August 2013
June 2012
Trayvon Martin By Rob Faircloth CP Op-Ed Contributor
O
ne must seriously weigh the decision to write about George Zimmerman and Trayvon Martin. But one must not miss the opportunity to talk about sin and how this case can bring the gospel to millions. Everyone wants to know whether you vote Guilty or Not Guilty, and someone is bound to be very disappointed with whatever answer is given, or the answer that is not given at all. And, with the nationalization of local crime, “someone” turns out to be quite large numbers of “someones”. Yet if we are able to reasonably discuss those things that threaten to divide us, in which the stakes of further division are high, hearing more voices is generally better than hearing fewer. Viewing the Martin-Zimmerman case from a distance, I naturally come to a conclusion about what the evidence shows, with one large caveat: I don’t know all the evidence. Nevertheless, I think that the evidence, as it has been reported, would support either the jury’s conclusion that Zimmerman committed a type of manslaughter (something less than premeditated murder) or its decision
that Zimmerman acted in justified selfdefense. At this point, most readers will disagree with me, perhaps violently, and claim that there is only one possible outcome from the evidence, and depending on your perception of the case, some will say the jury reached that one possible
Yet one thing that is always present in conflict between people, that never needs to be inserted, but that is almost always neglected, is not the race card, but the sin card. outcome while others will say it did not. Herein, as they say, lies the problem and the potential for a tumultuous national future. For if you believe that the only reason the jury reached a Not Guilty verdict is because Trayvon Martin is black and George Zimmerman is notblack, because it capitulated to the jurors’ own latent racist tendencies, because it is part of a long train of race-based abuses foisted on minorities by the majority
George Zimmerman government structure, then you will never be part of a solution to our nation’s real racial divide, but instead will exacerbate it. Similarly, if you believe that the only verdict the jury could have reached is Not Guilty because Trayvon Martin is black and George Zimmerman is not-black, because young black boys in hoodies are always thugs looking for trouble, because black people in gated communities must be criminals, because you refuse to consider the possibility of sinister racial motivations, then you, too, will never be part of the solution to our nation’s real racial divide, but instead will exacerbate it. Given how the conversation tends to go, one suspects, however, that a solution is not within human reach. Thabiti Anyabwile, in his post about this, states well the frustration some of us feel regarding the race discussion. First, for those holding a biblical worldview, there should be no race, only ethnicity. Second, in many situations, the race card is inserted to a deck that did not already contain it; in others, the issue becomes either only about race or not
MIRaCleS ABOUND IN NORTHERN CALIFORNIA
p. 4
In The News... P. 7-9 Community p. 12 -17
Cont. on p. 9
The Ambassador
1