Volume 43- No. 42
October 18, 2012
San Onofre Nuclear Facility
Editor’s Note: We don’t mean to frighten you but . . . what would happen if we had a nuclear meltdown at San Onofre? Consider: There are concerns about a plume exposure pathway zone with a radius of 10 miles, concerned primarily with exposure to, and inhalation of, airborne radioactive contamination, and an ingestion pathway zone of about 50 miles, concerned primarily with ingestion of food and liquid contaminated by radioactivity. The average prevailing westward wind direction at San Onofre blows inland 9 months of the year. The 2010 U.S. population within 10 miles of San Onofre was 92,687, an increase of 50.0 percent in a decade, according to an analysis of U.S. Census data for msnbc.com. The 2010 U.S. population within 50 miles was 8,460,508, an increase of 14.9 percent since 2000. Oceanside is within 20 miles of the facility, as is Carlsbad. Within the 50 mile radius The Paper - 760.747.7119
website:www.thecommunitypaper.com
email: thepaper@cox.net
is Vista, San Marcos, Lake San Marcos, San Elijo Hills, Escondido and Rancho Bernardo. With these concerns in mind, we commend to you this week’s cover story by Claudia Aragon. by Claudia Aragon
The Status of Nuclear Power in America and Around the World Being Powerless in a Nuclear Age Do you ever wonder where your lights and water come from? Most of us never give it a second thought. With a simple flip of a switch we can call on the gods of illumination. A quick turn of the faucet renders the cool, refreshing blessings of life enriching water, falling instantly at our feet to
cleanse and hydrate our bodies. These are simple, mindless acts we all perform daily and take for granted. We hardly ever think about where the water and power come from, as long as it’s there at our beck and call. I am no exception to the rule, as I mindlessly use both to my advantage on a daily basis. It wasn’t until the San Onofre nuclear power plant went down for repairs, that I became concerned and more aware. I began to wonder and worry about the infrastructure of our own nuclear plants, as I flashed back to recent world events, when just after the tsunami on March 11, 2011, Japan was met with severe problems at their nuclear facilities. Several heroic people died or suffered radiation poisoning while attempting to shut down the
“Meltdown” Continued on Page 2
Fukushima Daiichi reactors in order to save millions of their fellow Japanese countrymen. I, like many others out there began to play the WHAT IF game. What if we have an earthquake near San Onofre? What if we have a tsunami, will the reactor hold? What if it doesn’t? Etc, etc, etc. I began to wonder if the producers and regulators of the world’s Nuclear Energy treated the aging reactors like we do our cars. In an effort to save money many of us keep our older vehicles on the road well past their prime, holding them together with duct tape and band-aids. Can the same scenario be true for the nation’s and world’s nuclear reactors? Are these aging behemoths of unspeakable junkyard dog fury, held at bay, tethered with only dental floss to keep them in their yards, as their unthinking operators feel confident they won’t break loose and bite?