Doctor
ISSUE 6, NOV/DEC 2025 VOLUME 37, NO. 6
CANBERRA
Canberra Doctor is proudly brought to you by the AMA ACT CIRCULATION: 1,900 IN ACT & REGION
Home-grown: Canberra’s newest consultants
Historic vote secures AMA ACT future
Canberra trainees increasingly satisfied PAGE 5
PAGE 3
PAGE 6-7
Informing the Canberra medical community since 1988
Doctors distrust data and governance: survey ACT doctors have voiced distrust in the data, governance and processes of the ACT public health system, as momentum builds for large-scale reforms. Around 80 doctors working in the ACT, including public hospital doctors and private practitioners, responded to an AMA ACT survey about systems and processes across the ACT public health system. The survey provides the basis for AMA ACT’s submission to an ongoing inquiry into the health system being led by Mr Michael Walsh PSM, which was called for by the Canberra Liberals and ACT Greens.
Data and governance Respondents to AMA ACT’s survey expressed low trust in published hospital performance data, consistent with past Auditor-General findings about data inaccuracy and incompleteness in the ACT.
Around
50%
The top factors affecting doctors’ morale and intention to remain in the workforce were:
58% 44% 49% 54%
of respondents reported experiencing or witnessing pressure to reclassify urgency or alter documentation for non-clinical reasons;
burnout
pay rates
poor workplace governance and management issues culture
only 30% said this never happens.
Only
Many clinicians expressed a feeling of being outsiders to health data and decision-making.
Less than 20% said they had good visibility over relevant waitlists.
Just 18% said clinicians
were always or usually involved in system level decisions, and 45% said this rarely/never happens.
Digital health record Despite negative mainstream news coverage about the digital health record (DHR), most survey respondents supported the system. Around 60% reported some improvements with workflow since the DHR was implemented, and only 30% said it had worsened or Continued page 2
1/4
answered “yes” when asked if patients were prioritised fairly across outpatient and surgical waiting lists; most said “no” or “sometimes".
Less than
1/2
said they felt comfortable raising concerns about clinical interference and integrity, despite concerns about delayed care, patient harm and distorted data.