Intersect Spring 2024

The Bromley by Dalecki Design. WA winner of the 2023 Building Design Awards

From the Chair

OMG! Another financial year has flown by!

At DMN, we’ve certainly been busy over the last 6 months.

I’m thrilled to see a record number of entries into our 2024 Building Design Awards. From the West Coast to the East Coast, you’ve wowed us with your design brilliance. I want to personally extend a huge shoutout to our panel of judges, chaired by our past president Sean Hamilton, whose commitment to the judging process this year has been tremendous. We wish our entrants the best of luck and warmly invite you to join us for this year’s anticipated Awards celebrations: Perth on October 11, followed by Melbourne on October 25. With our new event format (see more details in this issue of Intersect), we’re sure to keep everyone entertained. Please join us at one or even both events. I’m looking forward to greeting you and clinking glasses as we celebrate the talent within our great community. The DMN member social calendar has been taken up a notch, and it’s been heartening to see our face-to-face event attendance growing throughout the year— and at such exciting venues.

In other news, our DMN 2024 Study Tour to Mexico kicks off shortly, as well. Participant numbers are up from last year, and we wish all travellers departing in September a safe journey. We hope they return with wonderful memories and stories with which to excite our members for the 2025 Study Tour. Who knows where the road (or sky) will take us next? DMN members’ tips for potential destinations are always welcome; after all, these tours are for YOU, so your input is valued. We’ll get the ball rolling early for next year, so expect to see a ‘save the date’ coming your way soon.

As we approach the end of the cooler months, we know our industry is about to kick into high gear. The dreaded Christmas rush seems to start earlier each year. Right after the AFL/NRL grand finals, it’s all systems go. So, let’s get prepared and sail into the busy season with confidence and readiness.

I hope to see you soon at one of our many DMN face-to-face events.

Best, Peter

From the CEO

“What you do makes a difference, and you have to decide what kind of difference you want to make.” – Dr Jane Goodall.

Last month, Tori Walker, one of our board members, suggested we paste DMN’s Statement of Purpose at the top of every board meeting agenda. The intent of Tori’s motion was to remind each DMN director of their responsibility to ensure they’re making decisions considering our purpose as an organisation.

Tori’s motion, moved and seconded, invoked Dr Goodall’s wisdom. It also underscored the fact that when there’s a long list of industry problems to fix, laser-focusing scarce resources on purpose and difference is vital.

Our purpose last week, while meeting with the Department of Housing in Adelaide, was protecting SA consumers from inaccurate energy assessments through mandatory accreditation of energy assessors. This week, we are writing to the Minister for Commerce with an important goal: to protect Western Australian consumers. We aim to prevent consumers from unknowingly hiring individuals or organisations that lack the requisite skills or qualifications to provide design services.

Dr Goodall’s approach bore her great fruit: her discovery that chimpanzees make and use tools (to crack nuts, not construct tree houses!) is considered one of the greatest achievements of 20th Century scholarship. On Friday 25 October, the greatest achievements in building design, and the winners of the True Zero Carbon Challenge, will be announced at the DMN Excellence + Innovation Summit, at Melbourne’s Fed Square. Preceding these events, throughout the morning on Friday, will be a conference program with panels of speakers talking about future cities, industry trends, and building a successful career, by design.

Registrations for the DMN Summit are now open. It promises to be a day away from the desk for immersing yourself in information and conversations that will inform and inspire your practice, and quite possibly your purpose, and the difference you want to make in the world.

Isobel Fuller

Isobel is DMN’s new National Events Coordinator who comes to us from across the Tasman. Ultra-organised, observant and detail-focused, Isobel brings valuable experience in event management for the built environment sector, honed through her work with building surveyors in New Zealand. Her expertise in coordinating CPD sessions, conferences, and networking events makes her a welcome asset to the DMN team.

At DMN, Isobel has found a creative community that complements her skills in project management and stakeholder engagement. Her calm efficiency and attention to detail make her an event planning Maestra, quietly ensuring every gathering runs smoothly and effectively.

When she’s not organising impactful professional events, Isobel enjoys exploring art in its many forms, delving into a good book, or taking a peaceful hike. Her sharp wit and delightful laugh are wonderful additions to the DMN team.

Lia Simmonds

Lia joins DMN as the new WA State Coordinator, bringing a wealth of local knowledge and a passion for community building. A long-time Perth resident, Lia’s experience in member engagement and event planning will enhance DMN’s presence in WA through tailored local events, improved communication, and fresh ideas.

With a background in organisations like Impact100 WA and the Council for International Students of WA, Lia understands the diverse needs of the community. Her role will focus on creating opportunities for members to connect, learn, and grow within the DMN network.

Fun fact: When she’s not fostering connections in the design world, Lia indulges her creative side as an avid art collector and seller. Her entrepreneurial spirit, artistic appreciation and innovative thinking make Lia a perfect fit for the dynamic DMN community.

Nicola Lister

Nicola brings four years of dynamic experience in aviation recruitment to her role at DMN. With a knack for end-to-end recruitment and business development, she thrives on connecting people and achieving goals. Her career has come full circle, starting in customer-facing roles and now returning to the building industry in a new capacity. Nicola’s passion lies in fostering relationships and turning challenges into opportunities. At DMN, she’s eager to help members maximise their benefits and achieve success. When she’s not assisting members, Nicola can be found hitting high notes with her beloved choir group, balancing her professional drive with musical harmony.

01Planning

Photo by Tom Rumble on Unsplash

Planning TidBits

to your town planning

Little bits that can make a big difference

These tidbits are part of the regular contribution made by Clause 1 Planning to Design Matters National Intersect. For more information visit www.clause1.com.au

Proof of continuous use

Planning Scheme Amendment VC254, gazetted on 12 February 2024, included changes to the way in which existing use rights applications are considered. Prior to the Amendment, Clause 63.11 of Planning Schemes provided that existing use rights could be established if the use has been carried out continuously for 15 years prior to the date of an application or proceeding for existing use rights. The Amendment changed that provision to:

…it is sufficient proof of the establishment of the existing use right if the use has been carried out continuously for a period of 15 years at any time before the date of the application or proceeding. [our emphasis added]

The Amendment also changed the circumstances in which existing use rights may not be established, adding:

The use ceased between the end of the 15 year period and the date of the application or proceeding.

The amendment was made so that a land user can seek to confirm existing use rights even if the responsible authority has directed the use to stop before an application to prove existing use rights is made, allowing a fair consideration of an application and the site’s history.

This amendment affectively removes the ability of the Responsible Authority to issue a written order to cease the use just prior to an application being made for a planning certificate to establish existing use rights.

Photo by R Architecture on Unsplash

Effect of third party appeal exemptions on Omibus permits

In Myers v Southern Grampians Shire Council [2023] VSC 658, the Supreme Court of Victoria was asked to review a decision of VCAT. The matter before VCAT was an objector’s appeal against a notice of decision to grant a permit for tourist accommodation on the subject land.

The land was in a Rural Living Zone and affected by an ESO and DDO. A permit was triggered under all three controls. However, only, the permission required under the DDO was exempt from third party notification and review rights.

The significant-question that arose was in a situation where multiple permit triggers are present as part of a single application – how should the Tribunal deal with those triggers that are exempt from notice and review rights?

In its decision the Supreme Court noted:

25. In an application where there are multiple permit triggers for a proposal overall, but the permission under review pursuant to the Planning Act and the VCAT Act is limited by operation of the exemptions applying to the review, the ambit of the Tribunal’s review enquiry will be restricted to the non exempt provisions…

VCAT has since posted a statement on its website that informs practitioners:

In circumstances where an application is heard under s.82(1) of the PE Act [objectors appeal] and some of the permissions sought in the permit application are exempt from notice and review, VCAT cannot direct the responsible authority to issue a permit with any permissions exempted from review.

Parties to such proceedings should carefully consider the orders they seek from VCAT in such circumstances.

The impact of this interpretation appears to be that VCAT can only issue a partial approval for omnibus permits (with multiple triggers), if some of them are exempt from review rights.

The exact practicalities of this issue, will play out in future VCAT decisions. Stay tuned…

application for group accommodation and a caretaker’s house in Johanna, Victoria. The appeal was brought by objectors to the planning permit application. The application included six planning permit triggers:

• Use of land for group accommodation in the Rural Conservation Zone (RCZ)

• Use of land for a caretaker’s house in the RCZ

• Building and works associated with the land uses in the RCZ

• Buildings and works in the Significant Landscape Overlay (SLO)

• Buildings and works in the Environmental Management Overlay (EMO)

• Building and works in the Bushfire Management Overlay (BMO)

Of the planning controls triggering a planning permit, only two controls provided the opportunity for the appellants to appeal, being the permissions sought under the RCZ and the SLO. This is because the planning scheme provisions of the EMO and BMO exempted planning permit applications from third party notice and appeal rights.

The Tribunal decision noted that:

Limits of Tribunal Consideration where some permit triggers are exempt from third party notice and appeal

Further to the above article; The Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal (VCAT) decision in Dance v Colac Otway SC [2024) VCAT 443 considered an

Whilst the Tribunal’s jurisdiction is limited to a review of the RCZ and the SLO4, it cannot be ignored that the permit application as a whole is seeking multiple permissions including under the EMO1 and the BMO. The Tribunal’s limited jurisdiction creates something akin to an artificial demarcation in this planning application in a planning system that otherwise encourages omnibus planning applications capturing all the necessary planning permissions. The Respondent permit applicant has appropriately lodged an omnibus permit application, which the Council has considered and decided to approve, granting all the necessary planning permissions. It is the Tribunal’s limited jurisdiction that creates the complexity for the parties in terms of what is relevant and what is not relevant in this proceeding, including in any final order issued. It also creates complexity for the ultimate outcome sought by the Respondent permit applicant and the Council – being one permit for the whole proposal as was sought in the omnibus planning application.

While the Tribunal found it was in a position to grant a permit subject to amendments to the application, it did not have the jurisdiction to require amendments to those parts relating to the BMO and EMO, for which no third party appeal

right applied. Further, the Tribunal found that the permissions required under all permit triggers were intertwined (in matters such as accessway design and building placement under the BMO and EMO), creating complexity, noting:

…when a proposal is amended by the Tribunal for only some of the necessary permissions, separate additional processes are then required to amend the remainder of the permit application and gain the planning permissions to facilitate the proposal.

The permit applicant had amended the plans prior to the hearing, including changes which affected the BMO and EMO controls, matters over which the Tribunal had no jurisdiction. The permit applicant had not amended the proposal for the EMO and BMO permissions which were the responsibility of Council. However, neither Council nor the permit applicant wanted two separate planning permits to issue covering the separate planning permit triggers and suggested the Tribunal could issue an Interim Order which foreshadowed its support of the proposal and then give Council 6 months to enable the amendments to the other planning permissions to be reconsidered by Council. Council could then combine a final order from the Tribunal in regard to the RCZ and SLO with its own decision under the EMO and BMO.

The Tribunal referred to the VCAT decision of Myers v Southern Grampians SC (Red Dot) [2022] VCAT 695 and Supreme Court decision Myers v Southern Grampians Shire Council [2023] VSC 658 which pointed out that part of the Tribunal’s task under section 84B of the Act is to:

(a) take account of any matter which the person or body in respect of whose decision the application for review is made—

(i) properly took account of in making its decision; or

(ii) was required to take account of in making its decision; and

(b) have regard to any matter which the person or body in respect of whose decision the application for review is made—

(i) properly had regard to in making its decision; or

(ii) is required to have regard to in making its decision.

In this case, this means the Tribunal considering the matters properly considered by Council,

including the weight given to the Council decision to grant permissions under the EMO and BMO. The Tribunal noted that to consider only the RCZ and SLO provisions would lead to a piecemeal application, where other permissions were decided elsewhere and separately.

The Tribunal issued an Interim Order to:

• Enable the Respondent permit applicant to seek the necessary amendments to the permit application, and

• Enable the Council to consider the amendments sought to the planning permissions required under the EMO1 and the BMO for this amended proposal

The Tribunal found that if either EMO or BMO amendment permission was not granted by Council, the Tribunal would not issue a planning permit under the RCZ and the SLO, given the approvals would then be piecemeal. The Tribunal’s conclusion noted:

If the Council’s decision is to grant an amended permit with conditions under the EMO1 and the BMO, the Tribunal will then issue another interim order allowing for any submissions, if necessary, from the parties regarding any further changes required to the draft permit conditions under the RCZ and the SLO4 as a consequence. If a further hearing is requested or required, the Tribunal will consider this. The Tribunal will then consider those submissions before issuing the final order.

The issues raised in the Myers and Dance decision provide a perplexing new interpretation of the how VCAT will deal with objector’s appeals that include both, permit triggers that are exempt from third party review rights and permit triggers that are open to third party appeals.

Practitioners need to be aware of this distinction and the potential protracted procedural consequences.

Permit no longer required

In Eddy v Yarra CC (Red Dot) [2024] VCAT, Council had issued a Notice of Decision to grant a permit (NOD) for a double storey dwelling on a lot less than 500 square metres (but greater than 300 square metres). No other planning permissions were required. Amendment VC243 to the Yarra Planning Scheme, which came into effect after the Council’s NOD was issued but before the appeal was lodged, changed all planning schemes to set

the minimum lot size for which the construction or extension of a single dwelling required a planning permit under zone provisions, to 300 square metres. The appeal was lodged under Section 82 of the Act by an objector to the planning permit.

The Tribunal found that the appellant did not have standing to bring the application for review as planning permission was not required when the appeal was lodged and there were no transitional provisions to the amendment. Had the appeal been lodged prior to the Amendment coming into effect, the appellant would have had standing and the Tribunal would have had jurisdiction to decide the matter. In that instance, given planning permission would no longer be required when Tribunal made its decision, it would be likely that the decision of the Tribunal would have been to order than no permit issue.

The Tribunal found that Amendment VC243 removed the appeal rights under Section 82(1) of the Act because no planning permission was required when the appeal was made. The Tribunal found that it did not have jurisdiction and struck out the proceeding. Of interest, the Tribunal also noted in its decision:

71 I accept that this outcome means the responsible authority will need to turn its mind to whether it has the power to grant a planning permit in circumstances where planning permission is no longer required despite the existence of the NOD.

72 This is a matter for the responsible authority given there were no transitional provisions introduced when Amendment VC243 came into force.

73 If the responsible authority considers it is bound to issue a planning permit but that this is an uncertain or undesirable outcome, it may wish seek advice about whether there are other statutory avenues available to the responsible authority (or indeed any other parties) to address the consequences of a planning permit being issued.

There may be other instances where planning permits for construction or extensions of single dwellings on lots between 300 and 500 square metres once required a planning permit, but no longer do.

No more gas connections

Planning Scheme Amendment VC250 was

gazetted on 1January 2024, prohibiting new gas connections for new dwellings, apartments and residential subdivisions where a planning permit is required. The Amendment changed all of Victoria’s Planning Schemes by:

• amending policy to restrict the provision of new gas connections in new residential development and subdivision,

• remove the optional requirement for a gas connection in Clauses 55/56/58 (ResCode)

• create a specific provision at Clause 53.03 to prohibit residential reticulated gas connections to new dwellings, new apartment developments and new residential subdivisions. This provision is explicit in that it specifies that no permit is to be granted for a new dwelling, apartment development or subdivision for dwelling/apartment purposes that is to be connected to a reticulated gas service. It also requires a condition on any planning permit granted for buildings and works for a new dwelling or apartment development that:

“Any new [dwelling/apartment] allowed by this permit must not be connected to a reticulated gas service (within the meaning of Clause 53.03 of the relevant planning scheme). This condition continues to have force and effect after the development authorised by this permit has been completed.”

Clause 53.03 has transitional provisions which exempt any new applications lodged prior to 1 January 2024 and any amendment to a planning permit which was issued prior to 1 January 2024. Practitioners should be aware that any amendments to current planning permit applications under Section 50 or 57a of the Planning and Environment Act 1987 (the Act), made after 1 January 2024, will reset the statutory clock to zero and this means you can no longer benefit from the Transitional Provisions of this Clause.

• Other changes include removing regional policy support for the expansion of gas infrastructure and amending land use conditions for small second dwellings to align with the above gas prohibitions.

The amendment was introduced to assist in phasing out the use of natural gas in Victoria, supporting emissions reduction targets.

DOUBLING UP

Secondary dwellings come in many different styles and a variety of sizes – though in most states they are limited to a maximum of 60 square metres.

The why, how and where of building a secondary dwelling.

The good old ‘granny flat’ isn’t just for your elderly relatives any more. Secondary dwellings have a lot to offer in a tight housing market, and the regulations that govern them are evolving. Victorian building designer Andrew Ferris gives us a rundown.

Unless you have been living under a rock, you will have noticed that Australia is experiencing some pretty stressful cost of living issues, along with a housing affordability crisis. (If you are living under a rock, that could well be the reason!).

At the core of the affordability issue is a housing shortage According to the Australian Bureau of Statistics, in the year ending 30 September 2023, Australia’s population grew by 659,800 people. The average household size is 2.52, meaning around 260,000 new homes are needed each year to house them. However, according to PopTracks, just 170,000 new homes were built in the year to March 2023 – the most recent data available. And indications are that construction of dwellings is slowing, not increasing. We are simply not keeping up, and with so much demand and so little housing stock, rents have escalated to the point that they are no longer affordable to many (housing is considered ‘affordable’ when rent is a maximum of 30 per cent of a household’s income).

Governments have tried to solve the housing affordability crisis in various ways, including by applying pressure on landlords to sell up and providing incentives to retirees to downsize, all in the name of making more houses available to buy, but that’s kicking the can down the road. If a large percentage of your income is being directed to rent, then it’s very difficult to save a deposit for a home of your own. Our governments also regularly spruik plans to build ambitious numbers of new homes, but history shows us that this is not what governments do well. Arguably, they should instead focus on their key role: facilitating the framework and legislation to activate a private sector response to the crisis.

One option with promise is the secondary dwelling, also known as an ancillary dwelling or ‘granny flat’. A second, usually separate, habitable building on a block, this kind of structure is distinctly different from a dual occupancy development where the land is subdivided into separate titles. For many years, granny flats were something of an elephant in the room, with

restrictive rules: usually not officially a dwelling by planning or building definitions, they were often required to be demountable, occupied only by a dependent family member, and removed when the dependent person no longer needed it (however, in practice they seldom were removed).

State governments have been reluctant to open the door to a broader, less restrictive definition of a secondary dwelling, and many councils have also pushed back. In the past few years, though, many states have made it easier to build one, and the sky has not fallen. In fact, this type of dwelling can play an important part in the multi-pronged approach to diversifying our housing stock that’s necessary for addressing the affordability crisis.

Whether it’s retirees moving into a unit in the backyard and renting the main house out for income, accommodation for young adult children, an elderly relative or a friend, or a smaller and more affordable place to live for students, people saving for their own home, or people who move often for work, secondary dwellings can be a solution.

Each state has its own definition of a secondary dwelling and its own planning and building requirements for approval to construct one (see facing page for an overview), but many of the principles and objectives are similar. Until late 2023, Victoria still considered such a dwelling a ‘dependent person’s unit’ (DPU) with its restrictive uses and requirement for removal once the dependent person no longer required it. However, newly minted ‘small second dwelling’ (SSD) regulations in the state now allow for the construction – in many cases, without the need for a planning permit – of a secondary dwelling of up to 60 square metres on blocks over 300 square metres with an existing house. Anyone can live in them, and they do not need to be relocatable. (In fact, the old DPU building type has been completely removed from the planning framework as part of the changes.)

Not only do updated regulations like Victoria’s –now more in line with other states – make it easier

to build a secondary dwelling, but they should also lead to better-performing ones.

As they are now defined as Class 1a dwellings, the usual National Construction Code requirements (including energy efficiency requirements) must be met. Designers will need to consider design criteria such as overshadowing, orientation and passive solar design to achieve at least the minimum Star rating and deliver a quality product. This can only be a good thing; increased availability of energy-efficient, small-footprint dwellings that cost little to run will help alleviate the cost of living crisis.

If you are interested in building a secondary dwelling on your block, it is important to remember that planning and building rules, permitted uses, assessment criteria and so on are different in every state and territory, and there are also likely to be specific controls and limitations imposed by your local council. Do your research for what applies in your location. It is also important to seek proper financial advice.

Although secondary dwellings are certainly not a magic bullet for the housing affordability situation, I’m hopeful that with more appropriate regulations in place, in a pretty short timeframe this type of housing will not only be embraced, but will start to become embedded in strategic planning for housing needs.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Andrew Ferris is a building designer specialising in unit and townhouse developments, along with bespoke homes. His passion is balancing the objectives of his developer clients with creating affordable, functional and practical homes, and advocating for the housing needs of the community. He is also a member of the Design Matters National Planning Advisory Group. ferrisdesign.com.au

SECONDARY DWELLING REGULATIONS AROUND AUSTRALIA

AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY

A secondary residence (SR) of between 40m2 and 90m2 can be built on a block over 500m2 that contains a principal residence. The SR must:

- Comply with Australian Standard AS4299 Adaptable Housing (Class C)

- Adhere to setback requirements

- Provide clear pedestrian access, at least one car parking space, and private open space for SR occupants.

For more: planning.act.gov.au

NEW SOUTH WALES

Secondary dwellings (SDs) are permitted in residential zones on lots of at least 450m2, and may also be permitted in other zones. You can build an SD without the traditional council approval process, provided that:

- The SD is under 60m2 and under 3.8m in height

- The SD is at least 1.8m from existing structures and 3m from trees over 6m in height

- 3m rear and 0.9m side setbacks are maintained

- The property has maximum 50% site coverage, including the main dwelling footprint and garage, and at least 25% landscaping

- The SD has a minimum of 24m2 of private open space

The lot cannot be subdivided. You will require a complying development certificate (CDC) from either your local council or an accredited certifier.

For more: bit.ly/NSW-SD

NORTHERN TERRITORY

An independent unit (IU) is permitted in most zones, with a maximum floor area of 75m2. It must meet all requirements under the NT Planning Scheme 2020, including setback requirements for ancillary structures.

For more: bit.ly/NT-SD

QUEENSLAND

Requirements vary depending on the council area in which the secondary dwelling (SD) is to be built. Usually, no planning approval is needed as long as the SD meets the development criteria in the ‘Dwelling house’ code or ‘Dwelling house (small lot)’ code. Common requirements are:

- An SD must be built on a property with a primary dwelling, and be the only SD on the property

- The SD is a maximum of 80m2 and within 20m of the main house

- The SD has an entryway that’s separate from the main house

- The SD is of a similar style and built with similar materials to the main dwelling

- From the street, it must appear that there is only one dwelling on the property

- If the SD is rented, a parking space for each dwelling (main and secondary) is to be supplied.

For more: bit.ly/QLD-SD

SOUTH AUSTRALIA

Both planning and building approvals are required in order to build an ancillary dwelling (AD). The main governing factors for approval are based on aspects such as site cover, private open space, soft landscaping and car parking. Generally:

- The property must be a minimum of 600m2 and have a primary dwelling

- The AD can be up to 60m2, with a maximum of two bedrooms

- The AD must share all services with the main house (power, water, sewer, and driveway)

- The AD must have at least 20m2 of private open space.

For more: bit.ly/SA-SD

TASMANIA

An ancillary dwelling (AD), also known as a secondary residence, can be built on residential-zoned land that has one existing dwelling. It must be on the same title as the main dwelling, share utilities, and be the only AD on the lot. It can be self-contained, and the maximum allowable size is 60m2.

For more: bit.ly/TAS-SD

VICTORIA

You can build a small second dwelling (SSD) that’s under 60m2 in most land use zones without a planning permit provided that:

- The block is over 300m2 with one existing house on it

- It’s the only SSD on the lot

- Dwelling height does not exceed 5m

- The SSD doesn’t have a reticulated gas connection or environmental overlay.

You will still need a building permit. Building requirements include that the SSD be set back behind the facade of the existing dwelling, have safe pedestrian access, and have at least 8m2 private open space.

For more: bit.ly/VIC-SD

WESTERN AUSTRALIA

An ancillary dwelling (AD) of up to 70m2 can be built on residential zoned land of any size without planning approval, provided that it complies with the latest R-Codes, does not prevent the main dwelling from meeting minimum open space and outdoor area requirements, and is located behind the street setback line. An extra car parking bay is not required if the property is close to public transport.

For more: bit.ly/WA-SecDwelling

Information compiled with the assistance of Phoebe McGrath, Design Matters National. Please note: While we have done our best to ensure this information is accurate, it is intended as an overview only. Please check requirements in your own state and council area carefully.

Build your modern life

Discover how the #1 cladding brand in Australia can help you build your dream modern home.

The James Hardie Modern Homes Forecast 2024 is our first annual research report discovering popular and emerging contemporary home styles. Whether you are planning an extension, renovation, restoration or new build, this forecast will be an invaluable tool on your journey.

The grand Modern Farmhouse is one our seven emerging home styles, a seamless balance of traditional design and contemporary elements, references classic architecture with a focus on clean lines and open spaces. This style satisfies the desire for both modern functionality and the comfort of traditional design and craftsmanship.

To learn more about the trajectory of home design in Australia, download the Forecast at the QR code below.

It’s time to build your modern life.

It’s Possible™ with James Hardie

Scan to read the James Hardie Modern Homes Forecast 2024.

Hardie™ Oblique™ Cladding

Axon™ Cladding

ADVOCACY UPDATE

Victoria:

Last month, DMN wrote to the outgoing State Building Surveyor, Andrew Cialini, thanking him for the positive working relationship we’ve enjoyed for five years. Andrew replied: “I have appreciated the support and input from DMN also. We have many challenges in our industry, and these are best addressed in a collaborative and constructive manner across all practitioners – not just building surveyors. The insights of Peter [Lombo] and others have been invaluable in my work and I am disappointed in not having the opportunity to continue that work in the role of SBS but do look forward to concentrating on one project for my remaining time at VBA. I would also like to call out DMNs involvement on the Documentation Standard Working Group that has, for me, shown what can be achieved if we work collaboratively and constructively across disciplines. Once again only a starting piece but a very important one.”

In June, the Commissioner and CEO of the Victorian Building Authority (VBA), Anna Cronin, announced that former City of Melbourne Municipal Building Surveyor Steven Baxas will replace Andrew Cialini, with Mr Cialini moving to a new role at the VBA tasked with addressing the critical shortage of building surveyors in Victoria. Steven Baxas will commence as State Building Surveyor from 5 August. DMN’s Peter Lombo, Jason Holmes and CEO will have a ‘changing of the guard’ meeting with the old and new State Building Surveyor, on 29 August.

Several months ago, DMN attended an information session about the Regulation 286 proposed fee reset and release of the Regulatory Impact Statement (RIS). The Victorian Department of Transport and Planning (DTP) reviewed fees prescribed in the regulations listed under regulation 286 of the Building Regulations 2018. The review covered fees collected by the VBA for owner-builder applications and duplicate certificates; fees collected by the Building Appeals Board for applications, appeals, referrals, and fast-track appeals; fees collected by the Building Regulations Advisory Committee (BRAC) for accreditations; and fees collected by local councils for Report and Consent, Lodgement, and Request for Information. DMN called on members to provide feedback in May, and then contributed a written submission to the DTP, saying that whilst DMN appreciates the cost recovery required by all departments in government, we are concerned over the rising costs and pressured placed on the industry in these difficult economic times and the rising costs need to be offset with improved efficiencies in handling the various requests. DTP evaluated and considered all submissions and feedback received and the Minister for Planning proceeded with the making of the proposed

Regulations with one amendment. The Building Amendment (Fees and Other Matters) Regulations 2024 came into effect on 30 June 2024. The increased fees will commence on 1 October 2024.

Over in Planning, having met with the Victorian Minister for Planning and Minister for the Suburbs, The Hon. Sonya Kilkenny, in June, DMN sent a follow-up letter to Minister Kilkenny reiterating that DMN is dedicated to improving the planning and development sphere, so we appreciated the chance to put forward our Members’ ‘wish list’ (published in “REVUE” magazine) to address planning issues as well as offer several simple ways to alleviate the housing shortage. We reminded the Minister that our findings aim to foster a constructive dialogue on how we, alongside other stakeholders, can streamline processes to address the growing housing crisis effectively. We clarified that our intention is not to critique but to cultivate a partnership that drives policy reform and facilitates efficient planning and development practices. The “REVUE” article outlined a series of issues and recommendations derived from a survey of DMN members, highlighting areas where enhancements could significantly impact processing times and, by extension, the economic throughput of planning permit applications in Victoria. It is DMN’s belief that, with over $32 billion worth of development projects under consideration annually in Victoria, even minor improvements in efficiency could unlock substantial economic benefits. By reducing the application processing times, around $500 million worth of development could be released for each week saved. DMN acknowledges and values the efforts being undertaken by various arms of the Allan Government to address some of the issues raised. The efforts to reform policy and address the housing shortage are vital steps towards enhancing the planning system. However, with DMN’s unique position—representing over 2,000 designer members responsible for lodging a significant portion of all Victorian Planning Permit applications—we believe that involving our members in the demonstration or testing of new provisions could provide invaluable real-world insights. Over the next 24 months, DMN will delve deeper into each issue raised, with the Planning Working Group developing a dedicated campaign for each concern. The first campaign focuses on unreasonable and unnecessary requests for amendments to planning permit applications and has already been distributed to all Victorian councils and stakeholders. At the meeting, DMN Peter Lombo suggested that planning subdivision applications be removed from the statistical data on processing times for ‘building and works’ applications. Ashley Thomson put

forward some additional member feedback, namely that ‘garden area’ requirements are overly restrictive and prohibit infill development on well-located lots in proximity to activity centres. The inclusion of an additional one-line exemption within the general residential zone, for land within 200 metres of a designated activity centre, would unleash thousands of new home opportunities in well serviced locations across the state. Ashley also reported that DMN members have identified that a few councils are unreasonably requesting/ demanding section 50, Section 50A and Section 57A amendments to planning permit applications, as a proforma on their RFIs. These requests result in a distortion of the planning permit activity reporting statistics upon which the industry relies to gauge, among other things, improvements in system efficiency. The industry’s confidence in the PPARs should be maintained and Councils that seek to distort their numbers addressed. DMN will now meet with the Shadow Minister for Planning, James Newbury.

In the education sphere, the Advanced Diploma of Building Information Modelling (BIM) qualification, has recently been accredited by the Victorian Registration and Qualifications Authority (VRQA). Swinburne University is keen to deliver this course to a broad range of students. To further this goal, they requested the Victorian government include the Advanced Diploma of BIM as part of the ‘Free TAFE’ initiative. This initiative would greatly benefit students by providing access to high-quality education and training at no cost, thereby fostering a skilled workforce in the BIM sector. DMN endorsed the inclusion of this course in the ‘Free TAFE’

initiative because it stands to benefit our industry by bridging the skills gap in the construction technology field.

Western Australia:

Earlier this year, DMN re-engaged FPL Consulting’s Steven Cusworth to create capacity and capability with DMN about the work DMN’s WA Mandatory Registration Working Group is conducting. DMN has written to The Hon. Sue Ellery MLC, Minister for Commerce, regarding the Building Better in WA regulatory reforms, and the imminent release of the Review of Regulation of Building Designers in WA. DMN told the minister that it is a strong supporter of mandatory registration of BDs and congratulated the Cook Government on the ongoing process to consider this important reform, stating clearly our priorities and support for reform with respect to BDs in WA. DMN supports mandatory registration of building designers in WA. Registration with minimum standard requirements will lead to improved consumer outcomes and an improved professional reputation for building designers. It concerns our members and many good operators in the sector that no regulation currently allows for shonky operators (either underqualified or completely unskilled) to sully the reputation of the industry and expose consumers to poor outcomes. Registration will require building designers to have the requisite level of skills to practice. Registration will provide consumers with an independent verification of building designer skill and competency.

South Australia

DMN’s Chair and CEO travelled to Adelaide earlier this month for a member gathering, and meetings alongside DMN Member and CEO of SUHO, Jim Woolcock. The trio met with The Hon. Nick Champion MP, Minister for Planning, Minister for Housing and Urban Development, Minister for Housing Infrastructure, and Member for Taylor; Sabina Douglass-Hill, a long-time collaborator, and the Senior Project Manager –Energy Efficient Buildings, Energy and Technical Regulation, in the SA Government’s Department of Energy & Mining; and Jodie Evans who heads up PlanSA, the SA govt department which introduces the NCC.

Tasmania:

Several Tasmanian members brought it to our attention that the website of the Consumer, Building and Occupational Services (CBOS) in the Department of Justice, in the Tasmanian Government, did not include DMN in its list of Additional Training Resources. DMN contacted CBOS and had this rectified. Also, the CBOS Technical Regulation area has confirmed that DMN CPD is recognised in Tasmania, and that if DMN holds any local industry training or events that we wish to publicise, we can submit details to CBOS and they will be featured publicly on their website.

DMN has written to The Hon. Felix Ellis MP, Minister for Housing and Planning in Tasmania, introducing DMN and requesting a meeting to discuss two matters: addressing the current anomaly of the exclusion of BDs from accessing the Keystone training rebate; and adding DMN to the list of training providers with courses currently funded by Keystone. This was brought to our attention by a DMN Member in Tasmania who observed that BDs are not permitted to access the type of training subsidies that other “hands-on” built environment practitioners such as plumbers can. CBOS said only the trades are eligible for subsidies and is starting a petition to change this. Keystone is the training facilitator for Tasmania.

Queensland:

Since signing an MOU earlier this year between DMN and BDQ, our organisations have had monthly catch-ups between the CEO and Chair of DMN, and the CEO, President and Secretary of BDQ. DMN and BDQ formalised reciprocal rights to receive member pricing for CPD and attendance at each other’s Building Design Awards in 2024.

“The Advanced Diploma of Building Information Modelling (BIM) qualification, has recently been accredited by the Victorian Registration and Qualifications Authority (VRQA).”

“Ministers collectively recognised the need to make Australia’s buildings more resilient to extreme weather events driven by climate change.”

National:

DMN has written to the Australian Building Codes Board (ABCB), requesting a seat on the Building Codes Committee (BCC). Membership of the technical committees is determined by the Board and DMN’s request has been forwarded for the consideration of the Board.

The CEO met with the CEO of the Design Institute of Australia (DIA) in July having initially met as fellow members of the ACIF and NATSPEC.

DMN attended the Master Builders Victoria (MBAV) Building Product Assurance Summit last month for the launch of the National Building Product Coalition Guide to Traceability and Digitalisation of Building Product Information. The guide provides foundational elements needed to facilitate digital traceability along the construction supply chain and across all product types. The recent Commonwealth, state, and territory Building Ministers’ meeting in Melbourne in June agreed to establish a national product scheme and the incoming rules to report on embodied carbon that traceability can support, as a key part of the BMM’s focus on Enhancing Building Industry Capability and Capacity. This was the Communique from the meeting. In summary, the Ministers, “…met to confirm their

commitment to climate resilience and discuss measures to assist the transition to net zero in the built environment. Ministers collectively recognised the need to make Australia’s buildings more resilient to extreme weather events driven by climate change. As a first step, Ministers agreed to include climate resilience as a specific objective of the Australian Building Codes Board (ABCB) from 2025. This will give the ABCB a clear mandate to develop future National Construction Code (NCC) requirements that reduce the impact of natural disasters on housing and other critical community facilities.”

DMN’s Chair and CEO will meet with the CEO of the MBAV, Michael Lihou, in August.

DMN is a shareholder of NATSPEC and attended an annual lunch at the Westin in July, hosted by Richard Choy, who also presented at a member event about NATSPEC in Melbourne this month. Another NATSPEC event is planned for August in Perth.

DMN has joined the National Building Products Coalition (NBPC) which is an “industry coalition to help advance the implementation of the National Building Product Assurance Framework. The National Building Products Assurance

Framework was prepared in response to the Building Confidence Report (BCR) which sought to address systemic issues in the Australian construction industry. The Framework was written to address the safe use of building products in construction, and this is the key priority for the Coalition. However, many of the proposed actions can have the added benefit of contributing to other priorities including, improved construction sector productivity, the goal of net zero carbon in Australian buildings, circular economy and ending the use of products made under conditions of modern slavery. Having taken the pledge to join the Coalition, DMN’s logo has been added to the Guide and the website, and DMN will be added as a signatory to the letter going to the Federal Minister for Industry and Science, The Hon. Ed Husic. DMN will also be invited to fortnightly online meetings of the coalition.

Assessor Advocacy:

DMN has identified an error in the course content of Elemental DTS Assessment training that some Assessors may have attended.

The training suggested that applying a ‘weighted average eave calculation’ methodology when

“The limitations within NCC2022 Elemental DTS Provisions restrict the types of projects suitable for assessment under these provisions.”

evaluating wall insulation requirements was an acceptable NCC 2022 compliant solution for Elemental DTS assessment.

The Australian Building Codes Board (ABCB) has confirmed that this methodology is not supported by, and conflicts with, the legislation and provisions in NCC 2022. As such, it should not be used.

The Design Matters National Technical Support Team advises members that the limitations within NCC 2022 Elemental DTS Provisions restrict the types of projects suitable for assessment under these provisions. In cases where Elemental DTS assessment is not appropriate, NatHERS assessment may be a suitable alternative. Otherwise, a performance solution might be necessary.

The ABCB states: “It is a matter for an appropriate authority such as a building certifier or surveyor to determine compliance with the NCC, including any performance solution. Section A of the Code, Governing Requirements, sets out requirements for showing compliance with the code (including Performance Solutions).”

In addition to the above work with ABCB this week, the following activities have been keeping DMN busy on behalf of our Assessor community:

• NatHERS Climate Zone amendment advocacy

• NatHERS Proposed Standardised QA procedure progress meetings

• NatHERS for Existing Homes QA Consultation Group

• NatHERS for Existing Homes Training Consultation Group

• NatHERS for Existing Homes DRAFT Technical Note feedback

• Home Energy Ratings Disclosure Framework Version 2 Consultation

• NatHERS Conflicts of Interest policy

• Technical advice from NatHERS seeking confirmation on correct modelling of void formers such as Biax and Cuplox

• Technical advice from NatHERS requesting clarification on modelling VRF and ducted systems air conditioning systems (should the performance of the indoor or the outdoor unit be used)?

02 Design

ITTY BITTY HOUSE

Tiny Footprint, Towering Ambition: The Itty Bitty House Transformation

Nestled among the heritage facades of Whitehall Street, Melbourne, an architectural gem stands testament to innovative design and space maximisation. Sky Tiong of Sky Architect Studio has defied the odds, converting a modest singlestorey dwelling into an aspirational three-storey residence that harmoniously juxtaposes old-world charm with contemporary living.

The project, endearingly named ‘Itty Bitty House’, is a marvel of modern architectural design that originated from a young couple’s vision. Their request was simple yet ambitious: to transform their old home into a stunning space that not only celebrates the Melbourne skyline but also serves as a functional haven for entertaining and living.

Preserving the existing heritage front, Sky Architect Studio has crafted a rear extension that soars with modernity. The challenge? A mere 4.88-metre frontage and a shared wall with the neighbours. Yet, with careful negotiations with Maribyrnong Council, Sky Architect Studio achieved a groundbreaking design approval, setting a new precedent for Whitehall Street with its open roof terrace – a crown that affords unparalleled views of Melbourne’s CBD.

“Sky Architect Studio has crafted a rear extension that soars with modernity.”

“The open roof terrace affords unparalleled views of Melbourne’s CBD.”

CREDITS

Photos: Chris Murray

Interior Design: Sky Architectural Studio

Builder: Louis Wang

Structural Engineer: I. Struct.D

Energy Assessor: Rob Iacono

Building Surveyor: MKT Building Surveyors

The design exploits verticality to circumvent spatial limitations, weaving in a pull-out pantry within the sleek white kitchen, a guest suite, and communal spaces that spill out onto generous decking. Ascending to the private quarters, the first floor unfurls into a sun-drenched family hall, bedrooms, and the pièce de résistance: a master suite with an ensuite and walk-in robe. All this, topped with a rooftop terrace that marries the skyline with vertical timber battens in an elegant dance of form and function.

Sky Architect Studio has turned constraints into creative catalysts, ensuring each room basks in natural light, using glass expansively to foster a sense of openness. White walls act as a canvas for the clients’ personal touches, while the treasured green wall remains, now part of a modern architectural tableau.

The construction phase was as challenging as the design phase, if not more. From demolition

dilemmas due to the party wall intricacies to the ballet of manual Hebel power panel installations, each hurdle was a testament to the team’s resilience and innovation. The post-COVID material scarcity further tested the team’s adaptability, leading to a pivot towards light gauge steel framing and inventive solutions for built-in downpipes and rendering works.

The Itty Bitty House stands as a bold statement of what can be achieved with vision, collaboration, and a refusal to be constrained by physical dimensions. It’s a testament to the power of architecture to transform not just spaces, but the way we perceive and interact with them. The house, once a line drawing, now stands proudly as a significant sculptural form, redefining the architectural identity of Whitehall Street. It’s a story of a little house with a big heart, and an even bigger impact on the fabric of its community.

ASGARD

BY ZANETTO BUILDERS

Author: Kyle Zanetto

Drawing upon a wealth of building experience DMN member Kyle Zanetto from Zanetto Builders creates Asgard, a minimalist home imbued with a sense of luxury and superior function.

Located in Launceston, Tasmania, ‘Asgard’ emerges from the creative vision of homeowner, builder, and design enthusiast, Kyle Zanetto.

Crafted with the architectural expertise of Honed Architecture, this residence stands as a testament to a thoughtful and innovative approach to living spaces.

Challenging his previous design ethos marked by bold, black themes, Zanetto pivoted towards a concept defined by luminosity and openness. Asgard is conceptualized to harness white light, utilising a palette of light materials complemented by the warmth of Australian hardwood. This strategic use of materials ensures a modern yet timeless aesthetic.

At the heart of Asgard’s design is a striking Pure White polished concrete slab, which sets a foundational tone for the home. This is artfully complemented by extensive use of Blackbutt timber, which lines both the interior and exterior spaces, adding a touch of organic warmth. The home’s dynamic character is further enriched by carefully selected wallpapers, battened walls, and textured tiles, with deliberate pops of colour enhancing each room, ensuring that each space within Asgard is both inviting and distinctly unique.

CREDITS

Photographer: Matthew Long – Tassie Visuals

Interior Design, Build, Styling and Design: Kyle Zanetto of Zanetto Builders

Architecture: HONED ARCHITECTURE for Documentation

Landscape Design: Martin Ruzicka

Upon entering the residence and turning right, visitors are welcomed into an expansive open-plan living, kitchen, and dining area that seamlessly extends into a covered alfresco space, ideal for entertaining. This area is meticulously designed for both comfort and elegance, featuring an electric fireplace, all electric blinds, floor to ceiling glazing with double grey tint to ensure privacy without sacrificing style.

To the left of the entrance, an extended timber clad hallway hiding 5 secret doors serves as the architectural spine and lightwell of the home. On one side, the corridor is lined with a triple car garage, two bedrooms, a large bathroom, and a cinema room, designed for ultimate relaxation and entertainment. Opposite these rooms sits an 18m long floor to ceiling glazing unit which draws the occupant through to a serene Japanese garden offering a tranquil retreat.

At the end of the hallway, the functional areas of the home are situated, including a laundry room equipped with stone benchtops and a double sink, emphasising practicality and sophistication. The master suite, complete with a luxurious ensuite, provides a private sanctuary for relaxation. Outside, the property is completed with a spa area, dog run and a lush lawn, creating a perfect setting for leisure and outdoor enjoyment.

Zanetto Builders redefines minimalist elegance in Asgard, showcasing bespoke detailing that distinguishes their interpretation of contemporary design. The material palette is grounded in Australian timber, creating a striking contrast with polished concrete floors and expansive glazing. Custom lighting design by Darklight UK led to European lights to be imported to create a flush finish throughout the home. Recessed lighting and groove-lined feature walls enhance the spatial perception under the lofty 2.7-meter-high ceilings.

In the culinary centre of the home, the kitchen features seamlessly integrated appliances that subtly complement a dramatic five-meter snow stone island bench and a 64-bottle wine rack, blending functionality with aesthetic appeal. The bathrooms offer a lavish experience with floor-toceiling Italian tiles, dual shower heads, heated floors, and stone vanity tops, embodying a generous design philosophy.

The master suite is a testament to luxury, equipped with a built-in walk-in wardrobe and an ensuite that basks in natural light from a strategically placed skylight covering the entire double shower void.

Asgard epitomises the Zanetto Builders’ commitment to balancing aesthetic allure with

“The layout optimises the natural trajectory of sunlight.”

efficient performance. The architectural layout optimises the natural trajectory of sunlight throughout the day, enhancing internal temperature control. Protective soffits shield the timber cladding from UV damage, while ducted heating with recessed linear grills ensures uniform warmth across all rooms. The roof’s double cavity batten design promotes effective drainage and drying.

For entertainment and privacy, the home features a soundproofed media room with a surround sound system and acoustic insulation across all walls. Security is paramount, provided by a Samsung smart lock with fingerprint and code access, ensuring a secure and private living environment.

Aligning with Zanetto Builders ethos of Healthy Home building the entire project was constructed using the Proclima external membrane and ventilated cavity design. Each room is fitted with isolated temperature control and humidity control within the bathrooms ensuring in house moisture levels are maintained to provide the homes occupants with a healthy and habitable space.

Evidencing the importance of a builder’s perspective, Asgard is a home of superior finishing that is innovatively designed. Zanetto Builders surpasses expectations for a minimalist outcome, delivering a home that testifies to its unique creative vision.

1. SIlver Linings, Rachco Vella Architecture, Photo: Tatjana Plitt

Phoenix Central Park - Gallery, John Wardle Architects, Photo: Trevor Mein

Northcote House, Melanie Beynon Architecture & Design, Photo: Tom Blachford 4. The Boathouse, My Build Collective, Photo: Anjie Blair

03 Events

Design Matters National Excellence + Innovation Summit

Friday 25 October 2024, The Edge, Fed Square, Melbourne.

The inaugural Design Matters National Excellence + Innovation Summit is Australia’s flagship forum for Building Designers, TPAs/EEAs, and other built environment professionals to explore the latest trends, innovative technologies, best practices, and of course, celebrate excellence.

All DMN Members, staff, family, friends, and professional associates are invited to ‘down tools’ for a day and come together to work on their business rather than in the business and be inspired by excellence and innovation.

Getting there will be a breeze as it’s all happening across one day, under one roof, at Melbourne’s centrally located Federation Square. Open your calendar now and block out Friday 25 October 2024, for the Design Matters National Excellence + Innovation Summit at Fed Square, then jump on the website and register.

Why a Design Matters National Excellence + Innovation Summit?

The purpose of this full-day event is to bring together DMN’s Building Designers, Energy Assessors, and other built environment professionals, from all over Australia to:

• hear diverse perspectives from authoritative thought leaders

• be inspired by DMN members elevating design excellence,

• celebrate best practice in our industry

• grow your networks, and

• contribute to the conversation.

What will happen at the Design Matters

National Excellence + Innovation Summit?

During the morning, the DMN Summit Conference will bring together compelling speakers from across the country to discuss issues of national significance to Australia’s built environment. Then, in the afternoon and evening, we’ll toast the winners of DMN’s two design competitions: the

True Zero Carbon Challenge (TZCC), and the DMN Building Design Awards.

What’s included in my Design Matters National Excellence + Innovation Summit ticket?

This day-long event will feature three distinct parts (and you’re encouraged to attend all of them!):

• A highly informative and engaging DMN Summit Conference program, from 9am3pm

• The exciting True Zero Carbon Challenge presentations and winner announcements, from 3pm-5pm, then

• The glamorous DMN Building Design Awards, where the National Building Design of the Year will be announced, from 6pm11pm.

As part of your ticket to the DMN Summit Conference, you’ll not only get ample brain-food in the form of engaging keynote and panel speakers, but we’ll also provide a sumptuous morning tea, lunch, and afternoon tea. Then, when the stars come out for the DMN Building Design Awards at 6pm, so will an incredible bar and banquet from our catering partner, Olive & Thyme.

How to register

Head over to the DMN website to register for the entire day-long Summit program (the best value option!), or to purchase tickets for the Design Matters National Excellence + Innovation Summit, True Zero Carbon Challenge, or the DMN Building Design Awards.

Seating will be limited and tickets at the super early bird rate won’t last long.

We’re looking forward to welcoming you to the DMN Summit to explore the future of building design and our built environment.

REGISTER NOW!

The True Zero Carbon Challenge: Pioneering sustainable Building Design at the DMN Summit

As part of an exciting all-day Summit program on 25 October, the True Zero Carbon Challenge (TZCC) will be a unique catalyst for transformative change in sustainable building design. This fantastic event, now in its second year, nestled within a broader conference and followed by the Building Design Awards, promises to showcase the future of eco-friendly construction.

The TZCC segment of the Summit will feature presentations from all entrants, with each team comprising a building designer partnered with an energy efficiency assessor (EEA). This unique collaboration is at the heart of the challenge, fostering interdisciplinary approaches to creating truly sustainable, carbon-positive buildings. The TZCC goes beyond the concept of net-zero energy, pushing participants to design structures that actively repay their carbon impact over time.

At its core, the TZCC is built on a platform of education and training. It asks crucial questions: How can we collaboratively address the housing industry's contribution to greenhouse gas emissions? How do we transition to a built environment that's not just carbon-neutral, but carbon-positive? Are we, as an industry, moving swiftly enough to meet the Commonwealth Government's Paris Agreement commitments?

The challenge aims to lead a paradigm shift in the industry. It encourages a move away from large, energy-hungry homes towards smaller footprint highly liveable dwellings that make considered use of space and materials. Participating teams are urged to incorporate solar passive design principles, creating energy-efficient, healthy, and adaptable homes that will serve future generations.

A key focus of the TZCC is to elevate the

“The

TZCC champions the

notion of a circular economy in construction.”

status of NatHERS Accredited Assessors within the broader building design industry. The challenge promotes the idea of integrating these professionals into design teams from the concept stage, highlighting their crucial role in optimising thermal performance and minimising carbon footprints.

By showcasing the capabilities of NatHERS software tools and Chenath, the TZCC demonstrates how Accredited EEAs can substantiate design decisions, providing valuable insights throughout the design process. This emphasis aims to encourage building designers to collaborate with accredited assessors for superior outcomes.

The TZCC also champions the notion of a circular economy in construction. Entrant teams are challenged to consider the entire lifecycle of their designs, from the sourcing of materials to their potential reuse at the end of a building's life.

For building design professionals attending the Summit, the TZCC presentations promise to be a highlight. They offer a unique opportunity to witness cutting-edge sustainable design concepts, network with industry innovators, and gain insights as the entrant teams present the creative processes, they worked through to develop design concepts that will inform the future of building design practice.

As we face the urgent need to address climate change, the True Zero Carbon Challenge represents a critical step forward. It not only presents groundbreaking designs but also promotes an holistic approach to sustainability in the built environment.

Don't miss this opportunity to be inspired by the leaders in sustainable building design. The True Zero Carbon Challenge at the DMN Summit on October 25, 2024, is set to be a pivotal moment in the journey towards a greener, more sustainable future for Australian building design.

2022 TZCC Winning project Omnia House

Designer: Elizabeth Wheeler, Future Focused Buildings

Energy Assessor: Tamar Boyd, Blue Lotus Energy Rating

On-Site Tour: Lessons from The Cape

Words by: Phoebe McGrath

In the design industry, practical experience is invaluable, especially for those embarking on their careers. While university and TAFE provide essential theoretical knowledge, nothing solidifies information quite like firsthand experience. This truth was brought home to me during DMN’s recent member tour of The Cape, Australia’s most sustainable housing estate in Cape Paterson, Victoria.

As an architecture undergraduate, I once conducted a precedent study of the 10 Star House by The Sociable Weaver and Clare Cousins Architects for a unit on sustainable construction. While I thoroughly enjoyed analysing the project remotely, photographs, text, and diagrams can only convey so much.

Visiting The Cape deepened my appreciation for the project I had studied. I could now relate the facts I had learnt to the physical reality, valuing the project in its broader context: surrounded by similarly environmentally conscious homes in the refreshing coastal landscape of Victoria. The experience was further enriched by

discussions with fellow DMN members, whose diverse opinions and enthusiasm spanned a variety of topics.

This visit underscored the complementary nature of classroom learning and on-site experiences. While formal education provides a solid theoretical foundation, practical, in-person experiences powerfully consolidate this knowledge. The combination achieves the best learning outcomes.

To my fellow emerging designers, I cannot emphasise enough the value of getting out there to experience, explore, and experiment. These activities will not only expand your knowledge but also boost your confidence in applying what you’ve learnt.

In our ever-evolving field, bridging the gap between theory and practice is crucial. The Cape serves as a great example of how sustainable design principles can be brought to life, offering invaluable lessons for those willing to step out of the classroom and into the real world.

DMN's Tassie Mini Roadshow: A Success

CEO Danielle Johnston led DMN’s Kingspan Insulation Design & Insulation Tour across Tasmania last month, focusing on rigid insulation. The event combined upskilling and networking opportunities for DMN members, with stops in Hobart and Launceston. Kingspan Insulation experts Stuart Braine and Robert Sebek delivered valuable presentations, enhancing the educational experience. A huge thank you to our valued partner Kingspan Insulation, and host Brickworks, for such a cheerful and informative event.

Kingspan’s integrated insulation and membrane solutions deliver homes that are warmer in winter, cooler in summer and dry all year round.

Kingspan Insulation Pty Ltd

Tel: 1300 247 235

Email: info@kingspaninsulation.com.au

www.kingspaninsulation.com.au

A Day of Impactful Connections in Adelaide

DMN’s recent visit to Adelaide proved to be an incredibly worthwhile and engaging experience. The day centred around key meetings with government officials, including an insightful discussion with the advisor to the Minister for Planning. A serendipitous encounter with the Minister himself added unexpected value to the trip.

The team, led by CEO Danielle Johnston, DMN Chair, Peter Lombo, and including DMN member Jim Woolcock from SUHO, engaged in productive conversations with various department representatives. These discussions touched on crucial topics such as the implementation of the National Construction Code in South Australia and initiatives around net-zero energy building.

The day was filled with meaningful exchanges and valuable networking opportunities. The visit also included an informative breakfast and tour, providing a comprehensive look at Adelaide’s approach to sustainable design and construction.

This eventful day not only strengthened DMN’s relationships with key stakeholders but also provided invaluable insights into South Australia’s progress in sustainable building practices.

04 Brainwaves

Photo by Alona Gross on Unsplash

Photo by Hans Isaacson on Unsplash

DMN ROLE AT THE BUILDING REGULATIONS ADVISORY COMMITTEE

BY GREG BLANCH,

DMN MEMBER AND FOUNDER OF DETAIL 3

Photo by Pixasquare on Unsplash

Design Matters National has had and maintains a broad and extensive role in building governance and advocacy. One of the lesserknown but very important roles is that of DMN representation on the Building Regulations Advisory Committee (BRAC).

BRAC is an independent statutory body established under section 210 of the Building Act 1993.

The Building Regulations 2018 (Victoria) sets out the industry stakeholders that make up the various committee members on BRAC. Design Matters National (called up by its former name of BDAV) is allowed to have one representative on BRAC.

I have had the privilege of being the DMN representative on BRAC since November 2020.

The BRAC functions are set out in section 211 of the Building Act. These are to advise the Minister (Planning in Victoria) on the following:

• draft regulations prepared under the Act

• the administration of the Act and the regulations

• the impact on the building regulations system

• issues relating to the building permit levy

• any matter referred to it by the Minister.

Additionally, BRAC accredits building products, including construction methods, design components or systems connected with building products.

BRAC members are appointed by the Minister for Planning for their expertise.

BRAC works closely with the Victorian Building Authority (VBA) and the Department of Transport and Planning (DTP – formerly DELWP). BRAC committee membership is made up of the

following industry stakeholders: Property Council of Australia, Minister for Emergency Services, Australian Institute of Building Surveyors, Melbourne City Council, Australian Institute of Architects, an independent member with building industry experience, Engineers Australia, a Lawyer, Master Builders Association, a Consumer Advocate, Housing Industry Association, Design Matters National, Municipal Association of Victoria, a nomination of the Assistant Treasurer, Department of Treasury and Finance, and Australian Institute of Building Surveyors.

Frankly, it’s a formidable group of expertise and knowledge that has been incredibly interesting and insightful to work within, learning an awful lot about other aspects of the industry and gaining an insider’s view of the government departments and their bureaucratic machinations. For example, we are now working closely with the new VBA Commissioner, Anna Cronin, and also one of the authors of the Shergold Weir report, Bronwyn Weir.

In the time I have been involved (4 years), BRAC has contributed to many of the regulatory proposals introduced and/or passed into law by the VBA and the DTP, being requested to provide comment or opinion on the draft paperwork in each case. Currently, issues related to compulsory CPD, Design and Construct/novation agreements, quality (lacking) in Class 2 buildings, the possibility of requiring independent observers/certifiers (similar to the old Clerk of Works), the impact and risks of EV charging in Class 1 and 2 buildings, quality of building documentation generally, various statutory fees, changing requirements for building surveyors and building inspectors are some of the recent subjects that BRAC has and continues to contribute to. BRAC has also provided comment, at the Minister’s request, as to the currency and relevance of Ministerial Guidelines.

Additionally, BRAC continues to review renewal applications and new applications for accreditation of products and assemblies that are not Deemed to Satisfy under the NCC. Accreditations provided by BRAC only apply to

Victoria, unlike the CodeMark accreditation approvals which are valid for all states.

BRAC accreditations currently apply to more than 30 products/assemblies and include things like hands-free tapware, bushfire shelters, external cladding systems, waterproofing systems, prefabricated concrete formwork systems, and the like.

Interestingly, one of the things that BRAC is currently considering is the role of its accreditation system compared with that of the CodeMark system. When an application is made by a manufacturer or agent, they are required to specifically identify which NCC references are applicable to the accreditation they are seeking. BRAC has found that while some products are suitable for and meet the intent of the NCC, without specifically meeting the NCC DtS provision, they may fail to meet the criteria of other aspects of the NCC or other standards/ codes.

BRAC takes the view that, as an accreditation body, it takes a more rigorous overarching view of

“BRAC accreditations apply to more than 30 products, currently.”

the product seeking accreditation. When an approval is granted, BRAC ensures that appropriate conditions are put in place on the accreditation, ensuring that the specifics of the approval are clear.

Typically, BRAC member representatives have been engaged by the VBA for periods of one or two years. We understand this is now likely to extend to three-year terms. I assume that is a consequence of the importance government places on the contributions made by BRAC and the preference to maintain consistency within the committee makeup for a greater period of time.

Photo by Scott Webb on Unsplash

New & Affordable Opportunities

With Your Design Matters National Insurance Facility

We’re thrilled to offer you a series of updates to make your insurance journey more beneficial and financially accessible.

New Coverage Level 1

For Victorian Design Matters National members, we now offer coverage starting at $1,000,000, with Costs in addition, effortlessly meeting the Victoria Building Authority (VBA)* requirements.

2 3

Premium Reduction

We’re delighted to announce a slight decrease in premiums across all income bands. This reduction, though seemingly modest, is a significant advantage amidst rising inflation – a token of appreciation from our insurer for the currently insured members active role in risk management.

Excess Waiver Benefit

The Design Matters National insurance program now includes 1 excess waiver per Professional Indemnity policy. This means if a claim occurs and an excess is due, it’s on us, with $0 for you to pay!

4

Low Starting Premium

Now, you can start with a low premium of just $710!**

OP ED: 10 THINGS BUILDERS WISH BUILDING DESIGNERS KNEW

BY SCOTT MCFARLANE, DMN MEMBER AND OWNER/ PRINCIPAL DESIGNER AT SEABREEZE DESIGN

Photo by Bernard Hermant on Unsplash

When asked to write this OP ED piece, I was excited to share my experiences with industry colleagues. My passion for Architecture began early, leading me through various roles: apprentice Carpenter Joiner, sub-contractor, Registered Builder, and finally, a Building Designer. With over 35 years in Victoria’s building industry, my appreciation for the trade remains strong despite my building years being behind me.

The domestic building industry has faced recent challenges. Building costs have soared, and we’re grappling with costly regulations and prescriptive design controls. The ‘Liveable Housing Design Guidelines’, once a helpful resource, has been incorporated into our National Construction Code (NCC), prescribing room sizes and inclusions for all new homes, regardless of occupants’ needs.

Increased energy efficiency regulations and accessibility requirements have pushed construction costs upward and imposed strict

design inclusions. For instance, standard door widths have increased, and we now face challenges with stepless thresholds and enhanced glazing requirements. As Building Designers, we must now balance prescribed sizes, budget constraints, and client briefs.

While reducing energy consumption is necessary, and meeting future accessibility needs is important, we’re now forced to design homes that may not fully align with our clients’ needs, instead addressing NCC-prescribed requirements.

I believe our industry will recover, but it may worsen before authorities realise the true cost of these changes. In the meantime, let’s focus on reinforcing our relationships with our closest allies – Builders.

10 Things Builders Wish Building Designers Knew

• ‘Buildability :Just because it can be drawn, doesn’t mean it can be built’

Earning respect from Builders involves either producing designs they like or changing their preconception that Building Designers don’t understand construction. A memorable site visit during my youth taught me the importance of understanding building before drawing plans. This lesson has guided my career, emphasising the need to build construction knowledge alongside design skills.

• ‘Economical construction’

Builders prefer cost-effective construction methods. Consider structural member sizes, material availability, and construction impacts when designing. Despite Australia’s metric system adoption, many materials still use imperial sizes. Aim for 300mm increments in room sizes when possible, explore various construction methods to reduce costs, and engage with Structural Engineers to optimise design and cost outcomes.

•‘Clear, easy-to-read construction drawings’

While 3D details and rendered perspectives complement construction documents, they don’t

replace the need for technical accuracy. Builders scrutinise drawings for errors, so clarity and relevance are crucial. Experiment with presentation methods, but prioritise clear, concise, and relevant drawings. Consider spreading perspective views throughout the set or creating a dedicated sheet for them.

•‘Builders aren’t mind readers’

We invest considerable time understanding client briefs and exploring design options. However, Builders rely solely on documentation. Ensure designs are well-communicated to avoid additional costs and confusion. Value on-site meetings with Builders to discuss unfamiliar details, as these interactions strengthen working relationships and provide opportunities to review projects.

• ‘Don’t ask for a ‘ballpark’ estimate figure’

Since the ‘HomeBuilder Grant’ in 2020-21 and subsequent material shortages, Builders have become cautious about providing cost estimates. This caution makes our job challenging, as we can only estimate based on our knowledge and resources. Be prepared to complete and issue entire construction documentation sets before clients receive clear project cost information.

“The building industry faces many challenges, from increased regulations to rising costs.”

Photo by Jimmy Nilsson Masth on Unsplash

• ‘Material availability’

Consider material accessibility, especially in rural or remote areas. While local availability is important, don’t shy away from experimenting with new products to ensure custom designs remain unique. Balance using readily available materials with introducing innovative products to avoid design stagnation.

• ‘Clients will try to get the best price they can’

Be transparent with clients about budget expectations and be aware that you may be played off against the Builder during budget discussions. Maintain open communication to protect your reputation and remind clients that while we can estimate costs, providing quotes isn’t our role. Advise clients on current industry costs and potential discrepancies between their budget and brief.

• ‘The almighty dollar rules’

Building Designers bear significant responsibility in managing clients’ largest investments. Take calculated risks with designs to increase value, even if it means pushing budgets. While clients who embrace your vision often don’t regret the investment, be prepared for occasional design simplifications or omissions to save money.

• ‘Builders don’t want to spend hours in their office’

Many smaller Builders lack comprehensive Australian Standards libraries or don’t keep them updated. Include specific details and notations in your drawings rather than simply referencing standards. This approach can lead to future referrals and is particularly beneficial for Owner Builder clients.

• ‘We need to work together’

Despite potential differences between Builders and Building Designers, fostering strong relationships is crucial. Invest time in building connections with Builders and trades. These relationships can lead to a steady client stream and valuable industry networks. Reach out to local Builders to create equitable working relationships based on respect, professionalism, and shared industry challenges.

In conclusion, the building industry faces

significant challenges, from increased regulations to rising costs. As Building Designers, we must navigate these obstacles while maintaining strong relationships with Builders and clients. By understanding and addressing Builders’ needs and concerns, we can create more efficient, cost-effective, and successful projects.

Our role extends beyond mere design; we must be knowledgeable about construction methods, material availability, and industry regulations. We should strive to produce clear, buildable designs that consider both aesthetic and practical aspects. Effective communication with both clients and Builders is key to avoiding misunderstandings and ensuring smooth project execution.

While we may face pressures to compromise on design due to budget constraints or changing regulations, we should always aim to balance client needs, building requirements, and design integrity. By fostering strong industry relationships and continuously improving our skills and knowledge, we can navigate these challenges and contribute to the recovery and growth of the building industry.

Ultimately, the success of our projects and the satisfaction of our clients depend on our ability to work collaboratively with Builders. By keeping these ten points in mind, we can enhance our professional relationships, improve project outcomes, and strengthen our position within the industry.

With over 35 years of experience in the building industry, Scott is the owner and principal designer of Seabreeze Designs. He has worked as a carpenter, builder and building designer. His unique perspective, shaped by hands-on experience in various aspects of construction and design, informs his approach to creating functional, beautiful, and buildable homes.

DISCLAIMER: The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of Design Matters National. This piece is intended to provide personal insights and spark industry discussion, and readers should consider it as one professional’s perspective on the current state of the building design industry.

ELEVATE YOUR BRAND WITH DESIGN MATTERS NATIONAL

Connect your business to Australia’s largest, most engaged community of building designers and built environment professionals. Design Matters National offers tailored sponsorship opportunities that put your brand at the forefront of innovation and design.

WHY PARTNER WITH DMN?

• Unparalleled reach: Engage with professionals specifying millions in building materials annually

• Continuous exposure: Participate in 3-4 events weekly across Australia

• Thought leadership: Share your expertise through CPD sessions and workshops

• Multi-channel visibility: Feature in our widely-read publications and digital platforms, including Instagram, Facebook and LinkedIn

FLEXIBLE SPONSORSHIP OPTIONS

1. DMN Annual Sponsorship

• Year-round brand exposure across all DMN channels

• Priority placement at major events, including the Building Design Awards

• Opportunities to host exclusive member events and workshops

• Featured content in INTERSECT and AWARDED magazines

2. 2024 Summit Sponsorship

• High-visibility presence at our premier annual event

• Networking with Design Matters National members, industry leaders and decisionmakers

• Exhibition space to showcase your latest products and innovations

• Speaking opportunities and branded sessions

3. Comprehensive Package

• Combine both for maximum impact and year-round engagement with our community.

TAKE THE NEXT STEP

Our sponsorship packages are designed to align with your business goals, whether you’re looking to increase brand awareness, drive sales, or establish thought leadership. Ready to explore how we can tailor a sponsorship package to your needs? Contact our team today for a personalised consultation and detailed benefits overview. Email: n.lister@designmatters.org.au Phone: 03 9416 0227

SHAPE THE FUTURE OF BUILDING DESIGN

Don’t miss this opportunity to be at the forefront of innovation. Partner with DMN and unlock unprecedented growth for your business. Contact us now to start your journey towards industry leadership.

Become a Design Matters National partner today!