Is the AICP Worth It?: Examining the Value of Planning Professional Certification in Florida by APA Florida

Is

the AICP Worth It?:

Examining the Value of Planning Professional Certification in Florida

Introduction

In 2024, the Florida Chapter of the American Planning Association (APA Florida) partnered with Evangeline Linkous, PhD, AICP of the University of South Florida (USF) Urban and Regional Planning program to study Florida professional planner perceptions and decisions related to the American Institute of Certified Planners (AICP) certification. The study included two phases: a survey launched in tandem with the Florida Planning Conference and interviews with Florida planning professionals from across the state and in a variety of practice areas. This White Paper summarizes the results of these research inquiries and identifies challenges and opportunities related to Florida planner valuation of AICP certification.

The paper presents three central findings. First, most Florida planners highly value AICP certification. Respondents especially value the professional credibility it affords, which derives from the education and experience it requires, the ethical standards it commits to, and the ongoing professional development it facilitates. Second, although most Florida planners highly value AICP, the mix of cost and benefits provided by the certification is more ambiguous for some. The value of AICP is less clear for planners whose certification is not employer-paid, whose planning careers are already firmly established, who work in parts of the state where planning talent is scarce, and for those in career pathways where AICP certification is not central to opportunity and promotion. A third finding relates to the critical role of public rules and processes in shaping Florida planner decisions around AICP certification. The public sector has several “pull” factors that support AICP certification. Many public sector planners enjoy

employer-paid AICP membership, especially those at the local level. Additionally, state contracts and fee schedules spur private-sector planners to pursue and maintain AICP credentials.

Conversely, some state rules, such as the Consultants’ Competitive Negotiation Act, can be seen as undermining the value of AICP. Some state agencies, such as the Florida Department of Transportation, do not support or incentivize staff to pursue or maintain AICP membership.

This White Paper is organized with introductory and background information followed by information about the study methodology. The Paper then summarizes the results from the survey and interviews, then presents a discussion and conclusions based on these findings.

AICP Certification

AICP Certification is the only independent verification of planner qualifications for the United States. Administered by the American Planning Association (APA), AICP certification is a multistep process for initial certification, with ongoing professional development requirements. More than 17,000 planners in the U.S. hold AICP credentials (American Planning Association, 2025).

APA launched the One Path program to AICP certification in 2017 to streamline the certification process. Under One Path, planners take three steps to pursue AICP certification: 1) Register for the program and AICP exam; 2) Take the exam and earn AICP Candidate designation upon passing; and 3) Apply education, employment, and experience to meet the AICP professional planning practice requirements necessary to achieve AICP certification. The AICP exam described in steps one and two consists of 170 multiple-choice questions as well as scenario questions and covers nine major topic areas with a national pass rate of around 66%. For step three, the years of professional planning experience required vary based on educational

background, ranging from two years of required experience for planners holding a graduate degree from a Planning Accreditation Board-accredited program to eight years for those who do not have or did not provide information about a college degree.

Once a planner earns AICP Candidate or AICP Certified status, they become AICP members and must participate in APA’s Certification Maintenance (CM) program to maintain their credential. Under this program, AICP members must earn a total of 32 CM credits within a two-year reporting period, with one training hour of continuing education equal to one CM credit. Of the 32 CM credits, there is a one-hour minimum requirement for four topic areas: law, ethics, equity, and sustainability/resilience.

AICP members are required to adhere to the AICP Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct. This Code defines aspirational principles for planning process participants, defines the rules of practice and behavior to which AICP members are held accountable, and defines the procedures for enforcement of the rules. AICP appoints an Ethics Officer and Ethics Committee to provide informal and formal guidance on ethical matters related to planning and for review of ethics complaints filed against Certified Planners. The APA website includes resources for filing complaints of misconduct and posts annual reports on ethics case activity. Ethical misconduct can result in a variety of actions including suspension or permanent revocation of AICP credentials.

Beyond AICP, planners can pursue Fellows of the American Institute of Certified Planners (FAICP) status, the highest honor the American Institute of Certified Planners bestow upon members. Fellows are nominated and selected by FAICP peers to recognize outstanding contributions as professional planners.

The cost of AICP certification at the time of writing is $610, inclusive of a $305 registration fee associated with the AICP exam with and a $305 application fee for review of education, employment, and experience. Ongoing CM costs vary depending on the continuing education opportunities pursued. Many state chapters and local sections of APA as well as other CM providers including universities, professional training services, and public-sector entities provide free and low-cost professional development opportunities both in-person and virtually. An enterprising planner may be able to meet all 32 CM credits in a two-year reporting period without cost. Many planners earn CM credits at annual conference such as the Florida Planning Conference (early bird registration fee for 2025 is $475). Alternately, products such as APA’s Passport and Planetizen Courses offer online learning for CM credits with subscription pricing. In addition to the cost of initial certification and CM, AICP members must pay annual dues for membership in both APA and AICP. Dues are prorated by member salary and a variety of deeply reduced rates are available, such as for retired members. Combined APA and AICP dues range from as low as $75 annually for Unemployed/In Transition members to a maximum of $645 a year for members with an undisclosed salary. Additionally, APA members pay Chapter Dues, which are generally associated with state chapters and typically billed at a portion of APA dues. Florida and Pennsylvania have the highest Chapter Dues, at 45%, followed by California at 40%. Among the 45 Chapters that bill at a percentage (and excluding the three Chapters with flat-rate dues), the average for Chapter Dues is 24.4%. Based on APA’s most-recent Planners

Salary Survey Results from 2018, the typical (median) planner reported an annual base salary of $79,900 (American Planning Association, n.d.). Adjusted for inflation, this is equivalent to $102,302 in 2025. If this planner was based in Florida and a member of AICP, they would pay

total APA and AICP dues of $586.00 plus Florida Chapter dues of $263.70 for a total of $849.70 in annual membership costs required for maintenance of AICP.

The Value of AICP

There is a dearth of academic research that examines the value of AICP and the decision-making nexus for professional planners regarding pursing and maintaining the credential. A review of the academic literature addressing the AICP credential yields only work concerned with planning education broadly (Dawkins, 2016) and planner ethics (Johnson and Gore, 2016).

APA offers a variety of materials to demonstrate the value of AICP credentials. The APA website includes a page titled, “Why AICP?” that leads with data about job competitiveness and compensation. For example, the page indicates that AICP-certified planners earn an average of $16,000 more annually over non-certified planners. The page emphasizes the value of AICP ethics and training for professional relevance and credibility. While APA-provided information must be recognized as promotional in nature, the content includes survey data relating both AICP member and planning employer perceptions of the value of AICP.

A unique source of data about the value of AICP comes from an APA California report entitled, The Planning Profession in California: Results from a Survey of the State’s Planners, prepared by researchers from the University of California San Diego and San Jose State University (Bussell, Kos, Owen, and Ruijgrok Neubauerova, 2021). The report provides data from a 2019 survey of APA California chapter members. Of the approximately 800 respondents, 59.5% were AICP members. Of AICP member respondents, 62% said AICP certification was valuable to their careers, with the most common reasons for value being demonstration of a commitment to the profession and the ethical code. Respondents who valued AICP also indicated

that continuing education, enhanced competitiveness in job searches, and the benefits of a support network are valuable benefits of AICP.

A variety of perspectives on the value of AICP can also be quickly gleaned through an internet search. On reddit, the community (or subreddit) r/urbanplanning hosts several threads with topic titles like, “Is AICP Certification Worth It?” and “AICP or No?” On the website for the nonprofit organization Strong Towns, founder Charles Marohn blogged about his personal struggle with the decision to renew AICP membership (Marohn, 2018).

Although AICP is the standard certification for planners in the U.S, a variety of agencies offer professional credentials that may be relevant to urban planners. These include LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design), Certified Floodplain Manager of the Association of State Floodplain Managers, the Professional Transportation Planner of the Transportation Professional Certification Boards, Inc., the GIS Professional (GISP) of the GIS Certification Institute, and the Congress for the New Urbanism-Accredited (CNU-A). These programs typically require passage of an exam and maintenance of continuing education. Additionally, there are many state-specific planning-related professional credentials. In Florida, the Florida Redevelopment Association offers two popular professional designations.

Planning in Florida

Florida’s ongoing growth over more than the last century has made it a vital context for urban planning. The State’s landmark 1985 Growth Management Act made planning a requirement at the state, regional, and local levels. Although these rules were significantly altered in 2011, local planning remains mandatory and the state is at the forefront of critical planning challenges including affordable housing, environmentally-sensitive land protection, and flood resiliency

planning. APA Florida has around 3,100 members, making it the second largest chapter of APA. More than 1,700 of these are AICP members.

Planning jobs are concentrated in Florida’s major metropolitan areas, including Miami, Tampa, and Orlando. There are PAB-accredited graduate planning programs at Florida Atlantic University, Florida State University, the University of Central Florida, the University of Florida, and the University of South Florida.

About this Study

This study was conducted by Evangeline Linkous of the USF Urban and Regional Planning program in partnership with APA Florida to study Florida professional planner perceptions and decisions related to the AICP certification. The two-phase study included a survey conducted in fall 2024 and interviews conducted in spring 2025.

The study effort was officially launched at the September 2023 Florida Planning Conference. Then-APA Florida President Whit Blanton convened a group of APA Florida members interested in the topic of AICP certification. From this initial meeting, a 21-member interest group was identified. The interest group developed initial research questions and Dr. Linkous developed research protocols. In August 2024, the interest group met to review the protocols including the survey design. The survey was launched on August 27, 2024 and remained open until September 20, 2024. The survey was administered electronically via Survey Monkey. The survey was promoted via emails to APA Florida members, APA Florida social media, and at the 2024 Florida Planning Conference. A total of 612 responses were received (19.7% response rate). Initial results from the survey were shared with APA Florida members via an October 1, 2024 APA Florida eNews & Notes electronic newsletter.

In the second phase, interviews were conducted to provide context and depth. A second meeting of the interest group was held on January 31, 2025 to refine interview protocols. Based on feedback from the interest group, the 23 members of the APA Florida Executive Committee were invited to participate in the initial round of interviews to ensure representation from across the state. Additionally, three members of the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) were invited to participate in the first phase of interviews because FDOT is a major funder and driver for planning projects in the state. Snowball sampling was used to identify additional interviewees. In total, 23 interviews were conducted from January through March 2025.

Survey Results

A set of basic demographic data was collected for all respondents, followed by separate questions for those who self-selected among the following: Current AICP Certified, Current AICP Candidate, Lapsed/Non-Renewed AICP Certified, and None of the Above.

Respondent Demographics

The demographic data collected for all respondents show a nearly equal mix of male and female respondents. Respondents varied in age but were mostly (67%) white.

Respondent Gender

Respondent Race

Other/Multiple Prefer not to answer

Respondent Age

and older Prefer not to answer

More than half of the respondents boasted more than two decades of planning experience, and this experience was evident in the large share of respondent salaries reported at $100K or more.

Over half of respondents characterized their place of employment as Urban. Just over half of respondents worked in the public sector. Sixty percent of respondents hold a master degree in urban planning.

Respondent Years of Planning Experience

Respondent Annual Salary

Lessthan$40K$40K-$59K$60K-$79K$80K-$99K$100K-$124K$125kandmore

Prefernottoanswer

Respondent Location of Employment

Respondent Employer

Respondent has Master Degree in Planning

AICP Status

The majority (77%) of respondents held current AICP Certification while an additional 4% were current AICP Candidates. This high share of AICP member respondents likely reflects two factors. First, the survey was disseminated through APA Florida channels including social media, emails to members, and the Florida Planning Conference, which is organized by APA Florida While these channels provide a readily-available opportunity to reach thousands of Florida planners, this approach means that respondents will tend to be APA aligned. Second, most APA Florida members are AICP members, with around 1,700 AICP members among APA Florida’s approximately 3,100 members. This means that the survey results may not fully reflect opinions of Florida professional planners who are not aligned with APA or AICP, which is a limitation of this survey. In the interview phase, an attempt was made to include several non-AICP members to ensure these perspectives were represented It is notable how few respondents (1%) report lapsed or non-renewed AICP Certification.

Respondent AICP Status

AICP Member

Professional credibility is the primary reason for holding AICP membership (certification or candidate status), with 84% of AICP member respondents selecting this rationale for AICP membership. AICP members also maintain or pursue AICP Certification for the ongoing Certification Maintenance education that helps keep planners knowledgeable and current, as well as for increased earnings, employer requirements or encouragement, and access to a network or resources. Respondents could also write in other reasons for AICP membership. A handful of respondents indicated that they didn’t want to lose AICP membership once achieved (e.g., “I worked very hard to get it and I may as well maintain it”; “the long journey to attain”; “don’t want to have to go through it again”) Three mentioned public sector and RFP/RFQ requirements (e.g., “often required to do public work”; “many RFP/Qs require a certified planner to be on the team”; “a federal contractor many contracts require the certification.”).

Reasons for AICP Membership Among AICP Certified or Candidate Respondents

More than half of AICP members are satisfied with the value of AICP for their career (40% very satisfied and 26% somewhat satisfied). However, about a quarter of AICP members are ambivalent or dissatisfied with the value provided.

Satisfaction with Value of AICP for Career Among AICP Certified or Candidate Respondents

AICP members were asked to identify all employer support for AICP certification and maintenance. Most AICP members enjoy employer-paid membership (72% for AICP and 69% for APA membership), as well as some employer-paid Certification Maintenance support such as conference registration (53%). Only 20% of AICP members reported that their employer offers an incentive policy for AICP certification or candidacy status, such as a one-time bonus. Eight percent of AICP members indicated that their employer does not demonstrate support for AICP Certification Maintenance. In the optional write-in, 15 respondents indicated that they were selfemployed and thus pay all costs out-of-pocket.

Employer Support for AICP Certification and Maintenance Among AICP Certified or Candidate Respondents

Offers an incentive policy for AICP certified/candidate employees, such as a one-time bonus Pays for AICP Certification Exam Pays AICP annual membership fee Pays APA annual membership fee

Pays for at least some certification maintenance activities such as conference registration

Demonstrates general support for APA involvement and AICP, such as recognizing staff with APA leadership roles and awards and AICP credentials

Employer does not demonstrate support for AICP certification maintenance

The primary challenge to maintaining AICP membership is cost, reported by 43% of AICP member respondents. Other challenges including earning Certification Maintenance credits (30%), a lack of real or perceived benefits (28%), lack of relevance or value in current line of work (18%), and competitive value with other professional certification and development opportunities (17%).

Challenges to Maintaining AICP Membership Among AICP Certified or Candidate Respondents

AICP Candidate

Only 25 of the respondents were AICP Candidates. Notably, 80% of these worked in the public sector, and only one indicated that they worked in the private sector. Like AICP members in general, the primary reason AICP Candidates pursued AICP membership is professional credibility (72%). Notably, 40% of AICP Candidate respondents indicated that the resource that best prepared them for the AICP exam was APA Florida. In Florida, the state chapter has had a long-time commitment to exam preparation with a Professional Development Officer who curates and shares extensive exam-prep resources. None indicated that APA National prepared them for the exam.

Lapsed/Non-Renewed

Only six respondents indicated that they had let their AICP lapse or had not renewed membership. Only one of the six of these responded to the question asking for the reason for the lapse, and this respondent indicated cost as the reason. Notably, two of the six specifically noted that AICP has value in an open-ended question (e.g., “Definitely worth it.”; “In my view, AICP certification is a valuable indicator of professional training and performance. Without it, anyone can hang out a shingle and claim to be a professional planner.”). Another indicated, “I am a believer in continuing education regardless of AICP.” One other comment called for a cost reduction for maintaining AICP. Overall, the responses of those with lapsed/non-renewed AICP membership do not suggest dissatisfaction with the credential’s value as a factor in lapsed status or non-renewal. However, the reasons for lapsed and non-renewal status are not clear based on responses provided.

Comments

All respondents had the opportunity to provide open-ended comments about the value of AICP in their career. These comments are included in Appendix A. The comments were analyzed for word frequency using Word Cloud Generator software After eliminating several common and neutral words (AICP, certification, planning, value, planners, professional, APA), “cost” was the most frequently-used word (45 instances), and a quick scan of the comments reveals many concerns about high and increasing membership costs.

Word Cloud Displaying Word Frequency: Open-Ended Survey Comments

Interview Results

The Phase II interviews, conducted with 23 Florida planners from January through March 2025, generally reinforced findings from the surveys. Most respondents expressed that AICP provided value during their careers, primarily because of the professional credibility it signals. Although most interviewees benefit from employer-paid APA and AICP member, the cost of maintaining AICP certification was a concern for those who paid out-of-pocket. The interviews revealed a

few additional issues not evident from survey results: there are mixed opinions about the value of AICP Candidacy and rural areas place less emphasis on AICP credentials. Additionally, State of Florida rules and norms play a significant role in generating value for AICP in Florida although some State agencies do not support AICP membership for staff.

Value

Interviewees generally believed that AICP provides value to planning practitioners due to the professional credibility it bestows. This credibility derives from the planning knowledge associated with the AICP credential. A private sector planner stated, “AICP provides and really requires us to have a fundamental understanding of the planning profession and what is going on in the planning world.” Interviewees observed that the knowledge baseline signaled by AICP is useful for those entering the profession, for hiring managers, for understanding peer qualifications, for dealing with the public and elected officials, and even for long-time practitioners’ career growth. One private sector planner observed that AICP “gives everyone an equal playing field what we are looking for, the values of the profession. Managers can rely on this as a source to know what the candidate brings.” Another private sector planner said, “Here in Florida, AICP is valued everywhere I’ve worked mom-and-pop firms and huge national firms.”

Planners indicated that AICP credentials were valued whether planners worked in the public or private sector, although the reasons underscoring this value differed by workplace. In general, private sector planners often work in multidisciplinary firms where engineers, architects, and other professionals have licenses that signal professional qualifications. The AICP critically fills this role for planners. “From a private sector perspective, especially working in an engineering firm, it is a way for us as planners to show that we are professionals too.” On the

public side, AICP was seen as valuable for establishing legitimacy when dealing with the public and elected officials. “In the public sector, it helps when you are out there doing your job, working with the public and elected officials. It says you really are a professional.”

The continuing education requirement built into AICP through the Certification Maintenance program was regularly mentioned as a key part of AICP’s value. A private sector planner said, it is “good to be able to hear about new ways of doing things.” A public sector planner said that AICP has value, even “20 years into planning career” because “the education to obtain AICP enlightened me quite a bit as far as was what I need to do, and then of course the continuing education that’s required, it keeps me engaged with the planning profession.”

Interviewees also noted that adherence to the AICP Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct distinguishes and creates value for AICP planners. A planner currently in private practice but with many years of public sector experience said that AICP planners are respected for “keeping public interest out in front.” A private sector planner said AICP ethical commitments demonstrate that a planner is “more than just a person getting money.” Some interviewees mentioned that AICP’s combination of professional credibility and ethical standards made it especially valuable for expert witness testimony.

Some interviewees observed features unique to the State of Florida that may create added value for AICP, including the presence of a large and strong state APA chapter and a complex state planning context. For example, a private sector planner said, “We have a very strong chapter here, so I think because of that, the AICP factor is heavily weighed in public and private–because of the presence of a strong chapter.” Another private sector planner said, “I do see some states who don’t have the same level of value that we do here in Florida. I think those communities that are going through significant challenges and growth and change are probably

places that have a higher value on it [AICP].” A public sector planner observed that, because “Florida has a growth management law”… being an AICP planner means “you are not just a planner … you are an expert in state law.”

Although most interviewees indicated that AICP provides value to professional planners, some indicated that AICP had less value in certain sectors, regions, or for planners further along in their careers. State-level transportation planning was an area where AICP was seen as having limited value. In rural areas, a dearth of planning talent and opportunities mean AICP is not necessary for professional success. A private planner said that, in her “part of state primarily small and rural communities there might not even be planner on staff, let alone an AICP planner.” Several interviewees discussed diminished returns on AICP value over time. A private sector planner with more than 20 years experience said, “I’m at a point in my career where I don’t need it.” Another private sector planner said, “I have yet to find not having AICP to be a limiting factor.” A planner currently in private practice but with many years of public experience said AICP has value, but “not as much as you evolve in your career depending on what you do in your career.”

One public sector planner summarized the overall sense of AICP’s value discussed in interviews. She said, AICP “shows a commitment to a level of professionalism and code of ethics and staying up with planning.”

AICP Candidacy

Interviewees were asked about the value of the AICP Candidate program, a credential for planners who have passed the AICP exam but may not have the education or professional experience required for AICP Certification. Although the One Path program to AICP that created

the AICP Candidate certification was launched in 2017, few of the interviewed planners had encountered the credential among job applicants or their workplace teams. Opinion was mixed about the value of AICP Candidacy. Some felt the credential undermined AICP Certification because it did not require the experience associated with full AICP Certification. For example, one private sector planner said “it cheapened the impact” of AICP. Others believe AICP Candidacy gives opportunity to those who are entering the field from other backgrounds or signals a work ethic and commitment to planning. A public sector planner said that he would look favorably upon AICP Candidates in hiring decisions. “To me, it means they are serious and they want to prove themselves right from the get go.”

State of Florida Rules and Norms and the Value of AICP

The interviews revealed a set of State of Florida rules and norms that shape valuation of AICP. These center on the role of the Consultants’ Competitive Negotiation Act (Act), the influential role of FDOT contracts, and FDOT’s policies regarding planning credentials among its staff.

A few interviewees discussed the role of the Consultants’ Competitive Negotiation Act (Florida Statutes §287.055) in limiting the value of AICP. The Consultants’ Competitive Negotiation Act governs state agency procurement of professional services, The Act addresses “services within the scope of the practice of architecture, professional engineering, landscape architecture, or registered surveying and mapping, as defined by the laws of the state, or those performed by any architect, professional engineer, landscape architect, or registered surveyor and mapper in connection with his or her professional employment or practice.” For selection of services from these professional areas of practice, state agencies are guided to negotiate contracts with “the most qualified firm” within fair, competitive, and reasonable standards. Interviewees

indicated that, because planners are not included in the Act, contracts involving planners are more likely to compete on cost rather than qualifications. One private sector planner said this forces planners into “competing from the bottom-line standpoint.” This devalues planners in general because they must compete on cost but also because qualified planners such as AICP planners are not identified in this select category of professional services.

In contrast to the perceived negative role of the Consultants’ Competitive Negotiation Act, a more common theme was the way public sector contracts, including those with state agencies, supports valuation of AICP due to billing classification practices. State agencies such as FDOT as well as some other public sector clients have specific guidelines for consultant billing including a fee schedule for professional rates based on consultant qualifications. A private sector planner described how this process shapes valuation of AICP. “Billing classification and how we determine hourly rate is much higher once you become AICP. You can be a Planner, or, if you have AICP, you can become a Professional Planner. We have to match up classifications with other classifications. The higher I can get my staff internally, it helps me.”

Although several private practice planners discussed how billing classifications especially those of FDOT contribute to valuation of AICP, not all private planners shared this experience.

One private planner said, “We don’t bill at a different rate for AICP.”

As perhaps the largest purchaser of planning consulting services in the state, the role of FDOT in shaping decisions around AICP was a dominant theme in interviews, with seemingly contradictory dynamics at play. Although FDOT billing classifications encourage private sector planning firms who contract with FDOT to employ AICP planners, the agency’s own planning staff are not encouraged to pursue AICP credentials. FDOT staff indicated that the Department does not pay for APA or AICP membership. FDOT is almost unique in the state among planning

employers in not paying for planning professional certifications. A private planner said, “Other than State of Florida employees, generally your employer will at the least reimburse you for taking the exam.” Because AICP credentials are not supported by FDOT, AICP is also not rewarded in career development and promotions within FDOT. Some observed that FDOT culture is centered around engineering, assigning the greatest support and value to staff with the State’s Professional Engineer license. For example, one private sector planner who previously worked at FDOT said they are “too fixated on the PE licensure.” Notably, the state PE license costs only $98.75, considerably less than the annual costs for AICP annual dues.

Interviewees were asked whether state licensure of planning would be beneficial. New Jersey is the only state where planners can obtain a state license and the state regulates professional planning practice. State-licensed planners in New Jersey must first pass the AICP exam before they are eligible to site for the New Jersey Professional Planner exam. Some interviewees believe state licensure of planning would be beneficial in Florida because it would allow planners to compete for contracts on qualifications, bill at higher rates, and obtain professional credibility on par with Professional Engineers. Others felt a state license would add additional costs and barriers to entry in a field where there is already intense competition for talent. Some private planners who work beyond state lines indicated that a national credential like AICP was more valuable than a state license.

Finally, interviewees were asked about the value of FAICP. Overall, interviewees indicated that the FAICP designation brought meaningful recognition to exceptional planners. A private sector planner said the FAICP “enhances the public and our own colleagues’ understanding of what planners do.” However, several interviewees described the FAICP as having a limited audience or scope. A public sector planner indicated that the FAICP is valuable

for “recognizing people who have done certain kinds of work not necessarily that someone does good work.” One public sector planner described it as a “peer to peer” recognition. A private sector planner observed that FAICP “doesn’t add value except amongst peers. For people on the outside looking in, I’m not sure of the value.”

Many interviewees see FAICP as a crowning achievement toward the end of a career. A public sector planner indicated that the FAICP is the “capstone for a career;” similarly, another private sector planner described FAICP as a logical next step for someone who “has been in the profession and truly loves what they do.” However, many interviewees mentioned that FAICP has unique currency in practice and is thus relevant beyond those nearing retirement. In particular, FAICP is seen as valuable for planners in leadership roles as well as for expert witness work. For example, a private sector planner indicated that he intentionally sought a job where he would work with an FAICP planner to benefit from expertise. One public sector planner discussed how his organization sought an FAICP to oversee a major project because FAICP “signifies a level of experience” appropriate for complex initiatives.

Conclusions

This White Paper summarizes findings from a two-part study launched in 2023 and including a survey and interviews of Florida planners conducted in 2024-25 on the value of AICP. The research finds that most Florida planners value AICP membership. Respondents pursued and maintained their AICP primarily for the professional credentials it brings. Florida planners also believe AICP has value because it ensures ongoing education through Certification Maintenance and because it requires planners to adhere to the AICP Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct. These factors help ensure that planners are seen as educated, experienced, and committed to

serving the public interest. Private sector planners use these credentials to boost their qualifications when competing for contracts, and public sector planners use these credentials to establish legitimacy with the public and elected officials. Although AICP is widely valued, some see more limited value for planners whose careers are more established or in parts of the state where planning talent is scarcer

The majority of respondents benefitted from employer-paid AICP membership. However, cost is a significant consideration and challenge for some planners. Because most planners benefit from employer-paid AICP credentials, concerns about cost came from self-employed planners, planners who work at FDOT (where membership is not covered), and retired planners.

Cost was the most frequently-mentioned word in write-in comments among all respondents

While most of the costs associated with AICP are established at the national level, Florida’s relatively high state chapter costs may be something APA Florida could look at to address affordability, at least for those who face cost challenges.

Although Florida chapter costs are higher, this study indicates that Florida’s exceptionally strong APA chapter plays an important role in ensuring the value of AICP for Florida planners. Respondents observed that APA Florida provides a network and resources that are critical parts of the value nexus for AICP. Additionally, AICP Candidate respondents indicated that APA Florida was the primary resource they used in preparing for the AICP exam.

Other State of Florida dynamics contribute to the value of AICP for Florida planners.

With the notable exception of FDOT staff, most public sector planners benefit from employerpaid AICP membership. Public sector contract and billing classification practices are generally seen as encouraging or incentivizing private sector planners to hold AICP credentials as part of establishing qualifications. Respondents indicated mixed opinions on the value of state licensure

for planning in Florida, with some arguing that a state license would elevate the profession while others were concerned about additional costs and burdens.

In conclusion, Florida planners from all areas of practice and across the state value AICP credentials for the multi-dimensional professional credibility it brings. AICP signals professional credibility to a wide range of audiences (elected officials, the public, peers) and for a wide range of purposes (complex planning work, service in the public interest, expert witness work, billing classification and contract qualification purposes). In Florida, the strong state chapter is an integral part of the value of AICP membership since both work in alignment to promote and foster planning excellence.

References

American Planning Association. (2025). About APA. https://www.planning.org/aboutapa/#:~:text=We%20have%20grown%20from%20an,planning% 20archives%20at%20Cornell%20University

American Planning Association. (n.d.). Summary of 2018 Planners Salary Survey Results https://www.planning.org/salary/2018/summary/

Bussell, M., Kos, R., Owen, E., and Ruijgrok Neubauerova, J. (2021). The Planning Profession in California: Results from a Survey of the State’s Planners. A Report for the California Chapter of the American Planning Association.

Dawkins, C. J. (2016). Preparing Planners: The Role of Graduate Planning Education. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 36(4), 414-426. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X15627193

Johnson, B. J., & Gore, N. (2016). What do the professions ‘profess’? Comparing architecture and planning codes of ethics. Architectural Science Review, 59(6), 449–464. https://doi.org/10.1080/00038628.2016.1194255

Marohn, C. (2018, December 3). Goodbye AICP? Strong Towns. https://www.strongtowns.org/journal/2018/12/3/goodbye-aicp

Appendix

Write in comments:

“Offer any additional comments on the value of AICP certification in your career.”

AICP as a certification is worth it. The AICP-prep for the test was especially worth it. As it forces you to not only know the answers but talk about them with others. I went to a Prep session over 2 days, I am not sure they do them anymore. My question is what does AICP expect the Certification to do? The certification, IS NOT the same as PE. It does show a level of expertise, commitment and Professional Standards. However, the best way to forward a career is still producing high quality work, on-time and on-budget. I have worked with some very talented non AICP certified people, the letters behind someone's name is not an indicator of producing a quality product. Personally, I believe we need to stress project/program development, work planning and project delivery more if we are going to provide quality products for both the public and private parties. Too much is theory, with very little on how to turn ideas into living, buildable places.

It sounds frustrating when a certification process is altered in a way that feels like it undermines the efforts of those who have worked hard to achieve it. Allowing people from similar fields to apply for the AICP (American Institute of Certified Planners) without the same level of planning experience might dilute the value of the certification for those who have specifically invested in their career as planners. Your perspective highlights the importance of maintaining the integrity and standards of professional credentials, especially in specialized fields like urban planning, where experience

1 Baseline requirement for acceptance of expert witness status. 2 Threshold certification for midcareer planners.

Absolutely minimal at best. Small increase in pay will be the only perceived benefit. The sheer volume of material memorization for the test is unacceptable. Furthermore, the test material has little relation to day to day planning work.

Achieving AICP certification was definitely helpful earlier in my career in the form of higher salary and recognition. I have been fortunate to work for organizations that encouraged and supported (paid) for my memberships. But if I had to pay for it myself I would find it less valuable, given the high cost and lack of time in my current position.

AICP and APA cost is much higher than it is for other certifications and employers are now questioning the costs and benefits.

AICP and APA due are rather expensive compared to similar programs, such as ULI and CNU, and offers much less in terms of resources. CM credits are difficult to obtain for busy professionals, and APA keeps adding more and more required subjects.

AICP certification and its accompanying requirements have enriched my career experience, and awarded me valuable knowledge and education, helping me to remain current.

AICP certification and the FL APA in general focus on urban communities. It seems most of my annual membership fee covers soft political aims (affordable housing, gender and equity issues) without much consideration of rural communities, containing sprawl in a meaningful way, and promoting biophillic design. The latter are lasting concerns that will affect the next 3 generations of Floridians, and without political clout to regain home role and regional planning efficacy, Florida’s only hope of curtailing development will be running out of resources. So in short, the AICP cert bears little help in my current and future professional ambitions. Please expand the organization’s focus.

AICP Certification is something that will help me in the future to obtain a higher paying position. AICP certification keeps me current in the field.

AICP certification should be viewed the same way a college education is viewed. Earning potential is critical but is secondary to professional development and achievement.

AICP combined with APA dues is not worth the annual cost. The cost should not be based on salary; a discounted rate for new planners is OK but the socialist dues tier structure should be removed.

AICP could improve its value with broader application and training for advanced training in land use law, economic development, land development and project management, etc.

AICP has become very political. I learn more while earning CEU from other disciplines than by listening to the politics on actual APA Conferences. This is more pronounced at the national level. Get the politics opinions out the lectures and encourage focusing at the actual issues.

AICP has been a great value for me. Yes, AICP is worth it!

AICP helped me see the value of professional development and has helped bolster my job prospects for the near future

AICP is 100% worth it. Professionals that are questioning the validity are lazy and do not want to push themselves to grow and achieve.

AICP is a national certification which offers credibility when seeking employment and relocation. It is well respected in the industry. Obtaining AICP certification was a milestone that helped me overcome imposter syndrome.

AICP is absolutely worth it!

AICP is always helpful when looking for jobs because it checks the box. It's an added bonus to have the masters degree too. But there isn't much benefit for people staying in one job and it is a long process to become certified without the education. I think high-level planners SHOULD have the accreditation, but it's hard to convince people that it's important.

AICP is great, but it's a bummer that I have to wait until I have 4 years of professional experience when my undergrad minor was urban planning.

AICP is perceived as a $ making sham. You pay a huge fee annually for membership plus AICP just to keep the status, and are required to take a ton on prof dev't courses irrelevant to your position. It would be helpful if the prof dev't courses available were more diverse. Suggest more hazard mitigation, public speaking tips, understanding other programs such as NPDES, Clean Water Act, Stormwater Management best practices, CRS, NFIP, etc.

AICP is valuable, but the people in charge of establishing the CM level of credits is out of touch with reality

AICP is very valuable in establishing my credentials with clients also it allows me to testify as an expert at quasi judicial hearings. Planners must continue establishing planning as a profession much like other professions: like architects lawyers etc. Is AICP worth it? Yes if we want to be treated as other professionals. There are planners who whine about the cost, about the fact they "don't have an AICP because they want ppl messing with their heads". I really hope these planners are in the minority and that the leadership of APA supports and improves AICP. In my opinion instead of "Is AICP worth it" a better question is how can we support and improve AICP. Finally I know developers who want to destroy the planning profession (because they want less regulation and quicker permitting and less public participation) and for those developers and politicians trashing the value AICP is a way to do it.

AICP is worth the commitment, time, and cost! Having multiple certifications, AICP is one of the least costly.

AICP keeps me engaged with current planning practices and engaged with the profession. AICP offers the credentials but does not guarantee values, knowledge and morals.

AICP previously was a certification that set planners apart based upon their professional knowledge in, and commitment to, the field. Not every planner had nor needed to earn the certification. And, due to the amount of effort required to even sit for the exam, it seemed to be a move made mid-career rather than directly after a MURP. As a result of the rightful and wellmeaning attempt to make the certification more accessible to emerging planners, the value of the certification has also diminished. Typically, our young planners are simply earning the AICP for the one-time bonus. The majority have no interest in the concept or intent of the certification, nor have the body of knowledge/experience typical of those who held certification before major process changes were made. It has become a simple financial decision, made easier when most competitive private sector employers cover the one-time and annual fees and offer a certification bonus. This will ultimately diminish the value of the certification for all, except for the perverse incentive of a one-time bonus.

AICP provides professional credibility and sometimes projects or clients require an AICP professional to serve as the project manager. If planning is your profession/career interest, you should get your AICP.

AICP really assists in pursuits AICP is highly sought after with roadway engineers for roadway/transportation projects ie PD&E, RRR, Corridor studies, etc.

AICP should be something that brings value to employment, hiring qualifications, etc. The cost is prohibitive for many who work for employers who do not pay for the exam, annual dues or conference registration (public agencies). It is not recognized for promotion within the field, not is it recognized as the same value as other designations like PE or CPA. Implementing the candidate AICP designation has both positive and negative affects on the items mentioned above. It makes it easier for more people to get the AICP designation, however most candidates have very little (internship) or no experience working in the field. Possibly no work force experience at all.

AICP used to be worth it and was money well spent. Now we are directed to do whatever developers want, even if it is bad planning. does not seem worth it to keep AICP.

AICP valuable throughout my career. Never mandatory to obtain/hold a position, but valuable to demonstrate competency. Encouraged all professionals I worked with or supervised to obtain certification. Should be mandatory for all supervisory and director level planning staff.

AICP was important factor when hired for planning positions.

All Civil engineers, Land Scape Architects, and surveyors advertise and engage in professional planning. Anyone who wants to can call themselves a "Planner". And yet when we, as experienced provide "Preliminary engineering, preliminary plats, landscaping designs or many of the other elements associated with Land Development we get phenomenal push back form the other professions. There is little to no protection or recognition at the regulatory level for an AICP designation. "Planners" at many times are viewed as "second class professionals". the other professions view it as AICP = Any Idiot Can Plan.

Although AICP is not necessary for my present job continuing to keep and maintain my AICP helps me to remain relevant in urban planning matters.

Although not as applicable to my current work, AICP was more relevant in my past work. An essential element of professional engagement.

Any college graduate can become a planner for convenience as long as Urban and Regional academic programs don't adhere to specific course requirements, including electives in engineering, architecture, and urban design. The profession is poorly defined, and the APA encourages and rewards this ambiguity.

Any involved in planning at any level should seek to obtain the AICP certification. Along with negotiating higher salaries, you get access to a professional network that can help you to develop personally and professionally.

APA and AICP seems to be frequently focused on the topic du jour which often distracts from the day to day issues in our communities.

APA and its chapters need to provide more opportunities to get the specialized credits (equity, sustainability & resilience, etc.)

APA is extremely disorganized organization. Especially evident at their annual conferences. Certification has absolutely no value in real life. I always encourage other not to join and seriously considering to quit.

APA needs to offer more widely available Ethics classes for certification requirements.

APA/AICP has watered down the qualification criteria, allows for cheating on the exam, and has totally reduced the credibility of the designation, unfortunately.

As a former County Planning Director, and in retrospect the other private and public section positions I have held, the AICP Certification provided some credibility with my employers. In my consulting work that also applied. However, for the cost of receiving and maintaining the designation, APA and AICP have not done near enough to promote the designation and credentials necessary to enhance AICP members professional status and status. Ironically, having done considerable expert witness testimony the Courts and Judges in Florida do recognize the professional designation.

As a long time AICP certified planner, my certification is very important to me. I firmly believe it provides a level of credibility, and trust in my work. It also lets people know that I have a Code of Ethics that I follow. I have always encouraged young planners to pursue AICP certification. I plan to die with my AICP intact.

As a municipal planner, I seem to react more than plan. I see how it is beneficial to stay on top of the latest trends, but in my capacity I have to follow direction from others.

As a relatively new school planner who spent the past 30 years in architecture, the AICP certification process is helping me not only to improve our school district's relationships within the planning/development community, but also in giving me a broader view of ways we can improve community engagement. However, because the school district doesn't support certification of non-instructional personnel, my personal financial constraints are inhibiting my progress from candidacy to certification.

As Covil engineers replace planners to ans software and data analysts replace planners we have to encourage our planners to use tools that enable their efficiency and data driven decision making abilities. Like REINS, Go Tech Portal and the Prioritizer.

As the AICP certification is not professionally recognized as a licensure like other careers (PE, AIA, etc), many private employers who operate in the Planning realm do not see AICP certification as a positive or negative. My employers (current and past) do not see it as an integral part of the job, therefore, they do not support it financially or with time. Additionally, as Planning is such a broad career, people who are AICP certified may know much about one topic, but none in another compared to other AICP certified people. This creates a lack of standardization that other careers have that makes the AICP certification appear like just another set of letters at the end of your name instead of a true certification.

Awareness of AICP meaning is low among non-planners and among planners, it is not known to distinguish competency or credibility of holders. The Continuing Education program is not held in high regard.

Both AICP and Florida APA are just big money grabs - offer very little value for what they cost. Compared to P.E. licensure it's an embarrassment

Certification adds a level of professionalism, while the test was very broad and I believe there should be specializations it was not bad. Clients feel that I am knowledgeable and professional.

City budgets for training continue to be reduced/cut, making it challenging to attend conferences and forcing more time on free webinars.

CM credits not worth the time based on experience. APA in general should drop DEI

Coming from a design-based educational background and historic preservation planning experience, the certification was what I needed to move into other areas of planning when I experienced burn-out from historic preservation planning. The certification supported my move into current planning and long range and now as an Assistant Director, where I do not have a planning degree or a Master's Degree - I did not complete graduate school. While I have been employed at the same municipality for nearly 20 years, I believe the certification would have allowed me to be more competitive with other employers if I were to leave, either back when I obtained it or even now.

Compared to my Florida Bar License and Mediation license, AICP license and membership renewal requires considerably more CMs bi-annually and the membership fees exceed 2x the annual membership dues for my other 2 licenses. I have seriously considered dropping this certification for several years now which is a shame because I’ve been certified over 25 years.

Cost of maintenance is very high, conference cost also significant. I work with a lot (!) of engineers who pay far less to maintain PE.

Create a planning zoning board for discussion. We need an online platform where planners can explore and share ideas. Two heads are better than one Credibility when working with other planning professionals Credibility.

Definitely worth it.

Demonstrated credibility to clients

Don’t have it just yet.

Early in my career it was important to show competence. Today, with years of experience and knowledge, the only asset to the certification IMHO is when acting as an expert witness, to show credibility. Most of our clients are not concerned with the AICP certification, although I acknowledge to those outside the profession it is a demonstration of a certain level of expertise. Licensure is something we cannot compete with as the lessor certification.

Earning your AICP is a bit rigorous however overall it was a great career enhancing experience. I decided to get my AICP after being in the field for 11 years and I loved the sense of accomplishment but even with all my years of experience it did feel a bit daunting.

Employers in the planning and development sector often overlook the critical importance of having an AICP professional on staff or contracted. Without AICP-certified planners, organizations may struggle with navigating complex land use, zoning, and environmental regulations, potentially leading to suboptimal project outcomes. Additionally, the absence of this specialized expertise can hinder effective community engagement and decision-making processes. Employers must address this gap to ensure they are adhering to best practices and maintaining a competitive edge in the industry. Bringing awareness to employers about the value of having an AICP on staff or contracted can be achieved through several strategic approaches: Educational Campaigns: Develop targeted educational materials, such as brochures, webinars, and articles, that highlight the benefits of AICP certification, including case studies showing how certified planners have positively impacted projects. Industry Partnerships: Collaborate with professional organizations, to host events or workshops that focus on the value of AICP professionals in planning and development. Success Stories: Share success stories and testimonials from companies that have benefited from having AICP-certified planners. These can be featured in industry publications, social media, and at conferences. Direct Outreach: Engage in direct outreach to employers, particularly those in the municipal government and planning and development sectors, to inform them of the advantages of hiring or contracting with AICP professionals. This can include personalized presentations or meetings. Incentives: Advocate for industry recognition and incentives for employers who hire or work with AICP-certified planners, such as awards or certifications that acknowledge their commitment to high standards in planning.

employers ofter look for AICP for upper level planning jobs

Enabled me to be more competitive than other candidates and stay current Enhaces my knowlegebase

From my personal experience, the value of having the AICP certification was in demonstrating my experience and credibility in the profession. It motivates me to stay current on planning topics beyond those in the scope of my specialty area, encouraging me to be well-rounded as I seek out opportunities to earn CM credits.

Gives more credibility to the person that is certified and provides professional growth opportunities

Hasn't added any real value. I maintain because some RFP's require it.

Have not experienced any perceived value outside of APA except as an "expert witness".

Haven't gotten the chance to work in full capacity in planning to fully access the value.

Having AICP shows a commitment to the field and ethical obligations.

Having an AICP will solidify that I have basic planning knowledge.

Having my AICP does not offer a financial incentive with my employer, despite being "preferred" on job postings.

Having the credentials when it comes to moving outside of the state. Having something to vouch for my work where I may not have as many personal connections in that new city.

Helped recognition as a professional.

Helps keep planning as a "professional" career path.

Honestly the AICP certification should be a part of the college degree requirements and build you up to come out of college prepared to take the exam. When your hiring entry level planners those planners who passed the exam would score on an interview panel much higher. When you look at the experience people have there are some people who have all the titles in the world but when it comes to doing the job it doesn't always translate. Not being an AICP doesn't restrict you from anything, you can still approve land development items, zoning inspections, plan reviews, present before your Commission our Council. It would be a better incentive for entry level planners to encourage them to have the certification if it was part of your degree and then you would have higher chance of landing your dream job. I am not taking away from people who's put in the time to get the certification but it becomes more difficult for seasoned planners to go back later and try to get the certification than if it was offered right out of college or part of your degree requirements. In the medical world you come out college with a medical license, Lawyers you come out prepared to take the Bar exam, engineers you come out prepared to get your PE, Pilots you come out of flight school with a pilot license but when you come out of Urban Planning school your not prepared for an AICP exam.

I actively train planners in Florida, nationally and internationally on taking/passing the AICP exam. The AICP's benefits included training me/broadening my perspectives on aspects of planning I wouldn't have been exposed to as thoroughly. I allowed my AICP to lapse many years ago because it was not supported by my (then) employer nor did it have any content relevance for me. I reactivated it because i was a co-author of a planning related document with two other AICP certified planners. Other planners seem to think it's important and meaningful, and I have maintained it since and pay for it myself. I am now FAICP.

I am a believer in continuing education regardless of AICP. Also, in my opinion, the 32 credits required for AICP maintenance are excessive.

I am concerned that the AICP credibility will slip again as it has become much easier to attain in recent years.

I am happy to have my AICP, but each year APA raises not only membership dues but also AICP dues by an incredibly high amount. It seems very unnecessary that these both necessitate separate dues - in some ways feels like a punishment or money grab by APA on planners who get their AICP. Especially with the recent percentage based due fee for state chapters. My employer is considering no longer supporting AICP/APA as a credential they will pay/sponsor as the price to maintain is becoming increasingly unaffordable for public servants and public agencies on limited operating budgets. When APA is spending money at conferences on “emotional support llamas” it truly feels like APA is using our membership and certification dues in a very poor manner, pocketing money like some pyramid scheme, and is out of touch with the realities of the profession.

I am hoping to obtain certification rather than seek a master's degree.

I am lucky in that my employer encourages participation and pays for anything AICP related I do (membership fees, paid for the test, study materials, conference costs - registration, hotel, travel). If they didn't it would be very cost prohibitive.

I appreciate that the certification credits give a rationale for conference attendance.

I believe AICP is a valuable tool for planners in helping to remind them why they chose the field. I also believe it is a little to difficult for junior planners to obtain and there should be a junior level AICP certification for planners who have less than 3 years of experience. Being an experienced planner I found preparation to be a bit overwhelming because there is no defined curriculum aside from the outline on the APA site. Perhaps the APA should print and sale a series of digital books for Beginning, Intermediate and Advanced Planners focused on AICP material. I believe AICP is worth it. However, the cost is higher than my husband’s fees to maintain his bar membership to be an attorney. While my current employer pays it, I have had other employers who do not and I would not pay these fees on my own based on the value I get from the certificate

I believe it is because of the level of support and some of the material resources provided for training for AICP

I believe it is good to have the certification as it shows one values the profession but for me it has been really to keep up with the requirements since I am in seaport planning and the AAPA American Assc. of Port Authorities has their own requirements and credentials.

I believe it shows an interest and a commitment towards the pursuit of professional and ethical planning application.

I believe that our industry should move towards state licensing, similar to the evolution of the professional engineer industry, which also started out as an optional National accreditation system, and then successfully transitioned to state licensing, which resulted in significantly elevating the engineering industry, including the professional salaries associated with obtaining the state license. As long as AICP is an optional professional certification, the planning industry will not achieve the same level of recognition and professional salaries as our state licensed counterparts. I do not see the value in continuing the ACIP given the comparison of annual AICP dues to maintain the certification, versus the salary range of counterpart state licensed professionals.

I believe there needs to be a certification. However, once you have taken the VERY BROAD and not indicative of experience test you should not have to take it again as it is costly and frankly most are at a higher level in their career where it is hard to find time to study to take it again. I am not a fan of getting your AICP WITHOUT experience like it used to be. The experience is what adds to the AICP. Just because you have AICP behind your name does not mean you understand or have experience in planning. Half of the people I interview for Planner positions have NO IDEA how to conduct a public meeting or understand how to bring a project through the process. That is what the experience piece is but they have AICP at the end of their name.... I am bitter about taking the test again as in my new position it is virtually impossible to find time to work, raise a family, etc. and find time to study. However, my employer is very supportive of it so I will do my best, even though I have already had my AICP.

I believed at the time I studied for and took the examination that I should have a credential in the field. I have enjoyed the continuing education aspect of the certificate and the job.

I don't believe I have received any value from my certification. The test was hard and I learned a lot taking it, but I don't jump jobs so it hasn't led to any new opportunities in the last 15 years.

I don't have a planning degree and so waited 10 years into my planning career to get it. I don't think my career was hindered without it, and I don't think it's necessarily boosted my career since having it. It's not been a requirement for prior positions I had. Again I keep it because it's a recognized credential so people see I have it, not necessarily because I get some major value out of it. The costs to maintain AICP and APA membership are outrageous. I maintain a professional license in another field as well and it's significantly cheaper on an annual basis and was much harder to obtain. I debate dropping the AICP and APA membership because of the cost to value proposition. I'm not sure what value my APA membership give me either. For example, I've been in planning 15+ years, I've never been able to attend a national APA conference because of the cost.

I don't see any value in having AICP. Maybe people who have it value having the letters after their names so other with it can compare their struggles to get it.

I don't see the value. I see it as not making planners any better and the fact that non-planning professionals can take one test and be a "planner" doesn't seem right.

I find the most value with having AICP is getting my foot in the door for interviews. However, if employers did not offer to pay for it I am not sure I would be willing to front the high cost of maintaining the certification on my own.

I got a master's in planning to transition into the field and soon thereafter got certified. I viewed certification at that time as lending additional credibility to my skills since I was pivoting fields, and my former employer valued certification by prioritizing it for promotions. In benefit from concrete skills I can actually apply from CM credit trainings, I have been skeptical of the value relative to the cost, particularly as I've advanced in my career. At this point, I need more nuts and bolts training relevant to my work delivered using effective teaching methods. I have actively sought this professional development, but found it hard to identify available and affordable opportunities for what I was seeking. I have explored formal certificates and degree programs through local academic institutions, and plan to look into online opportunities. The cost of what is available through APA has also motivated me to make events I contribute for CM credits free.

I got my AICP in 1996 while I was working at a state DOT. I got a nice congratulatory note from the Secretary. My engineering colleagues got automatic raises when they got their PE. I think AICP should work harder to make this a real required credential like architects and engineers have. I am only aware of one state that requires AICP for certain planning work (there may be more), and I'm not sure that is still the case. Lots of paraprofessionals call themselves planners and practice planning with no consequence. It's all we have to hang our hats on but it is not enough. I have more obligations to the credential ($ and CMs) than the credential has to me.

I got my AICP in 2000, mainly to give myself an edge in the job market over other Planners who didn't have it. Also, I do not have a Planning Degree (Historic Preservation and Landscape Architecture) so AICP helped to bolster my status and credibility as a Planner. I think it has been worth having.

I have a PE to certify my engineering skills. I strongly support the AICP to certify planning skills. The AICP is definitely worth it.

I have already stated that to me it has had zero value in my career. My employer does not even require it to advance, and I am of the opinion that it should never be required. The only thing that should matter is whether you can do the job, yes or no.

I have become very frustrated over the years with certification. It was sold to me 20 years ago as a way to prove my understanding of the field, professionalism, and ethical obligations. However, I have since found the certification to hold back my ambitions to work in private real estate development due to the 2 year rule. Now, I recently learned that people who have never studied the practice of planning, and never reported to a practicing planner can receive the AICP certification. I personally know a non-PE engineer who is primarily a construction project manager, who never studied planning or zoning, nor worked under a planner, who has been awarded certification. Why have I worked so hard to maintain my AICP when any project manager can also receive the AICP credential?

I have been able to advance in my career with relatively short amount of experience (6 years) without AICP certification. It seems to be an important achievement amongst planners who have it, but not so much from City Managers, County Managers, etc.

I have been AICP since the first year, 1986. The most obvious value has been as an expert witness in court cases.

I have interviewed for several jobs over the years and am always surprised to see that the person selected has neither a Master's degree in Urban Planning nor AICP certification. I have both. A Master's used to be required, but now most, if not all, planners I work with either only have a bachelor's (sometimes just high school) and it's often not in planning or even a related field. They have no idea why they do what they do. They also have poor spelling and grammar skills. And readability? Forget it. They do like the titles however. And appearing professional by going to all of the conferences and talking urban design and vertical and horizontal integration. Whatever that is. Made up terms. AICP is supposed to signify professionalism. But there isn't much to go around. Planning has come down to connecting the dots. It's just a job. I see Duany is still going strong. But very few of his projects ever get constructed. And when they do, they are too expensive for planners to live there. But it looks nice.......

I have mixed feelings. The AICP certification is primarily important when applying to jobs. It's often a requirement or will put you ahead of a candidate without the certification. However, the certification gets very little respect from other planning-related professions, particularly those in design (landscape architecture, engineering, etc.). I see AICP as having more to do with ethics and professional responsibility, not with practical planning knowledge or practice. If you have it, ideally it connotes that you take your job and its outcomes seriously and you're a steward of good practice. You have a higher standard of care you're attempting to meet -- hopefully. If the certification could shift to focus on skills or applying knowledge, it might give it more overall esteem. A good example to follow is CFM - certified floodplain manager - certification, which I'm currently working on. You must have a good foundation of knowledge to apply on flood risk and regulation that is beneficial to planning, too. Part of the issue with certifications in general is the glut of different ones available - CNU-a, ENV SP, LEED, all the transportation safety ones, etc. With so many different ones, and all of them being optional, they water each other down. That said, I think AICP is really well established a notch above the rest but it definitely could be more well respected. Maybe it should be even harder to obtain so other professions don't see it as a set of letters they can easily tack on to their email signature.

I have noticed that some people have an AICP and no planning degree and to be frank they have no knowledge of what planners actually do or need to do when it comes to supervising a planning department.

I have seen AICP as a desirability on job postings, but never a requirement. I’ve encountered far more professionals without certification than with, which makes me question the value of maintaining certification. It doesn’t appear to provide an edge over other candidates, nor does it appear to result in higher salaries. The main benefit is being able to refuse unethical work due to AICP code of conduct. It lets me avoid politically driven or questionable projects.

I have studied for the test twice, applied and been accepted to take the test three times. I just never seem to get over the hump to take it due to work and family constraints.

I have tested twice for the AICP and plan to again in the fall. I keep missing just a few questions on the historical side of things. I understand the reasoning behind wanting planners to know the history of their trade, but what day-to-day value is gained from knowing what bill/law was passed in the 1800's or early 1900's. My TBI prevents me from memorizing a lot of new data and it's becoming frustrating.

I haven't found many other than maintaining a professional certification, and it can be a prerequisite to some positions. Honestly, way more expensive than my other professional certifications.

I initially acquired AICP certification because jobs descriptions for positions I desired required it.

I knew it was an important statement of my dedication to being on top of my profession. Especially since credits were required to keep it up. I never regretted getting and keeping it ultimately become an FAICP and live time member of APA. After a successful career beyond what I could ever have dreamed of having without a masters degree I think being an AICP certified made the difference for me.

I know AICP would be of value to me in terms of how other people view my skill and knowledge, but with 2 small children, I just don't have the time to study 150 hours to successfully take the exam

I like that AICP has a code of ethics and has mechanisms for holding you to those. That shouldn't be restricted only to paying AICP members ethics should be for all of us, regardless of how much we pay (and not just those who passed a knowledge test). AICP seems primarily like a way to maintain letters after your name, and generate revenue (although this aspect has gotten a little better over time). Conferences (which are a primary source of CM credit), seem focused on quantity rather than quality. The quality of CM courses can be hit or miss, which tarnishes the reputation of the CM program and erodes the value proposition. Employer constantly complains at renewal how expensive it is. PE renewals are less than $100 for 2 years. Since you have to have APA memership and can't be AICP only, it's $700 per year (14x more). Also since the AICP specialty certification programs were discontinued, it costs my employer more overall to maintain an additional specialized transportation certification (PTP) than it would to maintain an AICP CTP (again, eroding the value proposition). They should consider a way of allowing a PTP test to stand in for CTP certification, since they no longer offer the test.

I LOVE APA AND AICP

I love the fact that I have to continue to learn and network in order to maintain my AICP certification. It is a good excuse to break away from the day-to-day work and learn something new. I just wish that we were encouraged to read books in addition to attending sessions at conferences.

I love the resources that the AICP and APA membership offers; I love all the publications the APA has to offer and the website is my first go to when looking for resources and want some guidance on an issue. The AICP provides credibility when appearing and speaking at a hearing. I believe that it really matters when saying you are an expert.

I pursued AICP certification primarily to help with career advancement. I was working in a niche planning position and I believe the certification was helpful (if not necessary) in enabling me to transfer to a more traditional planner role without having to start at an entry level position.

I really like that planning doesn't impose any barriers to practice the profession. However, licensing can help planners to refresh their knowledge, gain new skills, and uphold professional ethic principles. Like with any other occupation, professional planners need to embrace the opportunity to achieve the highest professional standards. This is what AICP provides.

I spent 20 plus years in the private sector as well as multiple years in County government (Escambia county). In my experience, the private sector values the AICP designation considerably more than the public sector I spent the first 30 years of my career in the public sector, and the cities I worked for (Charlotte, NC and Orlando, FL) really emphasized and encouraged AICP certification. I felt I definitely benefited from being around AICP planners who mentored me early in my career. I have worked to mentor new planners in the field and always encourage them to pursue their AICP when they are eligible.

I think AICP certification would be a valuable addition to my planning experience and would enhance my planning career

I think AICP status was valued more when I first entered the profession in 1996. I am not sure that it helped elevate my salary, and is expensive to maintain as not all employers pay for it nor I did think they understand the value if they are in an allied profession.

I think APA, especially APA Florida, needs to take a long hard look at what classes, teaching and information is being thrown at planners, especially young planners, and realize you're creating a false sense of importtance, riticousness, and confidence that will only get beaten out of them by local and state politics. It does a disservice to everyone to not have realistic information, classes and test information about very RED states like Florida. The Pie in the Sky new urbanist utopia described at planning conferences does not, and has not existed in Florida for decades. Not to mention APA andf AICP offers no real support to planners in the field. In fact, Florida League of Cities does more in advocacy for planners and planning. It's exhausting to go to these conferences, to study for the AICP, knowing it all is meaningless to our actual jobs.

I think it is a good way to maintain professional education, continuing credits.

I think it is worth it in terms of knowing that a planner is operating with at least a base level of knowledge. It is really expensive though and sometimes seems like a money grab.

I think it's valuable to obtain the certification as is provides an additional level of credibility. However, it is very expensive.

I think the AICP exam is too easy. All of the planning history and theory has been removednow allowing engineers and others who have no training in planning to have equal footing and no understanding of the basics.

I think the AICP should have value for professionals and require a certain expectation of involvement in the profession and development of future planners. Consider adding speaking engagement requirements or other things that make those with AICP stand out in our profession.

I think the questionnaire could have asked why is the AICP valuable? and For suggestions on how to strengthen the profession.

I value AICP because I believe it shows a commitment to ethical planning practices but as the cost continues to increase it seems like more of a business than credible certification. I also have AICP professionals that will tell me not to be an advocate so I also feel other don’t perceive it as an ethical thing.

I was going to get the AICP cert when I was a student. When they dissolved the pathway program for students and kept the enrollment cash it felt like a money grab and put a bad taste in my mouth.

I was hired as Director of Planning in San Antonio, Reno and Tampa/Hills. Co. Because I was AICP…

I wish the fees were lower, with less fluctuations based on salary

I wish there was a way to make it required, like a P.E. or R.L.A., to practice planning. AICP should carry the same weight/be on the same level as a P.E. license in the professional world. It should be challenging to obtain and carry significance.

I wish there was more content/incentive within the content for certification credits that was more applicable for private planners. The vast majority of all content at the planning conference is aimed at the public sector.

I work nationally and the credibility of having AICP is important. Having a national standard exam and certification for the profession is very important.

I'd like to see more professional development in ways of add on certifications in modern areas

I’m glad I have it. It gives professional credibility and down the line it helps make you a more desirable applicant for jobs and can lead to more earning potential. However, I recognize that APA is cost prohibitive if your employer doesn’t pay for it (thankfully mine does) and I lament that it is very much a pay-to-play system. Paying to maintain AICP and get CM credits whether your employer pays for it or not can be a hassle.

I’m proud of having the AICP designation. It shows colleagues that I’ve taken another step in my professional development. However that’s where the value of AICP certification ceases in my career. Self-Pride and proof I could pass an exam.

I’m recognized as a planning expert is court proceedings. It adds legitimacy to my testimony.

I've been retired a little over 2 years, but maintain my AICP and I'm so proud of my Planning profession for 35+ years.

I’ve been underwhelmed by the quality of work done by some AICP members.

I’ve brought both issues here to the attention of APA and Florida APA in the past: 1) My AICP is absolutely useless in terms of being competitive for jobs within a critical part of the industry: Transportation. It means literally nothing against the likes of (misinterpreted) State law that implies PE licensure is required for every job that has a technical component at FDOT or any of its consultants. That includes willful exclusion of AICP as a valid qualification in lieu of PE registration for all planning and programming functions. The only places that maintain credibility for AICP are the various MPOs across the State, which likewise have found it necessary to hire a PE to combat the ignorance of the validity of our AICP certifications by the State DOT. 2). What EXACT value does the specialty certification that many of us paid extra for, and tested for, provide? The description of specialty certifications such as CUD, CTP, and CEP have quite literally been buried so deep on the APA website that they can only be found if previously bookmarked! Can’t even find the page describing them through the search bar. Plus, having the specialty cert has seemed to pigeonhole those of us that have them into being limited to only those areas where we specialized… may AICP CTP has never led me to be considered for Land Use roles in the industry, for example, despite having deep expertise in that side of the industry. The “value” of AICP and specialty certs is barely worth much in terms of getting the job or conveying any minimum level of qualification in the State of Florida when it comes to any topic beyond comp plans and zoning maps. My experience has been that public officials commonly dismiss the AICP qualification when any PE speaks in opposition of their efforts. I expect much, MUCH more from APA, and the Florida chapter, with regard to espousing the value of the AICP and Specialty Certs as an equivalent to PE in any matter that does not (by law) require the signature and seal of a PE.

If I plan on transitioning to the private sector then I think AICP certification is necessary, but not in my current position working in municipal government. If it weren't for my certification, I would have questioned what I did for a living and my self worth.

If my employer wasn't paying, I wouldn't do this. Certification costs a fortune, where does the money go? Also, some planners have different points of view. How about being more open to different perspectives in planning than the woke liberal agenda? Diversity of opinion should be promoted.

If the certification carried wider recognition in other professional arenas, more planners would seek to obtain and maintain their certification. Even elected officials don’t understand its value or know the difference between a certified or non-certified planner. The certification doesn’t have strong “brand” value.

In a large engineering/planning firm the AICP designation made me one of only three (another AICP through the RTPI and a P.E. licensed in Mich) eligible to move to the U.S.

In many ways AICP certification is a gateway to employment in the planning field. Thus, it is really a necessity for anyone planning to advance in planning.

In municipal government, there are no salary increases or promotions if you obtain your AICP.

In my opinion, AICP is worth it as long as the costs are covered by your employer. However, I can see why it wouldn’t be as appealing if all costs are put on the certified employee.

In my particular industry, it was perceived as a requirement to advancement. Without it, I could only go so far in my company.

In my view, AICP certification is a valuable indicator of professional training and performance. Without it, anyone can hang out a shingle and claim to be a professional planner. I can't imagine why its value is even being questioned at this point.

In the Federal Agency I work, they have just restructured the requirements for upward mobility to include AICP Certification. Additionally, with an AICP, employers and prospective clients will benefit with the knowledge that the planner they hired is bound by ethics and principles.

Increase cost of dues are not equal to the benefits

Increased AICP fees are unreasonable. These fees are not reimbursed if the exam not passed. It makes it harder to retake the exam, while no pay raise or incentives offered by the employer.

Increased credibility and stature giving value to my insights, recommendations, opinions, expertise and integrity

Indicates a level of professional involvement to other professional planners. Of lesser value to general public

It has allowed me to get jobs where it was required, however, I really didn't change jobs much so not sure what the cost/benefit would really show.

It has been a tremendous asset in my planning career.

It helped up until about 15 years ago, then I noticed that fewer job posting even mentioned AICP.

It is a good standard to gauge someone’s planning knowledge. My first boss required it. He said if you couldn’t pass the exam you were not a true planner and I agree. I also to the CEP exam for environmental planning and have AICP CEP

It is meaningless but necessary.

It is very valuable in being recognized as a witness in quasi judicial proceedings or expert witness testimony. It would be great if more employers recognized that value. The cost is high.

It isn't a widely known certification. It isn't mandated like a PE would be to sign off on documents or approve plans.

It offers some external recognition but the real value to me as a professional engineer is the depth of understanding gained in the community, sociocultural and land planning fields from AICP certification. The AICP is not really required for any legal or professional duties which reduces the need to have an AICP. Also the excessive cost of APA/AICP is not conductive of building membership. A professional engineer liscense cost $245 for a two year period compared to $1900 for the AICP. The AICP needs to be disconnected from APA membership just like ASCE is not connected with FBPE.

It seems that the AICP designation is unknown beyond the public-private sector planning profession. the allied professions (engineering, landscape architecture, etc.) we work with are not familiar with the designation. Unfortunately, in Florida planning is not a licensed profession, therefore it's not as understood. I think APA National needs to do more to promote the profession.

It should be more difficult to become an AICP member. If you do not have a degree in urban planning. I realize this is a bias but I feel strongly about it. I had to work very hard to get my master’s degree in Planning.

It use to be a honor to get your certificate, no that is see an old co-worker with no experience in the field was able to register to take the test and passed, is really sad. Her ethics is horrible. Hopefully she is report of all the bad things she does.

It was much more valued by my employer when I was in the private sector than it is now as a public sector employee.

It would be great if the state were to recognize AICP as a part of a license and recognize planners for the professionals we are with unique knowledge, skills, and value.

It would help if when an AICP signs a document or application they are required to show their certification number. Then implement policy that if an AICP signs something that is not accurate or misleading, they could have their certification suspended or revoked.

It would hold value if I were to leave my job and try to find another job

It'd be nice to get a small business discount for renewal

It’s a valuable tool that offers me access to a large pool of professionals to speak with and learn from.

It’s been great for my career but it has hampered my recruiting efforts because our organization requires AICP for certain job titles. I miss out on minorities and people with non- traditional job backgrounds. And I have lost staff to other positions if they fail AICP or don’t want to take it.

It's highly recommended but does not really provide any incentives.

It’s made me a better planner

Land Use Attorney's classify me as an "expert" if I'm called to clarify or explain the details of a proposed development application at quasi-judicial public hearings.

Let's get AICP pay increases like PEs get. Also, the cost is prohibitive; I should not be spending $78/month to maintain my AICP certification. APA/AICP leadership should be ashamed of the cash-grab that the AICP has become. Looks a little better on paper with AICP after my name.

Maintaining my AICP credential is very expensive. I am fortunate my employer pays. But I must annually justify the cost requiring me to again explain the value of my professional planning credential. For reference, I am also a member of the Florida Bar and my annual APA (including AICP dues) dues are TWICE the cost of my bar dues. The bar provides me two significant benefits the planning association does not provide (but that it should provide!). One, the bar ensures people without a license do not practice law in Florida. People without essential training in the planning process, local government functions, and urban design should not be eligible to professionally practice planning. I encourage the planning profession to take this issue on. The public deserves to know that practicing planners meet minimum standards of professional conduct, knowledge, and ethical behavior. I know my barber has a license. Why not the planner at city hall? Do we think cutting hair is harder or has less impact on the public than does planning? Two, the bar rigorously enforces minimum standards of professional conduct. When a client or a member of the public alleges an attorney violates bar rules, the bar investigates in an open process. While our ethics committee (apparently) does investigate alleged violations of our code of ethics, those proceedings are shrouded in secrecy as they occur and AFTER they are complete. Even the disposition of a claim that a planner has violated ethical and professional rules is kept from the public and from other planners. Why is our annual report just a count of the number of claims against planners? Where are the documents presenting specific allegations, collected facts, identification of rules at issue, analysis of whether a violation occurred, etc.?! Because the public and professional planners cannot know how our professional association reviews allegations of misconduct, we cannot know how the profession applies our code of ethics (which has subjective provisions). This prohibits planners from having a record they can use to gauge whether their own behavior complies with our professional standards. We shouldn't have to guess at this stuff. Review and analysis by our peers should be available for learning and teaching. Further, secrecy prevents public trust. Our review of our member's conduct should be open and available to the public and other members so they can believe we will protect the public against planner misconduct. How can people have faith in a process they are not allowed to see? If we want to cultivate public trust, we should show the public how we protect them. We are professional planners. We should take ourselves more seriously. Many employers prefer AICP candidates when looking to hire someone.

Membership dues are high, as is the cost to take the exam. This is an obstacle for some planners. AICP is not recognized and valued in the same way other designations are, such as CPA or PE. This might be because the certification is not necessary to ascend in ranks of planning in many/most organizations.

More AICP maintenance classes should be provided. More of a resume item for me; I'm also within 5 years of retirement

More value at current job. Would like to see more GIS and data topics

Most employers I have applied with or interviewed with do not require AICP but prefer it and are willing to substitute 2 years of experience for AICP. I personally have taken the exam 2 times without passing and supposed to take again Fall of 2024

My agency does not value or support AICP certification. I continue to maintain it to maintain my professional standing and ethics. It is a personal commitment.

My AICP certification is essential in my professional journey. The certification has immense personal and professional value to me.

My AICP designation gave me more credence in front of a jury.

My AICP helped me obtain a promotion within my organization but allowed me to teach as an adjunct professor at USF.

My career was propelled by skills learned in college and experience over time. These enabled me to obtain AICP certification but the certification itself only offered the possibility of seeking projects funded with federal or state of FL funds, if/when employed in the private sector. My company ties bonuses/pay raises/promotion to Project Manager to AICP. I have worked in both public and private and until now did not really see the benefits of attaining my AICP certification.

My employer didn't encourage the certification. However, a major client required PE or AICP for contract managers. As such, I saw it as a benefit. On a day-to-day basis, it wasn't a "big deal" meaning that others didn't see much value in it. For a major policy project, the AICP credential helped demonstrate neutrality when facilitating a large task force. I've elected tp maintain my AICP even though recently retired. Not sure how long that will continue.

My employer does not value AICP certification; but, relies on my knowledge and experience. My employer highly encourages certification as one advances in their career.

My employer requires AICP certification to move to the senior level. That is 95% of the reason I obtained it. In terms of professional prestige/recognition, I don't see much value in it. Certainly not to the level of PE or RLA or AIA. Those are true certifications that are needed in order to perform a job. AICP is not needed/required for planning documents. The fact that anyone can take the test does not help. There is no educational minimum if you have enough work experience. There needes to be an educational requirement. Additionally, it is extremely expensive compared to other certifications. While the actual AICP certification is relatively affordable- it is required that you are a member of APA which is extremely overpriced for what it is. Basically you are forced to pay for APA and the AICP certification.

My FAICP credential was built on my AICP credential. FAICP credential, even though I am retired, continues to be valuable.

My Master's is in Mass Communications Research. With general, rather than specialized knowledge, passed exam on first try.

My old agency paid the cost of the membership and it was great. As an individual, the cost is a real burden.

My plan is to eventually become a Senior Planner. This will help with that.

Need additional required skills training in site planning, code creation, comp plan processing, and/or transportation modeling that is hands on and not just a speech.

Networking

No value. It amazes me that the professional world gives AICP a greater value than my incredibly intensive Masters in City Planning degree. AICP really enables people who have no background or training in urban planning to speak with authority about urban planning. In a field where every lay citizen thinks they understand planning and growth management, this is a disservice to the profession.

None other than listing certification on resume

Not sure why FAICP was added. AICP was a good credential esp when some states required licensing to be hired like NJ. The courses were sometimes expensive esp requiring national conferences attendance, but by increasing free ones esp with videos online by demand made it easy and inexpensive. Sometimes hard/slow for planned events to be recognized for credit. Collaboration with grad sch (Harvard) and other professional associations like ULI events great. Good sessions esp on legislation, laws and specialties. The two year carry over is helpful. Nice fixed number to be reported is not required for retired members.

Not worth it. APA failed to protect the worth of an AICP by allowing those without planning education to get certified. Makes the AICP practically worthless.

Not worth the money. Staff is overpaid and the organization offers little value. A PE which carries much more responsibility costs much less to keep active. There are many other credentials that you can get that costs way less

Once I started belonging to other orgs, I realized how little the comparative value is. And during the recession, I called to get help justifying my company pay, and I was told we get a magazine. So I paid my own. It's ok to say we are sending fellows to help New Orleans or something like that. But otherwise, not able to document value. Luckily, in most times, my employer is very supportive.

Other than it being the only professional designation for planning, I am not sure that the CM credits add much value for me.

Overall there should be an option for people who do not use it to keep it and not loose it. I have paid membership for 11 years but not used my certification just in case I go back to work when my children are older and need it. pay and promotion opportunity

Personally valuable to me because I have an unrelated degree to Urban Planning.

Please do away with AICP CM requirements. Waste of time and space and all it does in enrich APA National and stroke egos of the same. Not all people have time or money or desire to go to conferences or some Zoom meeting just to get credits. What a mistake. No payoff. No benefit. and the requirements get ratcheted up every 6 months whenever the PMC ghouls want it.

Please offer advanced certifications in specified fields. Transportation and land use planning is king in Florida but there’s a strong lack of how the future of Florida is shaped between these two sectors.

Please reduce the cost. Especially the monthly/yearly membership

Pointing to the ethical code is useful in advocating for doing the right thing when faced with political challenges

Recommend credits for years of planning experience for cm

Reduce annual membership dues and cost of maintenance. Provide more technical skills training.

Remove certification requirements for 15 or more years of experience. Provide spa cart options to reduce costs to semi retired planning professionals.

Should strive to make AICP certification a national licensing program

Since I'm now in a high-level multidiscipline administrative role the AICP certification adds little value; however, I value it as I feel that it has been instrumental in my career's development.

Some employers and private clients value the certification but others do not. So many people do not understand what urban planning is, so they first have to get over that hurdle of comprehension. APA is very progressive minded almost to the point of advocacy and I'm a planner that believes that a lot of change is incremental so sometimes it is hard for me to find continuing credits that I find congruent with my beliefs

Some jurisdictions require an AICP planner submit applications.

Stop majoring in indoctrination and ideologies and start offering useful information in CM maintenance.

Stop with the political indoctrination and start adding some usable, practical CM opportunities. Studying for AICP exam and earning AICP has paid off in an improvement in my general planning knowledge and helped me get a promotion immediately after receiving AICP credentials.

The AICP certification has more value when your employer also values professional development.

The AICP certification has offered me the opportunity to be recognized professionally as a Certified Planner. Along with this, it has allowed me to see an increase in earning potential by approximately 20% over the years.

The AICP cost is not terrible, but the APA and section costs are. What we get for APA and section costs is not worth it.

The AICP dues and APA dues should be combined. My firm would pay one fee by not two separate fees, even if the one fee were larger than the two smaller fees.

The amount of CM credits we need is too much. I have friends who are doctors (in physical therapy) that only need 24 credits every 2 years. The 32 credits we need is too much and I don't believe I learn much of anything new that's of value. Honestly, it seems like we need these extra credits just to keep planning consultants/contractors in business. The annual cost for APA/AICP membership needs to be lowered

The annual fees are way too expensive. Compared to engineers, architects, and attorney. I feel taken advantage of and will drop it as soon as I feel comfortable doing so - within a few years. Take the test and pay a lot of money and keep paying money every year - it's a racket.

The availability of certain required sessions such as Ethics is severely lacking locally and nationally. I would prefer an Ethics course supplied by national APA with a quiz at the end instead of trying to search for an Ethics course.

The biggest challenge is the continued discussion with my employer regarding the cost. Especially the cost of the APA FL chapter of $200 which is the most expensive chapter in the country. This cost raises my annual membership & certification to $860.00. This is 2 to 3 times more than any other organization and certification my company supports.

The Certification Maintenance requirements have been difficult to access, expensive, timeconsuming, and have added little value. With few exceptions, those that I have seen or accessed have not provided actual training, nor have they helped develop skills or lasting knowledge. Research and activities that would add value are generally not accepted by AICP. As an institution, it seems to emphasize format and vendor over content.

The CM is really high, you all. I mean double a PE, LA, PSM, or Architect. Just sayin'. The cost is outrageous. I have an engineering license is 10% of the cost.

The cost to maintain it is ridiculously expensive. We should be able to opt in or out of our state chapter dues.

The dues are much higher than the industry standard for this area. There is very little involvement/benefit from APA for these high dues. There seems to be a strong focus on profit over member or community benefit. The private sector is often completely ignored. The exam materiel is largely irrelevant to practical work functions. The excellence and professionalism of other AICP members

The FL County where I work doesn't value the Planning profession. The AICP credential doesn't mean anything to the current administration. I will be leaving my job ASAP to work in an area that respects the profession. Thank you for the opportunity to provide input.

The level of CM is rediculous; we all know it is a scam to bolster attendance at conferences. Shame on the AICP and APA governing boards.

The military still doesn’t offer any incentives for planners to get the AICP. I feel like this should be amended.

The minimum qualifications to obtain AICP are too easy! Need to provide more value to Planning degrees. We spend a lot of resources training non planning backgrounds to understand basic planning principles.

The new required certification categories seem excessive and an attempt to be on trend. Core values, such as ethics and law make sense.

The number of CM credits required are too high and expensive. APA membership is too high and not a good value.

The real question you should be looking at is why AICP is not valued in the professional world as much as many other certifications. The answer is probably that anyone can take it with a couple of years of experience and this leads to inconsistent levels of proficiency in planning practice.

The test is an exercise of memorizing an immense amount of barely relevant material that is essentially forgotten once it's over. It is difficult to study for and did not serve to assist in any sort of practical aspect of my job. The status (AICP certified) is often required for upper level positions, hence it has been beneficial to me financially - however I tend to find the continuing education maintenance portion to be lack luster. The state conferences are a great time and wonderful for networking, however the sessions are often redundant examples of projects with the same genesis, public participation effort, and outcome (a plan, a complete street project, etc).

There tend to be 1-5 truly inspiring sessions that have nothing to do with my day to day career which leaves me wondering if I should quit my municipal planning position every year and go to the private sector or some non-profit organization.

The test is difficult without experience in all facets of planning. Also biased

The test is hard and studying while working full time is arduous

The value of AICP & a commitment to the code of ethics has had a real & positive impact on my career.

The variety of CM credit courses is extremely limited. The breadth of CM requirements is getting excessive and, frankly, too political.

There are no legal requirements to have my AICP to work as with the PE or AIA Colleagues. Formalization of the certification would help normalize the certification.

There aren’t many opportunities to celebrate your career after graduation so earning your AICP is a nice additional step to celebrate.

There needs to be a more practical and common sense questions on the exam and not really focus on history snd theories areas.

There should be a conscious effort to keep the membership costs down.

There should be a much lower cost. It is very expensive to maintain the certification but the ability to reactivate the certification if it lapses is punitive.

This comment is about this survey. You placed all the value on a masters in Planning. I have 2 masters, one of which is applied geography, clearly planning related. It is offensive to consider only a planning degree as important. I beg to differ with that narrow opinion and won't be filling out any more of your surveys as a result.

This is a valuable certification that all planners should be required to obtain.

Though AICP has not had an impact on my current salary I believe it is important in the event I should change jobs.

too expensive, DEI garbage

Total money grab and gate keeping operation. Very dissatisfied. Zero value to my job in public or private sector beyond letters after my name.

Valuable for seeking public work and working large private firms. Distinguishes planners from other design professionals.

Value is beneficial for those of us without planning degree to “prove” our credentials as planners. That said the costs are extremely high especially for maintenance.

Value of certification is the perceived value assigned by the community. Little meaning to those outside of APA organization even within industry

Value only when working with public sector to show comparable credentials

When applying for higher management positions the AICP certification is a must have.

When I first achieved AICP certification, it was very valuable and colleagues took note of it. Many folks I worked with were AICP or lawyers or architects and the AICP gave some professional credibility. I am now self-employed and I've been keeping up the AICP again to show some credibility. Even though I have 30+ years of experience, it helps to introduce me to new clients who live in areas I've haven't worked in, so I'm new to them. My main source of income is non-planning work now so I've thought about dropping AICP but I'll probably hang on until retirement so as not to lose all the effort and money I've already put in. Frankly, every year I consider dropping both APA and AICP due the the cost. I don't participate as much in chapter activities as I used to so the connection is fraying. The first 20 years of my career APA and AICP were very valuable to me and kept me connected to others in the profession. I had a leadership role on one of the chapter committees and I found that to be a valuable activity. The CM requirements are a bit much. I think the number of hours should be reduced.

When I was a young planner, AICP did not seem "worth it" because other certifications such as PMP have more rigorous standards to achieve and therefore seem more worthwhile. However, now that I am 11 years into my career and at a director level, AICP provides me with credibility when presenting in front of elected officials or the public. It shows my dedication to the planning practice and has 100% helped me climb the ladder. The downside I have now is that it is very expensive annually. I am lucky that my employer covers the cost, but if I had to pay out of pocket it would be a burden... and especially because my renewal is during the holidays. My advice is for everyone who is graduating with their masters in urban planning to get their AICP right away. The test is not very hard when all the theory and case law is fresh in your mind from school. Employers will without a doubt value your credential on your resume.

While I do believe that having an AICP certification is a value, I would like to see more hands-on learning experiences. Most of the information provided at conferences is very low level and usually does not demonstrate how the process actually worked. Wish the course offering was better. More focus on content, less on “general test prep.”

With a foreign planning degree, AICP gave me a U.S. credential that was very helpful early in my career

With the current state of planning and political administration in Florida, planning is no longer relevant.

Within my field it doesn’t seem like a barrier but an unnecessary requirement. While my company does pay for certification, clients prefer planners be AICP certified. Works fine for me

Would help AICP to offer greater focus on city planning as it relates to infrastructure efficiency. This is in terms of water, sewer, roads, etc. and what it means for local governments to serve these areas based upon types of development. Think cost of services studies to support better regulations. More focus on economics of development. You can't move up in my company without having your AICP. We place a high value on it.

Is the AICP Worth It?: Examining the Value of Planning Professional Certification in Florida