Anjali Agarwal_Architecture Portfolio

ANJALI AGARWAL Architecture Portfolio Selected works | 2017-2022

Anjali Agarwal

School of Environment and Architecture (SEA), Mumbai

DETAILS

SKILLS

CLASS COLLABORATIONS

Emailanjaliagarwal.a1@gmail.com a17anjali@sea.edu.in

Autodesk Autocad Rhinoceros Sketchup Vray | Enscape

1. Buhari: An Open Village | 2017 2. History of Integrated Technology | 2017 3. Mumbai Neighbourhood Studies Vol.4 | 2018 4. Pune: Intervening the Inner City | 2018 5. South Asian Architecture and Urbanism | 2018 6. Operative Concepts | 2018 7. The Architecture of Ahoms, Sivasagar | 2019 8. What is a Clinic? | 2019 9C-Ward Mumbai | 2021

Contact+91 9930309267 D.O.B | 05 August 1999 Languages - English | Hindi | Marwadi

Adobe Illustrator Adobe InDesign Adobe Photoshop Adobe After Effects

Add: M-102, Satellite Gardens ph-2, Film city road, Goregaon (East), Mumbai 400063

Research | Hand Drafting Model Making | Laser Cutting Microsoft Word | PowerPoint | Excel

EDUCATION

WORK EXPERIENCE

WORKSHOPS

2017 - 2022 School of Environment and Architecture, Mumbai

Sameep Padora + Associates (Sp+A) | 2018 May A month long Volunteer work for the production of their book “(de)Coding: A visual history of Mumbai’s building codes”

1. Enthonography by Sarover Zaidi | 2017 2. Exploration with Body and Space by Sanjukta Wagh | 2018 3. Origami by Bobby Vijayakar | 2019 4. Illustration by Harshad Marathe | 2019 5. Project Management at Perkins Eastman Office | 2019 6. Art’s after image by Sabih Ahmed | 2019 7. Bamboo Weaving by Pratik Dhanmer and team | 2020 8. Reading Rhythms by Shivani Shah and Eloise Maltby | 2021 9. Psycho-Spatiality by Drishti Mehta | 2022

2015 - 2017 Lilavatibai Podar Senior Secondary High School (ISC), Mumbai Grade 11|12 2011 - 2015 Lakshdham High School, Mumbai Grade 7|10

Collage Architecture Studio | 2020 Nov2021 Apr 100 working days as a part of the curriculum

HOBBIES / INTERESTS Kathak Dancer Pianist Mandala Artist

Date: 30th Apr, 2021 Ref. No. COL/201-22/009

EXPERIENCE LETTER TO WHOMSOEVER IT MAY CONCERN

Ms. Anjali Agarwal has worked for COLLAGE- architecture studio as an Intern, starting from 23rd Nov, 2020 to 23rd Apr, 2021. Her responsibilities have included presentation, design development and working drawing stages of architectural practice.

During her term here, she has worked on the working drawings and handled projects ranging from residences to apartments with great sincerity and efficiency. We have seen good progress in her working drawing detailing since the time she had first joined us.

Her hard work and ability to grasp topics quickly and thoroughly require a special mention. She is hardworking, creative and reliable, thus was a valuable asset to the team.

We at COLLAGE, wish her all the best in her future endeavor.

Yours Sincerely,

For COLLAGE - architecture studio

Swapnil Valvatkar Studio Head COA: CA/2014/62951

CONTENTS

1. DE-SCHOOLING ARCHITECTURE - A Typological Experiment Undergraduate Thesis Semester 9 + Design Dissertation Semester 10

2. COLLAGE ARCHITECTURE STUDIO Internship - Semester 8 | 2020-21

3. sP+a ( Sameep Padora and Associates) Volunteer Work | 2018

4. BIOPHILIA Studio Work

5. THE LIGHT WEAVE Studio Work

6. HIGH-RISE STRUCTURE Studio Work

7. WORKSHOPS Electives - illustration | Origami | Bamboo Weaving Material Sense- Concrete | Model Making 8. ART WORK Personal Interest

De-Schooling Architecture - A psychospatial study of educational spaces

The thesis sought to establish the relationship between the configuration of space and psycho-social experiences of learning through a sampling of three schools in Mumbai.

It concluded that certain typological and spatial organizations create power hierarchies in the school space that discipline and suppress the student rather than nurturing an environment for self-growth. The Students then employ various tactics to then break these structures and start appropriating spaces that nurture physical and emotional growth.

Lakshdham High School

Lilavatibai P

Podar S.S. School

Gokuldham High School

For eg. The classroom is configured for the teacher's disciplinary gaze, but students find spaces of escape from the gaze.

The spaces within and outside classrooms create incarcerations and forced attention within, versus students finding their own intimate spaces.

Some corridors are designed for forced disciplinary movement versus some which are scaled to allow for pauses and interactions.

These tactics may inform how architecture can work towards nurturing the students rather than suppressing them.

Gaze of the teacher

Spaces of escape from the gaze

Spaces of incarceration

Student seeking intimate spaces

Forced disciplinary movement

Pauses and interactions

De-Schooling Architecture - A Typological Experiement The ambition was to rethink the typology of the school itself and its spatial configuration and layout to create spaces that are more conducive to learning and growth rather than a space of discipline through power structures.

The site is primarily located in Malvani in Mumbai, which includes a large resettlement site from slum rehabilitation from the 70s and other informally built neighbourhoods.

The social infrastructure in Malvani is highly lacking. However one also sees that in low-income neighbourhoods such as Malvani, learning takes place through the intensities of everyday life.

As opposed to this, municipal schools in the area follow similar disciplinary logic as explained earlier. Rethinking the typology of a school in Malvani that questions relationships of power and disciplinary learning are therefore pertinent here.

Case studies were looked at to understand building types that successfully, through their spatial configurations, managed to challenge power hierarchies, and a disciplinary space to create a learning environment for self-growth - key concepts and strategies were understood from each of these schools.

In Fuji kindergarten, the circular form creates an endless loop as a space of freedom for the children to explore. There is a constant interaction between the ground and the roof through multiple skylights creating spaces of wonder.

The shell-like exterior wall of Jadgal elementary school is porous creating visual connections with the outside and blurring the boundaries between inside and outside.

The ruptures between the classrooms become intimate spill-out spaces for smaller interactions. in both Jadgal and LAAFI schools, smaller courtyards create intimate spaces which are then connected to larger courtyards. These intimate spaces allow for self-expression rather than the surveillance of larger spaces.

Deepshika METI provides spaces at multiple scales for larger gatherings to intimate conversations.

Canvas community school provides spaces that are flexible so as to provide for changing events.

The intensities of everyday life, around the chosen site were studied and represented.

Given the high density of the settlement, people are easily drawn out of the houses at the thresholds and onto the streets for a large part of the day.

To maintain the idea of the school as learning from the intensities of every day, the typological diagram is such that it generates porosity between the inside and the outside, thus blurring the relationships between spaces of education and learning from the everyday.

Existing Type- Large Mass

Creating Courtyard - opening corners

Reducing the bulk

Disaggregation

Breaking Rigidity

Reducing to walls as elements

Roof ties the fragments

Heart of the school

Abdul Hamid Marg

Shared Learning Space Intimate Learning Space

MHB Colony

ZONE B

ZONE C ZONE A New Collector Colony

Community Infrastructure

MHADA Housing Society

The building design strategy was developed to create this porosity. This diagram shows the fragmentation of the volume of space required for the school into disaggregated parts.

These blocks are further tilted to create ruptures that become the spill out spaces.

The volumes are then further broken into smaller elements as walls that hold the space together while blurring the boundaries between the inside and outside.

The roof then ties back the fragments creating shaded outdoor spaces and further blurring the relationship between inside and outside. It is a series of folded plates that strategically slope down to the courtyards to channel the water. A central court becomes the heart of the school.

Zone A due to its adjacency to a rickshaw stand and the main road, becomes the place for shared community infrastructure like the canteen, daycare centre and public toilet. Zone B which flanks the settlement is created as a post educational space including areas for workshops and a shared public library. Zone C, which is separated by an internal street, becomes the space of learning for the children.

Developed form of the School

The spaces plan out in a way that they expand or contract to create scales of interactions. The children and the community inhabit and personalize different spaces. This then merge with the landscape and blur the boundaries between the shared and intimate spaces.

The central courtyard that is the heart of the school is connected through smaller pathways to the multiple internal courtyards that become spill out spaces for each of the programs. The walls always run perpendicular to the road to allow constant porosity throughout the structure. The parallel walls have been reimagined into flexible furniture like rotating fins or collapsible doors that may be shut in need of enclosed private spaces and can be opened out to flow onto the landscape.

The school is one with no boundaries between education and the surrounding community, It is where the classrooms do not limit the children within it, rather allow for open learning and cross-culture engagements to happen It is a space that opens out different scales of intimate and shared spaces that nurture individual identities and builds a social network.

It is a balance between the inside and outside as well as personal and shared spaces. A space that provokes one to engage with integrated learning that is inspired by the life and living of the existing community.

Classroom space

Section through Community Infrastructure

Resting space

Section through Classrooms

Workshop Space

Section through Amphitheatre

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSION

GENERAL

· All dimens · All levels · The written drawing.

· This drawi · Any discre · All dimens · The revisio

drawings to b

· Only the d

Architect is n

04

Collage Architecture Studio

KEY PLAN TERRACE FLOOR FFL

2900

LVL:+129.50M

EIGHTH FLOOR FFL

2900

LVL:+126.60M

SEVENTH FLOOR FFL

2900

LVL:+123.70M

SIXTH FLOOR FFL

2900

LVL:+120.80M

FIFTH FLOOR FFL

27500

2900

LVL:+117.90M

FOURTH FLOOR FFL

2900

LVL:+115.00M

THIRD FLOOR FFL

2900

LVL:+112.10M

SECOND FLOOR FFL LVL:+109.20M

CONSUL

3300

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSION

Throughout the Internship, a wide range of projects were worked on. Various scales of projects were dealth with, from row houses, partment buildings to stand alone bungalows.

One of the major learnings were through working drawings- detailing at multiple scales of the project.

STRUCTU

FIRST FLOOR FFL LVL:+105.90M

3450

P.H.E. GROUND FLOOR FFL LVL:+102.45M

ELECTRIC

LANDSC

3150

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSION

CLIENTS

BASEMENT FFL LVL:+98.85M

JOB NUM

PROJECT

ADDRES

DWG STA DEALT

BLOCK 1 - ELEVATION 01 (EAST)

CHECKE

APPROV SCALE

N

O

P

3250

P

3200

2725

Q

R

475

R'

3200

2600

S

T

600

3225

T' 1500

DATE

U

TITLE

1650

DWG NU

GARDEN AREA FFL +102.45 M SSL+101.975M

FIRST FLOOR SSL

ARCHITE

LVL:+102.45M

BOS:+101.85M

PODIUM LEVEL

TOB:+101.00M

FFL +101.15 M SSL+100.55 M

TOB:+101.00M

TOB:+101.00M

© As per the studio and sh

TOB:+101.00M

3700

STILT FLOOR

2550

STILT FLOOR

LVL:+98.75M

FFL +98.85 M SSL+98.75 M

DRIVEWAY LVL:+98.60M

DRIVEWAY

FIRE DRIVEWAY

FFL +97.80 M SSL+97.70 M

3300

LVL:+98.00M

RAMP SECTION 2 SCALE 1:50

11

10 975

FIRST FLOOR SSL

9 2225

8

7

1075

6

2125

3200

5 3200

4 3200

3 3200

PODIUM LEVEL

LVL:+102.45M

FFL +102.00 M SSL+101.60 M

PODIUM LEVEL FFL +101.15 M SSL+100.55 M

2550

3700

BOS:+101.40M

STILT FLOOR

DRIVEWAY

LVL:+98.75M

2550

FFL +98.85 M SSL+98.75 M

DRIVEWAY LVL:+98.60M

DRIVEWAY

FIRE DRIVEWAY

FFL +97.80 M SSL +97.70 M 2400

LVL:+98.00M

3050

3300

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSION

RAMP LANDING FFL +96.20 M SSL+96.10 M

STORE FFL +95.50 M SSL+95.45 M

BASEMENT LVL:+95.45M

DRIVEWAY FFL +96.20 M SSL+96.10 M

DRIVEWAY BASEMENT

FFL +95.55 M SSL+95.45 M

LVL:+95.45M

RAMP SECTION 1 SCALE 1:50

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSION

Assisted with GFC working drawings and presentations for client meetings

LVL:+102.00M

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSION

Project - WONDERWALL Type- Apartment Buildings Site location - Bangalore

450

FIRE DRIVEWAY

Project - ROYAL TULIP VILLAS Type- Row Housing Site location: Hosur, Bangalore.

Assisted with the preparation of the presentation for client meetings that included the site study, design development as well as architectural representation of the typical villa for the potential investors.

Worked on approval drawings and the working drawings of the project.

GROUND FLOOR

EAST FACING VILLAS COLLAGE - architecture studio

FIRST FLOOR

SECOND FLOOR

Agarwal Residence - Plan Renders

AAYI - South Elevation

AAYI - West Elevation

Site Visits to Wonderwall and Kavitha’s Residence

Sameep Padora + Associates (Sp+A)

A month long volunteer work for the production of their book “(de)Coding: A visual history of Mumbai’s building codes”

I was assigned with the task of documenting the BDD Chawl in Mumbai, one of many neighborhoods documented for the book and produced a 3D visual and axonometric of the site along with the structural system, facades, fenestrations and activities.

Biophilia

IIT Bombay, Mumbai | 2020 The interpretive centre is largely an interactive community space that caters to people engaging in collaborative activities, along with that the intent to have a biophilic architecture, where the spaces and the built environment will connect the human to nature, it will change the proximity to nature and shift the physical relationship of the people to the environment.

Inspired by various factors on the site, the design aims at disconnecting the human from the built structure and gives an opportunity at exploration.

Biophilia (love for nature) focuses on human’s inborn attraction to nature and natural processes. It proposes that we all have a genetic connection to the natural world built up through hundreds of thousands of years of living in rural settings. Biophilia is of ever-increasing importance to our health and well-being in the built environment.

The form of the built structure allows the design to merge with the ground giving a sense of continuity and doesn’t break the human off the ground, the roof becomes a habitable space bringing the human between dense foliage of the trees separating them from the concrete world visually.

When seen in plan, there is an opportunity at the free-flowing movement across the spaces, of not only humans but also the natural process like water flowing during monsoon.

7

Initial Sketches

Spatial Experience

Ground Level plan

First Level plan

Study space Work space

Exhibition of plants and trees

Activities intended through the research parkBird watching, nature walks, interactions, etc.

9

Living spaces with plants around create a positive and calmer environment.

Kitchen

The Light Weave Churchgate, Mumbai | 2019

The Idea of Co-living was Community interweaving which has been achieved along with the resource concern management.

Daylight being the top priority as the site receives daylight for the minimum part of the day has majorly shaped the form of the building.

My project aimed at interweaving not only within the built form but also with the surrounding community as the site is surrounded by educational institutes.

Having said that, the security and privacy of the residents were also kept in mind and hence the design decision was further taken as to designing the ground floor as a public space and the upper floors as private spaces.

The form has been developed by scooping out masses from a chunk to create spaces. These chunks that have been scooped out have shaped the form of the building to allow light to enter efficiently.

The section of the building has been played with to create double-height spaces that would allow much more light to enter, multiple elements have been used to filter light such as bamboo louvres and pergolas.

11

The resource concern has overlapped with the idea of co-living to further develop multiple courtyards and terraces in the building that not only allows the people to interact but also to provide them with cross-ventilation and good quality light, which impacts into healthier relationship among them and the spaces.`

Experimenting through model

A huge chunk is scooped out to form a through and through courtyard in the center, allowing the spaces to align along the periphery for better light and wind quality

scooping out masses facing east and west allows morning and evening sun to enter the courtyard and south sun is blocked.

As the site receives North-west winds that are less harsh than the south west winds, the massing as been done in a way to get as much wind from north-west as possible

Reflective Surface

Circulation Spaces Semi-private Spaces Private Spaces

Organization and Form Development

Ground Floor Plan

13

Section A-A’

SCREEDING 25MM

Design Detailing 3150

EXTERNAL PLASTER 25MM

W1

INTERNAL PLASTER 25MM

3150

m

6

CHINA MOSAIC15MM SCREEDING 25MM

m

TERRACE PARAPET DETAIL A - @1:20 TERRACE +28.05m

BCC 100MM

3150

W1

3150

INTERNAL PLASTER 25MM

W1

W1 W2

W1

COPPING

W1

PARAPET WALL 230MM THICK

SCREEDING 25MM BCC 100MM

3150

EXTERNAL PLASTER 25MM

Floor Finish

W1

COPPING BRICK WALL 150MM THICK DRIP MOULD

3150

FL 2 +9.15m

NOSING 25MM

DETAIL D PARAPET WALL 230MM THICK

1200 3150

W1

SCREEDING 25MM

TERRACE PARAPET DETAIL A - @1:20 BCC 100MM

RCC BEAM Floor Finish

INTERNAL PLASTER 25MM

FL 2

SOLING

W2

SCREEDING 40MM RAMMED EARTH

BRICK WALL 150MM THICK

1000

LD

Ground level EXTERNAL PLASTER 25MM

Ramp 3150

3300 FL 1 +6.00m

DETAIL B

2100

FL 3 +12.30m

0m

Foundation Detail C

W1

CHINA MOSAIC15MM

1200

3150

Ground level

Ramp

C'

CHECKED BY

C

SHAHBAD STONE 25MM

D

FLOORING RUBBLE SOLING

KEY PLAN

F

IN

SKIRTING

RAMMED EARTH Floor Finish SCREEDING 40MM

1000

1

RAFT SLAB

SHAHBAD STONE 25MM IN

OUT

SKIRTING

Ground level RAMMED EARTH DETAIL B

4

5

6

C

C'

WINDOW DETAIL

B

C

D

E

RCC BEAM

Ramp 2100

3300

1200

FLOORING

3

A

FOUNDATION DETAIL C - @1:20

RUBBLE SOLING

2

STAMP & SIGN

WOODEN FRAMEWORK SILL LEVEL

SCREEDING 40MM

CO-LIVING AT CHURCHGATE, MUMBAI F

SCREEDING 40MM

FOUNDATION DETAIL C - @1:20

ANJALI AGARWAL

Window Detail D RAFT SLAB

WINDOW DETAIL D - @1:20WOODEN FRAMEWORK SILL LEVEL

1000

SCREEDING 40MM

SHAHBAD STONE 25MM

Section GroundC-C' level @1:50

FLOORING

DETAIL C

Floor Finish

C

SCREEDING 40MM

E

PLINTH +1.20m

Ramp

6

RAFT SLAB ISSUED BY

2100

3300

DETAIL B

DETAIL C

TAIL B

5

B

Section C-C' @1:50

GL 0.00m

4

3

A

PLINTH DETAIL B - @1:20

W1

FL 1 +6.00m

Floor Finish

2

WINDOW DETAIL D - @1:20

Plinth Detail B

TERRACE PARAPET DETAIL A - @1:20

IL D

1

FOUNDATION DETAIL C - @1:20 DETAIL C

GL 0.00m

KEY PLAN SR.NO. DATE REVISION DESCRIPTION SCREEDING 40MM

on C-C' @1:50 +9.15m PLINTH +1.20m

PLINTH DETAIL B

EXISTING ROAD 10 M WIDE

TH m

RCC BEAM

W2

INTERNAL PLASTER 25MM

TERRACE PARAPET DETAIL A - @1:20

700

3150

FL 4 +15.45m

DRIP MOULD DETAIL D

700

CHINA MOSAIC15MM

A

m

SCREEDIN

EXISTING ROAD 10 M WIDE

W1

NOSING 25MM

RUBBLE SOLING

IN

700

m

SEA SIDE

3150

FL 6 +21.75m

700

3150

3150

W1

FL 5 +18.60m

GENERAL NOTES

COPPING ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN MILLIMETERS UNLESS RAMMED E DRIP MOULD OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. ALL THE WRITTEN DIMENSIONS ARE TO BE FOLLOWED. CHINA MOSAIC15MM DRAWINGS TO BE SEEN WITH RESPECT TO ALL PARAPET WALL OTHER DRAWINGS. SCREEDING 25MM 230MM-THICK P.C.C. IS IN THE RATIO OF 1:3:6 (CEMENT : SAND : COARSE AGGREGATE).

BCC 100MM TERRACE PARAPET DETAIL A - @1:20 PLINTH DETAIL B - @1:20 LEVELS SPECIFIED IN METERS. EXTERNAL ALL PLASTER ALL DECISIONS REINFORCEMENT CALCULATIONS 25MM NEED TO BE TAKEN BY STRUCTURAL ENGINEER. DO NOT SCALE THE DRAWING. ALL DISCREPANCIES SHALL BE BROUGHT TO RCC BEAM NOTICE TO THE ARCHITECT BEFORE THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY WORK. INTERNAL PLASTER RICHER CONCRETE MIX TONOTES BE USED FOR THE GENERAL 25MM SCREEDING 40MM FOUNDATION AND M:30 MIX TO BE USED FOR - THE ALLSUPER DIMENSIONS ARE INALL MILLIMETERS UNLESS STRUCTURE, MIXES SHALL BE BRICK WALL OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. SUGGESTED, EXAMINED AND APPROVED BY 150MM THICK - THE ALLSTRUCTURAL THE WRITTENENGINEER. DIMENSIONS ARE TO BE RAFT SLAB FOLLOWED. VERIFY FIELD CONDITIONS AND COORDINATION WOODEN FRAMEW - WITH DRAWINGS TO BE SEEN WITH RESPECT TO ALL THE PROJECT DOCUMENTS PRIOR TO SILL LEVEL SCREEDING 40MM OTHER DRAWINGS. PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK. P.C.C.WITHIN IS IN THE RATIO 1:3:6 (CEMENT - - WORK THE FIELDOF BOUNDARIES AS : SAND : COARSE AGGREGATE).

SPECIFIED IN THE PROJECT DOCUMENT AND SHAHBAD STONE 25MM - COMPLY ALL LEVELS IN METERS.BUILDING WITHSPECIFIED ALL THE APPLICABLE IN OUT FLOORING REINFORCEMENT - CODES, ALL DECISIONS CALCULATIONS REGULATIONS AND ORDINANCE RUBBLE SOLING - REQUIREMENTS. NEED TO BE TAKEN BY STRUCTURAL ENGINEER. SKIRTING SHEAR WALL DO NOT SCALE DRAWING. - - OCCUPANTS ON THE ADJACENCIES TO THE RAMMED EARTH NOSING - PROJECT ALL DISCREPANCIES BE BROUGHT TO AREA SHALL SHALL CONTINUE PLINTH PROTECTION NOTICE TO THE ARCHITECT BEFORE THE RCC BEAM UNINTERRUPTED/UNDISTURBED OCCUPANCY SLAB 120MM COMMENCEMENT OF ANY WORK. DURING THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROJECT. SOLING RICHER CONCRETE MIX TO BE USED FOR THE FOUNDATION AND M:30 MIX TO BE USED FOR SCREEDING 40MM DATE REVISION SR.NO. DESCRIPTION SCREEDING 40MM THE SUPER STRUCTURE, ALL MIXES SHALL BE RAMMED EARTH SUGGESTED, EXAMINED AND APPROVED BY THE STRUCTURAL ENGINEER. WINDOW DETAIL D - @1:20 FOUNDATION DETAIL C - @1:20 VERIFY FIELD CONDITIONS AND COORDINATION RAFT SLAB WOODEN WITH THE PROJECT DOCUMENTS PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK. SILL LEVE SCREEDING 40MM - ISSUED WORK WITHIN

BY THE FIELD BOUNDARIES CHECKEDAS BY SPECIFIED IN THE PROJECT DOCUMENT AND PLINTH DETAIL B - @1:20 COMPLY SHAHBAD STONE 25MM WITH ALL THE APPLICABLE BUILDING CODES, REGULATIONS IN OUT FLOORINGAND ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS. SHEAR WALL RUBBLE SOLING SKIRTING OCCUPANTS ON THE ADJACENCIES TO THE NOSING PROJECT AREA SHALL CONTINUE RAMMED EARTH PLINTH PROTECTION UNINTERRUPTED/UNDISTURBED OCCUPANCY RCC BEAM SLAB 120MM DURING THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROJECT.

Terrace Parapet Detail A

FL 5 +18.60m

FL 3 +12.30m

SHEAR WA NOSING PLINTH PR SLAB 120M SOLING

BRICK WALL 150MM THICK

NOSING 25MM

W1

DETAIL D

FL 4 +15.45m

PLINTH DETAIL B - @1:20

RCC BEAM

FL 7 +24.90m

0m

PARAPET WALL 230MM THICK EXTERNAL PLASTER 25MM

W1

3150

FL 6 +21.75m

SCREEDING 40MM RAMMED EARTH

BRICK WALL COPPING 150MM THICK DRIP MOULD

NOSING 25MM DETAIL A

FL 7 +24.90m

m

SHEAR WALL NOSING PLINTH PROTECTIO SLAB 120MM SOLING

RCC BEAM

SEA SIDE

TERRACE +28.05m

230MM THICK

BCC 100MM

W1

OUT

SKIRTING

ROLL NO | A17 - 01 STAMP & SIGN THIRD YEAR B.ARCH 2019 - 2020

SCHOOL OF ENVIRONMENT AND ARCHITECTURE NORTH

RAMMED EARTH RCC BEAM

SCALE

CO-LIVING AT CHURCHGATE, 1:50 MUMBAI ANJALI AGARWAL DRAWING TITLE & NUMBER ROLL NO | A17 - 01

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSION

DETAIL WINDOW-1

DETAIL WINDOW-3

600

95

600

LAP JOINET FOR PANELS

280

437

50MM THICK PLYWOOD

250

STAINLESS STEEL HANDLE

1500

25MM THICK GRANITE FRAMING

50

3150

50

6MM THICK FROSTED GLASS

250

667

GLAZED GLASS 8MM THICK

50

15MM MORTAR TO FIX GRANITE FRAME

297

275

ALUMINIUM FRAME

100

WINDOW LOCK SILL LEVEL

SILL LEVEL

SILL LEVEL

IN

IN

100

700

OUT

700

700

OUT

SKIRTING

SKIRTING

SKIRTING

FLOORING

FLOORING

FLOORING

EXT 2000 120

SECTION B-B' 40

SECTION A-A'

750

135

120

INT

1050

750

80

20

165

ELEVATION FROM INSIDE

80

145

20 70

WINDOW SCHEDULE

WINDOW TYPE

COUNT

WINDOW DESCRIPTION

TYPE

WIDTH

HEIGHT

SILL HEIGHT

W1

90

SHUTTER (DOUBLE)

EXTERIOR FACADE

1000

1500

700

W2

6

SHUTTER (DOUBLE)

EXTERIOR FACADE

1500

1500

700

W3

46

SLIDING (DOUBLE)

INTERNAL FACADE

2000

1500

700

W4

70

LOUVERS

TOILET WINDOW

2000

600

1200

W5

11

LOUVERS

EXTERIOR FACADE

400

600

700

GRAND TOTAL

223

100

325

325 75 1000

PLAN AT LEVEL A-A'

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSION

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSION

DOOR 2 DETAIL

B

D

HEIGHT - 2100MM WIDTH - 800MM TYPE - SINGLE, PLYWOOD WITH FROSTED GLASS

DOOR 1 DETAIL HEIGHT - 2100MM WIDTH - 1000MM TYPE - SINGLE, SOLID PLYWOOD

15MM THICK BRICK WALL

173

LINTEL

105

50MM THICK PLYWOOD

250

6MM THICK FROSTED GLASS LAP JOINTS

A

725

250

50MM THICK PLYWOOD

A' C

C' 250

60

165

2100

STAINLESS STEEL HANDLE

STAINLESS STEEL LEVER

2100

128

2100

2150

2100

STAINLESS STEEL HANDLE

725

250

LOCKING FROM INSIDE

KEY HOLE

250

1060

1115

25MM THICK GRANITE FRAMING 25 MM THICK GRANITE FRAME

15MM MORTAR TO FIX GRANITE FRAME

340

250

15 MM MORTAR TO FIX GRANITE FRAME

132

127

ELEVATION FROM OUTSIDE

SECTION B-B'

OUT

IN

ELEVATION FROM OUTSIDE

SECTION D-D'

B'

D'

IN IN 175

850 150

500

125

75

150

60

60

50

1050

50 1000

800

OUT OUT PLAN AT LEVEL C-C'

DOOR SCHEDULE

WINDOW TYPE

COUNT

WINDOW DESCRIPTION

TYPE

WIDTH

HEIGHT

D1

60

SINGLE

SOLID PLYWOOD -50MM

1000

2100

D2

111

SINGLE

PLYWOOD WITH FROSTED GLASS

800

2100

D3

11

SINGLE PUSH BAR

2 HRS FIRE RATED DOOR

1450

2100

GRAND TOTAL

182

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSION

PLAN AT LEVEL A-A'

High-rise Strcuture

Borivali, Mumbai | 2020 | Group work The planning of the structure in terms of circulation started with an idea of a courtyard that divides the occupants into public and private spaces from a central lobby that has green open spaces on both sides, to give a calming experience to the occupants.

Not only does this allow an opportunity at creating breathing spaces but also to allow comparatively more natural light into various parts of the structure.

The form of the building further evolved through the idea of tilt and tapering of the building towards the south to reduce the amount of direct sunlight intake thereby reducing the heat gain and hence the load on the services that run in the building to make it habitable.

Inspired by the case study (shanghai tower, Gensler) the structural system of the building consists of five major elements, the core, walking columns, belt trusses, outriggers and the outer framework that holds the facade that is independent of the floor plates. The building is largely divided into 5 stacks one atop the other and the smaller assembly building that largely holds apartments on the upper floors.

The south and the west façade of the building are covered by a kinetic façade to sensitively react to the amount of sunlight falling on it and thereby reducing the amount of heat intake.

25

Services

Structural Elements

TERRACE

RESTAURANT

RESTAURANT

RESTAURANT

RESTAURANT

RESTAURANT

REFUGE FLOOR

+146.8M

OFFICE

OFFICE

OFFICE

OFFICE FIRE CHECK

OFFICE

OFFICE

REFUGE FLOOR

+116M

OFFICE

OFFICE

OFFICE

OFFICE

OFFICE

RELAXATION SPACE FOR OFFICE

TERRACE

REFUGE FLOOR

+84.5M

OFFICE

OFFICE

OFFICE

OFFICE

OFFICE FIRE CHECK

FIRE CHECK

OFFICE

+53.7M

REFUGE FLOOR

REFUGE FLOOR

OFFICE

OFFICE

OFFICE

+13.8M OFFICE

RESIDENCE

ART GALLERY

+32.7M

+28.5M

+22.2M

+13.8M

+9.6M

+5.4M

PODIUM

MULTIPLEX

RETAIL

RETAIL

RETAIL

0.0

- 4.3M

- 7.8M

- 11.3M

Ground level plan

Section

FIRE STAIRCASE

1 | Illustration 2 | Origami 3 | SEA-tyscape

Expressing through Physical Models

Mandala Art I find my escape from the chaos through this therapeutic art form.

Find more such work by me on instagram @mandalaartaa

Thank You for your time!

Anjali Agarwal anjaliagarwal.a1@gmail.com a17anjali@sea.edu.in +91 9930309267