Tuesday June 13, 2017
Volume 79, Issue 2
Clash of Two Parties Tyler Hapney Reporter
for treasurer agreed upon the statement that keeping an income tax would benefit the state economy. Though the Federalist candidate used a more colorful analogy including Bill Gates and the “Cash Me Outside” girl, both candidates stood on common ground on the topic of state income tax. The governors were then last to take the stage. Each governor was presented with the question of possibly giving teachers lessons in business to help connect them to local businesses. Federalist Governor Candidate, Thanh Pham, provided interesting input right up to the time limit on his opinion, stating that he did not
believe teachers should be given business classes. His opponent, Faris Rehman, was of the complete opposite opinion. Putting forth the idea that business classes would help teachers connect with local businesses and thus help teachers put students into jobs with local businesses, the Nationalist Candidate polarized the question. Both governors ended the debate with equally inspiring closing messages. Delegates of Buckeye Boys State were then released to lunch with something to think about and a tough vote to cast later on in the day.
Tuesday June 13, delegates at Buckeye Boys State had the opportunity to watch and participate in an active debate between those running for state office positions. The half hour debate included insight from both the Nationalist and Federalist parties . Following the debate, delegates were given time to consider the answers of their future officials and were then led to the polls later on during the day. The debate began with an introduction explaining the concept of a coin toss to decide who would be answering the questions first. The Nationalists won this coin toss, therefore answering the question first. From then on, the answer-first priority would alternate as the debate took off. The first question included the idea of illegal immigration and sanctuary cities. Federalist candidate for Attorney General, Nathan Forrest, responded by referencing the major Supreme Court case McCulloch v. Maryland. In his response, Forrest claimed that since the federal government identified illegal immigrants as illegal, states should accordingly identify them as such. To this, he then referred to sanctuary cities as “a crime.” Federalist Party Governor Candidate, Thanh Pham, delivers his argument during Later on when asked about income tax, both candidates the debate on Tuesday. Photo courtesy of Aaron Crank