AAC
County Lines County Lines [(ISSN 2576-1137 (print) and ISSN 2576-1145 (online)] is the official publication of the Association of Arkansas Counties. It is published quarterly. For advertising inquiries, subscriptions or other information, please contact Christy L. Smith at 501.372.7550. Executive Director/Publisher Chris Villines Communications Director/ Managing Editor Christy L. Smith Communications Coordinator/ Editor Holland Doran
AAC Executive Board: Debbie Wise – President Brandon Ellison – Vice President Rhonda Cole – Secretary-Treasurer Tommy Young Terri Harrison Debra Buckner Sandra Cawyer Kevin Cleghorn Terry McNatt Debbie Cross Brenda DeShields Ellen Foote Jimmy Hart Gerone Hobbs Marty Boyd John Montgomery Heather Stevens David Thompson National Association of Counties (NACo) Board Affiliations Debbie Wise: NACo board member. She is the Randolph County Circuit Clerk and president of the AAC Board of Directors. Brandon Ellison: NACo board member. He is the Polk County Judge and vice-president of the AAC Board of Directors. Ted Harden: Finance & Intergovernmental Affairs Steering Committee. He serves on the Jefferson County Quorum Court. David Hudson: Chair of NACo’s Justice and Public Safety Steering Committee. He is the Sebastian County Judge and member of the Rural Action Caucus Steering Committee. Barry Hyde: Justice and Public Safety Steering Committee. He is the Pulaski County Judge. Gerone Hobbs: Membership Committee. He is the Pulaski County Coroner. Kade Holliday: Arts and Culture Committee and International Economic Development Task Force. He is the Craighead County Clerk. Paul Ellliot: Justice and Public Safety Steering Committee, vice-chair of law enforcement subcommittee. He serves on the Pulaski County Quorum Court. Ellen Foote: Community, Economic & Workforce Development Steering Committee. She is the Crittenden County Tax Collector. Tawanna Brown:Telecommunications & Technology Steering Committe. She is the Crittenden County Chief Computer Operator.
COUNTY LINES, FALL 2019
DIRECTOR’S DESK
The state of state retirement
E
mployment in county government can be an incredibly rewarding career. Opportunities to help on a local level abound, and the satisfaction of being a public servant can be fulfilling. Jobs are usually stable, and the potential for many years of steady work (save being unelected) exist in a world that doesn’t change too much. Chris Villines But county government is not usually financially rewarding. AAC Fiscal rewards come to those in the civilian world more often Executive Director than they do to those in government. Christmas bonuses are unheard of, and raises don’t move the salary needle very often. This systemic shortfall was acknowledged years ago by our state. In order to somewhat equalize the playing field between public and private sector jobs, our state created the Arkansas Public Employee Retirement System (APERs). This defined benefit plan sought to reward long-standing career employees with a benefit at the end of their careers. It has helped to attract and retain employees since its inception. Defined benefit plans base a post-career annuity based on a formula of salary and years worked. These systems incur some risk because the annuity doesn’t change regardless of the market value of investments. Most government pension plans remain defined benefit plans like ours. In addition to government pensions, the world’s largest defined benefit plan is something we all have access to: Social Security. Alternatively, defined contribution plans pay out only what is put in, plus or minus interest gained or lost, over time. Defined contribution plans incur no risk to the employer, instead shifting all risk to the employee/investor. 401(k) plans (or the 457(b) (3) — the government equivalent) are the most common defined contribution plans. APERs has been under incredible scrutiny over the last couple of years, and several bills filed in the 2019 session could have made significant changes in how APERs functions. Ideas such as raising the contribution rate, decreasing the multiplier used for the formulaic calculation, lowering the final average salary, and lowering the cost of living increase for retirees were all met with immediate opposition from state, county and city employees. While changes may come in the future, I would like to thank state Sen. Bill Sample and state Rep. Les Warren for their leadership as co-chairs of the Legislative Joint Retirement Committee. They, along with many committee members, believed that a measured approach to change, along with APERs member input, was necessary before any major modifications were made. As a result, this committee met 12 times around the state over the last four months. Much has been learned in this round-robin exercise. We’ve learned that APERs is around 79 percent funded. This means if the system (1) no longer gained new members; (2) hit its target investment rate; and (3) paid out all members already in the system who retire into the future, the amount of money would fall short of that amount needed to fulfill retirement obligations. While not funded in full at 100 percent, this 79 percent level still places APERs roughly in the top third of retirement systems similar to ours in the country. Philosophies of how much a system like this needs to be funded run along a spectrum, and some believe the only healthy system is one that is 100 percent funded, while others are comfortable at a number less than our current 79 percent — after all, the scenario of nobody new coming into the system is not plausible. >>> 7
