Presentation: Bus Transit Oriented Design in the Trinity Metro

Page 1

Bus Transit-Oriented Design

Advancing Equity in the Trinity Metro System In Fort Worth

Ayushi Mavuduru PLAN 4395 Green Cities and Transportation

How can principles of multimodal transportation, transitoriented design, and mixeduse development improve the connectivity provided by and perception of safety of Fort Worth's Trinity Metro bus lines?

The Trinity Metro System

of Planning and Development 2022)

Fixed-Route
ACCESS TexRail Trinity Railway Express "Molly the Trolley" The DASH Vanpool Zipzone Fort Worth Bike Sharing Fixed Route On Demand
Circulators Rideshare
Bus
(Department
(Trinity Metro 2020) (Fitzgerald 2019) (Trinity Metro 2021) (Trinity Metro 2019) (Harbor 2010) (Trinity Metro 2023) (Vanstar Vehicles 2019) (Trinity Metro 2022) (Sakmari 2020)

The Trinity Metro System

Fixed-Route Bus ACCESS TexRail Trinity Railway Express "Molly the Trolley" The DASH Vanpool Zipzone Fort Worth Bike Sharing Fixed Route On Demand
Circulators Rideshare Leading Annual Ridership, Annual Passenger Miles, and Annual Vehicle Revenue Miles Mode Ridership Passenger Miles Vehicle Revenue Miles Bus 2,952,079 23,000,000 5,386,660 ACCESS 213,987 2,000,000 2,211,603 TRE 800,000 22,0000 154,718 Texrail 304,545 4,600,000 125,398 Vanpool 129,919 5,000,000 21,308 Bikeshare 84,073 421,063 8,760 Performance
(Department of Planning and Development 2022)
By Mode FY 2021

Suitability of BTOD To Fort Worth

(Currie 2006)

Adaptability of routes

(Transit Moves Fort Worth 2019)

Lack of Basic Amenities at Bus Stops Population and employment densities too low to support high frequency buses

(Transit Moves Fort Worth 2019)

of Fort Worth's Land area is dense enough to support some level of fixed service

Lower construction and operating costs

Mimic "many to many" character of suburban transit patterns

Spatial inequities in road and sidewalk conditions hinders first/ last mile connectivity to buses

(City of Fort Worth 2022)

Limitations of

Existing Bus

System in Fort Worth

90% 78% 76% 40% 47% 41%
31%

Addressing the Negative Perception of Bus Transit

Racialized association with "dependent riders"

Texrail expansion into biomedical research and health education village south of downtown, and TCU campus area

(Spieler 2020) (Currie 2006)

Perceived as less enduring, and therefore less economically viable

Bike share growth in recreational and educational areas like TCU campus, Southside, and Stockyards District

(Department of Planning and Transportation 2022)

Proposed BRT line along East Lancaster Avenue faces opposition from business leaders

(Department of Planning and Transportation 2022) (Sadek

2023)

Routes

Mobility Assessment

Performanceand Demographics

Population Density

(2023-2026 Title VI Assessment) (EPA Smart Location Database)

Total Passengers per hour across transfer routes

(2023-2026 Title VI Assessment)

National Walkability Index

Poverty

Race/Ethnicity

(H+T Index)

Transit + Housing Cost as a Percentage of Income

30-minute transit shed

Transit Use Propensity

Job Access Disparity

(H+T Index) (H+T Index) (2020 US ACS) (2020 ACS) (2020 ACS) (Transit Moves Fort Worth 2019)

2023)

Jobs by Car – Jobs By Transit Jobs by Car 100
(USDOT
Justice 40 Initiative

Mobility Assessment

SelectedStations, Transfers,and Stops

Routes 1, 2, 5, 6, 11, 12, 46, 89, 19,50 21, 22, 25, 89 1, 5, 6, 19, 61, 66 1, 29, 25, 33, 72

Station Dr.
T&P Station
Lancaster
Vickery
Mercantile
54, 89 21, 29, 51, 52 5, 6 11, 12, 16 Passengers /Hr 89.91 58.02 49.98 45.3 34 28.15 25.81 16.88 30-minute Transit Shed 118 74 118 66 98 57 91 56 Job Access Disparity 7.17% 21.59% 7.17% 31.37% 65.30% 50.61% 71.64% 69.86% Transit+ Housing % of Income 12+28% 20+17% 12+28% 20+15% 15+8% 15+17% 15+16% 20% Walkability 18.17 13.83 (16.33) 18.17 15(17) 13.92 15.5 15.25 (17.83) 7 Population density 8,327.04 (21,327.55) 4,701.1 (6,018.91) 8,327.04 (21,327.55) 4,122.04 1,943.14 2,576.73 (1,695.22) 826.45 3,680.71 Race/ Ethnicity W 53.15% B 30.56% H 76.36% W 53.15% B 30.56% H 95.28% B 37.91% H 26.9% W 31.8% B 28.9% H 22.6% H 37.5% W 34.61% H 77.61% Poverty 12.74% 13.18% 12.74% 24.61% 55.99% 12.05% 32.44% 18.61% Transit Dependence Low High Low High High Low High Medium J-40 Tract 0 2 0 4 6 0 3 3
Location Fort Worth Central
Dennis Dunkins
Gran Plaza
& Pine Hulen Mall
Blvd
Station

Transit supportive amenities

Lighting Sidewalk

Mobility Assessment

BuiltEnvironment Attributes

Using Google Earth

Street View &Satellite

Imagery

Trash Receptacles

Water Fountains

Bike Racks Bus Stop

Right of Way

Road Condition

Traffic Calming Devices

Traffic Signals

Bike Lanes Crosswalk Parking

Urban design Elements

Place Signs

Street Furniture

Public Art

Overhangs & Vegetation

Sight Lines

Street Life

Urban Form

Public Space

Historic Buildings

Diversity of Uses

Contiguous street wall

1st Floor Windows

Façade Design Variety

Fort Worth Central Station+ Mercantile Center Station

T&P Station+

Vickery Blvd Transfer Center

La Gran Plaza Transfer Center+ Hulen Mall

Dr. Dennis Dunkins Transfer Center+ Lancaster & Pine

Mobility Assessment

Recurringtrends

Painted bike lanes with lack of continuity/ conflict with buses "Implied" crosswalk

Narrow crosswalk on 4+ lane intersection

Visual separation of bus and rail when contained in the same site

Murals on "closed off" facades

Large blocks of parking

Individual bus shelter clusters instead of large terminal

Continuity of colors and materials across uses

Wider, red brick paved sidewalks associated with city center Art and decoration commissioned by city/ developers

Mobility Assessment

Results

Design Proposals

2016
Thoroughfare
Neighborhood Connector Commerce/ Mixed
Street Activity Street System Link
Fort Worth Master
Plan Commercial Connector
Use

Design Proposals Advancing East Lancaster

Design Recommendations

Recommendations

A Better Connection (2021)

Short-Term

Active Transportation Plan

-Pop up Projects Guide

-Sidewalk gaps

-Bike lane and transit integration

Transit Moves Fort Worth

-Performance analysis

-Market and demand analysis

-Land use and transportation planning

-Funding strategies

Long -Term

Public Engagement

Target younger audiences via Instagram instead of just Facebook

Continue face-to-face outreach to homeless population through TransitEnvoys

Short-term intervention strategies

Modify Pop Up Projects Guide:

City targets high-priorityareas, neighborhood residents collaborate with experts on design decisions, city-wide workforce and volunteersdeployed complete project

Partner with local small businesses to sponsorsmall scale upgradingof sidewalks or bus shelters

Data

Collection

Disaggregate surveydata by zip code, income, , race, age, education level, etc

Conductorigin-destinationsurveysfor existing bus trips

Existing Policies & Projects

Funding Strategies

Local Parking fees

Rideshare taxes

Turning partner cities into member cities

Federal

Justice 40

Elligibility for competitive grants

Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.