ASFP Ignite September 2024

FIRE STOPPING EXPERTISE IS ON HAND.

FAST TURNAROUND TECHNICAL SUPPORT.

Sometimes you need another opinion to be sure you’re choosing the right fire stopping product or fitting it in the right way. FSi Promat can support you in a number of ways, from our comprehensive Product Selector App; linking solutions and downloadable standard details, to our team of technical engineers who will work alongside you on complex projects, right from the early stages of project design and specification through to installation.

CHAIR EDITORIAL

ASFP Chair, Clive Miles, welcomes you to the latest edition of Ignite.

As we continue to move through a period of significant change, it is crucial to address the developments that are shaping our industry. This period of transition extends beyond our internal advancements, as we also witness shifts in the political landscape. With the recent General Election and the formation of a new Government, we are closely monitoring any potential implications for the passive fire protection sector, something easier said than done! Our commitment remains in adapting and advocating for the best interests of ASFP members in this evolving environment.

When I presented my vision for the ASFP at the 2023 AGM, I emphasised the increased pressures from legislation, media coverage, insurance requirements, and skills shortages driving unprecedented transformation in our sector. The ASFP and our members must evolve in innovative ways to adapt to this ever-changing world. Many of our members are stepping up to this challenge, which is amazing.

It’s certainly not new news that the industry faces challenges from both an ageing workforce and a skills shortage, making it essential to attract and retain young professionals. Through a combination of apprenticeships, academies, outreach programmes and even members introducing their own bespoke training schemes, we can and must help secure the next generation of our profession. By creating and implementing new ways to train, engage, and promote passive fire protection (PFP), we can ensure that the ASFP becomes the industry benchmark for educational best practices.

One of the key areas of focus for the new Government is skills development, which aligns closely with our priorities at the ASFP. The proposed Skills England Bill aims to establish ‘Skills England,’ a new partnership centred around employers and designed to ensure the

supply of skills across various sectors. This initiative also includes reforms to the Apprenticeship Levy, which we believe will be instrumental in addressing the skills gap within our industry.

At ASFP, we recognise the importance of developing a skilled workforce to meet the demands of our sector and are committed to working alongside the Government and other stakeholders to ensure that our members and the wider community have access to the necessary training and resources. By doing so, we can maintain the highest standards of fire safety and protection.

Open Doors

We are excited to support the Open Doors initiative next year, you can read more about this on page 44. This important programme, coordinated by Build UK, provides an opportunity for the public to see behind the scenes of live construction sites and offices, offering a unique insight into the diverse career opportunities within the industry. This year, the event attracted over 5,000 visitors nationwide, with an impressive 88% of attendees reporting that they are now more inclined to pursue a career in construction. Do mark your calendars for the next Open Doors event, which is scheduled to take place from Monday, 17th March to Saturday, 22nd March 2025. More details will be available over the coming months from the ASFP team, and I’d encourage all members to get involved and help inspire the next generation.

New Member Hub

We are also thrilled to introduce our new Member Hub; a dedicated platform designed to provide valuable resources. This hub will serve as a central repository of information and support tools for our members. More in-depth details about the Member Hub can be found on pages 36 and 37.

In addition to these initiatives our work with the new Council members has been immensely rewarding.

The first meeting of the newly elected Council took place in June. I know their dedication and insight will be invaluable as we work towards our shared goals. The collaboration and input from our Council members ensures that we are wellequipped to address the challenges and opportunities that lie ahead, and that we are continually reviewing and supporting our members’ needs.

Thank you for your continued support and dedication. I know together we can navigate these changes and continue to uphold the integrity and safety of our built environment. The work we do is critical, and it is through our collective efforts that we can achieve a lasting impact.

Read More About The Open Doors Initiative On Page 44

Read More About The Member Hub On Page 36-37

MANAGING DIRECTOR

So, it seems some weeks after the new Government took up office their leader is determined to come out of the traps running to put right all the things that were ‘apparently’ wrong. His mantra certainly seems to be one of producing tangible outcomes, as with all examples like this we’re judged on our actions and not just words.

In terms of the outcomes post release of the first Grenfell report (the second will have been released as you read this) it has been in the main, civil servants and industry that has been leading the way in terms of creating output. That said, has the said output to date yet to create real change?

First, we have to look at where we’ve come from, namely a construction sector that had in the main evolved to the lowest common denominator in many areas. Operated by individuals and organisations who often lacked defined and evidenced relevant competency, being policed by people and organisations no more competent than those they’re meant to oversee. Plus, a perception from Government of the design and construction chain that did not reflect the realities of the landscape in architects’ practices, on building sites and in occupied buildings. Finally, within the construction industry itself, a culture of pushing risk and responsibility on to others, whoever they may be.

In real terms not a great position to have begun one of the biggest overhauls of what is the UK’s single biggest employment sector. For those looking in from the outside, they could be forgiven for assuming little has changed, for those of us on the inside we know the truth is something different albeit the green shoots may not yet be bearing fruit, but we know they’re growing all the same.

One of the challenges facing industry is the number of interested parties involved, as exampled briefly below:

British Standards Institute (BSI)

ASFP Managing Director, Mike Ward, touches on the challenges of delivering tangible outcomes that drive actual change and gives an overview on why in many circles ASFP is seen as leading the way.

As one can clearly see there are multiple agencies involved across a huge spectrum of authorities, professions and trades from architects all the way through to facilities management with construction product manufacturers, principal contractors and specialist subcontractors sitting in the middle. Where do you even start, standing back it looks like an impossible task.

In resolving the fundamentals, the first, and most honest thing to admit is that there’s not one organisation or body that can do it all, even though there are some that would suggest as much. As someone much wiser than I once said, the ASFP is fifty percent construction and fifty percent fire. You could level the same theory at say the Fire Industry Association (FIA), the rationale behind this is that the ASFP and its members operate within the design and construction industry and are governed by the science and discipline of fire performance in all its facets.

This differs from those organisations which operate within the sphere of fire engineering and risk, they’re not per se as entrenched in the functional and operational aspects of the design and construction industry as are the ASFP and other bodies of a similar type. A good demonstration of the issue of fragmentation is the number of organisations and associations involved in the fire door industry.

Department for Leveling Up, Housing and Communities (DLUHC)

• Now Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG)

• Responsible for setting new construction products regulations

Will determine the legislation and timeframes regarding the proposed transition from the prior EU-based CPR and CE marking to UKCA

Firstly, you have product and ancillary (manufacturers and suppliers) representative associations. Interestingly, fire doors have been represented by virtue of the material from which they are made i.e. wood, steel or glass etc, and not necessarily in terms of the door’s performance when in its fire/smoke operational position. Secondly you have those that represent the compliance sector i.e. checking and signing off doors, then those associations that represent the installation, service and maintenance of fire doors and finally those that represent the risk authorities and underwriters. As you can see there’s a cornucopia of interested parties, all with views based on their particular position or perspective. It creates a kaleidoscope of differing views and opinions.

Office for Product Safety and Standards (OPSS), works with trading standards to ensure that products can do whatever performance is claimed (as and when the product leaves the factory gate)

Health and Safety Executive (HSE)

• Operates Building Safety Regulator (BSR)

• Write Approved Document B (staff transferred over from DLUHC)

• Headline competence committee (the Industry Competence Committee – ICC) Industry Competence Steering Group (ICSG), this convenes the work that keeps going from the original 12 working groups, and the setting the bar / raising the bar reports etc

Drafting and reviewing the BS8670 series

Converting the PFPF guide “Guide to Undertaking Technical Assessments of Fire Performance of Construction Products Based on Fire Test Evidence” into a BSI standard

Construction Industry Council (CIC) Competency Steering group (CSG) was the original industry-led initiative (by Build UK / CIC / CPA) that set up the 12 working groups. CSG is now no more, it morphed into the Industry Competency Steering group (ICSG)

Construction Products Association (CPA)

Set up CCPI (Code for Construction Product Information)

Others

• Trade associations

Professional and chartered organisations, and bodies

All of the aforementioned stakeholders have and continue to pass comment and opinion, write papers and give presentations on their very specific part. The question is, in isolation what positive effect and outcomes do the interested parties offer as part of their individual ‘hand in the game’?

One of the common criticisms of representative bodies and ‘trade’ organisations is that they spend too much time talking and not enough time doing. This view is not always misplaced in my experience. There’s also the halfway house of publishing what they’ve been (collectively) talking about i.e. white papers, manifestos and other such commentaries. In my view these have little to no effect, primarily because they’re either out of touch, too difficult to understand, administer or more commonly the infrastructure to support the proposed requirements are just not there or the publisher is too small and lacks influence for their publication to drive change in isolation. On top of this, quite often the cost of implementing the requirements make it unrealistic for companies to adopt and operate without significantly changing their business model(s). The words get lost on the audience, nothing changes, and industry moves on, driven by the typical key drivers i.e. time and money!

So, here’s the dichotomy, not one organisation or association has the skills, knowledge and experience to cover every aspect of the product or service, but when broken down into its component parts, the specialist disciplines are too small to create significant positive effect on their own.

The answer has to lie in the middleground, big enough the be able to effect change, small enough to be in the detail where and when required. In support of this let us not forget what Dame Judith Hackitt recommended in her report; that:

So, there’s a clear argument that in relation to the discipline of passive fire protection the ASFP is best placed to lead the delivery of tangible outcomes across the spectrum of design, construction and occupation. Working with other relevant individuals, organisations and associations, government bodies and ASFP member companies, the ASFP is delivering change.

The ASFP has recently launched two new technical groups, one for fire-rated glazing (TG8) and another covering digital data systems in support of the requirements of the ‘golden thread’ (TG9). Both groups will publish new best practice guidance documents (ASFP Colour Books) over the coming months to support the improvement in standards and best practice in the respective sectors. Beyond these two new groups ASFP will announce further new technical groups adding to the comprehensive spectrum of product groups and services within passive fire protection by function and/or performance.

TG8

All this, plus other proprietary achievements will lead the ASFP member company and/or organisation to achieve the ASFP Pass Mark. The Pass Mark is what the ASFP will drive into Government and industry as the pinnacle of an organisation’s quality and competency within passive fire protection.

The Association’s mission is to break the stigma of the passive fire industry being thought of as an unskilled trade, to be left to the last minute or shoehorned into a package of an unsuitable subcontractor. Passive fire protection will become a profession under ASFP’s support, creating tangible training and support for the architectural and design communities (Principal Designer), all levels of Principle Contractor, passive fire manufacturers and installers and those supporting buildings and their occupants.

LAUNCHED

TG9

LAUNCHED

TWO

“Moving towards a system where ownership of technical guidance rests with industry as the intelligent lead in delivering building safety; continuous improvement and best practice learning through membership of an international body.”

In recognition of said criticisms, and Dame Judith’s recommendations, plus a keen sense of knowing what needs to be done, ASFP has continued its primary strategy of delivering tangible value adding assets for its members and the wider design and construction sectors. Collaborating with Government departments and peers such as the Finishes & Interiors Sector (FIS), Fire Industry Association (FIA), Building Engineering Services Association (BESA), British Standards Institute (BSI), British Woodworking Federation (BWF) and Passive Fire Knowledge Group (PFKG), plus wider stakeholders, ASFP is creating effective, affordable improvements in the quality and competency of the built environment.

Beyond the Colour Books ASFP is launching new training courses and material on subjects such as the design of passive fire protection, and supply and distribution of passive fire products.

As well as the new training courses, the ASFP is developing the Competency Pathway. This is made up of the competency framework (which tells you what you need to achieve to be deemed competent in your chosen operations), training recognition (training provision by relevant others) and the training register (upload and evidence individual and organisational competence).

So, in answer to the original question “has the output to date yet to create real change”, the answer is yes in some parts, such as the ongoing improvement of competency in passive fire protection, although this is mainly contained within the ASFP membership groups of manufacturers, installers and associate organisations. The answer is now across many (not all) product and service types in terms of improved design, evidencing of product performance, quality of installation and competency of those auditing, servicing and maintaining, but things are changing, gradually. Working collaboratively with those professions and trades up- and down-stream from ASFP’s core membership groups will accelerate filling the gaps of ASFP’s Competency Framework, plus improve the comprehensiveness of best practice guidance published by the association, guidance which in some parts is enshrined in building code, plus, in many parts used by the professions outside of ASFP core membership, which is exactly where it’s needed!

Talking is great, collaboration even better, but as an industry we will have failed unless all representative bodies come together, bring their respective skills, knowledge and experience and create real ‘touch’ outcomes that can be seen to be creating future tangible benefit in buildings being safer to occupy.

The ASFP has left the echo chamber of self-congratulation, the change and benefit you will see over the coming years is a direct result of bringing people together to deliver not talk.

High performance Passive Fire Protection solutions for linear and penetrative joint seals

Take an active approach to Passive Fire Protection with Sika.

Our high performance fire stopping products for linear and penetration seals can help contain and control the spread of fire and allow more time for occupants to be safely evacuated.

FRESH FACES NEW SERVICES & EVENTS

ASFP Operations Director, Nadine Saxon, reviews the latest ASFP activities and looks to the future.

It’s been an absolute whirlwind since joining the ASFP as Operations Director, especially with our move into our new home last October. Upon joining the team, I immediately saw the potential to increase member support. However, the question was how to achieve this with such a small team, which is already performing as a far bigger operation.

How do we support members further? What do our members really need? While we know some answers, our mission, vision, and values are to serve and represent the needs of our members and the wider passive fire protection industry by raising standards and competence through training, testing, certification, and quality installation and maintenance.

As our Managing Director Mike Ward, wrote in the last issue of Ignite, our ASFP Pass Mark will play a significant role moving forward. But how else can we support our members beyond training and technical advice, which we know from our member survey is so important?

New Member Hub

ASFP is thrilled to announce the upcoming launch of our newly improved Member Hub in September.

This platform will enhance offerings to our members, providing a space for resources ranging from business management, employment, insurance, and contractual information to marketing and training support.

For further details of what the Member Hub has to offer, turn to pages 36 and 37, where Louis Bradley introduces you to our new offering.

ASFP Academy Sessions

The ASFP Academy Sessions are a series of free talks and workshops exclusively available to our members. These sessions are designed to focus on both passive fire protection and comprehensive business support, ensuring our members receive valuable insights, practical skills, and strategic advice to help advance their expertise, tackle industry challenges, and support their professional growth.

Throughout 2025, we will host a diverse range of sessions featuring leading industry experts and distinguished guest speakers. These events are crafted to enrich your knowledge, expand your skill-set, and support your ongoing development in the field of passive fire protection.

The September session features Connor Minihane, BIM Lead at CLM Fireproofing. Please make sure you take advantage of these sessions and let us know if there are any topics or support you would like us to focus on in upcoming sessions. For more information and to register, visit www.asfp.org.uk/page/AcademySessions

The ASFP Council

In the March 2024 edition of Ignite, I thanked our serving Council members who were nearing completion of their two-year tenure. We welcomed and introduced the new Council members, who were elected in April 2024 and have now held their first meeting. You can get to know them better on pages 8 and 9. Their fresh perspectives and enthusiasm are already making a positive impact, and we look forward to the contributions they will bring to ASFP in the coming years.

Recent and upcoming events

We’ve had an incredibly productive and successful couple of months in terms of our engagement at events. On 11 April, we held a successful AGM in London, followed by a well-attended and informative few days at the Fire Safety Event in Birmingham on 30 April. It was good to see so many of our members at both events.

The grand opening of our new office space took place on 15 May, and the very next day, we hosted the Industry Leaders Event. This marked the first use of our theatre space here in the ASFP Academy and Office. On 21 May, we had another successful seminar in Glasgow, reaching our members further north.

The ASFP Regatta Challenge in Southampton on 19 June was a full event, with over 90 members in attendance. Congratulations to the winning boat, Consort!

Looking ahead, our Autumn events will soon be upon us and we will soon be sharing details of our 2025 event schedule. We will be holding our annual London seminar on 20th September; while the 2024 Awards Dinner is in Leicester on 28th November.

I can’t believe we have already closed the Awards nominations for 2024 and announced the finalists! There are some truly exciting nominations this year which highlight the excellence of our industry. This year we have raised the bar yet higher with the introduction of an external judging panel of leaders from across the fire sector. I’m looking forward to seeing members in November and celebrating their successes at the Awards Dinner.

More event details can be found on page 42 and 43. All event bookings can be made on our website at www.asfp.org.uk/page/Events_Listing. Make sure you book ahead of the dates to avoid disappointment.

The wider perspective

On a final note, it’s important to look ahead and actively contribute to shaping the future of our sector. This is something we’ve been talking about for some time and there has been a lot of planning and discussion within the team about how we do this.

So we are excited to announce that we will be supporting Build UK’s Open Doors initiative, taking place from Monday, 17th March to Saturday, 22nd March, 2025. This initiative provides a unique opportunity to showcase the diverse range of career opportunities within construction, opening the doors of live sites, offices and manufacturing facilities across the UK to the public. We strongly encourage our members to get involved, and we’ll be sharing more information with you shortly on how you can participate.

Alongside our support for Open Doors, we are also launching a new Young Leaders Group (YLG). This group will play a pivotal role in driving the Open Doors initiative while also focusing on identifying and addressing the key challenges our sector may face in the future. We’ll be sending out details on how to get involved in the YLG soon.

For more information on the Open Doors initiative, please see page 44.

We invite you to explore the insightful content within these pages and take full advantage of the new opportunities presented by our Member Hub. And as always, we are here to support you, please let us know what your challenges are and how we can help you. I hope you enjoy this edition of Ignite

MEET THE ASFP COUNCIL

Clive Miles

Chair of ASFP & Founder of CLM Group

Clive has 30 years of experience in the passive fire protection sector, founding CLM and partnering with some of the largest construction businesses to deliver solutions for the UK’s and London’s most iconic buildings.

Clive has made significant contributions as Chair of the ASFP, successfully hosting numerous events and council meetings while advancing his vision for the Association.

He has identified key challenges facing the industry, including increased pressures from legislation, media coverage, insurance requirements, and a shortage of skilled professionals.

Clive has emphasised the need to address the ageing workforce and skills shortage by attracting and retaining young professionals. His approach includes enhancing training methods, developing apprenticeships, and establishing outreach programmes to secure the next generation of talent.

He has aimed to position the ASFP as the industry benchmark for educational best practices by implementing new strategies to train, engage, and promote passive fire protection.

Sharon McClure

Vice Chair of ASFP & Director of Avesta Scotland

Sharon, ASFP Vice Chair, has over 15 years of experience in passive fire protection.

In her role as Vice Chair of the ASFP, Sharon aims to support the membership and ensure the Association is well-prepared for forthcoming changes across the built environment throughout the UK.

Mike Ward

Mike has over 11 years of experience in the passive fire protection industry, he is dedicated to advancing the Association and the industry. Identifying new markets and revenue streams, developing pricing strategies, and reviewing operational procedures.

Nadine Saxon

Managing Director Operations Director

Nadine is responsible for coordinating the broad range of services that ensure efficient business operations. Nadine assists in developing and implementing policies and procedures, managing HR policies, and overseeing administrative functions.

EXECUTIVE BOARD? WHAT IS THE

The ASFP Executive Board consists of the Chair, the Vice Chair, Managing Director, and Operations Director. All of whom are the legally registered directors of the ASFP as recorded at Companies House. The Board works to establish budgetary and financial targets, ensuring the Association’s financial health.

They are also responsible for overseeing legal and constitutional matters, providing a framework within which the ASFP operates. Additionally, the board sets performance targets for the Association, aligning their efforts with the strategic goals of the Association.

THE ASFP COUNCIL MEMBERS

Moe Elmasry

Technical Manager

Moe has 15 years of experience in passive fire protection, working with manufacturers. He holds a BSc in Chemical Engineering, an IFE Level 3 certification, a NACE CIP Level 2 certification, and is pursuing a Level 4 diploma in Fire Safety.

Carrie Blackshaw

Fire Protection Sales Director

Carrie Blackshaw is a leading authority in fire protection. With 15 years of experience in the industry, Carrie has deep knowledge in product development, fire testing, and building regulations, supported by IFE Level 3 and FSIDip qualifications.

Carl Burrell

Regional Market Director

Alan Curran

Fire Engineer

Alan has 30 years of experience in construction, with 20 of those years dedicated to fire safety. His extensive industry knowledge is a valuable asset to the PFP industry and ASFP members.

Liam Keenan

Technical & Managing Director

Liam Keenan has 10+ years of construction experience, including the last 6+ years in PFP with his previous background in construction including as an external PFP consultant.

Carl has over 26 years of experience in the fire protection industry. Carl has also been a UK nominated expert on international standards committees. His broad experience spans technical, practical, and market aspects of fire protection.

Jamie O’Hagan

Chief Executive Officer

Jamie has over 30 years of experience in fire protection. Since starting in 1992, Jamie has worked through various roles, gaining extensive expertise in all aspects of the field.

Matthew Jones

Technical Support

Matthew has nearly 10 years of dedicated experience in fire protection. His journey in the field, driven by a passion for ensuring safety in the built environment, is supported by education in IFE Level 3 Passive Fire Protection.

Ian Outram

Fire-Stopping Manager

Ian Outram has 22 years of experience in the fire protection industry, with a strong understanding of site, laboratory, and user requirements. Consistently contributing to the ASFP and participating in both European and British working groups.

Will Pitt Technical Leader

Will has 30 years of experience in engineering design, management, and construction. His extensive background includes contributing to industry technical guides and publications, and co-leading collaborative projects.

John O’Callaghan

Managing Director

John has over 26 years of industry experience as an innovative technical professional in the corrosion prevention and high-performance coating sector in Ireland.

On the 12th October 2023 the ASFP launched a new Task Group to support the fire-resistant glazing industry. Task Group 8 is working to develop the ASFP Clear Book, A Comprehensive Guide to FireResisting Glazing Systems.

Fire-resisting glazing is a critical component in modern building design, serving as a vital fire barrier. The combination of carefully designed, fabricated, and installed components helps restrict the spread of fire and harmful gases, allowing safe evacuation and providing firefighters the opportunity to control the blaze.

The purpose of the Clear Book is to provide a comprehensive guide to principal designers, principal contractors, controlling authorities, fire engineers, and others within the built environment in the specification and use of fire-resisting glazed systems. Experienced individuals and organisations within the sector have all pooled their knowledge to produce this comprehensive document which aims to ensure that correct principles, best practice, and standards are utilised in the specification, procurement, fabrication, installation, and maintenance of fire-resisting glazing systems.

Fire-resisting glazing is engineered to withstand high temperatures and prevent the spread of flames and smoke. These barriers are essential for maintaining the integrity of escape routes, protecting building compartments, and ensuring boundary protection. By slowing the spread of fire, these systems give occupants more time to evacuate safely and reduce potential damage to the structure, thereby preserving both lives and property.

The effectiveness of fire-resisting glazing depends on the integration of various components, including:

• Fire-resistant glass: Specially treated to withstand extreme heat

• Framing systems: Designed to hold the glass securely while maintaining fire

• Sealants and gaskets: Essential for preventing the passage of smoke and gases.

Successful implementation of a fire-resisting glazing system starts with early engagement, ideally at RIBA Stage 3. Early involvement ensures that the fire safety strategy is integrated into the building design from the outset, allowing for better coordination and fewer revisions later.

Contractors must understand the risks associated with fire and prioritise ‘best value’ over ‘lowest price’. This approach ensures that high-quality, compliant materials and methods are used, enhancing the overall safety and performance of the fire-resisting glazing systems.

The guide covers a range of issues in the following sections:

Comprehensive Design Information

Effective fire-resisting glazing requires detailed design information, including:

• Elevational appearance: Visual aspects of the building’s façade

• Structural details: Information on the building’s framework

• Performance specifications: Requirements for fire classification and other performance metrics

• Fire strategy information: Details on interfaces with curtain walling, compartments, escape routes, and boundary protection.

ASFP Technical Officer, Stuart Southall, reports on the ASFP’s work to support the fire-resisting glazing industry.

A Good Route to Market: The guide outlines a step-by-step framework for the industry to follow when bringing fire-resistant curtainwalling systems to the market and to ensure they remain operational throughout the building lifetime:

Early Engagement: Engage contractors at RIBA Stage 3 to incorporate fire safety strategies early in the project

Fire Strategy Integration: Include information on fire strategy, such as curtain wall interfaces, compartments, and escape routes.

Specialist Proposals: Specialists propose the best solutions to meet fire safety requirements, noting any

Risk and Value Awareness

Contractors should focus on risk mitigation and best value, not just cost

Detailed Design Information

Provide comprehensive design details, including elevational appearance, structural details, and performance specifications

market, stakeholders can ensure that these systems are effectively integrated and maintained.

This comprehensive guide provides the necessary framework to specify, procure, fabricate, install, and maintain fire-resisting glazing systems, safeguarding both lives and property.

The Clear Book will aim to provide the industry with this key information to improve the glazing industries.

The Clear Book will be published in quarter 3 of 2025 and will be available to download from the ASFP website: www.asfp.org.uk

Fire-resisting glazing systems are crucial for modern building safety. By adhering to best practices and following a structured route to

DEVELOPING A CULTURE OF CHANGE

ASFP Competence Specialist, David Marah, discusses the ASFP Competence Framework and Pass Mark initiative for enhancing industry standards to ensure safer buildings.

Just three years ago, Kate and I met with the ASFP team at the BCF offices in Coventry. We had been asked to review the work so far on the “ASFP Competency Pathway” that the ASFP had recently developed. But more importantly we were asked how we could help raise the profile of passive fire protection in the competence work being undertaken in a post-Grenfell and post-Hackitt review world.

The assignment sounded simple, thanks to the groundwork already laid on how passive fire protection fitted into the construction landscape, and the foundation courses that were already delivered by the ASFP that led directly to IFE Certificates in Passive Fire Protection. While there were acknowledged gaps in many areas, there was a base to work from, including a culture of voluntary third-party certification embedded within the ASFP and several certification schemes, and other potential partners, already working to make a difference in this space. Crucially, there was a strong commitment from ASFP officers, staff, and members to create a competent industry capable of building safer structures.

Our initial review quickly evolved into a mission to bring the ASFP vision to life. Passive fire protection is not a ‘traditional’ industry, with a core that works autonomously and interacts with related trades when needed. Instead, it is embedded throughout the building lifecycle – from design and installation to occupation – and involves multiple trades and professions. An approach to competence was established and published that committed the ASFP to how it would make a difference, and a complex picture emerged of overlapping priorities and interactions with a wide range of other stakeholders.

Demonstrating individual competence Due to its non-traditional nature, passive fire protection was often neglected by the existing skills system, which favours well-defined, structured occupations. This resulted in a lack of available, appropriately funded, and well-regarded qualifications. Without a benchmark for training and skills, demonstrating individual competence reliably was impossible.

Seizing the initiative, and the opportunity presented by the installerfocused Working Group 2 (WG2) of the Competence Steering Group, the ASFP led a collaborative effort to set an industry benchmark for individual competence. The ASFP Competence Framework now brings together standards for individual competence across passive fire protection. Through our seven domains across the building life-cycle, and at all levels from Foundation (qualification Level 2) through to Authoritative, the Framework specifies the passive fire protection activities that should be undertaken.

Read more about the ASFP Framework at www.asfpindex.org.uk/ competenceframework

Breaking the traditional ‘occupational’ mould, the ASFP Framework recognises that these activities might be performed by individuals in various job roles from different organisations. By bringing together content and collaborators from diverse areas, the Framework focuses on the required work rather than legacy requirements embedded within existing structures. This is especially evident in our recently published profiles for design and specification, which are designed so they can be adopted by those coming from an architectural, engineering, or passive fire product background. These profiles are new to industry and constantly being improved, so if you’d like to be involved get in touch via www. asfpindex.org.uk/competenceframework

In addition to setting a benchmark for individual competence, we’ve expanded training to help people gain the necessary knowledge and skills. The ASFP training offer continues to expand, with a wider range of courses available including the specifics of installation activities. Our role is to provide the technical training people need to do their jobs and innovate in delivery methods to make this training widely accessible. As a result, we are changing the way we deliver our foundation courses from 2025. We will deliver our Level 3 course with one day of classroom training each month for a period of seven months. This will enable us to set coursework and provide better support for delegates. As an association we are focused on ensuring that all training we offer provides the highest quality of experience and output.

We also recognise that not all highquality training is delivered by the ASFP. Our Training Recognition service identifies and promotes the best passive fire training available, incorporating expertise from across the industry and providing further opportunities for collaboration. A robust and systematic process, ASFP Provider Recognition assesses an organisation’s ability to deliver high-quality learning and their passive fire technical expertise to do so to the benefit of the industry overall. Read more about the ASFP Training Recognition service at www.asfp.org.uk/ page/TrainingRecognition

From an organisational perspective, the picture is more mature due to the third-party certification schemes already supported by the ASFP. While not a panacea, these schemes offer a basis for independently measuring organisational capability. A core tenet of the ASFP’s approach to competence has been incorporating these schemes into a broader picture. As we always have, we are working with members delivering these schemes to address the widely acknowledged challenges, establish consistent best practice requirements, and promote consistency among

providers

Evidencing competence

While methods of defining and building competence are emerging, there is a renewed focus on providing tools for evidencing competence. Individual competence can now be validated by collecting evidence of meeting the Competence Framework’s skills, knowledge, experience, and behaviour statements contained within the Framework.

The ASFP Register will provide one mechanism to do just that, with the ASFP offering independent validation that individuals have provided evidence of competence, in specific activities and for roles within their organisation. This is currently being piloted with installer organisations.

Equally important are robust, wellregarded certification schemes that provide evidence of organisational capability. For installer schemes, there is a renewed focus on establishing consistent minimum requirements and supporting scheme providers to adopt this industry best practice. This will be a vital step forward in ensuring a robust measure of organisational capability in this space. We also continue to work to ensure there are schemes available wherever they are needed, providing a route to organisational capability for all parts of the industry.

Our approach to unifying these elements is the ASFP Pass Mark. An umbrella for the sector, this provides a simple way for passive fire protection companies to demonstrate their commitment to competence. Companies can earn the Pass Mark by providing evidence that they meet the requirements of both organisational capability and individual competence for their workers and, since different parts of the industry are

different, the criteria they need to meet are also different. In this way, that complex picture of overlapping priorities and interactions begins to simplify into a clearer Competence Pathway. The Pass Mark criteria outline what is required, related to the specific area of passive fire protection. Organisational capability will be evidenced by independent third-party certification meeting the industry published best practice requirements. Since people are the drivers of competence, there will always be a requirement for organisations to select the passive fire activities their workers undertake, develop their people, and have their individual competence validated against the Competence Framework. They may then go further, incorporate other relevant priorities such as the Code for Construction Product Information.

Achieving the Pass Mark enables companies to demonstrate their commitment to best practice in passive fire protection, and complete the Competence Pathway. A single, straightforward yet comprehensive method with multiple routes that incorporates all the complexity. Most importantly, it fosters a culture change within the industry – one where competence is owned by the organisation and as a sector, of taking a lead to do the right thing proactively, and where the ultimate goal is to build safer buildings.

Get In Touch With David & Kate info@asfp.org.uk www.asfp.org.uk

MIND THE GAP

Andrea White, explores the impact of greater building complexity on competence.

Competence is the current buzzword in the fire safety industry. I’m certainly not denying that competence is an issue today, but what got us here? Since history has a habit of repeating itself, I think it’s useful to understand why we’re in the current position – it may even offer some clues to potential solutions.

Over my 25-year career, I’ve witnessed a growing gap between complexity and competence. A gap that, in my opinion, is both a problem for fire safety in our buildings and a potential problem for the individuals and organisations working within the industry.

Firstly, if we compare the types of construction materials used in buildings over the last 50 years, we can see that today we’re building with less robust and more combustible materials. Where previously we were building in noncombustible concrete and solid masonry, we are now incorporating combustible insulation and far greater amounts of timber into our buildings.

Secondly, if we compare the quality of workmanship today in terms of design, construction and installation, it’s dramatically lower than several decades ago. Sadly, I do not always see pride in the job today. All too often I see significant corner-cutting in the buildings that I inspect and those I offer an opinion on. This is often in areas which are hidden and out of sight, such as passive fire protection.

So, we have less robust building materials, which have more combustible elements, being designed and installed in a poor fashion. Our buildings are less

resilient than they used to be because of these issues, and they are less inherently fire safe because of the materials used and the way they’re built.

My point is that there is a much higher level of complexity involved in designing and building appropriate levels of fire safety within modern forms of construction.

We’ve introduced more failure points into the system, more holes in the Swiss Cheese model of accident causation. And that means we need greater knowledge and skills amongst those involved in designing buildings, more oversight of the construction process and diligent ongoing management of our buildings. We need those working in the industry to be more competent.

Taking time to return into classrooms and see for myself whether competence has kept pace with building complexity, I pondered the following:

1. We have a number of different organisations which have created competency criteria for fire safety roles. This is a good start, however, in my opinion they don’t go into an adequate level of detail to be meaningful. In a poll I ran at a conference last year, 96% of people agreed that more specifics were needed in terms of training topics within competence frameworks. The next question is whether training courses are meaningfully using those competence frameworks to decide what topics to cover – my research suggests that often they are not.

2. Are we giving students access to knowledgeable tutors who have a good grasp of their subject, and are we teaching people the correct information? Based on my time sitting in classrooms, I would say sometimes. However, often those teaching the subject are only knowledgeable to the level of training they are giving. They’re not sufficiently qualified beyond that level to be able to answer students’ questions. We know that Powerpoint makes it very easy for trainers to just read off slides which may have been written by someone else. What I found was that tutors may offer their version of an explanation, which may or may not be correct.

The competence situation was relatively easy to predict, as we moved from exam-based courses to attendance-based courses during my career. But when a degradation of competence is combined with today’s less resilient construction, the gap between our building stock’s complexity and industry competence widens two-fold. Quite how each of us can address this problem seems to be the real question we should all now be asking. But in the meantime, I urge you to mind the gap!

Andrea White MSc BSc(Hons) IEng FIFireE C.BuildE FCABE CFIOSH is an independent Fire Engineer and Founder of Women Talking Fire, an independent networking and support group for women and male allies in the UK fire safety industry. In 2023, Andrea was voted one of the Top 100 most influential women in the construction industry.

Your learning, your way

With ROCKWOOL Learning you can:

Expand your knowledge and take control of your learning pathway

Complete courses at your preferred time and location

Access courses designed for all construction stakeholders

EIMPORTANC

e of TRAINING

Technical & Training Officer, Adam Shipstone, describes upcoming changes to the ASFP Level 3 training course.

Back in March, I joined the ASFP because I wanted to help improve the passive fire industry. In previous roles I have been heavily involved in the creation and delivery of training, but these sessions were always specific to the needs of the organisation and, as we all know, there is an issue in our industry with the level of knowledge and understanding at all levels involved in a passive fire project. My desire and drive to do more has led me to the ASFP and I can’t be more excited to be on this journey.

So Why Is Training Important

With passive fire protection, the industry is always changing. If you look at our history as a passive fire protection trade association, originally we focused on the protection of the structural elements of the building. Buildings were built differently in the 40s, 50s and 60s than how they are constructed now. Back then the only real form of passive fire protection would have been cementitious coatings applied to concrete or steel frames. Walls were built from block and bricks and/or plaster systems, so service penetrations were usually sealed with mortar or cement.

Let’s fast forward to today and there are hundreds of passive fire systems on the market. The industry has changed so much in the past 50 years and it will continue to change over the next 50 years. Buildings will continue to be built with lighter, more environmentallysustainable products and the passive fire systems will need to be developed in line with this. This means those of us involved in passive fire at any level, whether that be design, testing, manufacture, installation, or inspection and certification will need to keep our skills, knowledge and understanding up to date to show we continue to understand this ever-changing industry.

Likewise, training employees and investing in continuous professional development (CPD) is crucial for businesseses, as statistics show that companies with structured training programmes experience 218% higher income per employee than those without such programmes (Source: Association for Talent Development, 2023). This highlights the significant financial and operational benefits of prioritising employee development.

The ASFP also needs to adapt and change with industry needs. There are growing commercial pressures in industry which affect attitudes towards training, plus issues around labour shortages and project delivery challenges. Our biggest classroom courses currently are our Level 2 and Level 3 foundation courses, with the latter required to complete 350 hours of learning in readiness for the IFE Level 3 Certificate in Passive Fire Protection. We provide around 32 hours of learning towards this qualification with delegates expected to achieve the rest via selflearning. Currently we deliver these hours over seven days of classroom sessions spread over seven weeks. This is why I am happy to share that we are changing the way we deliver our foundation courses from 2025. We will now deliver our Level 3 course over a period of seven months prior to the next IFE exam date.

Why

We Are Doing This?

As I said above, the industry changes and there are greater pressures on businesses now to deliver projects quicker and more cost efficiently than ever before.

There are labour shortages as well as other factors that may stop business committing to losing staff members for seven days over two working months. Also, delegates who sit our courses finish our courses around two weeks before the exam, this limits the time needed to complete their own learning prior to the exam dates.

What Is Changing?

We at the ASFP must provide the best learning experience for the exams. We want to give delegates the best support for their own learning as well as the best classroom sessions possible.

We will now be asking delegates to sit one classroom session a month in the lead up to an exam, while setting coursework and providing essential support for delegates. See opposite how this will work in the run up to the October 2025 Exams.

Book Your Training Course

ASFP training courses are designed to accommodate all levels of experience in the passive fire protection (PFP) industry, from beginners to seasoned professionals. The training is structured into stages to ensure comprehensive learning and skill development.

All courses can be booked on the ASFP website by visiting www.asfp.org.uk/page/ ASFPTrainingCourses or scanning the QR code below.

April

Registration for the Level 3 Foundation Course is open at various UK locations. Registered delegates will receive course materials, a reading list, exam preparation instructions, and qualification specifications.

May

Module 1 reading materials are sent to delegates a week before the first classroom session, which covers Fire Science, Human Behaviour, Fire Protection, Building Performance, Testing, Certification, and Fire Strategy. After this session, coursework must be completed and submitted before the second session.

June

Coursework from Session 1 must be submitted for feedback. Module 2 reading materials are sent a week before Session 2, which covers Structural Fire Protection and Compartmentation. After this session, delegates must complete and submit coursework before the next session.

July

Coursework from Session 2 must be submitted for feedback. Module 3 reading materials are sent a week before Session 3, which covers Firestopping, Building Envelope, and Cavity Barriers. After this session, delegates must complete and submit coursework before the next session.

August

Delegates submit coursework after Classroom Session 3 for feedback. Module 4 reading materials sent a week before Session 4, which covers Ductwork, Dampers, and Fire Doors. Coursework issued post-session, due before the next classroom session (dates TBD). Session 4 coursework due prior to classroom session 5. Module 5 reading materials sent before Session 5, covering Fire -resisting Glazing, Fire Retardant coatings, Fire Detection, and Firefighting.

September

Delegates submit coursework after Classroom Session 5 for feedback. Module 6 reading materials sent a week before Session 6. Session 6 covers Suppression Systems, Signage, Emergency Lighting, Fire Engineering, Building Regulations, Approved Documents, and Regulatory Guidance. Coursework issued post-session, due before the next classroom session.

October

Delegates submit coursework after Classroom Session 6 for feedback. Module 7 reading materials sent a week before Session 7. Session 7 covers CDM Regulations, Conformity Marking, Industry Codes of Practice, BIM, and Examination Preparation.

October

Delegates ready to sit the IFE Level 3 Exam.

The Future

Finally, going forward I am excited to share that I will be expanding our online training offerings during 2024 and 2025. We have two new courses that are in the final stages of development, and I am excited to share these with you once they are finished.

Remember training and continuous development are one of the greatest tools we have at our disposal to improve our industry, it is our responsibility to provide the best training and support to industry. It is your responsibility to want to learn.

I’ll leave you with a reminder of our vision: To offer the industry we serve:

• Advancing knowledge and guidance on all aspects of ‘built-in’ fire protection

Providing technical support and impartial advice

Leading regulatory and behavioural change as an independent authority

Improving competence and quality through training

A NEW STANDARD FOR PRODUCT ASSESSMENTS?

ASFP Technical & Regulatory Affairs Officer, Niall Rowan, offers insight into the development of the PFPF Guide to Undertaking Assessments in Lieu of Fire Tests and how recent changes may affect its role in the current regulatory framework.

To prove the performance of passive fire protection products, manufacturers undertake fire tests to BS or BS EN (European) standards. Indeed, this is ‘required’ by Approved Document B (AD-B) to the Building Regulations and the equivalent statutory guidance documents in Scotland, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Republic. Appendix B of AD-B for England states: “Much of the guidance in this document is given in terms of performance classifications in relation to British or European Standards. In such cases, it will be necessary to demonstrate that a system or product can meet the relevant performance classification. This will be achieved if the system or product complies with one of the following:

a. They should be in accordance with a specification or design that has been shown by a specific test to be capable of meeting that performance classification.”

However, the results of these are only applicable to the item tested – no variation is allowed; so eg in the case of a fire resistance test on a simple single swing, single leaf fire door hung on hinges, the test result does not cover a double swing, double door hung on pivots. The same is true of cladding systems which comprise a wide variety of cladding panels, fixings, firestopping materials and insulation; change one component and the fire performance can change significantly.

To accommodate this, AD-B allows variations in products and end use applications different from the tested specimen to be ‘assessed’. Assessments are the written opinion of the fire performance of a product or system were it to be fire tested. These range from the simple substitution of eg a non-essential item of hardware on a door right up to a ‘global assessment’ of a wide variety of parameters. Appendix B of AD-B states:

“c. They should have been assessed by applying relevant test evidence, in lieu of carrying out a specific test, as being capable of meeting that performance classification”.

In consideration of who can undertake assessments, AD-B says:

“Tests and assessments should be carried out by organisations with the necessary expertise. For example, organisations listed as ‘notified bodies’ in accordance with the European Construction Products Regulation or laboratories accredited by the United Kingdom Accreditation Service (UKAS) for the relevant test standard can be assumed to have the necessary expertise”.

The bad old days…

Let’s take a step (or several) back to the situation as it used to exist in the late 1980s before the explicit recognition of assessments. Back then the Building Regulations only referred to testing, but assessments were still done for the same reasons that they are now ie it is simply too expensive and impossible to test everything. To take the fire door example cited earlier; a fire resistance test on a fire door costs about £7-10,000; so with the numerous combinations and permutations of opening action, single vs double leaves, hardware, inclusion of glazing, method of hanging etc, it is easy to come up with a huge number of tests and a wholly unsustainable and unnecessary cost for testing. For products that are manufactured in the hundreds of thousands, this cost is not so much of an issue, but many fire doors are of semi-bespoke design and the cost of four or five fire resistance tests on a project with less than 100 fire doors makes it uneconomic.

It also soon becomes apparent that if regulatory authorities were to insist on a fire test on every combination and permutation of building product, there are simply not enough fire test laboratories in the world to cope with the demand, disregarding the timing and economic aspects.

Where assessments were undertaken, there was often no control on who did them; whether they were independent of the manufacturers, how detailed they were, or the form of report required, and so on. There were some truly shocking assessment types, consisting of a single line stating: “I have examined the variation in these products and, in my opinion, if they were to be tested, they would pass.” These were produced by all sorts of individuals with no qualifications, to support the argument. This situation was chaotic and open to corruption.

In fact, the situation was analogous to that following the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order introduced in 2005 that requires a fire risk assessment to be undertaken on every public building or one running a business, but not requiring ANY competence or independence from those carrying out the fire risk assessment. Clearly, we never learned.

FTSG Resolutions 64 & 64a

Accordingly, the fire test laboratories who undertook the majority of assessments for Building Control purposes got together under the auspices of the Fire Test Study Group (FTSG). They produced FTSG Resolution 64 in 1989 and its updated successor Resolution 64a in 1993.

These resolutions contained the backbone of the Passive Fire Protection Federation Federation (PFPF) Guide to Undertaking Assessments in Lieu of Fire Tests that we still have today. Included were:

A written requirement for the request of an assessment ie not just a phone call

All information used in compiling the assessment, including test data that might show failures, and the permission to use that information

• Requirement to use NAMAS (UKAS predecessor) accredited laboratories. At that time, that meant no industry laboratories as they weren’t accredited then. This helped with impartiality

The introduction of two-factor verification, in that an assessor who undertook an assessment had to have it reviewed by a reviewer

• The requirement to declare if the applicant has approached any other organisation or individual for an assessment of the same or similar construction ie the ‘no shopping around’ clause

Requirement on assessors – but still pretty vague at this time

Requirement of impartiality

The requirement that considerations of the assessor should be adequately documented such that the user can understand the basis and technical justification of the opinion formulated. ie a cohesive written argument

A statement that if contradictory evidence becomes available to the assessing authority the assessment will be unconditionally withdrawn and the applicant will be notified in writing

• A requirement for a full written report of the assessment ie not just a letter

This was a major step forward from the differing ad hoc arrangements that existed beforehand and gave greater confidence in assessments that were undertaken.

The Passive Fire Protection Federation Around 2000, the PFPF was formed. PFPF consisted of:

• Laboratories from the Fire Test Study Group (FTSG) and their associated certification bodies Department of the Environment Transport and the Regions (now Ministry of Housing Communities and Local Government

• Chief and Assistant Chief Fire Officers Association (CACFOA) now National Fire Chiefs Council (NFCC) Institute of Trading Standards Administration (ITSA)

• Several trade associations including ASFP, British Woodworking Federation, Door and Hardware Federation, Glass & Glazing Federation, Guild of Architectural Ironmongers etc

The Federation had a secretariat, a constitution and subscriptions for laboratory, certification body and trade association members. However, there were still weaknesses and omissions in FTSG Resolution 64a. In addition, with the formation of the PFPF there was the opportunity to bring the industry and the regulators along as well.

PFPF Guide

The collaboration resulted in the publication of the PFPF’s Guide to Undertaking Assessments in Lieu of Fire Tests in June 2000. This guide, which incorporated much of the original text, addressed Resolution 64a and covered aspects such as the relationship with statutory provisions, the requirements for subscribing organisations, including accreditation by UKAS or ISO 9000/EN 45000, a code of conduct for assessors and reviewers, professional indemnity cover, maintenance of assessor matrices, levels of assessment complexity, and the nomination of assessors and reviewers by named individuals within the assessing organisation.

Four levels of assessor and reviewer were included: Trainee, Assessor, Senior and Principal. Assessors had increasing requirements on fire testing experience, qualifications, degree of supervision required and level of assessment that they could undertake, as they moved from Trainee through to Principal Assessor.

Four levels of complexity of assessment were also included: Simple, Intermediate, Complex and Engineering Appraisals. These varied from simple repositioning of fixings through to the performance of elements such as large curtain walls that cannot be tested in a standard test furnace. Requirements were also included on the level of complexity that each assessor could undertake eg complex assessments could only be undertaken (and reviewed) by Assessors or above ie not Trainees.

Evaluation of test data was provided including a separation into primary and secondary data. Primary information is test data obtained from one or more fire tests and is essential to the formulation of the assessment. Secondary information is that which may be used to provide supplementary data or to fill in gaps in knowledge.

Also included was a requirement to review data over five years old to assess its suitability. Interestingly, this was brought in at the request of industry rather than the laboratories. The review included examination of the test data to verify: ownership, completeness, relevance to current material/product (third party product certification helps here) and, most importantly, would it pass today’s test?

Outcome of Publication of PFPF Guide

The Guide was another step up from Resolution 64a and was universally taken up by the laboratory and certification body community. However, take up elsewhere was patchy and some passive fire protection companies started producing the somewhat confusingly titled ‘Engineering Judgements’ (not to be confused with Engineering Appraisals in the PFPF Guide) that they said followed the Guide. Of course, Engineering Judgements produced by companies selling PFP lack the impartiality requirements of the PFPF Guide, but that didn’t stop them producing them. In reality, they were probably needed to satisfy the huge demand for solutions to on-site variations in the installation of successfully tested PFP products.

The Grenfell Tower fire

In the aftermath of the Grenfell fire there was a great deal of speculation and accusation that assessments, or as they were referred to ’desktop studies’ were one of the reasons that Aluminium Composite Material was used on the tower. This was not the case, it was due to another document: Building Control Guidance Note 18 - Use of Combustible Cladding Materials on Buildings Exceeding 18m in Height, which allowed a third option to satisfy AD-B, by using ‘desktop studies’ viz:

“If no actual fire test data exists for a particular system, the client may instead submit a desktop study report from a suitably qualified fire specialist stating whether, in their opinion, BR135 criteria would be met with the proposed system. The report should be supported by test data from a suitable independent UKAS accredited testing body (BRE, Chiltern Fire or Warrington Fire) and so this option may not be of benefit if the products have not already been tested in multiple situations / arrangements. The report should also specifically reference the tests which have been carried out on the product.” (continued on next page)

This wording is very lax and allows the unscrupulous or ignorant to produce, or persuade a consultant to produce, a desktop study that may not be adequate in its evaluation of the safety of the construction considered. Consider the following:

• There was no definition or requirement on who is ‘a suitably qualified fire specialist’ There was no direct specification as to the testing required – merely a reference to BRE 135 criteria which would indicate BS 8414 testing, but an unscrupulous or ignorant assessor might use other fire test evidence to put something together • There were none of the comprehensive checks and balances included in the PFPF Guide. There was no requirement for any quality system, for an assessor and a reviewer, for an evaluation of the type of assessment needed (simple vs complex), no code of ethics, no manufacturer’s or sponsor’s declaration that if they become aware of the product or system under consideration being tested.

Not surprisingly, this document got pulled from the Building Control Alliance website days after the fire. But it was worrying, because up until then, we had two documents on undertaking ‘assessments’ which were of widely differing scope, complexity, rigour etc. How many more documents on assessments were there? Which one was ‘Top Dog’?

It became increasingly clear that something needed to be included in AD-B to regularise assessments and to cover all products. Logically, that document was the PFPF Guide and, as agreed by the PFPF, two ASFP representatives (including the author and one from Warringtonfire) met with MHCLG (in its first incarnation) to take this forward. MHCLG was keen and it was agreed that it would be included in AD-B. However, since the document had not been reviewed since it was produced in 2000, a review was considered overdue. PFPF (now just a loose forum rather than a full federation) undertook that review and the result was the slightly less snappily titled PFPF Guide to undertaking technical assessments of the fire performance of construction products based on fire test evidence.

The 2019 Guide

This was largely the same as the 2000 version, but there were a number of changes, partly to allow it to be referred to in AD-B and partly to tighten up and make further improvements. These included:

• A change to the title. The previous version, Guide to Undertaking Assessments In Lieu of Fire Tests, indicated to some that you could do an assessment with no testing at all (not at all true but needed for clarity) Acknowledgement that assessments will be undertaken by manufacturers but that this must be stated or implicit in the assessment report. Consequently, the conflict of interest provisions were tightened

• Explicit references to the relationship with Statutory Provisions (Building Regulations)

• Requirement that the Guide is used in the undertaking of third-party product certification where an assessment underpins the scope of certification for the products offered to the market

Exclusion of external envelope façade or cladding systems (belt and braces requirement following the Grenfell Tower Fire)

• Removal of ‘Engineering Appraisals’ so that there are now just three levels of assessment: simple, intermediate and complex Introduction of Apprentice assessor so there are now five levels of assessor in the guide. The other levels and the requirements are largely unchanged

Further expansion and elaboration on the complexity levels of assessment

• Elaboration regarding type and use of Primary and Secondary data

A requirement that the report should be produced in accordance with the principles in BS EN 15725:2010 as required by Approved Document B amendment 2022 Appendix B. In reality this standard is more applicable to undertaking Extended Applications of scope of products to be classified to the BS EN 13501 series of standards. It is not used much in day-to-day assessments.

Publication of the revised guide occurred in 2019 and the document is now referenced in Approved Document B:

“Further information on best practice is provided in the Passive Fire Protection Forum’s Guide to Undertaking Technical Assessments of the Fire Performance of Construction Products Based on Fire Test Evidence.”

So, all well and good then? We have the Guide and it is now properly referenced in Approved Document B. Job done. However, there was a cloud forming on the horizon.

DLUHC proposal to remove BS 476 from Approved Document B

On 23rd December 2022 the Department of Levelling Up, Housing and Communities (MHCLG’s predecessor) started a consultation on the introduction of sprinklers in care homes, restrictions to height of single staired blocks of flats and removal of national BS476 based classes from AD-B. This last item would be a major headache for passive fire protection products if it was not handled sensitively. It meant that only European classes were acceptable, and these cannot be generated from British Standard tests. This created a problem, because a great deal of test evidence for some passive products, in particular, doors had been generated using BS 476 testing.

The first consideration – which some industries latched onto – was the need to retest to European standards at great cost and that this, together with the limitations imposed by test house capacity, meant the proposal was too onerous/impossible/not acceptable. This, despite EN standards having been published over 20 years ago and the move to them being the stated direction of travel of Government ever since. This article will not discuss this since the issue can be solved by a long transition period, of for example, five years and it’s not the most important or pressing issue.

The second consideration is that if we are relying solely on European classifications for fire resistance then this leads to the situation where the products and the end use applications of such products will be very restricted because:

I. Classification as defined in 13501-X is a process which converts or expresses the results of fire tests, Direct Applications and Extended Applications into European Classes in a fairly rigid framework. There is no ‘expert judgement’ in this process. This was intentionally introduced at a European level to prevent a ‘rogue Notified Body’ producing classes that are unconservative by using ‘fast and loose’ expert judgement and so distorting the EU Single Market. Consequently, everything is written down in rules which much be followed. This is a rigid, limited and conservative system and consequently, the resulting scope of products which can use that class is very limited. In other examples, eg for smoke controls ducts, the EXAP standards are not yet written.

The upshot of this is that one can only classify what has been tested with relatively limited variations allowed by EXAP, which is extremely restrictive.

II. European classifications relate to products (and variants covered by EXAP) at factory gate and do not encompass all the different applications eg mounting and fixing conditions found on site. Currently, these are dealt with by assessments as per variations in products. If we move over to solely EN, relying on solely European classifications will severely limit the end use applications that can be used.

So here we are almost back to the ‘test everything’ scenario and we know that is impossible and financially unviable.

A possible solution?

If we could use the results of European tests (as opposed to classes) for fire resistance – and these could be supplemented by assessments to satisfy national provisions in AD-B, then that could be a solution. We would be using EN standards for testing, EXAP and classification, but would be able to use the flexibility of assessments of fire resistance performance to cover wider product ranges and all the other end use applications not included in the European classifications. There would be no need for BS 476 tests or classes.

By this time, the PFPF Guide was already referenced in AD-B and stakeholders were aware of what it was and why it was needed. Clearly, such an approach would need to be referenced in AD-B and the assessment process regularised, possibly in the form of a British Standard rather than an industry code of practice.

Discussions between ASFP and Government

Between August 2023 and early 2024, several meetings were held between ASFP on behalf of PFPF and BSi but also including HSE which is the Building Safety Regulator and is now responsible for AD-B. The issues above were aired and considerations made for a solution.

Further discussions with the above stakeholders and BSi resulted in the intention to ‘convert’ the PFPF Guide into a British Standard, but we would need agreement by the PFPF to release the copyright first.

2024 PFPF meeting

On 29th May this year, the PFPF met at ASFP offices to discuss the future of the PFPF Guide. There were concerns as to whether all of the Guide could be included into a BS or only certain parts. The main concern being that the Guide has requirements on subscribing organisations, such as mandating UKAS or ISO 9000/EN 45000 accreditation, the code of conduct for assessors and reviewers, and professional indemnity cover for assessments would not be allowable in a BS. BSi indicated that these could be included as best practice in informative annexes.

In light of these reassurances, PFPF agreed to sign over the copyright to BSi. At the time of writing, this had been done.

How will the new BS ‘PFPF’ be drafted? PFPF met again on 3 July 2024 to discuss the mechanism of conversion of the guide to a BS. Inevitably, it will be given to a BSi committee, either an existing one, or a new one. PFPF agreed at the July meeting to apply to BSi to raise a project within FSH 22 to deliver the new standard. FSH 22 is the national committee on fire resistance testing, which I currently chair. There is no guarantee that BSi will accede to our request; and may decide to give it to or form a new committee with a much broader representation. Alternatively, the project will be kept with a sub-committee of FSH 22 with representation from stakeholders who are not normally represented on or interested in fire resistance testing. At the time of writing, meetings have been set up between BSi, HSE and ASFP on behalf of PFPF to progress this further.

It has been a long road from one-line assessments written by unqualified individuals with no impartiality to a definitive code of practice used by industry and referenced in Government statutory guidance. A relatively small push should see it converted to a full British Standard. It will be worth it.

ASFP Technical Officer, Stuart Southall, provides an introduction to ASFP Advisory Note 33: A Guide for Designing Passive Fire Protection Systems.

Passive fire protection (PFP) is a critical aspect of building design that helps to contain or slow the spread of fire, thus providing valuable time for occupants to escape and for the fire service to intervene. However, the design and specification of PFP systems often faces significant challenges, particularly during the construction phase. These issues typically arise at the interfaces between different systems, such as service penetrations through compartment walls and where structural fire protection interacts with compartment walls. The Association for Specialist Fire Protection (ASFP) has developed Advisory Note 33 (AN33) to provide guidance for architects and designers to mitigate these challenges and ensure effective implementation of PFP systems.

The Problem

The construction industry in the UK frequently encounters problems with PFP systems due to a lack of coordination and foresight in the design phase. The design responsibility for these systems is often passed down the contractual chain, ultimately ending with specialist installers. When decisions about wall design and the placement of mechanical, electrical, and plumbing (MEP) services are made without considering PFP requirements, it can lead to compliance issues and significant delays later in the project. As a result, specialist contractors may struggle to find systems supported by suitable certification or test evidence, which is essential for ensuring compliance.

The ASFP Solution

AN33 outlines a structured process for the design and specification of PFP systems to prevent these issues. The key steps recommended by ASFP are as follows:

Early Identification and Planning:

The architect or Principal Designer, in collaboration with the M&E designer, should identify areas requiring PFP from the fire strategy plans. Utilising Building Information Modelling (BIM) software can help highlight potential problem intersections early on.

Engaging Specialists Early: The architect or Principal Designer should seek support from manufacturers, specialist fire engineers, and contractors during the early design stages. This collaboration helps in drafting a provisional modelling plan to address areas of concern and ensures that the proposed systems are feasible and compliant.

Coordinated Design Process: The Principal Contractor’s design and fire teams should work closely with the architect, Principal Designer, and M&E designer to identify and address potential issues. Early engagement with a specialist fire protection contractor is crucial to review proposed designs and confirm compliance, suggesting changes where necessary.

Contractual and Quality Assurance:

Pre-contract meetings between the Principal Contractor, architect, and specialist contractors should ensure that specifications address all quality requirements. This includes detailed record-keeping, quality inspections, and adherence to industry best practices.

Benchmarking and Installation Standards: Establishing benchmarks prior to or early in the construction phase sets installation standards. Benchmarks can include product samples, on-site mock-ups, or examples of previous work. These benchmarks should be agreed upon by all relevant parties and used to induct installation personnel.

Ongoing Collaboration and Inspection:

Regular design meetings during construction help address any arising issues, review progress, and ensure compliance with regulatory requirements. Inspections of completed work by a systematic approach involving all key stakeholders ensure that PFP systems are installed correctly before other construction progresses.

Early engagement

AN33 emphasises the importance of early engagement with specialist fire protection contractors, consultants, and manufacturers. By involving these experts in the early stages of design, potential issues can be identified and addressed before construction begins. This proactive approach ensures that PFP systems are correctly specified and compliant with legislative requirements, avoiding costly and time-consuming redesigns or project-specific fire testing later on.

The architect or Principal Designer may not possess the detailed knowledge required to ensure PFP compliance. However, their role in facilitating collaboration among all parties is essential. Providing comprehensive information to all contractors ensures that the design is adhered to, preventing additional costs and technical issues during construction.

In conclusion, the ASFP’s Advisory Note 33 is a crucial document for architects and designers involved in PFP. It promotes a collaborative approach to design and construction, ensuring that PFP systems are effectively integrated into building projects. By following the guidance in AN33, stakeholders can achieve better compliance, reduce delays, and enhance the overall safety and integrity of the built environment.

INDUSTRY IMPACT

Max Joyce, Senior Marketing Executive, explains ASFP’s pivotal role in advancing industry standards and competence through active participation in key committees and groups.

The ASFP is dedicated to elevating industry competence and standards while fostering development across related groups and committees. Our highly skilled Technical team actively participates in numerous committees and groups, all with the goal of advancing the industry. This involvement is crucial as it ensures that the latest knowledge and best practices are shared and implemented across the sector, driving continuous improvement and innovation.

Founded 35 years ago, CLM Fireproofing are industry-leading experts in passive fire protection installation and consultancy.

This collaborative approach is essential for maintaining high safety standards and ensuring that passive fire protection measures are effective and up-to-date. Through its commitment to these goals, ASFP plays a pivotal role in safeguarding lives and properties by enhancing the overall fire safety landscape.

We offer a wide range of passive fire protection solutions and pride ourselves on providing a quality service underpinned by best in class technical skills & innovation.

BSi and CEN

Standards bodies like BSi and CEN are crucial for the performance and market support of Passive Fire Protection (PFP). Our involvement in drafting standards at both UK and European levels helps us maintain and promote our technical expertise.

BCF - Intumescent Coatings Group

Trusted

This group is significant for our intumescent paint members. Attending meetings and providing technical updates have allowed the Association to better understand the intumescent paint industry.

BUILD UK

We have worked some of the UK’s most iconic buildings such as The Shard, Battersea Power Station & The Royal Opera House

BRE & BRE Governors Board

Experienced

BRE provides critical documents, studies, and research for the government, influencing policy. Our involvement in their certification and technical groups helps guide these efforts to align with industry

We support clients in the residential, commercial, social housing, aviation, education, remedial & health sectors

BUILD UK is influential in shaping HMG policy and a founder member of the Construction Leadership Council. We participate in their group activities to influence competency debates critical to our industry.

Digitally Enabled CLM are compliant with the golden thread, from BIM in predesign, to digital record keeping of all site activity

CIC - Construction Industry Council

The CIC’s focus on professional standards in the construction industry aligns with our goals. Our participation in their membership panel enhances our influence in competence standards.

Construction Products Association

As the trade association for building product manufacturers, the CPA is critical for our mutual aims. Active involvement in their councils and committees keeps us well-connected and influential.

PFKG

The PFKG is a not-for-profit collaboration comprising contractors, consultants, and relevant trade associations. It is a place where the industry can send its issues to be looked at by the group.

Bim4 Housing and Asset Management Group

Bim4 Housing and Asset Management have multiple active working groups, ASFP’s focus has been on the Digital and Interoperability groups. This engagement has been particularly valuable in enhancing the Associations understanding of the Golden Thread, which is crucial for ensuring accurate and comprehensive information flow within the industry.

We participate in many more industry groups which are just as important for the industry. As time goes on and the ASFP Technical team grows, we will engage with even more groups for the benefit of both the industry and the members of the association.

Our commitment to active participation underscores our dedication to supporting industry-wide progress and member development.

WHO PAYS FOR

FIRE SAFETY DEFECTS

Ron Alalouff, examines the options leaseholders have when there is unsafe cladding or other fire safety defects in their blocks.

Leaseholders of flats in residential blocks have unwittingly been caught up in the consequences of the post-Grenfell fire safety landscape. Many have had to live in the knowledge that their blocks have unsafe cladding or other significant fire safety defects, while they are also unable to sell their flats and move, because lenders are unwilling to advance mortgages to potential buyers.

Partly in response to this, the Building Safety Act 2022 was enacted. It contains provisions to avoid leaseholders in buildings over 11 metres (or five storeys) high having to pay for cladding remediation, and capping the amount they have to pay for non-cladding work. The work must fix a building safety risk, which includes any defect caused during the construction or refurbishment of a building in the past 30 years that causes a risk to people’s safety from the spread of fire, or the collapse of some or all of the building.

Building owners and landlords must pay if they are (or are linked to) the developer of a defective building, or they meet a certain wealth threshold. If an owner or developer is liable to pay but refuses to do so, several bodies have powers to take them to court, including fire and rescue authorities, local authorities, the Building Safety Regulator, leaseholders themselves, or the Secretary of State.

By 31 January 2024, 55 developers had signed the Government’s developer remediation contract. The contract commits developers to remediate

buildings they’ve developed, taking responsibility for work necessary to address life-critical fire safety defects arising from the design and construction of buildings 11 metres and over in height. Developers are also required to reimburse the Government for taxpayer-funded remediation of buildings.

Who pays?

Earlier this year, legal action was launched by the Secretary of State against freeholder Grey GR, following “unacceptable delays” in fixing multiple fire safety issues at the 16-storey Vista Tower block in Stevenage. It was the first case brought by the Government using new powers under the Building Safety Act. Fire safety defects at Vista Tower included:

Combustible materials in external walls

PVC window/spandrel panels with a combustible filler

• UPVC curtain glazing incorporating materials not of limited combustibility

Lack of cavity barriers/fire stops

• Combustible PIR insulation and plywood in the inner sections of other external walls

The contentious elements of the case were whether the Government was entitled to a remediation order –which would set out the scope of the required works and a timetable for their completion – and whether the freeholder should be required to carry out aspects of work, funding for which had not yet been confirmed by the Building Safety Fund.

In reaching its decision, the tribunal said there had been delay on both sides, and that although Grey GR were scheduled to complete the works by autumn 2025, it would nevertheless make a remediation order to reinforce the situation and provide reassurance to leaseholders.

One of the blocks had been converted from an office development in 2005, with two storeys added making it six storeys high, while the other is a seven-storey new build separated from the existing block by a party wall. Following the Grenfell Tower fire, there were concerns about the aluminium cladding on the top two storeys of each block and firestopping of internal compartments.

A building inspection in June 2001 concluded that there were:

Limited horizonal cavity barriers and no vertical cavity barriers

The insulation – while compliant at the time of construction – was now considered non-compliant

• There was no firestopping around vents within cavities

The vents used were not fire-rated

• Combustible materials had been used as part of the external wall system.

The tribunal made an order for remediation, setting a deadline of September 2025 for the work to be completed.

The tribunal stated that any remediation work should be compliant with building regulations at the time of remediation and – at the very least – allow for a satisfactory EWS1 form to be issued.

Olympic Village

In another case heard earlier this year, two property firms were ordered to pay nearly £18 million for remediation work on blocks in the former Olympic Village in east London.

Office block conversion

In what is believed to have been the first contested case for a remediation order under the Building Safety Act, the case of Waite & others v Kedai Ltd saw leaseholders in two residential blocks in Streatham, south west London, successfully apply for the replacement of unsafe external cladding and the rectification of other defects, at their landlord’s expense.

The landlord, Triathlon Homes, brought the case against Get Living and Stratford Village Development Partnership (SVDP). The case relates to five blocks originally built for the London 2012 Olympic Games, comprising more than 2,800 homes. Triathlon owns all the social and affordable housing, while Get Living owns all the private rented housing at East Village, and now owns the original developer, SVDP.

It was found that aluminium composite material (ACM) has been used in cladding on some of the blocks, and there were serious fire safety defects in the design and construction of non-ACM cladding on external facades. These included combustible breather membrane and insulation, inadequate firestopping, combustible timber decking in external balconies, and the absence or defective installation of cavity barriers and firestopping within the external wall systems.

Remediation work began in April 2023, funded by grants to the management company via the Building Safety Fund. The total cost of the work is over £25 million.

Defective Premises Act 1972

Aside from the Building Safety Act, leaseholders are also able to claim directly against landlords and developers under the Defective Premises Act 1972. In a recent case, the residents of a housing block destroyed in a fire are claiming more than £3 million in damages from the company that built it – housebuilder St James, part of the Berkeley Group – and housing association Metropolitan Thames Valley Housing (MTVH).

The residents argue that St James is liable under the Defective Premises Act (DPA) because of the design and construction of Richmond House. They also claim that MTVH breached the Defective Premises Act and Occupiers’ Liability Act arising out of the design, construction, repair, maintenance, improvement or management of the block.

The alleged deficiencies included missing and inadequate cavity barriers and inadequate compartmentation.

Although independent expert reports identify the construction defects as responsible for the rapid spread of the fire, St James and MTVH deny liability, but have offered damages of around £3,000 per claimant. A spokesperson for Berkley Group said:

“The cause of the fire was never identified but the building ‘performed’ as it was supposed to, allowing everyone to get out safely. Compensation has been paid to residents, and those that wished to do so have been able to sell their flats back to the owner, MTVH.”

Rebuilding of the block is due to be completed soon, and Berkeley is trying to agree the size of final, additional compensation with the residents’ lawyers.

Contractual remedies

Notwithstanding the Building Safety Act, landlords may look towards third party developers for compensation for fire safety defects, and developers may even go back to designers and/or subcontractors for recovery of costs. Such scenarios, however, depend ultimately on whether there is enough evidence that a specific party is in breach of contract by designing, specifying or installing sub-standard, built-in fire protection.

Business insurance designed to help organisations manage their exposure and liabilities in relation to fire risk.

As the Trusted Insurance Advisor and Affiliate Partner to the Association for Specialist Fire Protection (ASFP), Consort Insurance has developed an exclusive, informed insurance programme reserved for ‘Best of Sector’ companies operating within the fire and security industry. This is not an open market solution, and terms are exclusively available from Consort.

Over the past few years, Consort has secured the backing of leading reputable insurers, and in combination, we are able to provide an incredibly comprehensive and competitive product.

If your organisation has an element of exposure to fire risk, you are likely to benefit from our insurance programme.

01621 890285

advice@consortpad.co.uk

www.consortpad.co.uk

FINALISTS

This award recognises exceptional customer service and demonstrates a profound commitment to understanding and meeting customer needs

Team Approach To Customer Service

Nullifire Technical Team

Positively Raising Awareness of the Silverliner Cavity

Barrier

This category recognises a company that has executed an exceptional marketing campaign, capturing significant industry attention and exemplifying outstanding passive fire protection practices.

FIREFLY Marketing Activity & Rebranding

This will be awarded to an Individual who has shown exceptional potential in a short period of time in the passive fire protection industry (5 years)

The Member Engagement Award recognises an ASFP member company for their active involvement and contributions towards the improvement of the Association

PURCHASE

The Lifetime Contribution Award will be presented to an individual who has demonstrated exceptional practice over a significant period (20+ years). This person will have made a substantial impact on people, organisations, and the industry

The Passive Fire Protection Advocate of the Year will be awarded to a non-member of ASFP who demonstrates significant advocacy for highquality installed passive fire protection.

Join us on the 28th of November, at the The Athena Events venue, Queen St, Leicester LE1 1QD for an evening dedicated to honouring exceptional accomplishments and celebrating the forefront of the passive fire protection industry!

Purchase ASFP Award 2024 Tickets using the QR code below or visit www.asfp.org.uk/page/ASFPAwards

Member Table: £1500 (excl VAT)

Non-Member Table: £2000 (excl VAT)

Member Single Ticket: £175 per person (excl VAT)

Non-Member Single Ticket: £220 per person (excl VAT)

Technical Department

Nathan Small, Technical Officer

Robert Grant, Technical Officer

Jack Colloff, Technical Designer Chelsea Campbell, Regional Fire Protection Manager

FACING UP TO THE CHALLENGES

I wanted to start by stating I have 15 years of experience in the Passive Fire Sector and up until March 2024, when I joined the ASFP, all those years were spent in various roles working for contractors. I have worked for very small consulting contractors to very large £multi-million specialist installing contractors.

I have held various roles during that time from labouring (my first day on a building site consisted of moving 100 tins of intumescent paint from the ground floor to the third floor of a project), all the way to contracts management and compliance management.

What’s the point in this opening statement? It is to demonstrate that, no matter the company, a lot of the issues faced are the same. But new challenges are also emerging for which contractors must be ready.

If we strip out the issues we are all facing with material shortages and the Cost of Living crisis and focus on passive fire project delivery alone, it’s clear that the issues still remain the same for all: tenders and bids that are still more weighted by price than quality; the issued scope of works is unclear or vague; passive fire elements are being awarded to different companies; (yes, we still see examples of pipe closures being fitted by companies that install pipework etc). The list goes on for quite some time.

Internal factors

Then there are internal issues, where companies start pricing and delivering passive fire works without having the necessary knowledge or skills. We also have passive fire contractors who are asked to design elements, without realising that they are being asked to design. An example of this situation is where a standard detail from a supplier does not cover a particular project application, with the contractor asked to provide a solution to this. A lot of the time third party accreditations for installers will not allow you to do this, since providing a solution can be seen as providing a design.

Obtaining your IFE certificate in passive fire is a fantastic achievement

How can ASFP help?

We have revamped our training to optimise delivery and provide greater support to candidates through the IFE examinations. We constantly review and update all our training offerings, so they remain relevant to the industry.

This means that you should treat our online courses as continuous professional development and not just a one-time session. Our industry changes, as do our training courses, and we are developing more. Late 2024 and 2025 are going to be big years for our training offering and I can’t wait for you to see it!

We have introduced our Competency Pathway and Pass Mark. You can read more about the importance of the ASFP Competency Pathway and benefits of the Pass Mark on page 12 and 13.

ASFP Technical & Training Officer, Adam Shipstone, discusses the many issues faced by passive fire contractors.

Finally, if you are a contractor member, you will see we have relaunched our Contractor Task Group. I urge all our contractor members to join this Group to help us to collectively develop solutions to some of these issues.

You only get as much out of the Association as you put in. Your active participation and support are crucial for us to drive the industry forward to where it needs to be. Our success and the industry’s progress depend significantly on your involvement and contributions.

We have always prioritised our members’ needs and will continue to do so. Your satisfaction and success are our top priorities, and we are committed to supporting you in any way we can. If you have any suggestions or ideas on how we can further benefit the industry, please do not hesitate to get in touch with us. We value your feedback and are always open to new ideas that can help us better serve our members and the industry as a whole.

In addition, if you require assistance in developing a training strategy for your business, please contact us. We understand the importance of having a well-structured training programme and are here to provide the support and resources you need to achieve your business goals. Our team is ready to work with you to create a comprehensive training strategy that meets your specific needs and helps your business thrive. Thank you for your continued support and engagement. Together, we can achieve great things and advance our industry to new heights. Get In Touch With Adam Shipstone

+44 (0) 247 693 5412

www.asfp.org.uk

HOW IT WORKS

A month-long event honouring the life of Brendan Pettit, where we encourage our members to get outside and seize the end of summer in aid of motor neurone disease.

Brendan’s incredible work has created opportunities and fostered collaboration across the passive fire sector for years. This year, Brendan was diagnosed with motor neurone disease, and his condition accelerated at a rate his family and friends couldn’t have prepared for. We created Seize September in Brendan’s honour - to remind us of the importance of seizing every moment possible with our loved ones and friends. We hope you can join us for this month-long event in celebration of Brendan.

Get yourself or your team outside throughout the month of September, to work towards our collective goal of 500 miles.

• You can walk, run or cycle, so long as you get outside and work towards the goal. We encourage you to conduct outdoor meetings, do team lunchtime walks, or use this as a team-building exercise.

• Track your distance and share it with us along with any photos of your progress. Take a photo *** Donate to our JustGiving link which will go directly to MND Association. Our goal is £5000 across September!

ASFP Head of Technical, Dr. Andrew Taylor, outlines the latest developments in Construction Product Regulations in the UK and EU.

At ASFP, we have been trying to forewarn members and the wider industry of changes that are coming to Construction Product Regulations (CPR) in both the UK and wider EU. Since 2011, the UK and EU have shared a common regulatory framework, based on the European Construction Products Regulations. These regulations are important, as they set the laws covering what manufacturers must do if they place a construction product on the market.

However, there is an imminent divergence of construction product regulations between the UK and EU which will present a complex and slowly evolving landscape for manufacturers and specifiers of passive fire protection products. This article investigates the key differences, challenges, and opportunities arising from these regulatory shifts, focusing on their impact on the passive fire protection sector.

The European CPR was published in 2011 and came fully into force in 2013. It is designed to ensure free movement of goods within the EU by setting a common technical language to describe the performance and test methods used for construction products. The European Commission started a review of the EU CPR in 2016, looking to determine the successes and areas where the CPR had failed. Legal cases had occurred between the EC and member state regulators since not all member state legal requirements were covered within the harmonised product standards, and the implication of the James Elliott court case in Ireland meant that the CPR needed a significant amendment. That process has been going on since 2016, and only now is it finally looking like it will come to fruition.

During that time, the UK’s relationship with the EU has, of course, changed following the Brexit Vote in 2016 and

THE EVOLVING LANDSCAPE FOR CONSTRUCTION PRODUCTS

subsequent departure from the EU in 2020. However, so far little has changed, and the UK regulatory framework is still based on the EU framework of 2011. The Grenfell Tower tragedy of 2017 has also brought the UK framework into focus. The EU system is supposed to cover free movement of goods. Product safety in use is a question that the EU system leaves to the project team. Obviously, there is now a clamour in the UK to increase the importance of product safety within the provisions of the UK CPR.

One of the main challenges for the passive fire protection industry is that almost all of our product families sit outside the mandatory CPR framework, in an area where assessments are done on a voluntary basis. In the EU, this is predominantly via the European Office of Technical Assessments (EOTA) route.

Where next for Europe

In March, the European Commission finally published the draft of the CPR2.0. One of the biggest fundamental changes is to set a timeframe for the adoption and inclusion of a number of environmental and sustainability indicators within European Assessments of Construction Products – both mandatory and voluntary.

Another key change that will affect manufacturers is the setting of validity dates for European Technical Assessments (ETAs). Current ETAs are valid indefinitely – it is down to the project team to decide whether the assessment meets the project need. However, new ETAs will have a maximum 10-year validity period (reduced to 5 years at any point that the product standard is updated. We will be discussing the wider changes within the EU CPR during our ASFP technical groups over the coming months.

The EC’s review to get to this point has been long and overly complicated. In addition to reviewing the mechanics of the system, the review has also been trying to assess the mandatory requirements in each member state, by virtue of the Acquis process. This is designed to stop EU member states from having national requirements that require national marks in future.

However, one of the things that the revised EU CPR does not look like it will change any time soon is the voluntary nature of how it applies to passive fire protection products. Rumours of a mandate to have a harmonised product standard have circulated for over 15 years, according to some of those who worked on this before me. I don’t see any progress on this any time soon, and the EC and CEN are not keen to discuss it, as it’s a very complex matter.

What about in the UK.

Different national regulations across the EU for construction products Introduction of the European Construction Products Regulations (EU CPR), creating a common regulatory framework. EU CPR fully comes into force, ensuring free movement of construction products within the EU.

UK votes to leave the EU European Commission starts a review of the EU CPR to address successes and failures.

Dame Judith Hackitt’s Building a Safer Future report in 2018 recognised the need to create a comprehensive regime that ensures that all products used in construction are properly tested, certified, labelled and marketed. The Building Safety Act of 2022 was the enabling legislation which transferred the power to produce such legislation over to the Secretary of State within what was then the Department for Levelling Up, Communities and Housing (DLUCH). 2011

Grenfell Tower tragedy in the UK, prompting a focus on construction product safety within the UK.

Dame Judith Hackitt’s “Building a Safer Future” report recommends a comprehensive safety regime for construction products in the UK.

In 2021, Government commissioned the report, Testing for a Safer Future, prepared by Paul Morrell and Anneliese Day. The report was ultimately published in 2023 with 20 headline recommendations and over 60 sub recommendations, over half of which were for Government, with the route for many of these to be changes in the construction products regulations. The report made much of the fact that the UK system, based on a read across from the EU, was more concerned with free movement of goods, not product safety, for a number of product families, including many passive fire protection products.

There is also the issue of the end of recognition of CE marking and the switch over to UKCA marking as the system for product labelling. The Government’s policy changed in 2023 to allow indefinite recognition of CE marking in the UK for most product areas, but NOT construction products. The previously stated policy by Government is that the recognition of CE marking for construction products will end on 30/6/25. However, there is no current or draft legislation to make this occur.

We have been expecting the draft legislation to come out for consultation for some time, but so far, there is no sign of a draft or a consultation. When nothing came forward from DLUCH in Q1 2024, I became convinced that there would be no such documents until at least six months after the general election (albeit I didn’t think that the election would have already taken place).

Let’s face it, construction product regulations is a very complicated subject, and was hardly a priority for the outgoing Government (it was never going to change the way that many people voted). It is also not an easy topic for the new Ministers in post in the newly renamed department of the new Government.

So, we are still waiting for some form of paper explaining the Government’s intentions in respect of construction product regulations. ASFP and its manufacturer members would welcome increases in the scope and rigour of these regulations, as an important step in improving the safety of passive fire protection products and systems.

Challenges and Opportunities

Given the EU has published their draft regulations focusing more on sustainability and common technical languages, and the UK Government is expected to look at safety in use as a prime motivator, we can be fairly confident that we are heading for some form of regulatory diversion.

This will cause a number of challenges for manufacturers and users of construction products alike:

Dual Market Access: Manufacturers targeting both the UK and EU markets face the challenge of meeting different regulatory requirements. This will almost certainly lead to increased costs and complexities in product testing and certification. There will be an increased need for environmental testing for products that are being sold within the EU market, and the UK system may well have a whole new series of product standards, which could include different levels of testing.

Supply Chain Implications: Changes in regulations can disrupt supply chains as manufacturers and distributors adapt to new requirements. European Manufacturers may not be willing to meet the UK’s diverging regulations and chose instead to withdraw from the market.

Technical Challenges: Differences in testing standards and methodologies can pose technical challenges for product development and validation. Will we see a divergence in UK and EU products? On the one hand, this could increase complexity and costs of test programmes. On the other hand, the divergence in regulations may create opportunities for product differentiation and innovation, as manufacturers tailor products to specific market requirements in UK or EU, delivering better products.

The evolving regulatory landscape for construction products, including passive fire protection, demands careful attention from industry stakeholders. ASFP will continue to work with regulators towards understanding the key differences between the forthcoming changes to UK and EU regulations. We will then disseminate the information to our manufacturer and specifier/installer members, so they can navigate these challenges and capitalise on emerging opportunities.

Watch this space – but don’t hold your breath!

2020 2021

UK formally leaves the EU, retaining the EU CPR framework temporarily.

UK Government commissions the “Testing for a Safer Future” report by Paul Morrell and Analiese Day.

2022

Building Safety is enacted in the UK, empowering the Secretary of State to produce new construction product regulations.

“Testing for a Safer Future” report published with recommendations for changes in UK construction product regulations.

Get In Touch With The Technical Team

info@asfp.org.uk

+44 (0) 247 693 5412

www.asfp.org.uk

UK Government policy changesindefinite recognition of CE marking for most products, but not for construction products.

European Commission publishes the draft of CPR 2.0, introducing new sustainability indicators and validity periods for European Technical Assessments(ETAs).

Expected draft legislation for UK construction product regulations does not appear.

Scheduled end of CE marking recognition for construction products in UK

MEMBER SPOTLIGHT

CH Materials Ltd

CH Materials Ltd has been a leading supplier of high-quality technical materials and products to the passive fire protection sector for close to 20 years. With our office and warehouse based in Lancaster, we provide high quality products including intumescent materials for the manufacture of firestopping devices, thermal protection tapes and accessories for fire-rated doors, glazing and ducting applications.

This has enabled our team at CH Materials to build up a large loyal customer base over the years, not just across the UK but also worldwide with quality service and premium products at the heart of what we do.

CHM became part of the svt group of companies in 2022. The svt group have been manufacturing and supplying passive fire protection materials and products for over 50 years to the construction, rail, aerospace and marine transportation sectors. svt is also heavily involved in the complex field of battery safety, where their expertise and technical knowhow is developing safe ways to utilise energy storage in our fast-moving sustainable world.

Years of industry experience within our team enable us to offer expert advice on our products as well as finding bespoke solutions for any new development projects. Problem-solving is a big part of any passive fire protection project and we are perfectly positioned to provide expertise throughout the stages of planning, testing and final accreditation, making us an ideal one-stop-shop for any research and development project

Indicative testing can be carried out at one of our fully-accredited test sites to provide realistic fire test scenarios to EN1363-1, as well as full certified testing by an external independent institute.

This summer has seen the launch of the Flamro range of structural passive fire protection products into the European market, which is a great addition to our intumescent and thermal protective products already on offer in the UK marketplace. All these products are independently tested to the highest European standards, are CE Marked and have updated ETAs, which will set a new benchmark for Europe. This is an excellent opportunity to be able to offer high quality fully certified products in the UK, from innovative Service Transits, the Multi Collar and cable protection systems to protect against spread of flame and help maintain circuit integrity during a fire.

Phone: 01524 406088

Email: info@chmaterials.com

Website: www.chmaterials.com

To find out more about how we can help you, please get in touch!

S.R Passive Fire Limited

At S.R Passive Fire Limited, we provide comprehensive passive fire protection services to help you safeguard your property from fire and smoke. With over four decades of collective experience, our dedicated team handles everything from consultation and installation to maintenance, ensuring a worry-free experience for you. By investing in our passive fire protection solutions, you enhance property safety and ensure compliance with industry regulations.

Whether your property is a commercial building, residential complex, or public institution, we understand the critical importance of fire safety and the need to maintain daily operations without disruption. Our experts work closely with you to develop a tailored fire protection strategy that integrates seamlessly with your structure.

Fire safety is a critical concern for all property owners and managers. Our professional firestopping services provide a robust solution to prevent the spread of fire and smoke within your property, helping to safeguard lives and assets while ensuring regulatory compliance.

Invest in our firestopping solutions for enhanced fire safety and peace of mind. Our team of trained professionals offers exceptional service and expert guidance throughout the process, ensuring optimal protection and satisfaction. At S.R Passive Fire Limited, we understand the significant risks posed by unsealed openings and gaps in a building’s structure, which can allow fire and smoke to spread rapidly. Our firestopping services are designed to address these risks effectively, offering the best defence against fire spread.

For more information about our services or to schedule a consultation, please contact us at:

Phone: 01623702299

Email: enquiries@srpassivefire.com

Website: www.srpassivefire.com

ASFP JOIN THE CITB EMPLOYER NETWORKS

ASFP Technical Training Officer, Adam Shipstone, discusses the benefits of CITB Employer Networks for members and the wider industry.

When I joined the ASFP as Technical Training Officer, I aimed to make positive changes that benefit both the industry and our members. I am excited to share the first of many announcements over the coming 12 months.

We are pleased to announce that the ASFP has joined the CITB Employer Networks initiative. This initiative, set up and funded by the CITB, has two main aims:

Easier Access to Training and Funding

Diverse Training Options: The Employer Networks make it simpler for you to access training in various areas essential to construction employers. This includes current trade skills and future needs such as net-zero, digital skills, and mentoring.

Hassle-Free Funding: The Employer Networks handle all the organisation, eliminating the need for you to complete any paperwork to apply for funding.

Collaborative Input on Training Needs

Local Employer Engagement: Employers come together at a local level to inform the CITB about their training needs, advise on how funding should be prioritised and allocated, and effectively utilise training provisions to address immediate and future skills needs in their region.

If you claim funding through the Employer Network, you won’t be able to claim the same training costs through the levy. We recommend speaking with your CITB Engagement Advisor to determine the best option for your business.

Why This Matters To ASFP Members

The ASFP’s involvement in the CITB Employer Networks means our members will have a stronger voice in shaping the training landscape, ensuring it meets their current and future needs. This collaboration underscores our commitment to supporting our members and the wider industry by facilitating access to crucial training and resources.

For more information or to check your business’s eligibility, please visit www.citb.co.uk/levy-grants-and-funding/grants-and-funding/employer-networks/

Our Newest Members

The ASFP proudly welcomes new members from across the passive fire protection (PFP) industry, including a diverse range of professionals such as manufacturers, installers, distributors, testing authorities, fire engineers, risk assessors, and certification bodies. ASFP membership is vital for advancing the interests of the PFP community by advocating for higher industry standards and engaging in government lobbying. This collective effort aims to improve training, testing, certification, and overall quality in installation and maintenance, ensuring the continued progress of the PFP sector.

We would also like to welcome individual members:

Chris Winstanley

Victoria Hennessy

Mark Bramwell

Max Roberts

Julius Windels

UNLOCKING THE POWER OF PASSIVE FIRE PROTECTION

A Guide to Effective Passive Fire Protection in Construction By Sika UK

A comprehensive firestopping strategy is a critical aspect of most construction projects. Along with active fire protection – smoke alarms, fire blankets, extinguishers, sprinkler systems – it’s crucial to include a first defence for controlling fires in the form of Passive Fire Protection. Here is a comprehensive guide to ensuring your next project meets the highest standards when it comes to fire safety, utilising Sika’s innovative Passive Fire Protection range.

What is Passive Fire Protection?

Active Fire Protection is visible to all, whereas Passive Fire Protection solutions aren’t always evident to the building’s inhabitants. However, just because they can’t be seen doesn’t mean that they aren’t an integral part of the building fabric.

A key aspect of fire safety is containing and controlling the spread of fire and smoke. Not only does this reduce the potential damage a fire can cause to a building but above all, it can help save lives by increasing the time for people to be safely evacuated.

Most public buildings are naturally interspersed with multiple utility and network services such as cables, cable trays, pipes and ventilation ducts. These penetrations within walls and floors create a passage through which flames, smoke and heat can quickly spread. To protect adjoining rooms and areas and to prevent further fire propagation throughout the entire building, it’s essential that measures are taken to stop fire in its tracks. This is where specialist products such as silicone sealants, acrylic sealants, fire boards, pipe collars, loadbearing compounds and pipe wraps should be considered.

Where is Passive Fire Protection used?

In terms of compartmentalising fire, the potential ‘weak spots’ in a building can be found in linear joint seals, and penetration seals.

Linear joint seals can be found in walls, floors and in so called ‘head of wall applications’, which are the joints between a wall and ceiling or a wall and floor. Linear joint seals are passive fire protection systems designed to maintain the required building fire resistance across a separating element, whilst also being able to accommodate a defined degree of structural movement.

Sikasil® 670 Fire Rated Joint Sealant is a one-component solution which provides up to 4 hours of fire resistance according to EN 1366-4. Its exceptional flexibility properties allow an array of applications particularly in movement and connection joints within fire compartments, such as stairwells and corridors.

Penetration Seals are those found within walls and floors, where services such as cables, cable trays, pipes, or ventilation ducts pass through. One major challenge with sealing around penetrations is that certain services (e.g. combustible pipes) will melt when subjected to the intense heat of fire. This results in even larger apertures that must be closed. For this type of application, expanding intumescent materials are usually a very effective solution.

SikaSeal®-627 Fire Collar offers one such solution, providing a high-volume expansion and pressure seal should the pipe within fail under the heat.

Where to start with firestopping systems

Knowing the exact Passive Fire Protection solution for your project is imperative. Sika’s Fire Stopping Solution Finder for both linear and penetration seals removes the guesswork by providing system information and technical drawings for individual requirements.

Sika can also provide detailed technical evaluations to assist with the correct specification of passive fire protection products for linear joints, and penetration seals. Factors such as building materials, orientation (walls or floors), the thickness of the element, the joint dimension, the joint configuration, and expected joint movement, would be taken into consideration.

Protecting the building from the devastating effects of fire is vital, and choosing the right Fire Stopping solution is the first step in achieving a safe and secure environment. Trust Sika to become your partner for Passive Fire Protection, and together we can improve the safety of buildings from within.

For more information about Sika’s Passive Fire Protection range, visit sika.co.uk/passivefire

ASFP MEMBERSHIP

ASFP Membership Officer, Tony Corcoran, delivers an update on ASFP membership and explains the requirements and benefits of membership.

ASFP Membership

The ASFP represents and supports the passive fire protection industry by raising standards and competence through training, testing, certification, and quality assurance. It offers industry knowledge, technical support, and impartial advice. As an independent authority, the ASFP drives regulatory and behavioral change, enhancing competence and quality. Membership spans the construction industry, providing benefits such as access to guidance, technical documentation, training discounts, participation in Technical Task Groups, and influence on legislation and standards.

Current Position

Interest in membership is robust, with the ASFP’s industry profile, comprehensive training, and extensive member benefits serving as key attractions for companies seeking business development opportunities through membership.

Over the past 12 months, 57 new members have joined, adding to the 400+ members who have come on board in the last 11 years. However, it’s important to remember that membership can be suspended or cancelled if the requirements outlined in the Association Byelaws are not met.

ASFP Membership Requirements

To qualify for ASFP membership, businesses must demonstrate their commitment to high standards in passive fire protection by meeting specific requirements. These include providing evidence of appropriate insurance, details of products and services, staff information, and recent financial accounts. Companies must also hold third party certification from an accredited body, such as UKAS, for their fire protection products or services. THey must commit to ASFP’s training programme, be certified to ISO 9001 or provide Quality System details, and adhere to the Association Code of Practice. Additionally, members offering consultancy or risk assessment services must have relevant qualifications or certifications.

Before ASFP membership is approved, applicants must pass the Association’s verification process and meet all relevant Byelaws. To maintain membership, members must annually declare their continued compliance with ASFP Byelaws, Code of Practice, and general requirements, providing updated information as needed.

ASFP membership requires adherence to qualification and competency standards relevant to each membership category, ensuring professionalism and exceeding industry expectations. With a growing emphasis on staff competency and safe working environments, the ASFP is leading efforts to promote and verify competence through collaborative industry initiatives. Members displaying the ASFP logo are recognised for their high standards, assuring those seeking fire protection products and services of their qualifications.

Key Benefits of ASFP Membership ASFP members enjoy numerous advantages after passing a rigorous approval process, aligning their organisation with ASFP values and gaining access to valuable benefits.

ASFP membership provides significant advantages, including enhanced professionalism and competence through strict entry standards, helping members stand out in the passive fire industry.

Members have the chance to influence industry practices and legislation via ASFP’s involvement in national and international bodies.

They benefit from expert guidance and access to extensive training resources at discounted rates, along with promotional support through the ASFP logo, website visibility, and promotional opportunities.

Networking within a growing community of fire protection professionals and industry influencers is also a key benefit.

Exclusive member support includes access to webinars, technical advice, and promotional platforms. Joining the ASFP elevates your industry profile and aligns your organisation with high standards and influential industry practices.

The ASFP works continually to increase its profile and to encourage industry influencers to select only ASFP members for all their passive fire protection products, services and installations –a real benefit to all members.

ASFP members can be proud to display the ASFP logo, linking themselves to the strength of the ASFP’s industry presence whilst having access to the many benefits and services available to them.

The ASFP represents the needs of its members and the wider passive fire protection industry, by:

• Advancing knowledge and guidance on all aspects of ‘built-in’ fire protection

• Providing technical support and impartial advice

• Leading regulatory and behavioural change as an independent authority

• Improving competence and quality through training

ELEVATING MEMBER VALUE

explains how the ASFP aims to elevate its member services.

2024 has been a process of reflection and improvement for the ASFP. We have continually asked ourselves - how do we ensure our members are receiving the utmost possible value for their membership fee?

This goes beyond simply upscaling our staff headcount and moving into a new HQ. Every offering that ASFP members engage with is in the process of optimisation, elevation, and scrutiny. If something doesn’t work or isn’t easily accessible to our members, we are fixing the problems and re-routing efforts into the things that do work.

In short, we want to ensure every move we make for our members countsalongside all the bells and whistles. Over the next year, our marketing and technical efforts will be put into new initiatives, and reconfiguring old offerings – starting with our Member Hub.

Previously, our Member Hub housed predominantly discounts for our members. While useful, we wanted to elevate this offering to include our in-house expertise. We want to create a space where our members (from the small start-up to the large global organisation) can glean valuable information that will benefit their businesses. That is why our Member Hub will now house bespoke resources, created by our in-house team, covering everything from advice on handling PQQ bundles to improving HR support for your staff.

By lending our expertise, we are able to give burgeoning companies the knowledge and network they need to create a forward-thinking company infrastructure; a space for their employees to grow, knowing that their directors are putting their best foot forward. We will be bringing in industry expertise from our Council members, as well as from organisations that are doing incredible work in supporting workers across the sector.

We don’t claim to have all the answers, and all of our resources will lead to a reliable source that we trust to support your business. We want to act as a conduit between your business and the tools you need to grow and thrive, in a sector that we are driven to support.

For example, we have created a resource on Diversity: a first of its kind for the passive fire sector. We have created this with the aim of connecting our members with talent pools they may not be aware of. We have chosen to spotlight organisations and groups we have collaborated with before, as well as new ones we hope to work with in the future.

Alongside this, our Conflict Avoidance resource was created with the aim of encouraging our member base to sign up for the Conflict Avoidance Pledge, recommended by our Vice Chair of Council, Sharon McClure. This pledge provides a framework for companies to follow when handling a conflict during their projects, as well as providing support and intervention when needed. This is an example of a resource that can benefit our members in real-time with their day-to-day business operations, and is an initiative we are proud to support.

In addition to these resources, we are looking to provide in-person support to our members. This comes in the form of Academy Sessions – a quarterly event series, completely exclusive to members and absolutely free of charge. Taking place at our new Coventry HQ, these will have limited numbers to ensure that everyone is able to draw the insight they need from our esteemed guest speakers.

As you can see, our Member Hub has also been condensed, refined, and given a user-friendly facelift, which should enable all members to access all of our downloadable resources, discounts from our affiliate partners, and partnership opportunities to exhibit with us at events, or host your job adverts.

Listening to feedback

We want to take this time to reinforce our stance on feedback. Our mission is to serve the passive fire sector and support the innovative work of our members. For us to do that, we rely on your feedback, scrutiny, and expertise. We set out to refine this hub with the goal of creating accessibility, not complexity.

The Member Hub will continue to expand and be refined year-on-year. If something doesn’t work, you as a member have the power to change it. As such, we pledge to address any feedback we receive into our refinement process.

Alongside this, if you have an initiative, or expertise to offer that you think could help propel the work of companies within passive fire, we would love to hear from you.

For now, we hope you feel that your experience has been improved, and it is wholly apparent what the benefits of being part of the ASFP are. If not, don’t hesitate to get in touch!

You can access the new and improved Member Hub by visiting www.asfp.org. uk/page/Memberhub or scanning the QR Code below

ASFP Marketing Executive, Louis Bradley,

OUR LATEST INITIATIVES

An Introduction To Conflict Avoidance In The Workplace

The Open Doors Initiative

The ASFP Young Leaders Group

An Introduction To Diversity & Inclusion In The Workplace

How To Ensure Accreditation Across A Project Lifecycle

EXPLORING OF INDUSTRY ACCOUNTABILITY

EVOLUTION THE

CEO of Totus Digital, Aman Sharma, joins Mike Ward on the Sparking Interest Podcast to discuss the future of industry standards and accountability.

In the latest episode of the ASFP Sparking Interest Podcast, Aman Sharma delves into the evolution of industry accountability, highlighting key changes and ongoing challenges within the building sector. This discussion emphasises the importance of robust certification schemes, consistent regulatory compliance, and the industry’s responsibility to adapt and improve.

The Importance of Certification and Standards

Mr Sharma opens the discussion by reflecting on the industry’s move towards higher standards and accountability. The ASFP’s PassMark criteria, which members must achieve to support procurement processes, is a significant step in this direction. This certification has been welcomed by Principal Contractors and regulatory bodies alike, creating a more robust framework for prequalification questionnaires and procurement practices.

Digital Provisions and Regulatory Compliance

Mr Sharma addresses the complexities of regulating digital provisions within the industry. He emphasises the need for standardised software solutions to support regulatory compliance, particularly in relation to building safety regulations. The discussion touches on the thematic commonalities across various software solutions and the importance of meeting consistent principles, such as those outlined in Dame Judith Hackitt’s 2018 interim report and her final report in 2019.

Transition to New Regulatory Regimes

The transition to new regulatory regimes is a critical topic, especially with the introduction of new requirements and the closing out of transitional periods. Mr Sharma discusses the significance of Gateway submissions and the competency regulations that have been implemented. He stresses the importance of understanding what good looks like at different stages of the construction process, from Gateway 2 to Gateway 3, and how these standards apply to Principal Contractors and designers.

Challenges and Responsibilities

Mr Sharma highlights the industry’s ongoing challenges, such as the need for faster adaptation and proactive improvement without waiting for regulations. He criticises the “head in the sand” mentality some in the industry adopt, advocating for continuous improvement and accountability. He underscores that subcontracting does not absolve Principal Contractors of their responsibilities, emphasising that risk and responsibility cannot be outsourced.

Human Behaviour and Industry Morality

The conversation also touches on the commercialisation of morality and the importance of being judged by outcomes rather than commitments. Mr Sharma shares insights into behavioural economics and human behaviour, noting the industry’s shift towards prioritising demonstrable actions over mere promises. He cites the example of Alcoa, the Aluminium Company of America, as a success story of how scientific approaches and simplicity can turn major disasters into significant achievements. Mr Sharma’s exploration of industry accountability underscores the importance of adhering to high standards, embracing digital solutions, and maintaining consistent regulatory compliance. As the industry evolves, continuous improvement and proactive adaptation remain essential. By focusing on outcomes and holding all parties accountable, the building sector can achieve greater safety and reliability for all stakeholders.

To watch the full Sparking Interest Podcast episode with Aman Sharma, scan the QR Code.

@ASFPTV

Subscribe to ASFPTV to watch all episodes of the Sparking Interest Podcast

Want To Take Part In A Sparking Interest Podcast?

If you’re passionate about passive fire protection and want to share your insights with a broader audience, consider taking part in The Sparking Interest Podcast!

Produced by the ASFP, our podcast is a platform dedicated to exploring the industry’s core values through engaging discussions, expert interviews, and powerful personal stories from leaders in the passive fire protection and construction sectors. To be a guest on the podcast and contribute your voice to this important conversation, get in touch with Max Joyce at max.joyce@asfp.org.uk. We’d love to hear from you.

Room Hire Pricing

MEETING ROOM HIRE

The ASFP meeting rooms offer adaptable spaces tailored to individual or organisation needs, ranging from small team gatherings to expansive presentations.

Designed to facilitate various activities including business meetings, the rooms provide a conducive environment for strategic discussions and decision-making.

The meeting rooms provide a professional setting that is essential for conducting business. Whether you’re hosting a client presentation, a strategic meeting, or a training session, the meeting rooms offer a polished and professional environment.

At ASFP, we understand that every meeting can be unique, which is why the meeting rooms are adaptable to cater to a diverse range of requirements. The meeting rooms seamlessly facilitate both in-person meetings and remote participation via video conferencing platforms.

The pricing structure is tailored to the specific room you choose to hire. ASFP members benefit from a preferential rate compared to non-members. Additionally, there are optional add-ons available, including unlimited tea and coffee, as well as a catering service option. If you have any questions please do contact info@asfp.org.uk.

To book meeting room space please visit use the QR Code or visit www.asfp.org.uk/page/MeetingRoomHire

Hosts

Power-up with HEET Dynamic. The simple to use

plug-in estimation software for BIM

Real time design and calculation, estimation power at your fingertips.

Make light work of complex calculations with HEET

Dynamic intumescent coatings estimation software.

• Section factor calculation (for serial/bespoke profiles)

• Cellular beam calculations

• Best practices built-in

• BIM integration

Easy to download and simple to use, giving you genuine time and cost savings on your projects.

Discover the power of HEET Dynamic today. Speak to your Hempel representative or email us to request a demo. HEET-support@hempel.com

Passive Fire innovation of the year (digital)

THE FUTURE IS CCPI

CEO of CCPI Ltd, Amanda Long, explains the growing role of the Code for Construction Product Information (CCPI) in the management and presentation of product information.

The Code for Construction Product Information (CCPI) is becoming a must have across the industry. What it will take to ensure a place in the future of the industry is becoming increasingly clear. As the volume continues to be turned up on the critical importance of product information management and presentation, the role of the CCPI is crucial.

The CCPI has been established to drive positive behaviour change in relation to product information presentation and management across the construction product manufacturers and building products supply chain sectors. The purpose of the Code is to raise standards in product information and move the industry to a place where product information is clear, accurate, accessible, up-to-date and unambiguous.

There are in fact two specific codes, one available for manufacturers, and the other for the building products supply chain. The CCPI for manufacturers addresses the responsibility for product information and relates specifically to assessment of product information on products. Independent third-party assessment against this includes organisational leadership and culture assessment, followed by assessment of the product information for a specific product set in relation to an eleven-clause code. Construction product manufacturers must therefore ensure a robust product information management system is in place, and that claims made about a product’s performance can be substantiated.

There is also a Merchants and Distributors Code Version, which provides tailored assessment for organisations in the building products supply chain who have responsibility to manage and present product information. The latter focuses specifically on the company and its systems and processes as a conduit for product information, including requirements for creating and reproducing product information along with an emphasis on accurate representation.

Assessment against the CCPI Merchants and Distributors Code provides confirmation that the organisation has been assessed to have the necessary product information processes and systems in place to uphold the CCPI. It demonstrates that the organisation has the systems and processes in place to adhere to the clauses diligently, proactively promoting and supporting the adoption of the Code with their suppliers.

Increasing CCPI registration CCPI is growing from strength to strength. To date more than 80 companies are through or close to completing the organisational assessment which gives them access to the product set portal where they can apply for the CCPI mark for specific product information.

Some 85 product sets (relating to over 1,000 products) have earned the CCPI mark or are in the final stages of assessment to carry the mark. This lasts for two years before re-assessment is required. In this time, a company must stay registered with the scheme to uphold conformance and respond to CCPI ongoing checks.

As part of its ongoing checks process, CCPI has launched its ‘Issues’ portal, which is there to facilitate anyone with concerns about product information to get in touch. If the product is CCPIassessed it will be investigated by the organisation and, where appropriate, remedied. If it is not CCPI-assessed, then the company providing the product information will be encouraged to go through the CCPI assessment process.

An Assessment Search on the CPI website includes all the products carrying the CCPI mark so far. This is growing monthly and you will increasingly see specifier search engines including search mechanisms to locate products carrying the CCPI mark for their product information.

All of this is vitally important as claims made in product information and related marketing and advertising are relied on by those who use construction product information to make informed decisions about product choice and substitution in a project. Contractors, architects, maintenance professionals – a whole supply chain is relying on this information to be accurate and accessible to them. So, it is important to note that clients, investors, customers, specifiers and product users seeking greater confidence that product information can be used for important decision-making are becoming CCPI demand-side Supporters.

The critical factor for Supporters is that they want to deploy products that are supplied with product information independently assessed as conforming with CCPI and carrying the CCPI Mark. The list of Supporters who have signed the public commitment to support CCPI is growing.

The list includes major Tier One contractors and leading housebuilders such as Mace, Berkeley Homes, Morgan Sindall, Murphy, Barratts Developments, Persimmon Homes, Kier and Skanska, who are all playing a lead role and engaging their supply chains in the CCPI.

With the findings of the Grenfell Inquiry due to be published in September, the time is now for manufacturers, merchants and distributors who see themselves as part of the future of the industry to step up and engage with CCPI assessment. The gains are many – conformance with CCPI will help to support your organisation with regulatory compliance; it will provide your organisation with valuable organisational insights to benefit your internal practices for managing and presenting product information; and it will position your company as part of the solution and the future rather than the past and unacceptable practice. And, of course, most importantly it will help you give your customers greater confidence when they are deciding which products to buy and deploy.

Read More About The Code for Construction Products Information www.cpicode.org.uk

WHAT’S LEFT IN 2024

ASFP Academy Sessions

We are pleased to announce the commencement of our Academy Sessions, featuring Connor Minihane, BIM Lead at CLM Fireproofing. Our inaugural session will focus on utilising Building Information Modeling (BIM) effectively.

25 SEP

Fire Safety Matters Live is a new free-to attend conference where 450+ delegates will be able to network, see the latest industry products and enjoy CPD accredited seminars.

3 OCT

London Build offers thousands of unique experiences over the two days with 700+ incredible speakers across 12 CPD stages, 450+ exhibitors, Meet the Buyers, live product demos, networking parties, entertainment, live music, the UK’s biggest Festival of Construction and endless networking opportunities

ASFP Awards Dinner 2024

The Awards recognise excellence within the passive fire protection industry. Showcasing these incredible achievements to fellow members and industry peers. See the 2024 Finalists on page 26 - 27.

Anticipate London 2024

Anticipate London, emerging from the fusion of IFSEC, FIREX, Safety & Health Expo, and the Facilities Show, is the leading event for property and people professionals aiming to thrive amidst an uncertain future.

Participate in ASFP Events in 2024

20-21

NOV

28

NOV

2-4 DEC

Engage with the ASFP community by taking part in our remaining events for 2024! Our events offer valuable opportunities for professional development, networking, and staying informed about industry advancements. To explore upcoming events and learn how to participate, simply scan the QR code or visit www.asfp.org.uk/page/Events_Listing

Don’t miss out on these essential gatherings that will enhance your expertise and connect you with industry leaders.

Unit A West Oak House, Westwood Business Park, Coventry, CV4 8HS

Fire Safety Matters Manchester

London Build Fire & Security Expo

Emirates Old Trafford Cricket Ground

Olympia London, Hammersmith Rd, London W14 8UX

Olympia London, Hammersmith Rd, London W14 8UX

ExCeL London, Royal Victoria Dock, E16 1XL

WHAT T EXPECT IN 2025

ASFP is excited to present a full calendar of events for 2025, tailored for the construction and passive fire protection industry. From technical seminars to the thrilling ASFP Regatta Challenge, our events offer unparalleled opportunities for professional development, networking, and staying current with industry advancements. Visit our website asfp.org.uk/page/Events_Listing to learn more and get involved today.

Liverpool CPD Seminar

A networking event covering a topic related to passive fire protection. The event attracts four CPD hours and welcomes ASFP members to exhibit their products and services while networking with other members and non-members alike.

18 MAR

ASFP Annual General Meeting

The 2025 ASFP AGM will feature key industry updates, recent achievement reports from the Association, and a thought-provoking keynote speaker, providing a platform to connect with industry leaders and peers in a dynamic and engaging setting.

Scotland CPD Seminar

A networking event covering a topic related to passive fire protection. The event attracts CPD hours and welcomes ASFP members to exhibit their products and services while networking with other members and non-members alike.

10 SEP

18 JUN

8 MAY

20 MAY

Regatta Challenge

The ASFP Regatta Challenge is an exhilarating team-building event designed to provide a unique and memorable experience on the water. It’s an opportunity to strengthen team cohesion, enhance communication, and build lasting relationships.

London CPD Seminar

A networking event covering a topic related to passive fire protection. The event attracts CPD hours and welcomes ASFP members to exhibit their products and services while networking with other members and non-members alike.

ASFP Annual Awards

The ASFP Awards aim to recognise excellence within the passive fire protection industry. Showcasing these incredible achievements to fellow members and industry peers, as well as other stakeholders within the construction industry.

27 NOV

ASFP Academy Sessions

The ASFP Academy Sessions are a series of exclusive, free talks and workshops designed for our members, focusing on passive fire protection and comprehensive business support.

Titanic Hotel, Liverpoo,l Stanley Dock Regent Road, Liverpool L3 0AN

HMS Belfast, The Queen’s Walk, London, SE1 2JH

Kimpton Charlotte Square Hotel, 38 Charlotte Square, Edinburgh EH2 4HQ

1 Wimpole Street, Westminster London W1G 0AE

Port Hamble Marina, Satchell Lane, Portsmouth, Hampshire, SO31 4Q

Oak House, Westwood Business Park, Coventry, CV4 8HS

London Marriott Hotel Grosvenor Square, Grosvenor Sq, London W1K 6JP

Get Ready to Inspire Careers in Construction

Open Doors is a fantastic opportunity for young people and those looking for a change of career to find out what construction has to offer by going behind the scenes and seeing the wide range of opportunities available.

From Monday 17 until Saturday 22 March 2025, Build UK, its members and partners will be hosting tours of sites, offices, manufacturing facilities and training centres across the UK

The purpose of Open Doors is to give people an inside look at the construction industry, showcasing the various career opportunities available and the diverse range of jobs within the sector. By visiting these sites, participants can see firsthand what it’s like to work in construction, learn about the different roles, and explore potential career paths.

Nadine Saxon, Operations Director, ASFP

“Inspiring future professionals through Open Doors”

The ASFP is excited to participate in Build UK’s Open Doors initiative, scheduled for 17-22 March, 2025. This event is a unique opportunity for us to showcase the critical role of passive fire protection within the construction industry. By opening our doors, we aim to inspire the next generation of construction professionals, highlighting the importance of fire safety and the diverse career opportunities available in our sector.

For students, this is a chance to gain first-hand experience in a vital area of construction, network with industry leaders, and explore various career paths that contribute to safer buildings and communities. Engaging with Open Doors can provide valuable insights into the industry and help shape your future career.

How To Get Involved

To get involved in Open Doors Week 2025, start by visiting the official website at opendoors. construction. Here, you can explore a list of participating construction sites, training facilities, and manufacturing plants across the UK.

Once you’ve found a location near you, simply register to book your visit during the event, which runs from 17-22 March, 2025. Whether you’re a student, job seeker, or just curious about the construction industry, Open Doors Week is a unique opportunity to see the industry in action. Scan the QR Code to the right or visit www. opendoors.construction

FIREFLY® is a pioneering UK specialist manufacturer of flexible fire barriers and passive fire protection products. Offering a range of fully certified systems comprising lightweight, easy to install fire barriers with ancillaries supported by fire stopping products.

60mm FB180 Ablative

Batt Wall System

FIREFLY® Flexible Fire Barriers

Single layer freestanding compartment wall that can be installed between timber studs. Fire-rated to E90 : EI60

A flexible fire barrier designed to provide compartmentalisation of larger concealed spaces within a building.

Available in:

(E120 : EI60)

(E60 : EI60)

(E90 : EI30)

(E30 : EI30)

(E120)

60mm FB180 Ablative Batt Floor System

Single layer compartment floor that can be installed above ceilings with access from only one side between existing joists, minimising disruption. Fire rated to E90 : EI60

Roof Cavity Closer

Roof Cavity Closer is designed to extend the compartmentalisation line all the way through the roof membrane to the outer tile/sheet. Used in conjunction with Firefly flexible barriers or FB180 Batt Wall system.

Introducing The ASFPTV Studio

Find out more about the ASFPTV Studio:

To enquire about booking space at the podcast studio, simply visit www.asfp.org.uk/page/MeetingRoomHire

Whether you’re looking to record a podcast, produce multimedia content, or host a voiceover session we can accomadate your needs.

Contact Us

info@asfp.org.uk

www.asfp.org.uk

The ASFPTV studio is crafted to provide a professional backdrop for professional-quality video recordings.

Post Production Video Recording Audio Recording