Basel Life Science Campus

B A S E L

L I F E SCIENCE

CAMPUS ACADEMIC Y EA R 2 0 2 0 - 2 0 21

MASTER OF SCIENCE THESIS (TESI DI LAUREA MAGISTRALE)

MUHAMMED ENES SIVRI ARIAN SHAHVERDIPOUR

POLITECNICO DI MILANO - SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE URBAN PLANNING CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING FRANCE SCA BAT TISTI | GRIGOR ANGJELIU | FRANCESCO ROMAN O| L AV I NI A CH I ARA TAG LI ABU E | G I OVANNI D OT ELLI

Politecnico di Milano School of Architecture Urban Planning Construction Engineering Academic Year 2020/2021 Laurea Magistrale (equivalent to Master of Science) Thesis Study Programme ArchitectureBuilding Architecture BAS E L UNIVE RS ITY L IF E SCIENCE CAMPU S Authors ARIAN SHAHVERDIPOUR MUHAMMED ENES SIVRI

Supervisor prof. FRANCESCA BATTISTI Architectural Design

Professors GRIGOR ANGJELIU Structural Design GIOVANNI DOTELLI Innovative Materials for Architecture FRANCESCO ROMANO Building Services Design LAVINIA CHIARA TAGLIABUE Technology and Design in BIM Environment

Assitants ROBERTA CONTRINO DENISE HOUX LORENZO CASTELLANI LOVATI

Abstract Teaching and learning environments are changing shape. In some cases, they seem to be carving out new kinds of spaces whose complexity of use (both as an academic facility and a new center of reference for the community) requires profound typological research. Within an overall vision and an “Idea of Architecture,” new conceptions of urban campus can rise and

generate those innovative, less “academic” spaces on which the contemporary transformations of university campus models and building types are focusing.

The thesis research focuses on the spatial, functional, and infrastructural relationships between campus and context between the new Life Science Campus and Basel contemporary dynamics of transformation to pro-

vide those innovative spaces.

The design of the architectural project results from an investigation of both architectural and compositional design issues and those relating to structural, technical, functional, and linguistic aspects, as well as conditions of environmental sustainability at architectural and urban scales.

ABS

University of Basel’s Life Sciences Campus Nearly 800 million Swiss francs will be invested in the Life Sciences Campus, for a highly modern infrastructure, in order to create and further an optimal research environment for the various life science areas and train future scientists for the regional life science industry. The University of Basel is in fact not only specialized in those areas that are particularly important to the local economy, namely life science and medicine, but together with Novartis, Roche, and over 600 life sciences and biotech companies, is also the most important employer in the region, with high growth rate and a regional added value. The Biozentrum, inaugurated in 2021, is the first state-of-theart research building built on campus to house 600 researchers and a large range of highly

sensitive scientific installations, with an additional lecture hall for 800 students open to the use of the whole academic community.

The Life Science Campus will also be completed by the new building for the Department of Biosystems at ETH Zurich, which will be fully funded by ETH Zurich and the new building for the Department of Biomedicine.

The last expansion step of the Life Science Campus consists of the so-called Construction Area 4, on which new stateof-the-art infrastructures for the departments of chemistry and physics as well as a building with social infrastructure (refectory, library, etc.) will be created.

The implementation and financing of this project, its planning in the 2022-2025 period and the implementation of the projects in

INTRO

the next 2026-2029 period, are the subject of further negotiations by the governments. During the 2018-2021 service period, governments will agree on the basis of the renegotiated property agreement and the new 2030 Strategy for the approval and planning of future construction projects. Today, the university’s building which host the Departments of chemistry and physics no longer rneet the required standard for seismic and fire safety, equipment, energy consumption and space. For this reason, significantly additional space was made available in our proposal for the same volume of use and for the same number of staff. Moreover, the increasing mechanization of research leads to a higher space requirement for modern equipment and core facilities.

66 General Master Plan 68 Urban Context 70 New Construction Areas 80 Space Program

URBAN CAMPUS

98 100 102 104

Analysis On An Urban Campus Imperial Collage London Present Condition of The Campus South Kensington Master-plan

122 130 138 144

Sir Alexander Fleming Building Fabrikstrasse 10 Bocconi University School of Economics Yale Art and Architecture Building

TECHNOLOGY & DESIGN WITH BIM

CAMPUS DESIGN

TYPOLOGICAL SERIES

5 6 7 8 154 160 172 188

The Project Proposal 212 Envelope Design Structural Design Concept 246 Manifesto Architectural Drawings Labs Design

254 256 264 266

BIM Workflow LEED Certification Energy Optimization Solar Analysis

268 272 280 292

Lighting Analysis Life Cycle Assessment Building Service Design Structural Design

BIBLIOGRAPHY SITOGRAPHY ICONOGRAPHY

42 Knowledge Economy 46 Innovation Districts 50 Types of Innovation Districts 60 Basel The New Innovation District

16 The Urban “Cut” 18 Thresholds 20 Urban Morphologies 24 Interpreting The Project Area Environment

THE PROJECT BRIEF

BASEL

INNOVATION DISTRICT

1 2 3 4

306 Bibliography and Sitography 308 Iconography

BASEL

1 1

The City of Basel The city is the center of the Life Sciences Region, an economical cluster that extends outside the city administrative region into the wider tri-national area, which contains 5 Cantons in Switzerland, 3 in France and one German district.

MetroBaselis “the region around the core city of Basel, including its suburbs, the urbanized agglomeration in the valleys to the south and the north as well as more rural areas in its sphere of influence.

MetroBaselis the identity, forming a unit of the trinationalmetropolitan region of Basel.

The history of the Basel region has always been marked by political upheaval and confrontation between Basel-City and Basel-Country as well as between the various communities. The many monasteries, communities and villages settled in the metropolitan area have often changed affiliation or ownership over the centuries. Very early on, Basel was the dominant pole, the large

| Basel

city in the region. More later, communities of Weil am Rhein, Saint-Louis, Huningue, and contributed to the economic development of neighboring towns and departments. Weil am Rhein is mentioned for the first time under the name of Willa in a document dated February 27, 786. Long marked by agriculture and in particular viticulture, Weil developed during the 19th century, in particular thanks to its advantageous position for the trade in goods. Following the construction of the Weil am Rhein railway station and the marshalling yard Basel-Weil (1913) and the boom in construction activities (example of the “garden city”), the population increases and new neighborhoods are growing. In addition, Swiss textile companies were establishing themselves in the Friedlingen district.

Huningue was first mentioned in 828 in a donation to the Abbey of St. Gallen. Several changes of owner subse-

quently took place. Despite its efforts, the city of Basel never succeeded in acquiring its neighbor, a former property of the Habsburgs. The name of the city of Basel is mentioned for the first time in 237 or 238 (Basileam applicuerunt). At that time, a military fort in order to prevent the invasion of the Germanic tribes from the north of the Roman Empire. In 1900, the canton statistician qualified the city of Basel as an international “manufacturing city”. Until 1980, the city had a number of workers above the average. Today, the entire area between Basel, Weil am Rhein and Huningue is urbanized. Within the perimeter of 3Land, the urban spaces of cities separated by borders have developed side by side, without real connection and according to different functions. This urban situation has a big impact on daily life, but also on transport and the economy.

12

2

The Rhine

3Land Territory The course of national borders has evolved over the centuries, as have the states on both sides of the Haut-Rhin. The current border between Germany and France runs through the middle of the Rhine, between Weil am Rhein and Huningue, which conditions the use of the river in a heterogeneous way, which is appreciated in par-

ticular for swimming. The lines of the borders between Switzerland, France and Germany today leave significant traces in urban space. Cities have developed a lot on border areas in recent decades, which leads to very different interweaving of urban textures. The border areas between Germany, Switzerland and France have seen

the development of so-called “peripheral” activities, such aswaste management, logistics and sport. This mixture is now the specificity of the 3Land territory.

The 3Land development vision (MVRDV/Cabane/Josephy) gave the impetus for the definition of a joint mission statement for space use in a first 2012 planning agreement.

The Rhine changes its westerly direction of flow in an angle of 90 degrees to a northerly direction, along the borders of France and Germany, to flow to the North Sea. From a political viewpoint, the Rhine knee is near the tripoint of France, Germany and Switzerland.Rhine significantly altered the landscape of the region in the 19th century. The

increase in the flow of the Rhine has sharply lowered the water table, drying up the secondary branches of the river and pushing back the alluvial forest. In the city center of Basel, many bridges and ferries cross the Rhine. In summer, swimming is permitted in the river, while it is prohibited in France and Germany. Between the Dreirosenbrücke and

the Dreiländerbrücke, there is no way to cross the Rhine. The result is a separation of urban areas and a fragmentation of the space of the river which prevents a general perception, this being particularly noticeable in the perimeter of 3Land. In Basel, the Rhine is an urban space integrated into the topography of public spaces.

| The 3Land development vision (MVRDV/Cabane/Josephy)

3

The Urban “Cut” The proposed survey aims in fact to investigate the “morphological potential” of the project area, starting from the interpretative analysis of the relationships it has with the rest of the city and, especially, with the urban sector where it fits. It is a result of an analysis of Basel University Campus Schallematteli surrounding conditions, focusing on the connections provided by

| The Urban “Cut”

the main vehicular arteries and railways, developing a grasp of the site’s adjacent districts, taking also into account the nearby and more distant ongoing urban-planning initiatives and cultural context of the city. The reasoned map has been created to point out the highlighting of urban morphologies which define the urban structure of the city, the analysis of local urban

16

morphologies and the “forms” of their mutual adaptation over time (investigating Town Plans and urban transformations that have been shaping the site and its surroundings), the classification of public open spaces, with reference to their character, role, scale and connections as a coherent system within the morphological organization of the urban sector.

17

“Thresholds” Integrating the historical documentation of Basel with additional references and the study of specific bibliography, in order to fully reconstruct the history of morphological transformation of the site.

Starting from the comparison of the present conditions

with historical maps and considering the relationship between plans and projects for the study area and their implementation over time, it has pointed out the most relevant historical “thresholds”.

The selection of historical “thresholds”are in relation to

their influence on the morphological structure and identity of this part of the city. The aim is to elaborate an angina! cartography of the historic-morphological layers to gain a deeper grasp of the Campus’s and its context to support the first design considerations.

Roman Settlement Before 1206 14th Century 1860 1900 1939 Present

| “Thresholds”

18

19

| Urban Morphologies

20

21

| Urban Morphologies

22

23

Interpreting The Project Area Environment Taking into account the aims and the rules set by the masterplan and the environment provided by the laboratory and office building already existing or expected to be built in the next few years. Analyzing the project area surrounding condition, focusing on the connections provided by the main vehicular arteries and the railway, developing an understanding of the adjacent fabrics and taking as well into account the nearby or more distant ongoing urban planning initiatives and the cultural context of the city.

Reading of the analyses have ben indivuated in different point of views such as, The scale and presence of the campus buildings (present and planned) with reference

to that of the surrounding city and to the way they anchor the campus in the cityscape of Basel, investigating the role they assume within the views from the banks of the Rhine and from the surrounding streets; the reciprocal, physical and functional, integration among the campus buildings, existing or already designed and scheduled to be built; the relationships already linking (or potentially achievable) Campus Schällemätteli to the adjacent campuses, also part of the “superordinate” hospital and university quarter: the Petersplatz site, embedded in historically grown urban structures, and “Campus der Gesundheit” of the University Hospital Basel, undergoing deep transformation as well.

| Interpreting The Project Area Environment

24

25

4

5

There was not any connection between two important train stations across the Rhine river in the middle of the 19th century. The centrality of the expanded area hadn’t been established by the boundary of the railways yet. Joining the train stations across the river create a new defined space to expand the city. İnteraction between stations made each of them more central.

26

Railways(1896) Urban structure(1896) Railways(1862) Urban structure(1862)

27

6

7

To have a more efficient international railway system there have been a lot of changes during beginning of the 20th century such as replacing main railway station to the northern part of little Basel. Adding one more main station near to France borders in great Basel and changing the railway path between the stations were radical transformations made a new gap in urban structure to fill and changed the urban structure in some specific parts.

28

Railways(1896) Urban structure(1896) Railways(1862) Urban structure(1862)

29

8

9

From 1905 to 1946 the urban growth reached to the border of railway path and even acrossed to path with continuous planning of settlement. Tunnels were made for the railway path in order to make this continuity. Between 1946 and 1992 new type of urban morphology was expanding. As the settlements move away from the main artery,the urban structure becomes more organic.

30

Railways(1896) Urban structure(1896) Railways(1862) Urban structure(1862)

31

10

11

The railway station of the Little Basel took a lot of space which was becoming a valuable area while the growth of the settlements is increasing causing the more dense urban structure. In little Basel, the railway station had been changed it included demolishing the northern part of the railway station. The area of the demolishing part had been transformed. it created a new gap for new developments.

32

Railways(1896) Urban structure(1896) Railways(1862) Urban structure(1862)

33

Transportation Hub As A Catalyst For Innovation Campus Proximity is everything for an innovation campus. Location of site has a huge potential in future to be a vital point for public transportation. It already provides diferent type of transportation connections but it will be even more valuable location for public transportation.

According to 3-land development there will be a metro connection linking the across the river.

| Interpreting The Project Area Environment

34

35

EXPANSION OF URBAN PUBLIC NETWORK

Expansion Urban Public Network From the riverOf side throught the campus there is public green area network which is nearly working. This system will be more efficient after setting a

hubthe and activethere scientiic center which is providing different typse of public space addition to the macro public network.

From thetransportation river side throught campus is Public public green area network which is nearly workPathway ing. This system will be more efficient after setting a Green transportation hub and active scientific cenArea ter which is providing different typse of public space addition to the macro public network.

| Interpreting The Project Area Environment

36

37

LEISURE -FACILITIES AND AMENITIES Leisure - Facilities And Amenities There are more leisure near to the project site which is a vital need for new scientiic innovation center but the number of business

Museums, There are more leisure activities near to the andproject universty facilities must be much more higher to achieve the aim of innovation district.

Church,etc site which is a vital need for new scientific Business innovation center but the number of busiLeisure ness activities and universty facilities must be much more higher to achieve the aim of University Facilites innovation district.

| Interpreting The Project Area Environment

38

Museums,Church,Theatre,etc

Business Leisure (Cafe & Restaurants,Shops,Spor University Facilites ( Library,Restaurant,Sport,etc

39

INNOVATION DISTRICT

2

40 41

Knowledge Economy Both today’s economy and future growth sectors are thriving due to urban density and close ties with higher education and research institutions, which require easy access to highly skilled workers.

GLA Infrastructure Plan 2050 predicts that by 2050, the number of jobs will increase from 4.9 million to 6.3 million.

Growth is expected to be concentrated in knowledge-intensive industries: professional

industries, real estate, science and technology, and information and communication technology are expected to add one million jobs between them.

The impact of the knowledge economy on increasing employment growth is closely related to increasing national productivity. Nonetheless, due to urban density and close ties with higher education and research institutions that need easy access to high-

ly skilled workers, the growth sector in the future will flourish.

The Greater London Authority (GLA) is paying increasing attention to the number of incubators, accelerators and coworking spaces. This focus on coworking spaces is a response to existing concerns about the affordability of office space in London, and is particularly suitable for startups and large-scale businesses.

12 Percentage of employees working in the knowledge economy (2010)

13 Percentage of employees working in the knowledge economy (2014)

| Innovation District

42

43

14

By the early 2030s, London’s permanent population will reach 10 million. London needs to find housing and work spaces at the same time. The central government has introduced a “permitted development right” that allows offices to be converted to residential property without planning permission, thus intensifying a new law. (Between May 2013 and April 2015, more than 1 million square feet of fully occupied office space was allowed to be converted to residential use.)

| Innovation District

44

45

What are Innovation Districts?

Innovation and Knowledge Economy The recent rise in the relative importance of the digital and creative sectors is part of the long-term growth of the knowledge economy. This growth is reflected in the decline of traditional sectors, including manufacturing and large-scale agriculture in the UK. Although employment in the consumer goods manufacturing industry has declined, since the crisis, output from high-value manufacturing industries has remained relatively stable.

The knowledge economy and the city go hand in hand.

Compared to traditional manufacturing, mining or construction, material resources

(usually limited) are not as important as human resources. This is because the most important assets of the knowledge economy are trained personnel and the interactions that occur between them.

“Crowding” has the positive effect of reducing the distance of goods transportation and the flow of people, skills and ideas.

This report identifies three driving factors for the booming knowledge economy; Skills (human capital), space (physical capital) and investment (financial capital) Skills: as an indispensable resource.

Space: The vigorous develop-

ment of the knowledge economy requires space where these skills can be cultivated, ideas can be shared and developed, ideas can be shared, and facilities and resources available to transform them into products and services. From offices and cafeterias to specially designed co-working spaces, from hightech laboratories in universities and science parks to innovation districts and Silicon Valley.

Financial capital: A large amount of investment is required in human and material resources, whether in higher education, infrastructure, research and development, or direct investment in companies.

The innovation districts are composed of entrepreneurs and educational institutions, start-ups and schools, mixed-use development and medical innovation, bicycle

sharing and bank investment, all of which are connected by transportation, powered by clean energy, and wired for digital technology.

On the other hand, innovation

TRADITIONAL INNOVATION SPACES SPACES TRADITIONAL INNOVATION

zones with traditional innovation spaces, such as science parks, are usually located in the suburbs and can only be reached by car, and institutions work in effective silos.

INNOVATION DISTRICTS

INNOVATION DISTRICT

Accessible by car

Accessible by public transport, and walkable

Spatially Isolated

Located in downtown, mid-town Physically compact

Predominantly research

Mixed use Built on brownfield sites

INNOVATION DISTRICT ?

46

47

15

Economic assets are companies, institutions and organizations that promote, nurture or sup-

port an innovative environment. Economic assets can be divided into three categories: Innovation drivers: Companies, research institutions, start-ups and en-

trepreneurs that promote regional economic growth.

Innovation cultivators: Companies, organizations, or groups that sup-

port the development of people, companies, and their ideas. This includes incubators, accelerators, co-working spaces, and institutions involved in training personnel, including colleges and universities.

Innovation Ecosystem In view of the huge differences in regional economies, there are significant differences in the forms and functions of innovation zones around the world. However, all innova-

tion districts contain economic, material and network assets.

When these three assets are combined with a supportive adventurous culture, they create an ecosystem of innovation,

that is, a synergy between people, companies and places ( Natural geographic areas of the region) to promote and accelerate the commercialization of creativity.

Neighborhood amenities: These are spaces and services that support

workers in the innovation zone, including bars, cafes, and cultural spaces.

Physical assets are public and private spaces (buildings, open spaces, streets, and other

infrastructure), which are designed and organized to inspire higher levels of connectivity, collaboration, and innovation. Physical assets can also be divided into three categories: Physical assets in the public realm: These are digital and physi-

cal connected spaces that encourage encounters. These spaces are usually flexible and can be used as “living laboratories” to test regional innovations.

ECONOMIC ASSETS

Physical assets in the private realm: This includes offices and res-

PHYSICAL ASSETS

NETWORKING ASSETS

idential spaces. For example, many American innovation zones include micro-houses, which provide compact and generally (relatively) affordable housing for workers in the innovation zone.

INNOVATION ECOSYSTEM

Assets that join spaces together: These spaces are fundamental to

the “open” nature of the innovation zone, which distinguishes them from the more traditional science park model. This can include sidewalks and bike lanes and infrastructure that connects the area to the broader city network.

15

Networking Assets are the relationships and social ties that connect employees and institu-

tions in the innovation zone. As mentioned above, the interaction between formal and informal employees, especially the interaction between companies and departments, is a distinctive feature of the innovation zone. These relationships can be defined as strong relationships, including collaboration and networking within specific departments, and weak relationships, including interdepartmental networks, in the form of dedicated network events, hacker days, or meetings. It is these activities and the relationship established between the institution and its users that make the innovation zone greater than the sum of its components. | Innovation District

48

49

The Three Types Of Innovation Districts And Their Location Varies Within A Metropolis

1

The “anchor plus” model, appears mainly in the center and center of central cities. It is a large-scale mixed-use development focused on a rich base of anchor institutions and related companies, entrepreneurs, and spin-offs engaged in innovative marketing.

3 1

2

3

The third model, “urbanized science park,” commonly found in suburban and outer suburbs, is through increasing density and injecting new activities (including retail stores, retailers and restaurants), expanding and traditionally isolated areas of innovation are urbanizing The place. Mixed rather than hidden

2 16

The “re-imagined urban areas” model, often appears near or along historic waterfronts, where industrial or warehouse areas undergo a physical and economic transformation. Part of the reason for this change is convenient transportation, historic buildings, and its proximity to the inner city of high-rent cities, which are then complemented by advanced research institutions and leading companies.

| Innovation District

50

51

The Three Types Of Permeabilities Of Universities, Clusters And Innovation Districts

The defensive urban enclave with the fewest routes is completely disconnected from the urban environment and can sometimes control access. There is very little mixing of general traffic and university/research institute/commercial traffic.

18

University buildings and institutions, generally with a long history, have been integrated into the urban fabric of the city.

Therefore, these sites have the largest number of direct access roads, almost all public roads, and a series of facilities shared by students, researchers and the public. University / research institution / company traffic is highly mixed with general traffic

17

EMBEDDED Embedded

CAMPUS

Campus

Universities, institutions and a large number of companies traverse several highways and are divided into several “subfields”.

University groups usually include some shared facilities and accessible public domains. General traffic and university / research institute / business traffic are somewhat mixed.

19

CLUSTER | Innovation District

52

Campus

53

Cluster

| Innovation District

54

UNIVERSITY LED

These areas have no dominant tenants or property types. The neighborhood could instead include residential space along with private offices, HEI spaces, incubators and accelerators. The Knowledge District around North Bloomsbury/Fitzrovia is a prime example of such a district, home to a number of cultural, academic and business organisations, including Google and Macmillan. While many of these institutions are housed in some of London’s oldest buildings, the Knowledge Quarter can be seen as an attempt to rearrange the neo-division-style governance structure across an ecosystem. with a wide range of uses and organisations. By contrast, Here East’s Olympicopolis and 1.2m² space represent a radical mixeduse development conceived almost from the ground up, thanks to the availability of land and buildings following the 2012 Olympics.

These are neighborhoods with only or almost exclusively university campuses. There may be retail or commercial spaces, but the site is generally accessible only to students. It should be noted that none of the recently developed research sites operate on the basis of university-led development.

ENTERPRISE LED

UNIVERSITY PLUS

These are districts where universities have established a presence in partnership with a private sector partner, a research institute or a teaching hospital. Collaboration between institutions can be formalized because one institution has administrative control over the other (such as Imperial College and Hammersmith Hospital), while others are based on instruction from the private sector in an academic setting (such as the Translation Center at the Imperial White City Campus). These developments often take the form of a joint venture between a university and a partner, as is the case with Imperial College and their development partner Voreda at the White City site.

RADICAL MIXED DEVELOPMENT

Institutional Mix Of Universities, Clusters And Innovation Districts

These innovation districts do not have an identifiable university presence and are instead dominated by a single private sector company or by an ecosystem consisting of a number of small firms. Tech City is a prime example of the latter, identified as a cluster because of its significant volume of digital businesses, which eventually caught the attention of policymakers and a next government initiative.

55

Market-Frankford Trolley to West Philadelphia

Red Line to Harvard University

UNIVERSITY CITY SCIENCE CENTER

WHITEHEAD INSTITUTE FOR BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH

DREXEL UNIVERSITY

30TH STREET STATION

AKAMAI TECHNOLOGIES INC BROAD INSTITUTE NOVARTIS INSTITUTES FOR BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH

GENOMICS COLLABORATIVE

ACCELERON

YAHOO!

CAMBRIDGE INNOVATION CENTER

Facebook | Apple | Highland Capital | Charles River Ventures

PENN ALEXANDER SCHOOL

AMAZON LAB | CENTRAL KOCH CENTER FOR GOOGLE CAMBRIDGE INTEGRATIVE MICROSOFT CANCER RESEARCH MIT MEDIA LAB

FIRST ROUND CAPITAL

Market-Frankford Trolley to Center City

UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA

Red Line to Boston

WISTAR INSTITUTE

MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY

VA HOSPITAL

CHARLES RIVER

CHILDREN’S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA

ER

IV

LR

IL

K YL

HU

SC

UNIVERSITY OF THE SCIENCES 1/4 mile

PFIZER RESEARCH TECHNOLOGY CENTER

1/4 mile

UPENN INNOVATION AND RESEARCH PARK (PLANNED)

21

20

CAMBRIDGE KENDALL SQUARE

PHILADELPHIA UNIVERSITY CITY

Built by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) and linked in transit to Harvard, Mass General, and other medical and research institutions, Cambridge’s Kendall Square is today an iconic district of innovation. Since its founding in 1861, MIT has focused on university / industry partnerships and the commercialization of ideas. Beginning in the 1950s, the school actively deployed school-owned land to support this goal. This strategy has helped spur the growth of a major pharmaceutical / life sciences hub nationwide over the past two decades. It has also spurred the growth of hundreds of small businesses and attracted several large tech companies.

The Cambridge Innovation Center (CIC), established in 1999 and housed in a building owned

by MIT, is an excellent example of the reciprocal relationship between the university and the private sector.

Home to the University of Pennsylvania, Drexel University, College of Science, and Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, University City is leveraging its strengths in teaching, research and medicine to become a center of innovation. new and start-up. The University City Science Center is an engine of this development. Founded in 1963 as the nation’s first urban research park, it includes 31 member institutions across Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and Delaware. Penn Medicine anchors UCSC ’s newest building, and Drexel has opened an ExCITe center and (in partnership with UCSC) a regional technology incubator. In total, UCSC ’s 17-acre campus houses 2.5 million square feet of offices and labs, with business incubation activities, networking opportunities, and support services for a group of companies. emerging and established in the field of life sciences, nanotechnology, computing and other fields

EMBEDDED

EMBEDDED

ANCHOR PLUS

Embedded PERMEABILITY | Innovation District

Campus URBAN MODEL 56

UNIVERSTY PLUS

Cluster INSTITUTIONAL MIX

Embedded PERMEABILITY

ANCHOR PLUS

RADICAL MIXED DEVELOPMENT

URBAN MODEL

INSTITUTIONAL MIX

57

LAKE UNION RTI INTERNATIONAL GRIFOLS

BATTELLE SEATTLE RESEARCH CENTER

MUSEUM OF HISTORY AND INDUSTRY FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER SYNGENTA

ALLEN INSTITUTE FOR BRAIN SCIENCE UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON RESEARCH CAMPUS

SIGMA XI PARK CENTER

AMAZON NOVO NORDISK

PROGRESS CENTER

INSTITUTE FOR SYSTEMS BIOLOGY

GATES FOUNDATION

SPACE NEEDLE

RESEARCH TRIANGLE FOUNDATION

SEATTLE BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE

NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY SEATTLE

BD TECHNOLOGIES BASF

1/4 mile

PATH

Streetcar to Downtown Seattle

FIDELITY INVESTMENTS

1/4 mile

23

22

SEATTLE SOUTH LAKE UNION

RALEIGH-DURHAM RESEARCH TRIANGLE

The rapid rebirth of South Lake Union (“SLU”) - from a run-of-the-mill warehouse barely a decade ago to a vibrant, blended driver of housing and shipping companies and today’s global technology and life sciences - stand out as one of the most powerful urban transformations in the United States. This transformation was led by Vulcan Real Estate, a company owned by Microsoft co-founder Paul Allen. After an unsuccessful referendum to approve a public park, Vulcan began assembling restricted properties in the area. In the early 2000s, he convinced the University of Washington to host his medical and biological sciences at SLU. UW and the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center are now the engines of growth for healthcare and life science companies. In the late 2000s, Amazon decided to move its global headquarters to SLU, accelerating its housing, retail, and startup operations.

Aware that the 20th-century suburban science park model requires updating, leaders at Research Triangle Park (RTP) are working to urbanize portions of the 7,000-acre park acres and surrounding areas. Hailed as a hub of innovation from the late 1960s to mid-2000s, RTP stakeholders expressed concern that the park’s vast structure and enclosed research environment could hinder its success. the park’s permanence. In response, in 2012, the RTP Foundation released a new 50-year master plan for a physical overhaul of the area, with the aim of both encouraging workers to live nearby, while retaining and earning money. attract businesses that want to benefit from the “random collision” that thickens and unleashes an innovative offering. “Many knowledge workers today expect amenities and opportunities to network and share ideas in a dynamic social environment,” the plan says. “RTP’s independent campuses, mostly hidden behind trees, do not reflect this trend. “

EMBEDDED

CLUSTER

RE-IMAGINED URBAN AREA

Embedded PERMEABILITY | Innovation District

URBAN MODEL 58

RADICAL MIXED DEVELOPMENT Campus INSTITUTIONAL MIX

Cluster PERMEABILITY

URBANIZED SCIENCE PARK

ENTERPRISE LED

Embedded URBAN MODEL

INSTITUTIONAL MIX

59

Economic Assets Facilities And Amenities Leading Institutions Area Innovation District Area Leading Institutions Physical Assets (Connections) Railways (Infrastructure)

Economic Assets |

60

61

NOVARTIS CAMPUS

UNIVERSITY OF BASEL

ROCHE CAMPUS

62

63

64

THE PROJECT BRIEF

3 65

24

General Master Plan In its “Strategy 2007” report, the University of Basel envisaged the spatial integration of the seven faculties scattered over forty locations into a few locations as the main objective of their strategic spatial planning. Spatial development was originally intended to concentrate on three locations on the Petersplatz-Schällemätteli-Volta axis. After the Volta university location could not be pursued in partnership with Novartis AG, an alternative planning was started in early 2010. This led to the re-planned spatial strategy, the area between Spital-, Schanzen-, Klingelbergstrasse and the St. Johanns-Ring with increased space potential to the most important location for the central life science activities and the associated exact sciences for the University. These activities include interdisciplinary research in the fields of

| Campus Design

molecular and system biology, biomedicine, chemistry, and physics. There are common infrastructural needs in a wide range of areas, including imaging and animal husbandry. In addition, proximity to university hospitals is essential, especially for biomedical and clinical research. For a fruitful interaction of the participating sciences, which corresponds to the strategy of the university and the region, the spatial proximity of the various research units and the associated possibility of formal and informal contacts are decisive. Also, in teaching basic lectures are held, which are organized across disciplines and are dependent on a corresponding spatial proximity of the students. In addition to the life science activities of the university, the ETH Department of Biosystems, Sciences and Engineering (D-BSSE) will continue

66

to be optimally located on the site named “Hochschulareal St. Johann, Campus Schällemätteli”. Dividing the life sciences into several locations would not only jeopardize the functioning of interdisciplinary research, but also cause costly duplication of infrastructures. The development of the two campus areas of the university and the “Campus of Health” in the immediate vicinity is of great importance for the Life Science Region Basel. For the knowledge society of the future, a place of knowledge and knowledge transfer arises here.

With the major investments of the next few years in new buildings and conversions, a new scale will also be introduced. At the same time, the areas are to be opened to all sides, creating a dynamic meeting place not only for university and hospital residents, but also for the neighborhood population.

67

25

SITE 4

SITE 3 BIOZENTRUM Urban Context Today, numerous university buildings and the new University Children’s Hospital of both Basel (UKBB) are located on the university premises between Spital-, Schanzen-, Klingelbergstrasse and the St. Johanns- Ring. The former prison “Schällemätteli” was built later on as the terminus of the Alsatian railway. Since

its demolition, this area has been made available for the planned new construction of the university’s Bio center.

On the adjacent “Campus der Gesundheit” campus of the University Hospital Basel, congestion and urban changes are planned, which are the subject of an ongoing competition procedure. Even today,

this area is characterized by large-volume buildings and generous open spaces, which will be reinforced by these spatial developments. The Petersplatz site, embedded in historically grown structures, is also part of this superordinate hospital and university quarter, despite its small-scale urban planning character.

ETH

UKBB

| Campus Design

68

69

26

27

New Contruction Areas UKBB: The new University Children’s Hospital of both Basel, hereafter referred to as UKBB, began operation in January 2011. It has four floors above ground.

Characteristically, there are two differentiated courtyards, one of which is a green outside space. Construction site 1: The prison was relocated from the Schällemätteli and the cross-shaped facility

| Campus Design

was dismantled in the winter of 2009/10. The new building for the Biozentrum and other central facilities (data center, cafeteria, teaching) are being planned and are currently in the SIA phase of the construction project. Construction site 2: The remaining buildings of the former Women’s Hospital were used as temporary housing. The tenants are the university hospi-

70

tal, the university, the school for bridge offers, a kindergarten and the K’Werk. According to the strategic spatial planning of the university, this construction site is intended for the new construction of the D-BSSE of the ETHZ. Site 3, Pharmacentrum: The Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences remains in the new pharmaceutical center, but claims this only about half.

The remaining space is occupied by other university units as well as general areas (including lecture halls). The pharmacy center was cultivated in 2000 as a laboratory building at the Biozentrum and is as high as this one. Construction site 3, Biozentrum: The users will move to the construction site 1 after completion of the new building. The

existing Biozentrum will then be completely refurbished or dismantled with regard to the construction of a new building. According to the current spatial planning, the research of the Department of Biomedicine is to be housed here. The existing eight-storey building was completed in 1971. Site 4: The buildings on this site are currently occupied by the

71

Institute of Legal Medicine, the Anatomical Institute and the Anatomical Museum, the Department of Physics and the Department of Chemistry.

According to current spatial planning, the departments of physics and chemistry remain on construction site 4 and will be rounded off with various central facilities (lecture halls, library, canteen).

Above Ground

Area Surcharge

Requirements BGF

BGF in m 2

in %

in the development plan

BF 1

33’560

1%

34’000

BF 2

24’920

10%

27’500

BF 3 (Bioz)

23’610

15%

27’000

BF 3 (Pharmz)

12’000

20%

14’500

BF 4 (inkl.Unisport)

50’370

15%

58’000

Total

144’460

Expansion Program The calculation of the gross floor area is based on the specifications of the main usable areas of the university, which are necessary for the implementation of the spatial strategy of the university and the associated space requirements until 2020 (Plan Midi around 13’000 students). For zoning plans, the determinations of above-ground gross floor area on the individual construction sites are authoritative. The factor 2 applies to

the ratio between the main usable area and the gross floor area. Depending on the state of planning, scope for future implementation has been taken into account with appropriate area surcharges. At the present time, no binding statements can be made about the space requirements with the exception of the projected new building Biozentrum. Depending on the dimension of the jacket volume, the arrangement latitude of the surfaces is greater or less. The

o.g. data in construction area 3 are reported separately due to the different refurbishment requirements of the buildings, as in the near future, a renovation or renewal requirement of the ten-year pharmaceutical center is not expected. In view of the long-term planning perspective, however, the scope for future developments should be made as comprehensive as possible. Therefore, the potential at Building 3 is shown as a whole.

161’000

- Overview of the Space requirement

| Campus Design

72

73

Starting Position Over the past twelve years, the University of Basel has successfully positioned itself in the national and international environment and has aligned itself scientifically and organizationally to the requirements of the modern university landscape.

Among other things, this can be seen in the marked growth in the number of students, which is slowly but steadily taking the University of Basel out of a critical size. With this growth, however, the care and space conditions have largely been exhausted in recent years. Especially with the latter, therefore, a pent-up demand has developed. For the coming decade, university infrastructures must be given a higher priority. In the future, this will be decisive for the positioning

of the university in international competition. Investments by the two cantons Basel-Stadt and Basel-Landschaft for the life sciences and basic sciences of the university sustainably strengthen the research and business location. The framework conditions for innovation in the region are optimized and the preconditions for further growth are created. By prioritizing these areas of expertise, investments are made in securing a scientifically and therefore economically and socially dynamic future. As part of the planned spatial development of the University in the field of life sciences, the Schällemätteli campus in particular is to be expanded (see adjacent diagram on spatial planning at the University of Basel). The

Regierungsrat Basel-Stadt has the areas of the former penal institution Schällemätteli and the former women’s hospital (south wing), in the immediate vicinity next to the new building for the University Children’s Hospital of both Basel (UKBB) already housed various university institutes in the field of life sciences, reserved for structural needs of the university.

A university campus is to be built here, which will require extensive structural measures over the next 15 to 20 years.

The existing university buildings here are to be replaced in the short to medium term or comprehensively repaired or converted (Bio- and Pharmazentrum, Spitalstrasse district - Pestalozzistrasse - Klingelbergstrasse - St. Johannsring).

the will of the university, this spatial development should be concentrated in the long term on three campus areas on the axis Petersplatz-Schällemätteli-Volta. Campus Schällemätteli, Biozentrum, Pharmazentrum, Environmental Sciences, Center

for Biomedicine, ETHZ Department of Biosystems, Sciences and Engineering (D-BSSE), other third parties. Campus Volta Exact natural sciences, nanosciences, FMI, other third parties. St. Peter’s Square Humanities and Social Sciences.

Objective University The University of Basel sees in its report “Strategy 2007” as the main objective of spatial planning the spatial integration of the seven faculties scattered in more than forty locations and in more than ninety buildings at a few locations. According to

| Campus Design

74

75

28

4

New Campus Objectives The design study focuses on the area of Klingelbergstrasse St, beyond the campus of the Basel university. Construction site 4 is being redesigned as the last site as part of the University Camus Schällemätteli.

It is currently being developed with buildings of Forensic Medicine, the Departments of Physics, Chemistry and SNI as well as the Anatomy of the Department of Biomedicine.

With the exception of forensic medicine, all uses remain on the site, with additional uses being added. It is intended to replace all buildings, the (par-

tial) receipt is due to the high pressure of use of the situation apart. It has been confirmed, that the development plan “Hochschulareal St. Johann” can be met with the space required by the university and that under its auspices a functional and urbanistic solution is possible. The construction field is 4, as well as the neighboring Baudelfer 1-3 and the area of the Vosges Schoolhouse, in the “Zone for uses in the public interest. Based on the “test planning campus Schällemätteli “was a development plan for developed the univer-

sity estate. This included all 4 construction fields. As a referendum against the provided therein demolition of the mouse on St. Johanns-Ring 19 announced on construction field 4 was the development plan to two stages divided. The first stage included the construction fields 1-3, the second the construction field 4. The buildings plot 1-3 are currently up-todate under construction or in planning. Finally, For construction field 4 a maximum Sheath volume is defined and the BGF on limited to a maximum of 58,000 square meters.

1

3

UKBB

2

| Campus Design

76

77

29

SITE

30

Logistics The site logistics of the construction sites 1 to 4 became originally considered in its entirety and recorded by the Zoning plan. It is thought that a logistics tunnel Underground through the Baufelder 1 - 3 out is crossed and the Pestalozzistrasse reappears on the construction field 4

| Campus Design

and connected to the Klingelbergstrasse. All site logistics from the Material supply until disposal, should realized in one-way traffic underground.

The advantages lie in the otherwise Use of the ground floor and therein Freedom of design for urban planning create. The exit situation of the Klingel-

78

bergstrasse has been investigated due to limited accessibility and the emergence of the ramp of the logistics tunnel and the adjacent intersection with trailing curves. For the overall solution, it was an indication whether the proposed variant also works in the exit situation.

It is assumed that articulated trains with a length of up to 18.5m drive through the tunnel. In general, no deliveries of articulated trains are expected on the site. The same applies to the exit situation, which must allow oncoming traffic at Halt at the intersection of Pestalozzi and Klingel-

bergstrasse. The design of the underground trucking yard has become of the mandatory length the ramp and the altitude overcoming both as well as from the stage of the construction field 4 result.The logistics tunnel and Fuhrhof will be built in the second stage.

The trucking yard should be

79

able to have three trucks to record at the same time - a truck for the Disposal and two trucks for delivery of goods.

The length of the truck yard extends is underground in the middle of the construction field and is through the shunting, parking and unloading area much longer than wide.

Space Program According to the space program of 23 May 2017, a main usable area of 30’402 square meters is planned for construction site 4. Of these, 24,595 square meters are to be arranged above ground, 5,807 square meters are to be provided on the lower

| Campus Design

floors. A total of 2,530 square feet can be optional in the Downslope be settled, which reduces the above-ground HNF to 22,065 square meters. The study assumes a floor height (OKOK) of 4.5 meters.

The lecture theaters and the dissecting room are assumed

80

to be one and a half stories high. The factor 2 was used to determine the WHP (including the technical equipment). In addition, a reserve of 10% has been included to allow more freedom for the competition and to react to any program changes.

81

Rules Shell volume: The maximum volume follows along the Klingelbergtrasse the light incidence angle of 45 ° with a maximum wall height along the 5th floor.

Along the St. Johanns-Ring is the building line in addition to stock by up to 4.4 Meter reset and the foot of the 45 ° angle to 11.4 meters in the site postponed.

| Campus Design

Building height: The maximum building height of the construction site 4 is according to development plan 50.5 meters. This is below the 73 meters of the NBZ skyscraper however, over the 40 meters of the planned DBM and far above the quarterly average the residential building of St. Johann. The NBZ has as

82

pulled off the road punctiform skyscraper over a large Prägnanz both in the district and in Urban space. Another high point will be Urban as a problematic competition seen and should be avoided. The angle of incidence with respect to the Residential buildings is in the development plan committed.

2 Hours shadow: Due to the orientation of the construction field and the limitations of the angle of light is a shading of the residential building the Klingelbergstrasse or at the St. Johannsring within the 2-hour-shadow locked out.

A regulation on shading of school buildings does not exist.

Spitalstrasse: The present study shows that the Transition to the Vosges Schoolhouse at the Spitalstrasse a special attention must be given. Such are the spaces used mainly during the day and the school and way home leads directly to the construction field 4 over. Even if the break times partly through

83

own buildings are shaded, must in the Frame of an architectural competition to a reasonable height and / or backing away from the building line to be respected. Taking advantage of the maximum height of 50.5 Meters should be avoided.

That is why is maximum height of build-able area is changing.

| Campus Design Evolution

84

85

| Campus Design Evolution

86

87

| Campus Design Evolution

88

89

| Campus Design Evolution

90

91

| Campus Design Evolution

92

93

| Campus Design Evolution

94

95

URBAN CAMPUS

4

96 97

31

ANALYSIS ON AN URBAN CAMPUS “Urban Campus” is a chapter to analyze one of the most innovative laboratory and research environments. Analyzing its conceptual frameworks and outcomes, the public space pertaining to the analyzed building, com-

pared to the overall public space on which it stands. As it is easily perceived, there are situations in which the pertinence space has an elemental character, as in the case of a continuous building facade fronting the public

98

space of the street or when public space is subordinate to a single monumental building that plays a prominent role. However, situations are often given more complexity due to specific way to deal with the public spaces

99

32

33

IMPERIAL COLLAGE LONDON SOUTH KENSINGTON CAMPUS Imperial was founded at South Kensington in 1888 as part of Prince Albert’s vision for a largescale cultural and scientific quarter emerging from the success of the Great Exhibition. Over the last 125 years the South Kensing-

ton campus has seen successive waves of redevelopment; from its Victorian and Edwardian origins and the substantial Post- War Jubilee Expansion scheme to more recent building projects such as the Sir Alexander Fleming Build-

ing. These periods of growth have been essential in enabling the College to continue to grow and evolve, maintaining its status as a world-leader in education and research in science, engineering, medicine and business.

The main reason for choosing Imperial Collage South Kensington Campus as a case study is that it shows the clear idea of how the urban campus design

should respond to the public realm of the neighborhood.

The campus consists of different urban corridors and interaction points with the urban life, Campus especially after redesigning the master

plan by the architect’s Allies and Morrison. Seeing the not working elements on the existing master plan and the solutions helped us find the correct answers to how the Cluster urban campus design should be. ,

| Analysis on Urban Campus

100

EMBEDDED

Embedded PERMEABILITY

ANCHOR PLUS

UNIVERSTY PLUS

URBAN MODEL

INSTITUTIONAL MIX

101

34

Present Condition of The Campus Today over 50 years on, the university has once again outgrown its space and have developed campuses elsewhere. With new space available from recent de-

| Analysis on Urban Campus

velopment at Imperial White City, attention has turned to the South Kensington Campus to ensure it is prepared to meet future needs. As with all large institutions, the Campus

102

risks becoming more complex, confusing and unclear over time. This is particularly true of the public realm - the spaces shared by all staff, students and visitors.

The present condition of the public spaces and the connections between them have loosing their clearity and efficiency. Such as, unefficient visual connection at the cen-

ter of the campus caused by hedge on Queen’s Lawn, currently dominated by vehicles and parking Imperial College Road and overcrowded Sherfield Walkway at peak

103

times in the morning and at lunch. So there is a need of new master plan to provide a flexible framework for the Campus’ future development and growth.

35

South Kensington Masterplan The South Kensington Masterplan, developed by architects Allies and Morrison, sets out an ambitious long term vision to make the campus environment the best it

| Analysis on Urban Campus

can be for staff, students and visitors. Developed in consultation with more than 550 members of the College community, the Masterplan provides a flexible frame-

104

work for the Campus’ future development and growth. The Masterplan can be thought of as an ambition. It’s a vision for the best version of the campus we can imagine.

This then provides a framework that helps us as we move forward with our development plans for the campus as investment becomes available.

There are different type of

projects and each project is grouped by terms. Term is an indication of impact, ease of implementation and level of investment required. Projects can be cat-

105

egorised into short, medium, long term and distant future.

There will be demonstrations show summary of the various projects are planning to be executed in various terms.

36

Queen’s Lawn | Short Term Queen’s Lawn is the heart of the campus and a much loved green space used throughout the year. Our consultation highlighted Queen’s Lawn and

Queen’s Tower as the most liked elements of the campus.

Already the university has taken steps to open up Queen’s Lawn through removing the

hedge to improve visual connections. Further steps like small interventions can be taken to strengthen this space as the centre of the campus.

106

107

37

38

39

Sherfield Walkway and Links | Short Term The Sherfield Walkway is the main spine of the campus. It connects east and west from the Main Entrance from the east to the Sherfield and Huxley buildings. It is located one storey above natural ground and is cut

| Analysis on Urban Campus

into the first floor of the Sherfield Building. The Walkway is overcrowded at peak times in the morning and at lunch. Connections to the Queen’s Lawn are congested. Ideas to improve the Walkways include upgrading

108

the surface finishes; opening up adjacent spaces to the Walkway thereby allowing better visibility and access to building entrances and common workspaces; and even creating an entirely new street by aligning the Walkway.

109

40

41

Dalby Court | Mid Term Dalby Court is the largest paved outdoor space in the South Kensington campus.

It is a significant space at the crossroads of pedestrian

| Analysis on Urban Campus

movement east-west from the Main Entrance to Sherfield and north-south from the Royal School of Mines to the Faculty Building and beyond. The

110

space can be improved by improved finishes, lighting and wind mitigation along with a new pavilion, outdoor furniture and soft landscaping.

111

42

43

Main Entrance | Mid-Long Term The Main Entrance is an important point of arrival for visitors and the college community. Its architectural style gives the College a sense of status befitting its reputation on Exhibition Road.

The entrance doors and internal

| Analysis on Urban Campus

circulation complicate its easy use and restrict access. The future vision involves creating a welcoming entrance with visitor reception and street presence on Exhibition Road to communicate to the public the exciting

112

research and teaching within by exhibiting material onto the street by opening up frontages. For the long term, future development of expansion has been designed for additional teaching space.

113

44

45

Imperial College Road | Mid Term Imperial College Road is a tree lined boulevard and also a public right of way through the campus. Once the address of the Imperial Institute and the Royal College of Science, it now connects Exhibition

| Analysis on Urban Campus

Road to Queen’s Gate with the Queen’s Lawn at the midpoint. It is currently dominated by vehicles and parking. The vision focusses on creating a sense of arrival into the campus with a feeling of welcome.

114

This could involve high quality paving for a shared surface to support a public realm prioritising pedestrians and can cater for college events such as the Imperial Festival or the weekly farmers’ market.

115

46

47

Chemistry 1&2 - RCS1 | Long Term Chemistry 1-2 projects aim to refurbish the Chemistry Building as shared labs with common space open-

ing onto Queen’s Lawn.

This will increase the interaction between campus and urban life. The project called

RCS1 aims to provide a new entrance pavilion with common space opening up to Imperial College Road.

116

117

48

49

118

TYPOLOGICAL SERIES

5 119

“Typological series” is a way of searching for the foundation of an innovative environment and investigating how the designers used specificities and restrain of intervention plot as an incentive to direct the attention towards typological research and innovation in laboratory and research

| Typological Series

work environment. How do they build a creative and multi-disciplinary research community through new kinds of shared spaces? How structural, technological, and linguistic choices interrelate with the formal structure of the building. How each architect modulates, starting

120

from the typological scheme, the different subsystems that make up the building (access and distribution system, the structural system, the linguistic system, etc.)? The various subsystems coincide and overlap the typological form accurately and uniquely or act independently.

This chapter is aimed at analyzing precedents and providing theoretical and cultural foundations for designing new buildings.

How can a primary, historical or modern, space-structural type be reinvented and developed in contemporary ways? Typological thinking facilitates the archi-

tectural design capacity to define an organic relation between a space-structural idea and the project’s necessity, the complexity of the program, and the construction process, always finding, in reality, the necessary confrontation. This implies combining different architectural works and

121

projects in a “continuous morphological process” of transformation. Defining a typological series around our specific architectural project presupposes two actions: recognizing and discovering or re-discovering basic types and seeing different architectures in complementary relationships.

Sir Alexander Fleming Building Sir Alexander Fleming Building represents a major advance in medical research facilities, encouraging social and intellectual interaction to an unprecedented degree. At its heart is a research forum on five levels, where research work not directly associated with the laboratory takes place. It provides an open arena where researchers can meet their colleagues from all disciplines and all levels, and forms the hub of the building’s primary circulation system. Standard and specialist laboratories are wrapped around the forum, as are undergraduate teaching spaces, administration and a cafe.

The main reason for choosing Sir Alexander Fleming Building as a case study is the radical design of the evaluation areas of the labs. Placing the workspaces into the heart of the building is encouraging social and intellectual interaction in the work environment.

This central atrium is also providing an efficient work environment thanks to well-designed skylights.

| Typological Series

122

123

50

”Foster’s addition to the Imperial College campus is remarkable not only for its use of a constrained site, in an area where major institutions contend for land, but also for its inspired adaptation of space-planning and management techniques learned in the world of office design.”

- The Architects’ Journal

51

| Typological Series

124

125

52

53

The forum widens as it rises, forming open-plan terraces for research students on the second and fourth floors, where the perimeter is lined with study

| Typological Series

carrels. Fully glazed at its northern end -the site’s only open aspect - the forum looks onto the Queen’s Lawn and Queen’s Tower, the last fragment of the

126

1890s campus. Open galleries with work desks surround the central space.

Laboratories are arranged adjacent to the galleries.

A service zone comprising equipment, cool storage, and special laboratories partly constitute a dark zone that is located adjacent to the ex-

isting building or faces south and receives daylight. This U-shaped typical floor plan with various access corridors ensures short distances

127

between related spaces and close cooperation between scientists conducting theoretical Studies and scientists working in the laboratories.

54

The saw-tooth roof covering the atrium provides an interesting and optimized mixed lighting scenario which is

| Typological Series

composed of indirect northern light and direct sunlight in points. Sculpted roof lights introduce a combination of

128

north light for optimum working conditions and controlled sunlight to bring sparkle into the building.

The scheme makes skillful use of the restrictive site and proposes a compact introverted building with a five-storey

light flooded communication space at its center and research space around it. The central space is reminiscent

129

of an agora and gets increasingly wider and brighter towards the top as the floor areas around it gets smaller.

Fabrikstrasse 10 | Yoshio Taniguchi Fabrikstrasse 10 is a highly modern research building that combines form and function with aesthetically appealing surroundings. The laboratory building is unobtrusive, but offers a dynamic and lively working atmosphere with a new laboratory concept that enhances the flow of communication and the exchange of knowledge. Structurally, the building is strongly characterized by the flexible public usage on the ground floor, with a column-free room approximately 1000 m² in size.

The main reason for choosing Fabrikstrasse 10 as a case study is the structural design solution to provide an open ground floor and well-functioning lab floors. The structural design is consists of hanging floors as we propose in Life Science Campus. Moreover, the minimal design of the building envelope inspired us to keep the facade simple but effective.

| Typological Series

130

131

55

56

The building at Fabrikstrasse 10, with its closing white glass facade, evinces a very sculptural expression that

| Typological Series

is unusual for a laboratory building. Its compact outer appearance, the specially designed ground floor and

132

the unconventional interpretation of the arcades distinguish it from all other buildings on the Campus.

Extremely high demands are made on precision in the execution of this building. Normally, a building’s

weight is directly transferred to a foundation via columns.

Here, in order to create the column-free ground floor, the

133

system has been reversed: using columns, the building was suspended from a steel bridge in the roof.

This bridge, a steel framework structure measuring 4 m high, 46 m long and 24 m wide, is supported by four infrastructural cores made of reinforced concrete. In order to reduce weight, strain and seismic forces, coffered ceilings were used. On each floor, the glass facade rests on the slabs’ edges, which were adjusted according to the strain specifications with steel hangers before the installation work began. The “bridge structure” in the roof required a provisional column system on the ground floor, which was removed using jacks once the upper floors had been raised and lowered.

| Typological Series

134

135

57

58

Structural design choice with the hanging floors provides an open and permeable ground floor for the use of community

| Typological Series

of Novartis Campus. Additionaly. there are some openings on the ground floor to access to underground. These openings

136

also provide a natural light to the underground spaces. The underground accommodation is solid, dense and carved.

The sophisticated building design by Japanese architect Yoshio Taniguchi had to be matched precisely with both the

stringent user requirements and the high density of service installations. Special attention was given to an inherently flexible

137

floor layout to facilitate future adaptations to ever-changing user requirements and innovative laboratory technology.

Bocconi University School of Economics | Grafton Architects The Luigi Bocconi University is thought of as a large market hall or place of exchange. The Building’s hall acts as a filter between the city and the university. The northern edge of the site fronts onto the artery of Viale Bligny, with the clatter of trams, the rush of busses, general traffic, people passing. It addresses the throbbing urban life of Milan, weaves into the mesh of the city. This frontage becomes the architectural opportunity to have a ‘window’ to Milan, a memorable image to confirm the important cultural contribution that the Bocconi University plays in the life of this city. For this reason, the public space of the aula magna occupies this frontage, asserting a symbolic presence and a register of the prestigious status of the University.

The main reason for choosing Bocconi University School of Economics as a case study is the structural design solution to provide an open ground floor and well-functioning education and learning spaces above it.

The structural design is consists of hanging floors as we propose in Life Science Campus. Moreover, breaking apart the massive volumes into smaller floor plates and getting more natural light to each floor is the key concept that inspired us.

| Typological Series

138

139

59

60

The ground floor volume is a visually permeable and freely-accessible ensemble of entrance halls, courtyards and

| Typological Series

public facilities, such as the cafe, aimed to be a “filter between the city and the university”. Most of the functional spac-

140

es of the school are contained into fifteen 5-story “boxes” separated by nine courtyards in a “beehive-like” configuration.

Rather than a single building, this makes the school look more like a campus composed of various pavilions, but arranged in

a vertical configuration instead than in a horizontal one. Spatially the underground accommodation is solid, dense and

141

carved. Design tries to establish a continuity between the ‘landscape’ of the city and the ‘made landscape’ of this undercroft.

The building is set back from the Viale Bligny & Via Roentgen edges to make a public space 18m x 90m inspired by the space forward of Hospital Maggiore.

This new deep ‘finger’ of space reaches out to the city and beckons the visitor into the heart of the interior. This public space continues into the building, bringing with it its stone surface, the floor of the city.

In order to make this grand place of exchange we thought about the research offices as beams of space, suspended to form a grand canopy which filters light to all levels. The offices form an inhabited roofscape. This floating canopy allows the space of the city to overlap with the life of the university and internal and external public spaces to merge.

| Typological Series

142

143

61

Yale Art and Architecture Building by Paul Rudolph One of the earliest known examples of Brutalist architecture in America is Paul Rudolph’s Yale Art and Architecture Building in New Haven, Connecticut, an imposing, fortress-like building that juxtaposes masses of textured concrete with layers of steel-framed glazing.

Paul Rudolph was awarded the commission for the Yale Art and Architecture building during his six year stint as departmental chair, between 1958 and 1965. His unique position as both client and architect gave him the opportunity to explore a bold new direction for architecture that still divides opinion.

The main reason for choosing Yale Art and Architecture Building as a case study is the unique structural design to provide a main hall of the University with a large span and playing with the floor plates to get natural light to common areas.

So the building design doesn’t follow an ordinary structural grid with an ordinary section of the structural element. Still, it shapes the structural design according to the need of the main spaces of the University.

| Typological Series

144

145

62

”Paul Rudolph’s Yale Art and Architecture Building showed modern architecture how to find its ways out of the confusion and dead-ends of the late 1950s. Its powerful forms, textured surfaces, complex spaces, sensitive urban presence, and many allusions to the past demonstrated how to recover the things that Rudolph said the debased functionalism of the 1950s and the International Style had ‘brushed aside’, namely monumentality, urbanism, symbolism, and decoration.”

- Timothy Rohan

| Typological Series

146

147

63

64

Completed in 1963, the building is formed of intersecting volumes of bush-hammered concrete. Smooth concrete

| Typological Series

and glass horizontal elements are supported by a sequence of towers that protrude above the roof in a series of turrets.

148

Slabs of ribbed concrete run in vertical sections on the interior and exterior of the 11,000-square-metre building.

The concrete was cast in place using corrugated wooden molds and bush-hammered to expose the aggregate. In-

side, the complex floor plan is made up of 37 terraced levels spaced across seven main stories and two basement floors.

149

Each level overlooks a central atrium that features a sunken pit and is topped by a series of skylights.

With a career spanning from the 1940s to the 1990s, Rudolph’s oeuvre has been attributed to several architectural movements including the Sarasota School and late Modernism, as well as Brutalism.

The Yale Art and Architecture building features elements typical of the Sarasota School – terraced levels, an open plan core and plays on light and shadow – although externally it features the raw concrete of Brutalist architecture.

| Typological Series

150

151

65

152

CAMPUS DESIGN

6 153

66

The Project Proposal The project proposal tries to transform the University of Basel into an Anchor Institution of the future innovation district of Basel. To achieve that result, it offers solid infrastructural solutions to the site by knowing that proximity is everything to share knowledge and experience in the innovation districts of the future. One of the infrastructural solutions of the project proposal is being connected to the future metro network of Basel. So, apart from all the other various transportation networks, the project proposal provides a metro connection into the heart of the Basel Life Science Campus.

The project site is located at the threshold of Urban morphologies of Basel. The mega structures of the University of Basel Campus are losing the opportunity to communicate efficiently with the urban life, which is vital for innovation districts. This is why the project proposal aims to be a sort of bridge between the public realm and the University of Basel Campus. To do that, the Life Science Campus is divided into four buildings by gridal organization.

So inside the Life science campus, there are several urban corridors and one central plaza thanks to gridal organization. Moreover, typologies of the campus buildings are trying to mimic the more minor scales of the urban morphologies in the neighborhood. So this decision shapes the many design aspects of the project proposal, from the permeable ground floor design to the structural design of the buildings.

A permeable ground floor is one of the key concepts for the project proposal because it is vital for the innovation districts. To desing porous ground floor, there was a need for separated buildings and open | Campus Design Evolution

organization on the ground floor of the campus. But also these separated buildings need to be connected in a way. So, the underground connection has been provided by wide sunken plazas. So the visitor can walk around all campus buildings just following a single continuous underground route by entering from sunken plazas or coming from the metro line to the campus.

The radical design choices have been made to create an open ground floor and a vast amount of lab units on the upper floors of the Life Science Campus. One of them is a structural design approach.

The structural design of the campus buildings doesn’t consist of an ordinary gridal organization. There are columns with a 3x1m section on the ground floor of the buildings that provide an open and permeable ground floor. On the upper floors of the campus building, there is a transition from columns to shear walls to provide circulation spaces between lab modules on the upper floors and resist the lateral forces acting. On the upper Lab floors, it is hard to use large spans as on the ground floors because larger spans mean bigger beam sections which the floor heights of the lab floors cant accommodate. As a solution, the upper floors are designed as hanging floors with frequent repetition of hanging columns that carry the lab floors by transferring all the loads to the massive beams on the rooftop of the buildings.

The design of the Lab floor was another keystone of the project proposal. There was an aim of providing a high-quality environment for the scientist and the researchers working at the labs. So, apart from all functional requirements,

154

they need natural lights for most of the labs and spaces for interaction between the colleagues to get relaxed and share the knowledge and experience in a daily work environment. To achieve that result, the design of the lab buildings breaks apart the massive building to the smaller floor plates to have natural light and keep the visual connections between these floor plates. The floor plates are divided with an atrium between them so that the evaluation areas of the lab units keep the visual connections between each other. Evaluation areas are radically designed as open workspaces to enhance the interaction between colleagues and benefit from the daylight coming through the skylights above the atrium.

The modular double facades of the lab floors provide a high-quality indoor environment and reduce energy consumption by decreasing the heating and cooling load thanks to the air gap between double facade modules. The choice of polymer concrete panels for the cladding of the facade aims to integrate the building with the public spaces on the ground and underground floors which have the concrete pavements.

The Project proposal is designed with an environmentally sustainable approach by using building information modeling(BIM). Moreover, the project design follows the rules of LEEDS Green Buildings Certification. According to LEED standards, the project proposal is entitled to a LEED Gold Certification.

To sum up, the project proposal offers a highly permeable, efficiently functioning, and environmentally sustainable Life Science Campus to the University of Basel. will be an anchor institution of the

155

A

A

| Campus Design Evolution

156

157

Master Plan |

72.50

51.00

39.70

33.20

24.80

| Campus Design Evolution

158

159

Urban Section A-A |

STRUCTURAL DESIGN CONCEPT 160

The structural design of the campus buildings doesn’t consist of an ordinary gridal organization. There are columns with a 3x1m section on the ground floor of the buildings that provide an open and permeable ground floor. On the upper floors of the campus building, there is a transition from columns to shear walls to provide circulation spaces between lab modules on the upper floors and resist the lateral forces acting. On the upper Lab floors, it is hard to use large spans as on the ground floors because larger spans mean bigger beam sections which the floor heights of the lab floors cant accommodate. As a solution, the upper floors are designed as hanging floors with frequent repetition of hanging columns that carry the lab floors by transferring all the loads to the massive beams on the rooftop of the buildings.

161

M E H C S S L R A O R O U L T F C E U L R TIP ST U L M

L A R R U O T C LO U F R E ST T H R F LA O U E G M E E R H C S

E O F

1 | Structural Design Concept

Standart Organization Of The Gridal Structure

162

2

Repition Of The Gridal Organization On Each Floor For Diverse Functions

163

M E H C S L S A N R O U I T T C C U N R FU ST N D A

L A N N IO IO T T A C IZ N N O A F RG O

E

3 | Structural Design Concept

Overlapping Diverse Functions With Same Structural Scheme

164

4

Conflict Between Structural Scheme And The Diverse Needs Of The Functions

165

5 | Structural Design Concept

Open Floor Plan For Public Use On The Ground And First Floor

166

6

Wider Span Needs Bigger Sections - Huge Beam To Carry Hanging Upper Floors

167

7

Switching Between Columns To Shear Walls To Provide Circulation - Access To Underground Floor

| Structural Design Concept

168

8

Combining The Structural Modules With An Atrium Between Them To Get Natural Light

169

9 | Structural Design Concept

Avoiding To Create A Mega Block To Refer To The Context With Using Modular Structure

170

10

Providing An Access To Underground Floor From Urban Level And Getting Natural Light To Lecture Halls

171

UNIVERSITY OF

B A S E L

| Architectural Drawings

172

173

| Architectural Drawings

174

175

Ground Floor Plan |

33.20

24.80

| Architectural Drawings

176

177

North-East Elevation |

B

| Architectural Drawings

B

178

179

First Floor Plan |

33.20

24.80

24.80

| Architectural Drawings

180

181

Section B-B |

| Architectural Drawings

182

183

Underground Floor Plan |

| Architectural Drawings

184

185

Lab Floors Plan |

IN

TE

RA OF

CT

LA YE RS

186

IO

N

187

LAB DESIGN The design of the Lab floor was another keystone of the project proposal. There was an aim of providing a high-quality environment for the scientist and the researchers working at the labs. So, apart from all functional requirements, they need natural lights for most of the labs and spaces for interaction between the colleagues to get relaxed and share the knowledge and experience in a daily work environment. To achieve that result, the design of the lab buildings breaks apart the massive building to the smaller floor plates to have natural light and keep the visual connections between these floor plates.

The floor plates are divided with an atrium between them so that the evaluation areas of the lab units keep the visual connections between each other. Evaluation areas are radically designed as open workspaces to enhance the interaction between colleagues and benefit from the daylight coming through the skylights above the atrium.

188

189

LAB DESIGN LAB DESIGN

DESIGN PROCESS OFDESIGN LAB MODULES PROCESS OF LAB MODULES

1.201.20

5.00

1.20 10

1.40

1.20

1.20

1.20

3

2

80

1

1

2

4

5

8

80 1.60

1.60

5

6

6

7

1

2

4

5

=169.4

12

13

Standardlabor

9

10

12 7

13 8

11 2.60

8

Standardlabor Auswertbereich

7

80

1.60

1.60

attung / spezielles im Auswertbereich: Ausstattung / spezielles im Auswertbereich: Bürostühle und Bürotische mit Starkstrom - undBürostühle EDV und Bürotische mit Starkstrom und EDV Ablagemöglichkeit für Papierakten ist vorzusehen Ablagemöglichkeit für Papierakten ist vorzusehen

EVALUATION AREA

STANDARD LAB SERVICED LAB ROOM

STANDARD D EVALUATION LAB AREA

EVALUATION AREA

(7.10m + 5.00m) X 7.00m = 2 X 84.7m

3

m2

=169.4

6

m2

LAB SERVICE ROOM Schnitt Auswertbereich MST 1:75

5

Schnitt Auswertbereich MST 1:75

3

80

2

10

4

80

11

4

7.00

90

10

EVALUATION STANDARD D LAB AREA

2X

(7.10m + 5.00m) X 7.00m = 2 X 84.7m

10

147

90

90

6

AREA FOR DOUBLE LAB MODULE

8

2X

40

3

7

1.60

90

20 90

2

1

80

15

1 1.60

16

13

6

LAB SERVICE STANDARD D LAB ROOM

1.60

3

12 40

13

AREA FOR DOUBLE LAB MODULE

LAB SERVICE ROOM

8

Auswertbereich

CORRIDOR

CORRIDOR

| Lab Design

STANDAR RD LAB

DOUBLE LAB MODULES SPACE REQUIREMENTS PER RESEARCHER

EVALUATION STANDAR RD AREA LAB

AREA / RESEARCHER RATIO EVALUATION

AREA2

169.4 m /8

WITH 16 + 4 LAB BENCHS

WITH WITH 8 16 DESKS FOR + 4 LAB 8 RESEARCHERS BENCHS

WITH 2 = 21.175 8 DESKS FORm 8 RESEARCHERS

STANDARD D LAB

EVALUATION STANDARD D LAB AREA

RESEARCHER EVALUATION DESK RATIO AREA

WITH + 4 LAB 816 DESKS FOR BENCHS 8 RESEARCHERS

20/8 WITH 8 DESKS FOR = 2.50 8 RESEARCHERS

AREA / RESEARCHER RATIO

LABmSERVICE 2 /8 169.4 ROOM

LAB SERVICED STANDARD ROOM LAB

EVALUATION STANDARD D AREA LAB

EVALUATION AREA

LAB SERVICE STANDAR RD LAB ROOM

EVALUATION STANDAR RD LAB AREA

EVALUATION AREA

= 21.175 m2

CORE

DOUBLE LAB MODULES SPACE REQUIREMENTS PER RESEARCHER

Departement Biomedizin der Universität NeubauBasel, Departement Labor- und Biomedizin Forschungsgebäude der Universität aufBasel, dem Campus Labor- und Schällemätteli Forschungsgebäude / Anonymer aufProjektwettbewerb dem Campus Schällemätteli im selektiven / Anonymer VerfahrenProjektwettbewerb für Generalplanerteams im selektiven Verfahren für Generalplanerteams

LAB BENCH/

WITH 16 + 4 LAB BENCHS

190

bench/person

LAB BENCH/ RESEARCHER DESK RATIO

LAB SERVICE ROOM 20/8 = 2.50

bench/person

191

Proposal Lab Design |

CONNECTION

7

1.60

80

6

3

UNNECESSARY

11

80

9

10

8

LACK OF NATURAL LIGHT

7

10 5

CASE STUDY PROPSAL FOR LAB ORGANIZATION DRAWBACKS TO SOLVE

6

4

7.00

5

3

10

11

900

2.60

80

90

2

4

80

10

90

9

15 attung / spezielles im Standardlabor: Ausstattung / spezielles im Standardlabor: Pro Standardlabor eine Kapelle vorsehen Pro Standardlabor eine Kapelle vorsehen In jedem zweiten Standardlabor ist ein -explosionsgeschützer In jedem zweiten Standardlabor ist ein explosionsgeschützer Lösungsmittelschrank vorzusehen Lösungsmittelschrank vorzusehen 4 5 14 Unter den Labortischen (Benches) befinden sich Unter üblicherweise den Labortischen (Benches) befinden sich üblicherweise Labor-Korpusse Labor-Korpusse 9 denMedienÜber den Labortischen sollen Hängeschränke Über und die Labortischen sollen Hängeschränke und8 die Medienerschliessung angeordnet werden erschliessung angeordnet werden

90

1

7.00

147

80

1.60 20 90 90 1.60

10

1.201.20

7.00

6

1.60

1.60 90 90

8

16

15

nscht sind nutzerseitig möglichst offene Gewünscht Zirkulationswege. sind nutzerseitig möglichst offene Zirkulationswege. ntliche Merkmale für die Planung einer Forschungseinheit, Wesentliche Merkmale für die Planung einer Forschungseinheit, e aus Standardlabor und Auswertbereichwelche besteht aus sind: Standardlabor und Auswertbereich besteht sind: 8 Auswertplätze im Auswertbereich = min.

- 8 Arbeitstische 8 Auswertplätze im Auswertbereich = min. 8 Arbeitstische à mind. 80x120cm à mind. 80x120cm 8 Arbeitsplätze im Labor = 1,5 Benches- (Labortisch) 8 Arbeitsplätze pro im Labor = 1,5 Benches (Labortisch) pro Mitarbeiter/in Mitarbeiter/in 12 Grösse einer Bench = 90x120cm Grösse einer Bench = 90x120cm Labor- und Auswertbereich ggf. durch Spritzschutz Laborlaborseitig und Auswertbereich ggf. durch Spritzschutz laborseitig (Verglasung mit Türen) getrennt (Verglasung mit Türen) getrennt 2 1 Labor gilt grundsätzlich als BSL-2-Bereich.

BeiLabor Ausgängen gilt grundsätzlich aus als BSL-2-Bereich.

Bei Ausgängen aus 16 diesem Bereich müssen Kittel und Schutzbrillediesem Bereich deponiert und müssen Kittel und Schutzbrille deponiert und die Hände gewaschen werden können. die Hände gewaschen werden können.

REQUIREMENTS FOR LAB SPACES

1.201.20

2.60

3

90

2

90

1

DOUBLE LAB MODULES OPTIMAL DIMENSIONS

DOUBLE LAB MODULES OPTIMAL DIMENSIONS

1.401.40

900

e Vorabklärungen haben zum abgebildeten Diverse Schemaplan Vorabklärungen haben zum abgebildeten Schemaplan altypische Anordnung geführt. Falls alternative als idealtypische Ansätze Anordnung geführt. Falls alternative Ansätze gt werden, sollen diese funktional mindestens verfolgt gleichwertig werden, sollen diese funktional mindestens gleichwertig 15 sein. chemaplan zeigt zwei Standardlabore mit Der direkt Schemaplan angrenzenden zeigt zwei Standardlabore mit direkt angrenzenden ertplätzen. Die Abstände zwischen den Benches Auswertplätzen. bzw.

Die Abstände zwischen den Benches bzw. gemäss ist so gewählt, dass es den schen ist so gewählt, dass es den Anforderungen Bürotischen Anforderungen gemäss 4 5 14 r Wirtschaft und Arbeit entspricht. DieseAmt und Arbeit entspricht. Diese sind im Wettbewerbssindfür imWirtschaft Wettbewerbsmm Ziffer 518 detailliert aufgeführt. programm Ziffer 518 detailliert aufgeführt.

REQUIREMENTS FOR LAB SPACES

90 1.20 10

CASE STUDY PROPSAL FOR LAB ORGANIZATION DRAWBACKS TO SOLVE

1.20

BORING CORRIDOR

1.20

7.10 5.00

90

16

90

erungen zum vorliegenden Schemaplan Erläuterungen zum vorliegenden Schemaplan

1.20

10

2.60

1.40

12.20

7.10

80

90

Grundriss MST 1:75 12.20

CORE

Grundriss MST 1:75

Labor- und Auswertbereiche Plan Labor- und Auswertbereiche Erläuterungen / 19.12.2014 mit Erläuterungen / 19.12.2014

SCIENCE

SS OF LAB MODULES

CAMPUS

900

POOR USAGE NO OF MAIN NATURAL INTERACTION LIGHT SPACE BY SERVICE ROOMS

CORE

LACK OF NATURAL LIGHT

BARRIER

MAIN CORRIDOR

BARRIER

LACK OF NATURAL LIGHT

CORE

MISSING INTERACTION

BORING CORRIDOR

STUCKS IN THE MIDDLE

STUCKS IN THE MIDDLE

BORING CORRIDOR

ROOMS

MISSING INTERACTION

LACK OF NATURAL LIGHT

INTERACTION

SERVICE

CONNECTION

LACK OF NATURAL LIGHT

UNNECESSARY

BORING CORRIDOR

CORE

EVALUATION AREA

CASE STUDY PROPSAL FOR LAB ORGANIZATION DRAWBACKS TO SOLVE

EVALUATION AREA

CORE

EVALUATION AREA

LACK OF NATURAL LIGHT

ONE WAY

EVALUATION AREA ONE WAY

| Lab Design

192

INTERACTION

193

Proposal Lab Design |

CASE STUDY PROPOSAL LAB FLOOR ORGANIZATION

| Lab Design

194

195

Proposal Lab Design |

LIF LAB

| Lab Design

G9

STANDARD D LAB WITH STANDARD 16 + 4 LAB D LAB BENCHS WITH 16 + 4 LAB BENCHS

STANDARD D LAB LAB WITH SERVICE 16 + 4 LAB ROOM BENCHS

LAB SERVICE 196 MUHAMMED ENES SIVRI ROOM ARI AN SH A H VE R D IP OU R

G9

LAB SERVICE ROOM

STANDARD D LAB

DOUBLE LAB MODULE 2 =204.40

EVALUATION =204.40 m2 AREA

m

ATRIUM NATURAL LIGHT

(7.70m x 6.80m) + (4.80m x 10.40m) =2 x (52.30 + 50.00m) =204.40

EVALUATION AREA

ATRIUM NATURAL LIGHT

NATURALVISUAL LIGHT

m2

VISUAL

FACADE

(7.70m x 6.80m) + (4.80m x 10.40m) =2 x (52.30 + 50.00m)

ATRIUM NATURAL LIGHT

(7.70m x 6.80m) + (4.80m x 10.40m) AREA FOR =2 x (52.30 + 50.00m)

EVALUATION NATURAL AREA LIGHT VISUAL

INTERACTIO

NATU NATURAL LIG INTERACTION LIGHT

ATRIUM NATURAL LIGHT

2x

FACADE

2x

LAB STANDARD D SERVICE LAB ROOM EVALUATION EVALUATION AREA AREA

STANDARD AREA FOR D DOUBLE LAB LAB MODULE EVALUATION AREA

FACADE

LAB SERVICE ROOM

CORE

VISUAL

NATURAL INTERACTIO LIGHT

VISUALINTERACTION

WITH 8 DESKS FOR 8 RESEARCHERS

EVALUATION AREA WITH 8 DESKS FOR 8 RESEARCHERS

EVALUATION AREA WITH 8 DESKS FOR 8 RESEARCHERS

EVALUATION AREA WITH 8 DESKS FOR 8 RESEARCHERS

204.4 m /8 2

STANDARD =AREA 25.55/Dm2 RESEARCHER LAB RATIO WITH m2/8 16204.4 + 4 LAB BENCHS = 25.55 m2

STANDARD D LAB BENCH/ RESEARCHER LAB DESK RATIO WITH 16 + 420/8 LAB BENCHS 2.50 LAB=BENCH/ RESEARCHER bench/person DESK LABRATIO

SERVICE 20/8 ROOM = 2.50 bench/person

COMMON 204.4 m /8 AREAS

EVALUATION AREA

2

= 25.55 m2

WITH 8 DESKS FOR 8 RESEARCHERS

ATRIUM NATURAL LIGHT

NATURAL VISUAL LIGHT

ATRIUM NATURAL LIGHT

VISUAL

EVALUATION AREA

EVALUATION AREA

FACADE

EVALUATION AREA

AREA / RESEARCHER RATIO OFFICES /

NATURAL LIGHTVISUAL

ATRIUM NATURAL LIGHT

EVALUATION EVALUATION AREA AREA

EVALUATION AREA

LAB BENCH/ RESEARCHER DESK RATIO

EVALUATION 20/8 AREA STANDARD D = 2.50 LAB bench/person

WITHLAB 8 DESKS FOR SERVICE 8 RESEARCHERS ROOM

ATRIUM NATURAL LIGHT

LAB AREA / SERVICE RESEARCHER ROOM RATIO

FACADE

OFFICES / COMMON AREAS

OFFICES / COMMON AREAS

ATRIUM NATURAL LIGHT

ATRIUM NATURAL LIGHT

EVALUATION LAB LAB AREA D STANDARD STANDARD SERVICE SERVICE D LAB LAB ROOM ROOM

D STANDARD LAB

FACADE

WITH 16 + 4 LAB BENCHS

LAB STANDARD SERVICED LAB ROOM

LAB SERVICE ROOM FACADE

ROOM

AREA FOR DOUBLE LAB MODULE

2x

DOUBLE LAB MODULES SPACE REQUIREMENTS PER RESEARCHER

LAB STANDARD D SERVICE LAB

LAB STANDARD D SERVICE LAB ROOM

STANDARD D LAB

CORE

CORE

DOUBLE LAB MODULES OPTIMAL DIMENSIONS

MEETING THE NEEDS AND CREATING NEW INTERACTIONS

DOUBLE LAB DOUBLE MODULES LAB MODULES OPTIMAL DIMENSIONS OPTIMAL DIMENSIONS

LAB SERVICE ROOM

LAB SERVICE ROOM

DOUBLE LAB DOUBLE MODULES LAB MODULES SPACE REQUIREMENTS RESEARCHER PER RESEARCHER SPACE PER REQUIREMENTS

MEETINGMEETING THE NEEDS AND CREATING NEW INTERACTIONS THE NEEDS AND CREATING NEW INTERACTIONS

CORE

FACADE

C

CASE STUDY PROPOSAL LAB FLOOR ORGANIZATION

VISUAL

NATURAL LIGHT VISUAL

VISUAL NATURAL LIGHT

CORE

LAB SERVICE ROOM

STANDARD D LAB

STANDARD D LAB

LAB SERVICE ROOM

VISUAL

CORE

Lab Design | 197 MUHAMMED ENES P O L SIVRI I T E C N I C O D I M I L A N O - S C H O OPLOO L IFT EACRN C IHCIO T ED C IT UMRIEL AUNRO B A-NS C P LHAONONLI N OG F A C ROCNHSITTRE U CC TU T IROE NU R EN B AGNI NPELEARNI N NG I N GARCHITECTURAL C O N S T R U C T IDESIGN ON ENG I N E E R I NACADEMIC G ARCHI STUDIO FRAIPNCESCA BAT TISTI | GRIGO R A NGJ ELIU FRANCESCA | FRA NCES BATCO T I STRO I |MA G RI NG OO | RL AVI A NN GIJELI A CH U I|A RA F RATAG N CES LI ACO BU ERO | MA G I ONVA O |N LNAVI I DOT N I AELLI CH I AFOR RA TAG LI A BU ECONSTRUCTION | G I O VA N N I DOT COMPLEX 2 ELLI ARIA N SHAHV ERD O UR 2 0 1 FOR 9 - 2CO 0

LAB ERVICE ROOM

LAB SERVICE ROOM

STRUCTION ENGINEERING L I ABUE | G I OVANNI D OTE L L I

LAB FLOOR ORGANIZATION

CORE

CORE

INTERACTION

INTERACTION

CORE

INTERACTION

NATURAL LIGHT

INTERACTION

CORE

VISUAL

NATURAL LIGHT

CORE

INTERACTION

NATURAL LIGHT

VISUAL

VISUAL

VISUAL

VISUAL

VISUAL

NATURAL LIGHT

VISUAL

CORE

ACADEMIC YEAR 2 019 - 2 0 2 0

ATRIUM NATURAL LIGHT

ATRIUM NATURAL LIGHT

NATURAL LIGHT

INTERACTION

ATRIUM NATURAL LIGHT

VISUAL

ATRIUM NATURAL LIGHT

NATURAL LIGHT

FACADE

ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN STUDIO FOR COMPLEX CONSTRUCTION 2

FACADE

30

Lab Design | 199 198

| Lab Design

FACADE

LIFE SCIE ENCE CAMPUS LAB FLOOR ORGANIZATION

| Lab Design

200

201

Lab Design |

SCIENCE

PROCESS OF LAB MODULES

CAMPUS

ST AN LA DAR B D

LAB DESIGN

DESIGN PROCESS OF LAB MODULES

LAB DESIGN

STANDARD LAB DOUBLE LAB MODULES

STANDARD LAB DOUBLE LAB MODULES

DESIGN PROCESS OF LAB MODULES

LA BS RO ERV OM IC E

- Standard Lab -

O N

202

A TI

| Lab Design

203

Lab Design |

V R SE B OO LA R

| Lab Design

VA

LAB SERVICE ROOM DOUBLE LAB MODULES

LU A A R TI E O A N

E

LAB SERVICE ROOM DOUBLE LAB MODULES

E IC V R SE M B OO LA R

- Lab Service Room -

204

205

Lab Design |

LU A A R TI E O A N

VA

LU A R TI E O A N

VA E

A

EVALUATION AREA DOUBLE LAB MODULES

E EVALUATION AREA DOUBLE LAB MODULES

E IC V R SE M B OO LA R

| Lab Design

D R A D N A AB ST L

URE URBAN PLANNING CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING RO MANO| L AVI NIA CHIARA TAGLIA BUE | GIOVANNI DOTELLI

ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN STUDIO FOR COMPLEX CONSTRUCTION 2

206

ACADEMIC YEAR 2 019 - 2 0 2 0

31

- Evaluation Area -

207

Lab Design |

E IC V R SE M B OO LA R

E VA LU A A R TI E O A N

D R A D N A AB ST L

ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN STUDIO FOR COMPLEX CONSTRUCTION 2

ACADEMIC YEAR 2 019 - 2 0 2 0

31

EVALUATION AREA DOUBLE LAB MODULES

EVALUATION AREA DOUBLE LAB MODULES

URE URBAN PLANNING CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING RO MANO | L AVINIA CHIARA TAGLIA BUE | GIOVANNI DOTELLI

G9

MUHAMMED ENES SIVRI A R IA N SHAHVE R D I PO U R

POLITECNICO DI MILANO - SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE URBAN PLANNING CONSTRUCTION EN F RAN CE S CA B AT T I ST I | G R I G O R A N G J E L I U | F RA NC E S CO RO MA NO| L AVI NIA CH IARA TAG L IA BU E | G I O V - Lab Module -

| Lab Design

MUHAMMED ENES SIVRI

208

209

Lab Design |

POLITECNICO DI MILANO - SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE URBAN PLANNING CONSTRUCTION

- Lab Modules & Office Spcaes -

| Lab Design

210

211

Lab Design |

ENVELOPE DESIGN 212

The modular double facades of the lab floors provide a high-quality indoor environment and reduce energy consumption by decreasing the heating and cooling load thanks to the air gap between double facade modules. The choice of polymer concrete panels for the cladding of the facade aims to integrate the building with the public spaces on the ground and underground floors which have the concrete pavements.

213

CONTEXTUAL ANALYSIS FACADE TYPOLOGY MATERIALS CONTEXTUAL ANALYSIS FACADE TYPOLOGY MATERIALS

CHARACTERISTICS OF NEIGHBORHOOD

CONTINUITY OF GRIDAL AND CHARACTERISTICS OF NEIGHBORHOOD HORIZONTAL ELEMENTS CONTINUITY OF GRIDAL AND HORIZONTAL ELEMENTS

66

Klingelbergstrasse 97-79 | 1918 Klingelbergstrasse 97-79 | 1918

| Envelope Design

Classical Cast Stone

Plaster

Wooden Frame

Pvc Frame

Classical Cast Stone

Plaster

Wooden Frame

Pvc Frame

214

Cast Iron Porch Railing Cast Iron Porch Railing

Asphalt Shingle Asphalt Shingle

215

Facade Design |

FACADE TYPOLOGY MATERIALS CONTEXTUAL CHARACTERISTICS OF CAMPUSANALYSIS FACADE TYPOLOGY MATERIALS HORIZONTAL ORGANIZATION OF FACADE ELEMENTS

CHARACTERISTICS OF CAMPUS HORIZONTAL ORGANIZATION OF FACADE ELEMENTS

67

68

University Hospital University Hospital of Basel | 2003

University Children’s

12 cm thick

| Envelope Design

Silicone

Aluminium

Silicone

Aluminium

216

ETH Zurich

University HospitalChildren’s Basel | 2011 Hospital Basel | 2011

of Basel | 2003

12 cm thick

69

Multilayered Polymeric

Multilayered Polymeric Film with a Polyester Film with a Polyester Surface Surface

Glass

Glass

ETH Zurich D-BSSE | 2022 D-BSSE | 2022

UPVC - Woodlike

UPVC - Woodlike

Glass

Glass

Silicone

217

Silicone

Composite Panel

Composite Panel

Facade Design |

CONTEXTUAL ANALYSIS FACADE TYPOLOGY CONTEXTUAL ANALYSIS MATERIALS FACADE TYPOLOGY MATERIALS CHARACTERISTICS OF CAMPUS CHARACTERISTICS OF CAMPUS GRIDAL ORGANIZATION OF FACADE ELEMENTS GRIDAL ORGANIZATION OF FACADE ELEMENTS

70

71

University of Basel University Basel Faculty of of Science Faculty of Science

Reinforced Concrete Reinforced Concrete

| Envelope Design

72

University of Basel University ofofBasel Department Biomedicine Department of Biomedicine

University of Basel University of Basel New Biozentrum | 2017 New Biozentrum | 2017

Aluminium Aluminium

Glass Glass

218

Chrome steel Chrome steel

Silicone Silicone

Glass Glass

Aluminium Aluminium

Silicone Silicone

219

Glass Glass

Facade Design |

3 25.30 24.80

21.60

1 17.40

13.20

8

9.00

4.50

0.00

5 2

| Envelope Design

220

221

Facade Design |

SYSTEM SECTION

Prefabricated Double Skin Facade with Closed Cavity

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSION

Low-emissivity Triple Glazing 6 + 6 + 15 + 9 Filled With Argon Ug Gas (First skin) Low-emissivity Double Glazing 7 + 7 (Second skin) Window Seal Gasket in EPDM

Epoxy Resin Flooring, Thickness 5 mm

Steel Anchoring System For Double Skin Curtain Wall Extruded Alluminium Mullion, Thickness 90 mm

Thermal Insulation Layer : Extruded Polystyrene (XPS) Foam Insulation, Thickness 100 mm Separation Layer : Polyethylene Vapour Barrier - Heat-Reflective Reinforced Concret Ribbed Slab With EPS , Thickness 31 cm

Hangers with Adjustable Spring, Knauf - plus with Double Non-overlapping Metal Frame

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSION

Separation Layer : Polyethylene Vapour Barrier - Heat-Reflective

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSION

Leveling Layer : Cement Screed, Thichkness 60 mm

Thermal Insulation Layer : Rockwool, Thickness 30 mm

HAFEN Fastening System with Bracket

HAFEN Galvanized Bolts with Framing Channel

Thermal Insulation Layer : Wood Fiber Rigid Panel, Density 250 kg/m3, Thickness 90 mm

Thermal Insulation Layer : Rockwool, Thickness 80 mm

Extruded Alluminium Mullion, Thickness 90 mm Shading System: Motorized Roller Shading L-profile Galvanized Steel Metal Frame

Openable triple Glazing Window

Double Acoustic Insulation Panel Made by Polyester Fibers Obtained From The Recycling of Plastic Bottles, Thickness 40mm C-shaped Profiles in Galvanized Steel 5 x 7.5 cm , “Knauf” Finishing Layer, Plasterboard Sp. 15 mm “ Knauf GKB”, Fixed with Self-driling Screws

DETAIL 1

| Envelope Design

222

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSION

223

Detail 1 |

L I F E SCIENCE

CAMPUS

Air Gap 10 mm Thermal Insulation Layer : Rockwool, Thickness 80 mm Interal Coating : Double Plaster-fiber Panel Sp 2 x 12.5 mm , Equiped with Double Vapour Barrier Sp 8 mm

C-hanger Adjustable

Openable triple Glazing Window

Undercut Anchor Thermal Insulation Layer : Extruded Expanded Polystyrene with Skin, Fixing by 5 Exapnsion Dowel For Panel, Thickness 120 mm Perimeter Anchor

Prefabricated Double Skin Facade with Closed Cavity

Vertical L Profile C-carrier Rail

Window Seal Gasket in EPDM

Polymer Concrete Facade Panel, Thickness 20 mm

Steel Anchoring System For Double Skin Curtain Wall

Low-emissivity Triple Glazing 6 + 6 + 15 + 9 Filled With Argon Ug Gas (First skin) Low-emissivity Double Glazing 7 + 7 (Second skin) Extruded Alluminium Mullion, Thickness 90 mm

Reinforced Concrete Beam 3.8m x 0.8m

D ETA I L 2 | Envelope Design

224

225

Detail 2 |

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSION Stainless Steel Snap Cover Galvanied Steel Foils Thermal Insulation Layer : Wood Fiber Rigid Panel, Density 250 kg/m3, Thickness 60 mm Wood Frame

Thermal Insulation Layer : Extruded Expanded Polystyrene with Skin, Fixing by 5 Exapnsion Dowel For Panel, Thickness 120 mm

Thermal Insulation Layer : Wood Fiber Rigid Panel, Density 250 kg/m3, Thickness 120 mm

Plasterboard Sp. 15 mm , Type “KNAUF GKB”, With a Leveling and Finishing Layer, Equiped With an Aluminum Vapour Barrier sp. 25 mm

Leveling Layer : Cement Screed, Thichkness 5cm Aluminium Drainage Channel Water Proof Layer : Water Membranes Leveling Layer : Cement Screed, Thichkness 15cm Separation Layer : Vapour Barrier Multi-Layer Polypropylene Thermal Insulation Layer : Wood Fiber Rigid Panel, Density 250 kg/m3, Thickness 120 mm Separation Layer : Polyethylene Vapour Barrier - Heat-Reflective Reinforced Concret Ribbed Slab With EPS , Thickness 31 cm

| Envelope Design

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSION

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSION

Stainless Steel Water Protection Cover

Vertical L Profile

Double Vapour Barrier : Aluminium Sheet, Thickness 8mm

Alpha V Wall Bracket Perimeter Anchor C-hanger Adjustable C-carrier Rail

Polymer Concrete Facade Panel, Thickness 20 mm Reinforced Concrete Beam 3.8m x 0.8m

226

DETAIL 3

227

Detail 3 |

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSION

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSION

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSION PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSION

Reinforced Concrete Retaining Wall, Thickness 60 cm

Thermal Insulation Layer : Extruded Polystyrene (XPS) Foam Insulation, Thickness 120 mm Studded Membrane with Geotextile Layer to Prevnt Blockage Water-Proofing Layer : Self-adhesive Bituminous Membrane, Thickness 2 mm Drainage Pipe For Water Collection 150 mm Compact Aggregate Base

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSION

Thermal Insulation Layer : Rockwool, Thickness 80 mm Interal Coating : Double Plaster-fiber Panel Sp 2 x 12.5 mm , Equiped with Double Vapour

Finishing HPL Laminate Sheet, Thickness 3 mm Leveling Layer : Cement Screed, Thichkness 60 mm Impact Insulation Layer : Recycled Textile Fiber Carpet Coupled with a Film Waterproof Anti-Clogging

Reinforced Concrete Footing

Vapour Barrier Multi Layer Polypropylene Sealing Membrane, Thickness 0.2 mm Thermal Insulation Layer : Extruded Polystyrene (XPS) Foam Insulation, Thickness 100 mm Loading Layer : CLS Filling With Electro-welded Metal Mesh 10 x 10 cm, Thickness 80 mm Ventilation System For Foundation With IGLOO in Regenrated Plastic Material,Thickness 52 x 66 cm Leveling Layer : Sand & Cement, Thichkness 120 mm Lean Concrete, Thickness 100 mm

D E TA I L 4

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSION | Envelope Design

228

229

Detail 4 |

CAMPUS DESIGN

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSION

Stainless Steel Snap Cover Galvanied Steel Foils Thermal Insulation Layer : Wood Fiber Rigid Panel, Density 250 kg/m3, Thickness 60 mm Wood Frame

Thermal Insulation Layer : Wood Fiber Rigid Panel, Density 250 kg/m3, Thickness 120 mm Plasterboard Sp. 15 mm , Type “KNAUF GKB”, With a Leveling and Finishing Layer, Equiped With an Aluminum Vapour Barrier sp. 25 mm Double Vapour Barrier : Aluminium Sheet, Thickness 8mm

Removable Grid For For Well Windows Felix H25 - Used For Mechanical Room’s Ventilation Steel Hollow Square Section, Thickness 100 mm L-Shaped Steel Support Profile Galvanized Bolts

Skylight : VISS Roof Glazing, “SCHUCO” , U value 0.82 W/(m²·K) Low-emissivity Triple Glazing 6 + 6 + 15 + 9 Filled With Argon Ug Gas (First skin) Welded Steel Structure, Thickness 60 mm Extruded Alluminium Mullion, Thickness 100 mm L-Shaped Steel Support Profile

DE TAI L 5 230

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSION

| Envelope Design

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSION

231

Detail 5 |

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSION

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESKPRODUCED STUDENT VERSION

BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSION

Stainless Steel Water Protection Cover

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSION

SYSTEM SECTION

Schüco Façade System FWS 50 SG Low-emissivity Triple Glazing 8 + 20 c + 4 + 12 c + 6 Filled With Argon Ug Gas

g/

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSION Reinforced Concret Ribbed Slab With EPS , Thickness 31 cm

D E TA I L 8

SCH ÜCO J ANSE NSTE E L SYSTEMS - VI SS® : Hangers with Adjustable Spring, Knauf - plus with Double Non-overlapping Metal Frame

S C HÜCO J A N S E N ST E E L SYSTE MS - V I SS ® :

DESCRIP TIO N

Highly therm a l l y i n su l a t e d m u llion/tra ns om c o n st ru c t i o n for s ky n d ve l f atçhe ades f alights c e awidt hsr t i c aof

The n a r ro w VISS ® s ys tem en s ure m axim u m l i ght p en etra ti o n . The int ersect ion D E S CRI PT I O N of the s ky l i g ht c o n s truct ion and t he f a c e elegant w i d t hs o ly. f t he v er tic a l f a ç a dThee i na s srrow o l ved

VISS ® s ys te m e n su r e m a x i m u m light p e ne tra t i o n . The i n t e rse c t i o n light o n st ruand c t i o n a n60 d t he wofi dthe thss ky o f c50 v e rtica l fa ça d e i s so l ve d e l e g a n t l y.

Sli m f a c e mm fo r m a x i m um l i g ht penet rat ion i d te hs otfo5 0 wide and 60 Vari et y i n dS lim es i gfance wdu mm for ma x i m u m l i g ht p e n e t ra t i o n ran ge o f a lVa um cover rieti n y i uinm d e si g n d u e caps to wide l u m i n i uwall m c o ve r at c a- p s Speci a l p roraf nge i l es of faor S p ecia l p ro f i l e s f o r w a l l a t tac hm en ts taachments nd insert and i n se r tu nitu sn i t s of i n f i lul nitu sn i t s Flexi b l e u sFlex e ib leo f u se infill in 20 toVISS4Roof 0 m m Glazing, t hi c kn e“SCHUCO” ss , U value in 20 toEleSkylight 4 0 min: m ga nt t e rse c t i tohickness n of sky 0.82 W/(m²·K) light ec atind tical f a ç a-d e El ega n t i n ters o n ve rof sky lev el o f t he r m a l i n su l a t i o n l i ght a n d High ver ti cal façade Triple Glazing 6 + 6 + 15 + 9 Hi gh l evel o fLow-emissivity ther mal insu lat ion Filled With Argon Ug Gas (First skin)

T EC HN ICA L I N FO RMAT I O N

Welded Steel Structure, Thickness 60 mm

U va lue of f ra m e ( ≥) : 1. 2 W /( m² ·K ) M inExtruded . f a c e widthAlluminium : 5 0 mm

Mullion, Thickness 100 mm

TE CH NICAL INFOR MATI O N M a x. gla s s / p a ne l thi ckne ss : 70 mm

L-Shaped Steel Support Profile

Surf a c e f in is he s : Po w d e r, p a i nt, RA L A ir p e rm e a b ili t y : A E

U valu e o f framMea x.(≥) : 1.2W/(m²·K) s oun d red u cti o n Rw p : 4 7 d B ( A ) rt ight Min. f ace widtWa h :t e 5 0 nme sms : RE 12 0 0

Double Acoustic Insulation Panel Made by Polyester Fibers Obtained From The Recycling of Plastic Bottles, Thickness 40mm

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSION

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESKPRODUCED STUDENT VERSION

BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSION

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSION

Hi ghl y ther m a l l y i nsu lat ed mu ll i on / tra n s o m c o n s t ru ct ion for skyli g hts a n d ver tical façades

Finishing Layer, Plasterboard Sp. 15 mm “ Knauf GKB”, Fixed with Self-driling Screws

Schuco AWS 50 - Interior Partition Glazing Low-emissivity Double Glazing 6 + 12 c + 6

Extruded Alluminium Mullion, Thickness 50 mm Metal Frame with Galvanized Steel Profile, th.0.06 cm Like “ KNAUF Profile C-Shape Finishing Layer: Thickness 1mm Indoor Finishing Layer, Double Coated Plasterboard, Thickness 2 x12.5mm “ Knauf GKB”, Fixed with Self-driling Screws Acoustic Insulation Panel Made by Polyester Fibers Obtained From The Recycling of Plastic Bottles, Thickness 100mm

73

Im p a c t re s is t a n ce : cl a ss 5

Max. g lass/ pane l t hicknes s : 70 mm B urgla r re s is t a nce U p to : U p to RC4

le wder, f or s afe t ypaint, b a r r i e r l oRA a d iLng : J a Surfac e finisheSuit s :a bPo

Air pe rm e abilit y : AE Max. so u nd re du ct io n Rw p : 47 dB(A ) Watert ig ht ne ss : R E 12 0 0 Impac t re sist ance : class 5

N PLANNING C O N S T Rre U Csist T I ance ON EN R I N to G RC4 ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN STUDIO Burglar UGp I tNoE :E Up | L AV I N I A C H I A RA TAGLI A B UE | GI OVAN N I DOT E L L I FOR COMPLEX CONSTRUCTION 2

Suitab le fo r safe t y barrier loading : J a

TRUCTION ENGINEERING TAGLI A BUE | GIOVA N N I DOTE L L I | Envelope Design

ACADEMIC YEAR 2019-2020

2

Epoxy Resin Flooring, Thickness 5 mm Leveling Layer : Cement Screed, Thichkness 60 mm Separation Layer : Polyethylene Vapour Barrier - Heat-Reflective Thermal Insulation Layer : Extruded Polystyrene (XPS) Foam Insulation, Thickness 100 mm

ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN STUDIO FOR COMPLEX 232 CONSTRUCTION 2

ACADEMIC YEAR 2019-2020

2

DE TAI L 6

233

Detail 6 |

Zinco Solarbase 15’

Soil, Constitued by a Mix of Volcanic aggregates, Thickness 100mm

KnickFix L-shaped Mounting Bracket

Separation Layer (Filtration): Anti-root Membrane

Panel Support

Accumulation and Drainage Layer - XPS with a Raw Mass of 25kg Thickness 80mm and Water Storage Capacity of 13.1 sqm

Photovoltaic Panel with Middle and End Clamp

Double Water Proof Layers : Water Membranes Leveling Layer : Cement Screed, Thichkness 15cm Separation Layer : Polyethylene Vapour Barrier - sp 0.3 cm Thermal Insulation Layer : Wood Fiber Rigid Panel, Density 250 kg/ m3, Thickness 120 mm Separation Layer : Polyethylene Vapour Barrier - sp 0.3 cm Reinforced Concret Ribbed Slab With EPS , Thickness 31 cm

234

D ETAIL 7

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSION

| Envelope Design

235

Detail 7 |

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSION Prefabricated Double Skin Facade with Closed Cavity

Low-emissivity Double Glazing 7 + 7 (Second skin)

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSION

Window Seal Gasket in EPDM Steel Anchoring System For Double Skin Curtain Wall Extruded Alluminium Mullion, Thickness 90 mm

Spandrel Panel Composed by an Insulation Panel in XPS, Thickness 90mm btw Two Aluminium Sheets Fixed Bearing Point, Vertical Installation, Base Bracket Consisting of Insert Profile on Steel Plate

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSION

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSION

Low-emissivity Triple Glazing 6 + 6 + 15 + 9 Filled With Argon Ug Gas (First skin)

Thermal Insulation Layer : Extruded Expanded Polystyrene with Skin, Fixing by 5 Exapnsion Dowel For Panel, Thickness 120 mm Alpha V Wall Bracket

Vertical L Profile Perimeter Anchor

Steel Hollow Square Section, Thickness 90mm

C-hanger Adjustable

C-carrier Rail

Polymer Concrete Facade Panel, Thickness 20 mm

Extruded Alluminium Mullion, Thickness 150mm Shading System: Motorized Roller Shading with Semi-Circle Aluminium box Schüco Façade System FWS 50 SG Low-emissivity Triple Glazing 8 + 20 c + 4 + 12 c + 6 Filled With Argon Ug Gas

| Envelope Design

236

237

Detail 8 |

SCHÜCO FACADE SYSTEM FWS 60 SG.SI

E legant all-glass faç ade wi E ltehgant a l ow al l - gl ass f açade wi t h a l ow heat transfer co ef fici e nt and he atl arge t ransf - e r coe f f i ci e nt and l arge scale units w ith do ubl e orscal t ri pleeuni i n-t s wi t h doubl e or t ri pl e i nsulating g lass o f fers hi ghsu l qual at i ngi t ygl ass of f e rs hi gh- qu al i t y architectural and t e chni cal archisol t e ctu-ural and t e chni cal sol utions for the build i ng et inv ons e l ope f or. t he bu i l di ng e nv e l ope .

An at tractiv e app e arance An com at t ract - i v e appe arance com bined w ith technical i nnov bi neatdi ons wi t h t e chni cal i nnov at i ons – larg e -scale all- gl ass – f açade l arge s- scal e al l - gl ass f açade s can be achiev ed wi t h t hecan S chü becoachi ev e d wi t h t he S chüco FWS 6 0 SG system as aF WS t he rm60 al- S G syst e m as a t he rm ally insulated v ersio n and l yF WS i nsul60 at e d v e rsi on and F WS 60 SG.SI as a high insul at i on S Gv.eSrsi I as on a hi gh i nsul at i on v e rsi on w ith triple glaz ing . The wif ltushh t rif ipl t- e gl az i ng. The f l ush- f i tted appearance of t he ftaçade e d appe i s arance of t he f açade i s achiev ed by using profachi i l e s evt hat e d by u si ng prof i l e s t hat are only v isible o n t he room are onl si de y . v i si bl e on t he room si de .

Fro m the outside, onl y glFrom ass sur t he- out si de , onl y gl ass su r faces w ith slender j oi nt s f ace are s v wi i si -t h sl e nde r j oi nt s are v i si ble. M ax imum insulat i on blS eI . i sol M axi a- m u m i nsul at i on S I i sol ators, pre -filler and t ri pl e it nsu ors,l atpre i ng- f i l l e r and t ri pl e i nsul at i ng g lass result in low U cwgl ass v al ueres.sul t i n l ow U cw v al u e s.

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSION

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSION

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK PRODUCED STUDENT

BY AN VERSION AUTODESK STUDENT VERSION

SCHÜCO FACADE SYSTEM FWS 60 SG.SI

74

TE C H NICAL INFO R MAT IO T ENC HN ICAL IN FO R MAT IO N U val u e of frame (≥) : 0.88 W/(m²·K U v alue of ) f rame (≥ ) : 0.88 W/(m²·K ) M i n . fac e wi dth : 6 0 m m

Min. f ace w idth : 60 mm

M ax . gl as s / pan el thi ckne ss Max. : 64 mm glass/pane l thi ckne ss : 64 mm Su rfac e fi n i s hes : Powde r, Anodi S urf ace se d f inishe s : Pow de r, Anodi se d Ai r permeabi l i t y : AE

Air pe rme abil i t y : AE

M ax . s ou n d redu c ti on Rw p : Max. 42 dB(A) sound re duction Rw p : 42 dB(A) Waterti ghtn es s : R E 1200

Wate rtightne ss : RE 1200

I mpac t res i s tan c e : I 5 /E5

Impact re sistance : I5/E5

B u rgl ar res i s tan c e U p to : RC2 Burgl ar re sistance Up to : RC2 Su i tabl e for s afet y bar ri e r l oading S ui table : J faor saf e t y barrie r l oading : J a

| Envelope Design

238

239

Architectural Technology |

YE P O L I T E C N I C O D I MPIO LA L INTO E C- NSI C H O ODOI LMOI LFAANROC H - ISTCEHCO TU O RL EOUF RABRACNH PI TLEACNTNUI RNEG UCROBNASNT RP U LA CN T INOI N GE NC G OINNSETERRUI N CG T I O N E N GARCHITECTURAL INEERING DESIGN ARCHITECTURAL STUDIO ACADEMIC DESIGN STU

1

p a n e l s ar e cThe o m ppoas needl sbya rae hoc omposed by a ho he p a n e l s a r e c o m p o s e d by a hoeneous mixture mogeneous of fillers, mineral mixture of fillers, mineral mogeneous mixture of fillers, mineral e g a t e s a n d ac hem gg r ei cgaalt easd ad ni tdi ves c hemical additiv es g g r e g ate s a n d c he m i c a l a d d itiv es d w i t h u n s abtu ouran tde dw ipt ho l yuen s taerturated po lyester o u nd wi th u n s a t u ra t e d p o l yester s . The exte rrneaslinssu. r fThe a c e exo tf etrhe nal surface of the e s i n s . The exte r n a l s u r f a c e o f the l i s c o v e r e dpby a neploilsy ec o s tve e r rreeds iby n po lyester resin a n e l i s co v e r e d by p o l y e s t e r resin ra t i v e l ay e r. d e co ra t i ve l a y e r. e c o rat i ve l a y e r.

2 3 4

1 2 3 4

1 2 3 4

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSION

P O LYM ER CO NCR P OET LYME E R CONC R E TE P O LYMER CO NCR ET E V E N T İ L AT E D PA VNEENLST İ L AT E D PA N E LS V E N T İ L AT E D PA N E LS

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSION PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSION

öko skin stripes

öko skinskin stripes öko easy skin stripes easy ökoöko skinskin strip öko skin stripesöko easy skin stripes easy öko skin stripes öko bicolour skin stripes bicolour öko stripes easy st öko skin stripes easy öko skin stripes bicolour * * * * * * * * * 75

5 5 5 Colours Colours 1 colour from colour collection 1 colour from greyscale colour collection greyscale 2 colours from colour collection 2 colours from greyscale colour collection greyscale 6 Colours 6 1 colour from colour collection greyscale colours colour greyscale Colours Colours 1 colour from colour21collection colour from from greyscale colourcollection collection greyscale 2 colours from colour2 6 Colours 1 colour from colour collection greyscale 2 colours from co Surfaces Surfaces Mix of ferro light + ferro Mix(contrast) of ferro light + ferro (contrast) Mix of matt + ferro light Mix+offerro matt(extra + ferro contrast) light + ferro (extra contras 7 Surfaces 7 Mix of ferro light + ferro (contrast) Mix of matt + ferro light + ferro (extra contrast) Surfaces Surfaces Mix of ferro light + ferro Mix of (contrast) ferro light + ferro (contrast) Mix of matt + ferro liM 7 Surfaces Mix of ferro light + ferro (contrast) Mix of matt + fer 8 8 MATERIAL MATERIAL 8 MATERIAL MATERIAL MATERIAL Length Length 2500 mm, 3100 mm /2500 98.42“, mm,122“ 3100 (US) mm / 98.42“, 122“ (US) MATERIAL Length 2500 mm, 3100 mm / 98.42“, 122“ (US) 2500 mm, 3100 mm 2500 / and 98.42“, mm,of 122“ 3100 (US) mm / 98.42“,of 122“ (US) Width Width 70Length mm,Length 147 mm and 302 70Length mm, mm 147 / 2.76“, mm 5.79” and 302 and mm 11.89“ / 2.76“, (US) 5.79” sequencing slats (US) issequencing pre-defined slats is pre-defined 2500 3100 / 11.89“ 98.42“, 122“ (US) Width 70 mm, 147 mm and 302 mm / 2.76“, 5.79” andmm, 11.89“ (US)mm sequencing of slats is pre-defined Width Width 70 mm, 147 mm and 70 302 mm, mm 147 / 2.76“, mm and 5.79” 302 and mm 11.89“ / 2.76“, (US) 5.79” sequencing and 11.89“ of(U sl Thickness Thickness 13 mm / 0.5“ (US) 13 mm / 0.5“ (US) 70 mm, 147 mm and 302 mm / 2.76“, 5.79” and 11.89“ (US) sequencing Thickness 13Width mm / 0.5“ (US) Thickness Thickness 13 mm / 0.5“ (US) 13 mm / 0.5“ (US) Colour collection Colour collection greyscale greyscale Thickness 13 mm / 0.5“ (US) Colour collection greyscale Texture Texture standard standard Colour collection Colour collection greyscale greyscale Texture standard Colour collection greyscale

MA NUFACT U R E MA N U FAC TUR E MANU FACT U R E

m a nu f ac tu r eTheof mt ahen u fpaoc ltym u r eer o f the po lymer he m an u fa c tur e o f t he p o lymer r e t e p a n e l sc onc b e gr ei nt es w p ai t nh e ltshebegins w ith the o n c r e t e p a n e l s b e g i n s w i t h the p o ra t i on of i nthe c o rdpi o f f ra e r tei on tn coofmt he - dif ferent comn c o r p o ra ti on o f t he d i f f e r e n t comn t s o f t he p one n t s o f t he o n e nt s o f the l i n a mol d . pAf a ne t e rl iinnf ra a rmeodl dc .u Af r - ter infrared cur a n e l i n a mo l d . Af t e r i n f ra r e d cur t he p a n e l i si ndg,e mt he o l dpe ad n, eclu irse ddemo lded, cured n g , t he p a n e l is d e m o l d e d , cured g a s o v en . Lai te n ar, g t he a s poave n enl.s La a rteer, the panels are n a g a s o v e n . Lat e r, t he p a n e l s are o t he c ut t o t he u t t o t he e n s ize , a n dc ho g ros eonvesdizei n, a o nr dderg roov ed in o rder ho s e n s ize , a n d g ro o ve d i n order l o w f o r thetopo a sl ltoew r i o fro rp l tahe c e -posterior place o a l l o w for the p o s t e r i o r p lace of t he a n c ho mersn t oo tf he t hef aacnacdho e.rs to the facade. m e n t o f the a n c ho rs t o t he f a c ade. e n d i n g o n the De pl oe cn ad ti inogn oonf t he locatio n o f the D e p e n d i n g o n t he l o c a t i o n o f the l , t he p a n epl a ca ne ln, bt he e epdagneed, l can be edged, a n e l , t he p a ne l c a n b e e dg ed, o n d e ma n d a , npde rof onradt ei omnas nadn, dperfo rations and n d o n d e ma n d , p e r f o ra t i o n s and i n g s c a n d ra w i n g s c a n ra w i ng s c a n a d e o n the bpeanmeal .d eFi noanl l ty,het he panel. Finally, the e m ad e o n the p a n e l . Fi n a l l y, the u c t i s p a c kepdro dauncdt si st o rpeadc ke f ord and sto red for ro d u c t i s p a c ke d a n d s t o r e d for p o r t a t i o n totra c unsst po omret ar.t i o n t o customer. a n s p o r t a ti o n to c u s t o m e r.

HANDLING HANDLING Mounting Mounting

HANDLING Mounting

Texture Texture

TEX T U R E

HANDLING Mounting Mounting

Manually or with vacuum Manually suction; or with slats vacuum must be suction; handled slats with must special be handled care w

SCOPE OF DELIVERY SCOPE OF DELIVERY SCOPE OF DELIVERY Palletisation Palletisation Mix of colours, surfaces Mixand of colours, the sequencing surfacesused and for thethe sequencing three slat-widths used for the is pre-defi three slat-widths ned on the pallet is pre-defined on the pallet Palletisation Mix of colours, surfaces and the sequencing used for the three slat-widths is pre-defined on the pallet 8 slats per layer in colour 8 slats andper surface layer in mix colour (according and surface to visualisation*) mix (according to visualisation*) SCOPE OFsurface DELIVERY 8 slatsOF perDELIVERY layer in SCOPE colour and mix (according to visualisation*) 18 layers per pallet (54 18m² layers / 581.251 per pallet ft² (US) (54of m² 2500 / 581.251 mm length ft² (US)| of 662500 m² / 1,313.2 mm length ft² (US) | 66ofm² 3100 / 1,313.2 mm length) ft² (US) of 3100 mm le SCOPE OF DELIVERY 18 layers per pallet (54 m² / 581.251 ft² (US) of 2500 mm length | 66 m² / 1,313.2 ft² (US) of 3100 mm length)

1

4 5 6 7 8

| Envelope Design

Mounting

302 mm / 11.89“ (US) minimum distance to slat edge 60 mm / 2.36“ (US) (w Maximum distance between Maximumtwo distance vertical between attachment two vertical points: attachment 600 mm / 23.62“ poin Maximum distance between two vertical attachment points: 600 mm / 23 Additional supporting Additional structure supporting or bracingstructure required depending or bracing required on statics. depen Additional supporting structure or bracing required depending on statics

3

COLO R S

standard

Manually or with vacuum suction; slats must be handled with special care FIXING FIXING FIXING Visible: rivet, screw Visible: rivet, screw Distance to slat edgeDistance at least 30 to mm slat /edge 1.18“at(US) least 30 mm / 1.18“ (US) Visible: rivet, screw Distance to slat edge at least 30 mm / 1.18“ (US) FIXING FIXING FIXING Concealed: Concealed: Distance to slat edge (vertically) Distance toatslat least edge 100(vertically) mm / 3.93“ at(US) least 100 mm / 3.93“ (US) Concealed: Distance to slat edge (vertically) atscrew least 100 mm /slat 3.93“ (US) Visible: screw Visible: Distance edge Distance at and least to 30slat mm // 2.76“ 1.18“ at least (US) 30 (US) mm / 1.18“ (US) adhesive, undercut anchor, adhesive, undercut anchor, Distance torivet, slat edge (horizontally): Distance torivet, slat with edge 70 (horizontally): mm andto 147 mm with / 2.76“ 70 mm and 5.79“ 147 (US) mmedge once in and the middle; 5.79“ with once in the middle; wit Visible:torivet, screw Distance slat at and least 30 (US) mm once / 1.18“ (US) adhesive, undercut anchor, Distance slat edge (horizontally): with 70 mm andto 147 mmedge / 2.76“ 5.79“ in the middle; with Rieder Power Anchor Rieder Power Anchor 302 mm / 11.89“ (US) minimum 302 mm / distance 11.89“ (US) to minimum slat edge 60 distance mm / 2.36“ to slat (US) edge (with 60 point mm / attachment: 2.36“ (US) (with 2 pieces) point attachment: 2 pieces) Rieder Power Anchor Concealed: Concealed: Distance slat60 edge Distance (vertically) to slat at least edge 100 (vertically) mm / 3.93“ at 2 least (US) 100 mm / 3.93“ (U 302 mm / 11.89“ (US) minimum distance to slatto edge mm / 2.36“ (US) (with point attachment: pieces) Concealed: Distance to slat600 edge at 600 leastmm 100 mm / 3.93“ Maximum distance between Maximum twodistance vertical between attachment twopoints: vertical attachment mm(vertically) / 23.62“ points: (US) / 23.62“ (US) (US) adhesive, undercut adhesive, anchor, undercut anchor, Distance to slat edge Distance (horizontally): to slat with edge 70 (horizontally): mm and 147 with mm 70 / 2.76“ mm and 5.79“ 147 m(U Maximum distance between two vertical attachment points: 600 mm / 23.62“ (US) adhesive, undercut anchor, Additional supporting Additional structure supporting or bracing required structure depending orto bracing on required statics. dependingwith on statics.

Distance slat edge (horizontally): 70 mm and 147 mm / 2.76“ and 5.

Rieder Power Anchor Rieder Power 302 mm / 11.89“ (US)302 minimum mm / 11.89“ distance (US)to minimum slat edgedistance 60 mm /to 2.36“ slat (US) edge(with 60 mm p Additional supporting structure orAnchor bracing required depending on statics.

Rieder Power Anchor

2

CO LO R S CO LORS

standard standard

Manually or with vacuum Manually suction; or slats with vacuum must besuction; handledslats withmust special becare handled with special care HANDLING HANDLING Manually or with vacuum suction; slats must be handled with special care

Palletisation Palletisation

TEXTURE T EX TU R E

Texture

240

Thermal Insulation Layer : Extruded Thermal Expanded Insulation Layer Polystyrene : Extruded Expanded Polystyrene Thermal Insulation Extruded Expanded Polystyrene Dowel For Panel, with Skin, Fixing by 15 Layer Exapnsion with: Skin, Dowel Fixing For by 5Panel, Exapnsion 1 with Skin, Fixing by 5 Exapnsion Dowel For Panel, Thickness 120 mm Thickness 120 mm Thickness 120 mm 2 Vertical L Profile Vertical L Profile 2 Vertical L Profile Alpha V Wall Bracket3 Alpha V Wall Bracket 3 Alpha V Wall Bracket 4 Perimeter Anchor Perimeter Anchor 4 Perimeter Anchor C-hanger Adjustable5 C-hanger Adjustable 5 C-hanger Adjustable 6 C-carrier Rail C-carrier Rail 6 C-carrier Rail 7 Polymer Polymer Concrete Facade Panel, Thickness Concrete 20 Facade mm Panel, Thickness 20 mm 7 Polymer Concrete Facade Panel, Thickness 20 mm Reinforced Concrete 8Beam Reinforced 3.8m x 0.8m Concrete Beam 3.8m x 0.8m 8 Reinforced Concrete Beam 3.8m x 0.8m

Palletisation

Mix of colours, surfaces Mix of and colours, the sequencing surfaces and usedthe forsequencing the three slat-widths used for the is tp Mix of colours, surfaces and the sequencing used for the three slat-width 8 slats per layer in colour 8 slatsand persurface layer inmix colour and of surface to visualisation*) mix (according to vis Ara(according Institute Canterbury, Ara Jasmax Institute of Canterb 8 slats per layer in colour and surface mix to visualisation*) Ara(according of Canterbury, 18 layers per pallet (54 18 layers m² / 581.251 per pallet ft² (US) (54 m² of 2500 /Institute 581.251 mm ft² length (US) of | Jasmax 66 2500 m² mm / 1,31 le 18 layers per pallet (54 m² / 581.251 ft² (US) of 2500 mm length | 66 m² /

241

Architectural Technology |

DE TA I L 7

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSION

R E M O VA B LE G R I D FO R WE LL WI N D O WS WO LF H 3 0 R E M O VA B LE G R ID FO R WE LL WI N D O WS W O L F H 3 0 G r i d s fo r w e l l w i n d o w s a r e p rod u c e d w i t h e l e c t ro w e l d e d a n d G r i d s fo r w e l l w i n d o w s a r e p rop r e sse d g ra t i n g s a n d t he n ho t d e e p d uc e d w i t h e l e c t ro w e l d e d a n d g a l v a n ize d t o g u a ra n t e e a l o n g l a s t . p r e sse d g ra t i n g s a n d t he n ho t d e e p Tw o d i f fe r e n t he i g ht s (25 a n d g a l v a n ize d t o g ua ra n t e e a l o n g l a s t .

30 m m ) a r e a v a i l a b l e i n o r Tw o d i f fe r e n t he i g ht s ( 25 a n d d e r t o a l l o w a p e r fe c t i n s e r 30 mm) are available in or t i o n i n a n y c i v i l ex t e r n a l p a v i n g . der to allow a perfect inser t i o n i n a n y c i v i l ex t e r n a l p a v i n g .

Fi x e d g r i d m a d e by e l e c t ro w e l de d g ra t i n g , m e sh 25 x 76 , b e a r Fi x e d g r i d m a d e by e l e c t ro w e l din g b a r 25 x 2 , c o n n e c t i n g p l a t e e d g ra t i n g , m e sh 25 x 76 , b e a r 10 x 2 w i t h ‘ L’ sha p e d fra m e h 3 0 i n g b a r 25 x 2 , c o n n e c t i n g p l a t e w e l d e d o n t he g r i d , fu r n i she d w i t h 10 x 2 w i t h ‘ L’ sha p e d f ra m e h 3 0 c l a m p s t o c a st i ro n a n d c l a m p s w e l d e d o n t he g r i d , f u r n i s he d w i t h f o r fa st e n i n g p l ug s. A l l t he e l e c l a m p s t o c a st i ro n a n d c l a m p s m e n t s a r e ho t d i p g a l v a n ize d . fo r fa st e n i n g p l u g s. A l l t he e l e m e n t s a r e ho t d i p g a l v a n ize d .

RE M O VA B LE G RI D FO R W E LL W I ND O WS W O LF H 3 0

SCH S

H i g hl y t l i o n/ t ra n s ky l i g ht s

G r i d s f o r we l l wi n d o ws a r e p rod u c e d wi t h e l e c t ro we l d e d a n d p r e sse d g ra t i n g s a n d t he n ho t d e e p g a l v a n ize d t o g u a ra n t e e a l o n g l a st .

Two d i f f e r e n t he i g ht s (25 a n d 3 0 mm) a r e a v a i l a b l e i n o r d e r t o a l l o w a p e r f e c t i n se r t i o n i n a n y c i v i l ex t e r n a l p a v i n g .

The na r r V I SS ® s l i g ht p en o f t he s ky v er t i ca l f a

Fi x e d g r i d ma d e by e l e c t ro we l de d g ra t i n g , me sh 25 x 76 , b e a r i n g b a r 25 x 2 , c o n n e c t i n g p l a t e 10 x 2 wi t h ‘ L’ sha p e d f ra me h 3 0 we l d e d o n t he g r i d , f u r n i she d wi t h c l a mp s t o c a st i ro n a n d c l a mp s f o r f a st e n i n g p l u g s. A l l t he e l e me n t s a r e ho t d i p g a l v a n ize d .

76

S l i m f a ce mm for m Va r i et y i ra ng e o S p eci a l t a chm ent F l exi b l e in 20 E l eg a nt l i g ht a H i g h l ev

TECHN

U va lu e of Min. f a ce Ma x . gla s

S u rf a ce f in

A ir p ermea

Ma x . sou n

Wa t ert ight

Imp a ct res B u rgla r re

S u it a b le f o

G9

| Envelope Design

242

MUHAMMED ENES SIVRI

MUHAMMED ENES SIVRI AR I AN S H AH V ER DI P O U R

POLITECNICO DI MILANO - SCHOOL OF ARCHITEC TURE URBAN PLANNING CONSTRUC TION ENG F RA N C E S CA B AT T I ST I | G R I G O R A N G J E L I U | F RA N C E S CO RO MA N O | L AV I N I A C HI A RA TAG L I A B UE | G I O

243

Architectural Technology |

POLITECNICO DI MILANO - SCHOOL OF ARCHITEC TURE URBAN PLANNING CONSTR

SCHÜCO FACADE SYSTEM FWS 60 SG.SI

E legant all-glass faç ade E l ewigant t h a al l ow l - gl ass f açade wi t h a l ow heat transfer co ef fici e ntheand at t ransf l argee-r coe f f i ci e nt and l arge scale units w ith do ubl escal or teri pl unie t si n-wi t h doubl e or t ri pl e i nsulating g lass o f fers su hi ghl at i ng qualgl i t yass of f e rs hi gh- qu al i t y architectural and t e chni archi calt e ct sol ural u- and t e chni cal sol utions for the build i ngt i ons e nv ef or l opet he . bu i l di ng e nv e l ope .

An at tractiv e app e arance An at t ract comi-v e appe arance com bined w ith technical bii nnov ne d atwi i ons t h t e chni cal i nnov at i ons – larg e -scale all- gl ass – l arge f açade - scal s e al l - gl ass f açade s can be achiev ed wi t h can t he be S chü achi co ev e d wi t h t he S chüco FWS 6 0 SG system asF WS a t he 60 rm alS G syst e m as a t he rm ally insulated v ersio n and l y i nsul F WSat e60 d v e rsi on and F WS 60 SG.SI as a high insul atSiG on. S vI eas rsi on a hi gh i nsul at i on v e rsi on w ith triple glaz ing . The wi t h f l usht ri pl fei t- gl az i ng. The f l ush- f i tted appearance of t het e df açade appe arance is of t he f açade i s achiev ed by using prof achii lev e se dt hat by u si ng prof i l e s t hat are only v isible o n t heare room onl ysi de v i si. bl e on t he room si de .

Fro m the outside, onl yFrom gl asst hesurout - si de , onl y gl ass su r faces w ith slender j oi nt f ace s are s wivtihsi -sl e nde r j oi nt s are v i si ble. M ax imum insulat i on bl e .S IMi axi sol am u m i nsul at i on S I i sol ators, pre -filler and t ri plt eors, i nsu pre l at-ifng i l l e r and t ri pl e i nsul at i ng g lass result in low Uglcw ass v al reue suls.t i n l ow U cw v al u e s.

77

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSION

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSION

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK PRODUCED STUDENT

BY AN AUTODESK VERSION STUDENT VERSION

SCHÜCO FACADE SYSTEM FWS 60 SG.SI

TE C H NICAL INFO R MAT T EIO C HN N ICA L IN FO R MAT IO N U val u e of frame (≥) : 0.88 U vW/(m²·K alue of f rame ) (≥ ) : 0.88 W/(m²·K ) M i n . fac e wi dth : 6 0 m m Min. f ace w idth : 60 mm M ax . gl as s / pan el thi ckneMax. ss : 64 glass/pane mm l thi ckne ss : 64 mm Su rfac e fi n i s hes : Powde r,S Anodi urf acesef inishe d s : Pow de r, Anodi se d Ai r permeabi l i t y : AE

Air pe rme abil i t y : AE

M ax . s ou n d redu c ti on RwMax. p : 42sound dB(A)re duction Rw p : 42 dB(A) Waterti ghtn es s : R E 1200 Wate rtightne ss : RE 1200 I mpac t res i s tan c e : I 5 /E5Impact re sistance : I5/E5 B u rgl ar res i s tan c e U p to :Burgl RC2ar re sistance Up to : RC2 Su i tabl e for s afet y bar ri e S r ui l oading table f or : J asaf e t y barrie r l oading : J a

| Envelope Design

244

245

Architectural Technology |

ACADEMIC YE P O L I T E C N I C O D IPM O ILLI A T ENCON -I CSOC HDOI O MLI LOAFN A O R-CSHCI THEOCOTLU R OEF UA RR BCAHNI T PE LCAT N UN R EI NUGR C BO A N SPTLRAUNCNTIINOGN CEO NN G SI N TR E EURCITNI G O N E N G I NARCHITECTURAL EERING DESIGN ARCHITECTURAL STUDIO DESIGN STUDI

| Architectural Drawings

246

247

Manifesto |

| Architectural Drawings

248

249

Perspective Section |

| Architectural Drawings

250

251

View I |

| Architectural Drawings

252

253

View II |

| Building Information Modelling

254

255

BIM Work Flow |

1

11

2

Credit

Interior Lighting

3

Credit

Daylight

1

Credit

1 1 4 4 5 5 1 1 1 1

Quality Views Acoustic Performance

quired

0

quired

LEED v4 for BD+C: New Construction and Major Renovation

3

quired 2

Y

3 ?

6 2 1

33

quired

quired

quired

quired 6

18 1

1 2

Credit

N

0

1

0

Integrative Process Credit

Innovation LEED Accredited Professional

0 Location and Transportation

0

Credit Credit

0Sensitive Regional Land Protection Priority

LEED for Neighborhood Development Location

Y

1 11

16

Y

2 Regional Priority: Specific Credit

4

Credit

Surrounding Density and Diverse Uses

5

2

5

Credit

Access to Quality Transit

2

Credit

Credit Bicycle Facilities

5

1 1

Credit

Reduced Parking Footprint

Credit

Green Vehicles

5 Y

0

67 0

2 1 0 2 0

2

0

Credit

0

Prereq

4

Regional Priority: Specific Credit Regional Priority: Specific Credit 1

2

1

1

Regional Priority: Specific Credit 1

0 Sustainable Sites

Activity Pollution Prevention 0Construction TOTALS

Y

Required

0 0

0

2

0 00

0 0

Y Y Y Y Y Y 1 1

0 0

1 1

0 0

Open Space

1

1

Rainwater Management

3

1

Credit

Heat Island Reduction

2

1

Credit

Light Pollution Reduction

1

2 3

11

1

Indoor Water Use Reduction

Required

Y

Prereq

Required

Credit

Building-Level Water Metering Outdoor Water Use Reduction

Credit

Indoor Water Use Reduction

6

Credit

Cooling Tower Water Use

2

Credit

Water Metering

1

0 Energy and Atmosphere

Outdoor Water Use Reduction Required Outdoor Life-Cycle Water Use Reduction Required Building Impact Reduction ? Use N Reduction Indoor YWater Required Indoor Water UseDisclosure Reduction and Optimization - Environmental Product Required Building Product Credit Integrative Process Building-Level Water Metering Required Declarations Building-Level Water Metering Required Outdoor Water Use Reduction 2 Building Product Disclosure and Optimization Sourcing of Raw Materials Outdoor Water Use Reduction 2 Location and Transportation 0 Use 0 Reduction Indoor13 Water 6 Indoor Water UseDisclosure Reduction 6 Building Product andfor Optimization - Material Ingredients Credit LEED Neighborhood Development Location Cooling Tower Water Use 2 Cooling1 Towerand Water Use Sensitive 2 Construction Demolition WasteLand Management Credit Protection Water Metering 1 Credit Water Metering 1 High Priority Site 1

Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 3 3 12 12

Prereq

Prereq Prereq Prereq Prereq Prereq Prereq Credit Prereq Prereq Credit Prereq Credit Credit Credit Credit Credit Credit Credit Credit Credit Credit Credit Credit Credit Credit Credit Credit Credit Credit Credit Credit

2

3 3

1 1 3 3 1 1

0 0

0

0 0

0

0 0

0

Credit

33

Credit Credit

Y

Required

Y

Prereq

Fundamental Refrigerant Management

Required

3

Credit

Enhanced Commissioning

6

Credit

Optimize Energy Performance

18

Credit

Advanced Energy Metering

1

Credit

Demand Response

2

Credit

Renewable Energy Production

3

Credit

Enhanced Refrigerant Management

1

Credit

Green Power and Carbon Offsets

2

| Environmental Design with BIM

Credit

Light Pollution Reduction

0

3 3 3 3

0 0

33 33

Required Required Required Required Required Required Required Required 6 6 18 18 1 1 2 2 3 3 1 1 2 2

Credit Credit

Indoor Water Use Reduction

Minimum Energy Performance

Y

Prereq

Building-Level Energy Metering

Possible Points:

Certified: 40 to 49 points, Silver: 50 to 59 points, Gold: 60 to 79 points, Platinum: 80 to 110 Prereq

3 0 1

5

1

2

1

1 10

2 Required 1 1 2 2 3 1 1 3 1

Credit Credit Credit Credit Credit Credit Credit Credit

16 16

Required Required Required Required 2 2 3 3 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 3 3 1 1 1 1

Green Power and Use Carbon Offsets Prereq Indoor Water Reduction Prereq

6 6

Building-Level Water Metering

5 5 1 1

Innovation Creditand Outdoor Materials Resources Water Use Reduction 11 LEED 0 1 0Accredited Professional

Professional Storage Indoor and Collection of Recyclables Y LEED Accredited Credit Water Use Reduction 0Prereq Prereq Construction and Tower Demolition Waste Y Credit Cooling Water UseManagement Planning 1 2 2 2 1

Building Life-Cycle Impact Reduction

Credit Water Metering Regional Priority: Specific BuildingCredit Product Disclosure and Optimization - Environmental Product Regional Priority: Specific Credit Credit Regional Priority: Specific Credit Declarations Regional Priority: Specific Credit Energy and Atmosphere Credit 20 0 0 Building Product Disclosure and Optimization - Sourcing of Raw Materials Regional Priority: Specific Credit Regional Priority: Specific Credit Prereq Credit Fundamental Commissioning and Verification Y BuildingCredit Product Disclosure and Optimization - Material Ingredients Regional Priority: Specific Regional Priority: Specific Credit Credit Construction and Demolition Waste Management Prereq Minimum Energy Performance Y

4 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

Prereq Building-Level Energy Metering Possible Points: 0 TOTALS Y 110 0 TOTALS Possible Points: 110 13 400toY49 0 points, IndoorSilver: Environmental Quality Prereq Refrigerant Certified: 50 Fundamental to 59 points, Gold: 60 to Management 79 points, Platinum: 80 to 110

Certified: Silver: 50 to 59 points, Gold: 60 to 79 points, Platinum: 80 to 110 Prereq Minimum Indoor Air Quality Performance Y 40 to 49 points, Credit Enhanced Commissioning 3 Prereq Environmental Tobacco Smoke Control Y Credit Optimize Energy Performance 12 1

1

1

3

1 1

1

2

2

0Credit

3

2

Required

1

Required

Credit

Enhanced Commissioning

6

Credit

Optimize Energy Performance

18

Credit

Advanced Energy Metering

1

Credit

Demand Response

2

Credit

Renewable Energy Production

3

Credit

Enhanced Refrigerant Management

1

Credit

Green Power and Carbon Offsets

2

Credit Credit Credit

Enhanced Indoor AirEnergy Quality Metering Strategies Credit Advanced Low-Emitting Materials

Credit

Demand Response

Credit

Enhanced Refrigerant Management

Credit

Green Power and Carbon Offsets

Construction Indoor Air Quality Management Plan Credit Renewable Energy Production Indoor Air Quality Assessment

2 5

2

65 21

10 Required

Required

Required 1 Required 2

Required 1

6

0

Y

Prereq

Environmental Tobacco Smoke Control

Required

1

Credit

Enhanced Indoor Air Quality Strategies

2

3

Credit

Low-Emitting Materials

3

Credit Credit

Construction Indoor Air Quality Management Plan Indoor Air Quality Assessment

67 1

Credit Credit

0

Regional Priority: Specific Credit Regional Priority: Specific Credit

0 TOTALS

Possible Points:

Thermal Comfort

1

Interior Lighting

2

Daylight

3

1

Credit

Quality Views

1

Credit

Acoustic Performance

1

Required 2

1

2

0

3 3

0 0

0

0

2 33

Required 2 2 Required

Required

16 Required

Required

6

67

Required 18

0

2

0 Innovation

6

Credit

Innovation

Credit

LEED Accredited Professional

5 1

0 Regional Priority

4

Credit

Regional Priority: Specific Credit

Credit

Regional Priority: Specific Credit

1

Credit

Regional Priority: Specific Credit

1

Credit

Regional Priority: Specific Credit

1

0 TOTALS

1

Possible Points:

Certified: 40 to 49 points, Silver: 50 to 59 points, Gold: 60 to 79 points, Platinum: 80 to 110

2 1 3 2

2 3 1 2

1

6 5 1

0 Regional Priority

4

Credit

Regional Priority: Specific Credit

Credit

Regional Priority: Specific Credit

1

Credit

Regional Priority: Specific Credit

1

Credit

Regional Priority: Specific Credit

1

1

Possible Points:

Certified: 40 to 49 points, Silver: 50 to 59 points, Gold: 60 to 79 points, Platinum: 80 to 110

1

Certified: 40 to 49 points, Silver: 50 to 59 points, Gold: 60 to 79 points, Platinum: 80 to 110

Credit

Required 6

1

0 Innovation

0 TOTALS

Required

Credit

13 2

1

Minimum Indoor Air Quality Performance

Credit

Required

4

Prereq

Y

3

2 Required

1

16

2

1 Required

Acoustic Performance

67

Regional Priority: Specific Credit

1

11

Credit

0

Credit

5

2

1

3

5

Credit

2

2

1

0

2

1

1

2

LEED Accredited Professional

Building Product Disclosure and Optimization - Material Ingredients Construction and Demolition Waste Management

Credit

6

2

3

18

1

Innovation

2

Credit Credit

0 Regional Priority

Interior Lighting

Credit

0

0 Indoor Environmental Credit Regional Priority: Quality Specific Credit

Thermal Comfort

Credit

5

Innovation Declarations Building Product Disclosure and Optimization - Sourcing of Raw Materials LEED Accredited Professional

Credit

0

3

0

Building Life-Cycle Impact Reduction

Credit

0

Daylight

3

2

Credit

0 Innovation Building Product Disclosure and Optimization - Environmental Product

13

1

Quality Views

0

2

0

33

Credit

0

2

3

01

Credit

3

4

3

11

3

110

Required

Credit

0

1 33

Required

Credit

Required Required

1

6

1

Prereq

1

16

Credit Credit Credit

Credit

0 Regional Priority Credit 0 Regional Priority 4 0

1 2 1 1

Y

0

2

4

Fundamental Commissioning and Verification

3

0 0

Required 1

EnergyCredit and Atmosphere 20 Priority: 0 0 Specific Regional

12

2 1

5 Required

Regional Priority: Specific Credit

Fundamental Refrigerant Management

2

0 16 0 16 2

Required

Prereq

Building Product Disclosure and Optimization - Sourcing of Raw Materials Access toUse Quality Transit Credit CreditIndoor Water Reduction 05 Product Building Disclosure and Optimization - Material Ingredients Building Disclosure and Optimization - Material Ingredients CreditCooling Bicycle Facilities 1 Product Credit Tower Water Use 1 Construction and Demolition Waste Management Construction and Demolition Waste Management Credit Reduced Parking Footprint 1 Credit Water Metering 0

1 02 1 0 Innovation Y 0 0 InnovationY Credit Innovation

67 03 67 0

Regional Priority: Specific Credit Credit Water Metering 0

5 5 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

Site - Environmental Product 1 Product DisclosureHigh Building and Priority Optimization

PrereqDisclosure and Optimization - Environmental Product Y Building Product Building-Level Water Metering Declarations Credit Surrounding Density and Diverse Uses 4 Declarations Credit Outdoor Use Reduction 1 Building Product Disclosure andWater Optimization - Sourcing of Raw Materials

Credit

6 11

Y

Life-Cycle Reduction Prereq Impact Indoor Water Use Reduction Y Building Building Life-Cycle Impact Reduction Credit

0 Green Vehicles 0 0 Indoor Indoor Environmental Environmental Quality Quality

1 Required

Regional Priority: Specific Credit Credit Cooling Tower Water Use 1

0 TOTALS

Credit Credit Credit Credit Credit Credit

Required 5

Outdoor Water Use Reduction Building-Level Water Metering Outdoor Water Use Reduction

Prereq

Y

256

110

Credit Credit

13 13 0 0

0 Water Efficiency Prereq

1

Required

1

0

0 Regional Priority

Required

0

0

Y

Building-Level Energy Metering

67

Acoustic Performance

Prereq Indoor Water Use Reduction Y LEED Accredited Professional

Minimum Energy Performance

0

Possible Points:

Fundamental Commissioning and Verification Credit Smoke BicycleControl Facilities 1 Energy Environmental Tobacco Minimum Performance Minimum Energy Performance Credit Reduced Parking Footprint 1 Building-Level Energy Metering Enhanced Indoor Air Quality Building-Level Energy MeteringStrategies Credit Green Vehicles 0 Refrigerant Fundamental Management Low-Emitting Materials Management Fundamental Refrigerant Enhanced Commissioning Construction Air Quality Management Plan Enhanced Sites 5 Commissioning 0 Indoor 0 Sustainable Optimize Energy Performance Indoor AirEnergy QualityPerformance Assessment Optimize Prereq Construction Activity Pollution Prevention Y Advanced Energy Metering AdvancedComfort Energy Metering Thermal Credit Site Assessment 0 Demand Response Demand ResponseCredit Interior Site Development - Protect or Restore Habitat 2Lighting Renewable Energy Production Renewable Energy Credit Production Open Space 1 Daylight Enhanced Refrigerant Management Credit Rainwater Management Enhanced Refrigerant Management 0 Quality Views Green Power and Carbon Offsets Credit Heat Island Reduction Green 2Power and Carbon Offsets

Innovation Y

Fundamental Commissioning and Verification

3

1

Minimum AirCredit QualityAccess Performance to Quality Transit 5 Indoor Fundamental Commissioning and Verification

Credit Credit

Prereq 20 Minimum Air Quality Y Energy andPerformance Atmosphere 0 0Indoor Prereq Minimum Indoor Air Quality Performance Y Sustainable Sites 5 0 Prereq 0Tobacco Prereq Fundamental Commissioning and Verification Smoke Control Y Environmental Y Prereq Environmental Tobacco Smoke Control Activity Pollution Prevention Y Prereq Construction Y Prereq Air Quality Minimum Energy Performance Credit Y Enhanced Indoor Strategies 1 Credit Enhanced Indoor Credit Air Quality Strategies 1 Site Assessment 0 Prereq Credit Low-Emitting MaterialsBuilding-Level Energy Metering 3 Y Credit Low-Emitting Materials 3 Credit Site Management Development Plan - Protect or Restore Habitat 2 Credit Prereq 1 Indoor Air Quality Fundamental Refrigerant Management Y Construction Credit 1 Construction Indoor Air Quality Management Plan Open Space 1 Air Quality Credit Credit Indoor 1 Credit Assessment Enhanced Commissioning 3 Credit Indoor Air Quality Credit Assessment 1 Rainwater Management 0 Credit Thermal Comfort 1 Credit Optimize Energy Performance Credit 12 Thermal Comfort 1 Credit Heat Island Reduction 2 Credit Interior 2 Credit Advanced Energy Metering 0 Lighting Credit 13 Interior Lighting 2 Renovation Major Light Pollution Reduction Credit Daylight 0 Credit CreditDemand 3 Response 1 Daylight 3Required Credit Project Name: LIFE SCIENCE CAMPUS Credit Quality Views 1 Credit Renewable Energy Production 1Required Credit 3 Quality Views 2 Performance 0 0 Water Efficiency Credit Date: Acoustic 0 Credit Acoustic Performance Credit 0 Enhanced Refrigerant 0Y 5 Prereq Outdoor Water UseManagement Reduction

1

Credit

Credit

4 4 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1

1

Credit

Prereq

0

11 11

1

0 Innovation 2

Prereq

1

4

Prereq Prereq Credit Prereq Prereq Credit Prereq Prereq Credit Credit Credit Credit Credit Credit Credit Credit Credit Credit Credit

Water Construction Efficiency and Demolition Waste Management Planning 0Prereq Water Efficiency 0

Prereq

12

New

Storage and Collection of Recyclables Project Checklist

Y

Y

1

Prereq

Credit

20 0

Required Required 1 1 2 2 1 1 3 3 2 2 1 Construction 1and

5

Credit

3

0 Water Efficiency

10 10

6

Prereq

Credit

2

Prereq

0

1

Credit

Y

0

Y

Site Assessment

Required

1

1

Sustainable Sites Sites 0 Sustainable 0

Construction Activity Pollution Prevention Construction Activity Pollution Prevention LIFE SCIENCE CAMPUS Site Assessment Site Assessment Site Development - Protect or Restore Habitat Credit Site Development - Protect or Restore Habitat Credit Open Space Credit Open Space Credit Rainwater Management Credit Rainwater Management Credit Heat Island Reduction Credit Heat Island Reduction Credit Light Pollution Reduction Materials and Resources Credit Light Pollution Reduction LEED v4 for BD+C:

2 2 5 5 5 5 1 1 1 1 1 1

3

1 Certified: 40 to 49 points, Silver: 50 to 59 points,1 Gold: 60 to 79 points, Platinum: 80 to 110 Site Development - Protect or Restore Habitat

Credit

Outdoor Water Use Reduction

1

2

Credit Surrounding Density and Diverse Uses 13 200 0 0 0Indoor Environmental Quality Energy and 4Atmosphere 20 0 0 Energy and Atmosphere

10

Prereq

Y

2 2

Y 2

1

High Priority CreditSite

0

0 0

0 0

2 1 1

16

Credit Credit Credit Credit Credit Credit Credit Credit

High Priority Site High Priority Site Surrounding Density and Diverse Uses Surrounding Density and Diverse Uses Access to Quality Transit Access to Quality Transit Bicycle Facilities Bicycle Facilities Reduced Parking Footprint Reduced Parking Footprint Green Vehicles Green Vehicles

Y Project Name:Prereq Credit 0 Credit 0 Date: Credit 2

Credit

Credit

Credit Credit

5 5

1

2 3

0Project0Checklist Innovation Credit

13 0

Credit

Credit Credit

110

257

LEED Certification Check List |

110

1 1 1

110

SU STAINABL E S I T E S

ENERGY AND ATMOSPH ERE

H EAT I SL A N D R EDUC TION

R E N E WA B LE E N E R GY PRO DUCTI O N

LEED v4 for BD+C: New Construction and Major Renovation

Project Checklist Y

?

N

LEED v4 for BD+C: New Construction and Major Renovation

Credit

Integrative Process

Project Checklist

13 0 Y

?

1 1

13 0 4 5 1 1 1 1 4

0

5 1 5

1 Y 2

5 1

Y

LEED v4 for BD+C: New Construction and Major Renovation

Project Checklist Y

?

2 2

LIFE SCIENCE CAMPUS

0 Location and Transportation

16

11

0

0 Materials and Resources

13

Credit

LEED for Neighborhood Development Location

Prereq

Storage and Collection of Recyclables

Required

1

Credit

Sensitive Land Protection

1

Y

Prereq

Construction and Demolition Waste Management Planning

Required

Building Life-Cycle Impact Reduction Building Product Disclosure and Optimization - Environmental Product Declarations Building Product Disclosure and Optimization - Sourcing of Raw Materials

5

Building Product Disclosure and Optimization - Material Ingredients Construction and Demolition Waste Management

2

16

Y

1

Credit

High Priority Site

2

4

Credit

4

Credit

Surrounding Density and Diverse Uses

5

2

Credit

5

Credit

Access to Quality Transit

5

2

Credit

1

Credit

Bicycle Facilities

1

2

Credit

1 0

5

0

Y 0 1 0 2 0

Y

Reduced Parking Footprint

1

Credit

Green Vehicles

1

0 Sustainable Sites Prereq

2

2

Credit

0

| Environmental Design with BIM Y Y 1 0

10

Construction Activity Pollution Prevention

1

13

Credit

0

0 Indoor Environmental Quality

Y

2 1 Y

1

2

16

Prereq

Minimum Indoor Air Quality Performance

Required

Prereq

Environmental Tobacco Smoke Control

Required

Site Assessment

1

1

Credit

Enhanced Indoor Air Quality Strategies

2

Credit

Site Development - Protect or Restore Habitat

2

3

Credit

Low-Emitting Materials

3

Credit

Open Space

1

1

Credit

Rainwater Management

3

1

Credit

Construction Indoor Air Quality Management Plan Indoor Air Quality Assessment

1

Credit

Heat Island Reduction

2

1

Credit

Thermal Comfort

1

Credit

Light Pollution Reduction

1

2

Credit

Interior Lighting

2

12

3

Credit

Daylight

3

1

Credit

Quality Views

1

Credit

Acoustic Performance

1

1 1

11

Outdoor Water Use Reduction

Required

Prereq

Indoor Water Use Reduction

Required

Prereq

Required

Credit

Building-Level Water Metering Outdoor Water Use Reduction

Credit

Indoor Water Use Reduction

258

2 6

0

3 3

0 0

0 Innovation Credit

Innovation

Credit

LEED Accredited Professional

6 5 1

Reduced Parking Footprint Construction Activity Pollution Prevention Green Vehicles Site Assessment

Credit

Site Development - Protect or Restore Habitat

Sustainable Sites 0 Credit Open Space Credit

Credit Prereq Credit Prereq

Water 0 Credit Prereq Credit Prereq Credit Prereq Credit Credit

16

11 2

1 10

1 Required 1 1 2

10 1 Required 3 1 2 2 1 1 3 11

Building-Level Water Metering Efficiency Outdoor Water Use Reduction OutdoorWater WaterUse UseReduction Reduction Indoor

Required

11 2 Required 6 Required 2

Required 1 2

Prereq

Building-Level Energy Metering

Required

Credit Credit

Fundamental Commissioning and Verification Enhanced Commissioning Minimum Energy Energy Performance Performance Optimize Building-Level Energy Metering Advanced Energy Metering Fundamental Refrigerant Management Demand Response Enhanced RenewableCommissioning Energy Production Optimize Energy Performance Enhanced Refrigerant Management

Credit

Advanced Energy MeteringOffsets Green Power and Carbon Demand Response

Credit

Renewable Energy Production

Credit

Credit

Enhanced Refrigerant Management 259

Credit

Green Power and Carbon Offsets

Construction and Demolit

Credit

Building Life-Cycle Impac

4

Y 2 Y 2 4

2 13 2 Y 1 Y 1

13 3 Y 1 Y 1

33 Required Required 6 Required 18 Required 1 Required 2 6 3

0

Building Product Disclosu Materials and Resources 0 Credit Prereq Credit Prereq Credit Credit Credit Credit

0

0

MinimumProduct Indoor Air Quali Building Disclosu Construction DemolitS Environmentaland Tobacco

Credit

Enhanced Indoor Air Qua

Prereq Credit

Minimum Indoor Air Quali Construction Indoor Air Q Environmental Tobacco Indoor Air Quality AssessS

0 Credit Indoor Environmental Qual Low-Emitting Materials Prereq Credit

1 3 1

Credit

Credit

2 3 3 1 3

0 0

3 0 3

0 0

Enhanced Indoor Air Qua Thermal Comfort Low-Emitting Materials Interior Lighting

78 Construction Indoor Air Q Daylight

Credit

Indoor Quality Assess QualityAir Views Thermal Acoustic Comfort Performance

Credit

Interior Lighting

Credit

0

Declarations

Credit Prereq

Credit Prereq

Credit

1

Declarations Storage and Collection of Building Product Construction andDisclosu Demolit Building Disclosu Building Product Life-Cycle Impac Construction andDisclosu Demolit Building Product

Building Product Disclosu 0 Credit Indoor Environmental Qual

1 3 2

6 33

2 Required 1 Required

Prereq Credit

Storage and Collection of

Prereq

1 2

2 Required 1 Required

EnergyFundamental and Atmosphere Refrigerant Management 0 Prereq

Prereq

1 2 1 5 1 5

Heat Island Reduction Outdoor Water Use Reduction Light Pollution Reduction Indoor Water Use Reduction

Indoor Reduction CoolingWater TowerUse Water Use Building-Level Water MeteringWater Metering Outdoor Water Use Reduction

Y

Y

11 2

16 5 1

LIFE SCIEN

Project Name: LIFE SCIEN Date: 11 0 0 Materials and Resources

16 5

Cooling TowerCommissioning Water Use Fundamental and Verification Water Metering Minimum Energy Performance

Prereq Credit

0

16

Credit Prereq

Credit Prereq

Prereq Credit

0 0

Site - Protect or Restore Habitat LightDevelopment Pollution Reduction Open Space

Water Use Reduction EnergyIndoor and Atmosphere 0 Credit

Prereq Credit

0

Construction Activity Pollution Prevention Rainwater Management Site Assessment Heat Island Reduction

Rainwater Management Water Efficiency 0 Credit

0

0

Bicycle Facilities High Priority Site Reduced Parking Footprint Surrounding Density and Diverse Uses Green Vehicles Access to Quality Transit

Credit Credit

Credit Prereq

0

0

LEED for Neighborhood Development Location Access toLand Quality Transit Sensitive Protection

Bicycle Sites Facilities Sustainable 0 Credit

Prereq

3 1

Credit Credit Credit Credit Credit Credit Credit Credit

Credit

Y

Credit

High Priority Site

Credit

20 0 Y

Y 1 3

2

Credit

Location and Transportation 0 Credit Surrounding Density and Diverse Uses

0

1 Y

Y 3 Y 12 Y

LEED for Neighborhood Development Location IntegrativeLand Process Sensitive Protection

Prereq Credit

0 20 0 Y

Credit Credit

Credit

0 0

Y

2

Y

Prereq

0

0

Y 1 Y

Credit

0 Water Efficiency

0 0

0 0

2

Required

Y

0

2 2 Y

1

Integrative Process

N

Credit

1

N Credit

13 0

Project Name: Date:

0 Location and Transportation

1

Project Name: Date:

Daylight 0 Credit Innovation Credit Credit

Quality Views Innovation Acoustic Performance LEED Accredited Profess

0 Innovation Regional Priority Credit

InnovationPriority: Specific Regional LEED Accredited Profess Regional Priority: Specific

Credit

Regional Priority: Specific

Credit

0

0

0 Credit Regional Priority Regional Priority: Specific

67

0

0 Credit TOTALSRegional Priority: Specific

67

0

0 TOTALS

Credit

Regional Priority: Specific

Credit Regional Priority:Silver: Specific Certified: 40 to 49 points, 5 Credit Regional Priority: Specific

Certified: 40 to 49 points, Silver: 5

18 1 1 2 2 3

LEED Certification Check List | 1 2

se Uses

RE D U C T I O N

LEED 2009 IEQc8 T he

Construction and Major Renovation

opment se UsesLocation

BU I LD I NG LI F E -CYC LE I M PAC T

DAY L IG H T

applicable spaces achieve daylight illuminance levels of a minimum of 10 fc (108 lux) and a maximum of 500 fc (5,400 lux) in a clear sky condition on 21 September at 9 am and 3 pm.

The minimum resoluConstruction andgrid Major tion is Renovation 12 inches Project Name: (30cm).

opment Location

MAT E RIALS AN D RE SOURC E S

I N D O O R E N V I R O N M E N TA L Q U A L IT Y

1 16 16 1

Project Name: Date: 11 Y

1

Y

2 16

4 11

16 5 1 5 2 1 5 1 1 5 1

10 1

LIFE SCIENCE CAMPUS

Date:

Y 2 Y 2 4 2 2 1 2

13 2 Y 1

0 0

0 Materials and Resources

Storage and Collection of Recyclables

Required

Prereq

Construction and Demolition Waste Management Planning

Required

Building Life-Cycle Impact Reduction Materials and Resources 0 Credit Prereq Credit Credit Credit Credit Credit Credit

0

13

Prereq

Prereq Credit

Building and Product Disclosure and Optimization - Environmental Product Storage Collection of Recyclables Declarations Construction and Demolition Waste Management Planning Building Product Disclosure and Optimization - Sourcing of Raw Materials Building Life-Cycle Impact Reduction Building Product Product Disclosure Disclosure and and Optimization Optimization -- Environmental Material Ingredients Building Product Construction Declarations and Demolition Waste Management Building Product Disclosure and Optimization - Sourcing of Raw Materials

5 13

Required 2 Required 2 5 2 2 2 2

Prereq Credit

Minimum Indoor Quality Performance Construction andAir Demolition Waste Management

16 2 Y Required 2

Prereq

Environmental Tobacco Smoke Control

Required

0 Credit Indoor Environmental Qualityand Optimization - Material Ingredients Building Product Disclosure

Prevention

1 Required

Restore Habitat Prevention

10 2 Required 1 3 1 2

1 1 3

Credit

Restore Habitat

1

2 1 3 1

Credit

1

Credit

Interior Lighting Construction Indoor Air Quality Management Plan DaylightAir Quality Assessment Indoor Quality Views Thermal Comfort

Credit

Acoustic Performance Interior Lighting

1 1 1 2 1

Credit

Daylight

3

1

3

11 2

Required 1 Required

Y

13 1 Y 3 Y 1

2

0

0 Credit Indoor Environmental Enhanced Indoor AirQuality Quality Strategies Prereq Credit Prereq Credit

Credit

Credit

0

3

Minimum Indoor Air Quality Performance Low-Emitting Materials Environmental Tobacco SmokeManagement Control Construction Indoor Air Quality Plan Indoor Air Quality Assessment Enhanced Indoor Air Quality Strategies Thermal Comfort Low-Emitting Materials

3 0 0 Innovation 1 11 | Environmental Design3with BIM Innovation 2 Acoustic Performance Required 0 Required

Credit

Quality Views

Credit

6 Required 2 Required

0

3

0

Credit

(30yrs)

13

LIFE SCIENCE CAMPUS

LEED Accredited Professional

0 Innovation

260

16 2 13 Required 3 Required 1 1

LEED v4 for BD+C: New Construction and Major Renovation

Project Checklist ?

2 1 1 3

4

2 1 3 2 5

0

6 1 5 1 1

6

5 Y

0

LIFE SCIENCE CAMPUS

N Credit

0

Project Name: Date:

Integrative Process

0 Location and Transportation

1 16

0

0 Materials and Resources

13

Storage and Collection of Recyclables

Required

Y

Prereq

Construction and Demolition Waste Management Planning

Required

4

Credit

5

5

2

Credit

Access to Quality Transit

5

2

Credit

Building Life-Cycle Impact Reduction Building Product Disclosure and Optimization - Environmental Product Declarations Building Product Disclosure and Optimization - Sourcing of Raw Materials

Bicycle Facilities

1

2

Credit

2

1

Credit

Building Product Disclosure and Optimization - Material Ingredients Construction and Demolition Waste Management

LEED for Neighborhood Development Location

Credit

Sensitive Land Protection

1

Credit

High Priority Site

2

Credit

Surrounding Density and Diverse Uses

Credit Credit

16

Credit

Reduced Parking Footprint

1

Credit

Green Vehicles

1

0 Sustainable Sites Prereq

11

Prereq

Credit

Construction Activity Pollution Prevention

10 Required

Y

13 Y

Y

0

0 Indoor Environmental Quality

261

Prereq

Minimum Indoor Air Quality Performance

Prereq

Environmental Tobacco Smoke Control

2 2 2

16 LEEDRequired Certification Check List | Required

LO CATI O N A ND TR A N S P O R TAT IO N

LOCAT I ON A N D T R A N S P OR TAT I ON

ACC E SS TO Q U AL I T Y T RA N S I T

BI CYC LE FAC I LI T I E S

LEED v4 for BD+C: New Construction and Major Renovation

Project Checklist Y

?

Y

0 Location and Transportation

16

0

0 Materials and Resources

13 13 0

Y

Prereq

Construction and Demolition W

High Priority Site

2

4

Credit

Credit

Surrounding Density and Diverse Uses

5

2

Credit

Credit

Access to Quality Transit

5

2

Credit

Building Life-Cycle Impact Red Building Product Disclosure an Declarations Building Product Disclosure an

1

Credit

Bicycle Facilities

1

2

Credit

1

Credit

Reduced Parking Footprint

1

1

Credit

Credit

Green Vehicles

2

4

Surrounding Density and Diverse Uses

5

2

Credit

Access to Quality Transit

5

2

Credit

Building Life-Cycle Impact Reduction Building Product Disclosure and Optimization - Environmental Product Declarations Building Product Disclosure and Optimization - Sourcing of Raw Materials

Credit

Bicycle Facilities

1

2

Credit

Credit

Reduced Parking Footprint

1

1

Credit

Building Product Disclosure and Optimization - Material Ingredients Construction and Demolition Waste Management

Credit

Green Vehicles

1

1

High Priority Site

4

Credit

5

Credit

1 1

Sustainable Sites Prereq

262

Construction Activity Pollution Prevention

10 Required

13 Y

Y

0

0 Indoor Environmental Quality

Credit

LEED for Neighborhood Development Location

1 Required

Credit

5

1

Credit

2

4

2

5

2 2

16

Prereq

Minimum Indoor Air Quality Performance

Required 5

Prereq

Environmental Tobacco Smoke Control

Y Required

0

0

0 Sustainable Sites Prereq

16

1

263

Construction Activity Pollution Prevention

Y

13

0

0 Materials and Resources

1

Construction and Demolition Waste Management Planning

Credit

1

0 Location and Transportation Sensitive Land Protection

Prereq

Sensitive Land Protection

Credit

1

Integrative Process

11

Y

Credit

Y

LIFE SCIENCE

16

Required

1

0

11

Storage and Collection of Recyclables

16

Project Name: Date:

N Credit

Prereq

LEED for Neighborhood Development Location

| Environmental Design with BIM 5 0 0

?

1

Integrative Process

Credit

Y

LEED v4 for BD+C: New Construction and Major Renovation

Project Checklist

LIFE SCIENCE CAMPUS

N Credit

13 0

Project Name: Date:

Prereq

0

Storage and Collection of Rec

Building Product Disclosure an Construction and Demolition W

0 Indoor Environmental Quality

LEED Certification CheckMinimum List |Indoor Air Quality Pe Prereq Y 10 Required

Y

Prereq

Environmental Tobacco Smok

TOTA L ENERGY ( € per m 2 )

E LE C T R I C I T Y ( € p e r m 2 )

F UE L - N AT URA L GAS (€ p e r m 2 )

ENERGY OPTIMIZATION |G R E E N BUI LD I NG STUD I O Autodesk® Green Building Studio is a flexible cloudbased service that allows you to run building performance simulations to optimize energy efficiency.

TOTA L ENERGY ( kWh)

E LE C T R I C I T Y ( kWh )

F UE L - N AT URA L GAS (m 3 )

Lo c at io n: B a s el, B S B u i l d ing Ty p e : U niv ersit y Fl oor A r e a : 9 , 32 6 m El e c tr ic Co s t : € 0 . 0 9 / kWh Fu e l Co s t : € 0 . 02 / MJ En e rg y U s e Int e ns it y : 3 3 3 k Wh / m 2 / yea r

A NNU A L EL ECT R IC A ND U S E

| Environmental Design with BIM

264

ANNU AL FU EL AND U SE

ANNU AL FU EL AND U SE

265

Energy Optimization |

SOLAR ANALYSIS C H E M I ST RY BU ILDING CUMULATIVE INSOLATION ANALYSIS

Solar analysis analyzes how much of the sun’s energy hits to our roof surface of the building and cumulative insolation analysis is an annual simulation for determining PV energy production estimates.

The ZinCo Solar Base adds a significant new benefit: the integration of solar energy use into the green roof build-up.

361,80 kWh 2.610,528 327 kW 2400 m2 18 year

| Environmental Design with BIM

266

267

Solar Analysis |

LIGHTING ANALYSIS C H E MI ST RY B UI LD ING LEED 2009 IEQc8 This analysis checks that the applicable spaces achieve daylight illuminance levels of a minimum of 10 fc (108 lux) and a maximum of 500 fc (5,400 lux) in a clear sky condition on 21 September at 9 am and 3 pm. The minimum resolution grid is 12 inches (30cm).

| Environmental Design with BIM

268

269

Lighting Analysis |

LIGHTING ANALYSIS CHEMISTRY BUILDING ILLUMINANCE This analysis checks that the applicable spaces achieve daylight illuminance levels of a minimum of 10 fc (108 lux) and a maximum of 500 fc (5,400 lux) in a clear sky condition on 21 September at 9 am and 3 pm. The minimum resolution grid is 12 inches (30cm).

| Environmental Design with BIM

270

271

Lighting Analysis |

L I F E C YC L E ASSESMENT |WITH ONECLICK

LCA CHECKER

OVERALL GRADE: B

13

(30yrs)

LCA Checker checks the embodied impacts plausibility. These results reflect plausibility for 60400.0 m2 project of type new construction, whole building with frame type concrete frame with scope consisting of foundations and substructure, structure and enclosure, finishings and other materials, external areas, services. To edit these parameters open LCA Parameters query.

The result is intended as indicative of the plausibility; and exceptions may occur.

| Environmental Design with BIM

272

273

Life Cycle Assesment |

L I F E C YC L E ASSESMENT | W I T H TA L LY

LCA METHODS The following provides a description of terms and methods associated with the use of Tally to conduct life cycle assessment for construction works and construction products. Tally methodology is consistent with LCA standards ISO 14040-14044, ISO 21930:2017, ISO 21931:2010, EN 15804:2012, and EN 15978:2011.

- Chemistry Building -

274

275

Life Cycle Assesment |

LIFE CYCLE STAGES Describe the scope and system boudaries used to define each stage of the life cycle of a building or building product, from raw material acquisition to final disposal. For products listed in Tally as Environmental Product Declarations (EPD), the full life cycle impacts are included, even if the published EPD only includes the Product stage [A1-A3].

T Y P I CA L F LO O R E N VELOPE

| Environmental Design with BIM

276

277

Life Cycle Assesment |

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT CATEGORIES A characterization scheme translates all emissions and fuel use associated with the reference flow into quantities of categorized environmental impact. As the degree that the emissions will result in environmental harm depends on regional ecosystem conditions and the location in which they occur, the results are reported as impact potential.

Potential impacts are reported in kilograms of equivalent relative contribution (eq) of an emission commonly associated with that form of environmental impact (e.g. kg CO₂eq).

EX TE R NAL WALL E NV E LO PE

INSIDE

GLOBAL WARMING POTENTIAL (GWP) kg CO₂eq A measure of greenhouse gas emissions, such as carbon dioxide and methane.

These emissions are causing an increase in the absorption of radiation emitted by the earth, increasing the natural greenhouse effect. This may, in turn, have adverse impacts on ecosystem health, human health, and material welfare.

| Environmental Design with BIM

278

279

Life Cycle Assesment |

HVAC SYSTEM CHEMISTRY BUILDING

In chemistry labs, there is a need to manage all air circulation separete from the other part of the building to avoid contamination.

For that reason one AHU just for the labs air conditioning. As a result of this fact have provide different HVAC systems for different functions.

LOCATION &WEATHER

CHOICE OF HVAC SYSTEM COMPONENTS

80 2. ROOFTOP CHILLER

79

The AquaSnap® 30RB chiller is an effective all-in-one package that is easy to install and easy to own. The chiller costs less to purchase and install and then operates quietly and efficiently. Value-added features include rotary scroll compression, Puron® refrigerant (R-410A), a quiet AeroAcoustic™ fan system, easy to use ComfortLink™ controls, microchannel condenser coil technology, optional integrated hydronic pump package (with or without VFD), optional full heat recovery package, and optional high-efficiency variable condenser fans (Greenspeed® intelligence).

1. AHU PLATE HEAT EXCHANGER An Air Handling Unit (AHU) is used to re-condition and circulate air as part of a heating, ventilating and air-conditioning system. Plate heat exchangers function as recuperative heat recovery systems. They are primarily used in air handling units with low to medium air flow rates. Plate heat exchangers are particularly suitable for circumstances requiring robust, low maintenance and highly efficient equipment which can also prevent any moisture transfer to the supply air.

| Building Service Design

280

281

HVAC System Plan |

ALL AIR SYSTEM FOR LABS

AIR-WATER SYSTEM FOR OFFICES COMMON AREAS

In chemistry labs, there is a need to manage all air circulation separete from the other part of the building to avoid contamination.For that reason one AHU just for the labs air conditioning.

Variable Air Volume Boxes

81

The variable air volume (VAV) box Model MQTHI5 is our high performance single duct air terminal product line. This series is available in a wide range of sizes with available capacities from 80 to 8,000 CFM. The MQTHI5 unit sets the standard in the industry for construction, performance, and quality ZONE SUMMARY L AB SPACES

Air-water systems are introduced as a hybrid system to combine both advantages of all-air and all-water systems . The volume of the combined is reduced, and the outdoor ventilation is produced to properly condition the desired zone. The water medium is responsible for carrying the thermal load in a building by 80–90% through heating and cooling water, while air medium conditions the remainder. There are two main types fan-coil units and induction units.

82 ZONE SUMMARY O FFI C E S PAC E S

Active Chilled Beams Active Chilled Beams is a compact ceiling or surface mounted unit for heating and cooling. With the supply of primary air through nozzles, secondary room air is inducted through a heat exchanger.

VARIABLE AIR VOLUME(VAV) Chemical labs require different airflow of supply air due to the changes in thermal loads.

Therefore, a variable-air-volume (VAV) all-air system is the suitable solution for achieving thermal comfort. The VAV system consists of a central air handling unit which provides supply air to the VAV terminal control box that located in each zone to adjust the supply air volume, as shown in Figure 8. The temperature of supply air of each zone is controlled by manipulating the supply air flow rate.

| Environmental Design with BIM

This is then supplied with cold or hot water, for chilling, or warming, and a multitude of nozzle configurations are available to meet any project requirements. The weight of the unit relative to its high capacity for heating and cooling is remarkable, and the shape of the unit gives a flat horizontal air supply pattern providing good throw characteristics.

282

283

Life Cycle Assesment |

TYPICAL FLOOR ENVELOPE

EXTERNAL WALL ENVELOPE

O U TS I D E

INSIDE

MAIN SHAFT FOR COMMON AREAS

SHAFT

AHU

FOR LABS

TYPICAL ROOF ENVELOPE

FOR OFFICES

ROOFTOP CHILLER

INNER WALL ENVELOPE

AHU

FOR LABS

BOILER TANKS

MAIN SHAFT

TYPICAL ROOF ENVELOPE

FOR COMMON AREAS

INNER WALL ENVELOPE

ROOFTOP CHILLER

AHU

FOR OFFICES

AHU

FOR LABS

TRANSPARENT ENVELOPE SHAFT

FOR LABS

INSIDE

| Building Service Design

O U TS I DE

284

285

Roof Plan |

HVAC SYSTEM CHEMISTRY BUILDING LOCATION &WEATHER BUILDING SUMMARY

In chemistry labs, there is a need to manage all air circulation separete from the other part of the building to avoid contamination.

For that reason one AHU just for the labs air conditioning. As a result of this fact have provide different HVAC systems for different functions.

F O R L AB S ZO N E S P E A K CO O L I N G LOA D (W ):616 , 72 0 P E A K CO O L I N G A I R F LO W (L / s ):37, 89 9

P E A K H E AT I N G LOA D (W ):2 34 , 273 P E A K H E AT I N G A I R F LO W (L / s ):6 , 955

2 x 3 0 w/ 4R MO DEL A HU’ S

F O R OF F IC E S + M E E TIN G R O OM ZO N E S P E A K CO O L I N G LOA D (W ): 32 2 , 157+ 26 9 , 4 4 5 P E A K CO O L I N G A I R F LO W (L / s ): 2 2 , 175 + 17, 6 5 8

P E A K H E AT I N G LOA D (W ):110 , 4 93+ 14 5 , 0 0 6 P E A K H E AT I N G A I R F LO W (L / s ):4 , 24 4 + 5 , 617

2 x 2 5 w/ 6R MO DEL A HU’ S

| Building Service Design

286

287

HVAC SYSTEM |

WASH BASIN LU: 1

SYSTEM IV

A B WASH BASIN

WASH BASIN LU: 1

AB

LU: 1

A WASH BASIN LU: 1

C

B WASH LU: 1 BASIN

TYPICAL LAB FLOOR WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM I

AB

TYPICAL LAB FLOOR WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM IV

D

SYSTEM I

WASH LU: 1 BASIN

ABCD

C WASH LU: 1 BASIN

ABC

16X2

STACK F

16X2

16X2

STACK B

16X2

STACK E ABC C B A

20X2.5

20X2.5

DEFGHIJ

WASH BASIN

CISTERN LU: 1

J

H

CISTERN LU: 1

WASH BASIN LU: 1

WASH BASIN

WASH BASIN

CISTERN LU: 1

I

WASH BASIN LU: 1

G

H

I

G

CISTERN LU: 1

ABCDEFGHI

F

LU: 1

LU: 1

WASH BASIN LU: 1

DEF

WASH BASIN LU: 1

WASH BASIN LU: 1

LU: 1

E

TYPICAL LAB FLOOR WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM II

D

CISTERN LU: 1

Q 26X3

CISTERN LU: 1

CISTERN LU: 1

P

O

CISTERN LU: 1

D

ABCDEF

WASH BASIN LU: 1

A

F

E

C

B

WASH BASIN LU: 1

WASH BASIN LU: 1

WASH BASIN LU: 1

WASH BASIN LU: 1

TYPICAL LAB FLOOR WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM III

CISTERN LU: 1

CISTERN LU: 1

CISTERN LU: 1

CISTERN LU: 1

CISTERN LU: 1

N

M

L

K

J

SYSTEM I

ABCDEFGHIJKLM STACK K

SYSTEM II

SYSTEM III

LEGEND

SYSTEM I

SYSTEM I

SYSTEM I

SYSTEM I

Cold Water Supply/ Distrubution Hot Water Supply/ Distrubution

| Building Service Design

288

289

Water Supply System |

h= 0 cm DU: 0.5

WASH BASIN h= 0 cm DU: 0.5

A

SYSTEM D L=1 m % 1.5

B

h= -1.5cm

WASH h= 0 cm BASIN DU: 0.5

AB

A

h= -1.5cm

L=4 m % 1.5

L=1.0 m % 1.5

WASH BASIN

B

h= 0 cm DU: 0.5

h= 0 cm WASH DU: 0.5 BASIN

WASH BASIN h= 0 cm DU: 0.5

TYPICAL LAB FLOOR DRAINAGE SYSTEM A

AB L=5 m % 1.5

C

TYPICAL LAB FLOOR DRAINAGE SYSTEM D

h= -7.5cm

D

L=1 m %3

SYSTEM A

SYSTEM A

SYSTEM A

SYSTEM A

h= -3cm

ABC L=4 m % 1.5

WASH BASIN h= 0 cm DU: 0.5

L=3.5 m %3

C

L=1 m % 3.5

AB

h= -7 cm

%3

C

h= -10.5 cm

WASH BASIN

WASH BASIN

WASH BASIN

h= 0 cm DU: 0.5

h= 0 cm DU: 0.5

h= 0 cm DU: 0.5

A

B

C

B L=1.0 m % 1.5

A

h= 0 cm DU: 0.5

WASH BASIN

CISTERN

ABC

h= 0 cm h= -1.5 cm DU: 0.5

h= 0 cm DU: 2.0

L=4 m % 1.5

WASH BASIN

CISTERN

h= 0 cm DU: 0.5

h= 0 cm DU: 2.0

J h= -4.5 cm

I

H h= -4.5 cm

G

h= 0 cm DU: 0.5

CISTERN h= 0 cm DU: 2.5

L=4 m % 1.5

DEF h= -1.5 cm

WASH BASIN h= 0 cm DU: 0.5

CISTERN

WASH BASIN

h= 0 cm DU: 2.5

h= 0 cm DU: 0.5

F L=1.0 m % 1.5

E

TYPICAL LAB FLOOR DRAINAGE SYSTEM B

CISTERN

CISTERN

CISTERN

h= 0 cm DU: 2.5

h= 0 cm DU: 2.5

h= 0 cm DU: 2.5

h= 0 cm DU: 2.5

D

L=0.2 m %1

M L=0.2 m % 1.5

N L=0.3 m %2

ONML

A1

D

E

F

G

WASH BASIN

WASH BASIN

WASH BASIN

WASH BASIN

h= 0 cm DU: 0.5

h= 0 cm DU: 0.5

h= 0 cm DU: 0.5

h= 0 cm DU: 0.5

WASH BASIN h= 0 cm DU: 0.5

TYPICAL LAB FLOOR DRAINAGE SYSTEM C

h= -3 cm

CISTERN

L

h= 0 cm DU: 2.5

B1

L=1 m % 1.5

ABCDEFG

CISTERN

AB

h= -1.5 cm

WASH BASIN

h= -6cm

STACK F2 (DN: 80) STACK F3 (DN: 60)

STACK B2 (DN: 70) STACK B3 (DN: 60)

h= -7.5cm

WASH BASIN

h= -15cm

L=1.4 m % 1.5

L=1.4 m % 3.5

C

L=1 m % 1.5

DL=1 m

h= -9 cm

STACK E2

h= -13.5cm

h= -12cm

h= -3.5 cm

O

CISTERN

CISTERN

CISTERN

CISTERN

h= 0 cm DU: 2.5

h= 0 cm DU: 2.5

h= 0 cm DU: 2.5

h= 0 cm DU: 2.5

J

I

L=2 m % 1.5

L=0.4 m % 2.5

K

L=0.4 m % 2.5 h= -6 cm

L=0.3 m %2

L=0.2 m % 1.5

H L=0.2 m %1

HIJKL

STACK K2

SYSTEM B

SYSTEM C

SHAFT II

SYSTEM A

SYSTEM A

SYSTEM A

SYSTEM A

LEGEND Residential Drainage Pipes

STACK VENTILATION

CISTERN DU: 2.5

SHAFT I

% 1.5

CISTERN

STACK VENTILATION

DU: 2.5

BRANCH DISCHARGE PIPE

WASH BASIN DU: 0.5

CISTERN

% 1.5

CISTERN

DU: 2.5

DU: 2.5

% 1.5

% 1.5

BRANCH DISCHARGE PIPE

WASH BASIN DU: 0.5

Chemical Drainage Pipes

CISTERN

CISTERN

DU: 2.5

DU: 2.5

% 1.5

% 1.5

WASH BASIN DU: 0.3

CISTERN

CISTERN

DU: 2.5

DU: 2.5

% 1.5

% 1.5

DISCHARGE STACK DISCHARGE STACK

DRAIN PIPE (90mm)

DRAIN

290

291

Water Supply System |

292 293

STRUCTURAL DESIGN

| Structural Design

294

295

Structural Plan |

Beams (80cm x 250cm) Shear walls

Steel rope Slabs

RC Columns (300cm x 80 cm)

| Structural Design

296

297

Structural Diagrams |

ANALYSIS | Load Map

Non‐Structural Non‐Structural Dead Loads Dead Loads (G2) (G2)

Structural Structural Dead Dead Loads Loads (G1) (G1)

Floor Envelope Load

Name Joist Slab Name EPS Joist Slab

ANALYSIS | Slab Design

Weight Thickness density [m] [kN/m3] 0,115 Weight 25,00 Thickness 0,04 density25 [m] [kN/m3] 0,345 0,15 0,115 25,00 Total 0,04 25

EPS

Name Plaster Screed Name Polystrene Plaster Floor Screed Partition Walls Polystrene Floor Partition Walls

G1) Structural self weights

0,345

Total

2,875 1 0,05 2,875 3,931

0,15

0,05 3,93

Weight Thickness density Area load [kN/m3] [kN/m2] [m] 0,015 Weight 20 0,3 Thickness 0,06 density 8 Area load 0,48 [m] 0,1 [kN/m3] 0,15 [kN/m2] 0,015 0,015 20 0,3 0,2 0,06 8 0,48 1,2 0,1 Total 0,15 0,015 2,20 0,2 1,2 Total 2,20

Structural Scheme q G

10m

G = 8.9 kNm

8m

10m

9m

9m

q = 4.5 kNm

-130.1

3,93 kN/m2

G2) Non-Structural self weights

2.20 kN/m2

Q) Live Loads as indicated in the Eurocode (Category C1)

3.00 kN/m2

77.5

Max Bending moment at support = 130 kNm

Max Bending moment at span = 78 kNm

ULS combination Qd = G1 x 1.35 + G2 x 1.5+ Q x 1.5 =

71.8

= (3,93 x 1.35+ 2.20 x 1.5 + 3.00 x 1.5) kN/m2 = 13.1 kN/m2

| Structural Design

298

Max Shear force = 72 kNm

299

Structural Analyses |

ANALYSIS | Beam Design

ANALYSIS | Beam Design

Cross section in bending with single reinforcement

Max Bending moment at Span = 3400 kNm

M = 3400 kNm

𝑓𝑓�� = 500 𝑀𝑀�� 𝑓𝑓�� = 40 𝑀𝑀��

b = 800 mm

d = 1180 mm

K=

�

�����

�

=

��� � ���

��� � ���� � ���

Z = 𝑑𝑑 𝑥𝑥 �0.5 + �0.25 −

𝐴𝐴� =

�

�.�� ��� �

=

= 0.077 < 0.167 , compression steel is not required

𝐾𝐾 0.077 � = 1180 x �0.5 + �0.25 − 1.134� = 1088 mm 1.134

���� � ���

�.�� � ��� � ����

Reinforcement ratio :

= 7177 𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚�

provide 6 Ø 40

ρ = 𝐴𝐴� /bd = 7177/(800 x 1180) = 0.76%

ρ min ≤ ρ ≤ ρ max , 0.13 % ≤ ρ % ≤ 4 %

| Structural Design

300

Structural Scheme

q G

24m

G = 8.6 kNm2 x 9 m = 77.4 kNm

20m

q = 4.5 kNm2 x 9 m = 40.5 kNm

Max Bending moment at support = 6600 kNm

24m

Max Bending moment at span = 3400 kNm

301

Structural Analyses |

ANALYSIS | Hanging Columns - Lab Floors

ANALYSIS | Hanging Columns - Lab Floors

midas Gen

POST-PROCESSOR DISPLACEMENT RESULTANT

0.002

0.002

5.43175e-003

0.002

4.93796e-003

0.004

4.44416e-003

0.002

0.002

0.005 0.002

0.002

0.002

0.004

0.002

0.005 0.004

0.005 0.001

0.005

0.000

0.005

0.004

0.005

0.002

0.005

0.002

0.001

0.000

0.000

StructuralStructural Dead Dead Loads Loads (G1) (G1) Non-Structural Non-Structural Dead Loads Dead Loads (G2) (G2)

Name Joist Slab Name EPS Joist Slab EPS

Name Plaster Screed Name Polystrene Plaster Floor Screed Partition Walls Polystrene Floor Partition Walls

| Structural Design

0,345

0,15

Total

Weight Thickness density [kN/m3] [m] 0,015 Weight20 Thickness 0,06 density 8 [m] 0,1 [kN/m3] 0,15 0,015 20 0,06 8 0,1 0,15 Total Total

Area load [kN/m2] 2 Area load1 [kN/m2] 0,05 2 3,05 1

0.002

0.002

0.0050.003

0.000

0.005 0.004 0.005

0.005

0.004 0.002 0.005

0.005

0.002 0.002

0.003

0.004

0.000

0.002

0.005

0.005

0.005

0.001

0.002

0.005

0.001

0.002

0.005

0,05 3,05

Z: 0.500

0.002

0.005 0.005 0.005

0.003

Y:-0.612

0.004

0.005

0.000 0.005

0.000

0.005

0.0020.000

0.005

0.004

Thickness [m] 0,08 Thickness 0,04 [m] 0,345 0,08 0,04

0.005

0.001

0.001

FILE: HANGIN COLUMNS UNIT: m DATE: 06/15/2020 VIEW-DIRECTION X:-0.612

0.001

0.005

Weight density [kN/m3] Weight 25,00 density25 [kN/m3] 0,15 25,00 Total 25

MAX : 430 MIN : 403

0.000

0.004

0.001

CBC: NULS

0.002

0.005

0.005 0.002

0.002

0.001

0.003

0.005

0.001

0.004 0.001

0.002 0.005

0.004

0.002

0.002

0.003 0.002

0.005 0.005

0.005

0.004

0.002 0.005

0.005 0.004

0.005

2.5590E+002

0.004

0.002

0.005

0.000

SCALEFACTOR=

0.005 0.005

0.002

0.005

0.005

0.00000e+000 0.002

0.004 0.005

0.003 0.000

0.002

0.004 0.002

0.005 0.005 0.005

0.005

0.002

0.002

0.0050.003 0.000 0.005

0.001

4.93796e-004

0.005

0.002

0.005

0.004

0.002 0.001

9.87591e-004

0.005

0.004

0.001

0.005

0.004

1.48139e-003

0.005

0.005 0.002

0.002

0.005

0.005

1.97518e-003

0.002

0.005

0.002

0.002

2.46898e-003

0.004

0.005

0.004

0.002

2.96277e-003

0.005 0.004

0.002

0.002

3.45657e-003

0.005

0.004 0.005 0.002

0.002

3.95036e-003

0.005

0.005 0.003 0.001

0.000 0.001 0.000

Area load [kN/m2] 0,3 Area load 0,48 [kN/m2] 0,015 0,3 0,2 0,48 1,2 0,015 2,20 0,2 1,2 2,20

302

0.000 0.000

Displacement The beam lenght (L) = 21.00 m

Maximum displacement < L/200

Maximum displacement = 0.005 m

0.005 < 0.105 so with in limit, verified

303

Structural Analyses |

Within an overall vision and an “Idea of Architecture,” new conceptions of urban campus can rise and generate those innovative, less “academic” spaces on which the contemporary transformations of university campus models and building types are focusing.

| Campus Design

304

305

Chapter | URBAN CAMPUS

- DIENER, R, HERZOG, J., MEili, M. DE MEURON, P (2006) Switzer/and An Urban Portrait, ETH Studio Basel, Basel

- South Kensington Masterplan | About | Imperial College London. https://www.imperial. ac.uk/about/leadership-and-strategy/south-kensington-masterplan/

- EOUIPE LIN (2015), Synthese concept urbain 3Land Synthese Raumkonzept 3Land (http://3- land. net/start/ fr/ download/ concept-urbain- 3Iand- synthese/)

Chapter | TYPOLOGICAL SERIES - Sir Alexander Fleming Building | Foster + Partners. https://www.fosterandpartners.com/ projects/imperial-college-sir-alexander-fleming-building/

- ESPON (2010), Metroborder Cross-border Polycentnc Metropolitan Regions. Final Report, Luxembourg, European Spa tial Planning Observation Network(ESPON) - ETH STUDIO BASEL, (2013), The City + Energy Investigating the Metabolism of Cities Metropolitan analysis. Gwdelihes for a energy strategic project1n Basel (Chatper 4.) (so urce: http://www.stud io- basel.com/proJects/the-cit y-energy/) - HERZOG, J, DE MEURON, P, HERZ, M. (2009), MetroBase/ Un Modele de Region Metropo/1taine Europeenne, ETH Studio Basel - IBA Basel 2020 (2013), /BA Basel 2020 - /BA Memorandum and projects Summary, retrieved April 18, 2016 (source: http://www.iba-basel.net) - METROBASEL (2006), Metrobasel- Vision 2020, (source http://www.metrobasel.ch) - METROBASEL (2005), Metrobase/ Report 2005 (source: http://www.metrobasel.ch) - REGIERLINGSRAT DES KANTONS BASEL-STA DT, (2011), Bebauungsp/an “Rheinfront” source: http://www .grosserrat.bs ch/dokumente/100372/000000372980.pdf) - REGIERUNGSRATDES KANTONS BASEL-S TADT, (2005), Betreffend Rea/is1erung des Pro;ekts Weunutzung Hafen St. Johann - Campus Plus” (source: www.wsu.bs.ch/darn/ jcr:c80030bc-67ce../ 000000191O35.pdf) - WALTHER, 0., & REITEL, B. (2013), Cross -Border policy networks in the Basel region: The effect of national bo1ders and brokerage roles. Space and Polity; 17(2),217-236.

Chapter | INNOVATION DISTRICT - CURVELO MAGDANIEL, F. (2016), Technology campuses and oties. A study on the relation between innovation and the bw/t environment at the urban area level (A+BE I Architecture and the Built Environment), TU Delft Open, Delft

- HOEGER, K., & BINDELS, E. (2007), Campus and the oty urban design for the knowledge sooety, gta Verlag, ETH Zurich, Zurich - KATZ, BRUCE, WAGNER JULIE, The Rise of Innovation Districts. A New Geography of Innovation 1n America, Metropolitan Policy Program at Brookings Institute of Technology School of Architecture and Planning, Cambridge - KAT HANNA (2016), Spaces to Think: Innovation Districts and the Changing Geography of London’s Knowledge Economy

BIBLIOGRAPHY SITOGRAPHY

Chapter | BASEL

- Fabrikstrasse 10 - zpf. https://www.zpfing.ch/en/projekte/projekteliste/035_novartis_taniguchi.html - Universita Luigi Bocconi / Grafton Architects | ArchDaily. https://www.archdaily. com/874794/universita-luigi-bocconi-grafton-architects - Milan memory/invention - Università Luigi Bocconi | Area. https://www.area-arch.it/en/ milan-memoryinvention-universita-luigi-bocconi/ - Brutalism: Yale Art and Architecture Building by Paul Rudolph. https://www.dezeen. com/2014/09/26/yale-art-and-architecture-building-paul-rudolph-brutalism/ Chapter | CAMPUS DESIGN - Kanton Basel-St adt, Hochschularea/ St. Johann Campus Schal/ematte/i All documents since 2009, published and downloadablefrom: Grosser Rat Basel-Stadt -Kanton Basel-St adt, http://www.grosserrat.bs.ch/de/)

- KANTON BASEL - STADT, https://www.bs.ch/ - KANTON BASEL- LANDSCHAFT, https:// www.baselland.ch/ - UNIVERSITAT BASEL, https://www.unibas.ch/de - https://www.unibas.ch/de/Universit aetj Universita et-in-Kuerze/ lmmobilien.html - https://www .biozentrum.unibas.ch/abou t/ biozentrum-a t-a-glance/overview/ - https://ethz.ch/en/campus/d eveloprnentj construction-projects/bss- projekt.htrnl - FISHMAN, M. C., (2017), LAB - Building a Home for Scientists, Lars Muller Publishers GmbH,Zurich -GOLDSTEIN, R. N. (2006), Architectural DeS1gn and the Collaborative Research Environment Cell 2006 Oct 20, 127(2), 243-6.

Chapter | BIM - Perform solar analysis during building design | Revit .... https://knowledge.autodesk.com/

- Green Building Studio - Autodesk. https://gbs.autodesk.com/ - Types of HVAC Systems | IntechOpen. https://www.intechopen.com/books/hvac-system/ types-of-hvac-systems 307

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

collection.hht.net.au photorator.com www.iba-basel.net www.stadtplan.bs.gh www.stadtplan.bs.gh www.stadtplan.bs.gh www.stadtplan.bs.gh www.stadtplan.bs.gh www.stadtplan.bs.gh www.stadtplan.bs.gh www.stadtplan.bs.gh

Chapter | INNOVATION DISTRICT 12.

13.

14.

15.

16.

17.

18.

19.

20.

21.

22.

23.

www.mpa.gov.uk www.brookings.edu citiesspeak.org citiesspeak.org inthecapital.streetwise.co centreforlondon.org centreforlondon.org centreforlondon.org maps.stamen.com maps.stamen.com maps.stamen.com maps.stamen.com

Chapter | THE PROJECT BRIEF 24. www.bzbasel.ch 25. www.bzbasel.ch 26. www.bzbasel.ch 27. www.bzbasel.ch 28. www.bzbasel.ch 29. www.bzbasel.ch 30. www.bzbasel.ch Chapter | URBAN CAMPUS 31. www.ogf.org 32. earth.google.com 33. earth.google.com 34. earth.google.com 35. www.alliesandmorrison.com 36. earth.google.com 37. www.alliesandmorrison.com 38. www.alliesandmorrison.com 39. earth.google.com 40. www.alliesandmorrison.com 41. earth.google.com 308

ICONOGRAPHIC SOURCES

Chapter | BASEL

Chapter | URBAN CAMPUS 42. www.alliesandmorrison.com 43. earth.google.com 44. www.alliesandmorrison.com 45. earth.google.com 46. www.alliesandmorrison.com 47. earth.google.com 48. earth.google.com 49. www.alliesandmorrison.com Chapter | TYPOLOGICAL SERIES 50. www.viewpictures.co.uk 51. www.bellerbys.com 52. www.fosterandpartners.com 53. www.fosterandpartners.com 54. www.fosterandpartners.com 55. divisare.com 56. divisare.com 57. divisare.com 58. divisare.com 59. www.graftonarchitects.ie 60. www.graftonarchitects.ie 61. www.graftonarchitects.ie 62. www.dezeen.com 63. www.dezeen.com 64. www.dezeen.com 65. www.dezeen.com Chapter | CAMPUS DESIGN 66. www.stadtplan.bs.gh 67. earth.google.com 68. www.unispital-basel.ch 69. www.ukbb.ch 70. bsse.ethz.ch 71. www.unibas.ch 72. www.biozentrum.unibas.ch 73. www.unibas.ch 74. schueco.com 75. schueco.com 76. www.ecocladding.com 77. www.archiproducts.com 78. schueco.com Chapter | BIM 79. www.zinco-greenroof.com 80. www.juwent.com 81. www.carrier.com 82. www.johnsoncontrols.com 83. www.ahrinet.org 309

Teaching and learning environments are changing shape. In some cases, they seem to be carving out new kinds of spaces whose complexity of use (both as an academic facility and a new center of reference for the community) requires profound typological research.

Within an overall vision and an “Idea of Architecture,” new conceptions of urban campus can rise and generate those innovative, less “academic” spaces on which the contemporary transformations of university campus models and building types are focusing.

The thesis research focuses on the spatial, functional, and infrastructural relationships between campus and context between the new Life Science Campus and Basel contemporary dynamics of transformation to provide those innovative spaces.

The design of the architectural project results from an investigation of both architectural and compositional design issues and those relating to structural, technical, functional, and linguistic aspects, as well as conditions of environmental sustainability at architectural and urban scales.