6
9
GLAAD 'Likes' FB
Colors galore in Vermont
24
New Queer Cinema
The
www.ebar.com
Serving the gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender communities since 1971
Vol. 42 • No. 23 • June 7-13, 2012
Out CA Leg. candidates advance
National report looks at hate bias A
by Matthew S. Bajko
T
by Seth Hemmelgarn
recently released national report highlights violent incidents suspected of being motivated by victims’ sexual orientation, gender identity, and HIV-affected status. But numbers for San Francisco and the other cities lump in categories like employment discrimination that make it difficult to determine actual cases of violence. Despite an overall drop in cases, murders are up, according to the study, “Hate Violence Against Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer, and HIV-affected Communities in the U.S. in 2011.” The report says that overall incidents decreased by 16 percent, 2,503 in 2010 to 2,092 in 2011. However, during the same period, murders increased 11 percent from 27 to 30. The study says, “This reflects the highest number of murders ever recorded” by the National Coalition of Anti-Violence Programs, which released the review Thursday, May 31. The high number could be the result of increased reporting by individuals to the various organizations that report data to NCAVP. Details on many of the 2,000-plus incidents in the report, which include information from individual and news accounts, appear to be extremely thin, but the data at least provide a snapshot. The San Francisco-based nonprofit Community United Against Violence, which has changed its focus in recent years, is the local organization that provided data for the national report. In the national study, people of color accounted for 87 percent of the murder victims in 2011. Half of the murder victims were non-transgender men, while most of the rest were transgender women. Chai Jindasurat, NCAVP coordinator at the New York City Anti-Violence Project, said in an interview that from what he and other advocates know about the murders, arrests have been made in only four of the cases. Locally, CUAV’s figures show 141 victims reporting incidents of hate violence in 2011, a drop of 34 percent from 2010. The study says the decrease is “likely due to transitions in program structure and documentation processes. CUAV started to implement programming in 2011 that focused on deeper support and leadership development for survivors, which entails decreasing [the] number of individuals reached ... .” Stacy Umezu, CUAV’s membership diSee page 13 >>
Rick Gerharter
Don’t pop those balloons! T
he Dollies, one of the few AIDS/LifeCycle participants to dress for the occasion, get ready for their ride to Los Angeles Sunday, June 3 during opening ceremonies at the Cow Palace in San Francisco. From left, Jim Bruls, Justin Weber, Claire Reinbold, and Greg Hinds are four of the five friends who make up the team. The 545-mile ride is produced by the San Fran-
cisco AIDS Foundation and the Los Angeles Gay and Lesbian Center. More than 2,700 bicyclists (and 550 volunteer roadies) are now en route to LA, where the ride ends Saturday. SFAF officials said that this year’s ride raised $12.7 million for the two organizations. Each rider commits to raising a minimum $3,000, with the average being $5,000.
uesday’s primary saw a number of out candidates for state legislative seats, as well as a Riverside congressional seat, advance to the November general election. Out male candidates faired particularly well in Jane Philomen Cleland: the June primary, where the top two vote-getters, Abel Guillen regardless of party affiliation, moved on to the fall contests. Lesbian Assembly candidates in Los Angeles and San Diego, however, failed to survive the June 5 election. In the fiercely fought race for the Assembly seat covering the gay enclave of West Hollywood, neither of the out candidates placed first or second, according to unofficial returns Wednesday. In Oakland community college leader Abel Guillen, who identifies as Two Spirit, survived See page 7 >>
9th Circuit rejects Prop 8 review by Lisa Keen
A
glimmer of politics showed through Tuesday when the full 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals declined a request from supporters of California’s ban on same-sex marriage to review a circuit panel’s decision that Proposition 8 is unconstitutional. In a dissent from the order refusing to have the full 9th Circuit hear the landmark Perry v. Brown case, three judges noted that just a few weeks ago, President Barack Obama had “ignited a media firestorm by announcing that he supports samesex marriage as a policy matter.” The three dissenting judges said that the refusal to review the circuit panel’s decision “silenced” Obama’s suggestion that the nation continue its “conversation” about same-sex marriage “in a respectful way.” All three dissenters were appointees of Republican presidents: Diarmuid Fionntain O’Scannlain (Ronald Reagan), Jay Scott Bybee (George W. Bush), and Carlos Bea (Bush). But politics or not, the refusal to give Perry v. Brown full circuit court review is a major victory for supporters of marriage equality and means almost certainly that the “final chapter” in the historic litigation can now begin, said Chad Griffin, co-founder of the American Foundation for Equal Rights, which organized and funded the lawsuit. Attorneys for Prop 8 supporters said they will now file a petition to the U.S. Supreme Court to review the 9th Circuit decisions. Theodore Olson,
Rick Gerharter
Lead attorney Theodore Olson, third from left, makes a point during a 2010 news conference with Chad Griffin of the American Foundation for Equal Rights, left, attorney Ted Boutrous, and co-lead attorney David Boies; the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals rejected a request to hear a full court review of the case, known as Perry v. Brown, meaning the case is likely headed to the U.S. Supreme Court.
a lead attorney for the gay couples in Perry, said that, even if the Supreme Court refuses to hear that appeal, the litigation would be a “complete victory” for the plaintiff couples. One looming question for the Perry case is
{ FIRST OF TWO SECTIONS }
whether the Supreme Court, if it accepts the case, would review the 9th Circuit panel’s very narrow reasoning to strike down Prop 8 or the federal district court’s more sweeping reasoning conSee page 12 >>