Alexander Jackson Portfolio 2020

...strangely, familiar Aesthetics of the Everyday

Alexander Jackson Master of Architecture Portfolio Stuart Weitzman School of Design University of Pennsylvania

Architecture and the Aesthetics of the Familiar

The familiar harkens towards an emotional response from an individual. The everydayness of one’s life operates upon routines and continuity, one could say that the familiar is something usually not thought of to be unique, or sublime, or really that exciting.

This familiar is what lies beyond, seemingly difficult to explain. Here lies the vast majority of architecture and the built environment, or as R. Buckminster Fuller would say, “Ninety-nine percent of who you are is invisible and untouchable.” It is here within these Ninety-nine percents that I would posit as the familiar. The cul-de-sac in suburban developments, the pitched roof, the trimmed, green lawn, all seep into the familiar.

Within this realm, (surely there is ninety-nine percent of it!) lies infinite possibility.

This portfolio of works draws upon close readings of aesthetics of the familiar, to create novel forms of architecture that challenge one’s relationships to the everyday.

Estrangement and defamiliarization produce novel forms that might seem... ...strangely, familiar.

contents

01 LIFE IN THE CIRCLE Mega-Block Redux IV 02 COMPANY HOUSE® Adaptive Reuse Live-Work Housing 03 ZEP-PORT Museum Archive Addition 04 INNATE EXPRESSIONS Urban Replica & Food Hybrids Market 05 DIPTYCH COPY Museum of Fake Realities 06 POETICS OF WASTE Precast Concrete Wall Assembly 07 THE URBAN CANOPY ULI Hines Student Competition

LIFE IN THE CIRCLE Adaptive Reuse Urban Housing

2019 Fall Architecture Urban Housing Studio - Mega-Block Redux IV Instructor: Kutan Ayata Site: The Round House, Moscow, Russia Building Area: 60,400 m2 Collective Studio Proposition With the implementation of 20th Century modernist urbanism, the typology of the urban mega block came to rise throughout the history of architectural development.

The mega block is a sizable block composed of a series of regularly scaled urban blocks within a city, that came from social housing ambitions from the densification of city centers throughout the modernist era.

These new utopian ideal attempted to replace the densely packed, existing urban fabric, with one that revealed openness and large format projects to define a new world of living conditions. While the effort had good initial intentions, the realization of these mega blocks would turn to be lackluster in density, character, segregated, and quite homogenous. As vestiges of the past, their footprints are imposing upon cities, and have become seemingly lifeless as their outputs have become stale in their aging.

The question of tabula rasa, the very beginning of these projects, seems a waste of structure and one that would replace sameness with the same very indifference.

With city centers globally shifting toward densification as populations grow, a radical re-approach toward urban housing is needed. While building taller and larger structures can be accomplished, these results have warranted lackluster responses, and have not shown meaningful impacts towards the cities that host them. These individuated projects do not participate within the larger context of the urban fabric. Perhaps no where more evident is this condition present, than Soviet Russia. The impetus of the project is the Round House, located in Moscow Russia, orginally created as a large housing development for the 1980s Olympics.

Collective Rendering

-8-

The studio collectively tackled the notion of the collective project to transform one of these Round House buildings.

Each structure is characterized by the 9 stories of residential units containing 956 apartments in a circular plan, with a commercial floor residing at the base of the building. The studio’s ambitions were focused on near future realities considering new socio-economic adaptations, life-style shifts, and demographics and act as a documentation of the project not as new concept, but rather a documentation of a potential fictious reality. With the notion of tabula rasa out of the question, interventions needed to not only consider the existing building as site, but the reality of ‘neighbors’ and close by projects to project an urban strategy that each project had to grapple with.

Assembling the Site Model

Collective Site Model

Each project began as a singular slice of the ‘Round House’ as the building capitalized on mass pre-fabrication systems. But, not relying upon these systems, projects began to deviate and transform the existing from performing surgical moves to the existing through a series of additions, subtractions, blending, growing, expanding and projecting. The strategy of the new building was one of collective decision, as the circle opened to the park adjacent to the site and arising the three towers to contextually relate toward the other modernist ‘towers in a park’. Projects began to define a varied program from research from shifting aging demographics (combined retirement + youth housing), to the adaptation of schools toward honed skills such as ballet, to the shifting population of incoming immigrants in temporary housing facilities.

-9-

- 10 -

- 11 -

COMPANY HOUSE®

Adaptive Reuse Live-Work Housing

2019 Fall Architecture Urban Housing Studio - Mega-Block Redux IV Instructor: Kutan Ayata Site: The Round House, Moscow, Russia Building Area: 4,650 m2 -a narrativeCompany House® bringing a new meaning to work – life balance. Have employees feeling the burden of work? Company House® offers a variety of services to help optimize your body to keep continual workflow! That pesky eye pestering you from writing code all day? Hands feeling weak from carpal tunnel syndrome? Company House® will replace it so you can keep working despite your bodily short-comings!

Company House® provides amenities for all your living and working needs! Our common roof deck makes sure you never need to touch the ground again. Also part of your new home is cafes and shops, all supported by the Company House®. Your home is your office! We work, we live: Company House®

The project is an exploration in challenging the prototypical ‘unit’ based housing typologies, in which the unit drives an exterior form and shell. Instead of starting from typical unit layouts, traditional in housing typology, the project is imagined as an object. As a formal generator, the building takes the logical of the assemblege, and mis-contrues its reading. Beyond the kit-bash, the grouping of form generate a new formal reading through close proximities, slippages, and loose fits.

Aperture patterning breaks this mass of assembleges, as the existing window pattern on the existing building, pushing through the facade to generate novel openning conditions. The play between the orthagonal grid logic and the radial organization of the Round House shear glazing, in which dichoic glass exposes the breaching of the existing exterior wall. Heavy stucco adorns the facade relating simultaneously to precast concrete pattern language on the existing, but permitting a great degree of material weathering and surface texture.

Maintaining the common roof and green park on the roof, the project sits gently and hovers above the Round House. The cores act as connectors to and from the existing, which become extended into the project. Once the object of the building locates itself onto the roof, the existing building is renovated to create new balconies, gathering spaces, shops for residents, and theater spaces to watch the life within the circle.

Select Iterative Formal Generations Each formal generation seeks to defamiliarize the image of the unit through the aggregation. As new generations emerge, new figural profiles are explored as a device to connect and remove the ‘unit-ness’ of the massing. Each massing block occupies the roof of the existing Round House. Various engagements with this roof are explored to either join or separate the two systems.

- 14 -

Ground Level Tenant Floor Plan

- 15 -

Isometric ‘Choisy’ The underbelly of the project is revealed through the massing render above. With the boundary of the existing building shearing off the massing, the dichoic glazing reveals a network of figural patterning that appears on the facade. The panelization of the radial geometry below, regulates the glazing vertically on the mass.

The existing windows puncture and push into the mass, creating shallow and deep pockets for apertures.

Through these windows, the black glazing is reflected by the shiny black chrome in stark contrast to the stucco facade. The black reflects and highlights opennings, while the stucco falls back and is contextual.

- 16 -

Level 10 Showroom Floor Plan

- 17 -

Isometric Building ‘Chunk’

- 18 -

Level 11 Common Roof Plan

- 19 -

Isometric Building ‘Chunk’

- 20 -

Level 12 Unit Floor Plan

- 21 -

- 22 -

Unique Units The interior of the apartments showcase the blending of the living and working conditions. Benches of workstations are aligned within the common spaces inside. Shown above, this unit is an example of a dormitory style unit, housing both an electronics lab and common spaces for individuals.

Perched Above Seen in this site model, the project sits atop the Round House, offering grand views from above, as well as functioning as a tall mass to relate more contextually toward the other tower projects nearby.

- 23 -

- 24 -

- 25 -

THE PODS, PORT, AND PARK Museum Archive Addition

2019 Fall Architecture Studio - Decolonizing the Archive Instructor: Eduardo Rega Site: Penn Museum, Philadelphia, PA Building Area: 52,000 SF -a manifestoMuseum archives are not to be stowed away from the public. Archived artifcats many times do not see the interaction with the public, to which these treasures once belonged. These artifacts should engage with the community and embed themselvces within their existing contexts. The role of the ethnographic museum is to showcase and engage the public domain to educate and explore those cultures of the ancient and present world.

The archives are no longer shelves of closed, concealed space, locked up in a building. The artifacts are housed within zeppelins that liberate themselves from the dock at the museum, now a port of call. The Zep-port houses The Dock, The Factory, and the Park. The Dock houses and exhibits the archival zeppelins, the Factory manufactures these zeppelins lead by research faculty at the museum, and the Park that integrates onto the roof of the Zep-Port where projections of exhibitions are now showcased.

The museum is a media machine.

IN H C R A CS I M E Y T I C A UR C OR E S IT N A J M

D

A N

A

N

E T IN R O IT

27 A

M

N

R

O

E

IT

S

E

R

E

C

N

A

D

J

A

A

J

2

4

.

ID

E

A

F

E

23

22 9

.

21

25

L

G R R O E U C P E E P N T T IO R N Y

O

A

D

20

AY A

G

ST

IN

24

D

O

K

19

15

13

12

16

N

1 e 1 w p ie A c c e q s u 2 i 0 s 1 i 7 t - io 2 0 n 1 8

3 14

M

C

F

O

IT

H

18

C

R

G

V

N E T IN R O IT

10

7

T

E

D

U

T

N

S

A

J

S

A

E

R

N

$

A

M

E

V

R

U

8

IS

E

1

L

F

R

O

T

IS

$

A

E

IN

IS

LEGEND

E

H

C

R

R

IT

E

C

N

A

R

A

E

S

E

2

56 4

N

A

J

R

17

F

9

R

E

11

3

PENN MU

EL E

4

1

Y R A IN R D O R T O SI I T $ V N E D R U O T T S SI I V $

ADMINISTRATIVE S

1

4

.

EXECUTIVE MARKETING DEPARTMENTS

C

A

F

E

SOCIO-SPATIAL MAP G IN T E H C R A E S TY E R UL Y C IT A F UR C OR E S IT N A J

R

O

IT

PENN MUSEUM N

A

J

A

T

N

E

M

E

S

SOCIO-

G

1

F

2

U

N

26

.

B

L

O

5

6

.

T

K

R

A

M

O

IL

E

B

B

E

S

A

mostly cations

LEGEND

U

S

T

N

E

M

T

R

O

IT

N

A

J

RESEARCH STAFF VISITING RESEARCH

ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF

EXECUTIVE6. TO I MARKETING LET DEPARTMENTS

SOCIO-SPATIAL MAP

from

PENN MUSEUM

.

VISITING SCHOLARS RESEARCHERS ADULT RESEARCHER COLLECTIONS COORDINATO VISITING SCHOLARS

E

X

H

IB

IT

IO

N

H

A

L

L

H

S

A

C

Y

IT

R

U

C

E

S

R

O

ir ty B ar P

IT

N

A

l

w

ra

C t

u

O

$

LEGEND n

ig

h

ts

Etruscan Italy d Mexico & Central

m

e

r

merican Voices ast Galleries Exhibitions phinx)

C

o

n

ce

rt

S

u

m

ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF EXECUTIVE MARKETING DEPARTMENTS

AREA

R PLACE .

3

R

IE

J

Japan in the Crossfire & Israel

NGLE

2

SOCIO-SPATIAL MAP

MONEY FLOW LEGEND

1

8

$$$$ (3.5M+) $$$

(2M-3.5M)

.

(1M-2M)

$

(0-1M)

1

2

.

G

IF T VISITING SCHOLARS RESEARCHERS S H O P ADULT RESEARCHER COLLECTIONS COORDINATORS VISITING SCHOLARS

C

O

U

R

O

IT

N

A

J

1

5

.

STUDENT RESEARC ACADEMIC STAFF NEW ACQUISITION PENN STUDENTS PROFESSORS OTHER STUDENTS LECTURERS

C O R A O T O M

R

T

Y

A

PENN MUSEUM

$$

RESEARCH STAFF VISITING RESEARCHER

R

D

$$$$ FACILITIES $$$

ADMINISTRATIVE

$$

ACADEMIC & RESEARCH

$

OTHER

LEGEND ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF EXECUTIVE MARKETING DEPARTMENTS

DISPLAY ARTIFACVT VISITING RESEARCHER RESEARCH STAFF VISITING SCHOLARS RESEARCHERS ADULT RESEARCHER COLLECTIONS COORDINATORS VISITING SCHOLARS

NEW ACQUISITION ACADEMIC STAFF STUDENT RESEARCHER PENN STUDENTS PROFESSORS OTHER STUDENTS LECTURERS

DISPLAY ARTIFACVTS RESEARCH STAFF

RESEARCHERS COLLECTIONS COORDINATORS VISITING SCHOLARS

STUDENT RESEARCHER ACADEMIC STAFF PENN STUDENTS PROFESSORS OTHER STUDENTS LECTURERS

- 28 -

DORMANT ACTIVE FACILITIES STAFF LEISURE VISITORS FAMILY GROUP BUILDING MAINTENANCE SUMMER CAMP HOUSEKEEPING MEMBERSHIP VISITORS TRAVEL VISITORS

DORMANT ACTIVE FACILITIES STAFF LEISURE VISITORS FAMILY GROUP BUILDING MAINTENANCE SUMMER CAMP HOUSEKEEPING MEMBERSHIP VISITORS TRAVEL VISITORS

STORAGE - ACTIVE

STUDENT VISITORS PENN STUDENTS OTHER STUDENTS

FINDINGS

O

J

A O CA F D F E IC M E IC

SP HI

N X

-SPATIAL MAP

.

U

T

H

C

R

R

O

IT

N

A

E

S

H C R A R E E S R E R TU R C O E L IT N A J

R

A

E

$

S

E

$

N

R

S C um a m m p e r

A

J

H

C

$

R

O

IT

$

USEUM

7

R

E

R

U

T

C

E

C a off k e e e e p w e it r h

E

R L

2

R

U

T

C

E

L

R

E

R

O

IT

N

A

J

.

3

.

1

1

M

U

L

T

I-

.

C

L

U

.

A

D

C

L

A

S

2

S

8

R

O

O

T

IO

S

R

R

1

3

.

H

C

C O L M A P B U

R

T

)

M

)

2

R

R

$ NEW ACQUISITION $ $ (

M

$

1

R L

+

M

3

A

$

(

1

0

R

E

R

H

O

R

E

R

U

T

C

E

L

P

T

R

O

IT

.

O

U

T

C

E

)

$

(

R

R

O

IT

N

A

J

L

A

N

A

urs

es

J

1

.

ry

ra

urs

ib

L

Co

ct

6

.

C

L

S

R

ia

O

ed

lM

cia

So

26

S

O

Re Ex se pe arc dit h io Pu n b M lic ag ati az on in s e

$

F

A

Ou tle ts

D

ig

it a

l

O

R

2

2

b je

E

era

SOCIO-SPATIAL MAP

A

5

B

Co

S U N H I C M D AR S E IC S M E D Y T A C RI A U C OR E S IT N A J B

E

)

M

2

-

M

$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

E

S

2

-

M

1

$

(

S

S

E

IN

A

E

S

E

H

C

E

M

3

-

VISITING SCHOLARS ADULT RESEARCHER

R

O

IT

N

A

J

VISITING RESEARCHER

A

E

S

E

R

M

STAFF

27

C

R

E

M

O

V

A

O

O

C O L N A S B E

R

O

R

.

M

H

T

S

E

R

O

IT

N

A

J

C O L M A P B U

A

S

E

R

R E O S F E F A IC R E CH

N

1 4

.

A

E

S

7

H

C

R

R R U R C E TO I N

A

J

A

6

Y

IT

S

R

E

R

C

E

1

IV

C

A

H

C

R

A

E

S

E

R

N

S

E

H

C

IO

T

A

V

R

E

S

N

AR T

IF AC TS

H

C

R

A

E

S

E

R

L

HE AV Y

CH I

N ES E

QI L

IN

S IC M E G D A IN G C N N E A R A IC E L EM Y D IT A C R A U C OR E S IT N A J

M

PENN MUSEUM G

IN

T

B O US F IN F IC E E SS

E

K

R

A

M

R

H

4

C

R

A

E

S

E

F

R

O

IT

N

A

J

25 2

2

DISPLAY ARTIFACVTS LEGEND .

A

R

T

IF

A

24

C

STUDENT RESEARCHER

$ e P n

u

r

t

n

ve e

to p u ro

a

u

id

iv

d

L

B

IT

N

r

u

to

VISITING SCHOLARS ADULT RESEARCHER

PENN MUSEUM

y il

a

d s

$

ctu

L

se

e

m

il

re

n

o

o

rn

e ft

F

$

ig

d

ra

C

$

m

e

3

F H

1

9

y

F In es stu te tiv r a d na l fo e n tio r ts n a l

P

a d rth y

u

b

$

li

c

s

cla

rie

$

C

R

$ $ $

.

A

E

S

o

e m n ti io ry dit to e S xp e

h

T

r e d n e o c w an m rld r o fo W er p

$

$

$

ss ro

p

u

r

o it

ro

G

vis

J

$

E

R

A

R

O

IT

N

H

A

U

J

D

IT

NEW A

VISITING RESEARCHER

EXECUTIVE MARKETING DEPARTMENTS

R

O

A

l

$

R

E

R

U

T

C

E

A

SOCIO-SPATIAL MAP

In

g

R

A

E

S

E

R

L

ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF

H

C

PENN STUDENTS OTHER STUDENTS

n

ORS

T

DORMANT ACTIVE

C

R

O

A

E

S

R

E

IU

R

M

14

R

O

IT

N

A

$

J

.

LEISURE VISITORS STAFF ADMINISTRATIVE FAMILY GROUP

L

EXECUTIVE SUMMER CAMP MARKETING MEMBERSHIP VISITORS DEPARTMENTS TRAVEL VISITORS

IB

R

A

R

Y

-SPATIAL MAP

USEUM

FE STAFF

F

TORS

T E K R A AL NT E IT PM IG O S D EL N IO M

V

5

.

S L S A P T O N G E IN Y R LD I IT U R B U C OR E S IT N A J

T

I IB TY I H R U R C E TO I N A X

E

S H

J

C

R

A

E

S

E

R

N

IA

R

A

R

IB

L

S

Y

IT

2

0

R

U

C

E

R

O

IT

N

A

J

.

G

E

R O VISITING SCHOLARS RESEARCHERS IT N A J ADULT RESEARCHER COLLECTIONS COORDINATORS VISITING SCHOLARS

G

E

A

1

RESEARCH STAFF VISITING RESEARCHER

IN

D

DISPLA

R

J C AN L I O T S O E R T

U

L

A

V

W

O

O

T

Y

V

O

L

“

A

E

H

E

IL

G

A

R

N

IO

F IB H O X O Y YE D R U A T OR S MP

IT

DORMANT 11 ACTIVE

STUDENT RESEARCHER NEW ACQUISITION 7

”

E

E

5

.

A

R

C

PENN STUDENTS OTHER STUDENTS

H

IV

E

T

2

F

T

E OU TANS

9

IR

LO A EP R

3

.

G

10

3 2

GREEK ARTIFACTS FOR CLASSICS CLASS

M O AR F K F E IC T E IN

12

O

IL

2

STORAGE - ACTIVE

T

A G

LEGEND

13 S

R

.

F

8

127

F O AC F I F L IC IT E IE

56 4

S

7

DISPLAY ARTIFACVTS VISITING RESEARCHER STUDENT VISITORS RESEARCH STAFF PENN STUDENTS VISITING SCHOLARS RESEARCHERS OTHER STUDENTS ADULT RESEARCHER COLLECTIONS COORDINATORS VISITING SCHOLARS

NEW ACQUISITION ACADEMIC STAFF STUDENT RESEARCHER PENN STUDENTS PROFESSORS OTHER STUDENTS LECTURERS

STORAGE - DORMANT

DORMANT ACTIVE LEISURE VISITORS FAMILY GROUP SUMMER CAMP MEMBERSHIP VISITORS TRAVEL VISITORS

1

F

5

F

26

4

F

STUDENT RESEARCHER ACADEMIC STAFF PENN STUDENTS PROFESSORS OTHER STUDENTS LECTURERS

DORMANT ACTIVE FACILITIES STAFF LEISURE VISITORS FAMILY GROUP BUILDING MAINTENANCE SUMMER CAMP HOUSEKEEPING MEMBERSHIP VISITORS TRAVEL VISITORS

- 29 -

STORAGE - ACTIVE

B

T

N

E

M

E

S

A

DISPLAY ARTIFACVTS

8

STORA

GREEK ART

25 24

STUDENT VISITORS PENN STUDENTS OTHER STUDENTS

3

A

M

E

S

T

N

E

STORA

Section perspective

Gallery Floor Plan

- 30 -

Site Axonometric

- 31 -

To po 18 f Lan 3’din 6” gP

ad

To po 17 f Cra 2’ne 0”

F

2

F’

E

2’

D

C

B

1

A

1’

Ro

of

Ga

M

rde 60 n ’-6 ”

ez

Ex

za nin 46 e ’-6 ”

hib

’

25

itio

nH a 28 ll ’-0 ”

Th

ird

Flo o 25 r ’-0 ”

’

20

’

15

25

’

Se

co

nd

Flo o 12 r ’-6 ”

20

’

’

10 15

’ 10

’ 5’ 5’

5’ ’

10 ’

15 ’

20 ’

25

Choisy Isometric Scale: 1/8” = 1’-0”

Isometric ‘Choisy’ Visual Studies I | DeLuna | Alexander Jackson

- 32 -

Fir

st

Flo or 0’0”

Urban Deployment Each zeppelin not only docks at the museum, but also engages with the city to bring and return artifacts back to the public domain. The zeppelins engage within the public realm through occupying vacant lots in underrepresented areas of the city, areas where the museum has little reach. The zeppelins project onto the facades of the surrounding buildings; acting as an attractor for the public parks within the city. This brings the message of the museum to areas that cannot be accessed.

Finally, the zeppelins engage with the skyscrapers, which now become billboards not to their private owners, but now to the decolonialized message.

- 33 -

INNATE EXPRESSIONS

Urban Replica & Hybrid Foods Market

2019 Spring Architecture Studio - Miscellany Instructor: Andrew Lucia Site: Manayunk, Philadelphia, PA Building Area: 67,000 SF selected for publication in Pressing Matters 8 The project, Innate Expressions, is an exploration of the difference between that which lies beneath in its inherent and underlying data, and its outward expression or manifestation. This data adn its expression mixes and produces novel hybrids and new fusions. With digital scanning technologies, able to capture any object in three dimensions, one can begin to blend this raw data and produce new alalgamations.

The proposal is for a market of purely hybridized produce and mixed architectural replicas. With reference to traditional canopy structures, the market manifests as a distribution of tents, each cluster created with the same texture mapping and meshes but become characterized differently as each program becomes unique. Underlying beneath these tents, the replication factory, genetics laboratories, and produce warehouse become revealed as the mesh-like flooring system begins to expose this innate data. The plazas between become new blends of each of the floor plans of each market folly. A distribution of artifacts crafts the landscape, all for purchase at the market. Replication processes and the role of hybrids brings a contemporary discourse to the question of an urban market, what is innate and what is expressed.

PHOTOGRAMMETRY STUDIES a catalog of fruits and vegetables Choose from the following fruits and vegetables to create new forms of produce.

ARTICHOKE Texture Mapping

ARTICHOKE

ARTICHOKE

AVOCADO Texture Mapping

ARTI-CADO

ARTI-ROT

Scanned Geometry

Artichoke & Artichoke

AVOCADO

AVO-CHOKE Avocado & Artichoke

Avocado & Avocado

CARROT

CAR-TICHOKE

CAR-VOCADO

GARLIC

GAR-TICHOKE

GAR-VOCADO Garlic & Avocado

Garlic & Carrot

GINGER

GING-CHOKE

GING-CADO

GING-ROT

NECTARINE

NECT-ICHOKE

NECT-CADO

NECT-ARROT

Scanned Geometry

Scanned Geometry

Scanned Geometry

Scanned Geometry

Scanned Geometry

ONION

Carrot & Artichoke

Garlic & Artichoke

Ginger & Artichoke

Artichoke & Avocado

CARROT

Texture Mapping

AVOCADO

Carrot & Avocado

Ginger & Avocado

Nectarine & Artichoke

Nectarine & Avocado

Artichoke & Carrot

AVO-ROT

Avocado & Carrot

CARROT

Carrot & Carrot

GAR-ROT

Ginger & Carrot

Nectarine & Carrot

GINGER

NECTARINE

ARTI-NGER

ARTI-CTARINE Artichoke & Nectarine

Artichoke & Onion

Texture Mapping

ARTI-LIC

Artichoke & Garlic

Artichoke & Ginger

AVO-LIC

Texture Mapping

ONION

BELL PEPPER

SWEET POTATO

ARTI-NION

BELL ARTI-PER

SWEET ARTI-TATO

BELL AVO-PER

SWEET AVO-TATO

Texture Mapping

AVO-TARINE

AVO-NION

CAR-LIC

CAR-INGER

CARRO-TARINE

CAR-NION

GARLIC

GAR-INGER

GAR-TARINE

GAR-NION

BELL GAR-PER

SWEET GAR-TATO

GINGER

GIN-TARINE

GING-NION

BELL GING-PER

SWEET GING-TATO

NECTARINE

NECT-NION

BELL NECT-PER

SWEET NECT-ATO

ONION

BELL ONIO-PER

SWEET ONI-TATO

Carrot & Garlic

Carrot & Ginger

Garlic & Garlic

Garlic & Ginger

GING-LIC

Avocado & Nectarine

Carrot & Nectarine

Garlic & Nectarine

Ginger & Garlic

Ginger & Ginger

NECT-LIC

NECT-INGER Nectarine & Ginger

Nectarine & Nectarine

Nectarine & Garlic

Ginger & Nectarine

Avocado & Onion

Carrot & Onion

Garlic & Onion

Ginger & Onion

Nectarine & Onion

ONI-CADO Onion & Avocado

Onion & Carrot

Onion & Garlic

ONI-LIC

ONI-INGER

ONI-TARINE Onion & Nectarine

Onion & Onion

BELL PEPPER

BELL PEP-OKE

BELL PEP-VOCADO

BELL PEP-ROT

BELL PEP-LIC

BELL PEP-INGER

BELL PEP-TARINE

BELL PEP-NION

SWEET POT-ICHOKE

SWEET PO-VOCADO

SWEET PO-ROT

SWEET PO-LIC

SWEET POT-INGER

SWEET PO-TARINE

SWEET PO-NION

SWEET POTATO Scanned Geometry

Sweet Potato & Artichoke

Sweet Potato & Avocado

Bell Pepper & Carrot

Sweet Potato & Carrot

Artichoke & Sweet Potato

AV-INGER

ONI-OKE

Bell Pepper & Avocado

Artichoke & Bell Pepper

Texture Mapping

Avocado & Ginger

Onion & Artichoke

Bell Pepper & Artichoke

Texture Mapping

Avocado & Garlic

Scanned Geometry

Scanned Geometry

ONI-ROT

GARLIC

Texture Mapping

Onion & Ginger

Bell Pepper & Garlic

Bell Pepper & Ginger

Sweet Potato & Garlic

Sweet Potato & Ginger

Bell Pepper & Nectarine

Sweet Potato & Nectarine

Bell Pepper & Onion

Sweet Potato & Onion

Avocado & Bell Pepper

BELL CAR-PER Carrot & Bell Pepper

Garlic & Bell Pepper

Ginger & Bell Pepper

Nectarine & Bell Pepper

Onion & Bell Pepper

BELL PEPPER

Bell Pepper & Bell Pepper

SWEET BELL PO-PER Sweet Potato & Bell Pepper

Photogrammetry Studies One primary study in the development of the market was the analysis of how 3D scanning technologies determine and generate three dimensional data. These texture mappings are generated from ‘rationalization’ outputs based on certain inputs. The technique of blending textures and cross pollination of this data was inspired by the cross mutations of fruits commonly found in contemporary markets. This technique was applied initially to fruits and vegetables, but become farther reaching in terms of building components, developing a catalog of site conditions unique to Manayunk and the market itself.

- 36 -

Avocado & Sweet Potato

SWEET CAR-TAT0 Carrot & Sweet Potato

Garlic & Sweet Potato

Ginger & Sweet Potato

Nectarine & Sweet Potato

Onion & Sweet Potato

SWEET BELL PEP-TATO Bell Pepper & Sweet Potato

SWEET POTATO

Sweet Potato & Sweet Potato

METRY

nts

mponents

ARCH

BAY WINDOW Texture Mapping

Texture Mapping

Texture Mapping

Texture Mapping

ARCH

BAY WINDOW ARCH

COLUMN ARCH

PILASTER ARCH

STAIRS ARCH

BAY WINDOW

COLUMN BAY WINDOW

PILASTER BAY WINDOW

STAIRS BAY WINDOW

Texture Mapping

Arch & Arch

ARCHED BAY WINDOW Arch & Bay Window

Bay Window & Arch

Bay Window & Bay Window

COLUMN

Column & Arch

Column & Bay Window

HITECTURAL ARTIFACT REPLICAS

ctions:

t from the sampling list of ectural artifacts. Bring this og to the replication factory he recreation will be created.

have time to wait in our y?

model is available for sale in ard of each folly. See a sales iate for further details.

ks for your visit!

- 37 -

PILASTER

Pilaster & Arch

Pilaster & Bay Window

STAIRS

Stairs & Arch

Stairs & Bay Window

Ground Floor Plan

Longitudinal Site Section

- 38 -

- 39 -

Section through warehouse showroom

Section through market

- 40 -

Revealing Sections The section reveals the spaces housed below the market.

These spaces are derived from the same geometric metadata, but have beeen realized in a different formal operation.

The triangulation and thus more rigid geometries of below represent the mesh logic as computational pattern making.

The sails and fabric of the market utilize these meshes as tether points in which physics-based simulations were used to find funicular forms.

- 41 -

The Yard: A Well Littered Lawn The drawing reveals the relationship between the viaduct, the railroad, and the market site. Vehicular, rail, and pedestrian traffic all intersect at this junction, becoming a nexus of all transit. An ideal location for an urban market, connectivity toward the city was crucial.

Littered across the site, the field of replicas act as both landscape and as market. The market follies begin to perform more than just as building, becoming benches, and landscaping islands for locating artifacts and replicas. The viaduct gives views throughout the market and well as connecting to Greater Philadelphia.

- 42 -

- 43 -

DIPTYCH COPY Museum of Fake Realities

2020 Spring Architecture Integrated Options Studio - Museum Hybrid Instructor: Miroslava Brooks Site: The Met Breuer, New York, NY Building Area: 85,700 SF in collaboration with Kevin He The Polemic & The Project Through centuries, architecture has operated between the worlds of science and the humanities with increasingly greater emphasis on the former. Historically, museums were places of authority where knowledge was collected by a few disciplinary experts, clearly categorized, and presented to the public. Such authority was often conveyed through a building’s façade via symmetry, monumentality, and historical (Western) references.

Today, cultural institutions are rethinking their institutional identities to expand their audience through cross-disciplinary thinking and risk-taking programming.

The project looks at the transformation and addition to the canonical Marcel Breuer building – an icon of sculptural modernist monumentality. Currently the building’s fate is uncertain as the Metropolitan Museum of Art will vacate its premises after a fiveyear lease from the Whitney Museum of American Art, and the Frick Collection will temporarily move in. We will take on the challenge and speculate on its future. As Paul Goldberger, the former New York Times architecture critic, articulated: “The Breuer building is resistant to all attempts to bring it into an urban dialogue along the street, but that alone should not be a reason not to build a work of architecture that attempts, gently and powerfully, to coax it into speaking.” A site of some of the most compelling esthetic battles in recent architecture history, the Breuer building is an epitome of modernism. Reflective of modernity’s divide between nature and culture, the hermetic, anti-contextual, anti-historical, tabula-rasa approach is clearly conveyed in its bold and severe form, entirely cut off from everything around it.

The project is Strangely, familiar; the Museum of Fake Realities: an exploration of the replica through the near miss. We wanted to explore how the idea of fake realities could be explored through architecture by replicating the original Breuer on the opposite side of the site. We were interested in how elements of the Breuer can start to spin an entirely new system, like how one small piece of truth can spin many new tales of fiction. With the aperture of Breuer being the most iconic image of the project, we sought to re-present these through a spatial near miss. The apertures become large spatial voids and organizes exhibition spaces. The iconic figure of the Breuer is now radically transformed on the interior. Situated in parallel to the original Breuer, the elevational experience presents the addition on equal footing with the museum to the point where one may question which is the original.

ALIEN

ANTARCTIC NINGEN

BIGFOOT

BLOND HAIR GHOST

BODMIN BEAST

CADBOROSAURAUS

CHUPACABRA

DOGMAN

FOO FIGHTERS LIGHTS

HODAG

IGOPOGO

LOCH NESS MONSTER

MER PEOPLE

MOTHMAN

RUSSIAN YETI

SHADOW PEOPLE

SKUNK APE

TATZELWORM

THUNDERBIRD

TRUNKO

Nature’s Resolution Collection The collections represent a diptych of representations of nature. One the left, the collection is a series of cryptids. Cryptids are folk lore creatures whose representations throw into question what is actually there.

The collection on the right are drawings of 16th century animals from the new world. Here, drawings are highly detailed representations of actual creatures that exist. The collection is a showcase of resolutions.

The cryptids, fake creatures, rely on low resolution to become real. The drawings, utilize high resolution to replica a real creature, but through the drawing process, become not real.

This idea is exemplified through these two emlarged images. The Loch Ness monster’s size, scale, and material, shape, is thrown into question through the low resolute picture. While, the walrus is drawn to such detail, even toenails that look like humanfeet, but becomes a fake creature.

- 46 -

Generative Collage We wanted to explore how the idea of fake realities could be explored through architecture by replicating the original Breuer on the opposite sideof the site with new modifications: first with fictionalized anamorphic features, then with architectural elements. We were interested in how just one element of the Breuer can start to spin off into an entirely new system, similar to how one small piece of truth can spin many new tales of fiction.

Diptych Elevation Rendering Situated in parallel to the original Breuer, the front elevational experience presents the addition on equal footing with the museum to the point where one mayquestion which is the original. As explored later in the interiors, the new addition houses parallel exhibits to the original Breuer with the original exhibiting certain factual events/findings. Borrowing elements from the original Breuer, the addition spins a new architecture based upon the exaggeration and reorientation of the original Breuer’s architectural elements such as the apertures and stepping that continue into the groundscape.

- 47 -

- 48 -

- 49 -

- 50 -

1.1

2.1

3

4.7 4.9

5.1

0.9

- 51 -

1

2

3

4

5

6 a

aa

bb

cc

dd

ee

ff

Basement Level Floor Plan 1

2

3

4

5

6 a

aa

Street Level Floor Plan

- 52 -

e3

e2

e1

e

d

c9

c

b

aa

b.1

Madison Avenue Section

- 53 -

a

1

2

3

4

5

6 a

aa 1.1

2.5

3.9

5.1

b

c

d

e

Second Level Floor Plan 1

2

3

4

5

6 a

aa 1.1

2.9

3.9

5.1

b

c

d

e2

Third Level Floor Plan

- 54 -

Isometric ‘Chunk’ Model The chunk model showcases the relationship between the public plaza at the street level, the basement theaters and classrooms, and the exhibition spaces above. The addition is of steel construction with a hung stone façade, to match the existing stone on the Breuer building. The Skylight is the terminus of the structure as it opens the interior up toward the sky.

- 55 -

2

1

3

4

5

6 a

aa 1.1

3.1

4.1

5.1

b

c

d

e

e3

Fourth Level Floor Plan

Compared to Breuer, these apertures now exist in all directions with skylight apertures on top and now basement apertures as structure on the bottom.

Originally a faรงade element, the aperture has now taken over the Breuer on the interior to become the organization, structural cores front and back, room layouts while still existing similarly on the exterior faรงade. Both formally and programmatically, the authority & factuality of the museum is questioned through the dyptical relationship.

- 56 -

Public Garden Plaza The new public plaza plays games of resolution, the legs transforming in scale and color as they reach the ground, while the benches that erode from this new earth reveal bright mosaic patterning, the smallest scale of resolution.

- 57 -

- 58 -

- 59 -

POETICS OF WASTE Precast Concrete Wall Assembly

2019 Fall Technology Seminar Matter, Making, & Testing: Designing Next Generation Precast Concrete Instructor: Richard Garber, AIA Mockup Wall Area: 32 SF in collaboration with Northeast Precast & Lauren Hunter, YongKyu Hong With concrete manufacturing being a major contributor toward global climatic change, we sought to design a process that would help capitolize both on ‘leftovers’ from precast concrete pours and establishing a new aesthetic.

We want to prioritize waste into a new tectonic expression of the prefabrication processes used to manufacture concrete wall panels. The most interesting expression we found at the plant was the casts of the leftover concrete deposits (pictured on the left).

This stratification of the material is rendered in an almost haphazard way; a beautiful expression of the materiality of concrete.

The proposal taxonomizes on the waste to create a new expression in wall panel surface treatment. The walls are assembled from any leftover concrete that is simply poured into the formwork until it is filled. Blends and mixes of the concrete become the new ornament of the panel, self-expressive of the process. These new panels take advantage of recycling processes and showcase the character and act as a billboard to expose the re-used nature of the wall. Each panel becomes a unique assemblage of mixes and transforms the seemingly banal into the beautiful.

This seminar focused on precast concrete and specifically it’s history, materiality – how it is manufactured and the logistics of its assembly - and cultural affects through its uses within the urban environment. Through a strategic partnership with Northeast Precast (NEP), based in Millville, NJ, project teams gained access to places where precast concrete is made, formed, and put into action. Over two weekends, students were exposed to the fabrication process from material selection, to formwork production, to pour, and disassembly.

Utilizing NEP’s facilities and their workforce, a group of professional engineers and concrete experts, students worked in teams to produce panel prototypes for wall assemblies that respond to structural, thermal, and water-proofing performance; and received feedback from NEP’s expert staff on the construction feasibility and applicability of student-proposed prototypes. Developed a delivery workflow utilizing digital tools to communicate with and transmit panel, assembly and formwork concepts to NEP staff, fostering a collaboration opportunity for students that is not regularly experienced in architecture school. This workflow allowed students to virtually study panelization schemas and jointing ahead of actual prototype preparation.

team trash

NOTES: Concrete panel to be treated with Basf Silane Sealer, MasterProtect H1000 sealant after curing.

4'-0"

RV1

2"

EH1

1

PLAN - TOP

4'-0"

HARDWARE SCHEDULE:

REVEAL DETAIL

8"

CL

1'-0"

3

EH1

1'-0"

CL

PL1

PL1

CL

3'-6" Top of Reveal

PL1 - (4) 4”x4”x3/8” Steel Angle PL2 - (2) 6”x6”x1/2” Steel Angle EH1 - (2) Erection Head Anchor (QL403SPG) CI1 - (2) Coil Insert (CI16124P) PSA - (4) 4 1/2” Slotted insert short studs (4535 PSA) RV1 - GOLD Poly-Comp Reveal (RVL-050-150-050X10’) AC1 - (16) 4” x1/2” HCA Anchor

8"

2'-8"

1'-0"

1. 1/2” Chamfer at corner 2. 1/2“ bolt to concrete slab 3. Epoxy rebar at front face

2 1/2" 1 1/2"

2"

3

SECTION - CHAMFER

°

135

45°

3'-6"

PSA

Top of Reveal

1/2"

1'-0"

135°

1 3/4"

Low RPM vibrator - less than 14,000 VPM under load for vibrating concrete.

1/

3/4"

3

Lauren Hunter Alex Jackson Yongkyu Hong Matt Hicks

CONCRETE: Strength - 5000 psi Volume - 25 cubic ft (25 x 150 = 3750 lbs. per panel)

8'-0"

RV1

REBAR: ASTM Grade 60 rebar

(8) 3’-6” #4 rebar (horizontal) (8) 3’-6” #4 rebar w/ epoxy coat

4'-6"

4'-6"

(5) 7’-6” #4 rebar (vertically) (5) 7’-6” #4 rebar w/ epoxy coat AC1 PL1 CL

PL2

1'-0"

PL2

CI1 10/24/2019

ELEVATION - FRONT

2

ELEVATION - BACK

team trash

A101

ELEVATION - SIDE

3

3

Lauren Hunter Alex Jackson Yongkyu Hong Matt Hicks

2

1

1

Architectural Precast Panel

NOTES: 1. Foam 2. HDO Plywood 3. HDO Plywood Siderail

2

PIECES: F1 - Foam 1 P1 - Plywood 1

4'-6"

3'- 7 1/4"

F1

ELEVATION - SIDE

1

1 1/2"

1/2"

3’ - 6 1/2"

6 1/4"

6 1/4"

4'-5"

F2 - Foam 2 P2 - Plywood 2

F2

1"

1" 4'-6"

3'- 6 3/4"

ELEVATION - SIDE - F1

ELEVATION - SIDE - F2

F1

4’

PLAN - TOP - F1

1/2"

1/2"

3'- 6 3/4"

PLAN - TOP - F2

F1 2

F2 3'- 6 1/2"

2

4’

4’

4'-5"

1

4’

1

4'-6"

F2

10/24/2019

PLAN - TOP - F1

P1

PLAN - TOP - F2

- 62 -

P2

F101

Formwork

- 63 -

FORM

Geometric Development

12 | Prototype Wall Assemblies

Designing with Next Generation Precast Concrete | 13

20 | Prototype Wall Assemblies

Designing with Next Generation Precast Concrete | 21

MATTER, MAKING & TESTING Designing with Next Generation Precast Concrete Team A Amanda Gruen, Catherine Shih, Karen Toomasian

Team D Lauren Hunter, Alexander Jackson, Yongkyu Hong

The panel design originates from a studio project which involved an exploration of apertures and surface texture. At the scale of the panel, we are interested in the interplay of deep, cavernous pockets or impressions, juxtaposed against thin, sinuous, and sharp edges or seams. The pocketed openings of varying sizes give depth and variation to the panel, allowing light to dance over the surface in rhythms.

Poetics of Waste We want to prioritize waste into a new tectonic expression of the prefabrication processes used to manufacture concrete wall panels. The most interesting expression we found at the plant was the casts of the leftover concrete deposits. This stratification of the material is rendered in an almost haphazard way; a beautiful expression of the materiality of concrete.

The pockets have both sharp corners as well as more smooth curvilinear edges, creating both dramatic and soft shadow effects on the surface as the sun changes position throughout the day. The space between each of the disparate impressions create interstitial seams that read as a network of flat, sinuous, sharp edges. Overall, the collection of pockets creates an overall reading of a curvilinear form. The tension between the cavernous area of the panel and the flattened surface is heightened by the thin reveal that runs between the two.

UPENN PRECAST PIECE MARK

DETAILS

SHEET NO.

3 OF 7

Designing with Next Generation Precast Concrete | 23

Concrete panel to be treated with Basf Silane Sealer, MasterProtect H1000 sealant after curing.

4'-0"

EH1

1

RV1

135°

1 3/4"

2"

PLAN - TOP

2 1/2" 1 1/2"

ITEM MARK

GR

LENGTH

#4BB01

60

#4 X 9’-3”

#4BB02

60

#4 X 6’-11”

12”

2”

SECTION VIEW - LOWER MAT

24”

1'-0"

1 QTY. UOM

B/F F

3,200 LBS

S/F = 32 L/F =

DATE

BY

10/23/19

7”

1’-2”

1’-6”

1’-0”

2’-0”

10"

PENNDESIGN

5-1/2"

3”

#40308

#40308

#40308

#40308

#40308

11”

#40708

ELEVATION - SIDE - F1

ELEVATION - SIDE - F2

F1 1

4'-6"

1

1/2"

1/2"

F2

3'- 6 3/4"

PLAN - TOP - F1

PLAN - TOP - F2

F1 4'-5"

(8) 3’-6” #4 rebar (horizontal) (8) 3’-6” #4 rebar w/ epoxy coat

PL2

2

F2 2

3'- 6 1/2"

CI1 10/24/2019

ELEVATION - BACK

2

ELEVATION - SIDE

A101

Architectural Precast Panel

10/24/2019

PLAN - TOP - F1

PLAN - TOP - F2

P1

P2

DETAILS

SHEET NO.

JOB NO.

2 OF 7

TEAM A

PIECE MARK

DETAILS

SHEET NO.

team trash

4 OF 7

NOTES: 1. 1/2” Diameter hole.

2. 3/8” Steel 3. 1/2” Steel

Lauren Hunter Alex Jackson Yongkyu Hong Matt Hicks

10”

#40708

1’-2”

1’-3”

#4BB01

PSA 4535

PSA 4535 NUT TYPE SLOTTED INSERT

2

3

#4 REBAR X 3’-8” LONG

11

6”

2

#4 REBAR X 7’-8” LONG

#40308

1

#40202

#4 REBAR X 2’-2” LONG

1

1

#4BB01

#4 BENT REBAR X 9’-3 LONG

1

2T LIFTING PIN 4 3/4” LENGTH

#4BB02

#4 BENT REBAR X 6’-11” LONG

1

1 1

#4 BENT REBAR X 6’-11” LONG

#4BB02

1

3”

MARK

QTY. UOM

CONCRETE MIX MIX

B/F F

2

COIL INSERT 3/4” CI5634412P #4 REBAR X 6’-8” LONG

#40708

PIECES REQ'D:

CY

4

PL3/8X8X8 W/ (4) 1/2” DIA X 5” LONG HCAs

CI5634412P #40608

QTY. UOM

CONCRETE MIX MIX NEP-15

2T LIFTING PIN 4 3/4” LENGTH

EP08

2 1 1

MARK

FORM VIEW - UPPER MAT

LPA2T434G

4

PL3/8X8X8 W/ (4) 1/2” DIA X 5” LONG HCAs COIL INSERT 3/4” CI5634412P #4 REBAR X 6’-8” LONG

#40708

6”

PSA 4535 NUT TYPE SLOTTED INSERT 2T LIFTING PIN 6 3/4” LENGTH

3 11

#4 BENT REBAR X 9’-3 LONG

EP08 CI5634412P

3”

PSA 4535 LPA2T634G

2

#4 REBAR X 7’-8” LONG #4 REBAR X 3’-8” LONG #4 REBAR X 2’-2” LONG

#4BB01

#40608

#40708

2

2T LIFTING PIN 6 3/4” LENGTH

10”

LPA2T634G LPA2T434G

#40308 #40202

#40608

CY

ISOMETRIC

PIECES REQ'D:

ISOMETRIC

B/F

WEIGHT:

WEIGHT:

3,200 LBS

3 LENGTH

#4 X 9’-3”

60

#4 X 6’-11”

5,000 PSI

f'c (SHIPPING)

12”

L/F =

PSI PC. FOUND ON E-DRAWING:

PSI

SECTION

10”

7”

5,000 PSI

f'c (SHIPPING)

f'ci (RELEASE)

PSI

REV.

DESCRIPTION

DATE

BY

10/23/19

FOR REVIEW

0

SECTION VIEW - UPPER MAT

REV.

DESCRIPTION

DATE

SECTION

BY

10/23/19

FOR REVIEW

0

TEAM A

1

2 43 "

2 43 "

CL CHECKED:

TEAM A

ENGR:

PLOTTED:

DRAWN:

TEAM A

CHECKED:

ENGR:

1

TEAM A

40”

DRAWN:

2

S/F =

f'c (28 DAYS)

L/F =

PSI

f'ci (RELEASE)

2”

10” 26”

19”

S/F = 32

f'c (28 DAYS)

DESCRIPTION

24”

CL CL

4"

GR

60

#4BB02

6"

ITEM MARK

#4BB01

BEND DIAMETER : 2”

PLOTTED:

4" 6"

SCALE 1/8” = 1’-0”

PLAN + ELEVATION

PLAN + ELEVATION

PL2

PL1

16 | Prototype Wall Assemblies

Designing with Next Generation Precast Concrete | 17

UPENN PRECAST

Northeast Precast is a supplier of precast concrete and prefabricated steel located in southern New Jersey. After first opening up production in 2004 with a handful of employees, John and Lorie Ruga and their team have grown the business to be a regional leader across several construction markets.

With over 300 acres of production and storage space the Northeast team has heavy involvement in industrial warehousing, residential construction, highway and marine infrastructure as well as other niche markets.

JOB NO.

PIECE MARK

DETAILS

SHEET NO.

PSA 4535

PSA 4535

PSA 4535 NUT TYPE SLOTTED INSERT

LPA2T634G

2

2T LIFTING PIN 6 3/4” LENGTH

LPA2T434G

EP08

2

#40608

2

2T LIFTING PIN 6 3/4” LENGTH

2

2T LIFTING PIN 4 3/4” LENGTH

4 2

COIL INSERT 3/4” CI5634412P

1 1 3

#4 REBAR X 3’-8” LONG

11

#4 REBAR X 2’-2” LONG

1 1

#4 BENT REBAR X 6’-11” LONG

#4BB02

1

PSA 4535 NUT TYPE SLOTTED INSERT

#4 BENT REBAR X 9’-3 LONG

#4BB01

1

7 OF 7

#4 REBAR X 7’-8” LONG

#40308 #40202

1

SHEET NO.

#4 REBAR X 6’-8” LONG

#40708

3 11

#4 BENT REBAR X 6’-11” LONG

MARK

DETAILS

PL3/8X8X8 W/ (4) 1/2” DIA X 5” LONG HCAs

CI5634412P

1 1

#4 REBAR X 7’-8” LONG #4 REBAR X 3’-8” LONG #4 REBAR X 2’-2” LONG #4 BENT REBAR X 9’-3 LONG

#4BB02

LPA2T434G

4

PL3/8X8X8 W/ (4) 1/2” DIA X 5” LONG HCAs COIL INSERT 3/4” CI5634412P #4 REBAR X 6’-8” LONG

#40708

#4BB01

LPA2T634G

2

2T LIFTING PIN 4 3/4” LENGTH

EP08 CI5634412P #40608 #40308 #40202

PIECE MARK

TEAM A

5 OF 7

1

MARK

QTY. UOM

QTY. UOM

CONCRETE MIX

CONCRETE MIX MIX

CY

PIECES REQ'D:

MIX

B/F

CY

PIECES REQ'D:

B/F WEIGHT:

WEIGHT:

5,000 PSI

L/F =

PSI

DESCRIPTION

DATE

SANDBLASTED FINISH

BY

10/23/19

FOR REVIEW

PLYWOOD TEMPLATE PIECE 2

PLYWOOD TEMPLATE PIECES COMBINED

PLYWOOD TEMPLATE OVER THE CAST PANEL

TEAM A

S/F =

f'c (28 DAYS)

5,000 PSI

f'c (SHIPPING)

f'ci (RELEASE)

PC. FOUND ON E-DRAWING:

PSI

REV. 0

PLYWOOD TEMPLATE PIECE 1

S/F =

f'c (28 DAYS)

f'c (SHIPPING)

f'ci (RELEASE)

REV. 0

L/F =

PSI PC. FOUND ON E-DRAWING:

PSI

DESCRIPTION

DATE 10/23/19

FOR REVIEW

BY TEAM A

PLYWOOD TEMPLATE

DRAWN:

DRAWN:

TEAM A

ISO VIEW - REBAR

CHECKED:

ENGR:

TEAM A

PLOTTED:

CHECKED:

ENGR:

PLOTTED:

FINISH DIAGRAM

TOP VIEW - REBAR

PENNDESIGN PROJECT:

UPENN PRECAST

JOB NO.

PIECE MARK

DETAILS

TEAM A

While construction has advanced tremendously over the past 200 years John Ruga and his team realize that future advancements will come in new ways. As the construction environment adapts to current world challenges the mindset at Northeast Precast remains the same; combine the current trades in construction with the efficiencies and quality of manufacturing, led by industrious and engaged employees, and they’ll continue to move towards being the standard in this fast growing industry.

PSA 4535 LPA2T634G LPA2T434G EP08

SHEET NO.

6 OF 7

PSA 4535 NUT TYPE SLOTTED INSERT

2

2T LIFTING PIN 6 3/4” LENGTH

2

2T LIFTING PIN 4 3/4” LENGTH

4

PL3/8X8X8 W/ (4) 1/2” DIA X 5” LONG HCAs

CI5634412P #40608

1 1

#4 REBAR X 7’-8” LONG

3

#4 REBAR X 3’-8” LONG

11

#4 REBAR X 2’-2” LONG

1

#4 BENT REBAR X 9’-3 LONG

#4BB01

1

#4 BENT REBAR X 6’-11” LONG

#4BB02

1

MARK

QTY. UOM

CONCRETE MIX MIX

CY

NEP-15

PIECES REQ'D:

B/F F

WEIGHT:

3,200 LBS

S/F = 32

f'c (28 DAYS)

5,000 PSI

f'c (SHIPPING)

f'ci (RELEASE)

0

DRAWN:

L/F =

PSI PSI

DESCRIPTION

DATE 10/23/19

FOR REVIEW

TEAM A

ISO VIEW

Finished residual concrete panel

2

COIL INSERT 3/4” CI5634412P #4 REBAR X 6’-8” LONG

#40708 #40308 #40202

REV.

CHECKED:

ENGR:

BY TEAM A

PLOTTED:

TOP VIEW SCALE 1/8” = 1’-0”

Utilization of residual concrete pours from other prototypes

18 | Prototype Wall Assemblies

Designing with Next Generation Precast Concrete | 19

Formwork test fit

Final completed wall panel

Rebar installation

- 64 -

Steel Fabrication

Designing with Next Generation Precast Concrete | 25

PROJECT:

UPENN PRECAST

TEAM A

24 | Prototype Wall Assemblies

PENNDESIGN

PROJECT:

Designing with Next Generation Precast Concrete | 11

10/24/2019

S101

PENNDESIGN

10 | Introduction

Formwork

UPENN PRECAST

PIECE MARK

JOB NO.

Throughout the years the team at Northeast Precast has remained focused on combining hard work and ingenuity with the best technology and equipment available. In order to always provide a product and service that’s at the leading edge, the company has continued to reinvest its resources back into its employees and equipment.

F101

PROJECT:

UPENN PRECAST

TEAM A

#40308

1" 3'- 6 3/4"

PENNDESIGN

PROJECT:

JOB NO.

#40308

F2 - Foam 2 P2 - Plywood 2

3’ - 6 1/2"

4'-6"

CONCRETE:

PLOTTED:

ELEVATION - FRONT

5-1/2”

3'-6"

PL1

PL2

1'-0" ENGR:

SCALE 1/8” = 1’-0”

SCALE 1/8” = 1’-0”

F1 - Foam 1 P1 - Plywood 1

1/2"

REBAR: ASTM Grade 60 rebar

AC1

TEAM A

CL CHECKED:

TEAM A

PIECES:

F2

1/2"

1"

(5) 7’-6” #4 rebar (vertically) (5) 7’-6” #4 rebar w/ epoxy coat

DESCRIPTION FOR REVIEW

0

DRAWN:

NOTES: 1. Foam 2. HDO Plywood 3. HDO Plywood Siderail

2

3'- 7 1/4"

1

1

Strength - 5000 psi Volume - 25 cubic ft (25 x 150 = 3750 lbs. per panel)

RV1

WEIGHT:

PSI

REV.

40”

BEND DIAMETER : 2”

PL1

PSA

PSI

10”

BY TEAM A

PLOTTED:

PL1

CL

PIECES REQ'D:

CY

5,000 PSI

f'c (SHIPPING)

f'ci (RELEASE)

10” 26”

ENGR:

#4 BENT REBAR X 6’-11” LONG

CONCRETE MIX MIX

f'c (28 DAYS)

DESCRIPTION

56”

DATE 10/23/19

CHECKED:

MARK

NEP-15

S/F = 32

DESCRIPTION FOR REVIEW

0

TEAM A

#4BB02

3,200 LBS

L/F =

PSI

REV.

DRAWN:

1

WEIGHT:

PSI

f'ci (RELEASE)

LPA2T634G

1

1

F1

4'-5"

4’

B/F F

f'c (SHIPPING)

PSA 4535

3 11

#4 BENT REBAR X 9’-3 LONG

FORM VIEW - LOWER MAT

PIECES REQ'D:

CY

5,000 PSI

LPA2T434G

1

#4 REBAR X 7’-8” LONG #4 REBAR X 2’-2” LONG

#4BB01

3

EH1

PL1 - (4) 4”x4”x3/8” Steel Angle PL2 - (2) 6”x6”x1/2” Steel Angle EH1 - (2) Erection Head Anchor (QL403SPG) CI1 - (2) Coil Insert (CI16124P) PSA - (4) 4 1/2” Slotted insert short studs (4535 PSA) RV1 - GOLD Poly-Comp Reveal (RVL-050-150-050X10’) AC1 - (16) 4” x1/2” HCA Anchor

4’

QTY. UOM

CONCRETE MIX MIX NEP-15

f'c (28 DAYS)

CI5634412P

#40708

1'-0"

Top of Reveal

1

MARK

PSA 4535 (TIF)

LPA2T434G

SECTION VIEW

1

#4 REBAR X 6’-8” LONG #4 REBAR X 3’-8” LONG

#40202

#40308

CL

8'-0"

#4 BENT REBAR X 6’-11” LONG

#4BB02

FORM VIEW

EP08

NOTES: 1. ALL REBAR IS TO BE 1 1/2” CLR. UNO 2. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO CENTERLINE UNO SYMBOLS: SIF= SIDE IN FORM TIF= TOP IN FORM BIF= BOTTOM IN FORM

2

COIL INSERT 3/4” CI5634412P

#40608

#4BB02

8"

2'-8"

CL

4'-6"

1

9”

1

4

PL3/8X8X8 W/ (4) 1/2” DIA X 5” LONG HCAs

CI5634412P

#40202

3 11

2

2T LIFTING PIN 4 3/4” LENGTH

EP08

2 1 1

#4 REBAR X 7’-8” LONG #4 REBAR X 3’-8” LONG #4 REBAR X 2’-2” LONG #4 BENT REBAR X 9’-3 LONG

2

2T LIFTING PIN 6 3/4” LENGTH

LPA2T434G

4

PL3/8X8X8 W/ (4) 1/2” DIA X 5” LONG HCAs COIL INSERT 3/4” CI5634412P #4 REBAR X 6’-8” LONG

#40708

LPA2T634G

2

2T LIFTING PIN 4 3/4” LENGTH

EP08 CI5634412P

#4BB01

8" 1'-0"

PSA 4535 NUT TYPE SLOTTED INSERT

3'-6" Top of Reveal

2T LIFTING PIN 6 3/4” LENGTH

LPA2T434G

#40608

#40202

#40308

4'-0"

PSA 4535

3

1

2

4'-6"

ELEVATION - SIDE

HARDWARE SCHEDULE:

REVEAL DETAIL

4'-6"

2’-8”

1’-4” 2’-0”

1’-4”

11"

LPA2T634G (SIF)

EP08 (TIF)

2

8-1/2”

10"

LPA2T634G

8-7/8”

3’ 3-1/2”

PSA 4535 NUT TYPE SLOTTED INSERT

3

Lauren Hunter Alex Jackson Yongkyu Hong Matt Hicks

Low RPM vibrator - less than 14,000 VPM under load for vibrating concrete.

1. 1/2” Chamfer at corner 2. 1/2“ bolt to concrete slab 3. Epoxy rebar at front face

135°

45°

3

SECTION - CHAMFER

PSA 4535

team trash

NOTES:

3/4"

#40308

6 1/4"

PSA 4535 (TIF)

#40308

Lauren Hunter Alex Jackson Yongkyu Hong Matt Hicks

PROJECT:

TEAM A #40308

6 1/4"

PENNDESIGN

5-1/2"

JOB NO.

#40308

1’-0”

Designing with Next Generation Precast Concrete | 9

4’-3”

1 OF 7

3”

8 | Introduction

1’-9”

SHEET NO.

DETAILS

EP08 (TIF)

56”

3. Developed a delivery workflow utilizing digital tools to communicate with and transmit panel, assembly and formwork concepts to NEP staff, fostering a collaboration opportunity for students that is not regularly experienced in architecture school. This workflow allowed students to virtually study panelization schemas and jointing ahead of actual prototype preparation.

PIECE MARK

1/2"

UPENN PRECAST

TEAM A

LPA2T634G (SIF)

1. Over two weekends, attended two six-hour sessions to learn about the precast concrete manufacturing process.

Students were exposed to the fabrication process from material selection, to formwork production, to pour, and disassembly.

2. Utilized NEP’s facilities and their workforce, a group of professional engineers and concrete experts. Students worked in teams to produce panel prototypes for wall assemblies that respond to structural, thermal, and water-proofing performance; and received feedback from NEP’s expert staff on the construction feasibility and applicability of studentproposed prototypes.

1’ 6-1/2”

PROJECT:

1'-0"

LPA2T434G (TIF)

PENNDESIGN JOB NO.

3

CI5634412P

7”

CI5634412P (TIF)

LPA2T634G

3’-1/2"

1/2"

CI5634412P

LPA27434G

EPO8

LPA2T634G

PSA 4535 8-7/8”

10"

1’-4”

11”

LPA2T434G (TIF)

22 | Prototype Wall Assemblies team trash

20"

5”

This seminar focused on precast concrete and specifically it’s history, materiality – how it is manufactured and the logistics of its assembly - and cultural affects through both its traditional uses within the urban environment as well as new approaches to building typologies such as housing. Through a strategic partnership with Northeast Precast (NEP), based in Millville, NJ, students gained access to places where precast concrete is made, formed, and put into action. The class was organized as a seminar, with a group of 18 students. In addition to readings and case studies via traditional seminar delivery, students had access to Northeast Precast’s state-of-the-art facility where they:

2’-0”

The Premise

PSA 4535 EP08

20"

4’

Designing with Next Generation Precast Concrete | 15

10" 10"

4’

14 | Prototype Wall Assemblies

7”

Designing with Next Generation Precast Concrete | 7

19”

6 | Introduction

The proposal taxonomizes on the waste to create a new expression in wall panel surface treatment. The walls are assembled from any leftover concrete that is simply poured into the formwork until it is filled. Blends and mixes of the concrete become the new ornament of the panel, selfexpressive of the process. These new panels take advantage of recycling processes and showcase the character and act as a billboard to expose the re-used nature of the wall. Each panel becomes a unique assemblage of mixes and transforms the seemingly banal into the beautiful.

26 | Prototype Wall Assemblies

34 | Prototype Wall Assemblies

Designing with Next Generation Precast Concrete | 27

Designing with Next Generation Precast Concrete | 35

Team E Ian Lai, Quan Hao Huynh, David Forero

Team F Abdullah Alsahafi, Huadong Lin, Xiaoyi Peng

Topologically Optimized Concrete Structural Tee

We see the panel as a screen rather than a solid wall. The openings create visual continuity between the two sides.

Ample light can pass through, while shadows are cast at different angles due to the openings’ slanted side walls.

The design creates a structural challenge since there is no continuous line in the Y axis. Therefore, steel reinforcements must loop around the openings to transfer forces. As an aggregate, we imagine the panel to a horizontal long yet vertically short façade.

Precast concrete has benefits of much lighter weight construction than typical steel frame building types and can withstand much higher building loads per weight of structure.

Precast panels traditional have been limited to modular and rectilinear units for ease of fabrication, while the standard single and double Ts have been used for long span efficiency parking garages. These T units are already optimized in their industrial form for quick production and low cost of fabrication, but have not been structurally optimized for even higher structural optimization from minimizing material use.

24.00"

24.00" 24.00"

In the current age where buildings, either from embodied energy or cost of transportation due to weight are the greatest contributor to greenhouse gases, calls for not only a cost effective standard modular unit for precast building systems, but also material efficient units. Our choice was to focus on the single T as a point of departure for structural optimization and fabrication assessment. Following would be our examination into the execution of the structural member.

6.00"

6.00" 6.00"2.00" 6.00"2.00" 2.00"

2.00"

12.00" 12.00"

12.00" 12.00"

24.00" 24.00"

24.00" 24.00"

3.00" 24.00" 24.00"

24.00" 24.00"

12.00"

12.00" 12.00"

12.00"

24.00"

24.00" 24.00"

24.00"

3.00" 24.00"

3.00" 3.00"

3.00" 3.00"

96.00"

3.00"

96.00" 96.00"

AXON AXON AXON AXON

3.00"

96.00" 96.00" 48.00"

48.00" 48.00"

96.00" 96.00"

48.00"

12.00"

24.00"

3.00"

Learning Through Making Students visited Northeast Precast’s state-of-the-art facility to manufacture their prototype walls. Groups learned how to mix concrete, assemble and create formwork, and cast the prototypes.

CNC CNC CNC CNC NEGATIVE NEGATIVE MOULD MOULD NEGATIVE NEGATIVE MOULD MOULD 3/16" 3/16" Layers Layers 3/16" 3/16" Layers Layers (whole) (whole) (whole) (whole)

PANEL PANEL PANEL PANEL

24.00"

3.00"

24.00"

3.00"

12.00"

24.00"

Designing with Next Generation Precast Concrete | 41

96.00"

PLAN PLAN PLAN PLAN

6.00" 6.00"2.00" 2.00" 6.00" 6.00"2.00" 2.00"

40 | Learning Through Making

3.00"

24.00"

48.00" 48.00"

AXON AXON AXON AXON

12.00"

12.00"

48.00" 48.00" 24.00"

24.00"

PLAN PLAN PLAN PLAN 24.00" 24.00"

24.00"

CNC CNC CNC CNC NEGATIVE MOULD NEGATIVE MOULD 3/16" Layers 3/16" Layers MOULD NEGATIVE MOULD 3/16" Layers 3/16" LayersNEGATIVE (whole) (whole) (whole) (whole)

PANEL PANEL PANEL PANEL 6.00"

3.00" 3.00"

6.00"

12.00" 12.00"

96.00"

96.00" 96.00"

2.00"

96.00"

2.00"

24.00"

3.00"

24.00"

3.00"

12.00"

6.00"

6.00"

2.00"

24.00" 24.00"

2.00"

AXON AXON

48.00"

CNC CNC 3/16" Layers 3/16" Layers

PANEL PANEL

PLAN PLAN 48.00"

12.00" 24.00"

NEGATIVE MOULD NEGATIVE MOULD (whole) (whole)

24.00"

96.00" 96.00"

AXON AXON 28 | Prototype Wall Assemblies

0.98

1x

1x

1.18

0.18

0.98

1.03

1x

1.04

0.18

1x 1x

1.18

0.18

0.36

0.24

1.03

0.18

0.14

4x

0.90

0.98

0.36

8x 0.33

0.21

4x

8x

0.90 0.21

0.84 0.19

0.33

0.42

1.18

0.18

0.36

1.04

0.18

0.36

0.42

0.84 0.19

0.33

PANEL PANEL

PLAN PLAN

96.00"

36 | Prototype Wall Assemblies2.00"

2.00"

17.40

4x

0.90

3.00

0.33

0.21

0.38 0.19

0.48

0.42

0.33 0.48

6.00"

2.00"

2'-8 21"

AXON AXON

0'-1 21" 0'-3 21"

0'-3"

1x

1x

1.04 0.18

0.36

1.18 0.18

1x

1.03

PLAN PLAN

12.00"

AXON

PANEL PANEL 3.00"

0.36

1.16 0.98

1x

1.18 0.18

1x

1.04 0.18

0.36

1.18 0.18

1x

1.03

0.84 0.19

10'-3 21"

4x

0.90

0.38 0.19

0.38

0.48

0.42

0.84 0.19

0.33

0.42

0.33

0.42

0.14

8x

0.33 0.19

4x

0.90

0.33

0.21

0.38 0.19

0.48

0.42

0.33 0.48

96”

96.00"

17.66 17.66

1x

6.00"

1.18 0.18

1x

1.03

1.04 0.18

10.70

0.38 0.42

0.33 0.48

0.98

1.18

1x

1.03

1.04 0.18

16.71

0.36

0.24

1.16

3.00

0.33 0.38 0.19

0.42

0.33 0.48

48.00"

5'-2 21"

SLAB RCP

SLAB ELEVATION

PLAN

ROTATED AXONOMETRIC

1x1x 1x1x 17.60

3.00

PLAN

WEITZMAN SCHOOL OF DESIGN AT THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA IN COLLABORATION WITH NORTH EAST PRECAST PROJECT MANAGER: SHEA JONES

Taylor Wigglesworth | Team Members: Abdullah Alsahafi, Huadong Lin, Xiaoyi Peng

Team

14.40

7.60

Project Manager: Taylor Wigglesworth Project | TeamManager: Members:Taylor Abdullah Alsahafi, Huadong Lin, XiaoyiAbdullah Peng Alsahafi, Wigglesworth | Team Abdullah Members: Huadong XiaoyiPeng Peng Taylor Wigglesworth | Team Members: Alsahafi, Huadong Lin,Lin, Xiaoyi

3.19

19.77

3.19

19.77

1.18 0.18

1x

1x

1.04 0.18

1.18 0.18

0.36

1x

5.81

1.03

7.20

1.04 0.18

0.38 0.42

0.48

6.50

0.33 0.38 0.19

0.42

0.33 0.48

2.40

2.40 2.40

3.60

1.18 0.18

1x

1.03

1.04 0.18

0.36

0.24

1.16

0.84

4x

0.90

0.33

0.21

0.19

0.38 0.19

0.42

3.60

14.40 15.40 14.40 15.40

1x

1.03

0.36

7.17

PLAN SHOWING FIRST LAYER OF REBAR

3.19

0.42

4x

0.90

0.38 0.19

0.42

1.18 0.18

1x

0.18

3.19

3.19

7.20

1x 1x

7.20

17.60

0.36

7.20

1.16 0.98

1x

1.18 0.18

1x

1.03

1.04 0.18

1.16

4x

0.90

0.38 0.19

0.33

0.42

0.48

0.84 0.19

4x4x 4x4x 1x1x

0.42

0.14

8x

4x

0.90

0.33

0.21

0.38 0.19

0.42

0.33 0.48

3.00

6.50

0.33

0.21

20.17 5.60

8x 8x

4.06 6.12

5.79

6.50 3.00

6.50

7.17

7.17 8.20 7.17

8.20

7.17 8.20 20.17 5.60 5.60

17.40 4.06

1x 17.66

1x

17.66

4.06

6.12

4x4x

4.06

8.20

20.17 19.77

1x 2.00

5.60

16.71 3.00

18.40

10.70

17.60

1.00

3.19

10.70

19.60

7.17 20.10

8x 8x

6.12 6.12

14.40

6.50

14.40 15.40

15.40

8x

3.19

4.06

3.19

Project Manager: Taylor Wigglesworth Project | TeamManager: Members:Taylor Abdullah Alsahafi, Huadong Lin, XiaoyiAbdullah Peng Alsahafi, Wigglesworth | Team Abdullah Members: Huadong XiaoyiPeng Peng Taylor Wigglesworth | Team Members: Alsahafi, Huadong Lin,Lin, Xiaoyi

3.19

3.19

19.77 19.77

8x8x

5.60 5.60

5.79

5.60

2.40 3.60

8.20

10.70 7.60

20.10

8.20

8x 8.20

19.60

20.10 7.60

5.81 1.00

8x

5.79 19.60

14.40

20.10

5.79

15.40 2.40 3.60 3.19

20.10

19.60

20.10

14.40

15.40

5.81

Team

F

F

Team Team F

5.81 3.19 7.20

5.79

6.50

7.17

8.20

4x

5.60

3.19 6.50

7.17

8.20 7.20 5.60

4x

5.60

15.40 5.60

10.70

5.81

*GENERAL NOTE: ALL REBAR USED ISALL #3 REBAR USED IS #3 *GENERAL NOTE: 3.19

7.20

6.50

7.17

5.60

15.40

18.40

7.60

1.00

5.79 7.20

4x 4x

2.40

10.70

3.60

7.60

19.60

8x

18.40 17.40 10.70 2.00

17.40

1.00

5.81

19.77

2.40

3.60

1.00

4.06

2.00

17.40

4x

6.50 7.20

5.60

7.17

5.81 5.79

19.77 6.12

4.06

2.40

3.60 17.66

3.60

19.60

17.66

10.70

10.70

2.40

17.66 17.60

14.40

15.40

18.40 4.06

1x

16.71 3.00

17.60

14.40

8x 8x4x 4x 6.12

17.40

16.71

8x8x

15.40

3.19

7.60

1.00

5.79

5.79

18.40

4x

10.70

7.20

2.00

17.40

19.77

5.60 5.60

7.60

17.66

20.10

5.81

17.40

3.60

14.40

14.40

3.19 3.19

17.60

20.10

1.00

3.60 2.40

10.70

19.60

19.60

5.81

18.40 2.40

10.70

8x 8x

20.17

3.00

17.40

19.77

2.00

17.40

10.70

20.17

3.00

16.71

17.40

5.60

5.60

3.00

1x1x

2.00

17.40

5.60

16.71

6.12

6.50

5.60

4x 4x

8.20

3.00

5.60 5.60

18.40

7.60

17.66

6.50

7.17 8.20 8.20

20.17 5.60 5.60

3.00

17.60

7.20

0.36

0.24

0.42

0.84 0.19

3.00

0.33 0.48

0.24

0.14

3.00 6.50 6.50

7.17 7.17 8.20

16.71

3.19

0.33

0.21

1.04

3.00

5.60

3.19

1.16

0.84 0.19

1x

F

Team Team F 6.12

19.77

3.19 3.19

1.04 0.18

0.24

0.14

8x

8x

5.79 5.79

7.20

15.40 5.60

3.19 1.18 0.18

4x 4x 4x 4x 1x 1x 15.40

14.40

0.33 0.48

0.98

1x

2.40

3.60

14.40

0.42

0.14

3.60

8x8x 8x8x

0.98

1x

8x

0.98

1.03

7.20 7.20

10.70

10.70

F

Team

1.00 7.60

17.40

4x

0.90 0.21

18.40

10.70

10.70

17.60

0.42

0.84 0.19

0.33

17.40

2.00

17.40

17.66

0.36

0.14

8x 0.33

0.19

1x 1x

1.16

0.42

4x

0.90 0.21

20.10

5.81

3.00 17.60

0.24

1.16

0.84

2.00

17.40

16.71

19.60 20.10

5.81 5.81

0.98

1.03

0.24

0.14

0.19

20.17

3.00

20.10

*GENERAL NOTE: ALL REBAR USED #3 REBAR USED IS #3 *GENERAL NOTE:ISALL

3.19

4x 4x

20.17

1.00 19.60 20.10

5.79 0.98

1x

8x

17.40

5.79

3.00

16.71

1.00 1.00

19.60

19.60

3.19 3.19

19.77 19.77

8x8x 8x8x

3.19 3.19

20.10

5.81

5.79 5.79 3.00

7.60

15.40 1.00

3.19

4.06

5.81 5.81

5.79

7.60 7.60

14.40 15.40 15.40

6.12

4.06

F

5.81

1x 1x

3.60

14.40 14.40 15.40

19.60 20.10 20.10

10.70

2.40

3.60 3.60

17.66

6.12 6.12

4.06

2.40 2.40

3.60

17.66

8x 8x 8x 8x

17.66

17.60

6.12

4.06

ARCH 732-005: MATTER, MAKING, AND TESTING: DESIGNING WITH NEXT GENERATION PRECAST CONCRETE F19 PROFESSOR: RICHARD GARBER STUDENTS: DAVID FORERO, IAN LAI, QUAN HAO HUYNH (TEAM E)

2.40

17.66

17.60

17.60

PLAN

10.70 16.71

3.00

3.00

Hanger

SPECULATIVE SECTION

10.70

16.71 16.71

0.42

4x

0.90 0.21

1.00

19.60 19.60 20.10

18.40

10.70

10.70

0.33 0.19

0.18

0.84 0.19

7.60

1.00 1.00

19.60

18.40

18.40 10.70

Mini V

Anchor

4x

0.90 0.21

0.14

10.70

7.60 7.60

1.00

18.40 17.40

10.70

19.77

8x 8x 8x 8x

2.00

17.40

17.40

19.77 19.77

0.36

0.42

0.84 0.19

1x

8x

0'-10 21"

7.60

17.40

2.00 2.00

17.40

19.77

1.16

0.14

8x

AXON AXON

0'-5 21"

17.40

6.12

4.06

20.17

0.24

2.00"

0'-10 21"

10.70 10.70

17.66

17.40

4.06 4.06

20.17 20.17

18.40

16.71

6.12 6.12

4x4x 4x4x 2.00

4.06 20.17

18.40 18.40

10.70

3.00

17.66 17.60

6.12

3.00

1x1x 1x1x

24.00"

0.98

STEM PLAN & ELEVATION

Designing with Next Generation Precast Concrete | 43

2.00

17.40 18.40

10.70 10.70

10.70

16.71 16.71

3.00 3.00

17.60 17.60

3.00

3.00 Rebar

1'-7 21"

2.00 2.00

17.40 17.40

17.40

20.17

10.70

16.71

3.00

0.33

0.21

0.42

4x

0.90

0.21

20.17 20.17

17.40

0.36

1.16 0.42

0.14

8x 0.33 0.48

0.84

0.19

20.17

3.00

1.04 0.18

0.24 1.16

0.38 0.42

0.14

8x

17.60

0.98

1.03

0.24

0.42

0.33 0.19

2.00

PLAN SHOWING SECOND LAYER OF REBAR

PANEL

48.00"

24”

0'-3 21"

1.04 0.18

0.24 1.16

1x

4x

0.90 0.21

42 | Learning Through Making

17.40

3.00

4x 4x 4x 4x CNC 3/16" Layers NEGATIVE MOULD (whole) CNC NEGATIVE MOULD 3/16" MOULD 3/16"Layers Layers NEGATIVE PANEL PLAN 3/16" Layers NEGATIVE MOULD (whole) (whole) (whole) 1x 1x 1x 1x

12”

0.98

1.03

0.24

0.84 0.19

24.00"

CNC PLAN CNC

3”

24”

AXON 24.00"

0.98

1x

1.18

0.18

0.14

8x

10'-3 21"

0'-4 21"

48.00" 48.00"

3.00 3.00

1x 1x 1x 1x

48.00"

0'-3"

17.40 17.40

0.42

0.14

8x 0.38

0.33 0.48

1.03

1.16

0.42

0.33

0.38 0.19 0.42

1x

0.24

1.16

4x

0.90 0.33

0.21

0.19

0.48

6.00" 0.98

1x

1.04

0.18

0.42

0.14

0.84 0.19

0.38 0.19

1.03

0.24

1.16

0.42

0.84 0.19

1x

1.04

1.18 0.18

0.24

1.16

0.14

CNC CNC NEGATIVE MOULD MOULD 3/16" 3/16" Layers LayersNEGATIVE (whole) (whole) Designing with Next Generation Precast Concrete | 37

96.00"

48.00"

6.00"

Designing with Next Generation Concrete | 29 6.00" Precast 2.00" 8x

48.00"

6.50 5.60 7.17

8.20

5.60

3.19 3.19

5.60

3.19 3.19

7.20 7.20

4x4x 30 | Prototype Wall Assemblies

Designing with Next Generation Precast Concrete | 31

Formwork

38 | Prototype Wall Assemblies

6.50 6.50 7.17

8.20 7.17

8.20

5.60 5.60

Designing with Next Generation Precast Concrete | 39

5.60 5.60

Rebar detail with spacers

Finishing the voids

Assembling the voids

First precast assembly

Comparison of void elements to cup of coffee

Final pour of concrete mixture

32 | Prototype Wall Assemblies

Designing with Next Generation Precast Concrete | 33

Final precast assembly

Final precast assembly

- 65 -

48 | Learning Through Making

Designing with Next Generation Precast Concrete | 49

50 | Learning Through Making

Designing with Next Generation Precast Concrete | 51