THE VENICE OF THE EAST The Venice of the Far East – the capital still wrapped in mystery, in spite of the thousand efforts of modernism amid its maze of canals, and in spite of the popularity of the reigning monarchy... From the crowded dock-roads of the River... which reminds one of the Giudecca [several linked islands south of and separated from the main mass of Venice by the Canale della Giudecca in which merchant ships moored in times past] across the intricate mass of... the Chinese quarter... which, whilst resembling Canton, is still more Venetian. Were it not for queues, almond eyes, and odours, decidedly Oriental, the illusion would very often be complete... the Quarter of the Legations, the European residences and sporting clubs, all... shady and surrounded by canals which reminded me of Stra (Curious these continual Venetian reminiscences in the Far East.)... the canals ploughed by sampans, which the rowers guide standing as in Venice... little bridges and tiny gardens, reflecting in the quiet water the drooping foliage of ancient trees... as in the remotest corners of the City of the Doges (and a longing for the lagoons nearly seizes one)...the Royal Quarter, rich in parks, temples, and palaces... all a dazzling variety of colour and cadences...which give one the impression of being in Venice... a wild primitive Venice. So Salvatore Besso, a young, adventurous and perceptive Italian nobleman writing about happenings in the Far East, saw the city of Bangkok on the eve of the coronation of King Vajiravudh, Rama Vl of Thailand, in 1911. Many before Besso had casually compared Bangkok and the previous Thai capital of Ayutthaya, its prototype, with the fantastic Adriatic port. Apparently, Fernao Mendez Pinto was the first to use the epithet ‘Venice of the East’ when referring to Ayutthaya in a letter to the Society of Jesus in Lisbon dated 1554. Bangkok was born during troubled times, a period of intense conflict among the principalities of Southeast Asia, and, more importantly, among the powers of Europe engaged in the Napoleonic wars. Solemnly proclaimed the capital of Thailand in 1782, Bangkok apparently was unsighted by Europeans of wit before the cessation of hostilities permitted the great powers to revive their intercourse with first island and then mainland Southeast Asia, an endeavour which needed the concurrence of the influential Thai court. From the 1820s Bangkok was on the itinerary of an everincreasing stream of diplomatic, commercial and evangelical transients, a number of whom thought to leave accounts of their visit containing descriptions of the city which, when freed from prejudice, provide the material for a vivid anthology comprising material from fifteen eyewitness descriptions of Bangkok between 1821 and 1855:
Yet another tack, yet one more bend of the tortuous river and lo! The glories of the floating city, the capital of Siam, at sunrise. Numerous temples of Buddha with their gilt and glazed tile roofs, some blue and others green or yellow, and tall single spires sparkling in the sun, rise from what seems to be a forest, but is in reality a great city. On each side of the river floating habitations, resting on rafts of bamboos. Close to these anchored the largest descriptions of native vessels. A row of Chinese junks extend for more than two miles, at anchor in the middle of the stream, where they often remain for months, retailing their cargoes. The river presented a busy scene, from the number of boats of every size and description, some not larger than clothes-
‘Sketch of the Town of Bangkok by a Native’ was included in a journal of an embassy to the Siamese Court in 1821-22. Although a ‘mental map’, a caricature, rather than a representation of the built city, something is shown of the citadel and a great deal about the raison d’etre of the capital. Source: Crawfurd, J., Journal of an Embassy from the Governor-General of India to the Courts of Siam and Cochin-China London, 1828.