VOLUME 45, ISSUE 37
Thursday, February 20, 2014
UW athletes face cyberbullies Social media criticisms unavoidable, but some coaches look to control players’ use Morgan Krause Campus Editor With the rise of social media, a public figure’s personal critics are never more than 140 characters away. Student-athletes are among those who feel the sting of ill-advised or critical social posts, which has raised the question as to whether universities should take steps to regulate the sites. At universities that place an emphasis on their athletics program, it may not come as much of a surprise that personal social media attacks are a frequent
occurrence for a number of prominent studentathletes. University of Wisconsin fullback Derek Watt said he sees the critique as an inevitable reality but that he believes athletes can choose to receive it in a variety of ways. “People are behind their computers so they can say what they want,” Watt said. “Sometimes I use it as motivation. You just have to acknowledge it and let it go.” UW quarterback Joel Stave is no stranger to criticism from fans and said he prefers to take the “don’t read it”
approach by staying away from Twitter completely, he said. While Stave was aware that such criticisms were out there, he said he prefers not to seek the negativity out and sad he feels unaffected by this version of cyberbullying. “All that really matters to me is what my teammates think, what my coaches think and what my family thinks,” Stave said. Michigan State Coach Tom Izzo spoke about the effect social media can have on student-athletes on the ESPN radio show “Mike & Mike.” Izzo said there was no
way to get away from social media. “When you’re in the gym, two hours, they’re yelling at you. You get away, go back to your dorm and life becomes normal. Not anymore,” Izzo said. “Those same people at that arena are now yelling at you on Twitter. You can say, ‘Don’t read it,’ but I don’t think it’s the way our kids are brought up.” Izzo also brought up that while he could not control what the athletes read, he could control what they tweet. Universities around the country are adopting
BULLYING, page 2
John Doe emails released Walker says Democrats will spin documents for political gain, denies importance Nyal Mueenuddin Print State Editor More than 28,000 pages of documents were released Wednesday in the closed John Doe investigation into a number of then-Milwaukee County Executive Scott Walker’s aides. The John Doe probe — which did not bring charges against Walker but did lead to convictions against
four of his staffers while he was county executive — expanded the day before Walker’s 2010 election as governor, the new documents show. Another key finding in the newly released documents includes an email from Walker administration director Cindy Archer to deputy chief of staff Kelly Rindfleisch. Pending her appeal, Rindfleisch was
sentenced to six months in prison and three years probation for campaigning on county time for former Rep. Brett Davis, R-Oregon, a lieutenant governor candidate who is now the state’s Medicaid director. In that email, Archer said she used the private wireless system that had been set up in the county office often. “Consider yourself now in the ‘inner circle’. :) I use this
private account quite a bit to communicate with SKW and Nardelli. You should be sure you check it throughout the day,” Archer wrote to Rindfleisch. Although many of the documents had already been public, the ones released today came after a court ruled that most of the John Doe documents could be released since the probe had
JOHN DOE, page 3
Kirby Wright
JFC approves tax cut plan Amended version of Walker’s ‘Blueprint for Prosperity’ passed 12-4 in committee Dan Kinderman Herald Reporter The state’s Joint Finance Committee passed an amended version of Gov. Scott Walker’s “Blueprint for Prosperity” Wednesday, although the committee kept the bulk of Walker’s plan — roughly $400 million in property tax cuts and about $100 million in income tax cuts. The compromise between the Senate and the Assembly, sparked by some Republican senators’ concerns with the structural deficit, makes $38 million in budget lapses, or cuts, to state agencies. It also puts the $117 million originally intended for the state’s rainy day fund into the state’s general account to lower the state’s structural deficit heading into the next biennial budget. The moves would lower the state’s structural deficit to less than $660 million, according to the Legislative Fiscal Bureau, lower than the $807 million structural deficit that the bureau had projected under
Walker’s original plan. Walker’s $400 million in property tax cuts would save the owner of a medianvalue home $131, according to the LFB. The second bill the finance committee approved grants $35 million to workforce training and collaboration efforts between school districts and technical colleges. Sen. Mary Lazich, R-New Berlin, said returning a large chunk of the state’s projected $1 billion surplus through property and income tax relief was a major achievement for Republicans. “I think it’s remarkable because we’ve had some very difficult years in the Legislature where we just haven’t had a whole lot of funds and we’ve had a lot of debt, and so to turn that around this session so much that we can provide property tax relief and income tax relief is something we can be amazingly proud of,” she said. Democrats, who voted against the proposal, said the
TAXES, page 4
Preliminary diversity plan draft unveiled Rachel Jones Print Campus Editor A University of Wisconsin ad hoc committee released a preliminary draft of a new campus diversity plan Wednesday, outlining a variety of new campus goals with an emphasis on access and Jeff Miller University of Wisconsin accountability. The draft outlines The draft revisits the 2008 plan, which emphasized increasing the number of students in targeted diversity groups.
a variety of measures for recommendations, emphasizing accountability for the university to develop programs and policies related to diversity and building an inclusive community. The Ad Hoc Diversity Planning Committee began preparation for the new diversity plan began in November 2012 and is now
reaching its final stages before its adoption this summer. The draft sets a framework to increase access to the university and its resources and to create an inclusive campus environment that ensures individuals in the community feel valued and supported.
DIVERSITY, page 4
Committee proposes new campus budget model Current model lacks financial planning incentives, concerns over transparency Emma Palasz Herald Contributor A University Wisconsin committee proposed a new budget model for the university that would allow for more flexibility and the ability to
drive funding to departments as students flock to certain majors. The Budget Model Review Committee released a white paper Tuesday which proposed possible changes to the university’s current budget model and compared it to other universities’ models. The paper proposed four different types of budgets UW could follow, which include formula budgeting, zerobased budgeting, performance budgeting and incentive-based
budgeting. The committee’s website described these budgets as respectively allocating budgets based on an algorithm, clearing a previous year’s budget and requesting a new one each year, funding a budget based on enrollment with units meeting certain requirements or units being responsible for their own expenses, respectively. UW currently uses incremental budgeting, which assumes the university’s goals will not change from year to
year, the website said. The white paper outlined problems with the current budget model, including a lack of incentives for academic units to involve themselves in financial planning, transparency concerns over resource decisions and the outcomes of those decisions and few clear financial incentives for innovation. Darrell Bazzell, vice chancellor for finance and administration and head of the Budget Model Review
© 2014 BADGER HERALD
Committee, said no changes have been made yet. “The white paper made a case to change the current model [and] called for a followup team to consider different budget models,” Bazzell said. Terry Warfield, department chair of accounting and information systems and Budget Model Review Committee member, said the current model does not have “too many flaws.” “The current budget model is very good,” Warfield said. “It
has a lot of great features, but that doesn’t mean it can’t be improved.” Bazzell said the changes concern how the university can or cannot incentivize good budgeting practices of specific units at the university. He said the new plan addressed in the white paper is to accommodate changes in campus priorities. Trends in students’ majors and degree choices are changing in correlation with
BUDGET, page 4