The
HOWLER 2024 JUNE 6
THEHOWLER@ALLENDALECOLUMBIA.ORG
Unified creates Unity “Rough Draft” An Open Letter to Teachers Who Use the Phrase
ROWAN BISSONETTE
JAMES THORNBURG
Dear teachers, As a high school junior, I feel that it’s important that there is minimal miscommunication between students and teachers. The use of the phrase “rough draft” can be dangerous when the dictionary definition and the colloquial definition are different. You may not have noticed, but this isn’t how most of the English language works. Though sometimes differing with context, definitions aren’t typically relative to the person speaking. Rough drafts should be the same. Merriam-Webster describes rough as “harsh,” “crude,” and “unfinished.” If your students turned in a draft with these qualities, what grade would you give them? Probably not a good one. Most teachers don’t really want a “rough draft” when they ask for it. A “rough draft” should be one you can get splinters from, one you trip over when you read. A “rough draft” Photo by Wesley Tingey on Unsplash should be my thoughts on paper, harsh, crude, and unfinished as they are, simply so I can get them out of my head. The way you use the phrase “rough draft” does not fit the description. You say “rough draft” but you mean semi-final draft. You mean sanded draft and mostly-there draft and formal draft and ready-toglaze draft and polished draft. The gap between dictionary and colloquial definitions has never been so wide. Unlike most confusion surrounding words in schools, this one is not generational. Rough isn’t a word like gay or queer or sick that has changed meaning over time or based on context. Rough is a word whose use has not changed since before the 1400s according to the Oxford English Dictionary. Rough isn’t listed in Madison Kircher’s article on new words like rizzler and yeet and cap are. Rough is not a new word. I believe the miscommunication comes from focusing solely on the word draft. The draft spectrum ranges from the moment a writer begins
I’ve done unified basketball for three years, which is all of the years that the unified basketball program has existed at Allendale Columbia, but the program, despite its tremendous impact on me, is not about me, it is about the impact on the lives of the Creekside students Allendale Columbia School partners with to make this program possible. Students from Creekside rarely get an opportunity to play on a sports team so participation in the unified basketball program is an invaluable opportunity that not only allows them to participate in a sport but also allows them to learn important lessons about being on a team and losing. One of the struggles many Creekside students have to overcome during their first unified season is losing. Losing is part of a competitive sport like basketball, where one team must make a mistake or simply be unlucky, for the opposing team to score. For many Creekside students the idea of losing a game or simply the idea that the basketball can be stolen from them is a difficult one, which can result in outbursts or pouting. Over the course of the season students who struggle with losing, begin to progress beyond this over the course of competitive games and help from coaches. As anyone’s life will have some sort of loss or frustrating element, everyone must learn to lose. The unified basketball team offers creekside students this opportunity, which they might not otherwise have. Beyond the mere element of learning life lessons, the unified basketball team provides immeasurable joy to Creekside students, evident by the fact that when they make a basket during a game their faces light up. I am not sure how many Allendale Columbia students will participate in unified basketball next year but I know this: the Unified basketball program must continue to exist. If the unified basketball program is discontinued due to a lack of Allendale Columbia participants not only will the AC community suffer but Creekside students will lose an invaluable experience. •
An Open Letter continued on page 2