granted unless an inter ested person files an objection to the petition and shows good cause why the court should not grant the author ity.

A HEARING on the petition will be held on January 20, 2023 at 8:30 AM in Dept. No. 5 located at 111 N. Hill St., Los Angeles, CA 90012.

IF YOU OBJECT to the granting of the petition, you should appear at the hearing and state your objections or file written objections with the court before the hearing. Your appearance may be in person or by your attorney.

IF YOU ARE A CREDITOR or a contingent creditor of the decedent, you must file your claim with the court and mail a copy to the personal repre sentative appointed by the court with in the later of either (1) four months from the date of first issuance of let ters to a general personal represen tative, as defined in section 58(b) of the California Probate Code, or (2) 60 days from the date of mailing or per sonal delivery to you of a notice under section 9052 of the California Probate Code.

Other California statutes and legal authority may affect your rights as a creditor. You may want to con sult with an attorney knowledgeable in California law.

YOU MAY EXAMINE the file kept by the court. If you are a person interested in the estate, you may file with the court a Request for Special Notice (form DE-154) of the filing of an inventory and appraisal of estate assets or of any petition or account as provided in Probate Code section 1250. A Request for Special Notice form is available from the court clerk.

Attorney for petitioner: CYNTHIA VELASCO ESQ SBN 306140 GREENACRE LAW LLP 700 FLOWER ST STE 1000 LOS ANGELES CA 90017 CN992072 DAVIS Dec 1,5,8, 2022

WEST COVINA PRESS

NOTICE OF PETITION TO ADMINISTER ESTATE OF TERUO YAMANE

Case No. 22STPB07287

To all heirs, beneficiaries, creditors, contingent creditors, and per sons who may otherwise be inter ested in the will or estate, or both, of TERUO YAMANE

A PETITION FOR PROBATE has been filed by Harvey Kazuo Ya mane in the Superior Court of Califor nia, County of LOS ANGELES.

THE PETITION FOR PROBATE requests that Harvey Kazuo Yamane be appointed as personal repre-sen tative to administer the estate of the decedent.

THE PETITION requests the decedent’s will and codicils, if any, be admitted to probate. The will and any codicils are available for examination in the file kept by the court.

THE PETITION requests authority to administer the estate under the Independent Administration of Estates Act. (This authority will allow the personal representative to take many actions without obtaining court approval. Before taking certain very important actions, however, the per sonal representative will be required to give notice to interested persons unless they have waived notice or consented to the proposed action.)

IF YOU ARE A CREDITOR or a contingent creditor of the decedent, you must file your claim with the court and mail a copy to the personal repre sentative appointed by the court with in the later of either (1) four months from the date of first issu-ance of let ters to a general personal represen tative, as defined in section 58(b) of the California Probate Code, or (2) 60 days from the date of mailing or per sonal delivery to you of a notice under section 9052 of the California Probate Code.

Other California statutes and legal authority may affect your rights as a creditor. You may want to consult with an attorney knowl-edgeable in California law.

YOU MAY EXAMINE the file kept by the court. If you are a person interested in the estate, you may file with the court a Request for Special Notice (form DE-154) of the filing of an inventory and appraisal of estate assets or of any petition or account as provided in Probate Code section 1250. A Request for Special Notice form is available from the court clerk. Attorney for petitioner: KRISTIN E REYNOLDS ESQ SBN 186248

KRISTIN E REYNOLDS ESQ APC 329 MARYKNOLL CIR MONROVIA CA 91016 CN992093 YAMANE Dec 5,8,12, 2022

MONTEREY PARK PRESS

NOTICE OF PETITION TO ADMINISTER ESTATE OF: ANNE CAIGER

CASE NO. 22STPB11593

To all heirs, beneficiaries, creditors, contingent creditors, and persons who may otherwise be interested in the WILL or estate, or both of ANNE CAIGER.

A PETITION FOR PROBATE has been filed by TIMOTHY JOHN CAIGER in the Superior Court of Cali fornia, County of LOS ANGELES.

THE PETITION FOR PROBATE re quests that TIMOTHY JOHN CAIGER be appointed as personal representa tive to administer the estate of the decedent.

THE PETITION requests authority to administer the estate under the Inde pendent Administration of Estates Act. (This authority will allow the personal representative to take many actions without obtaining court approval. Before taking certain very important actions, however, the personal rep resentative will be required to give notice to interested persons unless they have waived notice or consented to the proposed action.) The indepen dent administration authority will be granted unless an interested person files an objection to the petition and shows good cause why the court should not grant the authority.

A HEARING on the petition will be held in this court as follows: 12/27/22 at 8:30AM in Dept. 11 located at 111 N. HILL ST., LOS ANGELES, CA 90012

IF YOU OBJECT to the granting of the petition, you should appear at the hearing and state your objections or file written objections with the court before the hearing. Your appearance may be in person or by your attorney.

IF YOU ARE A CREDITOR or a con tingent creditor of the decedent, you must file your claim with the court and mail a copy to the personal represen tative appointed by the court within the later of either (1) four months from the date of first issuance of letters to a general personal representative, as defined in section 58(b) of the Califor nia Probate Code, or (2) 60 days from the date of mailing or personal deliv ery to you of a notice under section 9052 of the California Probate Code. Other California statutes and legal authority may affect your rights as a creditor. You may want to consult with an attorney knowledgeable in Califor nia law.

ALICE ELIZA BETH HADSELL WALLIS

A PETITION FOR PROBATE has been filed by Eileen V. Wallis in the Superior Court of California, County of LOS ANGELES.

IF YOU ARE A CREDITOR or a con tingent creditor of the decedent, you must file your claim with the court and mail a copy to the personal represen tative appointed by the court within the later of either (1) four months from the date of first issuance of letters to a general personal representative, as

NOTICE OF PETITION TO ADMINISTER ESTATE

OF JESSIE INEZ DAVIS

Case No. 22STPB11530 To all heirs, beneficiaries, credi tors, contingent creditors, and per sons who may otherwise be inter ested in the will or estate, or both, of JESSIE INEZ DAVIS A PETITION FOR PROBATE

The independent administra-tion au thority will be granted unless an inter ested person files an objec-tion to the petition and shows good cause why the court should not grant the author ity.

A HEARING on the petition will be held on January 13, 2023 at 8:30

AM in Dept. No. 4 located at 111 N. Hill St., Los Angeles, CA 90012.

IF YOU OBJECT to the granting of the petition, you should appear at the hearing and state your objections or file written objections with the court before the hearing. Your ap-pearance may be in person or by your attorney.

YOU MAY EXAMINE the file kept by the court. If you are a person inter ested in the estate, you may file with the court a Request for Special Notice (form DE-154) of the filing of an inven tory and appraisal of estate assets or of any petition or account as provided in Probate Code section 1250. A Re quest for Special Notice form is avail able from the court clerk.

Attorney for Petitioner

LEMUEL B. MAKUPSON SBN 207383, THE LAW OFFICE OF LEM UEL B. MAKUPSON, APC 680 E. ALOSTA AVENUE, SUITE 106 AZUSA CA 91702 12/1, 12/5, 12/8/22 CNS-3647486#

Dr. S. Abajian, The City Clerk of the City of Glendale Publish