What do I have to do to pass/Assessment Criteria

Reflective performance

You will undertake independent research, and present your research as part of a Reflection Event in term 3.

What do I have to do to pass?

The minimum pass mark for each unit or module of the course is 50%.

You will be assessed according to the criteria set out below.

ASSESSMENT CRITERIA FOR PERFORMANCE, REHEARSAL PROCESS AND CLASSWORK

70% +

The student should be able to demonstrate the following characteristics: • A joyous, intelligent and courageous performance • Confident and bold response to the demands of the text and character(s) being played • Full creative ownership of the character(s) • Inspired and imaginative range of choices • Highly advanced technical skill • Highly responsive sensitivity to fellow actors

60% - 69%

The student will be awarded a mark in this band if he or she consistently demonstrates the following characteristics: • A committed performance with creative flair and a level of risk • A clear understanding of the demands of the text and the character(s) being played • Ownership of the character(s) • Engaging range of choices • Strong technical skill • Sensitivity to fellow actors.

50% - 59%

The student will be awarded a mark in this band if he or she demonstrates the following characteristics, with varying degrees of consistency: • A committed performance with creative flair and a level of risk • A clear understanding of the demands of the text and the character(s) being played • Ownership of the character(s) • Engaging range of choices • Good technical skill • Sensitivity to fellow actors.

Fail : 0 - 49%

The student will be awarded a mark in this band if he or she demonstrates the following characteristics:

• A performance displaying a lack of commitment and flair • Poor understanding of the text and/or character being played. • Little technical ability • A performance lacking sensitivity to the ensemble.

ASSESSMENT CRITERIA FOR WRITTEN REFLECTION AND SEMINAR PRESENTATIONS

Marks are awarded with reference to the unit-specific learning outcomes described in the relevant module, the following general criteria, and the more detailed criteria set out below:

• the student’s ability for independent research, analysis and reflection, allied to a professional ability to apply good judgement, creativity and autonomy to their own preparation and performance process • the student’s ability to receive constructive criticism and to apply it to their own creative preparation and performance • the student’s ability to express and structure ideas and information with clarity and maturity • the student’s ability to present research in a lucid and imaginative manner

70+

The work is thoughtful and fascinating, with a clear, articulate writing and/or presentation style. Clear links are made between different aspects of the training, and reflection on creatives’ and fellow students’ work is generous and insightful. Challenges faced in class, rehearsal or performance are analysed positively, and solutions identified for improvements in the future. Research is relevant and interesting, drawn from a variety of sources, such as audio, visual and books as well as the internet. Any additional material is creative, relevant and detailed.

60+

The work contains some interesting insights. Some links are made between discoveries made in classes or rehearsal and other aspects of the training, and the work reflects a good understanding of the contribution of the creatives and fellow students. Challenges are clearly identified and attempts are made to find positive solutions. The writing or presentation may be uneven, with some good sections and flashes of insight and others in need of further editing or clarification. There is evidence of research but this may either be fairly generalised or focused in only one area. The presentation is creative and engaging.

50+

The work meets the minimum requirements but is fairly basic in its execution. Few if any links are found between work covered in the class, project or production and other aspects of the training. There is acknowledgement of the input of creatives and fellow students but there may be a tendency to blame others for difficulties, and few solutions are put forward for improvements in the future. The writing may be naïve and muddled in places, or just a bit dull. Research is adequate but sketchy, drawn mainly or even entirely from the internet. Presentation is basic. Attempts have been made to reference reading and resources correctly. Appendices meet the minimum requirements, with no additional material.