This thesis proposes an interrogation of the endurance of the quarter acre dream as a dominant (sub)urban mythology. The critical discourses surrounding; the “ontology of dwelling”, habitus, and myth, serve to frame the architectural analysis of modern Australian vernaculars within this thesis, and their degradation into cul-de-sacs of “non-place”.
The premise of this thesis is that our current patterns of suburban development are outdated, unsustainable and problematic. The creation of socio-cultural expectations elide the role that ideology and power have in the formation of space/place, rendering architecture a natural, neutral “framework of everyday life”.
In order to probe the causal factors behind Melbourne’s patterns of urbanization it is necessary to ask why, despite the development of technology, construction techniques, planning regulations and shifting cultural demographics, the developer-designed large detached house has remained the most prevalent architectural form within the burbs.