Technical Systems_Compost Storage Space

THE COMPOST STORAGE PLACE

PROJECT REPORT TECHNICAL SYSTEMS II UEM December 2014

PRESENTED BY: ALIA SABRY SUPERVISED BY: LUIS ALVAREZ ALFARO XAVIER AGUILÓ NIEVES PLAZA

CONTENTS PAGE DESCRIPTIVE REPORT ........................................................................................................................ 01 1. REPORT OBJECTIVES..................................................................................................................... 01 2. INVOLVED PARTIES........................................................................................................................ 01 3. ABOUT THE PROJECT................................................................................................................... 02 3.1 INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................................. 02 3.2 THE PROCESS.................................................................................................................................. 02 3.3 COMPOST STORAGE SPACE........................................................................................................... 03 3.4 GOALS.............................................................................................................................................. 03

4. LOCATION & OTHER CONDITIONS............................................................................................. 04 4.1 SITE................................................................................................................................................... 04 4.2 MACRO CLIMATE OF MADRID....................................................................................................... 05 4.3 MICRO CLIMATE OF THE CAMPUS................................................................................................ 08

5. DESCRIPTION OF THE BUILDING................................................................................................ 11 4.1 GENERAL DESCRIPTION................................................................................................................. 11 4.2 PROGRAM........................................................................................................................................ 11 4.3 BUILDING USERS............................................................................................................................. 11 4.4 SURFACE AREAS.............................................................................................................................. 12 TECHINICAL SYSTEMS.......................................................................................................................... 13 STRUCTURAL CONCEPT....................................................................................................................... 14 LOADS..................................................................................................................................................... 15

CONSTRUCTION REPORT .................................................................................................................. 16 1. SOIL CHARACTERISTIC..................................................................................................................... 16

2. STRUCTURAL SYSTEM.................................................................................................................. 17 2.1 RETAINING WALL............................................................................................................................ 17 2.2 VERTICAL STRUCTURE................................................................................................................... 17 2.3 HORIZONTAL STRUCTURE............................................................................................................ 17

3. ENCLOSURE SYSTEM..................................................................................................................... 17 3.1 ETFE FACADE................................................................................................................................... 17

4. INSTALLATIONS............................................................................................................................. 17 4.1 VENTILATION.................................................................................................................................. 17 4.2 ETFE COMPRESSOR........................................................................................................................ 17 4.3 LIGHTING......................................................................................................................................... 17 4.4 FIRE SAFETY..................................................................................................................................... 17 4.5 DRAINAGE SYSTEM......................................................................................................................... 17 4.6 COMPOST LIQUID GATHERING SYSTEM...................................................................................... 17

ANNEX .................................................................................................................................................. 17

DESCRIPTIVE REPORT 1. REPORT OBJECTIVES The goal of this project is to develop a compost storage space for UEM’s new recycling system. It has recently decided to take a step closer to being a sustainable campus. This step involves making a biodigestor on campus to treat the waste produced by the campus community. The biodigestor will receive organic (from cafeteria), green (from gardening) and paper (from printing stations) waste. The biodigestor will need multiple facilities, those include: a pre-treatment facility, a facility for the biodigestion to occur, a facility to handle the gases produced (CO2 and methane) and finally a facility to store compost which will be used as soil fertilizer. This report is focused on the facility of storing the fertilizer. It will investigate the spatial requirements as well as the optimum condition for fertilizer to be stored in.

2. INVOLVED PARTIES CLIENT The Universidad Europea de Madrid is a private university focused on being a sustainable community. It has already taken measures towards becoming more sustainable and is in the process of constructing a recycling system. It is a university of 15.000 students located in Villaviciosa de Odon, Madrid, Spain.

ARCHITECT The project is divided between a group of 40 architects who are split into smaller groups of 6, each group focusing on a different aspect. Then each of the proposals will be developed in parts by each group member.

01

3. ABOUT THE PROJECT 3.1 INTRODUCTION A biodigester is a natural system that takes advantage of anaerobic digestion in the absence of oxygen.

The bacteria that already live in the manure is used to transform this into biogas and fertilizer. Biogas can be used as fuel in the kitchens, or illumination, and in great facilities it is possible to be used to feed a motor that generates electricity. The fertilizer was initially considered a secondary product, but at the moment is being considered of the same importance, or of more importance than biogas since it provides farmers with a natural fertilizer that strongly improves the yield on harvests.

Fig. Biodigestor Diagram 1.jpg

Fig. Biodigestor Diagram 2.jpg

3.2 THE PROCESS The main stages of the process are the following:

1) Reception of the residue: the residue is collected and store in a receptacle.

2) Preparation of the residue. In this stage the mixed residue is pretreated and classified to separate organic matter from non-organic matter. There is also a recovery of glass, metals, plastics, cardboard and paper for recycling purpose.

3) Anaerobic digestion: the organic residue is diluted and mixed to form a dense mud that is sent to a biodigestor. It stays in the biodigestor for a period of time, usually about 10 weeks in which methane is constantly being produced. Methane reaches a peak in the 4th week.

4) Use of biogas: the bio-gas produced can be use for vapor production, electricity, heat or fuel after a purification process.

02

5) Aerobic post-treatment and refine: the maturation and drying process of the digested matter takes place in a closed building where the compost is store for a minimum of two weeks.

Fig. Biodigestion Process Diagram

3.3 COMPOST STORAGE SPACE

PHASE 1

PHASE 2

PRETREATMENT HOUSE

PHASE 3

BIODIGESTOR

COMPOST STORAGE SPACE

PHASE 4

GAS GENERATOR

The new UEM compost storage space is mainly a functional building that prioritizes controlling the internal climate of the building in order to maintain the fetilizer in optimum conditions. The aim is to have good quality fertilizer which can be used on campus or can be sold to neighbouring clients.

5: Aerobic post-treatment and refine: the maturation and drying process of the digested matter takes place in a closed building where the compost is store for a minimum of two weeks.

Fig. Important Enclosure Requirements MOST IMPORTANT FACTOR

PROTECT FROM WATERSHED

PROTECT FROM

SUN

WIND

RAIN

protecting COMPOSTfrom rainfall improves its quality, increases nutrient retention and produces and overall higher quality product

3.4 GOALS

• • • • • •

provide a storage space for the produced compost maintain UEM’s aesthetics prevent odorous emissions onto the campus design optimum climate conditions for good quality fertilizer finally to achieve all this with minimum costs.

03

4. LOCATION & OTHER CONDITIONS 4.1 SITE Fig. Location From Madrid.png

Fig. Campus Location.png

04

4.2 MACRO CLIMATE OF MADRID Fig. Weather Data Summary

Fig. Temperature Range

Fig. Monthly Diurnal Averages

Fig. Radiation Range

Fig. Illumination Range

05

Fig. Sky Cover Range

Fig. Ground Temperature

Fig. Wind Wheel

Fig. Wind Velocity Range

Fig. Dry Bulb X Relative Humidity

Fig. Dry Bulb X Dew Point

Fig. Sun Shading Chart (Dec 21 - June 21)

Fig. Sun Shading Chart (June 21 - Dec 21)

06

Fig. Sun Chart (Dec 21 to June 21)

Fig. Sun Chart (June 21 to Dec 21)

Fig. Dry Bulb Timetable Plot

Fig. Wet Bulb Timetable Plot

Fig. Psychrometric Chart

CONCLUSION Madrid has 63 days of year on average and has some very hot months and other very cold ones. The envelope of the storage space will have to be water tight and mediate between the extreme temperature and try to be steady.

07

PROJECT VISUALIZATION Fig. Compost Storage Space

08

5. DESCRIPTION OF THE BUILDING 4.1 GENERAL DESCRIPTION The Compost storage space is mainly a functional building thats function is to store the fertilizer until usage or distribution. It will not accomodate people on a regular basis and its main accessibility will be for drop off and pick up of fertilizer as well as organized visits which will be fairly quick since the smell is quite uncomfortable for many people.

4.2 PROGRAM Compost: From the average biodigestion process, 100 kg of organic waste produce 30 kg of compost.

According to previous research the university produces 30.000kg of waste per week. The ratio of waste:compost is 100:30 which is equivalent to 30.000:9.000 according to the follow calculation: 30.000kg of waste * 30 kg of compost / 100 kg of waste = 9.000 kg of compost Translate that weight into volume and 9 m³ of compost is produced weekly. The second piece of information gathered from research is that 1 m³ of compost costs 51,53€.

9m³ * 51,35€ =462,15€/week 462,15€ * 12 months * 4 weeks = 22.200€/year This building should perform as a good storage space for the compost since the quality of the fertilizer will determine its value and therefore the income (if sold) or savings (if used instead of purchasing fertilizer).

4.3 BUILDING USERS The organization of pick up and drop off will be based on a FIRST IN, FIRST OUT basis so things will be dropped off in rows. The accessibility will be big enough for a forklift which can pick up 3 fertilizer boxes at a time.

The main user of the building will be the compost since the climate is controlled for it and the organization of the space as well. The building will be able to store 300m³ of compost at a time which is 350 containers (0.8m x 1.2m x 0.8m) while we are producing 9m³ of compost a week (about 11 containers). This storage space will be enough for the first phases of the biodigesting the campus’ organic waste as well as some of Villaviciosa de Odon.

09

CONSTRUCTION REPORT 1. SOIL CHARACTERISTIC In order to design a good retaining wall and its footing dimensionsthe study of the soil on campus is necessary. Below is a map of the soils across madrid.

Fig. Madrid Soil Map.png

Fig. Campus Soil Map

According to the “Instituto Geológico y Minero de España” the soil on the campus (which is the green shade) is “arenas arcósicas finas, arenas micáceas y lutitas verdosas y ocres” which translates to “arkosic fine sand, micaceous sands and shales green and ocher”. With this description, in the CTE-DB-SE-C (Annex D, Table D.27) Fig. CTE-DB-SE-C Table D.27

From these ranges the vale for the weight of soil will be 18kN/m3 and the internal angle of friction will be 33º. These will be used to calculate the dimensions of the retaining wall.

10

2. STRUCTURAL SYSTEM The structural system is light weight, extendible, and cheap. It consists of a Hercules Truss Arch which rests on a retaining wall. The building extends 2 meters under ground level however the retaining wall continues 1m above ground level. It is then connected to the arches with a brace plate. The arches are constructed one by one while fixing the bracing at the same time.

2.1 RETAINING WALL Retaining wall dimensions are as follow: Fig. Weights.pdf STEM

0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3

OFFSET

1 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3

TOTAL WIDTH

2.3 2.1 1.9 1.7 1.5 1.3 1.1 0.9

Weight of Stem

24.75 24.75 24.75 24.75 24.75 24.75 24.75 24.75

Weight of Footing Weight of Soil 34.5 31.5 28.5 25.5 22.5 19.5 16.5 13.5

41.4 37.26 33.12 28.98 24.84 20.7 16.56 12.42

Nk Total

100.65 93.51 86.37 79.23 72.09 64.95 57.81 50.67

Fig. Sliding.pdf Sliding

0.575958653

Fr Stablizer

100.65 93.51 86.37 79.23 72.09 64.95 57.81 50.67

0.404026226

40.67 37.78 34.90 32.01 29.13 26.24 23.36 20.47

1.821221693 1.692026234 1.562830776 1.433635318 1.304439859 1.175244401 1.046048943 0.916853484

No Sliding No Sliding No Sliding SLIDING!!

SLIDING!!

SLIDING!!

SLIDING!!

SLIDING!!

Fig. Overturning.pdf Overturning Weight of Stem

24.75 24.75 24.75 24.75 24.75 24.75 24.75 24.75

Distance from Moment Weight of Footing Distance from Moment Weight of Soil 1.15 34.5 1.15 1.05 31.5 1.05 0.95 28.5 0.95 0.85 25.5 0.85 0.75 22.5 0.75 0.65 19.5 0.65 0.55 16.5 0.55 0.45 13.5 0.45

41.4 37.26 33.12 28.98 24.84 20.7 16.56 12.42

E 21.658694 Distance from Moment M Stabilizer M Destabilizer γv 1.8 142.6575 21.659 6.59 No Overturning 1.65 120.5415 21.659 5.57 No Overturning 1.5 100.2675 21.659 4.63 No Overturning 1.35 81.8355 21.659 3.78 No Overturning 1.2 65.2455 21.659 3.01 No Overturning 1.05 50.4975 21.659 2.33 No Overturning 0.9 37.5915 21.659 1.74 No Overturning 0.75 26.5275 21.659 1.22 No Overturning

2.2 SLAB ON GRADE A slab on grade will be used as the flooring of the building. It will be a bidirectional slab with the minimum reinforcement required by the CTE.

11

2.3 TRUSS STRUCTURE Loads LOADS ON CENTRAL TRUSSES Vertical Loads "Permanent" (also called "Dead") Loads Roof and Facade Self weight ( P1) EFTE panels Aluminium subestructure Total (characteristic value P1 ,k) Partial factor for the action Total (desing value P1 ,d )

KN/m2 KN/m2 KN/m2 no units KN/m2

0.01 0.20 0.21 1.35 0.28 Fans ( P2)

Depending on model, from 0,1 to 0,5 KN (P2 ,k, point load) "Variable" (also called "Live") Loads Note: This is a roof of category H (Eurocode 1991-­‐1-­‐1): not accessible except for normal maintenance and repair Use overload (Q) Normal maintenance Total (characteristic value Q ,k) Partial factor for the action Total (desing value Q ,d )

1.00 1.00 1.50 1.50 Snow overload ( S)

KN/m2 KN/m2 no units KN/m2

Snow (Values for Madrid) Total (characteristic value S ,k) Partial factor for the action Total (desing value S ,d )

0.60 0.60 1.50 0.90

KN/m2 KN/m2 no units KN/m2

Fig. Loads Applied on Structural Model SAP2000 17.0.0

18/12/2014

Fig. Variable Use Load SAP2000 17.0.0

Cercha_8_combos.sdb

3-D View

KN, m, C

Cercha_3D_v7b.sdb

11/12/2014

3-D View

KN, m, C

12

Fig. Axial Forces

Fig. Worst Deformation in Z Direction

SAP2000 17.0.0

Cercha_8_combos.sdb

18/12/2014

3-D View

KN, m, C

SAP2000 17.0.0

Cercha_8_combos.sdb

18/12/2014

3-D View

KN, m, C

Finally, in order to create a resistant structure, the minimum diameters for the truss bars are the following:

13

Fig. Fixing Brace Plate to Retaining Wall (Ref Clear Span)

2.4 PROCESS The process of the structure is as follows: 1-Excavated for foundations 2 -Place footings 3-Lay gravel for slab on grade 4-Pour slab on grade 5-Excavate around the stem of the footing 6-Pour stem or retaining wall 7-Fix brace plates onto retaining wall 8-Join truss elements 9-Mount truss with crane 10-Fix to brace plates 11-Stabilize with bracing

14

3. ENCLOSURE SYSTEM 3.1 ETFE Facade Inflatable ETFE cushions comprise of two or more layers of a plastics foil material, ETFE, (ethylene tetra flouro ethylene) which are inflated with low pressure air. The ETFE foil cushion is restrained in a perimeter frame manufactured from aluminium, which is then fixed to a support structure. As the ETFE foil cushion is inflated, the ETFE is put under tension and forms a tight drum-like skin. There are many manufacturers for ETFE foil cushions such as Architen Landrell and Texlon. ETFE cushions are fixed to a support structure to form a cladding and are used to enclose atria or other enclosed spaces to provide a transparent or translucent roof or facade to the enclosure, and are considered an alternative to glass. A number of buildings have been built using this technology, some examples are shown below.

The cushions are held in an aluminium perimeter frame extrusion which is supported by the main building structure.

Fig. Media Tic, Barcelona.jpg

Fig. Cornwall, England.jpg

ETFE cushions are kept continually pressurised by a small inflation unit which maintains the pressure at approximately at 220 Pascals and gives the foil a structural stability and some insulation properties.1 3.2 ETFE Insulation A single layer of ETFE membrane has an approximate U value of 5.6 w/m2K, a standard three layer cushion can achieve a U value of 1.96 w/mK which is a better insulation value than triple glazing when used horizontally2. Since this building has two layers of ETFE then the U-value is 3.78 w/m2K. ETFE’s insulation properties can also be enhanced by treating the foil with specialist coatings which improve the thermal properties.

1 http://www.google.es/patents/US20040074151 2 http://www.architen.com/articles/etfe-foil-a-guide-to-design/

15

3.3 ETFE Transparency ETFE Foil is naturally very transparent and transmits light across the entire visible light region (380780nm). One layer of medium weight ETFE has an approximately 85% light transmission but adding layers slightly decreases this percentage. Another important factor to consider is that the film absorbs a large proportion of infra red light transmitted, a quality which can be exploited to improve buildings energy consumption.1 3.4 Summary of Technical Features • • • • • • • • • • •

Low weight Can be colored or printed or lit High Transparency (95% visible light / 85% ultraviolet) Fire resistance Impermeable Self-cleaning with rain water Permeable to UVA rays but preventing the passage of UVA C rays Minimum maintenance Resistant to bad weather Recyclable Does not discolour over years

4. INSTALLATIONS 4.1 VENTILATION The calculation for ventllation has been done to conclude that two fans are needed, one to input air and the other to output air. They will be positioned in order to maximize the surface area the air flows through.

4.2 ETFE COMPRESSOR ETFE cushion systems need monitoring system for the pressure of the air inside. What this monitor does is that it provides real-time information on the pressure inside the cushions, the local weather conditions, temperature and humidity levels and any problems or changes within the system to a local computer screen. This system makes it possible for people to have control over the system.

1 http://www.architen.com/articles/etfe-foil-a-guide-to-design/

16

Fig. ETFE Control System.jpg

Continual monitoring allows the system to automatically responds to potential problems that may not be easily detectible. In case of a problem the control system will automatically try to compensate for the fault; if the pressure inside the cushion drops, the system will detect that and immediately increase the air flow into that cushion. Additionally, to allow simple diagnostics, maintenance staff can inspect the coloured indicators traffic lights on the front of the air handling unit. The traffic lights display the status of the inflation equipment:

Green light = all working fine

Green & amber lights = minor problem, needs attention (for example, a partially blocked air filter)

Red = Immediate attention required 4.3 COMPOST LIQUID GATHERING SYSTEM As many of us know that when dealing with organic compost and fertilizer there is often some leakage of toxic liquids. In order to prevent this a few options were explored. The intitial idea was to treat the concrete floor as a pool is treated in order to ensure that it can reists the liquid as well as resist toixic substances which will never compete with chlorine. There are four types of conrete sealers: acrylic,

17

polyurethane, epoxy, and penetrating sealer. The acrylic sealer is the fastes application, fastest drying but its weakness is that its coating vanishes quite quickly too and with the constant traffic of the forklift this option was rejected. The second option is the polyurethane sealer which is twice as thick but the installation process is complex and if not done accurately can be problematic. Third is the epoxy which has been proven to be the toughest as well as leaving a smooth finish indoors. The fourth has the same strengths as epoxy however also vanishes quickly so it is not recommended for areas with traffic.1 The final verdit is that epoxy will be used to secure the concrete floor.

4.4 DRAINAGE SYSTEM Additionally to concrete sealer, an exit for the liquids is needed so the slab on grade will be divided into four parts in order to comply with CTE regulations and have four drainages, each with the appropriate slope of 1%. The drainage will be placed behind the compost boxes, so the forklift circulation occupies the left-most of the space, in the middle will be the compost boxes available for take out. and then after that the compost boxes will be offset from the wall by a meter for circulation of people and that is where the drainage will be. Accessible for fixture and maintenance as well as away from the forklift.

1

2 3

4

5

6

24.0 m

7

8

9 10 11

Retaining Wall Axis

14.7 m

4.8 m

4.8 m

4.8 m

4.8 m

4.8 m

A B

Truss Axis

2.7 m

1.5 m

1.9 m

C D

1.8 m

Forklift Circulation Space

E F G I

2.3 m

3.6 m

145 m²

9.8 m

Compost Storage

Footing Axis

3.6 m

Facade Mullions 1.6 m

ETFE Substructure Axis

2.3 m

126 m²

1.8 m

J

1.9 m

1.5 m

2.7 m

K L M N O

Level 1 ANNEX 1 1 : 100

1

2 14.4 m

3 4

5 5.1 m

6 4.8 m

7 4.8 m

8 4.8 m

9 10 11 4.8 m

B 1.5 m

ETFE Substructure

1.8 m

E

1.6 m

G I

2.3 m

ETFE Substructure

2.3 m

F

1.8 m

J

1.5 m

K N

2

Level 3 1 : 100

1 http://www.slideshare.net/waterproofing076/concrete-sealer-waterproofing-of-swimming-pools-utilising-epoxy-paints

18

BOQ Civil Works Breakdown NO.

ITEM

BRIEF SPECIFICATION

QUANTITY Unit

1

Unit Rate Materials

Q'ty

Labour

Total Price Equip.

U/Price

Remarks

Price

FOUNDATION WORKS 1

Excavation

-By equipment

M3

1,012.50

1.19

5.14

6.33

6,409.13

2

Soil disposal

M3

1,012.50

1.27

3.85

5.12

5,184.00

5

Polyethylene sheet

M2

190.00

6.29

18.79

3,570.10

7

Re-bar

- Excavated Material - Thk. = 0.25mm - Two Layers - Uncoated - f'c=10MPa, - Thickness 50mm - Type I /II - For structural

1,701

1701.00

8

Lean concrete

9

Concrete

TON

12.5

0.50

M3

12.00

69.2

50.94

120.14

1,441.68

M3

130.00

72.45

52.3

124.75

16,217.50

Sub-Total 2

850.50

33,672.91

CIVIL FOR ELECTRICAL WORK 1

Excavation

-By equipment

M3

15.00

1.19

5.14

6.33

2

Disposal

- Excavated Material

M3

15.00

1.27

3.85

5.12

3

Sand Bedding

- Sand Bed

M3

7.00

28.5

1

2

4

Fans for ventilation

- For ventilation

Unit

2.00

159

1.4

5

Unburied Cables

- Cooper cable

M

60.00

18.83

3.78

2.77

25.38

1,523

6

Earthing conductor

- Cooper cable

M

100.00

18.83

3.78

2.77

25.38

2,538

1

Gravel filling

2

Polyethylene sheet

3

Re-bar

4

Concrete

5

Grout

221 321

392 - Imported clean gravel - Thk. = 0.25mm - Two Layers - Uncoated - For structural - Non-shrink Cement Base Grouting

M3

50.00

M2

270.00

TON

20.9

1.61

5.01

27.52 0.00

0.50

1,701

M3

50.00

72.45

M3

30.00

52.3

1,376 0

1701.00

851

124.75

6,238

0.00

Sub-Total DRAINAGE WORK

4

77

31.50 160.40

Sub-Total UNDERGROUND WORK

3

95

0

8,464.0

1

Excavation

-By equipment

M3

100.00

1.19

5.14

6.33

2

Soil disposal

- Excavated Material

M3

100.00

1.27

3.85

5.12

633 512

3

Perimeter drainage in wall

M

65.00

24.96

1,622

4

Polyethylene sheet

M2

18.79

3,570

5

Sand Bedding

- With gravel filter - Thk. = 0.25mm - Two Layers - Sand Bed

M3

6

Gravel filling

- Imported clean gravel

M3

7

Sink downstairs

8

Buried sewers

- Output 90 Ø - Board adhered

16.72

8.24

190.00

12.5

6.29

20.00

16.11

2.59

1.38

20.08

402

150.00

20.9

1.61

5.01

27.52

4,128

Unit

5.00

17.33

6.29

M2

74.00

12.4

1.14

8.84

23.62

118

22.38

1,656

9

Linear drainage

-In terrain surface

M

65.00

54.36

16.5

70.86

4,606

10

Linear drainage

-In ramp

M

12.00

49.36

16.3

65.66

788

11

Gutters

-Steel gutters

M

65.00

12

PVC Pipelines

13

Lean concrete

from Ø 90 to Ø 200 - f'c=15MPa(Cube Strength), - Thickness 15mm - Type I /II

0.00

0

14

Polished Concrete

Sub-Total STEEL STRUCTURE WORK

5

- Area paving thickness 150mm

M

15.00

M3

40.00

M2

80.00

14.49

10.46

24.95

-Includes bars, welded works and primer

1

Truss structure

2

Facade Substructure

3

Roof horizontal substructure

4

Bracing

-Cable high resistance Steel

5

Special joints

16

Anchor Bolt

-Singular bolded connections - M12~M16 grade 4.6 bolts or better - M16 for main connections

M3

270.00

49.45

8.29

15

0.9

4

61.74

16,670

15.90

15,964

M2 M Unit Unit

1,004.00

Sub-Total 6

1,996 18,035

32,633

ETFE COVER 1

EFTE surface

M2

427.00

30.3

1.19

5.14

36.63

15,641

2

Aluminium substructure

M2

427.00

4.5

1.27

0.6

6.37

2,720

3

Bolts

Unit

930.00

4

0.4

Sub-Total

4.40

4,092 22,453

TOTAL

1

FOUNDATION WORKS

2

CIVIL FOR ELECTRICAL WORK

3

CIVIL FOR UNDERGROUND WORK

4

DRAINAGE WORK

18,035.14

5

STEEL STRUCTURE WORK

32,633.40

6

EFTE COVER

22,453.00

TOTAL TO SUMMARY

33,672.91 392.25 8,464.00

115,650.70

19 1

TECHNICAL DRAWINGS ALIA SABRY

ARCHITECTURE DRAWINGS

TECHNICAL ARCHITECT ALIA SABRY CORRECTORS LUIS ALVAREZ XAVIER AGUILO NIEVES PLAZA

EXECUTED PROJECT UEM BIODIGESTOR: COMPOST STORAGE SPACE

1

Site Plan

LOCATION UEM CAMPUS CLIENT UNIVERSIDAD EUROPEA DE MADRID C/ Tajo s/n Villaviciosa de Od贸n, 28670 Madrid 902 23 23 50 ARCHITECT ALIA SABRY

CALLE SAN BERNARDO 18, 3B MADRID ESPANA 28015 +34 657 654 387 aliaahtsabry@gmail.com DOCUMENT PLAN_SITE SCALE 1:2500 DATE 10 - 12 - 2014 DRAWING CODE CS_PL_01

TECHNICAL ARCHITECT ALIA SABRY CORRECTORS LUIS ALVAREZ XAVIER AGUILO NIEVES PLAZA

1

Topography Before

1

Topography Befoe EXECUTED PROJECT UEM BIODIGESTOR: COMPOST STORAGE SPACE

LOCATION UEM CAMPUS CLIENT UNIVERSIDAD EUROPEA DE MADRID C/ Tajo s/n Villaviciosa de Od贸n, 28670 Madrid 902 23 23 50 ARCHITECT ALIA SABRY

CALLE SAN BERNARDO 18, 3B MADRID ESPANA 28015 +34 657 654 387 aliaahtsabry@gmail.com DOCUMENT PLAN_TOPOGRAPHY SCALE 1:2000 DATE 10 - 12 - 2014 DRAWING CODE CS_PL_02

2

1

Topography After

Topography After

TECHNICAL ARCHITECT ALIA SABRY CORRECTORS LUIS ALVAREZ XAVIER AGUILO NIEVES PLAZA

Level 3 7

Level 3 Level 2 7 4

Level 2 4

Level 1 0

1

1

West Elevation (Front) 1 : 50

Level 1

West Elevation (Front)

0

EXECUTED PROJECT

1

UEM BIODIGESTOR: COMPOST STORAGE SPACE

West Elevation (Front) 1 : 50

LOCATION Level 3

UEM CAMPUS

7

CLIENT UNIVERSIDAD EUROPEA DE MADRID C/ Tajo s/n Villaviciosa de Od贸n, 28670 Madrid 902 23 23 50

Level 3 Level 27 4

ARCHITECT ALIA SABRY

Level 2 4

CALLE SAN BERNARDO 18, 3B MADRID ESPANA 28015

Level 1 0

2

+34 657 654 387 aliaahtsabry@gmail.com

East Elevation (Back) 1 : 50

DOCUMENT Level 1 0

EAST & WEST ELEVATIONS SCALE 1:50 DATE

2

2

East Elevation (Back)

East Elevation (Back) 1 : 50

10 - 12 - 2014 DRAWING CODE CS__EL_03

TECHNICAL ARCHITECT ALIA SABRY CORRECTORS LUIS ALVAREZ XAVIER AGUILO NIEVES PLAZA

Level 3 7

Level Level 3 2 7 4

Level 2 4 Level 1 0

Level 1 0

1

1

North Elevation (Side) 1 : 100

North North Elevation (Side)Elevation 1

(Side)

1 : 100

EXECUTED PROJECT UEM BIODIGESTOR: COMPOST STORAGE SPACE

LOCATION UEM CAMPUS CLIENT UNIVERSIDAD EUROPEA DE MADRID

Level 3 7

C/ Tajo s/n Villaviciosa de Od贸n, 28670 Madrid 902 23 23 50

Level Level 3 2 7 4

ARCHITECT ALIA SABRY

Level 2 4 Level 1 0

CALLE SAN BERNARDO 18, 3B MADRID ESPANA 28015

Level 1 0

+34 657 654 387 aliaahtsabry@gmail.com

2 2

South Elevation (Side) 1 : 100

South Elevation (Side) 1 : 100

DOCUMENT SIDE ELEVATIONS SCALE 1:100 DATE 10 - 12 - 2014 DRAWING CODE CS__EL_04

2

South Elevation (Side)

TECHNICAL ARCHITECT ALIA SABRY CORRECTORS

1

2 3

4

5

6

24.0 m

7

8

LUIS ALVAREZ XAVIER AGUILO NIEVES PLAZA

9 10 11

Retaining Wall Axis

14.7 m

4.8 m

4.8 m

4.8 m

4.8 m

4.8 m

A B

Truss Axis

5

6

24.0 m

7

8

9 10 11

14.7 m

4.8 m

4.8 m

4.8 m Truss Axis

C D

2.7 m

Retaining Wall Axis

1.9 m

4

1.5 m

2 3

Forklift Circulation 4.8 m Space

4.8 m

1.8 m

1

E A F B

1

1

Footing Axis

1.9 m 1.9 m 1.9 m

Level 1

Footing Axis

ETFE Substructure Axis

Facade Mullions 1.6 mm 1.8 2.3 m1.5 m 1.5 m

2.7 m

1.8 m

3.6 m

145 m²

C G D EI F

2.32.3 m m

3.6 m3.6 m 2.7 m

Compost Storage

9.8 m

1.5 m

126 m²

145 m²

9.8 m

Compost Storage

ETFE Substructure Axis

Forklift Circulation Space

Facade Mullions 1.8 mm 1.6

2.7 m

3.6 m

2.3 m

126 m²

J G K I L M J N O K L M N O

1 : 100 Ground Floor Plan EXECUTED PROJECT

1

Level 1

1

1 : 100

2

3 4

14.4 m

5 5.1 m

6 4.8 m

7 4.8 m

8 4.8 m

UEM BIODIGESTOR: COMPOST STORAGE SPACE

9 10 11 4.8 m

B

ETFE Substructure

2

3 4

5

6

7

8

9 10 11

LOCATION

1.5 m

1

UEM CAMPUS

14.4 m

5.1 m

4.8 m

4.8 m

4.8 m

4.8 m

1.8 m

E B F ETFE Substructure

UNIVERSIDAD EUROPEA DE MADRID C/ Tajo s/n Villaviciosa de Odón, 28670 Madrid 902 23 23 50

FI ARCHITECT

ETFE Substructure

ALIA SABRY

J G KI

2.3 m1.5 m

1.6 mm 1.8

CLIENT

G E

2.32.3 m m

1.8 mm 1.6

1.5 m2.3 m

ETFE Substructure

CALLE SAN BERNARDO 18, 3B MADRID ESPANA 28015

1.8 m

N J K 1.5 m

+34 657 654 387 aliaahtsabry@gmail.com

N

DOCUMENT GROUND FLOOR & LAYOUT PLAN

2

Level 3 1 : 100

SCALE 1:100 DATE 10 - 12 - 2014 DRAWING CODE CS__PL_05

2

Layout

2

Level 3 1 : 100

TECHNICAL ARCHITECT ALIA SABRY CORRECTORS LUIS ALVAREZ XAVIER AGUILO NIEVES PLAZA

A B C D

EF

G

I

J K

L M N O

A B C D

EF

G

I

J K

L M N O

1.6 m 2.3

2.4 m 2.4

m

m

Level 3 2.4

m

2.4

m

7

1.6 m m

Level 3 Level 2 7

m

1.

8

m

8 1.

2.3

2.4 m 2.4

m

1.

8

1.8 m

m

1.8 m

8 1.

m

4 Level 2

1.8 1.8mm

1.8 1.8mm

4 Level 1

1.8 m

1.8 m

0 Level-1 1 Level 0 -2 Level -1 -2

1

Transversal Section North - South

1 1

Section North - South

EXECUTED PROJECT UEM BIODIGESTOR: COMPOST STORAGE SPACE

1 : 100

Section North - South 1 : 100

LOCATION UEM CAMPUS CLIENT

11 10 9 11 10 9

7

8 4.8 m

4.8 m

8

4.8 m

4.8 m

7

6 4.8 m

4.8 m

6

5 4.8 m

4.8 m

5

4.8 m

4.8 m

43 2

1

UNIVERSIDAD EUROPEA DE MADRID

43 2

1

C/ Tajo s/n Villaviciosa de Od贸n, 28670 Madrid 902 23 23 50

Level 3 7

ARCHITECT ALIA SABRY

Level 3 Level 2 7 4 Level 2

CALLE SAN BERNARDO 18, 3B MADRID ESPANA 28015

4 Level 1 0

+34 657 654 387 aliaahtsabry@gmail.com

Level-1 1 Level 0 -2

2 2

Section West - East 1 : 100

Section West - East

Level -1

DOCUMENT SECTION

-2

SCALE 1:100 DATE

1 : 100

10 - 12 - 2014 DRAWING CODE CS_SE_06

2

Longitudinal Section West - East

TECHNICAL ARCHITECT ALIA SABRY CORRECTORS LUIS ALVAREZ XAVIER AGUILO NIEVES PLAZA

1

Axonometric Longitudinal Section EXECUTED PROJECT UEM BIODIGESTOR: COMPOST STORAGE SPACE

LOCATION UEM CAMPUS CLIENT UNIVERSIDAD EUROPEA DE MADRID C/ Tajo s/n Villaviciosa de Od贸n, 28670 Madrid 902 23 23 50 ARCHITECT ALIA SABRY

CALLE SAN BERNARDO 18, 3B MADRID ESPANA 28015 +34 657 654 387 aliaahtsabry@gmail.com DOCUMENT AXONOMETRIC SECTION SCALE DATE 10 - 12 - 2014 DRAWING CODE CS_SE_07

2

Axonometric Transversal Section

TECHNICAL ARCHITECT ALIA SABRY CORRECTORS LUIS ALVAREZ XAVIER AGUILO NIEVES PLAZA

Cushioned ETFE Enclosure

ETFE Substructure

1

EXECUTED PROJECT UEM BIODIGESTOR: COMPOST STORAGE SPACE Flat ETFE Facade

LOCATION UEM CAMPUS CLIENT UNIVERSIDAD EUROPEA DE MADRID

Steel Truss Structural Brace Cables

C/ Tajo s/n Villaviciosa de Od贸n, 28670 Madrid 902 23 23 50

Concrete Retaining wall ARCHITECT

ALIA SABRY

Retaining Wall Foundation CALLE SAN BERNARDO 18, 3B MADRID ESPANA 28015 +34 657 654 387 aliaahtsabry@gmail.com DOCUMENT CONSTRUCTION AXONOMETRIC SCALE 1:50 Sliding Door Entrance for Forklift

DATE 10 - 12 - 2014 DRAWING CODE CS_SE_08

1

Construction Layers

TECHNICAL ARCHITECT ALIA SABRY CORRECTORS LUIS ALVAREZ XAVIER AGUILO NIEVES PLAZA

ETFE cushion layer Stainless Steel Bird Wire ETFE clamp Water Proof Membrane Metal Sheet Polyurethane Insulation Welded Stainless Steel Plate Steel Substructure

Bolted Steel Profile

Truss Main Structure

1

ETFE Substructure with Gutter EXECUTED PROJECT UEM BIODIGESTOR: COMPOST STORAGE SPACE Metal Profile Anchoring

Drainage Sheet Waterproofing Membrane Asphalt Primer Sealing Gasket

LOCATION UEM CAMPUS

Line Drainage

CLIENT UNIVERSIDAD EUROPEA DE MADRID

Slab on Grade Polished Concrete

C/ Tajo s/n Villaviciosa de Od贸n, 28670 Madrid 902 23 23 50 ARCHITECT ALIA SABRY

Layer of Gravel Fast Setting Mortar Drainage Pipe Sand Layer

Geo textile Membrane

CALLE SAN BERNARDO 18, 3B MADRID ESPANA 28015

Waterproof Membrane Geo textile Membrane Slab On Grade 150mm Sealing Gasket

+34 657 654 387 aliaahtsabry@gmail.com

Retaining Wall Concrete Footing Lean Concrete

DOCUMENT SECTION_DETAILS SCALE 1:20 DATE 10 - 12 - 2014 DRAWING CODE CS_SE_09

2

Retaining Wall Constructive Detail

TECHNICAL ARCHITECT ALIA SABRY

Bolted Steel Profile Steel Substructure Welded Stainless Steel Plate Metal Sheet ETFE clamp Stainless Steel Bird Wire Polyurethane Insulation Water Proof Membrane

CORRECTORS LUIS ALVAREZ XAVIER AGUILO NIEVES PLAZA

Steel Truss

Steel Base Plat Connection

Enclosing Metal Profile

Line Drainage

Slab on Grade Polished Concrete EXECUTED PROJECT

Drainage Sheet

UEM BIODIGESTOR: COMPOST STORAGE SPACE

Waterproofing Membrane LOCATION UEM CAMPUS

Asphalt Primer

CLIENT UNIVERSIDAD EUROPEA DE MADRID

Gravel Sealing Gasket

C/ Tajo s/n Villaviciosa de Od贸n, 28670 Madrid 902 23 23 50

Layer of Gravel Fast Setting Mortar Geo textile Membrane

Drainage Pipe

ARCHITECT ALIA SABRY

Waterproof Membrane

Sand Layer

Geo textile Membrane CALLE SAN BERNARDO 18, 3B MADRID ESPANA 28015

Slab On Grade 150mm Sealing Gasket

+34 657 654 387 aliaahtsabry@gmail.com

Retaining Wall Concrete Footing DOCUMENT

Lean Concrete

SECTION_DET AIL SCALE 1:10 DATE 10 - 12 - 2014 DRAWING CODE CS_SE_10

1

Foundation - Facade Connection and Enclosure

STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS

TECHNICAL ARCHITECT ALIA SABRY

2 4

5

1

6

7

2 4

1

5

2 4

8

6

5

6

24.0 m

9 10 11

7

8

7

CORRECTORS

9 10 11

8

LUIS ALVAREZ XAVIER AGUILO NIEVES PLAZA

9 10 11

Bearing Footing 1900 x 600

24.0 m

A

24.0 m

Bearing Footing 1900 x 600

C

1.9 m

1.9 m

1.9 m

Bearing Footing 1900 x 600

A E C

A

E

C

11.7 m 13.6 m

13.6 m

9.8 m 11.7 m

9.8 m

E

K

150mm Foundation Slab

13.6 m

11.7 m

1.9 m

9.8 m

1.9 m

M

K O M O

150mm Foundation Slab

Level -1

1

1 : 100

K

Foundation Plan

M

1.9 m

1

1 1 : 100 Level -1

1

2 4

1

13.9 m

5

150mm 2 4Foundation Slab

5

6

7

6

7

25.8 m

8 8

EXECUTED PROJECT UEM BIODIGESTOR: COMPOST STORAGE SPACE

O

9 10 11 9 10 11

24.0 m

13.9 m

LOCATION

A

25.8 m

UEM CAMPUS

C

24.0 m

A E C

CLIENT UNIVERSIDAD EUROPEA DE MADRID

11.7 m

C/ Tajo s/n Villaviciosa de Od贸n, 28670 Madrid 902 23 23 50 ARCHITECT ALIA SABRY

11.7 m

12.0 m

12.0 m

E

J J K

CALLE SAN BERNARDO 18, 3B MADRID ESPANA 28015

M

K O M

2 4

5

6

7

8

9 10 11

+34 657 654 387 aliaahtsabry@gmail.com

O DOCUMENT

PLAN_FOUNDATION & -1M

Level 1

2

2

2 1 : 100 Level 1 1 : 100

Plan at -1m

SCALE 1:100

25.8 m

DATE 10 - 12 - 2014

24.0 m

A C E

DRAWING CODE ST_PL_11

TECHNICAL ARCHITECT ALIA SABRY CORRECTORS

1

2 4

5

6

7

8

9 10 11

1

2 4

5

6

7

8

9 10 11

0.3 m

4.5 m

0.3 m

4.5 m

0.3 m

4.5 m

0.3 m

4.5 m

0.3 m

4.5 m

0.3 m

0.3 m

4.5 m

0.3 m

4.5 m

0.3 m

4.5 m

0.3 m

4.5 m

0.3 m

4.5 m

0.3 m

LUIS ALVAREZ XAVIER AGUILO NIEVES PLAZA

A C E A C

11.7 m

11.7 m

E

K M O K M O

1

Level 2 1 : 100

Level 2

1

Plan1at +1m 1 : 100

EXECUTED PROJECT UEM BIODIGESTOR: COMPOST STORAGE SPACE

1

2 4

1

2 4

5 4.8 m

4.8 m

4.8 m

6

7 4.8 m

4.8 m

7

8 4.8 m

4.8 m

8

9 10 11 4.8 m

9 10 11

LOCATION

A

4.8 m

C

UEM CAMPUS CLIENT UNIVERSIDAD EUROPEA DE MADRID

E A C F E

C/ Tajo s/n Villaviciosa de Od贸n, 28670 Madrid 902 23 23 50

1.8m m 2.3

1.0 m 1.8 m

1.0 m

4.8 m

5

6

ARCHITECT

1.6 m m 2.3

F G

ALIA SABRY

1.6 2.3 m m

I G JI

1.0 m

1.8 m 1.0 m

2.3m m 1.8

CALLE SAN BERNARDO 18, 3B MADRID ESPANA 28015

K J M O K

+34 657 654 387 aliaahtsabry@gmail.com

M O

DOCUMENT PLAN_TRUSS SCALE

2 2

2

Level 3 1 : 100

Level 3 1 : 100

Structural Layout

1:100 DATE 10 - 12 - 2014 DRAWING CODE ST_PL_12

TECHNICAL ARCHITECT ALIA SABRY CORRECTORS LUIS ALVAREZ XAVIER AGUILO NIEVES PLAZA

winch support base segment

nut washer

winch cable assembly

nut

bolt

washer

steel plate shackle

TRUSS BASE TO SUPPORT CONNECTION

1

Truss Base to Retaining Wall Connection EXECUTED PROJECT UEM BIODIGESTOR: COMPOST STORAGE SPACE Concrete Wall Reinforcement

LOCATION UEM CAMPUS CLIENT UNIVERSIDAD EUROPEA DE MADRID C/ Tajo s/n Villaviciosa de Od贸n, 28670 Madrid 902 23 23 50 ARCHITECT ALIA SABRY

Sealing Gasket

CALLE SAN BERNARDO 18, 3B MADRID ESPANA 28015

Concrete Slab Reinforcement

+34 657 654 387 aliaahtsabry@gmail.com DOCUMENT STRUCTURAL DETAILS SCALE 1:20

Inferior Reinforcement

DATE 10 - 12 - 2014

Lean Concrete

DRAWING CODE ST_SE_13

2

Retaining Wall and Slab on Grade Structural Detail

TECHNICAL ARCHITECT ALIA SABRY CORRECTORS LUIS ALVAREZ XAVIER AGUILO NIEVES PLAZA

1

Truss Elevation EXECUTED PROJECT UEM BIODIGESTOR: COMPOST STORAGE SPACE

LOCATION UEM CAMPUS CLIENT UNIVERSIDAD EUROPEA DE MADRID C/ Tajo s/n Villaviciosa de Odón, 28670 Madrid 902 23 23 50 ARCHITECT ALIA SABRY

UPPER CHORD Ø103, THICK 3.6 CENTER PIECES Ø40, THICK 3.2 LOWER CHORD Ø127, THICK 4

CALLE SAN BERNARDO 18, 3B MADRID ESPANA 28015 +34 657 654 387 aliaahtsabry@gmail.com DOCUMENT TRUSS ELEVATION SCALE 1:50 DATE 10 - 12 - 2014 DRAWING CODE ST_EL_14

2

WHATEVER IT IS

TECHNICAL ARCHITECT ALIA SABRY CORRECTORS LUIS ALVAREZ XAVIER AGUILO NIEVES PLAZA

2

Bracing System

1

1

Structural Elements

Bracing System EXECUTED PROJECT UEM BIODIGESTOR: COMPOST STORAGE SPACE

LOCATION UEM CAMPUS CLIENT UNIVERSIDAD EUROPEA DE MADRID C/ Tajo s/n Villaviciosa de Od贸n, 28670 Madrid 902 23 23 50 ARCHITECT ALIA SABRY

CALLE SAN BERNARDO 18, 3B MADRID ESPANA 28015 +34 657 654 387 aliaahtsabry@gmail.com DOCUMENT

1

Bracing System

SCALE

2

TRUSS & BRACING Structural Elements

DATE 10 - 12 - 2014 DRAWING CODE ST_AX_15

3

2

Structural Elevation

Structural System Elevation

MEP DRAWINGS

Ventilation Calculation

TECHNICAL ARCHITECT ALIA SABRY

Ventilation air volume needed: 2326.5 m³ Assuming 3 Air Changes per Hour (ACH),

CORRECTORS LUIS ALVAREZ XAVIER AGUILO NIEVES PLAZA

6980 m³ / h is needed.

Two fans are needed; one for input and one for output. They should be located at a reasonable distance from the ground which is approximately 3m. In order to optimize the air sweep of the fans, the positioning of the fans is crucial. Fance are placed in order for the air to travel through the greatest area of the building before exiting. The air input fan is placed lower in the back, in order to get cooler air, and it exists with the odor at a higher level from the front.

1

Ventilation Diagram EXECUTED PROJECT UEM BIODIGESTOR: COMPOST STORAGE SPACE

LOCATION UEM CAMPUS CLIENT UNIVERSIDAD EUROPEA DE MADRID C/ Tajo s/n Villaviciosa de Odón, 28670 Madrid 902 23 23 50 ARCHITECT ALIA SABRY

CALLE SAN BERNARDO 18, 3B MADRID ESPANA 28015 +34 657 654 387 aliaahtsabry@gmail.com DOCUMENT VENTILATION SCALE 1:50 DATE

Back Elevation

Front Elevation

10 - 12 - 2014 DRAWING CODE MEP_AX_16

2

Fan Placement

TECHNICAL ARCHITECT ALIA SABRY CORRECTORS LUIS ALVAREZ XAVIER AGUILO NIEVES PLAZA 20

m

20c

cm

CLEAN WATER PRESSURE PUMP

1% slope

1% slope

1% slope

slope

1%

TOXIC WATER THAT NEEDS SPECIAL TREATMENT

RAIN WATER THAT GOES TO VILLAVICIOSA DE ODON SEWAGE

1

Drainage System EXECUTED PROJECT UEM BIODIGESTOR: COMPOST STORAGE SPACE

LOCATION UEM CAMPUS CLIENT UNIVERSIDAD EUROPEA DE MADRID C/ Tajo s/n Villaviciosa de Odón, 28670 Madrid 902 23 23 50 ARCHITECT ALIA SABRY 1

2 3

4

5

6

24.0 m

7

8

9 10 11

Retaining Wall Axis

14.7 m

4.8 m

4.8 m

4.8 m

4.8 m

4.8 m

A B

Truss Axis

1.9 m

1.5 m 2.7 m

1.8 m

Forklift Circulation Space

E F

9.8 m

Footing Axis

I

1.8 m

J K 1.9 m

1.5 m

2.7 m

+34 657 654 387 aliaahtsabry@gmail.com

G

2.3 m

3.6 m

145 m²

ETFE Substructure Axis

2.3 m Facade Mullions 1.6 m

3.6 m

126 m²

Compost Storage

CALLE SAN BERNARDO 18, 3B MADRID ESPANA 28015

C D

L M N O

DOCUMENT VENTILATION SCALE 1:50 DATE 10 - 12 - 2014 DRAWING CODE MEP_PL_17

2

Zoning of Space in relation to dr 1

Level 1 1 : 100

1

2 14.4 m

3 4

5 5.1 m

6 4.8 m

7 4.8 m ETFE Substructure

8 4.8 m

9 10 11 4.8 m