5
Figures
Figure 2.1 Geographic distribution of projects ............................ 37 Figure 2.2 Distribution of the extent to which the three priorities of the programme are included in projects. 39 Figure 2.3 Percentage of respondents reporting additional project funding from a variety of sources . ................. 41 Figure 2.4 Ability to carry out the activity without support from the Barents Secretariat ......................................... 42 Figure 2.5 Distribution of opinions to the question: ”To what extent have the economic developments in Russia affected your project work?” ........................................ 43 Figure 2.6 The extent to which different perspectives have been included in the projects funded by the Barents Secretariat. ....................................................................... 44 Figure 2.7 The extent to which different components have been included in the projects funded by the Barents Secretariat. ........................................................ 45 Figure 2.8 Level of perceived success of the project. .................. 47 Figure 2.9 Obstacles in project implementation. ......................... 49 Figure 2.10 Level of satisfaction with various aspects of the Barents Secretariat administration. .............................. 52 Figure 2.11 Perception of potentially negative aspects of the collaboration between Norwegian and Russian partners. ........................................................................... 54 Figure 2.12 Perception of potentially positive aspects of the collaboration between Norwegian and Russian partners. ........................................................................... 56 Figure 2.13 Percentage indicating that different types of impact have been among the most important for their own project .............................................................................. 58 Figure 2.14 Ability to follow up activities without further support of the Barents Secretariat by country of residence. .. 59 Figure 2.15 General satisfaction with the Barents Secretariat by country of living. ............................................................ 61 NIBR Report 2008:4
